इंटरनेट मानक

Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information

Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to
information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities,
in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,
and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest
to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of
education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the
timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.

“जान1 का अ+धकार, जी1 का अ+धकार” “प0रा1 को छोड न' 5 तरफ”

Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan Jawaharlal Nehru
“The Right to Information, The Right to Live” “Step Out From the Old to the New”

IS 14458 (Part 3) (1998, Reaffirmed 2007): Retaining Wall

for Hill Area--Guidelines, Part 3: Construction of Dry
Stone Walls. ICS 93.020

“!ान $ एक न' भारत का +नम-ण”

Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda
“Invent a New India Using Knowledge”

“!ान एक ऐसा खजाना > जो कभी च0राया नहB जा सकता ह”

है”
ह
Bhartṛhari—Nītiśatakam
“Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen”
 · (Real~ ~l~'lfJ ~~~ )
'Jfl '! rf) 2/ Jil rt Cfj

4t:?1\$l af?r ctT RePiJI RCJI~ - ~+IJ1~~fi fti(fll~

~ 3 ~tr~¢tcfrcnx em f1~lUI

Indian Standard
RETAINING WALL FOR HILL AREA -
GUIDELINES
PART 3 CONSTRUCTION OF DRY STONE WALLS

res 93.020

© BIS 1998

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI 110002

June 1998 Price Group 3

Hill Area Developll1Qnt Engineering Sectumal Committee, CED 56

FOREWORD

This Indian Standard (Part 3) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by
the Hill Area Develqpment Engineering Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering
Division Council.

Retaining wall is a structure used to retain backfill and maintain difference in the elevation of the two
ground surfaces. Retaining wall may be effectively utilized to tackle the problem af landslide in hill area
by stabilizing the fill slopes and cut slop~s.

From the initial construction cost consicJ.raaions, one mek"e of extra width in filling, requiring retaining
walls, costs much more than constructing the same width by cutting inside the hill. Similarly the cost
of.a breast wall is several times more than a ROl'l--walled cut slope. However, considering mainknance
cost, progressive slope instability and environmental delfada&ion fromlWlprotected heavy ~xcavations. the
use of retaining walls on hill roads aftd terraces beeomes tssential. 'Ilris standard (Part 3) is, therefore,
being formulated to provide necessary guidanace in construction of dry stone retaining walls for stability
of hill slopes, the other parts of the code being:

Part 1 Selection of type of wall

,Part 2 Design of retainingJ\lJeast wan.,
Part 4 Construction of banded dry stone wans
Part 5 Construction of cement stone walls
Part 6 Construction of gabion walls
Part 7 Construction of RCC crib walls
Part 8 Construction of timber crib walls
Part 9 Design of RCC cantilever walIlbuttressed waUs/L-type walls
Part 10 Design and construction of reinforced earth retaining walls

The present practice in various Government departments is to construc~ retaining walls up to 4 m height
in random rubble dry stone masonry. Retaining walls more than 4 m height are constructed either in lime
or cement mortar masonry or in dry stone masonry panels separated by 0.6 m wide mortarred masonry
sleepers laid 3 to 4 m apart both in horizontal and vertical directions; The specified nonns prescribed
by the respective departments usually do not give sufficient weight age . t.o the nature and properties of the
sailor rock be10w the wall base and at the back of the wall, or the. ",'.eather conditions. It is normally
assumed that the mortarred masonry or bands give sufficient strength to the wall for added stability and
confines local failure, if any. In actual practice it has however been·.observed that a number of dry as
well as banded or fully mortarred walls do collapse during rains witho\it offering much resistance as such
these walls are used only as a temporary measure. This part, therefo;e, gives definite guidelines to the
field -engineers for constru~tion of dry stone retaining waRs. ~,'.

Dry stone masonry retaining walls generally fail due to construction of.,.,ossly inadequate section of walls.
Good supervision is, therefOfe, the key to better quality of construction of dry stone masonry walls. Strict
supervision is essential for longer life of these type of walls. It shall be ensured that skilled labour is
used in construction of dry stone masonry walls. ~ .

The composition of technical committee responsible for the formul~on of this standard is given at
Annex A.
 IS 14458 (Part 3) 1998

Indian Standard
RETAINING WALL FOR HILL AREA
GUIDELINES
PART 3 CONSTRUCTION OF DRY STONE WALLS

1 SCOPE a dry stone retaining wall, on account of tire following:

This standard (Part 3) deals with the construction a) The value of bonding material or mortar is
aspects of dry stone retaining walls. only from the point of view of making the
wall an integral unit. However it is not assured
2 REFERENCES ~n th~ case of hill roads and site development
In hIlls; due to lack of supervision, non-

The Indian Standard IS 1123: 1975 ':Mcthod of availability of skilled labour, improper mixing
identification of natural building stones (first revision)' of mortar, lack of post-construction. curing,
c.ontain provisions which through reference in this etc and also sometimes paucity of water in
text, constitute provision of this standard. At the the area.
time of publication, the edition indicated was valid. b) Since both types of wall are not supposed
All standards are subject to revision, and parties to to bear any tension, the strength of a dry
agreement!'; based on this standard are encouraged stone masonry wall having the same section
to investigate the possibility of applying the most and similar soil conditions as a fullYJTIortarred
recent edition of the standard indicated above. masonry walL shall be adequate. The
compressive strength of properly packed dry
3 GENERAL stone masonry is likely to be more than that
of foundation soil on the hill slope.
3.1 A hill road masonry retaining wall is a gravity
wall which shall be considered safe under the expected c) For sliding at the base, coefficient of friction
L:onditions of loading, if following conditions are between the wall base and the foundation soil
satisfied: being same in both types, the -behaviour shall
not be different. . Thus there is no particular
a) it shall be safe against overturning, utility of bands or mortar and the strength
b) shearing stress shall be less than shearing of ~ ~roperly constructed dry stone masonry
retamtng wall shall be quite sufficient. On
strength available, and
account of its flexibility, a dry stone masonry
c) the pressure at the toe shall remain less than retaining wall may be expected to behave·
the safe bearing capacity of the foundation better than a fully mortarred masonry wall
material. under seismic conditions.

l,t. m.ay be, however, assumed that there isadeq'uate

d) Dry stone walls are easy to repair when it
fails.
fnctIOnal bond between the stone layers from face
to back and from top to base so that the entire section
of the retaining wall acts as one unit. This may be
3.4 The design of
dry stone masonry retaining waH
very easily achieved by using stones of rectangular shall be in accordance with Part 2 of this standard.
A stlitable computer pr{)gram may be used for the
shape with sufficient overlap on each other enabling
design.
proper interlo<...1<ing. The top width of the retaining
wall shall be taken as 600 mm.
4 MATERIAL
3.2 The stability of the retaining wall mainly depends
Stone, the main material required for the construction
upon the allowable bearing pressure of the foundation,
of dry stone masonry retaining wall, is available in
particularly under the toc as compressive strength of
properly construct.ed masonry section is usually large quantity in hills. To select and utilize them
adequate. Sliding at the base depends on the for their satisfactory performance, it shall be necessary
to know the various properties which can be
coefficient of friction between the wall base and the
determined according to relevant Indian Standards.
foundation soil. The total earth pressure above any
level along the height of the retaining wall reduces The strength of rocks depends on j ts mineral
constituents which form the basis of classification
parabolically from base upward, whereas the wall
and -identification of rocks. Identification of stones
thickness reduces linearly. Thetefore in most cases
the critical section in the wall is at the hase.
may be done i-n accordance with IS 1123.

3.3 It. cannot be asserted with any degree of certainty

5 BASE SLOPE
that fully mortarred masonry wal1 or a panelled
masonry wall shall give a better performance than An inward slope provides good keying of the wall
IS 14458 (Part 3) : 1998
in the hill face and also reduces the toe pressure, thickness which shall be made as impervious as
besides greatly increasing the sliding strength of the possible to minimize ingress of water from top surface.
wal I at base. Therefore, the base shall preferably
he at right angles to the face of the wall. A minimum 8 DRAINAGE
inward slope of I (Vertical) in 6 (Horizontal) shall
be provided and it shall not be more than 1 (Vertical) 8.1 The dry stone masonry retaining walls have the
in :1 (Horizontal). Base slope is very effective in advantage that the masonry remains quite permeable
scism it: stabil ity of walls. to the flow of water and pressure normally does not
build up. However, efficient drainage system above
() STONE \VORK the top of the retaining wan 'is most essential. The
top layer of backfill shall be laid at a proper camber
6.1 Rough tlat stones shall be preferred as they give and shoulder slope. The water flowing in the hill
helter contact and friction at joints. There shall be side drain shaH be drained off through scuppers of
no dumping of stones. Stones shall be placed well appropriate design at regular intervals. The retaining
interlocked at close proximity with each other. Size wall top shall be kept slightly lower than the shoulder
or stones helow 225 mm x 100 mm x 75 mm (with sloping outward so that water runs over the wall
mass of about 5 kg) shall not be used. The maximum instead of seeping into the backfill. For site
size of stone shall be 600 mm x 200 mm x 300 mm development, a 300 mIll thick impervjous soil layer
with mass of about 45 kg. The largest dimension, (properly compacted) with boulders shall be laid above
that is, the length shall be placed across the length the top surface and backfill to prevent ingress of drain
of the retaining wall for maximum stability as with water. Typical sketch showing best retaining waH
this arrangemcnt the wall face will not easily separate with good filling is shown in Fig. I (d).
from thc hearting. It shall result in greater unity
and interlocking among the stones placed around it. 8.2 Excavated material from foundation if dumped
by the side of the toe obstructs drainage. It must be
6.2 In drystone masonry it shall be necessary to sloped down below the top level of the toe projection.
spread broken stone Just, stone chips, soil (gravelly
or sandy soils) and soil mixtures, after placing each 9 TOE PROTECTION
layer of stones to fill the voids. Filling of voids The water coming out at high velocity from top of
prevent filling of cavities by mud which is injurious retaining wall can cause soil erosion at the toe and
to the wall as it makes it impervious to the flow of even below it by back erosion of soft rock or shale.
water. Fine grained soils and smooth river shingle Toe protection shall always be provided particularly
shall not be used as these may lubricate the joint in walls having height more than 3 m except where
decreasing the frictional resistance. Only coarse the toe rests on hard non-erodable rock.
angular particles shall be made use of. If available
in the vicinilYl water may also be sprinkled to moisten 10 RCC BONDING ELEMENT
the filler material. Some ramming shall also be
preferred. this belps in spreading the load of the In thicker wall sections and tall retaining walls, say
. overlying stones more evenly and increasing the greater than 3 m, special duly staggered bonding
weight of the wall and in turn increases the strength elements through the masonry, going from earth face
of the wall. Fig. I (a), Fig. I (b) and Fig. 1(c) represent of the wall to its front face at regular spacing along
had construction practices liable to damage or cause the length and height, shall he used. The honding
failure of wall and shall be avoided. elements shall be spaced at I m interval along the
length of the wall. These elements may consist of
7 PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL with overlapping bond stones (scissor bond stones),
wooden ballies or bamboos but considering the
No dumping of stones shall be done. The backfill durability these may consist of reinforced concrete
shall preferably be done by hand packing to achieve member of square cross-section of 75 mm x 75 mm
the maximum angle of internal friction. The width or 100 mm x 100 mm and having a length equal
of backfill shall be at least 500 mm. The backfill to the thickness of the wall plus 150 mm so that
material shall be non-cohesive and as free draining it may project out of wall by 75 mm on both sides
as possible except the top layer of 300 to 500 mm for easy checking as shown in Fig. 2.

2
 IS 14458 (Part 3) 1998

ONLY fACE
STONES ARE
WELL PLACED
REST IS
DUMP1NG OF
STONE STONE LAYERS
Sr..OPlNG OUIWARDS

1 (a) 1(b)

HAND PACKED STONE

" - FlL LING MAY
SLtQEDOWN ON ',- Gaul! H,\ND PACKED
SLOPE SUR FACE STONE Ftl LING IN
CAUSiNG BACK STEPPED FACE
PRESSURE ON
WAll

- GOOO
MASONRY
,I ~
TOE
PITCHING

1 (c) 1(d)
1(a) RETAINING WALL OF VERY SMALL STRENGTH
1(b) RETAINING WALL OF POOR STRENGTH
1(c) GOOD RETAINING WALL BUT UNSTABLE FILLING
1(d) BEST RETAINING WALL WITH GOOD FILLING
FIG. I TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR DRY STONE MASONRY WALL

~-
1m

-+
1m
_t

75 OR 100
~1 BAR OF <J>12 mm
.~ ORq,16mm --i r--
_-L-i ---I G~
~----- b +150 mm -~---~ 7S OR 100 mm

FIG. 2 RCC BONDING ELEMENTS

3
IS 14458 (Part 3) 1998
ANNEX A
(Foreword)
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
Hill Area Development Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 56

CI/(/imwl/ Representinf!,

DH C.OPAL RANJA01 University of Roorkee, Roorkee

AlemiJers

SHRI SHEI!\1l NAZIR AHMED Public Works Department, Jammu & Kashmir

Prmr A. K. C1li\KRAHORTY Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehra Dun

SHI\I R. C. LAKHERA (Alternate)

CrJ;\II{MAN·CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR National Buildings Construction Corporation, New Ddhi

SIIRI B. B. KUMAR (Alternate)

CHIEF ENGINEER (DAM DESIGN) Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Design Organization, Roorkee
SlIPTD<I ENGINEER (TEHRJ DAM
DESIGN CIRCLE) (Alternate)

OIlH' ENGINEER (ROADS) Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi

SlWTT>G ENGINEER (ROADs)(Alternate)

DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL (D&S DTE, DGBR) Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi
DEPIJTY SECRETARY (T), lRC (Altemate)

DIRECTOR, He£) (N&W) Central Water Commission, New Delhi

DIRECTOR (SARDAl{ SAROV AR)(Aiternllte)

DR R. K. DUBEY Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi

DI~ D. S {JPADIIYA Y (Alternate)

SHRI PAWt\N KUf\lAR GUPTA Society for Integrated Development of Himalayas, Mussoorie
FIELD COORDINATOR (Alternate)

SflRI T. N. GUPTA Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi
SlIRI .I. SENGUPTA (Altern(/te)

SHRI M. M. HARnOLA Forest Survey of India, Dehra Dun

SHRI P. K. PATHAK (Alternate)

DR U. C. KAUrA Rcgional Research Labor~lOry, Jorhat

SHRI B. C. BORTHAKUR (Alternate)

SHRI S. KAUL "Ministry of Railways, New Delhi

SIIRI KIREET KUMAR ·G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Developwent, Almo{"u

PROF A. K. MAtTRA School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi

PROF ARVIND KRISHAN (Alternale)

DR G. S. MEHROTRiI. Ccntral Building Research lnstitutc, Roorkee

SHRI N. C. BHACiAT (;t!ternate)

SHRI P. L. NARULA Geological Survey of India, Calcutta

SHRI S. DA9GUPTA (Alternate)

SIIRIMATI M. PARTHASARATHY Engineer~in-Chiefs Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi

SHIU N. k- BALI (Alternate)

SIIRI D.P. PRAOfMN Sikkim Hill Area Deve.1opment Board, Gangtok

SIlRI P. JAGANtlATlJA RAG Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi

SHRI D. S. TOl.lA (Alternate)

(Cofltillued on paf!,e 5)

4
 IS 14458 (Part 3) 1998
(C(Jlllillll('c/ Ji'oJII 11(1f.,;c 4)

/v1elrl/Jers Representing

DR K. S. RAO lIT, New Delhi

DR BHAWAN! SrNcH University of Roorkee, Roorkee

DR P C Ji\lN (Alternate)

SHR! SHOOP SINGH Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi

SHRI R;\l\li\N SIN(/II Directorate General Border Roads (D&S), New Delhi
SHRI J. Gl)PALAKR1SHNA (/~lt('m(/te)

SI-lRl R. U. SIN(;II National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee

DR 511DIIII< KUi\lAR (Allcrt/llfe)

PROF C. P_ SINI!A North-Eastern Regional Institute of Water and Land Management, Assam
SHRI U.K. SIN(3i-l (Allcnwte)

SHRI LAKHBIR SINGHSONKHLA Public Works Department, Simla

SHR[ A. K. SON] Central Mining Research Institute, Dhanbad

DR P. SRINIVASIiLU Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai

SIIRI N. GOPALAKR1SlINAN (Altem~lte)

SlrI'ERI~TENDING SURVEYOR OF WORKS (NZ) Central Public Works Department, New Delhi
SURVEYOR or WORKS - I (NZ) (Alternate)

SIlI{1 V. SURESIl HOllsing anu Urban Development COIvoration (HUDCO), New Delhi
StIRI D. P. SINCi!l (Alternate)

StlRl S. C. TIWl\RI U.P. Hill Area Development Board, Lucknow

SHRI 1(. VENKATACIIALAM Central Soil and Mater1ul Research Station, New Delhi
SIIRI S. K. BABBAR (Alter11ate)

DR N.S. VIRDI-H Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun

STIRI VINO[) KUMAR, Director General, BIS (Ex-officio Member)

Director (Civ Engg)

Member-Secretw-y
SHRJT.B. NARAYANAN
Joint Director (Civ Engg), BlS

5
Bureau or Indian Standards

BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and
attending to connected matters in the country.

Copyright

BIS has the copyright of all its publications~ No part of these publications may be reproduced in any fOflT
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course oi
implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publication), BIS.

Review of Indian Standards

Amendment\) are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed
periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are
needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards
should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue
of 'BIS Handbook' and 'Standards Monthly Additions'
This Indian Standard has been developed from Doc: No. CED 56 (5599).

Amendments Issued Since Publication

Amend No. Date of Issue Text Affected

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

Headquarters:
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 Telegrams: Manaksanstha
Telephones: 32301 31,3233375,3239402 (Common to all offices)
Regional Offices: Telephone
Central Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Z1far Marg 32376 17,3233841
NEW DELHI 110002
Eastern 1/14 C.LT. Scheme VII M, V.LP. Road, Maniktola 337 8499,3378561
CALCUTTA 700054 { 33786 26, 33791 20

Northern : sca 335-336, Sector 34-A, CHANDIGARH 160022 60 38 43

{ 602025

Solflhern : C.I.T. Campus, IV Cross Road, OIENNAI 600113 235 02 16,2350442

{ 235 15 19,23523 15

Western : Manakalaya, E9 MIDC, Marol, Andheri (East) 832 92 95, 832 78 58

MUMBAI 400093 { 832 78 91, 832 78 92

Branches AHMADABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESH\VAR.

COIMBATORE. FARIDABAD. GHAZlABAD: GUWAHATL
HYDERABAD. JAIPUR. KANPUR. LUCKNOW. NAOPUR.
PATNA. PUNE. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Printed at Dee Kay Printers, New Delhi, India