INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: PJAF Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was
and Diversity of structure to management management management management shown
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies thatstrategies that
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
individually or in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
groups, in
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%
 focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown
diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
rating of 6
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
 evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
 teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
 progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0!
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
#DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Score

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Score

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Score

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Score

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Score

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Score

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
 #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4
Objective 3 7.5% 4
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4
Objective 6 7.5% 5
Objective 7 7.5% 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 5
Objective 10 7.5% 4
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
4 4.500 0.338
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
5 5.000 0.375
4 4.000 0.300
5 5.000 0.375
4 4.000 0.300
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
4 4.000 0.300
4 4 4.333 0.325
5 4 4.667 0.350
0 0.000 0.500
Final Rating 4.513
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: RAMONA S. ESTOQUE Name of Rater:

Position: Master Teacher I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/DivisionGeneral Santos City Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2019 - 2020

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
and knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of
Pedagogy across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the
research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period
T AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

MATTY B. NAPOLES
Principal I
May 7, 2019

ANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Actual Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Modeled effective evidence was
applications of shown
content knowledge
within and across
curriculum teaching
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from shown
colleagues and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No acceptable 1 1 1 1.000 0.075

research with evidence was
colleagues shown

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV evidence was
shown
Proposed the No acceptable
research report evidence was
within the rating shown
period
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SU
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: RAMONA S. ESTOQUE Name of Rater:

Position: Master Teacher I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: General Santos City Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2019 - 2020

Numerical Ratings
Weight per Weight per
KRA Objectives
KRA Objective
Q E T
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 1 1 1
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5
Objective 4 7.5% 5 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 5
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4
Objective 7 7.5% 5 5
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 4
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4
Objective 10 7.5% 4 3
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 3
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5
Fina
Adjectiva

RAMONA S. ESTOQUE MATTY B. NAPOLES

Master Teacher I Principal I
Ratee Rater
RF) SUMMARY SHEET

MATTY B. NAPOLES
Principal I
May 7, 2019

ings
Score
Ave
5.000 0.375
1.000 0.075
5.000 0.375
5.000 0.375
5.000 0.375
4.000 0.300
5.000 0.375
4.500 0.337
4.000 0.300
3.500 0.262
3.500 0.262
4.000 0.300
5.000 0.500
Final Rating 4.211
djectival Rating Very Satisfactory

MARIO M. BERMUDEZ, CESO VI

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority