Greeks and All That
Greeks and All That
Greeks and All That
08/14/12 2
Distance of Moon From Earth
Suggest a method for determining this
distance; hint: use the Sun. Twice if you
like.
Start with:
The size of the Earth (radius R)
The Sun is very far away
You’ve seen lunar eclipses…
(Work in your groups of 3)
I’ll get you started…
Distance of Moon From Earth
Moon moves in a large circle of radius R
Moon goes around one circle per month T
Earth’s shadow is about twice its radius r
Time it takes Moon to cross the shadow t
(maximally, about 3.6 hours)
v = v it’s the same “velocity”!
2πR/T = 2 r/t R/r ~ 1 month / (3 hr * π)
Average distance of the Moon ~ 60 Earth radii
Aristarchus, 270 BC…
But how big is r?
Eratosthenes
Astronomer/mathematician in Hellenistic Egypt
(c.275-195 BC)
Calculated circumference of Earth
Measured altitude of Sun at two different
points on the Earth (Alexandria & Syene about
800 km apart): found 7° difference
How did he do it? (What do you do with those
numbers?)
Multiplied (360°/7°)×800km (distance
between the 2 sites) to obtain
08/14/12
circumference~40,000km 5
This is a bit
oversimplified!
Note mountains not
shown to scale.
Eratosthenes
08/14/12 6
Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 B.C.)
Using eclipse data and geometry:
Measured relative sizes of Earth, Moon
Attempted to measure distance to Sun
Size of shadow?
Need to measure the angle of Sun and Moon
when Moon is exactly at 1st or 3rd quarter
(“half”)
08/14/12 7
Aristarchus Earth-Sun distance
Measure angle of Sun & Moon 1st or 3rd quarter (“half”)
cosϕϕ ==d/D
cos d/D →→
d/cos ϕϕ
DD==d/cos
d
ϕ
Earth
D
Sun
08/14/12 8
Moon waxing quarter
Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 B.C.)
Use angles and known Earth-Moon distance to
get Sun’s distance
Precision very difficult!
Deduced Sun is 20 times further from Earth
than Moon… [actual answer is 400 times…]
Sun must be huge! Bigger than the Earth!
First to propose a heliocentric model!
08/14/12 9
Cosmology of Eudoxus and
Fundamental “principles”:
Aristotle
Earth is motionless
Sun, Moon, planets and stars go around the Earth:
geocentric model
Eudoxus* (408-355 B.C.)
Proposed all heavenly bodies embedded in giant,
transparent spheres that revolve around the Earth.
Eudoxus needed 27 interlocking spheres to explain observed
celestial motions
e.g., need to have 24-hr period = day and 365-day
period=year for the Sun
*most renowned astronomer and mathematician of his day.
08/14/12 10
http://graduate.gradsch.uga.edu
/archive/Aristotle.html
08/14/12 12
Aristotle’s celestial physics
Heavens are governed by different laws from Earth
Celestial bodies composed of “aether,” a fifth
element not present on Earth*
*turns out there might a quintessence! (later…)
“Natural motions” of celestial spheres are different
from terrestrial motions:
circular, constant, and eternal
Aristotle needed 55 spheres to explain observed motions of
Sun, Moon, planets, stars
Space is finite, bounded by outer sphere
Edge is unreachable: motions become circular in the ethereal
Time is infinite
Why is such a perfect universe centered on such an imperfect
Earth?
08/14/12 13
Because you’re all sinners!
Just kidding!
(But I wouldn’t be kidding in the Middle Ages…)
08/14/12
Why do you care what a
bunch of dead Greeks did?
08/14/12
Retrograde motion
Motion of Mars over 1 year- notice 'reversal of direction'
Ptolemy’s epicycles-how to calculate
the positon of the planets
Ptolemy’s original “epicycles”
Larger circle (“deferent”) not centered
on the Earth
Motion appeared uniform from “equant”
(offset from Earth and from center of
“deferent”)
08/14/12 18
Copernicus (1473-1543)
Nicholas Copernicus was modern (re)founder
of the heliocentric (Sun centered) model for
the solar system
Rejected Ptolemy’s geocentric model
because it was too complicated (Occam's
razor)
Heliocentric model …
…with perfect circular motions (model bias!)
08/14/12 19
Copernicus
Mathematics was not simpler than Ptolemy's,
but it required fewer basic assumptions
By Copernicus assuming only
the rotation of the Earth,
revolution about the sun,
tilt of Earth's rotational axis,
he could explain observed “motions” of the
heavens
Because he retained circular orbits, his
system required the inclusion of epicycles
Copernicus (1473-1543)
The Copernican Principle: The Earth is not
at a special location in the Universe.
08/14/12 21
Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)
08/14/12 22
Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)
• Born 3 years after Copernicus’ death
• Last of the great “naked eye” observers
• Observed nova “new star” (1572)*
• From parallax observations of comet:
• knew they were not in Earth’s atmosphere
• Showed they crossed the spheres!
• Beyond Moon’s orbit!
• evidence heavens not immutable!
• Collected the premiere dataset on the motion of
the planets
08/14/12 23
Tycho Brahe and the Origin of Scientific
Funding
He received an annual pension of five
hundred dalers.
This was far more than the income
of any other man of learning in
Europe, and even for an aristocrat,
it was a substantial income.
Tycho set a new European
standard for the financial support
of scientific research.
It is estimated that Brahe's
observatory cost about 1% of the
Danish government budget during
construction. Uraniborg
Large mural quadrant
at Uraniborg ~2.6m in
diameter (to measure
angles precisely)
09/07/12 25
Tycho’s cosmological model
09/07/12 26
Tycho’s cosmological model
09/07/12 27
Tycho’s Compromise
• Alas, stellar parallax is 100× too small for
naked-eye observation to measure; largest
values are about 1”
• 1 arcsecond=(1/3600)°
• What’s 1” in radians? Board digression
• How many AU away is 1 arcsecond?
• What is the parallax of α-Centauri, 4 ly
away?
08/14/12
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
• Convinced God made the Universe
according to mathematical plan
• Was hired as Tycho Brahe’s assistant in
Prague to make sense of Brahe’s
extremely accurate observations of
Mars
• Led to the publication of three laws of
planetary motion (1601, 1609, 1619)
09/07/12 29
An imprecise version of Kepler’s
laws
Orbits are not circular
A planet’s speed changes during its orbit
There is a definite relationship between
orbital period and the distance from
the star
09/07/12 30
Kepler in perspective
• Based on Tycho Brahe’s accurate observations,
Kepler calculated his way to a major
breakthrough in cosmology
• Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion
• Represented a simpler model of solar system
and can be generalized
• Swept away thousands of years of prejudice –
and his own previous pet theory!
• Were driven fundamentally by the data,
including Tycho’s error estimates
• Data will lead theory again in cosmology!
09/07/12 31
Kepler in perspective
• Unlike previous models, Kepler’s Laws had
predictive power, consistent with modern idea
of a meaningful scientific theory
• Newton’s derivation (i.e., deeper underlying
theory) of Kepler’s laws from even more general
principles comes later…
• 19th century observations of small deviation of
Mercury’s orbit from Newton’s/Kepler's laws
spur theoreticians again… more on that later
09/07/12 32
Galileo Galilei
(1564-1642)
33
09/07/12
Moon is not
smooth, but
covered by
mountains and
craters.
http://www.astromax.org
09/07/12 34
• Galileo observed sunspots
moved = Sun was rotating on
an axis.
• The doctrine of an
unchanging perfect
substance in the heavens
(aether) starts to crumble!
09/07/12 35
Letter from Galileo
reporting the discovery
of Jupiter’s moons…
Not everything goes
around the Earth!
09/07/12 36
Galilean moons
(from Galileo spacecraft!)
NASA
09/07/12 37
Impact of Galileo’s observations
• Crucial experiment ruling out Ptolemaic
model:
• Possible phases of spherical Venus in
Ptolemaic model are only crescent or new
-- but Galileo observed full phase
• Observation supported Copernican (or at
least Tycho’s) model
09/07/12 38
Phases of Venus: a test of the
Heliocentric system
In the heliocentric model Venus can show certain phases impossible
if the sun goes around the earth.
09/07/12 http://www.telescope1609.com/Galileo.htm 39
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/galileo.html
Impact of Galileo’s observations
• Galileo became ardent supporter of
Copernican viewpoint
• In 1632, published Dialogue Concerning
the Two Chief Systems of the World -
Ptolemaic and Copernican;
• Inquisition bans book
• Galileo found guilty of heresy;
sentenced to house arrest
• Giordano Bruno did not fare quite so
well (1548-1600 – burned at the stake)
09/07/12 40
Galilean physics
After 1633 trial, Galileo works on mechanics
Used “thought experiments” to conclude that all
bodies, regardless of mass, fall at the same rate
in a vacuum – contrary to Aristotle
Now known as “equivalence principle” – will pop
up later
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk
09/07/12 41
Galilean physics
Realized full principle of inertia:
body at rest remains at rest;
body in motion remains in motion (force not
required)
Realized principle of relative motion (“Galilean
invariance”):
If everything is moving together at constant
velocity, there can be no apparent difference
from case when everything is at rest
Ball dropped from top of moving ship’s mast
hits near bottom of mast, not behind on deck
(ship not big enough to notice Coriolis force!)
09/07/12 42
Isaac Newton (1643-1727)
Attended Cambridge University,
originally intending to study law, but
reading Kepler, Galileo, Descartes
Cambridge closed due to plague (1665-
Isaac Newton in 1689, by 1667), Newton went home and
Sir Godfrey Kneller.
began to work out calculus
Father of realized (contrary to Aristotle) that
modern white light is composed of colors
physics and began to formulate laws of motion
cosmology and law of gravity
What have you done lately?
09/07/12 43
Newton’s history, cont.
In 1687, published Philosophiae naturalis principia
mathematica, or “Principia
included proof that inverse square law produces
ellipses (Kepler!)
generalized Sun’s gravity law to universe law of
gravitation: all matter attracts all other matter
with a force proportional to the product of their
masses and inversely proportional to the square
of the distance between them
09/07/12 44
Newton’s history, cont.
“Principia”:
laid out general physics of mechanics – laws of
motion
Principia is possibly greatest scientific book ever
written (“Origin of Species” anyone?)
Newton’s physics good enough to explain all
astronomy until late 19th century (Mercury);
good enough to land on the Moon.
Not good enough for GPS accuracy…
09/07/12 45