Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 133 views

    Rubric For Simulation Based CIA

    Uploaded by

    Samridh Agarwal
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group simulation reports on capital budgeting. Students will work in groups of 2-3 to run a capital budgeting simulation and submit a report detailing their choices. Groups will be assessed on the value created in the simulation (7.5 marks) and the quality of their report (7.5 marks). Individual students may receive different grades based on their contributions. The rubric evaluates reports on conceptual clarity, analysis/explanation, and structure/presentation. Plagiarism from other groups will be penalized.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric For Simulation Based CIA

    Uploaded by

    Samridh Agarwal
    133 views1 page
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group simulation reports on capital budgeting. Students will work in groups of 2-3 to run a capital budgeting simulation and submit a report detailing their choices. Groups will be assessed on the value created in the simulation (7.5 marks) and the quality of their report (7.5 marks). Individual students may receive different grades based on their contributions. The rubric evaluates reports on conceptual clarity, analysis/explanation, and structure/presentation. Plagiarism from other groups will be penalized.

    Original Description:

    Very Important

    Original Title

    Rubric for Simulation Based CIA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group simulation reports on capital budgeting. Students will work in groups of 2-3 to run a capital budgeting simulation and submit a report detailing their choices. Groups will be assessed on the value created in the simulation (7.5 marks) and the quality of their report (7.5 marks). Individual students may receive different grades based on their contributions. The rubric evaluates reports on conceptual clarity, analysis/explanation, and structure/presentation. Plagiarism from other groups will be penalized.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    133 views1 page

    Rubric For Simulation Based CIA

    Uploaded by

    Samridh Agarwal
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group simulation reports on capital budgeting. Students will work in groups of 2-3 to run a capital budgeting simulation and submit a report detailing their choices. Groups will be assessed on the value created in the simulation (7.5 marks) and the quality of their report (7.5 marks). Individual students may receive different grades based on their contributions. The rubric evaluates reports on conceptual clarity, analysis/explanation, and structure/presentation. Plagiarism from other groups will be penalized.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Rubric for Simulation based CIA

    This would be a group assignment involving teams of 2 or 3 students each, depending on the
    class size. Each team would be required to run a simulation on Capital Budgeting. Apart from
    running the simulation, each team would also be required to submit a report detailing the
    rationale behind the choices made. Each team would be assessed on the basis of value created
    (7.5 marks) as well as the quality of the report (7.5 marks). Members of the same team may be
    graded differently based on their contribution to the assignment. Mentioned below is the rubric
    that would be used for evaluating the reports. Any attempts to copy the simulation runs of the
    other teams, or to plagiarise from their reports would be viewed seriously and suitably
    penalised.

    Performance Area Outstanding Good Average Needs Improvement


    Concepts explained Concepts explained Concepts Poor understanding of
    unambiguously and with some ambiguous and not the concepts
    Conceptual complete in all ambiguity; one or completely clear
    Clarity respects two points missed (1) (0)
    (2)
    (3)
    Analysis & Very well analysed Good analysis Relatively poor Poor analysis
    Explanation (3) analysis
    (2) (0)
    (1)
    Very well Reasonably well Somewhat well Poorly structured,
    structured, very structured, structured, poorly presented and
    Report Structure well presented and reasonably well somewhat well not at all easy to read
    & Presentation extremely easy to presented and easy presented and and understand
    read and to read and somewhat easy to
    understand understand read and (0)
    understand
    (3) (2)
    (1)

    You might also like