City of San Antonio Master Plan
City of San Antonio Master Plan
City of San Antonio Master Plan
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
San Antonio I. Introduction 1
Economic Development, Community Services, not until the early part of the Twentieth Century that
Neighborhoods, Natural Resources, and Urban Design. master planning was given official governmental sanction.
Within each of these topic areas is a discussion of the
importance of that topic to the future of San Antonio, Work on San Antonio’s first master plan began in 1929,
followed by Goals and Polices for each topic. when City Commissioners contracted with Harland
Bartholomew and Associates of St. Louis, Missouri, for
The Glossary defines some of the terms used in the plan development of a master plan. Delayed by the Depression,
which are unique to city government and planning in the Plan was approved in 1933 after nearly four years of
particular. The Index is a list of key words which assist a work. The 1933 Master Plan advocated major proposals in
reader in easily finding all policy statements using key six areas: streets; transportation; transit; parks and
words. recreation; zoning; and civic art. In the plan, Bartholomew
and Associates proposed rules for the subdivision of land,
C. BACKGROUND OF PLANNING IN SAN ANTONIO the tabulation of major street widths, and a zoning
ordinance. Rehabilitation of the San Antonio River was one
of the Plan’s major goals. Inadequate enabling legislation,
Although planning looks to the future, it is grounded in the the Depression and the absence of a planning commission
realities of the present and the lessons of the past. Thus, it adversely affected the implementation of the 1933 Plan.
is appropriate to review San Antonio’s planning legacy. Perhaps the most significant outcome of the Plan was the
enactment of a zoning ordinance in 1938 and the
Planning had its inception in San Antonio with the first subsequent appointment of a Zoning Commission.
Spanish migration into this region at the close of the
Seventeenth Century. A directive known as the Laws of The availability of federal urban renewal grants prompted a
the Indies was used by the Spanish to control colonization new planning initiative in 1951. In an effort to be eligible for
and development in New Spain. These laws set out a these grants, the City contracted with local consultant
detailed plan for new cities which prescribed that Walter H. Lilly to develop a comprehensive City master
development should emanate from a central plaza and plan. The Plan, adopted in 1951, included sections on
proceed outward in a symmetrical manner. Following the streets, transportation, utilities, flood control and drainage,
independence of Mexico from Spain, San Antonio was recreation and parks, schools, slum clearance and urban
controlled by the Laws and Decrees of Coahuila and redevelopment, civic improvement, conservation, civil
Texas, which regulated town planning in the territory and defense, and capital improvements. Subdivision
were similar to the Laws of the Indies. regulations and an improved zoning ordinance were also
addressed. The Plan recognized the need for future
Shortly after the birth of the Republic in 1836, the Texas auxiliary surface water resources and protection of the
Congress initiated legislation allowing San Antonio to existing underground water supply; however, it did not
incorporate and receive a state charter. This gave the City foresee that growth would accelerate along the City’s
greater control over its developmental destiny, but it was northern fringe with a correspondent inner city decline. The
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
San Antonio I. Introduction 2
1951 Plan achieved its primary purpose, that of fulfilling forwarded them to the City Council. On May 29, 1997, the
requirements for a receipt of federal urban renewal funds. City Council approved the Master Plan Policies.
Not intended as a land use management or fiscal planning
tool, the Plan provided only limited direction in these These Master Plan Policies complete the City’s Master
areas. Plan and replace the Foreword and the Basic Plan
elements of the Master Plan adopted by the City Council
As San Antonio grew in the Sixties and Seventies, the City on August 28, 1980. Previously approved component
was faced with new issues such as non-conforming land plans will remain in effect until they are specifically
uses, urban blight, and the protection of the community’s replaced or revised.
water supply. As a result of these concerns, a series of
background documents was published outlining growth
alternatives for the City in the Seventies. These
documents resulted in the drafting of a new master plan in
1979 which was returned by the City Council to the
Planning Commission with instructions that it be revised
and resubmitted. In August, 1980, the Foreword to the San
Antonio Master Plan and the Basic Plan segment of the
Plan were adopted.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
San Antonio I. Introduction 3
formed in 1997 within 90 days of adoption by the City City Council. Specific standards and requirements
Council. The MPPAC shall be representative of the generated from implementation of Master Plan Policies
diverse interests of various groups such as neighborhood, shall be effective only after an ordinance specifying the
business, real estate/industry organizations, and the regulations, penalties and incentives relating to the policy
community at large. The committee shall be appointed by has been passed by the City Council.
the Planning Commission, shall serve two year staggered
terms, and shall consist of no more than 15 members, with F. REVIEW OF THE MASTER PLAN POLICIES
the Chair of the Planning Commission also serving as one
of the committee members.
The Planning Commission should perform an annual
The purpose of the MPPAC shall be to make comprehensive review of the Master Plan Policies and
recommendations regarding prioritization in the forward the Commission’s recommendations for
implementation of the Master Plan Policies. The amendments to the Plan to the City Council. In addition,
committee shall review the funding and staffing required to the Planning Commission should prepare an annual report
carry out policies recommended for implementation. The on development and planning activities. The report should
MPPAC shall make its recommendations to the Planning indicate changes in current trends and applicable laws and
Commission for review and consideration prior to being regulations, include recommendations for changes to the
forwarded to the City Council through the City Manager. Master Plan’s implementation mechanisms, and assess
To facilitate this process, City staff shall provide strategies, the City’s progress toward achieving the Plan’s goals and
responsibilities, proposed timing, budget implications, policies.
cost/benefit analysis, and progress-to-date.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
San Antonio I. Introduction 4
organizations throughout the City, the Master Plan
II. VISION STATEMENT Advisory Committee members, Planning Commission
members, and City of San Antonio staff.
The Master Plan of the City of San Antonio will provide a
functional framework to guide in the development and These goals and policies are dynamic, and it is important
implementation of policies that promote: that citizens and organizations continue to share their
concerns regarding San Antonio’s future.
♦ Equal opportunity to all San Antonio citizens and equity in the
distribution of benefits.
♦ Safe, dynamic and sustainable neighborhoods which offer
employment opportunities, high quality education, adequate
and affordable shelter, health care, and recreational
amenities.
♦ A vibrant economic climate which will attract and support a
wide diversity of business opportunities and community
services to provide benefits within the metropolitan area.
♦ Balanced and responsible urban design, planning and
development, and responsible protection of the City’s
historical, cultural, and natural resources.
♦ An open, accessible, responsive, and fiscally responsible
government whose structure creates the functional
framework to reach the Master Plan goals.
♦ The best city in America for children.
The goals and policies in the Master Plan have been “If you don’t know where you are going,
developed from the input of concerned citizens and you could wind up someplace else.”
! Yogi Berra
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
San Antonio II. Vision 5
Growth Management Goals
III. GOALS AND POLICIES
Goal 1 Utilize City resources and authority to manage
A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT growth and development.
Goal 2 Develop a process for responding to projected
Social and economic progress depends on dynamic urban change.
development and sound growth management. If the vision, Goal 3 Develop policies to minimize the negative
challenge and elements of the Master Plan are used impact and maximize the benefit from
effectively to guide future growth and development, the development located outside and adjacent to
standard of living and quality of life for all the citizens of San Antonio’s City Limits.
San Antonio will be enhanced.
Figure 5
Policy 3d: Use development policies such as utility extension
Goal 3 Develop policies to minimize the negative policies and impact fees to encourage contiguous
impact and maximize the benefit from growth.
development located outside and adjacent to 1. Require public utilities to publish extension policies for
San Antonio’s city limits. single and multi-family residential, commercial, and
industrial uses.
Policy 3a: Pursue a systematic annexation process to promote
orderly growth and the provision of municipal Policy 3e: Seek and support new statutory authority to guide
services, and to preserve the City’s positive fiscal development activities in the City’s extraterritorial
position. jurisdiction.
1. Develop a proposed three year annexation plan that is 1. Support statutory authority which permits
reviewed, updated and adopted annually by the City municipalities to guide development activity such as
Council. zoning and building codes in the City’s extraterritorial
2. Define and publicize the benefits of annexation. jurisdiction.
3. Encourage growth to occur inside the city limits; 2. Consider the feasibility of governmental consolidation.
however, if it is to occur in the extraterritorial
jurisdiction, encourage development to occur in areas
contiguous to the city limits.
4. Involve both CPS and the San Antonio Water System
in the development of the City’s growth and “Most economic success is luck, but we need to plan to be lucky.”
annexation policies.
5. Provide an adequate level of municipal services to ! George Geis
keep up with population growth and annexation.
Figure 10
Policy 3e: Facilitate economic development activities that will:
strengthen neighborhoods and communities; provide Goal 4 Provide economic opportunities in targeted
educational, training and employment opportunities; areas, particularly within Loop 410 and the
provide necessary support services; and promote southern sector.
and encourage economic participation for all San
Antonio citizens. Policy 4a: Increase coordination and visibility of current
1. Provide to neighborhood residents information on, economic development efforts in targeted areas.
and assistance in, completing community 1. Develop a marketing plan to increase the visibility of
development corporation applications to encourage economic development and its impact on the City.
revitalization and create job opportunities.
2. Develop specific policies regarding targeted areas in
2. Assist neighborhoods to obtain federal planning a business retention and expansion program.
grants to stimulate business growth and job creation
in neighborhood commercial areas. 3. Work with appropriate groups to promote economic
development in targeted areas.
4. Work with chambers of commerce and other
Policy 3f: Develop public and private initiatives to provide the community groups to disseminate information on the
funding and capital resources needed to finance impact of economic development in targeted areas.
small business and economic growth.
5. Develop joint projects and programs that provide
spin-off benefits in targeted areas.
FIGURE 12
Figure 15
Policy 3f: Emphasize the assets to be found in each
Goal 3 Develop a formalized planning relationship neighborhood and school through a coordinated
public relations campaign.
among school districts, neighborhoods and the
City to enhance the efficient and effective use of
educational facilities. Policy 3g: Encourage strong and continuing community and
school relationships beyond the walls of facilities by
Policy 3a: Promote schools as integral components of utilizing the neighborhood as an educational
residential neighborhoods. resource.
1. Encourage citizens to become involved in educational
awareness programs.
Policy 3h: Publicly recognize neighborhoods which have shown
individual initiative to improve schools within their
Policy 3b: Target areas for revitalization where excess space in neighborhoods.
neighborhood schools exists.
1. Establish incentives which encourage neighborhoods
to support their schools.
Policy 3c: Encourage school districts to upgrade schools to
contribute to neighborhood stability. Policy 3i: Encourage school districts and other entities to share
fiscal and demographic data for planning purposes.
1. Establish neighborhood awareness programs that
explain the direct link between education, 1. Encourage the accessibility of all available financial,
neighborhood, and economic stability. demographic, and physical plant information on
individual schools and school districts through a
computerized central clearinghouse.
Policy 5c: Assess the effectiveness with which art, cultural and
recreational facilities serve neighborhoods and the
community and develop a long term cultural facilities
plan.
1. Provide facilities and services for art, cultural and
recreational activities to be located in neighborhood
centers.
2. Inventory existing cultural facilities including use,
rental and fee policies.
3. Integrate the cultural facilities planning process into
the ongoing planning processes of the City.
The creation, preservation and enhancement of Goal 1 Preserve, protect and enhance the integrity,
neighborhoods is essential to the success of this plan. economic viability, and livability of San
Neighborhoods define and characterize the unique Antonio's neighborhoods.
cultural, historical and natural qualities of San Antonio. Goal 2 Strengthen the use of the Neighborhood
Planning Process and neighborhood plans.
Intrinsic to the success of neighborhoods and to a stable Goal 3 Provide safe, attractive, well-maintained
and attractive quality of life for all citizens is an emphasis neighborhoods for all adults and children.
on home ownership and housing availability for all ethnic Goal 4 Promote the provision of sound and affordable
and economic segments of the community. housing to all San Antonians.
Goal 5 Encourage development of the downtown area
Strong, viable neighborhoods create a sense of place as a complete neighborhood to enhance its
within the community. Basic elements such as schools, image to both visitors and residents.
churches, parks, open space, offices, stores, police and
fire stations, health care, cultural and human services
facilities, libraries and all types of housing, if balanced
properly, will contribute to safe, dynamic and sustainable
neighborhoods that form our City.
RA
U
FRESNO
RZ
UR
RD.
WU
G
RD.
RD.
QUILL HILDEBRAND
Y
ST. CLOUD
RR
. 78
HA
F.M
RD
RD
RAM .
.
ING
PEDRO
BLANCO
WOODLAWN
CALLAGHAN
FUNSTON
ACKERMAN RD.
DR.
. RA CULEBRA N
SAN
RD LEB .35
CU I.H
RD.
0
41
OP
RD.
LO
GEMBLER
GEN MCMULLEN
COLORADO
COMMERCE
HOUSTON ST.
MILITARY DR.
COMMERCE ST.
RD.
BACH RD.
W.
RA
Y 90
ZARZAMO
WALTERS
D HW
HACKBERRY
LOOP 410
OL
LOOP 410
U.S. HWY
90 W.
parks.
RIGSBY AVE.
DR.
CUPPLES
NEW BRAUNFELS
MALONE AVE.
Y-
W.W. WHITE
LE
VAL
HI
VALLEY
RA
Y ELL
.
ROOSEVELT
N
CA
SOUTHCROSS
MEDINA
AVE.
BASE
S. PR
ESA
MILITARY DR.
S FLO
Y DR.
TAR
RAY ELLISO MILI
RES
N
RD.
.
RD
.
RD
I.H
Y.
NA
HUTCHINS
HW
PL.
ET
TA
. 37
RS
ED
QU
S.
ME
R
HIL
LA
DE
SO
BR
AN
PLEASANTON
DT
RD.
R
.
LOO
RD ASHLEY
P 410
S.
35 GILLETTE BLVD.
I.H.
LL
COVEL
SA
AR
Figure 20
Figure 26
Policy 3e: Encourage cooperation among natural resource “Man shapes himself through decisions
management agencies, other professionals and local that shape his environment.”
— Renee Dubois
school districts in developing environmental
education materials and outreach programs.
1. Educate the public on local sub-watersheds through
programs such as the "Know Your Watershed"
program.
FIGURE 36
Figure 38
Policy 3b: Plan and develop a citywide system of linear parks
and hike and bike trails which incorporate drainage
Goal 3 Develop and maintain a diversified and balanced ways and open spaces which link parks, schools,
citywide system of parks and open space. institutions, and neighborhoods.
1. Identify existing and planned drainage ways,
Policy 3a: Utilize a planning process which encourages civic
abandoned railroad rights-of-way, utility corridors and
participation in the creation of a City park, recreation
open spaces which are located near or between
and open space plan which will: schools, institutions and neighborhoods.
a) Coordinate the acquisition and development of 2. Continue to develop hike and bike trails through the
public and private parks and open spaces; City’s park system to connect neighborhoods, places
of employment, school campuses, and historical and
b) Develop master plans for existing City parks;
cultural attractions, where possible.
c) Complete the development and revitalization of 3. Work with schools, neighborhood groups, and
existing parks; institutions to ensure that hike and bike trails, and
d) Ensure that parks are fully accessible to all linear parks are designed, constructed and
maintained to meet national safety and accessibility
citizens.
standards.
1. Develop and maintain an inventory of existing and 4. Develop a compact, durable map or booklet of maps
potentially significant park and open space lands, and illustrating the system of linear parks and hike and
use the expertise of other entities in their evaluation. bike trails.
2. Encourage conservation and protection of identified
properties through leases, conservation or scenic
easements, overlay zoning districts, protective
covenants, tax abatements, or acquisition (by
purchase or donation).
3. Develop a process to amend and implement the
Open Space Plan and to designate open space lands.
Figure 39
Affordable Housing: A unit of housing which does not exceed in San Antonio’s Central Business District is the central area of the
cost 30% of the gross household income, including utilities and City starting at the intersection of Salado and El Paso Streets;
maintenance, for families as defined by the United States north on Salado to its intersection with Frio Street; thence
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). northeast in a straight line to the intersection of IH-10 and
Caldwalder; south on IH-10 to IH-35; northeast on IH-35 to a
At-Risk Population: Those living at or below the poverty line as perpendicular point connecting with Cherry Street; south on
defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development Cherry Street to Durango Boulevard; west on Durango to the San
(HUD). Antonio River; south along the San Antonio River to Arsenal to El
Paso Street to Salado.
Bioengineering: Using the dynamic capacities of living plant
materials, in combination with non-living materials, to stabilize Community: A large, well-known district, recognized by
stream banks and edges against erosion. outsiders as one area, but which has internal neighborhoods of
some importance to residents.
Business Assistance Focus Center: The clearinghouse for
business assistance with the City of San Antonio Economic Community-Based Development Corporation (CBDC): An
Development Department, the regional Office of the U.S. Small organization which meets all conditions of a non-profit
Business Administration, the University of Texas at San Antonio corporation (see Non-Profit) and the conditions of a CDC (see
Small Business Development Center, San Antonio Business Community Development Corporation).
Development Fund, State Comptroller’s Office, and Service
Corps of Retired Executives. Provides services to businesses Community Center: A building or buildings used for
looking to diversify or expand. Services include counseling and recreational, social, educational and cultural activities, usually
financing. owned and operated within a one and one-half mile radius from
the residents it serves.
Capital Improvements: New or expanded public improvements
that are of relatively large size, expensive and permanent. Some
common examples are streets, public libraries, water and sewer
lines and park and recreation facilities.
Economic sector: a specific industry or group of inter-connected Industrial Base: Those industries which make up a community’s
industries. economy; industries creating the most impact and job creation.
EDF or SAEDF: San Antonio Economic Development Industry: A distinct group of productive or profit-making
Foundation, Inc. enterprises including forestry, fishing, hunting and trapping;
mining; construction; manufacturing; transportation;
Endangered Historic Properties: Those buildings, objects, communication, electric, gas and sanitary services; retail and
sites, site improvements, appurtenances or structures of wholesale trade.
historical, cultural, architectural or archaeological importance
whose existence is threatened or imperiled by circumstances that Infill Development: New construction activity occurring on
would ultimately lead to the demolition or destruction of that vacant parcels located within an area which is predominately
property. developed.
Environmentally Sensitive Industry: An industry which causes Infrastructure: Facilities and services needed to sustain any
minimal disruption to ecosystems and habitats, optimizes use of type of development- residential, commercial or industrial
natural resources, and operates in a way to minimize adverse activities. Includes water and sewer lines, streets, electrical
environmental impacts and contribute to the sustainability of the power, fire and police stations.
region. Intelligent vehicle highway systems: refers to a multi-level
cooperative public and private effort to develop and implement
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ): For the City of San Antonio new technologies to improve transportation efficiencies. Included
which is a home-rule City with a population of over 100,000, the among these will be Advanced Traffic Management Systems,
ETJ is the unincorporated area that is contiguous within a five e.g., rapid detection of traffic jams and Advanced Traveler
mile radius of the City corporate boundaries. Information Systems, e.g., in-vehicle navigation information
based on current traffic jams.
Multi-modal: Capable of accommodating a variety of Objective: A specific end, condition or state that is an
transportation modes, such as buses, automobiles, rapid transit, intermediate step toward attaining a goal. An objective should be
rail, bicycles and pedestrians. A multi-modal transportation hub is achievable and when possible measurable and time specific.
a facility for the transfer of passengers or goods between
different modes of transportation. Passive Recreation: Any unstructured leisure time activity
pursued for its own value (e.g. hiking and nature study.)
Natural Resources: Elements relating to land, water, air, plant
and animal life, and the interrelationship of those elements. Policy: A specific statement that guides decision making.
Natural resource elements include soils, geology, topography, Policies are statements of intent for actions to be taken in pursuit
flood plains, vegetation, wildlife, surface and groundwater and of a given objective.
aquifer recharge zones.
Recharge Zone: In relation to the Edwards Aquifer, it is an area
Neighborhood: An area of a community with characteristics that where the stratigraphic units constituting the Edwards Aquifer
distinguish it from other community areas. It may be defined by crop out, and including the outcrops of other geologic formations
physical barriers such as major highways and railroads or natural in proximity to the Edwards Aquifer, where caves, sinkholes,
features such as rivers. It may also be distinguished by unique faults, fractures, or other permeable features would create a
architectural, historical, social or ethnic characteristics. potential for recharge of surface waters into the Edwards Aquifer.
The recharge zone is identified as that area designated as such
Neighborhood Centers: The pivotal placement and clustering of on official maps located in the offices of the Texas Water
land uses that support the life and identity of a neighborhood Commission and the appropriate underground water
including housing, parks, schools, libraries, fire stations and conservation district.
shopping centers. Ideally, neighborhood centers are designed on
a human scale to encourage pedestrian access and use.
Underutilized Urban Area: An area suitable for development or UTSA-SBDC: University of Texas at San Antonio Small Business
redevelopment uses that will encourage residential stability and Development Center. Provides management and technical
economic vitality. assistance to small businesses through counseling and classes.
The program is a partnership between UTSA and the
UNIFORCE: A regional, joint venture organization of businesses U. S. Small Business Administration.
and public and private educational institutions which identifies the
needs of the job market and promotes training and internship
programs.