0500 w17 Ms 11
0500 w17 Ms 11
0500 w17 Ms 11
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2017 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE®, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
Note 1: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the passage.
Note 2: Words underlined in the answers to the questions are required for the full mark(s) to be
awarded.
Question 1
Item Reading assessment objectives tested Marks for reading assessment objectives
1(a) R1 1
1(b) R1 2
1(c) R1 and R2 2
1(d) R1 and R2 3
1(e)(i) R1 and R2 1
1(e)(ii) R1 and R2 1
1(f) R1 and R2 1
1(g)(i) R1 3
1(g)(ii) R3 and R4 6
Total 20
1(a) Which one word (in line 3) tells you that the train is having difficulty 1
moving?
Faltered
1(b) Give two reasons from paragraph one for the train having difficulty in 2
moving.
• The train enters dip with thick snow on the ground/a metre of snow
• The (amount of) snow weighs down the carriages/train/roof.
1(c) Explain, using your own words, what the writer means by the phrase: 2
‘a strip of shadow lost in a field of sparkling whiteness’ (lines 9–10).
• Long/thin/dark train
• Difficult to see train/train seems small or insignificant
• (Contrasts) with the brilliant/ snowy/ background/field
1(d) Using your own words, state three things Jack does when the train 3
stops moving (paragraphs 3 and 4).
He had never been prevented from completing the journey (by the
weather)/because he can’t complete the journey.
1(f) Explain why the conductor ‘clenched his hands nervously’ (line 47). 1
Note: Don’t accept ‘he was lying’ without some reference to he doesn’t know
what is going to happen
1(g)(i) Re-read paragraphs 3 & 4. Explain, using your own words, what the 3
writer means by the word in italics in each of the following phrases:
(a) Hopelessly/weakly/feebly
(b) Filled (up)/stuffed/packed with/covered
(c) Struggling/(trying) hard/strong
1 mark for each explanation, up to a maximum of 3.
Note: the definitions above contain the essence of an answer. Be careful not
to credit a word actually used in the quoted phrase. However, accept that
candidates may respond in different ways, e.g. at greater length.
1(g)(ii) Explain how the language in each of the phrases in Question (g)(i) 6
helps to suggest the difficulty that the train encounters moving in the
snow.
• Examiners should observe the following principles when assessing candidates' responses to
this question:
• Question 1(g)(ii) requires a comment on the effectiveness of the writer's use of language for
a particular purpose in the whole phrase quoted.
• Credit should be given to responses that attempt to explain how the writer's choice of
words/images etc. produces the intended response in the reader's mind.
• When marking these responses, we are looking for evidence that candidates have some
appreciation of the appropriate associations and suggestions in the writer's choice of words.
There are, therefore, no specific right or wrong answers to this task. We should award marks on the
quality of linguistic analysis shown by the candidate in order to support her/his interpretation of the
writer's purpose.
• It is not necessary for candidates to show knowledge of the names of different figures of speech
(simile, metaphor etc.) to produce a successful answer – what we are looking for is an
understanding of how the writer uses any such literary devices.
• Remember that 2 is the maximum mark for any one explanation and that candidates are likely to
comment on each phrase in one or two lines only. This fact should be borne in mind when
applying the descriptors in the table below.
• Note: This question is marked out of a total of 6 (2 marks for explanation of each phrase).
However, it is fully acceptable to award a holistic mark for this question (e.g. a maximum of 5 out
of 6) especially when a partial understanding of the effects of some of the chosen phrases is implied.
2 marks There will be a secure understanding of the phrase and of the writer's purpose for
choosing the language used in it. There will be an appreciation of how the suggestions
and associations of the vocabulary/imagery used contribute to the writer's purpose
and a convincing attempt to explain how this effect is achieved.
Note: 2 marks can be awarded to a response that contains an interpretation different
from that anticipated if there is a convincing explanation given.
1 mark Responses gaining 1 mark will show understanding of the phrase as a whole and
show some awareness of the writer's purpose for choosing the language used in it.
However, this is likely to be only partially explained and an awareness of how this is
achieved is likely to be implied rather than specifically explained.
0 marks Responses gaining 0 marks will either show complete misunderstanding of the phrase
or simply list the figure(s) of speech used by the writer without further comment.
Question 2
2 Imagine that you are the conductor from Passage A. After the train has 15
reached its destination, you write a journal entry recording the events
of the day. Write the words of the journal entry.
Base your journal entry on what you have read in Passage A, but do
not copy from it. Be careful to use your own words. Address each of
the three bullet points.
Begin your journal: ‘We had a very difficult journey on the express
train this morning«’.
General notes
The most successful responses are likely to give a clear account of what the
conductor would have experienced when the train is struggling to move & to
show understanding of how he tried to keep the passengers calm. There will
be a sensible and convincing attempt to explain how the driver (possibly with
the conductor’s/passengers’ help) managed to escape the snow. Less
successful responses are likely to lift sections of the original and do little
more than repeat points that are already there without going beyond the more
obvious details.
Responses that do not comment on how the train eventually started moving
again (third bullet) are unlikely to score higher than Band 3, although this will
also depend on the quality of the responses to the first two bullet points.
Refers to several details from the passage and makes some reference to the
conductor’s concerns. Shows some awareness of some of the passengers’
Band 2 7–8
concerns. Explains in reasonable detail how the train is able to continue its
journey.
Repeats some details from the passage about what has happened and the
difficulty of the situation. Shows some incomplete understanding of the
Band 3 5–6 conductor’s concerns. Focuses on the question and on the passage, but uses
material simply and partially. There is little or no reference as to how the train is
able to continue on its journey.
There is some relevance to the question with a tendency to retell the original
Band 4 3–4 rather than to tell it from the conductor’s point of view. Makes simple references
to the difficulty the conductor has to deal with.
There is an attempt to use the passage. May retell the passage or give
Band 5 1–2 occasional relevant facts. There may be examples of misunderstanding or lack
of clarity.
Sentence structures and vocabulary are simple, but meaning is never in doubt.
Band 3 3 The order is reasonable. There may be an attempt at an appropriate register but
it is inconsistent.
The response is very simply written and there are occasional examples of
Band 4 2 blurred meaning. The structure can usually be followed. The response may be
over-dependent on lifted material.
Question 3
The questions tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R5 (10 marks)
3(a) What did the writer enjoy about Swiss railways and the holiday 10
according to Passage B?
Write your answers using short notes. Write one point per line.
8 September sunshine
3(a) Note: Although lifting of words and phrases from the passage is acceptable it
is important that in such cases candidates show evidence of understanding
by clearly focusing on the key details; over-lengthy lifting which does not
identify specific points should not be rewarded. Credit response which
attempt to use own words and convey the essence of the point.
If candidates list more than one point per line, they cannot receive marks for
both points if both are correct. If candidates list more than one point per line
and one of these points is incorrect, they can receive the mark for the
other/correct point.
Whole sentences lifted from the passage which contain a number of points
will not be credited, as they are not showing selection of points, and are not
conveying the essence of the point.
Additional points added on to the bottom of the list (in addition to the 10)
should not be credited unless earlier points have been removed/crossed out.
If a point has been crossed out and not replaced with another (and it can still
be read and is correct) it should be credited.
3(b) Summary 5
Now use your notes to write a summary of what Passage B tells you
about what the writer enjoyed about Swiss railways and the holiday.
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own
words as far as possible.
Band 1 5 The response is well focused on the passage and the question. All points are
expressed clearly, concisely and fluently, and in the candidate’s own words
(where appropriate) throughout.
Band 2 4 Most points are made clearly and concisely. Own words (where appropriate) are
used consistently. The summary is mostly focused but may have a redundant
introduction or conclusion.
Band 3 3 There are some areas of conciseness. There may be occasional loss of focus or
clarity. Own words (where appropriate) are used for most of the summary.
Responses may be list-like or not well sequenced.
Band 4 2 The summary is sometimes focused, but it may include comment, repetition,
unnecessarily long explanation or lifted phrases.
Band 5 1 The summary is unfocused or wordy. It may be answered in the wrong form (e.g.
narrative, commentary or as notes). There may be frequent lifting of phrases and
sentences.