cosmetics

Review
Halal Cosmetics: A Review on Ingredients,
Production, and Testing Methods
Kenji Sugibayashi 1, * , Eddy Yusuf 2 , Hiroaki Todo 1 , Sabrina Dahlizar 1,3 , Pajaree Sakdiset 4 ,
Florencio Jr Arce 1,5 and Gerard Lee See 1,5
1 Laboratory of Pharmaceutics and Cosmeceutics, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Josai University, Saitama 350-0295, Japan
2 International Center for Halal Studies, Management and Science University, Selangor 40100, Malaysia
3 Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Science, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta,
Banten 15419, Indonesia
4 School of Pharmacy, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80161, Thailand
5 Department of Pharmacy, University of San Carlos, Cebu 6000, The Philippines
* Correspondence: sugib@josai.ac.jp; Tel.: +81-049-271-7367




Received: 6 June 2019; Accepted: 28 June 2019; Published: 1 July 2019


Abstract: The demand for halal cosmetic products among the 2.4 billion Muslim consumers worldwide
is increasing. However, the demand for halal cosmetics remains unmet because cosmetics production
is dominated by non-halal cosmetic manufacturers, whose production methods may not conform
with the requirements of halal science. The development of halal cosmetics and the assessment of
their product performance is still in its infancy. The integration of halal science in the manufacture of
most cosmetic products remains inadequate. Moreover, there is a global dearth of guiding documents
on the development and assessment techniques in the production of comprehensively halal cosmetics.
This paper aims to abridge existing literature and knowledge of halal and cosmetic science in order to
provide essential technical guidance in the manufacture of halal cosmetics. In addition, the adoption of
these methods addresses the unique ethical issues associated with conformance of cosmetics’ product
performance to religious practices and halal science. It highlights the applicability of established
methods in skin science in the assessment of halal cosmetics.

Keywords: cosmetic ingredients; cosmetic manufacture; halal cosmetics; formulation; in vitro testing

1. Introduction
Halal denotes permissible and lawful, whereas haram means prohibited by Islamic law. Najis refers
to uncleanliness, analogous to the contamination of something considered halal. Halalan-toyyiban
is a concept wherein a product is deemed halal, contains wholesome ingredients, and does not pose
any health risk when the product is used. The halal-haram rule is a part of the entire legal system of
Islam. The term halal is often associated with food. However, this term essentially includes a wide
area apart from food. Halal is relevant in every aspect of a person’s life, such as source of income,
attitude towards a product, and religiosity, among others [1]. Halal law prioritizes the importance of
the permissibility of food to be consumed, because food intake directly impacts the development of
human wellness and behavior. In parallel, consuming haram products (prohibited) is purported to be
injurious to one’s physical health and overall character. It is a dictum among Muslims to consume only
halal products as this is viewed to affect religiosity [1,2].
Halal pharmaceuticals and cosmetic products are gaining awareness and increasing demand
among the 2.4 billion Muslim consumers worldwide. The global halal market is anticipated to expand
at a compound annual growth rate of 6.8% until 2024 [3]. Apart from the large Muslim population

Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37; doi:10.3390/cosmetics6030037 www.mdpi.com/journal/cosmetics

Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 2 of 17

who exhibit high loyalty to halal products, halal cosmetics carry a wider market appeal among
non-Muslim consumers, who attribute these products with ethical consumerism and more stringent
quality assurance standards. In addition, for non-Muslims, halal can become a benchmark of accepted
conformance and quality in trade dealings with Muslims [1,4].
Halal cosmetic products must not contain ingredients derived from pig, carrion, blood, human
body parts, predatory animals, reptiles, and insects among others. Cosmetic ingredients derived from
permissible animals must be slaughtered according to Islamic law to be considered halal [4]. In the
preparation, processing, manufacture, storage, and transport of halal cosmetic products, maintenance
of hygiene and pure conditions must be ensured at all times. There is an emphasis on the absence
of filth. The intent of certifying products as halal is parallel with the goals of most quality assurance
procedures (e.g., cGMP, HACCP) [1]. Hence, halal cosmetic products, bearing the halal logo, must be
recognized as an indicator of cleanliness, safety, purity, and quality.
Although pharmaceutical products have gained scientific advancement way beyond cosmetic
products as evidenced by the numerous halal-certified drug products in the market, scientific efforts in
the development of cosmetics as a halal product must be probed further to adequately fulfill global
demand. For Muslim consumers, knowing the origin of raw materials and the production process of
cosmetic ingredients is vital, due to the Islamic law stating that every Muslim must consume only halal
and wholesome products [5]. Moreover, scrutinizing cosmetic products can be very challenging and
demands technical knowledge of the ingredients, their sources, and manufacturing methods. Cosmetic
products are complex and constitute several highly processed products that are manufactured using
ingredients of animal or plant origins. Upon application, cosmetic products may be unintentionally
ingested (e.g., lipstick), inhaled (e.g., perfumes), or absorbed through the skin (e.g., alcohol or ingredients
of critical origin) [6]. With the known challenges, manufacturers have to guarantee that cosmetic
products are critically developed to be halal in composition and support holistically the requirements of
Islamic rituals (e.g., wudu, cleansing before praying, or reading the Qur’an) performed on a daily basis.
There are several challenges that need to be taken into account in the development of halal
cosmetics. Cosmetic ingredients derived from animals such as gelatin, lecithin, glycerol, fatty acids,
and collagen are very difficult to verify as halal. Some coloring agents may be derived from insects,
hence qualified as haram. Moreover, ingredients that are of bovine origin poses another challenge as
the animals may be slaughtered in non-halal manner. Not only the use of halal ingredients is required
in the production but also the overall cosmetic product performance, in order to meet requirements of
Islamic rituals. A case in point, a lacquered nail must be penetrable by water to allow sufficient rinsing,
and cosmetic products applied on skin must also be penetrable to water or be completely rinsed off to
allow Muslims to perform their rituals accordingly.
While the detection methods for haram materials are in place, the development of halal cosmetics
and the assessment of product performance are still in their infancy. Cosmetics production is dominated
by non-halal cosmetic manufacturers [6] whose production methods do not conform to the requirements
of halal science, hence, emphasizing the need to develop guiding documents for such purpose. Moreover,
there is a global dearth of guiding documents in the development and assessment techniques in
the production of comprehensively halal cosmetics. This paper aims to abridge existing literature
and knowledge of halal and cosmetic science in order to provide essential technical guidance in the
manufacture of halal cosmetics. It highlights the applicability of established methods in skin science in
the assessment of halal cosmetics.

2. Source of Halal Cosmetic Ingredients

Halal cosmetics are products, sourced from halal ingredients and produced in accordance with the
halal system, intended to be applied on a specific part(s) of the body, whether as leave-on or rinse-off,
for the purpose of beautifying, cleansing, protecting, and changing the appearance of the body.
Cosmetics constitute a myriad of ingredients including water, oils, surfactants, polymers, organic
solvents, colorants, proteins, vitamins, plant extracts, preservatives, and antioxidants, among others [7].
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 3 of 17

With the complex mixture of ingredients in a cosmetic product, cosmetic manufacturers must critically
evaluate the ingredients and their corresponding source prior to development and production.
The source of ingredients intended for the development and manufacture of halal cosmetics
plays a crucial role in the outcome and overall performance of the product. It is the responsibility
of manufacturers rather than regulators to substantiate the safety of the ingredients used for halal
cosmetic products [8]. Manufacturers have to work closely with suppliers to ensure only halal certified
ingredients are being supplied. It should begin with an end in mind that raw materials, actives, or
excipients must be obtained from certified sources considered halal. Not only do the ingredients have
to be halal, but also safe for consumers for the intended use. This section focuses on the common
ingredients used in the preparation of cosmetic products. These ingredients are classified into halal,
haram, and critical.

2.1. Halal (Permitted) Cosmetic Ingredients

Halal cosmetic ingredients are any constituents derived from plants, soil, water, permissible
animals slaughtered according to Islamic law, marine animals deemed halal, and synthetic materials
that are safe for consumers and unadulterated with filth (najis). Table 1 provides a representative
list of ingredients considered halal. Plant-derived components and chemical synthesis (precursor
compounds) of ingredients are replacing animal-derived ones in the manufacture of halal cosmetics as
a means to diminish doubt and to better gain acceptance among consumers. Reducing the number of
critical ingredients used in the development of cosmetics facilitates the certification process, because it
rules out the incorporation of unacceptable or haram ingredients. As a rule of thumb, manufacturers
must secure halal certification for each ingredient from suppliers.

Table 1. Halal cosmetic ingredients.

Category Examples References

4-potassium methoxysalicylate (4-MSK) [9,10]
Arbutin [11,12]
Ferulic acid [13]
Hinokitol [14]
Skin whitening agents Kojic acid [15,16]
Resveratrol [17]
Tranexamic acid [18]
Vitamin B3 [19]
Vitamin C [20]
Capsanthin [21]
Capsorubin [21]
Delphinidin [22]
Gallic acid [23]
Genistein [24]
Glycyrrhizin [25]
Anti-aging agents Lutein [26]
Phloretin [27]
Salidroside [28]
Sclareol [29]
Trans-communic acid (TCA) [30]
Umbelliferone [31]
Vitamin B3 [19]
Carboxymethyl cellulose [32]
Carnauba wax [33]
Thickeners
Carrageenan [34]
Petrolatum [35]
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 4 of 17

Table 1. Cont.

Category Examples References

Carotene (red-orange) [7,36]
Lithospermum purple (violet) [7,36]
Colorants Paprika (yellow, orange, red) [7,36]
Safflower (yellow, red) [7,36]
Turmeric (yellow) [7,36]
Avocado oil [37,38]
Corn oil [39]
Cottonseed oil [40]
Dipropylene glycol [41]
Jojoba oil [42]
Solvents
Liquid paraffin (mineral oil) [43,44]
Polyethylene glycol [45]
Safflower oil [46]
Sesame oil [47]
Water [4]

The cosmetic ingredients listed below are classified as halal on the basis that they remain
uncontaminated or unadulterated with najis after obtaining and producing them from their halal
sources.

2.2. Haram (Prohibited) Cosmetic Ingredients

Haram cosmetic ingredients are any constituents derived from human body parts, blood, forbidden
animal parts and insects, and prohibited or restricted chemicals that are harmful or injurious to
consumers. Ingredients recognized to be prohibited or restricted by governing bodies in cosmetic
products are recognized as haram. Table 2 provides a representative list of ingredients considered haram.

Table 2. Haram cosmetic ingredients.

Category Examples References

Chlorofluorocarbon propellants [48]
Chloroform [48]
Halogenated salicylanilides [48]
Hexachlorophene [48]
Restricted chemicals Mercury compounds [48]
Methylene chloride [48]
Prohibited cattle materials [48]
Vinyl chloride [48]
Zirconium-containing complexes [48]
Carmine dye (Cochineal; E 120 or Natural Red 4) [7,36]
Crimson dye (from Kermes vermilio) [7,36]
Insect derived
Laccaic acid [7,36]
Beeswax [49]
Human derived Amniotic fluid [4]
Growth factors [4]
Placenta [4]
Amniotic fluid [4,50]
Gelatin [4]
Porcine derived
Growth factors [4,50]
Placenta [4,50]
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 5 of 17

2.3. Critical Cosmetic Ingredients

Cosmetic ingredients are classified under this category if they originate from sources
(e.g., unspecified animals, halal animals slaughtered in an unspecified manner) and process of synthesis
(e.g., incorporation of haram processing aids, contamination with haram or najis) nonconforming to
the halal system. However, the use of alternatively sourced ingredients classified as “critical” may still
be allowed to be part of a halal cosmetic product after the manufacturer has secured halal certification
for its origin and production, at the same time, uncontaminated with najis. Particularly, the presence of
ethanol in cosmetic products is controversial, but according to the Department of Islamic Development
Malaysia (JAKIM) and the Assessment Institute for Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics Indonesian Council
of Ulama (LPPOM-MUI) [51], cosmetic products may contain ethanol as long as it is sourced from
natural aerobic fermentation (i.e., natural fermentation process in the presence of oxygen) or synthetic
sources (i.e., prepared from ethylene oxide, acetaldehyde, acetylene) and not from the khamr (liquor)
industry. Table 3 provides a representative list of ingredients classified as critical.

Table 3. Critical cosmetic ingredients.

Category Ingredients Comments References

Allantoin May be derived from unspecified animal urine [52]
Alpha hydroxy acids May be derived from unspecified animals [53,54]
May be derived from oleic acid of unspecified animal origin;
Azelaic acid [55]
haram if contaminated with Malassezia furfur
May be synthesized using microbes or obtained from bee propolis;
Caffeic acid [56,57]
Halal if plant-derived
Actives
Collagen May be porcine-derived, human-derived; halal if marine-derived [58]
Hyaluronic acid May be derived from unspecified animal tissues [59]
Keratin May be derived from cashmere goat or sheep wool [4,60,61]
Mequinol May be synthesized using methanol [62]
Oligopeptides May be derived from unspecified microorganisms and animals [63]
Ubiquinone (CoQ10) May be derived from unspecified animals [64,65]
Urea May be derived from unspecified animals [4,66]
May be produced from non-halal processes (i.e., use of lipase or
Vitamin E [67]
unspecified origin of precursor materials)
Gelatin May be porcine-derived; halal if derived from fish [68]
Thickeners Palmitic acid May be derived from unspecified animals; halal if plant-derived [69]
Haram if contaminated with fermenting bacterium; halal if
Xanthan gum [70]
uncontaminated and obtained from natural aerobic fermentation
Oils Linoleic acid/Linolenic acid May be derived from unspecified animals; halal if plant-derived [71]
Oleic acid May be porcine-derived [72]
Palm kernel oil May be derived from unspecified animals [73]
Stearic acid/stearyl alcohol May be porcine-derived; halal if plant-derived [74]
Squalane May be derived from unspecified animals; halal if plant-derived [75]
Cetyl alcohol May be derived from palmitic acid of unspecified animal origin [76–78]
Waxes May be derived from non-halal slaughtered animals;
Lanolin alcohol [79]
halal if obtained from living animals
Stearyl alcohol May be derived from stearic acid of unspecified animal origin [74]
Must be from natural aerobic fermentation or synthetic ethanol;
Ethanol [51,80]
intended as preservative in cosmetic formulations
Solvents
Glycerin/glycerol May be porcine-derived [81]
Propylene glycol May be derived from glycerol of unspecified animal origin [82,83]

2.4. General Guidelines for Halal and Non-Halal Cosmetic Ingredients

Several guiding documents on the requirements for the certification of halal cosmetics exist, and
manufacturers must adhere to the set standards alongside with those mentioned in the previous sections of
this paper. These documents provide general guidelines in the production and manufacture of cosmetics
but incomprehensive on sourcing of ingredients for the manufacture of halal cosmetics, although none
about testing of its product performance (i.e., in support of Muslim rituals). The applicability of the
guidelines listed in Table 4 may vary depending on the country of production and the target market,
manufacturers have to ensure that these are met.
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 6 of 17

Table 4. List of guidelines for cosmetic production.

Guidelines Description References

ISO 22716:2007 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Guidelines for Cosmetics [84]
Standard and Metrology Institute for the
OIC/SMIIC 4:2018 [85]
Islamic Countries—Halal Cosmetics Requirements
Gulf Cooperation Council Standardization Organization
GSO 2055-4:2014 [86]
(GSO)—Requirements for Cosmetics and Personal Care
LPPOM MUI: HAS23000:1 MUI Halal Certification Requirements [87]
Association for South East Asian Nations Guiding
ASEAN Cosmetic Directives [88]
Document for Cosmetic Manufacturers and Consumers
Islamic Consumer Goods Part 1:
MS 2200-1:2008 [89]
Cosmetic and Personal Care-General Guidelines
NPRA Guidelines: 2017 Guidelines for Control of Cosmetic Products in Malaysia [90]
U.S. FDA Guidance for Industry Cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practices [91]
International Council for Harmonization
ICH Guidelines Q7: 2016 [92]
Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practices

3. Production of Halal Cosmetics

The production of halal cosmetics does not only entail critically sourcing ingredients to be
considered halal. The same principle follows through the production of the cosmetic products. Aside
from cosmetic manufacturing requirements (e.g., cGMP, ISO among others) that manufacturers have to
adhere to, a halal assurance system has to be in place as well.
A form of halal assurance system must be developed and adapted as a requirement in seeking halal
certification of the cosmetic product. Its main objective is to sustain the halal production processes to
assure compliance to the mandates of halal regulating bodies (e.g., LPPOM-MUI, JAKIM). This assurance
system must be applied in all processes in the production of cosmetics, wherein proper documentation
of the processes is required. This allows the traceability of each process in the production system.
Manufacturers must create an in-house manual for the halal assurance system covering components
on the halal policy, halal guidelines, halal management organization, standard operating procedures,
technical references, administration system, documentation system, stakeholder engagement, training
programs, audit system, corrective action system, and management review system [87].
In this section, we provide points for manufacturers to consider and to ensure that a halal assurance
system is in place in the manufacture of halal cosmetics. Accuracy in documentation of these lines of
evidence is expected among halal cosmetic manufacturers. Table 5 presents points for consideration in
developing a halal assurance system.

Table 5. Points for consideration in halal assurance system.

a. Comprehensive document exhibiting halal assurance system

b. Comprehensive material specification used in the production of halal cosmetics
c. Comprehensive and valid halal certification of materials and facility
d. Compliance of formulation ingredients and the list of halal materials
e. Conformity between material purchasing document and the list of halal material
f. Comprehensive document and conformity between production document and the list of halal materials
g. Comprehensive document and conformity between warehousing/storage document and list of halal materials and products
h. Traceability system

Manufacturing, Storing, Packaging, and Distribution

The formulation development of halal cosmetics must begin with ingredients that are undoubtedly
of halal origin. Use of alternatively sourced “critical” ingredients (e.g., ethanol, fish-derived collagen,
chicken-derived gelatin) must be recognized only when appropriate documents of halal certification
are presented. Other critical ingredients of unverified halal certification status are not recommended
for use in the manufacture of halal cosmetics.
The manufacture of halal cosmetic products must be produced in accordance with cGMP and
other quality standards to assure product quality and safety. The creation of a group of personnel
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 7 of 17

dedicated to the handling and production of halal cosmetics is recommended. The premises must be
designed and located in an area with no risk of contamination by non-halal materials (e.g., proper
processes and personnel flow, distant from pig farms) [93]. All production facilities are restricted
to the manufacture of halal cosmetics products only. It is imperative that processing of non-halal
cosmetics must not be done in the same plant to avoid mandatory ritual cleansing (sertu), which
may affect operations [93]. Equipment must be dedicated for use only for halal cosmetic production.
Contaminated water (e.g., water recycled from sewage treatment, water contaminated with najis) must
not be used in the manufacture of halal cosmetics. The composition of cleaning materials (e.g., scrubs,
brushes) used in the maintenance of equipment and facilities must not originate from non-halal
animals [93]. Manufacturers have to assure that the warehouse and production lines for halal certified
and non-halal ones must be physically separated or located in different plants should the manufacturer
opt to produce non-halal certified cosmetics. All the processes involved must be clearly labelled with a
sign carrying the word halal to prevent them from mix-ups and contamination by non-halal or najis.
In addition, care should also be observed to avoid unexpected contamination from the environment
(e.g., haram pets) and manpower particulate contamination (e.g., non-halal food or dust).
Halal cosmetic products must be labelled according to the prescribed labelling requirement of the
regulatory bodies of each country. The label must bear a halal logo and accurately reflect the ingredients
of the product as a means to aid consumer in their decision and consumption of the cosmetic product.
Any text, illustrations as well as its advertisement must comply with Islamic law and local culture.
The label should not depict lascivious or provocative images as this will automatically qualify the
product as haram. The shape of the final product or its package must not exhibit the human body or
body parts that are sexually suggestive. A similar tone is recommended in branding of the product.
The brand name of halal cosmetics shall not be named or synonymously named after non-halal materials
to avoid confusion.
Packaging materials are one of the concerns in the manufacture of halal cosmetics. Materials used
in the production of the primary and secondary packaging must also comply with halal standards.
Generally, packaging materials are made from halal sources but awareness on the origin of animal-derived
ingredients used as aids in the manufacture of packaging must be recognized. Manufacturers of halal
cosmetics must secure packaging materials from reputable producers of halal packaging [94]. Product
accessories (e.g., application tools, brushes) must not be derived from porcine, human, or other
haram materials.
The distribution system has to ensure that halal cosmetic products reach the market maintaining
their halal status without being contaminated by haram materials or najis. Halal cosmetic products are
recommended to be handled and shipped separately from non-halal ones to avoid cross-contamination.

4. Testing Methods for Halal Cosmetics

In the analysis of halal cosmetics, sourcing of skin model is a major limitation that is unique to the
regulations for cosmetics testing, ideals of skin science, and halal systems. Although human or porcine
ears are ascribed [95–98] to be used in the testing of cosmetics, this directly opposes one of the basic
tenets of halal science, the absence of human- or porcine-based articles. Consistent with this, the use
of rat skin, a competent skin model, or the sacrifice of animals are unacceptable in cosmetics testing
as well [99–101]. Skin that is of biological origin would have been ideal in this interest owing to its
natural barrier function. These limitations overarch into the possible usefulness of artificial model
membranes and reconstructed human skin equivalents primarily due to their questionable barrier
function [99,102]. Despite these known limitations, a progressive recommendation must be met to
allow evaluation of cosmetics suited to be halal. In this paper, we propose the use of silicone model
membrane or Strat-M™ for permeation experiments, which supports the principles of the halal–haram
system, data reproducibility, and ease of use. Unavoidably, a 3D reconstructed skin model may be
used in determining the distribution of chemicals into stratum corneum (SC) and viable epidermis and
dermis (VED).
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 8 of 17

The methods described for the evaluation of water penetration, skin permeation of alcohol and
cosmetic actives of critical origin, and cosmetics “washability” are not yet required by any halal
governing bodies, as of the time or writing. However, these methods are viewed to supplement, if not,
enhance the assessment of cosmetic products compliant with halal science. Official tests and procedures
for the quantification of most cosmetic ingredients have been stipulated in several documents [103–105].
The methods described in this paper are intended for the analysis of compounds in the tests discussed
herein. This section presents proposed methods for the analysis of halal cosmetic product performance
on critical aspects undefined previously.

4.1. Water Penetration through Applied Nail Polish or Hard-to-Wash Cosmetics

Special criteria for halal cosmetics applied to the skin are their ability to allow water penetration.
The concept of classifying nail polish as a halal cosmetic product is still a debate. However, there is
a clear method that demonstrates the penetrability of specifically designed nail polish with water.
“Rinsing” of the nail may be achieved when a substantial amount of water penetrates the applied layer
of nail polish and reaches the nail bed. Breathability (air/oxygen) and water vapor permeability have
been claimed for water-based nail polish formulations using tests prescribed in DIN 53380-3 and DIN
53122-1 [106]. These tests, however, do not appear to be reflective of actual in-use conditions such as
application onto the nail or rinsing prior to rituals.
Assessment of water penetration of nail polish in its applied form may be done in two ways as a
combination of previously described works [107–110]. First, a practical procedure utilizing a Franz
diffusion cell and silicone membrane previously applied with nail polish may be employed. A second
method being more realistic, suggests the use of human nail, or in this context the use of equivalent
material, applied with nail polish and set on a specially designed Franz-type diffusion cell. The
temperature of the membrane and nail must be maintained at 32 ◦ C. A finite dose of deuterium oxide
(D2 O) is applied on the donor side, with the withdrawal of aliquots at predetermined times. Detection
of D2 O using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy should directly confirm water penetration
through the applied nail polish.
The same method is viewed to be beneficial in the assessment of water penetration in difficult
to wash cosmetics (e.g., lipstick, eye mascara, eye liner). A silicone membrane set on a Franz-type
diffusion cell applied with finite dose of D2 O should confirm water penetration as well.
This method opens windows of opportunities for current manufacturers of halal ingredient-based
nail polish and difficult-to-wash-off cosmetics to revise and improve formulations, and ultimately,
gain compliance.

4.2. Determining Permeation of Alcohol, and Solvent/Cosmetic Actives of Critical Origin

The use of ingredients in the development of cosmetic formulation are employed in accordance
with its intended purpose. Cosmetic active ingredients are employed mainly for their purported
activity (e.g., skin whitening, anti-aging). Excipients (e.g., ethanol, other solvents) are incorporated to
promote solubility of the actives/partitioning into the SC or simply for enhanced tactile impression
or psychorheology. It must be noted that ethanol is allowed in topical formulations for use among
Muslims provided it does not exceed 1% [80]. Absorption into the skin of solvents with doubtful origin
such as ethanol and glycerin are well documented [81,111–113].
Functional cosmetics (contains quasi-drug actives) are now common in the market and have
become the preferred way of delivering actives with purported skin enhancement effects. In fact, they
are sold in sets (i.e., cleanser, lotion, milk, essence) and are recommended to be applied in layers in a
predefined sequence.
Detection and quantification of cosmetic actives in skin (SC and VED) following dermal absorption
has long been established [96–100,108,114,115]. Quantification of cosmetic actives permeating through
the skin following actual in-use conditions, such as layered application, has been reported recently [116].
Together, these methods could provide insights into product formulation development with respect
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 9 of 17

to the permeation of ingredients. Manipulating the proportions of ingredients in the formulation or

the use of retardants could reveal an ideal formulation that could significantly reduce or eliminate
absorption through skin of alcohol, solvent/cosmetic actives of critical origin (e.g., collagen, gelatin,
glycerin). Analytical methods described in this section could ascertain whether critical ingredients are
absorbed or not. In addition, the evaporation of alcohol and other solvents can be evaluated to clarify
its behavior (i.e., permeation or evaporation) once applied on skin [111,112,117].
In the determination of ethanol permeation, radiolabeled ethanol (14 C-ethanol) is suggested to be
used in the formulation in place of regular ethanol. Permeation experiments for ethanol and other
ingredients of concern may be carried out in Franz-type diffusion cells as reported previously [107,112].
In addition, gravimetric techniques have been reported in estimating evaporation of neat ethanol from
formulations [112,118].
Realistic evaluation of chemical permeation can be attained when conditions closely simulating
actual use conditions are employed [119]. The use of a finite dose and the manner of formulation
application (in membrane) must be reflective of actual in-use conditions (e.g., layered application, defined
sequence). Sampling from the receiver chamber is then performed as described above. The instrumental
detection and quantification of compounds investigated may be performed as described previously. For
reference, we summarized instrumental quantification conditions in skin permeation experiments for
some cosmetic ingredients classified as critical (Table 6).

Table 6. List of methods used in the quantification of cosmetic ingredients.

Ingredients Analytical technique References

High-performance liquid chromatography
Azelaic acid [120]
(215 nm, acetonitrile:phosphate buffer; 25:75 (v/v))
Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy
Collagen, pentapeptide [121]
(Pentafluoropropionic acid solution:acetonitrile; 87:13 (v/v))
Ethanol (14 C-ethanol) Liquid scintillation counting [112]
Glycerin (14 C-glycerol) Liquid scintillation counting [111]
Propylene glycol Gas chromatography (helium as carrier gas) [117]
Ubiquinone (CoQ10) UV-Vis spectroscopy (405 nm) [122]
Urea (14 C-urea) Liquid scintillation counting [111]

4.3. Cosmetics “Washability” Quantification

The ability of applied cosmetics to be washed off is of paramount significance with physical purity.
This principle is of great value in the observance of wudu and encouraged prior to the reading of
the Qur’an. In fact, many cosmetics (e.g., body lotion, face cream, nail polish, eye mascara among
others) are applied as “leave on” cosmetics and adhere on the skin for a long time [123]. “Washability”
of applied cosmetics can be realistically simulated using a simple procedure described in a previous
work [124]. Concisely, applied cosmetics on the skin is rinsed first with water, and wiped off with a
cotton swab previously dampened with sodium lauryl sulfate (0.5%) to mimic consumer use of liquid
soap. Lastly, the skin may be rinsed with water to reflect terminal rinsing during bathing or washing.
To ultimately validate the washability of applied cosmetics, dermatopharmacokinetics and tissue
distribution studies could validate the deposition of chemicals in the SC and VED, if any, may be
done. A previous work presented a practical method for the quantification of chemicals deposited
on the SC and hair follicles after topical application [125]. It suggests stripping of the SC 20 times
using cellophane tape, extraction of drug from the tape with ethanol, and vortexing for 1 h. Tissue
distribution is established by cutting and homogenizing the resulting VED. Quantification may proceed
as described elsewhere [125].

5. Detection of Haram Ingredients in Cosmetics

Halal-based “purity” of materials and products is the basis for authenticity of halal products.
In this study, we have identified new, yet relevant, methods for qualifying cosmetic products claiming
to be halal-compliant.
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 10 of 17

Compliance should not be viewed only as an oversimplification of the absence or presence of

something haram in a product. Rather, one must not neglect the actual product performance and how
it interacts with a Muslim’s daily rituals. In this manner, products are developed to be halal with an
assurance both in composition and performance.
This section presents numerous works made in contribution to promote halal science, halal
product quality, and compliance, and efforts in safeguarding the religious interests of Muslims.
Methods of detecting haram ingredients, predominantly the presence of porcine-based materials, have
been extensively studied [2]. Detection techniques are broadly categorized as chromatographic; high-
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [126,127], reversed-phase HPLC [128], HPLC–tandem
mass spectrometry (MS) [129], ultra-performance liquid chromatography-time-of-flight MS [130],
ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight MS [131],
HPLC/MS linear ion trap/Orbitrap [132], liquid chromatography–tandem MS (LC–MS/MS) [133], and
Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy [134], or biochemical techniques; conventional duplex
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [135], multiplex PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism [136],
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [137], and calcium phosphate precipitation [138].
A recently developed method using LC–MS/MS claims to significantly reduce sample preparation time
and presents excellent sensitivity to a high number of specific peptide markers differentiating materials
of bovine and porcine origin [133]. Moreover, the use of a high-performance gas chromatography–time
of flight MS with a lipid library search feature allows discrimination of the origin of ingredients.
In addition, it has been reported to have isotope pattern analysis resulting in high sensitivity and high
mass accuracy of the analytes [4].
It is not the intention of this paper to prescribe analytical techniques for the detection of haram
materials but it encourages the use of the described methods, as is feasible with the institution’s
analytical capacity. Ultimately, any raw materials or finish products can be tested using the tests
described above to rule out the presence of haram materials.

6. Conclusions
The development of halal cosmetics encompasses the concept of critically sourcing halal ingredients,
applying halal practices in every step of the manufacturing process, and ensuring conformance of
product performance to Islamic rituals. This document sheds light on the methods to assess previously
disputed concepts in cosmetics and strengthens the existing testing methods in the assessment of halal
cosmetics. The use of scientific methods in the development of halal cosmetics must be advanced to
ascertain the halal status and promote market acceptance not only among Muslim consumers but also
by non-Muslims as well. Halal cosmetics transcends beyond religion because they require rigorous
scientific investigation to come up with a product that is safe, effective, pure, and sensitive to the
holistic needs of the Muslim community.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, K.S., G.L.S., F.J.A. and S.D.; methodology, K.S., H.T., G.L.S., F.J.A., S.D.;
resources, E.Y., K.S., H.T., P.S.; writing—Original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, all
authors; visualization, all authors; supervision, K.S., H.T., E.Y.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Hashim, P.; Mat Hashim, D. A review of cosmetic and personal care products: Halal perspective and
detection of ingredient. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 21, 281–292.
2. Hassan, N.; Ahmad, T.; Zain, N.M. Chemical and chemometric methods for halal authentication of gelatin:
an overview. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 2903–2911. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Trent, N. Halal Cosmetics Market 2018-Industry Analysis, Share, Growth, Sales, Trends, Supply, Forecast to
2025. Reuters. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/brandfeatures/venture-capital/article?id=52417
(accessed on 10 March 2019).
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 11 of 17

4. Yusuf, E.; Yajid, M.S.A. Related topic: Halal Cosmetics. In Skin Permeation and Disposition of Therapeutic and
Cosmeceutical Compounds; Sugibayashi, K., Ed.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2017; pp. 101–107.
5. Briliana, V.; Mursito, N. Exploring antecedents and consequences of Indonesian Muslim youths’ attitude
towards halal cosmetic products: A case study in Jakarta. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2017, 22, 176–184. [CrossRef]
6. Houlis, A. Halal Cosmetics: Control of Ingredients. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/
technical-documents/articles/white-papers/flavors-and-fragrances/halal-ingredients-sources-cosmetics.
html (accessed on 2 February 2019).
7. Iwata, H.; Shimada, K. Developing the formulations of cosmetics. In Formulas, Ingredients and Production of
Cosmetics: Technology of Skin-and Hair-care Products in Japan; Iwata, H., Shimada, K., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo,
Japan, 2013; pp. 21–86.
8. Dent, M.; Amaral, R.T.; Silva, P.A.; Ansell, J.; Boisleve, F.; Hatao, M.; Hirose, A.; Kasai, Y.; Kern, P.; Kreiling, R.;
et al. Principles underpinning the use of new methodologies in the risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients.
Comput. Toxicol. 2018, 7, 20–26. [CrossRef]
9. Li, Y.; Dong, C.; Cun, D.; Liu, J.; Xiang, R.; Fang, L. Lamellar liquid crystal improves the skin retention
of 3-O-ethyl-ascorbic acid and potassium 4-methoxysalicylate in vitro and in vivo for topical preparation.
AAPS PharmSciTech 2016, 17, 767–777. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Ito, S.; Wakamatsu, K. A convenient screening method to differentiate phenolic skin whitening tyrosinase
inhibitors from leukoderma-inducing phenols. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2015, 80, 18–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Ivica, C.; Litvić, M. Simple and efficient synthesis of arbutin. Arkivoc 2008, 2, 19–24.
12. Maeda, K.; Fukuda, M. Arbutin: Mechanism of its depigmenting action in human melanocyte culture.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 276, 765–769.
13. Kumar, N.; Pruthi, V. Potential applications of ferulic acid from natural sources. Biotechnol. Rep. (Amst.)
2014, 4, 86–93. [CrossRef]
14. Chien, C.W.; Teng, Y.H.G.; Honda, T.; Ojima, I. Synthesis of colchicinoids and allocolchicinoids through
Rh(I)-Catalyzed [2+2+2+1] and [2+2+2] Cycloadditions of o-Phenylenetriynes with and without CO.
J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 11623–11644. [CrossRef]
15. Kadokawa, J.; Nishikura, T.; Muraoka, R.; Tagaya, H.; Fukuoka, N. Synthesis of Kojic Acid Derivatives
Containing Phenolic Hydroxy Groups. Synth. Commun. Int. J. Rapid Commun. Synth. Org. Chem. 2003, 33,
1081–1086.
16. Liu, X.; Xia, W.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Yu, P. Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of kojic acid
grafted chitosan oligosaccharide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 297–303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Guiso, M.; Marra, C.; Farina, A. A new efficient resveratrol synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 597–598.
[CrossRef]
18. Li, Z.; Fang, L.; Dong, L.; Guo, Y.; Xie, Y. An improved and practical synthesis of tranexamic acid. Org. Process.
Res. Dev. 2015, 19, 444–448. [CrossRef]
19. Everts, S. Green chemistry environmentally friendly synthesis of niacin generates less inorganic waste.
Chem. Eng. News 2008, 86, 15. [CrossRef]
20. Linster, C.L.; Van Schaftingen, E.; Vitamin, C. Biosynthesis, recycling and degradation in mammals. FEBS J.
2007, 274, 1–22. [CrossRef]
21. Yamano, Y.; Ito, M. Total synthesis of capsanthin and capsorubin using Lewsi acid-promoting regio-and
stereoselective rearrangement of tetrasubstituted epoxides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 3207–3212. [CrossRef]
22. Goszcz, K.; Deakin, S.J.; Duthie, G.G.; Stewart, D.; Megson, I.L. Bioavailable concentrations of delphindin and
its metabolite, gallic acid, induce antioxidant protection associated with increased intracellular glutathione
in cultured endothelial cells. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 9260701. [CrossRef]
23. Aouf, C.; Nouailhas, H.; Fache, M.; Caillol, S.; Boutevin, B.; Fulcrand, H. Multi-functionalization of gallic
acid. Synthesis of a novel bio-based epoxy resin. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 1185–1195. [CrossRef]
24. Xiong, P.; Wang, R.; Zhang, X.; Dela Torre, E.; Leon, F.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, S.; Wang, G.; Chen, Q.H. Design,
synthesis, and evaluation of genistein analogues as anti-cancer agents. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2015,
15, 1197–1203. [CrossRef]
25. Brieskorn, C.H.; Sax, H. Synthesis of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetin acid derivatives. Pharm. Ges. 1970, 303,
905–912.
26. Kim, J.; Della Penna, D. Defining primary route for lutein synthesis in plants: The role of Arabidopsis carotenoid
B-ring hydroxylase CYP97A3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3474–3479. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 12 of 17

27. Wang, L.; Li, Z.W.; Zhang, W.; Xu, R.; Gao, F.; Liu, Y.F.; Li, Y.J. Synthesis, crystal structure, and biological
evaluation of a series of phloretin derivatives. Molecules 2014, 19, 16447–16457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, C.; Meng, Y.; Yang, Y. Synthesis, biological activity of salidroside and its analogues.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010, 58, 1627–1629. [CrossRef]
29. Schalk, M.; Pastore, L.; Mirata, M.A.; Khim, S.; Schouwey, M.; Dequerry, F.; Pineda, V.; Rocci, L.; Daviet, L.
Towards biosynthetic route to sclareol and amber odorants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 18900–18903. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
30. Barrero, A.F.; Siméon, A.; del Moral, J.F.Q.; Herrador, M.M.; Valdivia, M.; Jimenez, D. First synthesis
of the antifungal oidiolactone C from trans-commumnic acid: Cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity in
podolactone-related compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2501–2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Maimba, O. Umbelliferone: Synthesis, chemistry and bioactivities review. Bull. Fac. Pharm. Cairo Univ. 2017,
55, 223–232. [CrossRef]
32. Shui, T.; Feng, S.; Chen, G.; Li, An.; Yuan, Z.; Shui, H.; Kuboki, T.; Xu, C. Synthesis of sodium carboxymethyl
cellulose using bleached crude cellulose fractioned from cornstalk. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 105, 51–58.
[CrossRef]
33. Yu, X.; Wang, N.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, Z. Simple synthesis hydrogenated castor oil fatty amide wax and its
coating characterization. J. Oleo Sci. 2017, 66, 659–665. [CrossRef]
34. Zia, K.M.; Tabasum, S.; Nasif, M.; Sultan, N.; Aslam, N.; Noreen, A.; Zuber, M. A review on synthesis,
properties and applications of natural polymer based carrageenan blends and composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
2017, 96, 282–301. [CrossRef]
35. Battarjee, S.M.; Abd El-Azim, W.M.; Mohamed, A.A. Preparation of medicinal petroleum jelly using local
petroleum waxes. Lubr. Sci. 1999, 12, 89–104. [CrossRef]
36. Yusuf, M.; Shabbir, M.; Mohammad, F. Natural colorants: Historical, processing, and sustainable prospects.
Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2017, 7, 123–145. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Qin, X.; Zhong, J. A review of extraction techniques for avocado oil. J. Oleo Sci. 2016, 65, 881–888. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
38. Costagli, G.; Betti, M. Avocado oil extraction processes: Method for cold-pressed high quality edible oil
production versus traditional production. J. Agric. Eng. 2015, 46, 115–122. [CrossRef]
39. Ni, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gasmalla, M.A.A.; Yang, R. Efficient and eco-friendly extraction of corngerm
oil using aqueous ethanol solution assisted by steam explosion. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2018–2116.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Meshram, P.D.; Puri, R.V.; Patil, A.L.; Gite, V.K. Synthesis and characterization of modified cottonseed oil
based polyesteramide for coating applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 1144–1150. [CrossRef]
41. Liu, X.; Zhao, W.; Xiao, F.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. One-pot synthesis of propylene glycol and dipropylene glycol
over strong basic catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 675–678. [CrossRef]
42. Sandha, G.K.; Swami, V.K. Jojoba oil as an organic, shelf stable standard oil-phase base for cosmetic industry.
Rasayan J. Chem. 2009, 2, 300–306.
43. Klaus, E.E.; Tewksbury, E.J.; Fenske, M.R. Preparation, properties and some applications of super-refined
mineral oils. ASLE Trans. 1962, 5, 115–125. [CrossRef]
44. Morrison, D.S.; Schmidt, J.; Paulli, R. The scope of mineral oil in personal care products and its role in
cosmetic formulation. J. Appl. Cosmetol. 1996, 14, 111–118.
45. Li, J.; Kao, W.J. Synthesis of polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivatives and PEGylated–peptide biopolymer
conjugates. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 1055–1067. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Han, X.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, R.; Bi, J. Extraction of safflower seed oil by supercritical CO2 . J. Food Eng. 2000,
92, 370–376. [CrossRef]
47. Corso, M.P.; Fagundes–Klen, M.R.; Silva, E.A.; Filho, L.C.; Santos, J.N.; Freitas, L.S.; Dariva, C. Extraction
of sesame seed (Sesamim indicum L.) oil using compressed propane and supercritical carbon dioxide.
J. Supercrit Fluid 2010, 52, 56–61. [CrossRef]
48. Prohibited and Restricted Chemicals in Cosmetics. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/
GuidanceRegulation/LawsRegulations/ucm127406.htm (accessed on 1 February 2019).
49. Hepburn, H.R. Composition and Synthesis of Beeswax. In Honeybees and Wax; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg,
Germany, 1986; pp. 44–56.
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 13 of 17

50. Kim, T.; Kim, S.; Kang, W.Y.; Baek, H.; Jeon, H.Y.; Kim, B.Y.; Kim, C.G.; Kim, D. Porcine amniotic fluid as
possible antiwrinkle cosmetic agent. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 1839–1843. [CrossRef]
51. Fatwa of Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) No.: 11/2009. 18 November 2009. Available online: http:
//halalmui.org/images/stories/Fatwa/fatwa-alkohol.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2019).
52. Cativiela, C.; Fraille, J.M.; Garcia, J.I.; Lázaro, B.; Mayoral, J.A.; Pallarés, A. Heterogeneous catalysis in the
synthesis and reactivity of allantoin. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 275–277. [CrossRef]
53. Babilas, P.; Knie, U.; Abels, C. Cosmetic and dermatologic use of alpha hydroxy acids. J. Ger. Soc. Dermatol.
2012, 10, 488–491. [CrossRef]
54. Bhalla, T.C.; Kumar, V.; Bhatia, S.K. Hydroxy acids: Production and applications. In Advances in Industrial
Biotechnology; Singh, R.S., Pandey, A., Larroche, C., Eds.; IK International Publishing House PVT. Ltd.:
New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 56–76.
55. Nazzaro-Porro, M. Azelaic acid. In Dermatology in Five Continents; Orfanos, C.E., Stadler, R., Gollnick, H.,
Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 194–195.
56. Zhang, P.; Tang, Y.; Li, N.G.; Zhu, Y.; Duan, J.A. Bioactivity and chemical synthesis of caffeic acid phenethyl
ester and its derivatives. Molecules 2014, 19, 16458–16476. [CrossRef]
57. Lin, Y.; Yan, Y. Biosynthesis of caffeic acid in Escherichia coli using its endogenous hydroxylase complex.
Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 11, 1–9. [CrossRef]
58. Rodríguez, M.I.A.; Barroso, L.G.R.; Sánchez, M.L. Collagen: A review on its sources and potential cosmetic
applications. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2017, 17, 20–26. [CrossRef]
59. Sze, J.H.; Brownlie, J.C.; Love, C.A. Biotechnological production of hyaluronic acid: A mini review. 3 Biotech
2016, 6, 67. [CrossRef]
60. Mokrejš, P.; Hutta, M.; Pavlačkova, J.; Egner, P. Preparation of keratin hydrosylate from chicken feathers and
its application in cosmetics. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 129, e56254.
61. Rouse, J.G.; Dyke, M.E.V. A review of keratin-based niomaterials for biomedical applications. Materials 2010,
3, 999–1014. [CrossRef]
62. Couteau, C.; Coiffard, L. Overview of skin whitening agents: Drugs and cosmetic products. Cosmetics 2016,
3, 27. [CrossRef]
63. Shcagen, S.K. Topical peptide treatments with effective anti-aging results. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 16.
64. Knott, A.; Achterberg, V.; Smuda, C.; Mielke, H.; Sperling, G.; Dunckelmann, K.; Vogelsang, A.; Krüger, A.;
Schwengler, H.; Behtash, M.; et al. Topical treatment with coenzyme Q10-containing formulas improves
skin’s Q10 level and provides antioxidative effects. Biofactors 2015, 41, 383–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Hojerová, J. Coenzyme Q10–its importance, properties and use in nutrition and cosmetics. Ceska Slov. Farm.
2000, 49, 119–123. [PubMed]
66. Meessen, J. Urea synthesis. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2014, 86, 2180–2189. [CrossRef]
67. Netscher, T. Synthesis of vitamin E. Vitam. Horm. 2007, 76, 155–202.
68. Draget, K.I.; Haug, I.J.; Aasmund, S. Gel-Containing Topical Composition. U.S. Patent Application Publication
No. 2009/0131541 A1, 11 May 2009.
69. Alvarez, A.M.R.; Rodríguez, M.L.G. Lipids in pharmaceutical and cosmetic preparations. Grasas Aceites 2000,
51, 74–96.
70. Lopes, B.D.; Lessa, V.L.; Silva, B.M.; La Cerda, L.G. Xanthan gum: Properties, production conditions, quality
and economic perspective. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 54, 185–194.
71. Imanaka, H.; Ando, H.; Ryu, A.; Shigeta, Y.; Kishida, S.; Mori, A.; Makino, T. Liposomal linoleic acid is useful
as a skin lightening agent. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. Jpn. 1999, 33, 277–282. [CrossRef]
72. Nagai, J.; Block, K. Synthesis of oleic acid by Euglena gracilis. J. Biol. Chem. 1965, 240, 3702–3703. [PubMed]
73. Abdul Rahman, M.B.A.; Yap, C.L.; Dzulkefly, K.; Abdul Rahman, R.N.Z.; Salleh, A.B.; Basri, M. Synthesis of
palm kernel oil alkanolamide using lipase. J. Oleo Sci. 2003, 52, 65–72. [CrossRef]
74. Zhen, Z.; Xi, T.F.; Zheng, Y.F. Surface modification by natural biopolymer coatings on magnesium alloys for
biomedical applications. In Surface Modification of Magnesium and Its Alloys for Biomedical Applications Volume
II; Sanarka Narayan, T.S.N., Park, I.S., Lee, M.H., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015;
pp. 301–333.
75. Popa, O.; Bábeanu, N.E.; Popa, I.; Nita, S.; Dinu-Parvu, C.E. Methods for obtaining and determination of
squalene from natural sources. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 367202. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Youtz, M. Rapid preparation of cetyl alcohol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1925, 47, 2252–2254. [CrossRef]
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 14 of 17

77. Guo, W.; Sheng, J.; Zhao, H.; Feng, X. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce
1-hexadecanol from xylose. Microb. Cell Fact. 2016, 15, 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
78. Mutlu, V.N.; Yilmaz, S. Esterification of cetyl alcohol with palmitic acid over WO3 /Zr-SBA-15 and Zr-SBA-15
catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2016, 522, 194–200. [CrossRef]
79. Schlossman, M.L.; McCarthy, J.P. Lanolin and its Derivatives. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1977, 55, 447–450. [CrossRef]
80. Alzeer, J.; Hadeed, K.A. Ethanol and its halal status in food industries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 58,
14–20. [CrossRef]
81. DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Glycerin. In The MAK–Collection Part. I: MAK Value Documentations;
Wiley-VCH GmbH & Co.: KGaA, Weinheim, 2015; Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/
10.1002/3527600418.mb5681kske4215 (accessed on 1 January 2019).
82. Seretis, A.; Tsiakaras, P. Hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol by in situ produced hydrogen from
aqueous phase reforming of glycerol over SiO2 –Al2 O3 supported nickel catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016,
142, 135–146. [CrossRef]
83. Rabello, C.R.K.; Gomes, M.J.; Siqueira, B.G.; De Menezes, R.B.; Huziwara, W.K.; Yamada, T.S.;
De Oliveira, L.M.M.; Oliveira, G.C.; Candido, W.V.C. Production of Propylene Glycol from Glycerol.
European Patent Application EP 2540692 A2, 2013. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.
com/df/69/ae/f723554e9b191e/EP2540692A2.pdf (accessed on 2 January 2019).
84. International Organization for Standardization ISO. Cosmetics–Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)–Guidelines
on Good Manufacturing Practices; ISO 22716; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; Available online: https:
//www.sis.se/api/document/preview/909264/ (accessed on 31 December 2018).
85. Standard and Metrology Institute for Islamic Countries (SMIIC). Halal Cosmetics–General Requirements;
OIC/SMIIC 4:2018; SMIIC: Bakırköy/İstanbul, Turkey, 2018.
86. Gulf Cooperation Council Standardization Organization-Safety Requirements for Cosmetics and Personal
Care Products. GSO 12/ DS 1943. 2015. Available online: http://www.puntofocal.gov.ar/notific_otros_
miembros/yem3_t.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2019).
87. General Guidelines of Halal Assurance System. LPPOM MUI, Majelis Ulama, Indonesia. 2012. Available online:
https://www.halalcertifiering.se/newwebsiteimages/ebookhashaki.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2018).
88. ASEAN Guidelines for Cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practice. Available online: https://ww2.fda.gov.ph/
attachments/category/197/Appendix%20VI_CosmeticGMP.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2019).
89. Department of Standards Malaysia, MS2200. Part I: Islamic Consumer Goods–Part 1: Cosmetics and Personal
Care–General Guidelines, Standard Malaysia. 2008. Available online: https://law.resource.org/pub/my/ibr/
ms.2200.1.e.2008.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2018).
90. National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Division, Ministry of Health, Malaysia. Drug Registration Guidance
Document, 2nd ed.2019. Available online: https://www.npra.gov.my/images/Guidelines_Central/guideline-
DRGD/CompleteDRGDwithappendices.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2019).
91. Guidance for Industry: Cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practices. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. US FDA. 2013. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/86366/download (accessed on
11 January 2019).
92. Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Guidance for Industry.
International Council for Harmonization. 2016. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/71518/download
(accessed on 10 January 2019).
93. Department of Standards Malaysia, JSM 16/ISC/I-02R1. Halal Cosmetics-General Requirements. 2018.
Available online: http://www.jsm.gov.my/documents/10180/2793318/JSM16-MS2200Halal+Cosmetics_
21Mar2018.pdf/ca0cca15-c0e7-431e-ab60-debe532c2772 (accessed on 12 February 2019).
94. Talib, M.S.A.; Johan, M.R.M. Issues in halal packaging: A conceptual paper. Int. Bus. Manag. 2012, 5, 94–98.
95. Jung, E.C.; Maibach, H. Animal models for percutaneous absorption. In Topical Drug Bioavailability,
Bioequivalence, and Penetration; Shah., V.P., Ed.; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2014;
pp. 21–30.
96. OECD. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; Guidance 428: Skin Absorption; OECD
Press: Paris, France, 2004; p. 8. Available online: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/suppdocs/feddocs/oecd/
oecdtg428-508.pdf (accessed on 9 January 2019).
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 15 of 17

97. OECD. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; Guidance Document for the Conduct of Skin
Absorption Studies # 28; OECD Press: Paris, France, 2004; p. 14. Available online: https://www.oecd-
ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264078796-en.pdf?expires=1559264519&id=id&accname=oid006932&
checksum=650D34675626065E96BA28CE26628795 (accessed on 19 January 2019).
98. OECD. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; Guidance Notes on Dermal Absorption;
Series on Testing and Assessment # 156; OECD Press: Paris, France, 2011; p. 26. Available online:
https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/48532204.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2019).
99. SCCS/1416/11, 2012. The SCCS’s Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Safety
Evaluation, 9th Revision. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. 2016. Available online: http://ec.europa.
eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_190.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2019).
100. SCCS/1358/10, 2010. Basic Criteria for the in Vitro Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Cosmetic Ingredients.
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. 2010, p. 8. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_
committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_002.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2019).
101. Todo, H. Transdermal permeation of drugs in various animal species. Pharmaceutics 2017, 9, 33. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
102. Flaten, G.E.; Palac, Z.; Engesland, A.; Filipović-Grčić, J.; Vanić, Ž.; Škalko-Basnet, N. In vitro skin models as a
tool in optimization of drug formulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 75, 10–24.
103. Sixth Commission Directive 95/32/EC Relating to Methods of Analysis Necessary for Checking the Composition
of Cosmetic Products. European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1995. Available online:
https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f03d7204-0256-44a5-92be-265a88274047/
language-en (accessed on 31 December 2018).
104. Cosmetics Analytical Methods-Validation Criteria for Analytical Results Using Chromatographic Techniques.
ISO 1278. 2011. Available online: https://www.sis.se/api/document/preview/914189/ (accessed on 12 February 2019).
105. Chisvert, A.; Salvador, A.; Benedé, J.L.; Miralles, P. Tanning and whitening agents in cosmetics: Regulatory
aspects and analytical methods. In Analysis of Cosmetic Products, 2nd ed.; Salvador, A., Chisvert, A., Eds.;
Elsevier Science: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 107–121.
106. Schlay, S.; Schacht, K.; Storzer, U. Breathable nail polish on the basis of a new blend: A complex of water-based
polymer and functional vegan silk. SOFW J. 2017, 143, 56–60.
107. Horita, D.; Todo, H.; Sugibayashi, K. Effect of ethanol pretreatment on skin permeation of drugs.
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 1343–1348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
108. Sugibayashi, K.; Todo, H.; Oshizaka, T.; Owada, Y. Mathematical model to predict skin concentration of
drugs: Toward utilization of silicone membrane to predict skin concentration of drugs as an animal testing
alternative. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 134–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
109. Gunt, H.; Kasting, G. Effect of hydration on the permeation of ketoconazole through human nail plate
in vitro. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 32, 254–260. [CrossRef]
110. Okumura, M.; Sugibayashi, K.; Ogawa, K.; Morimoto, Y. Skin permeability of water-soluble drugs.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1989, 37, 1404–1406. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
111. Intarakumhaeng, R.; Wanasathop, A.; Li, K. Effects of solvents on skin absorption of nonvolatile lipophilic
and polar solutes under finite dose conditions. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 536, 405–413. [CrossRef]
112. Chaudhuri, S.R.; Gajjar, R.; Krantz, W.; Kasting, G. Percutaneous absorption of volatile solvents following
transient liquid exposure II. Ethanol. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 1665–1672. [CrossRef]
113. Kurihara–Bergstrom, T.; Knutson, K.; DeNoble, L.J.; Goates, C.Y. Percutaneous absorption enhancement of an
ionic molecule by ethanol-water systems in human skin. Pharm. Res. 1990, 7, 762–766. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
114. Matsumoto, M.; Todo, H.; Akiyama, T.; Hirata-Koizumi, M.; Sugibayashi, K.; Ikarashi, Y.; Ono, A.; Hirose, A.;
Yokohama, K. Risk assessment of skin lightening cosmetics containing hydroquinone. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
2016, 81, 128–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
115. Uchida, T.; Kadhum, W.R.; Kanai, S.; Todo, H.; Oshizaka, T.; Sugibayashi, K. Prediction of skin permeation
by chemical compounds using the artificial membrane, Strat-M™. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 67, 113–118.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
116. Arce, F.V.; Asano, N.; Yamashita, K.; Oda, A.; Uchida, T.; Sano, T.; Todo, H.; Sugibayashi, K. Effect of layered
application on the skin permeation of a cosmetic active component, rhododendrol. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2019, 44,
1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 16 of 17

117. Santos, P.; Watkinson, A.C.; Hadgraft, J.; Lane, M.E. Oxybutynin permeation in skin: The influence of drug
and solvent activity. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 384, 67–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
118. Gajjar, R.M.; Miller, M.A.; Kasting, G.B. Evaporation of volatile organic compounds from human skin in vitro.
Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2013, 57, 853–865.
119. Yamaguchi, M.; Araki, D.; Kanamori, T.; Okiyama, Y.; Seto, H.; Uda, M.; Usami, M.; Yamamoto, Y.;
Masunaga, T.; Sasa, H. Actual consumption amount of personal care products reflecting Japanese cosmetic
habits. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2017, 42, 797–814. [CrossRef]
120. Ma, H.; Yu, M.; Tan, F.; Li, N. Improved percutaneous delivery of azelaic acid employing microemulsion
as nanocarrier: Formulation optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 28985–28995.
[CrossRef]
121. Choi, Y.L.; Park, E.J.; Kim, E.; Na, D.H.; Shin, Y. Dermal stability and in vitro skin permeation of collagen
pentapeptides (KTTS and palmitoyl-KTTS). Biomol. Ther. 2014, 22, 321–327.
122. Schwarz, J.; Baisaeng, N.; Hoppel, M.; Löw, M. Ultra-small NLC for improved dermal delivery of coenzyme
Q10. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 447, 213–217. [CrossRef]
123. Comiskey, D.; Api, A.M.; Baratt, C.; Daly, E.J.; Ellis, G.; McNamara, C.; O’Mahony, C.; Robinson, S.H.;
Safford, B.; Smith, B.; et al. Novel database for exposure to fragrance ingredients in cosmetics and personal
care products. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 72, 660–672. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
124. Klimová, Z.; Hojerová, J.; Beránková, M. Skin absorption and human exposure estimation of three widely
discussed UV filters in sunscreens–In vitro study mimicking real-life consumer habits. Food Chem. Toxicol.
2015, 83, 237–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
125. Abe, A.; Saito, M.; Kadhum, W.R.; Todo, H.; Sugibayashi, K. Establishment of an evaluation method to detect
drug disposition in hair follicles. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 542, 27–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
126. Widyaninggar, A.; Triyana, K.; Rohman, A. Differentiation between porcine and bovine gelatin in capsule
shells based on amino acid profiles and principal component analysis. Indones. J. Pharm. 2012, 23, 104–109.
127. Rohman, A.; Che Man, Y.B. Analysis of pig derivatives for halal authentication studies. Food Rev. Int. 2012,
28, 97–112. [CrossRef]
128. Nemati, M.; Oveisi, M.R.; Abdollahi, H.; Sabzevari, O. Differentiation of bovine and porcine gelatins using
principal component analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 34, 485–492. [CrossRef]
129. Zhang, G.; Liu, T.; Wang, Q.; Chen, L.; Lei, J.; Luo, J.; Ma, G.; Su, Z. Mass spectrometric detection of marker
peptides in tryptic digests of gelatin: A new method to differentiate between bovine and porcine gelatin.
Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 2001–2007. [CrossRef]
130. Cheng, X.L.; Wei, F.; Xiao, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Shi, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, P.; Ma, S.C.; Tian, S.S.; Lin, R.C.
Identification of five gelatins by ultra performance liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry
(UPLC/Q-TOF-MS) using principal component analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 62, 191–195. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
131. Yilmaz, M.T.; Kesmen, Z.; Baykal, B.; Sagdic, O.; Kulen, O.; Kacar, O.; Yetim, H.; Baykal, A.T. A novel method
to differentiate bovine and porcine gelatins in food products: NanoUPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MSE based data
independent acquisition technique to detect marker peptides in gelatin. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2450–2458.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
132. Sha, X.M.; Zhang, L.J.; Tu, Z.C.; Zhang, L.Z.; Hu, Z.Z.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Huang, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; et al. The
identification of three mammalian gelatins by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.
LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 74–86. [CrossRef]
133. Jumhawan, U.; Xing, J.; Zhan, Z. Detection and Differentiation of Bovine and Porcine Gelatins in Food
and Pharmaceutical Products by LC/MS/MS Method. Shimadzu Application News No. AD-0164. 2017.
Available online: https://www.ssi.shimadzu.com/sites/ssi.shimadzu.com/files/bovine-and-porcine-gelatins.
pdf (accessed on 5 January 2019).
134. Che Man, Y.B.; Syahariza, Z.A.; Mirghani, M.E.S.; Jinap, S.; Bakar, J. Analysis of potential lard adulteration
in chocolate and chocolate products using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2005, 90,
815–819. [CrossRef]
135. Nikzad, J.; Shahhosseini, S.; Tabarzad, M.; Nafissi-Varcheh, N.; Torshabi, M. Simultaneous detection of
bovine and porcine DNA in pharmaceutical gelatin capsules by duplex PCR assay for halal authentication.
DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 25, 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cosmetics 2019, 6, 37 17 of 17

136. Sultana, S.; Motalib Hossain, M.A.; Nizar, N.N.A.; Eaqub Ali, M. Novel multiplex PCR-RFLP assay
discriminates bovine, porcine and fish gelatin substitution in Asian pharmaceuticals capsule shell. Food Addit.
Contam. Part A 2018, 35, 1662–1673. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
137. Nur Azira, T.; Amin, I.; Che Man, Y.B. Differentiation of bovine and porcine gelatins in processed products
via sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and principal component
analysis (PCA) techniques. Int. Food Res. J. 2012, 19, 1175–1180.
138. Hidaka, S.; Liu, S.Y. Effects of gelatins on calcium phosphate precipitation: A possible application for
distinguishing bovine bone gelatin from porcine skin gelatin. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2003, 16, 477–483. [CrossRef]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).