Nist Ir 8005 PDF

This publication is available free of charge from http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.
8005
NISTIR 8005
Applicability of Existing Materials

Testing Standards for Additive
Manufacturing Materials
John Slotwinski
Shawn Moylan
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8005
This publication is available free of charge from http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8005
NISTIR 8005
Applicability of Existing Materials

Testing Standards for Additive
Manufacturing Materials
John Slotwinski
Shawn Moylan
Intelligent Systems Division
Engineering Laboratory
This publication is available free of charge from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8005
June 2014
U.S. Department of Commerce

Penny Pritzker, Secretary
National Institute of Standards and Technology

Willie May, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Acting Director
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
APPLICABILITY ASSESSMENT
Mechanical Testing of Metal Parts 2
Metal Powder Testing 11
DISCUSSION AND NEXT STEPS 14
REFERENCES 14
ii
INTRODUCTION
This NIST Internal Report (NISTIR) is the third in a series of reports from the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) Engineering Laboratory’s project on Additive Manufacturing Materials.
This project provides the measurement science for the additive manufacturing (AM) industry to
measure material properties of additive manufacturing materials in a standardized way. Currently there
are no additive manufacturing-specific consensus-based standards in this area. This project, in
conjunction with the NIST Engineering Laboratory’s other additive manufacturing projects, will provide
the technical foundation and documentary standards development necessary to develop new
consensus-based standards for AM materials, AM processes, and AM part qualification. This will be done
via ASTM-International’s (hereafter referred to as ‘ASTM-I’) Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing
Technologies and the newly formed International Organization for Standardization (ISO) TC261
committee on Additive Manufacturing.
Determining the properties of the powder used for metal-based additive manufacturing, as well as the
properties of the resulting bulk metal material, is a necessary condition for AM users to be able to
confidently select powder and produce consistent parts with known and predictable properties.
Standardized methods for characterizing the properties of metal powders and metal parts already exist.
Summaries of these existing methods were published in NISTIR 7847 [1], for bulk metal materials
properties, and NISTIR 7873 [2], for metal powder properties. While many of these existing standards
are applicable for AM powders and parts, others are not, while still others are applicable with some
additional modifications or guidance to the existing standards. This report summarizes an assessment of
the applicability of the standards described in NISTIR 7847 and NISTIR 7873 for use on metal AM
powders and parts.
The applicability assessment presented here is based on our knowledge and experiences of the various
test methods, as well as our experiences and knowledge on the capabilities of metal powder-bed AM
systems. For each of the ASTM and ISO standards presented here, a qualitative judgment on the degree
of applicability of the standard for AM metal powders and parts is presented. This is shown in tabular
form in the next section. A description of each applicability classification is described at the beginning of
the table.
1
APPLICABILITY ASSESSMENT
In this chart, each standard is given one of the following classifications in determining if it is applicable for additive manufacturing. Some
standards have additional pertinent text in the NOTES column.
 YES – The standard should be applicable for additive manufacturing without any modifications.
 YES WITH GUIDANCE – The standard should be generally applicable for additive manufacturing, but there may be limits on its
applicability, or additional considerations. These include:
o Limits on some ranges of test specimens, especially thin sheets and wires that may not be easily realized via metals-based
commercial additive manufacturing systems; however some specimens can be readily built via AM.
o Required post-processing such that specimens built via additive manufacturing meet the requirements of the standard; this
typically includes surface finish or dimensional requirements.
o Material isotropy requirements. AM specimens usually have some inherent anisotropy. The measurement methods that specify
applicability for isotropic materials may still work, but the measured results may have larger uncertainties.
o Application specific considerations, such as elevated testing temperatures.
 NOT A TEST METHOD – These standards may have useful auxiliary information, such as terminology, but they are not by themselves a
test method.
 NO – The standard either requires specimens that certainly cannot be built via AM, or the measurement simply is not applicable.
This analysis does not address any measurement-specific safety issues, such as those that may be encountered while manipulating raw AM
powder, which may require additional modifications and/or considerations.
MECHANICAL TESTING OF METAL PARTS

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes
Designation AM Testing?
ASTM E0006 Terminology Relating to Not a test This is not a testing standard, it is a terminology document
Methods of Mechanical Testing method
ASTM A370 Standard Test Methods and Yes For steel, refers to several other testing standards for basics and adds additional
Definitions for Mechanical requirements/guidance, includes hardness, tension and impact testing
Testing of Steel Products
ASTM A1058 Standard Test Methods for Yes Same as ASTM A370 but in SI units
Mechanical Testing of Steel
Products—Metric
2

ASTM B557 Standard Test Methods for Yes ASTM B557 is for Al and Magnesium, ASTM E8 is the basic method
Tension Testing Wrought and
Cast Aluminum- and
Magnesium-Alloy Products
ASTM E8 Standard Test Methods for Yes with Basic method for tension testing at room temperature (10°C – 38°C, 50°F – 100°F). Not all
Tension Testing of Metallic Guidance specimen types can be made additively (e.g., wire and sheet). Includes requirements for
Materials powder metallurgy materials that should cover AM specimens.
ASTM E0021 Test Methods for Elevated Yes with Like ASTM E8 but at elevated temperatures (assume > 38°C/100°F). Yes with guidance
Temperature Tension Tests of Guidance that depends on application.
Metallic Materials
ASTM E0292 Test Methods for Conducting Yes with Similar to ASTM E8 but uses notched specimens. This test is done at elevated
Time-for-Rupture Notch Tension Guidance temperatures and with constant loads. Pre-test specimens need post-processing (after
Tests of Materials AM building) to achieve dimensional requirements.
ASTM E0740 Practice for Fracture Testing Yes with Similar to ASTM E8 but for plate with an existing flaw. Possible specimen thickness
with Surface-Crack Tension Guidance limitations for AM specimens.
Specimens
ASTM E1450 Test Method for Tension Testing Yes with Similar to ASTM E8 but done at cryogenic temperatures. May require possible
of Structural Alloys in Liquid Guidance application-specific guidance.
Helium
ISO 6892-1:2009 Metallic materials -- Tensile Yes with Basic ISO method similar to ASTM E8, includes additional test sample geometries (sheet,
testing -- Part 1: Method of test Guidance wire, etc.) that may not be appropriate for AM.
at room temperature
ISO 6892-2:2011 Metallic materials -- Tensile Yes with Similar to ISO 6892-1 and ASTM E8 but at elevated temperatures. Sheet and wire
testing -- Part 2: Method of test Guidance specimens may not be appropriate for AM.
at elevated temperature
ISO 15579:2000 Metallic materials -- Tensile Yes with Similar to ISO 6892-1 and ASTM E8 but at low temperatures (between 10°C and -196°C.)
testing at low temperature Guidance Sheet and wire specimens may not be appropriate for AM, also potentially application
specific.
ISO 19819:2004 Metallic materials -- Tensile Yes with Similar to ISO 6892-1 and ASTM E8 but at a very low temperature (-269°C or 4.2K, liquid
testing in liquid helium Guidance He temperature.) Also can be done at cryogenic temperatures (less that -196°C or 77K.)
Sheet and wire specimens may not be appropriate for AM, also potentially application
specific.
ISO 26203-1:2010 Metallic materials -- Tensile No Similar to ISO 6892-1 but for sheet materials such as those for car bodies, and at high
testing at high strain rates -- Part strain rates (> 102 s-1).These parts cannot currently be built on commercial AM systems
1: Elastic-bar-type systems due to their large size.
ISO 26203-2:2011 Metallic materials -- Tensile No Similar to ISO 6892-1 but for sheet materials such as those for car bodies, and at high
testing at high strain rates -- Part strain rates (10-2 s-1 to 103 s-1). These parts cannot currently be built on commercial AM
2: Servo-hydraulic and other test systems due to their large size.
systems
3

ASTM E9 Test Methods of Compression Yes with Basic test for axial-load compression testing of metals at room temperature. Not all of
Testing of Metallic Materials at Guidance the sample types (e.g., thin sheets) can be made additively.
Room Temperature
ASTM E0209 Practice for Compression Tests Yes with Similar to ASTM E9 but for specimens that are heated at a uniform temperature (up to
of Metallic Materials at Elevated Guidance and beyond 1000°F/538°C). Yes, depending on application.
Temperatures with Conventional
or Rapid Heating Rates and
Strain Rates
ASTM E0238 Test Method for Pin-Type Yes with Basic and only method for pin-type bearing. The surface finish requirements and some
Bearing Test of Metallic Guidance thickness requirements are problematic for some metal-based commercial AM systems.
Materials
ASTM E0111 Test Method for Young's Yes Limited to materials, temperatures, and stresses where creep is negligible. ASTM E8 and
Modulus, Tangent Modulus, and ASTM E9 are the basic tension and compression methods; this provides additional
Chord Modulus guidance (number of trials, specimens, temperature etc.) and defines the three moduli.
Provides guidance for both high and low temperatures.
ASTM E0143 Test Method for Shear Modulus Yes Basic method for shear modulus at room temperature only.
at Room Temperature
ASTM E1875 Test Method for Dynamic Yes with Instead of macro deformation, uses sonic resonance (which may be considered micro
Young's Modulus, Shear Guidance deformation.) This standard covers room, elevated, and very low temperatures in the
Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by range -195°C to 1200°C. Strict requirements for isotropic materials may be a problem for
Sonic Resonance some AM parts/processes.
ASTM E1876 Test Method for Dynamic Yes with Similar to ASTM E1875 but with an impulse instead of a body resonance. This might be
Young's Modulus, Shear Guidance considered micro-scale deformation. States that can be performed at non-room
Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by temperatures. Strict requirements for isotropic materials may be a problem for some AM
Impulse Excitation of Vibration parts/processes.
ASTM E0466 Practice for Conducting Force Yes with Basic method; fatigue testing of axial un-notched and notched specimens subjected to
Controlled Constant Amplitude Guidance constant amplitude periodic forcing function in air at room temp. Used to test effect of
Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic variations in material, geometry, surface condition, etc. Test is finished when it fails or a
Materials certain number of cycles are reached. Samples will require post-processing to achieve
recommended surface roughness and notch geometry.
ASTM E0467 Practice for Verification of Not a test A “method for testing the tests.” This is not a test method.
Constant Amplitude Dynamic method
Forces in an Axial Fatigue
Testing System
ASTM E0468 Practice for Presentation of Not a test Not a method, it’s about what to report.
Constant Amplitude Fatigue Test method
Results for Metallic Materials
ASTM E0606 Practice for Strain-Controlled Yes Similar to ISO 1099; strain-controlled instead of force-controlled fatigue. Uniqueness is
Fatigue Testing that it yields the determination of cyclic stresses and strains at any time during the tests.
4

ASTM E0647 Test Method for Measurement Yes with Determines fatigue crack growth rates from near-threshold to Kmax controlled instability.
of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates Guidance Possible anisotropy issues.
ASTM E1049 Practices for Cycle Counting in Not a test Not a test method but still potentially useful for fatigue analysis of AM specimens.
Fatigue Analysis method
ASTM E1823 Terminology Relating to Fatigue Not a test
and Fracture Testing method
ASTM E1942 Guide for Evaluating Data Not a test
Acquisition Systems Used in method
Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture
Mechanics Testing
ASTM E2368 Practice for Strain Controlled Yes with Uniform temperature and strain fields over the specimen are simultaneously varied and
Thermomechanical Fatigue Guidance independently controlled. AM samples would likely need post-processing.
Testing
ASTM E2714 Test Method for Creep-Fatigue Yes with Determines deformation and crack formation or nucleation as a consequence of
Testing Guidance constant-amplitude strain-controlled tests or constant-amplitude force-controlled tests
(ASTM E0606 and ASTM E0466, ISO 12106 and ISO 1099.) Typically done at elevated
temperatures and involves sequential or simultaneous application of loading conditions
necessary to generate cyclic deformation/damage enhanced by creep
deformation/damage or vice-versa. The difference with the basic method is the long hold
time.
ASTM E2760 Test Method for Creep-Fatigue Yes with ASTM E2760 is to ASTM E0647 as ASTM E2709 is to ASTM E0606 or ASTM E0466.
Crack Growth Testing Guidance Concerns fatigue cycling with long loading/unloading rates and/or hold times to cause
creep deformation at the crack tip and the creep deformation be responsible for
enhancing the crack growth per loading cycle.
ASTM E2789 Guide for Fretting Fatigue Yes ASTM E0466 is the basic method. Small amplitude motion, usually tangential, between
Testing two solid surfaces in contact.
ISO 1099:2006 Metallic materials -- Fatigue Yes with Samples are similar to ASTM E0466; stress vs. cycles to failure. Can be done at high
testing -- Axial force-controlled Guidance temperatures. Basic method. AM samples will require post-processing to achieve
method recommended surface roughness.
ISO 1143:2010 Metallic materials -- Rotating bar Yes with Circular cross-section samples, rotated and subjected to bending moment. Application
bending fatigue testing Guidance specific, post-processing may be required.
ISO 1352:2011 Metallic materials -- Torque- Yes Similar to ISO 1352 but for torque.
controlled fatigue testing
ISO 12106:2003 Metallic materials -- Fatigue Yes with Similar to ISO 1099 but for low-cycle fatigue tests. Imposed constant strain rate; test
testing -- Axial-strain-controlled Guidance starts by testing elastic region to measure modulus (checked vs nominal), test stops are
method failure. High and low temps mentioned. Samples will require post-processing to achieve
recommended surface roughness.
ISO 12108:2002 Metallic materials -- Fatigue Yes with Primarily intended for isotropic materials; variety of samples and tests.
testing -- Fatigue crack growth Guidance
5

method
ISO 12111:2011 Metallic materials -- Fatigue Yes with Similar to ISO 12106 but with the addition of temperature cycling. Samples will require
testing -- Strain-controlled Guidance post-processing to achieve recommended surface roughness.
thermomechanical fatigue
testing method
ASTM B645 Standard Practice for Linear- Yes with Fracture toughness is resistance to crack extension; Basic test method for plane-strain
Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Guidance fracture toughness of aluminum. Supplements E399 and B646. Samples will require post-
Toughness Testing of Aluminum processing to achieve recommended surface roughness and dimensional tolerances.
Alloys
ASTM B909 Standard Guide for Plane Strain Yes with ASTM E399 or ISO 12737 is basic method. ASTM B909 provides supplemental information
Fracture Toughness Testing of Guidance for plane-strain toughness testing of Al where complete stress relief is not possible.
Non-Stress Relieved Aluminum Additive manufacturing samples will require post-processing to achieve recommended
Products surface roughness and dimensional tolerances.
ASTM B646 Standard Practice for Fracture Not a Test Provides guidelines for test selection for fracture toughness properties of Al, particularly
Toughness Testing of Aluminum Method for quality assurance and material release purposes. Provides supplemental information
Alloys on specimen size, analysis, and interpretation of results, particularly for varying
thicknesses.
ASTM E0023 Test Methods for Notched Bar Yes with Notched-bar impact testing of metals by Charpy (simple-beam) and Izod (cantilever-
Impact Testing of Metallic Guidance beam) tests. Describes 4 differences between two tests (sample notches, holding
Materials mechanism, impact location, sample dimension). Additive manufacturing samples will
require post-processing to achieve recommended dimensional tolerances.
ASTM E0399 Test Method for Linear-Elastic Yes with Basic method. See also ISO 12737. For metals under linear-elastic, plane-strain
Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness Guidance conditions using fatigue pre-cracked specimens subjected to a slowly increasing crack-
KIc of Metallic Materials displacement force. May require post-process machining for notch.
ASTM E1221 Test Method for Determining Yes with Samples may require post-processing.
Plane-Strain Crack-Arrest Guidance
Fracture Toughness, KIa, of
Ferritic Steels
ASTM E1290 Test Method for Crack-Tip Yes with Determines critical crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) values, used to measure
Opening Displacement (CTOD) Guidance cleavage crack initiation toughness for materials that exhibit a change from ductile to
Fracture Toughness brittle behavior with decreasing temp. Notches may require post-processing (additional
Measurement machining).
ASTM E1304 Test Method for Plane-Strain Yes with Chevron-shaped-notch, notches may require post-processing (additional machining).
(Chevron-Notch) Fracture Guidance
Toughness of Metallic Materials
ASTM E1820 Test Method for Measurement Yes with This also appears to be the basic ASTM method for fracture toughness. Load a fatigue
of Fracture Toughness Guidance pre-cracked test specimen to induce either unstable crack extension and/or stable crack
extension. Need to measure force versus load-line displacement or crack mouth opening
6

displacement or both. ASTM E1921 recommended for testing ferric steels that undergo
cleavage fracture in the ductile-to-brittle transition. Notches may require post-processing
(additional machining).
ISO 148-1:2009 Metallic materials -- Charpy Yes with Break notched test piece with a single blow from a swinging pendulum. Mention of
pendulum impact test -- Part 1: Guidance heated or cooled tests in a liquid or gaseous medium. Notches may require post-
Test method processing (additional machining).
ISO 148-3:2008 Metallic materials -- Charpy Not a Test This is about sample prep.
pendulum impact test -- Part 3: Method.
Preparation and characterization
of Charpy V-notch test pieces for
indirect verification of pendulum
impact machines
ISO 12135:2002 Metallic materials -- Unified Yes with Fracture toughness (resistance to crack extension) in terms of stress intensity factor (K),
method of test for the Guidance crack-tip displacement (), loading parameter (J) and resistance curves for homogenous
determination of quasistatic metallic materials. Continually increasing force applied to sample by uniaxial tension or
fracture toughness 3-point bending. Notches may require post-processing (additional machining).
ISO 12737:2010 Metallic materials -- Yes with Similar to ASTM E399. Determines plane-strain fracture toughness (Klc) of homogeneous
Determination of plane-strain Guidance metallic materials using a specimen that is notched and pre-cracked by fatigue, and
fracture toughness slowly increasing crack displacement force. Notches may require post-processing
(additional machining).
ISO 14556:2000 Steel -- Charpy V-notch Yes with Similar to ISO 148 but for steels. Notches may require post-processing (additional
pendulum impact test -- Guidance machining).
Instrumented test method
ISO 22889:2007 Metallic materials -- Method of Yes with ISO 12135 is the basic method. ISO 22889 applies to samples that are very small (i.e.,
test for the determination of Guidance have size sensitivity). May require post-processing.
resistance to stable crack
extension using specimens of
low constraint
ISO 27306:2009 Metallic materials -- Method of Not a test Converts fracture toughness from lab specimens to equivalent toughness for structural
constraint loss correction of method components. This is not a test method; it is a description for how to use method.
CTOD fracture toughness for
fracture assessment of steel
components
ASTM E0740 Practice for Fracture Testing Yes with Covers design, prep, and testing of surface-crack specimens. Test is performed with
with Surface-Crack Tension Guidance continuously increasing force and excludes cyclic and sustained loadings. Determines
Specimens residual strength of a specimen with a semi-elliptical or circular-segment fatigue crack.
Requires post-processing to make initial pre-crack.
ASTM E1457 Test Method for Measurement Yes with Determines creep crack growth in metals at elevated temps using pre-cracked specimens
of Creep Crack Growth Times in Guidance subjected to static or quasi-static loading conditions. Requires post-processing to make
Metals initial pre-crack.
7

ASTM E1681 Test Method for Determining Yes with Appears to be basic method, requires environmental chamber. Requires post-processing
Threshold Stress Intensity Factor Guidance to make initial pre-crack since most metal-based AM cannot produce a test specimen
for Environment-Assisted with a small-enough crack.
Cracking of Metallic Materials
ASTM E2472 Test Method for Determination Yes with For low-constraint conditions (crack-length-to-thickness and un-cracked ligament-to-
of Resistance to Stable Crack Guidance thickness ratios are greater than or equal to 4) and that are tested under slowly
Extension under Low-Constraint increasing remote applied displacement. Requires post-processing to make initial pre-
Conditions crack.
ASTM B769 Standard Test Method for Shear Yes with Double-shear loading using a tension or compression testing machine. Requires post-
Testing of Aluminum Alloys Guidance processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
ASTM B565 Standard Test Method for Shear No Metal wire, rivets, and rods are difficult to make via additive manufacturing
Testing of Aluminum and
Aluminum-Alloy Rivets and Cold-
Heading Wire and Rods
ASTM E0010 Test Method for Brinell Yes with Basic method for Brinell; tests at temperatures outside of nominal (10°C to 35°C)
Hardness of Metallic Materials Guidance permitted. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
ASTM E0018 Test Methods for Rockwell Yes with Basic method for Rockwell; tests at temperatures outside of nominal (10°C to 35°C)
Hardness of Metallic Materials Guidance permitted. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
ASTM E0140 Hardness Conversion Tables for Not a test Tables that convert hardness values of one type of tests to other types.
Metals Relationship Among method.
Brinell Hardness, Vickers
Hardness, Rockwell Hardness,
Superficial Hardness, Knoop
Hardness, and Scleroscope
Hardness
ASTM E0384 Test Method for Knoop and Yes with Basic methods for Knoop and Vickers; tests at temperatures outside of nominal (10°C to
Vickers Hardness of Materials Guidance 35°C) permitted. Post-processing likely necessary for proper specimen surface roughness.
ASTM E0448 Practice for Scleroscope Yes with Dynamic indentation hardness (drop and bounce). This is the basic method. Requires
Hardness Testing of Metallic Guidance post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
Materials
ASTM B647 Standard Test Method for Yes with Webster gage for Al only. This is a portable handheld device useful for in-situ
Indentation Hardness of Guidance measurements; good for production/quality control purposes. Not as sensitive as
Aluminum Alloys by Means of a Rockwell or Brinell. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
Webster Hardness Gage
ASTM B648 Standard Test Method for Yes with Barcol gage for Al only. This is a portable handheld device useful for in-situ
Indentation Hardness of Guidance measurements; good for production/quality control purposes. Not as sensitive as
Aluminum Alloys by Means of a Rockwell or Brinell. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
Barcol Impressor
8

ASTM B724 Standard Test Method for Yes with Newage gage for Al only. Good for large pieces that can’t be measured with a caliper-
Indentation Hardness of Guidance type instrument. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
Aluminum Alloys by Means of a
Newage, Portable, Non-Caliper-
Type Instrument
ISO 4545-1:2005 Metallic materials -- Knoop Yes with Basic Knoop test like ASTM E0384. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface
hardness test -- Part 1: Test Guidance finish specification.
method
ISO 6506-1:2005 Metallic materials -- Brinell Yes with Basic Brinell test like ASTM E0010. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface
method
ISO 6507-1:2005 Metallic materials -- Vickers Yes with Basic Vickers test like ASTM E0384. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface
method
ISO 6508 Metallic materials -- Rockwell Yes with Basic Rockwell test like ASTM E0018. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface
method (scales A, B, C, D, E, F, G,
H, K, N, T)
ISO 14577 Metallic materials -- Yes with This test considers the force and displacement of the indentation during plastic and
Instrumented indentation test Guidance elastic deformation; monitoring the complete cycle of increasing and removal of test
for hardness and materials force. Requires post-processing in order to meet surface finish specification.
parameters -- Part 1: Test
method
ISO/TR Metallic materials -- Not a Test Can derive tensile properties from indentation measurements via one of three methods
29381:2008 Measurement of mechanical Method (representative stress-strain, inverse FEA methods, or neural networks). Not a test
properties by an instrumented method.
indentation test -- Indentation
tensile properties
ASTM E0132 Test Method for Poisson's Ratio Yes with Basic method, tension tests, requires extensometers; room temp only. Requires post-
at Room Temperature Guidance processing; specimens should be stress-relieved, isotropic and homogeneous.
ASTM E0290 Test Methods for Bend Testing Yes Bend testing for ductility of materials
of Material for Ductility
ASTM E0837 Test Method for Determining Yes with Isotropic and linearly-elastic materials only; drill hole at center of strain rosette, and
Residual Stresses by the Hole- Guidance measure strains. If AM materials are anisotropic then this method may not be applicable.
Drilling Strain-Gage Method
ASTM E0915 Test Method for Verifying the No This is not a materials test method, it is a method for verifying the alignment of an X-ray
Alignment of X-Ray Diffraction machine.
Instrumentation for Residual
Stress Measurement
9

ISO 7438:2005 Metallic materials -- Bend test Yes Like ASTM E0290.
ISO 11531:1994 Metallic materials -- Earing test No Metal AM systems cannot easily make samples with thicknesses of 100 m.
ISO/TR Metallic materials -- Strain Yes with The standard applies to sheet but the thickness requirements are not specified. AM
14936:1998 analysis report Guidance cannot make a very thin sheet.
ASTM E0003 Guide for Preparation of Not a test Not a mechanical test method, but important for micro-structural analysis.
Metallographic Specimens method
ASTM E0007 Terminology Relating to Not a test Terminology.
Metallography method
ASTM B348 Standard Specification for Not a test Not a mechanical test method, but does contain useful specs for various materials that
Titanium and Titanium Alloy method could be compared to those that are made additively.
Bars and Billets
ASTM B211 Standard Specification for Not a test Not a mechanical test method, but does contain useful specs for various materials that
Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy method could be compared to those that are made additively.
Bar, Rod, and Wire
10
METAL POWDER TESTING

Designation AM?
ASTM B212 Standard Test Method for Yes
Apparent Density of Free-
Flowing Metal Powders Using
the Hall Flowmeter Funnel
ASTM B213 Standard Test Methods for Flow Yes
Rate of Metal Powders Using the
Hall Flowmeter Funnel
ASTM B214 Standard Test Method for Sieve Yes with Applicable for sieves with openings from 45 m to 1000 m. Not suitable for powders
Analysis of Metal Powders Guidance smaller than 45 m.
ASTM B215 Standard Practices for Sampling Yes
Metal Powders
ASTM B243 Standard Terminology of Not a test Terminology, not a test method.
Powder Metallurgy method
Apparent Density of Metal
Powders and Compounds Using
the Scott Volumeter
ASTM B417 Standard Test Method for No AM powders are typically free flowing, in fact they flow exceptionally well.
Apparent Density of Non-Free-
Flowing Metal Powders Using
the Carney Funnel
Determination of Tap Density of
Metallic Powders and
Compounds
Apparent Density of Metal
Powders and Related
Compounds Using the Arnold
Meter
ASTM B761 Standard Test Method for Yes with Test method works best “for the analysis of elemental tungsten, tungsten carbide,
Particle Size Distribution of Guidance molybdenum, and tantalum. Other metal powders may be analyzed using this method
Metal Powders and Related with caution as to significance until actual satisfactory experience is developed.” It
Compounds by X-Ray appears that this only works for particles with sizes > 25 m (and minimum size depends
Monitoring of Gravity on species).
Sedimentation
11

Designation AM?
Particle Size Distribution of
Metal Powders and Related
Compounds by Light Scattering
Volumetric Flow Rate of Metal
Powders Using the Arnold Meter
and Hall Flowmeter Funnel
ASTM B923 Standard Test Method for Metal Yes
Powder Skeletal Density by
Helium or Nitrogen Pycnometry
ASTM B964 Standard Test Methods for Flow Yes
Rate of Metal Powders Using the
Carney Funnel
ASTM C177 Standard Test Method for Yes with Method uses solid specimens, applicability to powder specimens is uncertain.
Steady-State Heat Flux Guidance
Measurements and Thermal
Transmission Properties by
Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate
Apparatus
ASTM E161 Standard Specification for Not a Test This standard presents the specifications for precision electroformed sieves, and is not a
Precision Electroformed Sieves Method test method.
ASTM E1409 Standard Test Method for No This method will likely not work with metal powders since as part of the method the
Determination of Oxygen and surface of the material must first be removed, either chemically or mechanically. Given
Nitrogen in Titanium and the small diameters of AM powders, this is very impractical, and may completely
Titanium Alloys by the Inert Gas consume the powder under test.
Fusion Technique
ASTM E1447 Standard Test Method for No This method requires solid form specimens.
Determination of Hydrogen in
Titanium and Titanium Alloys by
Inert Gas Fusion Thermal
Conductivity - Infrared Detection
Method
ASTM E1461 Standard Test Method for No This method requires homogeneous isotropic solid disc specimens.
Thermal Diffusivity by the Flash
Method
ASTM E1569 Standard Test Method for No This method is only for tantalum powders.
Determination of Oxygen in
Tantalum Powder by Inert Gas
Fusion Technique
12

Designation AM?
ASTM E2792 Standard Test Method for No This method does not seem to be applicable to powder samples.
Determination of Hydrogen in
Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys
by Inert Gas Fusion
13
DISCUSSION AND NEXT STEPS

The analysis in this report shows that AM-specific materials standards for characterizing the properties
of metal powders and metal parts do not have to be developed from scratch. Decades of powder
property testing (born out of powder metallurgy processes) and mechanical property testing has
resulted in a suite of existing standards that can form the basis for AM-specific materials standards. This
report shows that while some of these existing standards are not appropriate for AM materials, many
are, either in the current form or with some additional guidance or enhancements to adequately
account for the characteristics of AM materials. Standards development organizations such as ASTM-I
F42 can now use this information in the development of new AM-specific materials standards, especially
new standards that are largely based on the existing standards contained in this report.
REFERENCES
[1] Slotwinski, J.A., Cooke, A.L., Moylan, S.P., “Mechanical Properties Testing for Metal Parts Made via Additive
Manufacturing: A Review of the State of the Art of Mechanical Property Testing,” NISTIR 7847, March, 2012.
[2] Cooke, A.L., Slotwinski, J.A., “Properties of Metal Powders for Additive Manufacturing: A Review of the State of
the Art of Metal Powder Property Testing,” NIST IR 7873, July, 2012
14

Nist Ir 8005 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nist Ir 8005 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nist Ir 8005 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This publication is available free of charge from http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.

Applicability of Existing Materials

Applicability of Existing Materials

This publication is available free of charge from:

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

DISCUSSION AND NEXT STEPS 14

MECHANICAL TESTING OF METAL PARTS

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

METAL POWDER TESTING

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

Standard Standard Name Applicable for Notes

DISCUSSION AND NEXT STEPS

You might also like