Commodity Trading Goes Back To The Future
Commodity Trading Goes Back To The Future
Commodity Trading Goes Back To The Future
Black and grey swan events will continue to result in intermittent spikes in volatility.
But these will only provide temporary relief from the relentless erosion in trading margins
that started in 2014. In fact, we estimate margins could likely decline by at least another
15 percent over the next five years as commodity markets become more stable and more
transparent and competition becomes more intense. (See Exhibit 1.)
This cutthroat environment will weed out the players that continue to follow the tactics
of the past from those pioneering new trading strategies by investing in advanced
predictive analytics to develop proprietary digital intelligence. As the amount of new
digital data available continues to soar, the top players will return to their roots and rely
more on developing information advantages from which they can increase their profits.
The traders who develop the operating model to support these analytics will succeed
and grow, while smaller players that can’t afford to invest in new digital capabilities will be
forced to retrench.
70 70%
67% CHANGES
2017/2018
60 60%
55 57 Top 10 share 57% Others1
50 50%
44 44 44 Softs
40 39 41 >1/3 40%
38 38
35 36 35
Metals and mining (inc. coal)
30 <30 30%
0 0% Total
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 2025F
1. Others include Asia power and gas, emission, exotics, and investor products
Source: Oliver Wyman proprietary data and analysis
This trading margin meltdown will continue as commodity markets become more mature,
stable, and liquid. Over the past decade, the volume of commodity contracts traded
nearly tripled and the value of contracts traded on standard electronic platforms doubled.
Commodity market data is also increasingly readily available and widely socialized, as a
greater number of players sell information and provide services to commodity traders.
These new sources of data allow commodity traders to estimate much more precisely
events that impact their trading strategies, such as when commodities will arrive at a specific
destination and when local stockpiles will be high or low.
The combination of increased transparency and gluts in almost every commodity should
keep volatility in the relatively tight band it has been confined to since 2012. (See Exhibit 2.)
20% +/-5%
M&M Product
10%
0% Ave Product
31/12/07
31/12/08
31/12/09
31/12/10
31/12/11
31/12/12
31/12/13
31/12/14
31/12/16
31/12/17
31/12/18
1. Average includes Brent, WTI, ICE Gasoil, EU Power, NYMEX HH, ICE NBP, CBOT Wheat, CBOT soybeans, ICE Cotton, LME Cu, LME Ni, LME Al, COMEX Au, NYMEX Pt,
NYMEX Pd. Average rolling 30 day volatility, 60 rolling average. Prices relative to 31/12/2007
Source: Reuters, Oliver Wyman analysis
So traders are forced to do more and more to gain an edge by further increasing their
scale. Top players are snapping up multi-billion-dollar commodity assets to protect their
positions by bulking up their massive trading portfolios. Medium-sized traders are shutting
down non-core businesses. Many small traders are pulling out of the commodity trading
business entirely.
Now, commodity traders are going back to the future. Instead of relying on extensive
traditional information networks to gain advantages from proprietary data, traders who
are large enough to invest in the sophisticated systems and dedicated teams required
to compete are focusing on how to use predictive analytics to draw valuable proprietary
insights from common data sources. (See Exhibit 3.)
Overall differentiation
potential from market
3 intelligence
2 Power of analytical
capabilities
Time
1980 Today 2020+
1 2 3 4
Mass socialization of data Currently at the cusp Ballooning impact from Residual advantage in
over the last 10–15 years of a return of the power the power of analytical niches where still possible
erodes the possibility or of proprietary market capabilities to create to have raw data analysis
proprietary advantage intelligence proprietary analytics
As commodity markets become more liquid and accessible, commodity traders are relying
more and more on algorithmic trading, coupling predictive analytics with robotic trade
execution. Traders are improving their ability to hedge and speculate by developing
codes that more nimbly identify trades and execute them across a broader set of
tradable instruments.
But this new digital approach to developing proprietary intelligence requires completely
revamping traders’ operating models. Commodity traders need to be willing and able to
experiment in order to be players in the new world of predictive analytics that is evolving.
At a time when trading margins are razor thin, top traders often need to invest millions of
dollars in multiple, large pilot programs to discover two or three viable new trading strategies.
It is often unclear if anticipated relationships between data feeds and commodity prices
actually exist, and even if they do it is not certain the volume of data is sufficient to make
meaningful predictions. For example, it is incredibly difficult to analyze global satellite imagery
to identify precisely the daily flow of commodities given the frequency at which images are
being taken. Depending on the specific market, these signals are often also relatively limited
compared to just market sentiment when forecasting in the horizon of interest.
More broadly, commodity traders need to embrace new ways of working. Developing
top notch predictive analytics often requires setting up data science teams in a way that
means they can operate differently from traditional commodity trading organizations, while
remaining deeply linked. So commodity traders are establishing incubators, entering joint
ventures, and striking partnerships with consultancies and universities. In some cases, they
are even pioneering ways that they can monetize proprietary intelligence outside of their own
trading and sales activities.
Simultaneously, existing teams of traders, quantitative analysts, and developers must work
more nimbly to make the most of short-lived information advantages. Until now, traders
and quantitative analysts have identified key metrics for trading strategies and then asked
developers to provide them with forecasting tools over a period of weeks or months.
Moving forward, rather than spending weeks on transforming spreadsheets into code,
quants and data scientists must concurrently work in code and draw from shared data lakes to
transform valuable insights into pilots and proofs of concepts for trading strategies. To predict
market behavior, they must use predictive analytics techniques ranging from single factor
analyses to more complex techniques such as convolutional neural. And quantitative analysts
need to become more familiar with data science techniques, tools, and ways of working.
The challenge is that dedicated data scientists are universally in high demand. Generally,
these digital data problem solvers prefer to work for prestigious tech giants and high paying
hedge funds rather than commodity traders. So commodity traders need to recalibrate their
recruiting strategies to attract data scientists primarily by interesting them in pioneering
digital solutions for seemingly impossible complex problems. After that, commodity traders
need to make sure there is a steady flow of such challenges to retain their interest.
Commodity traders must also revamp their organizations so that the expertise of their data
scientists can be spread broadly. For example, commodity traders should set up core teams
of purely data scientists in data labs to tackle their toughest challenges and empower them
to bring in external talent to supplement when necessary. However, this team will not be as
commercially driven as traders and analysts. As a result, in order to transform theoretical
solutions into the practical profits, traders also need a deep “bench” of quants with
commodity trading expertise who are fluent in the language and application of data science
to partner with and be guided by a core team of data scientists.
Members of the core team of data scientists will also have to be moved through different
parts of the organization so that they can interact with the larger group of existing top
quantitative analysts and traders. They can then mentor others who are just starting out
on what will eventually become a broader shift for the industry from developing analyses
in spreadsheets to working them out in code. Once this happens, analysts with coding
capabilities will be able to abstract and reuse solutions to improve traders’ strategies across
the board or even move themselves into the front office, trading on the back of their models.
PROPRIETARY INTELLIGENCE • Leverage scale of flows and possibility • Figure out where core competitive advantage
to invest by developing predictive analytics enables proprietary data or understanding
ECONOMIES OF SCALE • Continue the quest for scale • Reduce non-core activities (sacrificing marginal
P&L to enable improved margin)
• Creation of digital operating model to monetize
predictive analytics as best as possible • Pursuit of cost savings through digitization –
block chain across companies and robotic
• Creation of fit for purpose digital talent model process automation of internal processes
That means midsize players must shed noncore businesses, strike alliances to gain access to
larger portfolios, and automate back office functions. By relying more on robots to conduct
basic tasks such as reconciling data and blockchain to manage intercompany paperwork
exchanges, some commodity traders have lowered their costs by as much as 30 percent.
But it’s clear from the past several years that, like other industries, commodity traders cannot
simply cost cut their way to success.
AMERICAS
+1 212 541 8100
EMEA
+44 20 7333 8333
ASIA PACIFIC
+65 6510 9700
AUTHORS
www.oliverwyman.com
Copyright © 2019 Oliver Wyman
All rights reserved. This report may not be reproduced or redistributed, in whole or in part, without the written permission of Oliver Wyman
and Oliver Wyman accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Oliver Wyman. This report is not investment advice and should not be relied
on for such advice or as a substitute for consultation with professional accountants, tax, legal or financial advisors. Oliver Wyman has made
every effort to use reliable, up-to-date and comprehensive information and analysis, but all information is provided without warranty of any
kind, express or implied. Oliver Wyman disclaims any responsibility to update the information or conclusions in this report. Oliver Wyman
accepts no liability for any loss arising from any action taken or refrained from as a result of information contained in this report or any
reports or sources of information referred to herein, or for any consequential, special or similar damages even if advised of the possibility
of such damages. The report is not an offer to buy or sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. This report may
not be sold without the written consent of Oliver Wyman.