Surgical Pathology of Head & Neck - 1
Surgical Pathology of Head & Neck - 1
Surgical Pathology of Head & Neck - 1
Surgical
Pathology
of the
Head and Neck
Third Edition
EDITED BY LEON BAR NES
Surgical
Pathology
of the
Head and Neck
Volu m e 1
Surgical
Pathology
of the
Head and Neck
Third Edition
EDITED BY
LEON BARNES
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Presbyterian-University Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Printed in India by Replika Press Pvt. Ltd.
Preface to Third Edition
Seven years have elapsed since the second edition of Surgical Pathology of the Head
and Neck was published. During this interval there has been an enormous amount
of new information that impacts on the daily practice of surgical pathology.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the area of molecular biology and genetics.
Data derived from this new discipline, once considered to be of research interest
only, have revolutionized the evaluation of hematolymphoid neoplasms and are
now being applied, to a lesser extent, to the assessment of mesenchymal and
epithelial tumors. While immunohistochemistry has been available for almost
30 years, it has not remained static. New antibodies are constantly being
developed that expand our diagnostic and prognostic capabilities.
Although these new technologies are exciting, they only supplement and do
not replace the ‘‘H&E slide,’’ which is, and will continue to be, the foundation of
surgical pathology and this book particularly. This edition has been revised to
incorporate some of these new technologies that further our understanding of the
pathobiology of disease and improve our diagnostic acumen, while at the same
time retaining clinical and pathological features that are not new but remain
useful and important.
Due to constraints of time and the expanse of new knowledge, it is almost
impossible for a single individual to produce a book that adequately covers the
pathology of the head and neck. I have been fortunate, however, to secure the aid
of several new outstanding collaborators to assist in this endeavor and wish to
extend to them my sincere thanks and appreciation for lending their time and
expertise. In addition to new contributors, the illustrations have also been
changed from black and white to color to enhance clarity and emphasize
important features.
This edition has also witnessed changes in the publishing industry. The two
previous editions were published by Marcel Dekker, Inc., which was subse-
quently acquired by Informa Healthcare, the current publisher. At Informa
Healthcare, I have had the pleasure of working with many talented individuals,
including Geoffrey Greenwood, Sandra Beberman, Alyssa Fried, Vanessa San-
chez, Mary Araneo, Daniel Falatko, and Joseph Stubenrauch. I am especially
indebted to them for their guidance and patience.
I also wish to acknowledge the contributions of my secretary, Mrs. Donna
Bowen, and my summer student, Ms. Shayna Cornell, for secretarial support and
Ms. Linda Shab and Mr. Thomas Bauer for my illustrations. Lastly, this book
would not have been possible without the continued unwavering support of my
family, Carol, Christy, and Lori, who have endured yet another edition!
Leon Barnes
Contents
Volume 1
1. Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Tarik M. Elsheikh, Harsharan K. Singh, Reda S. Saad, and Jan F. Silverman
Volume 2
11. Midfacial Destructive Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 649
Leon Barnes
12. Tumors of the Nervous System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 669
Beverly Y. Wang, David Zagzag, and Daisuke Nonaka
13. Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of the Soft Tissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773
Julie C. Fanburg-Smith, Jerzy Lasota, Aaron Auerbach, Robert D. Foss,
William B. Laskin, and Mark D. Murphey
Volume 3
19. Odontogenic Tumors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1201
Finn Prætorius
20. Maldevelopmental, Inflammatory, and Neoplastic
Pathology in Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1339
Louis P. Dehner and Samir K. El-Mofty
21. Pathology of the Thyroid Gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1385
Lori A. Erickson and Ricardo V. Lloyd
Index . . . . I-1
Contributors
John Wallace Eveson Department of Oral and Dental Science, Bristol Dental
Hospital and School, Bristol, U.K.
Tarik M. Elsheikh
PA Labs, Ball Memorial Hospital, Muncie, Indiana, U.S.A.
Harsharan K. Singh
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Reda S. Saad
Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jan F. Silverman
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, and
Drexel University College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Table 1 Thyroid Diagnostic Categories, as proposed by PSC As many as one-third of the cases initially diagnosed
and NCI State of the Science Conference as ‘‘adequate and benign’’ were thought to be ‘‘non-
diagnostic’’ on second review by other pathologists
Category Thyroid diagnosis (9). Currently, there are no standardized criteria for
1 Benign, nonneoplastic judging aspirate sufficiency or cellularity. The most
2 Follicular lesion of undetermined commonly cited adequacy criteria in the published
significance literature are the presence of 5 to 6 groups of well
3 Follicular neoplasm/Hurthle cell preserved follicular cells with 10 or more cells per
neoplasm
4 Suspicious for malignancy
group (10); 10 or more clusters of follicular cells with
5 Malignant more than 20 cells per cluster (11); 6 groups of
6 Unsatisfactory follicular cells on at least 2 of 6 passes (12); and 8 to
10 clusters of follicular cells on each of two slides (13).
Abbreviations: NCI, National Cancer Institute; PSC, Papanicolaou
Society of Cytopathology With the application of these criteria, approximately
Source: Modified from Refs. 6, 7. 10% to 20% of thyroid aspirates fall in the nondiag-
nostic category. Repeat FNA, especially under US
guidance, will result in an adequate specimen in
‘‘follicular lesions.’’ The rendered cytologic diagnosis about half of these cases (14). Despite repeat FNAs,
should be specific enough to help the clinician appro- however, 5% to 10% of patients will continue to have
priately manage the thyroid condition. Increased com- persistently nondiagnostic FNAs. Studies evaluating
munication between the clinician and the pathologist, this subset of patients, with persistent nondiagnostic
and standardization of terminology within the pathol- FNAs, have found an incidence of 2% to 37% of
ogy department will greatly improve patient care. malignancy (14–16). Therefore, repeatedly nondiag-
Although the utilization of diagnostic categories is nostic FNAs should be surgically excised (1).
encouraged, they should not be used alone. These The main purpose of establishing the adequacy
diagnostic categories need to be qualified with a criteria is to minimize the number of false-negative
specific diagnosis when possible, or with a differential diagnoses. In our view, at least two passes are needed,
diagnosis, in order to give the clinician the clearest as a single pass may not be representative. In our
idea possible of the likely risk of malignancy, i.e., a practice, we obtain at least three to four passes from
diagnosis of follicular lesion alone is not encouraged, each nodule to insure sampling of different areas.
but rather should be further qualified as hyperplastic Exceptions include cystic lesions that collapse
nodule versus follicular neoplasm (FN) (8). completely following aspiration (1). We employ a
combined Kini-Hamburger criterion in our practice—
Diagnostic Accuracy at least six to eight groups of well-preserved follicular
Sensitivity of thyroid FNA ranges from 65% to 98%, cells (10 or more cells per group) on at least each of two
and specificity ranges from 72% to 100%. The false- slides, preferably from two separate passes. We do not,
positive rate varies from 0% to 7%, but is usually however, restrict ourselves to these numbers when
reported as below 1% if unsatisfactory, suspicious, aspirates are predominately cystic or contain abundant
and indeterminate diagnoses are excluded (3). The colloid, as the presence of few benign follicular cells
majority of false-positive diagnoses are due to overin- (3–4 groups) is sufficient to issue a diagnosis of benign/
terpretation of repair, hyperplastic papillae, and reac- colloid nodule in these situations. However, in cystic
tive nuclear changes as features of papillary carcinoma change alone, i.e., macrophages without follicular cells,
(3). False-negative rates range from 1% to 11%, and are we generate a nondiagnostic interpretation, as up to
predominately due to unsatisfactory/nondiagnostic 20% of cystic papillary carcinomas show only cystic
specimens, sampling error, misinterpretation, and change. Although abundant colloid alone represents a
cystic neoplasms (especially cystic papillary thyroid cytologically unsatisfactory specimen, we usually add a
carcinoma) (5,8). qualifier that colloid nodule is suggested if clinically
benign, and recommend repeat US-FNA in six months.
Adequacy Criteria Using our criteria, follow-up thyroidectomy showed a
12% cancer rate in nondiagnostic specimens (17). This
The goal of FNA is to provide a specimen from which rate, however, may be slightly overestimated because
the pathologist can render an accurate and meaningful of a selection bias, reflected by the fact that patients
interpretation, which the clinicians can then use in with clinically suspicious lesions are more likely to be
their management of the patient. This implies a speci- referred for surgical excision. Individual centers should
men with sufficient cellularity to yield a specific monitor their own diagnostic accuracy for guidance to
diagnosis that falls within one of the major diagnostic their clinicians, and make it unambiguous when the
categories listed above (Table 1), i.e., benign/nonneo- specimen is unsatisfactory. Nondiagnostic FNAs
plastic, FN, malignancy. A diagnosis of ‘‘rare or few should neither be considered benign nor be interpreted
benign follicular cells’’ without qualification is, in our as ‘‘negative for malignancy.’’ Repeat FNA is encour-
opinion, not considered an appropriate interpretation. aged, or excision may be indicated, especially in per-
An adequate sample should be representative of the sistently nondiagnostic cases and high-risk patients
lesion (appropriate cellularity) and technically well (14). A specimen should not be interpreted as ‘‘unsat-
prepared, i.e., good fixation, thin smear, adequate isfactory’’ in the presence of any degree of significant
staining. Unfortunately, judging specimen adequacy cytologic atypia, and should warrant an interpretation
tends to be subjective and differs among pathologists. of ‘‘atypical’’ or ‘‘suspicious’’.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 3
C. Follicular Lesions
Follicular lesions of the thyroid represent the most
Figure 8 Colloid nodule. The follicular cells are arranged in problematic area in thyroid FNA cytology. The major
large balls (microtissue fragments), but show no significant entities included in the differential diagnosis comprise
overlapping or atypia (Papanicolaou stain; magnification, 200). hyperplastic/adenomatoid nodule, FN (adenoma and
carcinoma), and follicular variant of PTC (Table 3).
Below is a discussion of the differential diagnosis of
follicular lesions, cytologic criteria, terminology com-
is needed for a definitive diagnosis. Specimens are monly used as well as terminology recently suggested
often cellular, containing numerous follicular cells by the PSC and NCI thyroid FNA state of the science
and thin colloid. Oncocytes and lymphocytes may be conference, and the clinical implications of various
found in the background (3). The follicular cells are diagnoses rendered (6,7). In general, smears contain-
commonly arranged in flat sheets and have foamy ing abundant colloid are more likely to be benign,
delicate cytoplasm with distinctive flame cells. Flame whereas markedly cellular aspirates are more likely to
cells are best appreciated on DQ stain and represent be neoplastic.
marginal cytoplasmic vacuoles with red to pink frayed
edges (Fig. 9) (31). Flame cells, however, are not specific
Table 3 Differential Diagnosis of Thyroid Follicular Lesions
to Graves’ disease as they may be encountered in other
nonneoplastic thyroid conditions, FN, and papillary Hyperplastic/adenomatoid nodule
carcinoma. Occasionally, treated Graves’ disease Follicular Neoplasm
shows prominent microfollicular architecture, signifi- Follicular adenoma
cant nuclear overlapping and crowding, and consider- Follicular carcinoma
Follicular variant of papillary carcinoma
able atypia. Therefore, care must be taken to not
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 7
Hyperplastic/Adenomatoid Nodule
Hyperplastic/adenomatoid nodule is characterized by
the presence of abundant colloid and variable number
of follicular cells. Often there is evidence of oncocytic
metaplasia and degenerative changes including mac-
rophages and old blood. Hyperplastic nodule is con-
sidered in the differential diagnosis of FN when
aspirates are cellular and contain scant colloid. Similar
to colloid nodules, the follicular cells are arranged
mainly in flat sheets with a honeycomb configuration
(Fig. 7). A few microfollicular structures can be seen.
Occasionally, balls and microtissue fragments are
present (Fig. 8), especially when larger gauge needles
are used. The nuclei are uniform in appearance and
approximate the size of RBCs. They show finely
granular chromatin with rare small nucleoli (Fig. 1).
There is minimal nuclear overlapping and crowding.
Figure 10 Follicular neoplasm showing prominent microfollicu-
FN (Adenoma and Carcinoma) lar architecture (DQ stain; magnification, 200).
Figure 14 Oncocytic (Hurthle cell) neoplasm showing sheets of Figure 15 Papillary carcinoma, classic type. Tightly cohesive
oncocytic cells and minimal to absent colloid (DQ stain; magnifi- clusters with papillary architecture are seen (Papanicolaou stain;
cation, 200). magnification, 400).
Anaplastic Carcinoma
Anaplastic carcinoma is the most aggressive of all
primary thyroid cancers and is usually unresectable
or present with metastatic disease. Therefore, an accu-
rate FNA diagnosis may spare the patient unnecessary
surgery, in favor of radiation therapy (3). Cytological-
ly, anaplastic carcinoma presents as isolated cells and
loose groups. The malignant cells show extreme
nuclear pleomorphism and atypia, and may have a
spindle, giant cell, or small cell appearance (Fig. 28).
Occasional multinucleated forms are seen. Typically,
Figure 27 Medullary carcinoma with a predominant oncocytic the nuclei have coarsely irregular chromatin and
appearance. Notice scattered intranuclear inclusions (DQ stain; prominent macronucleoli. Differential diagnosis
magnification, 600).
includes poorly differentiated components of papil-
lary, follicular, and medullary carcinoma. Anaplastic
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 15
Table 7 Thyroid Tumors with Clear Cell Features and neck, breast and liver, as well as germ cell tumors,
may show prominent clear cell features and should be
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Follicular adenoma
considered in the differential diagnosis.
Follicular carcinoma
Papillary carcinoma, i.e., columnar cell variant H. Metastatic Malignancies to the Thyroid
Medullary carcinoma
Paraganglioma The thyroid gland is a rare site for involvement by
Parathyroid adenoma metastatic malignancy, with a reported incidence of
Histiocytes and cyst lining cells 1.3 to 25 % (68). Metastasis to the thyroid can present
Salivary gland type cancers, i.e., mucoepidermoid carcinoma
as multiple small nodules, or as a solitary tumor mass
Other metastatic cancers, i.e., lung, head and neck, breast, liver,
germ cell tumor
mimicking a primary neoplasm (Table 8) (69). In some
cases, metastasis to the thyroid can become manifest
long after the detection of primary cancer; this scenar-
sheets with moderate to abundant finely vacuolated/ io is especially encountered with RCC (68). Breast and
clear cytoplasm and frayed cytoplasmic borders lung cancers are the most common primary tumors
(Fig. 32). Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios may range seen in autopsy studies, while the kidney is the most
from low to high, and nucleoli may or may not be common site reported in surgical series (70). Melano-
prominent. Occasionally, vascularized epithelial frag- ma and colon cancers not infrequently metastasize to
ments are seen. FN (adenoma or carcinoma) may show the thyroid (Fig. 33). The thyroid may also be involved
clear cell features; however, these changes are usually by direct extension from carcinomas of the upper
focal, and there is often an associated prominent micro- aerodigestive tract, such as squamous carcinoma
follicular architecture and/or syncytial arrangement, and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Metastasis
and pronounced nuclear overlap and crowding. should be suspected when the microscopic features
Columnar cell variant of PTC shows clear cytoplasm, appear alien to those neoplasms more commonly
but architecturally resembles colonic carcinoma, i.e., encountered in the thyroid such as PTC, FN, and
pseudostratification and elongated cells with hyper- medullary carcinoma. Michelow and Leiman reported
chromatic nuclei (63). Primary mucoepidermoid carci-
noma (MEC) is rarely reported in the thyroid, but
shows focal clear cell change and cytologic features Table 8 Malignancies Metastatic to the Thyroid Gland
similar to those described in the salivary glands, Kidney
including an admixture of metaplastic type squamous Lung
cells, mucin producing cells and intermediate cells (67). Breast
Clustering of histiocytes and cyst lining cells may at Colon
times raise the possibility of neoplasia (Figs. 29 and 30); Melanoma
however, these aspirates are of scant cellularity and Direct extension from upper aerodigestive tract, i.e., squamous
show spindling and degenerative changes. Finally, carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC)
other metastatic cancers from such sites as lung, head
Figure 32 Metastatic renal cell carcinoma. FNA shows clusters Figure 33 Metastatic colon adenocarcinoma. There are cohe-
and single cells with abundant finely vacuolated cytoplasm and sive clusters of elongated cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and
frayed cytoplasmic borders. There is mild nuclear atypia (DQ palisading. Dirty necrosis was present elsewhere on the smears
stain; magnification, 400). (Papanicolaou stain; magnification, 600).
18 Elsheikh et al.
21 cases of metastases to the thyroid gland in which Table 10 Assessment of Probability of Cancer Risk on Follow-
only five patients had a known history of malignancy up Thyroidectomies
(71). Metastatic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney is
FNA diagnosis Cancer rate Cancer risk(a)
especially difficult to distinguish from primary
thyroid carcinoma with clear cell features (72). Immu- Benign nonneoplastic 3% —
nohistochemistry, including demonstration of thyro- Follicular lesion of undetermined 14% 5X
globulin and TTF-1 staining can help in establishing significance
Follicular neoplasm 33% 11 X
the diagnosis of a primary tumor. Granular RCC can Suspicious for malignancy 56% 20 X
cytologically mimic oncocytic neoplasm; while plas- Malignant 100%
macytoma associated with amyloid may be misinter- Nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory 12%
preted as medullary carcinoma (73). Again, the a
Cancer risk is compared with benign nonneoplastic diagnosis.
utilization of immunohistochemical stains such as Source: Modified from Ref. 17.
calcitonin, chromogranin, kappa, lambda, cytokeratin,
and TTF-1 may be helpful in separating medullary
carcinoma from plasmacytoma; while renal cell Table 11 Thyroid FNA Diagnoses and Suggested Manage-
antigen, TTF-1 and thyroglobulin are helpful in the ment Options
work-up of RCC. Recognition of metastatic malignancy FNA diagnosis Management options
can prevent unnecessary thyroidectomy, and appro-
priately direct the search for an unsuspected primary Benign/nonneoplastic
malignancy. Asymptomatic, <4 cm Repeat US in 6 mo
Symptomatic or >4 cm Consider lobectomy
Cyst, >2 recurrences Consider lobectomy
I. Ancillary Studies Follicular lesion of Repeat US in 6 mo or repeat
undetermined significance FNA, if <4 cm. Consider
Ancillary studies, especially immunohistochemistry, lobectomy if larger.
may prove valuable in the differential diagnosis of Follicular neoplasm Lobectomy
thyroid tumors, provided a cell block, thinly prepared Suspicious for malignancy Lobectomy or total
smear, cytospins, liquid-based preparation, or tissue thyroidectomy
Malignant Total thyroidectomy
biopsy is available for evaluation (Table 9) (74). Only a
Nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory Repeat FNA under US
few studies describing the utilization of molecular guidance
tests on thyroid FNA specimens have been reported. Multiple nondiagnostic Consider lobectomy
RET/PTC rearrangements and BRAF mutations have samples
been reported to be useful as ancillary tests to cytolo-
Abbreviations: FNA, fine needle aspiration; US, ultrasonography;
gy in selected cases, where they helped confirm the Source: Modified from Ogilvie Ref. 2
diagnosis of malignancy (75). However, we believe
that currently, the diagnosis of malignancy should be
established on the basis of cytomorphologic features.
criteria, diagnoses of FN and ‘‘FLUS’’ show cancer on
histologic follow-up in 30% and 10% of cases, respec-
J. Clinical Implications of an FNA Diagnosis tively. Cancer is found in 20% or less of these cases
when using lax criteria and/or when FN is combined
The majority (70–80%) of FNAs classified as FN are with other indeterminate diagnoses. It is important,
neoplastic on histologic follow-up. Using strict cytologic therefore, to designate FN as a diagnostic category
that is distinct from ‘‘cellular hyperplastic nodule’’ or
other indeterminate follicular lesions, in our opinion.
Table 9 Selective Immunohistochemical Stains in the Differ-
Most clinicians will recommend excision for FN and
ential Diagnosis of Thyroid Tumors
accept the fact that the cytologic diagnosis is probabilis-
Papillary carcinoma, follicular neoplasm tic and that it may be benign on follow-up (23,76–78).
Thyroglobulin þ , TTF-1 þ Clinical follow-up or repeat FNA is recommended for
Renal cell carcinoma those cases classified as ‘‘FLUS.’’
CD10þ, EMAþ, RCAþ, TTF-1–, thyroglobulin– Wu et al. examined 401 FNAs with follow-up
Histiocytes and cyst lining cells:
surgical excision and calculated the cancer rates and
CD68þ, cytokeratin–
Endocrine tumors risks associated with various cytologic diagnoses (17).
Chromograninþ, synaptophysinþ, thyroglobulin–; calcitoninþ Providing this data to clinicians and patients may be
(medullary carcinoma); PTHþ (parathyroid adenoma); S-100þ extremely helpful in deciding on management options
(sustentacular cells in paraganglioma) (Tables 10 and 11). The estimated incidence of malig-
Metastatic carcinoma nancy in patients who have thyroid nodules and no
TTF-1þ and thyroglobulin– (lung); GCFPþ (breast); ER/PRþ other associated risk factors is 9% to 13% (79).
(breast, ovary); PLAPþ (germ cell tumor); HepPar1þ (liver);
PSAþ (prostate); S100þ and HMB 45þ (melanoma)
Abbreviations: EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; ER/PR, estrogen/
K. Summary of Thyroid FNA
progesterone receptor; GCFP, gross cystic fluid protein; PLAP, placental
like alkaline phosphatase; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PTH, para-
Thyroid FNA is primarily a screening tool; therefore, a
thyroid hormone; RCA, renal cell antigen; TTF-1, thyroid transcription conclusive diagnosis is not always required. The
factor-1; Source: Modified from Ref. 74. pathologist’s role is to minimize the number of
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 19
palpation and aspiration. Many neutrophils are Atypia, if present, is reactive and degenerative in
admixed with benign salivary gland elements. Reac- nature. Differential diagnosis of chronic sialadenitis
tive and reparative changes may be seen, as well as includes benign lymphoepithelial lesion (lymphoepi-
fragments of stone (98). thelial sialadenitis), Warthin tumor, and mucoepider-
Chronic sialadenitis. Chronic sialadenitis com- moid carcinoma (see lymphoid-rich lesions) (104).
monly results from stones or postsurgical scarring
and is more frequently seen in the submandibular C. Cystic Lesions
gland. The aspirates are usually of low cellularity and
show predominance of ductal cells (secondary to Nonneoplastic cysts present as mass lesions and may
acinar atrophy and ductular proliferation). The back- be congenital or a result of duct obstruction (retention
ground has variable number of lymphocytes, occa- cyst) (105).
sional plasma cells and neutrophils, and spindle Retention cyst. Retention cyst is the most com-
fibroblasts (Fig. 37). Squamous and mucinous meta- mon cause of benign cysts in the salivary glands and is
plasia may be focally encountered (Fig. 38) (103). a true cyst, i.e., lined by ductal epithelium. Grossly,
the aspirates have a watery, mucoid consistency. The
aspirates are of low cellularity and consist mostly of
proteinaceous mucoid material mixed with histiocytes
and few inflammatory cells. The ductal cells typically
show degenerative features (smudgy nuclei) and may
have a cuboidal or metaplastic squamous appearance.
Complete disappearance of the mass following aspi-
ration is supportive but not diagnostic of retention
cyst, as a number of neoplasms (especially low-grade
mucoepidermoid carcinoma) may present with a
prominent cystic component (Table 12). Therefore, a
descriptive diagnosis is warranted in these conditions,
with recommendations for clinical correlation and
follow-up. Re-aspiration of any residual mass follow-
ing evacuation of the cystic component is necessary, in
order to avoid a potential false-negative diagnosis.
Branchial cleft cyst. Branchial cleft cyst is the
most common cystic lesion of the lateral neck and is
usually located on the anterior border of sternoclei-
domastoid muscle. It has also been encountered in
Figure 37 Chronic sialadenitis characterized by low cellularity and around the parotid glands and in the floor of
and admixture of ductal and acinar cells. Inflammatory cells and mouth. Cytologically, it is indistinguishable from epi-
fibroblasts are present in the background (DQ stain; magnifica- dermoid cyst. The smears consist predominately of
tion, 200). anucleated and nucleated squamous cells, and vari-
able number of neutrophils (Fig. 39). Lymphocytes are
not commonly seen. Significant atypia may be appre-
ciated, especially if the cyst is secondarily infected
(Fig. 40). The atypia, however, is degenerative in
nature and is characterized by smudgy nuclei, low
nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios, and variably faint to
dense cytoplasm (106). However, extreme caution
must be exercised in these cases in order to avoid
overdiagnosing or underdiagnosing metastatic squa-
mous carcinoma.
Squamous carcinoma. Squamous carcinoma may
occasionally show minimal atypia, and can be indis-
tinguishable from an inflamed branchial cleft cyst. A
definitive diagnosis of malignancy, therefore, should
Figure 39 Branchial cleft cyst. There are many anucleated and Figure 41 Squamous carcinoma demonstrating clusters and
nucleated squamous cells and few neutrophils (DQ stain; mag- sheets of atypical epithelial cells (Papanicolaou stain, 400).
nification, 400).
render a specific diagnosis. This is due to the wide Table 14 Differential Diagnosis of Basaloid Neoplasms in
assortment of neoplasms arising in these organs, their Salivary Glands
relative rarity, and variability in their cytologic appear-
Basaloid neoplasms with Basaloid neoplasms without
ances (98). Histologic diversity may even occur within
significant cytologic atypiaa significant cytologic atypia
the same neoplasm. Diagnostic difficulties are encoun-
tered mostly with cystic lesions, as previously dis- ACC, cribriformb, and solid ACC, cribriformb, and solid
cussed, and with low-grade malignancies, cellular Basal cell adenocarcinoma Basal cell adenoma
benign neoplasms, atypical inflammatory and lym- Basaloid squamous cell Basal cell adenocarcinoma
carcinoma, metastatic
phoid lesions, and rarely encountered lesions (92,108). Poorly differentiated Cellular pleomorphic
Occasionally, an unusual cytologic presentation of a carcinoma, not otherwise adenoma
common tumor also presents a challenge. While FNA specified
diagnosis of high-grade malignancy is usually straight Neuroendocrine carcinoma Epithelial-myoepithelial
forward, distinguishing low-grade malignancies from carcinoma
benign neoplasms and some inflammatory processes Pilomatrixoma Polymorphous low-grade
may at times be problematic (109). adenocarcinoma
The more commonly encountered benign neo- Metastatic carcinoma, Pilomatrixoma
plasms include pleomorphic adenoma, basal cell ade- including cutaneous basal
noma, and Warthin tumor (110). Primary malignant cell carcinoma, thyroid,
breast, and lung
salivary gland neoplasms are subdivided into low Metastatic carcinoma
grade and high grade. Common low-grade malignan- a
cies include mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and Significant cytologic atypia is characterized by the presence of moderate
to marked nuclear pleomorphism and/or large prominent nucleoli. Small
acinic cell carcinoma. High-grade malignancies nucleoli may be seen in basal cell adenoma.
include adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), high-grade b
Cribriform ACC may or may not show significant cytologic atypia, but the
MEC, squamous cell carcinoma, salivary duct carci- combined architectural features of microcyst formation and hyaline
noma, and poorly differentiated carcinoma, not other- globules are usually diagnostic.
wise specified. Metastatic malignancies involving the
salivary glands include malignant melanoma and glands and its tendency for cytologic diversity and
squamous cell carcinoma. The salivary glands may mimicry of other neoplasms. This simplified approach
also be involved primarily or secondarily by malig- will emphasize differential diagnoses of tumors that
nant lymphoma. share similar cytomorphologic features and help iden-
The cytologic features of salivary gland tumors, as tify limitations associated with FNA.
well as some of the more commonly encountered
problems and pitfalls associated with FNA interpreta-
tions are presented in this chapter. Strict and well- E. Salivary Gland Neoplasms with
defined cytologic and architectural criteria that help Basaloid Cell Features
facilitate arriving at the proper diagnosis are discussed Salivary gland neoplasms with basaloid cell features are
in depth. The clinical significance of a precise cytologic a relatively uncommon and heterogeneous group of
diagnosis is highlighted. The role of ancillary studies tumors characterized by small cells, presenting mostly
such as immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry is in cohesive clusters. Most notable of these neoplasms
presented where appropriate. The traditional approach are ACC and basal cell adenoma. FNA cytology of these
of describing nonneoplastic and inflammatory salivary tumors is seldom described in the literature. The rare
gland lesions followed by benign and malignant neo- reports available emphasize the difficulty in making a
plasms, as presented in most textbooks, is not followed precise diagnosis. Appreciation of the architectural
in this discussion. Rather, we believe that subdividing features and nuclear atypia are most important for
salivary gland tumors into defined cytomorphologic evaluating basaloid tumors (Table 14).
groups is a more practical approach (Table 13) (111).
Four of these categories are based on cell size, amount Basal Cell Adenoma
of cytoplasm, degree of cytologic atypia, and the nature
of background. These categories include tumors with Basal cell adenoma is an uncommon benign neoplasm
small cell size (basaloid), intermediate-sized cells with accounting for approximately 2% of salivary gland
low-grade cytologic features, large cells with abundant tumors. Four architectural patterns are histologically
cytoplasm, and lymphoid-rich lesions (Table 13). A fifth described, including solid, trabecular, tubular, and
category is dedicated to pleomorphic adenoma, the membranous (110). These patterns, for the most part,
most commonly encountered neoplasm in salivary are not reproducible on FNA. Cytologic features
include the presence of tightly cohesive clusters of
basaloid cells with numerous naked nuclei in the back-
Table 13 Differential Diagnostic Categories in Salivary Gland
FNA
ground (Fig. 43) (112). The clusters may have sharp
smooth community borders, show a trabecular or jig-
Neoplasms with basaloid cell features saw puzzle configuration, or display branching and
Tumors with intermediate-sized cells and bland cytology budding (113). The basaloid cells have scant cytoplasm,
Tumors characterized by large cells and abundant cytoplasm round to oval nuclei, and finely to coarsely granular
Lesions rich in lymphocytes chromatin (Fig. 44) (114,115). The membranous variant
Variable cytologic appearances of pleomorphic adenoma
of basal cell adenoma often displays prominent dense
24 Elsheikh et al.
Figure 43 Basal cell adenoma. Tightly cohesive clusters of Figure 45 Membranous variant of basal cell adenoma. There is
basaloid cells and many background stripped nuclei (DQ stain, dense hyaline extracellular material surrounding the basaloid cell
200). clusters. Note the sharp interface between the stromal material
and cells (Papanicolaou stain, 400).
Figure 50 Low-grade MEC with prominent mucinous back- Figure 52 Low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Mucin pro-
ground and admixed neoplastic cells. The mucin has a stringy ducing cells and intermediate cells. The mucin producing cells
appearance (Papanicolaou stain, 200). resemble macrophages (Papanicolaou stain, 400).
Figure 54 High-grade salivary duct carcinoma. There are flat Figure 55 Salivary duct carcinoma, high-grade. Abundant
sheets of epithelial cells with abundant delicate cytoplasm and necrosis is associated with the malignant cells (DQ stain, 400).
moderate nuclear atypia. The nuclei are round to oval in shape
and show finely granular chromatin and prominent nucleoli.
(Papanicolaou stain, 600).
focal in nature (144). Papillary cystadenocarcinoma
(PCA) and PLGA show architectural similarities to
SDC, including cystic and papillary formation (147).
may not be possible. High-grade MEC is the most
Because of the absence of significant atypia, these
difficult neoplasm to cytologically distinguish from
neoplasms are difficult to distinguish from low-
high-grade SDC, since the latter is composed of large
grade SDC, but should not be confused with high-
epithelial cells that resemble the nonkeratinizing
grade SDC (145,148).
component of MEC (145). The presence of undifferen-
tiated intermediate squamous cells, poorly differenti-
Acinic Cell Carcinoma
ated squamous cells, and mucus producing cells in
addition to lack of papillary and cribriform configura- Acinic cell carcinoma is a low-grade malignancy char-
tion favors MEC (Table 19) (144). Furthermore, the acterized by sheets of large cells with abundant cyto-
atypia in MEC tends to be more pleomorphic and plasm. The neoplastic cells have foamy/vacuolated
diffuse in nature, whereas the atypia in high-grade cytoplasm with ill-defined borders, eccentrically
SDC tends to be uniform and sometimes random or placed nuclei, small inconspicuous nucleoli, and lack
Table 19 Differential Cytomorphologic Features of Salivary Gland Neoplasms with Large Cells and Abundant Cytoplasm
High-grade
High-grade mucoepidermoid
Salivary duct carcinoma carcinoma Acinic cell carcinoma Oncocytic lesions
Architecture Flat branching sheets and Tightly and loosely Large flat sheets Large flat sheets
tightly cohesive clusters cohesive clusters
Occasional cribriforming No cribriform or papillary
and papillary formation configuration
Cellular Large monomorphic Large atypical Monomorphic acinic cells Large monomorphic
Features polygonal cells showing keratinized and with abundant foamy epithelial cells with
abundant eosinophilic nonkeratinized vacuolated cytoplasm abundant dense
cytoplasm with squamous cells. eosinophilic cytoplasm
indistinct cell borders Rare mucus-producing and well-defined
cells cytoplasmic borders
Nuclear Focal/random moderate Diffuse marked nuclear Small eccentrically Centrally placed nuclei
Features nuclear atypia, round pleomorphism and placed nuclei and with prominent nucleoli
to oval enlarged atypia with nuclear inconspicuous nucleoli Nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio
hypochromatic nuclei hyperchromasia in the is low
with prominent nucleoli squamous epithelial
cells
Background Necrosis often present Necrosis and mucin may Naked nuclei Necrosis is absent
be present
Source: Modified from Elsheikh Ref. 144.
30 Elsheikh et al.
Warthin Tumor
Warthin tumor is almost always seen in the parotid
Figure 56 Acinic cell carcinoma. Flat sheets of epithelial cells, gland, comprising approximately 5% to 10% of all
with abundant vacuolated basophilic cytoplasm and indistinct parotid tumors. The aspirate has a thin watery mucoid
cytoplasmic borders. The nuclei are peripherally located. This
appearance, and consists of a mixed population of
cell group is traversed by thin capillaries (DQ stain, 200).
lymphocytes, occasional plasma cells, and variable
number of oncocytes (Fig. 58). Acinic cell carcinoma,
especially if associated with a prominent lymphocytic
infiltrate, may be confused with Warthin tumor. In
contrast to oncocytes, acinar cells have delicate vacuo-
lated cytoplasm and show peripherally located nuclei
(Table 19); this distinction, however, can be difficult in
certain situations and may require histologic confirma-
tion. If the lymphoid component predominates in an
aspirate and oncocytes are not appreciated, Warthin
tumor can be misinterpreted as reactive lymphoid
hyperplasia. In oncocytic-rich aspirates, it is impossible
to distinguish epithelial-rich Warthin tumor from
oncocytoma. Warthin tumor can also present as a
predominately cystic mass with nonspecific cyst content vacuolization, nuclear smudging, and low nuclear to
findings, in which case it must be included in the cytoplasmic ratios are features suggestive for therapy
differential diagnosis of other cystic lesions. MEC and effect (92,136).
SDC may show oncocytic features, but these changes
are usually focal (142). Clear Cell Change
Clear cell change is not uncommonly encountered in
Metastatic Malignancies salivary gland FNAs. Neoplasms presenting with clear
Squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma from the head cell morphology are listed in Table 20. Epithelial-
and neck make up the majority of metastases to myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is regarded as a low-
salivary glands (154,155). Primary sites originating to intermediate-grade malignancy with propensity for
below the clavicle are extremely rare, but when pres- local recurrence. FNA is usually of high cellularity and
ent are usually due to metastases from lung, kidney, shows two distinct cell populations, ductal and myoe-
and breast (156). Rarely metastasis presents as the pithelial (Fig. 59). The ductal cells present as tightly
initial manifestation of disease, mimicking a primary cohesive and three-dimensional clusters and sometimes
salivary gland neoplasm. Metastatic breast ductal form tubular structures. They have a basaloid appear-
carcinoma and prostatic large duct carcinoma may ance, i.e., small cells with scant cytoplasm, uniform
show cytologic features identical to SDC; therefore, round nuclei, small nucleoli and well-defined cyto-
the possibility of metastases need to be clinically plasmic borders (169–171). The myoepithelial cells are
excluded before making a diagnosis of primary SDC characterized by sheets and loosely cohesive groups of
(157). Immunocytochemical studies including estro- large cells with pale vacuolated (clear) cytoplasm, elon-
gen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and gated nuclei, and small distinct nucleoli. Single cells and
androgen receptor (AR) maybe helpful in this differ- numerous naked nuclei are seen in the background.
ential diagnosis. AR is positive in most SDC and a
subset of other primary salivary gland neoplasms, but Table 20 Salivary Gland Lesions Characterized by Clear Cells
negative in breast ductal carcinoma. ER is typically Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma
negative in SDC and positive in breast carcinoma Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
(158,159). SDC rarely expresses PR (<3% of cases) Hyalinizing clear cell adenocarcinoma
and, when positive, is seen in less than 25% of cells. Acinic cell carcinoma
Therefore, PR positivity in more than 25% of neoplas- Mucoepidermoid carcinoma
tic cells favors metastatic breast carcinoma (142). Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma
Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), Clear cell myoepithelioma/myoepithelial carcinoma
Sebaceous adenoma/carcinoma
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate acid
Clear cell oncocytoma
phosphatase (PAP) are not helpful markers since
they are also expressed by SDC (160–163). Metastatic
large cell carcinoma of the lung can mimic other
primary high-grade carcinomas of the salivary gland
and, if associated with cytoplasmic vacuolization and
clearing, may raise the differential diagnosis of clear
cell carcinoma (164). Assessment of the cytokeratin
(CK) 7 and 20 immunohistochemical profiles is of
limited usefulness in the distinction between primary
salivary gland malignancies and metastases since
most are CK7-positive/CK20-negative (165). Nonethe-
less, the relatively common CK20 positivity among
SDC may help in distinguishing it from morphologi-
cally similar carcinomas of breast or lung. In addition,
the prevalent CK7-negative/CK20-negative profile of
cancers as adrenal cortical, prostatic, and RCCs can
further aid in their discrimination from SDC (165).
TTF-1 has been shown to be a highly specific marker
for primary and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and
would be helpful in the differential diagnosis of
primary high-grade carcinoma (166,167).
Cellular PA
Cellular PA is characterized by the presence of loosely
cohesive branching and arborizing sheets of interme-
diate-sized cells with indistinct (fuzzy) community
borders (Fig. 64). There is a haphazard cellular
arrangement with occasional spindling (123). The
Figure 63 Pleomorphic adenoma. This myxoid mesenchymal
component has a fibrillary appearance, and shows intimately
neoplastic cells have moderate amount of cytoplasm,
admixed spindle myoepithelial cells (Papanicolaou stain, x 400). oval to round nuclei, finely granular chromatin, and
lack distinct nucleoli. Typically, the background
shows singly scattered cells with plasmacytoid
appearance (myoepithelial cells) (188). Mesenchymal
elements may be scant or absent. Basaloid neoplasms
cellular PA, where the epithelial/myoepithelial cells are the most difficult lesions to distinguish cytolog-
predominate, other salivary gland neoplasms such as ically from cellular PA, an experience shared by
basal cell adenoma, ACC, and low-grade malignancies several authors (123,187). Basal cell adenoma is charac-
may be suspected (123,136,187). Because of the terized by tightly cohesive clusters of small basaloid
increased rate of false-positive and false-negative cells, and many naked nuclei in the background.
diagnoses associated with these cellular lesions, Cellular PA, in contrast, has intermediate-sized cells
some authors have recommended for highly cellular with moderate amount of cytoplasm, and plasmacy-
lesions lacking stroma to be classified as ‘‘salivary toid cells in the background (Table 23). ACC is also
gland neoplasm, not otherwise specified’’ (108). considered in the differential diagnosis, as PA may
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 35
B. Clinical Considerations dedicated needle passes can be performed for cell block
preparation to perform immunohistochemistry or
The workup of lymphadenopathy in the head and neck placed in transport media for flow cytometry, electron
region requires close clinicopathologic correlation to microscopy, and molecular diagnostic studies.
arrive at an appropriate differential diagnosis, includ- As with the evaluation of FNAB smears from
ing patient age, prior medical history, clinical symp- other organs, the use of both low- and high-power
toms including anatomic location, and chronicity. The magnification is recommended. Evaluation of the pre-
age of the patient is especially useful as the etiology of dominant pattern of cell dispersion, cell size, and
lympadenopathy is vastly different in children com- background elements provides important diagnostic
pared with adults. clues as to the etiology (Tables 25–30). The presence of
In the pediatric age group, FNAB is especially cohesive cell clusters raises the possibility of metast-
advantageous since tissue biopsy requires general atic carcinoma, certain HLs, NHLs, and granulomatous
anesthesia and the risk of potential morbidity, includ- inflammation, and even nonneoplastic lymphohistio-
ing scarring and cranial nerve injury. In this age cytic aggregates. Singly dispersed cells raise the dif-
group, the vast majority of cervical lymphadenopathy ferential diagnostic consideration of malignant
is due to reactive lymphoid proliferations, most of melanoma, primary lymphoid lesions, and poorly
which are associated with infectious etiologies. differentiated metastatic carcinomas. Monomorphic
Although much less likely, the possibility of a meta- singly dispersed cells are most often seen in malignant
static neoplasm must always be ruled out. The most
commonly metastasizing pediatric neoplasms include
small, round blue-cell neoplasms (neuroblastoma, Table 25 Lymph Node Aspirates with a Large-Cell Pattern
rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, Wilms’ tumor) Metastatic carcinoma
and osteosarcoma that can be diagnosed by FNAB Malignant melanoma
(211). Malignant lymphomas of childhood include Germ cell tumors
high-grade lymphoblastic lymphoma, small non- Anaplastic large cell lymphoma
cleaved cell (Burkitt’s and non-Burkitt’s) lymphoma,
and intermediate-grade large cell lymphoma. In the
adolescents and young adults, metastases from germ Table 26 Lymph Node Aspirates with a Small-Cell Pattern
cell tumors, nasopharyngeal carcinomas, as well as
Reactive hyperplasias
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and NHL are most commonly Small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia
seen (212). Mantle cell lymphoma
In adults, especially after the age of 40 years, Marginal-zone lymphoma
lymphadenopathy in the head and neck region due to Follicular lymphoma
a malignancy becomes the primary diagnostic consid- Burkitt’s lymphoma
eration. A clinical history of alcohol and tobacco usage Small cell carinoma
increases the likelihood of metastatic disease. FNAB is Sarcoma (rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing’s/PNET, neuroblastoma)
highly accurate in the workup of patients with a Malignant melanoma
potential of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma and Lymphocyte-rich classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma
is, therefore, a widely used first-line diagnostic tech-
nique accepted by head and neck surgeons and oncol-
ogists (213). In patients with a past history of Table 27 Lymph Node Aspirates with a Squamous Pattern
malignancy, FNAB is especially useful for accurately
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma
establishing metastatic disease. A history of an HIV Benign inclusion cysts
infection raises the differential diagnosis of reactive Branchial cleft cysts
lympadenopathies as well as malignant lymphoma. Germ cell tumors
Immunosuppression increases the possibility of Mucoepidermoid carcinoma
opportunistic infections, including mycobacterium Malignant melanoma, spindle variant
avium-intracellulare (MAI) and fungal infections such
as cryptococcus and histoplasma. Infectious processes
can be easily recognized by FNAB and additional Table 28 Lymph Node Aspirates with Biphasic Pattern (Small
material can be obtained for culture. and Large Cells)
Reactive hyperplasias
C. Diagnostic Approach Follicular lymphomas
Partial involvement of a lymph node by lymphoma
An on-site cytopathologist for immediate interpretation Lymphocyte-rich classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma
and appropriate triage of the aspirated specimen great- Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma
ly increases the diagnostic accuracy of FNAB. Appro- T-cell-rich diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
priate triage also allows for a cost-effective workup of Malignant melanoma
lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Immediate eval- Metastatic carcinoma (malignant mixed mullerian tumors)
uation of the aspirate can help categorize lesions as Germ cell tumors
inflammatory lesions or as an epithelial, primary lym- Sarcomas (malignant fibrous histiocytoma, synovial sarcoma)
Cat-scratch disease
phoid, or nonlymphoid nonepithelial neoplasm. On the
Toxoplasmosis
basis of this broad initial subcategorization, additional
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 39
Table 29 Lymph Node Aspirates with a Neutrophil Rich Pattern large numbers of lymphoglandular bodies arising from
the residual lymphoid cells.
Abscess
Inflammed inclusion cyst
Cat-scratch disease D. FNA of Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
Metastatic carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma)
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma Because of the extensive clinical overlap between non-
neoplastic reactions such as reactive lymphoid hyper-
plasia, lymphoma, and carcinoma, the use of FNA
Table 30 Lymph Node Aspirates with a Histiocyte-Rich Pattern
remains a controversial topic, especially for a primary
lymphoma diagnosis (204 ). Lymph node FNA has a
Infectious granulomas modest to high sensitivity (66–100%, average >80%),
Sarcoidosis high specificity (58–100%, average >90%), and high
Toxoplasmosis diagnostic accuracy (50–100%, average >85%) for
Cat-scratch disease
NHLs (199,204,207,208,214–219). In comparison, FNA
Kikuchi syndrome
Rosai-Dorfmann disease
of HL has a lower sensitivity (48–86%), but a similar
Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis high specificity rate (98–100%) (201,220–222). The use of
Germ cell tumors ancillary testing with flow cytometry, immunohis-
tochemistry, and molecular techniques has led to a
higher sensitivity and specificity and higher accuracy
for the diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms by FNAB.
lymphomas compared with reactive lymphoid lesions, Additionally, the recent acceptance of the WHO classi-
which are polymorphic in appearance. The background fication scheme has allowed a more widespread use of
should be evaluated for necrosis, pigment, and lym- FNAB, since it places less importance on architecture
phoglandular bodies. The latter are an important clue and more emphasis on cytomorphology in combination
indicative of a lymphoid cell population and are char- with immunophenotype, genotype, and clinical char-
acterized as pale, basophilic rounded structures acteristics (204,205). Up to 85% of lymphomas may be
between 2 and 7 mm in size and representing fragments accurately classified by morphology alone, but total
of lymphocyte cytoplasm (Fig. 69) Lymphoglandular reliance on morphology can lead to misdiagnoses, such
bodies are seen in both reactive and neoplastic lym- as a large cell lymphoma misdiagnosed as a poorly
phoid proliferations, but their presence is a helpful clue differentiated carcinoma, HL mistaken for granuloma-
to differentiate lymphoid proliferations from other tous inflammation or a viral infection and finally, or an
small round-cell malignancies such as rhabdomyosar- overdiagnosis of a monomorphic lymphoid population
coma, Ewing’s sarcoma, and undifferentiated carcino- in a reactive hyperplasia as a small cell lymphoma (223).
mas. It must be kept in mind that partial involvement
of a lymph node by metastatic carcinoma may yield
E. Ancillary Studies
Cell Block and Core Needle Biopsy
Cell block and core needle biopsy (CNB) are important
diagnostic adjuncts in lymph node FNAB. The applica-
tion of IHC in paraffin embedded cell block prepara-
tions and/or CNBs is essential for an accurate
lymphoma diagnosis (219). The use of CD20 and CD3
immunostains can group most processes into broad
categories of B-cell dominance, T-cell dominance, or a
mixed B-cell and T-cell infiltrate. Additional more spe-
cific antibody panels can then be applied to B-cell and
T-cell processes for more specific classification. In situ
hybridization techniques for lambda and kappa light
chains have been successful in establishing clonality,
and show less nonspecific background staining com-
pared with conventional immunohistochemistry (224).
In patients at high surgical risk, CNB or a cell block is
particularly useful for evaluating lymphadenopathy. In
these cases, the tissue preparation can provide architec-
tural features important in the diagnosis of lymphoma.
The failure rate of core biopsy ranges from 14% to 58%
Figure 69 Lymphoglandular bodies (arrowheads) are pale, according to various studies (225–228).
basophilic rounded structures sized between 2 and 7 mm
and representing fragments of lymphocyte cytoplasm. They are
seen in both reactive and neoplastic lymphoid proliferations (DQ Flow Cytometry
stain, 400). Flow cytometry is critically important in lymph node
FNAB and has the distinct advantage of evaluating a
40 Elsheikh et al.
large population of cells. Flow cytometry allows Table 31 Key Diagnostic Features—Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
detection of small subpopulations of monoclonal
Cellular smears with dissociative cell pattern
cells and detection of low intensity expression of
Monotonous lymphoblasts with minimal cell variation (2 times
some markers that can be missed by IHC alone size of mature lymphocytes)
(210,229). Several studies have shown that the addi- Regular nuclei with minimal membrane convolutions; indistinct
tion of flow cytometry increases the sensitivity and nucleoli
accuracy of lymph node FNAB, especially in demon- Scant cytoplasm with or without minute vacuoles
strating B-cell clonality by kappa and lambda light
chain expression, a information that is vital for estab-
lishing a B-cell malignant lymphoma (178,207,208,
210,230,231). Nearly all small cell lymphomas show
clonality in FNAB specimens, especially in small
lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) follicular lymphoma,
and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The combination
of CD19 with other antigens such as CD5, CD10,
CD23, and FMC7 allows phenotypic definition of
more specific lymphoma subtypes of B-cell origin
(231). In comparison, less than 50% of large B-cell
lymphomas show a monoclonal population by flow
cytometry (217,230). This may be due to a high fragil-
ity and lower viability of large lymphoma cells, a lack
of surface immunoglobulin light chain expression,
extensive necrosis, and fibrosis.
Flow cytometry can also be limited by low
cellularity of the sample, as well as occasional prob- Figure 70 Aspirates from lymphoblastic lymphoma are cellular
lems with nonspecific staining (217). Therefore, it and composed of a dispersed monomorphic population of small
must be interpreted in the context of the cytomorpho- to intermediate-sized lymphoblasts (DQ stain, 400).
logic findings from FNAB to avoid pitfalls such as
coexisting neoplastic and reactive cells in the speci-
men. It is important to recognize that the lack of adolescent males. The anterior mediastinum is the
identification of a monoclonal population does not most common location (50–80%) although, many
rule out a malignant lymphoma. In clinically suspi- patients have supraclavicular or cervical lymphade-
cious cases, additional sampling or tissue biopsy nopathy with most showing involvement of multiple
should be recommended. HL cannot be reliably diag- lymph nodes. FNAB had a high diagnostic accuracy
nosed by flow cytometry. for this entity. Smears are highly cellular, with a
monotonous lymphoid cell population composed of
FISH and PCR medium-sized cells with a blast morphology, round
FISH and PCR studies have shown that sufficient nuclei, finely granular chromatin, inconspicuous
material can be obtained with FNAB for analysis nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm (Fig. 70). Individual
(232). FISH analysis can be performed on air-dried cell necrosis may be seen and tingible body macro-
cytologic smears, cytospins prepared from cell sus- phages may be numerous, imparting a ‘‘starry sky’’
pensions, or destained archival cytologic smears. appearance typical of an aggressive lymphoma.
More consistent results are obtained from cytospin Mitotic activity is brisk. Phenotypically, the majority
preparations as the cell suspension is concentrated are of T-cell lineage, characterized by surface and/or
and evenly distributed on the slide. FISH studies for cytoplasmic expression of CD3, other T-cell lineage
cyclin-D1 and Bcl-2 can be useful for confirming markers, and TdT. There is often co-expression of CD4
mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and follicular lympho- and CD8, with some cases expressing CD10. Myeloid
ma, respectively (232,233). PCR can reliably detect antigens such as CD13 and CD33 are often present
immunoglobulin gene rearrangement, Bcl-2 gene rear- and CD45 may be absent. Molecular testing demon-
rangement, and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement strates T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in approx-
from material obtained via FNAB. Other new technol- imately one-third of lymphoblastic lymphomas. Other
ogies recently applied to FNA include real-time PCR, differential considerations include Burkitt’s lymphoma,
automated DNA sequencing that aids in detecting any the blastoid variant of MCL, acute myeloid leukemia/
false-positives, and gene expression profiling to aid in chloroma, and other high-grade malignancies, includ-
subtyping lymphomas (234–236). ing metastatic carcinomas and sarcomas. Differ-
entiating lymphoblastic lymphoma from small cell
carcinoma often requires immunostaining for cytoker-
F. FNAB of Selected Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas atins and neuroendocrine markers.
Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Burkitt’s Lymphoma
Lymphoblastic lymphoma (Table 31) is an aggressive,
rapidly growing neoplasm that comprises up to 50% Burkitt’s lymphoma (Table 32) is a highly aggressive
of lymphomas of childhood, most often affecting undifferentiated lymphoma closely associated with
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 41
Immunoblastic Lymphomas
Immunoblastic lymphomas are more often seen in
adults than in children. The aspirates yield highly
cellular smears containing numerous immunoblasts
with extreme pleomorphism and scattered multinucle-
ated giant cells. Nuclei often exhibit a plasmacytoid
appearance with eccentric vesicular nuclei with a
prominent central macronucleolus, and abundant cyto-
plasm (Fig. 74). Mitotic activity is brisk and the back-
ground contains mixed inflammatory cells including
Figure 74 The nuclei from diffuse large cleaved B-cell lympho- eosinophils, plasma cells, lymphocytes, and histiocytes.
mas show nuclear clefting and indentations and smaller mature
lymphocytes are present in the background (DQ stain; oil mag-
nification, 600).
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) (Table 34)
accounts for 3% of adult NHL and 10% to 30% of
childhood lymphomas. Aspirates may be polymor-
Table 33 Key Diagnostic Features—Diffuse Large B-Cell phic due to partial involvement of lymph nodes
Lymphoma where the neoplastic cells may be confined to the
Monomorphic large cells with a minority of small lymphocytes sinusoids thus leading to potential sampling errors.
Cells 3 or more times the size of mature lymphocytes Generally, FNAB smears are characterized by large,
Large pleomorphic nuclei; round to irregular to multilobated and pleomorphic cells, often with a horseshoe-shaped
bizarre shaped nucleus (so-called ‘‘hallmark’’ cells) (Fig. 75)
Conspicuous nucleoli; single or multiple (178,239–242). Necrosis may be prominent (241). Var-
Moderate to abundant cytoplasm iants include the small cell type, the lymphohistiocytic
Necrosis and tangible body macrophages common variant, in which a large number of histiocytes may
Morphologic variants: centroblastic, anaplastic, immunoblastic,
mask the large tumor cells, the rare signet cell variant,
T-cell rich
the neutrophil-rich variant, and the sarcomatoid vari-
ant. Binucleate, Reed-Sternberg-like cells may be seen,
and have been mistaken for lymphocyte-depleted HL
anaplastic types (205). In cases with a mixture of small (Fig. 76) (243).
and large cells, caution should be taken, and ancillary Immunophenotyping of ALCL shows that cells
tests such as flow cytometry and IHC should be care- are usually of T-cell lineage. It is somewhat unique in
fully evaluated to rule out any small cell lymphomas. that CD3, CD5, and CD7 expression are usually lost
Nearly all DLBCL expresses pan B-cell markers such as and usually the only indication of T-cell differentia-
CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, and Pax5. Demonstration tion is expression of CD2 and CD4. Occasional cases
of a large cell predominant lymphoma with expression are immunophenotypically null cell type, but show
of one or more of these markers is sufficient for a rearrangement of the T-cell receptor genes. ALCL
diagnosis. Other than pan B-cell antigens, DLBCL also expresses CD30 in either a membranous or
usually lacks specific antigen expression (238). An Golgi pattern, in addition to epithelial membrane
MCL can be ruled out by a predominance of large
cells with centroblast morphology and lack of cyclin D1
expression or rearrangement. A definitive diagnosis of Table 34 Key Diagnostic Features–Anaplastic Large Cell
DLBCL by FNA usually requires the demonstration of Lymphoma
clonality, which can be achieved by flow cytometry or Moderate to high cellularity smears
PCR. Since flow cytometry has become a routine pro- Predominant large malignant cells with marked pleomorphism
cedure in lymph node FNA in many institutions, Multinucleation common with mirror image Reed-Sternberg-like
establishment of clonality should be first attempted cells
by this method. Detection of a clonal B-cell population ‘‘Hallmark’’ cells: large cells with eccentric indented nuclei, small
by flow cytometry also rules out HL. A concurrent core nucleoli, prominent golgi zone and abundant cytoplasm
needle biopsy (CNB) is a useful adjunct to FNA in the Intranuclear inclusions, nuclear membrane convolutions,
diagnosis of DLBCL because sufficient material to conspicuous nucleoli
Abundant cytoplasm with fine to coarse vacuoles
render a definitive diagnosis can usually be obtained
Lack or absence of other lymphoid cells on smears
when FNAB is nondiagnostic (212). Observation of a
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 43
Follicular Lymphoma
Follicular lymphoma is also generally seen in patients
over 50 with a slight female predominance. As with
MCL, follicular lymphoma tends to be widely dissem-
inated at the time of diagnosis. FNAB smears are
characterized by small, irregular lymphocytes with
notched and convoluted nuclei (centrocytes), few
associated tingible body macrophages, and lymphoid
Figure 77 Aspirates from small lymphocytic lymphomas are cell aggregates (212). Larger-cleaved and noncleaved
characterized by a monomorphous population of small, mature- lymphocytes are also seen and appear in proportion to
appearing lymphocytes with smooth nuclear borders, clumped the grade. Often there is enough material on a cell
chromatin, and scant cytoplasm (DQ stain; oil magnification, block preparation to appreciate a follicular architec-
600). ture. Immunohistochemical stains are useful to dem-
onstrate CD21-positive dendritic cells within follicles
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 45
Thyroid Carcinoma
Thyroid carcinoma metastases are a significant cause of
Figure 81 Large cohesive clusters of malignant cells, some
with a spindled pattern, from a lymph node aspirate containing
cervical lymphoadenopathy, and papillary carcinoma of
metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (DQ stain; magnification, the thyroid can initially present with cervical adenop-
400). athy in more than 10% of patients (256). Cytologically,
the smears demonstrate small clusters of neoplastic cells
with characteristic cytomorphologic features of papil-
lary carcinoma (nuclear grooves and intranuclear inclu-
abundant cytoplasm and retention of some cohesive sions best identified on Papanicolaou-stained smears)
clusters are seen even in nonkeratizing squamous cell (Fig. 83) (256). Occasionally, colloid may be seen in the
carcinomas. background. Medullary carcinoma can also be a source
of metastases to cervical lymph nodes.
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Malignant Melanoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma exhibits a bimodal age
distribution with peaks during the second and sixth Malignant melanoma often metastasizes to cervical and
decades of life, with males being affected 2.5 times more supraclavicular lymph nodes even when the primary
often than females, and is associated with EBV infection site is unknown. FNAB smears are highly cellular with
(255). Asians are more often affected than Caucasians. loosely cohesive and singly dispersed cells with a wide
Patients often present with nasal symptoms in combi- range of cytologic features including spindle cell, epi-
nation with cervical lymphadenopathy. FNAB smears thelioid, plasmacytoid, small cell like, and giant cell
demonstrate high cellularity with clusters and sheets of morphologies (Figs. 84–86). Metastatic melanoma often
48 Elsheikh et al.
Figure 83 Fine needle aspirate from a metastatic papillary Figure 85 Lymph node aspirate from metastatic malignant
carcinoma demonstrating a papillary cluster of malignant cells melanoma with a discohesive population of large malignant
with slight nuclear enlargement and nuclear grooving (arrow) cells mimicking a lymphoma (DQ stain; magnification, 400).
(Papanicolaou stain; magnification, 400).
Figure 84 Aspirate from metastatic malignant melanoma with Figure 86 Loosely cohesive clusters of malignant plump plas-
large cohesive sheets and clusters of spindle-shaped cells (DQ macytoid cells from an aspirate of metastatic malignant melanoma
stain; magnification, 200). (DQ stain; magnification, 600).
shows a singly dispersed cell pattern similar to NHLs phragm. Primary sites of origin are from malignancies
(Fig. 85). Macronucleoli and nuclear pseudoinclusions above and below the diaphragm including the lung,
are often seen. Melanin pigment is only seen in a breast, stomach, prostate, ovary, colon, biliary tract,
minority of cases. In cases where a primary melanoma pancreas, and uterus. FNAB is valuable for document-
diagnosis has not been established, confirmation with ing metastases from inoperable lung carcinomas to
immunostains (HMB-45, MART-1, S-100) on cell block this site. In women with cervical carcinoma, supra-
material will be necessary. clavicular lymph node metastases most often show
squamous cell carcinoma and may be the only site of
Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastases
extension outside the pelvis and abdomen, portending
a poor prognosis. Metastatic breast carcinoma must be
Left supraclavicular lymph node metastases often considered when evaluating aspirates from women, as
originate from malignancies arising below the (often lymph node status is a critical predictor of clinical
referred to as Virchow’s node) clavicle or the dia- outcome. Immunocytochemical staining for estrogen
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 49
Figure 89 Aspirate from a case of suppurative lymphadenitis Figure 90 Well formed noncaseating granuloma from a case of
containing numerous polymorphonuclear leukocytes in a back- sarcoidosis that is composed of cohesive ‘‘boomerang-’’shaped
ground containing a mixed lymphoid population. histiocytes (DQ stain; magnification, 400).
Cellular crush artifact can cause difficulty in distinguish- histiocytes possess moderate cytoplasm and a single
ing small lymphocytes from a small cell carcinoma, or elongated, bent (‘‘boomerang’’)-shaped nucleus with
from lymphoblasts. finely granular chromatin and an inconspicuous nucle-
olus. A background of fluffy, granular debris is often
seen, along with multinucleated giant cells in varying
Suppurative Lymphadenitis
numbers. The presence of granulomatous inflamma-
Suppurative lymphadenitis is most commonly seen in tion alone has a poor sensitivity for tuberculosis (25%)
children and is most often caused by a bacterial (260). In a significant number of cases, the only finding
infection from Staphylococcus aureus. Patients often is either acute inflammation or necrosis, especially in
present with tender, enlarged nodes with overlying cases of atypical mycobacterial infections in the AIDS
erythema in the head and neck region, which may be population. On Romanowsky-type-stained FNAB
associated with fevers. FNAB smears are generally smears, mycobacterial organisms may appear as ‘‘neg-
highly cellular and characterized by many neutrophils ative’’ images, both extracellularly and within histio-
admixed with smaller numbers of histiocytes and cyte cytoplasm (Fig. 91) (261). Ancillary studies,
lymphocytes (Fig. 89). The differential diagnosis for including cell block preparation for special stains,
a neutrophil-predominant FNA biopsy includes other cultures, and special studies such as PCR, are crucial
infectious processes such as mycobacteria in AIDS and for establishing a diagnosis. On Papanicolaou-stained
other suppurative infections such as cat-scratch dis- smears, the organisms may exhibit autofluoresence,
ease. Neoplasms that may mimic an acute suppurative providing a quick, inexpensive means for identifica-
lymphadenitis include necrotic metastases (especially tion. Occasional examples of HL may mimic a granu-
squamous cell carcinoma) and rare presentations of lomatous lymphadenitis.
HL and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (206,258,259).
Additional aspirated material should be obtained for
Toxoplasmosis
cultures. Flow cytometric studies are not generally
indicated for a neutrophil predominant FNAB smear. Toxoplasmosis is often asymptomatic and is caused by
infection with the protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii. In
immune-competent patients, the most common presen-
Granulomatous Lymphadenitis
tation is of posterior cervical lymphadenopathy. FNA
Granulomatous lymphadenitis can be seen in sarcoid- smears show characteristic clusters of small histiocytic
osis, foreign body reactions, and some infections such cells with abundant cytoplasm and eccentric oval
as mycobacterial and fungal infections. Sarcoidosis is nuclei, forming ‘‘microgranulomas’’ (262–265). The
a diagnosis of exclusion, but the findings of non- background is composed of a mixed lymphoid popula-
caseating granulomatous inflammation in the appro- tion, reactive follicular center cell fragments, and tin-
priate clinical and radiographic setting may be gible body macrophages reflecting the histologic
sufficient for establishing a diagnosis (Fig. 90). The findings of small epithelioid clusters opposed to germi-
typical FNAB smear from a patient with tuberculosis nal centers. The causative organisms, both bradyzoites
reveals varying proportions of necrosis, epithelioid and tachyzoites, can be seen in a minority of FNAB
histiocytes, and epithelioid granulomas. The epithelioid smear preparations (262,266). The combination of these
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 51
Kikuchi Lymphadenitis
Kikuchi lymphadenitis is a relatively rare, self-limited
disease seen in young adult women of Asian descent.
The cervical lymph nodes are most often involved.
FNAB smears show phagocytic histiocytes with a
crescent shaped nucleus with an irregular nuclear
outline, twisted contours, and inconspicuous nucleoli.
The cytoplasm contains phagocytosed debris. Also
seen are plasmacytoid monocytes that have eccentri-
cally placed round nuclei with basophilic cytoplasm.
Immunoblasts are seen and may be numerous. The
background contains karyorrhectic and granular
Figure 92 Aspirate from a case of infectious mononucleosis debris admixed with histiocytes and immunoblasts.
containing numerous immunoblasts with increased pleomor- There is an almost complete absence of neutrophils.
phism in a mixed lymphoid background (DQ stain; oil magnifica- There is significant overlap in the FNAB features of
tion, 600). Kikuchi lymphadenitis, reactive hyperplasias, and
tuberculosis (280,281). Additional differential diag-
nostic considerations include lymph node infarction,
metastatic carcinoma (particularly squamous cell car-
adolescents and most often leads to bilateral persistent cinoma), and high-grade lymphomas. The plasmacy-
and painless cervical lymphadenopathy. FNAB toid cells may also be confused with a plasmacytoid
smears are highly cellular with a pattern of reactive lymphoma. The atypical cells with crescent nuclei
lymphoid hyperplasia and a large number of histio- may be confused with signet ring carcinoma (280,281).
cytes containing phagocytosed lymphocytes and RBCs
termed ‘‘emperipolesis’’ (Fig. 93) (275–278). In the
proper clinical setting, the cytologic findings may be V. SARCOMAS
conclusive. A cell block preparation can allow for
immunohistochemical stains that show reactivity in A. General Considerations
the large histiocytoid cells for S-100 and CD68, but not
CD1a (279). The differential diagnosis includes reac- As a group, soft tissue sarcomas represent less than
tive hyperplasia, HL, and rare cases of nodal Langer- 1% of all malignant neoplasms diagnosed in the US
hans cell histiocytosis. The histiocytes of Rosai- each year (282). Furthermore, as an overall percentage
Dorfman disease do not exhibit the nuclear grooves of neoplasms, the incidence is higher in children than
in adults. Because of their absolute rarity and the
inexperience of many practicing pathologists in deal-
ing with the morphologic diversity of soft tissue
sarcomas, most institutions have traditionally
obtained diagnostic tissue from either open biopsies
or closed CNBs (211,283). Therefore, most pathologists
are uncomfortable making a definitive diagnosis of a
sarcoma, knowing that a misdiagnosis can potentially
lead to debilitating treatment such as an amputation
(282,284). FNAB has been further underutilized
because of the requirement of accurate histologic
subtyping for enrollment of pediatric patients into
histogenetic-specific therapeutic protocols (211,284).
However, a number of studies have systematically
evaluated the accuracy of FNAB and shown that on
adequate specimens and with the judicious use of
ancillary studies, there is an overall accuracy rate
comparable to CNB that approaches 95% for establish-
ing a benign versus malignant diagnosis and reported
false-positive and false-negative rates of less than 1%
to 4% (204,285–287). Studies evaluating the rate of
Figure 93 Aspirate from a case of Rosai-Dorfman disease accurate subtyping of soft tissue sarcomas by FNAB
showing a histiocyte containing phagocytized lymphocytes and have shown variable results with an average of 50% to
RBCs in a background of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (DQ 70% (285–288). One of the largest series reported by
stain; oil magnification, 600). Kilpatrick and colleagues found the accuracy rate for
sarcoma subtyping of 92% in pediatric sarcomas (with
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 53
use of ancillary studies), a rate higher than that Table 39 Sarcomas That Metastasize to Lymph Nodes
achieved in adult sarcomas (52%) (289). For pediatric
Rhabdomyosarcoma
small round cell tumors, histological subtyping is Synovial sarcoma
critical as most of these patients are eligible for enroll- Ewing sarcoma
ment in histogenetic-specific treatment protocols. In a Kaposi sarcoma
series of 18 pediatric patients eligible for such treat- Angiosarcoma
ment protocols, Kilpatrick and colleagues showed an Epithelioid sarcoma
accurate diagnosis by FNAB in 17 of 18 patients (94%)
(285). Similar results have also been shown by Jones
and colleagues supporting the opinion that FNAB can predominate in the pediatric age group whereas
accurately subtype and grade soft tissue sarcomas in myxoid and pleomorphic cell sarcomas are common
most cases (290). Grading of soft tissue sarcomas is in older adults (>50 years) and are virtually nonexistent
important in both management and prognosis, but in children. The epithelioid/polygonal and spindle cell
requires accurate evaluation of the percentage of groups are generally seen in young to middle-aged
tissue necrosis and mitotic rates, parameters that adults.
cannot be adequately assessed by FNAB alone. Thus, An interpretative approach used by most cytopa-
for FNAB specimens, most studies recommend a thologists involves morphologic pattern recognition
classification system dividing soft tissue sarcomas and categorization by the dominant cytomorphologic
into five major subgroups on the basis of the predom- phenotype identified. Once a lesion has been catego-
inant cytomorphologic phenotype seen on the aspira- rized as malignant, subtyping should be attempted
tion smears (291). These are the small round cell, especially for the small round cell category (211). Ancil-
spindle cell, epithelioid/polygonal cell, myxoid, and lary studies can be extremely useful in establishing a
pleomorphic sarcoma subgroups. Once a cytomorpho- specific diagnosis when the clinical and morphologic
logic phenotype has been determined, the corresponding findings are equivocal. IHC, molecular, and genetic
histological grade, in most cases, becomes definitional analysis of FNAB material play a critical role in render-
and a two tiered grading system works best (low ing histogenetic-specific diagnoses of pediatric soft tis-
grade and high grade; i.e., round cell, pleomorphic, sue sarcomas, including the small round cell sarcomas,
and epithelioid/polygonal subgroups are, by defini- a requirement for enrollment of patients on specific
tion, high-grade sarcomas) (291,292). For most soft treatment protocols (i.e., Pediatric Oncology Group)
tissue sarcomas, the stage (incorporating grade) and (Table 40) (284,285,292,293). A panel of immunohisto-
anatomic location are used to determine therapy and chemical stains plays an important role in the workup
in adults with high-grade sarcomas (i.e., pleomorphic of small round cell, spindle cell, and the epithelioid/
and epithelioid/polygonal subgroups), the therapy is polygonal cell sarcomas. IHC screening panels are also
similar. As with any classification system, there are important to separate primary soft tissue sarcomas from
certain limitations related to the morphologic spec- metastatic carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and malig-
trum that can be seen with various soft tissue sarco- nant lymphoma. Although helpful, some cytogenetic
mas. For example, rhabdomyosarcomas can display a and molecular studies initially thought to be highly
variety of cytomorphologic features ranging from specific for certain soft tissue sarcomas have now been
small round cell to spindle cell morphology. Likewise, shown to actually be more nonspecific. The best exam-
synovial sarcoma may demonstrate a predominant ple is the Ewing’s sarcoma translocation, t(11;22)
epithelioid/polygonal pattern rather than the classic (q24;q12) with the WES-FLI1 fusion product, which has
spindle cell pattern (211). Especially in adults, it is also been reported in embryonal and alveolar rhabdo-
important to remember and rule out metastatic carci- myosarcomas, neuroblastoma, and mesenchymal
noma, malignant lymphoma, and malignant melano-
ma as these lesions vastly outnumber primary soft Table 40 Immunohistochemical Screening Panels for Small
tissue sarcomas in this age group (284). Round Sarcomas
Rhabdomyosarcoma MyoD1/myogeninþ
Diagnostic Approach Including Ancillary Studies Desminþ
Cytokeratin
FNAB requires a multidisciplinary approach for diag- S-100
nostic success. Clinical and radiographic correlation is Ewing sarcoma/PNET Desmin–
crucial as radiographic studies can provide information CD56–
relating to location (superficial vs. deep), presence/ CD99þ
absence of osseous involvement, size, relationship to FLI-1þ
other structures (nerves, vessels) and degree of hetero- Cytokeratin
geneity (fat content, cyst formation). Correlation of S-100–
these features with the cytomorphologic findings can Synovial sarcoma Cytokeratinþ
help narrow down the differential diagnosis (284). CD99þ
Certain soft tissue sarcomas have a predilection for EMAþ
metastasizing to lymph nodes (Table 39). Patient age Desmin–
is a critical factor to consider, as there is little overlap in CD34–
S-100þ (30%)
the lesions that predominate in each general age group
(282,291). For example, small round cell tumors Abbreviations: EMA, epithelial membrane antigen.
54 Elsheikh et al.
chondrosarcoma (285). The cytomorphology and histo- Table 43 Key Diagnostic Features—Rhabdomyoma
pathology findings (285) should always ‘‘trump’’ the
ancillary studies. Therefore, we believe that ancillary Smear with single large polygonal cells with abundant granular
cytoplasm
studies should be used to supplement, not replace, the Multiple eccentrically located nuclei with indistinct nucleoli
cytomorphologic findings and data obtained from such Intracytoplasmic cross striations seen in a minority of cells
tests should be interpreted only within the context of No mitotic activity
the full clinical and cytologic findings.
Rhabdomyoma
B. FNAB of Benign Soft Tissue Lesions Rhabdomyoma is a benign tumor with adult forms
occurring almost exclusively in the head and neck
Proliferative Myositis and Nodular Fasciitis
region of older adults (295). Up to 20% can be multifo-
These pseudosarcomatous lesions can occasionally cal. Cytologic smears demonstrate sparsely cellular
affect the head and neck region. Proliferative myositis specimens composed of large oval to round cell with
frequently arises in he sternomastoid muscle in abundant granular cytoplasm (Table 43). Occasionally,
patients aged between 45 and 65 years. Rapid growth cross-striations may be seen. The differential diagnosis
leads to confusion with a sarcoma. Proliferative myo- includes other neoplasms with granular cytoplasm
sitis can be considered the intramuscular homolog of including rhabdomyosarcomas, acinic cell carcinomas,
nodular faciitis (284). Aspiration smears contain a paragangliomas, and granular cell tumors. Smears of
mixture of skeletal muscle, reactive fibroblasts, and acinic cell carcinomas are highly cellular with cohesive
multinucleated cells (Table 41–42). Scattered large clusters of cells and contain many stripped nuclei in the
polygonal cells with prominent nucleoli and abundant background. FNAB smears from rhabdomyosarcoma
cytoplasm may be seen. The differential diagnosis demonstrate nuclear atypia and mitotic figures not
mainly includes sarcomas including rhabdomyo- seen in rhabdomyoma. IHC can help distinguish rhab-
sarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). domyomas from granular cell tumors, as only the latter
Nodular fasciitis also represents a pseudosarcomatous are S-100 positive (295).
response to injury that manifests as a rapidly enlarg-
ing mass (294). Peak incidence occurs in the third and Granular Cell Tumor
fourth decades with approximately 13% occurring in
the head and neck region (294). Smears are generally Granular cell tumor is a benign tumor of probable
cellular with an admixture of single and small clusters neural origin with a predilection for the head and
of spindle shaped cells along with variable numbers of neck region, with almost 50% occurring at this site, in
myxoid stromal fragments. Cells demonstrate vesicu- particular, the larynx and tongue. FNAB smears are
lar nuclei with small multiple nucleoli and wispy usually cellular with cells arranged in syncytial
cytoplasm. Mitoses are frequently seen and admixed groups and lying singly (296). Cells demonstrate
inflammatory cells are seen admixed with stromal abundant granular cytoplasm and small bland round
fragments. The cytologic smears display a ‘‘tissue- to oval nuclei. The differential diagnosis includes
culture’’ appearance on low power examination. Dis- rhabdomyoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (discussed
tinction from true sarcomas of soft tissue is based on a above), and alveolar soft part sarcoma (296). The latter
clinical history of rapid enlargement and presence of a demonstrates grated nuclear atypia and may show
mobile superficial nodule. intracytoplasmic crystalloids.
rhabdomyosarcoma tends to display more cytologic vacuolization is noted in the majority of rhabdomyo-
variability, especially in the embryonal subtype sarcomas; however, it is also commonly seen in
(Fig. 94 and 95). FNAB smears demonstrate cellular Ewing’s sarcoma and malignant lymphoma, which
smears with predominantly discohesive cells of small enter into the differential diagnosis (Fig. 95). A useful
to intermediate size and with round to ovoid hyper- cytologic finding is the presence of binucleated and
chromatic nuclei, and one or more prominent nucleoli. multinucleated cells, more often seen in the embryo-
A fragile scant rim of cytoplasm, which can be easily nal subtype (Fig. 94). IHC for myo-D1/myogenin,
stripped, is noted with many stripped nuclei present desmin, and actin are helpful in rendering a diagnosis
in the background. Occasional loosely cohesive of rhabdomyosarcoma. Cytogenetic studies demon-
groups of malignant cells can be seen. Cytoplasmic strate an 11q deletion and a 2;13 translocation in
alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (285).
Ewing’s Sarcoma/PNET
Among round cell sarcomas, Ewing sarcoma/PNET is
the most difficult to diagnose based solely on cytomor-
phology; however, ancillary studies can help to estab-
lish a diagnosis by FNAB. Aspirated specimens
demonstrate highly cellular smears with strikingly uni-
form round cells with a very high nuclear/cytoplasmic
ratio and cytoplasmic vacuoles and most cases also
demonstrate pseudo-rosette formation (Fig. 96). Immu-
nohistochemical staining for CD99 and FLI-1 can aid in
the diagnosis and cytogenetic analysis for the t(11;22)
reciprocal translocation has been successfully per-
formed on aspirated material (285).
Synovial Sarcomas
Approximately 3% of synovial sarcomas occur in the
head and neck region and have been reported in the
larynx, hypopharynx, and retropharyngeal areas. They
are of unknown histogenesis (299). Synovial sarcoma, Figure 98 Monophasic synovial sarcoma showing uniform,
with its biphasic morphology and immunohistochemical round- to oval-shaped cells in a loose cluster. The cells have a
staining profile may be considered a ‘‘carcinosarcoma’’ high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, tapering cytoplasm, and incon-
of soft parts. FNAB smears from synovial sarcomas spicuous nucleoli (DQ stain; magnification, 400).
(monophasic and biphasic) demonstrate highly cellular
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 57
Figure 99 Immunostaining for pancytokeratin shows positivity Figure 100 Aspirate from a malignant fibrous histiocytoma
within synovial sarcomas (immunohistochemical incubation for demonstrating a pleomorphic, multinucleated giant cell (DQ
AE1/AE3 pancytokeratin marker; magnification, 400). stain; oil magnification, 600).
Pleomorphic Sarcomas
Pleomorphic sarcomas are easily recognized as malig-
nant and high-grade malignancies with moderate to
highly cellular smears and predominantly dyscohesive
cells and tumor giant cells. They tend to affect older
adults (>50 years) Currently, all pleomorphic sarcomas
(by definition, high-grade sarcomas) are treated simi-
larly with surgical excision in most cases along with
chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Therefore,
histologic subtyping is not usually necessary and an
FNAB diagnosis of ‘‘pleomorphic sarcoma, not other-
wise specified’’ is generally sufficient to initiate appro-
priate therapy. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) Figure 101 Aspirate from a pleomorphic liposarcoma with a
classic lipoblast that shows an atypical and bizarre nucleus and
occurs in the sinonasal cavity and neck on rare occa-
abundant multivacuolated, lipid-laden cytoplasm (DQ stain; oil
sions. MFH is best considered a generic high-grade magnification, 600).
sarcoma demonstrating a pleomorphic phenotype that
can be more definitively classified with IHC and more
reproducible diagnostic criteria as other more specific
sarcomas, carcinoma, or melanoma (300). FNAB smears
are generally highly cellular with marked nuclear pleo-
MFH as both contain large numbers of anaplastic giant
morphism, tumor giant cell formation, and variable cell
cells. Demonstration of lipoblasts, which may be rare or
morphology ranging from spindle to epithelioid shapes
absent in an FNAB sample, is necessary for a definitive
(Fig. 100). Differentiation from sarcomatoid carcinomas
diagnosis of liposarcoma (Fig. 101) (301).
can be problematic. The presence of marked nuclear
anaplasia and prominent numbers of anaplastic giant
Osteosarcomas
cells favors a diagnosis of MFH. However, most cases
are best resolved by IHC for cytokeratins. Similarly, Most osteosarcomas in the head and neck region occur
immunostaining for S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A can in the jaw. Smears generally contain osteoid along
confirm a diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Pleomor- with markedly pleomorphic ovoid to spindled cells
phic liposarcomas can be difficult to differentiate from with prominent nucleoli.
58 Elsheikh et al.
Leiomyosarcomas
Leiomyosarcomas occur in the superficial soft tissues
of the head and neck and the low-grade leiomyosar- Figure 103 Singly dispersed and loosely clustered malignant
comas are aspirated most often. FNAB smears cells from a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with
demonstrate low to moderate cellularity with a pre- characteristic comma- to serpentine-shaped cells with hyper-
dominance of cohesive cell clusters arranged in paral- chromatic nuclei and variable tapering cytoplasm (DQ stain;
lel bundles and containing characteristic cigar-shaped magnification, 600).
nuclei (Fig. 102). High-grade lesions demonstrate
increasing nuclear pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli,
and background necrotic debris. The high-grade pleo- actin, caldesmin) can help to separate leiomyosarco-
morphic leiomyosarcomas may be difficult to separate mas from other spindle cell sarcomas.
from other adult pleomorphic sarcomas; however, FNAB smears from MPNST demonstrate obvi-
treatment is essentially similar and an FNAB diagno- ous malignant features with moderate to highly cellu-
sis of ‘‘pleomorphic sarcoma, not otherwise specified’’ lar smears containing a predominance of single cells
would be enough to initiate appropriate therapy. and some loosely cohesive clusters of malignant cells.
Low-grade leiomyosarcomas may be impossible to The characteristic wavy, bent-shaped nuclei with
separate from leiomyomas, however, the presence of hyperchromasia, irregular nuclear membranes, and
atypia and mitoses would support a leiomyosarcoma high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios are evident and mito-
diagnosis (291,303). Immunohistochemical staining ses can be seen with higher-grade lesions (Fig. 103)
with muscle markers (i.e., desmin, muscle specific (302). IHC can be useful in separating MPNST from
leiomyosarcoma (muscle markers), synovial sarcoma
(cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen), and
MFH. The most useful finding for making a correct
diagnosis is the clinical scenario for diagnosing a high-
grade MPNST with a history of preexisting neurofi-
broma, neurofibromatosis, and origin from a major
nerve trunk (211,291).
and necrosis is needed before rendering a malignant from all three germ layers such as respiratory, intesti-
diagnosis (330). nal, and nervous system (339). The lumen of all three
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. Epithelioid types of dermoid cyst displays a greasy, cheese-like,
hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular neoplasm white gray or yellow tan content, formed by shed
with a biological behavior intermediate between hem- keratin and sebaceous material (340–342). When lined
angioma and angiosarcoma (331). Only a few cases by squamous cells, differentiation between a thyro-
have been reported in the oral cavity, with a wide glossal duct cyst, branchial cleft cyst, and teratoid cyst
distribution of patient ages and female predominance can be difficult (342).
(332). The sites of the tumor include the tongue, lip, jaw,
buccal mucosa, and the floor of the mouth. A painless
solitary mass is the most common presentation (332). C. Malignant Oral Lesions
The smears are usually sparsely cellular consist- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
ing of predominantly single, large polygonal cells in a
bloody background. A few atypical cells embedded in Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common
a dense metachromatic stroma can be seen. These oral lesion to be sampled by swab and/or scrape
atypical cells have abundant dense or fine granular smears (318). Prior scrape or aspiration cytology of
cytoplasm with ill-defined cell borders. The nuclei are an indurated, raised, or ulcerated intraoral lesion,
enlarged, oval, and eccentrically located, with fine combined with aspiration of any associated cervical
chromatin and indistinct nucleoli. Some binucleated lymphadenopathy will establish the diagnosis in the
and multinucleated cells can be present. Characteris- majority of cases. In the absence of metastatic disease,
tically, some cells show large cytoplasmic vacuoles scrape cytology cannot reliably separate in situ from
compressing the nuclei, some of which contained invasive squamous tumor. In this instance, biopsy
degenerated RBCs. Intranuclear inclusions are seen may be recommended.
and considered to be the most reliable diagnostic Squamous cell carcinoma is divided into kerati-
feature in FNAB (333–335). Distinction between epi- nizing and nonkeratinizing types (318,343). Cytologic
thelioid hemangioendothelioma and epithelioid features of keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma is
angiosarcoma may be difficult. However, significant characterized by cellular smears in which numerous
cytologic atypia, nuclear pleomorphism, brisk mitotic dispersed anucleated keratinized squames and kerati-
activity, and necrosis favor a diagnosis of epithelioid nized nucleated cells (Fig. 108). The smears contain
angiosarcoma (336). Epithelioid sarcoma usually many single cells and clusters of neoplastic cells are
occurs in the distal upper extremities of young adults present. The individual cells have abundant pink to
(332). Aspirates are hypercellular and composed of orange dense cytoplasm. Squamous pearls are often
both cellular aggregates and isolated tumor cells. seen. When keratin debris is abundant, foreign body
Epithelioid sarcoma is positive for vimentin and cyto- giant cells may be present. Moderately and poorly
keratin and is negative for vascular markers such as differentiated squamous cell carcinomas demonstrate
factor VIII, CD31 and CD34, in contrast to epithelioid little evidence of keratinization consisting of individual
hemangioendothelioma (330–332).
Epithelioid hemangioma. Epithelioid hemangio-
ma is a benign vascular tumor rarely seen in the oral
cavity (337). It usually presents as a small (< 3cm), red
or brown, circumscribed mass, and composed of
lobular proliferation of vascular like channels lined
with plump endothelial cells (337). The vascular pro-
liferation is associated with infiltration of lympho-
cytes, plasma cells, and abundant eosinophils. On
FNA, the neoplastic cells may be spindle or polygonal
(338). The nuclei are bland and usually oval with
smooth nuclear contours and vesicular chromatin.
The cytoplasm is granular and eosinophilic, but
lacks the dense texture of hemangioendothelioma
cells. In addition, most of the neoplastic cells form
cohesive and vascular-like cell aggregates with only a
few single neoplastic cells in the background. Inflam-
matory components, particularly eosinophils are pres-
ent in aspirates of epithelioid hemangioma, but are Figure 108 Well differentiated kertinizing squamous cell carci-
not seen in epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (338). noma. Smears are characterized by high cellularity with abun-
Teratoid cysts. Teratoid cysts consist of three dant anucleated and nucleated keratinized squamous cells.
distinct histological types: epidermoid (simple), lined Differentiating reactive atypia in branchial cleft cyst from well-
by stratified squamous epithelium without dermal differentiated squamous cell carcinoma can be challenging.
appendages; dermoid (compound), consisting of typi- Features supporting the branchial cleft cyst include numerous
cal squamous epithelium and dermal appendages anucleated squames and prominent acute inflammation (not
such as hair, hair follicles, and sebaceous and sweat seen in this smear) (DQ stain; magnification, 200).
glands; and teratoid (complex), consisting of tissues
62 Elsheikh et al.
amorphous debris and frequently contains neutro- membrane–like material should exclude ACC. PLGA
phils. Squamous cell nuclei can show reactive atypia should not be confused with SDC, which is a high-
and can be a pitfall for squamous cell carcinoma. grade and clinically aggressive tumor showing con-
Increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios, irregularity siderable cellular pleomorphism, anisonucleosis, and
of nuclear outline, and nuclear hyperchromatism are tissue fragments with a cribriform pattern (355).
characteristics for squamous cell carcinoma. In addi-
tion, the background of squamous cell carcinoma Nonepithelial Tumors
contains more necrotic debris and fewer polymorpho-
nuclear cells than aspirates of benign cysts. However, Nodal and extranodal lymphoma. Primary intraoral
well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma can have and perioral, localized nodal, and extranodal lymphoma
minimal atypia while branchial cleft cysts can show forms a considerable proportion of all lymphomatous
significant inflammatory atypia, making the distinc- presentations. We recommend that the initial investiga-
tion more challenging (Fig. 5). In such situations, tive biopsy should be FNAB. The diagnosis of lympho-
excision biopsy is highly recommended, especially in ma requires recognition of cell type with appropriate
older patients. application of immunostaining/or flow cytometry to
Aspirates from midline thyroglossal duct cysts define the immunophenotype (318,322).
may be indistinguishable from branchial cleft cysts. Kaposi’s sarcoma. In AIDS patients, Kaposi’s sar-
Cytomorphologic features are not unique; therefore, coma commonly presents with nodular orofacial masses
clinico-radiologic correlation should lead to the cor- without ulceration and is especially seen involving the
rect diagnosis. Abundant colloid, most often with palate (356). There may or may not be accompanying
ciliated columnar epithelium, is the predominant lymphadenopathy (318,356). Aspiration cytology usu-
cytopathologic finding (349). ally produces a hypocellular specimen. However, the
diagnosis may be more readily made when lymph
Salivary Gland Lesions
nodes are involved (357,358). If cellular, the aspirate
shows tangles and individually dispersed cells. The cells
Tumors of the minor (accessory) salivary glands most are spindle or polygonal cells with bland, plump nuclei
commonly occur as nodular or ulcerative lesions in the without hyperchromatism, and occasionally reveal
tongue, hard palate, or buccal mucosa. Minor salivary characteristic longitudinal nuclear grooves (356). Hemo-
tumors are commonly malignant such as mucoepider- siderin granules may be found in accompanying macro-
moid, adenoid cystic, and PLGA (Table 48). FNA of phages. The most characteristic cytologic features are
salivary gland neoplasms are discussed in detail intact tissue fragments composed of overlapping spin-
elsewhere in this chapter. dle cells with nuclear distortion and ill-defined cyto-
PLGA. PLGA is a rare neoplasm that occurs plasmic borders. Smaller groups of loosely cohesive
almost exclusively in the minor salivary glands, par- spindle-shaped cells and individual spindle cells with
ticularly in the palate (350). This tumor is a low-grade cytoplasm can also be helpful features (356). Radial
malignancy that infrequently metastasizes to regional arrangement and nuclear crush artifacts have not been
lymph node and rarely metastasizes to lung (350). described in other spindle-cell intranodal lesions that
FNA shows hypercellular smears with numerous epi- could be considered in differential diagnoses (51). Spin-
thelial cells in a blood-stained background. The cells dle cells are usually positively immunostained for factor
are mostly arranged in branching papillae, sheets, and VIII, CD34, CD31, and vimentin and negative for S-100,
clusters composed of bland, relatively uniform cells. alpha-smooth muscle actin (a-SMA), and desmin.
The cells are cuboidal in shape, with mild atypia. The Neurofibroma. Occasionally, neurofibroma
nuclei are enlarged, round to oval, moderately hyper- occurs in the tongue and may be diagnosed by FNA
chromatic in shape, with coarsely granular, dispersed biopsy. The appreciation of microtissue fragments of
chromatin, and absent or inconspicuous nucleoli. The thin spindle cells with wavy spindle nuclei along with
cytoplasm is moderate, dense, basophilic, with indis- loosely cohesive and individual scattered spindle cells
tinct borders (351–354). Bare nuclei also frequently are seen (321). Often intermingled mast cells are
appear in the background. Myxoid matrix, either present in the background.
dispersed in the background or interspersed with Sarcomas. Chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, rhab-
the cellular elements, is also seen often. domyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, liposar-
The differential diagnosis includes ACC, mucoe- coma, and angiosarcoma may all present as primary
pidermoid, monomorphic adenoma, and pleomorphic tumors in the soft tissues and bone of the oral cavity.
adenoma. However, absence of squamous cells and The cytologic findings are variable depending on the
extracellular or intracellular mucin should exclude type of sarcoma with features comparable to soft tissue
mucoepidermoid. The absence of three-dimensional malignancies at other sites. Complete discussion of the
cell clusters with a central core of hyaline basement FNA cytology features of sarcoma has been previously
presented in this chapter.
Table 48 Differential Diagnosis of Minor Salivary Gland Tumors
Arising in Oral Cavity
Pleomorphic adenoma
VII. NASAL CAVITY AND PARANASAL SINUSES
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma A variety of benign and malignant lesions affect the
Adenoid cystic carcinoma
nose, paranasal sinuses, and facial bones. The para-
Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA)
pharyngeal space is a well-defined anatomic zone of
64 Elsheikh et al.
loose connective tissue lying deep to the tonsil and but smears are usually very bloody (323,343). Plump
lateral to the pharynx. Rare neoplasms arising within spindle-shaped cells with pale indistinct cytoplasm
the parapharyngeal space are salivary gland tumors, are admixed with blood cells. The nuclei are bacillary
squamous-cell carcinomas, adenocarcinoma, lipoma, shape with blunt ends and a few nuclei may have
neurofibroma, paraganglioma, schwannoma, chor- folds or bends in their nuclear membranes. The chro-
doma, and NHL (359). matin is finely granular and small, but distinct nucle-
oli may be present.
Angiofibromas can be distinguished from nerve
A. Benign Lesions sheath tumors and malignant vascular neoplasms by
Paranasal Sinus Mucoceles their location and clinical features. Vascular malignan-
cies generally have a population of plumper cells with
Paranasal sinus mucoceles are cystic expansions of the more nuclear atypia (367).
paranasal sinuses due to obstruction of the draining
ostia. Aspiration of these masses will yield thick clear Sinonasal Hemangiopericytoma (Solitary Fibrous Tumor)
white mucus, which contains foamy or vacuolated
Approximately 20% of hemangiopericytomas are
mucus-filled hisiocytes (321). In long-standing cases,
found in the head and neck, especially the nasal cavity
the surrounding bone may show radiologic evidence
and paranasal sinuses. Histologically, the tumor is
of resorption.
circumscribed and composed of tightly packed prolif-
eration of short spindle or oval cells that form arcades
Rhinoscleroma around vascular slits and spaces lined by endothelial
Rhinoscleroma is a chronic granulomatous disease cells (368). Reticulin stains demonstrate reticulin fibers
caused by the Gram-negative bacteria, Klebsiella around each pericyte.
pneumoniae rhinoscleromatis, occurs most frequently The cytologic smears are modestly cellular with
in the middle East, Africa, and South America, and bloody background (368). The cells usually form tight
primarily involves the nasal cavity and nasopharynx aggregates and run in bundles, often with an arching
(343). Cytologic examination shows granulomatous appearance. Individual cells are oval or short spindle-
inflammation in which foamy macrophages (Mikulicz shaped and radiate along the long axis of the bundles.
cells) are admixed with plasma cells and granular The nuclei are bland, uniform, and oval, with finely
histiocytes (360). These macrophages contain short granular chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli. No
rod-shaped organisms with thick capsules and bipolar mitotic figures or necrosis are identified. The presence
cytoplasmic enlargements, best identified with of branched capillaries and abundant basement mem-
Warthin-Starry stain (361). brane material supports a diagnosis of hemangioper-
icytoma (368). Malignant hemangiopericytoma
Myospherulosis
demonstrates uninuclear tumor cells with high nuclear
to cytoplasmic ratios, evenly distributed chromatin and
Myospherulosis usually follows nasal surgery and one or two small but distinct nucleoli (369).
packing of the area with petroleum-impregnated
gauze (362–364). A chronic inflammatory infiltrate B. Malignant Lesions
surrounds spaces within a fibrotic stroma. Lying free
within the spaces are saclike structures called ‘‘parent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
bodies,’’ which contain many spherules.
Smears contain large numbers of spherules mea- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a relatively uncommon
suring between 4 and 7 mm in diameter, best seen in malignancy in western counties, but frequently seen
Papanicolaou stain (362). They have smooth distinct in China. It can be classified into keratinizing, non-
borders and contain discrete internal bodies that may keratinizing, and undifferentiated types. The neo-
be single and central with a halo or multiple attached plasms may present as a neck mass, with hearing
to the periphery of the large spheres (362,363). The loss, nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, headache, or
spherules are orange to green. Myospherulosis must bleeding (343).
be distinguished from fungal infections. However, Metastasis to neck lymph nodes often is the
fungal culture and stains are negative. initial presenting sign of occult head and neck carci-
nomas, including undifferentiated nasopharyngeal
Angiofibromas
carcinoma (370). Cytologic findings from metastatic
deposits have been reported (370–373). Cytologic find-
Angiofibromas occur almost exclusively in young ings in FNA obtained from the keratinizing and non-
adult men. It may be hormonally-induced, secondary keratinizing subtypes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
to imbalance between estrogen and testosterone levels resemble squamous cell carcinoma arising at other
(365). Most angiofibromas arise along the lateral or sites. The aspirates of undifferentiated nasopharyn-
superior nasopharyngeal wall and associated with geal carcinoma are more unique. These smears are
local destruction. Angiofibromas manifest with unilat- highly cellular and show clusters of cohesive neoplas-
eral nasal obstruction, epistaxis, facial swelling, tic cells with sharp or irregular edges, along with
exophthalmos, diplopia, or headache (366). Clinically, numerous single neoplastic cells (Fig. 111). The nuclei
the tumor is lobulated, sessile, red to tan, filling the of the neoplastic epithelial cells are oval or spindle-
nasopharynx (366). Cytologic findings are variable, shaped, with hyperchromatic nuclei and prominent
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 65
positive sustentacular cells. However, the cytomorphol- tive in SNUC and when positive are weak and patchy
ogy of paraganglioma is completely distinct from olfac- (388).
tory neuroblastoma (384).
SNUC is a rare tumor that occurs in the nasal Sinonasal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
passages and paranasal sinuses. The malignancy usu-
ally presents with nasal obstruction and septal devia- The differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated
tion. Oral examination may reveal a large ulcerative malignant tumors of sinonasal tract includes SNUC,
lesion involving the maxilla, frequently extending olfactory neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, mela-
across the midline (385,386). SNUC is highly aggressive noma, and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
tumor with a poor prognosis and is often inoperable. (389). FNA of sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma
FNA smears are highly cellular and contain are cellular and show a monotonous population of
poorly differentiated small- to medium-sized cells small to medium-sized cells, which can be singly
with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios (385–388). dispersed, form loose aggregates and/or arranged in
The cells are arranged in nests, trabeculae, and sheets. irregularly shaped sheets (389,390). Features of neuro-
The nuclei are mildly to moderately pleomorphic. endocrine differentiation can be found including
Nucleoli vary from prominent and large to inconspic- rosette-like structures, and round or oval-shaped
uous and small (Fig. 115). Chromatin is usually nuclei with stippled chromatin and indistinct nucleoli.
homogenous and diffuse. Numerous mitotic figures, There is little variation in nuclear size and shape and
apoptotic nuclei, and necrosis are seen. Immunoreac- the cytoplasm can be poorly preserved. A fibrillary
tion to cytokeratin, and EMA is identified (385,388). background is not seen (389,390). A high-grade neu-
Chromogranin and synaptophysin are usually nega- roendocrine carcinoma with extensive necrosis, high
nuclear to cytoplasm ratio, nuclear molding, pleomor-
phism, crush artifact, lack of nucleoli, and numerous
mitoses has been described (391,392). IHC shows
positive staining for chromogranin, and synaptophy-
sin with strong diffuse cytoplasmic staining with
cytokeratins (AE1/3 and CAM 5.2). Olfactory neuro-
blastoma usually shows abundant fibrillary material
between the tumor cells, rosette-like structures and
sometimes Homer-Wright or olfactory rosettes, unlike
sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (380,385,392).
Olfactory neuroblastoma is usually negative for cyto-
keratin, but up to one third can show focal positivity.
Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma
Sinonasal adenocarcinoma is uncommon and may be
related to exposure to wood dust and leather process-
ing. It arises from the surface epithelium and seromu-
cous glands. They frequently have an intestinal
appearance (393). The aspirate is moderately cellular,
with cohesive clusters of atypical columnar cells lying
in a background of cellular debris and mucin. Indi-
vidual cells are columnar and contained granular or
mucin-rich cytoplasm surrounding hyperchromatic-
elongated nuclei. The chromatin is coarsely granular
and prominent nucleoli are frequently present (343).
Sinonasal adenocarcinoma must be distin-
guished from metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma. A
clinical history is most helpful in this distinction.
Evidence of mucin production, and glandular differ-
entiation, separate these lesions from squamous cell
carcinoma.
Paraganglioma
Figure 115 Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. (A and B) Carotid body tumors (paraganglioma) are benign neo-
FNAB is cellular with dyscohesive undifferentiated small- to plasms that arise from the autonomic nervous system.
medium-sized cells and high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios. Nuclei They can occur at any age but are more frequent seen
are mildly pleomorphic with prominent nucleoli and frequent in the fifth decade, manifesting as a slowly growing
mitosis. Immunostaining for cytokeratin, CEA, and EMA will painless neck mass that is usually asymptomatic.
confirm the diagnosis [(A) Papanicolaou stain; magnification, FNA cytologic findings of a carotid body tumor
200 (B) DQ stain; magnification, 400]. are characterized by low to moderate cellularity
with bloody background (Table 51). Smears show
68 Elsheikh et al.
(403). Although, odontogenic myxoma is a benign aggregates. The mononuclear cells have dense, well-
neoplasm, it may have an infiltrative pattern, involv- defined cytoplasm and round nuclei with thin, delicate
ing the facial skeleton such as the mandible or soft membranes and fine chromatin. Additionally, some of
tissue (318). the cells have reniform nuclei with nuclear grooves or
FNA cytologic features of myxomas will reveal folds. The majority of smears have chondroid matrix.
abundant myxoid material in which slender ‘‘spindle- The appreciation of the chondroblasts is the most
shaped’’ or stellate mesenchymal cells are trapped useful feature in establishing the cytologic diagnosis
(404–407). These cells have elongated nuclei with (409,410).
bland chromatin. The tissue fragments obtained on
aspiration has a three-dimensional appearance and E. Ameloblastoma
often have entrapped delicately branching capillaries.
While the cells may appear slightly atypical, there is Ameloblastoma is the most common odontogenic
no evidence of nuclear anaplasia. Low cellularity and tumor, representing 1% of all jaw lesions. This is a
absence of cellular atypia, combined with the abun- locally aggressive tumor, arising from odontogenic
dant myxoid material in the background are impor- epithelial nests within the mandibule (411). It usually
tant features to differentiate this lesion from myxoid presents as a painless swelling with nasal obstruction.
sarcomas (404,405). Ameloblastoma is characterized by an unencapsu-
lated growth of epithelial nests and sheets, arranged
C. Giant Cell Lesions around a central zone of loosely spaced cells resem-
bling the stellate reticulum of the enamel organ. The
Giant cell lesions of the jaw and facial bones consist of epithelial cells are columnar or cuboidal cells with
four major entities represented by true giant cell small bland nuclei polarized away from the basement
tumor, giant cell reparative granuloma, aneurysmal membrane (412).
bone cyst, and the giant cell lesions of hyperparathy- FNA smears are usually cellular and contain a
roidism. All these lesions contain a mixture of small variable mixture of squamous, basaloid, spindle-
spindle-shaped to oval mononuclear stromal cells shaped and stellate cells (413). Sheets and clusters of
with a prominent number of multinucleated osteo- basaloid epithelial cells have poorly defined cyto-
clast-like giant cells (343). plasmic borders, and peripheral palisading is a prom-
Aspirates obtained from these giant cell lesions inent feature (413,414). The nuclear to cytoplasmic
have a similar appearance, providing few clues to ratios are high, with nuclei having coarse chromatin
distinguish them (405–407). The aspirate is often highly and indistinct nucleoli. The squamous cells demon-
cellular with a bloody background. The cellular com- strate individual cell keratinization with a glassy hya-
ponent is composed of osteoclast-like giant cells and line dense cytoplasm and open chromatin. A few
small mononucleated spindle- to oval-shaped cells fragments of loosely aggregated spindle cells repre-
(406). The nuclei of the spindle, oval and giant cells senting the stellate reticulum are often seen. The
are identical in giant cell tumors, but the nuclei of the background contains granular debris, fragments of
spindle-shaped cells in other lesions tend to be more pink stroma, and inflammatory cells. Malignant
elongated. Giant cells are also more numerous in the cases that metastasized have demonstrated prominent
giant cell tumors, but this is often difficult to estimate cytologic pleomorphism, cellular crowding with
on FNA. The giant cells found in true giant cell tumors molding and a high mitotic/karyorrhectic index
have more nuclei (more than 20) than do those seen in (415,416).
other giant cell proliferations (343). In all these lesions, Separation of ameloblastoma from metastatic
the giant cells frequently palisade around the periphery squamous cell carcinoma may be difficult, but recog-
of the stromal cell clusters. Aspirates from aneurysmal nition of the basaloid cell component and prominent
bone cyst are highly bloody with a few giant cells and palisading are helpful features for the diagnosis of
stromal cells scattered throughout the smears, making ameloblastoma.
the diagnosis difficult. Hemosiderin is abundant in
giant cell reparative granuloma, but is rarely seen in F. Odontogenic Cysts and Inflammatory Cysts
giant cell tumor (408). Open biopsy may be necessary
to properly classify these lesions (408). Several types of cysts develop from the dental epithe-
lium and may produce radiolucent lesions within the
D. Chondroblastoma mandible or maxilla. FNA is rarely performed for
these cysts since they are often covered by intact
Chondroblastoma usually presents as a lytic lesion in bone (406,407). They are subclassified on the basis of
the epiphyseal region of long bones, but can rarely origin, histologic and radiographic findings into pri-
affect temporomandibular region. They tend to occur mordial cysts, odontogenic keratocysts, calcifying
in older patients and have a high rate of local odontogenic cysts, and dentigerous cysts.
recurrence. The characteristic radiologic image is a On histologic examination, all cysts show a strati-
growth-plate related, sharply defined radiolucency, fied squamous epithelium lining. Cytologic examina-
containing areas of calcification with sclerotic margin. tion will show small numbers of benign-appearing
Smears are moderately to markedly cellular, composed squamous, columnar, or cuboidal cells admixed with
of osteoclast-type giant cells and mononucleated inflammatory cells in a watery background. An abun-
round to polygonal cells occurring singly or in loose dance of keratinizing cells and anucleate squamous
70 Elsheikh et al.
(445–447). FNAB has become an established diagnostic histologic concordance, with less than 2% false-
method for the evaluation of a variety of neoplastic and negative/false-positive rates and 6.3% insufficient
nonneoplastic intraocular lesions (448–452). FNA is a specimens (458). However, in Krohel’s series, a low
minimally invasive procedure without the morbidity cytopathologic concordance was reported with 24%
and expense of an orbitotomy. nondiagnostic or insufficient specimens (461). IHC
The diagnosis of orbital lesion is usually based could be helpful in assessment of specimens and
on clinical and radiologic findings. However, in some appropriate classification of the tumors (457). Eide et
occasions, the clinical and radiologic diagnoses are not al. (443), performed IHC on over half of their patients
conclusive, requiring a tissue diagnosis. FNAB has and they were able to increase the positive predictive
been used for the initial tissue diagnosis of orbital value of the cytologic diagnois from 93% to 96% and
mass lesions. There are two significant advantages of increased the specificity from 67 to 83%.
orbital FNA for the primary diagnosis of lacrimal and There are many advantages to orbital FNAB,
adnexal gland lesions. First, a definitive FNA diagno- including high accuracy (95%) in distinguishing
sis saves the patient from unnecessary surgical inter- benign from malignant lesions and allowing an imme-
vention. Second, preoperative FNA diagnoses may diate diagnosis reducing patient anxiety. FNAB also
help to better plan the surgical approach. FNAB is obviates the need for open biopsies in 40% to 50% of
generally reserved for the following situations: cases (458). However, FNAB does not allow assess-
(i) patients with nonresectable deep orbital lesions ment of tissue architecture, may produce a scanty
that require extensive surgery for diagnosis, (ii) the specimen and interpretation requires a trained cyto-
failure to establish a diagnosis with noninvasive imag- patholgist. Fibrotic or desmoplastic lesions of the orbit
ing techniques, (iii) patients with orbital lesions who may result in low cellular smears, with lack of diag-
cannot tolerate a more extensive procedure, and (iv) nostic material in 10% to 18% of specimens. False-
patients unwilling undergo definitive treatment negative biopsy may occur if the needle does not enter
before pathologic confirmation of the diagnosis the orbital lesion in question. Cohen et al. (462) found
(445,447,449,450). that tumors less than 2 mm had a higher incidence of
Orbital examination, visual acuity, and fundus false-negative diagnoses than those greater than
examination should be performed by the ophthalmol- 4 mm. Similarly, Augsburger et al. reported a diag-
ogist. Informed consent is obtained, with an explana- nostic accuracy of 68% in small choroidal lesions (463).
tion of the possible complications. Patients should be Although orbital FNA is a relatively safe proce-
informed that a negative biopsy is not definitive, and dure, there are certain limitations (459). Cystic orbital
even a diagnostic FNAB does not eliminate the possi- lesions should not be subjected to FNAB. Patients with
bility of subsequent surgical exploration. Local anes- a bleeding diathesis, those on anticoagulation, or
thesia is not used because there is generally minimal patients with highly vascular lesions, such as a sus-
pain from the FNA procedure and anesthetic injection pected arteriovenous malformation, cavernous hem-
could distort the tissue. angioma, or hemangiopericytoma, should not
For orbital FNAB, we usually use 23- to 25-gauge undergo FNAB (459). Individuals with high myopia,
needle, attached to a 10-mm syringe to generate especially those with intraocular lesions are at greater
negative suction. Orbital ultrasonography or computed risk for globe perforation, and should be approached
tomography (CT) guidance, may improve the accuracy with care. Uncooperative patients, such as the mentally
of deep orbital aspirates (453,454). The needle is intro- challenged or children, are poor candidates for orbital
duced by the ophthalmogist through the upper or FNAB (459).
lower lid in the lateral or medial quadrants, rather The risk of needle tract recurrence with the use
than in the superior or inferior quadrants. Once the of FNA (21–25 gauge) biopsy is exceedingly low.
needle is in the lesion, small forward and backward Henderson suggested that solid masses of lacrimal
movements through the lesion are made, while suction gland should not undergo FNA because of the risk of
is maintained. The suction should be released prior to disseminated disease (464). However, no case of
exit of the needle. For routine studies both alcohol tumor seeding due to the aspiration has been
fixed, Papanicolaou-stained, as well as air-dried, DQ- reported. In cases of suspected retinoblastoma, aspi-
stained smears are prepared. Zajdela et al. described a ration is contraindicated because of the risk of spread
successful series of orbital FNA without suction (455). along the needle track of this notoriously ‘‘sticky’’
The on-site cytopathologist may assess sample adeq- tumor (465). Some authors have reported experimen-
uacy to decrease false-negative results at the time of the tal data, suggesting that there is a risk of needle tract
procedure (456). In addition, tissue culture, immunos- seeding of melanoma cells (447,466). Shields et al.
taining, and even molecular studies can be performed have recommended enucleation within 24 hours of
on these samples (427,430,448,457). biopsy of a proven malignant neoplasm (466).
Complications of orbital FNA are not common,
Diagnostic Accuracy but can be serious. The more common complications
are retrobulbar hemorrhage and retinal detachment.
Combining the clinical and radiologic features of The most serious uncommon complication is eye
orbital lesions, with the aspiration biopsy results, the perforation, which may require cryoretinopexy
diagnostic yield of orbital FNAB can be greater than (467,468). Retrobulbar hemorrhage following FNAB
80% (458–460). In a review of 292 FNAB of palp- usually resolves without ocular sequelae. Other com-
able orbital and eyelid tumors, 87%, had a precise plications of FNAB include transient visual loss,
72 Elsheikh et al.
B. Benign Lesions
Infections
Viral diseases. Viral diseases include molluscum
contagiosum, verruca vulgaris, herpes zoster, and
herpes types 1 and 2, which can infect the lids and
conjunctiva. Some of these diseases are frequently
sexually transmitted and can be sight threatening.
Viral disease is not usually diagnosed by cytology
alone, but it is possible to diagnose poxvirus induced
molluscum contagiosum by identifying eosinophilic,
rounded cytoplasmic inclusions. Similarly, virus
induced veruca vulgaris and the effects of the herpes
simplex viruses 1 and 2 can be diagnosed by cytologi-
cal techniques (425,428). Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
infection can also be seen in immunocompromised
patients (469). Corneal scrapings showed many
enlarged cells with characteristic CMV nuclear inclu-
sions. The diagnosis can be confirmed by in situ
hybridization, and viral culture.
Bacterial and fungal conjunctivitis. Bacterial and
fungal conjunctivitis are best diagnosed by culture
(470,471). Cytology may be helpful in detecting
unusual infections such as actinomysis, acanthamoe-
bic keratitis (472), or blastomycosis, especially when
the organisms are superficial. In HIV and immuno-
suppressed patients, intraocular infections are more
common. FNA has been used to diagnose intraocular
aspergilosis, mucormycosis (Fig. 118) and coccidiodo-
mycosis (473,474). Cytologic examination of aqueous
Figure 118 Orbital fungal infection: FNA technique can be used
humor can reveal inflammatory cells (i.e., polymor- to diagnose orbital fungal infection. Smears usually show necrot-
phonuclear leukocytes, histiocytes-macrophages, and ic background with mixed chronic inflammatory cells. (A) Asper-
lymphocytes), cocci or other microorganisms gillus species with abtuse branching septate hyphae, better seen
(475,476). The collected sample in the syringe should with special fungal stain. (B) Mucormycosis infection in diabetic
be immediately sent to the laboratory: half mixed with patient demonstrates ribbon-like, pale-staining, pauciseptate,
an equal amount of 50% ethanol solution and fresh branching hyphae [(A) Silver fungal stain; magnification, 200
specimens for microbiologic examination. (B) DQ stain; magnification, 600).
Vernal conjunctivitis. Vernal conjunctivitis is a
recurrent hypersensitivity reaction of the conjunctiva,
occurring in atypic-allergic patients. Patients have
increased levels of IgE in the serum and tears (477). A number of entities can mimic ocular infection
This condition may mimic other causes of ‘‘red eye’’ including ghost cell glaucoma, phacolytic glaucoma,
and may be subjected to microscopic evaluation. The phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis, and iridocyclitis
resulting smears contain inflammatory cells, including (475). In general, a more dense infiltration by neuro-
eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, and lymphocytes. If phils and lymphocytes supports the diagnosis of
the condition is chronic, goblet cells may be abundant. infectious endophthalmitis, even in the absence of
Careful search for signs of Chlamydia is important, micro-organisms in the cytologic specimens of the
because the treatment of the two diseases is different. aqueous humor.
Chlamydial conjunctivitis (trachoma). Chlamydial Ghost cell glaucoma. In ghost cell glaucoma,
conjunctivitis (trachoma) has characteristic inclusions, RBCs are present in the vitreous for an extended
which can be appreciated in conjunctival smears in 8% period losing their hemoglobin. They become ghost
of patients (478,479). Naib correlated perinatal ocular erythrocytes leading to mechanical obstruction and
and maternal genital infections concluding that 61% glaucoma. The cytological findings are pathognomo-
of 54 mothers of a set of infected newborns had nic, when numerous ghost erythrocytes in the absence
diagnosable Chlamydia in recent cervical smears of inflammatory cells are identified.
(480). PCR shows comparable results to standard Phacolytic glaucoma. Phacolytic glaucoma may
McCoy cell culture, with equal specificity and more occur exogenously after lens damage by traumatic
senitivity (479). disruption or endogenously with hypermature cataract.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 73
Granulomatous Lesions
Foreign body granuloma. Foreign body granuloma
may present with a subconjunctival or orbital lesion.
Usually patients are not aware of a previous injury or
Figure 119 Ruptured dermoid cyst. Smears show anucleate
implanted foreign material. Patients present with a red squamous cells, keratin debris, and granulomatous inflammation
eye and reduced eye movements. FNA demonstrates with multinucleated giant cells [Papanicolaou stain; (A) magnifi-
granulomas with foreign-body type giant cells. Infec- cation, 200 (B) magnification, 400].
tions should be excluded with culture and special stains
(Table 52).
Chalazions. Chalazions are lipogranulomatous
reactions of the eyelid, occurring when Meibomian However, deep dermoids and those with extension
gland obstruction occurs secondary to inspissated through bone sutures are frequently difficult to diag-
secretions (485). These painful swellings are caused nose clinically and may be subjected to FNA (458).
by retained secretions of the Meibomian glands and FNA contains anucleate squamous cells, keratin debris,
are characterized by a mixture of lipogranulomatous and occasionally hair shafts. A ruptured dermoid cyst
and suppurative inflammation. Occasionally the cha- will also contain granulomatous inflammation with
lazion may present as a discrete nodular mass, mim- multinucleated giant cells (Fig. 119).
icking a sebaceous carcinoma (447,485). Smears of the Wegener’s granulomatosis. Wegener’s granulo-
aspirate show numerous hisiocytes with foamy cyto- matosis is characterized by necrotizing vasculitis and
plasm and occasional granulation tissue. granulomatous inflammation in the upper respiratory
Dermoid cyst. Dermoid cyst is the most common tract, lung, and kidneys. Orbital involvement occurs in
orbial tumor in children. It is preferable not to aspirate about 20% of the cases and is usually bilateral. These
a dermoid cyst to avoid spillage of its contents (485). lesions frequently have extensive fibrosis with scanty,
non-diagnostic FNA specimen.
Sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis occurs more frequently
Table 52 Differential Diagnosis of Orbital Granulomatous
Lesions
in black women, involving lacrimal glands in 7% of
patients. Ocular sarcoidosis can clinically simulate a
Chalazions neoplasm. FNA demonstrates granulomatous inflam-
Dermoid cyst, ruptured mation without necrosis (Fig. 120). Multinucleated
Infections giant cells are usually evident. Culture and special
Wegener’s granulomatosis
stains are needed to rule out an infectious etiology.
Sarcoidosis
Whipple disease
Whipple disease. Selsky et al. (486) reported ocular
involvement in a patient with Whipple’s disease.
74 Elsheikh et al.
Hemangiopericytoma
Hemangiopericytoma is a vascularized tumor with
characteristic staghorn appearance of vessels, and
interspersed spindle cells. The clinical findings
include proptosis, palpable mass, pain, and diplopia.
FNA reveals spindle and oval cells with occasional
branched vessels.
Mucoceles
Mucoceles are tumors composed of extracellular
mucous debris, caused by obstruction of the ostia of
the sinuses. The frontal sinus is the most common
origin for orbital mucoceles (487). FNA reveals a large
amount of mucoid material with occasional vacuolated
macrophages (mucophages).
Pilomatrixoma
Pilomatrixoma is a benign neoplasm that appears as
subepidermal nodule in the head and neck region,
most commonly in children and young adults. Cyto-
logically, pilomatrixomas are characterized by cellular
Figure 120 Granulomatous inflammation. (A) Granulomatous smears with three cell populations (488,489) (Fig. 121).
reaction with chronic inflammation and extensive necrosis usual- The first is of the small basaloid type, with scanty
ly results from infectious agents. (B) Sarcoidosis aspirates cytoplasm and round regular nuclei. The nuclear
demonstrate granulomatous inflammation with clean background chromatin of these cells is finely granular and evenly
and occasional multinucleated giant cells. Sarcoidosis is the
distributed. The second is of the squamous cells type,
diagnosis of exclusion after negative special fungal stains with
clinical and serological correlation. [(A). Papanicolaou stain;
with bland nuclei and evidence of keratinization. The
magnification, 400 (B) DQ stain; magnification, 400]. third, which is the epithelial cell type, is the shadow or
ghost cell, showing a high degree of keratinization
and lacks demonstrable nuclei. The ghost cells are
most easily seen on air-dried material, but are also
Characteristic vitreous opacities and retinitis, with con- recognized on Papanicolaou-stained smears. They fre-
sequent compromised visual acuity, are a result of quently have a pale, poorly discernible cytoplasm and
infiltration of the tissue with foamy macrophages. often appear only as outlines of cells. In addition to
These benign histiocytes contain intracytoplasmic PAS the epithelial component, scattered multinucleated
positive material. Electron microscopy discloses baciliary foreign body giant cell reaction to the keratinous
bodies. Many patients respond favorably to antibiotics. material is often present. A pitfall for a false-positive
diagnosis is not recognizing the presence of ghost cells
and misinterpreting the basaloid cells as a high-grade
C. Benign Neoplasms malignancy (489).
Ectopic lacrimal glands may be aspirated and are
composed of clusters of acinar cells, having small Pleomorphic Adenoma
bland nuclei. These glandular groups should not be
confused with adenocarcinomas, in which the nuclei Pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland usually
have malignant features. present as slow growing, painless mass, accounting
for 50% of epithelial lacrimal gland tumors (490–492).
Cavernous Hemangiomas It has been suggested that open biopsy of lacrimal
pleomorphic adenoma may lead to needle-tract seed-
Cavernous hemangiomas are well-encapsulated ing (464). However, no documented case of seeding
tumors located behind the eyeball within the boundaries following FNA has been reported. Smears show
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 75
Orbital Teratomas
Orbital teratomas are rare, but they form an important
differential diagnosis in neonatal orbital masses. Only a
few FNA cases of orbital teratomas with malignant
changes have been reported (511–513). The eye may
show proptosis, lid edema, conjunctival chemosis, and
a keratinized cornea. Orbital teratoma is usually multi-
loculated, cystic masses with solid areas, compared
with the unilocular cystic lesions such as dermoid
and epidermoid inclusion cysts (513). Malignant tera-
tomas are of three types: teratomas with germ cell
tumors, teratomas with nongerminal malignant tumors
Figure 124 Merkel cell carcinoma. Smears are cellular with
(carcinoma and sarcoma), and immature teratomas that
small round blue dyscohesive malignant cells. The cells demon- metastasize. FNA cytologic features are dependent on
strate large nuclei and a finely granular evenly dispersed chro- the components sampled and the type of teratoma
matin. The nuclear membranes are delicate, and nuclear molding (513).
is generally absent (Papanicolaou stain; magnification, 400).
Retinoblastoma
Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular neo-
plasm occurring in infants and children (514). It is
Table 53 Key Diagnostic Features—Merkel Cell Carcinoma
derived histogenetically from primitive neuroepithe-
Cellular smears with individually scattered cells lial cells that have the potential to differentiate into the
Large nuclei with finely granular, evenly distributed chromatin three layers of sensory retina, i.e., neurons, astrocytes,
Delicate nuclear membranes and photoreceptors (rods and cones) (515). Histologi-
Nuclear molding is usually absent (in contrast to small cell cally, the tumor is characterized by the presence of
carcinoma) undifferentiated small round cells with a variable
Tumor cells are positive for CK20 and negative for CK7 and TTF-1 tendency to form Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes.
78 Elsheikh et al.
Table 54 Key Diagnostic Features—Retinal Neuroblastoma well-differentiated retinoblastomas (Fig. 126). The
presence of Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes is consid-
Cellular smears with necrotic debris and inflammatory
background
ered to be an important morphologic feature for the
Two types of dyscohesive cells: undifferentiated cells (small diagnosis of retinoblastoma (449,515,520); although, in
round cells) and cells with early photoreceptor differentiation a significant number of cases, they may not be seen
(abundant, pale staining cytoplasm with cytoplasmic process) (521,522).
Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes formed by peripheral arrangement As many as 16% of eyes removed with the
of nuclei with fine central fibrillary cytoplasmic process. clinical diagnosis of retinoblastoma contain a simulat-
However, a significant number of cases may not show this ing lesion (517). The main differential diagnoses are
feature. vitreous hemorrhage, Coat’s disease, and ocular tox-
ocariasis (517). Coats’s disease is suspected cytolog-
ically when a subretinal aspirate reveals foamy
macrophages, which frequently contain coarse, oval
Cytological smears are hypercellular with single melanin pigment. Inflammatory cells (especially lym-
cells and cohesive clusters in which nuclear molding phocytes) are also noted (450). In toxocariasis, cytolog-
can be present (515–519) (Table 54). Smears show ical aspiration reveals a predominance of eosinophils.
necrotic debris and inflammatory cell in the back- In vitreous hemorrhage, the FNA consists erythro-
ground. The single cells can be divided into two cytes without any tumor cells (450). Metastatic neuro-
types with several transitional forms. The first cell blastoma can occur within the eye including the orbit,
type includes undifferentiated cells with high nuclear which may lead to diagnostic confusion with retino-
to cytoplasmic ratios, and markedly basophilic cyto- blastomas (518). Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes are
plasm (449,520). These cells are indistinguishable from more usually associated with retinoblastoma than
the undifferentiated cells present in other small round- neuroblastoma. History is crucial in this differential
cell malignant tumors of childhood (515) (Fig. 126). The diagnosis.
second cell type shows abundant, pale staining The diagnosis of the great majority of retinoblas-
cytoplasm with peculiar cytoplasmic processes. These toma can be achieved with noninvasive techniques,
processes are usually short and ‘‘hump-like,’’ although including indirect ophthalmoscopy, ultrasonography,
occasionally they can be long and slender. The and imaging procedure (CT and MRI). Shields and
presence of these cytoplasmic processes is probably Shields (517) reported only 2 FNA out of 500 referred
an indication of early photoreceptor differentiation. patients with a questionable retinoblastoma diagnosis.
The nuclei usually reveal deep indentations (451). The utilization of FNAB for the diagnosis of retino-
Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes are formed by blastoma is controversial among ophthalmologists
peripheral arrangement of nuclei with fine central and ocular oncologists. Some authors have reported
fibrillary cytoplasmic processes. Florets with the usefulness of this procedure in cases with diag-
photoreceptor cell differentiation are found only in nostic clinical uncertainty (449). Other investigators
have argued against FNAB because of the possibility
of tumor seeding and spread outside the globe
(518,519). There is no question that tumor seeding of
the needle tract takes place, but the long-term viability
of the spilled tumor cells causing extraocular spread is
questionable (518). Tumor growth outside of the globe
is a rare but a serious occurrence. Therefore, FNAB
should be limited to the extraordinarily unusual clini-
cal circumstance such as parents requesting histopath-
ologic verification of retinoblastoma before definitive
treatment, (especially enucleation), and recurrent or
metastasis of retinoblastoma in extraocular tissues
(516,518,519,523).
Metastatic Carcinoma
The frequency of ocular metastases has been reported
to be about 1% from grossly detectable orbital lesions
and 12.6% for microscopic metastases (425,524). Most
metastatic cancers occur in the uveal tract, while
metastases to the retina and optic disc are rare
(524–526).
Figure 126 Retinal neuroblastoma. Smears are cellular with Although metastases to the orbit usually reflect
Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes, formed by peripheral arrange- disseminated disease, the occurrence of a metastatic
ment of nuclei with fine central fibrillary cytoplasmic processes. deposit in this region may rarely be the initial presen-
The cells are elongated with early photoreceptor differentiation tation of a patient’s malignancy (527). When metastases
(DQ stain; magnification, 400). do occur in the region of the eye, they are commonly
from the breast in women, from the lung in men, and
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 79
27. Baloch ZW, Tam D, Langer J, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies of thyroid nodules: a sur-
fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: role of on-site vey of clinicians and pathologists. Thyroid 2006; 16(10):
assessment and multiple cytologic preparations. Diagn 1003–1008.
Cytopathol 2000; 23(6):425–429. 48. Piromalli D, Martelli G, Del Prato I, et al. The role of fine
28. Biscotti CV, Hollow JA, Toddy SM, et al. ThinPrep versus needle aspiration in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules:
conventional smear cytologic preparations in the analysis analysis of 795 consecutive cases. J Surg Oncol 1992; 50(4):
of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens. Am J Clin 247–250.
Pathol 1995; 104(2):150–153. 49. Foppiani L, Tancredi M, Ansaldo GL, et al. Absence of
29. Layfield LJ, Wax T, Jones C. Cytologic distinction of histological malignancy in a patient cohort with follicular
goiterous nodules from morphologically normal thyroid: lesions on fine-needle aspiration. J Endocrinol Invest 2003;
analyses of cytomorphologic features. Cancer 25 2003; 99(4): 26(1):29–34.
217–222. 50. Kini SR, Miller JM, Hamburger JI. Cytopathology of
30. Baloch ZW, Sack MJ, Yu GH, et al. Fine-needle aspiration Hurthle cell lesions of the thyroid gland by fine needle
of thyroid: an institutional experience. Thyroid 1998; aspiration. Acta Cytol 1981; 25(6):647–652.
8(7):565–569. 51. Kaur A, Jayaram G. Thyroid tumors: cytomorphology of
31. Soderstrom N, Nilsson G. Cytologic diagnosis of thyro- papillary carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7(5):462–468.
toxicosis. Acta Med Scand 1979; 205(4):263–265. 52. Miller TR, Abele JS, Greenspan FS. Fine-needle aspiration
32. Centeno BA, Szyfelbein WM, Daniels GH, et al. Fine biopsy in the management of thyroid nodules. West J Med
needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid gland in patients 1981; 134(3):198–205.
with prior Graves’ disease treated with radioactive iodine. 53. Kini SR. Guides to Clinical Aspiration Biopsy Thyroid.
Morphologic findings and potential pitfalls. Acta Cytol 2nd ed. New York, NY: Igaku-Shoin, 1996.
1996; 40(6):1189–1197. 54. Miller TR, Bottles K, Holly EA, et al. A step-wise logistic
33. Anderson SR, Mandel S, LiVolsi VA, et al. Can cytomor- regression analysis of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid.
phology differentiate between benign nodules and tumors Acta Cytol 1986; 30(3):285–293.
arising in Graves’ disease? Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 31(1): 55. Goellner JR, Johnson DA. Cytology of cystic papillary
64–67. carcinoma of the thyroid. Acta Cytol 1982; 26(6):797–808.
34. Kini SR, Miller JM, Hamburger JI, et al. Cytopathology of 56. Jayaram G, Kaur A. Cystic thyroid nodules harboring
follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Diagn Cytopathol malignancy: a problem in fine needle aspiration cytodiag-
1985; 1(2):123–132. nosis. Acta Cytol 1989; 33(6):941–942.
35. Rout P, Shariff S. Diagnostic value of qualitative and 57. Fulciniti F, Benincasa G, Vetrani A, et al. Follicular variant
quantitative variables in thyroid lesions. Cytopathology of papillary carcinoma: cytologic findings on FNAB
1999; 10(3):171–179. samples-experience with 16 cases. Diagn Cytopathol
36. Kellman A. Thyroid cytology. Thyroid 2001; 11:271–277. 2001; 25(2):86–93.
37. Barbaro D, Simi U, Lopane P, et al. Thyroid nodules with 58. Wu HH, Jones JN, Grzybicki DM, et al. Sensitive cytologic
microfollicular findings reported on fine-needle aspira- criteria for the identification of follicular variant of papil-
tion: invariably surgical treatment? Endocr Pract 2001; lary thyroid carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
7(5):352–357. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29(5):262–266.
38. Ersoz C, Firat P, Uguz A, et al. Fine-needle aspiration 59. Gupta S, Sodhani P, Jain S, et al. Morphologic spectrum of
cytology of solitary thyroid nodules: how far can we go in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: role of cytology in
rendering differential cytologic diagnoses? Cancer 2004; identifying the variants. Acta Cytol 2004; 48(6):795–800.
102(5):302–307. 60. Logani S, Osei SY, LiVolsi VA, et al. Fine-needle aspira-
39. Goldstein RE, Netterville JL, Burkey B, et al. Implications tion of follicular variant of papillary carcinoma in a
of follicular neoplasms, atypia, and lesions suspicious for hyperfunctioning thyroid nodule. Diagn Cytopathol
malignancy diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration of thy- 2001; 25(1):80–81.
roid nodules. Ann Surg2002; 235(5):656–662; discussion 61. Forrest CH, Frost FA, de Boer WB, et al. Medullary
662–654. carcinoma of the thyroid: accuracy of diagnosis of fine-
40. Yang GC, Goldberg JD, Ye PX. Risk of malignancy in needle aspiration cytology. Cancer 1998; 84(5):295–302.
follicular neoplasms without nuclear atypia: statistical 62. Papaparaskeva K, Nagel H, Droese M. Cytologic diagno-
analysis of 397 thyroidectomies. Endocr Pract 2003; sis of medullary carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Diagn
9(6):510–516. Cytopathol 2000; 22(6):351–358.
41. DeMay RM. The art and science of cytopathology. 63. Faquin WC, Powers CN. Aggressive forms of follicular-
Chicago, IL: ASCP Press, 1996. derived thryoid carcinoma. Pathol Case Rev 2003; 8(1):
42. Basu D, Jayaram G. A logistic model for thyroid lesions. 25–33.
Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8(1):23–27. 64. Faquin WC, Cibas ES, Renshaw AA. ’’Atypical’’ cells in
43. Harach HR, Soto MS, Zusman SB, et al. Parenchymatous fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens of benign thyroid
thyroid nodules: a histocytological study of 31 cases from cysts. Cancer 25 2005; 105(2):71–79.
a goitrous area. J Clin Pathol 1992; 45(1):25–29. 65. Renshaw AA. ‘‘Histiocytoid’’ cells in fine-needle aspira-
44. Yang GC, Liebeskind D, Messina AV. Should cytopathol- tions of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: frequency and
ogists stop reporting follicular neoplasms on fine-needle significance of an under-recognized cytologic pattern.
aspiration of the thyroid? Cancer 2003; 99(2):69–74. Cancer 25 2002; 96(4):240–243.
45. Clary KM, Condel JL, Liu Y, et al. Interobserver variability 66. Silverman JF, Khazanie PG, Norris HT, et al. Parathyroid
in the fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of follicular hormone (PTH) assay of parathyroid cysts examined by
lesions of the thyroid gland. Acta Cytol 2005; 49(4):378–382. fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1986; 86(6):
46. Stelow EB, Bardales RH, Crary GS, et al. Interobserver 776–780.
variability in thyroid fine-needle aspiration interpretation 67. Larson RS, Wick MR. Primary mucoepidermoid carci-
of lesions showing predominantly colloid and follicular noma of the thyroid: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration
groups. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124(2):239–244. biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(4):438–443.
47. Redman R, Yoder BJ, Massoll NA. Perceptions of diag- 68. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Pathology of the thyroid gland.
nostic terminology and cytopathologic reporting of Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingston, 2002.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 83
69. LiVolsi VA, ed. Surgical Pathology of the Thyroid (Major 91. Das DK, Petkar MA, Al-Mane NM, et al. Role of fine
Problems in Pathology, Vol. 22). Philadelphia, PA: WB needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of swellings in
Sanders, 1990. the salivary gland regions: a study of 712 cases. Med Princ
70. Lennard TW, Wadehra V, Farndon JR. Fine needle aspi- Pract 2004; 13(2):95–106.
ration biopsy in diagnosis of metastases to thyroid gland. 92. Qizilbash AH, Sianos J, Young JE, et al. Fine needle
J R Soc Med 1984; 77(3):196–197. aspiration biopsy cytology of major salivary glands.
71. Michelow PM, Leiman G. Metastases to the thyroid gland: Acta Cytol 1985; 29(4):503–512.
diagnosis by aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 93. Frable MA, Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of
13(3):209–213. salivary glands. Laryngoscope 1991; 101(3):245–249.
72. Halbauer M, Kardum-Skelin I, Vranesic D, et al. Aspira- 94. Rajwanshi A, Gupta K, Gupta N, et al. Fine-needle aspi-
tion cytology of renal-cell carcinoma metastatic to the ration cytology of salivary glands: diagnostic pitfalls–
thyroid. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(4):443–446. revisited. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(8):580–584.
73. Bourtsos EP, Bedrossian CW, De Frias DV, et al. Thyroid 95. Heller KS, Dubner S, Chess Q, et al. Value of fine needle
plasmacytoma mimicking medullary carcinoma: a poten- aspiration biopsy of salivary gland masses in clinical
tial pitfall in aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; decision-making. Am J Surg 1992; 164(6):667–670.
23(5):354–358. 96. Cohen MB, Reznicek MJ, Miller TR. Fine-needle aspira-
74. Renshaw AA. Aspiration Cytology: A Pattern Recognition tion biopsy of the salivary glands. Pathol Annu 1992; 27 Pt
Approach. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2005. 2:213–245.
75. Krishnamurthy S. Applications of molecular techniques to 97. Layfield LJ, Gopez EV. Cystic lesions of the salivary
fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 2007; 111(2): glands: cytologic features in fine-needle aspiration biop-
106–122. sies. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27(4):197–204.
76. Greaves TS, Olvera M, Florentine BD, et al. Follicular 98. Stanley M. Salivary glands and other head and neck
lesions of thyroid: a 5-year fine-needle aspiration experi- masses. In: Geisinger K, Silverman JF, eds. Fine Needle
ence. Cancer 2000; 90(6):335–341. Aspiration Cytology of Superficial Organs and Body Sites.
77. Hamberger B, Gharib H, Melton LJ III, et al. Fine-needle Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone, 1999:105–156.
aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Impact on thyroid 99. O’Dwyer P, Farrar WB, James AG, et al. Needle aspiration
practice and cost of care. Am J Med 1982; 73(3):381–384. biopsy of major salivary gland tumors: its value. Cancer
78. La Rosa GL, Belfiore A, Giuffrida D, et al. Evaluation of 1986; 57(3):554–557.
the fine needle aspiration biopsy in the preoperative 100. Henry-Stanley MJ, Beneke J, Bardales RH, et al. Fine-
selection of cold thyroid nodules. Cancer 1991; 67(8): needle aspiration of normal tissue from enlarged salivary
2137–2141. glands: sialosis or missed target? Diagn Cytopathol 1995;
79. Nam-Goong IS, Kim HY, Gong G, et al. Ultrasonography- 13(4):300–303.
guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid incidentaloma: 101. Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ, Goldstein Net al. Lipomatous
correlation with pathological findings. Clin Endocrinol lesions of the parotid gland. Potential pitfalls in fine
(Oxf) 2004; 60(1):21–28. needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(5):
80. Katz AD, Dunkleman D. Needle aspiration of nonfunc- 553–556.
tioning parathyroid cysts. Arch Surg 1984; 119(3):307–308. 102. Ascoli V, Albedi FM, De Blasiis R, et al. Sialadenosis of the
81. Layfield LJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic para- parotid gland: report of four cases diagnosed by fine-
thyroid lesions. A cytomorphologic overlap with cystic needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(2):
lesions of the thyroid. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(4):447–450. 151–155.
82. Bondeson L, Bondeson AG, Nissborg A, et al. Cytopatho- 103. Mooney EE, Dodd LG, Layfield LJ. Squamous cells in
logical variables in parathyroid lesions: a study based on fine-needle aspiration biopsies of salivary gland lesions:
1,600 cases of hyperparathyroidism. Diagn Cytopathol potential pitfalls in cytologic diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol
1997; 16(6):476–482. 1996; 15(5):447–452.
83. Friedman M, Shimaoka K, Lopez CA, et al. Parathyroid 104. Krane JF, Faquin WC Salivary gland. In: Cibas ES,
adenoma diagnosed as papillary carcinoma of thyroid on Ducatman BS, eds. Cytology: Diagnostic Principles and
needle aspiration smears. Acta Cytol 1983; 27(3):337–340. Clinical Correlates. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2003.
84. Mincione GP, Borrelli D, Cicchi P, et al. Fine needle 105. Droese M. Cytological diagnosis of sialadenosis, sialade-
aspiration cytology of parathyroid adenoma. A review nitis, and parotid cysts by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
of seven cases. Acta Cytol 1986; 30(1):65–69. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1981; 26:49–96.
85. Batsakis JG, Sneige N, el-Naggar AK. Fine-needle aspira- 106. Engzell U, Zajicek J. Aspiration biopsy of tumors of the
tion of salivary glands: its utility and tissue effects. Ann neck. I. Aspiration biopsy and cytologic findings in 100
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(2 pt 1):185–188. cases of congenital cysts. Acta Cytol 1970; 14(2):51–57.
86. Kern SB. Necrosis of a Warthin’s tumor following fine 107. Lampe HB, Cramer HM. Advances in the use of fine-
needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(2):207–208. needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable
87. Pabuccuoglu HU, Lebe B, Sarioglu S, et al. Infarction of lesions of the head and neck. J Otolaryngol 1991; 20(2):
pleomorphic adenoma: a rare complication of fine-needle 108–116.
aspiration obscuring definitive diagnosis. Diagn Cytopa- 108. Layfield LJ, Tan P, Glasgow BJ. Fine-needle aspiration of
thol 2001; 24(4):301–303. salivary gland lesions. Comparison with frozen sections
88. Balakrishnan K, Castling B, McMahon J, et al. Fine needle and histologic findings. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111(4):
aspiration cytology in the management of a parotid mass: 346–353.
a two centre retrospective study. Surgeon 2005; 3(2):67–72. 109. Heller KS, Attie JN, Dubner S. Accuracy of frozen section
89. Boccato P, Altavilla G, Blandamura S. Fine needle aspira- in the evaluation of salivary tumors. Am J Surg 1993; 166(4):
tion biopsy of salivary gland lesions. A reappraisal of 424–427.
pitfalls and problems. Acta Cytol 1998; 42(4):888–898. 110. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. eds. Pathology and
90. Cohen EG, Patel SG, Lin O, et al. Fine-needle aspiration Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours (WHO Classification
biopsy of salivary gland lesions in a selected patient of Tumours). Lyon: IARC Press, 2005.
population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 111. Elsheikh TM. Salivary gland aspiration cytology. In:
130(6): 773–778. Atkinson BF, Silverman JF, eds. Atlas of Difficult
84 Elsheikh et al.
Diagnoses in Cytopathology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saun- 131. Ritland F, Lubensky I, LiVolsi VA. Polymorphous low-
ders, 1998. grade adenocarcinoma of the parotid salivary gland. Arch
112. Stanley MW, Horwitz CA, Rollins SD, et al. Basal cell Pathol Lab Med 1993; 117(12):1261–1263.
(monomorphic) and minimally pleomorphic adenomas of 132. Simpson RH, Clarke TJ, Sarsfield PT, et al. Polymorphous
the salivary glands. Distinction from the solid (anaplastic) low-grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands: a
type of adenoid cystic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration. clinicopathological comparison with adenoid cystic
Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106(1):35–41. carcinoma. Histopathology 1991; 19(2):121–129.
113. Elsheikh T, Bernacki, EG. FNA cytology of salivary gland 133. Gibbons D, Saboorian MH, Vuitch F, et al. Fine-needle
neoplasms with basaloid cell features. Acta Cytol 1995; aspiration findings in patients with polymorphous low
39:1027–1028. grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands. Cancer
114. Hood IC, Qizilbash AH, Salama SS, et al. Basal-cell 25 1999; 87(1):31–36.
adenoma of parotid. Difficulty of differentiation from 134. Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Salivary carcinomas with papillae:
adenoid cystic carcinoma on aspiration biopsy. Acta cytology and histology analysis of polymorphous low-
Cytol 1983; 27(5):515–520. grade adenocarcinoma and papillary cystadenocarci-
115. Hruban RH, Erozan YS, Zinreich SJ, et al. Fine-needle noma. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 19(4):244–249.
aspiration cytology of monomorphic adenomas. Am 135. Lucarini JW, Sciubba JJ, Khettry U, et al. Terminal duct
J Clin Pathol 1988; 90(1):46–51. carcinoma. Recognition of a low-grade salivary adenocar-
116. Lopez JI, Ballestin C. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of a cinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120(9):
membranous basal cell adenoma arising in an intrapar- 1010–1015.
otid lymph node. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(6):668–672. 136. Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ. Diagnosis of salivary gland
117. Philpott CM, Kendall C, Murty GE. Canalicular adeno- tumors by fine-needle aspiration cytology: a review of
ma of the parotid gland. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119(1): clinical utility and pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7(3):
59–60. 267–272.
118. Hoang JT, Foss RD, Nowacki MR, et al. Basaloid squa- 137. Takeda Y, Yamamoto H. Oral collision carcinoma: sali-
mous cell carcinoma and fine-needle aspiration: a poten- vary duct carcinoma of minor salivary gland origin and
tial diagnostic pitfall. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; squamous cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa. J Oral Sci
119(6):655–657. 1999; 41(3):129–131.
119. Pisharodi LR. Basal cell adenocarcinoma of the salivary 138. Snyder ML, Paulino AF. Hybrid carcinoma of the salivary
gland. Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Am gland: salivary duct adenocarcinoma adenoid cystic car-
J Clin Pathol 1995; 103(5):603–608. cinoma. Histopathology 1999; 35(4):380–383.
120. Cameron WR, Johansson L, Tennvall J. Small cell carcinoma 139. Anand A, Brockie ES. Cytomorphological features of
of the parotid. Fine needle aspiration and immunochemical salivary duct carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: diag-
findings in a case. Acta Cytol 1990; 34(6):837–841. nosis by fine-needle aspiration biopsy with histologic
121. Domanski HA, Domanski AM. Cytology of pilomatrix- correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20(6):375–378.
oma (calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe) in fine needle 140. Kamio N, Tanaka Y, Mukai M, et al. A hybrid carcinoma:
aspirates. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(3):771–777. adenoid cystic carcinoma and salivary duct carcinoma of
122. Wong MP, Yuen ST, Collins RJ. Fine-needle aspiration the salivary gland. An immunohistochemical study.
biopsy of pilomatrixoma: still a diagnostic trap for the Virchows Arch 1997; 430(6):495–500.
unwary. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 10(4):365–369 (discussion 141. Delgado R, Klimstra D, Albores-Saavedra J. Low grade
369–370). salivary duct carcinoma. A distinctive variant with a low
123. Elsheikh TM, Bernacki EG Jr. Fine needle aspiration grade histology and a predominant intraductal growth
cytology of cellular pleomorphic adenoma. Acta Cytol pattern. Cancer 1996; 78(5):958–967.
1996; 40(6):1165–1175. 142. Brandwein MS, Kapadia SB, Gnepp DR. Salivary and
124. Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Fine-needle sampling of salivary lacrimal glands. In: Gnepp DR, ed. Diagnostic Surgical
gland lesions. IV. Review of 50 cases of mucoepidermoid Pathology of the Head and Neck. Philadelphia, PA: WB
carcinoma with histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol Saunders, 2001.
1997; 17(2):92–98. 143. Tatemoto Y, Ohno A, Osaki T. Low malignant intraductal
125. Cohen MB, Fisher PE, Holly EA, et al. Fine needle carcinoma on the hard palate: a variant of salivary duct
aspiration biopsy diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma? Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(4):275–277.
carcinoma. Statistical analysis. Acta Cytol 1990; 34(1): 144. Elsheikh TM, Bernacki EG Jr., Pisharodi L. Fine-needle
43–49. aspiration cytology of salivary duct carcinoma. Diagn
126. Zajicek J, Eneroth CM, Jakobsson P. Aspiration biopsy of Cytopathol 1994; 11(1):47–51.
salivary gland tumors. VI. Morphologic studies on smears 145. Khurana KK, Pitman MB, Powers CN, et al. Diagnostic
and histologic sections from mucoepidermoid carcinoma. pitfalls of aspiration cytology of salivary duct carcinoma.
Acta Cytol 1976; 20(1):35–41. Cancer 25 1997; 81(6):373–378.
127. Kumar N, Kapila K, Verma K. Fine needle aspiration 146. Chen KT. Cytology of salivary duct carcinoma. Diagn
cytology of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. A diagnostic Cytopathol 2000; 22(2):132–135.
problem. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(3):357–359. 147. Auclair PL, Ellis GL, Gnepp DR. Surgical Pathology of the
128. MacLeod CB, Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of Salivary Glands. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1991.
the salivary gland: problem cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 148. Frierson HF Jr., Covell JL, Mills SE. Fine-needle aspiration
9(2):216–224 (discussion 224–215). cytology of terminal duct carcinoma of minor salivary
129. Evans HL, Luna MA. Polymorphous low-grade adenocar- gland. Diagn Cytopathol 1987; 3(2):159–162.
cinoma: a study of 40 cases with long-term follow up and 149. Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Fine-needle sample of salivary
an evaluation of the importance of papillary areas. Am gland lesions. V: Cytology of 22 cases of acinic cell
J Surg Pathol 2000; 24(10):1319–1328. carcinoma with histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol
130. Frierson HF Jr., Mills SE, Garland TA. Terminal duct 1997; 17(5):347–352.
carcinoma of minor salivary glands. A nonpapillary sub- 150. Sauer T, Jebsen PW, Olsholt R. Cytologic features of
type of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. Am papillary-cystic variant of acinic-cell adenocarcinoma: a
J Clin Pathol 1985; 84(1):8–14. case report. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 10(1):30–32.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 85
151. Nagel H, Laskawi R, Buter JJ, et al. Cytologic diagnosis of 170. Wax T, Layfield LJ. Epithelial-myoepithelial cell carcinoma
acinic-cell carcinoma of salivary glands. Diagn Cytopathol of the parotid gland: a case report and comparison of
1997; 16(5):402–412. cytologic features with other stromal, epithelial, and myoe-
152. Laforga JB, Aranda FI. Oncocytic carcinoma of parotid pithelial cell containing lesions of the salivary glands.
gland: fine-needle aspiration and histologic findings. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14(4):298–304.
Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11(4):376–379. 171. Izquierdo R, Arekat MR, Knudson PE, et al. Comparison of
153. Rajan PB, Wadehra V, Hemming JD, et al. Fine needle palpation-guided versus ultrasound-guided fine-needle
aspiration cytology of malignant oncocytoma of the parotid aspiration biopsies of thyroid nodules in an outpatient
gland: a case report. Cytopathology 1994; 5(2):110–113. endocrinology practice. Endocr Pract 2006; 12(6):609–614.
154. Seifert G, Hennings K, Caselitz J. Metastatic tumors to the 172. Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Fine-needle sampling of salivary
parotid and submandibular glands–analysis and differen- gland lesions. VII. Cytology and histology correlation of
tial diagnosis of 108 cases. Pathol Res Pract 1986; 181(6): five cases of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Diagn
684–692. Cytopathol 1998; 19(6):405–409.
155. Batsakis JG, Bautina E. Metastases to major salivary glands. 173. Gnepp D, ed. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology of the Head
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(6 pt 1):501–503. and Neck. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders , 2001.
156. Zhang C, Cohen JM, Cangiarella JF, et al. Fine-needle 174. Auclair PL, Ellis GL, Stanley MW. Minor and major
aspiration of secondary neoplasms involving the salivary salivary glands. In: Silverberg S, DeLellis RA, Frable WJ,
glands. A report of 36 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 113(1): et al., eds. Silverberg’s Principles and Practice of Surgical
21–28. Pathology and Cytopathology. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill
157. Chen KT, Hafez GR. Infiltrating salivary duct carcinoma. Livingstone, 2006:1245–1248.
A clinicopathologic study of five cases. Arch Otolaryngol 175. Huvos A, Paulino,A FG. Salivary glands In: Mills S, ed.
1981; 107(1):37–39. Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. 4 ed. Philadel-
158. Hoang MP, Callender DL, Sola Gallego JJ, et al. Molecular phia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:950–952.
and biomarker analyses of salivary duct carcinomas: 176. Gilcrease MZ, Guzman-Paz M, Froberg K, et al. Salivary
comparison with mammary duct carcinoma. Int J Oncol duct carcinoma:is a specific diagnosis possible by fine
2001; 19(4):865–871. needle aspiration cytology? Acta Cytol 1998; 42(6):
159. Moriki T, Ueta S, Takahashi T, et al. Salivary duct carci- 1389–1396.
noma: cytologic characteristics and application of andro- 177. Harris NL. Lymphoid proliferations of the salivary
gen receptor immunostaining for diagnosis. Cancer 2001; glands. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111(1 suppl 1):S94–S103.
93(5):344–350. 178. Young NA, Al-Saleem T. Diagnosis of lymphoma by fine-
160. Wick MR, Ockner DM, Mills SE, et al. Homologous needle aspiration cytology using the revised European-
carcinomas of the breasts, skin, and salivary glands. A American classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Cancer
histologic and immunohistochemical comparison of duc- 25 1999; 87(6):325–345.
tal mammary carcinoma, ductal sweat gland carcinoma, 179. Safneck JR, Ravinsky E, Yazdi HM, et al. Fine needle
and salivary duct carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; aspiration biopsy findings in lymphoepithelial carcinoma
109(1):75–84. of salivary gland. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(4):1023–1030.
161. Wick MR, Lillemoe TJ, Copland GT, et al. Gross cystic 180. Gunhan O, Celasun B, Safali M, et al. Fine needle aspira-
disease fluid protein-15 as a marker for breast cancer: tion cytology of malignant lymphoepithelial lesion of the
immunohistochemical analysis of 690 human neoplasms salivary gland. A report of two cases. Acta Cytol 1994; 38(5):
and comparison with alpha-lactalbumin. Hum Pathol 751–754.
1989; 20(3):281–287. 181. Elliott JN, Oertel YC. Lymphoepithelial cysts of the sali-
162. Fan CY, Wang J, Barnes EL. Expression of androgen vary glands. Histologic and cytologic features. Am J Clin
receptor and prostatic specific markers in salivary duct Pathol 1990; 93(1):39–43.
carcinoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 13 cases 182. Chai C, Dodd LG, Glasgow BJ, et al. Salivary gland lesions
and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24(4): with a prominent lymphoid component: cytologic find-
579–586. ings and differential diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration
163. James GK, Pudek M, Berean KW, et al. Salivary duct biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17(3):183–190.
carcinoma secreting prostate-specific antigen. Am J Clin 183. Lowhagan T, Tani EM. Salivary gland and rare head and
Pathol 1996; 106(2):242–247. neck lesions. In: Bibo M, ed. Comprehensive Cytopathol-
164. Garcia-Bonafe M, Catala I, Tarragona J, et al. Cytologic ogy. Pennsylvania, PA: WB Saunders , 1991:621–640.
diagnosis of salivary duct carcinoma: a review of seven 184. Qizilbash A, Young JEM. Guides to Clinical aspiration
cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 19(2):120–123. biopsy: Head and Neck. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Igaku
165. Nikitakis NG, Tosios KI, Papanikolaou VS, et al. Immu- Shoin, 1996.
nohistochemical expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in 185. Kapadia SB, Dusenbery D, Dekker A. Fine needle aspiration
malignant salivary gland tumors. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(4): of pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma of
407–415. salivary gland origin. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(2):487–492.
166. Ordonez NG. Thyroid transcription factor-1 is a marker of 186. Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Fine-needle sampling of salivary
lung and thyroid carcinomas. Adv Anat Pathol 2000; 7(2): gland lesions. I. Cytology and histology correlation of 412
123–127. cases of pleomorphic adenoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;
167. Reis-Filho JS, Carrilho C, Valenti C, et al. Is TTF1 a good 14(3):195–200.
immunohistochemical marker to distinguish primary 187. Young JA. Diagnostic problems in fine needle aspiration
from metastatic lung adenocarcinomas? Pathol Res Pract cytopathology of the salivary glands. J Clin Pathol 1994;
2000; 196(12):835–840. 47(3):193–198.
168. Schelkun PM, Grundy WG. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy 188. Chan MK, McGuire LJ, King W, et al. Cytodiagnosis of
of head and neck lesions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49(3): 112 salivary gland lesions. Correlation with histologic and
262–267. frozen section diagnosis. Acta Cytol 1992; 36(3):353–363.
169. Miliauskas JR, Orell SR. Fine-needle aspiration cytological 189. Jayaram N, Ashim D, Rajwanshi A, et al. The value of
findings in five cases of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the cytodiagnosis of sali-
of salivary glands. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28(3):163–167. vary gland lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5(4):349–354.
86 Elsheikh et al.
190. Orell SR, Nettle WJ. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of 209. Young NA, Al-Saleem TI, Al-Saleem Z, et al. The value of
salivary gland tumours. Problems and pitfalls. Pathology transformed lymphocyte count in subclassification of non-
1988; 20(4):332–337. Hodgkin’s lymphoma by fine-needle aspiration. Am
191. Viguer JM, Vicandi B, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, et al. Fine J Clin Pathol 1997; 108(2):143–151.
needle aspiration cytology of pleomorphic adenoma. An 210. Young NA, Al-Saleem TI, Ehya H, et al. Utilization of fine-
analysis of 212 cases. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(3):786–794. needle aspiration cytology and flow cytometry in the
192. Geisinger KR, Reynolds GD, Vance RP, et al. Adenoid diagnosis and subclassification of primary and recurrent
cystic carcinoma arising in a pleomorphic adenoma of the lymphoma. Cancer 25 1998; 84(4):252–261.
parotid gland. An aspiration cytology and ultrastructural 211. Singh HK, Volmar KE, Elsheikh TM, et al. The diagnostic
study. Acta Cytol 1985; 29(4):522–526. utility of fine needle aspiration biopsy of soft tissue
193. Chhieng DC, Cohen JM, Cangiarella JF. Fine-needle aspi- sarcomas in the core needle biopsy era. Pathol Case Rev
ration of spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions of the 2007; 12(1):36–43.
salivary glands. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23(4):253–259. 212. Volmar KE, Singh HK, Gong JZ. The advantages and
194. Franquemont DW, Mills SE. Plasmacytoid monomorphic limitations of the role of core needle and fine needle
adenoma of salivary glands. Absence of myogenous dif- aspiration biopsy of lymph nodes in the modern era:
ferentiation and comparison to spindle cell myoepithe- Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas and metastatic
lioma. Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17(2):146–153. disease. Pathol Case Rev 2007; 12(1):10–26.
195. Schultenover SJ, McDonald EC, Ramzy I. Hyaline-cell 213. Geisinger KR, Rainer RO, Field AS. Lymph nodes. In:
pleomorphic adenoma. Diagnosis by fine needle aspira- Geisinger KR, Silverman JF, eds. Fine Needle Aspiration
tion biopsy. Acta Cytol 1984; 28(5):593–597. Cytology of Superficial Organs and Body Sites. New York,
196. Dardick I, Cavell S, Boivin M, et al. Salivary gland NY: Churchill-Livingstone, 1999:1–49.
myoepithelioma variants. Histological, ultrastructural, 214. van de Schoot L, Aronson DC, Behrendt H, et al. The role
and immunocytological features. Virchows Arch A Pathol of fine-needle aspiration cytology in children with persis-
Anat Histopathol 1989; 416(1):25–42. tent or suspicious lymphadenopathy. J Pediatr Surg 2001;
197. Di Palma S, Guzzo M. Malignant myoepithelioma of 36(1):7–11.
salivary glands: clinicopathological features of ten cases. 215. Daskalopoulou D, Harhalakis N, Maouni N, et al. Fine
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1993; 423(5): needle aspiration cytology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas:
389–396. a morphologic and immunophenotypic study. Acta Cytol
198. Jacobs JC. Low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma ex 1995; 39(2):180–186.
pleomorphic adenoma. A diagnostic problem in fine 216. Liu K, Stern RC, Rogers RT, et al. Diagnosis of hemato-
needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol 1994; 38(1):93–97. poietic processes by fine-needle aspiration in conjunction
199. Serrano Egea A, Martinez Gonzalez MA, Perez Barrios A, with flow cytometry: a review of 127 cases. Diagn Cyto-
et al. Usefulness of light microscopy in lymph node fine pathol 2001; 24(1):1–10.
needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol 2002; 46(2):364–368. 217. Meda BA, Buss DH, Woodruff RD, et al. Diagnosis and
200. Steel BL, Schwartz MR, Ramzy I. Fine needle aspiration subclassification of primary and recurrent lymphoma: the
biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in 1,103 usefulness and limitations of combined fine-needle aspi-
patients. Role, limitations and analysis of diagnostic pit- ration cytomorphology and flow cytometry. Am J Clin
falls. Acta Cytol 1995; 39(1):76–81. Pathol 2000; 113(5):688–699.
201. Prasad RR, Narasimhan R, Sankaran V, et al. Fine-needle 218. Nasuti JF, Yu G, Boudousquie A, Gupta P. Diagnostic
aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of superficial lymph- value of lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology: an
adenopathy: an analysis of 2,418 cases. Diagn Cytopathol institutional experience of 387 cases observed over a
1996; 15(5):382–386. 5-year period. Cytopathology 2000; 11(1):18–31.
202. Martins MR, Santos Gda C. Fine-needle aspiration cytolo- 219. Stewart CJ, Duncan JA, Farquharson M, et al. Fine needle
gy in the diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy: a aspiration cytology diagnosis of malignant lymphoma
5-year Brazilian experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(2): and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. J Clin Pathol 1998;
130–134. 51(3):197–203.
203. Pilotti S, Di Palma S, Alasio L, et al. Diagnostic assessment 220. Chhieng DC, Cangiarella JF, Symmans WF, et al. Fine-
of enlarged superficial lymph nodes by fine needle aspi- needle aspiration cytology of Hodgkin disease: a study of
ration. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(6):853–866. 89 cases with emphasis on false-negative cases. Cancer 25
204. Wakely PE Jr. Fine-needle aspiration cytopathology in 2001; 93(1):52–59.
diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphoma: accu- 221. Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Vicandi B, Lopez-Ferrer P, et al.
rate and reliable? Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22(2):120–125. Value of fine needle aspiration cytology in the initial
205. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein M, eds. Pathology and Genetics diagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease: analysis of 188 cases
of Tumours and Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues with an emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 2001;
(World Health Organization Classification of Tumors). 45(3):300–306.
Lyon: IARC, 2001. 222. Moreland WS, Geisinger KR. Utility and outcomes of fine-
206. Fulciniti F, Vetrani A, Zeppa P, et al. Hodgkin’s disease: needle aspiration biopsy in Hodgkin’s disease. Diagn
diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration: a report Cytopathol 2002; 26(5):278–282.
based on 62 consecutive cases. Cytopathology 1994; 223. Frable WJ, Kardos TF. Fine needle aspiration biopsy:
5(4):226–233. applications in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative dis-
207. Dong HY, Harris NL, Preffer FI, et al. Fine-needle aspira- eases. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12(suppl 1):62–72.
tion biopsy in the diagnosis and classification of primary 224. Stewart CJ, Farquharson MA, Kerr T, et al. Immunoglob-
and recurrent lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of the ulin light chain mRNA detected by in situ hybridisation in
utility of cytomorphology and flow cytometry. Mod diagnostic fine needle aspiration cytology specimens.
Pathol 2001; 14(5):472–481. J Clin Pathol 1996; 49(9):749–754.
208. Tarantino DR, McHenry CR, Strickland T, et al. The role of 225. Ben-Yehuda D, Polliack A, Okon E, et al. Image-guided
fine-needle aspiration biopsy and flow cytometry in the core-needle biopsy in malignant lymphoma: experience
evaluation of persistent neck adenopathy. Am J Surg 1998; with 100 patients that suggests the technique is reliable.
176(5):413–417. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(9):2431–2434.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 87
226. Pappa VI, Hussain HK, Reznek RH, et al. Role of image- 244. Bizjak-Schwarzbartl M. Large cell anaplastic Ki-1þ non-
guided core-needle biopsy in the management of patients Hodgkin’s lymphoma vs. Hodgkin’s disease in fine
with lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(9):2427–2430. needle aspiration biopsy samples. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(2):
227. Wotherspoon AC, Norton AJ, Lees WR, et al. Diagnostic 351–356.
fine needle core biopsy of deep lymph nodes for the 245. Chhieng DC, Cohen JM, Cangiarella JF. Cytology and
diagnosis of lymphoma in patients unfit for surgery. immunophenotyping of low- and intermediate-grade
J Pathol 1989; 158(2):115–121. B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas with a predominant
228. Gong JZ, Snyder MJ, Lagoo AS, et al. Diagnostic impact of small-cell component: a study of 56 cases. Diagn Cytopa-
core-needle biopsy on fine-needle aspiration of non- thol 2001; 24(2):90–97.
Hodgkin lymphoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 31(1):23–30. 246. Shin HJ, Caraway NP, Katz RL. Cytomorphologic spec-
229. Jeffers MD, Milton J, Herriot R, et al. Fine needle aspira- trum of small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients with an
tion cytology in the investigation on non-Hodgkin’s lym- accelerated clinical course. Cancer 25 2003; 99(5):293–300.
phoma. J Clin Pathol 1998; 51(3):189–196. 247. Caraway NP, Du Y, Zhang HZ, et al. Numeric chromo-
230. Gong JZ, Williams DC Jr., Liu K, et al. Fine-needle somal abnormalities in small lymphocytic and trans-
aspiration in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: evaluation of cell formed large cell lymphomas detected by fluorescence
size by cytomorphology and flow cytometry. Am J Clin in situ hybridization of fine-needle aspiration biopsies.
Pathol 2002; 117(6):880–888. Cancer 2000; 90(2):126–132.
231. Nicol TL, Silberman M, Rosenthal DL, et al. The accuracy 248. Rassidakis GZ, Tani E, Svedmyr E, et al. Diagnosis and
of combined cytopathologic and flow cytometric analysis subclassification of follicle center and mantle cell lympho-
of fine-needle aspirates of lymph nodes. Am J Clin Pathol mas on fine-needle aspirates: a cytologic and immunocy-
2000; 114(1):18–28. tochemical approach based on the Revised European-
232. Safley AM, Buckley PJ, Creager AJ, et al. The value of American Lymphoma (REAL) classification. Cancer
fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain 1999; 87(4):216–223.
reaction in the diagnosis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lympho- 249. Murphy BA, Meda BA, Buss DH, et al. Marginal zone and
ma by fine-needle aspiration. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004; mantle cell lymphomas: assessment of cytomorphology in
128(12):1395–1403. subtyping small B-cell lymphomas. Diagn Cytopathol
233. Caraway NP, Gu J, Lin P, et al. The utility of interphase 2003; 28(3):126–130.
fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of the 250. Hughes JH, Caraway NP, Katz RL. Blastic variant of
translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) in the diagnosis of mantle mantle-cell lymphoma: cytomorphologic, immunocyto-
cell lymphoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens. chemical, and molecular genetic features of tissue
Cancer 2005; 105(2):110–118. obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopa-
234. Torlakovic E, Berner A, Risberg B. Detection of immuno- thol 1 1998; 19(1):59–62.
globulin heavy chain gene rearrangements by polymerase 251. Bentz JS, Rowe LR, Anderson SR, et al. Rapid detection of
chain reaction analysis on lymph node imprints and fine- the t(11;14) translocation in mantle cell lymphoma by
needle aspirate smears: a comparison of five different interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization on archival
imprint preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20(6): cytopathologic material. Cancer 2004; 102(2):124–131.
333–338. 252. Gong Y, Caraway N, Gu J, et al. Evaluation of interphase
235. Ruschenburg I, Schlott T, Linke B, et al. Automated fluorescence in situ hybridization for the t(14;18)(q32;q21)
molecular genetic DNA analysis for detecting B-cell translocation in the diagnosis of follicular lymphoma on
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in cytologic specimens. Anal fine-needle aspirates: a comparison with flow cytometry
Quant Cytol Histol 1997; 19(3):255–263. immunophenotyping. Cancer 2003; 99(6):385–393.
236. Goy A, Stewart J, Barkoh BA, et al. The feasibility of gene 253. Kim SE, Kim SH, Lim BJ, et al. Fine needle aspiration
expression profiling generated in fine-needle aspiration cytology of small cell variant of anaplastic large cell
specimens from patients with follicular lymphoma and lymphoma:a case report. Acta Cytol 2004; 48(2):254–258.
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer 2006; 108(1):10–20. 254. Zhang JR, Raza AS, Greaves TS, Cobb CJ. Fine-needle
237. Hecht JL, Aster JC. Molecular biology of Burkitt’s lym- aspiration diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma using current
phoma. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(21):3707–3721. WHO classification: re-evaluation of cases from 1999–2004
238. Kaleem Z, White G, Vollmer RT. Critical analysis and with new proposals. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(6):
diagnostic usefulness of limited immunophenotyping of 397–402.
B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas by flow cytometry. Am J 255. Grenko RT, Shabb NS. Metastatic nasopharyngeal carci-
Clin Pathol 2001; 115(1):136–142. noma: cytologic features of 18 cases. Diagn Cytopathol
239. Kinney MC, Kadin ME. The pathologic and clinical spec- 1991; 7(6):562–566.
trum of anaplastic large cell lymphoma and correlation 256. De Jong SA, Demeter JG, Jarosz H, et al. Primary papillary
with ALK gene dysregulation. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; thyroid carcinoma presenting as cervical lymphadenopa-
111(1 suppl 1):S56–S67. thy: the operative approach to the ‘‘lateral aberrant thy-
240. McCluggage WG, Anderson N, Herron B, Caughley roid’’. Am Surg 1993; 59(3):172–176 (discussion 176–177).
L. Fine needle aspiration cytology, histology and immu- 257. Stani J. Cytologic diagnosis of reactive lymphadenopathy
nohistochemistry of anaplastic large cell Ki-1-positive in fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Acta Cytol
lymphoma. A report of three cases. Acta Cytol 1996; 1987; 31(1):8–13.
40(4):779–785. 258. Creager AJ, Geisinger KR, Bergman S. Neutrophil-rich
241. Sgrignoli A, Abati A. Cytologic diagnosis of anaplastic Ki-1-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a study by
large cell lymphoma. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(4):1048–1052. fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;
242. Zakowski MF, Feiner H, Finfer M, et al. Cytology of 117(5):709–715.
extranodal Ki-1 anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Diagn 259. Tani E, Ersoz C, Svedmyr E, Skoog L. Fine-needle aspira-
Cytopathol 1996; 14(2):155–161. tion cytology and immunocytochemistry of Hodgkin’s
243. Aljajeh IA, Das DK, Krajci D. Ki-1-positive anaplastic disease, suppurative type. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 18(6):
large cell lymphoma initially diagnosed as Hodgkin’s 437–440.
disease by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Cytopa- 260. Ellison E, Lapuerta P, Martin SE. Fine needle aspiration
thology 1995; 6(4):226–235. diagnosis of mycobacterial lymphadenitis. Sensitivity and
88 Elsheikh et al.
predictive value in the United States. Acta Cytol 1999; 281. Tsang WY, Chan JK. Fine-needle aspiration cytologic
43(2):153–157. diagnosis of Kikuchi’s lymphadenitis. A report of 27 cases.
261. Maygarden SJ, Flanders EL. Mycobacteria can be seen as Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102(4):454–458.
‘‘negative images’’ in cytology smears from patients with 282. Geisinger KR, Silverman JF, Wakely PE Jr. Pediatric
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Mod Pathol 1989; Cytopathology. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: American Society of
2(3):239–243. Clinical Pathologists, 1994.
262. Gupta RK. Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of toxo- 283. Gonzalez-Campora R, Otal-Salaverri C, Hevia-Vazquez
plasmic lymphadenitis. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(4):1031–1034. A, et al. Fine needle aspiration in myxoid tumors of the
263. Argyle JC, Schumann GB, Kjeldsberg CR, et al. Identifica- soft tissues. Acta Cytol 1990; 34(2):179–191.
tion of a toxoplasma cyst by fine-needle aspiration. Am 284. Singh HK, Kilpatrick SE, Silverman JF. Fine needle aspi-
J Clin Pathol 1983; 80(2):256–258. ration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas: utility and diagnos-
264. Christ ML, Feltes-Kennedy M. Fine needle aspiration tic challenges. Adv Anat Pathol 2004; 11(1):24–37.
cytology of toxoplasmic lymphadenitis. Acta Cytol 1982; 285. Kilpatrick SE, Ward WG, Chauvenet AR, et al. The role of
26(4):425–428. fine needle aspiration biopsy in the initial diagnosis of
265. Viguer JM, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Lopez-Ferrer P, et al. pediatric bone and soft tissue tumors: an institutional
Fine needle aspiration of toxoplasmic (Piringer-Kuchinka) experience. Mod Pathol 1998; 11:923–928.
lymphadenitis: a cytohistologic correlation study. Acta 286. Abdul-Karim FW, Rader AE. Fine needle aspiration of
Cytol 2005; 49(2):139–143. soft-tissue lesions. Clin Lab Med 1998; 18(3):507–540, vi.
266. Zaharopoulos P. Demonstration of parasites in toxoplas- 287. Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL, et al. Fine-needle
ma lymphadenitis by fine-needle aspiration cytology: aspiration cytology of sarcoma: retrospective review of
report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22(1):11–15. diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;
267. Volmar KE, Singh HK, Gong JZ. Fine needle aspiration 15(1):23–32.
biopsy of lymph nodes in the modern era: reactive 288. Kilpatrick SE. Histologic prognostication in soft tissue
lymphadenopathies. Pathol Case Rev 2007; 12(1):27–35. sarcomas: grading versus subtyping or both? A compre-
268. Jayaram N, Ramaprasad AV, Chethan M, et al. Toxoplas- hensive review of the literature with proposed practical
ma lymphadenitis. Analysis of cytologic and histopatho- guidelines. Ann Diagn Pathol 1999; 3(1):48–61.
logic criteria and correlation with serologic tests. Acta 289. Kilpatrick SE, Ward WG, Cappellari JO, et al. Fine-needle
Cytol 1997; 41(3):653–658. aspiration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas: a cytomorpho-
269. Silverman JF. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cat logic analysis with emphasis on histologic subtyping,
scratch disease. Acta Cytol 1985; 29(4):542–547. grading, and therapeutic significance. Am J Clin Pathol
270. Donnelly A, Hendricks G, Martens S, et al. Cytologic 1999; 112(2):179–188.
diagnosis of cat scratch disease (CSD) by fine-needle 290. Jones C, Liu K, Hirschowitz S, Klipfel N, et al. Concor-
aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13(2):103–106. dance of histopathologic and cytologic grading in muscu-
271. Stastny JF, Wakely PE Jr., Frable WJ. Cytologic features of loskeletal sarcomas: can grades obtained from analysis of
necrotizing granulomatous inflammation consistent with the fine-needle aspirates serve as the basis for therapeutic
cat-scratch disease. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 15(2):108–115. decisions? Cancer 2002; 96(2):83–91.
272. Stanley MW, Steeper TA, Horwitz CA, et al. Fine-needle 291. Geisinger KR, Abdul-Karim FW. Fine needle aspiration
aspiration of lymph nodes in patients with acute infec- biopsies of soft tissue tumors. In: Weiss SW, Goldblum JR,
tious mononucleosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6(5): eds. Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors. Saint
323–329. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2001:147–188.
273. Kardos TF, Kornstein MJ, Frable WJ. Cytology and immu- 292. Kilpatrick SE, Ward WG, Savage PD. Fine-needle aspira-
nocytology of infectious mononucleosis in fine needle tion biopsy of mesenchymal lesions: the value of clinicor-
aspirates of lymph nodes. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(5):722–726. adiologic correlation and the importance of histogenetic
274. Kardos TF, Sprague RI, Wakely PE Jr., et al. Fine-needle subtyping. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 108(2):237.
aspiration biopsy of lymphoblastic lymphoma and leuke- 293. Kilpatrick SE, Renner J. Small round cell tumors of bone
mia: a clinical, cytologic, and immunologic study. Cancer and soft tissues. In: Kilpatrick SE, ed. Diagnostic Muscu-
1987; 60(10):2448–2453. loskeletal Surgical Pathology with Clinicopathologic and
275. Deshpande V, Verma K. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) Cytologic Correlations. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders,
cytology of Rosai Dorfman disease. Cytopathology 1998; 2004:37–70.
9(5):329–335. 294. Montgomery EA, Meis JM. Nodular fasciitis. Its morpho-
276. Deshpande AH, Nayak S, Munshi MM. Cytology of logic spectrum and immunohistochemical profile. Am J
sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy Surg Pathol 1991; 15(10):942–948.
(Rosai-Dorfman disease). Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22(3): 295. Kapadia SB, Meis JM, Frisman DM, et al. Fetal rhabdo-
181–185. myoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic and
277. Layfield LJ. Fine needle aspiration cytologic findings in a immunophenotypic study of 24 cases. Hum Pathol 1993;
case of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopa- 24(7):754–765.
thy (Rosai-Dorfman syndrome). Acta Cytol 1990; 34(6): 296. Afify AM, Liu J, Al-Khafaji BM. Cytologic artifacts and
767–770. pitfalls of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using ThinPrep: a
278. Ruggiero A, Attina G, Maurizi P, et al. Rosai-Dorfman comparative retrospective review. Cancer 2001; 93(3):
disease: two case reports and diagnostic role of fine- 179–186.
needle aspiration cytology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 297. Akhtar M, Iqbal MA, Mourad W, et al. Fine-needle
2006; 28(2):103–106. aspiration biopsy diagnosis of small round cell tumors
279. Kakkar S, Kapila K, Verma K. Langerhans cell histiocy- of childhood: A comprehensive approach. Diagn Cytopa-
tosis in lymph nodes. Cytomorphologic diagnosis and thol 1999; 21(2):81–91.
pitfalls. Acta Cytol 2001; 45(3):327–332. 298. Kilpatrick SE, Renner J. Epithelioid/polygonal cell
280. Tong TR, Chan OW, Lee KC. Diagnosing Kikuchi disease tumors. In: Kilpatrick SE, ed. Diagnostic Musculoskeletal
on fine needle aspiration biopsy: a retrospective study of Surgical Pathology with Clinicopathologic and Cytologic
44 cases diagnosed by cytology and 8 by histopathology. Correlations. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2004:
Acta Cytol 2001; 45(6):953–957. 71–96.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 89
299. Kilpatrick SE, Teot LA, Stanley MW, et al. Fine-needle 321. Baurmash HD. Mucoceles and ranulas. J Oral Maxillofac
aspiration biopsy of synovial sarcoma: a cytomorphologic Surg 2003; 61(3):369–378.
analysis of primary, recurrent, and metastatic tumors. 322. Silverman SJ. Oral cavity. In: Bibbo M, ed. Comprehensive
Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106(6):769–775. Cytopathology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders,
300. Fletcher CD, Gustafson P, Rydholm A, et al. Clinicopath- 1997:403–412.
ologic re-evaluation of 100 malignant fibrous histiocyto- 323. Layfield L. Fine needle aspiration of the head and neck.
mas: prognostic relevance of subclassification. J Clin Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1996.
Oncol 2001; 19(12):3045–3050. 324. Tani E, Ersoz C, Silfversward C, et al. Rhabdomyoma:
301. Kilpatrick SE. Pleomorphic cell tumors of soft tissue and primary diagnosis by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytol-
bone. In: Kilpatrick SE, ed. Diagnostic Musculoskeletal ogy and immunocytochemistry. Cytopathology 1995; 6(3):
Surgical Pathology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 204–208.
2004:249–266. 325. McGregor DK, Krishnan B, Green L. Fine-needle aspira-
302. Kilpatrick SE, Geisinger KR. Soft tissue sarcomas: the tion of adult rhabdomyoma: a case repot with review of
usefulness and limitations of fine-needle aspiration the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28(2):92–95.
biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110(1):50–68. 326. Walker WP, Laszewski MJ. Recurrent multifocal adult
303. Gonzalez-Campora R. Fine needle aspiration cytology of rhabdomyoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytol-
soft tissue tumors. Acta Cytologica 2000; 44(3):337–343. ogy: report of a case and review of the literature. Diagn
304. Layfield LJ, Liu K, Dodge RK. Logistic regression analysis Cytopathol 1990; 6(5):354–358.
of myxoid sarcomas: a cytologic study. Diagn Cytopathol 327. Pieterse AS, Mahar A, Orell S. Granular cell tumour: a
1998; 19(5):355–360. pitfall in FNA cytology of breast lesions. Pathology 2004;
305. Kilpatrick SE, Inwards CY, Fletcher CD, et al. Myxoid 36(1):58–62.
chondrosarcoma (chordoid sarcoma) of bone: a report of 328. Liu K, Madden JF, Olatidoye BA, et al. Features of benign
two cases and review of the literature. Cancer 1997; granular cell tumor on fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol.
79(10):1903–1910. 1999; 43(4):552–557.
306. Kilpatrick SE, Ward WG. Myxofibrosarcoma of soft 329. Liu Z, Mira JL, Vu H. Diagnosis of malignant granular cell
tissues: cytomorphologic analysis of a series. Diagn tumor by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 2001;
Cytopathol 1999; 20(1):6–9. 45(6):1011–1021.
307. Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM, et al. Survival in squamous 330. Wieczorek TJ, Krane JF, Domanski HA, et al. Cytologic
cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: differences between pT4 findings in granular cell tumors, with emphasis on the
N0 and other stage IVA categories. Cancer 2007; 110(3): diagnosis of malignant granular cell tumor by fine-needle
564–571. aspiration biopsy. Cancer 2001; 93(6):398–408.
308. Bell RB, Kademani D, Homer L, et al. Tongue cancer: is 331. Sun ZJ, Zhang L, Zhang WF, et al. Epithelioid heman-
there a difference in survival compared with other sub- gioendothelioma of the oral cavity. Oral Dis 2007; 13(2):
sites in the oral cavity? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 244–250.
65(2):229–236. 332. Pettinato G, Insabato L, De Chiara A, et al. Epithelioid
309. Mehrotra R, Gupta A, Singh M, et al. Application of hemangioendothelioma of soft tissue: fine needle aspira-
cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalig- tion cytology, histology, electron microscopy and immu-
nant or malignant oral lesions. Mol Cancer 2006; 23:5–11. nohistochemistry of a case. Acta Cytol 1986; 30(2):194–200.
310. Acha A, Ruesga MT, Rodriguez MJ, et al. Applications of 333. Tong GX, Hamele-Bena D, Borczuk A, et al. Fine needle
the oral scraped (exfoliative) cytology in oral cancer and aspiration biopsy of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of
precancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005; 10(2):95–102. the oral cavity: report of one case and review of literature.
311. Ogden GR, Cowpe JG, Wight AJ. Oral exfoliative cytolo- Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(3):218–223.
gy: review of methods of assessment. J Oral Pathol Med 334. Mhoyan A, Weidner N, Shabaik A. Epithelioid heman-
1997; 26(5):201–205. gioendothelioma of the lung diagnosed by transesopha-
312. Scher RL, Oostingh PE, Levine PA, et al. Role of fine geal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration:
needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lesions of the oral a case report. Acta Cytol 2004; 48(4):555–559.
cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx. Cancer 1988; 62(12): 335. Cho NH, Lee KG, Jeong MG. Cytologic evaluation of
2602–2606. primary malignant vascular tumors of the liver. One
313. Frable MA, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration biopsy case each of angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioen-
revisited. Laryngoscope 1982; 92(12):1414–1418. dothelioma. Acta Cytol 1997; 41(5):1468–1476.
314. Sandler HC. Errors of oral cytodiagnosis: Report of follow- 336. Wakely PE, Frable WJ, Kneisl JS. Aspiration cytopathology
up of 1,801 patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 72(4):851–854. of epithelioid angiosarcoma. Cancer 2000; 90(4):245–251.
315. Rovin S. An assessment of the negative oral cytologic 337. Sun ZJ, Zhang L, Zhang WF, et al. Epithelioid hemangio-
diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 74(4):759–762. ma in the oral mucosa: a clinicopathological study of
316. Ljung BME, Larsson SG, Hanafee W. Computed seven cases and review of the literature. Oral Oncol
tomography-guided aspiration cytologic examination in 2006; 42(5):441–447.
head and neck lesions. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110:604–607. 338. Baehner F, Sudilvsky D. Fine needle aspiration cytology of
317. Statts OJ, Robinsn LH, Butterworth CJ. The effect of intraoral epithelioid hemangioma: a report of two cases.
systemic therapy on nuclear size of oral epithelial cells Acta Cytol 2003; 47(2):275–280.
in folate-related anemias. Acta Cytol 1969; 13:84. 339. Meyer I. Dermoid cysts (dermoids) of the floor of the
318. Deery A. Oral cavity. In: Gray W, McKee GT, eds. mouth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1955; 8(11):
Diagnostic Cytopathology. London, UK: Churchill Living- 1149–1164.
stone, 2003:325–332. 340. Babuccu O, Fsiksacan-Ozen OI, Hosnuter M, et al. The
319. Silverman S Jr, Beumer J. Primary herpetic gingivostoma- place of fine needle aspiration in the preoperative diagno-
titis of adult onset. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; sis of the congenital sublingual teratoid cyst. Diagn Cyto-
36(4):496–503. pathol 2003; 29(1):33–37.
320. Medak H, Burlakow P, McGrew EA, et al. The cytology of 341. Cramer H, Lampe H, Downing P. Dermoid cyst of the
vesicular conditions affecting the oral mucosa: pemphigus floor of the mouth diagnosed by fine needle aspiration
vulgaris. Acta Cytol 1970; 14(1):11–25. cytology: a case report. Acta Cytol 1996; 40(2):319–326.
90 Elsheikh et al.
342. Acree T, Abreo F, Smith BR, et al. Diagnosis of dermoid 362. Shabb N, Sneige N, Dekmezian RH. Myospherulosis fine
cyst of the floor of the mouth by fine needle aspiration needle aspiration cytologic findings in 19 cases. Acta
cytology: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20(2): Cytol 1991; 35(2):225–228.
78–81. 363. Kyriakos M. Myospherulosis of the paranasal sinuses,
343. Layfield L. Cytopathology of the Head and Neck. 1st ed. nose and middle ear: a possible iatrogenic disease. Am
Chicago, IL: ASCP Press; 1997. J Clin Pathol 1977; 67(2):118–130.
344. Kollur SM, El-Hag IA. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of 364. Vuong PN. Acquired gluteal myospherulosis secondary
metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in cervical lymph to intramuscular injections of petrolatum-based hor-
nodes: comparison with metastatic squamous-cell carci- mones: a case report diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration
noma, and Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1988; 4(2):137–139.
Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28(1):18–22. 365. Kumagami H. Testosterone and estradiol in juvenile
345. Vesoulis Z. Metastatic laryngeal basaloid squamous cell nasopharyngeal angiofibroma tissue. Acta Otolaryngol
carcinoma simulating primary small cell carcinoma of the (Stockh) 1991; 111:569–575.
lung on fine needle aspiration lung biopsy: a case report. 366. Hosseini SM, Borghei P, Borghei SH, et al. Angiofibroma:
Acta Cytol 1998; 42(3):783–787. an outcome review of conventional surgical approaches.
346. Gilcrease MZ, Guzman-Paz M. Fine-needle aspiration of Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262(10):807–812.
basaloid squamous carcinoma: a case report with review 367. Celik B, Erisen L, Saraydaroglu O, et al. Atypical angiofi-
of differential diagnostic considerations. Diagn Cytopa- bromas: a report of four cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolar-
thol 1998; 19(3):210–215. yngol 2005; 69(3):415–421.
347. Dejmek A, Lindholm K. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of 368. Chhieng D, Cohen JM, Waisman J, et al. Fine-needle
cystic lesions of the head and neck, excluding thyroid. aspiration cytology of hemangiopericytoma: A report of
Acta Cytol 1990; 34(3):443–448. five cases. Cancer 1999; 87(4):190–195.
348. Shahin A, Burroughs FH, Kirby JP, et al. Thyroglossal 369. Geisinger KR, Silverman JF, Cappellari JO, et al. Fine-
duct cyst: a cytopathologic study of 26 cases. Diagn needle aspiration cytology of malignant hemangiopericy-
Cytopathol 2005; 33(6):365–369. tomas with ultrastructural and flow cytometric analyses.
349. Pisharodi LR. False-negative diagnosis in fine-needle Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114(7):705–710.
aspirations of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and 370. Chan MKM, McGuire LJ, Lee JCK. Fine-needle aspiration
neck. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17(1):70–73. cytodiagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in cervical
350. Tanaka F, Wada H, Inni K, et al. Pulmonary metastasis of lymph nodes. A study of 40 cases. Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 344–354.
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma of the minor 371. Powers CN, Raval P, Schmidt WA. Fine needle aspiration
salivary gland. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 43(3): cytology of metastatic lymphoepithelioma: a case report.
178–180. Acta Cytol 1989; 33(2):254–258.
351. Gibbons D, Saboorian MH, Vuitch F, et al. Fine-needle 372. Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, et al. Diagnosis of
aspiration findings in patients with polymorphous low nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastatic to mediastinal
grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands. Cancer lymph nodes by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided
1999; 87(1):31–36. fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;
352. Saenz-Santamaria J, Catalina-Fernandez I. Polymorphous 125(9):1014–1017.
low grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland: diagnosis 373. Viguer JM, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Lopez-Ferrer P, et al.
by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 2004; 48(1): Fine-needle aspiration cytology of metastatic nasopharyn-
52–56. geal carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32(4):233–237.
353. Watanabe K, Ono N, Saito K, et al. Fine needle aspiration 374. Pacchioni D, Negro F, Valente G, et al. Epstein-Barr virus
cytology of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma of detection by in situ hybridization in fine-needle aspiration
the tongue. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20(3):167–169. biopsies. Diagn Mol Pathol 1994; 3(2):100–104.
354. Mincione GP, Nesi G, Amorosi A. Polymorphous low- 375. Macdonald MR, Freeman JL, Hui MF, et al. Role of
grade adenocarcinoma of the soft palate: fine needle Epstein-Barr virus in fine-needle aspirates of metastatic
aspiration (FNA) cytology. Cytopathology 1999; 10(1): neck nodes in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
61–65. Head Neck 1995; 17(6):487–493.
355. Dee S, Masood S, Issacs JH Jr., et al. Cytomorphologic 376. Kadish S, Goodman M, Wing CC. Olfactory neuroblastoma:
features of salivary duct carcinoma on the fine needle a clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer 1976; 37(3):1571–1576.
aspiration biopsy. A case report. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(4): 377. Taxy JB, Bharani NK, Mills SE, et al. The spectrum of
539–542. olfactory neural tumors: A light-microscopic, immunohis-
356. Hales M, Bottles K, Miller T, etal. Diagnosis of Kaposi’s tochemical and electron microscopic analysis. Am J Surg
sarcoma by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1986; 10(10):687–695.
Pathol 1987; 88(1):20–25. 378. Chung J, Park ST, Jang J. Fine needle aspiration cytology
357. Gamborino E, Carrilho C, Ferro J, et al. Fine-needle of metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma: a case report. Acta
aspiration diagnosis of Kaposi’s sarcoma in a developing Cytol 2002; 46(1):40–45.
country. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23(5):322–325. 379. Mahooti S, Wakely PE. Cytopathologic features of olfac-
358. Al-Rikabi AC, Haidar Z, Arif M, et al. Fine-needle aspira- tory neuroblastoma. Cancer 2006; 108(2):86–92.
tion cytology of primary Kaposi’s sarcoma of lymph 380. Logrono R, Futoran RM, Hartig G, et al. Olfactory neuro-
nodes in an immunocompetent man. Diagn Cytopathol blastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma): appearance on fine-
1998; 19(6):451–454. needle aspiration: report of a case. Diagn Cytopathol
359. Oliai BR, Sheth S, Burroughs FH, et al. ‘‘Parapharyngeal 1997; 17(3):205–208.
space’’ tumors: a cytopathological study of 24 cases on 381. Ferris CA, Schnadig VJ, Quinn FB, et al. Olfactory neuro-
fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32(1): blastoma: cytodiagnostic features in a case with ultra-
11–15. structural and immunohistochemical correlation. Acta
360. Steirnberg CM, Clark WD. Rhinoscleroma: A diagnostic Cytol 1988; 32(3):381–385.
challenge. Laryngoscope 1983; 93(7):866–870. 382. Fagan MF, Rone R. Esthesioneuroblastoma: cytologic fea-
361. Zaharopoulos P, Wong JY. Cytologic diagnosis of rhino- tures with differential diagnostic considerations. Diagn
scleroma. Acta Cytol 1984; 28(2):139–142. Cytopathol 1985; 1(4):322–326.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 91
383. Telen M, Wozniak Z, Rak J. Cytologic appearance of 403. Li TJ, Sun LS, Luo HY. Odontogenic myxoma: a clinico-
esthesioneuroblastoma in a fine needle aspirate. Acta pathologic study of 25 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;
Cytol 1988; 32:377–380. 130(12):1799–1806.
384. Walker WP, Wittchow RJ, Bottles K, et al. Paranuclear blue 404. Perez-Campos A, Perez-Rodriguez F, Azorin D, et al.
inclusions in small cell undifferentiated carcinoma: a diag- Cytologic features of odontogenic myxoma. Acta Cytol
nostically useful finding demonstrated in fine-needle aspi- 2004; 48(3):767–768.
ration biopsy smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 10(3):212–215. 405. Verma AK, Tandon R, Saxena S, et al. Aspiration cytology
385. Ejaz A, Wenig BM. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: of maxillary myxoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(2):
clinical and pathologic features and a discussion on 202–204.
classification, cellular differential and differential diagno- 406. Gunhan O, Dogan N, Celasun B, et al. Fine needle
sis. Adv Anat Pathol 2005; 12(3):134–143. aspiration cytology of oral cavity and jaw bone lesions:
386. Jeng Y-M, Sung M-T, Fang C-T, et al. Sinonasal undiffer- a report of 102 cases. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(2):135–141.
entiated carcinoma and nasopharyngeal type undifferen- 407. Ramzy I, Aufdemorte TB, Duncan DL. Diagnosis of
tiated carcinoma: two clinically, biologically and radiolucent lesions of the jaw by fine needle aspiration
histopathologically distinct entities. Am J Surg Pathol biopsy. Acta Cytol 1985; 29(3):419–424.
2002; 26:371–376. 408. Gupta K, Dey P, Goldsmith R, et al. Comparison of
387. Helsel JC, Bardales RH, Mukunyadzi P. Fine needle cytologic features of giant-cell tumor and giant cell
aspiration biopsy cytology of malignant neoplasms of tumor of tendon sheath. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30(1):
the sinonasal tract. Cancer 2003; 99(2):105–112. 14–18.
388. Cerilli LA, Holst VA, Brandwein MS, et al. Sinonasal 409. Cabrera RA, Almeida M, Mendonca ME, et al. Diagnostic
undifferentiated carcinoma. Immunohistochemical profile pitfalls in fine-needle aspiration cytology of temporoman-
and lack of EBV association. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; dibular chondroblastoma: report of two cases. Diagn
25(2):156–163. Cytopathol 2006; 34(6):424–429.
389. Loo CKC, Chin M, Farrell M, et al. Sinonasal neuroendo- 410. Kilpatrick SE, Pike EJ, Geisinger KR, et al. Chondroblas-
crine carcinoma: case report with FNA findings. Patholo- toma of bone: use of fine needle aspiration biopsy and
gy 2006; 38:181–184. potential diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16(1):
390. McCluggage QWG, Napier SS, Primrose WJ. Sinonasal 65–71.
neuroendocrine carcinoma exhibiting amphicrine differ- 411. Tsaknis PJ, Nelson JF. The maxillary ameloblastoma: an
entiation. Histopathology 1995; 27:79–82. analysis of 24 cases. J Oral Surg 1980; 38(5):336–342.
391. Perez-Ordonez B, Caruana SM, Huvos AG, et al. Small 412. Akrish S, Buchner A, Shoshani Y, et al. Ameloblastic
cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the nasal cavity and carcinoma: report of a new case, literature review, and
paranasal sinuses. Hum Pathol 1998; 29(8):826–832. comparison to ameloblastoma. J Oral Maxilofac Surg 2007;
392. Rosenthal DI, Barker JL, El-Naggar AK, et al. Sinonasal 65(4):777–783.
malignancies with neuroendocrine differentiation: 413. Radhika S, Nijhawan R, Das A, et al. Ameloblastoma of
patterns of failure according to histologic phenotype. the mandible: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration cytolo-
Cancer 2004; 101(11):2567–2573. gy. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(3):310–313.
393. Kleinsasser O, Schroeder HG. Adenocarcinoma of the inner 414. Stamatakos MD, Houston GD, Fowler CB, et al. Diagnosis
nose after exposure to wood dust: morphological findings of ameloblastoma of the maxilla by fine needle aspiration:
and relationships between histopathology and clinical behav- a case report. Acta Cytol 1995; 39(4):818–820.
ior in 79 cases. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1988; 245(1):1–15. 415. Parate SN, Anshu, Helwatkar SB, et al. Cytology of
394. Rana RS, Dey P, Das A. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) recurrent ameloblastoma with malignant change: a case
cytology of extra-adrenal paragangliomas. Cytopathology report. Acta Cytol 1999; 43(6):1105–1107.
1997; 8(2):108–113. 416. Matthew S, Rappaport K, Ali SZ, et al. Ameloblastoma:
395. Handa U, Bal A, Mohan H, et al. Parapharyngeal para- cytologic findings and literature review. Acta Cytol 1997;
ganglioma: diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration. Am 41:955–960.
J Otolaryngol 2005; 26(5):360–361. 417. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA. Calcifying epithelial odonto-
396. Zaharopoulos P. Diagnostic challenges in the fine-needle genic tumor: biological profile based on 181 cases from the
aspiration diagnosis of carotid body paragangliomas: literature. Oral Oncol 2000; 36(1):17–26.
report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23(3):202–207. 418. Shekarkhar MJ, Tabei SZ, Kumar PV, et al. Cytologic
397. Das DK, Gupta AK, Chowdhury C, et al. Fine-needle findings in calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor:
aspiration diagnosis of carotid body tumor: report of a A case report. Acta Cytol 2005; 49(5):533–536.
case and review of experience with cytologic features in 419. Maiorano E, Renne G, Tradati N, et al. Cytological fea-
four cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17(2):143–147. tures of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (Pindborg
398. Fleming MV, Oertel YC, Rodriguez ER, et al. Fine needle tumor) with abundant cementum-like material. Virchows
aspiration of six carotid body paragangliomas. Diagn Arch 2003; 442(2):107–110.
Cytopathol 1993; 9(5):510–515. 420. Maremonti P, Califano L, Mangone GM, et al. Intraoss-
399. Gonzalez-Caompora R, Otal-Salaverri C, Panea-Flores P, eous mucoepidermoid carcinoma: report of a long-term
et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of paraganglionic evolution case. Oral Oncol 2001; 37(1):110–113.
tumors. Acta Cytol 1988; 32:386–390. 421. Zaharopoulos P. Primary intraosseous (central) salivary
400. Jacobs DM, Waisman J. Cervical paraganglioma with gland neoplasms in jaw bones: report of a mucoepider-
intranuclear vacuoles in a fine needle aspirate. Acta moid carcinoma of the mandible diagnosed by fine needle
Cytol 1987; 31(1):29–32. aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 31(4):271–275.
401. Vera-Alvarez J, Marigil-Gomez M, Abascal-Agorreta M, 422. Favia G, Maiorano E, Orsini G, et al. Central (intraosseous)
et al. Malignant retroperitoneal paraganglioma with intra- adenoid cystic carcinoma of the mandible: report of a case
nuclear vacuoles in a fine needle aspirate: a case report. with periapical involvement. J Endod 2000; 26(12):760–763.
Acta Cytol 1993; 37(2):229–233. 423. Sato T, Indo H, Takasaki T, et al. A rare case of intra-
402. Logrono R, Kurtycz DF, Wojtowycz M, et al. Fine needle osseous polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma
aspiration cytology of fibrous dysplasia: a case report. (PLGA) of the maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;
Acta Cytol 1998; 42(5):1172–1176. 30(3):184–187.
92 Elsheikh et al.
424. August M, Faquin WC, Ferraro NF, et al. Fine needle 449. O’Hara BJ, Ehya H, Shields JA, et al. Fine needle aspira-
aspiration biopsy of intraosseous jaw lesions. J Oral tion biopsy in pediatric ophthalmic tumors and pseudo-
Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57(11):1282–1286. tumors. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(2):125–130.
425. Curling M. The eye. In: Gray W, McKee GT, eds. Diag- 450. Shields JA, Shields CL, Ehya H, et al. Fine needle
nostic Cytopathology. 2nd ed: Churchill Livingstone, aspiration biopsy of suspected intraocular tumors: The
2003:977–994. 1992 Urwick Lecture. Ophthalmology 1993; 100(11):
426. Makley TA Jr. Biopsy of intraocular lesions. Am J Oph- 1677–1984.
thalmol 1967; 64:591–599. 451. Lobo A, Lightman S. Vitreous aspiration needle tap in the
427. Char DH. History of ocular oncology. Ophthalmology diagnosis of intraocular inflammation. Ophthalmology
1996; 103(suppl 8):S96–101. 2003; 110(3):595–599.
428. Rosenthal DL, Mandell DB, Glasgow BJ. Eye. In: Bibbo M, 452. Tani E, Seregard S, Rupp G, et al. Fine needle aspiration
ed. Comprehensive Cytopathology. Philadelphia, PA: WB cytology and immunocytochemistry of orbital masses.
Saunders, 1991:484–501. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(1):1–5.
429. Char DH, Kemlitz BA, Miller T. Intraocular biopsy. 453. Gupta S, Sood B, Gulati M, et al. Orbital mass lesions:
Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2005; 18(1):177–185. US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Experience in
430. Char DH. Tumors of the eye and ocular adnexa. Hamil- 37 patients. Radiology 1999; 213(2):568–572.
ton, Canada: BC Decker, 2001. 454. Czerniak B, Woyke S, Daniel B, et al. Diagnosis of orbital
431. Machemer R, Parel JM, Buettner H. A new concept for tumors by aspiration biopsy guided by computerized
vitreous surgery. Part 1. Instrumentation. Am J Ophthal- tomography. Cancer 1984; 54(11):2385–2389.
mol 1972; 73(1):1–7. 455. Zajdela A, de Maublanc MA, Schlienger P, et al. Cytologic
432. Paerl R, Machemer R, Aumayr W. A new concept for diagnosis of orbital and periorbital palpable tumors using
vitreous surgery part 4: improvements in instrumentation fine needle sampling without aspiration. Diagn Cytopa-
and illumination. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 77(1):6–12. thol 1986; 2(1):17–20.
433. Green WR. Diagnostic cytopathology of ocular fluid speci- 456. Char DH, Kroll SM, Stoloff A, et al. Cytomorphometry of
mens. Ophthalmology 1984; 91(6):726–749. uveal melanoma: comparison of fine needle aspiration
434. Engel HM, Green WR, Michels RG, et al. Diagnostic biopsy samples with histologic sections. Anal Quant Cytol
vitrectomy. Retina 1981; 1(2):121–149. Histol 1991; 13:293–299.
435. Engel HM, de la Cruz ZC, Jimenez-Abalahin LD, et al. 457. Faulkner-Jones BE, Foster WJ, Harbour JW, et al. Fine
Cytopreparatory techniques for eye fluid specimens needle aspiration biopsy with adjunct immunohistochem-
obtained by virectomy. Acta Cytol 1982; 26:551–560. istry in intraocular tumor management. Acta Cytol 2005;
436. Palexas GN, Green WR, Goldberg MF, et al. Diagnostic 49(3):297–308.
pars plana vitrectomy report of a 21-year retrospective 458. Zajdela A, Vielh P, Schlienger P, et al. Fine needle cytolo-
study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1995; 93:281–308. gy of 292 palpable orbital and eyelid tumors. Am J Clin
437. Gunduz K, Shields JA, Shields CL, et al. Cutaneous Pathol 1990; 93(1):100–104.
melanoma metastatic to the vitreous cavity. Ophthalmol- 459. Kennerdell JS, Salmovits TL, Dekker A, et al. Orbital fine-
ogy 1998; 105(4):600–605. needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99(5):
438. Rastogi A, Jain S. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in orbital 547–551.
lesions. Orbit 2001; 20(1):11–23. 460. Arora R, Rewari R, Betharia SM. Fine needle aspiration
439. Augsburger JJ, Shields JA, Folberg R, et al. Fine needle cytology of orbital and adnexal masses. Acta Cytol 1992;
aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of intraocular cancer: 36(4):483–491.
cytologic-histologic correlations. Ophthalmology 1985; 461. Krohel GB, Tobin D, Chavis RM. Inaccuracy of orbital fine
92(1):39–49. needle aspiration biopsy. Ophthalmology 1984; 91
440. Czerniak B, Woyke S, Domagala W, et al. Fine needle (suppl):83.
aspiration cytology of intraocular malignant melanoma. 462. Cohen VM, Dinakaran S, Parsons MA, et al. Transvitreal
Acta Cytol 1983; 2(27):157–165. fine needle aspiration biopsy: the influence of intraocular
441. Scroggs MW, Johnston WW, Klintworth GK. Intraocular lesion size on diagnostic biopsy result. Eye 2001; 15(pt 2):
tumors: a cytopathologic study. Acta Cytol 1990; 143–147.
34(3):401–408. 463. Augsburger JJ, Correa ZM, Schneider S, et al. Diagnostic
442. Palma O, Canali N, Scaroni P, et al. Fine needle aspiration transvitreal fine needle aspiration biopsy of small mela-
biopsy: its use in the management of orbital and intraoc- nocytic choroidal tumors in nevus versus melanoma
ular tumors. Tumori 1989; 75(6):589–593. category. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2002; 100:225–232.
443. Eide N, Syrdalen P, Walaas L, et al. Fine needle aspiration 464. Henderson JW, Neault RW. En bloc removal of intrinsic
biopsy in selecting treatment for inconclusive intraocular neoplasms of the lacrimal gland. Trans Am Ophthalmol
disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77(4):448–452. Soc 1976; 74:133–147.
444. Glasgow BJ, Brown HH, Zargoza AM, et al. Quanitation 465. Stevenson KE, Hungerford J, Garner A. Local extraocular
of tumor seeding from fine needle aspiration of ocular extension of retinoblastoma following intraocular surgery.
melanomas. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105(5):538–546. Br J Ophthalmol 1989; 73(9):739–742.
445. Zeppa P, Tranfa F, Errico M, et al. Fine needle aspiration 466. Shields JA, Shields CL. Melanocytic tumors of the iris
(FNA) biopsy of orbital masses: a critical review of 51 cases. stroma. In: Shields JA, Shields CL, eds. Intraocular Tumors:
Cytopathology 1997; 8(6):366–372. A Text and Atlas. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1992:
446. Karcioglu ZA, Gordon RA, Karcioglu GL. Tumor seeding 61–83.
in ocular fine needle aspiration biopsy. Ophthalmology 467. Dey P, Radhika S, Rajwanshi A, et al. Fine needle aspira-
1985; 92(12):1763–1767. tion biopsy of orbital and eyelid lesions. Acta Cytol 1993;
447. Glasgow BJ, Layfield LJ. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of 37(6):903–907.
orbital and periorbital masses. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 468. Liu D. Complications of fine needle aspiration biopsy of
7(2):132–141. the orbit. Ophthalmology 1985; 92(12):1768–1771.
448. Cangiarella JF, Cajigas A, Savala E, et al. Fine needle 469. Wilhelmus KR, Font RL, Lehmann RP, et al. Cytomegalo-
aspiration cytology of orbital masses. Acta Cytol 1996; virus keratitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
40(6):1205–1211. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114(7):869–872.
Chapter 1: Fine Needle Aspiration of the Head and Neck 93
470. Mollan SP, Gao A, Lockwood A, et al. Postcataract 492. Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, et al. Clinicopathologic
endophthalmitis: incidence and microbial isolates in a review of 142 cases of lacrimal gland lesions. Ophthal-
United Kingdom region from 1996 through 2004. J Cata- mology 1989; 96(4):431–435.
ract Refract Surg 2007; 33(2):265–268. 493. Glasgow BJ, Foos RY. Ocular Cytopathology. Boston, MA:
471. Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ, DuPuis MH. Fine needle aspira- Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993.
tion of lymphoadenopathy of suspected infectious etiolo- 494. Cristallini EC, Bolis GB, Ottaiano P. Fine needle aspiration
gy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1985; 109(9):810–812. biopsy of orbital meningioma: report of a case. Acta Cytol
472. Froumis NA, Mondino BJ, Glasgow BJ. Acanthamoeba 1994; 38:158–164.
keratitis associated with fungal keratitis. Am J Ophthal- 495. Meyer E, Malberger E, Gdal-On M, et al. Fine needle
mol 2001; 131(4):508–509. aspiration of orbital lesions. Ann Ophthalmol 1983;
473. Hunt KE, Glasgow BJ. Aspergillus endophthalmitis: an 15(7):635–638.
unrecognized endemic disease in orthotopic liver trans- 496. Das DK, Das J, Bhatt NC, et al. Orbital lesions: diagnosis
plantation. Ophthalmology 1996; 103(5):757–767. by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;
474. Mondino KM, Holland GN, Glasgow BJ. Retinal seeding 38(2):158–164.
from anterior segment coccidioidomycosis after vitrecto- 497. Malberger E, Tillinger R, Lichtig C. Diagnosis of basal cell
my. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91(6):837–838. carcinoma with aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1984; 28(3):
475. Kalogeropoulos CD, Malamou-Mitsi VD, Asproudis I, et 301–304.
al. The contribution of aqueous humor cytology in the 498. Johnson LN, Krohel GB, Yeon EB, et al. Sinus tumors
differential diagnosis of anterior uvea inflammations. invading the orbit. Ophthalmology 1984; 91(3):209–217.
Ocular Immunol and Inflamm 2004; 12(3):215–225. 499. Lee DA, Campbell RJ, Waller PR, et al. A clinicopathologic
476. Mandell DB, Levy JJ, Rosenthal DL. Preparation and study of primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal
cytological evaluation of intraocular fluids. Acta Cytol gland. Ophthalmology 1985; 92(1):128–134.
1987; 31(2):150–158. 500. Finger PT, Marin JP, Berson AM, et al. Choroidal metas-
477. Khatami M, Donnelly JJ, John T, et al. Vernal conjunctivi- tasis from adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung. Am J
tis: model studies in guinea pigs immunized topically Ophthalmol 2003; 135(2):239–240.
with fluoresceinyl ovalbumin. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 501. Lloyd GA. Lacrimal gland tumors: the role of CT and
102(11):1683–1688. conventional radiology. Br J Radiol 1981; 54(648):
478. Wilhelmus KR, Robinson NM, Tredici LL, et al. Conjunc- 1034–1038.
tival cytology of adult chlamydial conjunctivitis. Arch 502. Zurcher M, Hintschich CR, Garner A, et al. Sebaceous
Ophthalmol 1986; 104(9):691–693. carcinoma of the eyelid: a clinicopatholgical study. Br J
479. Talley AR, Garcia-Ferrer F, Laycock KA, et al. Compara- Ophthalmol 1998; 82(9):1049–1055.
tive diagnosis of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis by 503. Brownstein S, Codere F, Jackson WB. Masquerade
polymerase chain reaction and McCoy cell culture. Am J syndrome. Ophthalmology 1980; 87(3):259–262.
Ophthalmol 1994; 117(1):50–57. 504. Wright P, Collin JRO, Garner A. The masquerade
480. Naib ZM. Cytology of ocular lesions. Acta Cytol 1972; 16(2): syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1981; 101:244–250.
178–185. 505. Hood IC, Qizilbash AH, Salama SS, et al. Needle aspira-
481. Butrus SL, Abelson MB. Laboratory evaluation of ocular tion cytology of sebaceous carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1984;
allergy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1988; 28:324–328. 28(3):305–312.
482. Hochman M, Sugino IK, Lesko C, et al. Diagnosis of 506. Das KK, Das J, Natarajan R, et al. Meibomian gland
phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis by fine needle aspira- carcinoma initially identified by cytology. Diagn Cytopa-
tion biopsy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999; 30(2):152–154. thol 1986; 12:154–156.
483. Hsuan JD, Selva D, McNab AA, et al. Idiopathic sclerosing 507. Jain P, Nanda A, Handa U, et al. FNA diagnosis of
orbital inflammation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124(9): recurrent sebaceous carinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;
1244–1250. 34(2):124–126.
484. Sa HS, Ji JY, Suh YL, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic 508. Domagala W, Lubinski J, Lasota J, et al. Neuroendocrine
tumor of the orbit presenting as a subconjunctival mass. (Merkel-cell) carcinoma of the skin. Cytology, intermedi-
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 21(3):211–215. ate filament typing and ultrastructure f tumor cell in fine
485. Arora R, Rewari R, Betheria SM. Fine needle aspiration needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(3):267–275.
cytology of eyelid tumors. Acta Cytol 1990; 34(2):227–232. 509. Kawamoto E, Geisinger KR, Leonard DD, et al. The
486. Selsky EJ, Knox DL, Maumence AE, et al. Ocular involve- cytologic appearance of Merkel-cell carcinoma in fine
ment in Whipple’s disease. Retina 1984; 4(2):103–106. needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 1984; 28:650.
487. Johnson LN, Helper RS, Yee RD, et al. Sphenoid sinus 510. Mellblom L, Akerman M, Carlen B. Aspiration cytology of
mucocele (anterior clinoid variant) mimicking diabetic neuroendocrine (Merkel-cell) carcinoma of the skin.
ophthalmoplegia and retrobulbar neuritis. Am J Ophthal- Report of a case. Acta Cytol 1984; 28(3):297–300.
mol 1986; 102(1):111–115. 511. Garden JW, McManis JC. Congenital orbital-intracranial
488. Gomez-Aracil V, Azua J, San Pedro C, et al. Fine needle teratoma with subsequent malignancy.: case report. Br J
aspiration cytologic findings in four cases of pilometrox- Ophthalmol. 1986; 70(2):111–113.
ima (calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe). Acta Cytol 1990; 512. Samii M, Ramina R, Koch G, et al. Malignant teratoma of the
34(6):842–846. optic nerve. Case report. Neurosurgery 1985; 16(5): 696–700.
489. Unger P, Watson C, Phelps RG, et al. Fine needle aspiration 513. Mahesh L, Krishnakumar S, Subramanian N, et al. Malig-
cytology of pilomatrixoma (calcified epithelioma of Mal- nant teratoma of the orbit: a clinicopathological study of a
herbe). Report of a case. Acta Cytol 1990; 34(6):847–850. case. Orbit 2003; 22(4):305–309.
490. Sturgis CD, Silverman JF, Kennerdell JS, et al. Fine needle 514. Char DH, Miller TR. Fine needle biopsy in retinoblastoma.
aspiration for the diagnosis of primay epithelial tmors of Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97(6):686–690.
the lacrimal gland and ocular adnexa. Diagn Cytopathol 515. Akhtar M, Ali MA, Sabbah R, et al. Aspiration cytology of
2001; 24(2):86–89. retinoblastoma: light and electron microscopic correla-
491. Ni C. Primary lacrimal gland tumors: the pathologic tions. Diagn Cytopathol 1988; 4(4):306–311.
classification of 272 cases. Yen Ko Hsueh Pao 1994; 516. Lussier C, Klijanienko J, Vielh P. Fine-needle aspiration of
10(4):201–220. metastatic nonlymphomatous tumors of the major
94 Elsheikh et al.
salivary glands: a clinicopathologic study of 40 cases 536. Fan JT, Buettner H, Bartley GB, et al. Clinical features and
cytologically diagnosed and histologically correlated. treatment of seven patients with carcinoid tumor meta-
Cancer 2000; 90(6):350–356. static to the eye and orbit. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 119(2):
517. Shields JA, Shields CL, Parsons HM. Differential diagno- 211–218.
sis of retinoblastoma: review. Retina 1991; 11(2):232–243. 537. Freedman MI, Folk JC. Metastatic tumors to the eye and
518. Karcioglu ZA. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for orbit: patients survival and clinical characteristics. Arch
retinoblastoma. Retina 2002; 22(6):707–710. ophthalmol 1987; 105(9):1215–1219.
519. Decaussin M, Boran MD, Salle M, et al. Cytological 538. Ritland JS, Eide N, Walaas L, et al. Fine needle aspiration
aspiration of intraocular retinoblastoma in an 11-year biopsy diagnosis of uveal metastasis from a follicular
old boy. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 19(3):190–193. thyroid carcinoma. Acta Ophthalm Scand 1999; 77(5):
520. Akhtar M, Ali MA, Sabbah R, et al. Fine needle aspiration 594–596.
biopsy diagnosis of round cell malignant tumors of child- 539. Irving RM, Parikh A, Coumbe A, et al. Melanotic neuro-
hood: a combined light and electromicroscopic approach. ectodermal tumor of infancy. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107(11):
Cancer 1985; 55(8):1805–1817. 1045–1048.
521. Arora R, Betharia SM. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of 540. Judd PJ, Pedod D, Harrop K, et al. Melanotic neuro-
pediatric orbital tumors. An immunocytochemical study. ectodermal tumor of infancy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Acta Cytol 1994; 38(4):511–516. Pathol 1990; 69:723–726.
522. He W, Hasimoto H, Tsuneyoshi M, et al. A reassessment 541. Mirich DR, Blaser SI, Harwood-Nash DC. Melanotic neu-
of histologic classifications and an immunochemical study roectodermal tumor of infancy: clinical, radiologic, and
of 88 retinoblastomas. A special reference to the advent of pathologic findings in five cases. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;
bipolar-like cells. Cancer 1992; 70(12):2901–2908. 12(4):689–697.
523. Takahashi T, Tamura S, Inoue M, et al. Retinoblastoma in 542. Borello DE, Gorlin RJ. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor
a 26 year old adult. Ophthalmology 1983; 90(2):179–183. of infancy: a neoplasm of neural crest origin. Report of a
524. Shields CL, Shields JA, Gross NE, et al. Survey of 520 case associated with a high urinary excretion of vanil-
uveal metastases. Ophthalmology 1997; 104(8):1265–1276. mandelic acid. Cancer 1966; 19:196–206.
525. Shields JA, Shields CL. Metastatic tumors to the intraocu- 543. Galera-Ruiz H, Gomez-Angel D, Vazquez-Ramirez FJ,
lar structures. In: Shields JA, Shields CL, eds. Intraocular et al. Fine needle aspiration in the preoperative diagnosis
Tumors: A Text and Atlas. Philadelphia, PA: WB of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy. J Laryngol
Saunders, 1992:207–238. and Otol 1999; 113(6):581–584.
526. Pollock SC, Awh CC, Dutton JJ. Cutaneous melanoma 544. El-Harazi SM, Kellaway J, Font RL. Melanocytoma of the
metastatic to the optic disc and vitreous. Arch Ophthal- ciliary body diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
mol 1991; 109(10):1352–1354. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22(6):394–397.
527. Sheilds JA, Sheilds CL, Singh AD. Metastatic neoplasms 545. Joffe I, Shields J, Osher R, et al. Clinical and follow-up
in the optic disc. The 1999 Bjerrum Lecture: Part 2. Arch studies of melanocytomas of the optic disc. Ophthalmolo-
Ophthalmol 2000; 118:217–224. gy 1979; 86:1067–1078.
528. Reddy SC, Madhavan M, Mutum SS. Anterior uveal and 546. Juarez CP, Tso MO. An ultrastructural study of melano-
episcleral metaseases from carcinoma of the breast. cytomas (magnocellular nevi) of the optic disk and uvea.
Ophthalmolgica 2000; 214(5):368–372. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 90(1):48–62.
529. Heerema A, Sudilovsky D. Mucinous adenocarcinoma of 547. Char DH, Miller TR, Crawford JB. Cytopathologic diag-
the ovary metastatic to the eye: report of a case with nosis of benign lesions simulating choroidal melanomas.
diagnosis by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 112(1):70–75.
2001; 45(5):789–793. 548. Shields JA, Shields CL, De Portter P, et al. Diagnosis and
530. Singh RP, Tullis S, Hatton M, etal. Orbital metastasis from treatment of uveal melanoma. Semin Oncol 1996; 23(6):
ovarian carcinoma in a patient with BRCA-2 mutation. 763–767.
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22(4):298–299. 549. Paridaens ADA, McCartney ACE, Curling OM, et al.
531. Bouvier D, Raghuveer C. Aspiration cytology of metastat- Impression cytology of conjunctival melanosis and mela-
ic chordoma to the orbit. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131(2): noma. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76:198–201.
279–280. 550. Woyke S, Domagala W, Czerniak B, et al. Fine needle
532. Otto RA, Templer JW, Renner G, et al. Secondary and aspiration cytology of malignant melanoma of the skin.
metastatic tumors of the orbit. Otolaryngol Head Neck Acta Cytol 1980; 24:529–538.
Surg 1987; 97(3):328–334. 551. Martinez F, Merenda G, Bedrossian CW. Lipid-rich meta-
533. Shields JA, Shields CL, Ehya H. Lung cancer diagnosis by static melanoma: diagnosis by a multimodal approach
fine needle biopsy of the optic disk. Retina 2001; 21(6): to aspiration biopsy cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1990;
665–666. 6:427–433.
534. Scolyer RA, Painter DM, Harper CG, et al. Hepatocellular 552. Tseng S-H, Chen Y-T, Huang F-C, et al. Seborrheic kera-
carcinoma metastasizing to the orbit diagnosed by fine tosis of conjunctiva simulating a malignant melanoma: an
needle aspiration cytology. Pathology 1999; 31(4): 350–353. immunocytochemical study with impression cytology.
535. Srinivasan R, Krishnanand G. Cytologic diagnosis of Ophthalmology 1999; 190:1516–1520.
metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as an
orbital mass: a case report. Acta Cytol 2007; 51(1):83–85.
2
Mario A. Luna
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
I. INTRODUCTION within a short time. The use of the cold chamber cry-
ostat, introduced into surgical pathology in the late
The frozen-section tissue examination, performed 1950s by Ibanez et al. (3), has eliminated most of the
during surgery while the patient is still under anes- technical shortcomings of the procedure. In most
thesia, was introduced 100 years ago, and the tech- instances, the quality of the preparations is equal to
nique is accepted as an integral part of the proper or only slightly less perfect than that of permanent
surgical treatment of a patient (1,2). Entire generations sections subjected to paraffin embedding.
of pathologists and surgeons have become familiar Several methods and a variety of microtomes
with the method and its benefits to them and their are currently available for the preparation of frozen
patients. Although frozen sections may be requested sections. Within 15 minutes, the newer cryostats can
by surgeons for several specific reasons, all are based provide a satisfactory section stained with hemato-
on their desire to obtain accurate diagnostic informa- xylin and eosin (H&E). At the M. D. Anderson Hospi-
tion, from which they will decide on the immediate tal the procedure is as follows: The biopsy specimen
surgical procedure. removed at time of surgery is transported to the
Frozen-section diagnosis should be considered a pathology laboratory by surgical personnel; because
cooperative effort between physicians, because the the frozen-section laboratory is adjacent to the operat-
surgical pathologist’s report carries the same weight ing rooms, the transportation takes little time. The
as that of any other consulting physician. It is impera- gross specimen is examined by a staff pathologist and
tive that a sound dialogue be established between the a pathology resident, and a representative portion is
surgeon and pathologist over the need for, limitations selected for cryostat sectioning. All tissue sections are
of, and consequences of the frozen-section diagnosis; prepared by a technologist. The tissue is embedded on
however, the actual decision of whether or not to a metal chuck with the use of a commercial prepara-
prepare a frozen section is up to the pathologist, rather tion (OCT, optimal cutting temperature compound,
than the surgeon. manufactured by Laboratory Technical Instruments
Company, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.). The compound
II. HANDLING OF THE TISSUE SAMPLE is sectioned with the tissue, but disappears in the
staining process.
Fragments of tissue obtained for frozen sections For freezing, the metal chuck is placed in an
should be sent to the pathologist in the unfixed insulated stainless steel box containing aluminum
state. Immersion in formalin, even for a brief time, racks, around which dry ice is packed into the box.
interferes with adherence of the sections to the glass The temperature of the box is –668C or less. Into the
slide, makes the technique more difficult, and may top of the racks, cylindrical cavities have been drilled
inhibit the performance of special studies, such as for the tissue holders; these cavities are filled with
cultures and immunofluorescence. To avoid desicca- 95% ethyl alcohol. The metal chuck containing the
tion, the specimen may be sent to the pathology specimen of tissue is inserted into one of the cylindri-
laboratory, wrapped in a piece of gauze moistened cal cavities of the rack. From 15 to 20 seconds are
with saline solution. required for freezing a block of tissue 15 15 3 mm
in diameter. When frozen, the tissue, with the holder
III. TECHNIQUE FOR PREPARING attached, is placed on the microtome inside the cold
A FROZEN SECTION chamber and sections are cut at 6 to 8/mm for fixation.
The slides, with the tissue attached, are next immersed
The technique of frozen-section preparation is not for a few seconds in a solution composed of equal
difficult, although the sections must be thin and parts of ether and absolute methyl alcohol and then
clearly stained, and the study should be completed stained with H&E. Stained sections are mounted and
96 Luna
retained for permanent reference. The time required differences. Remsen et al. (11) found an accuracy rate
for preparation and microscopic interpretation aver- of 100% on the submandibular gland, nose, and para-
ages 10 minutes. The pathologic diagnosis is relayed nasal sinuses, followed by the thyroid gland (99.2%),
directly to the surgeon by an intercommunicating neck (97%), parotid gland (95.4%), skin (94.3%), and
system. The exact verbal report is recorded by the larynx (93.2%). Areas in which frozen-section diagno-
pathologist on a specially designed ‘‘Frozen Section sis was least accurate included the nasopharynx
Diagnosis Form,’’ which becomes a permanent part of (87.5%) and the oropharynx (91.3%).
the pathology record of the patient. A duplicate of the Factors involved in improving the reliability of
diagnosis form is retained in the laboratory. frozen sections are (i) preparations of high quality
A much faster technique has been used at the with the use of the cryostat, (ii) experience of the
Mayo Clinic for many years, with excellent results (4). pathologist in performing frozen-section diagnoses,
The difference is that the tissue slides are stained with (iii) familiarity of the pathologist with the clinical
toluidine blue instead of using the conventional H&E history of the patient, (iv) direct communication with
stain (5). The only inconvenience is that tissue stained the surgeon, (v) availability of a qualified histology
with toluidine blue will fade with time and cannot be technologist, (vi) readily available consultation with
retained as permanent reference. staff pathologists, (vii) close cooperation between an
Dehner and Rosai (6) have emphasized the experienced surgeon interested in pathology and a
importance of keeping a written record of the pathologist dedicated to patient care, (viii) continual
frozen-section diagnosis exactly as it was verbally retrospective critical analysis of performance, and
rendered. They have given the following reasons for (ix) examination of selected cases and periodic discus-
this precaution: (i) It provides a permanent record for sion of frozen sections with the surgical team.
medical and legal purposes, (ii) it protects the pathol-
ogist and surgeon from possible misunderstanding
at the time of verbal communication, and (iii) it V. ERRORS
provides a retrievable format for periodic evaluation
of the procedure. Four types of errors are possible in frozen-section
diagnosis: sampling, interpretive, communicative,
and technical (16). Although improper surgical or
IV. ACCURACY pathologic sampling errors are unavoidable, the num-
ber may be reduced by an even more cautious gross
In reviewing publications evaluating the accuracy of examination or by cutting additional sections of tissue
frozen-section diagnosis in head and neck surgery, from different levels of the block submitted for frozen-
one is impressed by the generally high degree of section diagnosis. In my experience, the latter practice
accuracy obtained. The figures quoted have often is especially useful in studies of cervical lymph nodes
included deferred diagnoses. When these are exclud- in metastatic melanoma and thyroid carcinoma.
ed, the number of accurate diagnoses has varied from Gross-sampling errors by pathologists are not unusual
97% to 99%. This figure compares favorably with the in neoplasms of the salivary and thyroid glands.
0.7% to 2.5% rate of error reported previously in Interpretive errors are those made when the
general surgery (4,6–16). Dehner and Rosai (6) quoted pathologist fails to recognize a lesion that is actually
an accuracy rate of 96% on 1187 individual nonde- present in the frozen sections. In tissues from the head
ferred frozen sections. This is identical with the data and neck, this error is not uncommon in the interpre-
of Remsen et al. (11) and Bauer (12), which dealt tation of sites of a previous laryngeal biopsy (13), in
exclusively with frozen tissues from the head and irradiated tissues (16), and in unsuspected, unusual
neck. Also, of interest is the pronounced difference lesions. In the first and second cases, it is helpful if the
between the incidence of false-positive and false- pathologist has knowledge of the clinical history of the
negative diagnoses. The percentage of false-negatives patient and has reviewed the previously removed
is quite low, although still three times that of false- histologic material. In the last instance, given clinical
positives. There is no doubt that the attitude of the information and adequate tissue, the pathologist may
pathologist is, as a rule, one of extreme conservatism still have difficulty in arriving at a correct diagnosis.
in handling frozen-section material. As a consequence, Only the experience of the surgical pathologist can
confronted with the situation in which the problem of reduce interpretive errors.
neoplasia must be resolved, we are three times as Lack of identification of the exact source of the
likely to err on the side of conservatism. tissue specimen submitted for frozen-section diagno-
Gandour-Edwards et al. (13) analyzed the accu- sis is the communicative error most often committed
racy of frozen-section diagnosis in head and neck by the clinician. This neglect is especially frustrating
surgery in relation to the reason for the intraoperative in the histopathologic evaluation of lymph nodes of
request. Their accuracy rate in 1947 specimens for the neck if the typical surgical pathology request form
evaluation of adequacy of surgical margins was contains nothing more than the information ‘‘cervical
98.3%. The accuracy rate for diagnosis of an unknown node.’’ Such a problem can be solved only through the
process in 258 specimens was 96.6%, and no discrep- exchange of information between the surgeon and the
ancies occurred in the five requests for tissue identifi- pathologist.
cation. Analysis of accuracy of consultation by Technical factors, for example, slides of poor
anatomic region of the head and neck revealed certain quality, lead to interpretive errors by the pathologist.
Chapter 2: Uses, Abuses, and Pitfalls of Frozen-Section Diagnoses 97
This, however, should not be accepted as the sole of adequacy of surgical margins, 11.7% (25) for diag-
cause of error. The pathologist is the ‘‘captain of the nosis, and only 0.2% (5) for tissue identification.
ship’’ in the frozen-section laboratory. We agree with
Saltzstein and Nahum that ‘‘the surgical pathologist
should be aware that he is having problems and either B. Contraindications
correct them if at all possible or, if he is unable to The contraindications for and misuses of frozen sec-
correct them, report the situation to the surgeon’’ (16). tion are as follows:
1. When the frozen-section diagnosis carries no
VI. INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS immediate decision, for example, academic curi-
A. Indications osity, drama, or gamesmanship.
2. If tissue is heavily calcified or ossified.
The indications for the frozen-section examination, 3. If the tissue specimen is unique and small.
which have been discussed at length by many authors 4. For lesions that, even under optimum conditions,
(4,6–16) are, briefly, as follows: require extensive study because of their complex-
ity. These include the lymphoreticular disorders,
1. As an initial study, to obtain a histologic diagnosis small superficial melanocytic lesions, and some
when a definitive therapeutic procedure is to be granulomatous diseases.
carried out immediately. If, however, the treat-
ment would be the same, regardless of the nature
of the lesion or of other information gained, there VII. INTRAOPERATIVE CYTOLOGY
is no justification for a frozen section.
2. To assess the adequacy of the surgical excision by The use of imprint and smear cytology is a useful
a check of the margins of resection. Frozen-section adjunct to the frozen section, with proved acceptable
examination of the margins of neoplasms of the accuracy rate (17–20). The reports that have compared
head and neck is a common practice. intraoperative cytologic techniques with frozen sec-
3. To preliminarily assess the nature of the planned tions have noted similar accuracy rates. However,
procedure, as determined by the extent and dis- when both techniques are combined, this figure
tribution of the tissue involved by tumor. This increases to almost 100% (20). Cytologic techniques
is especially common in laryngeal surgery in are particularly useful when sampling lymph nodes
which the decision is between partial and total that are suggestive of either lymphoma or metastatic
laryngectomy. disease, parathyroid tumors, salivary gland tumors, or
4. To identify or diagnose any abnormality of tissue thyroid lesions (21–23).
observed during surgery that gives rise to a ques- The greatest advantage of cytologic examination
tion in the surgeon’s mind. is that minimal tissue is needed for examination;
5. To ascertain whether a biopsy is satisfactory for therefore, diagnosis of very small lesions is facilitated,
diagnostic purposes, thus eliminating the need and tissue is saved for permanent sections and special
for additional multiple biopsies, even though studies. Certain tissues that often cannot be adequate-
further surgery is not contemplated at the time. ly assessed by frozen section for technical reasons
This point is not infrequently presented when (e.g., bone, fat, or necrotic tissue) may be also appro-
lymphoma is suspected clinically and a cervical priate for intraoperative cytologic diagnosis.
lymph node or tonsillar biopsy is performed. In There are several situations in which an intra-
such cases, one-half of the specimen should be operative cytologic study is generally not as useful as
used for frozen section, while the other half is frozen-section examination. These include the evalua-
fixed for paraffin sectioning to eliminate the devel- tion of resection margins, the presence or absence of
opment of artifacts incident to freezing. stromal invasion, or the depth of invasion of a malig-
6. To determine if a lesion requires immediate or nant neoplasm (17–23).
special handling. For example, tissue for electron
microscopy and immunofluorescence requires VIII. REGIONAL APPLICATIONS OF
special treatment for optimal results. By knowing FROZEN-SECTION DIAGNOSIS
that a lesion is inflammatory, one will be able to
obtain adequate bacteriologic or viral cultures. A. Surgical Margins
7. To use the frozen-section technique when neces-
sary on biopsies taken from outpatients. This pro- Successful local control of a malignant tumor depends
cedure allows triage of a large number of patients on eradication not only of the gross disease but also
with lesions of the upper respiratory and digestive of its microscopic or subclinical extension (24–27).
tracts and rapid scheduling and treatment when Usually an experienced surgeon is able to resect the
necessary. palpable or visible tumor with a fringe of normal
tissue and feel confident of its complete removal in
The reasons for requesting an intraoperative 67% of the cases (24). Occasionally, however, to the
consultation in head and neck surgery have been chagrin of the surgeon, the pathology report, complet-
analyzed by Gandour-Edwards et al. (13). In their ed several days postoperatively, indicates the pres-
material of 2210 frozen sections from 258 patients, ence of microscopic cancer at the resected margins. To
88.1% (1947) of sections were requested for evaluation avoid this dilemma, the experienced surgeon, with the
98 Luna
Figure 3 Processing of surgical specimen. Sections are taken Figure 4 Ideal preparation for study of surgical margins for
from the different margins of resection as well as from the closest frozen section.
margins.
B. Peripheral Nerves
The frozen-section technique has been invaluable for
studying the spread of tumor through the peripheral is made for mounting the nerve on the tissue holder
nerves, especially those in the head and neck. In these and the section is made in the longitudinal axis. The
locations the invasion and extension along the proximal end of the nerve should be cut transversely
branches of the cranial nerves is of particular signifi- for study of the entire circumference (Fig. 7).
cance (37–39). Once a branch is invaded, the disease is
certain to extend to the dura mater and brain (37,40).
C. Lymph Nodes
To prevent this, the involved segment of nerve must
be removed as a principal part of the surgical proce- Frozen sections of enlarged cervical lymph nodes
dure and studied by frozen section. The nerves most permit a full range of pathologic interpretation,
frequently involved are the greater palatine nerve, by among other things, primary lymphoma, metastatic
tumors of the palate; the maxillary nerve, by tumors of carcinoma, granuloma, or nonspecific reactive hyper-
the maxilla; the lingual nerve, by tumors of the plasia. A tumor diagnosed preoperatively as an
tongue, floor of mouth, and submaxillary gland; the enlarged cervical lymph node may prove, on frozen
mental nerve by cancer of the lip (Fig. 6); and the facial section, to be an unsuspected neoplasm or cyst. Para-
nerve, and branches of the auriculotemporal nerve by gangliomas, schwannoma, Warthin’s tumor, or cyst of
tumors of the parotid gland (37–39). Any malignant the branchial cleft, all have been responsible, on occa-
tumor of the head and neck can invade the cranial sion, for a preoperative diagnosis of ‘‘indeterminate
nerves, but the more common are adenoid cystic cervical adenopathy’’ (see chaps. 16 and 17).
carcinoma (39), skin carcinoma of the face (40), facial Usually, the diagnosis of carcinoma within a
melanoma (41), and squamous cell carcinoma of the lymph node is easy; lymph nodes from patients with
lip, sinuses, and tongue (37,38). known cancer are often submitted. Keratinizing squa-
For frozen-section examination of a nerve, the mous carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, and mucinous
procedure is as follows: A platform of OCT compound carcinoma are recognized without any problem. If
to be clinically suspicious for malignancy (48). The removal of the tumor. To seek guidance on the basis of
plan for surgical treatment for malignant tumors of a frozen section of salivary gland tumor so that a neck
the parotid and submandibnular glands is based dissection might be performed in a patient with a neck
primarily on clinical staging, rather than on the histo- clinically negative for disease is to lack an apprecia-
logic type (52–54). tion and knowledge of the frequency of nodal metas-
Generally, one should not have trouble identify- tasis in the more commonly encountered salivary
ing the common tumors. The most difficult differential gland malignancies: adenoid cystic carcinoma, acinic
diagnoses, regardless of the salivary site, are (i) dis- cell carcinoma, and low-grade mucoepidermoid carci-
tinguishing mucoepidermoid carcinoma from noma. None of this trio exhibits a high incidence of
chronic sialadenitis and from necrotizing sialometa- metastases to regional lymph nodes. High-grade
plasia (Fig. 9), (ii) distinguishing some monomorphic carcinoma, such as the far less common primary
adenomas from adenoid cystic carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, and
(iii) distinguishing some low-grade adenoid cystic high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, may warrant
carcinomas from pleomorphic adenomas. elective dissections of the neck; but this decision is
Resection of the facial nerve is not dependent on principally surgical, not pathologic (52–54).
the histologic subtype of a parotid neoplasm. It is Margins in salivary gland tumors are relative to
based on the gross anatomic intimacy of a parotid the glands involved. For the parotid gland, margin
neoplasm to the nerve (55). The extent of parotidec- selection is facilitated by nearly 80% of the tumors
tomy is also less guided by histologic type than by size occurring in the superficial lobe (lateral to the facial
and extensions, especially when a definitive biopsy nerve) and the appropriate ‘‘biopsy’’ being a lateral
specimen is obtained by subtotal parotidectomy with lobectomy. The deep surface must be examined, and
Figure 9 Frozen-section slides. (A) Chronic sialoadenitis (B) Low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (C) Necrotizing sialometaplasia
(cryostat-prepared sections, H&E stained).
Chapter 2: Uses, Abuses, and Pitfalls of Frozen-Section Diagnoses 103
and 15 hyperplasias), both the surgeon’s and pathol- the accuracy of this methodology. The studies of Yao
ogist’s opinions on gross examination were concor- et al. (73) revealed that cytology does not provide the
dant. Incorrect gross identification occurred by both in accuracy needed in the operating room, where very
6% (3) of the cases. They concluded that experienced near 100% is required. A misinterpretation rate of 31%
parathyroid surgeons need not routinely request in identifying parathyroid and 44% in identifying
frozen-section examination for tissue confirmation, thyroid is not acceptable. This study provides addi-
especially with the use of MIBI and QPTH assays. tional support for the use of the standard frozen-
According to these authors, the situations that warrant section technique adjunct of cytology imprints and
the judicious use of frozen section would include the smears in the intraoperative pathologic evaluation of
following: (i) the infrequent parathyroid carcinoma, tissue during cervical exploration for primary hyper-
(ii) cases of multiple gland disease (primary, second- parathyroidism (57,66).
ary, or tertiary hyperparathyroidism), (iii) ectopic Although the combination of size and color
gland location, (iv) reoperant necks, (v) otherwise usually identifies a parathyroid gland as such, some-
technically difficult primary surgeries, and (vi) atypi- times a parathyroid gland may be inadvertently
cal parathyroid appearance (small, firm, or ectopic devascularized during thyroid surgery. In these
location). instances, biopsies of possible parathyroid tissue
The rarely encountered parathyroid carcinoma is may be submitted to the pathologist for proper iden-
identified largely by its invasion of adjacent structures tification by the frozen-section technique before auto-
(69–71). Questions are more likely to arise in the transplantation (57,69) (Figs. 11,12).
distinction between nonmalignant pathologic processes
in the gland (69,70). Parathyroid histopathologic inter-
pretation of an adenoma versus hyperplasia is consid-
ered by many pathologists to be a persistent challenge
(67).
The size of the parathyroid tumor is a factor in
its identification. A large tumor requires only a
section for its recognition as a parathyroid adenoma.
To determine whether a slightly enlarged parathy-
roid is an adenoma or not depends on its weight,
usually combined with examination of a histologic
section to establish the presence or absence of (i) fatty
stroma, (ii) an encapsulated nodule or mass with a
small rim of compressed normal tissue, and (iii) the
presence of cells with giant nuclei (70). These are not
absolute criteria. Furthermore, on frozen section, the
criteria for adenoma are seldom identified; hence, the
differentiation between adenoma and hyperplasia is
not based on pathologic criteria, but on operative
findings; optimally, all parathyroid adenomas should
be identified (57,69). Successful operations have been
shown to be strongly associated with experience of
the surgeon, with cure rates of 95% to 98% after neck
exploration and identification of all parathyroid
glands (57). Biopsy of each parathyroid is not neces-
sary and may lead to postoperative hypoparathy-
roidism.
Intracytoplasmic cytologic examination is of
great help during intraoperative consultation to
improve the diagnostic accuracy of parathyroid ade-
noma. Sasano et al. used air-dried Wright-Giemsa-
stained imprints and smears to demonstrate the pres-
ence of intraparenchymal and intracellular fat (72).
The cells of the parathyroid adenomas do not contain
extra or intracellular lipid, whereas the cytologic
material from normal or atrophic parathyroid glands
has large amounts of intracellular lipids and variable
amounts of extracellular lipid. They advocated that
this procedure is much more rapid, much easier, and Figure 11 Cryostat-prepared section and intraoperative cyto-
less labor intensive than using conventional frozen logy (A,B) of lymphoid tissue submitted as possible parathyroid.
sections with special stain procedures for fat staining. (A) Frozen section artifacts may simulate solid pattern of para-
Although there have been numerous studies thyroid gland. (B) Imprint showing cells with diagnostic features
(17–20,23) on the use of cytology in evaluating of of lymphoid cells.
parathyroid tissue, little attention has been paid to
106 Luna
28. Ord R, Aisner S. Accuracy of frozen sections in assessing 49. Zbaren P, Nuyens M, Loosli H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy
margins in oral cancer resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg of fine needle aspiration cytology and frozen section
1997; 55(7):663–669. in primary parotid carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100(9):
29. Batsakis JG. Surgical excision margins: a pathologist’s 1876–1883.
perspective. Adv Anat Pathol 1999; 6(3):140–148. 50. Longuet M, Nallet E, Guedon C, et al. Diagnostic value of
30. Meier JD, Oliver DA, Varvares MA. Surgical margin needle biopsy and frozen section histological examination
determination in head and neck oncology: current clinical in the surgery of primary parotid tumors. Rev Laryngol
practice. The results of an international American Head Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2001; 122(1):51–55.
and Neck Society member survey. Head Neck 2005; 27(11): 51. Iwai H, Yamashita T, Izumikawa M, et al. Evaluation of
952–958. frozen section diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Nippon
31. Black C, Zarowaya E, Marotti J, et al. Frozen section Jigbiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1999; 102(11):1227–1233.
evaluation of head and neck margins. Mod Pathol 2006; 52. Spiro RH. Diagnosis and pitfalls in the treatment of
19(1):204A. parotid tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 1991; 7(1):20–24.
32. Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A. A histopathological appraisal 53. Bell RB, Dierks EJ, Homer L, et al. Management and
of surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal cancer outcome of patients with malignant salivary gland
resection margins. Oral Oncol 2005; 41(10):1034–1043. tumors. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(7):917–928.
33. Bauer WC, Lesinski SG, Ogura JH. The significance of 54. Rinaldo A, Ferlito A, Pelliteri PK, et al. Management of
positive margin in hemilaryngectomy specimens. Laryn- malignant submandibular gland tumors. Acta Otolayngol
goscope 1975; 85(1):1–13. 2003; 123(8):896–904.
34. Kerawala CJ, Ong TK. Relocating the site of frozen 55. Guntinas-Lichius O, Klussmann JP, Schroeder U, et al.
sections-is there room for improvement? Head Neck Primary parotid malignoma surgery with normal preop-
2001; 23(3):230–232. erative facial nerve function: outcome and long term
35. Forest LA, Schuller DE, Lucas JG, et al. Rapid analysis of postoperative facial nerve function. Laryngoscope 2004;
mandibular margins. Laryngoscope 1995; 105(3):475–477. 114(5):949–956.
36. Oxford LE, Ducic Y. Intraoperative evaluation of cortical 56. Beckhardt RN, Weber RS, Zane R, et al. Minor salivary
bony margins with frozen-section analysis. Otolaryngol gland tumors of the palate: clinical and pathologic corre-
Head Neck Surg 2006; 134(1):138–141. lates of outcome. Laryngoscope 1995; 105(11):1155–1160.
37. Ballantyne AJ, McCarten AB, Ibanez ML. The extension of 57. Anton RC, Wheeler TM. Frozen section of thyroid
cancer of the head and neck through peripheral nerves. and parathyroid specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;
Am J Surg 1963; 106(10):651–667. 129(12):1575–1584.
38. Goepfert H, Ditchtel WJ, Medina JE, et al. Perineural 58. Cetin B, Asian S, Hatiblogu C, et al. Frozen section in
invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and thyroid surgery: is it a necessity? Can J Surg 2004; 47(1):
neck. Am J Surg 1984; 148(4):542–547. 29–33.
39. Garden AS, Weber RS, Morrison WH, et al. The influence 59. Rios-Zambudio A, Rodriguez-Gonzalez JM, Sola-Perez J,
of positive margins and nerve invasion in adenoid cystic et al. Utility of frozen section examination for diagnosis of
carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery malignancy associated with multinodular goiter. Thyroid
and radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32(3): 2004; 14(8):600–604.
619–626. 60. LiVolsi VA, Merino JM. Histopathologic differential diag-
40. Conrad GR, Sinha GR, Holzhauer M. Perineural spread nosis of the thyroid. Pathol Annu 1981; 16(2):357–406.
of skin carcinoma to the base of the skull: detection 61. Carcangui ML, Zampi G, Rosai J. Papillary thyroid carci-
with FDG PET and CT fusion. Clin Nucl Med 2004; 29(11): noma. A study of its many morphologic expressions and
717–719. clinical correlates. Pathol Annu 1985; 2(1):1–44.
41. Newlin HE, Morris CG, Amdur RJ, et al. Neurotropic 62. Furlan JC, Bedard YC, Rosen IB. Role of fine-needle
melanoma of the head and neck with clinical perineural aspiration and frozen section in the management of
invasion. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28(4):399–402. papillary thyroid carcinoma subtypes. World J Surg
42. Tschopp L, Nuyens M, Stauffer E, et al. The value of frozen 2004; 28(9):880–885.
section analysis of the sentinel lymph node in clinically N0 63. LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Follicular neoplasms of the
squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and orophar- thyroid. View, biases and experience. Adv Anat Pathol
ynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132(1):99–102. 2004; 11(6):270–287.
43. Terada A, Hazgawa Y, Goto M, et al. Sentinel lymph node 64. Callcut RA, Selvaggi SM, Mack E, et al. The utility of
radiolocalization in clinically negative neck oral cancer. frozen section evaluation for follicular thyroid lesions.
Head Neck 2006; 28(2):114–120. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11(1):94–98.
44. Barney PL. Histopathologic problems and frozen section 65. Harach HR, Cabrera JA, Williams ED. Thyroid implants
diagnosis in disease of the larynx. Otolaryngol Clin North after surgery and blunt trauma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2004;
Am 1970; 3(3):493–515. 8(2):61–68.
45. Berthrong M, Fajardo LF. Radiation injury in surgical 66. Guarda LA. Rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone
Pathology. Part II. Alimentary tract. Am J Surg Pathol testing with surgical pathology correlations: the ‘‘chemi-
1981; 5(2):153–178. cal frozen section’’. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122(5):
46. Seethala RR, LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Relative accuracy of 704–712.
fine needle aspiration and frozen section in the diagnosis of 67. Dewan AK, Kapadia SB, Hollenbeak CS, et al. Is routine
lesions of the parotid gland. Head Neck 2002; 27(3):217–223. frozen section necessary for parathyroid surgery? Otolar-
47. Badoual C, Rousseau A, Heudes D, et al. Evaluation yngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133(6):857–862.
of frozen section versus definitive pathologic diagnosis 68. Phillips IJ, Kurzawisnki TR, Honour JW. Potential pitfalls
in 721 parotid gland lesions. Virchows Arch 2005; in intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurements
447(2):192A. during parathyroid surgery. Ann Clin Biochm 2005;
48. Wong DS. Frozen section during parotid surgery revis- 42(6):453–458.
ited: efficiency of its applications and changing trend of 69. Westra WH, Pritcher DD, Udelsman R. Intraoperative
indications. Head Neck 2002; 24(2):191–197. confirmation of parathyroid tissue during parathyroid
108 Luna
exploration; a retrospective evaluation of the frozen sec- 72. Sasano H, Geelhoed GW, Sliverberg SG. Intraoperative
tion. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(5):538–544. cytologic evaluation of lipid in the diagnosis of parathy-
70. Grimelius L, Akerstrom G, Johansson H, et al. Anatomy roid adenoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12(4):282–286.
and histopathology of human parathyroid glands. Pathol 73. Yao DX, Hoda SA, Yin DY, et al. Interpretative problems
Annu 1981; 16(2):1–24. and preparative technique influence reliability of intra-
71. DeLellis RA. Parathyroid carcinoma: an overview. Adv operative parathyroid touch imprints. Arch Pathol Lab
Anat Pathol 2005; 12(2):53–61. Med 2003; 127(1):64–67.
3
Leon Barnes
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
Presbyterian-University Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
vocal abuse leads to mechanical trauma of the cords as which, if not removed, eventually undergoes fibrosis
a result of vibration with excessive friction and force- creating the fibrous variant of a VCNP (Figs. 3 and 4).
ful opposition on adduction (10,11). This, in turn, If the vascular injury is more severe, fibrin escapes
leads to increased vascular permeability with leakage creating the hyaline variant of a VCNP (Fig. 5). In an
of contents into the stroma (Fig. 2). If only fluid attempt to organize the extravasated fibrin, as in any
escapes, an edematous-myxoid VCNP is formed, blood clot, there is an ingrowth of new blood vessels
transforming the hyaline stage into a vascular VCNP
(Fig. 6). VCNPs with two or more of the above
patterns (mixed type) are not uncommon (Fig. 7).
The epithelium overlying a VCNP may be nor-
mal, hyperplastic, atrophic, ulcerated, keratotic, para-
keratotic, or even mildly dysplastic. These changes,
however, have no clinical significance. Thickening
and hyalinization of the basement membrane is also
common but inflammatory cells are absent, unless the
VCNP is ulcerated. Hemosiderin may also be seen.
process of the arytenoid cartilage. The predilection for to the development of the ‘‘granuloma’’ varied from 2
this site probably stems from the fact that the muco- to 28 weeks, with the majority appearing by the eighth
perichondrium in this region is very thin and tightly week (1).
bound with minimal subepithelial connective tissue.
This anatomic arrangement allows for little mobility of
the epithelium so that abrasion from intubation or C. Pathology
repeated forceful abuse of the voice may result in
ulceration. The histologic changes are nonspecific and range from
Hoarseness, as might be expected, is the most mucosal ulceration with marginal epithelial or pseu-
common presenting symptom. Others include dys- doepitheliomatous hyperplasia to a polypoid accumu-
phagia, sore throat, sensation of a foreign body in lation of granulation tissue. At times, the mucosa may
the throat, dysphonia, choking, and pain. even be intact but hyperplastic. Bacterial and fungal
The lesions may be unilateral or bilateral and contamination of the ulcers is not uncommon and may
present on laryngoscopic examination as a surface be responsible for progressive ‘‘activity’’ of the lesion.
irregularity, an ulcer, or as a tan, yellow, or red Although the histologic findings are nonspecific, the
polypoid or pedunculated mass from 1 to 30 mm characteristic location (posterior true vocal cord) cou-
(Figs. 8 and 9). Some are visible on computerized pled with the clinical history should suggest the
tomography and may be associated with sclerosis of correct diagnosis.
the underlying arytenoid cartilage (11). The mass of granulation tissue is often errone-
They occur in all age groups, but tend to be ously referred to as a ‘‘granuloma’’ or mistaken for a
uncommon in children. In general, those lesions that ‘‘pyogenic granuloma’’ (Fig. 9). Aside from the possi-
are related to vocal abuse and reflux are more com- ble occurrence of a few scattered multinucleated giant
mon in males, while those associated with intubation cells, granulomas are not seen. Accordingly the term
are more often seen in females. The smaller size of the ‘‘granuloma’’ is not only inappropriate but misleading
female larynx and the fact that the mucoperichon- since it suggests the possibility of an infectious lesion.
drium overlying the arytenoid cartilage is also thinner Pyogenic granuloma is now recognized to be a specific
in the female than the male (59 vs. 97 mm in thickness) hemangioma, namely a lobular capillary hemangioma
probably accounts for the predominance of intubation (17). The lobular arrangement of the capillaries in this
granulomas (4). lesion distinguishes it from the radial arrangement of
Considering the extent to which endotracheal capillaries in granulation tissue (Fig. 10).
intubation is practiced, intubation granulomas are
rare. The incidence in all surgical patients has varied
from 1 in 800 to 1 in 20,000 patients (4). The incidence D. Treatment and Prognosis
is higher, however, in patients confined to intensive
care. This is not unexpected since these patients are Once the diagnosis is established, therapy is directed
sicker and often have prolonged intubation. The at the underlying cause: voice counseling for vocal
‘‘granuloma’’ may develop weeks to months after abuse, medical therapy for acid reflux, and endoscopic-
intubation. In a review of 35 cases, Howland and laser excision for unresponsive lesions. Local recur-
Lewis noted the interval from operation (intubation) rences, however, are not uncommon.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 113
B. Pathology
In tissue, Teflon appears as roughly round to ovoid, 50
to 100 mm particles with clear centers and prominent
dark borders that are birefringent under polarized light
(Fig. 12). For the first three to five days after injection,
there is a marked edematous and neutrophilic response Figure 12. Teflon particles associated with a prominent multi-
to the particles, followed over the next several days by a nucleated foreign body giant cell reaction. Insert shows charac-
decrease in neutrophils and a progressive increase in teristic round to ovoid Teflon particles with thick border and clear
chronic inflammatory cells and multinucleated foreign centers (H&E, 200).
body giant cells (6). Over the ensuing three to six
months, fibrosis and foreign body giant cells become
more prominent and chronic inflammation gradually
ceases to exist (4). By six months of age, the lesion has ovoid Teflon particles with clear centers and dark
normally reached histologic maturity. A few, however, borders however contrast with the thin, elongated
may continue to enlarge beyond this date (5). sodium urate crystals of gout. In addition, urate
crystals stain positive (black) with the de Galantha
C. Differential Diagnosis stain, but only if the specimen has been prefixed in
absolute alcohol. Urate crystals are water-soluble and
To the unwary, Teflon granulomas are sometimes will dissolve in most formalin-based fixatives. Patients
mistaken for gouty tophi. The basically round to with gout will also have elevated serum uric acid
114 Barnes
levels. Particles of Teflon can also be identified, some- granulomatosis will present as isolated subglottic ste-
times unexpectedly, on fine needle aspirates of neck nosis and, in this instance, testing of the serum for the
masses (6). presence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies
may be helpful in establishing the diagnosis (6).
The idiopathic form of subglottic stenosis is
D. Treatment and Prognosis characterized histologically by dense fibrosis of the
Although Teflon is not carcinogenic, at least in the keloidal type separated by sparse fibroblasts (5).
larynx, therapeutic misadventures have been docu- Chronic inflammatory cells are modest or even lack-
mented in about 2% to 10% of injections (6,8–13). ing and mucoserous glands and ducts are dilated.
Most complications are due to overinjection of the Calcification is absent. The surface epithelium gener-
vocal cord or from inadvertent injection in sites other ally shows squamous metaplasia or even ulceration
than the true vocal cords. These complications often with replacement by granulation tissue. The underly-
result in exacerbation of previous symptoms, airway ing cartilage typically shows little, if any, changes.
obstruction, or the formation of a laryngeal or neck
mass (Teflon granuloma, Teflonoma) that can be mis- D. Treatment and Prognosis
taken for a neoplasm (10,14,7). Teflon can also migrate
from the larynx to the region of the thyroid gland and Effective treatment depends on identifying and elimi-
masquerade as a thyroid tumor. Experimental evidence nating the cause and establishing an adequate airway.
in dogs also indicates that Teflon particles can even The latter may be achieved by endoscopic or laser
migrate or embolize to cervical lymph nodes (15). excision of the stenotic airway, temporary tracheotomy,
Surgical removal of Teflon granulomas often or segmental resection. Local recurrences, however, are
results in improvement or disappearance of all related not uncommon in the idiopathic variety.
symptoms. Attempts, however, to remove these gran-
ulomas endoscopically from the vocal cords may at
times prove difficult and require several procedures V. TRACHEOPATHIA
(5). In these instances, the quality of the voice may OSTEOCHONDROPLASTICA
deteriorate and be even worse than that before Teflon
injection (16). A. Introduction
Tracheopathia osteochondroplastica (TPO) is an idio-
pathic disorder in which multiple ossified and/or car-
IV. SUBGLOTTIC STENOSIS tilaginous nodules appear submucosally in the trachea,
A. Introduction infrequently in the major bronchi, and exceptionally in
the larynx (1–11). Fortunately, it is a rare condition.
Subglottic stenosis (laryngotracheal stenosis) may be Jepsen and Sorensen observed 5 cases in 3500 bronchos-
congenital or acquired (1–4). Causes of the acquired copies, while Prakash et al. identified only 1 in 2000
type include trauma (intubation), infections (rhinoscler- bronchoscopies (6,12). Eimind, on the other hand found
oma), neoplasms (chondrosarcoma), and local and sys- no examples among 25,000 bronchoscopies (13).
temic diseases (gastrointestinal reflux, amyloidosis,
Wegener’s granulomatosis). If no etiology is found,
the term ‘‘idiopathic subglottic stenosis’’ is used. B. Clinical Features
Although TPO has been observed in an 11-year-old
B. Clinical Features girl, the vast majority of patients are over 50 years of
age at diagnosis. The gender distribution depends on
Subglottic stenosis occurs in all age groups and the study, some indicating either a male or female
presents as progressive airway obstruction, often predominance (1,3). When viewed collectively, the
with associated voice changes. For reasons unknown, gender distribution is probably about equal (7).
the idiopathic form is decidedly more frequent in TPO typically involves the cartilaginous frame-
women (80–94% of all cases) (4,5). work (anterior and lateral walls) of the lower two-thirds
The typical lesion is circumferential and varies in of the trachea. The posterior noncartilaginous membra-
length from a few millimeters to about 5 cm. The nous wall is not affected. The osteocartilaginous nod-
narrowing begins just beneath the true vocal cords ules are usually confined to the trachea but, on occasion,
and dramatically increases in severity as the cricoid may involve the main stem bronchi. The segmented
cartilage is approached. The point of maximum steno- bronchi as well as the larynx are seldom affected.
sis is usually found at the level of the cricoid cartilage Symptoms, which are often confused with asthma
and upper trachea (5). or bronchitis, vary with the degree of airway com-
promise. Some patients are asymptomatic while
C. Pathology others experience chronic cough, hoarseness, wheez-
ing, dyspnea, or repeated episodes of infections.
The pathology depends, to a large extent, on the Hemoptysis is not common.
etiology—intubation, infections, amyloid, and neo- A single case of familial TPO (mother and
plasms (see ‘‘Contact Ulcer, Contact Granuloma, Intu- daughter) has been described (6). Serum calcium
bation Granuloma’’ above). Infrequently, Wegener’s and phosphorous levels are normal (1).
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 115
C. Imaging
Imaging studies show multiple broad-based, symmetric,
or asymmetric protrusions, often calcified with a
beaded-scalloped appearance involving the anterior
and lateral walls (3,5). The posterior (membranous)
wall is spared. The nodules are covered with mucosa
and centered in the submucosa attached to the carti-
laginous framework.
D. Pathology
The nodules are composed of cartilage and/or bone,
often with focal calcification, resembling small chon-
dromas, exostoses, or osteochrondomas. Some may Figure 13. Diagram of a coronal section through the larynx at
even contain marrow spaces with hematopoietic ele- the level of the saccule demonstrating (A) normal anatomy and
ments (2). The nodules are centered in the submucosa (B) a mixed laryngocele herniating through the thyrohyoid mem-
and often maintain a continuity with the inner surface brane.
of the tracheal cartilage. The overlying mucosa is
usually intact and may appear normal or metaplastic.
10 millimeters or more and in 7%, the saccule extended
E. Treatment and Prognosis 15 mm or more. Since the superior margin of the
thyroid cartilage is approximately 16 mm above the
There is no medical therapy for TPO. Asymptomatic superior surface of the vocal cords; this means that a
patients require no treatment other than instructions small number of adults have saccules that extend
to avoid respiratory irritants. Symptomatic patients, in above the cartilage (3). In the fetus and newborn,
turn, will usually have to have one or more of the 25% of the saccules routinely extend beyond this
nodules removed with meticulous attention to the border (4). These extended saccules are referred to
long-term tracheobronchial hygiene to thwart off clinically as ‘‘elongated saccules.’’ Apparently in some
superimposed infections. ‘‘normal’’ larynges, the saccule may be entirely absent
(4). Although it may be a vestigial remnant of the
ventricular air sacs of anthropoid apes, the saccule in
VI. CYSTS AND LARYNGOCELES humans appears to function as a source of lubricant
A. Introduction for the vocal cords.
If the saccule becomes obstructed, secretions
Large saccules, some laryngeal cysts, and laryngoceles accumulate and a cyst is formed—the so-called saccu-
represent a spectrum of congenital and acquired dis- lar cyst (Fig. 14). If the saccule becomes distended
orders that occur within the saccular appendage of the with air and maintains an open communication
laryngeal ventricle. To appreciate the clinical and with the laryngeal lumen, it is termed a laryngocele
pathologic features of these lesions, one must first (Fig. 15).
consider the anatomy of this structure.
C. Cysts
B. Anatomy and Terminology
Cysts of the larynx can be classified as congenital or
The saccule, also known as the appendix of the laryn- acquired; ductal or saccular; or as ‘‘tonsillar,’’ epithe-
geal ventricle, is a blind respiratory epithelial-lined lial, or oncocytic (5–7). Most are acquired and of the
sac, which ascends vertically from the anterior one- ductal-epithelial type. They occur in all age groups
third of the ventricle between the false cord and inner but are most frequent in individuals over the age of
surface of the thyroid cartilage (Fig. 13). In infants, it is 50 years (3,5–15). Although some studies have shown
relatively large and lined by a papillary mucous a male or female predominence, there is no gender
membrane associated with subepithelial lymphoid preference when these studies are viewed collectively
aggregates (1). In adults, the mucosa is less complex (3,6,7,12,14). Hoarseness, respiratory compromise,
and usually devoid of a lymphoid component. dysphagia, coughing, feeding problems, foreign
Approximately 60 to 70 mucous glands empty their body sensation in the throat, neck mass, and pain
secretions into the saccule, which in turn drains into are common complaints. In many instances, the cysts
the larynx. The saccular orifice at the ventricle mea- are asymptomatic and represent only an incidental
sures only 0.5 to 1.0 mm and can therefore be easily finding.
compromised by atresia, tumors, infections, fibrosis, Cysts, which may be either solitary or multiple,
and trauma. The saccule is of variable depth but tends occur primarily in the supraglottic larynx, less fre-
to be larger in males than females. Broyles observed quently in the glottis, and infrequently in the sub-
that in 75% of the cases the saccule extended to a glottis. They arise from obstruction of the ducts of
depth of 6 to 8 mm (2). In 25%, the depth extended mucous glands or the orifice of the laryngeal saccule.
116 Barnes
Ductal Cyst
Ductal cysts arise when the ducts of mucous glands are
occluded; hence, they can occur at any site where these
glands are found. They are almost invariably less than
1 cm in diameter and are quite superficial, often
appearing to arise within the mucosa. Forty percent
occur in the vicinity of the true cords (excluding the
free margin which is essentially devoid of glands), 37%
Figure 14. Incidental saccular cyst (arrow) discovered in a
larynx removed for squamous cell carcinoma. The cyst was
in the epiglottis, 7% in the false vocal cords, 6% in the
lined by oncocytic epithelium and exhibited papillary infoldings. ventricles, 5% in the aryepiglottic folds, 3% in the
Such cysts are occasionally referred to as oncocytic papillary arytenoids, and the remainder in the anterior commis-
cystadenomas. sure, pyriform sinus, and subglottis (5).
Saccular Cyst
Saccular cysts are mucous filled cysts that develop
following obstruction of the laryngeal saccule. They
are always of supraglottic origin, distinctly submuco-
sal, covered by a normal mucous membrane, and vary
from 1 to 7.5 cm in diameter (Fig. 14). They most often
present in the region of the ventricles (58%), aryepi-
glottic folds (14%), lateral larynx (12%), or involve a
combination of adjacent sites (5).
There are two types of saccular cysts—anterior
and lateral. Approximately 60% of saccular cysts are
anterior (3,5). They arise near the orifice of the ventri-
cle and overhang the anterior glottis. Lateral saccular
cysts, on the other hand, tend to bulge the aryepiglot-
tic folds, false vocal cords, or epiglottis and, in a few
instances, may extend through the thyrohyoid mem-
brane to present in the neck. Whether a given cyst is
classified as anterior or lateral depends on the length
of the saccule and the level of obstruction.
Histologically, ductal and saccular cysts are both
lined by respiratory or squamous epithelium and,
therefore, have no distinguishing characteristics. A
few may even be lined, either focally or entirely, by
Figure 15. Gross picture of a resected external (air-filled) oncocytic epithelium. Accordingly, the DeSanto clas-
laryngocele that presented as a cyst of the neck. sification of laryngeal cysts into ductal or saccular is
largely clinical based on location, depth, and size and
is difficult for pathologists to use, and especially so,
since some of these cysts are removed in pieces
Some cysts, particularly those of the subglottis, are destroying the relation of the cyst to the surface
clearly related to postintubation while at least some mucosa. This has caused pathologists to search for a
vocal cord cysts may be related to vocal abuse trauma more useful but clinically relevant classification. That
(9,11,13). proposed by Newman et al. seems to fill this void (6)
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 117
Tonsillar Cyst
Tonsillar cysts resemble a palatine tonsillar crypt
distended with keratin, hence the name. They occur
almost exclusively in the epiglottis, vallecula, or pyri- Figure 17. Epithelial cyst filled with mucin and lined by attenu-
form sinus and may be single or multiple. They are ated respiratory epithelium (H&E, 20; insert, 300).
usually small and are lined by stratified squamous
epithelium, filled with keratin, and surrounded by
lymphoid tissue with prominent germinal centers
(Fig. 16). or may not have papillary infoldings and are lined
entirely by respiratory epithelium, squamous epitheli-
Epithelial Cyst um, or both or by a nonspecific attenuated epithelium.
They may therefore contain either keratin or mucin
These cysts are also found primarily in the supra- (Figs. 16 and 17). Some are focally associated with small
glottic larynx, pyriform sinus, or vallecula. They may aggregates of lymphoid tissue. With additional clinical
information, these cysts can be further subdivided into
ductal and saccular (anterior or lateral). See previous
discussion on ductal and saccular cysts.
Oncocytic Cyst
These cysts occur primarily in the area of the false
cords and ventricles in patients over the age of
50 years. They may be either unilocular or exhibit
papillary infoldings. Those exhibiting the latter fea-
ture are also referred to as oncocytic papillary cysta-
denomas. The cardinal features of these cysts are their
oncocytic epithelium and their tendency, on occasion,
for multifocality and local recurrence (Fig. 18).
Treatment
In order to avoid laryngeal stenosis, cysts in infants
and children should be managed conservatively.
Some advocate needle aspiration initially. Recurrence
may necessitate repeat aspiration, or, in some instan-
ces, the cyst may have to be deroofed, removed with
cup forceps, or marsupialized with lasers (16). Small
cysts in adults can be treated similarly. Larger cysts
Figure 16. A 42-year-old man presented with a sensation of a often require excision externally.
‘‘foreign body in his throat.’’ Endoscopic examination revealed a
cyst of the left pyriform sinus. Microscopically, the specimen Laryngocele
consisted of two adjacent cysts: (i) a tonsillar cyst (TC) filled with
keratin, lined by stratified squamous epithelium and surrounded Laryngoceles are abnormal dilatations of the saccule.
by lymphoid tissue; and (ii) an epithelial cyst (EC) also filled with They differ from saccular cysts in that they contain air
keratin and lined by stratified squamous epithelium, but without a rather than mucus and maintain an open communica-
mantle of lymphoid tissue (H&E, 20). tion with the lumen of the larynx (Figs. 13B, 15, and 19).
The distinction between a long saccule and a
118 Barnes
Kashima et al. indicate that patients with juvenile- AO-RRP. The age limit that defines these categories,
onset RRP (JO-RRP) are frequently characterized however, is arbitrary and highly variable. For
by a clinical triad: (i) first born child, (ii) vaginal instance, JO-RRP has been defined in various studies
delivery, and (iii) a teen-aged mother (26). It is as patients who present before the age of 12, 16, 18, or
known that teen-aged mothers at the time of first 20 years and AO-RRP as those who present over these
delivery have prolonged labors, with subsequent ages (5,13,26,30). In a review of 110 cases of RRP,
increased exposure to the virus. In their study, 32% Strong et al. noted that 66% of patients experienced
of patients with JO-RRP and none of those with adult- onset of the disease between birth and 15 years of age
onset RRP (AO-RRP) manifested the complete triad. while 34% developed their disease at 16 years of age
This compared with a 10% and 3% incidence, respec- or later (21). The majority of patients with JO-RRP
tively, in a control population of normal juveniles and become symptomatic between two and five years of
adults (26). age. Abnormal crying, hoarseness, dyspnea, cough,
The risk of acquiring RRP in children born dysphagia, and stridor are the usual symptoms.
vaginally to an HPV-infected mother ranges from 1 The clinical course is, to some extent, correlated
in 143 deliveries for those with a history of condyloma with the age of onset. In JO-RRP, the distribution
during pregnancy to 1 in 400 deliveries for those between the two sexes is about equal and the papillo-
women with an active or latent HPV infection as mas are more often multiple (80–98% of all cases) and
demonstrated by cervicovaginal swabs for the preva- frequently exhibit extensive growth and occasionally
lence of HPV DNA (27–29). The low rate of RRP in rapid recurrence after excision (5,21,31). JO-RRP may
exposed children suggests that additional factors remit spontaneously or persist into adulthood. AO-
(? immune) may be necessary before acquiring the RRP, in contrast, is three to four times more common
disease. Nevertheless, there is an on-going debate in males and the papillomas are multiple in only 25%
with medicolegal overtones on whether a pregnant to 35% of cases and recur less often (5,39).
woman with known condylomas should be permitted The disease almost invariably involves the lar-
to deliver vaginally or by elective cesarean section ynx, especially the true and false vocal cords and
(30,31). Although cesarean sections do diminish the ventricles. In more advanced cases, the lesions may
odds for acquiring RRP, the protection is not absolute, also involve other laryngeal sites, nasal cavity, lips,
as illustrated in the study of Wiatrak et al. (32). These gingiva, palate, nasopharynx, esophagus, trachea,
authors evaluated 73 patients with JO-RRP. The mode bronchi and/or lungs. Data derived from the National
of delivery was known in 69, and of these, 64 (93%) registry for JO-RRP (N = 603 children) indicate that in
were delivered vaginally and 5 (7%) by cesarean 87.4% of cases only one anatomic sites is involved,
section. while in 9.8%, 2.6%, and 0.2%, two, three, and four
In AO-RRP, risk factors are less conclusive. sites, respectively, are involved (35).
Conceivably such individuals may acquire the virus Extension of papillomas into the trachea or bron-
at the time of delivery. The virus may then remain chi occurs in 2% to 15% of patients, an event that is
dormant, only to express itself in adulthood. Orogen- usually associated with subglottic disease and prior
ital contact with an infected partner is also receiving tracheotomy (21,35,37,40–43). Some individuals (1–
increasing attention (21,26). 5%) may even have pulmonary parenchymal involve-
There is no known instance of RRP occurring ment (32,43–48). This is a potentially ominous finding
among siblings or transmission of the disease attributed as these individuals often die of their disease (43).
to therapeutic interventions in the newborn Atelectasis, bronchiectasis, and thin-wall cavities with
nursery (26). There is an interesting case report, smooth borders are the most common roentgeno-
however, of a surgeon who contacted the disease graphic signs of lung disease. Patients with bronchoal-
following laser therapy of some of his patients who veolar involvement tend to follow a common pattern:
had anogenital condylomas (33). It was speculated that (i) the majority have had laryngeal papillomas discov-
he acquired the disease by inhaling viral particles ered before the age of five years, (ii) the interval
present in the laser plume. between the onset of laryngeal disease and the dis-
RRP is an uncommon disease. In the United covery of bronchoalveolar papillomatosis averages
States, it is estimated that approximately 2400 new 12 years (range 1–36), (iii) all have tracheostomies,
cases among children and 3600 new cases among and (iv) all have worn tracheal cannulas for extended
adults are diagnosed each year, with an incidence of periods of time (43).
about 1.7 to 4.3 per 100,000 children and 1.8 per The distribution or recurrence of papillomas in
100,000 adults (28,29,32,34–38). Despite it rarity, the the aerodigestive tract, however, is not random,
impact of the disease on patients, their families, and according to Kashima et al., but instead follows a
the health care system is immense. It is not unusual predictable pattern with lesions occurring at sites in
for some individuals to require more than 100 surgical which ciliated respiratory and squamous epithelia are
procedures with an average lifetime cost of thousands juxtaposed (squamociliary junction) (49). Injury to a
of dollars. ciliated mucosa such as from a biopsy or surgical
procedure often results in squamous metaplasia, cre-
Clinical Features ating an iatrogenic squamociliary junction and predis-
posing the patient for additional lesions. This might
According to the age at initial diagnosis, RRP is explain the tendency for papillomas to occur at tra-
commonly divided into two categories: JO-RRP and cheostomy sites.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 121
excision frequently display varying degrees of atypia important in pathogenesis of the disease. If so, anti-
manifested by basal cell hyperplasia, increased mitotic vascular therapy may be of therapeutic value.
rate, prominent nucleoli, and focal variation in nuclear
size and shape. As the activity of the disease lessens, Treatment and Prognosis
the papillomas tend to revert back to normal epithelial
maturation. The natural history of RRP is highly variable and
unpredictable with remissions and exacerbations
occurring for no apparent reason. Some patients
Immunohistochemistry have only one or two papillomas with local recurrence
every two or three years and eventual spontaneous
Basal and occasionally suprabasal cells of papillomas
remission while others have extensive life-threatening
associated with RRP often stain positive by immuno-
histochemistry for Ki-67 and p53 (53–57). The signifi- disease. Benjamin and Parsons describe a patient who
had 20 operative procedures for JO-RRP and then
cance of these findings is controversial. Some indicate
remained disease-free for 25 years, only to experience
that these markers, especially if found throughout the
epithelium, correlate with more frequent recurrence another nine operations for recurrent disease later in
life (4). During periods of active growth, papillomas
and possible malignant transformation while others
may appear every two to four weeks, and it is not
contend that they have no predictive value.
uncommon for some patients to have undergone 50 to
Lele et al. examined four cases of HPV-11
100 operations or more for removal.
JO-RRP progressing to carcinomas utilizing immunos-
Majoros et al. followed 65 children and observed
tains for p53, pRb, p21, and p16 (58). They observed a
that the disease lasted five years or more in 80% (42).
marked increase expression of p53 and pRb and a
Ruparelia et al. identified 165 cases of JO-RRP with a
simultaneous decrease in p21 as the lesion progressed
median follow-up of 1.7 years (range 0.01–4.61 years).
from benign to dysplastic to malignant. p16 was
Disease remission, defined as the absence of surgical
expressed in all lesions and was, therefore nondis-
criminatory. On the basis of this combination of stains, intervention for at least one year, was seen in 36
(21.8%) of the children (64). It would appear, however,
the authors suggested that lesions with a malignant
from the case of Benjamin and Parsons noted above,
potential could be recognized. In contrast, Xu et al.
studied a single case of HPV-11 AO-RRP that pro- that patients with RRP may be at risk for possible local
recurrence throughout their life span (4).
gressed to carcinoma in which these stains (p53, Rb,
The effect of puberty on the course of the disease
and p16) were applied (59). They found these stains to
is controversial. Some are of the opinion that papillo-
be unaltered during tumor progression.
mas become less aggressive or even disappear during
puberty while others contend that puberty has no
Molecular-Genetic Data
relationship to the outcome of disease (4,21,42,65–
Patients with RRP may be unable to resist or control 67). The effect of pregnancy is also controversial; in
their disease because of an ineffective HPV-specific T- some pregnant women, the disease may resolve while
cell response. Bonagura et al. have observed that these in others it may become more aggressive (25,39,65).
individuals have an elevated percentage of CD8-posi- Although there are no parameters that allow one
tive, CD28-negative T-cells, and that the T-cells often to predict the course RRP, it is generally agreed that
express an increase in TH2-like cytokine mRNA in individuals who experience the onset of disease prior
response to autologous papilloma tissue (60). These to three years of age, have more than one anatomic
patients, otherwise, are not prone to other nonviral site of involvement, and are infected with HPV-11
infectious agents. tend to have a more aggressive disease.
Human leukocytes antigens (HLA) may also be Since RRP is often characterized by periods of
important in the etiopathogenesis of the disease. active growth and remission, it is difficult to evaluate
Gelder et al. studied a cohort of 60 RRP patients in the efficacy of various therapeutic modalities. Accord-
the United Kingdom for HLAs and compared the ing to Strong et al., there are three goals of manage-
results to 554 controls (61). Of these 60 patients, 36 ment: (i) to maintain the airway and voice and to
had JO-RRP and 24 AO-RRP. They noted that HLA avoid tracheotomy whenever possible, (ii) to reduce
DRB1*0301 was disproportionately present in the RRP the tumor burden to minimal proportions in hopes of
patients (55%) compared with the control population achieving remission via host responses, and (iii) in the
(25%). The possibility of a genetic association between presence of tracheotomy maintain the patency of the
this HLA and susceptibility was raised. Bonagura has airway by bronchoscopy and to use the shortest
also observed a potential relationship between HLA possible tracheotomy tube (21). Tracheotomy, howev-
DQ3 and DR11 and RRP (62). er, is ultimately required in a 1.8% to 64% of all
More recently, Rahbar, et al. found that vascular patients with RRP, with an average incidence of 30%
endothelial growth factor—A (VEGF-A) was strongly in combined studies (68,69).
expressed in the squamous epithelium of the papillo- The current standard treatment is microlaryng-
mas and that VEGF receptors 1 and 2 were strongly eal surgery using forceps, the microdebrider, or CO2
expressed in the endothelial cells of the underlying laser. Complications of treatment include webs, fibro-
blood vessel (63). Neither strong labeling of VEGF-A sis, arytenoid fixation, and laryngeal stenosis (70). In
nor labeling of its receptors was noted in the control general, the more vigorous the therapy, the greater the
population, suggesting that these factors may be complications.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 123
Surgical excision of the papillomas, however, is from a papilloma. Some authors have also observed
only a palliative procedure. It has been shown for that the transformation of RRP to squamous cell
instance, that HPV can be found by DNA hybridiza- carcinoma does not always progress through the
tion or the polymerase chain reaction in the adjacent usual dysplasia sequence (60).
or nearby nondiseased mucosa in approximately 40% Crissman et al. studied by image analysis the
to 75% of patients. The persistence of the virus DNA content of papillomas obtained from seven
explains the tendency for recurrence (17,71–73). As a patients with RRP (5 JO-RRP and 2 AO-RRP) (93).
result, search for effective adjuvant medical therapy is All of the papillomas microscopically exhibited areas
ongoing (37,74,75). of atypia/dysplasia and, when these foci were specif-
The overall mortality rate in patients with RRP ically examined, six of the seven were found to have
has varied from 4% to 14% (42,65,76). Causes of death abnormal (aneuploid) DNA. The significance of this
have included asphyxia, infections, pulmonary com- finding, however, is uncertain since none of the six
plications, and superimposed carcinoma. individuals developed carcinoma after an average
Carcinoma complicating RRP, so-called carcinoma follow-up of 30 years.
ex papilloma, is an infrequent occurrence (77–92). In
some instances, the carcinoma occurs ‘‘spontaneously’’
while in others, it seems to be related to prior radiation C. Keratinized Papilloma—Papillary Keratosis
exposure. Some patients with RRP are also heavy
smokers or consumers of alcohol, which may act as Keratinized papillomas, as previously indicated, occur
additional co-carcinogens or promoters in the develop- primarily in adults; are usually solitary lesions; gener-
ment of carcinoma. ally are not related to a virus; may be etiologically
The incidence of carcinoma developing in the linked, in some instances, to smoking; may or may not
nonirradiated patient is stated to be 2% and for the recur; and occasionally exhibit malignant potential
irradiated patient, 14% (3,4,85). According to Linden- (8,9,12,94–96). The majority arises from the true vocal
berg and Elbrond, there is a 16-fold increased risk of a cord and manifest clinically as hoarseness.
subsequent carcinoma in patients who have received It has been our experience over the years that
irradiation for their RRP (84). Even a small dose of many clinicians and pathologists do not appreciate the
irradiation may be carcinogenic in these patients. differences between keratinized and nonkeratinized
Carcinoma complicating RRP develops in either papillomas and equate the term ‘‘papilloma,’’ regard-
the larynx or lung, and prognosis depends, to a large less of histologic appearance, as being of viral origin
extent, on whether the tumor arises spontaneously or and akin to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. To
follows radiation exposure. Kashima et al. reviewed avoid this misunderstanding, we advocate the use of
17 patients with RRP who developed laryngeal carci- the term ‘‘papillary keratosis’’ in place of ‘‘keratinized
noma (81). Of the seven patients who developed papilloma.’’
spontaneous laryngeal carcinoma, all had JO-RRP. Papillary keratoses rarely exceed two cm. and
The average interval from onset of RRP to the devel- are composed, histologically, of fronds of squamous
opment of carcinoma was about 30 years, but only one cells with fibrovascular cores covered by a thick scale
of six patients available for follow-up died of disease. of orthokeratin or parakeratin (Figs. 26 and 27). In
In contrast, of the 10 patients that developed laryngeal some cases, the papillary fronds are small but yet
carcinoma following irradiation, 9 had JO-RRP with there is a definite papillary configuration to the sur-
the average interval from onset of RRP to the occur- face epithelium. Keratohyalin granules are usually,
rence of the carcinoma of about 10 years. Eight of the but not invariably, present, and the stroma contains
10 patients with follow-up died of disease. sparse to absent inflammatory cells. Not infrequently,
Guillou et al. reviewed 14 cases of spontaneous the squamous component will exhibit varying degrees
squamous cell carcinoma of the lung that occurred in of dysplasia which, if observed, should be quantitated
nonsmoking, nonirradiated patients with RRP and as mild, moderate, or severe, e.g. papillary keratosis
observed the following characteristic profile: (i) all with moderate dysplasia (Figs. 28 and 29). Likewise, if
patients developed laryngeal papillomatosis around no epithelial disturbances are see, it too should be
2.5 years of age (range 1–6 years), (ii) lung carcinoma noted, e.g., papillary keratosis without dysplasia.
was diagnosed at about 15 years after the onset of Clinically, the papillary keratoses appear to have
laryngeal papillomatosis (range 4–26 years), (iii) all the same significance as the flat keratoses. See
patients presented with pulmonary extension of their ‘‘Section X’’ below.
papillomatosis, (iv) the tumor was usually a well to Papillary keratosis may be confused, both clini-
moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma cally and microscopically, with verrucous carcinoma
often with regional lymph nodes and distant metasta- (VC) of the larynx (97,98). Verrucous carcinoma, how-
ses, and (v) most patients died soon after diagnosis of ever, contains expanded, club-shaped rete pegs, often
the carcinoma (82). distended with keratin, and a markedly inflamed
In most cases in which the papilloma and carci- stroma. Papillary keratosis, in contrast, has thin, pointy
noma have been examined for HPV, each has con- rete pegs and, at most, only a mildly inflamed stroma.
tained HPV-11. Rarely, HPV-6, 16, or 18 have been In addition, papillary keratosis usually, but not invari-
identified. able, has rather uniform keratohyalin granules in the
The squamous carcinomas are generally well epithelial cells just beneath the keratin layer (stratum
differentiated and, at times, difficult to distinguish granulosum). These granules are characteristically
124 Barnes
Figure 27. Papillary keratosis (keratinized papilloma shown in VIII. VERRUCA VULGARIS
Fig. 26). Note the papillary, heavily keratinized surface, promi- A. Introduction
nent keratohyaline granules, and absence of dysplasia (H&E,
140). Verruca vulgaris occurs primarily on the skin and is
etiologically related to the HPV. On occasions, it can
also arise on mucous membranes, particularly the lips,
infrequently in the oral cavity, and exceptionally in
sparse to absent in verrucous carcinoma. The presence the larynx (1–6). In the latter location, it may be
of more than just ‘‘inflammatory atypia/dysplasia’’ confused with papillary keratosis, condyloma acumi-
supports the diagnosis of papillary keratosis rather natum, and verrucous carcinoma.
than verrucous carcinoma. Verrucous carcinoma of
the larynx is also uncommon below the age of B. Clinical Features
50 years and often exceeds 2 cm in size, whereas
papillary keratosis is not infrequent below the age of Barnes et al. described one case and reviewed seven
50 and rarely exceeds 2 cm. additional cases of verruca vulgaris of the larynx
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 125
C. Pathology
Histologically, VVL resembles its cutaneous counter-
part in all respects (Figs. 30 and 31). Most will also be
positive, on immunostaining, for HPV. Virologically,
however, there does appear to be a difference. Using
in situ hybridization, Barnes et al. studied a single case
of VVL and found it to contain HPV 6 or 11 which was
unexpected because verruca vulgaris of the skin, lips,
and oral cavity is associated with HPV 2 and 4 (3,5,6). Figure 31. Electron microscopy of verruca vulgaris of the true
This implies that verruca vulgaris can be caused by vocal cord in Figure 30 showing intranuclear viral particles
HPV types other than 2 and 4. In addition, since HPV consistent with the human papillomavirus.
6 and 11 are the same genotypes associated with
recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (laryngeal papil-
lomatosis), it further indicated that VVL is at least
virologically more related to recurrent respiratory
papillomatosis of the larynx than to its counterpart contain prominent keratohyalin granules. However, in
on the skin, lips, and oral cavity. contrast to VVL, papillary keratosis lacks clear cells in
the epithelial layer (koilocytes) and is almost invari-
ably negative on immunostaining for HPV. Moreover,
D. Differential Diagnosis papillary keratosis often exhibits varying degrees of
dysplasia, which is not seen in VVL.
VVL should be distinguished from ‘‘ordinary’’ papil- Condyloma acuminatum and VVL share many
lary keratosis (keratinized papilloma), condyloma histologic features and the differences between the
acuminatum, and verrucous carcinoma. Both VVL two are more quantitative than qualitative (7–9). In
and papillary keratosis occur in adults and involve general, VVL is more heavily keratinized than condy-
the true vocal cords. Both are heavily keratinized and loma acuminatum and contains larger and more vari-
ably sized keratohyalin granules. The rete pegs in
VVL also tend to be more pointed and elongated.
Like VVL, VC of the larynx occurs in adults
(median age 58 years) exhibits a male predominance,
arises primarily from the true vocal cords, and is
heavily keratinized (10). VVL can be separated from
VC by the presence of numerous large keratohyalin
granules and prominent koilocytosis. Keratohylain
granules are sparse to absent in VC and, while koilo-
cytotic cells may be found in VC, they are decidedly
less common than in VVL. In VVL, the rete pegs (if
apparent at all on some biopsies) are elongated, thin,
pointed, radially oriented, and sometimes branched,
whereas in VC they are bulbous, rounded, or club-
shaped and exhibit less branching. VVL is also usually
positive on immunostaining for HPV, whereas verru-
ca carcinoma is uniformly negative.
qualify as benign hemangioendotheliomas. They are laser therapy is largely ineffective. Surgical excisions
typically confined to the lamina propria, but may are usually required.
extend to involve the perichondrium of the underling The vascular stage of a vocal cord nodule-polyp
cartilage or invade between the tracheal rings to lie is often confused with a hemangioma of the true vocal
external to the trachea (9). cord. See ‘‘Differential Diagnosis’’ in the discussion of
Because of the constant threat of asphyxiation, vocal cord nodules-polyps above.
some form of therapy is usually necessary. Tracheoto-
my with a ‘‘watch and wait’’ approach for spontane-
ous involution, as is commonly used and seen in C. Neurofibroma and Neurilemoma
cutaneous hemangiomas, is associated with 4% to Neurofibromas and neurilemomas are uncommon
46% mortality in subglottic hemangiomas (6,7). tumors in the larynx, representing in our experience
Other forms of therapy have been used with varying only 1.2% of all benign larynx neoplasms (Table 2). In
degrees of success and complications. Among these 1993, only about 130 cases were reported in the litera-
are included intralesional and systemic steroids, inter- ture (13–15).
feron, sclerosing agents, electrocautery, radioactive They typically occur in the 30- to 60-year-old age
gold implants, cryosurgery, laser ablation, surgical group but have been found in patients from birth to
excision, or a combination of these procedures old age (13–27). Although some studies indicate a
(6,7,10). Variables that have an impact on the form slight male predominance (61%), others suggest that
of therapy and outcome depend on age (younger they are more common in females by a ratio of 3:2
patients have more proliferative lesions), size of the (16,19).
lesion, location, and degree of airway compromise (7). Most arise submucosally in the supraglottic lar-
ynx in the vicinity of the aryepiglottic folds, false vocal
Hemangiomas in Adults cords, or arytenoids, presumable from branches of the
In contrast with laryngeal hemangiomas of infancy, superior laryngeal nerve (14) (Fig. 34). Symptoms are
which are primarily subglottic in origin and often life- slow to evolve and consist of a fullness or sensation of
threatening, hemangiomas in the adult larynx arise a foreign body in the throat, cough, hoarseness, and
primarily in the supraglottis and rarely compromise occasionally respiratory distress.
the airway. They also differ from the infantile type in The incidence of neurofibromas versus neurile-
that they are more common in men (67% of all cases) momas of the larynx is unknown, for studies often
and are usually of the cavernous type (11) (Fig. 33). lump the two lesions together under the generic term
Hoarseness, cough, dysphagia, and occasionally, of ‘‘neurogenic tumors.’’ In our series of five cases,
hemoptysis are the predominant symptoms. Pregnan- three were classified as neurofibromas and two as
cy, as in the case reported by Mugliston and Sangwan, neurilemomas (Table 2).
may have an adverse effect on preexistent laryngeal The distinction between these two neoplasms
hemangiomas, causing an increase in growth and can be difficult or even impossible or small diagnosis.
exacerbations of symptoms (12). In this instance, a diagnosis of ‘‘benign nerve sheath
Because adult hemangiomas tend to be of the tumor’’ would be appropriate.
cavernous type and composed of large blood vessels, Although neurilemomas are usually single
tumors, neurofibromas may be either solitary or
occur in association with neurofibromatosis
(16,20,22,24,26). Neurofibromatosis, however, rarely
involves the larynx. In a review of 257 cases of diagnosis (35). Fat is the only soft tissue with a density
neurofibromatosis, White et al. identified only one lower than water.
patient with a neurofibroma of the larynx (18). None- Because laryngeal lipomas are often deep-seated,
theless, examples of laryngeal neurofibroma associat- biopsies must also be deep or the lesion will be
ed with neurofibromatosis have been clearly missed. Treatment depends on the size and location
documented (20,22,26). of the lesion. Small tumors can usually be removed
Conservative excision is the treatment of choice. effectively through an endoscope, whereas larger ones
For small tumors, this can be accomplished endoscop- will require an external approach.
ically, whereas larger ones may require an open Although most lipomas of the larynx are of the
surgical procedure. If incompletely excised, local ‘‘usual’’ type, unusual variants have been described.
recurrence may develop. The plexiform neurofibroma Among these are included myxoid lipoma (36), spin-
is more problematic. These lesions are often more dle cell lipoma (37), intramuscular lipoma (38), and
extensive and ‘‘invasive’’ and to completely excise hibernoma (39).
might require loss of some laryngeal function. In this Lipomas may recur if incompletely excised (31).
instance, a subtotal excision might be appropriate in Such recurrences, however, must be meticulously eval-
order to preserve the integrity of the larynx (27,28). uated because some liposarcomas of the larynx are
often low-grade and initially mistaken for lipomas (40).
D. Lipoma
Approximately 112 lipomas of the larynx and hypo- E. Leiomyoma
pharynx have been described as of 2002 (29). At the Leiomyomas are benign tumors of smooth muscle that
University of Pittsburgh, it represents only 0.7% of all primarily occur in the uterus, gastrointestinal tract,
benign laryngeal neoplasms (Table 2). and skin. They are exceptionally rare in the larynx. In
It is more common in individuals in the seventh a review of 7684 leiomyomas at the University of
decade of life (range 8–83 years), and the majority are Witwatersrand, in which the location was known,
men (68%) (30–33). It typically presents in the supra- Farman observed only 1 that occurred in the larynx
glottic larynx in the area of the aryepiglottic fold, false (41). None was found in a review of 404 benign
vocal cord, or ventricle, areas that normally contain fat laryngeal tumors on file at the University of Pitts-
(Fig. 35). In come instances it may arise in adjacent burgh (Table 2).
anatomical sites and project into the larynx. Pathologically, leiomyomas can be divided into
Most are solitary lesions, but on occasion, may three types: conventional, vascular, and epithelioid.
coexist with lipomas in other body sites. At least one All of these have been described in the larynx.
case has been described in association with benign
symmetric lipomatosis (Madelung’s disease) (34). Conventional Leiomyoma
The tumors are sessile to polypoid and manifest
with dyspnea, change in quality of voice, snoring, or a These tumors in the larynx have been described in all
sensation of foreign body in the throat. Polypoid age groups, but primarily in adults, and are somewhat
lesions may even result in acute airway obstruction more common in males (42–46). The supraglottis is the
through a ball-valve effect. preferred site, especially in the region of the ventricle,
A CT scan can be extremely helpful, not only in false vocal cord, and aryepiglottic fold. Glottic and
localizing the lesion, but also in establishing the subglottic leiomyomas are uncommon.
Most are smaller than 3 cm and vary from sessile
to polypoid. Obstructive airway symptoms and
hoarseness are the usual presenting complaints. Exci-
sion, either through an endoscope or an open tech-
nique, is the treatment of choice. Subtotal removal will
almost assuredly result in recurrence.
may be accompanied by profuse bleeding that is diffi- Table 3 Classification of Premalignant Lesions of the Larynx
cult to control. Consequently, some advocate that these
2005 WHO Ljubljana
tumors in the larynx should always be excised through
Classification SIN Classification SIL
an external approach for better hemostatic control.
Squamous cell Squamous cell (simple)
Epithelioid Leiomyoma (Bizarre Leiomyoma, Leiomyoblastoma) hyperplasia hyperplasia
Mild dysplasia SIN 1 Basal/parabasal cell
There have been at least two documented cases of hyperplasiaa
epithelioid leiomyoma of the larynx (50,51). One Moderate dysplasia SIN 2 Atypical hyperplasiab
occurred in a 53-year-old man, who presented with Severe dysplasia SIN 3c Atypical hyperplasiab
a one-year history of hoarseness and was found to Carcinoma in situ SIN 3c Carcinoma in situ
a
have a 5-cm tumor of the left true vocal cord that was Basal/parabasal cell hyperplasia may histologically resemble mild
removed under general anesthesia using a suspension dysplasia, but the former is conceptually benign lesion and the latter
the lower grade of precursor lesions.
microlaryngoscope (50). He was reported free of the b
‘‘Risky epithelium.’’ The analogy to moderate and severe dysplasia is
disease 28 months later. approximate.
c
The other case occurred in a 49-year-old woman The advocates of SIN combine severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.
who presented with a one-year history of hoarseness Abbreviations: SIN, Squamous intraepithelial neoplasia; SIL, squamous
intraepithelial lesions.
(51). A 1-cm mass was demonstrated submucosally in Source: World Health Organization. Classification of Tumors. Pathology
the left true vocal cord, which was removed by and Genetics. Head and Neck Tumors, Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P,
multiple microlaryngoscopic procedures. No addi- Sidransky D, eds., Lyon, IARC Press, 2005. Used with permission.
tional follow-up was provided.
F. Other Tumors
Rhabdomyomas, granular cell tumors, chondromas,
and other nonepithelial tumors are discussed else-
where in this book.
D. Keratosis
This denotes the presence of keratin (orthokeratin) on
an epithelial surface and is often, but not always,
associated with a prominent granular cell layer.
Since the laryngeal mucosa is not normally kerati-
nized, the term ‘‘hyperkeratosis’’ is redundant.
E. Parakeratosis
Retention of nuclei within the keratin layer is referred
to as parakeratosis. It usually represents faulty matu-
ration or a more rapid turnover of epithelial cells than
Figure 37. Right true vocal cord biopsy showing normal matu- seen in keratosis. Otherwise, in the larynx, it has no
ration. Note the basal cells with their long axes perpendicular to clinical significance.
the basement membrane. As the cells approach the surface,
they become round, acquire intercellular bridges and ultimately
lie with their long axes parallel to the basement membrane. F. Dyskeratosis
There is no surface keratinization (H&E, 100).
Dyskeratosis represents faulty or premature keratini-
zation of individual squamous cells.
I. Leukoplakia
This is a clinical term, not a pathologic diagnosis, used
to describe any white lesion on a mucous membrane
that cannot be rubbed off with the hand. Histological-
ly, such lesions range from being totally innocuous to
invasive carcinoma.
J. Erythroplakia
This is another clinical term used to describe any red
area on a mucous membrane. In contrast to leukopla-
kia, erythroplakia is a more ominous lesion often
associated with high-grade dysplasia or in situ or
superficially invasive carcinoma. It is uncommon in
the larynx.
L. Clinical Features
KWOD and KWD are clinically indistinguishable and
typically present as a localized thick, white patch that
may be flat or papillary. On rare occasions, it may be Figure 39. Keratosis with mild dysplasia (H&E, 200).
diffuse, obstruct the glottis, and even necessitate a
tracheotomy (1).
KWOD and KWD average about 1 cm in greatest
dimension and can occur anywhere in the larynx. Most,
Table 4 Synonyms for Keratosis with and without Dysplasia however, arise from the true vocal cords with no
Keratosis without dysplasia Keratosis with dysplasia significant lateralization to either side. Bilateral
involvement of the true vocal cords occurs in about
Hyperplasia Atypia
25% to 30% of cases (3,6,7). As might be expected,
Acanthosis Dysplasia
Squamous hyperplasia Atypical hyperplasia
hoarseness or a change in quality of the voice are the
Keratosis SIN or SIL, I, II, III most common symptoms. Most patients (75–85%) are
Parakeratosis LIN or LIL, I, II, III male (3,8). The mean age at diagnosis, according to
Sllamniku et al. is 52 years for patients with KWOD
Abbreviations: SIN, squamous intraepithelial neoplasia; SIL, squamous
intraepithelial lesion; LIN, laryngeal intraepithelial neoplasia; LIN, and 59, 58, and 62 years, respectively, for those with
laryngeal intraepithelial lesion. keratosis with mild, moderate and severe dysplasia (3).
132 Barnes
Table 7 Incidence of Invasive Carcinoma Developing in anterior one-third. Sometimes, it may involve the
Patients with Keratosis with Dysplasia entire cord, the anterior commissure, or both vocal
Total Number of
cords. Multifocal areas are not uncommon. The rarity
number of invasive % of all of CIS in the supraglottic and subglottic larynx is
Author (yr) (Ref.) cases carcinomas cases probably because these are clinically ‘‘silent’’ areas,
which allows a prolonged asymptomatic interval for
McGavran (1960) (1) 18 2 11.1
Norris (1963) (9) 86 5 5.8
the lesion to become invasive.
Gabriel (1973) (11) 55 4 7.3 CIS has the same propensity for men as invasive
Henry (1979) (6) 14 3 21.4 laryngeal carcinoma, with most studies indicating a
Crissman (1979) (12) 42 3 7.1 male/female ratio between 3:1 and 8:1 (8,11,12). It
Hellquist (1982) (2) 63a 12 19 occurs over a broad age range, with a mean/median
Gillis (1983) (13) 17 5 29.4 age of 60 to 65 years (12–18). Hoarseness is the usual
Kalter (1987) (14) 92 20 21.7 presenting symptom.
Sllamniku (1989) (3) 317 44 13.9
Hojslet (1989) (15) 19 8 42.1
Cuchi (1994) (16) 74 23 31 C. Pathology
Blackwell (1995) (17) 50 12 24
Gallo (2001) (4) 116 13 11.2 CIS (also referred to as squamous intraepithelial neo-
Ricci (2003) (5) 111 10 9 plasia or lesion, type III) is defined histologically as a
Jeannon (2004) (18) 114 28 24 neoplastic process in which the normal epithelium is
Total 1188 192 (16.2%) 18.5 (average) completely replaced by cells with malignant charac-
a
Includes only grade II and III dysplasia. teristics that do not extend beyond the basement
membrane. As such, the cells demonstrate loss of
polarity and maturation, normal and abnormal mito-
ses, occasional dyskeratosis, increased nuclear/cyto-
Table 8 Incidence of Invasive Carcinoma in Patients with
Keratosis with Mild, Moderate and Severe Dysplasia
plasmic ratios, and anisonucleosis. Infrequently, the
abnormal cells may extend down into ducts of subja-
Mild Moderate Severe cent mucoserous glands, but such an involvement is
(Carcinomas: (Carcinomas: (Carcinomas: still within the realm of CIS (Fig. 42).
Author (yr) (Ref.) total cases) total cases) total cases) CIS that consists of a rather uniform population
of small basaloid cells, with no surface maturation or
Hellquist (1982) (2) 2:98a 3:24 9:39b
keratinization, as seen in classic CIS of the uterine
Sllamniku (1989) (3) 15:204 4:23 25:90
Hojslet (1989) (15) 6:128a 4:9 4:10
cervix, is uncommon in the larynx (Fig. 43). More
Blackwell (1995) (17) 3:26 5:15 4:9 often, CIS of the larynx, and especially of the true
Gallo (2001) (4) 4:56 6:28 3:32 vocal cords, presents as a white patch (leukoplakia)
Ricci (2003) (5) 2:42 5:36 3:21 with a full-thickness disarray and admixture of basa-
Total 32:554 27:135 48:201 loid and dyskeratotic squamous cells, covered by a
(5.7%) (20%) (23.8%) scale of orthokeratin or parakeratin (Fig. 44).
a
Includes some cases of keratosis without dysplasia.
b
Includes some cases of carcinoma in situ.
Table 9 Incidence of Carcinoma In Situ of Larynx Progressing epithelial basement membrane, with no evidence of
to Invasive Carcinoma lymphatic or vascular invasion (Figs. 45–47).
At times, either because of tangential embedding
Total Number of % of
cases invasive invasive
or inflammatory cells obscuring the epithelial-stromal
Author (yr) (Ref.) of CIS carcinomasc carcinomas interface, one cannot determine, with confidence,
whether or not the lesion has violated the basement
Altmann (1952) (2) 29 1 3.4
membrane (Fig. 48). In these instances, a diagnosis of
Kleinsasser (1968) (27) 20 18 90
Miller (1971) (28) 203 32 15.7
‘‘squamous cell carcinoma in situ, with questionable
Holinger (1974) (29) 8 2 25 microinvasion’’ is appropriate.
Som (1976) (30) 24 4 16.7 Not all carcinomas evolve through a dysplasia-
Pene (1976) (31) 26 1 3.8 CIS sequence. Some are invasive without a significant
Elman (1976) (7) 81a 13 16
Hintz (1981) (11) 45 22 48.9
Hellquist (1982) (32) 39a 9 23.1
Gillis (1983) (33) 8 3 37.5
Maran (1984) (8) 28 2 7.1
Kalter (1987) (34) 8 4 50
Shvero (1988) (35) 21 1 4.8
Crissman (1988) (36) 25 12 48
Rothfield (1991) (10) 13 2 15.4
Stenersen (1991) (37) 41a,b 19 46.3
Small (1993) (38) 21 1 4.8
Murty (1993) (14) 37 8 21.6
Brooks (1993) (13) 12 2 16.7
Myssiorek (1994) (12) 41 16 39
Blackwell (1995) (39) 9 1 11.1
Le (2000) (16) 82 15 18.3
Spayne (2001) (17) 67 1 1.5
Garcia-Serra 30 3 10
(2001) (18)
Total 918 192 (20.9%) 23.9%
(average)
a
Includes some patients with severe dysplasia.
b
Includes only patients who were treated with repeat biopsies. (Their
group C).
c
Includes microinvasive and ‘‘ordinary’’ invasive carcinomas.
Abbreviation: CIS, carcinoma in situ.
Figure 45. Microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the true
According to Rothfield et al., the ultimate suc- vocal cord. The tumor extends 0.38 mm into the lamina propria,
cess of therapy may depend more on compulsive as measured from the adjacent intact basement membrane
(H&E, 100).
follow-up than the specific form of treatment (10).
Figure 47. Higher magnification of the lesion shown in Figure 46. Figure 49. An invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx
that appears to arise from the basal layer of the mucosa. Note
the absence of dysplasia or carcinoma in situ. These are
sometimes referred to as ‘‘drop-off’’ carcinomas (H&E, 100).
Anatomy and Embryology The paraglottic space is also not a space, but an
area deep to the true and false vocal cords that
The larynx anatomically extends from the tip of the contains adipose and loose areolar tissue (Fig. 53). It
epiglottis to the lower border of the cricoid cartilage is bounded by the cricovocal membrane (conus elas-
(Fig. 51). The posterior boundary includes the posterior ticus) inferiorly, the thyroid cartilage laterally, the
commissure mucosa, the mucous membrane covering quadrangular membrane medially, and the pyriform
the cricoid cartilage, the arytenoid region, and the inter- sinus posteriorly (24,29). Superiorly, the paraglottic
arytenoid space. The anterior limit is composed of the space is in continuity with the pre-epiglottic space.
lingual surface of the epiglottis, thyrohyoid membrane, Although both spaces contain lymphatics and blood
anterior commissure, thyroid cartilage, cricothyroid vessels, neither contains lymph nodes.
membrane, and the anterior arch of the cricoid cartilage.
The blood supply is by the superior laryngeal
branch of the superior thyroid artery and the inferior
branch of the inferior thyroid artery. The nerve supply
is derived from two branches of the vagus nerve, the
superior and inferior laryngeal.
The larynx can be subdivided into three regions:
supraglottic, glottic, and subglottic (Fig. 51). The
boundaries of each of these are described in the
following sections. The term ‘‘transglottic’’ does not
correspond to a specific anatomical site, but rather, is
used to describe any tumor that crosses the ventricle.
The supraglottic larynx is derived embryologi-
cally from the third and fourth branchial arches (buc-
copharyngeal anlage); therefore, it is closely related to
the oral cavity and oropharynx and, accordingly, more
susceptible to ingested carcinogens (alcohol). The
glottis and subglottis, on the other hand, arise from
the sixth branchial arch (pulmonary anlage); therefore,
they are more intimately related to the lungs and more
susceptible to inhaled carcinogens (smoking) (15).
The growth and spread of laryngeal carcinoma is Figure 52. Diagram showing the pre-epiglottic space and its
determined by the site of origin of the tumor and the boundaries.
anatomical barriers produced by the different laryngeal
structures and compartments (16–19). Pathologists
should be aware of at least three of these anatomical
components, which are often not covered in standard
textbooks of pathology: the anterior commissure tendon
(Broyles’ ligament), the pre-epiglottic space, and the
paraglottic space. These structures represent the
‘‘weak points’’ of the larynx, whereby tumors may
escape from the larynx into the soft tissue of the neck.
The anterior commissure tendon is especially
important in glottic carcinomas that approach or
involve the anterior commissure. It consists of a
band of fibrous tissue 10 mm in length and 1 mm in
width and contains both blood vessels and lymphatics
(20). It serves to anchor the true vocal cords to the
upper inner midline of the thyroid cartilage. It is
important because at its attachment to the thyroid
cartilage there is no perichondrium, thereby eliminat-
ing an important tumor barrier (21). This allows a
more direct opportunity for tumor to invade the
thyroid cartilage, the anterior soft tissue of the neck,
or to involve the immediate subjacent subglottis.
The pre-epiglottic space is not a space, but
rather, a roughly triangular area anterior to the epi-
glottic cartilage that is filled with adipose and loose
areolar tissue (Fig. 52). It is bounded anteriorly by the
hyoid bone, thyroid cartilage, and thyrohyoid mem-
brane; posteriorly by the epiglottic cartilage and thy- Figure 53. Diagram showing the paraglottic space and sur-
roepiglottic ligament; and superiorly by the rounding landmarks.
hyoepiglottic ligament, which forms its base (22–28).
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 139
The pre-epiglottic and paraglottic spaces are metastasis, which averages 30% to 40% (range
important in understanding the growth and behavior 23–60%) (33,36,37,42,44–53). If the tumor crosses the
of supraglottic and transglottic carcinomas, respec- midline of the larynx, some have observed the inci-
tively. Once tumors bridge these spaces, they can dence of contralateral or bilateral nodal involvement,
spread with little resistance in the loose areolar tissue either at or during the course of the disease, to range
and eventually escape from the endolarynx into the from 7% to 50% (49,55–59). Lutz et al., in a study of 202
soft tissue of the neck. supraglottic carcinomas, found the incidence of con-
tralateral nodal metastases to be 18% and noted the
Staging risk of contralateral cervical metastases in patients
with midline (epiglottic) lesions to be similar to that
The TNM staging (T, tumor; N, nodes; M, metastasis) observed in patients who had lateral (aryepiglottic
of carcinoma of the larynx is shown in Table 10 (30). fold) lesions (37). The upper and midjugular lymph
nodes are most often involved.
B. Supraglottic Carcinoma At the time of diagnosis, most supraglottic
tumors are relatively large and, as such, are often
The tip of the epiglottis and the aryepiglottic folds treated by surgery and radiation. Because the neck,
form the superior margin of the supraglottis. The especially the contralateral neck, is the most common
inferior border is an imaginary horizontal plane pass- site of relapse, laryngectomy (either supraglottic or
ing through the apex of the ventricle (Fig. 51). The total) and bilateral selective neck dissections is emerg-
supraglottic larynx is composed of the epiglottis (both ing as the most preferred treatment (37,42,48,60–62).
its lingual and laryngeal surfaces), aryepiglottic folds, Additional forms of therapy have also been used.
arytenoids, false vocal cords, and ventricles (30). The For selected small volume tumors, an endoscopic-laser
epiglottis is divided into suprahyoid and infrahyoid approach has been successfully used. In more
components by a plane at the level of the hyoid bone. advanced tumors (stage III and IV) there is evidence
Supraglottic carcinomas account for 30% to 35% indicating that a treatment strategy involving induc-
of all laryngeal carcinomas in the United States. Most tion chemotherapy and definitive radiation therapy
patients with these tumors complain of dysphagia, may be effective in preserving the larynx in a high
change in quality of voice, sensation of a foreign body percentage of patients without comprising overall
within the throat, or a neck mass. With more extensive survival (64).
disease, odynophagia, hemoptysis, and dyspnea may The overall five-year survival for all stages is
be noted. about 65% to 75% (33,37,42,47,49,52–54,58,65). Only
The tumors tend to be large and moderately to 5% to 15% of patients with supraglottic carcinoma
poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas with develop clinical evidence of metastases below the
pushing margins (Figs. 54 and 55). Most arise from the clavicles (37,49,50,52,54,66,67).
base of the epiglottis or from the false vocal cords. The Tumors that arise from the suprahyoid epiglottis
epiglottis is involved alone in 45% to 55% of all cases or and aryepiglottic folds are often referred to as mar-
in combination with other sites in 70% to 90% of cases. ginal or epilaryngeal lesions. As a group, they consti-
The next most frequent site of origin is the false vocal tute 18% of all supraglottic carcinomas and behave
cords (12–33%) followed by the aryepiglottic folds more like hypopharyngeal carcinomas in that they
(8–21%). The remaining cases are equally divided often spread to the base of the tongue and are less
between the ventricles (4–7%) and arytenoids (5–6%) prone to invade the pre-epiglottic space (13,68). There
(31–33). is controversy, however, about the prognosis of this
From the base of the epiglottis—false vocal cord group of lesions. Some authors indicate that marginal
region, the tumors tend to spread upward toward the (suprahyoid) tumors have a greater propensity for
free margins of the epiglottis and aryepiglottic folds, cervical lymph node metastasis and a poorer progno-
or into the pyriform sinus or vallecula—base of sis than infrahyoid tumors (13,69–72), whereas others
tongue. On rare occasions, they may extend posterior- have found the converse; that is, infrahyoid epiglottic
ly to the arytenoids. Because of fenestrations in the tumors have a worse prognosis and a greater tendency
epiglottic cartilage, invasion of the pre-epiglottic space for cervical lymph node metastasis than marginal
occurs in 50% to 85% of cases (26,34–37), and when (suprahyoid) tumors (68).
this occurs, there is a high incidence of lymph node
metastasis (27,34,38,39) (Fig. 56). Although supraglottic
carcinomas usually do not invade the glottis or thy- C. Glottic Carcinoma
roid cartilage, there are exceptions (40–43). Weinstein
et al. indicate that when supraglottic carcinomas are The American Joint Commission on Cancer defines
associated with impaired vocal cord mobility and the superior border of the glottis as a horizontal plane
involve the paraglottic space, there is a high probabil- passing through the apex of the ventricle and the
ity that the tumors have invaded the glottis or carti- inferior border as a horizontal plane 1 cm below the
laginous framework of the larynx (43). If so, then the apex of the ventricle (30) (Fig. 51). The components of
patient is a candidate for a total rather than supra- the glottis include the true vocal cords and the anterior
glottic laryngectomy. and posterior commissures. The true vocal cords
The most important factor in determining average 14 to 16 mm in length in the adult male and
prognosis is the presence of regional lymph node 10 to 12 mm in the adult female (73). At their midpoint,
140 Barnes
D. Subglottic Carcinoma
The American Joint Commission on Cancer defines
Figure 59. Histological section should always be taken verti-
cally through the laryngeal glottis to preserve anatomical rela-
the superior border of the subglottis as an imaginary
tions (see Fig. 58). Note the tumor arising from the true vocal horizontal plane 1 cm below the apex of the ventricle
cord encroaching on the underlying vocalis muscle (H&E, whole (30). The lower border is the inferior rim of the cricoid
mount). cartilage (Fig. 51). Tumors in this site account for 1%
to 5% of all squamous carcinomas of the larynx seen in
the United States (Fig. 60). They tend to be moderately
to poorly differentiated, with infiltrating borders.
Dyspnea and stridor are the most common symptoms.
Because of the limited lymphatic supply and Almost one-third of the patients with these symptoms
scant number of mucoserous glands in the true vocal will require emergency tracheotomy to maintain an
cords, glottic carcinomas tend to remain localized for airway (89). The tumor usually spreads circumferen-
an extended time; therefore, they are amenable to cure tially and anteriorly through the cricothyroid mem-
if detected early (79,80). As the disease progresses, the brane to involve the thyroid gland and paratracheal
tumor may extend along several pathways: (i) across and prelaryngeal lymph nodes. It can also spread
the anterior commissure to the opposite true vocal posteriorly below the thyroid cartilage and involve
cord; (ii) anteriorly through the anterior commissure the cervical esophagus, medially into the cricoarytenoid
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 143
E. Transglottic Carcinoma
The term ‘‘transglottic carcinoma’’ was coined by
McGavran et al. in 1961 to designate those tumors
that cross the ventricles to involve the supraglottis and
glottis (and often the subglottis) (55) (Fig. 61). Unlike
the latter terms, transglottic does not correspond to a
specific anatomical site within the larynx.
Mendonca and Bryce are of the opinion that
most transglottic carcinomas represent supraglottic
extension of primary glottic carcinomas (82). In their
experience, 25% of all glottic carcinomas extend across
the ventricles. It is generally accepted that primary
carcinomas of the ventricle are rare.
Not all transglottic carcinomas are large. Of 152
cases reviewed by Mittal et al., 31% were classified as
T2, 39% T3, and 30% T4 (100). Twenty-six percent of
their patients had cervical lymph node metastasis at
presentation and another 19% subsequently devel-
oped positive lymph nodes during the course of
their disease.
Most of these tumors are moderately differentiat-
ed squamous cell carcinomas, with infiltrating margins.
The tumors characteristically spread within the para-
Figure 60. Rare example of primary subglottic carcinoma of the
glottic space and escape from the endolarynx by grow-
larynx (arrows). Note the attached right lobe of the thyroid gland. ing through the cricothyroid or thyrohyoid membranes,
or by spreading submucosally into the pyriform sinus
(Fig. 62).
In the series of Mittal et al., 70% of the tumors
joint to reach the hypopharynx, or inferiorly to involve were confined to the larynx, and 30% demonstrated
the trachea. extralaryngeal growth (100). If the tumor is larger
About 15% to 25% (range 4–40%) of patients than 3.0 cm, there is a 75% chance that it has invaded
have cervical lymph node metastases, usually to the the cricoid or thyroid cartilages, or both, especially
lower jugular chain (89–96). Lymphatic drainage of the lower one-third of the latter (101). Extralaryngeal
the subglottis consists of three main tributaries: one spread, invasion of the laryngeal cartilages, or
anterior and two posterolateral (97). The anterior both should be suspected in any patient whose trans-
group pierces the cricothyroid membrane to terminate glottic carcinoma is accompanied by referred otalgia
in the prelaryngeal (Delphian) lymph node, which, in (102). The five-year survival rate is approximately
turn, drains to the pretracheal and supraclavicular 50% (100).
nodes (91). The two posterolateral groups pierce the
cricotracheal membrane and terminate in the para-
tracheal nodes, which are continuous with those in the
superior mediastinum. Although only 15% to 25%
(range 4–40%) of patients have positive cervical
lymph nodes, about 50% have positive, but clinically
undetectable, paratracheal lymph nodes (91). For this
reason, Harrison advocates total laryngectomy with
clearance of the paratracheal and superior mediastinal
lymph nodes (91). Furthermore, one or both lobes of
the thyroid should also be removed, for they may be
involved in 10% to 20% of cases (98).
About half of patients with subglottic carcinoma
die of local or stomal recurrences (91) and 15% to 20%
will develop distant metastases, most often to the
lungs and bones (89,98,99). The five-year survival
rate most frequently quoted for subglottic carcinoma
is about 40% (range 36–70%) (89–91,94,95).
Occasionally, glottic carcinomas with subglottic
extension will exhibit a clinical course indistinguish-
able from a de novo subglottic carcinoma. In general,
the greater degree of subglottic extension, the worse Figure 61. Total laryngectomy and right radical neck dissec-
the prognosis and the more the tumor behaves as a tion. Note the large, ulcerated, transglottic carcinoma.
subglottic primary.
144 Barnes
do so within the first year after laryngectomy and 98% 17% to 90% of all tumors are aneuploid (133–138). The
within 2 years (121). clinical significance of ploidy patterns in the larynx,
The precise pathogenesis of stomal recurrence is however, is both confusing and controversial. Some
unknown. Factors that have been suggested include investigators indicate that there is no correlation
(a) unrecognized tumor at the margin of initial resec- between tumor ploidy and survival, whereas others
tion, (b) development of a second primary malignant indicate that patients with aneuploid tumors have a
neoplasm, (c) tumor implantation at the time of tra- more favorable outcome (129,130). Still others, con-
cheotomy or at the time of primary surgery, and (d) versely, have found that diploid tumors are associated
recurrence secondary to metastases in the paratracheal with a better prognosis (139). Although Rua et al. have
or pretracheal lymph nodes. noted that the overall survival rates of patients with
It is generally agreed, however, that individuals diploid and aneuploid tumors are comparable, they
with tumors that involve the subglottis, either primar- did observe that aneuploid tumors with a well-
ily or secondarily, are especially at risk for develop- differentiated pattern are associated with a poor
ing this complication. Whether preoperative or prognosis (136).
emergency tracheotomy enhances the risk is highly Laryngeal ploidy patterns have also been used to
controversial. predict response to irradiation and chemotherapy.
Invasion of the Thyroid Gland Invasion of the Again, the results are confusing. Some investigators
thyroid gland occurs in 3% to 14% of all laryngeal have observed that nondiploid tumors respond
carcinomas and is characteristically associated with better to both irradiation and chemotherapy, whereas
advanced tumors (124,125). Of 23 cases of laryngeal others have found no relation between tumor
carcinoma in which the thyroid was involved, Gilbert ploidy and subsequent response to either of these
et al. noted that (a) all 23 cases tumors had invaded therapeutic modalities (135,139–142). Walter et al., on
one or more of the laryngeal cartilages, (b) 16 of 23 the other hand, indicate that T1N0M0 glottic tumors
(70%) tumors demonstrated perineural or vascular that are aneuploid are more radioresistant than are
invasion, and (c) 21 of 23 tumors (91%) extended 10 diploid lesions and should be treated primarily with
mm or more subglottically (124). surgery (137).
Involvement of the thyroid may be by direct Part of the foregoing controversy may be related
extension of tumor from the larynx (65%) or by to tumor (DNA) heterogeneity. El-Naggar et al. stud-
metastatic spread to one or both lobes of the thyroid ied 21 squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx by flow
(35%). Either mechanism is associated with a poor cytometry and observed that 76% were heterogeneous
prognosis, for 78% patients with involvement of the in DNA content (138). According to these investiga-
thyroid will die of their disease within 3 years of tors, the calculated probability of missing aneuploidy
diagnosis and often within 1 year (117). if only one, two, three, or four tissue samples were
The work of Gilbert et al. further underscores the analyzed was 33%, 17%, 8%, and 3%, respectively.
need to remove one or both lobes of the thyroid gland
when dealing with all primary subglottic carcinoma or
any laryngeal tumor that has 10 mm or more of G. Molecular Genetic Data
subglottic extension (124).
Multiple Primary Malignancies Patients with There is much interest in identifying biomarkers that
laryngeal carcinomas will develop a second primary could be used to stratify patients with laryngeal
malignant tumor in 10% to 24% of cases (85,126–128). carcinomas into those who could be managed conser-
Seventy percent of these additional primaries will vatively (radiation therapy) versus those who are in
occur in the respiratory and upper aerodigestive tracts need of more aggressive therapy (surgery). The two
and most will appear within 2 years of treatment of most widely studied markers have been p53 and Ki-67
the index tumor (126,128). (143–146).
The lung is, by far, the most common site of It is generally agreed that p53 when used alone,
occurrence of the second primary, which is unfortu- has no predictive value for local recurrence, survival
nate because pulmonary carcinomas are generally or response to radiation (143–145). Studies reporting
more life-threatening than laryngeal tumors. The asso- the role of Ki-67 index in predicting response to
ciation of laryngeal with pulmonary carcinoma is radiation have produced, on the other hand, conflict-
strongest for those tumors that arise in the supra- ing results (144,145,147–149). Part of this Ki-67 contro-
glottic larynx. Patients with supraglottic tumors have versy may be related to whether the radiation is
a 14 times greater chance of developing lung cancer administered by routine or accelerated fractionated
than the normal population and are 3 times more schedules. Rapidly growing tumors not only exhibit a
likely to develop a second primary tumor in the greater initial response to radiation but also a greater
lung than those with glottic primaries (127,129–131). likelihood of tumor repopulation with the use of a
Whether patients who present with lung cancer routine six-week course of radiotherapy as compared
are at increased risk for subsequent laryngeal carcinoma with slowly growing tumors. By keeping the total
is unknown (132). Most patients with lung cancer, dose of radiation the same but giving it over a five
however, do not live long enough to assess this rather than a six-week interval (accelerated fractionated
possibility. therapy), slowly growing tumors are less likely to
Tumor (DNA) Ploidy Flow cytometric studies on repopulate the tumor site and tend to have a better
squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx indicate that prognosis.
146 Barnes
XV. SPINDLE CELL CARCINOMA, SARCOMATOID There are those who seemingly use the term
CARCINOMA, CARCINOSARCOMA ‘‘spindle cell carcinoma,’’ rather loosely and are will-
ing to apply to it any carcinoma associated with a
A. Introduction spindle cell component, even in the presence of heter-
ologous elements. With this generic approach, one
This malignant biphasic tumor has been referred to by could rightfully argue that synovial sarcoma is also
a variety of names, including spindle cell carcinoma an example of a spindle cell carcinoma. After all, it is
(SPCC), pseudosarcoma, pleomorphic carcinoma, biphasic, and the spindle cells characteristically stain
metaplastic carcinoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, and for cytokeratin.
collision tumor. Pathologically, it is composed of a The term spindle cell carcinoma does not address
squamous cell carcinoma, either in situ or invasive the sarcomatous component present in some, but not
(rarely an adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine car- all, of these tumors. One simply cannot choose to
cinoma) and a spindle cell component that may vary overlook the sarcomatous elements, because they may
from bland to pleomorphic. The former component is also metastasize, albeit rarely, and may, therefore,
often small and elusive, requiring numerous sections warrant additional therapy. The use of the popular
for demonstration, whereas the latter tends to form the term metaplastic carcinoma is also equally disconcerting
bulk of the tumor. As the plethora of names might because it too does not convey to the clinician the
indicate, its histogenesis, especially the spindle portion, potential dual composition of this group of neoplasms.
is disputed. Is it a squamous cell carcinoma, with a The literature on SPCC has mostly focused on
benign reactive stroma, or is the entire lesion just a the concept of carcinomas undergoing ‘‘metaplasia’’
peculiar squamous cell carcinoma in which the squa- into various types of sarcomas. Is the converse also
mous cells have assumed a spindled (pseudosarcoma- true? Can sarcomas undergo metaplasia into carcino-
tous) appearance (1,2)? Or does it represent a collision mas? For instance, a significant number of alleged
tumor (squamous cell carcinoma growing next to a leiomyosarcomas can express cytokeratin on immu-
sarcoma), or a carcinosarcoma (a mixed epithelial- nostaining (30). Are these examples of metaplastic
mesenchymal neoplasm arising from a single stem sarcomas and, therefore, the mesenchymal counter-
cell in which both elements are intermingled) (3,4)? part of metaplastic carcinomas?
Contrary to initial belief, it is now apparent that As a corollary to the foregoing discussion, there
the spindle component is capable, in some instances, is a growing school of thought that tumors should be
or metastasizing either independently or in conjunc- classified according to their degree of differentiation,
tion with the squamous cell carcinoma (5–7). This rather than their presumed histogenesis or cell of
would seem to dispel the notion that the spindle origin (31,32). If one carries the cell of origin concept
portion is always reactive. By light microscopy, one to its logical conclusion, there would be only two
often finds zones in which malignant squamous cells categories of tumors in the entire field of pathology:
appear to transform into spindle cells. Tissue cultures a benign zygotoma and a malignant zygotoma.
have also confirmed that squamous cells can grow in a Data have accumulated indicating that neoplasms
spindled pattern (8). On the other hand, enzyme are not static, but are evolutionary in composition,
histochemistry on fresh-frozen tissue suggests that responding to inherent genetic changes, the microenvi-
the spindle cells are more compatible with fibroblasts ronment, or therapeutic manipulation. Presumably,
or histiocytes than with epithelial cells (9). each tumor carries a partial or complete genetic compo-
Immunohistochemical studies have shown vari- sition of its host and, as such, may exhibit a uniform or
able results. In some instance, the spindle cells have variable phenotypic expression during its life span. We
exhibited only epithelial (cytokeratin, epithelial mem- agree entirely with Gould that ‘‘it may prove useful to
brane antigen) or mesenchymal markers (vimentin, classify certain groups of neoplasms on the basis of
actin, desmin, myoglobin), whereas others have what they in fact are, as defined by a series of appro-
expressed both epithelial and mesenchymal differentia- priate phenotypic-differentiation marker expressions,
tion (10–18). Ultrastructurally, some investigators have rather than on the basis of questionable assumptions
found evidence supporting a mesenchymal origin of the about their origin’’ (31). In other words, if a malignant
spindle cells (6,9,19), whereas others contend that they biphasic spindle cell tumor stains only for epithelial
are epithelially derived (2,20). To further confuse the markers, it should be designated as a spindle cell
issue, a few tumors, usually those occurring in areas of squamous carcinoma. If a similar tumor expresses
previous irradiation may contain metaplastic bone or both epithelial and mesenchymal markers or contains
even malignant osteoid and cartilage (4,12). A few may heterologous mesenchymal elements, it should be
even exhibit skeletal muscle differentiation (17,20). The called a carcinosarcoma.
source of these heterologous elements—whether epithe- It should be emphasized that the term ‘‘carcino-
lial, mesenchymal, or even myoepithelial—is the subject sarcoma’’ used in this context indicates tumor differen-
of ongoing controversy and heated debates, for it strikes tiation and not presumed histogenesis; that is, it does
at the very heart of our traditional histogenetic classifi- not imply that the tumor arises from two separate
cation of tumors. clones of cells, one being epithelial and the other
Molecular data now indicate, rather definitively, mesenchymal. It is generally accepted that most, if not
that these tumors have a monoclonal origin from a all, tumors originate from a single clone. If a clone
noncommitted stem cell, which gives rise to both should develop along divergent lines into epithelial
components (22–39). and mesenchymal elements, the term carcinosarcoma
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 147
Table 11 Classification of Spindle Cell Carcinomas age group (9,12,13,35,40–45). Occurrence in young
patients is unusual. The case of SPCC of the tongue
1. Squamous cell carcinoma Spindle cells are bland and
occurring in a four-year-old boy reported by Kessler
with reactive stroma negative for epithelial
markers; cells may stain for
and Bartley may be the youngest patient with this
histiocytic markers tumor reported thus far (46).
2. Spindle cell squamous Spindle cells stain positive for Although SPCC can arise from any cutaneous or
carcinoma epithelial markers (keratin, mucosal site in the head and neck, the larynx, especially
EMA) or EM shows epithelial the true vocal cords and anterior commissure, and
features esophagus—usually the middle and lower thirds—are
3. Carcinosarcoma Epithelial and spindle cells among the most common sites. In the oral cavity, the
intermingled; spindle cells are predominant sites, in descending order of frequency,
negative for epithelial are the lips (particularly the lower lip), tongue, and
markers but may stain for
alveolar ridge-buccal mucosa (40). Most individuals
desmin, myoglobin, etc.; or
presence of malignant
present with hoarseness, a change in quality of the
osteoid or cartilage voice, dysphagia, or airway obstruction. Few may even
4. Collision tumor Carcinoma growing adjacent to cough up bits of their tumor. Oral cavity tumors, in
a sarcoma without significant turn, usually manifest as a swelling with or without
intermingling; sarcoma pain or a nonhealing ulcer.
should be negative for
epithelial markers and EM
shows no epithelial features D. Pathology
Abbreviation: EM, electron microscopy. Depending on the series, 70% to 100% of SPCCs of the
larynx are polypoid, firm, pink, white, or gray, with a
would seem to be appropriate, calling attention, both mucosal attachment that varies from a broad base to a
clinically and pathologically, to both components of the thin string-like stalk (27,44,45) (Fig. 63). Sessile or
tumor. ulceroinfiltrative lesions are less common. In the oral
We believe that SPCC, as is currently used, is a cavity, the distribution between polypoid and ulcera-
generic term that encompasses four different catego- tive tumors is about equal. Most are 1 to 6 cm, but in
ries of tumors that are potentially separable only by the esophagus, they may reach 12 to 15 cm (47). The
the use of immunohistochemistry or electron micros- surface of the tumor is frequently ulcerated and
copy. These include squamous cell carcinoma with a covered by a shaggy exudate (Fig. 64). As such,
reactive or demoplastic stroma, spindle cell squamous biopsies from these areas are often returned by the
carcinoma (note addition of the word squamous), car- pathologist as ‘‘granulation tissue,’’ ‘‘tissue consistent
cinosarcoma, and collision tumor. (Table 11). with pyogenic granuloma,’’ or as ‘‘inflammation with
It has been suggested, however, that spindle cell stromal atypia.’’ The squamous carcinoma tends to be
squamous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma may repre- concentrated at the base or stalk of the tumor; there-
sent a spectrum of a single entity and that the two share fore, when clinically suspected, all biopsies should
a similar prognosis (11,33–35). The finding of individual include this region (Fig. 64).
tumor cells that coexpress both epithelial and mesen- Immunohistochemical assays for epithelial
chymal immunomarkers does add credence to this markers (cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen)
hypothesis (12). However, to suggest that they have a and electron microscopy have shown epithelial
similar prognosis is undoubtedly premature and based
on a very limited sample. Until the clinicopathological
features of this group of tumors are better defined, we
strongly recommend that they be classified according
to the scheme listed in Table 11. Only then, will we be
able to determine the most beneficial course of therapy.
B. Etiology
Smoking, alcohol abuse, prior irradiation exposure
and, possibly, poor oral hygiene, all have been impli-
cated as important risk factors for the development of
these tumors (36–39). Studies thus far indicate that the
HPV has little, if any, etiological significance (39).
C. Clinical Features
Most patients with SPCC (used here in a generic sense
to encompass all of the subtypes in Table 11 because Figure 63. Spindle cell carcinoma of the larynx. Note the
most investigators have not attempted to subclassify characteristic polyploidy configuration.
these entities) are men (68–99%) in the 50 to 80 year
148 Barnes
differentiation of the spindle cells in only 40% to 75% stroma may contain inflammatory cells and increased
of cases (12,13,18,44,45). Approximately 7% to 15% of blood vessels, but the spindle cells (more appropriate-
tumors will also contain heterologous elements, such ly fibroblasts or myofibroblasts) show a uniformly
as malignant osteoid, cartilage, and muscle (12,44,45). negative result for cytokeratin. In addition, the carci-
This suggests, as noted earlier, that SPCC is not a noma is always well demarcated from the stroma.
uniform tumor, but rather, a heterogeneous group of Spindle cell squamous carcinomas, on the other
lesions that can be segregated, by routine histology, hand, contain areas of squamous cell carcinoma, either
immunohistochemistry, or electron microscopy, into in situ or invasive, and an obviously malignant spindle
the four categories shown in Table 11. cell component (Fig. 66). The carcinoma varies from
Squamous cell carcinomas with a reactive or well to poorly differentiated and may be either sharply
desmoplastic stroma contain islands of malignant demarcated from the spindle element, or poorly
squamous cells associated with a fibrocollagenous defined, often appearing to give rise to the spindle
stroma that is readily recognized by the pathologist cells. The spindle cells usually assume a pattern remi-
as being benign or, at most, atypical (Fig. 65). The niscent of a fibrosarcoma or a malignant fibrous histio-
cytoma, yet the cells test positive, either focally or
diffusely, for cytokeratin (Fig. 67). At times, especially
E. Immunohistochemistry
In a review of 187 SPCCs of the larynx, Thompson et
al. observed that the spindle cell component was
positive for at least one epithelial marker in 68% of
cases and suggested the use of a screening panel
consisting of AE1/3, epithelial membrane antigen
Figure 68. Carcinosarcoma. Focus of osteosarcoma found in a (EMA), K1 and K18 (45). More specifically, they
tumor histologically similar to that shown in Figure 67 (H&E, observed that 41% of the tumors were positive for
200). This combination of findings supports a diagnosis of K1, 26% for AE1/3, 24% for K18, 15% for K14, 9% for
carcinosarcoma. K6, and 7% for K5/6, and 18% for EMA. In contrast to
our experience, none was positive for CAM5.2. The
150 Barnes
G. Differential Diagnosis
Posttraumatic spindle cell nodules, inflammatory
myofibroblastic tumors (inflammatory pseudotu-
mors), and radiation fibrosis, must be considered in
the differential diagnosis (49–51). A history of trauma;
presence of a significant inflammatory component;
and lack of atypical mitoses, dysplasia and significant
cellular pleomorphism are features of pseudotumors
rather than SPCCs. It should be noted that inflamma-
Figure 71. Collision tumor shown in Figures 69 and 70. A tory myofibroblastic tumors may contain a few
cytokeratin stain shows the carcinoma to be positive and the keratin-positive cells (myofibroblasts), and should
sarcoma negative. Again, note that the tumor components are not be misconstrued as evidence to support a diagno-
separate and do not intermingle (IHC, prekeratin, 40). sis of SPCC. The fibroblasts associated with radiation
are negative for p53 while SPCCs are often positive
(52,53).
Attention has already been called to the fact that
some SPCCs are monophasic and may masquerade as
soft tissue sarcomas, especially since some SPCCs and
sarcomas share similar mesenchymal markers (vimen-
tin, smooth muscle actin, etc.) and even keratin
expression (especially leiomyosarcomas and synovial
sarcomas) (see ‘‘Pathology and Immunohistochemis-
try’’ above). A p63 stain may be very helpful. SPCCs
are often positive (63% of cases) for p63, while sarco-
mas are almost invariably negative (especially leio-
myosarcomas) (48). Amelanotic spindle cell
melanoma and spindle cell myoepithelioma may
also be included in the differential diagnosis but can
usually be excluded by appropriate immunomarkers.
In some small biopsies, a definitive diagnosis
cannot be rendered. In this instance, a diagnosis of
‘‘malignant spindle cell lesion’’ is appropriate with a
comment that an SPCC, as well as other lesions,
should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Figure 72. Lymph node in which only the spindle cell compo-
nent has metastasized (H&E, 100).
H. Treatment and Prognosis
Surgery is the treatment of choice with the extent
based on the stage of the disease. Irradiation is gener-
tumors were also positive for a variety of mesenchy- ally unrewarding as a primary procedure but may
mal markers, including vimentin (100% positive), have merit as an adjunct. Whether additional therapy
smooth muscle actin (33%), S-100 protein (5%), and is warranted or prognosis is related to the four sub-
desmin (2%). types of SPCC listed in Table 11 is unknown since
More recently, p63 has been found to be a useful large series of tumors classified accordingly with
alternative marker. Lewis et al. observed it to positive adequate follow-up are not available. As a result, we
in the spindle cells in 63% of the cases tested (48). are forced to analyze the clinical data pertaining to
these tumors collectively. It is of interest, however, to
F. Molecular-Genetic Data note that there is data indicating that ‘‘metaplastic
carcinomas’’ of the breast with absent or minimal
Microdissection-based genotypic analysis of the epi- invasive carcinomatous component behave more like
thelial and mesenchymal components have shown sarcomas and therefore should probably be treated
that each exhibits an equivalent pattern of loss of with sarcoma rather than the usual breast cancer
heterozygosity implying that both elements most protocols (54). The incidence of cervical lymph node
likely originate from a single (monoclonal) totipotential involvement, distant metastasis, and mortality,
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 151
without regard to the site or stage of disease, are listed area and that the amount and degree of differentiation
in Table 12. Cervical lymph nodes and lungs are the of the carcinomatous component are not related to
most frequent sites of dissemination. Following treat- survival or tumor behavior (41). Positive cervical
ment, 20% to 45% of laryngeal SPCCs have developed lymph nodes are an ominous finding.
local recurrences.
Prognosis is related to location, tumor size,
depth of invasion, stage of disease, and, to some XVI. VERRUCOUS CARCINOMA
extent, with gross configuration of the tumor. Small
A. Introduction
tumors in strategic sites, such as the true vocal cords,
are more likely to have a favorable prognosis because Verrucous carcinoma was first described by Acker-
of early symptomatology. Tumors of the oral cavity man in 1948 and is often referred to as ‘‘Ackerman’s
and sinonasal tract tend to be more aggressive. Some tumor’’ in his honor (1–3). It is defined by the World
reports have indicated that polypoid tumors either do Health Organization as ‘‘a nonmetastisizing variant of
not metastasize or have a more favorable outcome well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma charac-
than the flat ulcerative type. While polypoid lesions terized by an exophytic, warty, slowly growing neo-
do, in general, have a better prognosis, they are plasm with pushing margins (4).’’
certainly capable of metastasizing and causing death. Although the oral cavity is the most frequent site
Leventon and Evans indicate that the degree of inva- of origin, 10% to 15% of all VCs occur in the larynx
sion may be the most important factor rather than the and, in the larynx, 1% to 3% of all carcinomas are of
gross appearance of the tumor (41). According to the verrucous type (5–12).
them, tumors which invade muscle, minor salivary
glands or bone are associated with a poor survival
whereas those tumors which are superficial and do B. Clinical Features
not involve these structures have a good survival.
Some polypoid tumors, therefore, may exhibit rather Most arise from the true vocal cords, although in the
deep invasion. series of 44 cases reported by Lundgren et al., 27%
In the extensive review of SPCCs of the larynx by occurred in the supraglottic larynx (8,13) (Fig. 73). Most
Lambert et al., the three year survival rate was 90% for individuals have been men (85–95%), averaging 58 to 62
glottic tumors that were polypoid but only 44% for years of age (range 29–83 years) (6,8,14). Hoarseness is
sessile glottic lesions (35). Prognosis was poor for the usual presenting symptom. Dysphagia, airway
supraglottic and hypopharyngeal tumors, regardless obstruction, and hemoptysis are uncommon.
of pattern of growth. In Ellis and Corio’s review of
oral cavity tumors, 40% of patients with polypoid C. Etiology
tumors and 40% with endophytic lesions succumbed
to their disease (40). The use of tobacco appears to be an important risk
Leventon and Evans also indicate that tumors factor. Most of the patients described thus far have
that arise in a site of previous irradiation tend to be been smokers. HPV, particularly types 16 and 18 and
more aggressive than those that arise in a nonirradiated rarely 6 and 11, have been found in some, but not all,
152 Barnes
Figure 73. Direct laryngoscopic view of a verrucous carcinoma in Figure 75. Verrucous carcinoma. Note the papillary surface,
region of anterior commmisure. Note the exophytic appearance. prominent keratin layer and absence of keratohyaline granules
(H&E, 100).
D. Pathology
The gross and histological features are identical with
those seen in the oral cavity (Figs. 74–76). Hybrid
(mixed) tumors composed of areas of both VC and
conventional squamous cell carcinoma have also been
described in the larynx; however, the frequency of
such tumors in the larynx (11% in one study) is
E. Molecular-Genetic Data
p53 over expression as determined by immunohis-
tochemistry can be found in 40% of VCs, which is
similar to other head and neck neoplasms (21).
Sakurai et al. studied C-erbB-3 protein, a growth
Figure 74. Verrucous carcinoma shown in Figure 73. Note the factor, in a series of verrucous hyperplasia, verrucous
exophytic, warty growth and the extensive surface keratinization. carcinoma, and well-differentiated squamous cell car-
cinoma arising in verrucous carcinoma and observed
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 153
F. Differential Diagnosis The tumors usually arise de novo but in some instan-
ces may arise in papillomas associated with recurrent
The differential diagnosis includes papillary keratosis, respiratory papillomatosis. HPV types 6,11,16 and 18
verruca vulgaris, and well-differentiated papillary have been detected in a few cases (2,3,5,6,). Whether
squamous cell carcinoma. Features that are useful in this virus has a role in the etiology of PSCC remains
separating these lesions are discussed in sections VIIC, unsettled. Smoking and alcohol are also possible risk
VIII and XVII. factors (2).
Figure 79. Papillary squamous cell carcinoma. Observe the Figure 80. Exophytic squamous cell carcinoma. Note the cells
basaloid cells and frequent mitoses (arrows) throughout all are more keratinized (or squamoid) rather than basaloid (H&E,
layers. Compare with Figure 80 (H&E, 400). 400).
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 155
each other. VC has a heavily keratinized surface and fact, because of the submucosal growth, many are
the cells are exceedingly well differentiated with a clinically thought to be of nonepidermoid origin and
pink, nonbasaloid appearance free of mitoses. In addi- are often confused with a minor salivary gland neo-
tion, the rete ridges are bulbous. plasm or a soft tissue tumor (Fig. 82).
As the name implies, BSCC is composed micro-
scopically of two components: basaloid and squamous
F. Treatment and Prognosis cells. The basaloid cells are arranged in smooth-
PSCCs, as defined above, are uncommon and therefore contoured lobules, small clusters, and cords with fre-
no large series are available to evaluate the effectiveness quent mitoses and often prominent peripheral palisading
of various therapeutic strategies, which have ranged
from biopsy followed by radiation to surgical excision
(2). In the larynx, the prognosis is favorable and no
doubt relates to the fact that the majority of tumors are
either in situ or show only superficial invasion. Involve-
ment of regional lymph nodes is uncommon and dis-
tant metastasis is exceptional. PSCCs in other sites,
especially the sinonasal tract, may be more aggressive.
C. Clinical Features
In the head and neck, BSCC occurs primarily in men
(82% of all cases) and patients between 27 and 88
years of age (average 63 years) (2). Symptoms vary
according to site of origin, but usually include a neck
mass, dysphagia, hoarseness, pain in the throat,
weight loss, otalgia, and/or hemoptysis.
D. Pathology
The tumors vary between 1 and 6 cm in greatest Figure 82. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Smooth con-
dimension and are firm, white, or yellow-white with toured lobules with central comedonecrosis are undermining the
a characteristic gross appearance of central ulceration normal mucosa (H&E, 100).
with prominent submucosal infiltration (Fig. 81). In
156 Barnes
of nuclei (Fig. 83). The cells have scant cytoplasm and In about 5% of cases, the epithelial component will
round to ovoid nuclei that vary from vesicular to hyper- assume a spindle cell configuration, similar to that
chromatic. Nucleoli may or may not be present (Fig. 84). seen in SPCC (27,28). A case of BSCC associated with a
Small cyst-like spaces are occasionally encountered and, squamous cell carcinoma and rhabdomyosarcoma
rarely, even ductal differentiation is seen (Fig. 83). The (carcinosarcoma) has also been described (29).
spaces may be empty or contain material that resembles Although basaloid cells predominate, a definable
mucin, but stains, if at all, only weakly with periodic element of squamous cell carcinoma should be present
acid-–Schiff (PAS), Alcian blue, or mucicarmine. By to make the diagnosis with confidence. The squamous
electron microscopy, the cyst-like spaces are lined by component may be in situ or invasive and is typically
basal membranes and filled with either loose stellate well to moderately differentiated (Fig. 86). If there is
granules or replicated basal lamina (1). Central ischemic
necrosis (comedonecrosis) of the basaloid lobules is
characteristic, as well as the deposition of amorphous,
eosinophilic material between tumor cells, referred to as
hyalinosis (Fig. 85).
At times, the stroma has a myxoid appearance,
with basophilic, extracellular connective tissue mucin.
Table 15 Basaloid Squamous Cell Carcinoma Vs. Small Cell Gerughty et al. in 1968 (1). Originally thought to be
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma a type of salivary tumor, it is now established that this
is a distinct variant of squamous carcinoma character-
Feature BSCC SCNEC
ized by a dual composition of both squamous and
Growth lobular diffuse glandular components (2–7).
Spindle cells – +
Nuclear molding – +
Nucleoli +/– –
B. Etiology
Hyalinosis + – As in conventional squamous cell carcinomas, alcohol
Stromal mucin + –
and tobacco abuse appear to be important risk factors
Cyst-like areas + –
Peripheral palisading + –
for ASC. Siar and Ng have also described a case that
In situ or invasive squamous cell + – may have been related to prior radiation exposure (8).
carcinoma
Synaptophysin, chromogranin, or Leu-7 – +/– C. Clinical Features
34BE12 (keratin) + –
Thyroid transcription factor – +/– ASC is more common in males by a ratio of 4:1 and
Inclusion body-cytokeratin positivity – +/– occurs over a broad age (34–81 years) with an average of
Neurosecretory granules on EM – +/– 61 years (6). The larynx is the most common site,
Abbreviations: EM, electron microscopy; BSCC, basaloid squamous cell accounting for 45% of all cases in the upper aerodigestive
carcinoma; SCNEC, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. tract. In a review of 26 tumors of the larynx, Keelawat et
al. noted that 46% were supraglottic, 19% transglottic,
(8,9,11–13). The general consensus, however, is that 15% glottic, 4% subglottic and in 15% the site was
when the two tumors are matched for anatomic site, unknown (6). Symptoms vary according to site, but
stage, and treatment the prognosis is similar. usually include airway compromise, hoarseness, sensa-
Surgery with regional lymphadenectomy and tion of a foreign body in the throat, and/or dysphagia.
postoperative radiation is the treatment of choice.
Because of the high incidence of distant metastases, D. Pathology
adjuvant chemotherapy may also be warranted. The tumors are grossly indistinguishable from ordi-
Whether or not determination of the DNA con- nary squamous cell carcinoma and range from 1 to
tent of the tumor offers prognostic significance is 6.5 cm. Each is composed of squamous and glandular
controversial. Luna et al. studied nine BSCCs and foci in varying proportions, with the former usually
found that five were aneuploid and four were diploid. predominating. The squamous carcinoma is seen most
Three of the four patients with diploid carcinomas often in the central part of the tumor originating from
died with distant metastases from 11 to 20 months a dysplastic mucosa that may be either intact or
after diagnosis whereas two of the five with aneuploid ulcerated. The adenocarcinoma, in turn, is most
tumors died of their disease at 36 and 43 months (8). often observed in the deeper part of the tumor.
They concluded that patients with aneuploid BSCC The two carcinomas range from well to poorly
had a better mean survival time (39.5 months) than differentiated and are typically separate and distinct but
those with diploid tumors (16.3 months). Raslan et al. occasionally intermingled (Fig. 88). A mucicarmine
studied 10 BSCC and found 6 to be diploid and
4 aneuploid (2). They concluded that tumor ploidy,
as determined by flow cytometry, provided no addi-
tional prognostic information beyond that supplied by
routing histological evaluation.
Seidman et al. indicate that BSCC may be associ-
ated with a high incidence of second primary tumors,
particularly in the upper gastrointestinal tract and
larynx (38). Of six patients with BSCC that had addi-
tional primary tumors reviewed by Raslan et al., the
second tumor was found in the distal esophagus
(small cell carcinoma), soft palate (squamous cell
carcinoma), left arytenoid (squamous cell carcinoma),
nasopharynx (nasopharyngeal carcinoma), and pros-
tate and colon (one patient had adenocarcinoma in
both of these sites (2,3,6,39). The sixth patient had
chronic lymphocytic leukemia (6).
stain shows, in most cases, luminal and intracellular seen at all, are an integral component of the basaloid
mucus in the glandular component while keratin pearls component.
and dyskeratotic cells may be seen in the squamous Conventional squamous cell carcinoma invading
areas. Perineural invasion is also quite common. and/or entrapping nontumorous mucoserous glands
Metastases are frequent and, while either compo- may also be confused with ASC, especially on small
nent may disseminate either alone or in combination, biopsies. Retention of the normal lobular architecture
the squamous carcinoma is usually dominant (6). of the mucoserous glands and the lack of any signifi-
cant cytologic atypia of the glands should always
suggest this possibility. Moreover, in true ASC one
E. Immunohistochemistry should see, if the specimen is large enough, one or
The adenocarcinoma is positive for CEA (92% of cases), more separate foci of unequivocal adenocarcinoma.
CK7 (75%), and CAM 5.2 (58%) while the squamous
carcinoma is either negative or focally reactive for these
markers (7). The high molecular weight cytokeratin G. Treatment and Prognosis
34BE12 is positive in both and CK20 negative. Most Treatment varies according to site and stage of dis-
are also aneuploid and positive for p53 (7). ease, but usually necessitates some form of laryngec-
tomy and neck dissection and possible supplemental
F. Differential Diagnosis radiation (6,10). In a review of 58 ASCs from all sites
in the head and neck, Keelawat et al. observed that
Because of its biphasic character the diagnosis of ASC 47% of patients experienced local recurrences, 65%
may not be apparent on small biopsies. Often the developed lymph node metastases and 23% had dis-
diagnosis can only be established after the entire tant dissemination (especially to the lung), with a
lesion has been resected and thoroughly evaluated 5-year determinant survival rate of 13% (6). If only
microscopically. The differential diagnosis includes ASCs of the larynx are considered, Fujino et al. in a
mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acantholytic (pseudo- review of 20 cases, observed that at presentation 25%
glandular) squamous cell carcinoma, basaloid squa- of patients had cervical lymph node involvement and
mous cell carcinoma, and conventional squamous cell 5% distant metastases. Following treatment, 55% of
carcinoma infiltrating nontumorous salivary and/or the patients experiences local recurrences and another
mucoserous glands. 15% developed systematic metastases. The 5-year
The distinction between ASC and mucoepider- survival rate was only 22% (4).
moid carcinoma (MEC) is more than academic. The
5-year survival rate for ASC is 13% to 20% compared
with 92%, 63%, and 27%, respectively, for low-, inter-
XX. ACANTHOLYTIC SQUAMOUS
mediate-, and high-grade MEC (9). ASC, as previously
CELL CARCINOMA
described, contains separate areas of adenocarcinoma
and squamous cell carcinoma as well as foci were the A. Introduction
two components commingle and also exhibits dys-
plastic-carcinomatous changes in the overlying sur- Acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma (ALSCC) is the
face (mucosal) epithelium. In contrast, the glandular term sanctioned by the World Health Organization to
and squamous elements in MEC are typically insepa- described an uncommon variant of squamous cell
rable, and there are no abnormalities of the surface carcinoma characterized by acantholysis of tumor
epithelium. Nuclear pleomorphism, high mitotic cells creating a false appearance of glandular differen-
activity, necrosis, dyskeratotic cells, and keratin pearls tiation (1). Adenoid squamous cell carcinoma is a
are common in ASC but rarely seen in MEC. MEC, in popular synonym but its usage often results in confu-
turn, often contains multiple cell types, including sion with adenosquamous carcinoma. Other terms
mucous, intermediate, clear, and epidermoid cells. that have been used to described this tumor include
As a result of acantholysis, spaces are created in pseudoglandular squamous cell carcinoma, squamous
acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma that be mistak- cell carcinoma with gland-like features, adenoacan-
en for true glands and thus cause confusion with ASC. thoma, and pseudovascular squamous cell carcinoma.
In contrast to ASC, the gland-like spaces in acantho- The tumor most often occurs on the sun-exposed
lytic squamous cell carcinoma are negative for mucin skin of the head and neck, including the vermilion
and carcinoembryonic antigen. border of the lips. Other than the lips, mucosal sites of
Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) may origin are exceptional and have included the tongue,
also be confused with ASC. Both neoplasms exhibit gingiva, floor of mouth, nasopharynx, hypopharynx
areas of squamous differentiation and duct formation and larynx (2–12).
and contain small cysts filled with material staining
positive with PAS and/or Alcian blue. However, in B. Etiology
BSCC the tumor is composed of large, round, solid
clusters of basaloid cells often with central comedo- Prolonged sun exposure appears to be an important
necrosis. Such areas are not seen in ASC. Also unlike etiologic factor for those tumors involving the skin
ASC, which contains separate foci of adenocarcinoma and lips, while prior radiation exposure might have a
and squamous cell carcinoma, the ducts in BSCC, if role in the origin of some mucosal lesions (4,5). As in
160 Barnes
conventional mucosal squamous carcinoma, smoking ‘‘Differential Diagnosis’’ under Adenosquamous Car-
and alcohol abuse are also likely contributors. cinoma above). The pseudovascular ALSCC can be
distinguished from an angiosarcoma by immunohis-
tochemistry. Pseudovascular ALSCC is positive for
C. Clinical Features cytokeratin and negative for vascular markers (3).
ALSCCs are more common in males and typically
occur in patients 40 to 70 years of age.
F. Treatment and Prognosis
B. Etiology
Although the undifferentiated type of nasopharyngeal
carcinoma is characteristically associated with the
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), LEC of the larynx and
hypopharynx is only infrequently associated with
this virus. In a review of 16 cases that were specifically
evaluated for the presence of EBV, only 4 (25%) were
positive (4).
Some patients have also been heavy smokers
and/or consumers of alcoholic beverages. These may
be additional risk factors.
times more common in men (4,5). In a review of 23 disease after a mean interval of 32 months (range 9–75
cases, MacMillan et al. noted that 52% arose in the months) (4,5).
larynx, 43% in the pyriform sinus, and 4% in the The frequent occurrence of distant metastases
trachea (5). Of those occurring in the larynx, two- would seem to warrant consideration of adjuvant
thirds were of supraglottic origin. chemotherapy.
The most common presenting manifestations are
hoarseness, followed by a neck mass, sore throat,
dysphagia and episodic hemoptysis. XXII. GIANT CELL CARCINOMA
A. Introduction
D. Pathology
Giant cell carcinoma (GCC) of the larynx has been
The tumors have ranged in size from 0.8 to 4.5 cm defined by World Health Organization (WHO) as ‘‘an
(mean 2.5 cm) and are histologically identical with the undifferentiated carcinoma containing many bizarre
undifferentiated type of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. multinucleated cells. The tumor cells have abundant
As such, they are composed of single, small aggre- eosinophilic cytoplasm that may contain neutrophil
gates, or large syncytial masses of cells associated with leukocytes or cell debris. There is no evidence of
a prominent component of lymphocytes. The tumor squamous or glandular differentiation by light micros-
cells have large, round, vesicular nuclei and promi- copy’’ (1). Therefore, it is, morphologically identical
nent nucleoli and, on immunostaining, are positive for with the giant cell carcinoma of the lung (2–5).
cytokeratin (Fig. 90). In some instances, the tumor cells
may show focal, rather abrupt, squamous differentia-
tion or keratinization. In about half the cases, there is a B. Clinical Features
component of squamous cell carcinoma that accounts Giant cell carcinomas of the larynx are exceptionally
for 10% to 75% of the entire tumor. The overlying rare neoplasms. Ferlito et al. identified only four cases
epithelium may show carcinoma-in situ (5). among a very large series of laryngeal carcinomas on
file at the University of Padua (6). These tumors
E. Treatment and Prognosis occurred in four men, aged 56 to 64 years. All were
smokers, predominantly of cigarettes, and three con-
Treatment has ranged from biopsy and subsequent sumed alcoholic beverages in moderation. Dyspnea
radiation to some form of laryngectomy or pharyng- and dysphagia were the most common presenting
ectomy and neck dissection. Approximately 75% of symptoms.
patients either have or will develop positive cervical The tumors occurred in all areas of the larynx,
lymph nodes and 25% to 30% will experience distant with no specific preferential site. One was subglottic,
metastases (lung, liver, bone, skin and mediastinal one involved the right vocal cord and ventricle, one
and retroperitoneal lymph nodes (4,5). Local recur- encompassed the vocal cords and subglottis, and one
rence following initial therapy has been recorded in originated in the area of the epiglottis and aryepiglottic
10% of patients, and at least 25% to 30% have died of fold.
C. Pathology
The tumors are grossly indistinguishable from ordinary
squamous cell carcinoma. They have ranged in size
from a ‘‘small plum’’ to 2.0 cm and, on cross section, are
usually white, hemorrhagic, and necrotic (6).
The histological hallmark of the tumor is the
presence of numerous, noncohesive, bizarre giant
cells that contain prominent, frequently multiple,
nuclei. The cytoplasm is abundant, eosinophilic,
sometimes vacuolated, and often contains neutrophils,
or cellular debris. The vacuoles may or may not stain
for mucin. The tumor, in addition, contains a back-
ground population of smaller anaplastic tumor cells,
red blood cells, neutrophils, and frequent abnormal
mitotic figures. The cells are positive for cytokeratin
and, occasionally, carcinoembryonic antigen (5).
The GCC may exist in a pure (as just described) or
mixed form, the latter in association with a squamous
Figure 90. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx. Syncytial cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or SPCC. Because of
arrangement of tumor cells composed of round, clear nuclei, these mixed forms, some have questioned whether
prominent nucleoli, and sparse cytoplasm. Lymphocytes perme- GCC is indeed a specific entity and have proposed, at
ate the tumor (H&E, 400). least in the lung, that such mixed tumors should be
designated as ‘‘pleomorphic carcinomas’’ (4).
162 Barnes
Electron Microscopy
TCs contain abundant membrane-bound, electron-
dense neurosecretory granules varying in size from
90 to 230 nm (10). Cell junctional complexes are
observed as well as numerous mitochondria if the
TC is of the oncocytic type.
Differential Diagnosis
See under ‘‘Atypical Carcinoid’’
Pathology
Figure 99. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma composed of
Although SCNEC can occur anywhere in the larynx, cells with poorly defined cytoplasm and spindled hyperchromatic
the majority are of supraglottic origin. The tumors are nuclei. Note the nuclear molding and mitoses (arrow).Compare
often ulcerated and, as a consequence, there are no with Fig. 94.
gross characteristics that distinguish it from ordinary
squamous cell carcinoma (Fig. 98).
In the past, SCNECs were often divided micro-
scopically into three types—oat cell (composed of
spindle cells), intermediate (composed of round common, as well as nuclear molding and DNA coat-
cells) and combined (composed of both spindle and ing (‘‘hematoxyphilia’’) of the walls of blood vessels.
round cells). This classification has no prognostic Rare rosette formation may also be seen. The mucosa
significance and is now largely abandoned. is often ulcerated, but the marginal epithelium is free
The tumor grows in the submucosa as sheets or of significant dysplasia or in situ carcinoma.
ribbons of closely packed cells, with indistinct cyto- In a few instances, SCNEC may also contain foci
plasm and round, oval, or spindled, hyperchromatic of squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous, or even
nuclei without nucleoli (Fig. 99). Mitoses, necrosis, rhabdomyosarcoma (see ‘‘combined SCNEC’’ below)
and lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion are (2,31).
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 167
adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carci- 1 or 2 cm (Fig. 14). Histologically, the cysts often contain
noma are the most frequent types. Because these intraluminal papillary projections (Fig. 18). The cysts as
tumors are rare, the differential diagnosis must well as the papillae are lined or covered by multiple
always include the possibility of a metastasis from a layers of large, uniform, deeply eosinophilic columnar
distant site. The location, symptomatology, and cells that, by electron microscopy, contain numerous
behavior of these neoplasms are correlated, to some mitochondria. The nuclei are small and dark and situ-
extent, with the specific histological type and, there- ated near the center of the cells. The contents of the
fore, they will be considered separately. See chapter 10, cysts vary from watery to mucoid.
‘‘Diseases of the Salivary Glands’’ for gross and The treatment of choice depends on the extent and
histologic description of each of the following tumors. location of the lesion, but usually entails microlaryngo-
scopy and excision. Inadequate removal may result in
recurrence. Because some OPCs may be multicentric, it
B. Pleomorphic Adenoma is important for the surgeon to thoroughly examine the
laryngeal mucosa to determine the extent of the disease.
Although pleomorphic adenoma is the most frequent
The OPCs have no malignant potential; however, a
tumor of the major salivary glands, it is unusual in the
few have been found incidentally in association with
larynx. Of 391 pleomorphic adenomas tabulated at the
squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (10).
University of Pittsburgh through 1976, only one
(0.25%) occurred in the larynx (3).
In 1997, Dubey et al. reported a pleomorphic
adenoma and identified 20 additional cases in a D. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
review of the world literature (4). These occurred in
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the larynx is a
12 males and 9 females, ranging in age from 15 to 82
distinctly uncommon tumor (11–19). In a review of 264
years (average 51 years). The tumors were generally
ACC from all sites in the head and neck on file at the
well demarcated and varied in size from 1 to 6 cm.
Memorial Hospital in New York, Spiro et al. identified
Fourteen arose in the supraglottic larynx (usually the
only three (1.1%) that originated in the larynx (20). As
epiglottis), three in the glottis and four in the sub-
of 1993, only about 120 cases have been reported in the
glottis. Most were treated by surgery and at the last
larynx in a review of the world literature (21).
follow-up, none was known to recur.
The tumor affects both sexes about equally and
Pleomorphic adenomas may contain areas of
occurs over a broad age range, with a peak incidence
squamous epithelium, which may represent a poten-
between 50 and 70 years. Approximately 50% to 60%
tial pitfall. MacMillan and Fechner, for instance, have
arise in the subglottic and 25% to 35% in the supra-
reported a pleomorphic adenoma of the larynx that
glottic larynx (11,14) (Figs. 100–102). Only 5% to 10%
had ulcerated and undergone peripheral squamous
involve the glottis. Airway obstruction, dysphagia,
metaplasia. A biopsy from this area was subsequently
misinterpreted as a squamous carcinoma and the
patient underwent unnecessary irradiation (5).
A few cases of carcinoma ex pleomorphic ade-
noma of the larynx have been reported (6–8). Some of
these, especially the case of Sabri and Hajjar are
questionable (6).
C. Oncocytic Lesions
Virtually all oncocytic lesions of the larynx are exam-
ples of what have been referred to as oncocytic cysts
or oncocytic papillary cystadenomas. Whether they
are true neoplasms or a cystic metaplastic-hyperplastic
response to various stimuli is the subject of ongoing
debate.
Such lesions, hereafter referred to as oncocytic
papillary cystadenomas (OPC), arise from the ducts of
laryngeal mucoserous glands and, as such, occur
primarily in region of the false vocal cords and
ventricles. They affect both sexes about equally and
are uncommon in individuals younger than 50 years
of age. Of 35 cases on file at the University of Pitts-
burgh, the average age is 69 years (range 55–82) (9).
Hoarseness is, by far, the most frequent com-
plaint. Dyspnea, stridor, pain, foreign body sensation,
and dysphagia have also been reported. Figure 100. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of subglottic larynx
When viewed endoscopically, OPCs appear as (arrows).
smooth, cystic, submucosal masses that rarely exceed
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 169
E. Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenosqua-
mous carcinoma are often erroneously assumed to be
synonyms. The former, however, is a type of salivary-
mucoserous carcinoma while the latter is a variant of
squamous cell carcinoma. These limitations, must be
considered when viewing reports of MECs in uncom-
mon sites, such as the larynx (22).
According to Prgomet, 80 cases of MECs of the
larynx have been reported as of 2003, of which some
degree of information was available on 63 (23). Of
these, 70% occurred in males and 30% in females with
an average age of 57 years. Fifty-seven percent were of
supraglottic origin, 30% glottic, 8% subglottic, and 5%
transglottic. At least 30% developed metastases, pri-
marily to cervical lymph nodes.
It is not uncommon in small biopsies for MEC to
be mistaken for squamous cell carcinoma. Because
Figure 102. Microscopic view of adenoid cystic carcinoma MECs are only moderately responsive to radiotherapy,
shown in Figures 100 and 101 (H&E, 100).
surgery offers the best opportunity for cure. The histo-
logical grade as well as anatomical site of the tumor
influence the extent of the surgical procedure. Patients
with high-grade supraglottic tumors (and possibly
hoarseness, cough, sore throat, and occasionally, pain intermediate-grade tumors) may be treated by supra-
are the usual presenting symptoms. glottic laryngectomy and neck dissection, even if the
Although some studies have indicated a rather lymph nodes are clinically negative. A neck dissection
significant incidence of cervical lymph node metasta- is not warranted for low-grade tumors.
ses, especially for those arising in the supraglottic The overall five-year survival rate for all grades
larynx, we suspect that in most of these cases the of laryngeal MEC is 75% to 80% (22). For low-grade
lymph nodes were involved by direct tumor extension tumors, the five-year survival is 90% to 100% and, for
or that the tumor was some other neoplasm incorrectly high-grade tumors, 50% to 55% (22). Distant metasta-
labeled as an ACC. In our experience, embolic nodal ses have occurred in about 10% of cases, primarily to
metastasis by ACC is infrequent. lung, brain, bone, and kidney.
Two recently recognized tumors of the larynx
that may be confused with ACC are the BSCC and F. Other Tumors
carcinoid tumor (typical and atypical). In contrast
with ACC, BSCC often exhibits pleomorphism, necro- A limited number of other salivary-type neoplasms
sis, and frequent mitoses and, in addition, contains have also been described in the larynx. Because of
either in situ or invasive component of squamous cell their scarcity, no generalizations concerning prognosis
170 Barnes
can be made. Among these are included acinic cell (3). The significance of melanocytes in the larynx is
carcinoma (24), clear cell carcinoma (25,26), benign that they may rarely give rise to nevi and malignant
and malignant myoepitheliomas (27,28), epithelial- melanoma.
myoepithelial carcinoma (29), salivary duct carcinoma In 1997, Gonzalez-Vela et al. reported four cases
(30,31), oncocytoma and oncocytoid adenocarcinoma of melanosis of the larynx and found only 13 addi-
(32,33), papillary adenocarcinoma (34) and mucoid tional cases in an extensive review of the literature (4).
adenocarcinoma (35). These 17 patients were aged between 53 and 86 years
(median 59 years), and of the 16 in which the gender
was known 15 were males and one female. Nine cases
XXV. MELANOTIC LESIONS OF THE LARYNX involved the true vocal cords, five the supraglottic
larynx, two the false vocal cords, and in one, the site
A. Melanosis
was unknown. At least half, and maybe more, of the
‘‘Melanosis’’ is a clinical term, much like leukoplakia, cases occurred in individuals with a history of smok-
which can be loosely applied to any melanin-containing ing. Only 25% of the cases, however, were associated
lesion, be it congenital or acquired, benign or malignant, with gross pigmentation.
or simply the result of physiological stimulation. In the Nine of the 17 cases of melanosis were associated
case of mucous membranes, it is most often used to with laryngeal neoplasms—seven squamous cell car-
describe a flat or slightly elevated solitary or multifocal cinomas and two malignant melanomas (4).
area of benign melanin pigmentation with associated Whether melanosis might be related to malignant
melanocytes, the border of which varies from well to melanomas is unknown. In a review of 22 malignant
poorly defined (1). melanomas of the larynx only 2 (9%) were associated
Melanosis has been observed in both white and with melanosis (5). None of the four laryngeal melano-
black populations. It is relatively common in the oral mas reported by Wenig showed this associated (6). The
cavity, less frequent in the nasal cavity, and rare in the link, therefore, between mucosal malignant melanomas
larynx. The melanocytes and pigment are usually and melanosis is apparently weak. Likewise, since
confined to the basal layer of the mucosa, but on squamous cell carcinoma and possibly even melanosis
occasion, can be found in the stroma or in the walls are related to smoking, the two events occurring con-
of mucoserous glands (Fig. 103). Their presence in the currently is most likely a coincidental finding. Never-
endodermally derived larynx is probably best theless, the presence of melanosis in the larynx may
explained by erratic migration of melanocytic precur- warrant the need for thorough evaluation and surveil-
sors from the neural crest during embryogenesis (2). lance to exclude carcinoma or melanoma.
Other theories have postulated a metaplasia of squa-
mous or glandular epithelium into melanocytes, or the B. Nevus
transformation of various neural elements into mela-
nocytes (2). Nevi of the larynx are extremely rare, with only a
With the exception of the oral cavity, these cells, handful of cases contained in the world literature.
when present, rarely produce enough pigment to be Seals et al. describe a junctional nevus of the left
grossly detectable unless stimulated by local irritation, true vocal cord in a 10-year-old black girl and Schimpf
inflammation, or radiotherapy; the latter is analogous et al. report a compound nevus of the plica ventricu-
to the effect of sunlight on epidermal melanogenesis laris (false vocal cord) (7,8). Wenig also illustrates
what appears to be a compound nevus of the larynx,
but provides no additional information (9). Travis et
al. report a 65-year-old black man who had a malig-
nant melanoma of the oral cavity associated with an
alleged lentigo of the right pyriform sinus (10). A
photomicrograph of the ‘‘lentigo,’’ however, is more
consistent with melanosis, as described above, rather
than a lentigo.
Nevi of the larynx, especially in older patients,
should be excised to rule out malignant melanoma.
Whether they have any malignant potential is unknown.
C. Malignant Melanoma
Clinical Features
Primary malignant melanoma of the larynx (PMML) is
an exceptionally rare neoplasm, with only 22 cases
recorded in the world literature in 1986 and 54 cases in
Figure 103. Melanosis of the epiglottis. Note the melanin (dark- 2001 (5,6,11). The Otolaryngic Tumor Registry at the
staining areas) in the basal region of the squamous mucosa and in Armed Forces Institute of Pathology contains only
the duct of a mucoserous gland (Warthin–Starry melanin, 40). nine cases (0.09%) among 10,270 primary laryngeal
neoplasms accumulated over a 75-year interval (9).
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 171
The tumor is more common in men (85% of all Amelanotic PMMLs that grow in a spindle or
cases) and has been described in individuals from 35 storiform pattern must also be distinguished from
to 86 years of age (average about 58 years) (5,6). monophasic spindle cell squamous carcinoma and
Almost all of the tumors reported thus far have malignant fibrous histiocytoma. This can usually be
occurred in whites. accomplished by the use of immunostains for cytoker-
Most (60–80% of all cases) arise in the supra- atin, S-100 protein, and HMB-45. PMML is negative
glottic larynx and present as an exophytic polypoid or for cytokeratin and positive for S-100 protein and
sessile, occasionally ulcerated, black, brown, gray, HMB-45. All three of these stains are negative in
pink, or white mass, ranging anywhere from 3 mm malignant fibrous histiocytoma.
to 8.0 cm (5,9). A few have been associated with Other tumors, particularly typical and atypical
laryngeal melanosis (4,5). carcinoids, paraganglioma, and renal cell carcinoma,
Dysphagia, sore throat, hoarseness, pain, inter- may also enter into the differential diagnosis. Stains
mittent hemoptysis, and a cervical (metastatic) mass that are helpful in distinguishing these neoplasms are
are the usual presenting manifestations Although shown in Table 17.
most tumors have occurred in individuals who are
smokers and consumers of alcohol, it remains uncer- Treatment and Prognosis
tain whether these factors are etiologically significant.
Primary malignant melanoma of the larynx is associ-
Pathology ated with a poor prognosis, with an average survival
of about three years (5). Although PMMLs exhibit a
Similar to melanomas elsewhere, PMMLs are com- lower incidence of local recurrence compared with
posed predominantly of epithelioid or spindle cells other mucosal melanomas of the head and neck, about
that grow, respectively, in an alveolar or fascicular- 80% are associated with positive cervical lymph nodes
storiform pattern. The cells typically have eosinophilic sometime during the course of the disease, and 80%
cytoplasm and nuclei that range from vesicular to will eventually develop distant metastases (5).
hyperchromatic, with or without prominent nucleoli. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of
Nuclear pleomorphism, multinucleated tumor giant choice. Depending on the site of origin and stage
cells, intranuclear inclusions of cytoplasm, mitoses, of disease, this will usually involve a partial or total
and necrosis are not uncommon. Because of surface laryngectomy and probable cervical lymph node
ulceration, junctional activity may or may not be seen. dissection.
About one-third of PMML are amelanotic,
requiring a high index of suspicion when dealing
with this tumor. Special stains for melanin, such as XXVI. GIANT CELL TUMOR
the Warthin-Starry stain, and immunohistochemical
procedures for S100 protein, HMB-45 and tyrosinase, A. Introduction
are important in confirming the diagnosis. In instan- The giant cell tumor of the larynx is identical to the
ces for which these procedures are negative or equiv- giant cell tumor seen elsewhere in the skeleton and, as
ocable, electron microscopy for the presence of such, is defined as a benign but locally destructive
premelanosomes and melanosomes is helpful. neoplasm composed of sheets of ovoid to spindle-
shaped mononuclear cells with uniformly dispersed
Differential Diagnosis
osteoclast-like giant cells (1–6).
Before the diagnosis of PMML can be accepted, meta- They are very rare in the larynx, representing
static malignant melanoma (MMM) from another site only 0.09% of 8995 benign and malignant primary
must be excluded. MMM is considerably more com- laryngeal neoplasms accessioned at the Armed Forces
mon than PMML and accounts for 30% to 40% of all Institute of Pathology during the years 1966–2000 (1).
metastatic tumors of the larynx (12–16). In general,
PMML presents as an exophytic mucosal lesion, often B. Clinical Features
associated with junctional activity and positive cervi-
cal lymph nodes. MMM of the larynx, on the other Of 28 reported cases, 25 were in men and 3 in women,
hand, is usually submucosal and not associated with aged 23 to 62 years (mean about 40–45 years) (1). Most
junctional activity or enlarged cervical lymph nodes. originate from the thyroid cartilage, followed by the
Furthermore, MMM of the larynx is usually a preter- cricoid cartilage and epiglottis. The tumors enlarge
minal event, associated with a known primary and slowly and manifest as palpable neck masses, hoarse-
multiorgan dissemination. It should be emphasized ness, airway compromise, dysphagia, or sore throat.
again that because of surface ulceration, junctional On imaging, it often appears as a tumor exploding
activity may not always be apparent in PMML. from within the cartilage, destroying it, and extending
Wenig also indicates that since melanocytes can be into the soft tissue of the neck or endolarynx.
identified in mucoserous glands or stroma that it is
possible that a PMML may take origin from these C. Pathology
melanocytes and not arise from the surface epithelium.
Hence, the presence of an in situ or junctional compo- Most tumors have ranged from 2.4 to 7 cm (mean
nent is not always required to postulate a primary about 4–4.5 cm) and have been centered in the thyroid
origin in the larynx (6). or cricoid cartilages, especially in the normally
172 Barnes
D. Pathology
IMTs are typically smooth, polypoid or nodular with a
fleshy to firm consistency. They have ranged in size
from 0.4 to 3.5 cm (13,21).
Histologically, they consist, in varying propor-
tions, of inflammatory and spindle-fibrous compo-
nents. The inflammatory element is typically
polymorphous and composed of lymphocytes, plasma
cells, histiocytes, eosinophils and, infrequently, neu-
trophils. The lymphocytes are mature, and, on immu-
nostaining, are composed of both T and B cells. They
may be randomly distributed or aggregate in small
nodules with or without germinal centers. The plasma
cells are also mature and polyclonal. Large sheets of
plasma cells are unusual. Eosinophils vary from rare
to numerous, and neutrophils, if seen at all, are
usually near areas of necrosis or surface ulceration.
The histiocytes are bland and may process small,
barely visible nucleoli.
Figure 104. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor composed of
The fibrous component consists of cytologically
both compact and myxoid areas with admixed inflammatory cells
bland spindle to stellate cells with characteristics of (H&E, 100).
fibroblasts and/or myofibroblasts. The nuclei vary
from round to elongated and vesicular to mildly
hyperchromatic with moderate amounts of basophilic
to eosinophilic cytoplasm.
Some lesions contain very little stroma while observed that 60% of the cases were positive for ana-
others are composed almost entirely of densely, scle- plastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) especially in younger
rotic, hypocellular collagen with a laminated or keloi- patients (7). Those tumors occurring in patients over 40
dal appearance. Mitoses are infrequent and necrosis, if years of age are usually ALK-negative.
seen at all, tends to be spotty, unless the lesion has
ulcerated the mucosal surface.
The fibroinflammatory process may encase F. Differential Diagnosis
nerves and blood vessels, forming concentric rings
The differential diagnosis can be exhaustive and has
of collagen (‘‘onion skinning’’) around them.
been covered in detail by others (23). In the larynx,
Although blood vessels may show obliterative
SPCC (spindle cell carcinoma) should be excluded.
changes, inflammatory cells in the walls of blood
This may be difficult, if not impossible, on small
vessels are rare to absent.
biopsies coupled with the fact that some IMTs are
On the basis of the proportion of inflammatory
also focally positive for cytokeratin. In this instance,
and fibrous components, four histologic patterns are
look for cells with atypical mitoses and dyskeratosis
recognized: (i) myxoid-granulation tissue which con-
as well as mucosal changes of dysplasia or CIS. These
tains plump spindle to stellate cells lying in an edem-
findings should suggest SPCC. In addition, unless
atous, highly vascular, inflammatory background, (ii)
ulcerated, SPCC usually does not have a large compo-
compact comprised of a more prominent element of
nent of inflammatory cells. SPCC is also often positive
closely approximated spindle cells with admixed
for p63 while the IMT is negative.
inflammatory cells, (iii) sclerotic made up of dense,
eosinophilic, relatively acellular collagen with scat-
tered inflammatory cells, and (iv) mixed composed G. Treatment and Prognosis
of two or more of the preceeding patterns (Fig. 104).
According to Hussong et al., IMTs that contain Treatment has ranged from corticosteroids, conserva-
ganglion-like cells and exhibit cellular atypia, atypical tive excision, laser therapy, and irradiation with vary-
mitoses, p53 expression, and DNA aneuploidy are ing degrees of success. Of 14 cases involving the
aggressive and might warrant the diagnosis of a larynx, at least three (21%) recurred following initial
malignant IMT (6). therapy (13,19,21). This compares with a recurrence
rate of 25% for all other IMTs. In one case, the tumor
recurred twice over a two-year period and ultimately
E. Immunohistochemistry required a total laryngectomy (13).
Data collected from several series (including all sites,
not just the larynx) indicate that almost all IMTs are XXVIII. SARCOMAS OF THE LARYNX
positive for vimentin, 87% for muscle specific actin,
and 82% for smooth muscle actin (22). About half are Primary sarcomas of the larynx comprise a rare het-
focally or diffusely positive for desmin and about a erogeneous group of neoplasms that, collectively,
third may focally express cytokeratin (22). Cook et al. compose only 0.3% to 1% of all laryngeal malignancies
174 Barnes
(1–3). Any attempt to statistically analyze these XXIX. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF
tumors is met with frustration, not only because of THE HYPOPHARYNX
their rarity, but because many of the cases lack suffi-
cient clinical information, follow-up is incomplete, A. Introduction
pathological documentation is often poor, and confu- The hypopharynx, which lies behind the larynx and
sion with spindle cell carcinoma is rampant. partially surrounds it on either side, extends from the
Etiologically, they do not appear to be related plane of the hyoid bone superiorly to the lower border
to smoking or alcohol intake. Most occur spontane- of the cricoid cartilage inferiorly (Fig. 105). It consists
ously, but some are radiation-induced (4). In the of three regions: the pyriform sinuses, postcricoid
study of radiation-induced sarcomas by Kim et al., area, and the posterior pharyngeal wall. Although
the median latent periods from radiation exposure to useful for descriptive purposes and classification,
diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcomas were, these divisions are in continuity with one another
respectively, 11 and 12 years (range 3–20 years) (5). and merge with the oropharynx, larynx, and cervical
No irradiation tumors were seen in doses below 1100 esophagus. The lumen of the hypopharynx is cone-
rets. Exposure to thorium dioxide (Thorotrast) and shaped, with a wide opening superiorly and a nar-
polyvinyl chloride has also been incriminated in the rower lumen in the postcricoid and cervical esophageal
development of angiosarcomas, especially of the region.
liver. Although patients with neurofibromatosis are The hypopharynx is richly endowed with lym-
at risk for developing malignant schwannomas, phatics that drain primarily to the upper and mid-
these tumors are more commonly located in the jugular lymph nodes (1). The lymphatics of the
deep soft tissues or retroperitoneum and rarely, if posterior wall also have a significant communication
ever, in the larynx. Viruses may also be etiologically with the retropharyngeal lymph nodes and the node
related to some sarcomas (e.g., kaposi’s sarcoma and of Rouviere at the base of the skull (2).
the HIV). The incidence of hypopharyngeal carcinomas
Grossly, sarcomas, regardless of the putative cell more closely parallels the incidence of malignant
of origin, tend to present as polypoid or multilobu- tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract, especially
lated, firm, submucosal masses that are usually pink, the oral cavity rather than the respiratory tract (3).
gray, or white. Flat ulcerative or fungating lesions are They are only about one-third as common as cancer of
rare. Multiple biopsies are sometimes necessary to the larynx (4).
establish the diagnosis. In fact, in the series of Setzen The distribution of malignant tumors within the
et al., 13% of the patients required more than one hypopharynx varies according to geographic location.
biopsy before the diagnosis was established (6). Cau- In the United States and Canada, approximately 65%
tion must be particularly exercised in evaluating to 85% arise in the pyriform sinus, 10% to 20% occur
laryngeal biopsies in patients who have received on the posterior wall, and 5% to 15% involve the
prior radiation therapy. The distinction between radi- postcricoid area (4–10) (Fig. 106).
ation-induced stromal atypia and de novo or radia-
tion-induced sarcomas can be difficult, requiring close
correlation with the clinical findings and, often, mul-
tiple biopsies over a time span to access the true
potential or autonomy of the lesion.
SPCCs of the larynx are also often confused with
sarcomas on small biopsies, usually a fibrosarcoma or
malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Accordingly, SPCC
must always be considered in the differential of all
alleged sarcomas of the larynx and excluded by exam-
ining multiple histological sections (for the biphasic
components), immunohistochemical stains for
cytokeratin, or electron microscopy.
Laryngectomy, either partial or total, is the
most successful form of therapy (7). Radiation ther-
apy may have merit as an adjunct, but not for
primary therapy. The role of chemotherapy is still
evolving, but has certainly proved useful in the
management of patients with embryonal rhabdo-
myosarcomas. Metastases are predominantly vascu-
lar, usually to the lungs. Involvement of regional
lymph nodes is uncommon.
Chondrosarcoma is, by far, the most common
sarcoma of the larynx, accounting for almost half of
all cases (8). For a more detailed discussion of the
clinical and pathological features of the various
sarcomas refer to the chapters on bone and soft Figure 105. Diagram showing boundaries of the hypopharynx.
tissue tumors.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 175
Postcricoid Carcinoma
The postcricoid area (the posterior surface of the
larynx) extends from the posterior surface of the
Figure 108. Pyriform sinus cancers may grow medially to arytenoid cartilage to the inferior surface of the cricoid
involve the supraglottic larynx (1); erode the thyroid cartilage cartilage and is bounded laterally by the pyriform
laterally and invade the thyroid gland (2); extend into the para-
glottic space (3); and escape through the cricothyroid interspace
sinuses (3). There is marked geographic variation in
into the soft tissue of the neck (4); or they may grow superiorly the incidence of postcricoid carcinomas (PCC). They
toward the base of the tongue (5). Source: From Ref. 11. are especially common in Scandinavian countries
where PVS was at one time prevalent; the syndrome
is now being recognized earlier and treated accord-
ingly (20). PVS, also known as Paterson–Kelly syn-
drome and sideropenic dysphagia, is characterized
predominantly by dysphagia, iron-deficiency anemia,
glossitis, chelitis, and achlorhydria. The dysphagia is
area to involve the opposite pyriform sinus or the due to webs, stenosis, or mucosal atrophy. The webs
contiguous posterior pharyngeal wall. Invasion of the most often arise from the anterior esophageal wall just
cervical esophagus is unusual. distal to the cricoid cartilage. When carcinoma devel-
At the time of diagnosis, about 65% to 75% of ops, it arises immediately proximal to the webs and
patients will have positive cervical lymph nodes. not within them (14). In the past, of those patients
However, no more than 10% of patients will present with PCC, 30% to 70% have also had PVS (13,19,30,31).
initially with bilateral positive lymph nodes (15,18, Conversely, of those patients with PVS, only 1% to
24,25). 10% have developed carcinoma (13,30). Richards et al.
have observed that the peak incidence of PCC occurs
15 years later than the peak incidence of PVS (31).
Posterior Hypopharyngeal Wall Carcinoma
Food stasis secondary to webs or stricture may
Tumors of the posterior hypopharyngeal wall are partly explain the increased incidence of carcinoma in
three times more common than those of the posterior this site (14). Because the webs have been noted to
oropharyngeal wall (26,27). Most studies pertaining to decrease or even disappear with dietary supplements,
carcinomas of the posterior pharyngeal wall include particularly iron, early recognition, and therapy are
all levels of the pharynx. This is not unreasonable, for mandatory to lessen the incidence of this lethal tumor.
there are no natural anatomical barriers among the In addition to the postcricoid area, patients with PVS
three levels of the pharynx (nasopharynx, oropharynx, may develop tumors in other mucosal sites, especially
and hypopharynx) and, at the time of diagnosis, the oral cavity and esophagus (13).
tumors often encroach on or invade more than one Postcricoid carcinomas commonly invade the
level. Furthermore, when posterior pharyngeal wall cricoid cartilage and cricoarytenoid muscle. They fre-
tumors are divided according to level of occurrence, quently become circumferential, and may extend
there are no significant differences in prognosis through the muscular lateral walls to directly invade
(26,27). the thyroid gland. Such behavior may warrant the
Almost 80% of these tumors are larger than 5 cm need for partial or total thyroidectomy (32). In
when diagnosed (17). Because these tumors almost the surgical treatment of PCC, Harrison indicates
invariably cross the midline, a minimum of 10% to that the superior extent of the disease is technically
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 177
not difficult to excise, but extension inferiorly can be, warrants consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy (15).
for the disease has tendency to involve the party wall Eighty percent of recurrences manifest within two years
between the esophagus and trachea, necessitating of treatment (25,40). Of those patients dying of disease,
removal of a considerable length of trachea (21). The almost half do so within the year following diagnosis
lymphatic drainage is mainly to the middle and lower (6,25,33). When all three sites of the hypopharynx are
jugular chain and to the paratracheal nodes (18,33). considered collectively, the overall five-year survival
Eighteen percent of patients have or will develop rate is between 20% and 40% (4,5,8,15,17–20,22,
bilateral cervical lymph node metastasis (18). Howev- 24,41,43,50,51,54). If only pyriform sinus tumors are
er, it is unrecognized involvement of the paratracheal considered, some recent studies indicate a better sur-
nodes that is responsible for most local recurrences vival. Spector et al. reviewed 408 squamous carcinoma
(33). Metastasis to these nodes may also secondarily of the pyriform sinus and observed the 5-, 10-,
involve the thyroid. 15-, and 20-year cumulative survival rates to be, respec-
tively, 56, 35, 31, and 20% (55). If the tumor involved
only one wall of the pyriform sinus, the five-year
D. Treatment and Prognosis survival was 53%, compared with 63% for tumors that
involved the medial wall, aryepiglottic fold, or supra-
Treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma depends on glottic larynx, and 49% for tumors that involved two or
the patient’s general state of health, location and three walls of the sinus with extension to the pyriform
extent of the tumor, and the technical ability of the apex or postcricoid region.
surgeon. Any therapeutic regimen, however, that fails
to consider the following is doomed to failure:
1. Tumors in this region are notorious for growing XXX. TUMORS OF THE TRACHEA
beneath an intact mucosa, extending far beyond A. Introduction
their clinically apparent margins. The average
extent of submucosal spread is 10 mm (34). Primary tumors of the trachea are rare, with a
2. A total of 65% to 75% of patients have positive reported frequency of less than 0.2 per 100,000 persons
ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes at the time of per year and a prevalence of 1 per 15,000 autopsies (1).
diagnosis, and 10% to 20% will either have The ratio of benign to malignant tumors varies
or develop contralateral nodal metastases according to age. In children, 60% to 90% of all
(3,5,7,15,18,21,24,25,28,35–37). Furthermore, 10% tracheal tumors are benign and the most frequent
to 60% of patients with clinically negative cervical are squamous papillomas, hemangiomas, and granu-
lymph nodes can be expected to harbor occult lar cell tumors (2,3). Of the remaining 10% to 40% that
metastases (5,7,15). are malignant, malignant fibrous histiocytoma and
3. The retropharyngeal and paratracheal lymph mucoepidermoid carcinoma predominate (3). In con-
nodes must be considered, respectively, when trast, in adults almost 90% of primary tracheal neo-
dealing with posterior pharyngeal wall and post- plasms are malignant and the two most common, by
cricoid carcinomas. far, are squamous cell carcinoma and adenoid cystic
4. Because as many as 17% of all hypopharyngeal carcinoma (4). These two tumors together comprise
carcinomas may involve the thyroid, some form of about 70% of all primary tracheal neoplasms in adults.
thyroidectomy may be required (3,32). Whether squamous cell carcinoma or adenoid cystic
5. Clinically, 20% to 40% of patients either have or carcinoma is the more common depends on the series.
will develop systemic metastases (6,15,22,38,39). In a collective review of 766 adult tracheal tumors, we
The median time from diagnosis to detection of observed 51% to be squamous cell carcinomas and
metastasis is nine months (6). The most common 21% adenoid cystic carcinomas (4–7).
sites are the lungs, mediastinum, brain, bones, Currently, there is no TMN staging system for
and liver. tracheal tumors.
6. Approximately 15% (range 7–31%) of these indi-
viduals have multiple primary malignancies
(6,15,18,24,26,29). Thirty-five percent of the second B. Anatomy
primaries are diagnosed before, 25% synchronous
The trachea extends from the lower border of the
with, and 40% subsequent to the discovery of the
cricoid cartilage to the carina and averages 11 cm in
hypopharyngeal carcinoma (6,18). They are most
length in the adult, varying roughly in proportion to
often found in the head and neck, lung, esopha-
the height of the individual (8,9) (Fig. 109). It is 2.0 to
gus, colon, or rectum.
2.7 cm in transverse dimension and 1.6 to 2.0 in
Details of therapy have been adequately covered saggital diameter (10). There are approximately two
by others (4,5,7,8,15,17–19,22,25,28,29,32,33,38–54). In tracheal cartilaginous rings per centimeter of trachea,
general, TIS, T1, some T2, and advanced inoperable with a total number of about 18 to 22. The tracheal
lesions can be treated with irradiation, either curatively cartilages are connected one to another by fibroelastic
or palliatively. Other tumors are approached surgically annular ligaments. In a few instances, the first tracheal
in conjunction with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy. ring may be fused to the cricoid cartilage.
Although most deaths are due to uncontrolled local The trachea is continuous with the larynx supe-
disease, the relative high incidence of distant metastases riorly and the bronchi inferiorly. Anteriorly it is
178 Barnes
2. Lancer J, Syder D, Jones AS, et al. Vocal cord nodules: a 11. Benjamin B, Roche J. Vocal granuloma including sclerosis
review. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1988; 13:43–51. of the arytenoid cartilage: radiographic findings. Ann
3. Marcotullio D, Magliulo G, Pietrunti S, et al. Exudative Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:756–760.
laryngeal diseases of Reinke’s space: a clinicohistopatho- 12. Olson NR. Laryngopharyngeal manifestations of gastro-
logical framing. J Otolaryngol 2002; 31:376–380. esopharyngeal reflux disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am
4. Wallis L, Jackson-Menaldi C, Holland W, et al. Vocal fold 1991; 24:1201–1213.
nodule vs. vocal fold polyp: answer from surgical pathol- 13. Maronion N, Haggitt R, Oelschlager BK, et al. Histologic
ogist and voice pathologist point of view. J Voice 2004; features of reflux-attributed laryngeal lesions. Am J Med
18:125–129. 2003; 115(suppl 3):1055–1085.
5. Johns MM. Update on the etiology, diagnosis, and treat- 14. Vaezi MF. Gastroesopharyngeal reflux disease and the
ment of vocal fold nodules, polyps and cysts. Curr Opin larynx. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 36:198–203.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11:456–461. 15. Devanery KO, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Vocal process granu-
6. Zeitels SM, Casiano RR, Gardner GM, et al. Management loma of the larynx—recognition, differential diagnosis
of common voice problems: Committee report. Otolar- and treatment. Oral Oncol 2005; 41:666–669.
yngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126:333–348. 16. Jecker P, Orloff LA, Mann WJ. Extraesophageal reflux and
7. Tillman B, Rudert H, Schunke M, et al. Morphological upper aerodigestive tract disease. ORL 2005; 67:185–191.
studies on the pathogenesis of Reinke’s edema. Eur Arch 17. Fechner RE, Cooper PH, Mills SE. Pyogenic granuloma
Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 252:469–474. of the larynx and trachea. A causal and pathologic
8. Courey MS, Shohet JA, Scott MA, et al. Immunohisto- misnomer for granulation tissue. Arch Otolaryngol
chemical characterization of benign laryngeal lesions. 1981; 107:30–32.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105:525–531.
9. Thibeault SL, Gray SD, Li W, et al. Genotypic and pheno-
typic expression of vocal fold polyps and Reinke’s edema:
A preliminary study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; III. TEFLON GRANULOMA (TEFLONOMA)
111:302–309.
10. Kambic V, Radsel Z, Zargi M, et al. Vocal cord polyp: 1. Maran AGD, Hardcastle PF, Hamid A, et al. An Analysis
incidence, histology, and pathogenesis. J Laryngol Otol of 102 cases of polytef injection of the vocal cord.
1981; 95:609–618. J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100:47–51.
11. Kleinsasser O. Pathogenesis of vocal cord polyps. Ann 2. McCaffrey TV. Transcutaneous Teflon injection for vocal
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91:378–381. cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109:
12. Sena T, Brady MS, Huvos AG, et al. Laryngeal myxoma. 54–59.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117:430–432. 3. Lewy RB. Teflon injection: pointers and pitfalls, Ann Otol
13. Lancer JM, Syder D, Jones AS, et al. The outcome of Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:283–284.
different management patterns for vocal cord nodules. 4. Dedo HH, Carlsoo B. Histologic evaluation of Teflon
J Otolaryngol Otol 1988; 102:423–427. granulomas of human vocal cords. A light and electron
microscopic study. Acta Otolaryngol 1982; 93:475–484.
5. Ossoff RH, Koriwchak MJ, Netterville JL, et al. Difficulties
II. CONTACT ULCER, CONTACT GRANULOMA, in endoscopic removal of Teflon granulomas of the vocal
INTUBATION GRANULOMA fold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:405–412.
6. Lewy RB, Millet D. Immediate local tissue reaction to
1. Howland WS, Lewis JS. Mechanisms in the development Teflon vocal cord implants. Laryngoscope 1978; 88:
of post-intubation granulomas of the larynx. Ann Otol 1339–1342.
Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 65:1006–1011. 7. Wenig BM, Heffner DK, Oertel YC, et al. Teflonomas of
2. Donnelly WH. Histopathology of endotracheal intubation. the larynx and neck. Hum Pathol 1990; 21:617–623.
An autopsy study of 99 cases. Arch Pathol 1969; 88: 8. Kirchner FR, Toledo PS, Sovoboda DJ. Studies of the
511–520. larynx after Teflon injection. Arch Otolaryngol 1966;
3. Burns HP, Dayal VS, Scott A, et al. Laryngotracheal 83:350–354.
trauma: observations on its pathogenesis and its preven- 9. Lewy RB. Experience with vocal cord injection. Ann Otol
tion following prolonged orotracheal intubation in the Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85:440–450.
adult. Laryngoscope 1979; 90:1316–1325. 10. Lewy RB. Teflon injection of the vocal cord: complica-
4. Balestrieri F. Watson CB. Intubation granuloma. Otolar- tions, errors and precautions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
yngol Clin North Am 1982; 15:567–579. 1983; 92:473–474.
5. Bain WM, Harrington JW, Thomas LE, et al. Head and 11. Dedo HH, Urrea RD, Lawson L. Intracordal injection of
neck manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux. Laryngo- Teflon in the treatment of 135 patients with dysphonia.
scope 1983; 93:175–179. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1973; 82:661–667.
6. Feder RJ, Michell MJ. Hyperfunctional, hyperacidic, and 12. Rubin JH. Misadventures with injectable polytef (Teflon).
intubation granulomas. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110: Arch Otolaryngol 1975; 101:114–116.
582–584. 13. Nakayama M, Ford CN, Bless DM. Teflon vocal fold
7. Benjamin B, Croxson G. Vocal cord granulomas. Ann Otol augmentation: failures and management in 28 cases.
Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94:538–541. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109:493–498.
8. Wilson JA, White A, von Haacke NP, et al. Gastroesopha- 14. Stephens CB, Arnold GE, Stone JW. Larynx injected with
geal reflux and posterior laryngitis. Ann Otol Rhinol polytef paste. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102:432–435.
Laryngol 1989; 98:405–410. 15. Ellis JC, McCaffrey TV, DeSanto LW. Migration of Teflon
9. Drosnes DL, Zwillenberg DA. Laryngeal granulomatous after vocal cord injection. Otolaryngol head Neck Surg
polyp after short-term intubation of a child. Ann Otol 1987; 96:63–66.
Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99:183–186. 16. Vavares MA, Montgomery WW, Hillman RE. Teflon
10. Wenig BM, Heffner DK. Contact ulcers of the larynx. A granuloma of the larynx: Etiology, pathophysiology, and
reacquaintance with the pathology of an often underdiag- management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104:
nosed entity. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114:825–828. 511–515.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 181
IV. SUBGLOTTIC STENOSIS 4. DeSanto LW. Laryngocele, laryngeal mucocele, large sac-
cules, and laryngeal saccular cysts: a developmental spec-
1. Quiney RE, Gould SJ. Subglottic stenosis: a clinicopatho- trum. Laryngoscope 1974; 84:1291–1296.
logical study. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10:315–327. 5. DeSanto LW, Devine KD, Weiland LH. Cysts of the
2. Grundfast KM, Morris MS, Bernsky C. Subglottic stenosis: larynx—classification. Laryngoscope 1970; 80:145–176.
retrospective analysis and proposal for standard report- 6. Newman BH, Taxy JB, Laker HI. Laryngeal cysts in
ing system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96:101–105. adults: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Am J Clin
3. McCaffrey TV. Management of subglottic stenosis in the Pathol 1984; 81:715–720.
adult. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100:90–94. 7. Ramesar K, Albizzati C. Laryngeal cysts: a clinical rele-
4. Park SS, Streitz JM, Rebeiz EE, et al. Idiopathic subglottic vance of a modified working classification. J Laryngol
stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: Otol 1988; 102:923–925.
894–897. 8. Donegan JO, Strife JL, Seid AB, et al. Internal laryngocele
5. Grillo HC, Mark EJ, Mathisen DJ, et al. Idiopathic laryng- and saccular cysts in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
otracheal stenosis and its management. Ann Thorac Surg 1980; 89:409–413.
1993; 56:80–87. 9. Bouchayer M, Cornut G, Witzig E, et al. Epidermoid cysts,
6. de Vries N, Gans ROB, Donker AJM, et al. Autoantibodies sulci, and mucosal bridges of the true vocal cord: a report
against constituents of neutrophils in the diagnosis and of 157 cases. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:1087–1094.
treatment of isolated subglottic stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol 10. Niparko JK, Moran ML, Baker SR. Laryngeal saccular
Head Neck Surg 1992; 118:1120–1123. cysts: an unusual clinical presentation. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 1987; 97:576–579.
11. Milutinovic Z, Vasiljevic J. Contribution to the under-
V. TRACHEOPATHIA standing of the etiology of vocal fold cysts: a functional
OSTEOCHONDROPLASTICA and histologic study. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:568–571.
12. Mitchell DB, Irwin BC, Bailey CM, et al. Cysts of the infant
1. Harma RA, Suukari S. Tracheopathic chondro-osteoplastica. larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:833–837.
A clinical study of thirty cases. Acta Otolaryngol 1977; 13. Smith JD, Cotton R, Meyer CM III. Subglottic cysts in the
84:118–123. premature infant. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
2. Pounder DJ, Pieterse AS. Tracheopathia osteoplastica: 1990; 116:479–482.
report of four cases. Pathology 1982; 14:429–433. 14. Civantos FJ, Holinger LD. Laryngoceles and saccular cysts
3. Young RH, Sandstrom RE, Mark GJ. Tracheopathia osteo- in infants and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
plastica. Clinical, radiological,and pathological correla- Surg 1992; 118:296–300.
tions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 79:537–541. 15. Weber PC, Kenna MA, Casselbrant ML. Laryngeal cysts: a
4. Paaske PB, Tang E. Tracheopathia osteoplastica in the cause of neonatal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Head
larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1985; 99:305–310. Neck Surg 1993; 109:129–134.
5. Hirsch M, Tovi F, Goldstein J, et al. Diagnosis of trache- 16. Myssiorek D, Persky M. Laser endoscopic treatment of
opathia osteoplastica by computed tomography. Ann Otol laryngoceles and laryngeal cysts. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94:217–219. Surg 1989; 100:538–541.
6. Prakash UBS, McCullough AE, Edell ES, et al. Tracheo- 17. Micheau C, Luboinski B, Lanchi P, et al. Relationship
pathia osteoplastica. Familial occurrence. Mayo Clin Proc between laryngoceles and laryngeal carcinomas. Laryn-
1989; 64:1091–1096. goscope 1978; 88:680–688.
7. Nienhuis DM, Prakash UBS, Edell ES. Tracheobroncho- 18. Canalis RF, Maxwell DS, Hemenway WC. Laryngocele—
pathia osteochondroplastica. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol an updated review. J Otolaryngol 1977; 6:191–199.
1990; 99:689–694. 19. Macfie, WCDD. Asymptomatic laryngoceles in wind
8. Birzgalis AR, Farrington WT, O’Keefe L, et al. Localized instrument bandsmen. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 83:270–275.
tracheopathic osteoplastica of the subglottis. J Laryngol 20. Baker HL, Baker SR, McClatchey KD. Manifestations and
Otol 1993; 107:352–353. management of laryngoceles. Head Neck Surg 1982; 4:
9. Tibesar RJ, Edell ES. Tracheopathia osteoplastica: Effec- 450–456.
tive long-term management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 21. Close LG, Merker M, Burns DK, et al. Asymptomatic
2003; 129:303–304. laryngocele: incidence and association with cancer. Ann
10. Grillo HC, Wright CD. Airway obstruction owing to Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96:393–299.
tracheopathia osteoplastica: treatment by linear tracheo- 22. Holinger PH, Brown WT. Congenital webs, cysts, laryng-
plasty. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79:1676–1681. oceles, and other anomalies of the larynx. Ann Otol
11. Mboti FB, Ninane V, Larsimont D, et al. Acute respiratory Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 76:744–752.
failure from tracheopathia osteoplastica 2005; 105:227–228. 23. Meda P. Symptomatic Laryngocele in cancer of the larynx.
12. Jepsen O, Sorensen H. Tracheopathia osteoplastica and Arch Otolaryngol 1952; 56:512–520.
ozaena. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1960; 51:79–83. 24. Canalis RF. Observations on the simultaneous occurrence
13. Eimind K. Tracheopathia chondro-osteoplastica. Nord of laryngocele and cancer J. Otolaryngol 1976; 5:207–212.
Med 1964; 72:1029–1031. 25. Birt D. Observations on the size of the saccule in laryn-
gectomy specimens. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:190–200.
26. Celin SE, Johnson J, Curtin H, et al. The association of
laryngoceles with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx.
VI. CYSTS AND LARYNGOCELES Laryngoscope 1991; 101:529–536.
2. Capper JWR, Bailey CM, Michaels L. Squamous papillo- 24. Bennett RS, Powell KR. Human papillomaviruses: associ-
mas of the larynx in adults. A review of 63 cases. Clin ation between laryngeal papillomas and genital warts.
Otolaryngol 1983; 8:109–119. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1987; 6:229–232.
3. Lindeberg H, Oster S, Oxlund I, et al. Laryngeal papillo- 25. Abramson AL, Steinberg BM, Winkler B. Laryngeal pap-
mas: classification and course. Clin Otolaryngol 1986; illomatosis: clinical, histopathologic and molecular stud-
11:423–429. ies. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:678–685.
4. Benjamin B, Parsons DS. Recurrent respiratory papillo- 26. Kashima HK, Shah F, Lyles A, et al. A comparison of risk
matosis: a 10 year study. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102: factors in juvenile-onset and adult-onset recurrent papil-
1022–1028. lomatosis. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:9–13.
5. Lindeberg H, Elbrond O. Laryngeal papillomas: clinical 27. Silverberg MJ, Thorsen P, Lindeberg H, et al. Condyloma
aspects in a series of 231 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 1989; in pregnancy is strongly predictive of juvenile recurrent
14:333–342. respiratory papillomatosis. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:
6. Quiney RE, Hall D, Croft CB. Laryngeal papillomatosis: 645–652.
analysis of 113 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 1989; 14: 28. Silverberg, MJ, Thorsen P, Lindeberg H, et al. Clinical
217–225. course of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis in Danish
7. Hartley C, Hamilton J, Birzgalis AR, et al. Recurrent children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;
respiratory papillomatosis—the Manchester experience, 130:711–716.
1974–1992. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108:226–229. 29. Shykhom M, Kuo M, Pearman K. Recurrent respiratory
8. Kleinsasser O, Cruz GD. Juvenile and adult papillomas of papillomatosis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27:
the larynx. Excerpta Medica 1974; 28:23 (abstr). 237–243.
9. Batsakis JG, Raymond AK, Rice DH. The pathology of 30. Shah K, Kashima H, Polk BF, et al. Rarity of cesarean
head and neck tumors: papillomas of the upper aerodi- delivery in cases of juvenile-onset respiratory papilloma-
gestive tract, part 18. Head Neck Surg 1983; 5:332–344. tosis. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:795–799.
10. Ullmann EV. On the etiology of laryngeal papilloma. Acta 31. Kosko JR, Derkay CS. Role of cesarean section in preven-
Otolaryngol 1923; 5:317–334. tion of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis – Is there one?
11. Lack EE, Jenson AB, Smith HG, et al. Immunoperoxidase Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 35:31–38.
localization of human papillomavirus in laryngeal papil- 32. Wiatrak BJ, Wiatrak DW, Broker TR, et al. Recurrent
lomas. Intervirology 1980; 14:148–154 respiratory papillomatosis: A longitudinal study compar-
12. Tsutsumi K, Nakajima T, Gotoh M, et al. In situ hybrid- ing severity associated with human papilloma viral types
ization and immunohistochemical study of human papil- 6 and 11 and other risk factors in a large pediatric
lomavirus infection in adult laryngeal papillomas. population. Laryngoscope 2004; 114(suppl 104):1–22.
Laryngoscope 1989; 99:80–85. 33. Hallmo P, Naess O. Laryngeal papillomatosis with human
13. Terry RM, Lewis FA, Robertson S, et al. Juvenile and adult papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon. Eur
laryngeal papillomata: classification by in-situ hybridiza- Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991; 248:425–427.
tion for human papillomavirus. Clin Otolaryngol 1989; 34. Derkay CS. Task force on recurrent respiratory papillo-
14:135–139. mas. A preliminary report. Arch Pathol Head Neck Surg
14. Levi JE, Delcelo R, Alberti VN, et al. Human papillomavi- 1995; 121:1386–1391.
rus DNA in respiratory papillomatosis detected by in situ 35. Reeves WC, Ruparelia SS, Swanson KI, et al. National
hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. Am J registry for juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papilloma-
Pathol 1989; 135:1179–1184. tosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129:976–982.
15. Lindeberg H, Johansen L. The presence of human papil- 36. Wiatrak BJ. Overview of recurrent papillomatosis. Curr
lomavirus (HPV) in solitary adult laryngeal papillomas Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11:433–441.
demonstrated by in-situ DNA hybridization with sulpho- 37. Silverman DA, Pitman MJ. Current diagnostic and man-
nated probes. Clin Otolaryngol 1990; 15:367–371. agement trends for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
16. Rimell F, Maisel R, Dayton V. In situ hybridization and Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12:532–537.
laryngeal papillomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 38. Lee JH, Smith RJ. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis:
101:119–126. pathogenesis to treatment. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head
17. Rihkanen H, Aaltonen L-M, Syrjanen SM. Human papil- Neck Surg 2005; 13:354–359.
lomavirus in laryngeal papillomas and in adjacent normal 39. Holinger PH, Johnston KC, Anison GC. Papilloma of the
epithelium. Clin Otolaryngol 1993; 18:470–474. larynx: a review of 109 cases with preliminary report of
18. Holinger PH, Shipkowitz NL, Holper JC, et al. Studies of Aureomycin therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1950;
etiology of laryngeal papilloma and an autogenous laryn- 59:547–564.
geal papilloma vaccine. Acta Otolaryngol 1968; 65:63–69. 40. Al-Saleem T, Peale AG, Norris CM. Multiple papilloma-
19. Boyle WF, McCoy EG, Fogarty WA. Electron microscopic tosis of the lower respiratory tract: clinical and pathologi-
identification of virus-like particles in laryngeal papillo- cal study of eleven cases. Cancer 1968; 22:1173–1184.
ma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 80:693–698. 41. Lynn RB, Takita H. Tracheal papilloma: case report and
20. Cook TA, Cohn AM, Brunschwig JP, et al. Laryngeal review of the literature. Can Med Assoc J 1967; 97:1354–1357.
papilloma: etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Ann 42. Majoros M, Parkhill EM, Devine K. Papilloma of the
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 82:649–698. larynx in children: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg
21. Strong MS, Vaughn CW, Healy GB, et al. Recurrent 1964; 108:470–475.
respiratory papillomatosis. Management with the CO2 43. Singer DB, Greenberg SD, Harrison GM. Papillomatosis of
laser. Ann Otol Laryngol 1976; 85:508–516. the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1966; 94:777–783.
22. Incze JS, Lui PS, Strong MS, et al. The morphology of 44. Kaufman G, Klopstock R. Papillomatosis of the respirato-
human papillomas of the upper respiratory tract. Cancer ry tract. Am Rev Respir Dis 1963; 88:839–846.
1977; 39:1634–1646. 45. Kirchner JA. Papilloma of the larynx with extensive lung
23. Quick CA, Watts SL, Krzyzek RA, et al. Relationship involvement. Laryngoscope 1951; 61:1022–1029.
between condylomata and laryngeal papillomata. Clinical 46. Kramer SS, Wehunt WD, Stocker JT, et al. Pulmonary
and molecular virological evidence. Ann Otol Rhinol manifestations of juvenile laryngotracheal papillomatosis.
Laryngol 1980; 89:467–471. AJR 1985; 144:687–694.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 183
47. Kawanami T, Bowen A. Juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis 65. Szupnar J. Laryngeal papillomatosis. Acta Otolaryngol
with pulmonary parenchymal spread. Case report and 1967; 63:74–86.
review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol 1985; 15:102–104. 66. Bone RC, Feren AP, Nahum AM, et al. Laryngeal papil-
48. Kerley SW, Buchon-Zalles C, Moran J, et al. Chronic lomatosis: immunologic and viral basis for therapy.
cavitary respiratory papillomatosis. Arch Pathol Lab Laryngoscope 1976; 86:341–348.
Med 1989; 13:1166–1169. 67. Stephens CB, Arnold GE, Butchko GM, et al. Autogenous
49. Kashima H, Mounts P, Leventhal B, et al. Sites of predi- vaccine therapy of juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis.
lection in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Ann Otol Laryngoscope 1979; 89:1689–1696.
Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:580–583. 68. Cole RR, Myer CM III, Cotton RT. Tracheotomy in chil-
50. Pou AM, Rimell FL, Jordan JA, et al. Adult respiratory dren with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Head
tract papillomatosis: Human papillomavirus type and Neck 1989; 11: 226:230.
viral coinfections are predictors of prognosis. Ann Otol 69. Shapiro AM, Rimell FL, Shoemaker D, et al. Tracheotomy
Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104:758–762. in children with juvenile onset recurrent respiratory pap-
51. Majoros M, Devine KD, Parkhill EM. Malignant transfor- illomatosis: The Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh experi-
mation of benign laryngeal papillomas in children after ence. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105:1–5.
radiation therapy. Surg Clin North Am 1963; 43: 70. Crockett DM, McCabe BF, Shive CJ. Complications of
1049–1061. laser surgery for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
52. Quick CA, Foucar E, Dehner LP. Frequency and signifi- Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96:639–644.
cance of epithelial atypia in laryngeal papillomatosis. 71. Steinberg BM, Topp WC, Schneider PS, et al. Laryngeal
Laryngoscope 1979; 89:550–560. papillomavirus infection during clinical remission. N Engl
53. Stern Y, Hurtubise PE, Cotton RT. Significance of DNA J Med 1983; 308:1261–1264.
ploidy and cell proliferation in juvenile respiratory 72. Pignatari S, Smith EM, Gray SD, et al. Detection of human
papillomatosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 107: papillomavirus in diseased and nondiseased sites of the
815–819. respiratory tract in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis of
54. Rady PL, Schnadig VJ, Weiss RL, et al. Malignant trans- patients by DNA hybridization. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar-
formation of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis associ- yngol 1992; 101:408–412.
ated with integrated human papillomavirus type 11 DNA 73. Smith EM, Pignatari SSN, Gray SD, et al. Human papillo-
and mutation of p53. Laryngoscope 1998; 108:735–740. mavirus infection in papillomas and nondiseased respira-
55. Stern Y, Heffelfinger SC, Walner DL, et al. Expression of tory sites of patients with recurrent respiratory
Ki-67, tumor suppressor genes, growth factor, and growth papillomatosis using the polymerase chain reaction.
factor receptor in juvenile respiratory papillomatosis: Ki- Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119:554–552.
67 and p53 as predictors of aggressive behavior. Otolar- 74. Avidano MA, Singleton GT. Adjuvant drug strategies in
yngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122:378–386. the treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
56. Rabah R, Sakr W, Thomas R, et al. Human papillomavirus Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 112:197–202.
type, proliferative activity, and p53. Potential markers of 75. Schraff S, Derkay CS, Burke B, et al. American Society of
aggressive papillomatosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; Pediatric Otolaryngology members experience with recur-
124:721–724. rent respiratory papillomatosis and the use of adjuvant
57. Go L, Schwartz MR, Donovan DT. Molecular transforma- therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:
tion of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: Viral typing 1039–1042.
and p53 overexpression. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003; 76. Klos J. Clinical course of laryngeal papillomatosis in
112:298–302. children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1970; 79:1132–1138.
58. Lele SM, Pou Am, Ventura K, et al. Molecular events in 77. Solomon D, Smith RRL, Kashima HK, et al. Malignant
the progression of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis to transformation in non-irradiated recurrent respiratory
carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126:1184–1188. papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:900–904.
59. Xu H, Lu Dw, El-Mofty SK, et al. Metachronous squa- 78. Schnadig VJ, Clark WD, Clegg TJ, et al. Invasive papil-
mous cell carcinoma evolving from independent oropha- lomatosis and squamous carcinoma complicating juvenile
ryngeal and pulmonary squamous papillomas: laryngeal papillomatosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
Association with human papillomavirus 11 and lack of Surg 1986; 112:966–971.
aberrant p53, Rb and p16 protein expression. Hum Pathol 79. Lim RY, Chang H-H. Malignant degeneration of a laryn-
2004; 35:1419–1422. geal papilloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;
60. Bonagura Vr, Hatam L, DeVoti J, et al. Recurrent respira- 96:559–561.
tory papillomatosis: Altered CD8 T-cell subsets and TH 80. Helmuth RA, Strate RW. Squamous carcinoma of the lung
1/TH 2 cytokine imbalance. Clin Immunol 1999; 93: in nonirradiated, nonsmoking patient with juvenile lar-
302–311. yngotracheal papillomatosis. Am J Surg Pathol 1987;
61. Gelder CM, Williams OM, Hart KW, et al. HLA class II 11:643–650.
polymorphisms and susceptibility to recurrent respiratory 81. Kashima H, Wu T-C, Mounts P, et al. Carcinoma ex-
papillomatosis. J Virol 2003; 77:1927–1939. papilloma: histologic and virologic studies in whole-
62. Bonagura VR, Siegal FP, Abramson AL, et al. Enriched organ sections of the larynx. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:
HLA-DQ3 phenotype and decreased class I major histo- 619–624.
compatability complex antigen expression in recurrent 82. Guillou L, Sahli R, Chaubert P, et al. Squamous cell
respiratory papillomatosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol carcinoma of the lung in a non-smoking, nonirradiated
1994; 1:357–360. patient with juvenile laryngotracheal papillomatosis. Evi-
63. Rahbar R, Vargas SO, Folkman J, et al. Role of vascular dence of human papillomavirus-11 DNA in both carcino-
endothelial papillomatosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ma and papillomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15:891–898.
2005; 114:289–295. 83. Gaylis B, Hayden RE. Recurrent respiratory papillomato-
64. Ruparelia S, Munger ER, Nisenbaum R, et al. Predictors of sis: progression to invasion and malignancy. Am J Otolar-
remission in juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillo- yngol 1991; 12:104–112.
matosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 84. Lindeberg H, Elbrond O. Malignant tumours in patients
129:1275–1278. with a history of multiple laryngeal papillomas: the
184 Barnes
significance of irradiation. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 5. Eversole LR, Laipis PJ, Green TL. Human papillomavirus
149–151. type-2 DNA in oral and labial verruca vulgaris. J Cutan
85. Siegel SE, Cohen SR, Isaacs H Jr., et al. Malignant trans- Pathol 1987; 14:319–325.
formation of tracheobronchial juvenile papillomatosis 6. Barnes L, Yunis EJ, Krebs FJ III, et al. Verruca vulgaris of
without prior irradiation. Ann Otol Laryngol Rhinol the larynx. Demonstration of human papillomavirus
1979; 88:192–197. types 6/11 by in situ hybridization. Arch Pathol Lab
86. Doyle DJ, Henderson, LA, LeJune FE Jr. , et al. Changes in Med 1991; 115:895–899.
human papillomavirus typing of recurrent respiratory 7. Jenson AB, Lancaster WD, Hartmann D-P, et al. Frequen-
papillomatosis progressing to malignancy. Arch Otolar- cy and distribution of papillomavirus structural antigens
yngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120:1273–1276. in verrucae, multiple papillomas, and condylomata of the
87. Singh B, Ramsaroop R. Clinical features of malignant oral cavity. Am J Pathol 1982; 107:212–218.
transformation in benign laryngeal papilloma. J Laryngol 8. Nash M, Lucente F, Srinivasan K, et al. Condylomatous
Otol 1994; 108:642–648. lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract. Laryngoscope
88. Hasan S, Dutt SN, Kini U, et al. Laryngeal carcinoma ex- 1987; 97:1410–1416.
papilloma in a non-irradiated non-smoking patient: a 9. Nuovo GJ, O’Connell M, Blanco JS, et al. Correlation of
clinical record and review of the literature. J Laryngol histology and human papillomavirus DNA detection in
Otol 1995; 109:762–766. condylomata acuminatum and condyloma-like vulvar
89. Sakakura A, Yamamoto Y, Takasaki T, et al. Recurrent lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13:700–706.
laryngeal papillomatosis developing into laryngeal carci- 10. Ferlito A, Recher G. Ackerman’s tumor (verrucous carci-
noma with human papilloma virus (HPV) type 18: a case noma) of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of 77 cases.
report. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110:75–77. Cancer 1980; 46:1617–1630.
90. Moore CE, Wiatrak BJ, McClatchey KD, et al. High-risk
human papillomavirus types and squamous cell carcino-
ma in patients with respiratory papillomas. Otolaryngol IX. BENIGN NONEPITHELIAL
Head Neck Surg 1999; 120:698–705. TUMORS OF THE LARYNX
91. Cook JR, Hill A, Humphrey PA, et al. Squamous cell
carcinoma arising in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis 1. New GB, Erich JB. Benign tumors of the larynx. A study of
with pulmonary involvement: Emerging common pattern seven hundred and twenty- two cases. Arch Otolaryngol
of clinical features and human papillomavirus serotype 1938; 28:841–910.
association. Mod Pathol 2000; 13:914–918. 2. Holinger PH, Johnston KC. Benign tumors of the larynx.
92. Silver RD, Rimell FL, Adams GL, et al. Diagnosis and Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1951; 60:496–509.
management of pulmonary metastasis from recurrent 3. Myers JN, Myers EN, Barnes EL. Benign neoplasms of the
respiratory papillomatosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg larynx. In: Fried, ed. The Larynx. A Multidisciplinary
2003; 129:622–629. Approach. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996:443–459.
93. Crissman JD, Kessis T, Shah KV, et al. Squamous papil- 4. Ferguson CF, Flake CG. Subglottic hemangioma as a
lary neoplasia of the adult upper digestive tract. Hum cause of respiratory obstruction in infants. Ann Otol
Pathol 1988; 19:1387–1396. Rhinol Laryngol 1961; 70:1095–1112.
94. Friedberg SA, Stagman R, Hass GM. Papillary lesions of 5. Holinger PH, Brown WT. Congenital webs, cysts, laryng-
the larynx in adults. A pathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol oceles and other anomalies of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol 1971; 80:683–692. Laryngol 1967; 76:744–752.
95. Johnson JT, Barnes EL, Justice W. Adult onset laryngeal 6. Shikhani AH, Jones MM, Marsh BR, et al. Infantile sub-
papillomatosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981; glottic hemangiomas. An update. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar-
89:867–873. yngol 1986; 95:336–347.
96. Kimmich T, Kleinsasser O. Benign keratoma of the vocal 7. Bitar MA, Moukarbel RV, Zalzal GH. Management of
cords. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 250:143–149. congenital subglottic hemangioma: Trends and success
97. Barnes L, Peel RL. Papillary keratosis of larynx versus over the past 14 years. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;
verrucous carcinoma of larynx. In: Barnes L, Peel RL, eds. 132:226–231.
Head and Neck Pathology. A Text/Atlas of Differential 8. Woolley AL, Lusk RP. Multiple vascular lesions of an
Diagnosis. New York: : Igaku-Shoin, 1990:80–81. infant’s airway. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;
98. Ferlito A, Recher G. Ackerman’s tumor (verrucous carci- 111:305–308.
noma of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of 77 cases. 9. Brodsky L, Yoshpe N, Ruben RJ. Clinical-pathological
Cancer 1980; 46:1617–1630. correlates of congenital subglottic hemangiomas. Ann
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92 (suppl 105):4–18.
10. Pransky SM, Canto C. Management of subglottic hemangio-
VIII. VERRUCA VULGARIS ma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12:509–512.
11. Ferguson GB. Hemangioma of the adult and of the infant
1. Wysocki GP, Hardie J. Ultrastructural studies of intraoral larynx. A review of the literature and report of two cases.
verruca vulgaris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979; Arch Otolaryngol 1944; 40:189–195.
47:58–62. 12. Mugliston TAH, Sangwan S. Persistent cavernous heman-
2. Fechner RE, Mills SE. Verruca vulgaris of the larynx. A gioma of the larynx—a pregnancy problem. J Laryngol
distinctive lesion of probable viral origin confused with Otol 1985; 99:1309–1311.
verrucous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982; 6:357–362. 13. Cummings CW, Montgomery WW, Balogh K Jr. Neuro-
3. Adler-Storthz K, Newland JR, Tessin BA, et al. Identifica- genic tumors of the larynx. Laryngoscope 1969; 78:79–95.
tion of human papillomavirus types in oral verruca vul- 14. Schaeffer BT, Som PM, Biller HF, et al. Schwannomas of
garis. J Oral Pathol 1986; 15:230–233. the larynx: a review and computed tomographic scan
4. Green TL, Eversole LR, Leider AS. Oral and labial verruca analysis. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8:469–472.
vulgaris: clinical, histologic and immunohistochemical 15. Barnes L, Ferlito A. Soft tissue tumors. In: Ferlito A, ed.
evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; Neoplasms of the Larynx. Edinburgh: Churchill Living-
62:410–416. ston, 1993:265–304.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 185
16. Supance JS, Quenelle DJ, Crissman J. Endolaryngeal neu- 41. Farman AG. Benign smooth muscle tumors. S Afr Med J
rofibromas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88:74–78. 1975; 49:1333–1340.
17. Takumida M, Taira T, Suzuki M, et al. Neurilemoma of 42. Harris PF, Ward PH. Leiomyoma of the larynx and
the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100:847–850. trachea: case reports. South Med J 1967; 60:1223–1227.
18. White AK, Smith RJH, Bigler CR, et al. Head and neck 43. Karma P, Rasanen O. Laryngeal leiomyoma. J Laryngol
manifestations of neurofibromatosis. Laryngoscope 1986; Otol 1978; 92:411–415.
96:732–737. 44. Kleinsasser O, Glanz H. Myogenic tumors of the larynx.
19. Fukuda I, Ogasawara H, Kumoi T, et al. Subglottic neu- Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979; 225:107–119.
rofibroma in a child. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987; 45. Kaya S, Saydam L, Ruacan S. Laryngeal leiomyoma. Int J
14:161–170. Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1990; 19:285–288.
20. Willcox TO Jr., Rosenberg SI, Handler SD. Laryngeal 46. McKiernan DC, Watters GWR. Smooth muscle tumours of
involvement in neurofibromasis. ENT J 1993; 72:811–815. the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109:77–79.
21. Ingels K, Vermeersch H, Verhoye C, et al. Schwannoma of 47. Shibata K, Komune S. Laryngeal angiomyoma (vascular
the larynx: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110: leiomyoma): clinicopathologic findings. Laryngoscope
294–296. 1980; 90:1880–1886.
22. Masip MJ, Esteban E, Alberto C, et al. Laryngeal involve- 48. Nuutinen J, Syrjanen K. Angioleiomyoma of the larynx.
ment in pediatric neurofibromatosis: a case report and Report of a case and review of the literature. Laryngo-
review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26:488–492. scope 1983; 93:941–943.
23. Zbaren P, Markwalder R. Schwannoma of the true vocal 49. Hirakawa K, Harada Y, Tatsukawa T, et al. A case of
cord. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121:837–839. vascular leiomyoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1994;
24. Nakahira M, Nakatani H, Sawada S, et al. Neurofibroma 108:593–595.
of the larynx in neurofibromatosis. Preoperative comput- 50. Mori H, Kumoi T, Hashimoto M, et al. Leiomyoblastoma of
ed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch the larynx: report of a case. Head Neck 1992; 14:148–152.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127:325–328. 51. Hellquist HB, Hellqvist H, Vejlens L, et al. Epithelioid
25. Rosen FS, Pou AM, Quinn FB Jr. Obstructive supraglottic leiomyoma of the larynx. Histopathology 1994; 24:
schwannoma: A case report and review of the literature. 155–159.
Laryngoscope 2002; 112:997–1002.
26. Yucel EA, Guldiken Y, Ozdemir M, et al. Plexiform
neurofibroma of the larynx in a child. J Laryngol Otol
2002; 116:49–51. X. KERATOSIS WITH AND WITHOUT
27. Rahbar R, Litrovnik BG, Vargas SO, et al. The biology and DYSPLASIA
management of laryngeal neurofibroma. Arch Otolar-
yngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:1400–1406. 1. McGavran MH, Bauer WC, Ogura JH. Isolated laryngeal
28. Sidman J, Wood RE, Poole M, et al. Management of keratosis. Its relation to carcinoma of the larynx based on
plexiform neurofibroma of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol a clinicopathologic study of 87 consecutive cases with
Laryngol 1987; 96:53–55. long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 1960; 70:932–951.
29. Lippert BM, Eggers S, Schluter E, et al. Lipoma of the 2. Hellquist H, Lundgren J, Olofsson J. Hyperplasia, kerato-
larynx. Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. sis, dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the vocal cords—a
Otolaryngol Pol 2002; 56:669–674. follow-up study. Clin Otolaryngol 1982; 7:11–27.
30. Zakrzewski A. Subglottic lipoma of the larynx (case report 3. Sllamniku B, Bauer W, Painter C, et al. The transformation
and literature review). J Laryngol Otol 1965; 79:1039–1048. of laryngeal keratosis into invasive carcinoma. Am J
31. Wenig BM. Lipomas of the larynx and hypopharynx: a Otolaryngol 1989; 10:42–54.
review of the literature with the addition of three new 4. Gallo A, de Vincentiis M, Rocca CD, et al. Evolution of
cases. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109:353–357. precancerous laryngeal lesions: A clinicopathologic study
32. Yoskovitch A, Cambronero E, Said S, et al. Giant lipoma with long-term follow-up on 259 patients. Head Neck
of the larynx: A case report and literature review. ENT 2001; 23:42–47.
J 1999; 78:122–125. 5. Ricci G, Molini E, Faralli M, et al. Retrospective study on
33. Jungehulsing M, Fischbach R, Pototschnig C, et al. Rare precancerous laryngeal lesions: long-term follow-up. Acta
benign tumors. Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal lipomata. Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2003; 23:362–367.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000; 109:301–305. 6. Henry RC. The transformation of laryngeal leukoplakia to
34. Moretti JA, Miller D. Laryngeal involvement in benign cancer. J Laryngol Otol 1979; 93:447–459.
symmetric lipomatosis. Arch Otolaryngol 1973; 97:495–496. 7. Lederman M. Keratosis of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol
35. Ortiz CL, Weber AL. Laryngeal lipoma. Ann Otol Rhinol 1963; 77:651–659.
Laryngol 1991; 100:783–784. 8. Bouquot JE, Gnepp DR. Laryngeal precancer: a review of
36. Dinsdale RC, Manning SC, Brooks DJ, et al. Myxoid the literature, commentary, and comparison with oral
laryngeal lipoma in a juvenile. Otolaryngol Head Neck leukoplakia. Head Neck 1991; 13:488–497.
Surg 1990; 103:653–657. 9. Norris CM, Peale AR. Keratosis of the larynx. J Laryngol
37. Nonako S, Enomoto K, Kawabori S, et al. Spindle cell Otol 1963; 77:635–647.
lipoma within the larynx: a case report with correlated 10. Putney FJ, O’Keefe JJ. The clinical significance of keratosis
light and electron microscopy. ORL 1993; 55:147–149. of the larynx as a premalignant lesion. Ann Otol Rhinol
38. Chen KTK, Weinberg RA. Intramuscular lipoma of the Laryngol 1953; 62:348–357.
larynx. Am J Otolaryngol 1984; 5:71–72. 11. Gabriel CE, Jones DG. Hyperkeratosis of the larynx.
39. Franceschini S, Segnini G, Berrettini S, et al. Hibernoma of J Laryngol Otol 1973; 87:129–134.
the larynx. Review of the literature and a new case. Acta 12. Crissman JD. Laryngeal keratosis and subsequent carci-
Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1993; 47:51–53. noma. Head Neck Surg 1979; 1:386–391.
40. Wenig BM, Weiss SW, Gnepp DR. Laryngeal and hypo- 13. Gillis TM, Ineze J, Strong MS, et al. Natural history and
pharyngeal liposarcomas: a clinicopathologic study of 10 management of keratosis, atypia, carcinoma in situ, and
cases with a comparison of soft tissue counterparts. 1990; microinvasive carcinoma of the larynx. Am J Surg 1983;
14:131–141. 146:512–516.
186 Barnes
14. Kalter PO, Lubsen H, Delemarre JFM, et al. Squamous cell on clinical course versus response. J Laryngol Otol 1993;
hyperplasia of the larynx (a clinical follow-up study). 107:1014–1016.
J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:579–588. 14. Murty GE, Diver JP, Bradley PJ. Carcinoma in situ of the
15. Hojslet P-E, Nielson VM, Palvio D. Premalignant lesions glottis: Radiotherapy or excision biopsy? Ann Otol Rhinol
of the larynx. A follow-up study. Acta Otolaryngol Laryngol 1993; 102:592–595.
(Stockh) 1989; 107:150–155. 15. Small W Jr., Mittal BB, Brand WN, et al. Role of radiation
16. Cuchi A, Bombi JA, Avellaneda R, et al. Precancerous therapy in the management of carcinoma in situ of the
lesions of the larynx: clinical and pathologic correlations larynx. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:663–667.
and prognostic aspects. Head Neck 1994; 16:545–549. 16. Le Q-T, Takamiya R, Shu H-K, et al. Treatment results of
17. Blackwell KE, Fu Y-S, Calcaterra TC. Laryngeal dysplasia. carcinoma in situ of the glottis. An analysis of 82 cases.
A clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1995; 75:457–463. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126:1305–1312.
18. Jeannon J-P, Soames JV, Aston V, et al. Molecular markers 17. Spayne JA, Warde P, O’Sullivan B, et al. Carcinoma-in-
in dysplasia of the larynx: expression of cyclin-dependent situ of the glottic larynx: Results of treatment with radia-
kinase inhibitors p21, p27 and p53 tumor suppressor gene tion therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 49:
in predicting cancer risk. Clin Otolaryngol 2004; 29: 1235–1238.
698–704. 18. Garcia-Serra A, Hinerman RW, Amdur RJ, et al. Radio-
19. Bocking A, Aufferman W, Vogel H, et al. Diagnosis and therapy for carcinoma in situ of the true vocal cords. Head
grading of malignancy in squamous epithelial lesions of Neck 2002; 24:390–394.
the larynx with DNA cytophotometry. Cancer 1985; 19. Sanz-Ortega J, Valor C, Saez MC, et al. 3p21, 5q21, 9p21,
56:1600–1604. and 17p13 allelic deletions accumulate in the dysplastic
20. Olofsson J, Franzen G, Lundgren J. Hypertetraploid cells spectrum of laryngeal carcinogenesis and precede malig-
in vocal cord epithelia. Clin Otolaryngol 1986; 11:345–351. nant transformation. Histol Histopathol 2003; 18:
21. Munck-Wickland E, Kulenstierna R, Lindholm J, et al. 1053–1057.
Image cytometry DNA analysis of dysplastic squamous 20. Nadal A, Campo E, Pinto J, et al. p53 expression in
epithelial lesions in the larynx. Anticancer Res 1991; normal, dysplastic, and neoplastic laryngeal epithelium.
11:597–600. Absence of correlation with prognostic factors. J Pathol
22. Crissman JD, Zarbo RJ. Quantitation of DNA ploidy in 1995; 17:181–188.
squamous intraepithelial neoplasia of the laryngeal glot- 21. Gallo O, Santucci M, Franchi A. Cumulative prognostic
tis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117:182–188. value of p16/CDKN2 and p53 oncoprotein expression in
premalignant laryngeal lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;
89:1161–1163.
XI. CARCINOMA IN SITU 22. Gallo O, Franchi A, Chiarelli I, et al. Potential biomarkers
in predicting progression of epithelial hyperplastic lesions
1. Kelinsasser O. Mikrolarynoskopie und Endolarungeale. of the larynx. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; Suppl
Mikrochirurgie. Technik und Typische Befunde. Stuttgart: 527:30–38.
Schattauer-Verlag, 1968. 23. Jin Y-T, Kayser S, Kemp BL, et al. The prognostic signifi-
2. Altman F, Ginsberg I, Stout AP. Intraepithelial cancer cance of the biomarkers p21, p53, and bcl-2 in laryngeal
(carcinoma in situ) of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol 1952; squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 1998; 82:2159–2165.
56:121–133. 24. Narayana A, Vaughan ATM, Gunaratne S, et al. Is p53 an
3. Bauer WC, McGravran MH. Carcinoma in situ and evalu- independent prognostic factor in patients with laryngeal
ation of epithelial changes in laryngopharyngeal biopsies. carcinoma? Cancer 1998; 82:286–291.
JAMA 1972; 221:72–75. 25. Jeannon J-P, Soames JV, Aston V, et al. Molecular markers
4. DeSanto LW. Selection of treatment for in situ and early in dysplasia of the larynx: expression of cyclin-dependent
invasive carcinoma of the glottis. In: Alberti PW, Bryce kinase inhibitors p21, p27, and p53 tumor suppressor
DP, eds. Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Carcinoma. gene in predicting cancer risk. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:146–150. 29:698–704.
5. Hawkins NV. Panel discussion on glottic tumors. VIII. 26. Hussein MR, Alterations of p53 and BCL-2 protein
The treatment of glottic carcinoma: an analysis of 800 expression in the laryngeal intraepithelial neoplasia. Can-
cases. Laryngoscope 1975; 85:1485–1493. cer Biol Ther 2005; 4:213–217.
6. Miller AH. Carcinoma in situ of the larynx—clinical 27. Kleinsasser O. Cancer of the larynx, a study of develop-
appearance and treatment. In: Alberti PW, Bryce DP, ment and early growth. J Otolaryngol Soc Aust 1968; 2:
eds. Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Carcinoma. 8–12.
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:161–166. 28. Miller AH, Fisher HR. Clues to the life history of carcinoma
7. Elman AJ, Goodman M, Wang CC, et al. In situ carcinoma in situ of the larynx. Laryngoscope 1971; 81:1475–1480.
of the vocal cords. Cancer 1979; 43:2422–2428. 29. Holinger PH, Schild JA. Carcinoma in situ of the larynx.
8. Maran AGD, MacKenzie IJ, Stanley RE. Carcinoma in situ In: Alberti PW, Bryce DP, eds. Centennial Conference on
of the larynx. Head Neck Surg 1984; 7:28–31. Laryngeal Carcinoma. New York: Appleton-Century-
9. McGuirt WF, Browne JD. Management decisions in laryn- Crofts, 1974:143–144.
geal carcinoma in situ. Laryngoscope 1991; 101:125–129. 30. Som ML. Surgery in premalignant lesions. In: Alberti PW,
10. Rothfield RE, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Carcinoma in situ Bryce DP, eds. Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Car-
and microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vocal cinoma. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1974:145.
cords. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100:793–796. 31. Pene F, Fletcher GH, Results in irradiation of the in situ
11. Hintz BL, Kagan AR, Nussbaum H, et al. A ‘‘watchful carcinomas of the vocal cords. Cancer 1976; 37:2586–2590.
waiting’’ policy for in situ carcinoma of the vocal cords. 32. Hellquist H, Lundgren J, Olofsson J. Hyperplasia, kerato-
Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107:746–751. sis, dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ of the vocal cords—a
12. Myssiorek D, Vambutas, Abramson AL. Carcinoma in situ follow-up study. Clin Otolaryngol 1982; 7:11–27.
of the glottic larynx. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:463–467. 33. Gillis TM, Ineze J, Strong MS, et al. Natural history and
13. Brooks JP, Morgan DW, Glaholm J. Twelve cases of glottic management of keratosis, atypia, carcinoma in situ, and
carcinoma in situ treated by radiotherapy: an observation microinvasive carcinoma. Am J Surg 1983; 146:512–515.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 187
34. Kalter PO, Lubsen H, Delemarre JFM, et al. Squamous cell 2. Sulfaro S, Volpe R, Barzan L, et al. Superficial extending
hyperplasia of the larynx (a clinical follow-up study). carcinoma of the larynx. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:
J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:579–588. 1127–1132.
35. Shvero J, Hadar T, Segal K, et al. Carcinoma in situ of the 3. Carbone A, Volpe R, Barzan L. Superficial extending
vocal cords: a retrospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 1988; carcinoma (SEC) of the larynx and hypopharynx. Pathol
13:235–237. Res Pract 1992; 188:729–735.
36. Crissman JD, Zarbo RJ, Drozdowicz S, et al. Carcinoma in 4. Bogomoletz WV. Early gastric cancer. Am J Surg Pathol
situ and microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the laryn- 1984; 8:381–391.
geal glottis. Arch Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 1988; 5. Bogomoletz WV, Molas G, Gayet B, et al. Superficial
114:299–307. squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. A report of
37. Stenersen T. Chr., Hoel PS, Boysen M. Carcinoma in situ 76 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol
of the larynx: an evaluation of its natural course. Clin 1989; 13:535–546.
Otolaryngol 1991; 16:358–363. 6. Rubio CA, Liu F-S, Zhao H-Z. Histological classification of
38. Small W Jr., Mittal BB, Brand WN, et al. Role of radiation intraepithelial neoplasias and microinvasive squamous
therapy in management of carcinoma in situ of the larynx. carcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;
Laryngoscope 1993; 103:663–667. 13:685–690.
39. Blackwell KE, Calcaterra TC, Fu Y-S. Laryngeal dysplasia: 7. Nagawa H, Kaizaki S, Seto Y, et al. The relationship of
Epidemiology and treatment outcome. Ann Otol Rhinol macroscopic shape of superficial esophageal carcinoma to
Laryngol 1995; 104:596–602. depth of invasion and regional lymph node metastasis.
40. Nasser VH, Bridger GP. Topography of the laryngeal Cancer 1995; 75:1061–1064.
mucous glands. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 94:490–498. 8. Ferlito A. The natural history of early vocal cord cancer.
41. Bridger GP, Nasser VH. Carcinoma in situ involving the Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115:345–347.
laryngeal mucous glands. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 94:389–400. 9. Ferlito A, Carbone A, DeSanto LW, et al. ‘‘Early’’ cancer of
42. Freeland AP, van Nostrand AWP. The applied anatomy the larynx: the concept as defined by clinicians, patholo-
of the anterior commissure and subglottis. Can J Otolar- gists, and biologists. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;
yngol 1975; 4:644–658. 105:245–250.
10. DeSanto LW, Olsen KD. Early glottic carcinoma. Am
J Otolaryngol 1994; 15:242–249.
XII. MICROINVASIVE (SUPERFICIAL) 11. Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Stringer SP, et al. Manage-
CARCINOMA OF THE LARYNX ment of TIS, T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the
glottic larynx. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15:250–257.
1. Miller AH. Carcinoma in situ of the larynx—clinical 12. Morris MR, Canonico D, Blank C. A critical review of
appearance and treatment. In: Alberti PW, Bryce DP, radiotherapy in the management of T1 glottic carcinoma.
eds. Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15:276–280.
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:161–166. 13. Shvero J, Hadar T, Segal K, et al. Early glottic carcinoma
2. Freidmann I. Precancerous lesions of the larynx. In: involving the anterior commissure. Clin Otolaryngol 1994;
Alberti PW, Bryce DP, eds. Centennial Conference on 19:105–108.
Laryngeal Carcinoma. New York: Appleton-Century- 14. Mahieu HF, Patel P, Annyas AA, et al. Carbon dioxide
Crofts, 1976:122–126. lazer vaporization in early glottic carcinoma. Arch Oto-
3. Padovan IF. Premalignant laryngeal lesions—a laryngol- laryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120:383–387.
ogist’s viewpoint. In: Alberti PW, Bryce DP, eds. Centen- 15. Thomas JV, Olsen KD, Neel HB III, et al. Recurrences after
nial Conference on Laryngeal Carcinoma. New York: endoscopic management of early (T1) glottic carcinoma.
Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:137–139. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:1099–1104.
4. Crissman JD, Zarbo RJ, Drozdowicz S, et al. Carcinoma in
situ and microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the laryn-
geal glottis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; XIV. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
114:299–307. OF THE LARYNX
5. Myers EN, Wagner RL, Johnson JT. Microlaryngoscopic
surgery for T1 glottic lesions: A cost-effective option. Ann 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006.
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994; 103:28–30. CA 2006; 56:106–130.
6. Nguyen C, Naghibzadeh B, Black MJ, et al. Glottic micro- 2. Hodge KM, Flynn MB, Drury T. Squamous cell carcinoma
invasive carcinoma: Is it different from carcinoma in situ? of the upper aerodigestive tract in nonusers of tobacco.
J Otolaryngol 1996; 25:223–226. Cancer 1985; 55:1232–1235.
7. McGuirt WF, Browne JD. Management decisions in laryn- 3. Robin PE, Reid A, Powell DJ, et al. The incidence of cancer
geal carcinoma in situ. Laryngoscope 1991; 101:125–129. of the larynx. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16:198–201.
8. Rotfield RE, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Carcinoma in situ and 4. Decker J, Goldstein JC. Risk factors in head and neck
microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vocal cancer. N Engl J Med 1982; 306:1151–1156.
cords. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100:793–796. 5. Morrison MD. Is chronic gastroesophageal reflux a causa-
9. Stutsman AC, McGavran MH. Ultraconservative manage- tive factor in glottic carcinoma? Otolaryngol Head Neck
ment of superficially invasive epidermoid carcinoma of Surg 1988; 9:370–373.
the true vocal cord. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 80: 6. Parnes SM. Asbestos and cancer of the larynx: is there a
507–512. relationship? Laryngoscope 1990; 100:254–261.
7. Cauvin JM, Guenel P, Luce D, et al. Occupational expo-
sure and head and neck carcinoma. Clin Otolaryngol
XIII. SUPERFICIAL EXTENDING CARCINOMA 1990; 15:439–445.
8. Hoshikawa T, Nakajima T, Uhara H, et al. Detection of
1. Carbone A, Micheau C, Bosq J, et al. Superficial extending human papillomavirus DNA in laryngeal squamous cell
carcinoma of the hypopharynx: report of 26 cases of an carcinomas by polymerase chain reaction. Laryngoscope
underestimated carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1983; 93:1600–1606. 1990; 100:647–650.
188 Barnes
9. Maier H, DeVries N, Snow GB. Occupational factors in the 33. Coates HL, DeSanto LW, Devine KD, et al. Carcinoma of
etiology of head and neck cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; the supraglottic larynx. A review of 221 cases. Arch
16:406–412. Otolaryngol 1976; 102:686–689.
10. Muscat JE, Wynder EL. Tobacco, alcohol, asbestos, and 34. Bocca E, Pignataro O, Mosciaro O. Supraglottic surgery of
occupational risk factors for laryngeal cancer. Cancer the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1968; 77:1005–1026.
1992; 69:2244–2251. 35. Olofsson J. Growth and spread of laryngeal carcinoma. In:
11. Waterhouse JAH. Epidemiology. In: Ferlito A, ed. Neo- Alberti PW, Bryce DP, eds. Centennial Conference on
plasms of the Larynx. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Laryngeal Carcinoma. New York: Appleton-Century-
1993:49–64. Crofts, 1976:40–53.
12. Wake M. The Urban/rural divide in head and neck 36. McDonald TJ, DeSanto LW, Weiland LH. Supraglottic
cancer—the effect of atmospheric pollution. Clin Otolar- larynx and its pathology as studied by whole laryngeal
yngol 1993; 18:298–302. sections. Laryngoscope 1976; 86:635–648.
13. Lawson W, Biller HF, Suen JY. Cancer of the larynx. In: 37. Lutz CK, Johnson JT, Wagner RL, et al. Supraglottic
Meyers EN, Suen JY, eds. Cancer of the Head and Neck. carcinoma: patterns of recurrence. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar-
2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1989:533–591. yngol 1990; 99:12–17.
14. DeRienzo DP, Greensburgh SD, Fraire AE. Carcinoma of 38. Sessions DG. Surgical pathology of cancer of the larynx
the larynx. Changing incidence in women. Arch Otolar- and hypopharynx. Laryngoscope 1976; 86:814–839.
yngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117:681–684. 39. Ogura JH. Surgical pathology of cancer of the larynx.
15. Hast MH. Applied embryology of the larynx. In: Alberti Laryngoscope 1955; 65:867–926.
PWW, Bryce DP, eds. Centennial Conference on Laryn- 40. Bocca E. Supraglottic cancer. Laryngoscope 1975; 85:
geal Carcinoma. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1318–1326.
1976:6–9. 41. Kirchner JA. What have whole organ sections contributed
16. Pressman JJ. Submucosal compartmentalization of the to the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol
larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1956; 65:766–771. Laryngol 1989; 98:661–667.
17. Pressman JJ, Simon MB, Monell C. Anatomical studies 42. Bocca E. Surgical management of supraglottic cancer and
related to the dissemination of cancer of the larynx. Trans its lymph node metastases in a conservative perspective.
Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1960; 64:628–638. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100:261–267.
18. Tucker GF Jr., Smith HR. A histological demonstration of 43. Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O, Brasnu D, et al. Reconsider-
the development of laryngeal connective tissue compart- ing a paradigm: The spread of supraglottic carcinoma of
ments. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1962; the glottis. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:1129–1133.
66:308–318. 44. Kirchner JA, Som ML. Clinical and histological observa-
19. Kirchner JA, Carter D. Intralaryngeal barriers to the tions on supraglottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
spread of cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 103:503–513. 1971; 80:638–645.
20. Broyles EN. The anterior commissure tendon. Ann Otol 45. Shah JP, Tollefson HR. Epidermoid carcinoma of the
Rhinol Laryngol 1943; 52:342–345. supraglottic larynx. Role of neck dissection in initial
21. Olofsson J, Williams GT, Rider WD, et al. Anterior Com- surgical treatment. Am J Surg 1974; 128:494–499.
missure carcinoma. Primary treatment with radiotherapy 46. Ogura JH, Sessions DG, Spector GJ. Conservation surgery
in 57 patients. Arch Otolaryngol 1972; 95:230–239. for epidermoid carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx.
22. Clerf LH. The pre-epiglottic space. Its relation to carci- Laryngoscope 1974; 85:1808–1815.
noma of the epiglottis. Arch Otolaryngol 1944; 40:177–179. 47. Meyer-Breiting E, von Ilberg C. Spread and mode of
23. Dayal VS, Bahri H, Stone PC. Pre-epiglottic space. An metastases of supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma. ORL
anatomic study. Arch Otolaryngol 1972; 95:130–133. 1979; 41:288–300.
24. Maquire A, Dayal VS. Supraglottic anatomy the pre- or 48. Burstein FD, Calcaterra TC. Supraglottic laryngectomy:
peri-epiglottic space? In: Alberti PW, Bryce DP, eds. series report and analysis of results. Laryngoscope 1985;
Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Cancer. New York: 95:833–836.
Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:26–33. 49. Spaulding CA, Krochak RJ, Hahn SS, et al. Radiothera-
25. Lam KH, Wong J. The preepiglottic and paraglottic spaces peutic management of cancer of the supraglottis. Cancer
in relation to spread of carcinoma of the larynx. Am 1986; 57:1292–1298.
J Otolaryngol 1983; 4:81–91. 50. Guerrier B, Balmigere G, Daures JP, et al. Cancer of the
26. Gregor RT. The preepiglottic space revisited: is it signifi- laryngeal vestibule. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1989; 246:
cant? Am J Otolaryngol 1990; 11:161–164. 378–381.
27. Zeitels SM, Vaughan CW. Preepiglottic space invasion in 51. DeSanto LW. Early supraglottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol
‘‘early’’ epiglottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; Laryngol 1990; 99:593–597.
100:789–792. 52. Lee NK, Goepfert H, Wendt CD. Supraglottic laryngec-
28. Sato K, Kurita S, Hirano M. Location of the preepiglottic tomy for intermediate-stage cancer: UT M.D. Anderson
space and its relationship to the paraglottic space. Ann Cancer Center experience with combined therapy.
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:930–934. Laryngoscope 1990; 100:831–836.
29. Tucker GF Jr. The anatomy of laryngeal cancer. In: Alberti 53. Zamora RL, Harvey JE, Sessions DG, et al. Clinical staging
PW, Bryce DP, eds. Centennial Conference on Laryngeal for primary malignancies of the supraglottic larynx.
Cancer. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:11–24. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:69–77.
30. Green FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al, eds. American Joint 54. de Guzman RB, Martorell MA, Basterra J, et al. Prognostic
Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer. 6th value of histopathological parameters in 51 supraglottic
ed. New York: Springer, 2002:47–57. squamous cell carcinomas. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:
31. Rowley NJ, Boyles R. Supraglottic carcinoma: a 10 year 538–540.
review at the University Hospital. Laryngoscope 1972; 55. McGavran MH, Bauer WC, Ogura JH. The incidence of
82:1264–1272. cervical lymph node metastases from epidermoid carci-
32. Smith RR, Caulk R, Frazell E. Revision of the clinical noma of the larynx and their relationship to certain
staging system for cancer of the larynx. Cancer 1973; characteristics of the primary tumor. A study based on
31:72–80. the clinical and pathological findings for 96 patients
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 189
treated by primary en bloc laryngectomy and radical neck 80. Nassar VH, Bridger GP. Topography of the laryngeal
dissection. Cancer 1961; 14:55–66. mucous glands. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 94:490–498.
56. Fiend CR, Cole RM. Contralateral spread of head and 81. Kirchner JA, Som JL. Clinical significance of fixed vocal
neck cancer. Am J Surg 1969; 118:660–665. cord. Laryngoscope 1971; 81:1029–1044.
57. Cocke EW Jr., Wang CC. Part I. Cancer of the larynx: 82. Mendonca DR, Bryce DP. Transglottic cancer of the
selecting optimal treatment. CA 1976; 26:194–200. larynx—a case presentation. Can J Otolaryngol 1973; 2:
58. Razack MS, Silapasvang S, Sako K, et al. Significance of 271–276.
site and nodal metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of 83. Kirchner JA. Two-hundred laryngeal cancers: patterns of
the epiglottis. Am J Surg 1978; 136:520–524. growth and spread as seen in serial section. Laryngoscope
59. Marks JE, de Vineni VR, Harvey J, et al. The risk of 1977; 87:474–482.
contralateral and lymphatic metastases for cancers of the 84. Foote RL, Buskirk SJ, Stanley RJ, et al. Patterns of failure
larynx and pharynx. Am J Otolaryngol 1992; 13:134–39. after total laryngectomy for glottic carcinoma. Cancer
60. Levendag P, Sessions R, Vikram B, et al. The problem of 1989; 64:143–149.
neck relapse in early supraglottic larynx cancer. Cancer 85. Johnson JT, Myers EN, Hao S-P, et al. Outcome of open
1989; 63:345–348. surgical therapy for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol
61. Myers EN, Alvi A. Management of carcinoma of the Laryngol 1993; 102:752–755.
supraglottic larynx: Evolution, current concepts, and 86. Thomas JV, Olsen KD, Neel HB III, et al. Early glottic
future trends. Laryngoscope 1996; 106:559–567. carcinoma treated with open procedures. Arch Otolar-
62. Chiu RJ, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Efficacy of routine yngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120:264–269.
bilateral neck dissection in the management of supra- 87. Yuen A, Medina JE, Goepfert H, et al. Management of
glottic carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; stage T3 and T4 glottic carcinomas. Am J Surg 1984;
131:485–488. 148:467–472.
63. Zeitels SM, Davis R Kim. Endoscopic laser management 88. Lundgren JAV, Gilbert RW, van Nostrand AWP, et al.
of supraglottic carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 1995; 16:2–11. T1N0M0 glottic carcinoma—a failure analysis. Clin Otolar-
64. Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Group. yngol 1988; 13:455–465.
Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with 89. Stell PM, Tobin KE. The behavior of cancer affecting the
surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryn- subglottic space. Can J Otolaryngol 1975; 4:612–617.
geal cancer. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1685–1690. 90. Vermund H. Role of radiotherapy in cancer of the larynx
65. Sessions DG, Lenox J, Spector GJ. Supraglottic laryngeal as related to the TNM system of staging. A review. Cancer
cancer: Analysis of treatment results. Laryngoscope 2005; 1970; 25:485–504.
115:1402–1410. 91. Harrison DFN. The pathology and management of
66. Probert JC, Thompson RW, Bagshaw MA. Patterns of subglottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 80:
spread of distant metastases in head and neck cancer. 6–12.
Cancer 1974; 33:127–133. 92. Bryce DP. The laryngeal subglottis. J Laryngol Otol 1975;
67. Merino OR, Lindberg RD, Fletcher GH. An analysis of 89:667–685.
distant metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the 93. Sessions DG, Ogura JH, Fried MP. Carcinoma of the
upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Cancer 1977; subglottic area. Laryngoscope 1975; 85:1417–1423.
40:145–151. 94. Shaha AR, Shah JP. Carcinoma of the subglottic larynx.
68. Nadol JB Jr. Treatment of carcinoma of the epiglottis. Ann Am J Surg 1982; 144:456–458.
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90:442–448. 95. Warde P, Harwood A, Keane T. Carcinoma of the sub-
69. Prades J-M, Simon P-G, Timoshenko AP, et al. Extended glottis. Results of initial radical treatment. Arch Otolar-
and standard supraglottic laryngectomies: a review of 110 yngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113:1228–1229.
patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262:947–952. 96. Weber RS, Marvel J, Smith P, et al. Paratracheal lymph
70. Taskinen PJ. The early case of supraglottic carcinoma. node dissection for carcinoma of the larynx, hypophar-
Laryngoscope 1975; 85:1643–1649. ynx, and cervical esophagus. Otolaryngol Head Neck
71. Cachin Y. Supraglottic carcinomas: the early cases. Laryn- Surg 1992; 108:11–17.
goscope 1975; 85:1617–1623. 97. Freeland AP, van Nostrand AWP. The applied anatomy
72. Laccourreye H, Brasnu DF, Beutter P. Carcinoma of the of the anterior commissure and subglottis. Can J Otolar-
laryngeal margin. Head Neck Surg 1983; 5:500–507. yngol 1975; 4:644–658.
73. Staff PM, Gregory I, Watt J. Morphometry of the epithelial 98. Dahm JD, Sessions DG, Paniello RC, et al. Primary sub-
lining of the human larynx. Clin Otolaryngol 1978; 3:13–20. glottic cancer. Laryngoscope 1998; 108:741–746.
74. van Nostrand AWP. Classification, anatomy, growth, and 99. Garas J, McGuirt WF Sr. Squamous cell carcinoma of the
spread of laryngeal cancer. In: Alberti PW, Bryce DP, eds. subglottis. Am J Otolaryngol 2006; 27:1–4.
Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Cancer. New York: 100. Mittal B, Marks JE, Ogura JH. Transglottic carcinoma.
Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:2–4. Cancer 1984; 53:151–161.
75. Daly CJ, Strong EW. Carcinoma of the glottic larynx. Am 101. Kirchner JA, Cornog JL Jr., Holmes RE. Transglottic
J Surg 1975; 130:489–492. cancer. Its growth and spread within the larynx. Arch
76. Sessions DG, Ogura JH, Fried MP. The anterior commis- Otolaryngol 1974; 99:247–251.
sure in glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1975; 85: 102. Pittam MR, Carter RL. Framework invasion by laryngeal
1624–1632. carcinomas. Head Neck Surg 1982; 4:200–208.
77. Olofsson J. Specific features of laryngeal carcinoma 103. Jones DG, Gabriel CE. The incidence of carcinoma of the
involving the anterior commissure and the subglottic larynx in persons under twenty years of age. Laryngo-
region. Can J Otolaryngol 1975; 4:618–632. scope 1969; 77:251–255.
78. Rothfield RE, Johnson JT, Myers EN, et al. The role of 104. Ossoff RH, Tucker GF, Norris CM. Carcinoma of the
hemilaryngectomy in management of T1 vocal cord can- larynx in an 11-year-old boy with late cervical metastases:
cer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115:677–680. report of a case with a ten-year follow-up. Otolaryngol
79. Werner JA, Schunke MN, Rudert H, et al. Description and Head Neck Surg 1980; 88:142–145.
clinical importance of the lymphatics of the vocal fold. 105. Gindhart TD, Johnston WH, Chism SE, et al. Carcinoma of
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 102:13–19. the larynx in childhood. Cancer 1980; 46:1683–1687.
190 Barnes
106. Hordijk GJ, de Jong JMA. Squamous carcinoma of the case for an endoscopic screening protocol. Ann Otol
adolescent larynx. Ear Nose Throat J 1981; 60:25–28. Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101:105–112.
107. Laurian N, Sador R, Strauss M, et al. Laryngeal carcinoma 129. Wagenfield DJH, Harwood AR, Bryce DP, et al. Second
in childhood. Report of a case and review of the literature. primary respiratory tract malignancies in glottic carcino-
Laryngoscope 1984; 94:684–687. ma. Cancer 1980; 46:1883–1886.
108. Singh W, Kauer A. Laryngeal carcinoma in a six year old 130. Wagenfield DJH, Harwood AR, Bryce DP, et al. Second
with a review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol 1987; primary respiratory tract malignant neoplasms in supra-
101:957–958. glottic carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107:135–137.
109. Zalzal GH, Cotton RT, Bore K. Carcinoma of the larynx in 131. Christensen P-H, Joergensen K, Munk J, et al. Hyper-
a child. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987; 13:219–225. frequency of pulmonary cancer in population of 415
110. Chaput M, Ninane J, Gosseye S, et al. Juvenile laryngeal patients treated for laryngeal cancer. Laryngoscope 1987;
papillomatosis and epidermoid carcinoma. J Pediatr 1989; 97:612–614.
114:269–272. 132. McGarry GW, Mackenzie EK. Second primary tumours of
111. Amirghassem B, Wenig BM, Heffner DK, et al. Pediatric the larynx following bronchial carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol
laryngeal squamous carcinomas (PLSQ). Mod Pathol 1990; 104:629–630.
1993; 6:79A (abstr). 133. Goldsmith MM, Cresson DS, Postma DS, et al. Signifi-
112. Simon M, Kahn T, Schneider A, et al. Laryngeal carcinoma cance of ploidy in laryngeal cancer. Am J Surg 1986; 152:
in a 12-year-old child. Association with human papillo- 396–402.
mavirus 18 and 33. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134. Feinmesser R, Freeman JL, Noyek A. Flow cytometric
1994; 120:277–282. analysis of DNA content in laryngeal cancer. J Laryngol
113. Futrell JW, Bennett SH, Hoye RC, et al. Predicting survival Otol 1990; 104:485–487.
in cancer of the larynx or hypopharynx. Am J Surg 1971; 135. Stell PM. Ploidy in head and neck cancer: a review and
122:451–457. meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16:510–516.
114. Bauer WC, Lesinski SG, Ogura JH. The significance of 136. Rua S, Comino A, Fruttero A, et al. Relationship between
positive margins in hemilaryngectomy specimens. Laryn- histologic features, DNA flow cytometry, and clinical
goscope 1975; 85:1–13. behavior of squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx.
115. Johnson JT, Myers EN, Bedetti CD, et al. Cervical lymph Cancer 1991; 67:141–149.
node metastases. Incidence and implications of extracap- 137. Walter MA, Peters GE, Peiper SC. Predicting radioresist-
sular carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111:534–537. ance in early glottic squamous cell carcinoma by DNA
116. Synderman NL, Johnson JT, Schramm VL, et al. Extrac- content. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100:523–526.
apsular spread of carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes. 138. El-Naggar AK, Lopez-Varela V, Luna MA, et al. Intra-
Impact upon survival in patients with carcinoma of the tumoral DNA content heterogeneity in laryngeal squa-
supraglottic larynx. Cancer 1985; 56:1597–1599. mous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
117. Johnson JT. A surgeon looks at cervical lymph nodes. 1992; 118:169–173.
Radiology 1990; 175:607–610. 139. Guo Y-C, DeSanto L, Osetinsky GV. Prognostic implica-
118. Hirabayashi H, Koshii K, Uno K, et al. Extracapsular tion of nuclear DNA content in head and neck cancer.
spread of squamous cell carcinoma in neck lymph Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 100:95–98.
nodes: prognostic factor of laryngeal cancer. Laryngo- 140. Sakr W, Hussan M, Zarbo RJ, et al. DNA quantitation and
scope 1991; 101:502–506. histologic characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma of
119. Dyess CL, Carter D, Kirchner JA. Morphometric compari- the upper aerodigestive tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;
son of the changes in the laryngeal skeleton associated 113:1009–1014.
with invasion by tumor and by external-beam radiation. 141. Campbell BH, Schemmel JC, Hopwood LE, et al. Flow
Cancer 1987; 59:117–1122. cytometric evaluation of chemosensitive and chemoresist-
120. Kirchner JA. Invasion of the framework by laryngeal ant head and neck tumors. Am J Surg 1990; 160:424–426.
cancer. Surgical and radiological implications. Acta Oto- 142. Tennvall J, Wennerberg J, Anderson H, et al. DNA analy-
laryngol (Stockh) 1984; 97:392–397. sis as a predictor of the outcome of induction chemother-
121. Rubin J, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Stomal recurrence after apy in advanced head and neck carcinomas. Arch
laryngectomy: interrelated risk factor study. Otolaryngol Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119:867–870.
Head Neck Surg 1990; 103:805–812. 143. Kropveld A, Slootweg PJ, van Mansfield A DM, et al.
122. Rockley TJ, Powell J, Robin PE, et al. Post-laryngectomy Radioresistance and p53 status of T2 laryngeal carcinoma.
stomal recurrence: tumour implantation or paratracheal Analysis by immunohistochemistry and denaturing gra-
lymphatic metastases? Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16:43–47. dient gel electrophoresis. Cancer 1996; 78:991–997.
123. Esteban F, Moreno JA, Delgado-Rodriguez M, et al. Risk 144. Lera J, Lara PC, Perez S, et al. Tumor proliferation, p53
factors involved in stomal recurrence following laryngec- expression, and apoptosis in laryngeal carcinoma. Rela-
tomy. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107:527–531. tion to the results of radiotherapy. Cancer 1998; 83:
124. Gilbert RW, Cullen RJ, van Nostrand AWP, et al. Prog- 2493–2501.
nostic significance of thyroid gland involvement in laryn- 145. Sittel C, Eckel HE, Damm M, et al. Ki-67 (MIB1), p53, and
geal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; Lewis-X (LeuM1) as prognostic factors of recurrence in T1
112:856–859. and T2 laryngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2000;
125. Ogura JH. Surgical pathology of cancer of the larynx. 110:1012–1017.
Laryngoscope 1955; 65:867–926. 146. Eriksen JG, Buffa FM, Alsner J, et al. Molecular profiles as
126. de Vries N, Snow GB. Multiple primary tumours in predictive marker for the effect of overall treatment time
laryngeal cancer. J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100:915–918. of radiotherapy in supraglottic larynx squamous cell
127. Silvestri F, Bussani R, Cosatti C, et al. High relative risk of carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2004; 72:275–282.
a second pulmonary cancer in patients affected by laryn- 147. Valente G, Orecchia R, Gandolfo S, et al. Can Ki-67
geal cancer: differences by specific site of occurrence and immunostaining predict response to radiotherapy in oral
lung cancer histotype. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:222–225. squamous cell carcinoma? J Clin Pathol 1994; 47:109–112.
128. Haughey BH, Gates GA, Arfken CL, et al. Meta-analysis 148. Raybaud-Diogene H, Fortin A, Morency R, et al. Markers
of second malignant tumors in head and neck cancer: the of radioresistance in squamous cell carcinoma of the head
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 191
and neck: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical 17. Roncaroli F, Montironi R, Feliciotti F, et al. Sarcomatoid
study. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:1030–1038. carcinoma of the anorectal junction with neuroendocrine
149. Roland NJ, Caslin AW, Bowie GL, et al. Has the cellular and rhabdomyoblastic features. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;
proliferation marker Ki-67 any clinical relevance in squa- 19:217–223.
mous cell carcinoma of the head and neck? Clin Otolar- 18. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ. Spindle cell carcinoma of the
yngol 1994; 19:13–18. larynx: a pathologic analysis of 26 cases including DNA
content and immunohistochemistry. Lab Invest 1995;
72:103A (abstr).
XV. SPINDLE CELL CARCINOMA, 19. Pearl GS, Mirra SS, Miles ML. Pseudosarcoma of the
SARCOMATOID CARCINOMA, tongue: light and electron microscopic observations.
CARCINOSARCOMA South Med J 1980; 73:504–507.
20. Lichtiger B, Mackey B, Tessmer CF. Spindle cell variant of
1. Lane N. Pseudosarcoma (polypoid sarcoma-like masses) squamous carcinoma: a light and electron microscopic
associated with squamous-cell carcinoma of the mouth, study of 13 cases. Cancer 1970; 26:1311–1320.
fauces, and larynx. Report of ten cases. Cancer 1957; 21. Rainosch DE, Ro JY, Ordonez NG, et al. Sarcomatoid
10:19–41. carcinoma of the lung. A case with atypical carcinoid
2. Battifora H. Spindle cell carcinoma. Ultrastructural evi- and rhabdomyosarcomatous components. Am J Clin
dence of squamous origin and collagen production by the Pathol 1994; 102:360–364.
tumor cells. Cancer 1976; 37:2275–2282. 22. Leibl S, Gogg-Kammerer M, Andrea MT, et al. Metaplastic
3. Brodsky G. Carcino(pseudo)sarcoma of the larynx: the breast carcinomas: Are they of myoepithelial differentia-
controversy continues. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1984; tion? Immunohistochemical profile of the sarcomatoid
17:185–197. subtype using novel myoepithelial markers. Am J Surg
4. Klijanienko J, Vielh P, Duvillard P, et al. True carcinosar- Pathol 2005; 29:347–353.
coma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106:58–60. 23. Thompson L, Chang B, Barsky SH. Monoclonal origins of
5. Leifer C, Miller AS, Putong PB, et al. Spindle cell carcino- malignant mixed tumors (carcinosarcomas). Evidence for
ma of the oral mucosa: a light and electron microscopic a divergent histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20:
study of apparent sarcomatous metastasis to cervical 277–285.
lymph nodes. Cancer 1976; 34:597–605. 24. Wada H, Enomoto T, Tsujimoto M, et al. Carcinosarcoma
6. Martin MR, Kahn LB. So-called pseudosarcoma of the of the breast: molecular- biological study for analysis of
esophagus: nodal metastases of the spindle cell element. histogenesis. Hum Pathol 1998; 29:1324–1328.
Arch Pathol Lab Med 1977; 101:604–609. 25. Ota S, Kato A, Kobayashi H, et al. Monoclonal origin of an
7. Staley CJ, Ujiki GT, Yokoo H. ‘‘Pseudosarcoma’’ of the esophageal carcinosarcoma producing granulocyte-
larynx: independent metastasis of carcinomatous and colony stimulating factor. A case report. Cancer 1998; 82:
sarcomatous elements. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 94:458–465. 2102–2111.
8. Sherwin RP, Strong MS, Vaugh CW Jr. Polypoid and 26. Dacic S, Finklestein SD, Sasatomi E, et al. Molecular
junctional squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and pathogenesis of pulmonary carcinosarcoma as deter-
larynx with spindle cell carcinoma (‘‘pseudosarcoma’’). mined by microdissection-based allelotyping. Am J Surg
Cancer 1963; 16:51–60. Pathol 2002; 26:510–516.
9. Goellner JR, Devine KD, Weiland LH. Pseudosarcoma of 27. Choi H-R, Sturgis EM, Rosenthal DI, et al. Sarcomatoid
the larynx. Am J Clin Pathol 1973; 59:312–326. carcinoma of the head and neck. Molecular evidence for
10. Ellis GL, Langloss JM, Enzinger FM. Coexpression of evolution and progression from conventional squamous
keratin and desmin in a carcinosarcoma involving the cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:1216–1220.
maxillary alveolar ridge. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 28. Arakawa A, Fujii H, Matsumoto T, et al. Loss of hetero-
1985; 60:410–416. zygosity in clonal evolution with genetic progression and
11. Humphrey PA, Scroggs MW, Roggli VL, et al. Pulmonary divergence in spindle cell carcinoma of the gallbladder.
carcinomas with a sarcomatoid element: an immunocyto- Hum Pathol 2004; 35:418–423.
chemical and ultrastructural analysis. Hum Pathol 1988; 29. Pelosi G, Scarpa A, Manzotti M, et al. K-ras gene muta-
19:155–165. tional analysis supports a monoclonal origin of biphasic
12. Zarbo RJ, Crissman JD, Venkat H, et al. Spindle-cell pleomorphic carcinoma of the larynx. Mod Pathol 2004;
carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract mucosa: an 17:538–546.
immunohistologic and ultrastructural study of 18 biphasic 30. Miettinen M. Immunoreactivity for cytokeratin and epi-
tumors and comparison with seven monophasic spindle- thelial membrane antigen in leiomyosarcomas. Arch
cell tumors. Am J Surg 1986; 10:741–753. Pathol Lab Invest 1988; 112:637–640.
13. Ellis GL, Langloss JM, Heffner DK, et al. Spindle-cell 31. Gould VE. Histogenesis and differentiation: a reevalua-
carcinoma of the aerodigestive tract. An immunohisto- tion of these concepts as criteria for the classification of
chemical study of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1987; 11:335– tumors. Hum Pathol 1986; 17:212–215.
342. 32. Mills SE. Editorial. Sometimes we don’t look like our
14. Ro JY, Chen JL, Lee JS, et al. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the parents. Mod Pathol 1995; 8:347.
lung. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of 33. Wick MR, Swanson PE. Carcinosarcomas: current per-
14 cases. Cancer 1992; 69:376–386. spectives and a historical review of nosological concepts.
15. Nakhleh RE, Zarbo RJ, Ewing S, et al. Myogenic differen- Semin Diagn Pathol 1993; 10:118–127.
tiation in spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinomas of the 34. Nappi O, Wick MR. Sarcomatoid neoplasms of the respi-
upper aerodigestive tract. Appl Immunohistochem 1993; ratory tract. Semin Diagn Pathol 1993; 10:137–147.
1:58–68. 35. Lambert PR, Ward PH, Berei G. Pseudosarcoma of the
16. Nappi O, Glasner SD, Swanson PE, et al. Biphasic and larynx. A comprehensive analysis. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;
monophasic sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung. A reap- 106:700–708.
praisal of ‘‘carcinosarcomas’’ and ‘‘spindle-cell carcino- 36. Leventon GS, Evans HL. Sarcomatoid squamous cell
mas.’’ Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102:331–340. carcinoma of the mucous membranes of the head and
192 Barnes
neck. A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Cancer 1981; 3. Ferlito A, Rechner G. Ackerman’s tumor (verrucous car-
48:994–1003. cinoma) of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of 77
37. Goldman RL, Weidner N. Pure squamous cell carcinoma of cases. Cancer 1986; 46:1617–1630.
the larynx with cervical nodal metastasis showing rhabdo- 4. Cardeza A, Zidar N. Verrucous carcinoma. In: Barnes L,
myosarcomatous differentiation. Clinical, pathologic, and Everson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organi-
immunohistochemical study of a unique example of diver- zation Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics,
gent differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17:415–421. Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press,
38. Wharton JM, Boguniewicz AB, Jennings TA. Sarcomatoid 2005:122–123.
tumors of the upper respiratory tract after irradiation: a 5. Kraus FT, Perez-Mesa C. Verrucous carcinoma. Clinical
comparative study. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102:525 (abstr). and pathologic study of 105 cases involving oral cavity,
39. Larsen ET, Duggan MA, Inque M. Absence of human larynx, and genitalia. Cancer 1966; 19:26–38.
papilloma virus DNA in oropharyngeal spindle-cell squa- 6. Ferlito A. Diagnosis and treatment of verrucous squa-
mous carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 101:514–518. mous cell carcinoma of the larynx: a critical review. Ann
40. Ellis GL, Corio RL. Spindle cell carcinoma of the oral Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94:575–579.
cavity. A clinicopathologic assessment of fifty-nine cases. 7. Maw AR, Cullen RJ, Bradfield JWB. Verrucous carcinoma
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50:522–534. of the larynx. Clin Otolaryngol 1982; 7:305–311.
41. Leventon GS, Evans HL. Sarcomatoid squamous cell 8. Lundgren JAV, van Nostrand AWP, Harwood AR, et al.
carcinoma of the mucous membranes of the head and Verrucous carcinoma (Ackerman’s tumor) of the larynx:
neck. A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Cancer 1981; diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Head Neck
48:994–1003. Surg 1986; 9:19–26.
42. Berthelet E, Shenouda G, Black MJ, et al. Sarcomatoid carci- 9. Edstrom S, Johansson SL, Lindstrom J, et al. Verrucous
noma of the head and neck. Am J Surg 1994; 168:455–458. squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: evidence for
43. Olsen KD, Lewis JE, Suman VJ. Spindle cell carcinoma of increased metastatic potential after irradiation. Otolar-
the larynx and hypopharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck yngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 97:381–384.
Surg 1997; 116:47–52. 10. Milford CA, O’Flynn PE. Management of verrucous car-
44. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ. Spindle cell carcinoma of the cinoma of the larynx. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16:160–160.
larynx: Review of 26 cases including DNA content and 11. Sllamniko B, Bauer W, Painter C, et al. Clinical and
immunohistochemistry. Hum Pathol 1997; 28:664–673. histopathological considerations for the diagnosis and
45. Thompson LD, Wieneke JA, Miettinen M, et al. Spindle cell treatment of verrucous carcinoma of the larynx. Arch
(sarcomatoid) carcinomas of the larynx. A clinicopathologic Otorhinolaryngol 1989; 246:126–132.
study of 187 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:153–170. 12. Orvidas LJ, Olsen KD, Lewis JE, et al. Verrucous carcino-
46. Kessler S, Bartley MH. Spindle cell squamous carcinoma ma of the larynx: a review of 53 patients. Head Neck 1998;
of the tongue in the first decade of life. Oral Surg Oral 20:197–203.
Med Oral Pathol 1988; 66:470–474. 13. Koch BB, Trask DK, Hoffman HT, et al. National survey of
47. Matsusaka T, Watanabe H, Enjoji M. Pseudosarcoma and head and neck verrucous carcinoma. Patterns of presen-
carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 1976; 37:1546–1555. tation, care and outcome. Cancer 2001; 92:110–120.
48. Lewis JS Jr., Ritter JH, El-Mofty S. Alternative epithelial 14. McCaffrey TV, Witte M, Ferguson MT. Verrucous carci-
markers in sarcomatoid carcinoma of the head and neck, noma of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;
lung, and bladder – p63, MOC-31 and TTF-1. Mod Pathol 107:391–395.
2005; 18:1471–1481. 15. Brandsma JL, Steinberg BM, Abramson AL, et al. Presence
49. Zellers RA, Bicket WJ, Parker MG. Posttraumatic spindle of human papillomavirus type 16 related sequences in
cell nodule of the buccal mucosa. Report of a case. Oral verrucous carcinoma of the larynx. Cancer Res 1986;
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74:212–215. 46:2185–2188.
50. Wenig BM, Devaney K, Biceglia M. Inflammatory myofi- 16. Bryan RL, Bevan IS, Crocker J, et al. Detection of HPV 6
broblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study and 11 in tumors of the upper respiratory tract using the
of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cell neo- polymerase chain reaction. Clin Otolaryngol 1990; 15:
plasm. Cancer 1995; 76:2217–2229. 177–180.
51. Baker PM, Young RH. Radiation-induced pseudosarcom- 17. Johnson TL, Plieth DA, Crissman JD, et al. HPV detection by
atous proliferation of the urinary bladder: A report of 4 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in verrucous lesions of the
cases. Hum Pathol 2000; 31:678–683. upper aerodigestive tract. Mod Pathol 1991; 4:461–465.
52. Meehan SA, LeBoit PE. An immunohistochemical analysis 18. Kasperbauer JL, O’Halloran GL, Espy MJ, et al. Polymer-
of radiation fibroblasts. J Cutan Pathol 1997; 24:309–313. ase chain reaction (PCR) identification of human papillo-
53. Ansari-Lari MA, Hoque MO, Califano J, et al. Immuno- mavirus (HPV) DNA in verrucous carcinoma of the
histochemical p53 expression patterns in sarcomatoid larynx. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:416–420.
carcinomas of the upper respiratory tract. Am J Surg 19. Fliss DM, Noble-Topham SE, McLachlin CM, et al. Laryn-
Pathol 2002; 26:1024–1031. geal verrucous carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study and
54. Davis WG, Hennessy B, Babiera G, et al. Metaplastic detection of human papillomavirus using polymerase
sarcomatoid carcinoma of the breast with absent or mini- chain reaction. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:146–152.
mal overt invasive carcinomatous component. A misno- 20. Medina JE, Dichtel W, Luna MA. Verrucous-squamous
mer. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1456–1463. carcinomas of the oral cavity. A clinicopathologic study of
104 cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110:437–440.
21. Lopez-Amado M, Garcia-Caballero T, Lozano-Ramirez A,
XVI. VERRUCOUS CARCINOMA et al. Human papillomavirus and p53 oncoprotein in
verrucous carcinoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1996;
1. Ackerman LV. Verrucous carcinoma of the oral cavity. 110:742–747.
Surgery 1948; 23:670–678. 22. Sakurai K, Urade M, Takahashi Y, et al. Increased expres-
2. Steffen C. The man behind the eponym. Lauren V. Acker- sion of C-erbB-3 protein and proliferating nuclear antigen
man and verrucous carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol 2004; during development of verrucous carcinoma of the oral
26:334–341. mucosa. Cancer 2000; 89:2597–2605.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 193
23. Choi HR, Roberts DB, Johnigan RH, et al. Molecular and 3. Wan SK, Chan JKC, Tse KC. Basaloid-squamous carcino-
clinicopathologic comparisons of head and neck squa- ma of the nasal cavity. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106:370–371.
mous carcinoma variants. Common and distinctive fea- 4. Lovejoy HM, Matthews BL. Basaloid-squamous carcino-
tures of biological significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; ma of the palate. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;
28:1299–1310. 106:159–162.
24. Poh CF, Zhang L, Lam WL, et al. A high frequency of 5. Cadier MA, Kelly SA, Parkhouse N, et al. Basaloid squa-
allelic loss in oral verrucous lesions may explain malig- mous carcinoma of the buccal cavity. Head Neck 1992;
nant risk. Lab Invest 2001; 81:629–634. 14:387–391.
25. Maurizi M, Cadoni G, Ottaviani F, et al. Verrucous 6. Banks ER, Frierson HF Jr., Mills SE, et al. Basaloid
squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: diagnostic and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A clinico-
therapeutic considerations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol pathologic and immunohistochemical study of 40 cases.
1996; 253:130–135. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16:939–946.
26. Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Mannara GM. Is primary radiother- 7. Coppola D, Catalano E, Tang C-K, et al. Basaloid squa-
apy an appropriate option for the treatment of verrucous mous cell carcinoma of the floor of mouth. Cancer 1993;
carcinoma of the head and neck? J Laryngol Otol 1998; 72:2299–2305.
112:132–139. 8. Luna MA, El-Naggar A, Parichatikanond P, et al. Basaloid
27. McClure DL, Gullane PJ, Slinger RP, et al. Verrucous squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.
carcinoma—changing concepts in management. J Otolar- Clinicopathologic and DNA flow cytometric analysis.
yngol 1984; 13:7–12. Cancer 1990; 66:537–542.
28. Hagen P, Lyons GD, Haindel C. Verrucous carcinoma of 9. Ereno C, Lopez JI, Sanchez JM, et al. Basaloid-squamous
the larynx: role of human papillomavirus, radiation, and cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. A clinico-
surgery. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:253–257. pathologic study of 7 cases. Path Res Pract 1994; 190:
29. Batsakis JG, Hybels R, Crissman JD, et al. The pathology 186–193.
of head and neck tumors: verrucous carcinoma, part 15. 10. Wieneke JA, Thompson LDR, Wenig BM. Basaloid squa-
Head Neck Surg 1982; 5:29–38. mous cell carcinoma of the sinonasal tract. Cancer 1999;
30. Glanz H, Kleinsasser O. Verrucous carcinoma of the 85:841–854.
larynx—a misnomer? Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1987; 11. Ide F, Shimoyama T, Horie N, et al. Basaloid squamous
244:108–111. cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa: a new case and review
of 45 cases in the literature. Oral Oncol 2002; 38:120–124.
12. Bahar G, Feinmesser R, Popovtzer A, et al. Basaloid
XVII. PAPILLARY SQUAMOUS CELL squamous carcinoma of the larynx. Am J Otolaryngol
CARINCOMA 2003; 24:204–208.
13. Grizzo de Sampaio Goes FC, Oliveira DT, Dorta RG, et al.
1. Ishiyama A, Eversole LR, Ross DA, et al. Papillary squa- Prognoses of oral basaloid squamous cell carcinoma and
mous neoplasms of the head and neck. Laryngoscope squamous cell carcinoma. A comparison. Arch Otolar-
1994; 104:1446–1452. yngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:83–86.
2. Thompson LDR, Wenig BM, Heffner DK, et al. Exophytic 14. Dougherty BG, Evans HL. Carcinoma of the anal canal: a
and papillary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: A study of 79 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 83:159–164.
clinicopathologic series of 104 cases. Otolaryngol Head 15. Tsang WYW, Chan JKC, Lee KC, et al. Basaloid-squamous
Neck Surg 1999; 120:718–724. carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract and so-called
3. Suarez PA, Adler-Storthz K, Luna MA, et al. Papillary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the esophagus: the same
squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tumour type? Histopathology 1991; 19:35–46.
tract: A clinicopathologic and molecular study. Head 16. Ferry JA, Scully RE. ‘‘Adenoid cystic’’ carcinoma and
Neck 2000; 22:360–368. adenoid basal cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a
4. Ereno C, Lopez JI, Sanchez JM, et al. Papillary squamous study of 28 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12:134–144.
cell carcinoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 17. Moro D, Brichon P-Y, Brambilla E, et al. Basaloid bronchi-
115:164–166. al carcinoma. A histologic group with a poor prognosis.
5. Crissman JD, Kessis T, Shah KV, et al. Squamous papil- Cancer 1994; 73:2734–2739.
lary neoplasia of the upper aerodigestive tract. Hum 18. Sturm N, Lantuejoul S, Laverriere M-H, et al. Thyroid
Pathol 1988; 19:1387–1396. transcription factor 1 and cytokeratins 1, 5, 10, 14 (34BE12)
6. Judd R, Zaki SR, Coffield LM, et al. Human Papillomavi- expressions in basaloid and large-cell neuroendocrine
rus type 6 detected by the polymerase chain reaction in carcinomas of the lung. Hum Pathol 2001; 32:918–925.
invasive sinonasal papillary squamous cell carcinoma. 19. Abe K, Sasano H, Itakura Y, et al. Basaloid-squamous
Arch Pathol Lab Med 1991; 115:1150–1153. carcinoma of the esophagus. A clinicopathologic, DNA
7. Quick CA, Foucer E, Dehner CP. Frequency and signifi- ploidy, and immunohistochemical study of seven cases.
cance of epithelial dysplasia in laryngeal papillomatosis. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20:453–461.
Laryngoscope 1979; 89:550–560. 20. Cubilla AL, Reuter VE, Gregoire L, et al. Basaloid squa-
mous cell carcinoma: A distinctive human papilloma
virus-related penile neoplasm. A report of 20 cases. Am
XVIII. BASALOID SQUAMOUS CELL J Surg Pathol 1998; 22:755–761.
CARCINOMA 21. Chetty R, Serra S, Hsieh E. Basaloid squamous carcinoma
of the anal canal with an adenoid cystic pattern. Histolog-
1. Wain SL, Kier R, Vollmer RT, et al. Basaloid squamous ic and immunohistochemical reappraisal of an unusual
carcinoma of the tongue, hypopharynx, and larynx: report variant. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1668–1672.
of 10 cases. Hum Pathol 1986; 17:1158–1166. 22. Wak S-K, Chan JKC, Lau W-H, et al. Basaloid squamous
2. Raslan WF, Barnes L, Krause JR, et al. Basaloid squamous carcinoma of the nasopharynx: An Epstein-Barr virus
cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic associated neoplasm compared with morphologically
and flow cytometric study of 10 new cases with review of identical tumors occurring in other sites. Cancer 1995;
the English literature. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15:204–211. 76:1689–1693.
194 Barnes
12. Kusafuka K, Ebihara M, Ishiki H, et al. Primary adenoid 4. El-Naggar AK, Batsakis JG. Carcinoid tumor of the larynx.
squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Pathol Int A critical review of the literature. ORL J Otolaryngol Relat
2006; 56:78–83. Spec 1991; 53:189–193.
5. Woodruff JM, Senie RT. Atypical carcinoid tumor of the
larynx. A critical review of the literature. ORL J Otorhi-
XXI. LYMPHOEPITHELIAL CARCINOMA nolaryngol Relat Spec 1991; 53:194–209.
6. Gnepp DR. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the
1. Tsang WYW, Chan JKC. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma. In: larynx. A critical review of the literature. ORL J Otorhi-
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health nolaryngol Relat Spec 1991; 53:210–219.
Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and 7. Barnes L. Paraganglioma of the larynx. A critical review of
Genetics, Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, the literature. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1991;
2005:132. 53:220–234.
2. Ferlito A. Primary lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the 8. Pesce C, Tobia-Gallelli F, Toncini C. APUD cells of the
hypopharynx. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91:361–367. larynx. Acta Otolaryngol 1984; 98:158–162.
3. Micheau C, Luboinski B, Schwaab G, et al. Lymphoepi- 9. Chung J-H, Lee S-S, Shim Y-S, et al. A study of moderately
theliomas of the larynx (undifferentiated carcinomas of differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the larynx
nasopharyngeal type). Clin Otolaryngol 1979; 4:43–48. and an examination of non-neoplastic larynx tissue for
4. Marioni G, Mariuzzi L, Gaio E, et al. Lymphoepithelial neuroendocrine cells. Laryngoscope 2004; 114:1264–1270.
carcinoma of the larynx. Acta Otolaryngol 2002; 122: 10. Wenig BM, Gnepp DR. The spectrum of neuroendocrine
429–434. carcinomas of the larynx. Semin Diagn Pathol 1989; 6:
5. MacMillan C, Kapadia SB, Finklestein SD, et al. Lymphoe- 329–350.
pithelial carcinoma of larynx and hypopharynx: study of 11. Soga J, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A. Endocrinocarcinomas (carci-
eight cases with relationship to Epstein-Barr virus and noids and their variants) of the larynx: a comparative
p53 gene alterations, and review of the literature. Hum consideration with those of other sites. Oral Oncol 2004;
Pathol 1996; 27:1172–1179. 40:668–672.
12. Synderman C, Johnson JT, Barnes L. Carcinoid tumor of
the larynx: case report and review of the world literature.
XXII. GIANT CELL CARCINOMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 95:158–164.
13. Stanley RJ, DeSanto LW, Weiland LH. Oncocytic and
1. Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin, Barnes L, et al. World Health oncocytoid carcinoid tumors (well-differentiated neuro-
Organization International Histological Classification of endocrine carcinoma) of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol
Tumours. Histological Typing of Tumours of the Upper Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:529–535.
Respiratory Tract and Ear. 2nd ed. New York: Springer- 14. Scmidt U, Metz KA, Schrader M, et al. Well-differentiated
Verlag, 1991. (oncocytoid) neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx with
2. Wang N-S, Seemayer TA, Ahmed MN, et al. Giant cell multiple skin metastases: a brief report. J Laryngol Otol
carcinoma of the lung. A light and electron microscopic 1994; 108:272–274.
study. Hum Pathol 1976; 7:3–16. 15. Ferlito A, Shaha AR, Rinaldo A. Neuroendocrine neo-
3. Ginsberg SS, Buzaid A, Stern H, et al. Giant cell carcinoma plasms of the larynx: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
of the lung. Cancer 1992; 70:606–610. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002; 64:108–113.
4. Fishback NF, Travis WD, Moran CA, et al. Pleomorphic 16. Goldman NC, Hood CI, Singleton GT. Carcinoid of the
(spindle/giant cell) carcinoma of the lung. A clinicopath- larynx. Arch Otolaryngol 1969; 90:91–93.
ologic correlation of 78 cases. Cancer 1994; 73:2936–2945. 17. Andrews TM, Myer CM III. Malignant (atypical) carcinoid
5. Hammar SP. Common neoplasms. In: Dail DH, Hammar of the larynx occurring in a patient with laryngotracheal
SP, Colby TV, eds. Pulmonary Pathology—Tumors. New papillomatosis. Am J Otolaryngol 1992; 13:238–242.
York: Springer-Verlag, 1995:1–156. 18. Ferlito A, Shaha AR, Rinaldo A. Paraneoplastic syndrome
6. Ferlito A, Friedmann J, Recher G. Primary giant cell in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the head and neck: Have
carcinoma of the larynx. A clinico- pathological study of they an impact on prognosis? Acta Otolaryngol 2001;
four cases. ORL 1985; 47:105–112. 121:756–758.
7. Mackay B, Lukeman J, Ordonez N. Tumors of the Lung. 19. Sweeney EC, McDonnell L, O’Brien C. Medullary carci-
Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:101–103. noma of the thyroid presenting as tumors of the pharynx
8. Martin PC, Hoda SA, Pigman HT, et al. Giant cell tumor and larynx. Histopathology 1981; 5:263–271.
of the larynx. Case report and review of the literature. 20. Smets G, Warson F, Dehou M-F, et al. Metastasizing
Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118:834–837. neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx with calcitonin
and somatostatin secretion and CEA production, resem-
bling medullary thyroid carcinoma. Virchows Arch
XXIII. NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS Pathol Anat 1990; 416:539–543.
21. Laccourreye O, Chabardes E, Weinstein G, et al. Synchro-
1. Travis WD. The concept of pulmonary neuroendocrine nous arytenoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcino-
tumours. In: Travis WD, Brambilla E, Muller-Hermelink ma. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105:373–375.
HK, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of 22. Wenig BM, Hyams VJ, Heffner DK. Moderately differen-
Tumours, Pathology and Genetics, Tumours of the Lung, tiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx. A clinico-
Pleura, Thymus, and Heart. Lyon: IARC Press, 2004:19–20. pathologic study of 54 cases. Cancer 1988; 62:2658–2676.
2. Barnes L. Neuroendocrine tumours in World Health 23. Woodruff JM, Shah JP, Huvos AG, et al. Neuroendocrine
Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and carcinomas of the larynx. A study of two types, one of
Genetics, Head and Neck Tumours, IARC Press, 2005: which mimics thyroid medullary carcinoma. Am J Surg
135–139. Pathol 1985; 11:771–790.
3. Ferlito A, Barnes L, Rinaldo A, et al. A review of neuro- 24. Googe PB, Ferry JA, Bhan AK, et al. A comparison of
endocrine neoplasms of the larynx: update on diagnosis paraganglioma, carcinoid tumor, and small-cell carcino-
and treatment. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112:827–834. ma of the larynx. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988; 112:809–815.
196 Barnes
25. Gillenwater A, Lewin J, Roberts D, et al. Moderately XXIV. SALIVARY GLAND-TYPE NEOPLASMS
differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (atypical carci- OF THE LARYNX
noid of the larynx: A clinically aggressive tumor. Laryn-
goscope 2005; 115:1191–1195. 1. Cady B, Rippey JH, Frazell EL. Non-epidermoid cancer of
26. El-Naggar AK, Batsakis JG, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, et al. the larynx. Ann Surg 1968; 167:116–120.
Medullary (thyroid) carcinoma-like carcinoids of the lar- 2. Batsakis JG, Luna MA, El-Naggar AK. Nonsquamous
ynx. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105:683–686. carcinomas of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
27. Sturm N, Rossi G, Lantuejoul S, et al. Expression of 1992; 101:1024–1026.
thyroid transcription factor-1 in the spectrum of neuroen- 3. Cotelingam JD, Barnes L, Nixon VB. Pleomorphic adeno-
docrine cell lung proliferation with special interest in ma of the epiglottis. Report of a case. Arch Otolaryngol
carcinoids. Hum Pathol 2002; 33:175–182. 1977; 103:245–247.
28. Hirsch MS, Faquin WC, Krane JF. Thyroid transcription 4. Dubey SP, Banerjee S, Ghosh LM, et al. Benign pleomor-
factor-1, but not p53, is helpful in distinguishing moderately phic adenoma of the larynx. Report of a cases and review
differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx from and analysis of 20 additional cases in the literature. Ear
medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. Mod Pathol 2004; 17: Nose Throat J 1997; 76:548–557.
631–636. 5. MacMillan RH III, Fechner RE. Pleomorphic adenoma of
29. Milroy CM, Williams RA, Charlton IG, et al. Nuclear the larynx. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110:245–247.
ploidy in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the larynx. ORL 6. Sabri JA, Hajjar A. Malignant mixed tumor of the vocal
J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1991; 53:245–249. cord. Report of a case. Arch Otolaryngol 1967; 85:332–334.
30. Olofsson J, van Nostrand AWP. Anaplastic small cell 7. Bomer DL, Arnold GE. Malignant mixed tumors of the
carcinoma of the larynx. Case report. Ann Otol Rhinol minor salivary glands. Acta Otolaryngol 1971; suppl 289.
Laryngol 1972; 81:284–287. 8. Milford CA, Mugliston TA, O’Flynn P, et al. Carcinoma
31. Eusebi V, Damiani S, Pasquinelle G, et al. Small cell arising in a pleomorphic adenoma of the epiglottis.
neuroendocrine carcinoma with skeletal muscle differen- J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103:324–327.
tiation. Report of three cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 9. Myers JN, Myers EN, Barnes EL. Benign neoplasms of the
223–230. larynx in The Larynx. A Multidisciplinary Approach, 2nd
32. Gnepp DR, Ferlito A, Hyams V. Primary anaplastic small ed, Fried MP, editor, Mosby, St. Louis, 1996:443–459.
cell (oat cell) carcinoma of the larynx. Review of the litera- 10. Gallagher JC, Puzon BQ. Oncocytic lesions of the larynx.
ture and report of 18 cases. Cancer 1983; 51:1731–1745. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1969; 78:307–317.
33. Baugh RF, Wolf GT, Beals TF, et al. Small cell carcinoma 11. Olofsson J, van Nostrand AWP. Adenoid cystic carcinoma
of the larynx: results of treatment. Laryngoscope 1986; of the larynx. A report of four cases and a review of the
96:1283–1290. literature. Cancer 1955; 40:1307–1313.
34. Trotoux J, Glickmanas M, Sterkers O, et al. Syndrome de 12. Ferlito A, Caruso G. Biological behavior of laryngeal
Schwartz-Bartter: Relevateur d’un cancer larynge’ sous- adenoid cystic carcinoma. Therapeutic considerations.
glottique a petites cellules. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervi- ORL 1983; 45:245–256.
cofac 1979; 96:1720–1726. 13. Tewfik TL, Novick WH, Schipper HM. Adenoid cystic
35. Takeuchi K, Nishii S, Shun J, et al. Anaplastic small cell carcinoma of the larynx. J Otolaryngol 1983; 12:151–154.
carcinoma of the larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx 1989; 16: 14. Donovan DT, Conley J. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the
127–132. subglottic region. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92:
36. Medina JE, Moran M, Goepfert H. Oat cell carcinoma of 491–495.
the larynx and Eaton-Lambert syndrome. Arch Otolar- 15. Stillwagon GB, Smith RRL, Highstein C, et al. Adenoid
yngol 1984; 10:123–126. cystic carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx: report of a
37. Bishop JW, Osamura Y, Tsutsumi Y. Multiple hormone case and review of the literature. Am J Otolaryngol 1985;
production in an oat cell carcinoma of the larynx. Acta 6:309–314.
Pathol Jpn 1985; 35:915–923. 16. Ferlito A, Barnes L, Myers EN. Neck dissection for laryn-
38. Travis WD, Tsokos MG, Cutler GB Jr., et al. Neuroendo- geal adenoid cystic carcinoma: is it indicated? Ann Otol
crine tumors of the lung with proposed criteria for large- Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99:277–280.
cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. An ultrastructural immu- 17. Shin YJ, Percodani J, Corte EU, et al. Adenoid cystic carcino-
nohistochemical, and flow-cytometric study of 35 cases. ma of the larynx. A case report and review of the literature.
Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15:529–553. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1998; 119:105–108.
39. Greene L, Brundage W, Cooper K. Large cell neuroendocrine 18. Damborenea TJ, Campos del Alamo MA, Marin GL, et al.
carcinoma of the larynx: a case report and a review of the Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the larynx. Case report and
classification of this neoplasm. J Clin Pathol 2005; 58:658–661. literature review. An Otorhinolaryngol Ibero Am 1999;
40. Milroy CM, Robinson PJ, Grant HR. Primary composite 26:257–263.
squamous cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine 19. Yang PY, Liu MS, Chen CH, et al. Adenoid cystic carcino-
carcinoma of the hypopharynx. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103: ma of the trachea: a report of seven cases and literature
1093–1096. review. Chang Gung Med J 2005; 28:357–363.
41. Asamura H, Kameya T, Matsuno Y, et al. Neuroendocrine 20. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Adenoid cystic carcinoma:
neoplasms of the lung: A prognostic spectrum. J Clin factors influencing survival. Am J Surg 1979; 138:579–583.
Oncol 2006; 24:70–76. 21. El-Jabbour JN, Ferlito A, Friedman I. Salivary gland neo-
42. Zacharias J, Nicolson AG, Ladas GP, et al. Large cell plasms. In: Neoplasms of the Larynx. (Ferlito A, ed).
neuroendocrine carcinoma and large cell carcinoma with Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 1993:231–264.
neuroendocrine morphology of the lung: prognosis after 22. Damiani JM, Damiani KK, Hauck K, et al. Mucoepider-
complete resection and systematic nodal dissection. Ann moid-adenosquamous carcinoma of the larynx and hypo-
Thorac Surg 2003; 75:348–352. pharynx: a report of 21 cases and review of the literature.
43. Jaiswal VR, Hoang MP. Primary combined squamous and Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981; 89:235–243.
small cell carcinoma of the larynx. A case report and 23. Prgomet D, Bilic M, Bumber Z, et al. Mucoepidermoid
review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004; carcinoma of the larynx: report of three cases. J. Laryngol
128:1279–1282. Otol 2003; 117:998–1000.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 197
24. Boscolo-Rizzo P, da Mosto MC, Marchiori C, et al. Trans- 11. Amin HM, Petruzzelli GJ, Husain AN, et al. Primary
glottic acinic cell carcinoma. Case report and literature malignant melanoma of the larynx. Arch Pathol Lab
review. ORL 2004; 66:286–289. Med 2001; 125:271–273.
25. Pesavento G, Ferlito A, Recher G. Primary clear cell 12. Batsakis JG, Luna MA, Byers RM: Metastases to the
carcinoma of the larynx. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33:1160–1164. larynx. Head Neck Surg 1985; 7:458–460.
26. Seo IS, Tomich CE, Warfel KA, et al. Clear cell carcinoma 13. Ferlito A, Caruso G, Recher G. Secondary laryngeal
of the larynx. A variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. tumors. Report of seven cases with review of the litera-
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89:168–172. ture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:
27. Batsakis JG, Hyams VJ, Morales AR. Special tumors of the 635–639.
head and neck. Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Annual 14. Patel JK, Didolkar MS, Pickren JW, et al. Metastatic
Seminar of American Society of Clinical Pathologists. pattern of malignant melanoma. A study of 216 autopsy
Chicago: American Society of Clinical Pathologists’ cases. Am J Surg 1978; 135:807–810.
Press, 1983. 15. Henderson LT, Robbins T, Weitzner S. Upper aerodiges-
28. Ibrahim R, Bird DJ, Sieler MW. Malignant myoepithe- tive tract metastases in disseminated malignant melano-
lioma of the larynx with massive metastatic spread to the ma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:659–663.
liver: an ultra-structural and immunocytochemical study. 16. Pau H, Spencer MG, Steele PRM. Metastatic malignant
Ultrastruct Pathol 1991; 15:69–76. melanoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115:925–927.
29. Mikaelian DO, Contrucci RB, Batsakis JG. Epithelial-
myoepithelial carcinoma of the subglottic region. A case
presentation and review of the literature. Otolaryngol XXVI. GIANT CELL TUMOR
Head Neck Surg 1986; 95:104–106.
30. Goel MM, Agrawal SP, Srivastava AN. Salivary duct 1. Wieneke JA, Gannon FH, Heffner DK, et al. Giant cell
carcinoma of the larynx: report of a rare case. Ear Nose tumor of the larynx: A clinicopathologic series of eight
Throat J 2003; 82:371–373. cases and a review of the literature. Mod Pathol 2001;
31. Ferlito A, Gale N, Hvala A. Laryngeal salivary duct 14:1209–1215.
carcinoma. A light and electron microscopic study. 2. Devaney KO, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A. Giant cell tumor of the
J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95:731–738. larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 107:729–732.
32. Robinson AC, Kaberos A, Cox PM, et al. Oncocytoma of 3. Hall-Jones J. Giant cell tumour of the larynx. J Laryngol
the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104:346–349. Otol 1972; 86:371–381.
33. Johns ME, Batsakis JG, Short CD. Oncocytic and oncocy- 4. Hinni ML. Giant cell tumour of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol
toid tumors of the salivary glands. Laryngoscope 1973; 1972; 86:371–381.
83:1940–1952. 5. Martin PC, Hoda SA, Pigman HT, et al. Giant cell tumor
34. Roa RA, Atkins JP Jr., Cunnane MF, et al. Papillary of the larynx. Case report and review of the literature.
adenocarcinoma of the larynx: a case report. Otolaryngol Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118:834–837.
Head Neck Surg 1988; 99:601–603. 6. Ribari O, Elemr G, Balint A. Laryngeal giant cell tumour.
35. Tsang YW, Ngan KC, Chan JKC. Primary mucoid adeno- J Laryngol Otol 1975; 89:857–861.
carcinoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105:315–317. 7. Thomas DM, Wilkins MJ, Witana JS, et al. Giant cell
reparative granuloma of the cricoid cartilage. J Laryngol
Otol 1995; 109:1120–1123.
XXV. MELANOTIC LESIONS OF THE LARYNX
1. Har-El G, Borederon M, Ladinsky S, et al. Melanosis of the XXVII. INFLAMMATORY
larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99:640–642. MYOFIBROBLASTIC TUMOR
2. Goldman JL, Lawson W, Zak FG, et al. The presence of
melanocytes in the human larynx. Laryngoscope 1972; 1. Coffin CM, Fletcher JA. Inflammatory myofibroblastic
82:824–835. tumor in World Health Organization Classification of
3. Busuttil A. Dendritic pigmented cells within human Tumours, Pathology and Genetics, Tumours of Soft Tissue
laryngeal mucosa. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102:43–44. and Bone, Fletcher, CDM, Unni KK, Martens F, editors,
4. Gonzalez-Vela MC, Fernandez FA, Mayorga M, et al. Lyon, IARC Press, 2002:91–93.
Laryngeal melanosis: Report of four cases and literature 2. Gomez-Roman JJ, Ocejo-Vinyals G, Sanchez-Velasco P,
review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117:708–712. et al. Presence of human herpes virus 8 DNA sequences
5. Reuter VE, Woodruff JM. Melanoma of the larynx. Laryn- and overexpression of human IL-6 and cyclin D1 in
goscope 1986; 94:389–393. inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseu-
6. Wenig BM. Laryngeal mucosal malignant melanoma. A dotumor). Lab Invest 2000; 80:1121–1126.
clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastruc- 3. Cheuk W, Chan JKC, Shek TWH, et al. Inflammatory
tural study of four patients and a review of the literature. pseudotumor-like follicular dendritic cell tumor. A dis-
Cancer 1995; 75:1568–1577. tinctive low-grade malignant intra-abdominal neoplasm
7. Seals JL, Shenefelt RE, Babin RW. Intralaryngeal nevus in with consistent Epstein-Barr virus association. Am J Surg
a child. A case report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1986; Pathol 2001; 25:721–731.
12:55–58. 4. Kazmierczak B, Cin PD, Sciot R, et al. Inflammatory
8. Schimpf A, Musebaeck K, Mootz W. Naevuszellnaevus myofibroblastic tumor with HMGIC rearrangement. Can-
(compoundnaevus) im Larynxbereich (plica ventricula- cer Genet Cytogenet 1999; 112:156–160.
ris). Z Haut Geschlechtskr 1969; 44:137–144. 5. Su LD, Atayde-Perez A, Sheldon S, et al. Inflammatory
9. Wenig BM. Malignant melanoma. In: Neoplasms of the myofibroblastic tumor: Cytogenic evidence supporting
larynx. (Ferlito A, ed). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, clonal origin. Mod Pathol 1998; 11:364–368.
1993:207–230. 6. Hussong JW, Brown M, Perkins SL, et al. Comparison of
10. Travis LW, Sutherland C. Coexisting lentigo of the larynx DNA ploidy, histologic, and immunohistochemical find-
and melanoma of the oral cavity: report of a case. ings with clinical outcomes in inflammatory myofibro-
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88:218–220. blastic tumors. Mod Pathol 1999; 12:279–286.
198 Barnes
7. Cook JR, Dehner LP, Collins MH, et al. Anaplastic lym- 3. Prasad JN. Fibrosarcoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol
phoma kinase (ALK) expression in the inflammatory 1972; 86:267–273.
myofibroblastic tumor. A comparative immunohisto- 4. Coia LR, Frazekas JT, Kramer S. Post-Irradiation sarcoma
chemical study. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25:1364–1371. of the head and neck: a report of three late sarcomas
8. Coffin CM, Patel A, Perkins S, et al. ALK 1 and p80 following therapeutic irradiation for primary malignan-
expression and chromosomal rearrangement involving cies of the paranasal sinus, nasal cavity, and larynx.
2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Mod Cancer 1980; 46:1982–1985.
Pathol 2001; 14:569–576. 5. Kim JH, Chu FC, Woodward HQ, et al. Radiation-induced
9. Som PM, Brandwein MS, Maldjian C, et al. Inflammatory soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Radiology 1978; 129:501–508.
pseudotumuor of the maxillary sinus: CT and MR find- 6. Setzen M, Sobol S, Toomey JM. Clinical course of unusual
ings in six cases. AJR 1994; 163:689–692. malignant sarcomas of the head and neck. Ann Otol
10. Benton NC, Korol HW, Smyth LT Jr. Plasma cell granulo- Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88:486–494.
ma of the middle ear and mastoid. Case report. Ann Otol 7. Brockstein B. Management of sarcomas of the head and
Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101:92–94. neck. Curr Oncol Rep 2004; 6:321–327.
11. Mulder JJS, Cremers WR, Joosten F, et al. Fibroinflamma- 8. Barnes L. Tumors and tumorlike lesions of the soft tissues.
tory pseudotumor of the ear. A locally destructive benign In: Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck (Barnes L,
lesion. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: ed). New York: Marcel Dekker, 1985:725–880.
930–933.
12. Perez M, Barnes L. Inflammatory (myofibroblastic) pseu-
dotumors (IPT) of the head and neck. Mod Pathol 1999; XXIX. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
12:129A (abstract). OF THE HYPOPHARYNX
13. Wenig BM, Devaney K, Bisceglia M. Inflammatory myofi-
broblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study 1. Lefebvre JL, Castelain B, De La Torre JC, et al. Lymph
of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cells neo- node invasion in hypopharynx and lateral epilarynx
plasm. Cancer 1995; 76:2217–2229. carcinoma: a prognostic factor. Head Neck Surg 1987;
14. Hytiroglou P, Brandwein MS, Strauchen JA, et al. Inflam- 10:14–18.
matory pseudotumor of the parapharyngeal space: Case 2. Hasegawa Y, Matsuura H. Retropharyngeal node dissec-
report and review of the literature. Head Neck 1992; tion in cancer of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head
14:230–234. Neck 1994; 16:173–180.
15. Inui M, Tagawa T, Mori A, et al. Inflammatory pseudo- 3. Olofsson J, van Nostrand AWP. Growth and spread of
tumor in the submandibular region. Clinicopathologic laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma with reflections
study and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med on the effect of preoperative irradiation: 139 cases studied
Oral Pathol 1993; 76:333–337. by whole organ serial sectioning. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl
16. Williams SB, Foss RD, Ellis GL. Inflammatory pseudotu- 1973; 308:1–84.
mors of the major salivary glands. Clinicopathologic and 4. Bryce D. The conventional surgical management of carcino-
immunohistochemical analysis of six cases. Am J Surg ma of the hypopharynx. J Laryngol Otol 1971; 85:1221–1226.
Pathol 1992; 16:896–902. 5. Shah JP, Shaha AR, Spiro RH, et al. Carcinoma of the
17. Martinez S, Bosch R, Pardo J, et al. Inflammatory myofi- hypopharynx. Am J Surg 1976; 132:439–443.
broblastic tumour of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 6. Stefani S, Eells RW. Carcinoma of the hypopharynx—a
140–142. study of distant metastases, treatment failures, and multi-
18. Munoz A, Villafruela M. Inflammatory pseudotumor of ple primary cancers in 215 male patients. Laryngoscope
the larynx: MR findings in a child. Pediatr Radiol 2001; 31: 1971; 81:1491–1498.
459–460. 7. Kirchner JA. Pyriform sinus cancer: a clinical and labora-
19. Rodriquez M, Taylor RJ, Sun CC, et al. Inflammatory tory study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84:793–803.
myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx in a 2-year-old 8. Razack MS, Sako K, Marchetta FC, et al. Carcinoma of the
male. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2005; 67:101–105. hypopharynx: success and failure. Am J Surg 1977; 134:
20. Suh S, Seol HY, Lee JH, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblas- 489–491.
tic tumor of the larynx. Head Neck 2006; 28:369–372. 9. ElBadawi Sa, Goepfert H, Fletcher GH, et al. Squamous
21. Guilemany JM, Alos L, Alobid I, et al. Inflammatory cell carcinoma of the pyriform sinus. Laryngoscope 1982;
myofibroblastic tumor in the larynx: Clinicopathologic 92:357–364.
features and histogenesis. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2005; 10. Keane TJ. Carcinoma of the hypopharynx. J Otolaryngol
125:215–219. 1982; 11:227–231.
22. Coffin CM, Humphrey PA, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary 11. Barnes L, Johnson JT. Pathologic and clinical considera-
inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: A clinical and path- tions in the evaluation of major head and neck specimens
ological study. Semin Diagn Pathol 1998; 15:85–101. resected for cancer. Pathol Annu (Part 1) 1986; 21:173–250.
23. Coffin CM, Dehner LP, Meis-Kindblom JM. Inflammatory 12. Vogler WR, Lloyd JW, Milmore BK. A retrospective study
myofibroblastic tumor, inflammatory fibrosarcoma and of etiological factors in cancer of the mouth, pharynx and
related lesions. An historical review with differential larynx. Cancer 1962; 15:246–258.
diagnostic considerations. Semin Diagn Pathol 1998; 15: 13. Keller AZ. Cirrhosis of the liver, alcoholism and heavy
102–110. smoking associated with cancer of the mouth and phar-
ynx. Cancer 1967; 20:1015–1022.
14. Wynder EL, Hultberg S, Jacobsson F, et al. Environmental
XXVIII. SARCOMAS OF THE LARYNX factors in cancer of the upper alimentary tract. A Swedish
study with special reference to Plummer-Vinson (Pater-
1. Cady B, Ripey JH, Frazell EL. Non-epidermoid cancer of son-Kelly) syndrome. Cancer 1957; 10:470–487.
the larynx. Ann Surg 1968; 167:116–120. 15. Goldstein F. Dysphagia with iron deficiency (Plummer-
2. Kraina Z. Laryngeal sarcoma. In: Centennial Conference Vinson syndrome, Paterson Brown syndrome, sidero-
on Laryngeal Carcinoma. (PW Alberti, DP Bryce, eds). penic dysphagia). In: Gastroenterology, 3rd ed. (Bockus
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976:485–488. HL, ed), Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1974:339–343.
Chapter 3: Diseases of the Larynx, Hypopharynx, and Trachea 199
16. Carpenter RJ III, DeSanto LW, Devine KD, et al. Cancer of 41. Marks JE, Kurnik B, Powers WE, et al. Carcinoma of the
the hypopharynx. Analysis of treatment and results in 162 pyriform sinus: an analysis of treatment results and
patients. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102:716–721. patterns of failure. Cancer 1978; 41:1008–1015.
17. Shimakage M, Sasagawa T, Yoshino K, et al. Expression of 42. Razack MS, Sako K, Kalnins I. Squamous cell carcinoma of
Epstein-Barr virus in mesopharyngeal and hypopharyng- the pyriform sinus. Head Neck Surg 1978; 1:31–34.
eal carcinomas. Hum Pathol 1999; 30:1071–1076. 43. McNeill R. Surgical management of carcinoma of the poste-
18. Cunningham MP, Catlin D. Cancer of the pharyngeal rior pharyngeal wall. Head Neck Surg 1981; 3:389–394.
wall. Cancer 1967; 20:1859–1866. 44. Marks JE, Smith PG, Sessions DG. Pharyngeal wall cancer.
19. Inoue T, Shigematsu Y, Sato T. Treatment of carcinoma of A reappraisal after comparison of treatment methods.
the hypopharynx. Cancer 1973; 31:649–655. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111:79–85.
20. Jorgensen K. Carcinoma of the hypopharynx: therapeutic 45. Teichgraber JF, McConnel FMS. Treatment of posterior
results in a series of 103 patients. Acta Radiol 1971; 10: pharyngeal wall carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
465–473. 1986; 94:287–290.
21. Farrington WT, Weighill JS, Jones PH. Post-cricoid carci- 46. Spiro RH, Kelly J, Vega AL, et al. Squamous carcinoma of
noma (a ten-year retrospective study). J Laryngol Otol the posterior pharyngeal wall. Am J Surg 1990; 160:420–423.
1986; 100:79–86. 47. Sasaki CT, Salzer SJ, Cahow E, et al. Laryngopharyngoe-
22. Harrison DFN. Malignant disease of the hypopharynx. sophagectomy for advanced hypopharyngeal and esoph-
Surgical pathology of hypopharyngeal neoplasms. ageal squamous cell carcinoma: the Yale experience.
J Laryngol Otol 1971; 85:1215–1218. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:160–163.
23. Horwitz SD, Caldarelli DD, Hendrickson FR. Treatment 48. Barzan L, Barra S, Franchin G, et al. Squamous cell
of carcinoma of the hypopharynx. Head Neck Surg 1979; carcinoma of the posterior pharyngeal wall: character-
2:107–111. istics compared with the lateral wall. J Laryngol Otol
24. AJC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed, Greene FL, Page DL, 1995; 109:120–125.
Fleming ID, et al, editors, New York, Springer, 2002:33–45. 49. Vandenbrouck C, Sancho H, LeFur R, et al. Results of a
25. McGavran MH, Bauer WC, Spjut HJ, et al. Carcinoma of randomized clinical trial of preoperative irradiation ver-
the pyriform sinus. The results of radical surgery. Arch sus postoperative in treatment of tumors of the hypophar-
Otolaryngol 1963; 78:826–830. ynx. Cancer 1977; 39:1445–1449.
26. Eibach KJ, Krause CJ. Carcinoma of the pyriform sinus. A 50. Vandenbrouck C, Eschwege F, De La Rochefordiere A, et
comparison of treatment modalities. Laryngoscope 1977; al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the pyriform sinus: retro-
87:1904–1910. spective study of 351 cases treated at the Institut Gustave-
27. Smith RR, Frazell EL, Chaulk R, et al. The American Joint Roussy. Head Neck Surg 1987; 10:4–13.
Committee’s proposed method of stage classification and 51. Pingree TF, Davis RK, Reichman O, et al. Treatment of
end results reporting applied to 1320 pharyngeal cancers. hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a 10-year review of 1,362
Cancer 1963; 16:1505–1520. cases. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:901–904.
28. Wilkins SA Jr. Carcinoma of the posterior pharyngeal 52. Jones AS, Wilde A, McRae RD, et al. The treatment of
wall. Am J Surg 1971; 122:477–481. early squamous cell carcinoma of the pyriform fossa. Clin
29. Wang CC. Radiotherapeutic management of carcinoma of Otolaryngol 1994; 19:485–490.
the posterior pharyngeal wall. Cancer 1971; 27:894–896. 53. Harrison DFN, Thompson AE. Pharyngolaryngoesopha-
30. Ballantyne AJ. Principals of surgical management of can- gectomy with pharyngeogastric anastomosis for cancer of
cer of the pharyngeal wall. Cancer 1967; 20:663–667. the hypopharynx: review of 101 operations. Head Neck
31. McNab Jones RF. The Paterson-Brown-Kelly syndrome. Surg 1986; 8:418–428.
Its relationship to iron deficiency and postcricoid carci- 54. Sasaki TM, Baker HW, Yeager RA, et al. Aggressive
noma. J Laryngol Otol 1961; 75:529–561. surgical management of pyriform sinus carcinoma. A 15
32. Richards SH, Kilby D, Shaw JD. Post-cricoid carcinoma year experience. Am J Surg 1986; 151:590–592.
and Paterson-Kelly syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 1971; 85: 55. Bataini JP, Bernier J, Jaulerry C, et al. Impact of cervical
141–152. disease and its definitive radiotherapeutic management
33. Harrison DFN. Thyroid gland in the management of on survival: experience in 2013 patients with squamous
laryngopharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol 1973; cell carcinomas of the oropharynx and pharyngolarynx.
97:301–302. Laryngoscope 1990; 100:716–723.
34. Harrison DFN. Surgical management of cancer of the 56. Spector JG, Sessions G, Emami B, et al. Squamous cell
hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. Br J Surg 1969; 56: carcinoma of the pyriform sinus: a nonrandomized com-
95–103. parison of therapeutic modalities and long-term results.
35. Harrison DFN. Pathology of hypopharyngeal cancer in Laryngoscope 1995; 105:397–406.
relation to surgical management. J Laryngol Otol 1970; 84:
349–367.
36. DeSanto LW, Carpenter RJ. Reconstruction of the pharynx XXX. TUMORS OF THE TRACHEA
and upper esophagus after resection for cancer. Head
Neck Surg 1980; 2:369–379. 1. Maziak DE, Todd TRJ, Keshavjee SH, et al. Adenoid cystic
37. Harwick RD. Carcinoma of the pyriform sinus. Am J Surg carcinoma of the airway: Thirty-two-year experience.
1975; 130:493–495. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112:1522–1532.
38. Lederman M. Cancer of the pharynx: a study based on 2. Gilbert JG, Kaufman B, Mazzanella LA. Tracheal tumors
2417 cases with special reference to radiation treatment. J in infants and children. J Pediatr 1949; 35:63–69.
Laryngol Otol 1967; 81:151–172. 3. Desai DP, Holinger LD, Gonzalez-Crussi F. Tracheal neo-
39. Jesse RH, Lindberg RD. The efficiency of combining plasms in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;
radiation therapy with a surgical procedure in patients 107:790–796.
with cervical metastasis from squamous cell cancer of the 4. Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ. Primary tracheal tumors: Treat-
oropharynx and hypopharynx. Cancer 1975; 35:1163–1166. ment and results. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49:69–77.
40. Marchetta FC, Sako K, Holyoke ED. Squamous cell carci- 5. Eschapasse H. Les tumerus tracheales primitives traite-
noma of the pyriform sinus. Am J Surg 1967; 114:507–509. ment chirurgical. Rev Fr Mal Resp 1974; 2:425–446.
200 Barnes
6. Gelder CM, Hetzel MR. Primary tracheal tumours: a XXXI. METASTASES TO THE LARYNX,
national survey. Thorax 1993; 48:688–692. HYPOPHARYNX AND TRACHEA
7. Manninen MP. Symptoms and signs and their prognostic
value in tracheal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1. Batsakis JG, Luna MA, Byers RM. Metastases to the
1993; 250:383–386. larynx. Head Neck Surg 1985; 7:458–460.
8. Grillo HC, Dignan EF, Miura T. Extensive resection and 2. Ferlito A. Secondary neoplasms. In: Neoplasms of the
reconstruction of mediastinal trachea without prosthesis Larynx, Ferlito A, ed. Edinburgh: Chuchill Livingstone,
or graft: An anatomical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993:349–360.
1964; 48:741–749. 3. Ferlito A, Caruso G, Recher G. Secondary laryngeal
9. Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC. Tumors of the cervical trachea. tumors. Report of seven cases with review of the litera-
In: Cancer of the Head and Neck, 3rd edition, Myers EN, ture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:
Suen JY, eds. WB Saunders, Philadelphia: 1996:439–461. 635–639.
10. Anson BJ. Morris’ Human Anatomy, 12 edition, McGraw 4. Baumgartner WA, Mark JB. Metastatic malignancies from
Hill New York: 1966; 1430. distant sites to the tracheobronchial tree. J Thorac Cardi-
11. Webb BD, Walsh GL, Roberts DE, et al. Primary tracheal ovasc Surg 1980; 79:499–503.
malignant neoplasms: the University of Texas MD Ander- 5. Westerman DE, Urbanetti JS, Rudders RA, et al. Metast-
son Cancer Center experience. J Am Coll Surg 2006; atic endotracheal tumor from ovarian carcinoma. Chest
202:237–246. 1980; 77:798–800.
12. Fields JN, Rigard G, Emani BN. Primary tumors of the 6. Mackenzie IJ, Morgan JM, Mitchell JF. Secondary tracheal
trachea. Results of radiation therapy. Cancer 1989; carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95:973–978.
63:2429–2433. 7. Nicolai P, Peretti G, Cappiello J, et al. Melanoma meta-
13. Howard DJ. Primary tumours of the trachea: analysis of static to the trachea and nasal cavity: description of a case
clinical features and treatment results. J Laryngol Otol and review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital
1994; 108:230–232. 1991; 11:85–92.
14. Rafely Y, Weissberg D. Surgical management of tracheal 8. Conti JA, Kemeny N, Klimstra D, et al. Colon carcinoma
tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:1429–1433. metastatic to the trachea. Report of a case and review of
15. Schneider P, Schirren J, Muley T, et al. Primary tracheal the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 1994; 17:227–229.
tumors: experience with 14 resected patients. Eur J 9. Koyi H, Branden E. Intratracheal metastasis from malig-
Cardio-Thorac Surg 2001; 20:12–18. nant melanoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000;
16. Chow DC, Komaki R, Libshitz HI, et al. Treatment of 14:407–408.
primary neoplasms of the trachea. The role of radiation
therapy. Cancer 1993; 71:2946–2952.
4
Robert A. Robinson
Department of Pathology, The University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver
College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.
Steven D. Vincent
Department of Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Oral Medicine, The University of Iowa
College of Dentistry, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.
Figure 1 Fordyce granule. Fordyce granules (ectopic seba- areas. The process appears as spongy and white
ceous glands) of oral mucosa appear clinically as 1 to 2 mm plaques with a folded appearance; hence the synonym
diameter, yellow submucosal nodules. They can be single or in familial white folded dysplasia of the mucus mem-
groups. They are most often identified in the mucosa of the lips brane (6) (Fig. 3). The lesions may be single or
and buccal mucosa. multiple.
B. Pathology
The histologic features of the white sponge nevus are
typified by acanthotic epithelium with parakeratosis
(Fig. 4). Keratin aggregates, characteristic of the lesion,
are present in the suprabasal cells. Intracellular edema
is seen by light and electron microscopy, with hyper-
keratotic plugs extending deep into the acanthotic
layers. These hyperkeratotic plugs are useful for the
histologic diagnosis and are considered pathogno-
monic (9).
childhood is not unexpected, and it may be identified Figure 4 White sponge nevus. The epithelium shows relatively
at birth. Bilateral involvement of the buccal mucosa is uniform acanthosis, spongiosis, and hyperparakeratosis. There
most common but other sites include the lips, palate, should be no evidence of dysplasia.
ventral tongue, peritonsillar, and hypopharyngeal
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 203
B. Pathology
E. Treatment and Prognosis
The developmental features of oral melanocytic nevi
The lesions require no treatment. White sponge nevus are thought to mirror those developing in cutaneous
has not been shown to be premalignant. locations. The melanocytic cells begin with growth in
the epithelium at the junction of subepithelial-
epithelial tissue and then develop in the subepithelial
III. ORAL MELANOCYTIC NEVI tissue as separate nests. These nevi are termed com-
pound intraoral melanocytic nevi. Over time, the
Oral melanocytic nevi are known by a variety of other intraepithelial (junctional) component vanishes, with
names, including mole, pigmented nevus, and nevo- only the nevus cells present in the subepithelial tissue
cellular nevus. Oral melanocytic nevi are uncommon remaining, resulting in the common type, intramu-
in the oral mucosa, but solitary oral pigmented cosal melanocytic nevus.
lesions of melanocytic origin as a whole are uncom- The histologic features of oral nevi also mirror
mon. In a study of 89,430 biopsies accessioned in an those of the skin. The nevus cells are usually round to
oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory during a oval in shape, although there may be some variation
19-year period, 773 (0.83%) were solitary pigmented in some of the cells size. Junctional nevi reveal nevo-
melanocytic lesions (1). Oral melanotic macules melanocytes at the junction of the mucosal epithelium
comprised 86.1% of the melanocytic group (0.7% of and submucosal connective tissue arranged in small
the entire accessioned biopsy series), and oral mela- nests. Compound nevi are composed of nevomelano-
nocytic nevi comprised 11.8% (0.1% of the entire cytes at the junction but also with nests of nevus cells
accessioned biopsy series). For comparison, melano- in the subepithelial connective tissue. Intramucosal
mas and atypical melanocytic proliferations com- nevi, the counterparts to intradermal nevi in the skin
prised just 0.6% of the melanocytic group and with the entire nevomelanocytic proliferation con-
0.006% of the total accessioned biopsies in the series. fined to the subepithelial submucosal connective tis-
The very infrequent development of intraoral muco- sue, show nonencapsulated nevus cells in small
sal nevi contrasts sharply with the ubiquitous nature clusters and aggregates (Fig 5). Common blue nevi
of cutaneous melanocytic nevi seen in individuals show elongated dendritic-like processes associated
with light skin. with melanin pigmentation (Fig. 6). Cellular blue
204 Robinson and Vincent
A. Clinical Features
Clinically, amalgam tattoos may be solitary or multi-
ple but are asymptomatic. Their coloration is gray or
dark blue-black in appearance (Fig. 7). The blue-black
coloration seen clinically is due to the electrolytic
corrosion of the amalgam. Most amalgam tattoos
measure less than 0.5 cm in greatest dimension (2).
They appear generally as macules and may have
either defined or irregular borders. The pigmentations
observed are seldom palpable, although in some cases
formation of submucosal fibrosis during the formation
of the tattoo may remain palpable for years. Over
time, amalgam tattoos may clinically enlarge. This
may be due to spreading of amalgam particles by
engulfing macrophages (5).
The clinical differential diagnosis includes other Figure 8 Amalgam tattoo. Black, foreign material is distributed
pigmented intraoral lesions, including melanocytic throughout the submucosa. Some tattoos will show microscopic
nevus, oral melanoma, and oral melanotic macule. evidence of a reactive infiltrate of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and
Varicosities with and without thrombi formation macrophages. Other tattoos show remarkably little inflammation.
may also be clinically similar to tattoos. Various
chemicals and drugs may cause pigmentation, includ-
ing cisplatin, arsenic, and bismuth. Occupational
exposures to mercury and lead may also lead to oral
B. Pathology
pigment deposition.
Unintentional oral mucosal tattoos may also be Microscopically the amalgam material is usually seen
found in patients with no history of amalgam place- just in the superficial submucosa but may be seen
ment. In these patients, the source of the accidental deeper (Fig. 8). The black to dark brown material
foreign material placement is often a graphite pencil can be seen in macrophages and giant cells but also
point. in fibroblasts, collagen, elastic fibers, blood vessel
walls, and endothelial cells (3). The pigmentation
can also occur in the minor salivary glands, nerves,
skeletal muscle, and the basement membranes of the
mucosa (1,3). In nearly half of all cases, there is no
inflammatory reaction, but one study reported 17% of
cases to have a macrophage response and 38% to
show a chronic response with foreign body granu-
loma formation with multinucleated giant cells (3).
Asteroid bodies may also be seen (3). Energy-
dispersive microanalysis reveals silver, tin, mercury,
and copper in the pigment (1,6,7).
A. Clinical Features
Benign migratory glossitis is most often asymptomatic,
although some patients complain of irritation when
eating spicy foods. If patients complain of symptoms
such as burning, there can be a secondary condition
such as oral candidosis. The lesions appear as multi-
focal, rounded, or irregular flat, red patches usually
with an elevated white border composed of aggregat-
ed papillae (Fig. 9). Only a single lesion may be seen
in some patients. Most commonly affected areas are on
the dorsum of the tongue, followed by the lateral
margins, or the tip of the tongue (14,15).
A. Clinical Features
Median rhomboid glossitis presents as a red lesion in
the midline of the tongue, anterior to the circumvallate
papillae, and most lesions are less than 2 cm (14).
There is depapillation that is oval, rhomboid, or dia-
mond shaped. This area may be flat or slightly raised
and nodular. Because it is red with surface changes, it
can be occasionally confused clinically with erythro-
plakia. An adjacent palatal mucosal focus of inflam-
mation often termed a ‘‘kissing lesion’’ has been noted
in patients with median rhomboid glossitis (15).
B. Pathology
Figure 12 Median rhomboid glossitis. A focus of papillary Histologically, median rhomboid glossitis shows fili-
atrophy on the dorsal tongue midline, just anterior to the circum- form papillae atrophy, parakeratosis, and irregular
vallate papillae. The shape is often, but not always rhomboid. acanthosis. Both the fungiform and filiform papillae
are diminished or absent (Fig. 13). The rete can
208 Robinson and Vincent
often an oral manifestation of sexually transmitted Many, but not all, authors believe that EBV
disease, this is not always the case. Oral hairy leuko- should be demonstrated in tissue biopsies before a
plakia has been described as an early indicator of diagnosis of oral hairy leukoplakia is rendered. A
EBV-associated posttransplant proliferative disorder variety of detection methodologies exist, including
and has occurred in HIV-negative patients with acute polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybrid-
lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, bone mar- ization as well as immunohistochemistry (10,38–40).
row transplants, and other neoplastic diseases treated
with immunosuppressive oncologic therapies
C. Electron Microscopy
(8,27–32). ‘‘Pseudo-oral hairy leukoplakia’’ has also
been described in rare patients that have oral lesions By electron microscopy herpes virus nucleocapsids
with both clinical and histologic features of oral hairy can be demonstrated in the ballooned keratinocytes
leukoplakia but are HIV-negative, have no immuno- (35,41–44).
suppression, and whose lesions do not demonstrate
EBV (10,33). Because of these mimics, numerous
authors recommend that diagnostic criteria for oral D. Treatment and Prognosis
hairy leukoplakia include clinical, histopathologic, Oral hairy leukoplakia is usually asymptomatic and
and immunohistochemical or molecular analysis (10). often does not require therapy. If the lesions are
symptomatic, then usually culprit is a secondary
B. Pathology candidosis, and treatment with systemic or topical
antifungals will be of value. Acyclovir and valacy-
Although there are a number of histologic features clovir may be used for therapy, but some investigators
that have been associated with oral hairy leukoplakia, have reported drug resistance, which may limit their
these features are not always specific (23). The epithe- usefulness.
lium is characterized by hyperparakeratosis of vari-
able thickness, acanthosis, and minimal-to-absent
submucosal inflammation (Fig. 18). The tongue fre- X. FOCAL EPITHELIAL HYPERPLASIA
quently shows hair-like projections of keratin (34). (HECK’S DISEASE)
Often a band of parakeratin, sometimes with corruga-
tion, can be seen sharply demarcated from the spinous Focal epithelial hyperplasia is a benign hyperplastic
layer. In the upper part of the spinous layer the EBV- lesion of the oral cavity that is caused by human
infected cells often have the appearance of koilocytes. papilloma virus (HPV) infection (1,2). It is commonly
The cells show cytoplasmic ballooning or ground- known as Heck’s disease after publication of a study of
glass change and intranuclear inclusions (35). primarily Native American Navajo children in 1965 (3).
Candida hyphae and spores are seen in many cases. However, the literature indicates that the lesion had
Cytologic preparations have also been described for been described earlier in numerous reports (4–6).
detection of oral hairy leukoplakia and to show con- Focal epithelial hyperplasia is much more com-
densation and margination of nuclear chromatin mon in certain ethnic groups such as Native
forming a bead-like appearance as well as intranuclear Americans, Eskimos, and native people in Central
inclusions (36,37). and South America. It is relatively rare in Caucasians
(4). In Native Americans, it is most commonly seen in
children and teenagers. In Eskimos, the lesions have
been found in all age groups with the highest preva-
lence in people older than 30 years. The lesions in
Native Americans are most frequent in the mucosa of
the upper lip followed by the buccal mucosa, commis-
sures, and labial mucosa of the upper lip (7). In
Eskimos, more than half the lesions are on the tongue
(7). Focal epithelial hyperplasia has also been reported
in an adult HIV-positive individual (8).
A. Clinical Features
The lesions present as circumscribed, sessile, soft, and
elevated nodules of the oral mucosa (Fig. 19).
Although beginning as separate nodules, the lesions
often become confluent and cover large areas of the
Figure 18 Oral hairy leukoplakia. The stratified squamous
oral mucosa of the lips and buccal surfaces as well as
epithelium shows evidence of irregular hyperparakeratosis and
acanthosis. The parakeratin often shows focal infiltration of
the tongue.
fungal hyphae and spores. Koilocytes are found nested in the
superficial stratum spinosum. The submucosa can show a B. Pathology
chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate or be free of inflammatory
cells presumably due to the patient’s immunosuppressed state. Histologically, the lesions show epithelial hyperplasia
with acanthosis and elongation and anastomosing of
212 Robinson and Vincent
B. Clinical Features
Figure 20 Focal epithelial hyperplasia (Heck). Focal areas of Oral condylomas may occur in conjunction with con-
stratum spinosum show acanthosis and mild hyperparakeratosis. dylomas at other sites, but may occur in the absence of
The lesions are well demarcated from the adjacent uninvolved condylomas elsewhere. Most are asymptomatic but
surface mucosa. may be tender if secondarily inflamed. They may be
multiple, and the most common sites are the upper
and lower lips, lingual frenulum, and dorsum of the
tongue. Other sites include the palate, buccal mucosa,
and floor of the mouth.
the rete ridges (Fig. 20). There is some resemblance to Condylomas appear as soft verrucous nodules or
condyloma acuminatum. Koilocytes are often found. multiple adjacent papillary clusters that tend to coa-
The lesions in focal epithelial hyperplasia do not form lesce into soft, pink cauliflower-like masses, although
fibrovascular cores as seen in papillomas (1,2). isolated lesions may occur (11) (Fig. 21). They may
also appear clinically as a diffuse verrucoid hyperpla-
C. Molecular and Genetic Data sia, an irregular exophytic mass with a granular
surface or multiple sessile fibroma-like lesions (12).
Multiple subtypes of HPV may be found in focal Clinically, condyloma may mimic other localized
epithelial hyperplasia, but HPV types 13 and 32 are epithelial proliferative conditions, including Heck’s
the most common (9). Other subtypes include HPV 6, disease, verruca vulgaris, squamous papilloma, or
HPV 16, and HPV 11. verrucous carcinoma (7).
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 213
Figure 21 Condyloma acuminatum. Rough, exophytic, sessile, Figure 23 Condyloma acuminatum. The epithelium shows evi-
papillary projections, occurring singularly or in groups. They may dence of profound stratum spinosum acanthosis-forming broad,
involve any oral mucosal surface but are most often noted to bulging rete ridges. There is often mild hyperparakeratosis.
involve soft palatal or floor-of-mouth mucosa. Koilocytes can often be noted but are not numerous. There
should be no evidence of dysplasia.
C. Pathology
acuminatum occurring in the anogenital regions.
Usually condyloma acuminatum has a pronounced However, dysplastic change may be detected, partic-
spinous layer hyperplasia and cellular ballooning, and ularly in those occurring in the presence of HIV
mitoses are seen extending into the spinous layer infection (13).
(Figs. 22,23). The base of the rete ridges are often
bulbous. The lesions show parakeratosis, acanthosis,
and papillomatosis. Frequently a mild lymphoplasma- D. Differential Diagnosis
cytic infiltrate is seen. Usually the base is sessile, and The microscopic differential diagnosis includes verruca
there is parakeratin crypt formation (1,7). These para- vulgaris, papilloma, and verrucous carcinoma (12).
keratin crypts invaginate into the spinous layers. Verrucae are typically sessile, circumscribed, exophytic
Condylomas often show koilocytes or paranuclear growths with elongated rete ridges often forming a
clearing, but frequency of these findings is variable in radial pattern pointing toward the center of the lesions.
the literature (1,7,11). The squamous proliferation seen Additionally, verruca vulgaris has epithelial projec-
in Condyloma acuminatum has also been reported to tions with more pointed ends (11). They exhibit hyper-
involve excretory ducts of minor salivary glands. parakeratosis at the tips and sometimes show
Malignant transformation of oral cavity condy- hyperorthokeratosis on the sides (11). Condylomas
loma appears to be rare as opposed to condyloma have a papillomatous surface, and the stratum cor-
neum is usually only slightly thickened.
Histologically, condyloma can be difficult to
separate from squamous papillomas at times, and
koilocytes are not always present. Squamous papillo-
mas are usually pedunculated and exophytic and tend
to exhibit epithelial tissue projecting outward from a
central vascular core of fibrovascular tissue (1).
E. Electron Microscopy
Electron microscopy reveals intranuclear viral particles,
and the particles are most numerous in the superficial
layers of the parakeratinized epithelium (3).
A. Clinical Features
Figure 27 Papilloma. An exophytic, often pedunculated, tree-like
Papillomas are exophytic proliferations arranged in a proliferation of stratified squamous epithelium. Each epithelial
finger-like configuration, giving a cauliflower-like branch has a core of fibrovascular connective tissue. There is
clinical appearance (Fig. 26). Papillomas are usually no extension into the underlying connective tissue. There can be
varying amounts of parakeratosis but without evidence of
solitary and reach their maximum size within a few
dysplasia.
weeks (2). Most are less than 1 cm in size. While the
majority are pedunculated, some are sessile (7).
Usually papillomas are white due to keratinization of
the surface, but those without abundant keratin pro-
duction may be pink. The tongue and palate are cells. Papillomas can rarely show dysplastic changes,
common sites of involvement (3). but this is uncommon in solitary papillomas (5).
A. Clinical Features
Clinically, verruciform xanthoma is well circum-
scribed and may be flat, papillary, or sessile. Many
have a cauliflower-like roughened surface (12,13)
(Fig. 28). They generally are slow growing. The lesions Figure 29 Verruciform xanthoma. At low microscopic power, a
may be pink, red, yellow, or white, depending on the verrucous surface is evident.
degree of keratinization (14). The margins are often
sharply demarcated. The center of the lesion has been
described as depressed, cup-shaped, or crateriform
and may be ulcerated. Most lesions are asymptomatic minimally raised to flat. The verrucous pattern reveals
and are detected incidentally. a warty surface with marked hyperparakeratosis.
Clinically, the differential diagnosis includes The papillary pattern shows a less church-spire archi-
papillomas, verruca vulgaris, leukoplakia, carcinoma tecture than the verrucous patterns, and overall it is
in situ, and verrucous carcinoma (6). Of these, most more exophytic. In the flat pattern the rete proliferates
cases are clinically misdiagnosed as papillomas. below the surface of the overlying epithelium. The
rete shows relatively uniform hyperplasia. As the rete
B. Pathology dips into the submucosa, the intervening spaces
are filled with parakeratinized squamous plugs. In
Histologically, the lesions have a verrucoid surface addition, the parakeratininzed surface layer has a
with surface parakeratosis (2) (Fig. 29). The surface of distinctive keratinization, which is more brightly
the lesions can include a variety of different architec- eosinophilic on routine hematoxylin and eosin stained
tural appearances, including verrucous, papillary, or sections.
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 217
A. Phenytoin
Phenytoin is an anticonvulsant drug used in a wide
range of therapeutic modalities but particularly in
seizure control. Gingival hyperplasia affects up to
50% of patients taking phenytoin, although some
authors report much higher and lower percentages
(3). Phenytoin-induced hyperplasia is usually evident
within the first three months of starting the drug and
is most rapid in the first year of administration (1).
Studies have shown that phenytoin-associated gingi-
val hyperplasia is exacerbated by chronic inflamma-
tion, including those caused by accumulations of
bacterial plaque. Patients of a young age and those
with higher serum phenytoin levels are also more
likely to develop gingival hyperplasia (4).
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) levels have
been noted to be elevated in drug-induced gingival
hyperplasias (5). Both transforming growth factor
(TGF)-b-1 and platelet-derived growth factor-BB
levels have been shown to be increased in the tissues
Figure 30 Verruciform xanthoma. The epithelium shows hyper-
parakeratosis with the formation of keratin plugs between acan-
of gingival hyperplasia in patients receiving pheny-
thotic rete ridges. The papillary submucosa contains foamy toin (3). Extracellular matrix–degrading ability may be
histiocytes in varying numbers. There should be no cellular impaired by phenytoin as well as cyclosporine (6).
dysplasia. There is also evidence that mast cell–mediated andro-
gen action in the gingiva in response to phenytoin
could cause gingival hyperplasia.
While phenytoin is the most common cause of
In all the subtypes, there are varying numbers of drug-induced gingival hyperplasia, other anticonvul-
xanthoma cells, which abut the basal layer of the sants, such as phenobarbital, sodium valproate, and
squamous epithelium (Fig. 30). These xanthoma cells primidone have also been implicated (7). Other drugs
can be plentiful, occupying much of the papillary reported to cause gingival hyperplasia include sertra-
submucosa, or few in number and difficult to notice line, vigabatrin, topirimate, lithium ethosuximide,
at low power. The cytoplasm of the foam cells may ketoconazole, lamotrigine, cotrimoxazole, erythromy-
contain PAS-positive, diastase-resistant granules. cin, and oral contraceptives (2). Phenytoin-induced
Some cases have described occasional xanthoma hyperplasias is halted but is not reversed by cessation
cells infiltrating into the overlying epithelium (15). of the medication.
C. Immunohistochemistry B. Cyclosporine
The xanthoma cells stain with CD68 and other Cyclosporine is a common drug for treating patients
markers of histiocytic lineage but are frequently nega- with renal transplant, and it is estimated that 20% to
tive for S-100 (4,10,16–18). 35% of renal transplant patients have gingival hyper-
plasia as a result (8). Whether or not gingival hyperpla-
sia secondary to cyclosporine A use is dose dependent
D. Electron Microscopy is not clear (9). Concomitant use of ketoconazole,
amphotericin B, and cimetidine increase the activity
Ultrastructurally the xanthoma cells contain lipid and
of cyclosporine A by decreasing its hepatic metabolism
have characteristics of macrophages (13).
(9). Cyclosporine A has been shown to increase the
production of collagen by fibroblasts. Cyclosporine
E. Treatment and Prognosis increases the levels of interleukin-6, TGF-b-1, and
FGF-2 and decreases gamma interferon, all of which
The lesions are treated with conservative excision and are thought to increase collagen production (10). There
are not considered premalignant. Recurrence is rare is also a concomitant reduction in collagenase activity.
(14). KGF is upregulated by cyclosporine, and studies
have shown that the KGF receptor and the receptor
mRNA are higher in epithelial cells in gingival hyper-
XV. DRUG-INDUCED GINGIVAL HYPERPLASIA plasia compared with normal controls (5).
Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia may be caused by
a variety of drugs, but several categories are particu- C. Calcium Channel Blocking Agents
larly common and deserve mention, including phe-
nytoin, cyclosporine, and calcium channel blockers, Approximately 20% of patients taking nifedipine
such as nifedipine (1,2). experience gingival hyperplasia. Other calcium
218 Robinson and Vincent
D. Clinical Features
The gingiva in drug-induced hyperplasia is nodular
and centered on the interdental papillae (14). While
the gingival proliferation usually begins in the inter-
dental papilla, it gradually moves to involve the
gingival margins (Fig. 31).
A. Clinical Findings
The clinical findings vary according to the degree and
length of trauma, inflammation, and subsequent fibro-
sis caused by the denture. The lesion may be sessile or
pedunculated and appears red and ulcerated or dense
and fibrous (3). Those that are ulcerated can have some
similarities to pyogenic granuloma. Lesions may be Figure 35 Denture-induced fibrous hyperplasia (epulis fissur-
present for a few months to many years. Most cases atum). A chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate is noted in the
occur in persons between 40 and 60 years, an age superficial submucosa. The bulk of the enlargement is due to a
associated with denture use. Denture-induced fibrous reactive buildup of dense, fibrocollagenous connective tissue.
hyperplasia is more commonly seen in women. The
anterior portions of both jaws appear affected more
than posterior locations, and more lesions are found
on the buccal aspect than the lingual aspect (3). epithelial changes may show acanthosis and hyper-
Occasionally, inflammatory papillary hyperplasia parakeratosis focally. Many have pseudoepithelioma-
may coexist. tous hyperplastic changes. It is thought that the
pseudoepitheliomatous response is a more severe
B. Pathology response to chronic trauma. In some cases, the epithe-
lium splits in the center of the rete pegs, and this
The histologic differential diagnosis is usually not splitting or clefting can extend into the underlying
difficult, given the appropriate clinical history and connective tissue (3). The stromal component may
findings (3). Histologically, the tissue shows dense, resemble that of a dermal hypertrophic scar (4).
fibrous tissue hyperplasia with varying amounts of Osseous and chondromatous metaplasia may be seen
mixed chronic inflammatory cells (Figs. 34,35). The and should not be mistaken for sarcomatous changes.
220 Robinson and Vincent
A. Clinical Features
Most cases are associated with a complete denture but
partial dentures may also be at fault. While the palate
is the most common anatomic site of involvement,
inflammatory papillary hyperplasia may be seen
under any part of any denture. The clinical findings
are multiple small papillary growths separated
by clefts (Fig. 36). The surface is often red, but
pain is not a common complaint, and, in fact, most
patients with inflammatory papillary hyperplasia are Figure 37 Inflammatory papillary hyperplasia. The overlying
asymptomatic. stratified squamous epithelium shows acanthosis, hyperparaker-
atosis, and papillomatosis. There is an infiltrate of lymphocytes,
plasma cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in the underlying
B. Pathology hyperplastic, fibrovascular connective tissue.
inflammatory papillary hyperplasia, a very helpful The overlying mucosa is smooth and nonulcerated.
finding. Nevertheless, before rendering a diagnosis They are typically light pink but in patients with dark
of invasive well-differentiated squamous carcinoma skin, may be gray to blue-black in color. Irritation
from a palatal biopsy in a situation where there is fibromas may range in size from several millimeters
limited clinical history, it may be of value to ascertain to as much as 2 cm or more but the majority are less than
if the patient has a denture in place. 1 to 1.5 cm.
aerodigestive tract. They are exposed to many air- tube dysfunction, voice changes, obstructive sleep
borne and food antigens and have been considered as apnea, and changes in facial growth (16). Children
the first line of defense against pathogens (1,3). The with large obstructing tonsils have a smaller oropha-
epithelium lining the crypts is a specialized type of ryngeal diameter compared with children with small
squamous epithelium and has a variable infiltration of tonsils (16).
lymphocytes. Investigators have found unique expres- Recurrent streptococcal tonsillitis has also been
sion of tight junctions in the palatine tonsils and also associated with pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiat-
suggest that the crypt epithelium may possess an ric disorders (PANDAS) (18).
epithelial barrier different from that of the surface
epithelium (4). C. Pathology
The lymph nodes draining the tonsils are first
the submandibular and then deep cervical, which Tonsillar tissue is at its largest size and immunologi-
explains the enlargement of these nodes during cally most active during childhood, especially
bouts of acute tonsillitis. between 4 and 10 years but then decreases in size
Tonsillitis may be caused by viruses or bacterial with age (16). Tonsillar size is said to be proportional
infection, but viral infections are likely more common. to aerobic bacterial load and the absolute numbers of
Bacterial infection may develop in the tonsil initially lymphoid cells (16). How chronic inflammation of the
infected by virus. tonsil affects tonsillar size or histologic features is not
The most common viral pathogens associated entirely clear. Some studies suggest that H. influenza is
with tonsillitis include respiratory synctial virus, echo- highly associated with tonsillar hyperplasia (8).
virus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, influenza virus, and Controversy exists as to whether there are histopatho-
parainfluenza virus. EBV has also been implicated in logic differences in tonsils removed from children
recurrent episodes of tonsillitis (5–7). with either a history of recurrent tonsillitis or solely
Chronic tonsillitis and tonsillar hyperplasia tonsillar hyperplasia without a clinical history of
appear related to bacterial infection and there is evi- recurrent infections (19,20).
dence that the presence of bacterial biofilms may Because the tonsils are hematopoietic tissue, it
explain the recurrent and chronic nature of tonsillitis may be difficult to define inflammation or ‘‘-itis’’
(8–10). Immunologic alterations in the tonsil are also histologically. Tonsils are infrequently removed dur-
related to chronic tonsillitis. Investigators have found ing ‘‘acute’’ tonsillitis unless there is concomitant
changes in the distribution of the antigen presenting peritonsillar abscess (see peritonsillar abscess).
dendritic cells within tonsils of children with and Tonsils removed for chronic or recurrent tonsillitis
without chronic tonsillar disease (11). This may be show lymphoid hyperplasia with large germinal cen-
due to pathogenic bacteria in the crypts of chronically ters (Fig. 42). Lymphocytes are seen normally in the
inflamed tonsil (11). epithelium but neutophils are not and indicate, if
Bacterial etiologies include group A beta-hemolytic prominent, ‘‘acute mucositis’’ (Fig. 43). The continu-
streptococcus, Haemophilus influenza, and Staphylococcus ous antigenic stimulation of the tonsils has been
aureus (12,13). However, other bacteria, including aer- termed a ‘‘physiologic inflammation,’’ and tonsillitis
obe and anerobes, are important contributors to tonsil-
litis, and culture of tonsils removed for recurrent
tonsillitis often show multiple organisms (14). Some
investigators have suggested that while acute tonsillitis
may be associated with group A beta-hemolytic strepto-
coccus, Hemophilus groups are more likely to be
involved in the pathogenesis of recurrent tonsillitis
and tonsillar hyperplasia (14–16).
B. Clinical Features
Separating viral and bacterial etiology by symptom-
atology may be difficult, as sore throat is the most
common symptom of tonsillitis in both viral and
bacterial etiologies (13). Clinical features suggestive
of viral etiology include cough, conjunctivitis, coryza,
and diarrhea. Clinical features suggestive of bacterial
tonsillitis include sore throat, fever, inflammation,
exudates, and enlarged and tender anterior cervical
lymph nodes. On physical examination, there is ton-
sillar and pharyngeal erythema. Palatal petechiae may
be seen. Because branches of the glossopharyngeal Figure 42 Tonsillar hyperplasia. Numerous hyperplastic lym-
and vagus nerves also innervate the ear, patients phoid germinal centers of varying sizes are present. Tonsillar
with tonsillitis may complain of ear pain (17). crypts with a minimal amount of desquamated surface epithelium
Changes associated with enlarged tonsils from are present.
chronic tonsillitis may cause otitis media, Eustachian
224 Robinson and Vincent
Figure 43 Tonsillar hyperplasia. The surface cryptal epithelium Figure 45 Tonsillar hyperplasia with skeletal muscle. This
is infiltrated by lymphocytes, a normal finding. tonsillectomy specimen reveals abundant skeletal muscle.
Skeletal muscle is not an unusual finding in tonsillectomy speci-
mens when an extratonsillar capsular surgical procedure is
performed.
While some have suggested that abnormal facial increased and because the adenoids normally tend
and dental development have a relation to enlarged to decrease in size as puberty is reached, removal in
adenoids (adenoidal facies), not all investigators have older children is controversial (12). While some clini-
found this to be true (4). cians believe that symptoms due to enlarged adenoids
Increased stratified squamous epithelium and recur because of regrowth of the adenoid tissue,
decreased ciliated epithelium is seen in adenoids others suggest that adenoidal tissue rarely, if ever,
from patients with otitis media, and the investing proliferate sufficiently after resection to cause symp-
epithelial cell layer extends more deeply into the toms of nasal obstruction (13).
lymphoid crypts in patients with otitis media (5). Adenoidectomy has been suggested to be of
This epithelium appears to lack antigen-transporting benefit in patients with otitis media and chronic
cells and would support an abnormality of the antigen- nasal obstruction and is a common indication for
trapping systems that is seen in adenoidal hyperplasia adenoidectomy for some surgeons (8). Some authors
(6). suggest that there are specific indications for tonsil-
The role of enlarged adenoids in otitis media lectomy alone, tonsillectomy combined with adenoi-
with effusion is not completely clear. Besides potential dectomy, and adenoidectomy alone. Otitis media
obstruction of the Eustachian tube by enlarged ade- and recurrent or chronic rhinosinusitis or adenoiditis
noidal tissue, the inflammatory-induced metaplasia of are indications for adenoidectomy but not tonsillecto-
the nonciliated surface may impair mucociliary drain- my (3,14). Children with sleep apnea may benefit
age (7). Many authors, however, suggest that adenoid from tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (14). Adeno-
enlargement is unrelated to otitis media and that there tonsillectomy in children with mild symptoms of
is no difference in adenoid size between children with throat infections or adenotonsillar hyperplasia may
or without otitis media with effusion (2,5,8). Most not have a benefit from surgical removal (15).
authors agree that the adenoids may have an impor-
tant role in the cause of otitis media with effusion by
serving as a reservoir for bacteria (5). H. influenza is XXIII. OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA
often cultured more frequently in adenoid specimens
from patients who have otitis media with effusion. Obstructive sleep apnea is defined as obstruction,
This is a reason that some authors recommend that either complete or partial, of the upper airway during
children who have bacterial otitis media and nasal sleep, and when combined with daytime sleep symp-
obstruction should undergo adenoidectomy to remove toms, this condition is termed ‘‘obstructive sleep
the chronically infected tissue (9). apnea syndrome’’ (1,2). Obstructive sleep apnea is
Studies have reported adenoidal hypertrophy more common in males until patients reach their
occurring in adults with HIV infection (10). Adeno- fourth and fifth decade, when the male-to-female
tonsillar hyperplasia may be a precursor to EBV-related ratio drops from 3:1 to 1:1. Its prevalence is reported
lymphoid hyperplasia and posttransplant lymphopro- to be up to 5% in the Western world, and sleep apnea
liferative disease (11). is thought to affect 20 million Americans. The peak
age for obstructive sleep apnea in children due to
tonsil and adenoid hyperplasia is three to six years,
A. Pathology although it may occur in younger children, including
infants (3). Children with Down syndrome are also
The adenoids are prominent in children but begin to
thought to be at increased risk of obstructive sleep
shrink in size at puberty and are often small and
apnea from tonsillar and adenoid hyperplasia (4).
fibrotic in adults. The prominence is due to lymphoid
Besides hyperplasia due to bacterial and common
proliferation, which decreases with age (7). Mucosal
viral causes, obstructive sleep apnea has also occurred
and submucosal lymphocytic infiltration are normally
secondary to EBV-induced lymphoid hyperplasia of
present in the adenoid and should not be construed as
the tonsil and adenoid following transplantation (5).
chronic inflammation. The adenoids usually show
Obstructive sleep apnea is considered to be
follicular lymphoid hyperplasia with enlarged germi-
multifactorial and may even have a genetic basis
nal centers. Tingible body macrophages are commonly
with complex interactions of neural, hormonal, and
seen. Interestingly, neutrophils are not usually seen. In
structural abnormalities (2,6). Although there is vari-
children, the epithelial surface may be transformed
ability in the dimensions of airways in normal adults,
from a ciliated-type to a stratified squamous epithelium
most investigators believe patients with obstructive
extending into the adenoidal lymphoid tissue (6). In
sleep apnea have narrower airways than normal.
adults, the adenoids may show significant fibrosis.
In adults, obesity is probably the greatest risk
Epstein-Barr infection may cause the adenoids, like
factor. Regional fat distribution has also been shown
the tonsils, to show marked immunoblastic reactions
to have a genetic component and may be more impor-
with Reed-Sternberg-like cells.
tant than overall obesity. However, not all patients
with obstructive sleep apnea are overweight (2).
B. Treatment Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing occurs be-
cause of numerous other factors, including increased
Adenoidectomy is often an added procedure to ton- adipose tissue (parapharyngeal fat pad) alterations in
sillectomy but may add complications. Besides craniofacial structures, reduction in mandibular size,
increasing operative time, operative blood loss is disease of the paranasal sinuses, tonsil and adenoid
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 227
A. Clinical Features
The cardinal symptom of obstructive sleep apnea is
excessive daytime sleepiness (9). Other symptoms
include unrefreshing sleep or chronic fatigue (1). Figure 46 Uvula and palatal tissue from uvulopalatoplasty. The
Snoring is often a common complaint, as is awakening overlying epithelium and submucosal glands and skeletal muscle
with a smothering sensation or gasping, awakening are normal in histologic appearance.
with a headache or dry throat, and restless sleep.
Other medical problems are associated with obstruc-
tive sleep apnea and include both systemic and pul-
monary hypertension, coronary artery disease, cardiac during sleep. Surgical therapy (uvulopalatoplasty) is
arrhythmias, diabetes, and decreased neurocognitive aimed at enlarging the posterior airway space and
functions. Gastroesophageal reflux, impotence, and reducing the ability of the airway to collapse (2).
depression are also associated with obstructive sleep
apnea, as are motor vehicle accidents, poor work
performance, and occupational accidents associated XXIV. LOBULAR CAPILLARY HEMANGIOMA
with obstructive sleep apnea (1,2,10). (PYOGENIC GRANULOMA)
Infants may have disturbed sleep with repetitive
crying and snoring. Children aged between one and Lobular capillary hemangioma is a common lesion of
three years may have snoring but also aggressive the oral cavity that has now been considered by some
daytime behavior. An overnight sleep study (polysom- to be synonymous with pyogenic granuloma, although
nography) is considered to be of great value in diag- some authors believe the two processes are distinct
nosing obstructive sleep apnea. Polysomnography can entities (1–3). Epulis granulomatosa is a designation
help determine the apnea-hypoxia index, determined used to describe lesions that appear as pyogenic gran-
by the average number of apneic and hypopneic epi- ulomas that arise in healing extraction tooth sockets.
sodes per hour of sleep. Lobular capillary hemangioma is a smooth or
lobulated mass that may be either sessile or peduncu-
lated. The tissue may histologically resemble granula-
B. Pathology tion tissue or, if there is minimal inflammation, a
hemangioma. Etiologies include lip biting, trauma,
Tonsil and adenoid hyperplasia is said to be to leading tissue edges of restorations, and tooth extraction sites.
cause of obstructive sleep apnea in children. The Rapid growth is not uncommon. Tie2, a human endo-
tonsils and adenoids do not have specific features thelial receptor tyrosine kinase, has been implicated in
that set them apart from the hyperplastic tissue seen the development of lobular capillary hemangioma (4).
in patients without obstructive sleep apnea. Both Pyogenic granuloma usually affects children and
children and adults may undergo uvulopalatoplasty young adults, but they may occur at any age, including
to enlarge the airway and help prevent it from col- infancy (5). In a study of patients 65 years and older,
lapsing. Uvulopalatoplasty specimens do not general- pyogenic granuloma was seen in 0.7% (6).
ly show any striking histologic changes (Fig. 46).
A. Clinical Features
C. Treatment and Prognosis
Lobular capillary hemangioma or pyogenic granulo-
Sometimes simple therapies may help alleviate milder ma varies from pink to red to purple and may range
symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea. Encouraging from several millimeters to several centimeters. These
the patient to sleep on their side, lose weight if tumors often arise on the gingiva, particularly the
obese, and to refrain from alcohol before bedtime anterior maxillary gingiva but may occur anywhere
may help. Other therapies include continuous positive in the oral cavity, including the lips, tongue, and
airway pressure (CPAP) and oral appliances used buccal mucosa (Fig. 47). They often have a rapid
228 Robinson and Vincent
Pathology
Benign inclusions should be represented by only a few
small follicles located in or immediately beneath the
lymph node capsule (11) (Fig. 51). These should not
have cleared nuclei or contain grooves, folds, or
inclusions nor show papillary formation (Fig. 52).
Figure 52 Benign thyroid inclusions in lymph node. Thyroid
Rosai et al. suggested that a diagnosis of meta-
follicles show no nuclear inclusions, clearing, grooves, or nuclear
static carcinoma be made in any case in which the overlap.
thyroid tissue has replaced one-third or more of the
node or in which several nodes are affected (11).
Treatment
unsuspected presentation in cervical lymph nodes,
No generic all-encompassing therapeutic approach is the thyroid carcinoma is often indolent (3,8,12).
possible. From a number of studies, it appears that Careful tailoring of diagnostic and therapeutic options
patients with small inclusions of thyroid tissue with- is required.
out features of papillary carcinoma do not always
require thyroidectomy. Most authorities do suggest
clinical examination of the thyroid and radiographic C. Ectopic Benign Thyroid Tissue in
or ultrasonic imaging to determine if thyroid masses Nonlymphoid Tissues of the Head
are present (1). Some studies suggest that even in and Neck
patients with histologic features of papillary thyroid Besides being found in the tongue or cervical lymph
carcinoma, thyroidectomy does not always ‘‘find’’ a nodes, benign thyroid tissue may be found in other
neoplasm in the gland. Further, in those patients with locales of the head and neck. The thyroid tissue may
primary thyroid carcinomas found after initial be incidentally found or may present as a mass.
Thyroid may be seen that is in the midline, outside
of the tissues of the tongue, along the track of the
normal descent of the thyroid. In the midline this
tissue is most commonly seen in the region of the
thyroglossal duct (1). The trachea and laryngo-
tracheal area are also known to harbor thyroid tissue,
and in this location the tissue may grow to such a size
as to obstruct the airway (2–4). Patients with ectopic
thyroid in the neck may also present with thryotox-
icosis, in a manner similar to those patients with
lingual thyroid that becomes hyperfunctional (5,6).
Nonmidline sites may also contain thyroid tissue,
including the submandibular gland, parotid, skin,
carotid sheath, and retropharyngeal and lateral oropha-
ryngeal spaces (7–13).
In some cases, thyroid may be found in patients
that have had prior surgery in the neck and thus may
represent unintentionally implanted thyroid tissue
(14).
preoperative techniques, such as fine needle aspira- 4. McLean WHI, Lane EB. Intermediate filaments in disease.
tion, be performed prior to total surgical excision of a Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995; 7(1):118–125.
mass of unknown etiology (15). 5. Banoczy J, Sugar L, Frithiof L. White sponge nevus: leu-
koedema exfoliativum mucosae oris. Swed Dent J 1973;
66:481–493.
Pathology
6. Krajewska IA, Moore L, Brown JH. White sponge nevus
The thyroid tissue in these ectopic locations appears as presenting in the esophagus – case report and literature
normal thyroid tissue, although in hyperfunctional review. Pathology 1992; 24:112–115.
7. Nichols GE, Cooper PH, Underwood PB Jr., et al. White
states the appearances are those seen in Graves dis-
sponge nevus. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76(3 pt 2):545–548.
ease. The ectopic thyroid tissue should not have histo- 8. Jorgenson RJ, Levin S. White sponge nevus. Arch Dermatol
logic or cytologic characteristics of thyroid carcinoma. 1981; 117:73–76.
9. Whitten JB. The electron microscopic examination of con-
Treatment and Prognosis genital keratosis of the oral mucous membranes. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 29(1):69–84.
Large masses are best treated by excision; however, 10. Chao SC, Tsai YM, Yang MH, et al. A novel mutation in the
consideration must be given to the fact that the keratin 4 gene causing white sponge naevus. Br J Dermatol
excised tissue may represent the patient’s only 2003; 148(6):1125–1128.
thyroid. 11. Rugg EL, Magee GJ, Wilson NJ. Identification of two novel
mutations in keratin 13 as the cause of white sponge
naevus. Oral Dis 1999; 5:321–324.
12. Rugg EL, McLean WHI, Allison WE. A mutation in the
REFERENCES mucosal keratin K4 is associated with oral white sponge
nevus. Nat Genet 1995; 11(4):450–452.
I. FORDYCE GRANULES 13. Terrinoni A, Rugg EL, Lane EB, et al. A novel mutation in
the keratin 13 gene causing oral white sponge nevus. J Dent
1. Halperin V, Kolas S, Jefferis KR, et al. The occurrence of
Res 2001; 80(3):919–923.
Fordyce spots, benign migratory glossitis, median rhom-
boid glossitis, and fissured tongue in 2,478 dental patients.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1953; 6(9):1072–1077.
2. Flinck A, Paludan A, Matsson L, et al. Oral findings in a III. ORAL MELANOCYTIC NEVI
group of newborn Swedish children. Int J Paediatr Dent
1994; 4(2):67–73. 1. Buchner A, Merrell PW, Carpenter WM. Relative frequency
3. Reichart PA. Oral mucosal lesions in a representative cross- of solitary melanocytic lesions of the oral mucosa. J Oral
sectional study of aging Germans. Dent Oral Epidemiol Pathol Med 2004; 33:550–557.
2000; 28:390–398. 2. Buchner A, Hansen LS. Pigmented nevi of the oral mucosa:
4. Leider AS, Lucas JW, Eversole LR. Sebaceous choristoma of a clinicopathologic study of 36 new cases and review of 155
the thyroglossal duct. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol cases from the literature. Part I: A clinicopathologic study
1977; 44(2):261–266. of 36 new cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;
5. Levinson AW, Jakobiec FA, Reifler DM, et al. Ectopic 63:566–572.
epibulbar Fordyce nodules in a buccal mucous membrane 3. Allen CM, Pellegrini A. Probable congenital melanocytic
graft. Am J Opththalmol 1985; 100:724–727. nevus of the oral mucosa: case report. Pediatr Dermatol
6. Marback EF, Gonzaga RL, Rigueiro MP, et al. Fordyce 1995; 12(2):145–148.
nodules in a buccal membrane graft to the ocular surface. 4. Biesbrock AR, Aguirre A. Multiple focal pigmented lesions
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 18(4):308–309. in the maxillary tuberosity and hard palate: a unique display
7. Rhodus NL. An actively secreting Fordyce granule. Clin of intraoral junctional nevi. J Periodontol 1992; 63:718–721.
Prev Dent 1986; 8(2):24–26. 5. Fistarol SK, Itin PH. Plaque-type blue nevus of the oral
8. Daley TD. Intraoral sebaceous hyperplasia. Oral Surg Oral cavity. Dermatology 2005; 211(3):224–233.
Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74:343–347. 6. Pinto A, Raghavendra S, Lee R, et al. Epithelioid blue nevus
9. Alwai F, Siddiqui A. Sebaceous carcinoma of the oral of the oral mucosa: a rare histologic variant. Oral Surg Oral
mucosa: case report and review of the literature. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96:429–436.
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 7. Ficarra G, Hansen LS, Engebretsen S, et al. Combined nevi
99:79–84. of the oral mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;
10. Dilley DC, Siegel MA, Budnick S. Diagnosing and treating 63:196–201.
common oral pathologies. Pediatr Clin North Am 1991; 38 8. Eisen D, Voorhees JJ. Oral melanoma and other pigmented
(5):1227–1264. lesions of the oral cavity. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;
11. Monk BE. Fordyce spots responding to isotretinoin therapy. 24:527–537.
Br J Dermatol 1993; 129(3):355. 9. Leston JMS, Garcia JV, Santos AA, et al. Dark oral lesions:
differential diagnosis with oral melanoma. Cutis 1998; 61
(5):279–282.
II. WHITE SPONGE NEVUS 10. Cicek Y. The normal and pathological pigmentation of oral
mucous membrane: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 4
1. Cannon AB. White sponge nevus of the mucosa (naevus (3):76–86.
spongiosus albus mucosae). Arch Derm Syph 1935; 31: 11. Gaeta GM, Satriano RA, Baroni A. Oral pigmented lesions.
365–370. Clin Dermatol 2002; 20(3):286–288.
2. Gorlin RJ, Sedano HO. Oral manifestations of systemic 12. Kaugars GE, Heise AP, Riley WT, et al. Oral melanotic
genetic disorders. Postgrad Med 1971; 49(4):155–160. macules. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76:59–61.
3. Richard G, De Laurenzi V, Didona B, et al. Keratin 13 point 13. De Giorgi V, Massi D, Carli P. Dermoscopy in the manage-
mutation underlies the hereditary mucosal epithelial dis- ment of pigmented lesions of the oral mucosa. Oral Oncol
order white sponge nevus. Nat Genet 1995; 11(4):453–455. 2003; 39(5):534–535.
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 233
IV. AMALGAM TATTOO 15. Drezner DA, Schaffer SR. Geographic tongue. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 1997; 117(3 pt 1):291.
1. Harrison JD, Rowley PSA, Peters PD. Amalgam tattoos: 16. Pass B, Brown R, Childers E. Geographic tongue: literature
light and electron microscopy and electron-probe micro- review and case report. Dent Today 2005; 24(8):54; 56–57.
analysis. J Pathol 1977; 121:83–92.
2. Owens BM, Johnson WW, Schuman NJ. Oral amalgam
pigmentations (tattoos): a retrospective study. Quintessence
VI. MEDIAN RHOMBOID GLOSSITIS
Int 1992; 23:805–810.
3. Buchner A, Hansen LS. Amalgam pigmentation (amalgam 1. Carter LC. Median rhomboid glossitis: review of a puz-
tattoo) of the oral mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol zling entity. Compendium 1990; 11(7):446, 448–51.
1980; 49(2):139–147. 2. Espinoza I, Rojas R, Aranda W, et al. Prevalence of oral
4. McHugh WD. Statement: effects and side effects of dental mucosal lesions in elderly people in Santiago, Chile. J Oral
restorative materials. Adv Dent Res 1992, 6:139–144. Pathol Med 2003; 32:571–575.
5. Kissel SO, Hanratty JJ. Periodontal treatment of an amal- 3. Cooke BE. Median rhomboid glossitis. Br J Dermatol 1975;
gam tattoo. Compendium 2002; 23(10):930–936. 93(4):399–405.
6. McGinnis JP Jr., Greer JL, Daniels DS. Amalgam tattoo: 4. Wright BA, Fenwick F. Candidiasis and atrophic tongue
report of an unusual clinical presentation and the use of lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 51(1):55–61.
energy dispersive X-ray analysis as an aid to diagnosis. 5. Allen CM, Blozis GG, Rosen S, et al. Chronic candidiasis of
JADA 1985; 110:52–54. the rat tongue: a possible model for human median rhom-
7. Hartman LC, Natiella JR, Mennaghan MA. The use of boid glossitis. J Dent Res 1982; 61(11):1287–1291.
elemental microanalysis in verification of the composition 6. Deshpande RB, Bharucha MA. Median rhomboid glossitis:
of presumptive amalgam tattoo. J Oral Maxillofac Surg secondary to colonization of the tongue by actinomyces (a
1986; 44:628–633. case report). J Postgrad Med 1991; 37:238–240.
7. Walsh LJ, Cleveland DB, Cumming CG. Quantitative eval-
uation of Langerhans cells in median rhomboid glossitis.
J Oral Pathol Med 1992; 21:28–32.
V. BENIGN MIGRATORY GLOSSITIS 8. Arendorf TM, Walker DM. Tobacco smoking and denture
1. Marks R, Radden BG. Geographic tongue: a clinico- wearing as local aetiological factors in median rhomboid
pathological review. Australas J Dermatol 1981; 22:75–79. glossitis. Int J Oral Surg 1984; 13:411–415.
2. Assimakopoulos D, Patrikakos G, Fotika C, et al. Benign 9. Barasch A, Saffort MM, Catalanotto FA, et al. Oral soft
migratory glossitis or geographic tongue: an enigmatic oral tissue manifestations in HIV-positive vs. HIV-negative
lesion. Am J Med 2002; 113:751–755. children from an inner city population: a two-year obser-
3. Yarom N, Cantony U, Gorsky M. Prevalence of fissured vational study. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22(3):215–220.
tongue, geographic tongue and median rhomboid glossitis 10. Flaitz CM, Nichols CM, Hicks MJ. An overview of the oral
among Israeli adults of different ethnic origins. manifestations of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma.
Dermatology 2004; 209(2):88–94. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995; 16(2):136–138, 140, 142
4. Richardson ER. Incidence of geographic tongue and medi- passim (quiz 148).
an rhomboid glossitis in 3,319 Negro college students. Oral 11. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA, Rossie K, et al. Insulin-
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968; 26(5):623–625. dependent diabetes mellitus and oral soft tissue patholo-
5. Aboyans V, Ghaemmaghami A. The incidence of fissured gies. I. Prevalence and characteristics of non-candidal
tongue among 4,009 Iranian dental outpatients. Oral Surg lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36(1):34–38. Endod 2000; 89:563–569.
6. Meskin LH, Redman RS, Gorlin RJ. Incidence of geographic 12. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA, Rossie K, et al. Insulin-
tongue among 3,668 students at the University of dependent diabetes mellitus and oral soft tissue patholo-
Minnesota. J Dent Res 1941; 116:16–21. gies. II. Prevalence and characteristics of candida and
7. Chosack A, Zadik D, Eidelman E. The prevalence of scrotal non-candidal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
tongue and geographic tongue in 70,359 Israeli schoolchil- Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:563–569.
dren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1974; 2:253–257. 13. Yamaoka Y, Suzuki A, Hatakeyama S, et al. Median
8. Shulman JD, Geach MM, Rivera-Hidalgo F. The prevalence rhomboid glossitis associated with amyloid deposition.
of oral mucosal lesions in U.S, adults. JADA 2004; Acta Pathol Jpn 1978; 28(2):319–323.
135:1279–1286. 14. Zegarelli DJ. Fungal infections of the oral cavity.
9. Shulman JD. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in children Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1993; 26(6):1069–1089.
and youth in the USA. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005; 5(2):89–97. 15. Touyz LZG, Peters E. Candidal infection of the tongue with
10. Fenerli A, Papanicolaou S, Papanicolaou M, et al. nonspecific inflammation of the palate. Oral Surg Oral Med
Histocompatibility antigens and geographic tongue. Oral Oral Pathol 1987; 63:304–308.
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76:476–479. 16. Wright BA. Median rhomboid glossitis: not a misnomer.
11. Gonzaga HFS, Torres EA, Alchorne MMA, et al. Both Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978; 46(6):806–814.
psoriasis and benign migratory glossitis are associated 17. Barrett AW, Kingsmill VJ, Speight PM. The frequency of
with HLA-Cw6. Br J Dermatol 1996; 135:368–370. fungal infection in biopsies of oral mucosal lesions. Oral
12. Younai FS, Phelan JA. Oral mucositis with features of Dis 1998; 4(1):26–31.
psoriasis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 18. Terai H, Shimahara M. Atrophic tongue associated with
Endod 1997; 84:61–67. candida. J Oral Pathol Med 2005; 14:397–400.
13. Marks R, Scarff CE, Yap LM, et al. Fungiform papillary 19. Holmstrup P, Axell T. Classification and clinical manifes-
glossitis: atopic disease in the mouth? Br J Dermatol 2005; tations of oral yeast infections. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;
153:740–745. 48:57–59.
14. Jainkittivong A, Langlais RP. Geographic tongue: clinical 20. Gorsky M, Raviv M, Taicher S. Squamous cell carcinoma
characteristics of 188 cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 1 mimicking median rhomboid glossitis region: report of a
(6):123–135. case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51:798–800.
234 Robinson and Vincent
VII. NICTOINIC STOMATITIS 17. Anderson G, Vala EK. The influence of cigarette consump-
tion and smoking machine yields of tar and nicotine on the
1. Boysen F. Stomatitis nicotina. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1950; nicotine uptake and oral mucosal lesions in smokers. J Oral
95:20–23. Pathol Med 1997; 26:117–123.
2. Forsey RR, Sullivan TJ. Stomatitis nicotina. Arch Dermatol 18. Meltzer L, Farfel B. Unilateral hairy tongue. AMA Arch
1961; 83:945–950. Derm Syphilol 1954; 69(4):497–498.
3. Schwartz DL. Stomatitis nicotina of the palate. Report of 19. Winzer M, Gilliar U, Ackerman AB. Hairy lesions of the
two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 20(3): oral cavity. Am J Dermatopathol 1988 10(2):155–159.
306–315. 20. Manabe M, Lim HW, Winzer M, et al. Architectural orga-
4. Fisher AA. Contact stomatitis. Dermatol Clin 1987; 5(4): nization of filiform papillae in normal and black hairy
709–717. tongue epithelium. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135:177–181.
5. Mirbod SM, Ahing SI. Tobacco-associated lesions of the 21. Svejda J, Skach M, Plaackova A. Hairlike variations of
oral cavity: Part I. nonmalignant lesions. J Can Dent Assoc filiform papillae in the human tongue. Oral Surg Oral
2000; 66:252–256. Med Oral Pathol 1977; 43(1): 97–105.
6. Taybos G. Oral changes associated with tobacco use. Am J 22. Harda Y. Black hairy tongue. A scanning electron micro-
Med Sci 2003; 326(4):179–182. scopic study. J Laryongol Otol 1977; 91(1):91–96.
7. Reddy CRRM, Rajakumari K, Ramulu C. Regression of 23. Langtry JA, Carr MM, Steele MC, et al. Topical tretinoin: a
stomatitis nicotina in persons with a long standing habit of new treatment for black hairy tongue (lingua villosa nigra).
reverse smoking. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38 Clin Exp Dermatol 1992; 17(3):163–164.
(4):570–583. 24. Standish M, Moorman WC. Treatment of hairy tongue with
8. Van Wyk CW. Nicotinic stomatitis of the palate: a clinico- podophyllin resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1964; 68:535–540.
histological study. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1967; 15;22(4):106–111. 25. Hasler JF, Standish SS. Podophyllin treatment of hairy
9. Reddy CRRM, Kameswari VR, Ramulu C, et al. tongue: a warning. J Am Dent Assoc 1969; 78(3):563–567.
Histopathological study of stomatitis nicotina. Br J Cancer 26. McGregor JM, Hay RJ. Oral retinoids to treat black hairy
1971; 25(3):403–410. tongue. Clin Exp Dermatol 1993; 18(3):291.
15. Walling DM, Ling PD, Gordadze AV, et al. Expression of 39. Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Pallesen G. Detection of Epstein-Barr
Epstein-Barr virus latent genes in oral epithelium: deter- virus small RNAs in routine paraffin sections using non-
minants of the pathogenesis of oral hairy leukoplakia. JID isotopic RNA/RNA in situ hybridization. Histopathology
2004; 190:396–399. 1994; 25:101–111.
16. Lilly EA, Cameron JE, Shetty KV, et al. Lack of evidence for 40. Mabruk MJEMF, Antonio M, Flint SR, et al. A simple and
local immune activity in oral hairy leukoplakia and oral rapid technique for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus
wart lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 20:154–162. DNA in HIV-associated oral hairy leukoplakia biopsies.
17. Rigopoulos D, Paparizos V, Katsambas A. Cutaneous J Oral Pathol Med 2000; 29:118–122.
markers of HIV infection. Clin Dermatol 2004; 22(6):487–498. 41. Guccion JG, Redman RS. Oral hairy leukoplakia: an ultra-
18. Hermann K, Frangou P, Middeldorp J, et al. Epstein-Barr structural study and review of the literature. Ultrastruct
virus replication in tongue epithelial cells. J Gen Virol 2002; Pathol 1999; 23(3):181–187.
83(pt 12):2995–2998. 42. Greenspan JS, Rabanus JP, Petersen V, et al. Fine structure
19. Walling DM, Flaitz CM, Nichols CM, et al. Persistent of EBV-infected keratinocytes in oral hairy leukoplakia.
productive Epstein-Barr virus replication of normal epithe- J Oral Pathol Med 1989; 18:565–572.
lial cells in vivo. J Infect Dis 2001; 184(12):1499–1507. 43. Epstein JB, Fatahzadeh M, Matisic J, et al. Exfoliative
20. Walling DM, Etienne W, Ray AJ, et al. Persistence and cytology and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of
transition of Epstein-Barr virus genotypes in the pathogen- hairy leukoplakia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
esis of oral hairy leukoplakia. J Infect Dis 2004; 190:387–395. Radol Endod 1995; 79:564–569.
21. Brandwein M, Nuovo G, Ramer M, et al. Epstein-Barr virus 44. Manca V, Mongiardo N, Pellegrino F, et al. Oral hairy
reactivation in hairy leukoplakia. Mod Pathol 1996; 9 leukoplakia in AIDS patients: an ultrastructural study.
(3):298–303. J Dermatol 1990; 17(12):729–736.
22. Walling DM, Flaitz CM, Hosein FG, et al. Effect of Epstein-
Barr virus replication on Langerhans cells in pathogenesis
of oral hairy leukoplakia. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1656–1663. X. FOCAL EPITHELIAL HYPERPLASIA
23. Ficarra G, Gaglioti D, Di Pietro M, et al. Oral hairy (HECK’S DISEASE)
leukoplakia: clinical aspects, histologic morphology and
differential diagnosis. Head Neck 1991; 13:524–521. 1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, et al., eds. Oral &
24. Aquilina C, Viraben R, Denis P. Secondary syphilis simu- Maxillofacial Pathology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders,
lating oral hairy leukoplakia. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49 2001:265–266.
(4):749–751. 2. Shafer WG, ed. A Textbook of Oral Pathology Philadelphia:
25. McCreary CE, Flint SR, McCartan BE, et al. Uremic stoma- WB Saunders, 1983:22–23.
titis mimicking oral hairy leukoplakia. Oral Surg Oral Med 3. Archard HO, Heck JW, Stanley HR. Focal epithelial
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83:350–353. hyperplasia: An unusual oral mucosal lesion found in
26. Fluckiger R, Laifer G, Itin P, et al. Oral hairy leukoplakia in Indian children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;
a patient with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1994; 106 20:201–212.
(2):506–508. 4. Pretorius-Clausen F, Willis JM. Papova virus-like particles
27. Casiglia J, Woo S. Oral hairy leukoplakia as an early indicator in focal epithelial hyperplasia. Scand J Dent Res 1971; 79:
of Epstein-Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphopro- 362–365.
liferative disorder. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60:948–950. 5. Carlos R, Sedano HO. Multifocal papilloma virus epithelial
28. Blomgren J, Back H. Oral hairy leukoplakia in a patient hyperplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77:
with multiple myeloma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 631–635.
Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82:408–410. 6. Estrada L. Informe preliminary sobre algunos aspectos
29. Nicolatou O, Nikolatos G, Fisfis M, et al. Oral hairy odontologicos de los indios caramanta. Boletin del instituto
leukoplakia in a patient with acute lymphocytic leukemia. de Antropologia 1956; 1:319–321.
Oral Dis 1999; 5:76–79. 7. Pretorius-Clausen F. Geographical aspects of oral focal
30. Epstein JB, Sherlock CH, Wolber RA. Hairy leukoplakia epithelial hyperplasia. Pathol Microbiol 1973; 39:204–213.
after bone marrow transplantation. Oral Surg Oral Med 8. Vilmer C, Cavelier-Balloy B, Pinquier L, et al. Focal epithe-
Oral Pathol 1993; 75:690–695. lial hyperplasia and multifocal human papillomavirus
31. Laine PO, Lindqvist JC, Pyrhonen SO, et al. Lesions of the infection in an HIV-seropositive man. J Am Acad
oral mucosa in lymphoma patients receiving cytostatic Dermatol 1994; 30(3):497–498.
drugs. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1993; 29B(4):291–294. 9. Pfister H, Hettich I, Runne U, et al. Characterization of
32. De Kaminsky AR, Kaminsky C, Blanco GF, et al. Hairy human papillomavirus type 13 from focal epithelial hyper-
leukoplakia in an HIV-seronegative patient. Int J Dermatol plasia Heck lesions. J Virol 1983; 47(2):363–366.
1995; 34(6):420–424.
33. Itin PH, Cajacob A, Langauer S, et al. Pseudo hairy leuko-
plakia. Br J Dermatol 1993; 128(5):589–591. XI. CONDYLOMA ACUMINATUM
34. Southam JC, Felix DH, Wray D, et al. Hairy leukoplakia – a
histological study. Histopathology 1991; 19(1):63–67. 1. Choukas NC, Toto PD. Condylomata acuminatum of the
35. Fernandez JF, Benito MAC, Lizaldez EB, et al. Oral hairy oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54(4):
leukoplakia: a histopathologic study of 32 cases. Am J 480–485.
Dermatopathol 1990; 12(6):571–578. 2. Jenson AB, Lancaster WD, Hartmann DP, et al. Frequency
36. Migliorati CA, Jones AC, Baughman PA. Use of exfoliative and distribution of papillomavirus structural antigens in
cytology in the diagnosis of oral hairy leukoplakia. Oral verrucae, multiple papillomas, and condylomata of the oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76:704–710. cavity. Am J Pathol 1982; 107:212–218.
37. Dias EP, Rocha ML, Silva A, et al. Histopathologic and 3. Shaffer EL Jr., Reiman BEF, Gysland WB. Oral condyloma
cytopathologic features of a subclinical phase. Am J Clin acuminatum. J Oral Pathol 1980; 9:163–173.
Pathol 2000; 114:395–401. 4. Butler S, Molinari JA, Plezia RA, et al. Condyloma acumi-
38. Gulley ML. Molecular diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus- natum in the oral cavity: four cases and a review. Rev
related diseases. J Mol Diagn 2001; 3(1):1–10. Infect Dis 1988; 10(3):544–550.
236 Robinson and Vincent
5. Knapp MJ, Uohara GI. Oral condyloma acuminatum. Oral 3. Abbey LM, Page DG, Sawyer DR. The clinical and histo-
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1967; 23(4):538–545. pathologic features of a series of 464 oral squamous cell
6. Flaitz CM. Condyloma acuminatum of the floor of the papillomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49(5):
mouth. Am J Dent 2001; 14:155–116. 419–428.
7. Anderson KM, Perez-Montiel D, Miles L, et al. The histo- 4. Tay ABG. A 5-year survey of oral biopsies in an oral
logic differentiation of oral condyloma acuminatum from surgical unit in Singapore: 1993-1997. Ann Acad Med
its mimics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Singapore 1999; 28:665–671.
Endod 2003; 96:420–428. 5. Greer RO, Goldman HM. Oral papillomas. Clinicopathologic
8. Leigh J. Oral warts rise dramatically with use of new evaluation and retrospective examination for dyskeratosis
agents in HIV. HIV Clin 2000; 12(2):7. in 110 lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38(3):
9. Greenspan D, Canchola AJ, MacPhail LA, et al. Effect of 435–440.
highly active antiretroviral therapy on frequency of oral 6. Yamaguchi T, Shindoh M, Amemiya A, et al. Detection of
warts. Lancet 2001; 357:1411–1412. human papillomavirus type 2 related sequence in oral
10. Greenspan D, Gange SJ, Phelan JA, et al. Incidence of oral papilloma. Anal Cell Pathol 1998; 16(3):125–130.
lesions in HIV-1 infected women: reduction with HAART. 7. Eversole LR, Laipis PJ. Oral squamous papillomas: detec-
J Dent Res 2004; 83(2):145–150. tion of HPV DNA by in situ hybridization. Oral Surg Oral
11. Esmeili T, Lozada-Nur F, Epstein J. Common benign oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65:545–550.
soft tissue masses. Dent Clin N Am 2005; 49:223–240. 8. Loning TH, Reichart P, Staquet MJ, et al. Occurrence of
12. Correll RW, Carroll GW. Multiple, painless, verruciform papillomavirus structural antigens in oral papillomas and
nodules on the mucosa of the lower lip. JADA 1986; leukoplakias. J Oral Pathol 1984; 13(2):155–165.
112:97–98. 9. Padayachee A, Van Wyk CW. Human papillomavirus
13. Regezi JA, Greenspan D, Greenspan JS. HPV-associated (HPV) in oral squamous cell papillomas. J Oral Pathol
epithelial atypia in oral warts in HIV+ patients. J Cutan 1987; 16:353–355.
Pathol 1994; 21:217–223. 10. Copete MA, Wendt K, Chen S-Y. Expression of p53, Ki-67
14. Zunt SL, Tomich CE. Oral condyloma acuminatum. and Cytokeratin-4 (CK4) in oral papillomas. J Oral Pathol
J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989; 15:591–594. Med 1997; 26:211–216.
15. Eversole LR, Laipis PJ, Merrell P, et al. Demonstration of 11. Ward KA, Napier SS, Winter PC, et al. Detection of human
human papillomavirus DNA in oral condyloma acumina- papilloma virus DNA sequences in oral squamous cell
tum. J Oral Pathol 1987; 16:266–272. papillomas by the polymerase chain reaction. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80:63–66.
12. Syrjanen S, Puranen M. Human papillomavirus infections
XII. VERRUCA VULGARIS in children: the potential role of maternal transmission. Crit
Rev Oral Biol Med 2000; 11(2):259–274.
1. Praetorius F. HPV-associated diseases of oral mucosa. Clin
13. Puranen M, Yilskoski M, Saarkoski S, et al. Vertical trans-
Dermatol 1997; 15(3):399–413.
mission of human papillomavirus from infected mothers to
2. Adler-Storthz K, Newland JR, Tessin BA, et al.
their newborn babies and persistence of the virus in
Identification of human papillomavirus types in oral ver-
childhood. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:694–699.
rucae vulgaris. J Oral Pathol 1986; 15:230–233.
14. Terai M, Hashimoto K, Yoda K, et al. High prevalence of
3. Bhatia B, Jain VK, Bhatia KK, et al. Verruca – vulgaris of
human papillomaviruses in the normal oral cavity of
oral cavity. J Indian Dent Assoc 1987; 59(6–9):147–149.
adults. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1999; 14:201–205.
4. Premoli de Percoco G, Galindo I, Ramirez JL, et al.
15. Eversole LR. Papillary lesions of the oral cavity: relation-
Detection of human papillomavirus-related oral verruca
ship to human papillomaviruses. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000;
vulgaris among Venezuelans. J Oral Pathol Med 1993; 22
28(12):922–927.
(3):113–116.
5. Green TL, Eversole LR, Leider AS. Oral and labial verrucae
vulgaris: clinical, histologic and immunohistochemical
evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62 XIV. VERRUCIFORM XANTHOMA
(4):410–416.
6. Eversole LR, Laipis PJ, Green TL. Human papillomavirus 1. Shafer WG. Verruciform xanthoma. Oral Surg Oral Med
type 2 DNA in oral and labial verrucae vulgaris. J Cutan Oral Pathol 1971; 31:784–789.
Pathol 1987; 14:319–325. 2. Neville B. The verruciform xanthoma. A review and report
7. Terezhalmy GT, Riley CK, Moore WS, et al. Oral verrucae of eight new cases. Am J Dermatopathol 1986; 8(3): 247–253.
vulgaris. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(2):162–163. 3. Toida M, Koizumi H. Verruciform xanthoma involving
8. Danforth RA, Green TL. Oral warty dyskeratoma. Oral the lip: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51:
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49(6):523–525. 432–434.
9. Harrist TJ, Murphy GF, Mihm MC Jr.. Oral warty dysker- 4. Oliveira PT, Jaeger RG, Cabral LAG, et al. Verruciform
atoma. Arch Dermatol 1980; 116:929–931. xanthoma of the oral mucosa. Report of four cases and a
10. Palefsky JM, Silverman JR S, Abdel-Salaam M, et al. review of the literature. Oral Oncol 2001; 37(3):326–331.
Association between proliferative verrucous leukoplakia 5. Agarwal-Antal N, Zimmermann J, Scholz T, et al. A giant
and infection with human papillomavirus type 16. J Oral verruciform xanthoma. J Cutan Pathol 2002; 29:119–124.
Pathol Med 1995; 24:193–197. 6. Drummond JF, White DK, Dam DD, et al. Verruciform
xanthoma within carcinoma in situ. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
1989; 47(4):398–400.
XIII. PAPILLOMA 7. Miyamoto Y, Nagayama M, Hayasi Y. Verruciform xan-
thoma occurring within oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol
1. Syrjanen S. Human papillomavirus infections and oral Med 1996; 25:188–191.
tumors. Med Microbiol Immunol 2003; 192:123–138. 8. Poulopoulos AK, Epivatianos A, Zaraboukas T, et al.
2. Bouquot JE, Wrobleski GJ. Papillary (pebbled) masses of Verruciform xanthoma coexisting with oral discoid lupus
the oral mucosa: more than simple papillomas. Pract erythematosus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 37(3):
Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996; 8(6):533–543 (quiz 543). 326–331.
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 237
9. Polonowita AD, Firth NA, Rich AM. Verruciform xan- 12. Haniastuti T, Santoso AS, Agustiono P, et al. Effect of
thoma and concomitant lichen planus of the oral mucosa. nifedipine on the expression of p53 protein in rat gingival.
Int J Oral Maxillofac 1999; 28:62–66. Biomed Pharmacother 2002; 56:235–240.
10. Iamaroon A, Vickers RA. Characterization of verruciform 13. Shimizu Yasuki, Kataoka M, Seto H. Nifedipine induces
xanthoma by in situ hybridization and immunohistochem- gingival epithelial hyperplasia in rats through inhibition of
istry. J Oral Pathol Med 1996; 25:395–400. apoptosis. J Periodontol 2002; 73:861–867.
11. Hu J, Li Y, Li S. Verruciform xanthoma of the oral cavity: 14. Nery EB, Edson RG, Lee KK, et al. Prevalence of
clinicopathological study relating to pathogenesis. Report Nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia. J Periodontol
of three cases. APMIS 2005; 113(9):629–634. 1995; 66:572–578.
12. Damm DD, Fantasia JE. Red, bumpy palate. Inflammatory 15. Seymour RA, Thomason JM, Ellis JS. The pathogenesis of
papillary hyperplasia. Gen Dent 2002; 50(4):378, 380. drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J Clin Periodontol
13. Cobb CM, Holt R, Denys FR. Ultrastructural features of the 1996; 23:165–175.
verruciform xanthoma. J Oral Pathol 1976; 5(1):42–51.
14. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA, Takata T, et al. Verruciform
xanthoma-biological profile of 282 oral lesions based on a XVI. DENTURE-INDUCED FIBROUS
literature survey with nine new cases from Japan. Oral HYPERPLASIA
Oncol 2003; 39(4):325–336.
15. Van der Waal I, Kerstins HCJ, Hens CJJ. Verruciform 1. Buchner A, Helft M. Pathologic conditions of the oral
xanthoma of the oral mucosa. J Oral Maxillofac Surg mucosa associated with ill-fitting dentures: III. Epulis fissur-
1985; 43(8):623–626. atum and flabby ridge. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim 1979;
16. Mostafa KA, Takata T, Ogawa I, et al. Verruciform xan- 28:7–13.
thoma of the oral mucosa: a clinicopathological study with 2. Bouquot JE, Gundlach KKH. Oral exophytic lesions in
immunohistochemical findings relating to pathogenesis. 23,616 white Americans over 35 years of age. Oral Surg
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1993; 423 Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62:284–291.
(4):243–248. 3. Cutright DE. The histolopathologic findings in 583 cases of
17. Shin HI, Choy KS, Nagasaki H, et al. Verruciform xan- epulis fissuratum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;
thoma of the oral mucosa: an immunohistochemical and 37:401–411.
ultrastructural study of two cases. Oral Oncol 1997; 33 4. Thomas GA. Denture-induced fibrous inflammatory
(4):279–283. hyperplasia (epulis fissuratum): research aspects. Austral
18. Orchard GE, Jones EW, Jones RR. Verruciform xanthoma: Prosthodont 1993; 7:49–53.
an immunocytochemical study. Br J Boomed Sic 1994; 51(1):
28–34.
XVII. INFLAMMATORY PAPILLARY
HYPERPLASIA
XV. DRUG-INDUCED GINGIVAL HYPERPLASIA
1. Bhaskar SN, Beasley JD III, Cutright DE. Inflammatory
1. Guggenheimer J. Oral manifestations of drug therapy. Dent papillary hyperplasia of the oral mucosa: report 341
Clin North Am 2002; 46:857–868. cases. JADA 1970; 81:949–952.
2. Abdollahi M, Radfar M. A review of drug-induced oral 2. Wescott WB, Correll RW. Multiple papillary projections on
reactions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 1(4):10–31. the alveolar mucosa and palate. JADA 1984; 108:91–92.
3. Kuru L, Yilmaz S, Kuru B, et al. Expression of growth 3. Salonen MA, Raustia AM, Oikarinen KS. Effect of treat-
factors in the gingival crevice fluid of patients with phe- ment of palatal inflammatory papillary hyperplasia with
nytoin-induced gingival enlargement. Arch Oral Biol 2004; local and system antifungal agents accompanied by
49:945–950. renewal of complete dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;
4. Majola MP, McFadyen ML, Connolly C, et al. Factors 54:87–91.
influencing phenytoin-induced gingival enlargement. 4. Monaco JG, Pickett AB. The role of Candida in inflammatory
J Clin Periodontal 2000; 27:506–512. papillary hyperplasia. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45(5):470–471.
5. Das SJ, Newman HN, Olsen I. Keratinocyte growth factor 5. Thwaites MS, Jeter TE, Ajagbe O. Inflammatory papillary
receptor is up-regulated in cyclosporine A-induced gingi- hyperplasia: review of literature and case report involving
val hyperplasia. J Dent Res 2002; 81(10):683–687. a 10-year-old child. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:133–138.
6. Yamada H, Nishimura F, Naruishi K, et al. Phenytoin and 6. Cutright DE. Morphogenesis of inflammatory papillary
cyclosporine A suppress the expression of MMP-1, TIMP-1, hyperplasia. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33(4):380–385.
and cathepsin L, but not cathepsin B in cultured gingival 7. Bergendal T, Heimdahl A, Isacsson G. Surgery in the
fibroblasts. J Periodontol 2000; 71(6):955–960. treatment of denture-related inflammatory papillary
7. Sinha S, Kamath V, Arunodaya GR, et al. Phenobarbitone hyperplasia of the palate. Int J Oral Surg 1980; 9:312–319.
induced gingival hyperplasia. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 2002; 73:597–603.
8. Tokgoz B, San HI, Yildiz O. Effects of azithromycin on XVIII. IRRITATION FIBROMA
cyclosporine-induced gingival hyperplasia in renal trans-
plant patients. Transplant Proc 2004; 36(9):2699–2702. 1. Esmeili T, Lozada-Nur F, Epstein J. Common benign oral
9. Jaiarj N. Drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J Mass Dent soft tissue masses. Dent Clin North Am 2005; 49:223–240.
Soc 2003; 52(3):16–20. 2. Barker DS, Lucas RB. Localised fibrous overgrowth of the
10. Yoshida T, Nagata J, Yamane A. Growth factors and oral mucosa. Br J Oral Surg 1967; 5:86–92.
proliferation of cultured rat gingival cells in response to 3. Dayan D, Bodner L, Hammel I, et al. Histochemical charac-
cyclosporine A. J Periodent Res 2005; 40:11–19. terization of collagen fibers in fibrous overgrowth (irritation
11. Shouda J, Nakamoto H, Sugahara S. Incidence of gingival fibroma) of the oral mucosa: effect of age and duration of
hyperplasia caused by calcium antagonists in continuous lesions. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1994; 18(1):53–57.
ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Adv Perit Dial 4. Bakos LH. The giant cell fibroma: a review of 116 cases.
1999; 15:153–155. Ann Dent 1992; 51(1):32–35.
238 Robinson and Vincent
5. Savage NW, Monsour PA. Oral fibrous hyperplasias and 14. Bieluch VM, Chasin WD, Martin ET, et al. Recurrent
the giant cell fibroma. Aust Dent J 1985; 30(6):405–409. tonsillitis: histologic and bacteriologic evaluation. Ann
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98:332–335.
15. Kuhn J, Brook I, Waters C, et al. Quantitative bacteriology
XIX. GIANT CELL FIBROMA of tonsil removed from children with tonsillitis, hypertro-
phy and recurrent tonsillitis with and without hypertro-
1. Weathers DR, Callihan MD. Giant-cell fibroma. Oral Surg phy. Acta Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104:646–652.
1974; 37:374–384. 16. Casselbrant ML. What is wrong in chronic adenoiditis/
2. Houston GD. The giant cell fibroma. a review of 464 cases. tonsillitis anatomical considerations. Int J Pediatr
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53(6):582–587. Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 49(suppl 1):S133–S135.
3. Savage NW, Monsour PA. Oral fibrous hyperplasias and 17. Johnson BC, Alvi A. Cost-effective workup for tonsillitis.
the giant cell fibroma. Aust Dent J 1985; 30(6):405–409. Postgrad Med 2003; 113:115–119.
4. Bakos LH. The giant cell fibroma: a review of 116 cases. 18. Heubi C, Shott SR. PANDAS: pediatric autoimmune
Ann Dent 1992; 51(1):32–35. neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal
5. Swan RH. Giant cell fibroma. A case presentation and infections- an uncommon, but important indication for
review. J Periodontol 1988; 59(5):338–340. tonsillectomy. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryng 2003; 67:837–840.
6. Weathers DR, Campbell WG. Ultrastructure of the giant- 19. Altemani A, Endo LH, Chone C, et al. Histopathological
cell fibroma of the oral mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral concept of chronic tonsillitis in children. Acta Otolaryngol
Pathol 1974; 8(4):550–561. Suppl 1996; 523:14–16.
7. Magnusson BC, Rasmusson LG. The giant cell fibroma. 20. Zhang PC, Pang YT, Loh KS, et al. Comparison of histology
Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:293–296. between recurrent tonsillitis and tonsillar hypertrophy.
8. Souza LB, Andrade ESS, Miguel MCC, et al. Origin of Clin Otolaryngol 2003; 28:235–239.
stellate giant cells in oral fibrous lesions determined by 21. Wenig BM, Thompson LDR, Frankel SS, et al. Lymphoid
immunohistochemical expression of vimentin, HHF-35, changes of the nasopharyngeal and palatine tonsils that are
CD68 and factor XIIIa. Pathology 2004; 36(4):316–320. indicative of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am
9. Waldron CA. Giant-cell fibroma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral J Surg Pathol 1996; 20:572–587.
Pathol 1974; 37(3):374–384. 22. Gnepp DR, Souther J. Skeletal muscle in routine tonsillec-
tomy specimens: a common finding. Hum Pathol 2000;
31:813–816.
XX. TONSILLITIS AND TONSILLAR 23. Akkawi NM, Borroni B, Magoni M, et al. Lemierre’s
HYPERPLASIA syndrome complicated by carotid thrombosis. Neurol Sci
2001; 22:403–404.
1. Nave H, Gebert A, Pabst R. Morphology and immunology 24. Griffies WS, Wotowic P, Wildes TO. Spontaneous tonsillar
of the human palatine tonsil. Anat Embryol 2001; 204: hemorrhage. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:365–368.
367–373. 25. Bisno AL, Gerber MA, Gwaltney JM Jr., et al. Practice
2. Heffner DK. Pathology of the tonsils and adenoids. guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group
Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987; 20:279–286. A streptococcal pharyngitis. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35(2):
3. Paulussen C, Claes J, Claes G, et al. Adenoids and tonsils, 113–125.
indications for surgery and immunological consequences of 26. Edmondson MB, Farwell KR. Relationship between the
surgery. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngo Belg 2000; 54:403–408. clinical likelihood of group A streptococcal pharyngitis
4. Go M, Kojima T, Ken-ichi T, et al. Expression and function and the sensitivity of a rapid antigen-detection test in a
of tight junctions in the crypt epithelium of human palatine pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2005; 115(2):280–285.
tonsils. J Histo Cyto 2004; 52:1627–1638. 27. Rimoin AW, Hamza HS, Vince A, et al. Evaluation of the
5. Chen HL, Chiou SS, Hsiao HP, et al. Respiratory adenoviral WHO clinical decision rule for streptococcal pharyngitis.
infections in children: a study of hospitalized cases in Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:1066–1070.
southern Taiwan in 2001-2002. J Trop Pediatr 2004; 50(5): 28. Abdul-Baqi KJ, Shakhatreh FMN. Effectiveness of treat-
279–284. ment of tonsillopharyngitis: comparative study. J Laryngol
6. Yamanaka N, Kataura A. Viral infections associated with Otol 2002; 116(11):917–919.
recurrent tonsillitis. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1984; 416:30–37. 29. Gerber MA. Rapid diagnosis of pharyngitis caused by
7. Yoda K, Sata T, Kurata T, et al. Oropharyngotonsillitis Group A Streptococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004; 17:571–580.
associated with nonprimary Epstein-Barr virus infection. 30. Gerber MA. Diagnosis and treatment of pharyngitis in
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126:185–193. children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2005; (3):729–747.
8. Brodsky L, Moore L, Ogra PL, et al. The immunology of 31. Syrogiannopoulos GA, Bozdogan B, Grivea JN, et al. Two
tonsils in children: the effect of bacterial load on the pres- dosages of clarithromycin for five days, amoxicillin/
ence of B- and T-cell subsets. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:93–98. clavulanate for five days or penicillin V for ten days in
9. Post JC, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L, et al. The role of acute group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr
biofilms in otolaryngologic infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis J 2004; 23:857–865.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12:185–190. 32. Curtin CD, Casey JR, Murray PC, et al. Efficacy of cepha-
10. Chole RA, Faddis BT. Anatomical evidence of microbial lexin two vs. three times daily vs. cefadroxil once daily for
biofilms in tonsillar tissues. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2003;
Surg 2003; 129:634–636. 42(6):519–526.
11. Brodsky L, Frankel S, Gorfien J, et al. The role of dendritic 33. Brook I. The role of bacterial interference in otitis, sinusitis
cells in the development of chronic tonsillar disease in and tonsillitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133(1):
children. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1996; 523:98–100. 139–146.
12. Richardson MA. Sore throat, tonsillitis and adenoiditis. 34. Curtin JM. The history of tonsil and adenoid surgery.
Med Clin North Am 1999; 83(1):75–83. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987; 20(2):415–419.
13. Tewfik TL, Garni MA. Tonsillopharyngitis: clinical high- 35. Koempel JA. On the origin of tonsillectomy and the dissec-
lights. J Otolaryngol 2005; 34(suppl1):S45–S49. tion method. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:1583–1586.
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 239
36. Lee KC, Bent JP, Dolitsky JN, et al. Surgical advances in XXII. ADENOID HYPERPLASIA
tonsillectomy: report of a roundtable discussion. Ear Nose
Throat J 2004; (suppl 3):83:4–13. 1. Lesmeister MJ, Bothwell MR, Misfeldt ML. Toll-like recep-
37. Van Den Akker EH, Hoes AW, Burton MJ, et al. Large tor expression in the human nasopharyngeal tonsil (ade-
international differences in (adeno) tonsillectomy rates. noid) and palantine tonsils: A preliminary report. J Pediatr
Clin Otolaryngol 2004; 29:161–164. Otohinolaryngology 2006; 70:545–552.
38. Beaty, MM, Funk GF, Karnell LH, et al. Risk factors for 2. Deutsch ES. Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Pediatr
malignancy in adult tonsils. Head Neck 1998; 20(5): Otolaryngol 1996; 43:1319–1338.
399–403. 3. Richardson, MA. Sore throat, tonsillitis, and adenoiditis.
39. Discolo CM, Darrow DH, Koltai PJ. Infectious indications Med Clin North Am 1999; 83(1):75–83.
for tonsillectomy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2003; 50: 4. Brodsky L, Koch J. Anatomic correlates of normal and
445–458. diseased adenoids in children. Laryngol 1992; 102:
40. Deutsch ES. Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Changing 1268–1274.
indications. Pediatr Clin North Am 1996; 43(6):1319–1338. 5. Suzuki M, Watanabe T, Mogi G. Clinical, bacteriological,
41. Paradise JL, Bluestone CD, Colburn DK, et al. Tonsillectomy and histological study of adenoids in children. Am J
and adenotonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in Otolaryngol 1999; 20:85–90.
moderately affected children. Pediatrics 2002; 110:7–15. 6. Fujiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Ichimiya I, et al. Functional
42. Van Staaij BK, van den Akker EH, van der Heijden GJMG, architecture of the nasopharyngeal tonsil. Am J
et al. Adenotonsillectomy for upper respiratory infections: Otolaryngol 1989; 10(2):124–131.
evidence based? Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:19–25. 7. Yasan H, Dogru H, Tuz M, et al. Otitis media with effusion
43. Van Staaij BK, van den Akker EH, Rovers MM, et al. and histopathologic properties of adenoid tissue. Int J
Effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67:1179–1183.
symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertro- 8. Gates GA, Muntz HR, Gaylis B. Adenoidectomy and otitis
phy: open, randomized controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1992; 155:24–32.
2005; 0(1):60–63. 9. Kveton JF, Pillsbury HC, Saaski CT. Adenoiditis vs. ade-
44. Mehanna H, Rejali D, Murray A. Suspending tonsillecto- noid hypertrophy. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 108:315–318.
my: The effects on primary and secondary acute care in 10. Hickey SA, Buckley JF, MCartney JC, et al. View from
Scotland. Scot Med J 2004; 49:144–145. beneath: Pathology in Focus. Adenoidal hypertrophy as the
45. Darrow DH, Siemens C. Indications for tonsillectomy and presenting feature of HIV infection. J Laryngol Otol 1990;
adenoidectomy. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:6–9. 104:58–60.
46. Netser JC, Robinson RA, Smith RJ, et al. Value-Based 11. Shapiro NL, Strocker AM. Adenotonsillar hypertrophy and
Pathology. A cost-benefit analysis of the examination of Epstein-Barr Virus in pediatric organ transplant recipients.
routine and nonroutine tonsil and adenoid specimens. Am Laryngoscope 2001; 111:997–1001.
J Clin Pathol 1997; 108:158–165. 12. Valtonen HJ, Blomgren EV, Qvarnberg YH. Consequences
47. Alvi A, Vartanian J. Microscopic examination of routine of adenoidectomy in conjunction with tonsillectomy in
tonsillectomy specimens: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Head children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 53:105–109.
Neck Surg 1998; 119:361–363. 13. Buchinsky FJ, Lowry MA, Isaacson G. Do adenoids
48. Williams MD, Brown HM. The adequacy of gross patho- regrow after excision? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
logical examination of routine tonsils and adenoids in 2000; 123:576–581.
patients 21 years old and younger. Hum Pathol 2003; 34 14. Darrow DH, Siemens C. Indications for tonsillectomy and
(10):1053–1057. adenoidectomy. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:6–10.
49. Dohar JE, Bonilla JA. Processing of adenoid and tonsil 15. Van Staaji Bak, van der Akker EH, Rovers MM, et al.
specimens in children: a national survey of standard prac- Effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild
tices and a five-year review of the experience at the symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertro-
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. Otolaryngol Head phy: open, randomized controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol
Neck Surg 1996; 115:94–97. 2005; 30(1):60–63.
50. Younis RT, Hesse SV, Anand VK. Evaluation of the utility
and cost-effectiveness of obtaining histopathologic diagno-
sis on all routine tonsillectomy specimens. Laryngoscope
XXIII. OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA
2001; 111:2166–2169. 1. Collop NA. Obstructive sleep apnea syndromes. Semin
51. Daneshbod K, Bhutta RA, Sodagar R. Pathology of tonsils Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 26(1):13–24.
and adenoids: a study of 15,120 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2. Magliocca KR, Helman JI. Obstructive sleep apnea. JADA
1980; 59(11):466–467. 2005; 136:1121–1129.
3. Greenfeld M, Tauman R, DeRowe A, et al. Obstructive
sleep apnea syndrome due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy
XXI. PERITONSILLAR ABSCESS in infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67(10):
1055–1060.
1. Harner SG. Peritonsillar, peripharyngeal, and deep neck 4. Bower CM, Richmond D. Tonsillectomy and adenoidec-
abscesses. Postgrad Med 1975; 57(6):147–149. tomy in patients with Down syndrome. Int J Pediatr
2. Tewfik TL, Garni MA. Tonsillopharyngitis:clinical high- Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 33(2):141–148.
lights. J Otolaryngol 2005; 34(suppl 1):S45–S49. 5. Huang RY, Shapiro NL. Adenotonsillar enlargement in
3. Scott PMJ, Dhillon RS, McDonald PJ. Cervical necrotizing pediatric patients following solid organ transplantation.
fasciitis and tonsillitis. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108(5):435–437. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126:159–164.
4. Mitchelmore IJ, Prior AJ, Montgomery PQ, et al. 6. Schwab RJ. Genetic determinants of upper airway struc-
Microbiological features and pathogenesis of peritonsillar tures that predispose to obstructive sleep apnea. Respir
abscesses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1995; 14:870–877. Physiol Neurobiol 2005; 147(2–3):289–298.
5. Fujimoto M, Aramaki H, Takano S, et al. Immediate 7. Nishimura T, Suzuki K. Anatomy of oral respiration:
tonsillectomy for peritonsillar abscess. Acta Otolaryngol morphology of the oral cavity and pharynx. Acta
Suppl 1996; 523:252–255. Otolaryngol Suppl 2003; 550:25–28.
240 Robinson and Vincent
8. Guilleminault C, Lee JH, Chan A. Pediatric obstructive 6. Dupuy A, Cosnes J, Revuz J, et al. Oral Crohn disease. Arch
sleep apnea syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; Dermatol 1999; 135:439–442.
159:775–785. 7. Kalmar JR. Crohn’s disease: orofacial considerations and
9. Caples SM, Gami AS, Somers VK. Obstructive sleep apnea. disease pathogenesis. Periodontology 2000; 6:101–115.
Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:187–197. 8. Lee CYS, Tomich CE. Oral lesions in Crohn’s disease:
10. Yates DW. Adenotonsillar hypertrophy and cor pulmonale. review of the literature with case report. Hawaii Dent J
Br J Anasth 1988; 61:355–359. 1995; 26(6):11–12.
9. Rehberger A, Puspok A, Stallmeister T, et al. Crohn’s
disease masquerading as aphthous ulcers. Eur J Dermatol
XXIV. LOBULAR CAPILLARY HEMANGIOMA 1998; 8:274–276.
10. Scheper HJ, Brand HS. Oral aspects of Crohn’s disease. Int
1. Mills SE, Cooper PH, Fechner RE. Lobular capillary hem- Dent J 2002; 52(3):163–172.
angioma: the underlying lesion of pyogenic granuloma. 11. Weiss JS, Gupta AK, Regezi J, et al. Oral ulcers and
Am J Surg Pathol 1980; 4:471–479. cobblestone plaques. Arch Dermatol 1991; 127(6):889–892.
2. Epivatianos A, Antoniades D, Zaraboukas T, et al. 12. Malins TJ, Wilson A, Ward-Booth RP. Recurrent buccal
Pyogenic granuloma of the oral cavity: comparative study space abscesses: a complication of Crohn’s disease. Oral
of its clinicopathological and immunohistochemical fea- Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72:19–21.
tures. Pathol Int 2005; 55(7):391–397. 13. Mills CC, Amin M, Manisali M. Salivary duct fistula and
3. Toida M, Hasegawa T, Watanabe F, et al. Lobular capillary recurrent buccal space infection: a complication of Crohn’s
hemangioma of the oral mucosa: clinicopathological study disease. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61:1485–1487.
of 43 cases with a special reference to immunohistochemi- 14. Halme L, Meurman JH, Laine P, et al. Oral findings in
cal characterization of the vascular elements. Pathol Int patients with active or inactive Crohn’s disease. Oral Surg
2003; 53(1):1–7. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76:175–181.
4. Sato H, Takeda Y, Satoh M. Expression of the endothelial 15. Schnitt SJ, Antonioli DA, Jaffe B, et al. Granulomatous
receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2 in lobular capillary hemangi- inflammation of minor salivary gland ducts: a new oral
oma of the oral mucosa: an immunohistochemical study. J manifestation of Crohn’ disease. Hum Pathol 1987; 18:405–
Oral Pathol Med 2002; 31:432–438. 407.
5. Willies-Jacobo LJ, Issacs H Jr., Stein MT. Pyogenic granulo- 16. Alawi F. Granulomatous diseases of the oral tissues: differ-
ma presenting as a congenital epulis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc ential diagnosis and update. Dent Clin North Am 2005;
Med 2000; 154:603–605. 49:203–221.
6. Espinoza I, Rojas R, Aranda W, et al. Prevalence of oral 17. Onishi Y, Imai Y, Tojima H, et al. Systemic sarcoidosis with
mucosal lesions in elderly people in Santiago, Chile. J Oral significant granulomatous swelling of the pharyngeal ton-
Pathol Med 2003; 32:571–575. sil. Int Med 1998; 37:157–160.
7. Silverstein LH, Burton CH Jr., Singh BB. Oral pyogenic 18. Ferguson MM, MacFayden EE. Orofacial granulomatosis –
granuloma in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995; 49 a 10 year review. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1986; 15
(3):331–332. (3):370–377.
8. Munoz M, Monje F, del Hoyo JRA, et al. Oral 19. Sciubba JJ, Said-Al-Naief N. Orofacial granulomatosis:
Angiosarcoma misdiagnosed as a pyogenic granuloma. presentation, pathology and management of 13 cases.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56:488–491. J Oral Pathol Med 2003; 32:576–585.
9. Ramirez JR, Seone J, Montero J, et al. Isolated gingival 20. Khouri JM, Bohane TD, Day AS. Is orofacial granuloma-
metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking a tosis in children a feature of Crohn’s disease? Acta Paediatr
pyogenic granuloma. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30:926–929. 2005; 94(4):501–504.
10. Lopez de Blanc S, Sambuelli R, Femopase F, et al. Bacillary
angiomatosis affecting the oral cavity. Report of two cases
and review. J Oral Pathol Med 2000; 29:91–96. XXVI. ECTOPIC THYROID
11. Monteil RA, Michiels JF, Hofman P, et al. Histological and
ultrastructural study of one case of oral bacillary angioma- A. Lingual Thyroid
tosis in HIV disease and review of the literature. Eur J
Cancer B Oral Oncol 1994; 30(1):65–71. 1. Rinkel RNPM, Manni JJ, Van der beek JMH. Ectopic
thyroid tissue manifesting as a unique cause of an oropha-
ryngeal mass. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124
XXV. CROHN DISEASE (3):340–341.
2. Kumar PV, Akbari HMH, Arjmand F. Letters to the editor:
1. Bozkurt T, Langer M, Fendel K, et al. Granulomatous Lingual thyroid diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytol-
tonsillitis, a rare extraintentinal manifestation of Crohn’s ogy. Acta Cytologica 1996; 40(2):387–389.
disease. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37(7):1127–1130. 3. Kumar R, Sharma S, Marwah A, et al. Ectopic goiter
2. Mones RL, Merrell N. Crohn’s disease presenting as chron- masquerading as submandibular gland swelling. Clin
ic purulent tonsillitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1984; 3 Nucl Med 2001; 26(4):306–309.
(3):475–477. 4. Soscia A, Guerra G, Cinelli MP. Parapharyngeal ectopic
3. Stavropoulos F, Katz J, Guelmann M, et al. Oral ulcerations thyroid: the possible persistence of the lateral thyroid
as a sign of Crohn’s disease in a pediatric patient: a case anlage. Clinical case report. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;
report. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:355–358. 26:338–343.
4. Plauth M, Jenss H, Meyle J. Oral manifestations of Crohn’s 5. Mysorekar VV, Dandekar CP, Sreevathsa MR. Ectopic
disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1991; 13(1):29–37. thyroid tissue in the parotid salivary gland. Singapore
5. Riggio MP, Gibson J, Lennon A, et al. Search for Med J 2004; 45(9):437–438.
Mycobacterium paratuberculosis DNA in orofacial granu- 6. Maino K, Skelton H, Yeager J, et al. Benign ectopic thyroid
lomatosis and oral Crohn’s disease tissue by polymerase tissue in a cutaneous location: a case report and review.
chain reaction. Gut 1997; 41:646–650. J Cutan Pathol 2004; 31:195–198.
Chapter 4: Benign and Nonneoplastic Diseases 241
7. Yimaz F, Uzunlar AK, Sogutcu N. Ectopic thyroid tissue in nodes found during neck dissection in head and neck
the uterus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84(2):201–202. carcinoma patients. Laryngoscope 2005; 115(3):470–474.
8. Baughman RA. Lingual thyroid and lingual thyroglossal 10. Kakudo K, Shan L, Nakamura Y, et al. Clonal analysis
tract remnants. A clinical and histopathologic study with helps to differentiate aberrant thyroid tissue from thyroid
review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1998; 29(2):187–190.
1972; 34(5):781–799. 11. Rosai J, Carcangui ML, De Lellis RA. Atlas of Tumor
9. Bayram F, Kulahi I, Yuce K, et al. Functional lingual Pathology. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of
thyroid as unusual cause of progressive dysphagia. Pathology, 1992:323.
Thyroid 2004; 14(4):321–324. 12. Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Weber RS. Metastatic thyroid
10. Banna M, Lasjuanias P. The arteries of the lingual thyroid: cancer as an incidental finding during neck dissection:
angiographic findings and anatomic variations. AJNR significance and management. Head Neck 1992; 14(6):
1990; 11:730–732. 459–463.
11. Abdallah-Matta MP, Dubarry PH, Pessey JJ, et al. Lingual
thyroid and hyperthyroidism: A new case and review of
the literature. J Endocrinol Invest 2002; 25:264–267.
12. Thomas G, Hoilat R, Daniels JS, et al. Ectopic lingual C. Ectopic Benign Thyroid Tissue in
thyroid: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; Nonlymphoid Tissues of the Head
32:219–221. and Neck
13. Kansal P, Sakati N, Rifai A, et al. Lingual thyroid.
Diagnosis and treatment. Arch Intern Med 1987; 1. Damiano A, Glickman AB, Rubin JS, et al. Ectopic thyroid
147:2046–2048. tissue presenting as a midline neck mass. Int J Pediatr
14. Fogarty D. Lingual thyroid and difficult intubation. Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 34(1–2):141–148.
Anaesthesia 1990; 45(3):251. 2. MacCormick J, Carpenter B. Pediatric intratracheal ectopic
15. Neinas FW, Gorman CA, Devine KD, et al. Lingual thyroid tissue: case study and review of the literature.
Thyroid: Clinical characteristics of 15 cases. Ann Int Med J Otolaryngol 2005; 34(5):365–369.
1973; 79:205–210. 3. Bowen-Wright HE, Jonklaas J. Ectopic intratracheal thy-
16. Barthel A, Bornstein SR. Obstructive lingual thyroid. roid: an illustrative case report and literature review.
N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1. Thyroid 2005; 15(5):478–484.
17. Kalan A, Tariq M. Lingual thyroid gland: clinical evalua- 4. Soylu L, Kiroglu F, Ersoz C, et al. Intralaryngotracheal
tion and comprehensive management. Ear Nose Throat J thyroid. Am J Otol 1993; 14(3):145–147.
1999; 78(5):340–341, 345–349. 5. Kumar R, Sharma S, Marwah A, et al. Ectopic goiter
18. Barnes TW, Olsen KD, Morgenthaler TI. Obstructive lin- masquerading as submandibular gland swelling. Clin
gual thyroid causing sleep apnea: a case report and review Nucl Med 2001; 26(4):306–309.
of the literature. Sleep Med 2004; 5(6):605–607. 6. Yamauchi M, Inque D, Sato H, et al. A case of ectopic
19. Massine RE, Durning SJ, Koroscil TM. Lingual thyroid thyroid in lateral neck associated with Graves’ disease.
carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Endocr J 1999; 46(5):731–734.
Thyroid 2001; 11(12):1191–1196. 7. Wong RJ, Cunningham MJ, Curtin HD. Cervical ectopic
thyroid. Am J Otol 1998; 19(6):397–400.
8. Rubenfeld S, Joseph UA, Schwartz MR, et al. Ectopic
B. Benign Thyroid Inclusions in a Lymph Node thyroid in the right carotid triangle. Arch Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:913–915.
1. Fliegelman LJ, Genden EM, Brandwein M, et al. 9. Morgan NJ, Emberton P, Barton RPE. The importance of
Significance and management of thyroid lesions in lymph thyroid scanning in neck lumps – a case report of ectopic
nodes as an incidental finding during neck dissection. tissue in the right submandibular region. J Laryngol Otol
Head Neck 2001; 23(10):885–891. 1995; 109(7):674–676.
2. Butler JJ, Tulinius H, Ibanez ML, et al. Significance of 10. Block MA, Wylie JH, Patton RB, et al. Does benign thyroid
thyroid tissue in lymph nodes associated with carcinoma tissue occur in the lateral part of the neck? Am J Surg 1966;
of the head, neck or lung. Cancer 1967; 20:103–112. 112:476–481.
3. Clark RL, Hickey RC, James JJ, et al. Thyroid cancer 11. Mysorekar VV, Dandekar CP, Sreevathsa MR. Ectopic
discovered incidentally during treatment for an unrelated thyroid tissue in the parotid salivary gland. Singapore
head and neck cancer: review of 16 cases. Ann Surg 1966; Med J 2004; 45(9):437–438.
163(5):665–671. 12. Rinkel RNPM, Manni JJ, Van der beek JMH. Ectopic
4. Ibrahim NB, Milewski PJ, Gillett R et al. Benign thyroid thyroid tissue manifesting as a unique cause of an oropha-
inclusions within cervical lymph nodes: an alarming inci- ryngeal mass. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124
dental finding. Aust N Z J Surg 1981; 51(2):188–189. (3):340–341.
5. Fechner RE. Pathologic Quiz Case 1. Arch Otolaryngol 13. Maino K, Skelton H, Yeager J, et al. Benign ectopic thyroid
1984; 110:698–700. tissue in a cutaneous location: a case report and review.
6. Gerard-Marchant R. Thyroid follicle inclusions in cervical J Cutan Pathol 2004; 31:195–198.
lymph nodes. Arch Pathol 1964; 77:633–637. 14. Harach HR, Cabrerra JA, Williams ED. Thyroid implants
7. Meyer JS, Steinberg LS. Microscopically benign thyroid after surgery and blunt trauma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2004; 8
follicles in cervical lymph nodes. Cancer 1969; 24:302–311. (2):61–68.
8. Ansari-Lari MA, Westra WH. The prevalence and signifi- 15. Kumar PV, Akbari HMH, Arjmand F. Letters to the editor:
cance of clinically unsuspected neoplasms in cervical Lingual thyroid diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytol-
lymph nodes. Head Neck 2003; 25(10):841–847. ogy. Acta Cytologica 1996; 40(2):387–389.
9. Leon X, Sancho FJ, Garcia J, et al. Incidence and signifi-
cance of clinically unsuspected thyroid tissue in lymph
5
Susan Müller
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Otolaryngology-
Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.
number of oral diseases that can mimic PV, obtaining layer (Fig. 2). The single row of basal cells, many of
tissue for microscopic examination and immunofluo- which are separated from each other, have a cuboidal
rescence is required for definitive diagnosis. shape giving the characteristic ‘‘tombstone’’ appear-
ance (Fig.2). Irregular upward growth of papillae,
Pathology which are lined by a single row of basal cells and
downward proliferation of strands of epithelial cells, in
Suprabasal bullae formation occurs in PV. The earliest the spaces between the papillae are observed (Fig. 3).
change is intercellular edema within the epithelium. During the early bullous phase of PV, there is
The subsequent acantholysis leads to the formation of little or no inflammation. At times, eosinophils invade
clefts and then of bullae immediately above the basal the epidermis before acantholysis, and this has been
Chapter 5: Noninfectious Vesiculoerosive, Ulcerative Lesions 245
Immunology
Autoantibodies in the serum of patients with PV react
against desmosomes, specifically the antigens, desmo-
glein 3 (DG3) and desmoglein 1 (DG1) in the basement
membrane zone (BMZ). DG3 is a 130-kD desmosomal
cadherin involved in cell-cell adhesion of keratino-
cytes. DG1 is a 160-kD antigen that reacts to pemphi-
gus foliaceous. Studies have demonstrated that
binding of PV antibodies to DG3 antigen causes loss
of intercellular adhesion mechanisms, thereby induc-
ing acantholysis and blister formation (2). Enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have shown Figure 5 Pemphigus vegetans. Prominent acanthosis with
that PV can be further divided into a mucosal domi- intraepidermal abscesses consisting of eosinophils can be seen.
nant type reactive with only DG3 and a mucocutane-
ous type reactive to both DG3 and DG1 (5).
Immunology
Patients with bullous pemphigoid have a circulating
antigen, BP-antigen (BPAG1), a 230-kD polypeptide
that is located intracellularly, associated with the
hemidesmosome (1,4). Another BP-antigen, a 180-kD Figure 10 Mucous membrane pemphigoid presenting as des-
(BPAG2) protein is a transmembrane protein of the quamative gingivitis. The gingiva is erythematous, and the surface
basal keratinocyte and upper lamina lucida (1,4). mucosa can be removed with ease. A similar clinical picture can
Some of the BP antibodies are complement activating sometimes be seen with pemphigus vulgaris or lichen planus.
and appear to play a very important pathogenic role
250 Müller
Differential Diagnosis
When a patient presents with mucosal ulcers, a biopsy
of the blister or perilesional tissue should be per-
formed for microscopic examination. Other diseases
that present histologically as a subepithelial separa-
tion include linear IgA disease and EBA. Direct immu-
nofluorescence is useful to distinguish between these
conditions. If the deposition along the BMZ is pre-
dominately IgA, then the diagnosis of linear IgA
should be suspected.
EBA presents as an acquired subepidermal blis-
Figure 13 Mucous membrane pemphigoid. Characteristic sub- tering disease characterized by a combination of blis-
epithelial clefting is evident. The lamina propria contains a
ters, erosions, scars, milia, and dyspigmentation of the
moderate chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate.
skin (10). Involvement of the mucous membranes,
including oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, nasal, conjuncti-
val, esophageal, and genital, are clinically similar to
MMP. In EBA, the production of autoantibodies to the
epithelial basement membrane protein type VII colla-
gen is distinct and permits differentiation from other
subepidermal blistering diseases (5). When EBA is
suspected, using 1.0-mol NaCl-split perilesional tissue,
which induces bullae formation, is helpful. The IgG
autoantibodies will be seen on the floor of the induced
bullae in EBA (corresponding to lamina densa), where-
as in MMP, the IgG deposits are seen on the roof of the
bullae (corresponding to lamina lucida) (3).
The reader is referred to specialty texts in der-
matology for an in-depth discussion of linear IgA
disease and EBA.
IV. LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS SLE have photosensitivity, and ultraviolet light (UV)
may precipitate or exacerbate the disease; however, the
A. Introduction exact mechanism is unclear. Bacterial or latent viral
LE is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology infections have also been proposed as initiating events,
affecting connective tissues and multiple organs. although no clear evidence exists (1,4). Hormonal fac-
There are three major clinicopathological forms recog- tors have long been considered in view of the high
nized. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic female incidence. Antiphospholipid antibodies associ-
inflammatory disease involving multiple organs and a ated with venous and arterial thrombosis are also seen.
variety of cutaneous and oral manifestations. The clini- The clinical features of SLE are varied, and
cal features vary tremendously, but the most common because of this, a definitive diagnosis of SLE is often
features are skin rashes, joint pain, fever, nephritis, and not made until a few years after the initial symptoms.
pleurisy. Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus Initial complaints include extreme fatigue, joint pain,
(CCLE), or discoid lupus erythematosus, consists pri- and myalgia. Up to 85% of patients have mucocutane-
marily of cutaneous and oral lesions. Although some ous symptoms, including the classic butterfly rash
patients with CCLE (<5%) may develop SLE, CCLE over the malar region and bridge of nose in approxi-
generally represents an independent entity with a good mately 50% of patients (5). Oral mucosal lesions occur
prognosis. A third form of LE, subacute cutaneous primarily on the palate, buccal mucosa, and gingivae.
lupus erythematosus (SCLE) has clinical features of The clinical appearance can range from lichenoid to
both SLE and CCLE, although systemic disease is granulomatous, at times with ulceration. Alopecia,
usually mild. An overview of the clinicopathological either diffuse or patchy may be encountered in SLE.
features of these three forms of LE is presented. Renal involvement, referred to as lupus nephri-
tis, can be seen in up to 50% of patients, although renal
changes can be demonstrated in almost all cases of
B. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus SLE when immunofluorescence and electron micros-
copy are used (6). The development of nephrotic
SLE is a disease that is five to ten times more likely to syndrome and subsequent uremia is a serous compli-
affect women than men and also more common in cation of SLE and the most common cause of death.
blacks (1:250) than whites (1:1000). The onset of Cardiac involvement in the form of pericarditis
symptoms most frequently occurs between the ages is common. Nonbacterial verrucous endocarditis
of 15 and 40 years, with the average age of 30 years; (Libman–Sacks endocarditis) can also be seen in 50%
however, the disease can affect both the pediatric and of the patients at autopsy, but is usually not clinically
older patient (1). recognized. Central nervous systems symptoms can
In the United States, the reported prevalence of be noted with seizures and psychosis among the more
SLE ranges from 14.6 to 50.8 cases per 100,000. The serious neurological abnormalities.
basic etiological event of SLE is unknown, although
several factors have been proposed. Genetic factors
include an increased incidence of clinical SLE or sero- C. Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
logical positivity in family members. In 40% of cases of
Patients with CCLE have limited disease, generally
neonatal SLE, the mothers will either demonstrate
confined to mucocutaneous areas, and systemic
evidence of SLE, or will have developed SLE within a
involvement is rare. CCLE is also called discoid
year after childbirth (2). The reported concordance rate
lupus erythematosus because the cutaneous lesions
of SLE in monozygotic twins is 25%. In 6% of SLE
are characterized by well-defined, scaly, erythematous
cases, patients have inherited deficiencies of early
discoid patches. With time, many of the older lesions
complement components, including C2 and C4 (2).
heal, with atrophic scarring. The cutaneous lesions
Circulating autoantibodies directed against
most commonly affect the face, particularly the malar
nuclear material, also known as antinuclear antibodies
area and bridge of nose, although the scalp, ears, oral
(ANA), are the serological hallmark of SLE. From 95%
cavity, and the vermillion border of the lips can be
to 100% of patients with SLE have positive ANA (3).
affected. The oral lesions of CCLE may clinically
Other autoantibodies to cytoplasmic material, blood
resemble lichen planus (7). White, radiating striae
proteins, and cell membranes are also present. These
surrounding an erythematous or ulcerated central
antibodies can have direct effect, with manifestations
zone typify the oral mucosal lesions (Fig. 15). At
such as hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, or leu-
times, a more diffused nondescript erythematous
kopenia. Another major effect of these formed
patch can be seen, particularly on the palate (Fig. 16).
immune complexes, especially by nuclear antigens
The exact pathogenesis of CCLE is unknown, but
and ANA, is their deposition in blood vessel walls,
most likely involves genetic factors in the develop-
glomerular basement membranes, and other sites. The
ment of the disease. Exposure to UV light can trigger
complexes activate the complement system, with sub-
as well as exacerbate CCLE.
sequent damage to the tissue sites.
Exogenous factors are also involved in the patho-
genesis of SLE. Drugs, including procainamide, hydral- D. Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
azine, isoniazid, and quinidine, may cause drug-
induced lupus, but this is limited to the duration of In SCLE, widespread nonscarring cutaneous lesions
drug usage (4). One-third to two-thirds of patients with arise mainly on the upper trunk and extensor part of
Chapter 5: Noninfectious Vesiculoerosive, Ulcerative Lesions 253
E. Immunopathology
The direct immunofluorescence pattern seen in lichen
planus is not specific or diagnostic. Most lesions
demonstrate the presence of fibrin or fibrinogen in a
granular or linear pattern along the basement mem-
brane (8). Although this finding is not diagnostic for
lichen planus, it is useful in eliminating other vesi-
culo-ulcerative diseases. Occasionally, deposits of
IgM, C3, IgG, and IgA are seen.
F. Immunology
The exact pathogenesis of lichen planus is unknown,
although both antigen-specific and nonspecific mech-
anisms are proposed (9). The disease appears to
represent a T cell–mediated immune response, and
the majority of T cells within the epithelium and
adjacent to the damaged basal cell are activated CD8
Figure 27 Lichenoid reaction to dental amalgam. Note the
lymphocytes. In one hypothesis, intraepithelial, anti-
formation of lymphoid follicles within a dense lymphocytic infiltrate.
gen-specific CD8 T cells trigger apoptosis of basal cell
keratinocytes in OLP (9). Other research points to
nonspecific events, including mast cell chemotaxis
Although there are many microscopic similarities
and degranulation, basement membrane disruption
to lichen planus, lichenoid lesions have some notable
by matrix metalloproteinases, as well as T cells
differences. At times, the lymphocytic infiltrate is so
recruited by keratinocye-derived chemokines.
dense that lymphoid follicles can be identified, which is
particularly true in amalgam reactions (Fig. 27). Lichen-
oid drug reactions may have a more diffused lympho-
cytic infiltrate and contain eosinophils and plasma G. Treatment and Prognosis
cells, and there may be more colloid bodies than in The treatment of OLP is dependent on disease extent.
classic LP, but there are no specific features. The In patients with the reticular form of lichen planus, no
microscopic features of cinnamon-induced stomatitis therapy is required because this form rarely produces
share many of the features of lichen planus; however, symptoms. At times, secondary candidiasis can cause
the lichenoid band-like infiltrate contains a higher a burning sensation, and antifungal therapy effectively
proportion of plasma cells than are expected in lichen relieves these symptoms. When patients present with
planus. In addition, perivascular chronic inflammatory limited oral erosive lichen planus, topical corticoste-
cell infiltrate is frequently seen (Fig. 28) (7). roids are recommended. For patients with extensive
oral lesions, treatment with systemic corticosteroids,
administered in tapering dosage; is effective.
Cyclosporine, dapsone, azathioprine, and psora-
len and ultraviolet light A (PUVA) have also been
used to treat symptomatic oral lesions of lichen pla-
nus; however, these reports are not controlled studies
and include only a few patients (1). OLP is a chronic
condition and can persist for up to 20 years (1,3). The
erosive form is least likely to undergo spontaneous
remission, whereas half of the reticular lesions will
eventually resolve.
B. Clinical Presentation
EM minor typically develops in young adults (aged
20–40 years) and accounts for 80% of patients with EM
(2,4). Skin lesions resembling a target or bull’s eye are
Figure 29 Graft-versus-host disease. Involvement of the the hallmark of EM (Fig. 31). The skin lesions typically
tongue in a patient who underwent a bone marrow transplant begin as flat, round, and dusky-red, then become
for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Note the ulcerations that slightly elevated. The most common sites are the
resemble erosive lichen planus. extremities, with the dorsum of the hand a prevalent
site. The cutaneous lesions are typically symmetrical
Chapter 5: Noninfectious Vesiculoerosive, Ulcerative Lesions 259
E. Differential Diagnosis
The diagnosis of recurrent EM of the oral mucosa in
the absence of cutaneous lesions may be difficult.
Other mucocutaneous, ulcerative diseases, including
aphthous ulcers, primary herpes, pemphigus, pem-
phigoid, and ANUG must be considered. Recurrent
aphthous ulcers are generally restricted to nonkerati-
Figure 34 Erythema multiforme. The basal cells show hydropic nized sites, whereas EM affects both keratinized and
degeneration and migrating into the epithelium are inflammatory nonkeratinized tissue.
cells. Multiple, individually necrotic keratinocytes can be seen Primary herpetic stomatitis shares many of the
(arrows). clinical features of EM. However, primary herpetic
stomatitis is not recurrent and usually involves the
Chapter 5: Noninfectious Vesiculoerosive, Ulcerative Lesions 261
B. Pathology
major recurrent ulcers can be seen in the vulva or
There are no diagnostic histological features of aph-
scrotum. Because the histopathological features of oral
thous ulcers. Early lesions show a central area of
ulcers in Behçet’s disease are nonspecific, the diagno-
ulceration covered by a fibrinopurulent membrane.
sis remains clinical.
The underlying lamina propria shows increased vas-
Intraoral herpes simplex virus type I (HSV I) can
cularity and a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate,
often be clinically mistaken for aphthous ulcers. How-
composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and neutro-
ever, both the etiology and the clinical location of these
phils (Fig. 37). Definitive diagnosis is made from the
two types of ulcers are different. The most common
clinical presentation and from exclusion of other dis-
location of recurrent HSV1 is the vermilion border of
eases that mimic oral aphthae.
the lip (herpes labialis), also called a ‘‘fever blister’’ or
‘‘cold sore.’’ However, recurrent HSV1 can also occur
C. Immunopathology intraorally on keratinized tissue such as the hard palate
and attached gingiva. Histological examination of an
The immunopathogenesis of RAS has become more early HSV1-associated ulcer does show marked acan-
defined in recent years with similarities to the tholytic epithelial cells termed ‘‘Tzanck cells.’’ The
pathogenic mechanisms seen in oral lichen planus. infected cells show nuclear enlargement (ballooning
Increased numbers of activated cytotoxic T lympho- degeneration) and condensation of the chromatin
cytes and natural killer (NK) cells are present in around the periphery of the nucleus (Fig. 38). The
patients with active disease, whereas CD4 T lympho- infected epithelial cells can fuse to form multinucleated
cytes are depressed (3). The cytotoxic T cells respond cells. The adjacent mucosa is edematous with second-
to a target antigen within the epithelium. The resul- ary inflammation. Older lesions may show nonspecific
tant lysis occurs, by the release of cytokines, including findings similar to RAS.
tumor necrosis factor. Similar to lichen planus, adhe- Another oral ulcer that may be clinically mistaken
sion molecules probably regulate the movement of for RAS is traumatic ulcerative granuloma [traumatic
lymphocytes, although in RAS, the keratinocyte lysis ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia
occurs throughout the epithelium and not just at the (TUGSE), eosinophilic granuloma]. These ulcers most
basal cell layer, which is seen in lichen planus. often occur on the lateral tongue or buccal mucosa
adjacent to an identifiable source of irritation, such as a
D. Differential Diagnosis broken tooth (Fig. 39). Histologically traumatic ulcera-
tive granulomas have a unique appearance. The gran-
The oral ulcers seen in Behçet’s disease clinically ulation tissue extends into the deeper tissue including
resemble RAS. In addition to oral ulceration, either muscle and contains sheets of lymphocytes and histio-
genital or ocular lesions can occur. Usually, the oral cytes with scattered eosinophils (Figs. 40, 41). Often the
ulcers are minor (i.e., smaller than 1 cm), however, epithelium exhibits hyperplasia.
Chapter 5: Noninfectious Vesiculoerosive, Ulcerative Lesions 263
REFERENCES
II. PEMPHIGUS
1. Becker BA, Gaspari AA. Pemphigus vulgaris and vege-
tans. Dermatol Clin 1993; 11:429–452.
2. Mutasim DF, Bilic M, Hawayek LH, et al. Immunobullous
diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52:1029–1043.
Figure 40 Traumatic ulcerative granuloma. Ulceration with a 3. Lamey PJ, Rees TD, Binnie WH, et al. Oral presentation of
fibrinopurulent membrane. Inflammation extends deep into the pemphigus vulgaris and its response to systemic steroid
underlying connective tissue. therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74:54–57.
4. Mutasim DF, Adams BB. Immunofluorescence in derma-
tology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45:803–822.
5. Hashimoto T. Recent advances in the study of the patho-
physiology of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol Res 2003; 295:
E. Treatment and Prognosis S2–S11.
6. Virgili A, Thrombelli L, Calura G. Sudden vegetation of
Because solitary aphthous ulcers are relatively asymp- the mouth: pemphigus vegetans of the mouth (Hallopeau
tomatic and self-limiting, no therapy is required. type). Arch Dermatol 1992; 128:398–402.
Topical corticosteroids are usually effective in treating 7. Iwata M, Watanabe S, Tamaki K. Pemphigus vegetans
all three types of aphthae and produce the least presenting as scrotal tongue. J Dermatol 1989; 16:159–160.
8. Fujimoto W, Hirano N, Miyashita M, et al. Pemphigus
number of side effects (1). When a patient presents
vegetans presenting with deafness, otalgia and facial
with numerous ulcers and has had an unfavorable nerve paralysis. Br J Dermatol 1991; 124:609–613.
response to topical steroids in the past, then low-dose 9. Kaplan I, Hodak E, Ackerman L, et al. Neoplasm associat-
systemic corticosteroids can be used. ed with paraneoplastic pemphigus: a review with empha-
Other treatment modalities to manage RAS sis on non-hematologic malignancy and oral mucosal
include chlorhexidine, topical and/or systemic manifestations. Oral Oncol 2004; 40:553–562.
264 Müller
10. Anhalt GJ, Kim SC, Stanley JR, et al. Paraneoplastic 3. Gill JM, Quisel AM, Rocca PV, et al. Diagnosis of systemic
pemphigus—an autoimmune mucocutaneous disease lupus erythematosus. Am Fam Physician 2003; 68:
associated with neoplasia. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 2179–2186.
1729–1735. 4. Hess EV, Farhey Y. Epidemiology, genetics, etiology and
11. Lam S, Stone MS, Goeken JA, et al. Paraneoplastic pem- environmental relationships of systemic lupus erythema-
phigus, cicatricial conjunctivitis, and acanthosis nigricans tosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1994; 6:474–480.
with patchy dermatology in a patient with bronchogenic 5. Lahita RG. Overview of lupus erythematosus. Clin
squamous cell carcinoma. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: Dermatol 1993; 10:389–392.
108–113. 6. Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, et al. Systemic lupus
12. Fullerton SH, Woodley DT, Smoller BR, et al. Paraneo- erythematosus: clinical and immunologic patterns of dis-
plastic pemphigus with autoantibody deposition in bron- ease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Medicine
chial epithelium after autologous bone marrow 1993; 72:113–124.
transplantation. JAMA 1992; 267:155–1502. 7. Burge SM, Frith PA, Juniper RP, et al. Mucosal involve-
13. Horn TD, Anhalt GJ. Histologic features of paraneoplastic ment in systemic and chronic cutaneous lupus erythema-
pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128:1091–1095. tosus. Br J Dermatol 1989; 121:727–741.
14. Su WP, Oursler JR, Muller SA. Paraneoplastic pemphigus: 8. Schiodt M. Oral discoid lupus erythematosus. III. A
a case with high titer of circulating anti-basement mem- histopathologic study of sixty-six patients. Oral Surg
brane zone autoantibodies. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57:281–293.
30:841–844. 9. Karjalinen TK, Tomich CE. A histopathologic study of
15. Camisa C, Helms TN. Paraneoplastic pemphigus is a oral mucosal lupus erythematosus. Oral Surg Oral Med
distinct neoplasia-induced autoimmue disease. Arch Oral Pathol 1989; 67:547–559.
Dermatol 1993; 129:883–886. 10. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of
16. Brenner S, Bialy-Golan A, Ruocco V. Drug-induced Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of
pemphigus. Clin Dermatol 1998; 16:393–397. systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40:
17. Sami N, Yeh SW, Ahmed AR. Blistering diseases in the 1725, (letter).
elderly: diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Clin 2004; 11. David-Bajar KM, Bennion SD, DeSpain JD, et al. Clinical,
22:73–86. histologic, and immunofluorescent distinctions between
subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and discoid
lupus erythematous. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 99:251–257.
III. PEMPHIGOID
1. Korman NJ. Bullous pemphigoid. Dermatol Clin 1993; V. LICHEN PLANUS
11:483–498.
2. Laskaris G, Sklavounou A, Stratigos J. Bullous pemphi- 1. Boyd AS, Neldner KH. Lichen planus. J Am Acad
goid, mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus Dermatol 1991; 25:593–618.
vulgaris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54: 2. Felner MJ. Lichen planus. Int J Dermatol 1980; 19:71–75.
656–662. 3. Eisen D. The clinical manifestations and treatment of oral
3. Mutasim DF, Adams BB. Immunofluorescence in derma- lichen planus. Dermatol Clin 2003; 21:79–89.
tology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45:803–822. 4. Silverman S, Gorsky M, Lozada-Nur F. A prospective
4. Yancy KB. The pathophysiology of autoimmune blistering follow-up study of 570 patients with oral lichen planus:
diseases. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:825–828. persistence, remission, and malignant association. Oral
5. Sami N, Yeh SW, Ahmed AR. Blistering diseases in the Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 60:30–34.
elderly: diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Clin 2004; 5. Jainkittivong A, Langlais RP. Allergic stomatitis. Semin
22:73–86. Dermatol 1994; 13:91–101.
6. Chan LS, Ahmed R, Anhalt GJ, et al. The first interna- 6. Miller RL, Gould AR, Bernstein ML. Cinnamon-induced
tional consensus on mucous membrane pemphigoid. stomatitis venenata. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;
Arch Dermatol 2002; 138:370–379. 73:708–716.
7. Higgins GT, Allan RB, Hall R. Development of ocular 7. DeRossi SS, Ciarrocca KN. Lichen planus, lichenoid drug
disease in patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid reactions, and lichenoid mucositis. Dent Clin North Am
involving the oral mucosa. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 2005; 49:77–89.
964–967. 8. Fith NA, Rich AM, Radden BG, et al. Assessment of the
8. Mutasim DF, Pelc NJ, Anhalt GJ. Cicatricial pemphigoid. value of immunofluorescence microscopy in the diagnosis
Dermatol Clin 1993; 11:499–510. of oral mucosal lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med 1990;
9. Sollecito TP, Parisi E. Mucous membrane pemphigoid. 19:295–297.
Dent Clin N Am 2005; 49:91–106. 9. Sugerman PB, Savage NW, Walsh LJ, et al. The pathogen-
10. Hallel-Halevy D, Nadelman C, Chen M, et al. Epidermol- esis of oral lichen planus. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;
ysis bullosa acquisita: update and review. Clin Dermatol 13:350–365.
2001; 19:712–718.
3. Mattisson T, Sundqvist KG, Heimdahl A, et al. A compar- 6. Huff JC. Erythema multiforme and latent herpes simple
ative immunological analysis of the oral mucosa in chron- infection. Semin Dermatol 1992; 11:207–210.
ic graft-versus-host disease and oral lichen planus. Arch 7. Lamoreux MR, Sternbach MR, Hsu WT. Erythema
Oral Biol 1992; 37:538–547. multiforme. Am Fam Physician 2006; 74:1883–1888.
8. McKenna JK, Leiferman KM. Dermatologic drug
reactions. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am 2004; 24:399–423.
VII. ERYTHEMA MULTIFORME
1. Assier H, Bastufi-Garin S, Revuz J, et al. Erythema multi-
forme with mucous membrane involvement with Stevens- VIII. RECURRENT APHTHOUS STOMATITIS
Johnson syndrome are clinically different disorders with
different causes. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131:539–543. 1. Zunt SL. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Dermatol Clin
2. Léauté-Labrèze C, Lamireau T, Chawki D, et al. Diagno- 2003; 21:33–39.
sis, classification, and management of erythema multi- 2. Scully C, Gorsky M, Lozada-Nur F. The diagnosis
forme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Arch Dis Child and management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis-a
2000; 83:347–352. consensus approach. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:200–207.
3. Pereira FA, Mudgil AV, Rosmarin DM. Toxic epidermal 3. Eversole LR. Immunopathology of oral mucosal ulcera-
necrolysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:181–200. tive, desquamative, and bullous diseases. Oral Surg Oral
4. Ayangco L, Rogers RS. Oral manifestations of erythema Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77:555–571.
multiforme. Dermatol Clin 2003; 21:195–205. 4. Letsinger JA, McCarty MA, Jorizzo JL. Complex aphtho-
5. Farthing PM, Maragou P, Coates M, et al. Characteristics sis: a large case series with evaluation algorithm and
of the oral lesions in patients with cutaneous recurrent therapeutic ladder from topicals to thalidomide. J Am
erythema multiforme. J Oral Pathol Med 1995; 24:9–13. Acad Dermatol 2005; 52:500–508.
6
Pieter J. Slootweg
Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands
Thijs A.W. Merkx
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical
Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Carcinoma In Situ
Carcinoma in situ is represented by full or almost full
Figure 4 Photomicrograph showing mild dysplasia, epithelial thickness architectural abnormalities in the viable
alterations being confined to the lower third of the epithelial cellular layers accompanied by pronounced cytologi-
thickness. cal atypia (Fig. 7A, B). Atypical mitotic figures and
abnormal superficial mitoses are commonly present.
270 Slootweg and Merkx
C. Ljubljana Classification
Within the Ljubljana grading system, the following
categories are distinguished (4,5).
C. Pathology
Histological examination of a leukoplakic lesion
invariably shows a hyperkeratotic surface, which
causes the clinical appearance. The underlying epithe-
lium may show a spectrum of histological appearan-
ces that includes either normal epithelium, various
grades of dysplasia, or even carcinoma in situ or
OSCC. A histological report on a leukoplakic lesion
should leave no doubt on the nature of these epithelial
histomorphologies (1,34).
D. Differential Diagnosis
The first step in developing a differential diagnosis for
a white patch (leukoplakia) in the oral mucosa is
determining whether the lesion can be eliminated
with gauze or spatula. If the lesion can be removed,
it represents a pseudomembranous lesion, fungal col-
ony, or debris.
If there is evidence of bilateral buccal mucosal
disease, conditions not to be discussed further in this
chapter such as leukedema and white sponge nevus,
cheek biting, lichen planus, and lupus erythematosus
(LE) should be considered. The latter two can be
associated with cutaneous lesions.
If either chronic trauma or tobacco use is excluded
in the patient’s history and the lesion is predominantly
situated at the gingival margin, the white lesion could
represent frictional hyperkeratosis. Elimination of a Figure 15 In an area of (A) homogeneous leukoplakia, (B) a
suspected cause then should result in some clinical squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed six months later.
improvement.
Chapter 6: Premalignant Lesions of the Oral Cavity 275
Whether the lateral border of the tongue and the plakia as malignant transformation to verrucous or
floor of the mouth are high-risk regions for develop- squamous cell carcinoma is almost always the out-
ment of malignancy is a debated subject (10,34,36). come for patients with PVL (41,43). The aggres-
Sometimes, leukoplakias may regress, especially siveness is not only demonstrated by a high
when patients quit smoking (37). recurrence rate after surgical excision but also by
Treatment may be effective in the removal of a development of multiple OSCCs (46).
lesion but relapses and adverse effects are common.
Moreover, to date, there is no evidence that treatment C. Pathology
is effective in preventing malignant transformation
(38). In spite of the limited ability of any treatment There is no histological feature that is pathognomonic
in preventing malignancy, various intervention for PVL. As this disease encompasses a spectrum
modalities have been advocated, such as surgical ranging from flat homogeneous leukoplakia to
excision and CO2-laser surgery. Also, agents such as conventional OSCC with various grades of dysplasia
b-carotene, a-tocopherol, and ascorbic acid have been and verrucous carcinoma as intermediate stages, the
attempted but until now none has been proven safe histopathology of an individual lesion from a patient
and effective in large-scale randomized trials (39). with PVL may show a morphology compatible with
any of these diagnoses, depending on the stage of the
disease (Fig. 17). The initial classification in 10 stages
VII. PROLIFERATIVE VERRUCOUS has been reduced to four stages: clinically flat leuko-
LEUKOPLAKIA plakia without dysplasia, verrucous hyperplasia, ver-
A. Definition rucous carcinoma, and conventional squamous cell
carcinoma (40,42). Probably, the number of stages
Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) is a variant can be reduced to three as verrucous hyperplasia
of leukoplakia that shows white mucosal plaques that has much in common with verrucous carcinoma, the
virtually always develop nodular, papillary, or verru- only difference being an exophytic growth pattern in
ciform surface projections, that gradually, sometimes verrucous hyperplasia as opposed to an endophytic
rapidly, spreads to encompass large regions of the oral growth pattern in verrucous carcinoma (42). There-
mucosa, and that is associated with a very high rate of fore, it is debatable if there is any need to make this
malignant transformation (40–43). The cause is distinction between verrucous hyperplasia and verru-
unknown. Neither tobacco usage nor infection with cous carcinoma (47).
HPV has been demonstrated to be of any etiological
significance (43–45).
D. Differential Diagnosis
B. Clinical Features The typical clinical appearance of PVL does not leave
any room for consideration of another lesion. However,
This type of leukoplakia begins in most instances as a the diagnosis cannot be made unless the patient has
simple keratosis, slow growing, persistent, and irre- developed the complete clinical picture as outlined
versible, and eventually becomes verrucous in nature above.
(Fig. 16). The diagnosis is determined clinicopatholog-
ically and is usually made in retrospect. PVL behaves
far more aggressively than other forms of oral leuko- E. Treatment and Prognosis
Treatment procedures employed for PVL have been
surgery, CO2-laser evaporation, and photodynamic
therapy. It is commonly resistant to all forms of
therapy. Early recurrence of the lesion in the same
area is the rule, usually accompanied by greater
extension and by an increase of epithelial changes
including dysplasia (40). It has been reported that in
case of an HPV-related PVL, the use of an antiviral
agent appears to offer a significant enhancement to the
surgical management of PVL (48). Recent data deny-
ing any etiological significance of HPV, however,
make the purported result of this therapeutic
approach difficult to understand (44,45).
VIII. ERYTHROPLAKIA
A. Definition
Erythroplakia is the clinical term for ‘‘a fiery red
Figure 16 Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia showing thick, patch’’ that cannot be characterized clinically or path-
irregular keratotic plaques involving large mucosal areas. ologically as any other definable lesion (49,50). The
term is used analogously to leukoplakia.
276 Slootweg and Merkx
Figure 17 Photomicrographs showing various appearances that may be shown by patients suffering from proliferative verrucous
leukoplakia. (A) Papillary epithelial projections covered with a hyperkeratotic surface. (B) Cellular alterations in the epithelium are not
very conspicuous [detail from (A)]. (C) Hyperplastic epithelium with a hyperkeratotic surface forming spires. (D) Detail from (C) showing
increased mitotic activity and slight cytonuclear atypia.
B. Clinical Features
This disease is rarely seen in western countries but
generally occur in India and Southeast Asia. People of
any age may be affected. Symptoms include a burning
sensation of the oral mucosa, occasional mucosal
Figure 21 Clinical picture of nicotine stomatitis. Raised umbili- ulceration, a peculiar marble-like blanching of the
cated papules on a leukoplakic background and with a mucosa, and palpable fibrous bands of the buccal
depressed red center are quite typical for this mucosal lesion. mucosa, soft palate, and lips (Figs. 22, 23). Fiery red
erythroplakic areas are also occasionally present.
C. Pathology
Histologically, nicotine stomatitis is characterized by
hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and dilatation of the
underlying salivary gland ducts that show chronic
inflammatory alterations (51,54). Concomitant dys-
plastic alterations have been reported to occur in
nicotine stomatitis induced by reverse smoking (55). Figure 22 Oral submucosal fibrosis. Note limited mouth open-
Another tobacco-induced histological alteration, ing and fibrous white appearance of right cheek mucosa. Source:
the so-called ‘‘chevron-like’’ keratinization does not Picture courtesy of Prof. Tien-Yu Shieh and Dr. Connie Yang,
occur on the palate and so is not included in the Oral Health Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University,
spectrum of histological alterations that characterize Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
nicotine stomatitis (56). This tissue alteration will be
discussed more extensively under the heading
‘‘Smokeless Tobacco Keratosis’’ (vide infra).
D. Differential Diagnosis
Because of the characteristics of its appearance and the
smoking habits of the patient, hardly any other diag-
nosis could interfere with diagnosing this mucosal
disorder.
B. Clinical Features
The affected vermillion portion of the lips acquires an
atrophic, pale-to-silvery gray, glossy appearance,
often with fissuring and wrinkling at right angles to
Figure 24 Photomicrograph showing compact collagen cov- the cutaneous-vermillion junction (Fig. 25). In advanced
ered with a thin squamous epithelial layer typical for oral sub- cases, the junction is irregular or totally blurred, with a
mucous fibrosis. Source: Photomicrograph courtesy of Dr. Yuk- degree of epidermalization of the vermillion evident.
Kwan Chen, Department of Oral Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical Mottled areas of hyperpigmentation and keratosis are
University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. often noted as well as superficial scaling, cracking,
erosion, ulceration, and crusting.
280 Slootweg and Merkx
for degree 3 with the exception that the furrows have by areas of atrophy and inflammation (67). Epithelial
changed their color from normal to red (64). This dysplasia does not form part of the spectrum of
clinical classification is supported by corresponding histological alterations shown in Swedish moist
histological alterations as outlined below. snuff users (67). In other populations, it may occasion-
ally occur (66). It is however debatable if such lesions
with dysplasia should be considered as smoker’s
C. Pathology keratosis or should be placed in the category of
Histological changes in smokeless tobacco users leukoplakia. Probably, it is wise to reserve the term
include hyperparakeratosis, hyperorthokeratosis, a ‘‘smoker’s keratosis’’ for lesions because of the use of
pale eosinophilic zone of hyperkeratosis, and basal smokeless tobacco and with the typical histological
cell hyperplasia (65,66). Moreover, a particular kerati- appearances as outlined above and to put any tobac-
nization pattern consisting of parakeratinized streaks co-induced lesion that combines hyperkeratosis with
with an appearance similar to a pine tree, the so-called dysplastic epithelial alterations within the category of
chevron-like pattern of keratinization, does occur, this leukoplakia.
feature being part of the mucosal changes associated
with the use of smokeless tobacco (Fig. 28) (56,65) as
well as appearing as a result of other types of tobacco D. Differential Diagnosis
usage (56). Following are the various histological
alterations seen in Swedish snuff dippers that corre- Confusing smoker’s keratosis with other oral mucosal
spond to the clinical alterations as detailed above. In disorders with a whitish appearance can easily be
degree 1 lesions, there is slight inflammation but avoided when taking into account the patient’s
no epithelial changes. Degree 2 shows a thickened history and habits. In doubtful cases, histological
surface layer of the epithelium with or without an examination is indicated to rule out more serious
accompanying surface of necrosis. A considerably epithelial alterations.
thickened surface layer composed of vacuolated cells
and chevron-type keratinization characterizes degree
3 clinical mucosal alterations, and in degree 4, a marked E. Treatment and Prognosis
thickening of the surface layer may be accompanied
With discontinuation of smokeless tobacco use, some
lesions may disappear after several weeks, indicative
of an excellent prognosis (67). Persistent lesions
should be removed and examined histologically.
Moreover, patients who use smokeless tobacco have
a slightly increased risk for development of oral
cancer, this also warranting follow-up for those who
persist in this habit (66,68,69). The risk for malignant
change, however, may vary among patient popula-
tions, type of smokeless tobacco used, and mode of
application, as for some populations, this risk has
been reported to be zero (67). These conflicting data
may be due to confusing genuine smoker’s keratosis
with leukoplakia, an issue already alluded to in the
previous text devoted to the pathological features.
2. Lotan R. Are we ready to use surrogate end points and dysplasia and risk for malignant transformation in poten-
surrogate tissues to evaluate response to chemopreventive tially malignant oral lesions from Northern Ireland. J Clin
and therapeutic intervention? Clin Cancer Res 2000; Pathol 2002; 55(2):98–104.
6(6):2126–2128. 21. Kujan O, Oliver R, Roz L, et al. Fragile histidine triad
3. Kopelovich L, Henson DE, Gazdar AF, et al. Surrogate expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma and precursor
anatomic/functional sites for evaluating cancer risk: an lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(22):6723–6729.
extension of the field effect. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 22. Hunter KD, Parkinson EK, Harrison PR. Profiling early
5(12):3899–3905. head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5(2):
4. Gale N, Pilch BZ, Sidransky D, et al. Epithelial precursor 127–135.
lesions. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. 23. Hunter KD, Thurlow JK, Fleming J, et al. Divergent routes
WHO Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics to oral cancer. Cancer Res 2006; 66(15):7405–7413.
of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005: 24. Noutomi Y, Oga A, Uchida K, et al. Comparative genomic
140–143, 177–179. hybridization reveals genetic progression of oral squa-
5. Gale N, Zidar N. Benign and potentially malignant lesions mous cell carcinoma from dysplasia via two different
of the squamous epithelium and squamous cell carcinoma. tumourigenic pathways. J Pathol 2006; 210(1):67–74.
In: Cardesa A, Slootweg PJ, eds. Pathology of the Head and 25. Axell T, Pindborg JJ, Smith CJ, et al. Oral white lesions
Neck. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2006:4–13. with special reference to precancerous and tobacco-related
6. Zerdoner D. The Ljubljana classification – its application lesions: conclusions of an international symposium held
to grading oral epithelial hyperplasia. J Craniomaxillofac in Uppsala, Sweden, May 18-21 1994. International
Surg 2003; 31(2):75–79. Collaborative Group on Oral White Lesions. J Oral Pathol
7. Driemel O, Hertel K, Reichert TE, et al. Current classifica- Med 1996; 25(2):49–54.
tion of precursor lesions of oral squamous cell carcinoma 26. Syrjanen S. Human papillomavirus (HPV) in head and
principles of the WHO classification 2005. Mund Kiefer neck cancer. J Clin Virol 2005; 32(suppl 1):S59–S66.
Gesichtschir 2006; 10(2):89–92. 27. Cianfriglia F, Gregorio Di DA, Cianfriglia C. Incidence of
8. Crissman JD, Zarbo RJ. Dysplasia, in situ carcinoma, and human papillomavirus infection in oral leukoplakia.
progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the Indications for a viral aetiology. J Exp Clin Cancer Res
upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13 2006; 25(1):21–28.
(suppl 1):5–16. 28. Cunningham LL Jr., Pagano GM, Li M, et al. Overexpres-
9. Scully C, Sudbo J, Speight PM. Progress in determining sion of p16INK4 is a reliable marker of human papilloma-
the malignant potential of oral lesions. J Oral Pathol Med virus-induced oral high-grade squamous dysplasia. Oral
2003; 32(5):251–256. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;
10. Reibel J. Prognosis of oral pre-malignant lesions: signifi- 102(1):77–81.
cance of clinical, histopathological, and molecular biolog- 29. Furrer VE, Benitez MB, Furnes M, et al. Biopsy vs.
ical characteristics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14(1): superficial scraping: detection of human papillomavirus
47–62. 6, 11, 16, and 18 in potentially malignant and malignant
11. Kujan O, Oliver RJ, Khattab A, et al. Evaluation of a new oral lesions. J Oral Pathol Med 2006; 35(6):338–344.
binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for 30. Nemes JA, Deli L, Nemes Z, et al. Expression of p16
prediction of malignant transformation. Oral Oncol 2006; (INK4A), p53, and Rb proteins are independent from the
42(10):987–993. presence of human papillomavirus genes in oral squa-
12. Holmstrup P, Vedtofte P, Reibel J, et al. Long-term mous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
treatment outcome of oral premalignant lesions. Oral Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102(3):344–352.
Oncol 2006; 42(5):461–474. 31. Gologan O, Barnes EL, Hunt JL. Potential diagnostic use
13. Kim MM, Califano JA. Mini review. Molecular pathology of p16INK4A, a new marker that correlates with dysplasia
of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Cancer 2004; 112(4):112, in oral squamoproliferative lesions. Am J Surg Pathol
545–553. 2005; 29(6):792–796.
14. Bremmer JF, Braakhuis BJM, Ruijter-Schippers HJ, et al. A 32. Bradley KT, Budnick SD, Logani S. Immunohistochemical
noninvasive genetic screening test to detect oral preneo- detection of p16INK4a in dysplastic lesions of the oral
plastic lesions. Lab Invest 2005; 85(12):1481–1488. cavity. Mod Pathol 2006; 19(10):1310–1316.
15. Mao L, Lee JS, Fan YH, et al. Frequent microsatellite 33. Gil J, Peters G. Regulation of the INK4b-ARF-INK4a
alterations at chromosomes 9p21 and 3p14 in oral prema- tumour suppressor locus: all for one or one for all. Nat
lignant lesions and their value in cancer risk assessment. Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7(9):667–677.
Nat Med 1996; 2(6):682–685. 34. Waal I van der, Schepman KP, Meij EH van der, et al. Oral
16. Rosin MP, Cheng X, Poh C, et al. Use of allelic loss to leukoplakia: a clinicopathological review. Oral Oncol
predict malignant risk for low-grade oral epithelial dys- 1997; 33(5):291–301.
plasia. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(2):357–362. 35. Schepman KP, Bezemer PD, Meij EH van der, et al.
17. Lee JJ, Hong WK, Hittelman WN, et al. Predicting cancer Tobacco usage in relation to the anatomical site of oral
development in oral leukoplakia: ten years of translational leukoplakia. Oral Dis 2001; 7(1):25–27.
research. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(5):1702–1710. 36. Schepman KP, Meij EH van der, Smeele LE, et al. Malig-
18. Partridge M, Pateromichelakis S, Phillips E, et al. A case- nant transformation of oral leukoplakia: a follow-up study
control study confirms that microsatellite assay can iden- of a hospital-based population of 166 patients with oral
tify patients at risk of developing oral squamous cell leukoplakia from The Netherlands. Oral Oncol 1998; 34(4):
carcinoma within a field of cancerization. Cancer Res 270–275.
2000; 60(14):3893–3898. 37. Roosaar A, Yin L, Johansson ALV, et al. A long-term
19. Cruz IB, Snijders PJF, Meijer CJ, et al. p53 immunoexpres- follow-up study on the natural course of oral leukoplakia
sion in non-malignant oral mucosa adjacent to oral in a Swedish population-based sample. J Oral Pathol Med
squamous cell carcinoma: potential consequences for 2007; 36(2):78–82.
clinical management. J Pathol 2000; 191(2):132–137. 38. Lodi G, Sardella A, Bez C, et al. Interventions for treating
20. Cruz I, Napier SS, Waal I van der, et al. Suprabasal p53 oral leukoplakia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 18(4):
immunoexpression is strongly associated with high grade CD001829.
Chapter 6: Premalignant Lesions of the Oral Cavity 283
39. Brown KS, Kane MA. Chemoprevention of squamous cell 56. Pindborg JJ, Reibel J, Roed-Peterson B, et al. Tobacco-
carcinoma of the oral cavity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am induced changes in oral leukoplakic epithelium. Cancer
2006; 39(2):349–363. 1980; 45(9):2330–2336.
40. Hansen LS, Olson JA, Silverman S Jr. Proliferative verru- 57. Eb MM van der, Leyten EM, Gavarasana S, et al. Reverse
cous leukoplakia. A long-term study of thirty patients. smoking as a risk factor for palatal cancer: a cross-sectional
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 60(3):285–298. study in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Cancer 1993;
41. Silverman S Jr., Olson JA. Proliferative verrucous leuko- 54(5):754–758.
plakia: a follow-up study of 54 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med 58. Tilakaratne WM, Klinikowski MF, Saku T, et al. Oral
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84(2):154–157. submucous fibrosis: review on aetiology and pathogene-
42. Batsakis JG, Suarez P, El-Naggar AK. Review. Prolifer- sis. Oral Oncol 2006; 42(6):561–568.
ative verrucous leukoplakia and its related lesions. Oral 59. Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg
Oncol 1999; 35(4):354–359. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 22(6):764–779.
43. Reichart PA, Philipsen HP. Proliferative verrucous leuko- 60. Visscher JG, Waal I van der. Etiology of cancer of the lip.
plakia. Report of five cases. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 27(3):199–203.
2003; 7(3):164–170. 61. Kaugars GE, Pillion T, Svirsky JA, et al. Actinic cheilitis. A
44. Campisi G, Giovanelli L, Ammatuna P. Proliferative verru- review of 152 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
cous vs conventional leukoplakia: no significantly increased Radiol Endod 1999; 88(2):181–186.
risk of HPV infection. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(8):835–840. 62. Markopoulos A, Albanidou-Farmaki E, Kayavis I. Actinic
45. Bagan JV, Jimenez Y, Murilli J. Lack of association cheilitis: clinical and pathologic characteristics in 65 cases.
between proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and human Oral Dis 2004; 10(4):212–216.
papillomavirus infection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 63. Taybos G. Oral changes associated with tobacco use. Am J
65(1):46–49. Med Sci 2003; 326(4):179–182.
46. Bagan JV, Murillo J, Poveda R, et al. Proliferative verrucous 64. Andersson G, Axell T, Larsson A. Clinical classification of
leukoplakia: unusual locations of oral squamous cell carci- Swedish snuff dippers’ lesions supported by histology.
nomas, and field cancerization as shown by the appearance J Oral Pathol Med 1991; 20(6):253–257.
of multiple OSCCs. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(4): 440–443. 65. Daniels TE, Hansen LS, Greenspan JS, et al. Histopatho-
47. Slootweg PJ, Muller H. Verrucous hyperplasia or verru- logy of smokeless tobacco lesions in professional baseball
cous carcinoma. An analysis of 27 patients. J Maxillofac players. Associations with different types of tobacco. Oral
Surg 1983; 11(1):13–19. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73(6):720–725.
48. Femiano F, Gombos F, Scully C. Oral proliferative verru- 66. Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Ralhan R. Clinical, pathological,
cous leukoplakia (PVL); open trial of surgery compared cellular and molecular lesions caused by oral smokeless
with combined therapy using surgery and methisoprinol tobacco—a review. J Oral Pathol Med 2007; 36(2):63–77.
in papillomavirus-related PVL. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67. Larsson A, Axell T, Andersson G. Reversibility of snuff
2001; 30(4):318–322. dippers’ lesion in Swedish moist snuff users: a clinical and
49. Pindborg JJ, Reichart PA, Smith CJ, et al. Histological histologic follow-up study. J Oral Pathol Med 1991; 20
Typing of Cancer and Precancer of the Oral Mucosa. 2nd (6):258–264.
ed. Berlin: Springer, 1997. 68. Rodu B, Jansson C. Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer. A
50. Reichart PA, Philipsen HP. Oral erythroplakia—a review. review of the risks and determinants. Crit Rev Oral Biol
Oral Oncol 2005; 41(6):551–561. Med 2004; 15(5):252–263.
51. Schwartz DL. Stomatitis nicotina of the palate; report of 69. Warnakulasuriya S. Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer.
two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; Oral Dis 2004; 10(1):1–4.
20(Sep):306–315. 70. Meij EH van der, Schepman KP, Smeele LE, et al. A
52. Mercado-Ortiz G, Wilson D, Jiang DJ. Reverse smoking review of the recent literature regarding malignant trans-
and palatal mucosal changes in Filipino women. Epide- formation of oral lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
miological features. Aust Dent J 1996; 41(5):300–303. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88(3):307–310.
53. Ortiz GM, Pierce AM, Wilson DF. Palatal changes associ- 71. Meij EH van der, Schepman KP, Waal I van der. The
ated with reverse smoking in Filipino women. Oral Dis possible premalignant character of oral lichen planus
1996; 2(3):232–237. and oral lichenoid lesions: a prospective study. Oral
54. Quigley LF, Cobb CM, Hunt EE. Reverse cigarette smok- Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96
ing in Caribbeans: clinical, histologic, and cytologic obser- (2):164–171.
vations. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 72(4):867–873. 72. Meij EH van der, Mast H, Waal I van der. The possible
55. Mehta FS, Jalnawalla PN, Daftary DK, et al. Reverse premalignant character of oral lichen planus and oral
smoking in Andhra Pradesh, India: variability of clinical lichenoid lesions: a prospective five-year follow-up
and histologic appearances of palatal changes. Int J Oral study of 192 patients. Oral Oncol 2007; 43(8):742–748.
Surg 1977; 6(2):75–83.
7
A. Chemical Carcinogens
Two-thirds of all cases are observed in developing
countries. The Indian subcontinent accounts for one- The most important chemical carcinogens are related
third of the global burden. Men are affected two-to- to tobacco and alcohol abuse. Through a large number
three times as often as women. The oral cavity/ of epidemiologic studies, a strong link has been estab-
oropharynx is the third most common site for cancer lished between the use of tobacco and oral/pharynx
among males in developing countries (3–5). However, SCC. Alcohol is an independent risk factor for the
the incidence of oral cancer for women can be equal disease, but it may have synergistic effect when com-
to, or even greater than, that of men in high incidence bined with tobacco (7). The risk of development of
areas where both sexes are equally exposed to the cancer is three to nine times greater in those who
same risk factors (4). smoke or drink, and as much as 100 times greater in
In the United States, approximately 24,000 men those who smoke and drink heavily, than those who
and 10,000 women are diagnosed with oral and oro- neither smoke nor drink (11). It has been estimated
pharyngeal carcinomas annually, representing 3.2% of that approximately 75% of oral cancers are related to
all newly diagnosed cancers (6,7). The majority of the prolonged and heavy smoking and alcohol abuse (12).
carcinomas develop predominantly between the fifth Cigar and pipe smoking pose similar risk as cigarette
and eight decades of life. Women tend to develop the smoking. Tobacco and alcohol abuse has been
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 287
implicated in the higher rates and earlier onset of which may include cloves and cardamom. Betel chew-
cancer among men in general and African American ing is a tradition that goes back thousands of years.
men in particular (8,12,13). Tobacco was added to betel quid sometime after its
In addition to cigarettes, cigars, and pipes, introduction to South Asia by Europeans in the seven-
tobacco is commonly smoked in other forms, in par- teenth century. Although Areca nut is carcinogenic in
ticular in parts of India and South Asia. Bidi, made of itself, the addition of tobacco increased the risk (17,18).
low-grade tobacco wrapped in tender leaf tobacco is As in the case of smoking, the risk for oral cancer
popular among rural folk and urban poor. The con- is dependent on dose and duration of use (19). Much
centrations of nicotine, tar, and other toxic agents in of the tobacco consumption in the world is without
the smoke are higher in bidi than other cigarettes, with combustion. In India, up to 40% of tobacco use is in
a higher risk for development of oral cancer (14). smokeless forms, mostly of the species Nicotiana rus-
Reverse chutta smoking, with the lighted end of the tica, while most smoking tobacco is Nicotiana tabacum
cigar placed inside the mouth, is associated with (20). Samples of N. rustica have been found to contain
particularly high rates of oral cancer of the palatal higher concentrates of tobacco-specific nitrosamines
mucosa (1,15), a site with otherwise very low cancer than N. tabacum (21). The tobacco is placed in direct
incidence. contact with the mucosa. In the developing countries,
The primary cause of the very high incidence of tobacco is mostly consumed mixed with other ingre-
oral cancer in South Asia is, however, the widespread dients, in addition to betel nut. Lime, molasses, oils,
habit of chewing betel quid or paan and related Areca and spices are used. Snuff is common in Scandinavia
nut use. An estimated 200 to 400 million people prac- and the United States. Tobacco is also prepared in
tice the habit worldwide (16). The components of the blocks or flakes for chewing. ‘‘Snuff dipper cancer’’
betel quid vary between different populations, but the described in the southeastern United States is due to
main ingredients are the leaf of the vine Piper betel— the habit of placing snuff in the labial sulcus (22,23).
which is not botanically related to the Betel palm, Areca Females in this geographic area have high prevalence
nut, slaked lime (calcium hydroxide), and spices, of snuff dipping and oral cancer (24).
288 El-Mofty and Lewis
Traditional values in some countries do not the subject did not corroborate earlier reports. It is
favor smoking by women and the young, but there concluded that the risk of developing oral cancer
is no such taboo against using smokeless tobacco. because of the use of alcohol-containing mouthwash is
Most women who use tobacco use it in its smokeless unlikely (38). Interestingly, however, dental products
form. The acquisition of tobacco habits, in whatever such as toothpaste and mouthwash containing sangui-
form, starts at an early age. In one study, one-third to narine (such as Viadent), which is the principle alkaloid
one-half of children younger than 10 years in three extract of the bloodroot plant (Sanguinaria Canadensis
rural areas in India had experimented with smoking L.), an antibacterial agent, is found to increase the risk of
or smokeless tobacco (25). Children have been known leukoplakia of the maxillary vestibule (39,40).
to choke to death on betel nuts. Pakistan’s new laws
forbid the selling of betel nut to children younger than
five years. B. Ultraviolet Light
More than 300 carcinogens have been identified Chronic exposure to sunlight (actinic radiation) is
in tobacco smoke or in its water-soluble components considered to be the most important factor in causa-
that will leach into saliva (26). The most important of tion of lip cancer, the vast majority of which occurs in
these is the aromatic hydrocarbon benz-pyrene and the lower lip (41–46). This proposal is supported by
other tar derivatives as well as the tobacco-specific the observations that cancer of the lip is more common
nitrosamines such as nitroso-nor-nicotine (NNN), in individuals who have fair complexion and who are
nitrosopyrrollidine (NPYR), nitrosodimethylamine. more exposed to sunlight because of outdoor occupa-
These aromatic hydrocarbons are identifiable in tions or who live near the equator. The propensity of
tobacco smoke as well as in smokeless tobacco. They the lip vermilion border for solar damage is attribut-
damage DNA by producing adducts, principally O6- able to lack of a pigmentary layer that protects against
methylguanine. UV radiation (47). Other risk factors may play a role in
Metabolism of these carcinogens usually involves the causation of cancer of the lip, most notably pipe
oxygenation by p450 enzymes in cytochromes, and smoking (45,48–50). It is suggested that the heat and
their conjugation, in which the enzyme glutathione S trauma of the pipe stem as well as the tobacco
transferase (GST) is involved. Polymorphism of the combustion products may play a role in the induction
p450 and GST genes is under active study in search of malignancy.
of genetic markers of susceptibility to head and neck
cancer and other tobacco-related cancers (27).
Alcohol is the second major risk factor for oral C. Oncogenic Viruses
cancer. In the West, 75% to 80% of patients frequently Accumulating evidence during the last two decades
consume alcohol. For nonsmokers, it is the most impor- has linked high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV),
tant risk factor. If above 30 g of alcohol is consumed per particularly type 16, with some upper aerodigestive
day, the risk increases linearly with the amount of tract carcinomas. The virus, which is a prerequisite for
alcohol consumed (28,29). As mentioned before, people cervical cancer, is also found to be an important
who smoke and drink have much greater risk of oral etiologic factor for a distinct, nonkeratinizing type of
cancer than those who only smoke or drink. The risk in SCC, which occurs in the oropharynx and more spe-
all cases is dose dependent. cifically in the palatine tonsils and base of tongue. The
Pure ethanol has never been shown to be carci- virus is very rarely identified in carcinoma of the oral
nogenic in vitro or in animal studies (30). It is pre- cavity proper (51–57). Substantial epidemiologic, clin-
sumed to act in concert with other, more direct ical, microscopic, and molecular evidence strongly
carcinogens, so called congeners that are found in support the connection between oropharyngeal cancer
the liquor, or from other sources such as tobacco. and HPV. HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma is
Nevertheless, alcohol drinking alone is an indepen- identified in subjects, with or without the established
dent risk for upper aerodigestive tract carcinoma (29). risk factors of tobacco and alcohol use (51–57). No
The increase in oral cancer in the Western world other type of oncogenic viruses has been convincingly
has been related to rising alcohol use. In England and shown to play a strong and direct role in the etiology
Wales, alcohol consumption more than doubled dur- of oral/pharyngeal SCC.
ing the second half of the 20th century, which closely
matched oral cancer mortality and, by inference, inci-
dence. There is strong circumstantial evidence that D. Dental Factors and Chronic Inflammation
alcohol rather than tobacco is the major factor in the
observed trend (4,31). Similar data have been reported An association between poor oral hygiene and poor
from Denmark (32). All forms of alcoholic drinks are dentition and oral cancer has been reported in several
dangerous if heavily consumed with evidence for the studies (4,36,58,59). Experimental evidence in animals
role of beer, wine, and spirits (12,33–36). The risk shows localization of chemical carcinogens–induced
becomes detectable when consumption exceeds 50 tumors to the sites of repeated mucosal traumatization.
drinks per week. An increase in yield and shortened latent period for
In 1979, a combined case-control study and case the development of the cancers are also observed in
series raised concern that alcohol-containing mouth- these sites (4). Clinical observations in human cases
wash is a risk for oral/pharyngeal cancer (37). More describe carcinomas developing at sites of chronic trauma
recently, extensive reviews of epidemiologic studies on caused by a broken teeth or ill-constructed dental
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 289
appliances (4,59,60). It is certain that the role of inflam- of AIDS-defining cancers: Kaposi’s sarcoma, non-
mation, whether caused by poor hygiene, infections or Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and cervical cancer as well as
mechanical trauma, in the etiology of carcinoma, is all HPV-related cancers and Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
compounded by known carcinogens such as tobacco An increased incidence in oral/pharyngeal cancer is
and alcohol abuse, nutritional deficiencies, and other observed in both HIV/AIDS patients as well as in
risks. However, during the current decade, the possibil- transplant recipients (73). Although incidence of can-
ity of a connection between chronic inflammation and cer of the lower lip is increased in both populations,
cancer has received intensive scrutiny and has moved to the increase was more marked in the transplant-
center stage in cancer research. It has been stated by recipient group (73). A similar pattern is observed in
some researchers that ‘‘genetic damage is the match that nonmelanoma skin cancer. While there is no known
lights the fire of the malignant process, and inflamma- connection between lip cancer in renal transplant
tion is the fuel that feeds it’’ (61). Recent clinical studies recipients and HPV or other viral infections, the risk
and experimental mouse models highlight a paradoxi- factors were found to be related to exposure to UV
cal role for the immune system as crucial regulator of radiation and tobacco products (74,75).
cancer development (62). Tumor-associated macro-
phages (TAM), which are ubiquitous in the stroma of IV. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENETICS
virtually all tumors, release a distinct repertoire of OF ORAL CANCER
growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes
that are known to regulate tumor growth, angiogenesis, Oral SCC, like many other epithelial cancers, evolves
invasion, and/or metastasis (61–64). through the accumulation of multiple genetic and
The risk for malignancy associated with oral epigenetic alterations in a multistep process (7,76).
lichen planus, a chronic inflammatory dermatologic Genetic changes commonly involved in oral cancer
disease, remains a subject of debate (1,65). Candidal include loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the sites of
hyphae are commonly observed to superficially known or suspected tumor suppressor genes, muta-
invade premalignant and malignant oral lesions. tion, and de novo promoter methylation of tumor
That such an association may be causally related, suppressor genes, amplification or overexpression of
rather than an effect of the malignant process, has oncogenes, and alterations in expression of DNA
been suggested (4,63,66). Some strains of candida repair genes. Common LOHs are observed at 3p, 9p,
were shown to produce hyperkeratotic lesions in the and 17p. The deletion of two genes located on the
dorsal rat tongue (1). In other studies, it was demon- short arm of chromosome 3; FHIT tumor suppressor
strated that some strains of Candida albicans produce gene and retinoic acid receptor (RAR)-b may play a
the chemical carcinogen nitrosamine from dietary role in development of oral cancer (77). P16INK4a
amines substrates (1,67). (p16), which is a tumor suppressor gene and a mem-
ber of the retinoblastoma pathway, is located at 9p21.
E. Nutritional Deficiencies High frequencies of deletions and mutations affecting
this gene are observed in oral SCC (77,78). p16 is also
Numerous studies report a significant preventive effect subject to epigenentic control through hypermethyla-
of proper diet on oral/pharyngeal cancer (68–72). The tion of its promoter. TP53 (p53), a tumor suppressor
antioxidant or free radical-scavenging vitamins A, C, gene located on the short arm of chromosome 17, is
and E as well as iron and trace elements, such as zink and mutated in the majority of oral cancers and is also
selenium, share a proven protective effect. High inci- frequently deleted (58,77). Gene amplification and
dence of upper gastrointestinal tract carcinoma is seen protein overexpression have also been found in head
in middle-aged women with chronic iron deficiency and neck carcinomas. Of special significance is epi-
anemia, glossitis, and mucosal atrophy, a condition dermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which has
known as the Plummer-Vinson syndrome. In animals been targeted as a treatment strategy for oral SCC.
rendered iron deficient by venesection and low-iron Cyclin D1 and p63 are other genes that are amplified
diets, there developed epithelial atrophy and increased (79,80). Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)
cancer risk, which was clearly shown when such animals is important in carcinogenesis and may provide
were challenged with chemical carcinogens (71). molecular target for treatment (81).
An important study in China found a strong Increased susceptibility to oral cancer is associ-
protective effect for carotenoid and vitamin C and ated with a number of inherited cancer syndromes,
fiber intake in oral cancer risk (72). including Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Fanconi’s anemia,
and xeroderma pigmentosum (82). Polymorphism in
F. Altered Immunity genes involved in the metabolism of carcinogens con-
tained in tobacco and alcohol have been linked to
A similarity in the pattern of increased risk for cancer individual susceptibility. These genes encode for such
in both HIV/AIDS populations and immunosup- enzymes as the glutathione-s-transferase, which are
pressed organ transplant recipients suggests that the involved in detoxifying some carcinogens in tobacco.
immune deficiency rather than other risk factors for Other enzymes that metabolize carcinogens have also
cancer is responsible for the increased risk (73). In both been implicated in oral cancer such as cytochrome
of these two populations, there is significant increase p450, N-acetyltransferase and alcohol dehydrogenase
of incidence, predominantly in cancers with known (77,83). There is increasing evidence for an inherited
infectious cause (73–75). These include all three types genetic component in oral cancer, possibly associated
290 El-Mofty and Lewis
with a greater susceptibility to genetic damage by borders, intercellular bridges, and hyperchromatic
environmental mutagens. Those individuals may be nuclei. Varying degrees of nuclear and cellular pleo-
more likely to develop multiple tumors (81,84). morphism are seen. A characteristic feature of KSCC
is formation of keratin pearls (round cellular nests
with central keratinization). Traditionally KSCC is
A. Molecular biology in HPV-Related graded as well, moderate, and poorly differentiated
Carcinomas variants. Previously, the grading system, which was
Molecular changes in HPV-related carcinomas may proposed by Broder (90), was based on the amount of
differ from those induced by other carcinogens. A keratin production and pleomorphism of the tumor
large body of studies in cervical, as well as HIV- cells. Four grades are described, grade I being the
positive oropharyngeal carcinomas, shows that HPV most differentiated with the highest keratin produc-
oncogenes E6 and E7 act through inactivation of P53 tion and minimal cellular pleomorphism (Fig. 5),
and retinoblastoma tumor suppressor genes, respec- while grade IV is poorly differentiated with little or
tively. In addition, E6 can directly activate telomerase, no keratin formation and marked cellular pleomor-
and E7 induces abnormal centrosome duplication. phism (Fig. 6). Grades II and III have intermediate
Consequent cell cycle deregulation and genomic insta- levels of these characteristics (Fig. 7). The purpose of
bility are instrumental factors for the developments of tumor grading is to provide a tool for predicting its
these distinct carcinomas, see infra (Fig. 35) (85–88). biologic behavior. However, because the histologic
features may vary considerably from area to area
within the same tumor, the Broders grading system
V. CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CONSIDERATION was found to lack significant prognostic value (91).
Several authors suggested that more useful prognostic
As stated above, SCC of the oral/pharyngeal mucosa information may be deduced from the invasive fronts
constitutes a range of variants. Differences between of the tumor where the deepest and presumably most
these entities are not only morphologic but also clini- aggressive cells reside (91–94). An invasive front grad-
cal and in some cases molecular. The clinical and ing system has been devised in which five histologic
pathologic features of the following variants of SCC features are graded and assigned points from one to
will be considered in some detail later in this chapter: four. The score for each variant is summed to provide
1. KSCC a total malignancy score for each tumor. The param-
2. Nonkeratinizing carcinoma eters used are degree of keratinization, nuclear pleo-
3. BSC morphism, number of mitoses per high-power field,
4. ASC pattern of invasion, and host response. Accordingly,
5. Adenoid squamous carcinoma the lower score is given to tumors with high keratini-
6. VC zation (>50% of cells), little nuclear pleomorphism,
7. Papillary squamous carcinoma (>75% mature cells), 0–1 mitotic figures/HPF, push-
8. Spindle cell carcinoma (SpCC) (sarcomatoid ing well-defined invasive front and marked host
carcinoma) response. On the other hand, the highest scores are
given to tumors with little or no keratinization,
Staging of Oral/Pharyngeal Carcinoma: extreme nuclear pleomorphism, more than five mito-
Regardless of morphologic type, all variants of ses/HPF, marked cellular dissociation in small nests
SCC are staged similarly using the TNM system or single cells, and no host response. The intermediate
(Table 1 and 2). grade tumors have moderate levels of these features.
This system has been found to be of high prognostic
value for oral cavity carcinomas (91,92,95,96). This
VI. KERATINIZING SQUAMOUS CELL histologic grading of malignancy at deep tumor inva-
CARCINOMA sive front was also found to have significant positive
KSCC is the prototype of SCC and is its most common relationship with Ki-67 cell proliferative index (97,98).
type. It may occur at any of the anatomic sites of the Other morphologic features that are found to
oral cavity and oropharynx. Variations in clinical have independent prognostic significance are pres-
presentation, symptomatology, treatment outcome, ence of perineural invasion and intralymphatic
and prognosis may to some extent depend on the tumor emboli (99–101). It has also been shown that
anatomic location of the tumors. Because of such the pattern of invasion, at the advancing front of the
variations, the clinical aspects of carcinomas at vari- tumor, is a significant and independent predictor of
ous sites will be addressed separately. both local recurrence and overall survival. The most
unfavorable pattern is described as diffuse infiltration
A. Pathologic Features with cellular dissociation, while the most favorable is
well defined with ‘‘pushing’’ border (118).
KSCC bears some resemblance to keratinizing strati- Many studies have advocated the use of tumor
fied squamous epithelium. The similarities vary thickness as a measurable prognostic indicator in
depending on the degree of differentiation. Micro- small tumors (T1–T2) (101–104). Tumor thickness was
scopically, KSSC is composed of sheets, strands, and found to be significant in predicting local recurrence,
nests of squamous cells. The tumor cells show nodal metastasis, and survival. However, a ‘‘cut off’’
abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, well-defined cell thickness level that can be used to discriminate
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 291
Definition of TNM
Primary tumor (T)
TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 No evidence of primary tumor
Tis Carcinoma in situ
T1 Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dimension
T2 Tumor more than 2 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest dimension
T3 Tumor more than 4 cm in greatest dimension
T4 (lip) Tumor invades through cortical bone, inferior alveolar nerve, floor of mouth, or skin of
face, i.e., chin or nose
T4a Tumor invades adjacent structures [e.g., through cortical (oral cavity) bone, into deep
muscles of the tongue (genioglossus, hyoglossus, palatoglossus, and styloglossus),
maxillary sinus, skin of face]
T4b Tumor invades masticator space, pterygoid plates, or skull base and/or encases
internal carotid artery
Note: Superficial erosion alone of bone/tooth
socket by gingival primary is not sufficient to
classify a tumor as T4.
Stage grouping
Stage 0 Tis N0 M0
Stage I T1 N0 M0
Stage II T2 N0 M0
Stage III T3 N0 M0
T1 N1 M0
T2 N1 M0
T3 N1 M0
Stage IVA T4a N0 M0
T4a N1 M0
T1 N2 M0
T2 N2 M0
T3 N2 M0
T4a N2 M0
Stage IVB Any T N3 M0
T4b Any N M0
Stage IVC Any T Any N M1
Source: From Ref. 89.
between favorable and unfavorable prognosis has variations were related to the size and peculiarity of
varied from 1.5 to 6 mm in various studies (102– the tumors. Studies on FOM and OT tumors showed
106). The variation in results reported in these studies cutoff thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.0 mm, respectively
might be related to several factors, such as using the (107,108), while in the case of buccal mucosal carcino-
surface of the tumor or the adjacent normal mucosa as mas with marked keratinization, the prognosis was
the point for measuring the thickness. More likely, the significantly worse for thicker tumors of more than or
292 El-Mofty and Lewis
equal to 6 mm in thickness (106). In a study of 145 who are involved in outdoor occupations, particularly
cases of oral carcinomas of all sites, O’Brian et al. (102) those with ruddy or fair complexions. It is also more
found that a 4-mm cutoff for good and poor prognosis prevalent in the Caucasian populations that live near
applied to all sites. the equator and is rare in blacks and dark-skinned
KSCC is the most common type of oral/pharyn- persons (44,45,109–112). The incidence of carcinoma of
geal carcinoma of all anatomic subsites. Clinical pre- the lip varies from 24% to 30% of oral cancers (113–
sentation and etiologic factors may vary according to 115) and 12% of head and neck cancers (114,115). The
anatomic locations. lower lip is involved in 85% to 98% of cases
(45,112,114,116,117) with a male predominance. The
male-to-female ratio varies considerably in different
VII. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE series from 2:1 to 45:1 (45,113,116–118). The patients’
ORAL CAVITY age ranges from the fifth through the eighth decades
A. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip of life (110,116,117,119–121) with a mean age of
between 60.5 and 70 years (113,116,117,119–121).
As stated above, chronic exposure to sunlight is the SCC of the upper lip accounts for 1.8% to 7.7% of
most important etiologic factor. Lip cancer is more all lip cancers (122,123). Upper lip carcinoma is seen
common in individuals who live in rural areas and more frequently in women than in men (121,124). The
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 293
present as a white plaque (leukoplakia), red plaque or a potential complication. Paralysis of branches of the
macule (erythroplakia) (Fig. 9), or exophytic verru- facial nerve may also occur (155,156). Invasion of the
cous hyperplasia (VH). The advanced lesions may mandible or maxilla may be present in advanced
appear as a fungating mass with a granular red cases. Death occurs from combination of infection,
surface or as ulcerating infiltrative cancer (Fig. 10). malnutrition, and hemorrhage.
Marked infiltration of the lamina propria and into the
underlying buccinators muscle and buccal fat is a Treatment and Prognosis
characteristic feature even in small T1 lesions
(153,154). VC commonly occurs in the buccal mucosa Primary radiation therapy is a good therapeutic
and is discussed independently later in this chapter. option for early buccal carcinoma (154,155,157).
The signs and symptoms of the disease are Patients with larger tumors show higher rates of
dependent on the degree to which the cancer has recurrence. Wide local resection even in small T1 to
progressed. Early lesions tend to be asymptomatic T2 tumors is associated with high recurrence rates
but eventually ‘‘soreness’’ becomes the most promi- (154,157), while aggressive composite resection has
nent initial complaint. As the tumor enlarges, trauma, better results (157). An improvement of the determi-
superimposed infection, and swelling result in nate cure rate from 28% to 42%, when surgery
increased pain. Involvement of the masticator spaces replaced radiation therapy as the preferred treatment,
in the process may lead to trismus. The tumor may was reported in a study from Memorial Sloan-Ketter-
slough and form a foul-smelling mass in the mouth or ing Cancer Center (145). In this study the presence or
may ulcerate and appear externally on the skin. Hem- absence of nodal enlargement was the most significant
orrhage from the internal maxillary or facial arteries is prognostic factor. Patients treated surgically for resid-
ual or recurrent buccal carcinoma have extremely
poor prognosis (155). The question of whether or not
to use surgery or irradiation to manage the neck with
clinically negative nodes has not been resolved. It is
suggested that prophylactic intervention is unwar-
ranted because of the low yield of occult nodal metas-
tasis (157,158).
Chemotherapeutic treatment of buccal carcinoma
using a variety of agents has not been very promising.
Use in larger tumors, T3 to T4, resulted in some tumor
regression in a minority of cases (155,159–161). The
vast majority needed surgical salvage, and nodal
regression was not significant in any case.
Regardless of the type of treatment, locoregional
recurrences are common, usually occurring within
18 months (155,161,162). Several factors affect the
prognosis: tumor size, location, and thickness as well
as presence or absence of nodal metastasis. Carcino-
Figure 9 SCC of the buccal mucosa presenting as erythropla- mas located anteriorly near the commissure area have
kia with leukoplakic areas. Abbreviation: SCC, squamous cell more favorable prognosis than those present posteri-
carcinoma. orly. The latter have a tendency to invade the oro-
pharynx and bone of the mandible and maxilla (163).
Tumor size is useful in predicting outcome only at the
extremes; (T1 and T4), but that discrimination is lost in
the intermediate sizes T2 and T3 (106). Tumor thick-
ness is suggested as a significant independent variable
in prognosis. The cutoff thickness for buccal cancer is
believed to be 6 mm, with five-year survival rates
significantly better for tumors less than 6-mm thick.
Patients presenting with cervical lymph node metas-
tasis are found to have a five-year cure rate of only
23% compared with 56% for those patients without
nodal disease (164).
Etiology
Excessive smoking and alcohol abuse are the main
etiologic factors. Prolonged contact of the potential
carcinogens in the salivary reservoir with FOM and
OT mucosa may play a role in targeting these sites
specifically (169). These usual risk factors are not
always apparent, particularly in cases of OT cancer
in patients younger than 40 years. In this population, Figure 11 SCC of the tongue in a 19-year-old woman with no
other risk factors may be involved, particularly genetic history of smoking or excessive drinking. Abbreviation: SCC,
squamous cell carcinoma.
predisposition (170–172). Many younger patients with
tongue cancer have never smoked or consumed alco-
hol, and in any case, the exposure to those carcinogens
might be of too short duration for malignant transfor-
mation to occur (172,173).
Clinical Features
Carcinoma of the OT and FOM are predominantly
diseases of the elderly with the greatest majority of
cases occurring in the sixth to the eighth decades of
life with a median age of about 60 years (165,169,
174,175). A small minority of cases occur in young
patients in the second and third decades of life. It has
been estimated that about 3% of carcinomas of the OT
occur in young patients but an increase to 6% to 7%
has been recently recognized (176–178). In the United
States, the incidence of OT cancer has increased in
adults aged 20 to 44 years during the last three
decades (177).
In general, men are affected two to three times as Figure 12 Early SCC of the tongue seen as an area of
erythroplakia on the lateral border. Abbreviation: SCC, squa-
much as women. However, the gap appears to be
mous cell carcinoma.
closing during the last several decades in various
parts of the world. The difference seen previously
was probably a reflection of the differences in habits
between males and females. As habits such as smok-
ing and drinking became more socially acceptable
among women, the gap has narrowed (166,172,179–
182). Among young patients with OT cancer, it is
particularly noticeable that the proportion of women
is greater than in the general population of tongue
malignancies, yet a history of smoking and drinking is
less frequently reported (183–187) (Fig. 11). Tongue
carcinoma in patients younger than 40 years may be a
distinct biologic entity but as alluded to above, the
underlying causes remain unknown (170–172).
Early asymptomatic carcinomas clinically pres-
ent as either leukoplakia or, more commonly, eryth-
roplakia (Fig. 12). Shafer and Waldron found that 50%
of erythroplakia of the FOM were histologically
proven to be invasive carcinoma. The remainder
were either severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ
(188). However, the typical patient presents with a Figure 13 Typical SCC of the lateral border of the tongue
painless, indurated ulcer of several months’ duration presenting as a painless indurated ulcer. Abbreviation: SCC,
(Fig. 13). The lesions are frequently more than 2 cm in squamous cell carcinoma.
diameter at the time when the true nature of the
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 297
general agreement on the need to treat the neck in all T3 covering of the mandibular and maxillary ridges in
and T4 tumors (180,181,220–223). Other considerations edentulous areas is the alveolar mucosa. For the
that are taken into account in deciding whether or not purpose of the current discussion, both the gingival
to treat the neck prophylactically in cases of T1 and T2 and alveolar mucosa will be referred to as gingival
tumors include depth and pattern of invasion, lymph mucosa. Gingival SCC is the third most common
vascular involvement, perineural invasion, and intraoral carcinoma after cancers of the tongue and
patients who are not amenable to follow-up. FOM. It constitutes 4% to 25% of all oral cancers
The most common causes of treatment failure (166,167,241–248).
are the usual events: large tumors, tumor thickness, Of particular significance is that gingival SCCs
positive margins of excision, perineural invasion, may clinically simulate inflammatory gum diseases
infiltrating pattern of the advancing front, lymph such as chronic gingivitis, periodontal disease, and
node metastasis, extranodal spread of tumor, and periodontal abscess. Consequently, misdiagnosis and
distant metastasis (95,118,224–229). The incidence of delayed diagnosis are not uncommon (241,248–251). In
local recurrence following surgery or irradiation addition, gingival carcinoma is characterized by early,
varies from 10% to 40%. Over 90% of the patients and sometimes extensive, involvement of underlying
who fail therapy, regardless of the modality bone with impending poor outcome (250–256).
employed, will manifest local or regional recurrence
within two years (181,189,190). Etiology
Several reports of large series of cases have
Several investigators have indicated that tobacco use
emphasized the importance of early detection for more
and, in particular, snuff dipping is a major risk factor in
favorable prognosis. Figures based on clinical stage of
the etiology of gingival carcinoma (22,241,245,257,258).
the tumors have shown a five-year survival rate of 69%
Alcohol consumption (246,259) and poor oral hygiene
to 90% in stage I disease and 0% to 26% for stage IV
(245,258) are also important considerations. Other
disease (165,174,181,190,192,194–196,200,230–232). As
studies, on the other hand, have suggested that the
previously mentioned, some investigators have found
risk of alcohol and tobacco usage is not as significant
that young patients, less than 40 years of age, with OT
for gingival carcinoma when compared with that of the
cancer tend to have poorer prognosis (171,172,176,178,
tongue and FOM tumors (12,166,259–261).
183–185,187,233) even when presenting with early-stage
The occurrence of gingival SCC in young
disease, with a locoregional recurrence of 57% and death
patients with HIV/AIDS and in patients with graft-
caused by disease in 47% of the cases (234). It was
versus-host disease following marrow transplants, in
therefore recommended that an aggressive therapeutic
the absence of the usual risk factors, suggests an
approach be taken in young patients with carcinoma of
etiologic role for immune disorders (262–264). A
the anterior two-thirds of the tongue.
genetic bases for gingival carcinoma is postulated on
Distant metastasis, usually to the lung and bone,
the basis of the detection of p53 mutations and over-
is estimated to occur in 5% to 15% of the cases, and of
expression in many cases (58,77,265). The high inci-
these, 90% expire within two years. Larger estimates
dence of gingival SCC in patients with proliferative
of distant metastasis below the clavicles are reported
verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) (266) may also suggest a
on the basis of autopsy studies (228,235–239). About
genetic basis (see infra).
20% to 30% of patients will develop a second primary
malignancy during the course of their disease Clinical Features
(220,228,240).
Gingival carcinoma is primarily a disease of the elderly,
D. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Gingiva with the vast majority of cases occurring in indi-
and Alveolar Mucosa viduals of 50 years or older (241,246,267,268). Only a
few cases of gingival carcinoma have been reported in
The gingiva is the part of the oral mucosa that covers patients younger than 40 years, (269,270) including
the alveolar process of the dentate jaws. Mucosal one adolescent patient (271). Data derived from several
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 299
distant sites developed most often in the presence of E. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of
extensive cervical metastasis or in the presence of the Hard Palate
bone involvement (246).
The hard palate is the rarest site of intraoral SCC. It is,
however, the most common site for minor salivary
Radiography gland adenocarcinoma of the mouth. As previously
alluded to, SCC of the hard palate is rather common in
Although radiography generally provides relatively some parts of India where reverse Chutta smoking is
reliable indication of bony involvement (Fig. 18), the prevalent (1,15,297,298). The hard palate is, however,
absence of detectable changes does not completely not uncommonly involved by extension of maxillary
exclude the possibility of invasion. Microscopic evi- gingival and alveolar ridge SCC (253,256).
dence of bone invasion is frequently seen in spite of In the United States, the peak incidence of occur-
radiographic findings (252,287). Additional techni- rence is between 60 and 70 years of age. Although
ques, other than intraoral and extra oral plain film some studies have found that it is more common in
radiography, are usually needed. CT scans, MRI, and men, other studies have indicated that women are
bone scans are all used for ascertaining bone involve- more often involved (299,300). The first sign of the
ment (252,253,256). CT scans are the most frequently disease is a lump or an ulcer (Fig. 19) that may or may
used and are usually the only necessary radiologic not be painful but occasionally bleeds. Exophytic
examination. CT can usually predict areas of bone growths are most common and can result in denture
invasion with a degree of accuracy (254). MRI has an malfunction in individuals who wear a maxillary
advantage in demonstrating malignancy in the bone prosthesis. Leukoplakia is detected in one-fourth of
marrow and perineural sheath. MRI can also aid in the patients in association with the tumor (301). The
delineating fluid from soft tissue when the paranasal average delay from onset of symptoms to diagnosis
sinuses are involved (254). Severe bone destruction has been as long as four to five months (299,302). The
may result in displacement of teeth and their isolation tumors are fairly well distributed between the two
producing ‘‘floating teeth’’ effect and may induce sides and the center of the palate (301). In reverse
pathologic fractures (288). smokers, however, the cancer usually develops as an
ulcer, lateral to the midline in the glandular zone of
the hard palate (297).
Treatment and Prognosis At the time of diagnosis, about half of the tumors
Surgery is the mainstay treatment of gingival carcinoma. are localized to the hard palate, 30% have invaded
Marginal mandibulectomy in appropriately selected adjacent structures, and 15% to 30% are associated
cases is as effective as segmental jaw resection with positive cervical lymph nodes, 5% of which are
(246,289–292), and maintenance of the mandibular con- bilateral (299,300,302). Close to one-half of the tumors
tinuity results in significant reduction in patient mor- are less than 4 cm in diameter. From the hard palate,
bidity and good long-term functional results (246,291). the cancer may spread to invade the underlying bone,
Segmental jaw resection is reserved for cases in which floors of the maxillary sinus and nasal cavity, gingiva,
bone destruction extends to the inferior alveolar canal and soft palate. Invasion through the bone and into
on imaging examination (Fig. 15). Hemimandibulec- the maxillary sinus or nasal cavity is usually a late
tomy is done in patients with unilateral involvement event. The submandibular and subdigastric lymph
of the entire inferior alveolar canal (252,290,293,294). nodes are the first to be involved with metastatic
Clinically positive cervical nodes N1 to N3 are carcinoma (301,303). Distant metastases are rare.
treated with modified or radical neck dissection. For
clinically N0 necks, a supraomohyoid neck dissection
is recommended (246,290). Postoperative radiothera-
py is used in patients with cervical metastasis as well
as in patients in whom tumor margins are inadequate
or who have advanced stage disease (i.e., stages III
and IV) (246,290,295). Chemotherapy has been used in
advanced cases (249,295).
Several factors play a determinant role in the
prognosis of gingival SCC. These include the size and
site of the tumor, presence or absence of bone involve-
ment and its extent, the adequacy of the surgical
margins, and presence or absence of metastasis
(241,245,269,291,296). Maxillary carcinomas have bet-
ter outcomes than mandibular ones with five-year
cures of 52% and 45%, respectively (22).
The main predictor of survival is considered to
be the stage of the tumor at the time of diagnosis
(246,253,256,280). Five-year survival rates decline Figure 19 Ulcerated, exophytic SCC of the hard palate in an
from 55% to 75%, for stages I and II patients, to 24% edentulous patient. Abbreviation: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
to 44% in more advanced cases (246,280).
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 301
Clinical Features
The soft palate represents 5% to 12% of all oropharyn-
geal carcinomas (323,324). Although the soft palate is
not an uncommon site for malignant tumors of minor
salivary gland, SCC is the most common malignancy
(324). The majority of the lesions develop on the oral
surface. Epidemiologically, these tumors are associated
with tobacco and alcohol use. SCC of the soft palate
and uvula is two-to-three times more abundant in men
than women and in blacks more than whites and tends
to occur in older individuals with an average age of
about 60 years (323–329). Because of its abundant nerve
supply, most patients (60–80%) present within three
months of onset of symptoms and typically complain
of a persistent sore throat, pain on swallowing, or
referred otalgia (330,331). In a review of 188 cases of
SCC of the soft palate and uvula, Weber et al. (329) Figure 22 Ulcerated SCC of the soft palate extending into the
observed that 80% were unilateral and 20% were either mucobuccal fold. Abbreviation: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
midline or bilateral. The uvula was the site of the
primary in 2.7% of the cases (329). Approximately
30% to 35% of patients (range 23–50%) will have
positive cervical lymph nodes at diagnosis, and of
these, 3% to 13% may be bilateral, especially if the
lesion approaches or crosses the midline (326,327,
329–333). The subdigastric and midjugular lymph
nodes are most often involved.
As the tumor enlarges, it is not uncommon for it
to spread beyond the soft palate to involve other sites,
especially the tonsils, RMT, base of tongue, and pha-
ryngeal wall. The lesions may present as an exophytic
growth, an ulcer, a slightly elevated plaque, or as a
diffuse area of erythroplakia (Figs. 21–23).
If less than half of the tongue base is excised, E. Pathology of Squamous Cell Carcinoma
supraglottic laryngectomy can be performed in other- Variants
wise healthy individuals without significant operative
problems. If, on the other hand, a large portion of The following variants of KSCC are discussed:
the base of the tongue needs to be removed, 1. NKCa and nonkeratinizing undifferentiated carci-
with sacrifice of both hypoglossal nerves, a total noma
laryngectomy is generally indicated to prevent severe 2. BSC
aspiration (393). 3. ASC
Total glossectomy may be required in some 4. Adenoid squamous carcinoma
patients to achieve an adequate resection margin 5. VC
(394). In a few highly selected patients, total glossec- 6. Papillary squamous carcinoma
tomy without total laryngectomy can be performed 7. Spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinoma
(395). For these reasons, some clinicians prefer primary
radiation therapy over surgery. Better survival and
functional outcome is reported after radiation therapy IX. NONKERATINIZING SQUAMOUS CELL
or chemoradiation in patients with advanced disease CARCINOMA
(384,386,391). Radiation alone was also shown to pro-
duce significantly improved posttreatment function NKCa is a distinct type of carcinoma, which is HPV
and quality of life compared with other modalities related. It differs from conventional KSCC, not only
(391). microscopically but also molecularly and clinically.
In a study from Memorial Sloan-Kettering The role of HPV infection, as a prerequisite for the
Cancer Center, it was found that most patients obtain development of a great majority of carcinomas of the
long-term regional control, with no severe complica- uterine cervix, is well established (408) and supported
tions, after definitive radiation therapy, of base-of- by molecular, serologic, and epidemiologic evidence.
tongue carcinoma, followed by neck dissection for Similar documentation has also been, more recently,
those patients who present with lymphadenopathy provided for a role for HPV, particularly type 16, in
(386). On the other hand, a study from M.D. Anderson the pathogenesis of a subgroup of SCCs of the head
Cancer Center found that patients whose neck disease and neck (361,409–411). Genomic DNA of high-risk
responded completely to radiation, using accelerated HPV is detected in approximately 26% of all SCCs of
fractionated dose, did not appear to need a planned the head and neck worldwide (412). Rigorous and
neck dissection (388). consistent molecular evidence have shown viral inte-
Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy for gration and the expression of viral oncogenes (E6 and
patients with stages III or IV SCC of the tonsils who E7) in nonkeratinizing oropharyngeal carcinomas of
have undergone complete surgical resection is the the tonsils and base of tongue (52,54,410,411,413). The
treatment of choice for many clinicians (380,382,390). prevalence of HPV DNA, particularly type 16, in
The overall five-year survival rate for tonsillar and oropharyngeal carcinomas has varied in different
base of tongue carcinomas has ranged from 20% to studies from 18% to 90% (52,54–57,411). A variety of
54% (361,362,369,372,375,380,382,384,391,394–400). techniques are used to identify HPV in the tumors,
The five-year disease-specific survival rates are stage including ISH, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and
dependent. Survival rates for stages I to IV in tonsillar immunohistochemistry. The virus is less frequently
carcinoma are 93%, 57%, 27%, and 17%, respectively identified in laryngeal and sinonasal carcinomas and
(362). The five-year survival rates for stages I to IV rarely in oral SCC (52–54).
base-of-tongue carcinoma are reported as 100%, 57%, In a review of 235 oropharyngeal carcinomas in
20%, and 0%, respectively (371). Fifteen percent of the all age groups by El-Mofty and Patil (54), 36% of
patients develop distant metastasis (401). The most tonsillar and 32% of base of tongue carcinomas were
frequent sites of dissemination, in order of frequency, HPV-related NKCa. Alternatively, 91% of tonsillar
are lung, liver, bones, and brain. carcinomas in young patients (younger than 40
The overwhelming cause of treatment failure years) were HPV type 16 positive (52). The average
and death is local recurrence. Distant metastasis age for patients with NKCa of the tonsil and base of
accounts for only a few cases. The five-year actuarial tongue was found to be 53.6 and 56.6 years, respec-
risk of distant metastasis in patients whose disease tively. On the other hand, patients with conventional
was controlled locoregionally was 21% in one study KSCC are slightly older with an average age of 56.6
(388) and 7.5% in another (389). and 58.0 years, for tonsillar and base of tongue,
Accumulating body of evidence in the United respectively. The male-to-female ratio for patients
States, as well as the international literature, confirms with HPV-related NKCa of the tonsils and base of
that HPV-related carcinomas of the tonsils and base of tongue is 4:1 (54). Numerous epidemiologic and case-
tongue have a statistically significant better prognosis control studies provide support for the association of
than HPV-negative carcinomas. The favorable out- high-risk sexual behavior with HPV-related oropha-
come is evident in disease-free and overall survival ryngeal cancer (51,357,414–420).
of the patients and is independent of TNM stage, Patients with HPV-positive tumors were three
nodal status, age, or gender (402–407). It is suggested times as likely to report having had oral sex as those
that the favorable prognosis is attributable to higher with HPV-negative tumors and were also more likely
sensitivity toward radiotherapy. to have had multiple sex partners (51,357). An analysis
306 El-Mofty and Lewis
A. Microscopic Features
HPV-related SCCs are characterized by nonkeratiniz-
ing basaloid morphology. The tumor cells are generally
monomorphic, oval, or spindle shaped, with hyper- Figure 27 NKCa. Oval and spindle shaped cells with hyper-
chromatic basophilic nuclei, inconspicuous cytoplasm, chromatic nuclei, inconspicuous cytoplasm and indistinct cell
and indistinct cell borders. They form cords, sheets, borders (200). Abbreviation: NKCa, nonkeratinizing squamous
and nests with sharply defined borders (Fig. 26). Pali- cell carcinoma.
sading of the peripheral cells may be present (Fig. 27).
Excessive mitoses and apoptosis as well as comedo-
type necrosis are commonly observed (Fig. 28). Kerati-
nization and keratin pearl formations are generally
absent, although some trend toward keratinocytic mat-
uration may occasionally be present focally in some
tumors (Fig. 29). In these hybrid lesions, the basaloid
epithelial cells at the center or the periphery of the
neoplastic cell sheets may show keratinocytic rather
than basal cell morphology (Figs. 29, 30). The meta-
plastic change is manifested by a more prominent
cytoplasm, distinct cell membrane, and intercellular
bridges.
HPV-related nonkeratinizing carcinomas typi-
cally start deep in the tonsillar crypts of both the
Figure 29 NKCa with focal areas of keratinocytic maturation Figure 31 NKCa arising deep in the wall of a tonsillar crypt
(400). Abbreviation: NKCa, nonkeratinizing squamous cell (200). Abbreviation: NKCa, nonkeratinizing squamous cell
carcinoma. carcinoma.
Figure 30 NKCa. Notice maturation of the peripheral cells Figure 32 Cystic changes in NKCa metastatic to a cervical
(200). Abbreviation: NKCa, nonkeratinizing squamous cell lymph node (100). Abbreviation: NKCa, nonkeratinizing squa-
carcinoma. mous cell carcinoma.
reliable techniques for establishment of the origin of characteristic cystic change. The lining epithelium of
an occult tonsillar carcinoma. These primary carcino- the cystic structures may be so scant and bland
mas are best identified in excisional biopsies of the appearing that a misdiagnosis of benign cyst may be
palatine or lingual tonsils (366,367,421). Identification rendered (Fig. 32). Such an error is more likely made
of the site of a clinically occult primary carcinoma is in patients whose primary tumors are occult.
crucial for the proper management of the patients. In
the absence of a known primary tumor, patients with B. Immunohistochemistry
cervical metastasis are likely to be overtreated with
wide-field irradiation that includes the entire pharyn- The immunohistochemical profile of nonkeratinizing
geal axis and larynx. Such treatment protocols are carcinoma differs from that of the conventional KSCC
associated with severe morbidity (422–424). Nonker- in several aspects. A major distinction is that non-
atinizing carcinoma metastasis to lymph nodes com- keratinizing carcinoma shows a diffuse and strong
monly exhibits extensive central necrosis leading to reactivity to p16 antibodies (Fig. 33), while KSCC is
308 El-Mofty and Lewis
Figure 33 NKCa showing strong and diffuse nuclear and cyto- Figure 35 Schematic representation of the proposed interac-
plasmic reactivity for p16 immunostain (200). Abbreviation: tion of HPV E6 and E7 oncoprotein with cell cycle regulators p53
NKCa, nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. and Rb.
Figure 36 Undifferentiated carcinoma of the palatine tonsil. Figure 37 BSC. Dysplastic surface epithelium at upper right
Notice morphologic similarities to nasopharyngeal undifferentiated corner (100). Abbreviation: BSC, basaloid squamous carcinoma.
carcinoma (lymphoepithelial carcinoma) (200).
Figure 39 BSC with pseudoglandular appearance reminiscent Figure 41 BSC showing deposits of intercellular hyaline mate-
of ACC (200). Abbreviations: BSC, basaloid squamous carci- rial (400). Abbreviation: BSC, basaloid squamous carcinoma.
noma; ACC, adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Figure 42 Adenosquamous carcinoma of the soft palate. Sur- Figure 44 (A) ASC, notice areas of comingling of squamous
face poorly differentiated SCC with deeper adenocarcinoma carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. (B) ASC, mucicarmine stain
(20). Abbreviation: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. (200). Abbreviation: ASC, adenosquamous carcinoma.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 313
ASC develops from surface as well as glandular Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, unlike ASC, only
epithelium. In addition to the upper aerodigestive arises from glandular and not surface epithelium.
tract, ASC has been reported in the skin, lung, stom- Both mucoepidermoid carcinoma and ASC manifest
ach, ileum, colon, gallbladder, endometrium, liver, epidermoid and glandular features. However, sepa-
pancreas, kidney, thyroid, and prostate among other rate and definitive areas of squamous carcinoma and
sites (467,470,478,483–489). In the upper aerodigestive adenocarcinoma are not seen in mucoepidermoid
tract, the larynx is the most frequently reported site carcinoma. Keratin pearl formation and individual
followed by, in order of frequency, FOM, tongue, cell keratinization are extremely rare in mucoepider-
tonsil, nasal cavity, and alveolar mucosa, less com- moid carcinoma, as compared with ASC, and surface
monly the buccal mucosa, lip, palate, and nasophar- carcinomatous changes are never seen. Although
ynx (479). In a review of oral cases examined at the mucicarmine-positive cells may be found in ASC,
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), the they are not requisite for diagnosis as in the case of
tongue, FOM, tonsil, and soft palate accounted for mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Moreover, the distinct
85% of the cases. The buccal mucosa, RMT, and lip are aggregates and cyst-lining rows of mucous cells, typi-
the other sites of occurrence (490). In a review of 58 cal of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, are not present in
cases of ASC of the upper aerodigestive tract reported ASC (490).
in the English literature, Keelawat et al. (479) found
that the patients’ age range was 34–81 years, with a
median age of 61.5 years. The male patients outnum- XIII. ADENOID SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA
bered females by a ratio of 4.3:1. A history of smoking,
smokeless tobacco use, and alcohol was common in This variant of SCC is also known as pseudoglandular
the majority of cases (479). A history of radiation has SCC and acantholytic SCC. It occurs most commonly
also been suggested as a risk factor in a case that on the sun-exposed skin of the head and neck region.
involved the mandibular alveolar mucosa (481). It has been shown to develop in areas of actinic
Symptoms vary according to site and range from 1.5 keratosis (493,494). Several cases have been reported
to 12 months in duration. Patients with FOM and in the vermilion border of the lip, most commonly the
tongue tumors typically complain of mouth ulcers, lower lip (495–499). Of 22 cases of adenoid squamous
pain, indurations, ill-fitting dentures, and a painless carcinoma of the lip published in the English litera-
mass. Patients with tonsillar tumors may complain of ture, only three were in the upper lip and the rest
odynophagia, otalgia, and weight loss (479,486). developed in the lower lip (495–499). The lesions
In spite of relatively few number of cases of oral affected predominantly males, with a 4.5:1 male-to-
and oropharyngeal ASC reported with adequate female ratio. The mean age of the patients was 55.3
follow-up, there is general agreement that this variant years (range 41–75 years).
of SCC is extremely aggressive and treatment resistant Clinically, the lesions have been variously
(477,479–481,486,491,492). Most patients present with described as keratotic or hyperkeratotic (499), ulcerat-
advanced-stage disease, early nodal metastasis, later ed (500), exophytic (498), and ‘‘warty and irritated’’
distant metastasis, and generally fatal outcome. Sites (501). Pain was reported at presentation in some cases.
of distant metastasis include lungs, liver, bone, brain, The lesion size varies from 0.2 to 2.0 cm with an
and kidney. Radical surgery with neck dissection is average of 1.0 cm. The prominent position of the
the treatment of choice. Adjuvant radiation and/or lesions favors early detection and treatment (495).
chemotherapy, with few exceptions, do not appear to Microscopically, the superficial portion of the
offer any therapeutic advantages (477,479,491). tumor resembles a typical SCC. However, the deeper
extensions demonstrate gland-like structures lined by
a single or double layer of cuboidal epithelial cells that
A. Immunohistochemistry exhibit nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromaticity,
and mitotic activity. Scattered acontholytic, dyskera-
Few studies have investigated the immunohistochem- totic cells are evident in these foci (Fig. 45). The
ical profile of oral/pharyngeal ASC (478,480,491). The fibrous connective tissue stroma may reveal solar
tumors show differences in staining patterns between elastosis in addition to an inflammatory cell infiltrate.
the squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma ele- Solar keratosis with acantholysis may be evident in
ments in the tumors. The former react positively to the adjacent stratified squamous epithelium.
high molecular weight cytokeratin and negative for Mucicarmine stains are negative for mucin
low molecular weight cytokeratin and carcinoem- (495,501). Cases that were evaluated immunohistoclin-
bryonic antigen, whereas the reverse is true of the cally showed strong positive reactivity to high molec-
glandular components. ular weight cytokeratins but were not reactive to S-100
protein, factor VIII-related antigen and vimentin
B. Differential Diagnosis (495,501).
The preferred treatment of the lip lesions is local
Two main entities are considered in the differential excision. Lymph node metastasis is rare, (495) and so
diagnosis for ASC: mucoepidermoid carcinoma and is death related to disease (501). The excellent progno-
adenoid squamous carcinoma. The later will be dis- sis may be due to early detection.
cussed in more detail below, in the section on adenoid Although quite uncommon, a few cases of
SCC. intraoral adenoid squamous carcinomas have been
314 El-Mofty and Lewis
A. Clinical Features
Although VC is primarily a disease of men, between
50 and 80 years of age, it has been described in
individuals as young as 34 years (504,506,516,517).
There are also some variations in gender according
to geographic location. In the southern United States,
where the use of snuff is prevalent among women,
there is a relative increase of VC in female patients
(516). A higher prevalence of VC in women is also
observed in patients with proliferative verrucous leu-
koplakia (PVL) (524,525). PVL is a clinicopathologic
entity that was originally described by Hansen et al.
(524). It is a continuum of hyperkeratotic disease with
high prevalence among elderly women. The condition
is detailed in another section of this text.
The majority of oral VC occurs either on the
buccal mucosa or the gingiva. Other sites affected, in
descending order of frequency, are the labial mucosa,
palate, RMT, or anterior tonsillar pillars (505,526). In
Figure 45 Adenoid squamous carcinoma of the lip showing
acantholysis (200).
most patients, the lesion presents as a slow growing,
exophytic, warty mass (Figs. 46, 47) that may be tender
or painful. Bleeding is uncommon.
B. Pathology
Grossly the tumor is exophytic, broadly based, gray-
white, soft or firm. The lesions size varies from 1 to 10
cm. Microscopically, it is composed of multiple filiform
projections, which are thickened and lined with normal-
appearing stratified squamous epithelium without any
evidence of atypia, dysplasia, or other malignant fea-
tures. The cells are arranged in an orderly maturation
pattern towards the surface, which typically shows
abundant keratinization, commonly in the form of para-
keratin. Orthokeratin with sparse keratohyalin granules
may be present. Parakeratin crypting and plugging may
be seen. The advancing front of the tumor is broad and
pushing with bulbous rete ridges, which extend deeper
than the level of the subjacent normal mucosa but with
no evidence of invasion. An intense inflammatory cell
infiltrate often precedes the advancing front of the
tumor (Fig. 48).
Figure 49 Conventional invasive SCC arising in VC (200).
Abbreviation: VC, verrucous carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell
carcinoma.
C. Differential Diagnosis
Figure 48 (A) VC advancing below the surface mucosa and
showing keratin plugging (20). (B) Bland squamous epithelium Two lesions that bear some morphologic similarities
showing normal maturation. Intense chronic inflammatory cell to VC are considered here:VH (papillary keratosis)
infiltrate is present surrounding stroma (100). Abbreviation: VC, and papillary squamous carcinoma. The latter is dis-
verrucous carcinoma. cussed separately below as a variant of conventional
SCC.
316 El-Mofty and Lewis
B. Differential Diagnosis
Morphologic differences between PSCC, VC, hybrid
Figure 52 Atypical VH. Notice the dysplastic changes (200). verrucous-SCC and atypical VH are detailed in the
Abbreviation: VH, verrucous hyperplasia. above discussion. Another lesion that must be distin-
guished from PSCC is nonkeratinizing squamous
papilloma. The latter lacks the full thickness of epithe-
Currently, reports dealing with PSCC exclude the lial dysplasia that characterizes PSCC.
other exophytic carcinoma (544), which is broad-based
with bulbous club-shaped ridges and excessive kerati-
nization and dysplastic cytologic features. Such an XVI. SPINDLE CELL (SARCOMATOID)
entity should be classified as either atypical VH, in CARCINOMA
the absence of invasion (Fig. 52), or SCC with verrucous
SpCC (1) is a variant of SCC characterized by spindled
features, if invasive elements are identified (Fig. 49).
or pleomorphic tumor cells, which simulate a true
The term papillary squamous carcinoma should
sarcoma. This tumor is one of the most unusual and
be reserved for those lesions with slender, finger-like
interesting lesions of the head and neck. Numerous
exophytic papillae containing delicate fibrovascular
alternate terms, several of which are preferred at other
cores. The surface epithelium shows full-thickness
specific body sites, have been used, including meta-
dysplasia. The epithelial cells have basaloid appear-
plastic carcinoma (2), anaplastic carcinoma (3), pleo-
ance and frequent mitoses. Surface keratinization is
morphic carcinoma (4), carcinosarcoma, and
characteristically sparse or absent (Fig. 51). Despite
pseudosarcoma, among others (5,6). These tumors
their large size, many of the tumors remain in situ or
have been described everywhere carcinomas arise,
only show superficial invasion of the lamina propria.
but are most common in the head and neck region,
In the absence of invasion, the tumor should be
lung, and urinary bladder. Many different theories for
termed PSCC in situ (545).
their pathogenesis have been put forward in the past,
A putative role for HPV in the etiology of PSCC
including divergent differentiation of carcinoma cells,
of oral and oropharyngeal cavity is unclear. Suarez et
so-called collision tumors where there are two sepa-
al. (546) using PCR techniques identified HPV in 5 of
rate neoplastic clones combined in the same lesion (5),
14 cases of PSCC of the upper aerodigestive tract.
or that the carcinoma ‘‘drives’’ a non-neoplastic (6)
HPV type 16 or 18 in three cases and types 6 of 11 in
stromal component to proliferate in the same lesion.
two. The exact site of the carcinomas was not identi-
Over time, from ultrastructural (7–10), immunohisto-
fied. The tumors were morphologically consistent
chemical (11–16), and genetic investigations (17,18), it
with the PSCC as described above. More recently,
has become abundantly clear that the first theory is
HPV type 16 was identified in PSCC of the tonsil in
correct, namely, that the sarcomatoid tumor repre-
a renal transplant recipient (547). Crissman et al. (548)
sents a line of differentiation or ‘‘dedifferentiation’’
showed that PSCC is unrelated to recurrent respirato-
of the carcinoma. Furthermore, there is ample evi-
ry papillomatosis. After a long period of follow up,
dence that squamous carcinoma cells can exhibit
none of the patients with recurrent papillomatosis
mesenchymal transformation (19,20). As such, SpCC
developed PSCC, and none of the patients with papil-
is regarded as a histologic variant of SCC. The tumor
lary squamous carcinoma had previous history of
is fundamentally a carcinoma, but is composed, in
recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
large part or completely, of spindled or pleomorphic
A. Treatment and Prognosis cells, which simulate a sarcoma or other spindle cell
neoplasm. Most SpCCs are biphasic tumors, consist-
Because of a lack of studies on large series of PSCC of ing of the spindle cell component and also a typical
the oral cavity and oropharynx, it is not possible to squamous carcinoma component or at least focal
evaluate the effectiveness of various therapeutic carcinoma in situ. However, a significant number
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 319
A. Clinical Features
SpCC has similar demographics to conventional SCC.
It is strongly associated with smoking and drinking
and, for cases in the oral cavity and oropharynx, has a
2 to 3:1 male-to-female ratio (15,16,21,22). In other
head and neck sites, this ratio is skewed much more
toward males (10,11,13,22). In most series, it occurs
most commonly in the larynx, particularly in the
glottis (11), followed by the oral cavity, hypopharynx,
and nasal cavity (16,22). Some series, however, have
found a higher percentage of cases in the oral cavity
and, in particular, in the oropharynx (15). The typical
age range is from 55 to 65 years (21,22). A significant
minority of patients have a history of previous radia- Figure 54 Ulcerated (U) SpCC consisting of a sheet of spindled
tion to the originating site. Combining four major tumor cells with abundant mixed associated inflammatory cells
clinicopathologic studies, 17% of the 300 cases of (40). Abbreviation: SpCC, spindle cell carcinoma.
SpCC occurred in a previously irradiated field at an
average of seven years and as late as 16 years later
(11,14,21,22). This is a much higher rate than for
conventional SCC. Oral cavity tumors usually arise
in the lip, alveolar ridge, and tongue and present with
swelling, pain, a nonhealing ulcer, dysphagia, or
hemorrhage (21). A unique clinical and pathologic
feature of SpCC is its macroscopic growth pattern.
More than 90% of laryngeal tumors (11,15,16) and
approximately 50% of oral tumors (21) present as
polypoid and exophytic masses projecting into the
lumen (Fig. 53). Sometimes there is a narrow stalk.
B. Pathology
The polypoid growth pattern usually results in an
exophytic mass with a smooth and extensively ulcerated
Figure 56 Hypocellular SpCC consisting of markedly atypical Figure 57 Focal positive cytokeratin immunostaining in the
spindled, stellate, and pleomorphic tumor cells sitting in an spindle cell (sarcomatoid) component of a SpCC (400).
edematous, loose submucosa (200). Abbreviation: SpCC, Abbreviation: SpCC, spindle cell carcinoma.
spindle cell carcinoma.
A. Clinical Features
The overwhelming majority of oral cavity and oropha-
ryngeal neuroendocrine carcinomas occur in men
(3,4,5,6). Beyond this, the small number of cases
does not allow for broad generalization of the clinical
features. Of the reported cases, the majority have been
in the oral cavity with a few reported in the orophar-
ynx (3,4,5,6,7,8). Specific oral sites include the lip
(3,14,7), FOM (12), RMT (6), tongue (3), and alveolar
ridges (4,13). There is no significant difference in Figure 61 Low-power view of high-grade neuroendocrine car-
tumors among these subsites. Almost all of the cinoma of the oral cavity showing sheets of small, blue cell tumor
patients are heavy smokers (8). Presenting symptoms in the submucosa (100).
include mouth pain, bleeding, or a neck mass.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 323
40% survival (42). There is slight variation by site, 16. Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of
with alveolar ridge lesions doing slightly better than areca nut usage. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):77–83.
palatal (1,9) and oropharyngeal ones. Although one 17. van Wyk CW, Stander I, Padayachee A, et al. The areca
might suspect that tumors with an in situ component nut chewing habit and oral squamous cell carcinoma in
South African Indians. A retrospective study. S Afr Med J
or preexisting pigmented lesion present before the 1993; 83(6):425–429.
mass-forming invasive tumor forms might show a 18. Warnakulasuriya KA. Analytical studies of the evaluation
better behavior, this has not been demonstrated (32). of the role of the betel quid in oral carcinogenesis. In: Bedi
Tumor spreads to cervical lymph nodes in approxi- Red. Betel Quid and Tobacco Chewing Among the Ban-
mately 40% of cases (41), and this appears to confer a gladeshi Community in the United Kingdom. London:
worse prognosis with shorter disease-specific survival Center for Transcultural Oral Health, 1995.
(19,24,36,41). Distant metastases usually occur after 19. Balaram P, Sridhar H, Rajkumar T, et al. Oral cancer in
several years, are often seen in the lungs, liver, and southern India: the influence of smoking, drinking, paan-
brain, and are almost always associated with recurrent chewing and oral hygiene. Int J Cancer 2002; 98(3):
disease at the primary site (42). 440–445.
20. Gupta PC, Ray CS. Smokeless tobacco and health in India
Treatment consists of radical surgery, but local and South Asia. Respirology 2003; 8(4):419–431.
recurrence is very common (31–85%) (18). As some 21. Bhide S, Kulkarni JR, Padma PR, et al. Studies on tobacco
patients have prolonged survival despite multiple specific nitrosamines and other carcinogenic agents in
recurrences, aggressive treatment is still recom- smokeless tobacco products. In: Sanghvi LD, Notany PP,
mended when it recurs (40). Selective neck dissection eds. Tobacco and Health: the Indian Scene. Proceedings of
is performed for clinically detected cervical metasta- the UICC Workshop. Bombay: Tata Memorial Center,
ses. Elective neck dissection is controversial but is 1989:121–131.
generally not performed. Radiotherapy and systemic 22. Brown RL, Suh JM, Scarborough JE, et al. Snuff Dippers’
therapy are used in most cases, but there is no Intraoral Cancer: clinical Characteristics and Response to
consensus on the types, regimens, or their efficacy. Therapy. Cancer 1965; 18:2–13.
23. McCoy JM, Waldron CA. Verrucous carcinoma of the oral
cavity. A review of forty-nine cases. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol 1981; 52(6):623–629.
REFERENCES 24. Winn DM, Blot WJ, Shy CM, et al. Snuff dipping and oral
cancer among women in the southern United States. N
1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, et al. Oral and Engl J Med 1981; 304(13):745–749.
maxillofacial pathology. In: Neville BW, Damm DD, 25. Krishnamurthy S, Ramaswamy R, Trivedi U, et al. Tobacco
Allen CM et al., eds. Epithelial Pathology. 2nd ed. Phila- use in rural Indian children. Indian Pediatr 1997; 34(10):
delphia: WB Saunders, 2002:356–366. 923–927.
2. Batsakis JG. Oral cancer. In: Shah JP, Johnson NW, Batsakis 26. IARC. Tobacco Smoking; 1986.
JG, eds. Clinical Pathology of Oral Cancer. London: Martin 27. Lafuente A, Maristany M, Arias C, et al. Glutathione and
Dunitz, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, 2002. glutathione S-transferases in human squamous cell carci-
3. Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Available at: nomas of the larynx and GSTM1 dependent risk. Antican-
http://www.dep.iarc.frl. IARC. 2006. cer Res 1998; 18(1A):107–111.
4. Johnson N. Tobacco use and oral cancer: a global perspec- 28. Rodriguez T, Altieri A, Chatenoud L, et al. Risk factors for
tive. J Dent Educ 2001; 65(4):328–339. oral and pharyngeal cancer in young adults. Oral Oncol
5. Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. 2004; 40(2):207–213.
Lancet Oncol 2001; 2(9):533–543. 29. Kato I, Nomura AM. Alcohol in the aetiology of upper
6. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. aerodigestive tract cancer. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1994;
CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57(1):43–66. 30B(2):75–81.
7. Mao L, Hong WK, Papadimitrakopoulou VA. Focus on 30. IARC. Alcohol drinking. IARC Working Group, Lyon,
head and neck cancer. Cancer Cell 2004; 5(4):311–316. 13–20 October 1987. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks
8. Mashberg A, Samit A. Early diagnosis of asymptomatic Hum 1988; 44:1–378.
oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancers. CA Cancer J 31. Hindle J. The epidemiology of oral cancer in England and
Clin 1995; 45(6):328–351. wales, 1901–1991. University of London PhD thesis, 1997.
9. Shiboski CH, Schmidt BL, Jordan RC. Tongue and tonsil 32. Moller H. Changing incidence of cancer of the tongue,
carcinoma: increasing trends in the U.S. population ages oral cavity, and pharynx in Denmark. J Oral Pathol Med
20-44 years. Cancer 2005; 103(9):1843–1849. 1989; 18(4):224–229.
10. Frisch M, Hjalgrim H, Jaeger AB, et al. Changing patterns 33. Andre K, Schraub S, Mercier M, et al. Role of alcohol and
of tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma in the United States. tobacco in the aetiology of head and neck cancer: a case-
Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11(6):489–495. control study in the Doubs region of France. Eur J Cancer
11. Neville BW, Day TA. Oral cancer and precancerous B Oral Oncol 1995; 31B(5):301–309.
lesions. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52(4):195–215. 34. Bundgaard T, Wildt J, Frydenberg M, et al. Case-control
12. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, et al. Smoking and study of squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity in
drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Denmark. Cancer Causes Control 1995; 6(1):57–67.
Res 1988; 48(11):3282–3287. 35. Franceschi S, Talamini R, Barra S, et al. Smoking and
13. Wey PD, Lotz MJ, Triedman LJ. Oral cancer in women drinking in relation to cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx,
nonusers of tobacco and alcohol. Cancer 1987; 60(7):1644–1650. larynx, and esophagus in northern Italy. Cancer Res 1990;
14. Rahman M, Fukui T. Bidi smoking and health. Public 50(20):6502–6507.
Health 2000; 114(2):123–127. 36. Zheng TZ, Boyle P, Hu HF, et al. Tobacco smoking,
15. Gupta PC, Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ. Mortality among alcohol consumption, and risk of oral cancer: a case-
reverse chutta smokers in south India. Br Med J (Clin control study in Beijing, People’s Republic of China.
Res Ed) 1984; 289(6449):865–866. Cancer Causes Control 1990; 1(2):173–179.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 327
37. Weaver A, Fleming SM, Smith DB. Mouthwash and oral 59. Regezi JA, Sciubba J. Oral Pathology—Clinical-pathological
cancer: carcinogen or coincidence? J Oral Surg 1979; 37(4): correlations. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993.
250–253. 60. Velly AM, Franco EL, Schlecht N, et al. Relationship
38. Cole P, Rodu B, Mathisen A. Alcohol-containing mouth- between dental factors and risk of upper aerodigestive
wash and oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the epidemi- tract cancer. Oral Oncol 1998; 34(4):284–291.
ology. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134(8):1079–1087. 61. Stix G. A malignant flame. Sci Am 2007; 297(1):60–68.
39. Mascarenhas AK, Allen CM, Loudon J. The association 62. de Visser KE, Eichten A, Coussens LM. Paradoxical roles
between Viadent use and oral leukoplakia. Epidemiology of the immune system during cancer development. Nat
2001; 12(6):741–743. Rev Cancer 2006; 6(1):24–37.
40. Mascarenhas AK, Allen CM, Moeschberger ML. The 63. Balkwill F, Charles KA, Mantovani A. Smoldering and
association between Viadent use and oral leukoplakia— polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of
results of a matched case-control study. J Public Health malignant disease. Cancer Cell 2005; 7(3):211–217.
Dent 2002; 62(3):158–162. 64. Lewis CE, Pollard JW. Distinct role of macrophages in
41. Blum HF. Sunlight as a causal factor in cancer of the skin different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res 2006;
of man. J Natl Cancer Inst 1948; 9:247–258. 66(2):605–612.
42. Blum HF. Sunlight as an environmental factor in cancer of 65. Eisenberg E, Krutchkoff DJ. Lichenoid lesions of oral
the skin. Mil Med 1955; 117(3):202–208. mucosa. Diagnostic criteria and their importance in the
43. Decker J, Goldstein JC. Risk factors in head and neck alleged relationship to oral cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med
cancer. N Engl J Med 1982; 306(19):1151–1155. Oral Pathol 1992; 73(6):699–704.
44. Keller AZ. Cellular types, survival, race, nativity, occupa- 66. Rindum JL, Stenderup A, Holmstrup P. Identification of
tions, habits and associated diseases in the pathogenesis Candida albicans types related to healthy and pathologi-
of lip cancers. Am J Epidemiol 1970; 91(5):486–499. cal oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med 1994; 23(9):406–412.
45. Spitzer WO, Hill GB, Chambers LW, et al. The occupation 67. Krogh P, Hald B, Holmstrup P. Possible mycological
of fishing as a risk factor in cancer of the lip. N Engl J Med etiology of oral mucosal cancer: catalytic potential of
1975; 293(9):419–424. infecting Candida albicans and other yeasts in production
46. Tan KN. Cancer of the lip in Australia. Aust Dent J 1970; of N-nitrosobenzylmethylamine. Carcinogenesis 1987; 8(10):
15(3):179–184. 1543–1548.
47. Shpitzer T, Stern Y, Segal K, et al. Carcinoma of the lip: 68. Block G, Patterson B, Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and
observations on its frequency in females. J Laryngol Otol cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological
1991; 105(8):640–642. evidence. Nutr Cancer 1992; 18(1):1–29.
48. Blomqvist G, Hirsch JM, Alberius P. Association between 69. La Vecchia C, Tavani A, Franceschi S, et al. Epidemiology
development of lower lip cancer and tobacco habit. J Oral and prevention of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 1997; 33(5):
Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49:1044–1047. 302–312.
49. Broders AC. Squamous cell epithelioma of the lip. J Am 70. Potter JD, Steinmetz K. Vegetables, fruit and phytoestro-
Med Assoc 1920; 74(10):656–664. gens as preventive agents. IARC Sci Publ 1996; (139):61–90.
50. Widmann BP. Cancer of the lip. Am J Roentgenol 1950; 71. Prime SS, MacDonald DG, Rennie JS. The effect of iron
63(1):13–25. deficiency on experimental oral carcinogenesis in the rat.
51. D’Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, et al. Case-control Br J Cancer 1983; 47(3):413–418.
study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal can- 72. Zheng T, Boyle P, Willett WC, et al. A case-control study
cer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(19):1944–1956. of oral cancer in Beijing, People’s Republic of China.
52. El-Mofty SK, Lu DW. Prevalence of human papillomavi- Associations with nutrient intakes, foods and food
rus type 16 DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the groups. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1993; 29B(1):45–55.
palatine tonsil, and not the oral cavity, in young patients: 73. Grulich AE, van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, et al. Incidence
a distinct clinicopathologic and molecular disease entity. of cancers in people with HIV/AIDS compared with
Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27(11):1463–1470. immunosuppressed transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
53. El-Mofty SK, Lu DW. Prevalence of high-risk human Lancet 2007; 370(9581):59–67.
papillomavirus DNA in nonkeratinizing (cylindrical cell) 74. King GN, Healy CM, Glover MT, et al. Increased preva-
carcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a distinct clinicopatho- lence of dysplastic and malignant lip lesions in renal-
logic and molecular disease entity. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 1995; 332(16):
29(10):1367–1372. 1052–1057.
54. El-Mofty SK, Patil S. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related 75. Vajdic CM, McDonald SP, McCredie MR, et al. Cancer
oropharyngeal nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma: incidence before and after kidney transplantation. JAMA
characterization of a distinct phenotype. Oral Surg Oral 2006; 296(23):2823–2831.
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101(3):339–345. 76. Hunter KD, Parkinson EK, Harrison PR. Profiling early
55. Franceschi S, Munoz N, Bosch XF, et al. Human papillo- head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5(2):127–135.
mavirus and cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract: a 77. Jefferies S, Foulkes WD. Genetic mechanisms in squa-
review of epidemiological and experimental evidence. mous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996; 5(7):567–575. 2001; 37(2):115–126.
56. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, et al. Evidence for a 78. Reed AL, Califano J, Cairns P, et al. High frequency of p16
causal association between human papillomavirus and a (CDKN2/MTS-1/INK4A) inactivation in head and neck
subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1996; 56(16):
92(9):709–720. 3630–3633.
57. Mork J, Lie AK, Glattre E, et al. Human papillomavirus 79. Izzo JG, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Liu DD, et al. Cyclin
infection as a risk factor for squamous-cell carcinoma of D1 genotype, response to biochemoprevention, and pro-
the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(15):1125–1131. gression rate to upper aerodigestive tract cancer. J Natl
58. Brennan JA, Boyle JO, Koch WM, et al. Association Cancer Inst 2003; 95(3):198–205.
between cigarette smoking and mutation of the p53 80. Patturajan M, Nomoto S, Sommer M, et al. DeltaNp63
gene in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. induces beta-catenin nuclear accumulation and signaling.
N Engl J Med 1995; 332(11):712–717. Cancer Cell 2002; 1(4):369–379.
328 El-Mofty and Lewis
81. Lippman SM, Sudbo J, Hong WK. Oral cancer prevention 101. Woolgar JA, Scott J. Prediction of cervical lymph node
and the evolution of molecular-targeted drug develop- metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue/
ment. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(2):346–356. floor of mouth. Head Neck 1995; 17(6):463–472.
82. Prime SS, Thakker NS, Pring M, et al. A review of 102. O’Brien CJ, Lauer CS, Fredricks S, et al. Tumor thickness
inherited cancer syndromes and their relevance to oral influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer—but
squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2001; 37(1):1–16. what thickness? Head Neck 2003; 25(11):937–945.
83. Cheng L, Sturgis EM, Eicher SA, et al. Glutathione-S- 103. Po Wing Yuen A, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors
transferase polymorphisms and risk of squamous-cell of clinically stages I and II oral tongue carcinoma-A com-
carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Cancer 1999; 84(3): parative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern,
220–224. invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score,
84. Sturgis EM, Wei Q. Genetic susceptibility—molecular and pathologic features. Head Neck 2002; 24(6):513–520.
epidemiology of head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 104. Yuen AP, Lam KY, Wei WI, et al. A comparison of the
2002; 14(3):310–317. prognostic significance of tumor diameter, length, width,
85. Chen XS, Garcea RL, Goldberg I, et al. Structure of small thickness, area, volume, and clinicopathological features
virus-like particles assembled from the L1 protein of of oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg 2000; 180(2):139–143.
human papillomavirus 16. Mol Cell 2000; 5(3):557–567. 105. Jones KR, Lodge-Rigal RD, Reddick RL, et al. Prognostic
86. Lukaszuk K, Liss J, Wozniak I, et al. HPV and histological factors in the recurrence of stage I and II squamous cell
status of pelvic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer: cancer of the oral cavity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
a prospective study. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57(5):472–476. Surg 1992; 118(5):483–485.
87. Syrjanen SM, Syrjanen KJ. New concepts on the role of 106. Urist MM, O’Brien CJ, Soong SJ, et al. Squamous cell
human papillomavirus in cell cycle regulation. Ann Med carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: analysis of prognostic
1999; 31(3):175–187. factors. Am J Surg 1987; 154(4):411–414.
88. zur Hausen H. Molecular pathogenesis of cancer of the 107. Mohit-Tabatabai MA, Sobel HJ, Rush BF, et al. Relation of
cervix and its causation by specific human papillomavirus thickness of floor of mouth stage I and II cancers to
types. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1994; 186:131–156. regional metastasis. Am J Surg 1986; 152(4):351–353.
89. AJCC. Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer, 108. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Wong GY, et al. Predictive value of
2002. tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the
90. Broder AC. The grading of carcinoma. Minn Med 1925; tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg 1986; 152(4):
8:726. 345–350.
91. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, et al. New malignancy 109. Anderson DL. Cause and prevention of lip cancer. J Can
grading is a better prognostic indicator than Broders’ Dent Assoc (Tor) 1971; 37(4):138–142.
grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol 110. Hornback NB, Shidnia H. Carcinoma of the lower lip:
Med 1989; 18(8):432–437. treatment results at Indiana University Hospitals. Cancer
92. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, et al. Malignancy 1978; 41(1):352–357.
grading of the deep invasive margins of oral squamous 111. Keller AZ. The epidemiology of lip, oral, and pharyngeal
cell carcinomas has high prognostic value. J Pathol 1992; cancers, and the association with selected systemic diseases.
166(4):375–381. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1963; 53:1214–1228.
93. Bryne M, Nielsen K, Koppang HS, et al. Reproducibility of 112. Lindqvist C, Teppo L. Epidemiological evaluation of
two malignancy grading systems with reportedly prog- sunlight as a risk factor of lip cancer. Br J Cancer 1978;
nostic value for oral cancer patients. J Oral Pathol Med 37(6):983–989.
1991; 20(8):369–372. 113. Chen J, Katz RV, Krutchkoff DJ, et al. Lip cancer. Incidence
94. Sawair FA, Irwin CR, Gordon DJ, et al. Invasive front trends in Connecticut, 1935-1985. Cancer 1992; 70(8):
grading: reliability and usefulness in the management of 2025–2030.
oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2003; 114. NIH. Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer:
32(1):1–9. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
95. Odell EW, Jani P, Sherriff M, et al. The prognostic value of National Institute of Health.; 197x.
individual histologic grading parameters in small lingual 115. Rice D. General management guidelines. In: Current
squamous cell carcinomas. The importance of the pattern Concepts in Head and Neck Cancer. Atlanta: American
of invasion. Cancer 1994; 74(3):789–794. Cancer Society, 1989:1–15.
96. Riffko J. Prognostic value of histopathological factors 116. Baker SR, Krause CJ. Carcinoma of the lip. Laryngoscope
(malignancy grading and AgNOR content) assessed at 1980; 90(1):19–27.
the invasive tumor front of oral squamous cell carcinoma. 117. Cruse CW, Radocha RF. Squamous cell carcinoma of the
Br J Cancer 1997; 75:1543–1546. lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80(6):787–791.
97. Kurokawa H, Zhang M, Matsumoto S, et al. The relation- 118. Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, et al. Oral
ship of the histologic grade at the deep invasive front and squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but
the expression of Ki-67 antigen and p53 protein in oral not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-
squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2005; 34(10): free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29(2):
602–607. 167–178.
98. Tumuluri V, Thomas GA, Fraser IS. Analysis of the Ki-67 119. Cross J. Carcinoma of the lip: A review of 563 case records
antigen at the invasive tumour front of human oral of carcinoma of the lip at the Bondville Hospital. Surg
squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2002; 31(10): Gynecol Obstet 1948; 87:153–162.
598–604. 120. Frierson HF Jr., Cooper PH. Prognostic factors in squa-
99. Brown B, Barnes L, Mazariegos J, et al. Prognostic factors mous cell carcinoma of the lower lip. Hum Pathol 1986; 17
in mobile tongue and FOM carcinoma. Cancer 1989; 64(6): (4):346–354.
1195–1202. 121. Mackay EN, Sellers AH. A statistical review of carcinoma
100. Shingaki S, Suzuki I, Kobayashi T, et al. Predicting factors of the lip. Can Med Assoc J 1964; 90:670–672.
for distant metastases in head and neck carcinomas: an 122. Jorgensen K, Elbrond O, Andersen AP. Carcinoma of the
analysis of 103 patients with locoregional control. J Oral lip. A series of 869 cases. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 1973;
Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54(7):853–857. 12(3):177–190.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 329
123. Ward JE, Hendrick JW. Results of treatment of carcinoma 147. Tiecke RW, Bernier JL. Statistical and morphological anal-
of the lip. Surgery 1950; 27:321–342. ysis of four hundred and one cases of intraoral squamous
124. Zitsch RP III, Park CW, Renner GJ, et al. Outcome analysis cell carcinoma. J Am Dent Assoc 1954; 49(6): 684–698.
for lip carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113 148. Rao DN, Ganesh B, Rao RS, et al. Risk assessment of
(5):589–596. tobacco, alcohol and diet in oral cancer—a case-control
125. Yonkers AJ, Yarington CT Jr. Cancer of the lip. Laryngo- study. Int J Cancer 1994; 58(4):469–473.
scope 1972; 82(4):625–630. 149. Ghoshal S, Mallick I, Panda N, Sharma SC. Carcinoma of the
126. Pindborg J. Oral Cancer and Pre-cancer. Bristol: John buccal mucosa: analysis of clinical presentation, outcome
Wright & Sons, 1980:20–32. and prognostic factors. Oral Oncol 2006; 42(5):533–539.
127. Lynch GA. Cancer of the lip. Ulster Med J 1967; 36(1): 150. Conley J, Sadoyama JA. Squamous cell cancer of the
44–50. buccal mucosa. A review of 90 cases. Arch Otolaryngol
128. Solomon LM, Rosenthal I, Klapman M. Tumor of lower 1973; 97(4):330–333.
lip. Arch Dermatol 1970; 101(2):241–244. 151. Vegers JW, Snow GB, van der Waal I. Squamous cell
129. Ballantyne AJ, McCarten AB, Ibanez ML. The extension of carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. A review of 85 cases.
cancer of the head and neck through peripheral nerves. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105(4):192–195.
Am J Surg 1963; 106:651–667. 152. Mishra RC, Singh DN, Mishra TK. Post-operative radio-
130. Banerjee TK, Gottschalk PG. Unusual manifestations of therapy in carcinoma of buccal mucosa, a prospective
multiple cranial nerve palsies and mandibular metastasis randomized trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996; 22(5):502–504.
in a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. 153. Rosenfeld L, Callaway J. Snuff Dipper’s Cancer. Am J
Cancer 1984; 53(2):346–348. Surg 1963; 106:840–844.
131. Brown RG, Poole MD, Calamel PM, et al. Advanced and 154. Strome SE, To W, Strawderman M, et al. Squamous cell
recurrent squamous carcinoma of the lower lip. Am J Surg carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck
1976; 132(4):492–497. Surg 1999; 120(3):375–379.
132. Byers RM, O’Brien J, Waxler J. The therapeutic and 155. Chhetri DK, Rawnsley JD, Calcaterra TC. Carcinoma of
prognostic implications of nerve invasion in cancer of the buccal mucosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123
the lower lip. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978; 4(3–4): (5):566–571.
215–217. 156. Martin H, Pflueger OH. Arch Surg 1935; 30:731–747.
133. Dodd GD, Dolan PA, Ballantyne AJ, et al. The dissemina- 157. Nair MK, Sankaranarayanan R, Padmanabhan TK. Evalu-
tion of tumors of the head and neck via the cranial nerves. ation of the role of radiotherapy in the management of
Radiol Clin North Am 1970; 8(3):445–461. carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Cancer 1988; 61(7):
134. Laine FJ, Braun IF, Jensen ME, et al. Perineural tumor 1326–1331.
extension through the foramen ovale: evaluation with MR 158. Dhawan IK, Verma K, Khazanchi RK, et al. Carcinoma of
imaging. Radiology 1990; 174(1):65–71. buccal mucosa: incidence of regional lymph node involve-
135. Petrovich Z, Kuisk H, Tobochnik N, et al. Carcinoma of ment. Indian J Cancer 1993; 30(4):176–180.
the lip. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105(4):187–191. 159. Bahadur S, Chatterjee TK. Chemotherapy in buccal
136. Bordin GM, Weitzner S. Distant cutaneous metastases in a mucosa cancer. J Surg Oncol 1986; 32(4):245–247.
patient with squamous-cell carcinoma of the lip. Oral 160. Dhawan IK, Thakur NS, Madan NC, et al. Polychemo-
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34(3):445–449. therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa.
137. Cerezo L, Liu FF, Tsang R, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma Cancer 1983; 51(5):773–777.
of the lip: analysis of the Princess Margaret Hospital 161. Tichler T, Ramon Y, Rath P, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-
experience. Radiother Oncol 1993; 28(2):142–147. therapy in early-stage and locally advanced small bulk
138. de Visscher JG, Botke G, Schakenraad JA, et al. A com- squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and orophar-
parison of results after radiotherapy and surgery for stage ynx. Isr J Med Sci 1988; 24(9–10):539–544.
I squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip. Head Neck 162. Pop LA, Eijkenboom WM, de Boer MF, et al. Evaluation of
1999; 21(6):526–530. treatment results of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal
139. de Visscher JG, Grond AJ, Botke G, et al. Results of mucosa. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989; 16(2):483–487.
radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vermil- 163. Cernea P, Billet J. Epithelioma of the buccal mucosa:
ion border of the lower lip. A retrospective analysis of 108 study of 60 cases. Rev Stomatol 1962; 63:222–232.
patients. Radiother Oncol 1996; 39(1):9–14. 164. O’Brien PH. Cancer of the cheek (mucosa). Cancer 1965;
140. Jesse RH. Extensive cancer of the lip. Surgical therapy. 18(11):1392–1398.
Arch Surg 1967; 94(4):509–516. 165. Funk GF, Karnell LH, Robinson RA, et al. Presentation,
141. Luce EA. Carcinoma of the lower lip. Surg Clin North Am treatment, and outcome of oral cavity cancer: a National
1986; 66(1):3–11. Cancer Data Base report. Head Neck 2002; 24(2):165–180.
142. Anderson C, Krutchkoff D, Ludwig M. Carcinoma of the 166. Barasch A, Morse DE, Krutchkoff DJ, et al. Smoking,
lower lip with perineural extension to the middle cranial gender, and age as risk factors for site-specific intraoral
fossa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69(5):614–618. squamous cell carcinoma. A case-series analysis. Cancer
143. Califano L, Zupi A, Massari PS, et al. Lymph-node metas- 1994; 73(3):509–513.
tasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. A retrospec- 167. Krolls SO, Hoffman S. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral
tive analysis of 105 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; soft tissues: a statistical analysis of 14,253 cases by age, sex,
23(6 pt 1):351–355. and race of patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 92(3):571–574.
144. Vartanian JG, Carvalho AL, de Araujo Filho MJ, et al. 168. Arosarena O MM, Haug R. Special Considerations with
Predictive factors and distribution of lymph node metas- floor of mouth and tongue cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg
tasis in lip cancer patients and their implications on the Clin North Am 2006; 18:521–531.
treatment of the neck. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(2):223–227. 169. Crissman JD, Gluckman J, Whiteley J, et al. Squamous-cell
145. Bloom ND, Spiro RH. Carcinoma of the cheek mucosa. A carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. Head Neck Surg
retrospective analysis. Am J Surg 1980; 140(4):556–559. 1980; 3(1):2–7.
146. Hirata RM, Jaques DA, Chambers RG, et al. Carcinoma of 170. Jin YT, Myers J, Tsai ST, et al. Genetic alterations in oral
the oral cavity. An analysis of 478 cases. Ann Surg 1975; squamous cell carcinoma of young adults. Oral Oncol
182(2):98–103. 1999; 35(3):251–256.
330 El-Mofty and Lewis
171. Koch WM, Lango M, Sewell D, et al. Head and neck 193. Mashberg A, Meyers H. Anatomical site and size of 222
cancer in nonsmokers: a distinct clinical and molecular early asymptomatic oral squamous cell carcinomas: a
entity. Laryngoscope 1999; 109(10):1544–1551. continuing prospective study of oral cancer. II. Cancer
172. Llewellyn CD, Johnson NW, Warnakulasuriya KA. Risk 1976; 37(5):2149–2157.
factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in 194. Correa JN, Bosch A, Marcial VA. Carcinoma of the floor of
young people—a comprehensive literature review. Oral the mouth. Review of clinical factors and results of
Oncol 2001; 37(5):401–418. treatment. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med
173. Kuriakose M, Sankaranarayanan M, Nair MK, et al. 1967; 99(2):302–312.
Comparison of oral squamous cell carcinoma in younger 195. Harrold CC Jr. Management of cancer of the floor of the
and older patients in India. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol mouth. Am J Surg 1971; 122(4):487–493.
1992; 28B(2):113–120. 196. Kolson H, Spiro RH, Rosewit B, et al. Epidermoid carci-
174. Aksu G, Karadeniz A, Saynak M, et al. Treatment results noma of the floor of the mouth. Analysis of 108 cases.
and prognostic factors in oral tongue cancer: analysis of 80 Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 93(3):280–283.
patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35(6):506–513. 197. Cuffari L, Tesseroli de Siqueira JT, Nemr K, Rapaport A.
175. Sessions DG, Spector GJ, Lenox J, et al. Analysis of Pain complaint as the first symptom of oral cancer: a
treatment results for floor-of-mouth cancer. Laryngoscope descriptive study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
2000; 110(10 pt 1):1764–1772. Radiol Endod 2006; 102(1):56–61.
176. Atula S, Grenman R, Laippala P, et al. Cancer of the tongue 198. Gorsky M, Epstein JB, Oakley C, et al. Carcinoma of the
in patients younger than 40 years. A distinct entity? Arch tongue: a case series analysis of clinical presentation, risk
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122(12):1313–1319. factors, staging, and outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
177. Bell RB, Kademani D, Homer L, et al. Tongue cancer: is Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98(5):546–552.
there a difference in survival compared with other sub- 199. Decroix Y, Ghossein NA. Experience of the Curie Institute
sites in the oral cavity? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65(2): in treatment of cancer of the mobile tongue: I. Treatment
229–236. policies and result. Cancer 1981; 47(3):496–502.
178. Myers JN, Elkins T, Roberts D, et al. Squamous cell 200. Hicks WL Jr., Loree TR, Garcia RI, et al. Squamous cell
carcinoma of the tongue in young adults: increasing carcinoma of the floor of mouth: a 20-year review. Head
incidence and factors that predict treatment outcomes. Neck 1997; 19(5):400–405.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122(1):44–51. 201. Marks JE, Lee F, Freeman RB, et al. Carcinoma of the oral
179. Carvalho AL, Nishimoto IN, Califano JA, et al. Trends in tongue: a study of patient selection and treatment results.
incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the Laryngoscope 1981; 91(9 pt 1):1548–1559.
United States: a site-specific analysis of the SEER data- 202. Decroix Y, Ghossein NA. Experience of the Curie Institute
base. Int J Cancer 2005; 114(5):806–816. in treatment of cancer of the mobile tongue: II. Manage-
180. Easson EC, Palmer MK. Prognostic factors in oral cancer. ment of the neck nodes. Cancer 1981; 47(3):503–508.
Clin Oncol 1976; 2(3):191–202. 203. White D, Byers RM. What is the preferred initial method
181. Ildstad ST, Bigelow ME, Remensnyder JP. Intra-oral can- of treatment for squamous carcinoma of the tongue? Am J
cer at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Squamous cell Surg 1980; 140(4):553–555.
carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. Ann Surg 1983; 197 204. Lindberg R. Distribution of cervical lymph node metasta-
(1):34–41. ses from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respirato-
182. Shaha AR, Spiro RH, Shah JP, et al. Squamous carcinoma ry and digestive tracts. Cancer 1972; 29(6):1446–1449.
of the floor of the mouth. Am J Surg 1984; 148(4):455–459. 205. Nakissa N, Hornback NB, Shidnia H, et al. Carcinoma of
183. Davidson BJ, Root WA, Trock BJ. Age and survival from the floor of the mouth. Cancer 1978; 42(6):2914–2919.
squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Head Neck 206. Feind CR, Cole RM. Cancer of the floor of the mouth and
2001; 23(4):273–279. its lymphatic spread. Am J Surg 1968; 116(4):482–486.
184. Pitman KT, Johnson JT, Wagner RL, et al. Cancer of the 207. McGuirt WF Jr., Johnson JT, Myers EN, et al. Floor of mouth
tongue in patients less than forty. Head Neck 2000; 22(3): carcinoma. The management of the clinically negative neck.
297–302. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121(3): 278–282.
185. Popovtzer A, Shpitzer T, Bahar G, et al. Squamous cell 208. Shingaki S, Suzuki I, Nakajima T, et al. Evaluation of
carcinoma of the oral tongue in young patients. Laryngo- histopathologic parameters in predicting cervical lymph
scope 2004; 114(5):915–917. node metastasis of oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas.
186. Vargas H, Pitman KT, Johnson JT, et al. More aggressive Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 66(6):683–688.
behavior of squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior 209. Kotwall C, Sako K, Razack MS, et al. Metastatic patterns in
tongue in young women. Laryngoscope 2000; 110(10 pt 1): squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Am J Surg
1623–1626. 1987; 154(4):439–442.
187. Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Sathiyaseelan Y, et al. Anterior 210. Bhattacharyya N, Nayak VK. Survival outcomes for sec-
tongue cancer: age is not a predictor of outcome and should ond primary head and neck cancer: a matched analysis.
not alter treatment. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73(11):899–904. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132(1):63–68.
188. Shafer WG, Waldron CA. Erythroplakia of the oral cavity. 211. Cianfriglia F, Di Gregorio DA, Manieri A. Multiple pri-
Cancer 1975; 36(3):1021–1028. mary tumours in patients with oral squamous cell carci-
189. Applebaum EL, Callins WP, Bytell DE. Carcinoma of the noma. Oral Oncol 1999; 35(2):157–163.
floor of the mouth. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106(7):419–421. 212. Merkx MA, van Gulick JJ, Marres HA, et al. Effectiveness
190. Nason RW, Sako K, Beecroft WA, et al. Surgical manage- of routine follow-up of patients treated for T1-2N0 oral
ment of squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the squamous cell carcinomas of the floor of mouth and
mouth. Am J Surg 1989; 158(4):292–296. tongue. Head Neck 2006; 28(1):1–7.
191. Shaw HJ, Hardingham M. Cancer of the floor of the 213. Haughey BH, Gates GA, Arfken CL, et al. Meta-analysis
mouth: surgical management. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91(6): of second malignant tumors in head and neck cancer: the
467–488. case for an endoscopic screening protocol. Ann Otol
192. Ballard BR, Suess GR, Pickren JW, et al. Squamous-cell Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(2 pt 1):105–112.
carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. Oral Surg Oral Med 214. Brown JS, Griffith JF, Phelps PD, et al. A comparison of
Oral Pathol 1978; 45(4):568–579. different imaging modalities and direct inspection after
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 331
periosteal stripping in predicting the invasion of the 236. Fein DA, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, et al. Carcinoma of
mandible by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Oral the oral tongue: a comparison of results and complica-
Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32(6):347–359. tions of treatment with radiotherapy and/or surgery.
215. Shaha AR. Preoperative evaluation of the mandible in Head Neck 1994; 16(4):358–365.
patients with carcinoma of the floor of mouth. Head Neck 237. Merino OR, Lindberg RD, Fletcher GH. An analysis of
1991; 13(5):398–402. distant metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the
216. Soderholm AL, Lindqvist C, Hietanen J, et al. Bone upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Cancer 1977; 40(1):
scanning for evaluating mandibular bone extension of 145–151.
oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 238. O’Brien PH, Carlson R, SteubnerEAJr., et al. Distant
1990; 48(3):252–257. metastases in epidermoid cell carcinoma of the head
217. Campbell RS, Baker E, Chippindale AJ, et al. MRI T and neck. Cancer 1971; 27(2):304–307.
staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: 239. Probert JC, Thompson RW, Bagshaw MA. Patterns of
radiological-pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 1995; 50 spread of distant metastases in head and neck cancer.
(8):533–540. Cancer 1974; 33(1):127–133.
218. Virapongse C, Mancuso A, Fitzsimmons J. Value of mag- 240. Korb LJ, Spaulding CA, Constable WC. The role of
netic resonance imaging in assessing bone destruction in definitive radiation therapy in squamous cell carcinoma
head and neck lesions. Laryngoscope 1986; 96(3):284–291. of the oral tongue. Cancer 1991; 67(11):2733–2737.
219. Segal R. Imaging of malignant neoplasms of the oral 241. Cady B, Catlin D. Epidermoid carcinoma of the gum. A
cavity. Br J Radiol (congr Suppl) 1994; 67:127. 20-year survey. Cancer 1969; 23(3):551–569.
220. Alvi A ME, Johnson J. Cancer of the Oral Cavity. 3rd ed. 242. Craig RM Jr., Vickers VA, Correll RW. Erythroplastic
WB Saunders, 1996. lesion on the mandibular marginal gingiva. J Am Dent
221. Jesse RH, BarkleyHTJr., Lindberg RD, et al. Cancer of the Assoc 1989; 119(4):543–544.
oral cavity. Is elective neck dissection beneficial? Am J 243. Krutchkoff DJ, Chen JK, Eisenberg E, et al. Oral cancer: a
Surg 1970; 120(4):505–508. survey of 566 cases from the University of Connecticut
222. Spiro RH, Strong EW. Epidermoid carcinoma of the Oral Pathology Biopsy Service, 1975–1986. Oral Surg Oral
mobile tongue. Treatment by partial glossectomy alone. Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70(2):192–198.
Am J Surg 1971; 122(6):707–710. 244. Makridis SD, Mellado JR, Freedman AL, et al. Squamous
223. Yco MS, Cruickshank JC. Treatment of stage I carcinoma cell carcinoma of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge: a
of the anterior floor of the mouth. Arch Otolaryngol Head clinicopathologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative
Neck Surg 1986; 112(10):1085–1089. Dent 1998; 18(3):292–298.
224. Fan KH, Lin CY, Kang CJ, et al. Combined-modality 245. Mattick WL, Meehan DJ. Carcinoma of the gum. Surgery
treatment for advanced oral tongue squamous cell carci- 1951; 29(2):249–254.
noma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67(2):453–461. 246. Soo KC, Spiro RH, King W, et al. Squamous carcinoma of
225. Menezes MB, Lehn CN, Goncalves AJ. Epidemiological the gums. Am J Surg 1988; 156(4):281–285.
and histopathological data and E-cadherin-like prognostic 247. Wilkins SA Jr., Vogler WR. Cancer of the gingiva. Surg
factors in early carcinomas of the tongue and floor of Gynecol Obstet 1957; 105(2):145–152.
mouth. Oral Oncol 2007; 43(7):656–661. 248. Yoon TY, Bhattacharyya I, Katz J, et al. Squamous cell
226. O’Brien CJ, Lahr CJ, Soong SJ, et al. Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the gingiva presenting as localized peri-
early-stage carcinoma of the oral tongue—wound adju- odontal disease. Quintessence Int 2007; 38(2):97–102.
vant treatment be beneficial? Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(6): 249. Heller AN, Klein A, Barocas A. Squamous cell carcinoma
401–408. of the gingiva presenting as an endoperiodontic lesion.
227. Shah JP, Cendon RA, Farr HW, et al. Carcinoma of the J Periodontol 1991; 62(9):573–575.
oral cavity. factors affecting treatment failure at the pri- 250. Levi PA Jr., Kim DM, Harsfield SL, et al. Squamous cell
mary site and neck. Am J Surg 1976; 132(4):504–507. carcinoma presenting as an endodontic-periodontic
228. Takagi M, Kayano T, Yamamoto H, et al. Causes of oral lesion. J Periodontol 2005; 76(10):1798–1804.
tongue cancer treatment failures. Analysis of autopsy 251. Seoane J, Varela-Centelles PI, Walsh TF, et al. Gingival
cases. Cancer 1992; 69(5):1081–1087. squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic delay or rapid inva-
229. Yamamoto E, Miyakawa A, Kohama G. Mode of invasion sion? J Periodontol 2006; 77(7):1229–1233.
and lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of 252. Nomura T, Shibahara T, Cui NH, et al. Patterns of
the oral cavity. Head Neck Surg 1984; 6(5):938–947. mandibular invasion by gingival squamous cell carcino-
230. Aygun C, Salazar OM, Sewchand W, et al. Carcinoma of ma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(10):1489–1493.
the floor of the mouth: a 20-year experience. Int J Radiat 253. Sasaki T, Imai Y, Fujibayashi T. New proposal for T
Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10(5):619–626. classification of gingival carcinomas arising in the maxilla.
231. Dinshaw KA, Agarwal JP, Ghosh-Laskar S, et al. Radical Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33(4):349–352.
radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: 254. Simental Aea. Cancer of the hard palate and maxillary
an analysis of prognostic and therapeutic factors. Clin alveolar ridge: technique and applications. Op Tech
Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18(5):383–389. Otolaryngol 2005; 16:28–35.
232. Fayos JV. Management of squamous cell carcinoma of the 255. Swearingen AG, McGraw JP, Palumbo VD. Roentgeno-
floor of the mouth. Am J Surg 1972; 123(6):706–711. graphic pathologic correlation of carcinoma of the gingiva
233. Liao CT, Wang HM, Hsieh LL, et al. Higher distant failure involving the mandible. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther
in young age tongue cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2006; 42 Nucl Med 1966; 96(1):15–18.
(7):718–725. 256. Yokoo S, Umeda M, Komatsubara H, et al. Evaluation
234. Sarkaria JN, Harari PM. Oral tongue cancer in young of T-classifications of upper gingival and hard palate
adults less than 40 years of age: rationale for aggressive carcinomas—a proposition for new criterion of T4. Oral
therapy. Head Neck 1994; 16(2):107–111. Oncol 2002; 38(4):378–382.
235. Dennington ML, Carter DR, Meyers AD. Distant metasta- 257. Holmstrup P, Pindborg JJ. Oral mucosal lesions in
ses in head and neck epidermoid carcinoma. Laryngo- smokeless tobacco users. CA Cancer J Clin 1988; 38(4):
scope 1980; 90(2):196–201. 230–235.
332 El-Mofty and Lewis
258. Landy JJ, White HJ. Buccogingival carcinoma of snuff 280. Silverman S. Oral Cancer. Atlanta, 1990.
dippers. Am Surg 1961; 27:442–447. 281. Pindborg JJ. Oral Cancer and Precancer. Bristol: John
259. Wynder EL, Bross IJ, Feldman RM. A study of the Wright and Son, 1980:86–93.
etiological factors in cancer of the mouth. Cancer 1957; 282. Shafer WH, Hine MK, Levy BM. A Textbook of Oral
10(6):1300–1323. Pathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1983:124–
260. Keller AZ, Terris M. The association of alcohol and 126.
tobacco with cancer of the mouth and pharynx. Am J 283. Fayos JV. Carcinoma of the mandible. Result of radiation
Public Health Nations Health 1965; 55(10):1578–1585. therapy. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 1973; 12(5):378–386.
261. Merletti F, Boffetta P, Ciccone G, et al. Role of tobacco and 284. Gilbert S, Tzadik A, Leonard G. Mandibular involvement
alcoholic beverages in the etiology of cancer of the oral by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1986; 96
cavity/oropharynx in Torino, Italy. Cancer Res 1989; 49 (1):96–101.
(17):4919–4924. 285. Erich JB, Kragh LV. Results of treatment os squamous-cell
262. Anil S, Beena VT, Nair RG. Squamous cell carcinoma of carcinoma arising in mandibular gingiva. AMA Arch
the gingiva in an HIV-positive patient: a case report. Dent Surg 1959; 79(1):100–105.
Update 1996; 23(10):424–425. 286. Marchetta FC, Sako K, Badillo J. Periosteal lymphatics of
263. Otsubo H, Yokoe H, Miya T, et al. Gingival squamous cell the mandible and intraoral carcinoma. Am J Surg 1964;
carcinoma in a patient with chronic graft-versus-host 108:505–507.
disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 287. Panagopoulos A. Bone involvement in maxillofacial can-
Endod 1997; 84(2):171–174. cer. Am J Surg 1959; 98:898–903.
264. Tenzer JA, Sugarman HM, Britton JC. Squamous cell 288. Whitehouse GH. Radiological bone changes produced
carcinoma of the gingiva found in a patient with AIDS. J by intraoral squamous carcinomata involving the lower
Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123(12):65–67. alveolus. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1976; 1(1):45–52.
265. Fettig A, Pogrel MA, Silverman S Jr., et al. Proliferative 289. Byers RM, Newman R, Russell N, et al. Results of treat-
verrucous leukoplakia of the gingiva. Oral Surg Oral Med ment for squamous carcinoma of the lower gum. Cancer
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90(6):723–730. 1981; 47(9):2236–2238.
266. Bagan JV, Jimenez Y, Sanchis JM, et al. Proliferative verru- 290. Gomez D, Faucher A, Picot V, et al. Outcome of squamous
cous leukoplakia: high incidence of gingival squamous cell cell carcinoma of the gingiva: a follow-up study of 83
carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2003; 32(7):379–382. cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000; 28(6):331–335.
267. Barasch A, Gofa A, Krutchkoff DJ, et al. Squamous cell 291. Munoz Guerra MF, Naval Gias L, Campo FR, et al.
carcinoma of the gingiva. A case series analysis. Oral Surg Marginal and segmental mandibulectomy in patients
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80(2): with oral cancer: a statistical analysis of 106 cases. J Oral
183–187. Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61(11):1289–1296.
268. Nathanson A, Jakobsson PA, Wersall J. Prognosis of 292. Wald RM Jr., Calcaterra TC. Lower alveolar carcinoma.
squamous-cell carcinoma of the gums. Acta Otolaryngol Segmental v marginal resection. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;
1973; 75(4):301–303. 109(9):578–582.
269. Martin H. Cancer of the gums (gingivae). Am J Surg 1941; 293. McGregor AD, MacDonald DG. Patterns of spread of
54(3):769–806. squamous cell carcinoma within the mandible. Head
270. Tolman A, Jerrold L, Alarbi M. Squamous cell carcinoma Neck 1989; 11(5):457–461.
of attached gingiva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 294. McGregor AD, MacDonald DG. Patterns of spread of
2007; 132(3):378–381. squamous cell carcinoma to the ramus of the mandible.
271. Bill TJ, Reddy VR, Ries KL, et al. Adolescent gingival Head Neck 1993; 15(5):440–444.
squamous cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of 295. Johnson NW. Orofacial neoplasms: global epidemiology,
the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol risk factors and recommendations for research. Int Dent J
Endod 2001; 91(6):682–685. 1991; 41(6):365–375.
272. Willen R, Nathanson A, Moberger G, et al. Squamous cell 296. Shingaki S, Nomura T, Takada M, et al. Squamous cell
carcinoma of the gingiva. Histological classification and carcinomas of the mandibular alveolus: analysis of prog-
grading of malignancy. Acta Otolaryngol 1975; 79(1–2): nostic factors. Oncology 2002; 62(1):17–24.
146–154. 297. Reddy CR. Carcinoma of hard palate in India in relation
273. Chen JK, Katz RV, Krutchkoff DJ. Intraoral squamous cell to reverse smoking of chuttas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1974; 53
carcinoma. Epidemiologic patterns in Connecticut from (3):615–619.
1935 to 1985. Cancer 1990; 66(6):1288–1296. 298. Waldron CA, el-Mofty SK, Gnepp DR. Tumors of the
274. Lipkin A, Miller RH, Woodson GE. Squamous cell carci- intraoral minor salivary glands: a demographic and his-
noma of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx in young tologic study of 426 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
adults. Laryngoscope 1985; 95(7 pt 1):790–793. 1988; 66(3):323–333.
275. Schwartz S, Shklar G. Reaction of alveolar bone to inva- 299. Chung CK, Rahman SM, Lim ML, et al. Squamous cell
sion of oral carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol carcinoma of the hard palate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1967; 24(1):33–37. 1979; 5(2):191–196.
276. Suei Y, Tanimoto K, Taguchi A, et al. Mucosal condition 300. Evans JF, Shah JP. Epidermoid carcinoma of the palate.
of the oral cavity and sites of origin of squamous cell Am J Surg 1981; 142(4):451–455.
carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53(2):144–147; 301. Martin H. Tumors of the palate (benign and malignant).
discussion 8. Arch Surg 1942; 44:599–635.
277. Torabinejad M, Rick GM. Squamous cell carcinoma of the 302. Ratzer ER, Schweitzer RJ, Frazell EL. Epidermoid carcinoma
gingiva. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100(6):870–872. of the palate. Am J Surg 1970; 119(3):294–297.
278. MacComb WS, Fletcher GH, Healey JE Jr. Intra-oral cavi- 303. Petruzzelli GJ, Myers EN. Malignant neoplasms of the
ty. In: MacComb WS, Fletcher GH, ed. Cancer of the Head hard palate and upper alveolar ridge. Oncology (Williston
and Neck. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1967:89–151. Park) 1994; 8(4):43–48 (discussion 50, 3).
279. Waldron CA. Oral epithelial tumors. In: Gorlin RJ, 304. Yorozu A, Sykes AJ, Slevin NJ. Carcinoma of the hard
Goldman HM, eds. Thomas’ Oral Pathology. St. Louis, palate treated with radiotherapy: a retrospective review of
MO: CV Mosby, 1970:834–835. 31 cases. Oral Oncol 2001; 37(6):493–497.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 333
305. Kovalic JJ, Simpson JR. Carcinoma of the hard palate. 326. Horton D, Tran L, Greenberg P, et al. Primary radiation
J Otolaryngol 1993; 22(2):118–120. therapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of
306. Eneroth CM, Hjertman L, Moberger G. Squamous cell the soft palate. Cancer 1989; 63(12):2442–2445.
carcinomas of the palate. Acta Otolaryngol 1972; 73(5): 327. Leemans CR, Engelbrecht WJ, Tiwari R, et al. Carcinoma
418–427. of the soft palate and anterior tonsillar pillar. Laryngo-
307. Simental AA Jr., Johnson JT, Myers EN. Cervical metasta- scope 1994; 104(12):1477–1481.
sis from squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary alveo- 328. Sweet RM, Corio RL, Kornblut AD. Squamous carcinoma
lus and hard palate. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(9):1682–1684. of the uvula. South Med J 1981; 74(6):681–683, 687.
308. Antoniades K, Lazaridis N, Vahtsevanos K, et al. Treat- 329. Weber RS, Peters LJ, Wolf P, et al. Squamous cell carcino-
ment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior faucial ma of the soft palate, uvula, and anterior faucial pillar.
pillar-retromolar trigone. Oral Oncol 2003; 39(7):680–686. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 99(1):16–23.
309. Kowalski LP, Hashimoto I, Magrin J. End results of 114 330. Chung CK, Constable WC. Squamous cell carcinoma of
extended ‘‘commando’’ operations for retromolar trigone the soft palate and uvula. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
carcinoma. Am J Surg 1993; 166(4):374–379. 1979; 5(6):845–850.
310. Byers RM, Anderson B, Schwarz EA, et al. Treatment of 331. Russ JE, Applebaum EL, Sisson GA. Squamous cell carcinoma
squamous carcinoma of the retromolar trigone. Am J Clin of the soft palate. Laryngoscope 1977; 87(7):1151–1156.
Oncol 1984; 7(6):647–652. 332. Cheng VS, Shetty KS, Deutsch M. Carcinomas of the
311. Lo K, Fletcher GH, Byers RM, et al. Results of irradiation anterior tonsillar pillar and the soft palate—uvula: treat-
in the squamous cell carcinomas of the anterior faucial ment by radiation therapy. Radiology 1980; 134(2):497–450.
pillar-retromolar trigone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 333. Tandon DA, Bahadur S, Rath GK. Carcinoma of the soft
1987; 13(7):969–974. palate. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106(2):130–132.
312. Brennan CT, Sessions DG, Spitznagel EL Jr., et al. Surgical 334. Morse DE, Kerr AR. Disparities in oral and pharyngeal
pathology of cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. cancer incidence, mortality and survival among black and
Laryngoscope 1991; 101(11):1175–1197. white Americans. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(2):203–212.
313. Fletcher GH, Lindberg RD. Squamous cell carcinomas of 335. Garrett PG, Beale FA. Carcinoma of the oropharynx: soft
the tonsillar area and palatine arch. Am J Roentgenol palate. J Otolaryngol 1984; 13(3):165–168.
Radium Ther Nucl Med 1966; 96(3):574–587. 336. Hansen E, Panwala K, Holland J. Post-operative radiation
314. Lane AP, Buckmire RA, Mukherji SK, et al. Use of therapy for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer.
computed tomography in the assessment of mandibular J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116(11):920–924.
invasion in carcinoma of the retromolar trigone. Otolar- 337. Har-El G, Shaha A, Chaudry R, et al. Carcinoma of the
yngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122(5):673–677. uvula and midline soft palate: indication for neck treat-
315. Crecco M, Vidiri A, Angelone ML, et al. Retromolar ment. Head Neck 1992; 14(2):99–101.
trigone tumors: evaluation by magnetic resonance imag- 338. Olasz L, Nyarady Z, Nemeth A, et al. Failure of alkylating
ing and correlation with pathological data. Eur J Radiol agents to improve induction chemotherapy of oropharyn-
1999; 32(3):182–188. geal squamous cell cancer. Anticancer Res 2004; 24(4):
316. Ayad T, Gelinas M, Guertin L, et al. Retromolar trigone 2557–2561.
carcinoma treated by primary radiation therapy: an alter- 339. Barzan L, Barra S, Franchin G, et al. Squamous cell
native to the primary surgical approach. Arch Otolar- carcinoma of the posterior pharyngeal wall: character-
yngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 131(7):576–582. istics compared with the lateral wall. J Laryngol Otol
317. Genden EM, Ferlito A, Shaha AR, et al. Management of 1995; 109(2):120–125.
cancer of the retromolar trigone. Oral Oncol 2003; 39(7): 340. Chang L, Stevens KR, Moss WT, et al. Squamous cell
633–637. carcinoma of the pharyngeal walls treated with radiother-
318. Glenn MG, Komisar A, Laramore GE. Cost-benefit man- apy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 35(3):477–483.
agement decisions for carcinoma of the retromolar trig- 341. Civantos FG, Goodwin WJ Jr. Cancer of the Oropharynx.
one. Head Neck 1995; 17(5):419–424. In: Myers EN, Suen JY, ed. Cancer of the Head and Neck.
319. Shumrick DA, Quenelle DJ. Malignant disease of the 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996:361–380.
tonsillar region, retromolar trigone, and buccal mucosa. 342. Cooper RA, Slevin NJ, Carrington BM, et al. Radiotherapy
Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1979; 12(1):115–124. for carcinoma of the posterior pharyngeal wall. Int J Oncol
320. Skolnik EM, Campbell JM, Meyers RM. Carcinoma of the 2000; 16(3):611–615.
buccal mucosa and retromolar area. Otolaryngol Clin 343. Hart AA, Mak-Kregar S, Hilgers FJ, et al. The importance of
North Am 1972; 5(2):327–331. correct stage grouping in oncology. Results of a nationwide
321. Huang CJ, Chao KS, Tsai J, et al. Cancer of retromolar study of oropharyngeal carcinoma in The Netherlands.
trigone: long-term radiation therapy outcome. Head Neck Cancer 1995; 75(11):2656–2662.
2001; 23(9):758–763. 344. Hull MC, Morris CG, Tannehill SP, et al. Definitive
322. Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Amdur RJ, et al. Retromolar radiotherapy alone or combined with a planned neck
trigone squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the pharyngeal
alone or combined with surgery. Cancer 2005; 103(11): wall. Cancer 2003; 98(10):2224–2231.
2320–2325. 345. Jones AS, Stell PM. Squamous carcinoma of the posterior
323. Canto MT, Devesa SS. Oral cavity and pharynx cancer pharyngeal wall. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1991; 16(5):
incidence rates in the United States, 1975-1998. Oral Oncol 462–465.
2002; 38(6):610–617. 346. Mak-Kregar S, Keus RB, Balm AJ, et al. Carcinoma of the
324. Douglas WG, Rigual NR, Giese W, et al. Advanced soft soft palate and the posterior oropharyngeal wall. Clin
palate cancer: the clinical importance of the parapharyng- Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994; 19(1):22–27.
eal space. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133(1):66–69. 347. Marks JE, Smith PG, Sessions DG. Pharyngeal wall cancer.
325. Fee WE Jr., Schoeppel SL, Rubenstein R, et al. Squamous A reappraisal after comparison of treatment methods.
cell carcinoma of the soft palate. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111(2):79–85.
105(12):710–718. 348. Spiro RH, Kelly J, Vega AL, et al. Squamous carcinoma of
the posterior pharyngeal wall. Am J Surg 1990; 160(4):
420–423.
334 El-Mofty and Lewis
349. Teichgraeber JF, McConnel FM. Treatment of posterior 369. Fleming PM, Matz GJ, Powell WJ, et al. Carcinoma of the
pharyngeal wall carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg tonsil. Surg Clin North Am 1976; 56(1):125–136.
1986; 94(3):287–290. 370. Jaulerry C, Rodriguez J, Brunin F, et al. Results of radia-
350. Jesse RH, Fletcher GH. Metastases in cervical lymph tion therapy in carcinoma of the base of the tongue. The
nodes from oropharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment and Curie Institute experience with about 166 cases. Cancer
results. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1963; 1991; 67(6):1532–1538.
90:990–996. 371. Kraus DH, Vastola AP, Huvos AG, et al. Surgical man-
351. Weller SA, Goffinet DR, Goode RL, et al. Carcinoma of the agement of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the
oropharynx. Results of megavoltage radiation therapy in tongue. Am J Surg 1993; 166(4):384–388.
305 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976; 126(2):236–247. 372. Mak-Kregar S, Hilgers FJ, Baris G, et al. Carcinoma of the
352. Cunningham MP, Catlin D. Cancer of the pharyngeal tonsillar region: comparison of two staging systems and
wall. Cancer 1967; 20(11):1859–1866. analysis of prognostic factors. Laryngoscope 1990; 100(6):
353. Meoz-Mendez RT, Fletcher GH, Guillamondegui OM, et 634–638.
al. Analysis of the results of irradiation in the treatment of 373. Perez CA, Carmichael T, Devineni VR, et al. Carcinoma of
squamous cell carcinomas of the pharyngeal walls. Int J the tonsillar fossa: a nonrandomized comparison of irra-
Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978; 4(7–8):579–585. diation alone or combined with surgery: long-term
354. Fein DA, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, et al. Pharyngeal results. Head Neck 1991; 13(4):282–290.
wall carcinoma treated with radiotherapy: impact of 374. Quenelle DJ, Crissman JD, Shumrick DA. Tonsil
treatment technique and fractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol carcinoma—treatment results. Laryngoscope 1979; 89(11):
Biol Phys 1993; 26(5):751–757. 1842–1846.
355. Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Mancuso AA, et al. Squa- 375. Remmler D, Medina JE, Byers RM, et al. Treatment of
mous cell carcinoma of the pharyngeal wall treated with choice for squamous carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa.
irradiation. Radiother Oncol 1988; 11(3):205–212. Head Neck Surg 1985; 7(3):206–211.
356. Talton BM, Elkon D, Kim JA, et al. Cancer of the posterior 376. Spiro JD, Spiro RH. Carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa. An
hypopharyngeal wall. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1981; update. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115(10):
7(5):597–599. 1186–1189.
357. Schwartz SM, Daling JR, Doody DR, et al. Oral cancer risk in 377. Suarez C, Rodrigo JP, Herranz J, et al. Extended supra-
relation to sexual history and evidence of human papillo- glottic laryngectomy for primary base of tongue carcino-
mavirus infection. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90(21): 1626–1636. mas. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996; 21(1):37–41.
358. Hemminki K, Dong C, Frisch M. Tonsillar and other 378. Tong D, Laramore GE, Griffin TW, et al. Carcinoma of the
upper aerodigestive tract cancers among cervical cancer tonsillar region: results of external irradiation. Cancer
patients and their husbands. Eur J Cancer Prev 2000; 9(6): 1982; 49(10):2009–2014.
433–437. 379. Weber PC, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Squamous cell carcinoma
359. Schantz SP, Byers RM, Goepfert H, et al. The implication of the base of tongue. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993;
of tobacco use in the young adult with head and neck 250(2):63–68.
cancer. Cancer 1988; 62(7):1374–1380. 380. al-Abdulwahed S, Kudryk W, al-Rajhi N, et al. Carcinoma
360. Snijders PJ, Scholes AG, Hart CA, et al. Prevalence of of the tonsil: prognostic factors. J Otolaryngol 1997; 26(5):
mucosotropic human papillomaviruses in squamous-cell 296–299.
carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Cancer 1996; 66(4): 381. Charbonneau N, Gelinas M, del Vecchio P, et al. Primary
464–469. radiotherapy for tonsillar carcinoma: a good alternative to
361. Barrs DM, DeSanto LW, O’Fallon WM. Squamous cell a surgical approach. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35(4):227–234.
carcinoma of the tonsil and tongue-base region. Arch 382. Foote RL, Schild SE, Thompson WM, et al. Tonsil cancer.
Otolaryngol 1979; 105(8):479–485. Patterns of failure after surgery alone and surgery com-
362. Givens CD Jr., Johns ME, Cantrell RW. Carcinoma of the bined with postoperative radiation therapy. Cancer 1994;
tonsil. Analysis of 162 cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107(12): 73(10):2638–2647.
730–734. 383. Genden EM, Ferlito A, Scully C, et al. Current manage-
363. Seda HJ, Snow JB Jr. Carcinoma of the tonsil. Arch ment of tonsillar cancer. Oral Oncol 2003; 39(4):337–342.
Otolaryngol 1969; 89(5):756–761. 384. Gourin CG, Johnson JT. Surgical treatment of squamous
364. Beaty MM, Funk GF, Karnell LH, et al. Risk factors for cell carcinoma of the base of tongue. Head Neck 2001;
malignancy in adult tonsils. Head Neck 1998; 20(5):399–403. 23(8):653–660.
365. Guntinas-Lichius O, Peter Klussmann J, Dinh S, et al. 385. Jones AS, Rafferty M, Fenton JE, et al. Treatment of
Diagnostic work-up and outcome of cervical metastases squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue base: irradiation,
from an unknown primary. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126 surgery, or palliation? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;
(5):536–544. 116(2):92–99.
366. Begum S, Gillison ML, Ansari-Lari MA, et al. Detection of 386. Lee HJ, Zelefsky MJ, Kraus DH, et al. Long-term regional
human papillomavirus in cervical lymph nodes: a highly control after radiation therapy and neck dissection for
effective strategy for localizing site of tumor origin. Clin base of tongue carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Cancer Res 2003; 9(17):6469–6475. 1997; 38(5):995–1000.
367. Zhang MQ, El-Mofty SK, Davila RM. Detection of human 387. Machtay M, Perch S, Markiewicz D, et al. Combined
papilloma virus (HPV)—related squamous cell carcinoma surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of
cytologically and by in situ hybridization (ISH) in fine the base of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the base of
needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of cervical metastasis: a tongue: analysis of treatment outcome and prognostic
tool for identifying the site of an occult head and neck value of margin status. Head Neck 1997; 19(6):494–499.
primary. Cancer Cytopathol 2008; 114:118–123. 388. Mak AC, Morrison WH, Garden AS, et al. Base-of-tongue
368. Barkley HT Jr., Fletcher GH, Jesse RH, et al. Management carcinoma: treatment results using concomitant boost
of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 33(2):
carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa, base of tongue, supra- 289–296.
glottic larynx, and hypopharynx. Am J Surg 1972; 124(4): 389. Malone JP, Stephens JA, Grecula JC, et al. Disease control,
462–467. survival, and functional outcome after multimodal
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 335
treatment for advanced-stage tongue base cancer. Head 410. Hoffmann M, Lohrey C, Hunziker A, et al. Human
Neck 2004; 26(7):561–572. papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 genotypes in head-
390. Perez CA, Patel MM, Chao KS, et al. Carcinoma of the and-neck carcinomas. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(5):520–524.
tonsillar fossa: prognostic factors and long-term therapy 411. Paz IB, Cook N, Odom-Maryon T, et al. Human papillo-
outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42(5): mavirus (HPV) in head and neck cancer. An association of
1077–1084. HPV 16 with squamous cell carcinoma of Waldeyer’s
391. Sessions DG, Lenox J, Spector GJ, et al. Analysis of tonsillar ring. Cancer 1997; 79(3):595–604.
treatment results for base of tongue cancer. Laryngoscope 412. Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, et al. Human papillo-
2003; 113(7):1252–1261. mavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcino-
392. Whicker JH, DeSanto LW, Devine KD. Surgical treatment mas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol
of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue. Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14(2):467–475.
Laryngoscope 1972; 82(10):1853–1860. 413. Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus-associated head and
393. Shumrick DA, Gluckman JL. Cancer of the oropharynx. neck cancer is a distinct epidemiologic, clinical, and
In: Suen JY, Meyers EN, ed. Cancer of the Head and Neck. molecular entity. Semin Oncol 2004; 31(6):744–754.
New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1981:342–371. 414. Dahlstrom KR, Adler-Storthz K, Etzel CJ, et al. Human
394. Sessions DG, Stallings JO, Brownson RJ, et al. Total papillomavirus type 16 infection and squamous cell carci-
glossectomy for advanced carcinoma of the base of the noma of the head and neck in never-smokers: a matched
tongue. Laryngoscope 1973; 83(1):39–50. pair analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9(7):2620–2626.
395. Effron MZ, Johnson JT, Myers EN, et al. Advanced carcino- 415. Hansson BG, Rosenquist K, Antonsson A, et al. Strong
ma of the tongue. Management by total glossectomy with- association between infection with human papillomavirus
out laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107(11): 694–697. and oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a
396. Dasmahapatra KS, Mohit-Tabatabai MA, Rush BF Jr., et al. population-based case-control study in southern Sweden.
Cancer of the tonsil. Improved survival with combination Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125(12):1337–1344.
therapy. Cancer 1986; 57(3):451–455. 416. Herrero R, Castellsague X, Pawlita M, et al. Human
397. Mizono GS, Diaz RF, Fu KK, et al. Carcinoma of the papillomavirus and oral cancer: the International Agency
tonsillar region. Laryngoscope 1986; 96(3):240–244. for Research on Cancer multicenter study. J Natl Cancer
398. Sanghvi V. The new combined surgical approach for Inst 2003; 95(23):1772–1783.
cancer involving the base of tongue-supraglottic complex. 417. Maden C, Beckmann AM, Thomas DB, et al. Human
Laryngoscope 1994; 104(6 pt 1):725–730. papillomaviruses, herpes simplex viruses, and the risk
399. Schleuning AJ II, Summers GW. Carcinoma of the tongue: of oral cancer in men. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135(10):
review of 220 cases. Laryngoscope 1972; 82(8):1446–1454. 1093–1102.
400. Zeitels SM, Vaughan CW. Tongue-base-cancer resection 418. Rosenquist K, Wennerberg J, Schildt EB, et al. Oral status,
with partial supraglottic laryngectomy. Am J Otolaryngol oral infections and some lifestyle factors as risk factors for
1994; 15(3):197–203. oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. A
401. Chung TS, Stefani S. Distant metastases of carcinoma of population-based case-control study in southern Sweden.
tonsillar region: a study of 475 patients. J Surg Oncol 1980; Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125(12):1327–1336.
14(1):5–9. 419. Smith EM, Ritchie JM, Summersgill KF, et al. Human
402. Dahlgren L, Dahlstrand HM, Lindquist D, et al. Human papillomavirus in oral exfoliated cells and risk of head
papillomavirus is more common in base of tongue than in and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96(6):449–455.
mobile tongue cancer and is a favorable prognostic factor 420. Smith EM, Ritchie JM, Summersgill KF, et al. Age, sexual
in base of tongue cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2004; 112(6): behavior and human papillomavirus infection in oral
1015–1019. cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Int J Cancer 2004; 108
403. Li W, Thompson CH, O’Brien CJ, et al. Human papillo- (5):766–772.
mavirus positivity predicts favourable outcome for squa- 421. El-mofty SK, Zhang MQ, Davila RM. Detection of HPV in
mous carcinoma of the tonsil. Int J Cancer 2003; 106(4): metastatic ssquamous cell carcinoma in cervical lymph
553–558. nodes: a tool for the identification of the site of occult head
404. Lindel K, Beer KT, Laissue J, et al. Human papillomavirus and neck primary. Mod Pathol 2007; 20:1016a.
positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a 422. Brizel DM, Wasserman TH, Henke M, et al. Phase III
radiosensitive subgroup of head and neck carcinoma. randomized trial of amifostine as a radioprotector in head
Cancer 2001; 92(4):805–813. and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(19):3339–3345.
405. Mellin H, Friesland S, Lewensohn R, et al. Human papil- 423. Davidson BJ, Spiro RH, Patel S, et al. Cervical metastases
lomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: clinical corre- of occult origin: the impact of combined modality therapy.
lates, risk of relapse, and survival. Int J Cancer 2000; 89 Am J Surg 1994; 168(5):395–399.
(3):300–304. 424. Nieder C, Gregoire V, Ang KK. Cervical lymph node
406. Ritchie JM, Smith EM, Summersgill KF, et al. Human metastases from occult squamous cell carcinoma: cut
papillomavirus infection as a prognostic factor in carcino- down a tree to get an apple? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
mas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Int J Cancer 2003; Phys 2001; 50(3):727–733.
104(3):336–344. 425. Herbsleb M, Knudsen UB, Orntoft TF, et al. Telomerase
407. Weinberger PM, Yu Z, Haffty BG, et al. Molecular classi- activity, MIB-1, PCNA, HPV 16 and p53 as diagnostic
fication identifies a subset of human papillomavirus— markers for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Apmis 2001;
associated oropharyngeal cancers with favorable progno- 109(9):607–617.
sis. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(5):736–747. 426. Keating JT, Cviko A, Riethdorf S, et al. Ki-67, cyclin E, and
408. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human p16INK4 are complimentary surrogate biomarkers for
papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical human papilloma virus-related cervical neoplasia. Am J
cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999; 189(1):12–19. Surg Pathol 2001; 25(7):884–891.
409. Morice WG, Ferreiro JA. Distinction of basaloid squamous 427. Klaes R, Friedrich T, Spitkovsky D, et al. Overexpression
cell carcinoma from adenoid cystic and small cell undif- of p16(INK4A) as a specific marker for dysplastic and
ferentiated carcinoma by immunohistochemistry. Hum neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri. Int J Cancer
Pathol 1998; 29(6):609–612. 2001; 92(2):276–284.
336 El-Mofty and Lewis
428. Lu DW, El-Mofty SK, Wang HL. Expression of p16, Rb, pathologic and immunohistochemical study of 40 cases.
and p53 proteins in squamous cell carcinomas of the Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16(10):939–946.
anorectal region harboring human papillomavirus DNA. 447. Luna MA, el Naggar A, Parichatikanond P, et al. Basaloid
Mod Pathol 2003; 16(7):692–699. squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.
429. Khleif SN, DeGregori J, Yee CL, et al. Inhibition of cyclin Clinicopathologic and DNA flow cytometric analysis.
D-CDK4/CDK6 activity is associated with an E2F- Cancer 1990; 66(3):537–542.
mediated induction of cyclin kinase inhibitor activity. 448. Klijanienko J, el-Naggar A, Ponzio-Prion A, et al. Basaloid
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93(9):4350–4354. squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Immunohis-
430. Phelps WC, Barnes JA, Lobe DC. Molecular targets for tochemical comparison with adenoid cystic carcinoma
human papillomaviruses: prospects for antiviral therapy. and squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Antivir Chem Chemother 1998; 9(5):359–377. Neck Surg 1993; 119(8):887–890.
431. Wilczynski SP, Lin BT, Xie Y, et al. Detection of human 449. Wan SK, Chan JK, Tse KC. Basaloid-squamous carcinoma
papillomavirus DNA and oncoprotein overexpression are of the nasal cavity. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106(4):370–371.
associated with distinct morphological patterns of tonsil- 450. Wieneke JA, Thompson LD, Wenig BM. Basaloid squa-
lar squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 1998; 152 mous cell carcinoma of the sinonasal tract. Cancer 1999;
(1):145–156. 85(4):841–854.
432. Boyer SN, Wazer DE, Band V. E7 protein of human 451. Abiko Y, Muramatsu T, Tanaka Y, et al. Basaloid-
papilloma virus-16 induces degradation of retinoblastoma squamous cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa: report of
protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Can- two cases and study of the proliferative activity. Pathol Int
cer Res 1996; 56(20):4620–4624. 1998; 48(6):460–466.
433. Dyson N, Howley PM, Munger K, et al. The human 452. Cadier MA, Kelly SA, Parkhouse N, et al. Basaloid squa-
papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the mous carcinoma of the buccal cavity. Head Neck 1992;
retinoblastoma gene product. Science 1989; 243(4893): 14(5):387–391.
934–937. 453. Campman SC, Gandour-Edwards RF, Sykes JM. Basaloid
434. van Houten VM, Snijders PJ, van den Brekel MW, et al. squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Report of a
Biological evidence that human papillomaviruses are case occurring in the anterior floor of the mouth. Arch
etiologically involved in a subgroup of head and neck Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118(12):1229–1232.
squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 2001; 93(2): 454. Coletta RD, Cotrim P, Almeida OP, et al. Basaloid squa-
232–235. mous carcinoma of oral cavity: a histologic and immuno-
435. Boyle JO, Hakim J, Koch W, et al. The incidence of p53 histochemical study. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(7):723–729.
mutations increases with progression of head and neck 455. Coppola D, Catalano E, Tang CK, et al. Basaloid squa-
cancer. Cancer Res 1993; 53(19):4477–4480. mous cell carcinoma of floor of mouth. Cancer 1993;
436. Field JK, Zoumpourlis V, Spandidos DA, et al. p53 72(8):2299–2305.
expression and mutations in squamous cell carcinoma of 456. Hellquist HB, Dahl F, Karlsson MG, et al. Basaloid squa-
the head and neck: expression correlates with the patients’ mous cell carcinoma of the palate. Histopathology 1994;
use of tobacco and alcohol. Cancer Detect Prev 1994; 18(3): 25(2):178–180.
197–208. 457. Ide F, Shimoyama T, Horie N, et al. Basaloid squamous cell
437. Hafkamp HC, Manni JJ, Speel EJ. Role of human papillo- carcinoma of the oral mucosa: a new case and review of 45
mavirus in the development of head and neck squamous cases in the literature. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(1):120–124.
cell carcinomas. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124(4):520–526. 458. Lovejoy HM, Matthews BL. Basaloid-squamous carcinoma
438. Evans AT, Guthrie W. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the palate. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 106(2):
of the uvula and soft palate: a rare lesion in an unusual 159–162.
site. Histopathology 1991; 19(2):184–186. 459. Raslan WF, Barnes L, Krause JR, et al. Basaloid squamous
439. Chow TL, Chow TK, Lui YH, et al. Lymphoepithelioma- cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic
like carcinoma of oral cavity: report of three cases and and flow cytometric study of 10 new cases with review of
literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31(2): the English literature. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15(3):
212–218. 204–211.
440. Weiss LM, Movahed LA, Butler AE, et al. Analysis of 460. Seidman JD, Berman JJ, Yost BA, et al. Basaloid squamous
lymphoepithelioma and lymphoepithelioma-like carcino- carcinoma of the hypopharynx and larynx associated with
mas for Epstein-Barr viral genomes by in situ hybridiza- second primary tumors. Cancer 1991; 68(7):1545–1549.
tion. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13(8):625–631. 461. Khaldi L, Apostolidis T, Pappa DA, et al. Basaloid squa-
441. Klijanienko J, Micheau C, Azli N, et al. Undifferentiated mous carcinoma of the larynx. A potential diagnostic
carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type of tonsil. Arch Otolar- pitfall. Ann Diagn Pathol 2006; 10(5):297–300.
yngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115(6):731–734. 462. McKay MJ, Bilous AM. Basaloid-squamous carcinoma of
442. Bansberg SF, Olsen KD, Gaffey TA. Lymphoepithelioma the hypopharynx. Cancer 1989; 63(12):2528–2531.
of the oropharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 100 463. Rodriguez Tojo MJ, Garcia Cano FJ, Infante Sanchez JC, et
(4):303–307. al. Immunoexpression of p53, Ki-67 and E-cadherin in
443. Nicholls JM, Pittaluga S, Chung LP, et al. The association basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Clin
between carcinoma of the tonsil and Epstein-Barr virus—a Transl Oncol 2005; 7(3):110–114.
study using radiolabelled in situ hybridization. Pathology 464. Bahar G, Feinmesser R, Popovtzer A, et al. Basaloid
1994; 26(2):94–98. squamous carcinoma of the larynx. Am J Otolaryngol
444. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. World Health 2003; 24(3):204–208.
Organization. Classification of Tumors: Pathology and 465. Winzenburg SM, Niehans GA, George E, et al. Basaloid
Genetics Head and Neck Tumors. Lyon: IARC press, 2005. squamous carcinoma: a clinical comparison of two histo-
445. Wain SL, Kier R, Vollmer RT, et al. Basaloid-squamous logic types with poorly differentiated squamous cell carci-
carcinoma of the tongue, hypopharynx, and larynx: report noma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 119(5):471–475.
of 10 cases. Hum Pathol 1986; 17(11):1158–1166. 466. Kim JY, Cho KJ, Lee SS, et al. Clinicopathologic study of
446. Banks ER, Frierson HF Jr., Mills SE, et al. Basaloid basaloid squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive
squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A clinico- tract. J Korean Med Sci 1998; 13(3):269–274.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 337
467. Ishikawa O, Matsui Y, Aoki I, et al. Adenosquamous review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
carcinoma of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic study and Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85(2):178–184.
report of three cases. Cancer 1980; 46(5):1192–1196. 487. Mingazzini PL, Barsotti P, Malchiodi Albedi F. Adenosqu-
468. Barnes L, Johnson JT. Pathologic and Clinical Consider- amous carcinoma of the stomach: histological, histochemi-
ations in the Evaluation of Major Head and Neck Speci- cal and ultrastructural observations. Histopathology 1983;
mens Resected for Cancer. Part 1. New York: Appleton- 7(3):433–443.
Century-Croft; 1986. 488. Saito R, Davis BK, Ollapally EP. Adenosquamous carci-
469. Oikawa K, Tabuchi K, Nomura M, et al. Basaloid squa- noma of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1984; 15(1):87–89.
mous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: a report of 489. Weidner N, Foucar E. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the
two cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 2007; 34(1):119–123. skin. An aggressive mucin- and gland-forming squamous
470. Shimaoka K, Tsukada Y. Squamous cell carcinomas and carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 1985; 121(6):775–779.
adenosquamous carcinomas originating from the thyroid 490. Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR. Adenosquamous carci-
gland. Cancer 1980; 46(8):1833–1842. noma. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical
471. Cabanillas R, Rodrigo JP, Ferlito A, et al. Is there an Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saun-
epidemiological link between human papillomavirus ders, 1991:455–459.
DNA and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the phar- 491. Napier SS, Gormely JS, Newlands C, et al. Adenosqua-
ynx? Oral Oncol 2007; 43(4):327–332. mous carcinoma. A rare neoplasm with an aggressive
472. Coletta RD, Cotrim P, Vargas PA, et al. Basaloid squa- course. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
mous carcinoma of the oral cavity: report of 2 cases and Endod 1995; 79(5):607–611.
study of AgNOR, PCNA, p53, and MMP expression. Oral 492. Sanner JR. Combined adenosquamous carcinoma and
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; ductal adenoma of the hard and soft palate: report of
91(5):563–569. case. J Oral Surg 1979; 37(5):331–334.
473. Salerno G, Di Vizio D, Staibano S, et al. Prognostic value 493. Johnson WC, Helwig EB. Adenoid squamous cell carcino-
of p27Kip1 expression in Basaloid Squamous Cell Carci- ma (adenoacanthoma). A clinicopathologic study of 155
noma of the larynx. BMC Cancer 2006; 6:146. patients. Cancer 1966; 19(11):1639–1650.
474. Barnes L, Ferlito A, Altavilla G, et al. Basaloid squamous 494. Muller SA, Wilhelmj CM Jr., Harrison EG Jr., et al.
cell carcinoma of the head and neck: clinicopathological Adenoid Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Adenoacanthoma
features and differential diagnosis. Ann Otol Rhinol of Lever). Report of Seven Cases and Review. Arch
Laryngol 1996; 105(1):75–82. Dermatol 1964; 89:589–597.
475. Emanuel P, Wang B, Wu M, et al. p63 Immunohistochem- 495. Blackburn TK, Macpherson D, Conroy B. Primary ade-
istry in the distinction of adenoid cystic carcinoma from noid squamous cell carcinoma of the upper lip associated
basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2005; 18 with a locoregional metastasis: a case report and review of
(5):645–650. the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57(5):612–616.
476. Lu SY, Eng HL, Huang CC, et al. Basaloid squamous cell 496. Caya JG, Hidayat AA, Weiner JM. A clinicopathologic
carcinoma of the sinonasal tract: report of two cases. study of 21 cases of adenoid squamous cell carcinoma of
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134(5):883–885. the eyelid and periorbital region. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;
477. Gerughty RM, Hennigar GR, Brown FM. Adenosquamous 99(3):291–297.
carcinoma of the nasal, oral and laryngeal cavities. A 497. Jacoway JR, Nelson JF, Boyers RC. Adenoid squamous-
clinicopathologic survey of ten cases. Cancer 1968; 22(6): cell carcinoma (adenocanthoma) of the oral labial mucosa.
1140–1155. A clinicopathologic study of fifteen cases. Oral Surg Oral
478. Abdelsayed RA, Sangueza OP, Newhouse RF, et al. Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32(3):444–449.
Adenosquamous carcinoma: a case report with immuno- 498. Tomich CE, Hutton CE. Adenoid squamous cell carcinoma
histochemical evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol of the lip: report of cases. J Oral Surg 1972; 30(8):592–598.
Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85(2):173–177. 499. Weitzner S. Adenoid squamous-cell carcinoma of vermil-
479. Keelawat S, Liu CZ, Roehm PC, et al. Adenosquamous ion mucosa of lower lip. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: a clinicopath- 1974; 37(4):589–593.
ologic study of 12 cases and review of the literature. Am J 500. Lever WF. Adenoacanthoma of sweat glands: Carcinoma
Otolaryngol 2002; 23(3):160–168. of sweat gland with glandular and epidermal elements.
480. Martinez-Madrigal F, Baden E, Casiraghi O, et al. Oral Report of 4 cases. Arch Dermatol Syphilol 1947; 56:157–171.
and pharyngeal adenosquamous carcinoma. A report of 501. Jones AC, Freedman PD, Kerpel SM. Oral adenoid squa-
four cases with immunohistochemical studies. Eur Arch mous cell carcinoma: a report of three cases and review of
Otorhinolaryngol 1991; 248(5):255–258. the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51(6):676–681.
481. Siar CH, Ng KH. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the floor 502. Goldman RL, Klein HZ, Sung M. Adenoid squamous cell
of the mouth and lower alveolus: a radiation-induced carcinoma of the oral cavity: report of the first case arising
lesion? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 63(2):216–220. in the tongue. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103(8):496–498.
482. Thompson LDR. Squamous cell carcinoma variants of the 503. Takagi M, Sakota Y, Takayama S, et al. Adenoid squa-
head and neck. Curr Diagn Pathol 2003; 9(6):384–396. mous cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa: report of two
483. Cerezo L, Alvarez M, Edwards O, et al. Adenosquamous autopsy cases. Cancer 1977; 40(5):2250–2255.
carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28(8): 504. Ackerman L. Verrucous carcinoma of the oral cavity.
597–603. Surgery 1948; 23:670–678.
484. Fitzgibbons PL, Kern WH. Adenosquamous carcinoma of 505. Batsakis JG, Hybels R, Crissman JD, et al. The pathology
the lung: a clinical and pathologic study of seven cases. of head and neck tumors: verrucous carcinoma, Part 15.
Hum Pathol 1985; 16(5):463–466. Head Neck Surg 1982; 5(1):29–38.
485. Howat AJ, Scott E, Mackie DB, et al. Adenosquamous 506. Kraus FT, Perezmesa C. Verrucous carcinoma. Clinical
carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 79 and pathologic study of 105 cases involving oral cavity,
(6):731–733. larynx and genitalia. Cancer 1966; 19(1):26–38.
486. Izumi K, Nakajima T, Maeda T, et al. Adenosquamous 507. McDonald JS, Crissman JD, Gluckman JL. Verrucous
carcinoma of the tongue: report of a case with histochem- carcinoma of the oral cavity. Head Neck Surg 1982; 5(1):
ical, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study and 22–28.
338 El-Mofty and Lewis
508. Ferlito A, Recher G. Ackerman’s tumor (verrucous carci- 529. Prioleau PG, Santa Cruz DJ, Meyer JS, et al. Verrucous
noma) of the larynx: a clinicopathologic study of 77 cases. carcinoma: a light and electron microscopic, autoradio-
Cancer 1980; 46(7):1617–1630. graphic, and immunofluorescence study. Cancer 1980; 45
509. Bacon MP, Chevretton EB, Slack RW, et al. Verrucous (11):2849–2857.
carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 530. Ogawa A, Fukuta Y, Nakajima T, et al. Treatment results
103(4):415–416. of oral verrucous carcinoma and its biological behavior.
510. Daoud A, Lannigan FJ, McGlashan JA, et al. Verrucous Oral Oncol 2004; 40(8):793–797.
carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 531. Medina JE, Dichtel W, Luna MA. Verrucous-squamous
105(8):696–699. carcinomas of the oral cavity. A clinicopathologic study of
511. Edelstein DR, Smouha E, Sacks SH, et al. Verrucous 104 cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110(7):437–440.
carcinoma of the temporal bone. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar- 532. Shear M, Pindborg JJ. Verrucous hyperplasia of the oral
yngol 1986; 95(5 pt 1):447–453. mucosa. Cancer 1980; 46(8):1855–1862.
512. Hanna GS, Ali MH. Verrucous carcinoma of the nasal 533. Slootweg PJ, Muller H. Verrucous hyperplasia or verru-
septum. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101(2):184–187. cous carcinoma. An analysis of 27 patients. J Maxillofac
513. Proops DW, Hawke WM, van Nostrand AW, et al. Ver- Surg 1983; 11(1):13–19.
rucous carcinoma of the ear. Case report. Ann Otol Rhinol 534. Zakrzewska JM, Lopes V, Speight P, et al. Proliferative
Laryngol 1984; 93(4 pt 1):385–388. verrucous leukoplakia: a report of ten cases. Oral Surg Oral
514. Thomas JR, Snyderman SC, Giffin CS, et al. Verrucous Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82(4):396–401.
carcinoma of the pyriform sinus. Arch Otolaryngol 1973; 535. Vedtofte P, Holmstrup P, Hjorting-Hansen E, et al. Surgi-
97(6):488–489. cal treatment of premalignant lesions of the oral mucosa.
515. Woodson GE, Jurco S III, Alford BR, et al. Verrucous Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 16(6):656–664.
carcinoma of the middle ear. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 536. Poh CF, Zhang L, Lam WL, et al. A high frequency of
107(1):63–65. allelic loss in oral verrucous lesions may explain malig-
516. Bouquot JE. Oral verrucous carcinoma. Incidence in two nant risk. Lab Invest 2001; 81(4):629–634.
US populations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral 537. Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Mannara GM. Is primary radiother-
Radiol Endod 1998; 86(3):318–324. apy an appropriate option for the treatment of verrucous
517. Goethals PL, Harrison EG Jr., Devine KD. Verrucous carcinoma of the head and neck? J Laryngol Otol 1998;
squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Am J Surg 1963; 112(2):132–139.
106:845–851. 538. McCaffrey TV, Witte M, Ferguson MT. Verrucous carci-
518. Nair MK, Sankaranarayanan R, Padmanabhan TK, et al. noma of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;
Oral verrucous carcinoma. Treatment with radiotherapy. 107(5 pt 1):391–395.
Cancer 1988; 61(3):458–461. 539. Tharp ME II, Shidnia H. Radiotherapy in the treatment of
519. Brandsma JL, Steinberg BM, Abramson AL, et al. Presence verrucous carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope
of human papillomavirus type 16 related sequences in 1995; 105(4 pt 1):391–396.
verrucous carcinoma of the larynx. Cancer Res 1986; 540. Parkhill E. Tumors of the palative tonsil. In: Tumors of the
46(4 pt 2):2185–2188. Oral Cavity and Pharynx Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Wash-
520. Bryan RL, Bevan IS, Crocker J, et al. Detection of HPV 6 ington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1968.
and 11 in tumours of the upper respiratory tract using the 541. Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH, Barnes L, et al. World
polymerase chain reaction. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci Health Organization. Histologic Typing of Tumors of the
1990; 15(2):177–180. Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear. 2nd. ed. Berlin,
521. Fliss DM, Noble-Topham SE, McLachlin M, et al. Laryn- Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
geal verrucous carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study and 542. Ishiyama A, Eversole LR, Ross DA, et al. Papillary squa-
detection of human papillomavirus using polymerase mous neoplasms of the head and neck. Laryngoscope
chain reaction. Laryngoscope 1994; 104(2):146–152. 1994; 104(12):1446–1452.
522. Johnson TL, Plieth DA, Crissman JD, et al. HPV detection by 543. Thompson LD, Wenig BM, Heffner DK, et al. Exophytic
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in verrucous lesions of the and papillary squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx: A
upper aerodigestive tract. Mod Pathol 1991; 4(4): 461–465. clinicopathologic series of 104 cases. Otolaryngol Head
523. Shroyer KR, Greer RO, Fankhouser CA, et al. Detection of Neck Surg 1999; 120(5):718–724.
human papillomavirus DNA in oral verrucous carcinoma 544. Batsakis JG, Suarez P. Papillary squamous carcinoma: will
by polymerase chain reaction. Mod Pathol 1993; 6(6): the real one please stand up? Adv Anat Pathol 2000; 7(1):
669–672. 2–8.
524. Hansen LS, Olson JA, Silverman S Jr. Proliferative verru- 545. Ferlito A, Devaney KO, Rinaldo A, et al. Papillary squa-
cous leukoplakia. A long-term study of thirty patients. mous cell carcinoma versus verrucous squamous cell
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 60(3):285–298. carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar-
525. Murrah VA, Batsakis JG. Proliferative verrucous leuko- yngol 1999; 108(3):318–322.
plakia and verrucous hyperplasia. Ann Otol Rhinol 546. Suarez PA, Adler-Storthz K, Luna MA, et al. Papillary
Laryngol 1994; 103(8 pt 1):660–663. squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive
526. Koch BB, Trask DK, Hoffman HT, et al. National survey of tract: a clinicopathologic and molecular study. Head
head and neck verrucous carcinoma: patterns of presen- Neck 2000; 22(4):360–368.
tation, care, and outcome. Cancer 2001; 92(1):110–120. 547. Cobo F, Garcia C, Talavera P, et al. Human papillomavi-
527. Wu M, Putti TC, Bhuiya TA. Comparative study in the rus associated with papillary squamous cell carcinoma of
expression of p53, EGFR, TGF-alpha, and cyclin D1 in the oropharynx in a renal transplant recipient. Infection
verrucous carcinoma, verrucous hyperplasia, and squa- 2006; 34(3):176–180.
mous cell carcinoma of head and neck region. Appl 548. Crissman JD, Kessis T, Shah KV, et al. Squamous papil-
Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2002; 10(4):351–356. lary neoplasia of the adult upper aerodigestive tract. Hum
528. Angadi PV, Krishnapillai R. Cyclin D1 expression in oral Pathol 1988; 19(12):1387–1396.
squamous cell carcinoma and verrucous carcinoma: cor- 549. Ferrer MJ, Estelles E, Villanueva A, et al. Papillary squa-
relation with histological differentiation. Oral Surg Oral mous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Eur Arch Oto-
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3):e30–e35. rhinolaryngol 2003; 260(8):444–445.
Chapter 7: Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 339
550. Takeda Y, Satoh M, Nakamura S, et al. Papillary squa- 19. Onoue T, Uchida D, Begum NM, et al. Epithelial-
mous cell carcinoma of the oral mucosa: immunohisto- mesenchymal transition induced by the stromal cell-
chemical comparison with other carcinomas of oral derived factor-1/CXCR4 system in oral squamous cell
mucosal origin. J Oral Sci 2001; 43(3):165–169. carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol 2006; 29(5):1133–1138.
20. Cano A, Perez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, et al. The tran-
scription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal
SPINDLE CELL (SARCOMATOID) transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell
CARCINOMA Biol 2000; 2(2):76–83.
21. Ellis GL, Corio RL. Spindle cell carcinoma of the oral
1. Cardesa A ZN. Spindle cell carcinoma. In: Barnes L cavity. A clinicopathologic assessment of fifty-nine cases.
EJRPeal, ed. World Health Organization Classification of Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50(6):523–533.
Tumours—Pathology and Genetics, Head and Neck 22. Leventon GS, Evans HL. Sarcomatoid squamous cell
Tumors. Lyons, France: IARC Press, 2005:127–128. carcinoma of the mucous membranes of the head and
2. Tse GM, Tan PH, Putti TC, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of neck: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Cancer 1981;
the breast: a clinicopathological review. J Clin Pathol 2006; 48(4):994–1003.
59(10):1079–1083. 23. Srinivasan U, Talvalkar GV. True carcinosarcoma of the
3. Papi G, Corrado S, LiVolsi VA. Primary spindle cell larynx: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1979; 93(10):1031–1035.
lesions of the thyroid gland; an overview. Am J Clin 24. Goldman RL, Weidner N. Pure squamous cell carcinoma
Pathol 2006; 125(suppl):S95–S123. of the larynx with cervical nodal metastasis showing
4. Nappi O, Wick MR. Sarcomatoid neoplasms of the respi- rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation. Clinical, patho-
ratory tract. Semin Diagn Pathol 1993; 10(2):137–147. logic, and immunohistochemical study of a unique exam-
5. Hansen LT, Kristensen S, Moesner J. Polypoidal carcino- ple of divergent differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;
sarcoma of the oropharynx: a clinicopathological and 17(4):415–421.
immunohistochemical study. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109(5): 25. Banerjee SS, Eyden BP, Wells S, et al. Pseudoangiosar-
459–465. comatous carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of seven
6. Batsakis JG. ‘‘Pseudosarcoma’’ of the mucous membranes cases. Histopathology 1992; 21(1):13–23.
in the head and neck. J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95(3):311–316. 26. Pitt MA, Morphopoulos G, Wells S, et al. Pseudoangio-
7. Battifora H. Spindle cell carcinoma: ultrastructural evi- sarcomatous carcinoma of the genitourinary tract. J Clin
dence of squamous origin and collagen production by the Pathol 1995; 48(11):1059–1061.
tumor cells. Cancer 1976; 37(5):2275–2282. 27. Zidar N, Gale N, Zupevc A, et al. Pseudovascular adenoid
8. Lichtiger B, Mackay B, Tessmer CF. Spindle-cell variant of squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity—a report of
squamous carcinoma. A light and electron microscopic two cases. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59(11):1206–1208.
study of 13 cases. Cancer 1970; 26(6):1311–1320. 28. Takata T, Ito H, Ogawa I, et al. Spindle cell squamous
9. Leifer C, Miller AS, Putong PB, et al. Spindle-cell carcinoma carcinoma of the oral region. An immunohistochemical
of the oral mucosa. A light and electron microscopic study and ultrastructural study on the histogenesis and differ-
of apparent sarcomatous metastasis to cervical lymph ential diagnosis with a clinicopathological analysis of six
nodes. Cancer 1974; 34(3):597–605. cases. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1991;
10. Zarbo RJ, Crissman JD, Venkat H, et al. Spindle-cell 419(3):177–182.
carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract mucosa. An 29. Weidner N. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the upper aerodi-
immunohistologic and ultrastructural study of 18 biphasic gestive tract. Semin Diagn Pathol 1987; 4(2):157–168.
tumors and comparison with seven monophasic spindle- 30. Favia G, Lo ML, Serpico R, et al. Angiosarcoma of the head
cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 10(11):741–753. and neck with intra-oral presentation. A clinico-pathologi-
11. Thompson LD, Wieneke JA, Miettinen M, et al. Spindle cell cal study of four cases. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(8):757–762.
(sarcomatoid) carcinomas of the larynx: a clinicopathologic 31. Gray MH, Rosenberg AE, Dickersin GR, et al. Cytokeratin
study of 187 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26(2): 153–170. expression in epithelioid vascular neoplasms. Hum Pathol
12. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ. Spindle cell carcinoma of the 1990; 21(2):212–217.
larynx: review of 26 cases including DNA content and 32. Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Angiosarcoma of soft
immunohistochemistry. Hum Pathol 1997; 28(6):664–673. tissue: a study of 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(6):
13. Slootweg PJ, Roholl PJ, Muller H, et al. Spindle-cell carci- 683–697.
noma of the oral cavity and larynx. Immunohistochemical 33. Meer S, Coleman H, Altini M. Oral synovial sarcoma: a
aspects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1989; 17(5):234–236. report of 2 cases and a review of the literature. Oral Surg
14. Olsen KD, Lewis JE, Suman VJ. Spindle cell carcinoma of Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96(3):
the larynx and hypopharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck 306–315.
Surg 1997; 116(1):47–52. 34. Benninger MS, Kraus D, Sebek B, et al. Head and neck
15. Lewis JS, Ritter JH, El-Mofty S. Alternative epithelial spindle cell carcinoma: an evaluation of current manage-
markers in sarcomatoid carcinomas of the head and ment. Cleve Clin J Med 1992; 59(5):479–482.
neck, lung, and bladder-p63, MOC-31, and TTF-1. Mod 35. Su HH, Chu ST, Hou YY, et al. Spindle cell carcinoma of
Pathol 2005; 18(11):1471–1481. the oral cavity and oropharynx: factors affecting outcome.
16. Ellis GL, Langloss JM, Heffner DK, et al. Spindle-cell carci- J Chin Med Assoc 2006; 69(10):478–483.
noma of the aerodigestive tract. An immunohistochemical
analysis of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1987; 11(5): 335–342.
17. Choi HR, Sturgis EM, Rosenthal DI, et al. Sarcomatoid
carcinoma of the head and neck: molecular evidence for NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA
evolution and progression from conventional squamous
cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27(9):1216–1220. 1. Chan JK, Suster S, Wenig BM, et al. Cytokeratin 20
18. Torenbeek R, Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, et al. Analysis by immunoreactivity distinguishes Merkel cell (primary
comparative genomic hybridization of epithelial and spin- cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinomas and salivary
dle cell components in sarcomatoid carcinoma and carcino- gland small cell carcinomas from small cell carcinomas
sarcoma: histogenetic aspects. J Pathol 1999; 189(3):338–343. of various sites. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21:226–234.
340 El-Mofty and Lewis
A case report and literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med 32. Takagi M, Ishikawa G, Mori W. Primary malignant mela-
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96(4):404–413. noma of the oral cavity in Japan. With special reference to
22. Rapini RP. Oral melanoma: diagnosis and treatment. mucosal melanosis. Cancer 1974; 34(2):358–370.
Semin Cutan Med Surg 1997; 16(4):320–322. 33. Regezi JA, Hayward JR, Pickens TN. Superficial melano-
23. Pandey M, Abraham EK, Mathew A, et al. Primary mas of oral mucous membranes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
malignant melanoma of the upper aero-digestive tract. Pathol 1978; 45(5):730–740.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28(1):45–49. 34. Coleman WP III, Loria PR, Reed RJ, et al. Acral lentigi-
24. van der Waal RI, Snow GB, Karim AB, et al. Primary nous melanoma. Arch Dermatol 1980; 116(7):773–776.
malignant melanoma of the oral cavity: a review of eight 35. Sutherland CM, Mather FJ, Muchmore JH, et al. Acral
cases. Br Dent J 1994; 176(5):185–188. lentiginous melanoma. Am J Surg 1993; 166(1):64–67.
25. Prasad ML, Jungbluth AA, Iversen K, et al. Expression of 36. Batsakis JG, Suarez P, El-Naggar AK. Mucosal melanomas
melanocytic differentiation markers in malignant melano- of the head and neck. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;
mas of the oral and sinonasal mucosa. Am J Surg Pathol 107(7):626–630.
2001; 25(6):782–787. 37. Barrett AW, Bennett JH, Speight PM. A clinicopathological
26. Prasad ML, Patel SG, Busam KJ. Primary mucosal desmo- and immunohistochemical analysis of primary oral mucosal
plastic melanoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2004; melanoma. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1995; 31B(2):100–105.
26(4):373–377. 38. Billings KR, Wang MB, Sercarz JA, et al. Clinical and
27. Ueta E, Miki T, Osaki T, et al. Desmoplastic malignant pathologic distinction between primary and metastatic
melanoma of the gingiva: case report and review of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. Otolaryngol
the literature. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(6): Head Neck Surg 1995; 112(6):700–706.
423–427. 39. Eneroth CM. Malignant melanoma of the oral cavity. Int J
28. Batsakis JG, Bauer R, Regezi JA, et al. Desmoplastic Oral Surg 1975; 4(5):191–197.
melanoma of the maxillary alveolus. J Oral Surg 1979; 40. Eneroth CM, Lundberg C. Mucosal malignant melanomas
37(2):107–109. of the head and neck with special reference to cases
29. Kilpatrick SE, White WL, Browne JD. Desmoplastic having a prolonged clinical course. Acta Otolaryngol
malignant melanoma of the oral mucosa. An underrecog- 1975; 80(5–6):452–458.
nized diagnostic pitfall. Cancer 1996; 78(3):383–389. 41. Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The National Cancer
30. Carlson JA, Dickersin GR, Sober AJ, et al. Desmoplastic Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma:
neurotropic melanoma. A clinicopathologic analysis of 28 a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. The
cases. Cancer 1995; 75(2):478–494. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer
31. Umeda M, Shimada K. Primary malignant melanoma of and the American Cancer Society. Cancer 1998; 83(8):
the oral cavity–its histological classification and treat- 1664–1678.
ment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32(1):39–47. 42. Stern SJ, Guillamondegui OM. Mucosal melanoma of the
head and neck. Head Neck 1991; 13(1):22–27.
8
Leon Barnes
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian-
University Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
governs the sinonasal mucosa (10,20,21). The imbal- and manifests with nasal obstruction, epistaxis, head-
ance results in overactive parasympathetic stimula- aches, nasal crusting, anosomia, halitosis, and the
tion, with subsequent vasodilation, edema, emission of the characteristic foul-smelling nasal
hypersecretion, nasal obstruction, sneezing, and head- odor (ozena) that is detectable by others at conversa-
aches localized over the bridge of the nose or frontal tional distances. The disease is nonfatal, but very
sinus area. Pruritus, in contrast to allergic rhinosinu- distressful. The patients often become social cripples
sitis, is not common. Some patients may have histories and may even commit suicide.
of additional autonomic dysfunctional states, such as Nasal biopsies of patients with ARS show chronic
the irritable bowel syndrome (22). nonspecific inflammation and edema with progres-
Many factors can exacerbate the symptoms. sive fibrosis, loss of cilia and goblet cells, squamous
Among these are included cigarette smoke, strong metaplasia, and atrophy of the mucoserous glands
perfumes or other odors, extremes of temperature, and turbinates. The blood vessels may be dilated, or
stress, anxiety, and fatigue. they may show signs of endarteritis (28). Whether the
Tissue removed from the sinonasal tract in latter is the cause or the result of ARS is open to
patients with vasomotor rhinosinusitis typically speculation. The end result of the atrophic process is
shows only chronic nonspecific inflammation, with or that nasal passages are widened and more air is
without retention cysts. Eosinophils and mast cells are inspired, which, with its drying effect, results in a
not increased, and neutrophils are sparse to absent, vicious cycle of more crusts being formed.
unless there has been superimposed infection (23). There is no known cure for ARS. A variety of
Patients respond to different treatments. Some medical and surgical procedures, however, may offer
may benefit from anticholinergic drugs administered some limited palliative effect. Among these are
either orally, topically, or both, or to local application included antibiotics, lubricating nasal drops, nasal-
of silver nitrate (24). Others may require partial cleansing procedures, correction of presumed defi-
removal of the turbinates, particularly the inferior. ciencies (iron, vitamin A, estrogen), surgical operation
This may be achieved either by surgery, electrocau- to narrow the air passages, and various techniques to
tery, cryosurgery, or laser (21). For those with severe disrupt the autonomic nerve supply of the nasal
intractable symptoms, interruption of the parasympa- mucosa (nerve blocks, neurectomies) (29,30).
thetic and sympathetic supply by a vidian nerve Shehata indicates that after the age of 40 years
section may be required (25). there is a tendency for some patients to show sponta-
neous arrest of the active disease in which the crusts
Atrophic Rhinosinusitis and odor disappear despite the presence of the wide
nasal passages (27).
Atrophic rhinosinusitis (ARS) is a chronic disease of
unknown etiology characterized by a triad of findings: Aspirin Intolerance: Samter’s Triad
(i) atrophy of the nasal mucosa, (ii) crust formation,
and (iii) the emission of a foul nasal odor, sometimes Samter has called attention to the fact that patients
referred to as ozena (stench) (26,27). It occurs world- who are intolerant to aspirin often have coexistent
wide, but is especially common in subtropical and nasal polyps and asthma (31,32). This constellation of
temperate climates, such as Southeast Asia, Africa, findings, referred to as the aspirin, acetylsalicylic acid
Egypt, India, China, Brazil, and the Mediterranean (ASA), or Samter’s triad, is relatively common, affect-
(26–29). Racial influence may also be a factor in that ing 2% to 3% of all asthmatics and 20% of severe
Asians, Latinos, and black Americans are more sus- asthmatics (33,34). In three series of 445, 127, and 154
ceptible than natives of equatorial Africa. The disease nasal polyps, the incidence of the complete triad was
is also more common among the poor who live in 2%, 19.7%, and 24%, respectively (35–37).
unsanitary conditions. The syndrome typically manifests during the
Rather than a single cause, multiple factors may third or fourth decade of life and begins with upper
be involved in the etiopathogenesis of ARS. Among respiratory signs of rhinitis. The asthma and aspirin
the possibilities that have been proposed include intolerance usually appears within one year of each
(i) chronic bacterial infection of the sinonasal tract, other and about 5 to 10 years after the onset of rhinitis
(ii) nutritional deficiencies, especially iron and vitamin A, (36,38,39). Nasal polyps, in turn, develop about
(iii) hypoestrogenemia, (iv) autonomic instability with 10 years after the other symptoms have started,
prolonged sympathetic stimulation and vasoconstric- although they can occur at any time. In most instan-
tion, (v) an autoimmune disease, (vi) chronic exposure ces, the syndrome appears sporadically. Rare reports
to irritants, (vii) end stage of a variety of chronic of familial occurrences, however, have been described
sinonasal infections, (viii) prior radiation exposure, (34,38,39).
and (ix) previous surgery (27,28). In the typical case, the patient starts to experi-
Although Klebsiella ozaenae, nontoxic Coryne- ence bronchoconstriction and rhinorrhea within
bacterium diphtheriae, and the Perez–Hofer bacillus minutes to three hours after ingesting aspirin, often
are often cultured from the sinonasal tract, it is uncer- accompanied by nausea, vomiting, intestinal cramps,
tain whether these organisms are responsible for the and diarrhea. In addition to aspirin, some individuals
disease or are just secondary invaders. may demonstrate an intolerance to other nonsteroidal
According to Shehata (27), the disease begins in anti-inflammatory drugs such as acetaminophen,
childhood, especially in girls at the onset of puberty, indomethacin, and ibuprofen (38).
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 347
Rather than an allergic reaction, aspirin sensitiv- After a careful history, the diagnosis can usually
ity represents a pharmacological effect that results be confirmed by intranasal examination. The nasal
when the ingested drug interferes with the metabo- mucosa is typically red and boggy and will not respond
lism of arachidonic acid (34). Normally, arachidonic to topical 4% cocaine, which normally produces vaso-
acid, which is released from phospholipids in cell constriction and shrinkage of the turbinates (45).
membranes, is metabolized along two alternative The management of rhinosinusitis medicamen-
pathways. One pathway is concerned with the forma- tosa, according to Mabry, involves four steps: (i) make
tion of prostaglandin derivatives by cyclooxygenase, the diagnosis, (ii) reverse the mucosal changes,
whereas the other forms leukotrienes by the action of (iii) withdraw the offending medication, and (iv) edu-
lipoxygenase. Aspirin inhibits cyclooxygenase and cate the patient (45). During drug withdrawal, the
thereby increases the production of more leukotrienes, obstruction often becomes worse, and as a result,
which are known to stimulate production of mucus, the patient may need additional medications (cortico-
cause vasodilation and edema, and act as chemotactic steroids) for temporary relief. After the patient has been
factors for inflammatory cells (34). weaned, a search should be made for the cause of the
The polyps are typically bilateral and, on histo- obstruction that led to the initial use of the nasal spray.
logical examination, show extensive thickening and
hyalinization of the basement membrane, increased Rhinosinusitis of Pregnancy
goblet cells, stromal edema, and chronic inflammatory
cells, including prominent eosinophils and mast cells Rhinosinusitis occurs in 30% of pregnant women,
(34,39,40). There are no histological features that dis- most notably in the second and third trimesters, and
tinguish the aspirin-intolerant polyp from the aspirin- usually disappears within five postpartum days (47).
tolerant polyp. Treatment consists of avoiding aspirin The changes are due to the stimulatory effect of
and other similar medications, aspirin desensitization, pregnancy-associated hormones on nasal mucoserous
palliative relief of symptoms, and possible polypec- glands and increased blood volume with nasal vascu-
tomy (41). lar pooling and resultant airway resistance.
Although pregnancy may specifically influence
Nonallergic Rhinosinusitis with Eosinophilia the nose, Schatz and Zeiger (47) indicate that most
women with rhinosinusitis during pregnancy actually
Nonallergic rhinosinusitis with eosinophilia syndrome, have other specific entities not unique to pregnancy,
or NARES, is a perennial form of rhinosinusitis charac- such as allergic rhinosinusitis, bacterial rhinosinusitis,
terized by the ‘‘on again–off again’’ symptoms of and so on. Emphasis, therefore, must be placed on
sneezing, profuse watery rhinorrhea, pruritus, and making the correct diagnosis so that therapy can be
lacrimation, in conjunction with nasal eosinophilia in directed as accurately, yet minimally, as necessary to
excess of 20% and negative intradermal skin tests (42). achieve the desired therapeutic outcome and not
The on again–off again symptomatology is one of damage the fetus.
the hallmarks of the disease. Although patients gener-
ally do not have prolonged symptom-free periods, Occupational-Environmental Rhinosinusitis
those with less severe disease may have symptoms
almost daily for several weeks to months interspersed Although occupational-environmental rhinosinusitis
with long periods without symptoms. In these instan- has been known for many years, it has only recently
ces, the patient is often mistaken for having ‘‘seasonal received significant attention among otolaryngologists
allergy.’’ Allergic rhinosinusitis, however, can be (48–52).
excluded on the basis of a family history of atopic The workplace may be the source of many
diseases and often positive skin tests. vapors or particulate matter that may result in rhino-
There is some evidence suggesting that NARES sinusitis by means of direct irritation or an allergic
may be a precursor of Samter’s triad (aspirin intoler- reaction. The list is long, but some of the noxious
ance, asthma, and nasal polyps) (43). As a group, agents include wood dust, formaldehyde, sulfur diox-
NARES patients respond well to topical corticoste- ide, flour, nickel, shoe dust, and passive cigarette
roids, supplemented, as needed, with decongestants smoke. Chronic exposure may not only result in
and antihistamines. chronic rhinosinusitis, with or without polyps, but
may also, in some instances, lead to malignant tumors.
Rhinosinusitis Medicamentosa
Structural-Mechanical Rhinosinusitis
Nasal obstruction caused by topical or systemic
medications is referred to as rhinosinusitis medicamen- Defects of the cilia, either structural or functional,
tosa (44–46). Most often the culprit is one of the many result in impaired mucociliary clearance, stagnation
over-the-counter nasal sprays or drops used for their of secretions, and inflammation. This topic [primary
vasoconstrictive action to alleviate nasal obstruction. ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), immotile cilia syndrome] is
Regular use, however, sometimes for as little as one discussed elsewhere in this chapter.
week, may result in the patient using more medication, Other mechanical derangements, such as a devi-
thereby establishing a vicious cycle of habitual depen- ated nasal septum or any benign or malignant tumor
dence. Systemic drugs that may cause similar effects may predispose the individual to infections. The pos-
include oral contraceptives, reserpine, hydralazine, thi- sibility of a tumor should always be considered in any
oridazine (Mellaril), and propranolol (10,45). patient who presents with unilateral rhinosinusitis.
348 Barnes
Idiopathic Rhinosinusitis
As the name implies, idiopathic rhinosinusitis is
inflammation of the sinonasal tract in which no
known or predisposing condition can be identified.
Figure 5 Note the three smaller nasal polyps that are fibrotic.
With long duration, polyps often became fibrotic and will not
transilluminate.
D. Pathology
B. Clinical Features
Other than the presence of an occasional cyst, repre-
senting the maxillary component of the polyp, and the PCD occurs in 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 34,000 births and is
presence of a stalk or long pedicle, representing the not a life-threatening disease (1,6,12). Symptoms
maxillary attachment, ACPs are grossly identical with include rhinorrhea, a moist-sounding cough, rhinosi-
other nasal polyps (Fig. 8). Microscopically, there are nusitis often associated with polyps, bronchitis, and
only quantitative differences, at most, between the frequent ear complaints (otitis, decreased hearing).
two; ACPs tend to have fewer mucoserous glands About half the cases are also associated with situs
and fewer eosinophils than ordinary nasal polyps. inversus or Kartagener’s syndrome, an autosomal
Atypical stromal cells, representing a reactive recessive disorder characterized by sinusitis, bron-
phenomenon, are sometimes seen. Their presence chietasis, and situs inversus (13).
has no clinical significance, but pathologists should Although patients are symptomatic soon after
be aware of this finding so that they do not confuse birth (‘‘my baby was born with a cold’’), it is not
the change with evidence of malignancy (Figs. 6 and 7) unusual for some patients to be in adulthood before it
(14). Because of their long pedicle, ACPs are susceptible is recognized. Once PCD is entertained, it is essential
to torsion with compromise of their vascular supply that cilia be evaluated for motility and ultrastructural
resulting in histological changes that might be confused abnormalities. Cilia from the nose, rarely the trachea,
with a vascular neoplasm or even a malignant process. are usually obtained either by biopsy or brush tech-
Such polyps are sometimes referred to as angiomatous nique (14).
or angiectatic ACPs (15,16).
C. Pathology
E. Treatment and Prognosis
The mucus-propelling cilia are approximately 6 mm in
ACPs treated intranasally by snare and avulsion diameter and there are 200 or more per cell (2). They
without due respect for their stalks have a 20% to exhibit a characteristic 9 þ 2 structure similar to
30% rate of recurrence; most of these reappear within the hubs and spokes of a wheel (Figs. 9 and 10).
two years of excision (2,3,7). If the maxillary sinus is At the center are two singlet microtubules (representing
entered and the pedicle of the polyp is removed with the hub), which are connected to nine peripheral
adjacent normal mucosa, the recurrence rate is practi- doublets (each representing two microtubules) by a
cally nil. series of nine spokes. The outer doublets are also
352 Barnes
V. CYSTIC FIBROSIS
A. Introduction
CF (mucoviscidosis) is the most common lethal genetic
disease among whites. It was first described by
Franconi et al. in 1936 and was given its present
Figure 10 Electron microscopic view of normal nasal cilia name of CF by Anderson in 1938 (1,2).
obtained by brush microscopy. Compare with Fig. 9. The disease follows an autosomal recessive pat-
tern of inheritance. A child born to two heterozygous
carriers has a 1:4 risk of having the disease, a 1:2
chance of being a carrier, and a 1:4 chance of neither
connected to one another by two arms, inner and being a carrier nor having the disease. The disease
outer dynein, that are attached to the doublets in a does, however, vary among ethnic groups. It has the
counterclockwise fashion. It is the arms that produce highest frequency among those of white Northern
the actual motion (1). The cilia beat asymmetrically European extraction, affecting about 1:2000 to 1:2500
with a relatively stiff forward stroke to move the newborns in this population (3–6). The frequency of
mucus, while on the backstroke they flex so that the heterozygote carrier in this same group is 1:20 to
they are drawn through the mucus so as not to stir 1:25 (4,5). Blacks and Asians are seldom affected.
the mucus in the opposite direction. Current estimates indicate that there are approximately
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 353
25,000 to 30,000 persons with this disease in the Nasal polyps are common in patients with CF,
United States (6,7). with most large series reporting an incidence of 10%
The gene responsible for CF has been localized to 20% (range 6–48%) (11–13,15,21,22). The polyps
to the long arm of chromosome 7 (4,8). This is a large tend to be multiple and bilateral and often appear at
gene composed of more than 250,000 base pairs and an early age. Nasal polyps in children are relatively
27 exons that encodes for a protein of 1480 amino uncommon; therefore, if a child develops bilateral
acids (4,6). This protein, referred to as cystic fibrosis nasal polyps before the age of 10 years, CF should
transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), is always be considered. In a review of 120 children with
intimately involved in a cAMP-dependent pathway nasal polyps, Schramm and Effron observed that 29%
for the transport of chloride across cell membranes occurred in association with CF (23). However, polyps
(6,9). are rarely the first manifestation of CF. It is much
The most common mutation in CF is a three- more common for polyps to develop in patients with
base-pair deletion that results in the absence of one known CF (3).
amino acid (phenylalanine, abbreviated ‘‘F’’) in the 508 Once the diagnosis is entertained, it can usually
position of the CFTR protein (5,6). Except for the be verified by an elevated sweat chloride test in excess
missing phenylalanine, the CFTR protein remains of 60 nEg/L. According to Davis, there are very few
intact, yet the flaw changes its structure and function diseases in children that elevate the chloride concen-
enough to produce a fatal disease. This specific genetic tration to this level (6). Among these are included
deletion, referred to as DF508, occurs in approximately untreated adrenal insufficiency, ectodermal dysplasia,
70% of patients with CF and is associated with the most renal diabetes insipidus, some forms of glycogen
severe form of the disease (5,6,10). The remaining 30% storage disease, and, possibly, untreated hypothyroid-
of patients have mutations at any of more than 200 sites ism. The role of molecular testing for the CFTR gene is
in the gene for CFTR (6). also becoming more available (11,24,25).
The basic genetic abnormality in CF, in summary,
is a defect in a cell membrane protein (CFTR) involved
in the secretion and absorption of chloride. A decrease C. Imaging
in chloride permeability across the membrane of
Imaging almost invariably reveals panopacification
epithelial cells of exocrine glands, in turn, leads to an
of the paranasal sinuses, particularly the maxillary
influx of salt and water into the cells, resulting in
and ethmoid. The frontal sinus is not present at
dehydration of the extracellular fluid compartment,
birth and, in fact, often fails to develop in patients
an increased chloride concentration in sweat (the
with CF (17). Despite evidence of radiographic
basis of the diagnostic sweat test), and thickening of
involvement, only 11% to 57% of patients actually
exocrine secretions.
complain of symptomatic sinusitis (fever, purulent
rhinorrhea, tenderness, or pain) (13,15). Bacterial
B. Clinical Features colonization alone does not always lead to infection,
but when infection occurs, it tends to be severe.
More than 60% of patients with CF will be diagnosed
Fortunately, the complications of sinusitis, such as
during the first year of life and fewer than 5% after the
osteomyelitis and orbital or cerebral abscesses, are
age of 15 years (6). Virtually, all of the clinical man-
rare (17). This may be the result of the frequent use of
ifestations of the disease can be attributed to the thick,
antibiotics or thickening of the adjacent bone from
tenacious secretions that accumulate in the ducts of
chronic persistent inflammation, which might pre-
exocrine organs that lead to destructive, inflammatory
vent spread.
changes, especially in the pancreas and lungs (11).
Eighty-five percent to 90% of patients will experience
pancreatic dysfunction with steatorrhea, malnutrition, D. Pathology
and possible growth retardation. Pulmonary involve-
ment, which tends to be chronic and suppurative, There is controversy on whether or not nasal polyps
eventually leads to insufficiency, and this is the most removed from patients with CF show histological
common cause of death in patients with CF. Other changes that are diagnostic of this disorder.
manifestations include meconium ileus, cholelithiasis, Oppenheimer and Rosenstein indicate that nasal
biliary cirrhosis, and infertility. polyps associated with CF may be identified by a
The sinonasal tract is the most conspicuously distinct triad of histological findings: (i) a thin delicate
involved site in the head and neck (12–18). Salivary surface epithelial basement membrane, (ii) lack of
glands are also affected, but rarely become symptom- extensive tissue eosinophilia, and (iii) the presence of
atic. Otitis media, likewise, is also uncommon in CF acid mucin in the glands and cysts (acid mucin stains
(19,20). blue with the alcian blue–periodic acid–Schiff stain)
Sinus involvement in CF is initiated by accumu- (26). In contrast, polyps that are not due to CF,
lation of viscous secretions that block the draining according to these investigators, exhibit a reversal of
ostia. This, in turn, leads to hypoxia, damage or this triad: (i) a thick, hyalinized surface epithelial
functional loss of the ciliary-clearing mechanism, basement membrane, (ii) stromal eosinophilia, and
edema, inflammation, and colonization by bacteria, (iii) the presence of neutral mucin in glands and
especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus, H. influ- cysts (neutral mucin stains red with alcian blue–
enzae, or anaerobes (17). periodic acid–Schiff stain).
354 Barnes
Other investigators, on the other hand, contend Table 4 Classification of Fungal Infections of
that there are no significant histological differences the Sinonasal Tract
between those polyps associated with CF and those
I. Invasive
that are not (3,12). More specifically, Tos et al. studied
A. Acute, fulminant, immunocompromised
and compared 11 CF polyps with 102 non-CF polyps B. Chronic, indolent, immunocompetent
and found no difference in density, distribution, II. Noninvasive
or architecture of glands, nor found any in the surface A. Mycetoma: fungus ball
epithelium or stroma between the two types of polyps B. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis
(12). From these studies, it is apparent that histological
evaluation of nasal polyps in CF is not entirely specific
and cannot be used alone to either establish or refute noninvasive group, is now being recognized with
the diagnosis. However, the presence of neutrophils, increased frequency.
sparse numbers of eosinophils, and lack of basement AFRS represents about 5% to 10% of all cases of
thickening in a nasal polyp removed from a child chronic sinusitis (1–5). It was probably first described
should make one at least think about CF. in 1976 by Saferstein who reported a 24-year-old
The pathogenesis of nasal polyps in CF appears woman with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis
to be multifactorial. Some contend that they are clearly associated with nasal obstruction, nasal polyps, and
related to the thick mucus that distends the mucoser- nasal cast formation (6). Cultures of the sinus grew out
ous glands. The cystic glands, in turn, compress adja- Aspergillus fumigatus. In 1981, Miller et al. presented
cent blood vessels with subsequent stromal edema five additional cases and coined the phrase ‘‘allergic
and prolapse (17,27). The incidence of allergic rhinitis aspergillosis of the paranasal sinuses’’ (7). Katzenstein
is about the same in CF as in the general population et al. reported seven more cases in 1983 and also noted
(16). It is thought that allergy as well as infection may that the fungal hyphae resembled those of Aspergillus
also contribute to the formation of some polyps in CF and proposed the name ‘‘allergic Aspergillus sinusi-
(12,17). tis’’ (1). Subsequent reports revealed that fungi other
than Aspergillus could also cause the syndrome and,
accordingly, the more generic term of ‘‘allergic fungal
E. Treatment and Prognosis sinusitis’’ was proposed (3,8–12).
Sinonasal disease in CF may respond to medical More recently, it has been shown that allergic
therapy, whereas others will require surgery. In the mucus is not unique to AFRS and that it can be seen in
past, surgery was largely palliative and consisted a variety of other eosinophilic sinonasal disorders
primarily of simple polypectomy for nasal obstruc- [eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS)], not nec-
tion. Recurrences were high, but acceptable, because essarily of allergic origin (Table 5) (4,5,13,14).
the risks associated with more extensive surgery and Accordingly, it has been proposed that the term
prolonged anesthesia were believed to be potentially ‘‘eosinophilic mucin’’ might be more accurate than
life threatening. More recent studies, however, have ‘‘allergic mucus’’ (13).
not supported this viewpoint and clearly point to the Ponikau et al. have observed that fungal organ-
advantages of combining polypectomy with additional isms can be demonstrated in almost all individuals,
sinus operations, such as the Caldwell–Luc proce- including normal controls as well as those suffering
dure, endoscopic sinus surgery, or ethmoidectomy from chronic rhinosinusitis (15). Why some individu-
(13–16). Cepero et al., for instance, observed a 61% als develop an immunological reaction to the fungi
recurrence rate for patients who underwent nasal and others do not is not entirely clear, but may be
polypectomy alone versus 9% for those who had related to genetic factors and the atopic status of the
both polypectomy and additional paranasal sinus patient.
surgery (13). The distinction between the various types of
Although there have been significant advances ECRS shown in Table 5 depends on clinical, physical,
in the recognition and symptomatic treatment of CF, it imaging, immunological, and pathological findings.
continues to be a lethal disease, with a median survival So what is the role of the pathologist? The pathologist
of about 30 years (6). With the advent of lung trans- can only report the presence or absence of allergic
plantation and the possibility of gene therapy on the (eosinophilic) mucus. If found, then he/she must
horizon, patients may live considerably longer or even report whether fungal organisms are seen and, if
be cured of their disease. possible, try to identify the fungus. All too often, it
is impossible for the pathologist to identify the fungal
organisms with certainty, and as a result, a diagnosis
VI. ALLERGIC MUCUS—ALLERGIC
FUNGAL RHINOSINUSITIS Table 5 Classification of ECRS
B. Clinical Features
AFRS is currently defined as fungal organisms associ-
ated with allergic (eosinophilic) mucus and an elevated
IgE (13,14).
AFRS should be suspected in any young adult
who presents with (i) recurrent sinonasal polyps, (ii) a
history of asthma, (iii) multiple involved sinuses on Figure 11 Image showing bilateral opacification of the nasal
imaging, (iv) poor response to medical treatment, (v) a cavity and paranasal sinuses in a patient with allergic fungal
history of multiple surgical procedures for chronic pol- rhinosinusitis. Note the erosion of bone, especially the medial
ypoid sinusitis, and (vi) a history of atopy with sinonasal wall of the right orbit.
polyps, and (vii) who is found to have thick inspissated
mucus at the time of surgical intervention (16).
AFRS affects both sexes equally and occurs in all
age groups. Most, however, are between 20 and
40 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Virtually, all
patients have sinonasal polyps, 41% have asthma, 70%
have peripheral eosinophilia, 13% have a history of
aspirin sensitivity, almost all have an increased serum
total IgE level, and 52% to 58% have positive skin tests
to fungal antigens (13).
C. Etiology
AFRS is thought to be mediated through a type I (IgE)
and possibly type III (immune complex) immunologi-
cal reaction. The disease begins by inhalation and
trapping of the fungi in the mucous blanket of the
sinonasal tract. Fungal antigens then react with IgE- Figure 12 Thick, tenacious mucus removed from a patient with
sensitized mast cells with a subsequent cascade of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, often described as similar to peanut
immunological events that result in an inflammatory butter or wet clay.
response.
D. Imaging
retention cysts are additional findings. The most dis-
Computed tomography scans characteristically reveal tinguishing feature, however, is the character of the
opacification of the nasal cavity and one or more para- mucus that is grossly thick, white, yellow, green, or
nasal sinuses, either unilateral or bilateral (Fig. 11). brown, with the consistency of ‘‘peanut butter’’ or ‘‘wet
Erosion of bone (skull base and orbit) is seen in 20% to clay’’ (Fig. 12).
60% of cases and should not be mistaken for tumor
Microscopically, the mucus appears inspissated
(5,17–19). AFRS is almost always an isolated event; only or ‘‘dried out’’ and purple or basophilic. It contains
rarely does it coexist with allergic bronchopulmonary large collections of ‘‘smudged’’ eosinophils and
aspergillosis.
neutrophils with admixed sloughed ciliated respirato-
ry epithelial cells. At times, the mucus even appears
E. Pathology laminated (Fig. 13). The eosinophils are frequently
ruptured and their granules widely dispersed.
Pathologically, AFRS consists of edematous polypoid Charcot–Leyden crystals are universal (Fig. 14).
respiratory mucosa with numerous mononuclear Fungi (hyphae), however, are sparse and, if found at
inflammatory cells and prominent eosinophils. all, are always located in the mucus and never in the
Hyalinization and thickening of the basement mem- tissue (Fig. 14). The use of fungal stains (silver methe-
brane and goblet cell hyperplasia with mucous namine and periodic acid–Schiff are very useful.
356 Barnes
VII. MUCOCELES
A. Introduction
Figure 15 Cholesterol granuloma composed of granulation- Figure 16 Myospherulosis. Note the pseudocysts surrounded
fibrous tissue containing cholesterol clefts, hemosiderin, inflam- by dense fibrous tissue with scattered inflammatory cells (H&E,
matory cells, and giant cells (H&E, 700). 40). Some of the pseudocysts contain altered erythrocytes that
agglomerate into sporangium-like sacs that may be mistaken for
a fungus (inset, H&E, 400).
and not the antibiotic, were the culprits responsible C. Clinical Findings
for the disease (4). In addition, they found that emul-
sified human fat could also induce formation of these In our review of 23 cases, 13 occurred in females and
structures and offered this as an explanation for the 10 in males who ranged in age from 25 to 79 years
disease in the African patients. Reasoning that it was (mean 50 years) (1–15). The disease most often involves
unlikely that all the African patients had been exposed the nasal cavity, either unilaterally or bilaterally, and
to antibiotic ointments, they suggested that fat necro- only rarely extends into the sinuses (usually the maxil-
sis secondary to trauma, injections, or infections might lary) or orbit (6,14,15). At least two cases have been
result in lipids responsible for the formation of described in the subglottic area of the larynx (2,3). In
myospherules. the nasal cavity, the preferred site is the septum
Although myospherulosis was initially thought followed by the lateral wall. As the disease evolves,
to be a totally innocuous iatrogenic disorder, subse- usually over many years, the nasal cavity becomes
quent reports have indicated that it may exceptionally progressively obstructed and multiple sites are
occur spontaneously (11,12) and, in many instances, involved.
often results in a chronic, painful inflammatory reac- Nasal obstruction is, by far, the most frequent
tion that requires surgical removal (13). The excised initial complaint. Pain and epistaxis are uncommon.
tissue is fibrotic and often has a brown or black On physical examination, the nasal mucosa and
discoloration from acid hematin, a degradation prod- adjacent soft tissue appear swollen, thickened, and
uct of hemoglobin (5,14). fibrotic, often resulting in fibrous tumor-like masses.
Myospherulosis must be recognized to avoid In more advanced cases, the entire nose may be
confusion with mycotic disease and the attendant enlarged and deformed.
morbidity of unwarranted antifungal therapy. The At least 4 (17%) of the 23 cases reviewed were
diseases most often confused with this disorder are found to have cutaneous lesions of granuloma faciale
coccidioidomycosis and rhinosporidiosis. In contrast (1,2,8,11). These appeared on the skin of the nose,
with myospherulosis, these two organisms are posi- malar prominence, temporal area, and forehead. In
tive with the usual fungal stains and are negative on two cases, the cutaneous lesions predated the appear-
immunostaining for hemoglobin. Furthermore, ance of EAF, while the other two developed during
Rhinosporidium is mucicarminophilic, whereas myo- the course of the disease.
spherulosis is not. Reports describing the synchronous
occurrence of both myospherulosis and Aspergillus sp., D. Imaging
however, have been published (15).
Imaging studies show thickening or polypoid hyper-
plasia of the nasal mucosa and soft tissue often
X. EOSINOPHILIC ANGIOCENTRIC FIBROSIS associated with opacification of one or more sinuses
A. Introduction and deviation of the nasal septum. Destruction of
cartilage and bone is not uncommon in more
Eosinophilic angiocentric fibrosis (EAF) is a chronic, advanced cases.
idiopathic disorder that characteristically involves the
upper respiratory tract, especially the nasal cavity, E. Pathology
which leads to progressive obstruction and airway
compromise over a course of many years (1–15). Roberts and McCann have identified two phases of
The disease was first described by Holmes and the disease, early (active) and late (quiescent), which
Panje in 1983 who regarded it as a intramucosal form may coexist (2). The active phase is characterized by a
of granuloma faciale (1). It was Roberts and McCann, prominent inflammatory infiltrate composed of
who in 1985, reported three more cases, described the numerous eosinophils with admixed plasma cells,
pathology in detail, and coined the term ‘‘eosinophilic lymphocytes, and few neutrophils centered around
angiocentric fibrosis’’ (2). capillaries, venules, and arterioles (Fig. 17). The
inflammatory cells may spill into the walls of blood
B. Etiology vessels, but vascular necrosis and thrombosis are rare
to absent. Small foci of stromal necrosis, however,
The etiology is unknown. Whether EAF represents a may be seen. Multinucleated giant cells and granulo-
mucosal form of the cutaneous lesion known as gran- mas are not observed.
uloma faciale or whether it has any relationship at all In the late stage, the inflammation becomes less
to this lesion remains uncertain. Some patients have a intense and fibrosis more apparent. The most charac-
history of allergic rhinosinusitis or allergies to other teristic feature of the disease, in addition to eosino-
substances, such as penicillin. This coupled with the phils, is the prominent deposition of collagen around
fact that large numbers of eosinophils are observed in blood vessels in an ‘‘onion skin’’ pattern (Fig. 18).
tissue samples have led some to speculate that EAF Even in the late stage, eosinophils are still usually
may have an allergic basis. On the other hand, most apparent, unless the patient has received prior
patients do not have allergies, and corticosteroids, corticosteroids.
thus far, are largely ineffective in controlling the The spindle cell fibrotic areas demonstrate dif-
disease. These features mitigate against allergy as an fuse strong positivity for vimentin but are negative
etiological factor. for smooth muscle actin, desmin, S-100 protein, and
360 Barnes
B. Clinical Features
Hamartomas of the sinonasal tract are uncommon and
most often of the pure epithelial type. Wenig and
Heffner have described 31 cases composed of a benign
glandular proliferation of respiratory epithelial cells
Figure 18 Eosinophilic angiocentric fibrosis, late phase. The that they have designated as ‘‘respiratory epithelial
small blood vessels are surrounded by rings of collagen (‘‘onion- adenomatoid hamartomas (REAH)’’ (4).
skin’’ pattern), and fibrosis is more apparent (H&E, 400). These occurred in 27 men and 4 women who
ranged in age from 27 to 81 years (median 58 years).
Most were unilateral and arose from the nasal cavity
(22 cases, 71%), particularly the posterior nasal sep-
CD-34 (6). The inflammatory infiltrate is polyclonal, tum and, to a lesser extent, along the lateral nasal wall,
reacting with B- and T-cell markers without a specific middle meatus, and inferior turbinate. A few, how-
pattern of distribution and without light chain restric- ever, were bilateral. The remaining cases occurred in
tion (6). the nasopharynx and paranasal sinuses. Nasal stuffi-
Complete blood counts show no evidence of ness, obstruction, epistaxis, and chronic rhinosinusitis
peripheral eosinophilia. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic with or without coexistent nasal polyps were the most
autoantibodies (ANCA) are negative, and the erythro- common manifestations.
cyte sedimentation rate is normal or only slightly
elevated.
C. Pathology
D. Differential Diagnosis
REAHs are most often confused with ordinary nasal
polyps, inverted papilloma (IP), and adenocarcinoma.
The presence of excess glands readily distinguish this
lesion from a nasal polyp. In contrast with REAH,
which occurs primarily on the nasal septum, IPs arise
almost exclusively on the lateral nasal wall in the
vicinity of the middle turbinate and ethmoid sinus
area. IPs are also composed predominantly of hyper-
plastic islands of squamous epithelium with few
interspersed mucous (goblet) cells and a prominent
intraepithelial component of neutrophils. Respiratory
epithelium may also be seen, but is usually not domi-
Figure 19 Respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma com-
posed of small to medium-sized glands lined by ciliated, respira- nant. The basement membranes around the epithelial
tory epithelium (H&E, 100). islands in IPs are also thin and delicate, not thick and
hyalinized, as seen in REAH. Mucoserous glands are
also sparse to absent in IPs.
Adenocarcinomas are characterized by back-to-
back arrangement of their glands, occasional nuclear
pleomorphism, prominent mitotic activity, and a des-
moplastic response to stromal invasion. These features
are not seen in REAH.
There is increasing evidence to suggest that EPs may Carcinoma and Exophytic Papilloma
be etiologically related to the human papillomavirus
(HPV), especially types 6 and 11, rarely 16 and 57b. In Carcinoma arising in or associated with EPs is excep-
a collective review of 79 EPs evaluated for the pres- tional. Buchwald et al. have described a case of a
ence of HPV by in situ hybridization or the polymer- 40-year-old man who developed a squamous cell
ase chain reaction, 45 (57%) were positive (Table 8) carcinoma in an EP that was first excised 16 years
(10,11,15–21). ago (23). HPV 6/11 was demonstrated by in situ
C. Inverted Papilloma
Clinical Features
IPs constitute 47% to 79% of all Schneiderian papillo-
mas (Table 7). They are two to five times more
common in men and are found primarily in the
40- to 70-year age group (2,3,9,14,15,24–31). The six-
year-old boy included in the series of Eavey is the
Figure 22 Exophytic papilloma composed of papillary fronds of youngest patient yet described with the disease (32).
squamous cells. Note the absence of surface keratin and scat-
They characteristically arise from the lateral
tered foci of clear cells within the epithelium, which represent
residual mucous cells (H&E, 40).
nasal wall in the region of the middle turbinate or
ethmoid recesses and often extend secondarily into
the sinuses, especially the maxillary and ethmoid and,
to a lesser extent, the sphenoid and frontal. Isolated
lesions of the paranasal sinuses without nasal involve-
hybridization and polymerase chain reaction in
ment, however, do occur (31,33). Only about 8% of IPs
the original papilloma as well as in the recurrent
arise on the nasal septum (34). Their rarity on the
papilloma and in the carcinoma.
nasal septum may be partly due to the fact that there
Norris described another possible case that
is little soft tissue in the septum for the lesion to invert
occurred in a 62-year-old man who experienced four
into before it meets the resistance of the underlying
recurrences of his EP over the course of nine years
septal cartilage which, in turn, would force the lesion
(13). He subsequently developed an invasive squa-
to grow exophytically.
mous cell carcinoma in the same area.
Although reported to be bilateral in 0% to 10% of
cases, such an occurrence should always arouse the
Differential Diagnosis
suspicion of septal erosion and perforation from uni-
EP must be distinguished from the much more com- lateral disease (2,3,15,25,30).
mon keratinizing cutaneous papillomas (e.g., verruca Exceptionally, IPs may arise in sites other than
vulgaris) occurring in the nasal vestibule. The lack of the sinonasal tract. They have been recorded in the
extensive surface keratinization and the presence of oropharynx (35), posterior pharyngeal wall (36), hypo-
mucous cells (accentuated by mucin stains) and pharynx (37), nasopharynx (35,38), lacrimal sac (39),
ciliated or ‘‘transitional’’ epithelium serve to distin- middle ear-mastoid (40), and possibly in the wall of a
guish EP from cutaneous papillomas. In addition, the branchial cleft cyst (41). It has been suggested that
presence of mucoserous glands and septal cartilage ectopic migration of the Schneiderian membrane dur-
further indicate that the lesion is of mucosal, rather ing embryogenesis could account for those aberrant
than cutaneous origin. papillomas in sites contiguous with the sinonasal tract
364 Barnes
(2). Whether all of these ectopic cases are bona fide IPs HPV genomes in IPs by in situ hybridization or the
is uncertain. polymerase chain reaction, particularly HPV 6 and 11,
Unilateral nasal obstruction is the most common sometimes 16 and 18, and exceptionally HPV 57. The
presenting symptom. Other manifestations include frequency of finding the virus by these specialized
nasal drainage, epistaxis (10–20% of cases), anosmia, techniques is highly variable, ranging anywhere from
headaches (especially frontal), epiphora, proptosis, 0% to 100% (Table 9) (10,11,16–21,42–52). In a collec-
and diplopia. Pain, on the other hand, is an uncom- tive review of 341 IPs evaluated for the presence of
mon initial complaint, occurring in only about 10% of HPV by a variety of sophisticated molecular techni-
cases. When present, it should always suggest second- ques, 131 (38%) were positive (Table 9).
ary infection or even a malignant change (25). Macdonald et al. have also found evidence of the
On physical examination, IPs present as pink, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA in 13 of 20 (65%) IPs by
tan, or gray nontranslucent, soft-to-moderately firm using the polymerase chain reaction and have raised
polypoid growths, with a convoluted or wrinkled the possibility that this virus might be involved in its
surface (Figs. 23 and 24). pathogenesis (53). Gaffey et al., on the other hand, in
an in situ hybridization study of 19 IPs (1 of which
Etiology was associated with squamous cell carcinoma) found
no evidence of EBV (22). Obviously, more studies are
Although IPs have long been suspected of being of needed to resolve these conflicting data and the rela-
viral origin, viral inclusions have never been unequiv- tion, if any, between IPs and EBV.
ocally demonstrated by either light or electron micros- If one assumes that the IPs is etiologically related
copy. In addition, they are almost invariably negative to the HPV, then several important questions need
when stained for the HPV by immunoperoxidase. to be addressed: (i) Why is the virus so site specific
Some investigators, however, have demonstrated (i.e., lateral nasal wall)? (ii) Why are IPs almost
invariably unilateral? (iii) Why are IPs so rare in
children who are, conceivably, more susceptible to
viral infections than adults? (iv) If the IP is related to
an HPV infection, why do we not see several members
of a family affected with the lesion? (e) If due to HPV,
could IPs be treated with antiviral medication, rather
than by surgery?
Imaging
Imaging findings vary with the extent of the disease
(54). Early on, there may be only a soft-tissue density
within the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses. Later,
with more extensive disease, unilateral opacification
and thickening of one or more of the sinuses are
common, as are expansion and displacement of adja-
Figure 23 Gross appearance of an inverted papilloma of the cent structures (Fig. 25). Pressure erosion of bone may
lateral nasal wall removed intact by a medial maxillectomy. Note also be apparent and must be distinguished from
the polypoid growth and that each papillary structure is opaque osseous invasion associated with malignancy.
and will not transilluminate. Extensive bone destruction should always raise the
possibility of a carcinoma arising in, or associated
with, an IP.
Pathology
Microscopically, IPs are composed of hyperplastic
ribbons of basement membrane—enclosed epithelium
that grows endophytically into the underlying stroma
(Figs. 26 and 27). The epithelium is multilayered,
usually 5- to 30-cells thick, and formed of squamous
or ciliated, columnar (respiratory) epithelial cells
admixed with goblet cells. Nonkeratinizing squamous
epithelium tends to predominate, but occasionally a
case may be composed almost entirely of respiratory
epithelium (Figs. 28 and Fig. 29). Gradations between
these two extremes are not uncommon, resulting in a
Figure 24 Gross appearance of an inverted papilloma. Note the transitional epithelium reminiscent of that seen in the
convoluted surface, much like the gyri and sulci of the brain or a urinary tract. All of these epithelial types may be
wrinkled prune. present in the same lesion, and their proportions
may vary widely in different lesions or even in
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 365
Figure 28 Higher magnification of the advancing (inverted) Figure 30 Inverted papilloma composed of squamous and
edge of an inverted papilloma. The epithelium is of the squamous ciliated respiratory epithelium (H&E, 100).
type and the clear cells are mainly due to the accumulation of
glycogen. Note the thin basement membrane and sharp bound-
ary between epithelium and stroma (H&E, 200).
diagnosis of ‘‘IP with focal verrucous hyperplasia’’
might be appropriate. This change has no clinical
significance other than it might be mistaken for
appearance and the fact that they will transilluminate, a verrucous carcinoma (see sect. ‘‘Differential
whereas IPs will not (Fig. 27). Diagnosis’’).
Rarely, an IP will exhibit focal surface changes
reminiscent of a verruca vulgaris; that is, it will show Carcinoma and Inverted Papilloma
focal papillary squamous epithelial hyperplasia, with
marked keratosis or parakeratosis, with or without a IPs are occasionally complicated by carcinomas, espe-
prominent granular cell layer, and often contains cially squamous cell carcinoma and, to a much lesser
numerous vacuolated cells suggestive of koilocytes extent, verrucous (57,58), mucoepidermoid (3), spin-
(Fig. 31). Although this might be a viral effect, immu- dle cell, and clear cell carcinomas (8), as well as
nohistochemical stains for HPV, in my experience, are adenocarcinoma (54). The incidence of malignant
invariably negative. When this change is observed, the change in individual series of IPs has ranged
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 367
anywhere from 2% to 27% (Table 10) (2–4,9,11,14, primarily an IP with only a small focus of carcinoma,
26–31,47,51,55,56,59–62). In a collective review of (ii) those who have primarily a carcinoma with only a
1390 IPs reported in the literature, 150 (11%) were small focus of IP, and (iii) those who have an IP and
associated with carcinoma (Table 10). then years later develop a carcinoma in the area in
Patients with IPs that are associated with carci- which the papilloma arose.
nomas fall into three groups: (i) those who have Of all carcinomas associated with IPs, approxi-
mately 61% are synchronous and 39% metachronous
(Table 10). For metachronous carcinomas, Lesperance
and Esclamado observed the mean interval between
the onset of the IP and the development of carcinoma
to be 63 months (range 6 months–13 years) (63).
Carcinomas complicating IP vary from well- to
poorly differentiated and exhibit a broad range of
behavior. Some are in situ and of little consequence,
whereas others are locally aggressive or may even
metastasize (Fig. 32).
The carcinomas may actually arise within the
papilloma (carcinoma ex-IP), as evidenced by a gra-
dation of histological changes, ranging from dyspla-
sia, to carcinoma in situ, to frankly invasive
carcinoma; whereas in others, the carcinoma is merely
associated with a histologically bland IP. Once a
carcinoma is recognized, the pathologist should not
only indicate the histological type, the degree of inva-
sion and differentiation, and the adequacy of resection
Figure 31 Inverted papilloma with focal verrucous hyperplasia. margins (if possible) but also quantitate its volume
Note the papillary epithelial hyperplasia and marked surface (e.g., the specimen consists of 30% IP and 70% poorly
keratinization. Although not illustrated, a prominent granular differentiated squamous cell carcinoma).
cell layer and koilocytes are also occasionally seen. This change There is no correlation between the number of
may be mistaken for a verruca vulgaris or a verrucous carcinoma local recurrences of an IP and the subsequent devel-
(H&E, 40). opment of carcinoma (25). There is some evidence,
however, to suggest that HPV 16 and 18 may be more
No. of carcinomas
Total no. of inverted Percent of
References papillomas No. of carcinomas Synchronous Metachronous carcinoma
Norris (55) 29 2 1 1 7
Skolnik (59) 33 5 1 4 15
Hyams (2) 149 19 ? ? 13
Snyder (3) 39 8 7 1 21
Lasser (60) 17 4 2 2 24
Woodson (61) 90 4 1 3 4
Abildgaard-Jensen (56) 21 3 2 1 14
Weissler (4) 223 11 8 3 5
Segal (62) 30 3 0 3 10
Christensen (14) 39 7 6 1 18
Klemi (47) 19 3 2 1 16
Phillips (27) 112 8 8 0 7
Myers (26) 33 7 5 2 21
Outzen (28) 67 1 0 1 2
Furuta (50) 26 7 5 2 27
Dolgin (29) 42 5 4 1 12
Bielamowicz (30) 61 10 5 5 16
Vrabec (9) 101 8 7 1 8
Beck (51) 39 10 3 7 26
Buchwald (11) 57 5 3 2 9
Lesperance (63) 51 14 6 8 27
Lawson (31) 112 6 4 2 5
Total 1390 150 80 51 Average ¼ 14%
(11%) (61%) (39%) Median ¼ 13.5%
Range ¼ 2–27%
368 Barnes
Table 11 Krouse Staging System for Inverted Papilloma D. Oncocytic Schneiderian Papilloma
(Cylindrical Cell Papilloma,
T1 Tumor totally confined to the nasal cavity, without Columnar Cell Papilloma)
extension into the sinuses. The tumor can be localized to
one wall or region of the nasal cavity or can be bulky and Clinical Features
extensive within the nasal cavity, but must not extend
into the sinuses or into any extranasal compartment. Oncocytic Schneiderian papilloma (OSP) is the rarest
There must be no concurrent malignancy. of the three morphological variants of Schneiderian
T2 Tumor involving the ostiomeatal complex, ethmoid papillomas, constituting only 3% to 8% of the total
sinuses, and/or the medial portion of the maxillary sinus, (2,5,11,12,73–75) (Table 7). It shows many features in
with or without involvement of the nasal cavity. There common with the IP. In fact, some consider it to be
must be no concurrent malignancy. only a variant of the IP. Microscopically, however, the
T3 Tumor involving the lateral, inferior, superior, anterior, or
two lesions are distinct.
posterior walls of the maxillary sinus, with or without
involvement of the medial portion of the maxillary sinus,
OSP is equally distributed between the sexes and
the ethmoid sinuses, or the nasal cavity. There must be most of the patients are older than 50 years at the time
no concurrent malignancy. of diagnosis. The youngest patient reported thus far in
T4 All tumors with any extranasal/extrasinus extension the literature has been a 33-year-old woman (76).
to involve adjacent, contiguous structures such Recently, however, I have seen a case in consultation
as the orbit, the intracranial compartment, or the that involved a 25-year-old woman.
pterygomaxillary space. All tumors associated with OSP occurs exclusively on the lateral nasal wall
malignancy. or in the sinuses, usually the maxillary or ethmoid,
Source: From Ref. 70. and presents as a fleshy pink, tan, red-brown, or gray
papillary or polypoid growth (Fig. 34). Unilateral
nasal obstruction and intermittent epistaxis are the
The ‘‘gold standard’’ of therapy for most IPs most common symptoms.
has been a lateral rhinotomy and medial maxillec-
tomy with meticulous removal of all mucosa in the
ipsilateral paranasal sinuses (26,57). With this Etiology
approach, the incidence of recurrence is 20% (range At least 22 cases of OSPs have been examined by in
0–37%) (69). More recently, a less aggressive situ hybridization or the polymerase chain reaction for
approach using endoscopic resection has gained the presence of HPV, and all have been negative
momentum. With this technique and proper patient (11,16,17,20,22) (Table 12). This is in contrast with
selection, the incidence of recurrence is 12% (range the exophytic and IPs in which HPV has been found
0–33%) (69). The choice of therapy depends on the in many instances. Although this may be a sampling
training and bias of the surgeon, extent of tumor, problem, it does raise the possibility that the OSP is
and possibility of coexistent malignancy. To com- not etiologically linked to this virus.
pare therapeutic modalities, Krouse has proposed a
staging system for IPs, which involves the use of
both CT-MRI imaging and endoscopic examination Imaging
(Table 11) (70). The imaging features are identical with those of the IP
Although surgery is, and should remain, the described in the foregoing section.
primary treatment modality for IP, Mendenhall et al.
have suggested (71) that radiation therapy may have
merit in a small subset of patients with advanced or
incompletely resected tumors. Radiation therapy
should also be considered as an adjunct in patients
who have carcinomas arising in IPs.
Recurrences typically appear within two to three
years of therapy but, in some instances, are delayed
for many years. Attempts to correlate histological
features with risk of recurrence have been unsuccess-
ful (2,31,55,72). Even those with prominent mitotic
activity or dysplasia do not invariably show an
increased incidence of recurrence or malignancy.
Nevertheless, dysplasia, especially if moderate to
severe, demands thorough microscopic evaluation of
all resected tissue to avoid overlooking small foci of
cancer.
Whether the demonstration of HPV in IPs is
associated with a greater risk of local recurrences
is also open to debate. Beck et al. noted (51) that Figure 34 Gross appearance of oncocyte Schneiderian papil-
patients whose IP contained HPV often developed loma. Note both the exophytic (white arrow ) and inverted growth
relapses, whereas Furuta et al. found (50) no relation (black arrow ).
between HPV infection and local recurrence.
370 Barnes
Figure 35 Oncocytic Schneiderian papilloma showing both Figure 36 Oncocytic Schneiderian papilloma. Note the multi-
exophytic and inverted patterns of growth (left and right sides layered oncocytic epithelium, numerous intraepithelial mucin-
of illustration, respectively) (H&E, 40). filled cysts, and microabscesses (H&E, 200).
Pathology
Microscopically, OSP exhibits both exophytic and
endophytic patterns of growth (Fig. 35). The epithelium
is multilayered, two- to eight-cells thick, and is
composed of tall columnar cells, with swollen, finely
granular cytoplasm reminiscent of oncocytes (Figs. 36
and 37). Barnes and Bedetti have shown that the cells
not only resemble oncocytes but also possess a high
content of cytochrome-c oxidase and ultrastructurally
are distended with mitochondria, thus clearly estab-
lishing their oncocytic character (73). The nuclei are
either small, dark, and uniform or slightly vesicular,
with barely discernible nucleoli. Cilia in varying
stages of regression may be observed in a few of the
outermost cells.
The epithelium characteristically contains
numerous small cysts filled with mucin or neutrophils
(microabscesses) (Figs. 36 and 37). The stroma varies Figure 37 Higher magnification of the oncocytic Schneiderian
from edematous to fibrous and may contain modest papilloma shown in Figure 36 (H&E, 400).
numbers of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and neutro-
phils, but few eosinophils. Mucoserous glands are
sparse to absent.
but mucoepidermoid, ‘‘transitional,’’ sinonasal undif-
Carcinoma and Oncocytic Schneiderian Papilloma
ferentiated and small cell carcinomas have also been
described (77–79).
Approximately 4% to 17% of all OSPs may harbor a As in IP, the carcinoma complicating OSP may
carcinoma (2,73,77,78). Most of these are squamous, actually arise within the papilloma as evidenced by a
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 371
gradation of histological changes, ranging from originate in the maxillary sinus, 24% to 30% in the
dysplasia, to in situ, to invasive carcinoma, or it may nasal cavity and vestibule, 10% to 15% in the ethmoid
merely be associated with the OSP. Prognosis depends sinus, and 1% in the sphenoid and frontal sinuses
on the histological type, degree of invasion, and the (9,10).
extent of tumor. In some instances, the carcinoma is in
situ and of little consequence to the patient, whereas
others are locally aggressive and may even B. Etiology
metastasize. Multiple risk factors have been associated with a wide
variety of malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract.
Differential Diagnosis Among these are included (i) tobacco, (ii) ionizing
The intraepithelial mucin-filled cysts, because of their irradiation (radium dial painters, thorium dioxide),
spheroidal nature and mucicarminophilia, are often (iii) occupational exposure to wood dust, nickel, and
mistaken for rhinosporidiosis. In rhinosporidiosis, chromates (iv) boot and shoe manufacturing, (v) work-
however, the organisms are not only limited to the ing in the textile industry, (vi) formaldehyde expo-
epithelium but also involve the stroma and, moreover, sure, (vii) atmospheric pollutants, and (viii) history or
never induce a diffuse oncocytic change in the epithe- presence of an IP or OSP (2,11,12).
lium. The OSP is also occasionally mistaken for a low- Furuta et al. searched for the presence of HPV
grade papillary adenocarcinoma. The presence of 16 and 18 in 49 squamous cell carcinomas of the
intact basement membranes, the lack of nuclear pleo- sinonasal tract using polymerase chain reaction.
morphism and mitotic activity, and the absence of The virus was detected in 14% of the tumors, raising
extensive bone destruction on imaging are features the possibility that the virus might be etiologically
that point to the benignity of the tumor. Furthermore, related to some of the tumors (13). Interestingly, they
the stratified oncocytic epithelium of an OSP is in observed that the presence of HPV was not related to
distinct contrast to the single-layered, nononcocytic local progression, occurrence of metastases, or the
epithelium seen in a low-grade adenocarcinoma. prognosis of the patients. Paulino et al. studied
15 non-Asian patients with squamous cell carcinoma
Treatment and Prognosis
of the anterior nasal cavity for the presence of EBV
using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridiza-
The clinical behavior parallels that of the IP. Effective tion. All tumors were negative for the virus, leading
treatment consists of a lateral rhinotomy and medial the investigators to conclude that squamous cell
maxillectomy or, possibly, excision through an carcinoma in this site does not appear to be causally
endoscopic approach. If inadequately excised, at related to EBV (14).
least 25% to 35% will recur, usually within five years
of treatment.
C. Clinical Features
The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the
XIII. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA sinonasal tract, adjusted for age and gender, is 0.3 to
OF THE NASAL CAVITY 1.0 case per 100,000 people per year in most countries
A. Introduction (11). After the age of 35, the incidence rises steadily,
reaching about five to seven cases per 100,000 people
Assessing the clinical and pathological features of by age 80. It is practically nonexistent in children.
primary squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity Squamous cell carcinomas of the nasal cavity is
is an exercise fraught with frustration because (i) the more common in males (52–97% of all cases) and
disease is uncommon and very few institutions have occurs in individuals with a mean or median age of
acquired a sufficiently large series for evaluation, about 55 to 65 years (range 17–91 years) (Tables 13–15)
(ii) the tumors are usually considered jointly with (15–56). A nonhealing sore, ‘‘crusting’’ of the interior
those occurring in the paranasal sinuses, (iii) many of the nose, epistaxis, rhinorrhea, and unilateral
studies include a heterogeneous group of neoplasms obstruction are common presenting symptoms. Local
and report end results as if only a single histological pain is a feature in only about one-fourth of patients
entity were involved, (iv) some investigators include (21,32).
or exclude tumors arising in certain regions of On physical examination, the lesion presents as
the nasal cavity, whereas others include all sites, an ulcer or as a polypoid or sessile growth limited to
(v) there is no uniformly acceptable system for staging one area of the nose, or it may completely fill the
of tumors to compare the efficacy of various therapeu- cavity. Others, particularly those of the vestibule, may
tic modalities, and (vi) survival rates are variously manifest as an ‘‘infection,’’ with induration of the
reported as actuarial, absolute, or disease free, further upper lip. Benign lesions, on the other hand, tend to
complicating evaluation (1–5). be smooth, firm, localized, and mucosa covered (17).
With these limitations in mind, carcinomas of the There is no significant lateralization of carcino-
nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses account for 0.2% to mas to either side of the nose (Table 16). Although
0.8% of all malignancies and 3% of those occurring in 10% of tumors will present bilaterally, most of these
the head and neck (6,7,8). When broken down accord- are actually examples of unilateral disease that has
ing to site of origin, 58% to 60% of all sinonasal tumors perforated the nasal septum.
372 Barnes
Table 15 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Cavity, all Sites: Clinical Features
No. of Age (mean and/ Local Positive regional Distant
References cases or median) Males (%) recurrence (%) nodes (%) metastasis (%) Survival
Chung (30) 20 56 64 10 — — 70% 3-yr actuarial
Shidnia (37) 21 65 52 29 29 10 64% 5-yr NED
Hawkins (39) 46 61 71 34 22 11 55% at 5 yr
Sakashita (48) 5 40 80 20 20 40 60% at 4.3 yr
Fornelli (56) 32 65 66 16 41 — 50% 5 yr
Mean 124 57 67 22 28 20 —
Abbreviation: NED, no evidence of disease.
Table 16 Lateralization of Cancer of the Nasal Cavity Although the interior of the nose can be divided
No. of Right N Left N Bilateral into five areas—roof, septum, lateral wall, floor, and
References cases (%) (%) N (%) vestibule—squamous cell carcinoma of the nose is
usually considered clinically under three categories:
MacComb (15) 60 25 (42) 31 (52) 4 (6)
Badib (21) 57 33 (58) 21 (37) 3 (5) vestibule, septum, and nasal cavity proper (the
Bosch (25) 40 12 (30) 17 (43) 11 (28) remaining part of the nasal cavity). A discussion of
Lederman (57) 154 54 (35) 73 (47) 27 (18) squamous cell carcinoma at each of these sites follows.
Robin (58) 129 67 (52) 62 (48) —
Total 440 191 (43) 204 (46) 45 (10) Nasal Vestibule
The vestibule is the dilated cavity just inside the nose
Less than 10% of patients (range 0–27%) will that is lined by skin and contains long hairs (vibrissae)
have positive regional lymph nodes at the time of (Fig. 38). It extends from the anterior opening of each
diagnosis (22–24,29,34–36,41,43,45,46,48). Because it nostril to the level of the limen nasi, a distinct ridge on
is a midline structure, nodal metastases may be ipsi- the lateral nasal wall that corresponds to the superior
lateral, contralateral, or bilateral and typically involve margin of the greater alar cartilage and the zone of
the submandibular and submental and occasionally, transition between the skin and the ciliated respiratory
the facial, preauricular, and parotid lymph nodes epithelium of the nasal mucosa. The lateral wall of the
(10,22,24,31). vestibule is formed by the lateral plate of the greater
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 373
Figure 38 Diagram showing the internal anatomy of the nasal TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
cavity and its relation to surrounding structures. TO No evidence of primary tumor
TIS Carcinoma in situ
T1 Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dimension
T2 Tumor more than 2 cm, but not more than 5 cm,
in greatest dimension
T3 Tumor more than 5 cm in greatest dimension
T4 Tumor invades deep extradermal structures
(e.g., cartilage, skeletal muscle, or bone)
Source: From Ref. 52.
and grow in the contralateral nasal cavity, or laryngeal carcinoma certainly raises the question of
(iv) partially or totally fill the nasal cavity. possible seeding from the nasal lesions (32). The
On average, 11% (range 6–21%) of patients with remaining 60% of second primaries occur below the
septal squamous cell carcinomas will experience local clavicles, usually in the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, or
recurrences, 25% (range 7–50%) will develop positive breasts.
regional lymph nodes during the course of their
disease, and 15% (range 3–28%) will subsequently
have distant metastasis (Table 14). Survival rates are XIV. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
also shown in Table 14. According to Beatty et al., OF MAXILLARY SINUS
there is no significant difference in the tendency to
A. Introduction
metastasize between anteriorly or posteriorly located
tumors (32). Tumors larger than 2 cm and positive The maxillary sinuses are paired, usually symmetrical
regional lymph nodes are signs of adverse prognosis hollow cavities that lie in the body of each maxilla
(26,33). (Fig. 40). Each cavity is shaped similar to a pyramid,
being based medially on the nasal cavity and projec-
Nasal Cavity ting laterally to an apex in the zygoma (Fig. 41). Each
sinus has a roof, a floor, and three walls—anterior,
Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity arises
posterolateral, and medial (1). The base of the orbit
most often from the lateral wall. From this site, the
forms the roof of the sinus, and the floor is formed by
tumor may spread, if neglected, in several potential
the alveolar process of the maxilla.
directions to involve the paranasal sinuses, orbit,
The anterior wall is the facial surface of the
cranial cavity, palate, or skin, and it may even invade
maxilla, whereas the posterolateral wall relates to
cranial nerves (39).
the infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossa. The
On average, 22% (range 10–34%) of patients with
medial wall forms part of the lateral wall of the
squamous cell carcinomas of the nasal cavity will
nasal cavity. Each sinus drains through an opening—
experience local recurrences, 28% (20–41%) will
the hiatus semilunaris—into the middle meatus of the
develop positive regional lymph nodes, and 20%
lateral nasal wall.
(range 10–40%) will eventually have distant metasta-
Ohngren’s line, a theoretical plane joining the
sis. Table 15 shows survival rates from various pub-
medial canthus of the eye with the angle of the
lished series.
mandible, is sometimes used to divide the maxillary
sinus into an anteroinferior portion (the infrastruc-
D. Pathology ture) and a superoposterior portion (the suprastruc-
ture) (2).
Squamous cell carcinomas of the nose, regardless of
the site of origin, are predominantly well to moder-
ately differentiated. Poorly differentiated tumors are B. Clinical Features
uncommon.
Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxil-
lary sinus present late and die slowly. Fortunately, it is
E. Treatment and Prognosis a relatively rare disease. It occurs more often in men
(2–5 times) and affects individuals with a mean or
Cancer of the nasal cavity can be treated by radia- median age of 60 to 65 years (3–21).
tion, surgery, or both. Because of cosmetic concerns, Signs and symptoms depend on the stage of the
many clinicians initially favor radiation, especially disease and direction of tumor growth. Early on they
for vestibular tumors. The most common cause of are vague and often confused with sinusitis. This
death is uncontrolled tumor at the primary site.
Because regional and distant metastases without
local recurrence tend to be uncommon, adequate
local control is tantamount to cure. Most local fail-
ures appear within one year of treatment and only
rarely after two to three years (23,34–36,46,49). The
majority are due to underestimating the extent of the
disease or attempts by the surgeon or radiotherapist
to be less radical to preserve function and avoid risks
of complications.
Of all patients with carcinomas of the nasal
cavity, 15% (range 6–28) either have or will develop
a second primary malignancy (25,31,32). In the series
of Bosch et al., 42% of these other tumors were
discovered before, 16% at the same time, and 42%
after appearance of the nasal lesion (25). Approxi-
mately, 40% of the second primaries are found in the Figure 40 Coronal section through the maxillary sinuses show-
head and neck, with two-thirds of these occurring in ing relation of each sinus to other craniofacial structures.
the larynx or pyriform sinus. The high incidence of
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 375
Table 19 ‘‘T’’ Staging of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Approximately 10% to 15% (range 4–21%) of
Maxillary Sinus patients will present with positive regional lymph
nodes, usually the upper jugular, submandibular,
TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
TO No evidence of primary tumor
and retropharyngeal (3,5,6,10,11,13,14,16–18,25).
TIS Carcinoma in situ Distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, however,
T1 Tumor limited to the antral mucosa, with no erosion or are uncommon (0–4%) (5,10,14,16,17,25).
destruction of bone There is no significant lateralization of tumors to
T2 Tumor with erosion or destruction of the infrastructure, either sinus (26,27). Bilateral primary squamous cell
including the hard palate or the middle nasal meatus carcinomas of the maxillary sinuses, though
T3 Tumor invades any of the following: skin of cheek, described, are extremely rare and are predominantly
posterior wall of maxillary sinus, floor of medial wall of metachronous, rather than synchronous (28–30). In a
orbit, anterior ethmoid sinus review of 351 patients with squamous carcinomas of
T4 Tumor invades orbital contents or any of the following: the maxillary sinus, Shibuya et al. observed five
cribriform plate, posterior ethmoid or sphenoid sinuses,
nasopharynx, soft palate, pterygomaxillary or temporal
patients (1.4%) who had bilateral carcinomas (28). In
fossae, or base of skull a similar study of 802 patients, Miyaguchi et al. noted
that 10 (1.2%) had bilateral tumors (29). Of the five
Source: From Ref. 2.
patients with bilateral carcinomas in the study of
Shibuya et al., the interval between the diagnosis of
results in an average delay of five to eight months the index and second primary tumor was more than
before the diagnosis is established and is largely five years in all patients (28). This is a unique experi-
responsible for the 60% to 97% of patients who present ence, because most patients with squamous carcino-
with advanced T3 and T4 tumors (5,7,10–13,17,22–24) mas of the maxillary sinus are usually dead of disease
(Table 19). within five years and attest to the success that the
Complaints can be grouped into five categories: Japanese have had in treating this deadly disease.
nasal, oral, ocular, facial, and neurological. Nasal man- Shibuya et al. also indicate that of those patients
ifestations include unilateral stuffiness, obstruction, who survive more than five years, the incidence of
rhinorrhea, and epistaxis. Oral findings include pain bilateral cancers may even be as high as 5% (28).
referred to the upper premolar and molar teeth; loos-
ening of the teeth; swelling or ulceration of the palate, C. Imaging
alveolar ridge, or gingivobuccal sulcus; or a fistula.
Common ocular features consist of swelling of the Computed tomography and MRI are indispensable,
eyelids, excessive tearing, visual disturbances, and not only in determining the extent of disease but also
proptosis. Facial symptoms result from involvement in assisting the surgeon in selecting the best operative
of the anterior wall of the sinus and are characterized approach (31–34). Unfortunately, squamous cell carci-
by swelling and asymmetry of the cheeks. Neurological nomas of the maxillary sinus are rarely diagnosed in
manifestations are often due to tumor infiltration of the an early stage. Most are advanced and, on imaging,
infraorbital branch of the fifth cranial nerve with sub- show the sinus to be either partially or totally filled
sequent numbness or paresthesia of the cheek. with a tumor, with destruction of one or more of the
376 Barnes
bony walls. Extension into adjacent structures, such as canine fossa or skin involvement, orbital edema,
the cheek, oral cavity, infratemporal fossa, and peri- and positive cervical lymph nodes (46). Tumors that
orbital soft tissue, is not uncommon. originate in the antral suprastructure and those that
recur following initial curative therapy, regardless
of the site of origin, are also associated with a poor
D. Pathology prognosis.
The vast majority of squamous carcinomas are either
well or moderately differentiated. Poorly differentiated XV. NONKERATINIZING CARCINOMA
tumors are uncommon.
A. Introduction
E. Treatment and Prognosis ‘‘Nonkeratinizing carcinoma’’ (NKC) is the official
term sanctioned by the World Health Organization
Because the tumors are generally advanced at the (WHO) for a distinctive variant of squamous cell
time of diagnosis, a combination of surgery and carcinoma derived from respiratory (Schneiderian)
radiation is used in most instances, with or without mucosa and composed of mitotically active epithelial
chemotherapy (10,11,13,14,35–37). The Japanese, cells arranged in a characteristic ribbon-like pattern
however, have had rather remarkable success, using (1,2) (Fig. 42). Synonyms include cylindrical cell
primary irradiation followed by intra-arterial chemo- carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, Schneiderian
therapy (5-fluorouracil and bleomycin), weekly cryo- carcinoma, respiratory epithelial carcinoma, and
surgery, and immunotherapy (4,15,38,39). Ringertz carcinoma.
One of the most difficult decisions in treating Although uncommon in our experience, it com-
maxillary carcinoma is deciding whether or not the prises in some series 10% to 20% of all sinonasal
orbit should also be excised (40–44). This is a signifi- carcinomas (2–4).
cant emotional burden for both the patient and
surgeon and has resulted, in some instance, in the
patient opting for less aggressive or even nonsurgi- B. Etiology
cal treatment. The surgical consensus on manage- El-Mofty and Lu studied 39 carcinomas of the sino-
ment of the orbit in cases of carcinoma approaching nasal tract [21 keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma, 8
the orbital floor has changed from almost routine NKCs and 10 sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas
exenteration in the 1960s to a more current highly (SNUCs)] for the presence of HPV, using the polymer-
selective approach. Clinical evidence of invasion of ase chain reaction (4). They observed that four of the
the orbital fat or extraocular muscles, such as prop- eight NKCs (50%) contained HPV 16, 18, or 45, where-
tosis, diplopia, decreased visual acuity, and restri- as only 19% of the keratinizing squamous carcinomas
cted ocular mobility are clear indications for orbital and 10% of the SNUCs were positive for the virus.
exenteration. Invasion of the bone of the orbital floor Other than a possible link to HPV, its relationship to
is currently not an absolute indication for removal. other risk factors such as smoking and atmospheric
Stern et al., however, indicate that strong consider- pollutants is unknown.
ation should be given to orbital exenteration at the
time of surgery when the orbital floor is resected,
especially if postoperative radiation fields will
include the eye (44). Otherwise, the preserved, radi-
ated eye will almost assuredly be useless following
radiation and may have to be removed at a later
date.
Local recurrence, seen in about 30% to 45%
(range 18–75%) of cases, is the most common cause
of treatment failure and death (5,8,10,11,13,15–22,45).
Virtually, all recurrences appear within two years of
therapy and most within one year. During the course
of the disease, 25% to 30% of patients will develop
positive regional lymph nodes and 10% to 20% will
experience distant metastases (3,5,6,8,10,11,16–22).
Five-year survival rates, variously reported as actuar-
ial, determinant, cumulative, crude, and not otherwise
specified, average about 45% to 50% (range 22–72%)
(4,11,13,16–24,40,45).
According to Weymuller et al. (46), patients who
exhibit one or more of the following signs or symp-
toms have a greater than 75% chance of dying of their Figure 42 Nonkeratinizing carcinoma. Note the ribbons of
disease: facial numbness, facial swelling, diplopia, tumor cells. At low magnification, the tumor is often mistaken
epiphora, denture pain, a mass in the palate or naso- for an inverted papilloma (H&E, 40).
pharynx, proptosis, abnormal extraocular movement,
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 377
B. Etiology
Many of the patients with SNUC either are or have
been smokers. Whether or not there is a relation
between this habit and the development of the
tumor is unknown. Thus far, no specific occupational
exposure has been incriminated (1).
Lopategui et al. and Gallo et al. studied a com-
bined series of 35 SNUCs for the presence of the EBV,
using in situ hybridization, and found evidence of the
virus in 12 cases (34%) (5,6). The virus was found only
in those patients of Asian or Italian descent. None was
found in those patients tested from the United States.
At least some of their EBV-positive tumors on critical
review are, no doubt, examples of unrecognized pri-
mary lymphoepitheliomas of the sinonasal tract (7).
More recently, Cerilli et al., using strict criteria, stud-
ied 25 additional SNUCs for the presence of EBV,
using in situ hybridization. All of their patients were Figure 44 Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma growing as
from the USA, and all were negative for the virus (8). sheets and trabeculae of cells (H&E, 100).
It would thus appear that SNUC has little, if any,
relationship to EBV.
A few cases have also been observed in patients
who have a history of previous nasopharyngeal carci-
noma (NPC) treated with irradiation (7).
Another two cases of SNUC have been described
in patients with a past history of retinoblastoma (9,10).
Whether mutations of the retinoblastoma gene are
responsible for some cases of SNUC is also in need
of further studies.
C. Clinical Features
SNUC is a rare, highly aggressive malignant tumor of
the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. In a collective
review of 116 cases, the male to female ratio was 3:1
with a mean age at diagnosis of about 55 to 58 years
(range 20–84 years) (7,8,11–14). It most often originates
in the nasal cavity, but at the time of presentation the
tumor is often found unexpectedly to be quite exten-
sive, involving not only the nasal cavity and one or
more of the paranasal sinuses but also the orbit and
Figure 45 Higher magnification of the sinonasal undifferentiat-
cranial cavity. ed carcinoma shown in Fig. 44 showing a sheet of cells associ-
As such, patients typically present with multiple ated with extensive necrosis. Mitoses are usually prominent
signs and symptoms of about three- to four-months (H&E, 200).
duration. Among these are included nasal obstruction,
epistaxis, facial pain, headaches, proptosis, visual dis-
turbances, cranial nerve palsies, impaired mental func-
tion, neck mass, and weight loss. Tumors localized to (HPFs)] and angiolymphatic invasion and necrosis are
the nasal cavity or a single sinus are uncommon. prominent.
Infrequently, one may see changes of dysplasia or
carcinoma in situ of the overlying mucosa (Fig. 46).
D. Pathology Strictly defined, squamous and glandular differentiation
Microscopically, the tumors are composed of small to should not be seen nor rosettes or a neurofibrillary
medium-sized polygonal cells that grow in sheets, stroma (see discussion in the sect. ‘‘Introduction’’).
nests, wide trabeculae, and/or ribbons (Figs. 44
and 45). The nuclei are round to oval, hyperchromatic, E. Immunohistochemistry
and mild to moderately pleomorphic, but on occasions,
may be vesicular. Nucleoli vary from inconspicuous to The immunoprofile varies from case to case. The
large. The cells tend to have mild to moderate amounts tumors are, however, consistently positive for epi-
of eosinophilic to amphophilic cytoplasm. Mitoses are thelial markers, including parakeratin and the simple
numerous [10–50 or more per 10 high-power fields CK 7,8, and 19 (4,7,8,15,16). They are negative for CK4,
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 379
F. Electron Microscopy
Ultrastructurally, the cell membranes are smooth to
moderately ruffled and exhibit small desmosomes and
poorly formed junctional complexes (1). Nuclear
membranes are smooth to mildly irregular. The cyto-
plasm contains small amounts of rough endoplasmic
reticulum, polyribosomes, and mitochondria. Golgi
complexes are usually prominent, and lyzosomes
and lipid droplets may be found; however, bundles
of tonofilaments are absent. A few neurosecretory
granules have been observed in rare cells, but only
after a prolonged search (1).
G. Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes a myriad of round
Figure 46 Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. Note the sur- cell tumors that can occur in the sinonasal tract (16,17).
face component of in situ carcinoma and compare with similar Among the more common ones are olfactory
cells invading the lamina propria (H&E, 400). neuroblastoma (ONB), NPC, malignant lymphoma,
malignant melanoma (MM), rhabdomyosarcoma,
small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC), and
peripheral neuroectodermal tumor/Ewing’s sarcoma.
5/6, and 14. Variable reactivity has been observed Immunohistochemical stains that are useful in sepa-
with p63. Less than half the cases are reported to be rating these tumors are shown in Tables 20 and 21.
positive for epithelial membrane antigen, neuron- The three tumors that are most often confused
specific enolase, and p53 (8). The cells rarely decorate with SNUC are the ONB, NPC (undifferentiated type),
for synaptophysin, chromogranin, and Leu-7 and then and SCNEC. In addition to their different immunohis-
only in a spotty or patchy distribution. A few cases have tochemical profiles, ONB does not exhibit the degree
also been positive for CD-99, but in these instances, the of necrosis, mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism, or
staining is cytoplasmic rather than membranous as tendency for angiolymphatic invasion as seen in
characteristically seen in peripheral neuroectodermal SNUC. Features that are useful in separating these
tumor/Ewing’s sarcoma (8). three tumors are shown in Tables 22, 23, and 24.
Table 20 Immunohistochemical Staining of Selected Round Cell Tumors of the Sinonasal Tract
Tumor CK EMA LCA Synaptophysin HMB-45 Desmin Vimentin CD99
SNUC þ þ/ /þ /þ
ONB a þ
NPC þ þ
Lymphoma þ þ /þ
Melanoma þ þ
Rhabdomyosarcoma þ þ /þ
SCNEC þ þ þ/
PNET/ES /þ /þ þ þ
a
ONB is typically negative for CK, but may infrequently focally express low-molecular weight CK.
Abbreviations: CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; LCA, leukocyte common antigen; SNUC, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma;
ONB, olfactory neuroblastoma; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; SCNEC, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; PNET/ES, peripheral neuroectodermal
tumor/Ewing’s sarcoma.
B. Clinical Features
SCNEC of the sinonasal tract has been described in
patients from 16 to 79 years of age, with an average of
about 50 to 55 years, and a gender distribution of 1:1
to 1.5:1 in favor of males. Figure 47 Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Similar to their
It originates either within the nasal cavity or the counterpart in the lung, the small cells have poorly defined
paranasal sinuses, especially the ethmoid and maxil- cytoplasm and dense, hyperchromatic, round to short spindled
lary, and may remain localized to these sites, or it may nuclei devoid of nucleoli (H&E, 400).
spread to the orbit, cribriform plate, or cranial cavity.
Symptoms, therefore, depend on the extent of disease
and include intermittent epistaxis, nasal obstruction,
progressive swelling and deformity, proptosis, visual SCNECs characteristically grow in the lamina
disturbances, cranial nerve palsy, and pain. propria as sheets or small clusters of cells beneath
A few SCNECs have also been associated with an intact or ulcerated epithelial surface. If the latter is
paraneoplastic endocrine syndromes of ectopic adre- intact, it typically shows no significant dysplasia. In
nocorticotropic hormone production and in appropri- some instances, the tumor is intimately associated
ate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (4,13,17). One with mucoserous glands, often appearing to arise
tumor was found to contain a high content of calcito- from them.
nin on chemical examination, but was not associated
with hormonal symptoms (4). The occurrence of a
paraneoplastic syndrome is an ominous feature with E. Immunohistochemistry
death ensuing within six months of onset. The tumors are positive for AE1/3 and CAM5.2,
occasionally in a dot-like pattern. They are also usually
C. Imaging positive for neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin,
and synaptophysin and negative for S-100 protein
Imaging studies may show only a soft-tissue mass (14). Only about 40% of extrapulmonary SCNECs,
limited to the sinonasal tract, with or without obstruc- however, express thyroid transcription factor-1 (18).
tive opacification of the adjacent sinuses. Other At least one tumor has been reactive for 0-13. By in
tumors exhibit considerable osteodestruction, with situ hybridization, all tumors have been negative for
invasion of the orbit, cribriform plate, or cranial the EBV (14).
cavity.
F. Electron Microscopy
D. Pathology Neurosecretory granules may or may not be seen. Cell
SCNECs of the sinonasal tract presumably arise from junctions are present to a variable degree, ranging from
mucoserous glands or from an uncommitted (stem) absent to well-formed desmosomes. Occasionally,
cell of the surface epithelium (2). Microscopically, they bundles of tonofilaments are observed (19).
are identical with their pulmonary counterpart and, as
such, are composed of short, spindle cells, with G. Differential Diagnosis
sparse, poorly defined cytoplasm, and hyperchro-
matic nuclei without nucleoli (Fig. 47). Nuclear mold- The differential diagnosis includes ONB, SNUC, basa-
ing, frequent mitoses, and necrosis are common. loid squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC), and metastatic
Tumors composed of slightly larger cells, with pulmonary SCNEC.
round, hyperchromatic nuclei, and more abundant ONB is characteristically a low-grade neoplasm
cytoplasm have also been described (12). These are and does not show the prominent necrosis, mitotic
similar to the ‘‘intermediate’’ type of SCNEC seen in activity, or nuclear pleomorphism of SCNEC. It is also
the lung. A few may exhibit divergent differentiation, composed of ‘‘round’’ rather than short spindle cells
with foci of obvious squamous cell carcinoma or and frequently exhibits rosettes (Homer Wright,
adenocarcinoma. Flexner–Wintersteiner) and a neurofibrillary matrix.
382 Barnes
Primary NPC can only be excluded by demon- wood dust is 70 to 500 times that of the nonwood-
strating the absence of tumor in the nasopharynx. worker (28,29). Dust particles measuring 5 mm or more
and primarily from the hardwood trees, beech, oak,
and mahogany are thought to be responsible for the
H. Treatment and Prognosis disease, rather than the lacquers, varnishes, and adhe-
Effective therapy of LEC of the sinonasal tract is still sives applied to the furniture. The inhaled particles
evolving, but like its counterpart in the nasopharynx, are concentrated in the anterior part of the nasal
irradiation appears to be the mainstay. In a review of septum and the anterior end of the middle turbinate,
13 cases, Jeng et al. observed a 61% disease-free where they induce cuboidal or squamous metaplasia
survival at a median follow-up of 48 months (6). with impairment of the mucociliary clearance mecha-
Three (23%) of their patients had positive cervical nism (30,31). This results in prolonged mucosal con-
lymph nodes and one (8%) distant metastasis (bone). tact of the carcinogen present within the dust. The
potential chemical or physical carcinogen (i.e., wood
dust and its natural products or wood dust with both
XX. INTESTINAL-TYPE ADENOCARCINOMA natural products and chemical additives) has not been
adequately defined (26).
A. Introduction The average interval from first dust exposure to
Adenocarcinomas comprise 10% to 20% of all malig- the appearance of the carcinoma is 40 years (range
nant tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses 7–69 years) (24). In one of Hadfield’s patients, the length
and can be divided into four types (Table 25) (1–3). of exposure to wood dust was only 18 months (30). In
The intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) bears a other studies, the length of dust exposure has ranged
close resemblance to adenocarcinoma of the colon from 5 to 55 years (26). The risk for ITAC does not
and, in some instances, even to villous adenoma appear to decrease until at least 15 years after termina-
(4,5). A few may even resemble normal small intesti- tion of occupational exposure to wood dust (26).
nal mucosa (6). Although the majority of tumors associated with
In the past, ITAC has been referred to as ‘‘colonic- wood dust exposure are adenocarcinomas, there is
type adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, also an increased incidence of squamous cell carcino-
heterotopic tumor with intestinal mucous membrane, mas, especially among woodworkers in Japan (21).
enteric-type adenocarcinoma, or nonspecific adeno- Interestingly, in contrast with ITACs, which are asso-
carcinoma’’ (7–10). Because they may have features ciated with hard wood exposure, squamous cell carci-
in common with either the large or small intestine and nomas are more common in those exposed to soft
because the term ‘‘enteric’’ is sometimes used as a woods (pine and spruce) (26).
synonym for the small intestine (e.g., enteritis vs. There is also an increase in nasal cancers among
colitis), the term ‘‘intestinal-type adenocarcinoma’’ individuals exposed to leather dust, especially in the
has been proposed and adopted by the WHO (11,12). shoe industry, and possibly to flour in the baking
profession (17,28). However, in these occupations,
the tumors are evenly distributed between ITAC and
B. Etiology squamous carcinomas. Not all ITACs, however, are
related to an occupational exposure. They may occur
Interest in the ITAC peaked in the 1960s when
sporadically (11).
Hadfield, a British otolaryngologist, astutely observed
It has also been suggested that patients with an
an increased incidence of this tumor among wood-
occupational exposure to wood dust may be at risk for
workers employed in the furniture industry of
developing other site-specific malignancies. Among
Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
these are Hodgkin’s disease and carcinomas of the
Her observation was initially reported by her colleague,
skin, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs (26). More stud-
Macbeth, in 1965 and subsequently by Acheson,
ies, however, are needed to substantiate these alleged
Cowdell, Hadfield, and Macbeth in 1968 (13,14). It
associations.
has since become apparent that the risk for developing
ITAC is not limited to England, but also occurs in the
wood industries of many countries (15–27). C. Clinical Features
In a review of 5785 patients with sinonasal
ITACs can be divided clinically into two categories:
malignancies from 17 countries, Mohtashamipur
those related to occupational exposure (O-ITAC), and
et al. observed that 23% were woodworkers, and of
those that occur sporadically (S-ITAC) without a
these, 64% had adenocarcinomas (24). The risk for
known history of occupational exposure. There are
developing ITAC in the furniture worker exposed to
differences between the two. O-ITAC arises primarily
in the nasal cavity and ethmoid sinus region, and 85%
to 95% of patients are men (11). The male predomi-
Table 25 Classification of Adenocarcinomas of
the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses nance is probably related to the fact that very few
women are employed as woodworkers. S-ITAC, on
Salivary type the other hand, may also occur in the same site(s) as
Intestinal type the O-ITAC, but these tumors are relatively more
Nonintestinal type (seromucinous) common in the maxillary sinus. In addition, S-ITACs
Metastatic
occur equally between the two sexes. The average age
384 Barnes
at diagnosis for both types is about 58 years (range Table 26 Classification and Survival of Intestinal-Type
12–86 years) (11). Adenocarcinoma
Although most ITACs occur in the sinonasal Kleinsasser and 3-yr cumulative
tract, they are not unique to this site. Spiro et al. Barnes (11) Schroeder (19) survivala
have described three arising in the oral cavity: one
Papillary PTCC-I 82%
in the palate, one in the floor of the mouth, and one in
Colonic PTCC-II 54%
the cheek-lip area (32). Lopez and Perez have also Solid PTCC-III 36%
reported another case in the pharynx (33). Some of the Mucinous Alveolar goblet 48%
rare mucinous adenocarcinomas of the major salivary Signet ring 0%
glands described by Ellis and Aclair may be additional Mixed Transitional 71%
examples (34). a
Survival data derived from Ref.19.
The most common presenting symptom is uni- Abbreviation: PTCC, papillary tubular cylinder cell.
lateral nasal obstruction, followed by epistaxis and
purulent or clear rhinorrhea (4,7,11,25,35–39). Larger,
more extensive tumors result in facial pain, mass of
the cheek, proptosis, and visual or neurological symp-
toms. Cervical lymph node and distant metastases are
rarely present at the time of initial presentation.
On physical examination, the tumors are polyp-
oid, papillary, or nodular and dark red, gray-white, or
pink-gray. Most are friable. Some are ulcerated and
hemorrhagic, whereas others are mucoid.
Barnes has described one patient with an
advanced tumor of the maxillary sinus that was
associated with pretreatment borderline abnormal
serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (11).
Whether this laboratory test has any role in monitor-
ing the course of the disease in uncertain.
D. Imaging
Imaging studies are essential in determining the Figure 49 Papillary variant of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma.
extent of disease and the operative approach. Early Note the highly branched papillae with thin fibrovascular cores
lesions show only a soft-tissue mass with little, if any, (H&E, 40).
evidence of bone destruction. Other tumors are asso-
ciated with considerable osteodestruction and inva-
sion of contiguous structures, such as the orbit and
cranial cavity. A few may even involve the contralat-
eral sinonasal tract.
As the tumor enlarges, it interferes with drain-
age of nearby sinuses. The ensuing obstructive sinusi-
tis then may interfere with optimal preoperative
evaluation and staging.
E. Pathology
There are two generally accepted histological classi-
fications of ITAC. Barnes, in 1986, proposed that they
be divided into five types: papillary, colonic, solid,
mucinous, and mixed (11). Kleinsasser and Schroeder,
in 1988, suggested four categories: papillary tubular
cylinder cell, alveolar goblet cell, signet ring cell, and
transitional (19). They further divided their papillary-
tubular cylinder cell variant into three additional Figure 50 High magnification of a grade I (well differentiated)
papillary variant of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Note the
subtypes: I (well differentiated), II (moderately differ-
uniform, basally located nuclei (H&E, 200).
entiated), and III (poorly differentiated). These two
classifications actually share many similarities, and
their use depends on personal preference. Table 26
shows their interrelations. nonciliated, columnar (cylinder) cells (Fig. 49). The
The papillary-type (papillary-tubular cylinder columnar cells may be polarized with their long axes
cell-I) is characterized by highly branched fibrovascu- perpendicular to the basement membrane, or they may
lar fronds and glands (tubules) covered or lined by tall be stratified, crowded, and disorganized (Fig. 50).
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 385
H. Molecular-Genetic Data
Despite the similarity of ITAC and adenocarcinoma
of the colon at the light microscopic and immuno-
histochemical level, there is controversy on whether
this relationship extends to the molecular level.
Depending on the study, 0% to 29% of ITACs have
exhibited K-ras mutations, 0% to 25% H-ras muta-
tions, and 14% to 44% p53 mutations (54–59).
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
studies have revealed that ITACs carry a large number
Figure 54 Paneth cells in an intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of chromosomal gains and losses, including high-level
(H&E, 400). amplifications. The pattern of chromosomal abnor-
malities in these tumors differs from the pattern in
other tumors within the same anatomic area (e.g.,
squamous cell carcinomas, salivary gland tumors),
serum level of somatostatin, these tumors virtually which may be due to differences in etiology (60).
never produce a clinically significant endocrine syn-
drome (5).
Recurrent ITACs may manifest the histological I. Differential Diagnosis
identity of the original tumor, or they may recur or
convert into another histological pattern. If they do The differential diagnosis includes a primary non-
transform, the transformation is usually from papillary ITAC, papillary rhinosinusitis, papillary adenocarci-
to one of the more aggressive types. noma of the nasopharynx, and metastatic adenocarci-
The most common histological types of ITAC noma of the gastrointestinal tract.
seen in woodworkers as well as in sporadic cases are A primary non-ITAC typically consists of one
the papillary and colonic variants (11,19). cell population and, with the possibly exception of a
ITAC, particularly the papillary type, clearly few mucus cells, is devoid of goblet and Paneth cells.
arises from the mucosa of the sinonasal tract It is also positive for CK7 and negative for CK20,
(11,40,41). Whether others also arise from the mucosa CDX2, and villin (Table 27).
or from mucoserous glands or their ducts is uncertain. Sinusitis, at times, may have a papillary config-
On the basis of the work of Cheng and Leblond and uration, but in these instances, the papillae are short
Kirkland, it has been suggested that multidirectional and blunt and not highly branched as one sees in
differentiation of a common stem cell could account papillary ITAC. In addition, the background is
for the variety of cells (Paneth, endocrine, absorptive, ‘‘clean’’ in papillary rhinosinusitis, the basement
goblet) observed in ITAC (6,42,43). The stem cell, membrane is often thick and hyalinized, the surface
either by direct transformation or by induction of cells are ciliated and free of dysplastic changes, and
adjacent mesenchyme, might also give rise to the the stroma often has a prominent component of
muscularis mucosa noted in a few tumors. eosinophils.
Features that distinguish papillary ITAC from
papillary adenocarcinoma of the nasopharynx are
F. Immunohistochemistry discussed in section XXV of this chapter.
In a collective review of 97 ITACs, we observed that, if
performed, 66% were positive for the CK7, 89% for Table 27 Differential Diagnosis of Intestinal and Nonintestinal
CK20, 89% for CDX2, 96% for synaptophysin, and 53% Adenocarcinoma
for chromogranin (44–53). On the basis of these results
ITAC in two-thirds of the cases exhibits a characteris- Synaptophysin
þ Tumor CK7 CK20 CDX2 Villin or chromogranin
tic profile of CK7 , CK20þ, CDX2þ, villinþ; however,
in one-third of cases the profile is CK7–, CK20þ, Normal mucosa þ
CDX2þ, villinþ. ITAC þ/a þ þ þ þ/
Non-ITAC þ
Adenocarcinoma þ/b þ þ þ
G. Electron Microscopy of colon
a
Approximately 66% of ITAC are CK7-positive.
The similarity of ITAC to intestinal tumors extends b
Approximately 74% of adenocarcinomas of the rectum are CK7 positive,
beyond the light microscopic to the ultrastructural all other colon adenocarcinomas are usually CK7 negative.
level (5,7). Batsakis et al. have observed glycocalyceal Abbreviation: ITAC, intestinal-type adenocarcinoma.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 387
Metastases to the nasal cavity and paranasal may have a slow, ‘‘smoldering’’ disease, only to die of
sinuses from a primary adenocarcinoma of the gastro- their tumor 10 or more years later.
intestinal tract are not common (61,62). In a study of Treatment consists of surgical excision using a
82 tumors metastatic to the nasal cavity and paranasal lateral rhinotomy or, at times, even a cranial base
sinuses, Bernstein et al. found the most common sites approach. The use of radiotherapy is dictated by the
of origin to be the kidney (40 cases), lung (10 cases), extent and resectability of the tumor. An elective neck
breast (8 cases), testis (6 cases), gastrointestinal tract dissection is not warranted.
(5 cases; 2 stomach, 2 colon, and 1 rectum), uterus Prognosis depends on the histological type,
(4 cases), thyroid (3 cases), adrenals (2 cases), cutane- degree of differentiation, stage of the disease, and
ous melanoma (2 cases), and pancreas (2 cases) (61). the adequacy of resection margins. Papillary ITAC,
The maxillary, ethmoid, and frontal sinuses, and the especially grade I or well differentiated, has the best
nasal cavity were involved in descending order. In prognosis. It may recur, but it rarely metastasizes. The
some of these patients, the head and neck metastasis other types are more virulent, with a greater propen-
was the initial manifestation of an otherwise clinically sity for dissemination. Over the course of time, a few
occult carcinoma. For this reason, consideration of a tumors may change from one histological type into
gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma in all patients another. This is an ominous finding, signaling a tumor
with ITACs, especially the colonic variant, would with increased aggressiveness.
seem prudent, although in the absence of relevant Woodworkers seem to have a better prognosis
signs and symptoms such studies will generally than those individuals with sporadic ITAC. This is
prove negative. probably because the woodworker is under height-
Immunohistochemistry offers little, if any, help ened surveillance for this tumor, and in this group, the
in distinguishing ITAC from a metastatic colorectal tumors are more often found in the nasal cavity or
adenocarcinoma (see sect. ‘‘Immunohistochemistry’’ ethmoid sinus and, therefore, can be detected earlier
above and Table 27). In the past, an immunoprofile by the patient. In contrast, patients with a sporadic
of CK7–/CK20þ was considered characteristic of a tumor are not in early detection programs and have
colonic adenocarcinoma. More recent studies have tumors that are relatively more common in the maxil-
shown that the presence or absence of CK7 positivity lary sinus, which are difficult to detect early.
in colon carcinomas varies according to the level of
tumor involvement. Zhang et al. observed in an
evaluation of 35 adenocarcinomas of the rectum that XXI. NONINTESTINAL-TYPE
26 (74%) expressed CK7 whereas only 3 of 11 (27%) ADENOCARCINOMA
colon adenocarcinomas proximal to the rectosigmoid
colon were positive for CK7 (63). A. Introduction
Since about two-thirds of sinonasal ITACs also
Nonintestinal-type adenocarcinomas (Non-ITAC) are
express CK7, one cannot rely on this stain entirely to
uncommon tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal
separate ITAC from a metastatic colorectal adenocar-
sinuses that can be divided into low- and high-grade
cinoma. Immunostains for neuroendocrine markers
subtypes (1–5). By definition, they do not show histo-
may offer some possible aid since ITACs tend to
logical features of salivary-type neoplasms and do not
contain more endocrine-type cells than colorectal
contain the multiple cell types (absorptive, goblet,
adenocarcinomas and would be expected to stain
endocrine, Paneth) or exhibit the immunoprofile of
more extensively (44). When used in tandem, a strongly
an ITAC.
positive stain for both CK7 and synaptophysin and/or
Synonyms include low- or high-grade adenocar-
chromogranin would be more supportive of a primary
cinoma, nonenteric adenocarcinoma, seromucinous
ITAC. Also, if dysplasia or in situ carcinoma is
carcinoma, low-grade papillary adenocarcinoma, ter-
observed in the mucosa adjacent to an ITAC, this
minal tubulus adenocarcinoma, and sinonasal tubulo-
would imply that the tumor is primary rather than
papillary low-grade adenocarcinoma.
secondary.
B. Etiology
J. Treatment and Prognosis There are no known environmental or occupational
The clinical course is characterized by repeated local risk factors, although a few cases have occurred in
recurrences (53%), with ultimate invasion of the orbit patients with smoking histories.
and cranial cavity, but little tendency toward cervical
lymph node (mean 8%; range 0–22%) and systemic C. Clinical Features
metastases (mean 13%; range 0–29%) (11). Tumor
necrosis with sepsis is often a problem and may be Low-grade non-ITACs occur over a broad age range
life threatening. In a review of 213 ITACs, Barnes (9–89 years, mean about 55–65 years) and exhibit a
noted that at least 60% of the patients were known gender distribution of 1:1 to 1.3:1 in favor of males
to have died of their disease (11). Of those dying, 80% (1–5). They tend to predilect the nasal cavity and
did so within three years of diagnosis. The survival ethmoid sinus and manifest as nasal obstruction and
according to histological type is shown in Table 26. epistaxis. High-grade non-ITACs also occur over a
Some patients, especially those with papillary ITAC, broad age range (15–80 years, mean 59 years) but are
388 Barnes
D. Pathology
Non-ITACs usually arise from the mucosa and exhibit
a glandular and/or papillary growth (Figs. 55–58).
The low-grade variant is composed of small glands,
lying back to back, lined by a single layer of epithelial
cells. Myoepithelial cells are not seen, mitoses are
sparse, and necrosis and perineural invasion are rare
to absent. Occasionally, the glands are dilated and/or
cystic with intracystic papillary projections. The
stain for S-100 protein, they are otherwise negative for to date, Compagno and Wong noted that 25 originated
myoepithelial and neuroendocrine markers (3). from the bony or cartilaginous nasal septum, with
most having a broad base rather than a pedicle
attachment. Eight arose from the lateral wall, usually
F. Differential Diagnosis involving a turbinate, and in seven the exact site of
The differential diagnosis includes ITAC, inverted origin within the nasal cavity could not be determined
Schneiderian papilloma or OSP, and a salivary-type (3). The sinuses were not involved in any case, either
adenoma. primarily or secondarily.
Non-ITAC has a characteristic immunoprofile of Intranasal pleomorphic adenomas occur over a
CK7þ, CK20–, CDX2–, villin– which contrasts with broad age range (3–82 years, mean 42 years) and
the CK7þ/–, CK20þ, CDX2þ, villinþ profile of ITAC involve both genders about equally (3,4). Unilateral
(Table 27). ITAC is also occasionally positive for nasal obstruction and episodic epistaxis are the usual
neuroendocrine markers, while the non-ITAC is symptoms. On imaging, one sees an expanding, het-
negative. erogenous mass that fills the cavity and may even
The inverted Schneiderian papilloma is com- erode or destroy bone (3,6).
posed of squamous and/or respiratory epithelium, Grossly, the tumors appear exophytic, polypoid,
which is not seen in non-ITAC. The OSP is uniformly or dome shaped and have ranged from 0.5 to 7.0 cm in
composed of oncocytic epithelium, with prominent greatest dimension. Microscopically, they are more
intraepithelial mucin-filled cysts and microabscesses cellular than the ‘‘usual’’ pleomorphic adenoma.
(Figs. 36 and 37). While oncocytic cells may be seen in Rare examples, which have ossified or even exhibited
non-ITAC, intraepithelial cysts and microabscesses focal skeletal muscle differentiation have been
are not. Salivary-type adenomas contain myoepithelial described (5,7).
cells, which are not observed in non-ITACs. In the series of Compagno and Wong, 31 of
34 patients (90%) available for follow-up (mean
7.4 years) showed no evidence of local recurrence,
G. Treatment and Prognosis regardless of excisional procedure used (intranasal vs.
Low-grade non-ITAC can usually be managed by wide excision) (3).
surgery alone, either through an endoscope or a A few examples of carcinoma expleomorphic
medial maxillectomy, whereas high-grade tumors adenoma of the nasal cavity have been documented
often require both surgery and radiation. (8).
Low-grade non-ITACs are characterized by 20%
to 30% incidence of local recurrences (usually within
2–4 years of therapy) and rare to absent cervical C. Oncocytic Tumors
lymph node and distant metastases (1–5). Death
Oncocytic tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal
from disease is rare (1). High-grade tumors, on the
sinuses, comparable to those seen in the major sali-
other hand, are aggressive, with a 30% incidence of
vary glands, are rare. They are more common in the
distant metastases and a 20% three-year survival (1).
nasal cavity than the sinuses and frequently predilect
the nasal septum.
In our review of 15 cases, nine occurred in males
XXII. SALIVARY-TYPE NEOPLASMS and five in females. The gender of one case was not
A. Introduction indicated (9–13). The ages ranged from 23 to 86 years
(mean 58 years). All presented with nasal stuffiness/
Mucoserous glands are present throughout the sino- obstruction, rhinorrhea, and/or epistaxis.
nasal tract and are particularly abundant in the nasal Some of the tumors have been as small as 5 mm
cavity along the lateral wall, including the turbinates, (9), and most on microscopic examination are of
and to a lesser extent on the nasal septum (1). They the solid type of oncocytoma. There are some who
are, however, relatively uncommon in the sinuses. state that all oncocytic lesions in this location should
Salivary-type neoplasms may arise not only from be considered as low-grade carcinomas, despite their
these glands but also the surface mucosa (2). Despite histological appearance. We wish to point out that
the abundance of glands, tumors derived from them, any benign tumor in this relatively closed environ-
with the exception of adenoid cystic carcinoma, are ment may erode bone and exhibit necrosis, e.g., IP,
scarce, and risk factors are largely unknown. angiofibroma, and are not absolute signs of malig-
A brief summary of some of these neoplasms nancy. In our opinion, an oncocytic lesion should
follows. A more detailed account of their clinicopatho- only be considered as malignant if it shows unequiv-
logical features can be found in the chapter ‘‘Diseases ocal invasion (not erosion of bone), increased mitotic
of the Salivary Glands.’’ activity (especially atypical mitoses), pleomorphism,
perineural invasion, and/or metastasis.
B. Pleomorphic Adenoma The differential diagnosis includes an oncocy-
toid/oncocytic carcinoid tumor, a metastatic renal cell
Pleomorphic adenoma of the sinonasal tract occurs carcinoma, and a metastatic oncocytic (Hurthle cell)
primarily in the nasal cavity and only rarely in the carcinoma of thyroid. A carcinoid tumor, in contrast to
sinuses (3–5). In a review of 40 cases, the largest series an oncocytoma, is positive for synaptophysin and/or
390 Barnes
E. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Figure 60 Gross picture of the resected adenoid cystic carci-
noma shown in Fig. 59. The tumor is solid and deceptively well
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is the most frequent circumscribed.
salivary-type neoplasm of the sinonasal tract.
Although slowly growing, it is locally aggressive
and relentless in its progression with death from
disease often exceeding 10 years or more (16–19).
ACC of the sinonasal tract occurs over a broad
age range (18–82 years, mean about 45–55 years) and
exhibits a gender distribution of 1:1 to 2.5: 1 in favor of
males (17,19). In one series of 35 cases, 19 tumors arose
in the maxillary sinus, 10 in the nasal cavity, and 6 in
the ethmoid sinus (19). Symptoms include nasal
obstruction, epistaxis, toothache, swelling and pain
of the premaxilla and palate, paresthesias, proptosis,
visual disturbances, trismus, and/or headache.
Tumors, especially those of the maxillary sinus, are
often advanced at the time of diagnosis and staged as
T3 or T4 (Figs. 59–61).
Surgery with adjuvant radiation is the usual
treatment. Following therapy, approximately 50% to
75% of patients will experience local recurrence usu-
ally within five years, and 3% to 5% will experience
cervical lymph node metastasis, and 30% to 35% will Figure 61 Microscopic view of the adenoid cystic carcinoma in
have distant dissemination of tumors to the lungs and Figs. 59 and 60 showing the classic cribriform pattern of tumor
bones. The overall 10-year survival is about 40% to cells (H&E, 100).
55% at best (17,19).
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 391
occasionally accompanied by swelling of the nose or diffusely hemorrhagic and fill the entire nasal cavity.
cheek, are the usual presenting complaints. Pain, Bone destruction may or may not be apparent on
however, is uncommon. radiological studies.
On physical examination, the tumors are sessile At the time of diagnosis, 0% to 20% of patients
or polypoid, pink, white, brown, or black and average will have positive cervical lymph nodes, especially
1 to 4 cm (Fig. 62). In some instances, they are around the submandibular gland (9,27,28,30,32,
34,35,38,40,42,43). Only 6%, however, will have distant
Table 28 Distribution of 604 Malignant Melanomas of the Nasal metastases (9,42).
Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses
Total D. Pathology
no. of
References cases Nose Sinus Sinonasal MMs of the sinonasal tract, histologically, resemble
their cutaneous counterparts and, as such, are com-
Moore (7) 10 9 1 0 posed of epithelioid or spindle cells arranged in small
Holdcraft (26) 39 21 7 11
clusters (thèques) or sheets (Figs. 63 and 64). Mitoses,
Freedman (27) 47 29 18 0
Conley (28) 18 12 6 0
Eneroth (29) 24 16 0 8
Shah (30) 45 39 6 0
Snow (31) 11 11 0 0
Cove (24) 1 0 0 1
Lund (9) 36 33 3 0
Bethelsen (32) 20 20 0 0
Blatchford (33) 6 6 0 0
Panje (34) 10 9 1 0
Trapp (35) 15 11 4 0
Suen (36) 1 1 0 0
Huntrakoon (44) 2 0 1 1
Going (37) 1 0 1 0
Gilligan (38) 28 16 4 8
Franquemont (39) 14 4 7 3
Stern (40) 20 12 8 0
Guzzo (41) 26 26 0 0
Thompson (42) 16 13 3 0
Kingdom (43) 17 10 7 0
Loree (45) 18 14 4 0
Brandwein (46) 21 12 5 4
Thompson (20) 106 64 3 39 Figure 63 Amelanotic malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity
Prasad (47) 39 29 4 6 composed of epithelioid cells arranged in an alveolar pattern
Manolidis (48) 13 10 3 0 (H&E, 200).
Total 604 427 96 81
(100%) (71%) (16%) (13%)
Figure 62 Deeply pigmented malignant melanoma involving Figure 64 Amelanotic malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity
the inferior nasal turbinate. The thick arrow shows small, mulifo- composed of spindle cells. Note the vague storiform pattern.
cal areas of additional melanoma. The thin arrow depicts an area Such tumors may be confused with a malignant fibrous histiocy-
of melanosis. toma or other soft-tissue sarcomas (H&E, 100).
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 393
G. Differential Diagnosis
MM is one of the great mimickers in pathology. Under
appropriate conditions, it can be mistaken for a varie-
ty of tumors, including carcinomas, sarcomas, and
lymphomas (54,55). This is especially true in the
sinonasal tract where the tumor is rare, often fails to
show junctional activity, frequently is amelanotic, and
occasionally grows in a spindle pattern.
The biggest problem in differential diagnosis
rests, therefore, in simply failing to consider MM as
a possibility. Once considered, the diagnosis can
easily be established by appropriate immuno-
histochemical stains or ultrastructural evaluation.
Amelanotic spindle cell melanomas of the sino-
Figure 65 In situ malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity (H&E,
nasal tract often grow in large fascicles and are
400).
frequently mistaken for a fibrosarcoma or malignant
schwannoma. They may also exhibit a storiform pat-
tern and be confused with a malignant fibrous histio-
pleomorphism, intranuclear inclusions of cytoplasm, cytoma (Fig. 64). As a general rule, one should never
necrosis, and lymphatic, vascular, and perineural in- make a diagnosis of a soft-tissue sarcoma adjacent to a
vasion are additional, although inconsistent, features. mucous membrane in the head and neck without first
Because of extensive ulceration, junctional or excluding a spindle cell carcinoma, an amelanotic
pagetoid invasion of the overlying mucosa is seen in MM, and a myoepithelial neoplasm.
only 9% to 44% of cases (20,26,39,49) (Fig. 65). Ten to A metastasis from a cutaneous MM to the sino-
30% of tumors are also amelanotic, requiring special nasal tract must also be considered in the differential
tissue stains [S-100 protein, HMB-45 etc.] and a high diagnosis (56–60). The incidence of cutaneous MM
index of suspicion for diagnosis (26,27). metastasizing to the mucosal surfaces of the head
Desmoplastic mucosal MMs, though rare, have and neck is 0.2% to 0.7% if clinical data are used
also been described, primarily in the oral cavity but and 2% to 8% if autopsy studies are included
also in the sinonasal tract (50). (56,58,60–62). When cutaneous MMs disseminate to
the mucous membranes of the head and neck, the
primary is most often located on the trunk (55–62% of
E. Immunohistochemistry cases), followed by extremities (24–27%), and head
and neck (18–24%) (58,60). More than 60% of the
Immunohistochemical evaluation of sinonasal MMs
mucosal metastases will appear within two years of
using the standard melanoma markers have shown
diagnosis of the cutaneous lesion and about 60% to
that 91% to 95% are positive for S-100 protein, 76% to
65% of the patients will also have evidence of dissem-
98% for HMB-45, 78% to 100% for tyrosinase, 65% to
inated disease at the time of diagnosis of the mucosal
100% for melan-A, and 57% to 91% for microphthal-
lesion. Junctional activity in the overlying or adjacent
mic transcription factor (20,51). S-100 protein and
mucosa, if present, in conjunction with the clinical
tyrosinase are the best stains to identify desmoplastic
history, distinguishes primary mucosal MM from
mucosal MMs, while HMB-45 is negative in most
metastatic disease (60). However, as previously men-
desmoplastic and many spindle cell MMs (51).
tioned under ‘‘Etiology,’’ some primary sinonasal
MMs may also arise from stromal melanocytic pre-
F. Molecular-Genetic Data cursors and, accordingly, will not show junctional or
in situ mucosal changes.
Van Dijk et al. examined 14 sinonasal MMs by com-
parative genomic hybridization (CGH) and observed H. Treatment and Prognosis
two remarkably consistent alterations (52). First, chro-
mosome arm 1q was gained in all tumors, and all The treatment of choice for sinonasal MM is surgery.
tumors harbored a gain of 6p, a loss of 6q, or both. Once considered radioresistant, radiation is now
Second, gains of 1q, 6p, and 8q occurred frequently in considered by some and denied by others to be an
combination with a loss of copy number or a normal important adjuvant in achieving local control and may
copy number of the opposite chromosome arm, sug- even have merit as a prime modality in selected
gesting isochromosome formation. Comparing these patients (20,63–66). An elective neck dissection
CGH results, the authors concluded that sinonasal for sinonasal MM is usually not warranted (40).
melanomas harbor a more consistent CGH pattern Chemotherapy is, at present, employed principally
than other melanoma types and subtypes. This as in the treatment of disseminated disease and for
well as other studies suggest that there may be several palliation.
394 Barnes
Local recurrence (40–85%) and distant metastasis Table 30 Proposed TNM staging of Sinonasal and Nasophar-
(30–70%), rather than regional lymph node metastasis yngeal Mucosal Malignant Melanomas
(10–30%), are responsible for most treatment failures Stage Definition
and deaths (9,27,28,30,32,34,35,38,40,42,43,67). The
five-year survival rate is about 20% to 30% (range Primary tumor
6–48%) (9,26,28,30,32,34–36,40,41,67). The average inter- T1 Single anatomic
site
val from initial treatment to local recurrence in three T2 Two or more
reported series has ranged from 9 to 13 months anatomic sites
(34,40,43). Local recurrence following seemingly ade- Regional lymph node
quate excision is ascribed to the presence of intrale- N1 Any lymph node
sional lymphatic and blood vessel invasion seen in metastasis
many tumors. Distant metastasis
Local recurrence and distant metastasis are omi- M1 Distant metastasis
nous signs. Most patients who fail locally eventually Stage grouping
die of their disease, and of those who develop syste- Stage I T1, N0 M0
mic disease, the average survival after metastasis is Stage II T2, N0 M0
Stage III Any T, any N, M1
only six months (30,34,40). The lungs, liver, brain, Stage IV Any T, any N, M1
bones, and spinal cord are the most frequent sites of T, primary tumor.
dissemination, but occasionally unusual areas, such as TX, primary tumor cannot be assessed.
the small intestine and heart, may also be involved T0, no evidence of primary tumor
(62,68,69). T1, tumor limited to a single anatomic
Clark staging of mucosal MMs is not possible site. A single anatomic site is defined
because of the absence of comparable landmarks as one of the following: nasal cavity,
within the mucosa and lamina propria of the upper maxillary sinus, frontal sinus, ethmoid
respiratory tract that are present in the dermis. sinus, sphenoid sinus, nasopharynx.
The Breslow thickness, the single most important Subsites, such as septum, lateral
wall, turbinate, nasal floor, or nasal
histological prognostic factor in cutaneous MM, has vestibule are not separately
not been found to be useful in mucosal MMs of considered.
the head and neck (20,47). In lieu of these two param- T2, tumor involving more than one
eters, Prasad et al. have proposed a three-level micro- anatomic site. More than one
staging system that seems to correlate with prognosis anatomic site is defined by tumor
(Table 29) (47). In a review of 61 mucosal MMs (39 involvement of more than one
sinonasal, 20 oral, 1 pharyngeal, and 1 laryngeal), they anatomic site (although not subsite)
observed the median survival to be 138 months for as cited above, including any
Level I, 69 months for Level II, and 17 months for extension into subcutaneous tissues,
Level III (47). skin, palate, pterygoid plate, floor,
wall, or apex of the orbit, cribriform
The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifica- plate, infratemporal fossa, dura, brain,
tions for nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and skin are middle cranial fossa, cranial nerves,
not readily applicable for mucosal MMs. As a result, clivus.
Thompson et al. have proposed a modification shown
Data derived from Ref. 20.
in Table 30 (20). Another more simplified clinical Abbreviation: TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
staging system uses three stages—stage I (localized
disease), stage II (locoregional disease), and stage III
(distant disease at presentation) (70).
XXIV. NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA
Local recurrence, and tumors composed
of undifferentiated cells with a sarcomatoid and A. Introduction
pseudopapillary architecture, and more than 10 mito-
ses per 10 HPFs are indicators of a poor prognosis NPC is defined by the WHO as ‘‘a cancer arising in
(20,47). the nasopharyngeal mucosa that shows light or ultra-
structural evidence of squamous differentiation. It
encompasses squamous cell carcinoma, nonkeratiniz-
ing carcinoma (differentiated or undifferentiated) and
Table 29 Prasad’s Microstaging of Mucosal Malignant Melano- basaloid squamous carcinoma. Adenocarcinoma and
mas of the Head and Neck salivary gland carcinoma are excluded’’ (1).
Level Definition It has a very distinctive geographic and ethnic
distribution (see ‘‘Etiology’’ below). On a worldwide
I Melanoma in situ without evidence of invasion or with
only microinvasion (defined as invasive individual or
basis, it is a relatively rare tumor, with an estimated
clusters of <10 atypical melanocytes near the 65,000 new cases per year, or 0.6% of all cancers (1).
epithelial junction)
II Invasion limited to the lamina propria
B. Anatomy
III Deep tissue invasion into skeletal muscle, bone, or
cartilage Anatomically, the nasopharynx is a small, relatively
Source: From Ref. 47. inaccessible space that represents the cranialmost
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 395
portion of the pharynx. It averages 2 to 3 cm ante- and III) by the fact that high antibody titers to the
roposteriorly and 3 to 4 cm vertically and transver- virus are found in most patients regardless of geo-
sally, with considerable individual variation (2). graphic location. The association was strengthened
Anteriorly, it communicates with the nasal cavity when EBV DNA and EBV-associated nuclear antigens
through the posterior choanae. Superiorly, the roof is were found in the epithelial cells of NPC and not in
formed by the base of the skull and the undersurface of the lymphoid component of the tumor (13,14). As the
the sphenoid sinus. Posteriorly, the wall is composed of tumor burden increases so does the antibody titer.
the ventral surfaces of the first and second cervical It has been suggested that the HPV, as well as
vertebrae. Inferiorly, it communicates with the oro- cigarette smoking, alcohol, and formaldehyde expo-
pharynx, or if the soft palate is closed, the superior sure, may play a role in the etiology of the keratinizing
surface of the soft palate forms the floor. Laterally, the type of NPC (WHO I) (15–18). Other factors that may
orifices of the eustachian tubes are found, each partially impact on the risk of NPC include an occupational
surrounded by a cartilaginous elevation referred to as exposure to wood dust and a history of chronic nose
the torus tubarius. Medial to this elevation is the and throat problems (rhinosinusitis) (1,19–21).
pharyngeal recess or fossa of Rosenmuller, which is a
slit-like space of variable size and depth.
Histologically, the nasopharynx is lined by both D. Clinical Features
ciliated respiratory and stratified squamous epitheli-
um, with respiratory epithelium predominating near NPC occurs in all age groups with a peak incidence
the posterior choanae and squamous epithelium on between 30 and 50 years of age. Some regions have
the posterior and lateral walls, with areas of epithelial observed a bimodal distribution, with one peak
transition. The nasopharynx is part of Waldeyer’s ring between 10 to 20 years of age and another at 40 to
and, accordingly, contains abundant lymphoid tis- 60 years (22–33). The ratio of males to females is rather
sue, with occasional germinal centers and crypts. consistent, regardless of geographic location, and is
Mucoserous glands are seen but are not prominent. about 2 to 3:1.
Patients typically present with nasal obstruction,
epistaxis, serous otitis media, or an asymptomatic
C. Etiology neck mass (usually in the apex of the posterior cervical
triangle or superior jugular area). At the time of
The etiology of NPC is multifactorial and relates to the diagnosis, 10% to 20% will also have a cranial nerve
interaction of race, genetics, environment and the dysfunction (especially III, IV, V, and VI) and 60% to
EBV. Although the incidence is declining, it is still 85% will have positive cervical lymph nodes, of which
one of the most frequent cancers in Chinese, especially 35% to 45% will be bilateral (2,34–36). Less than 5%,
among those who reside in southern China in the however, will have distant metastasis. In rare instan-
province of Kwantung and in Hong Kong (20–30 ces, NPC may present with dermatomyositis or mani-
cases per 100,000 population per year), and also fest with inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic
occurs with increased frequency in North Africa and hormone or Cushing’s syndrome secondary to ectopic
among Alaskan Eskimos, Indians, and Aleuts (3,4). In adrenocorticotrophic hormone production (37–39).
most other countries, it is an uncommon tumor (less The most common site of origin in the nasophar-
than one case per 100,000 population per year) (5). As ynx is the lateral wall in the region of the fossa of
the Chinese immigrate to other low-frequency coun- Rosenmuller, adjacent to the opening of the eusta-
tries, the incidence of NPC diminishes with successive chian tube followed by the posterior-superior wall. In
generations, but even then, the risk of NPC remains a review of 437 patients, Skinner et al. observed that
greater than that of the new host population (6,7). 78% of the tumors were lateral in origin and equally
Human leukocyte antigens (HLA) may also be distributed between the right and left sides of the
important etiological or prognostic indicators in NPC. nasopharynx, 12% were central in origin, 5% were
The association, however, is sometimes confusing and occult with a normal-appearing nasopharynx, and 5%
contradictory and may vary with ethnic group and were too large to determine their origin (34).
country. In a meta-analysis of southern Chinese, The clinical appearance of the tumor, as viewed
Goldsmith et al. observed a positive association for through an endoscope, is highly variable. In a retro-
NPC risk and HLA-A2, HLA-B14, and HLA-B46 and a spective review of 209 patients, Dickson noted that
negative association for HLA-A11, HLA-B13, and 74% of the carcinomas were exophytic, 14.4% infiltra-
HLA-B22 (8). A genetic predisposition is also sup- tive, and 6.7% ulcerative; in the remaining 4.8%, the
ported by the observation that individuals who have a tumor was not described (7).
first-degree relative with NPC are also at risk for In countries where the incidence of NPC is low,
developing tumor (9). the diagnosis is often not considered. The symptoms
Dietary factors, especially preserved foods that are regarded as trivial and largely ignored, which
contain a high content of nitrosamines such as accounts for the advanced stage when first recognized.
Cantonese salted fish, are also implicated and espe- Once the diagnosis is entertained, the patient should
cially if the individual consumes such food on a have a thorough examination, including nasopharyngo-
regular basis during the first decade of life (10–12). scopy (40). Imaging studies are crucial for proper
The EBV has been incriminated in the etiology of staging, planning of treatment, and selecting the most
NPC (especially the nonkeratinizing tumors, WHO II appropriate site of biopsy. Plain radiography, however,
396 Barnes
lacks sensitivity and specificity. Computed tomography Table 31 AJCC Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, 2002
and magnetic resonance imaging are much preferred
Primary tumor (T)
and very helpful in defining the extent of skull base TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
invasion, present in about 25% to 30% of cases (41). T0 No evidence of primary tumor
Cytology, both exfoliative and fine needle aspi- Tis Carcinoma in situ
ration, may also have a role in the diagnosis of NPC. T1 Tumor confined to the nasopharynx
The value of exfoliative cytology is, however, contro- T2 Tumor extends to soft tissues
versial, with overall diagnostic accuracy rates ranging T2a Tumor extends to the oropharynx and/or nasal cavity
anywhere from 26% to 89% (42). Fine needle aspira- without parapharyngeal extension
tion of enlarged cervical lymph nodes has, on the T2b Any tumor with parapharyngeal extension
other hand, opened a new vista in diagnosis. It not T3 Tumor involves bony structures and/or paranasal sinuses
T4 Tumor with intracranial extension and/or involvement of
only provides material that may be diagnostic but also
cranial nerves, infratemporal fossa, hypopharynx, orbit,
provides cells or tissue fragments that can be analyzed or masticator space
by in situ hybridization and/or the polymerase chain
Regional lymph nodes (N)
reaction for the presence of the EBV (43–46).
NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
Patients with NPC frequently develop antibodies N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
to a variety of EBV antigens, particularly immuno- N1 Unilateral metastasis in lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in
globulin A (IgA) antibodies, to the viral capsid antigen greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossaa
and early antigen. As the tumor burden increases, N2 Bilateral metastasis in lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in
so does the antibody titer. Consequently, the viral greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossaa
titer can be used not only as a diagnostic tool to screen N3 Metastasis in lymph node(s)a>6 cm and/or to
populations at risk but also to monitor therapy supraclavicular fossa
(47–51). N3a Greater than 6 cm in dimension
More recently, it has been shown that the detec- N3b Extension to the supraclavicular fossab
tion of EBV genomic LMP-1 by nasopharyngeal cotton Distant metastasis (M)
swab and polymerase chain reaction amplification is a MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
valuable tool for screening and early detection of M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis
NPC. Hao et al. indicate that the procedure has a
92% positive predictive value and a 97% negative Stage grouping: nasopharynx
predictive value (52). Stage 0 Tis N0 M0
Once the diagnosis is established, it then Stage I T1 N0 M0
becomes necessary to determine the extent or stage Stage IIA T2a N0 M0
of the tumor. In the past, there were two competing Stage IIB T1 N1 M0
staging symptoms—the AJCC and the Ho. Each had T2 N1 M0
its own advantages and disadvantages (53–56). The T2a N1 M0
new sixth edition (2002) of the AJCC Cancer Staging T2b N0 M0
Manual has incorporated the best features of both and T2b N1 M0
Stage III T1 N2 M0
is now emerging as the most preferred (Table 31) (57).
T2a N2 M0
T2b N2 M0
T3 N0 M0
E. Pathological Features T3 N1 M0
T3 N2 M0
To standardize the confusing histological terminology Stage IVA T4 N0 M0
of NPC, the WHO in 1978 proposed that these tumors T4 N1 M0
be divided into three categories: squamous cell carci- T4 N2 M0
noma, nonkeratinizing carcinoma (NKC), and undif- Stage IVB Any T N3 M0
ferentiated carcinoma (58). In 1991, the WHO slightly Stage IVC Any T Any N M1-
modified this classification and once again in 2005 a
Midline nodes are considered ipsilateral nodes.
(Table 32) (1,59). b
Supraclavicular zone or fossa is relevant to the staging of nasophar-
The term ‘‘squamous cell carcinoma,’’ also some- yngeal carcinoma and is the triangular region originally described by Ho.
It is defined by three points: (i ) the superior margin of the sternal end of
times referred to as WHO I, is used for those tumors the clavicle, (ii ) the superior margin of the lateral end of the clavicle, and
that show definite evidence of squamous differentiation (iii ) the point where the neck meets the shoulder. Note that this would
(intercellular bridges, keratinization) over most of its include caudal portions of Levels IV and V. All cases with lymph nodes
extent and is associated with a desmoplastic reaction (whole or part) in the fossa are considered N3b.
(Fig. 66). It can be graded as well, moderately, or poorly Abbreviation: AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Source: From Ref. 54.
differentiated, has a weak relationship to EBV, tends to
remain localized, and has a variable response to irradi-
ation (60). It rarely occurs in individuals younger than
40 years. (Fig. 67). The cell margins are distinct and the junction
The differentiated NKC (WHO II), as the name between stroma and epithelium is sharp. This type has
implies, shows no evidence of keratinization. The cells a strong relationship to EBV, tends to disseminate
are stratified and have an appearance similar to that from its site of origin, and has a variable but usually
of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder good response to irradiation (60).
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 397
F. Immunohistochemistry
NPCs are positive pankeratin, AE1/3 and p63. They
are also positive for CK 5/6, 8, 13, and 19 and usually
negative for CK7 and 20 (1,75). CAM 5.2 and epithelial
membrane antigen are weak and patchy. The lymphoid
cells are mixture of the T and B cells, with the former
predominating (66,67). Plasma cells are polyclonal.
Some tumors also contain scattered S-100 protein-
positive dendritic cells, and the more of these cells
seen, allegedly the better the prognosis (76,77).
G. Viral Studies
If one employs in situ hybridization or the polymerase
chain reaction, EBV genomes can be detected in most
NPCs, especially the nonkeratinizing variants (WHO
II and III) (Fig. 69). The incidence of finding EBV in the
squamous cell carcinoma variant of NPC, however, is
Figure 69 Positive EBER stain for Epstein-Barr virus in an controversial and, if found at all, is usually limited to a
undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Abbreviation: few scattered cells in the dysplastic surface epithelium
EBER, Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA. or in the relatively ‘‘nonkeratinized’’ portion of the
tumor and then only low copies of the virus are found
(78–81).
According to Pathmanathan et al., EBV infection
is an early initiating event in the development of NPC.
It is generally agreed that the above three They observed evidence of the virus in 11 cases of
types of NPCs actually represent variants of preinvasive lesions of the nasopharynx and that the
squamous cell carcinoma. The histological distinc- EBV DNA was clonal, indicating that the preinvasive
tion among these three tumor types is by no lesions arose from a single EBV-infected cell.
means always sharp. In fact, in the series of Moreover, they noted that the EBV-induced clonal
Shanmugaratnam et al., 26% of 363 NPCs had fea- proliferation in these preinvasive lesions often pro-
tures of more than one of the above histological gressed to an invasive carcinoma within one year (82).
patterns (72). In such a case, the tumor is classified Pak et al., however, indicate that the interval from in
according to its dominant component. situ to invasive NPC may take as long as four or five
NPC may also contain amyloid. Prathap et al. years (83).
studied consecutive biopsies in 434 Malaysian patients Hording et al. studied 38 NPCs for the presence
with NPC and found amyloid in 12% of the tumors. of the HPV. Four of 15 squamous carcinomas were
The amyloid was present in all three histological types positive for HPV (1 HPV-11 and 3 HPV-16). None of
of NPC but was highest in nonkeratinizing carcinoma the remaining 23 undifferentiated and nonkeratiniz-
(NKC) (22%) followed by squamous cell carcinoma ing carcinomas harbored HPV. They suggested that
(12%) and undifferentiated carcinoma (7%). The amy- the HPV might be responsible for some EBV-negative
loid was patchy in distribution and often localized to a squamous cell carcinomas of the nasopharynx (15).
small part of the tumor. No significance was apparent
in patients with this finding (73). H. Molecular-Genetic Data
Basaloid squamous carcinoma is distinctly
unusual in the nasopharynx. Histologically, it is com- Cytogenetic studies of NPC have shown multiple
posed primarily of smooth contoured lobules of mitot- chromosomal abnormalities, most of which are non-
ically active basaloid cells with comedonecrosis and specific. The only somewhat consistent finding has
occasional peripheral palisading of nuclei. The squa- been a loss of genetic material at two loci (3p 14 and
mous component is generally small and, at times, 3p25) on the short arm of chromosome 3 in a series of
elusive due to surface ulceration. Three cases have 36 patients from China (84).
been described in the nasopharynx in Hong Kong, and The frequency of chromosomal damage varies
all three were associated with the EBV (74). with the stage of the tumor; early-stage tumors
The frequency of the above histological types (I and II) have fewer genetic changes than those
varies according to geographic location. In North observed in advanced stages (III and IV). Gains in
America, about 75% of cases are of the nonkera- genetic material have been observed, in decreasing
tinizing type (WHO II and III) and 25% squamous order of frequency, on 12p, 1q, 17q, 11q, and 12q.
cell carcinoma (60) (WHO I). In endemic areas, such Loss of genetic material has been observed at 3p, 9p,
as Hong Kong, almost all (99%) are of the nonkera- 11q, 13q, and 14q (1,85).
tinizing type (WHO II and III). The frequency of Whether DNA tumor ploidy has prognostic sig-
basaloid squamous carcinoma in the nasopharynx is nificance remains controversial. Costello et al. con-
unknown, but appears to be distinctly uncommon (1). cluded that tumor ploidy was not a significant
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 399
determinant of prognosis, while Cheng et al. and Yip Primary LEC of the sinonasal tract should also
et al. observed that diploid tumors had a significant be distinguished from the undifferentiated NPC. Since
survival advantage over those that were aneuploid the two are identical histologically and both contain
(86–88). the EBV, separating the two depends on identifying the
P53 overexpression has been reported in 31% to location of the tumor either in the sinonasal tract or
95% of NPCs and, with few exceptions, does not nasopharynx (97) (Figs. 48 and 68).
appear to be a significant prognostic factor (89–91). Basaloid squamous carcinoma, in turn, is occa-
In a study of 30 NPCs, Roychowdhury et al. noted that sionally confused with adenoid cystic carcinoma.
intense angiogenesis and C-erb B2 overexpression These two can be distinguished by features shown
correlated with a tendency for distant metastasis in Table 34.
and/or shorter overall survival (92). Shi et al. in a
review of 87 NPCs found no association between
tissue angiogenesis (microvessel density count) and J. Treatment and Prognosis
clinical behavior (93). Because of the strategic location of the nasopharynx
In a review of 49 NPCs, Bar-Sela et al. observed and the tendency for the tumor to invade surrounding
that one-third were positive for C-Kit and none for tissues, the first line of therapy for NPC is irradiation
C-erb B2 (HER2) (94). The C-Kit positive tumors were (98–102). Surgery, if used at all, is reserved for radio-
all EBV-positive and nonkeratinizing type (WHO II resistant and/or locally recurrent tumors (103–107).
and III). Although the C-Kit-positive tumors tended to As the local and regional disease can be adequately
be associated with a slightly better prognosis, this was managed by radiotherapy, the role of chemotherapy is
not statistically significant. usually reserved for disseminated disease and, more
There is preliminary evidence to suggest that
patients with tumors that are Bcl-2-negative and
Table 34 BSCC Vs. ACC
C-Myc-positive have a better prognosis (lower rates
of recurrence and death from disease) compared Feature BSCC ACC
with those whose tumors are Bcl-2 positive and Lymph nodes þ
c-Myc-negative (95,96). Cribriform pattern focal often prominent
Nuclei Hyperchromatic to dark, angulated
vesicular, round
I. Differential Diagnosis Nucleoli þ/
The keratinizing NPC (squamous cell carcinoma, Mitoses þ þ/
Squamous carcinoma þ
WHO I) is easily recognized and resembles squamous
Perineural invasion rare frequent
cell carcinoma anywhere else in the body. The non- Comedonecrosis prominent rare
keratinizing variants (WHO II and III), on the other Muscle specific actin Neg. or focal diffuse
hand, may be more problematic and can be confused Myoepithelial cellsa þ
with a myriad of other small round cell tumors of the P53 þ
sinonasal tract, including malignant lymphoma, Ki-67 high low
malignant melanoma, ONB, extramedullary plasma- S-100 focal, dendritic diffuse
cytoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. SNUC, especially, is cells
often confused with the undifferentiated NPC (WHO C-kit þ/ þ
III). Features that are useful in separating these two P63 diffuse, basaloid, myoepithelial
and squamous cells only
neoplasms are shown in Table 33. The other small
cells
round cell tumors can usually be excluded with an a
appropriate panel of immunostains [leukocyte com- Although in our experience myoepithelial cells are usually not seen in
BSCC, a recent abstract indicates that myoepithelial cells may be seen in
mon antigen, S-100 protein, HMB-45, synaptophysin, some BSCCs (36).
immunoglobulin G (IgG), Lambda and kappa light Abbreviations: BSCC, basaloid squamous cell carcinoma; ACC, adenoid
chains, myogenin, etc.]. cystic carcinoma.
400 Barnes
recently, has also been used in a neoadjuvant stetting The status of the regional lymph nodes also
(108–113). Newer therapeutic options are being affects prognosis. Lymph nodes confined to the
explored, including brachytherapy, interferon upper neck, regardless of size, and whether they are
gamma, immunization with EBV peptide-pulsed den- unilateral or bilateral, fixed or nonfixed, do not carry
dritic cells, and photodynamic therapy (114–116). the same weight as those present in the lower neck–
After treatment with radiation, it may take up to supraclavicular area (25,126). Positive lymph nodes in
10 weeks for the tumor to disappear histologically. If the latter location are associated with a poor
posttreatment biopsy is still positive for tumor after prognosis.
10 weeks, additional salvage therapy is warranted The prognosis for NPC is better in young patients
(117,118). (younger than 40 years) than old, and in females than
Screening for LMP-1 also seems to be a valuable in males. Cranial nerve involvement also adversely
test to monitor therapy and early recurrence of NPC affects prognosis, whereas erosion of the base of the
following radiotherapy. According to Tsang et al., skull does not (127). Keratinizing histology and
LMP-1 becomes undetectable at a median interval of absence of EBV indicate a poor prognosis.
4.3 weeks (range 1.3–28 weeks) after the beginning of In contrast to other patients with mucosal head
irradiation. If LMP-1 reappears, the patient is at risk and neck squamous carcinomas who have an
for recurrence. In their study, the median interval increased frequency for developing additional prima-
between the reappearance of LMP-1 and abnormal ry tumors (field effect of Slaughter), patients with
mucosal findings by endoscopy was 11.9 weeks (range NPCs do not exhibit an increased frequency of second
2.7–27.4 weeks) (119). primaries, probably related to different risk factors.
At times, it is often difficult to distinguish on Patients with NPCs, however, are at risk, though
biopsies radiation changes from recurrent NPC. If the small, for developing radiation-induced neoplasms
LMP-1 is positive, then the biopsy most likely repre- (128–130).
sents recurrent tumor rather than radiation-induced
atypia-dysplasia.
Sixty percent to 85% of patients with NPCs will XXV. PAPILLARY ADENOCARCINOMA
have positive cervical lymph nodes at the time of OF THE NASOPHARYNX
diagnosis, but less than 5% will demonstrate clinical
evidence of distant metastasis (4,25,34). However, A. Introduction
during the course of the disease, 20% to 60% (depend-
ing on whether clinical or autopsy data are used) will The vast majority of malignant tumors of the naso-
develop tumor dissemination below the clavicles, usu- pharynx are either keratinizing or nonkeratinizing
ally to the bones, distant lymph nodes, lungs, and liver squamous cell carcinomas or malignant lymphomas
(25,120–122). Ninety-eight percent of distant metasta- (1,2). Adenocarcinomas are uncommon, constituting
ses are detected within three years of diagnosis (122). no more than 6% of all malignancies, and, of these,
Their presence is an ominous sign of impending death. most are derived from the mucoserous (minor
The median survival following their appearance is only salivary) glands and can be classified according to
six months (121). According to Vikram et al., the standard categories (adenoid cystic carcinoma,
presence of distant metastases correlates with the N mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), and such) (3).
stage but not T stage (120). The incidence of distant Exceptionally, adenocarcinomas may also arise from
metastasis in patients whose cervical lymph nodes the mucosa and, when they do, they are typically
measure less than 3 cm, 3 to 6 cm, and more than papillary and are referred to as papillary adenocarci-
6 cm is 10%, 25%, and 50%, respectively (123). nomas of the nasopharynx (PACN) (4–6).
In a review of 103 patients with NPCs treated by
radiation therapy, Bailet et al. observed the 5-, 10-, and B. Clinical Features
15-year overall survival rates were 58%, 47%, and
41%, respectively, with a median survival of 96 months PACNs are slightly more common in males (60%) and
(124). Local recurrences following radiation therapy occur in individuals from 11 to 64 years of age (medi-
continue to be a problem and range from approximately an 33 years) (4–6). Most present with airway obstruc-
30% to 45% (120,124,125). In general, the greater the tion. Other less common symptoms include serous
T stage the more likely that the patient will develop otitis media, with or without hearing loss, and post-
local failure (125). nasal drip with blood-tinged sputum. Rarely, the
Keratinizing carcinomas (squamous cell carcino- tumor may be an incidental finding following
ma; WHO 1) have a much worse prognosis than adenoidectomy.
nonkeratinizing carcinomas (nonkeratinizing carcino- PACNs are typically confined to the nasophar-
ma, WHO 2, undifferentiated carcinoma, WHO 3). ynx and, on physical examination, present as exo-
The overall five-year survival rate for patients with phytic or pedunculated masses, with a papillary,
NPCs in the United States is about 40% to 50%. For nodular, or cauliflower-like appearance. The tumors
specific histological types, the five-year survival is range from 0.3 to 4.0 cm, and most often they involve
20% to 40% for squamous cell carcinoma (WHO 1) the roof, lateral or posterior walls of the nasopharynx.
and about 65% for the nonkeratinizing carcinomas There are no known risk factors associated with
(WHO 2 and 3). the development of this tumor. None of the patients
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 401
C. Pathology
The tumors arise from the surface epithelium of the
nasopharynx and may remain in situ or become
invasive. They are characterized by papillary and Figure 71 Papillary adenocarcinoma of the nasopharynx. The
glandular growth patterns (Fig. 70). The papillae cells lining the papillae are often stratified and have nuclei that
vary from hyperchromatic to optically clear (H&E, 400).
have fibrovascular cores and often show arboriza-
tion, whereas the glands frequently have a back-to-
back, often cribriform arrangement. Both papillae
and glands are covered or lined by one or more
layers of cuboidal to columnar cells, with pink cyto- D. Immunohistochemistry
plasm and round to oval nuclei that vary from PACNs are positive for pankeratin, epithelial mem-
hyperchromatic to optically clear (Fig. 71). Mild to brane antigen, and CK7 and negative for CK20, CDX2,
moderate nuclear pleomorphism may be seen, but villin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and S-100 protein
nucleoli, mitoses, and necrosis are uncommon. A few (4,8,9). They may also focally stain for carcinoem-
tumors may also contain psammoma bodies. bryonic antigen.
Vascular, lymphatic, or neural invasion are usually Carrizo and Luna have described two cases that
not seen. were positive for thyroid transcription factor-1 and
PACNs typically contain periodic acid–Schiff, positive for CK7 and 19 (10). The tumors are otherwise
diastase-resistant intracytoplasmic granules, and negative for thyroglobulin and have no association
stain focally positive for intracellular or luminal with the EBV (4).
mucin (4).
E. Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes papillary thyroid
carcinoma, papillary variant of intestinal-type adeno-
carcinoma (P-ITAC), and low-grade papillary adenocar-
cinoma of salivary gland origin (LGPASO).
Because of the papillae and the occasional pres-
ence of psammoma bodies and optically clear nuclei,
PACN can easily be mistaken for metastatic papillary
thyroid carcinoma. Although a few are positive for
thyroid transcription factor-1, they are negative for thy-
roglobulin and will typically show dysplasia or in situ
changes of the surface epithelium (4,10).
P-ITAC, in contrast with PACN, occurs primari-
ly in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and is
often (not invariably) associated with an occupation
exposure to wood dust (11,12). P-ITAC also tends to
be less glandular and more papillary. Rather than
cuboidal cells, the papillae are covered by tall colum-
nar and goblet cells, the latter of which are sparse to
Figure 70 Papillary adenocarcinoma of the nasopharynx. Note absent in PACN. P-ITAC may also contain Paneth
the extensive branching and that the tumor is arising from the cells and scattered endocrine cells that may express
mucosa (H&E, 40).
somatostatin, gastrin, serotonin, or other secretory
substances on appropriate staining. Such cells are
402 Barnes
not seen in PACN. P-ITAC also tends to be associated Table 36 Most Frequent Sites of Tumors to
with a hemorrhagic, inflammatory background and Metastasize to the Paranasal Sinuses
often recurs following therapy. PACN, in contrast, has Primary tumor Frequency
a ‘‘clean’’ background and rarely recurs.
Immunohistochemistry is also helpful. P-ITAC is Kidney 40%
typically CK7þ, CK20þ, CDX2þ, villinþ, while PACN Lung 9%
Breast 8%
is CK7þ, CK20–, CDX2–, villin–. Thyroid 8%
LGPASO occurs almost exclusively in the oral Prostate 7%
cavity, especially the palate (13–15). Furthermore, it Miscellaneous 28%
arises submucosally from minor salivary glands,
Source: From Ref. 2.
rather than from the surface, as does the PACN.
Staining for S-100 protein may also be helpful. Thus
far, PACNs have been S-100 protein-negative,
while LGPASOs are usually positive (4,15). B. Clinical Features
LGPASOs are also more aggressive, with frequent
local recurrence (27%) and, at times, lymph node Metastases may occur in any age group. In a review of
metastasis (17%) (15). 82 cases, Bernstein et al. observed the median age at
the time of diagnosis of the metastatic tumor to be
57 years (range 3 months–76 years) and that 60% of the
F. Treatment and Prognosis patients were males (3).
Metastases to the sinonasal tract may be solitary
PACN is a slow-growing, indolent neoplasm that may or multifocal and ordinarily produce symptoms
recur but thus far has not metastasized to either indistinguishable from those of a primary tumor.
cervical lymph nodes or more distant sites [with the Among these are included nasal obstruction, head-
possible case of Karkos et al. as noted above (7)]. ache, facial pain, visual disturbances, exophthalmos,
The treatment of choice is surgery. Wenig et al. facial swelling, cranial nerve deficits, and epistaxis
describe one case that was treated initially with full- (especially metastatic renal and thyroid carcinomas).
course radiotherapy (4). The tumor recurred within In some instances, the metastasis may be the first
months following treatment. The patient subsequently manifestation of an otherwise clinically occult
underwent surgical excision and was reported free of carcinoma.
disease 11 years later. This singular experience casts
doubts on the efficacy of radiation therapy.
Photodynamic therapy has also been successful for C. Prognosis
an incompletely resected PACN (16).
Although the eventual outcome is usually poor, prog-
nosis depends, in part, on whether the sinonasal
XXVI. METASTASES TO THE NASAL CAVITY metastasis is isolated or part of widespread dissemi-
AND PARANSAL SINUSES nated disease. If the metastasis to the nasal cavity and
sinuses is localized and treated aggressively, Kent and
A. Introduction Majumdar indicated that the average survival follow-
ing discovery of the metastasis may be as long as 20 to
Metastases to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses
30 months (1).
are rare and are hematogenously derived. Kent and
Majumdar identified only two metastatic tumors of
the maxillary sinuses in their review of 250 malignant
sinonasal tumors on file at their regional medical REFERENCES
center (1). In 2001, only 169 cases were recorded in
the world literature (2).
I. RHINOSINUSITIS (SINUSITIS, RHINITIS)
The distribution of tumor among the sinuses and 1. Lanza DC, Kennedy DW. Adult rhinosinusitis defined.
the most frequent tumors to metastasize to these sites Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117:S1–S7(Suppl
are shown in Tables 35 and 36, respectively. In 10% to Number 3, part 2).
15% of cases, the metastases are limited to the nasal 2. Kennedy DW, Gwaltney JM Jr, Jones DW. Medical man-
cavity. agement of sinusitis: Educational goals and management
guidelines. The International Conference on Sinus Disease.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 167:22–30.
3. Clayman GL, Adams GL, Paugh DR, et al. Intracranial
Table 35 Distribution of 168 Tumors
complications of paranasal sinusitis: a combined institu-
Metastatic to Paranasal Sinuses
tional review. Laryngoscope 1991; 101:234–239.
Sinus Frequency 4. Tovi F, Benharroch D, Gatot A, et al. Osteoblastic osteitis of
maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:426–430.
Maxillary 33%
5. Chiu AG. Osteitis in chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol
Sphenoid 22%
Clin North Am 2005; 30:1237–1242.
Ethmoid 14%
6. Engler DB, Grant JA. Allergic rhinitis: a practical
Frontal 9%
approach. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1991; 26:105–112.
Multiple sinuses 22%
7. Naclerio RM. Allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:
Source: From Ref. 2. 860–869.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 403
8. Plaut M, Valentine MD. Allergic rhinitis. New Engl J Med 35. Moloney JR. Nasal polyps, nasal polypectomy, asthma and
2005; 353:1934–1944. aspirin sensitivity. Their association in 445 cases of nasal
9. Corren J. Allergic rhinitis and asthma: how important is polyps. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91:837–846.
the link? J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 99:5781–5786. 36. McFadden EA, Kany RJ, Fink JN, et al. Surgery
10. Lieberman P. Rhinitis—allergic and nonallergic. Hosp for sinusitis and aspirin triad. Laryngoscope 1990;
Pract (Off Ed) 1988; 23:117–132. 100:1043–1046.
11. Mygind N. Pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis. Acta 37. Patriarca G, Romano A, Schiavino D, et al. ASA disease:
Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1979; 360:9–12. the clinical relationship of nasal polyposis to ASA intoler-
12. Haberal I, Corey JP. The role of leukotrienes in nasal ance. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1986; 243:16–19.
allergy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129:274–279. 38. Settipane GA. Nasal polyps: epidemiology, patho-
13. Mabry RL. Allergic rhinosinusitis. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, logy, immunology, and treatment. Am J Rhinol 1987;
Kohut RI, et al. ed. Head Neck Surgery—Otolaryngology. 1:119–126.
Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:290–301. 39. Ogino S, Harada T, Okawachi, et al. Aspirin-induced
14. Whiteside TL, Rabin BS, Zetterberg J, et al. The presence of asthma and nasal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh)
IgE on the surface of lymphocytes in nasal polyps. 1986; 430:21–27.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 1975; 55:186–194. 40. English GM, Spector S, Farr R, et al. Histiopathology and
15. Shatkin JS, Delsupehe KG, Thisted RA, et al. Mucosal immunoflourescent immunoglobulin in asthmatics with
allergy in the absence of systemic allergy in nasal polyposis aspirin idiosyncrasy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
and rhinitis: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113:377–379.
1994; 111:553–556. 41. Gosepath J, Mann WJ. Current concepts in therapy of
16. Postic WP, Wetmore RF. Pediatric rhinology. In: Goldman chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. ORL 2005;
JL, ed. The Principles and Practice of Rhinology. New 67:125–136.
York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987:801–845. 42. Jacobs RL, Freedman PM, Boswell RN. Nonallergic rhinitis
17. Piccirillo JF. Acute bacterial sinusitis. N Engl J Med 2004; with eosinophilia (NARES syndrome). Clinical and
351:902–910. immunologic presentation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981;
18. Evans FO, Sydnor JB, Moore WEG, et al. Sinusitis of the 67:253–262.
maxillary antrum. N Engl J Med 1976; 293:735–739. 43. Moneret-Vautrin, Hsieh V, Wayoff M, et al. Nonallergic
19. Frederick J, Braude A. Anaerobic infection of the paranasal rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome. A precursor of the
sinuses. N Engl J Med 1974; 290:135–137. triad: nasal polyposis, intrinsic asthma, and intolerance to
20. Kimmelman CP, Ali GHA. Vasomotor rhinitis. Otolaryngol aspirin. Ann Allergy 1990; 64:513–518.
Clin North Am 1986; 19:65–71. 44. Toohill RJ, Lehman RH, Grossman TW, et al. Rhinitis
21. Kopke RD, Jackson RL. Rhinitis. In: Bailery BJ, Johnson JT, medicamentosa. Laryngoscope 1981; 91:1614–1621.
Kohut RI, et al. ed. Head and Neck Surgery—Otolaryn- 45. Mabry RL. Rhinitis medicamentosa: the forgotten factor in
gology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:269–289. nasal obstruction. South Med J 1982; 75:817–819.
22. Pogorel E. Vasomotor rhinitis and nasal dyspnea. Ear Nose 46. Graf P, Hallen H, Juto J-E. The pathophysicology and
Throat J 1977; 56:261–272. treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa. Clin Otolaryngol
23. Blom HM, Godthelp T, Fokkens WJ, et al. Mast cells, eosino- 1995; 20:224–229.
phils and IgE—positive cells in the nasal mucosa of patients 47. Schatz M, Zeiger RS. Diagnosis and management of rhini-
with vasomotor rhinitis. An immunohistochemical study. tis during pregnancy. Allergy Proc 1988; 9:545–554.
E u r A r c h O t o r h i n o la r yn go l 19 9 5; 25 2 ( su p p l 1) : 48. Welch AR, Birchall JP, Stafford FW. Occupational rhinitis—
533–539. possible mechanisms of pathogenesis. J Laryngol Otol 1995;
24. Al-Samarrae SM. Treatment of ‘‘vasomotor rhinitis’’ by 109:104–107.
local application of silver nitrate. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 49. Holt GR. Effects of air pollution on the upper aerodigestive
105:285–287. tract. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 114:201–204.
25. Golding-Wood PH. Vidian neurectomy: its results and 50. Trevino RJ. Air pollution and its effect on the upper
complications. Laryngoscope 1973; 83:1673–1683. respiratory tract and allergic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol
26. Han-Sen C. The ozena problem. Clinical analysis of atrophic Head Neck Surg 1996; 114:239–241.
rhinitis in 100 cases. Acta Otolaryngol 1982; 93:461–464. 51. Sala E, Hytonen M, Tupasela O, et al. Occupational
27. Shehata MA. Atrophic rhinitis. Am J Otolaryngol 1996; laryngitis with immediate allergic or immediate type
17:81–86. specific chemical hypersensitivity. Clin Otolaryngol 1996;
28. El-Barbary AE-S, Yassin A, Fouad H, et al. Histo- 21:42–48.
pathological and histochemical studies in atrophic rhinitis. 52. Torjussen W. Rhinoscopical findings in nickel workers,
J Laryngol Otol 1976; 84:1103–1112. with special emphasis on the influence of nickel
29. Sinha SN, Sardana DS, Rajvanshi VS. A nine year review of exposure and smoking habits. Acta Otolaryngol 1979;
273 cases of atrophic rhinitis and its management. 88:279–288.
J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91:591–600. 53. Camilleri AE. Chronic sinusitis and yellow nail syndrome.
30. Dudley JP. Atrophic rhinitis: antibiotic treatment. Am J J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104:811–813.
Otolaryngol 1987; 8:387–390. 54. Varney VA, Cumerworth V, Sudderick R, et al. Rhinitis,
31. Samter M, Beers RF Jr. Concerning the nature of intoler- sinusitis and the yellow nail syndrome: a review of symp-
ance to aspirin. J Allergy 1967; 40:281–293. toms and response to treatment in 17 patients. Clin
32. Samter M. Intolerance to aspirin. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1973; Otolaryngol 1994; 19:237–240.
8:85–90. 55. Smith MP. Dysfunction of carbohydrate metabolism as an
33. Zeitz HJ. Bronchial asthma, nasal polyps, and aspirin element in the set of factors resulting in the polysaccharide
sensitivity: Samter’s syndrome. Clin Chest Med 1988; nose and nasal polyps (the polysaccharide nose).
9:567–576. Laryngoscope 1971; 81:636–644.
34. Probst L, Stoney P, Jeney E, et al. Nasal polyps, bronchial 56. Smith MP, Frable WJ. Ultrastructure of the polysaccharide
asthma and aspirin sensitivity. J Otolaryngol 1992; 21: nose: its relationship to allergy and carbohydrate dysfunc-
60–65. tion. Laryngoscope 1973; 83:783–795.
404 Barnes
II. NASAL POLYPS 26. Rejowski JE, Caldarelli DD, Campanella RS, et al. Nasal
polyps causing bone destruction and blindness.
1. Bateman ND, Fahy C, Woolford TJ. Nasal polyps: still more Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982; 90:505–506.
questions than answers. J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117:1–9. 27. D onov an R, Jo hansso n S GO, Bennich H, et a l.
2. Pawliczak R, Lewandowska-Polak A, Kowalski ML. Immunoglobulins in nasal polyp fluid. Int Arch Allergy
Pathogenesis of nasal polyps: an update. Curr Allergy Appl Immunol 1970; 37:154–166.
Asthma Rep 2005; 5:463–471. 28. Whiteside TL, Rabin BS, Zetterberg, et al. The presence of
3. Bernstein JM. Update on the molecular biology of nasal IgE on the surface of lymphocytes in nasal polyps.
polyposis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005; 38:1234–1255. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1975; 55:186–194.
4. Larsen PL, Tos M. Origin of nasal polyps. Laryngoscope 29. Alun-Jones T, Hill J, Leighton SEJ, et al. Is routine histo-
1991; 101:305–312. logic examination of nasal polyps justified? Clin
5. Andrews AE, Bryson JM, Rowe-Jones JM. Site of origin of Otolaryngol 1990; 15:217–219.
nasal polyps: relevance to pathogenesis and management. 30. Kale SU, Mohite U, Rowlands D, et al. Clinical and
Rhinology 2005; 43:180–184. histopathological correlation of nasal polyps: are there
6. Sorensen H, Mygind N, Tygstrup I, et al. Histology of nasal any surprises? Clin Otolaryngol 2001; 26:321–323.
polyps of different etiology. Rhinology 1977; 15:121–128. 31. Garavello W, Gaini RM. Incidence of inverted papilloma
7. B a u m g a r t e n C , K u n k e l G , R u d o l f R , e t a l . in recurrent nasal polyposis. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:
Histopathological examinations of nasal polyps of different 221–223.
etiology. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1980; 226:187–197. 32. Compagno J, Hyams VJ, Lepore ML. Nasal polyps with
8. Kakoi H, Hiraide F. A histological study of formation stromal atypia. Review and follow-up study of 14 cases.
and growth of nasal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 103: Arch Pathol Lab Med 1976; 100:224–226.
137–144. 33. Klenoff BH, Goodman ML. Mesenchymal cell atypicality in
9. Krajina Z, Zirdum A. Histochemical analysis of nasal inflammatory polyps. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91:751–756.
polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 103:435–440. 34. Kindblom L-G, Angervall L. Nasal polyps with atypical
10. Settipane GA. Nasal polyps: epidemiology, pathology, stroma cells: a pseudosarcomatous lesion. Acta Pathol
immunology and treatment. Am J Rhinol 1987; 1:119–126. Microbiol Immunol Scand Sect A 1984; 92:65–72.
11. Petruson B, Hansson H-A, Petruson K. Insulin-like growth 35. Nakayama M, Wenig BM, Heffner DK. Atypical stromal
factor I is a possible pathogenic mechanism in nasal cells in inflammatory nasal polyps: immunohistochemical
polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 1988; 106:156–160. and ultrastructural analysis in defining histogenesis.
12. Perkins JA, Blakeslee DB, Andrade P. Nasal polyps: a Laryngoscope 1995; 105:127–134.
manifestation of allergy? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 36. de la Cruz Mera A, Lopez MJS, Royo EM, et al.
1989; 101:641–645. Premalignant changes in nasal and sinus polyps: a retro-
13. Tos M. The pathogenic theories on formation of nasal spective 10 year study (1979–1988). J Laryngol Otol 1990;
polyps. Am J Rhinol 1990; 4:51–56. 104:210–212.
14. Larsen PL, Tos M, Kuijpers W, et al. The early stages of 37. Hasegawa M, Nasu M, Ohki M, et al. Malignant transfor-
polyp formation. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:670–677. mation of nasal polyp. Case report. Arch Otolaryngol Head
15. Otsuka H, Ohkubo K, Seki H, et al. Mast cell quantitation Neck Surg 1988; 114:336–337.
in nasal polyps, sinus mucosa and nasal turbinate mucosa. 38. Westra WH, Holmes GF, Eisele DW. Bizare epithelial
J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107:418–422. atypia of the sinonasal tract after chemotherapy. Am J
16. Norlander T, Fukami M, Westrin KM, et al. Formation of Surg Pathol 2001; 25:652–656.
mucosal polyps in the nasal and maxillary sinus cavities 39. Busuttil A. Granulomas in nasal polyps. J Laryngol Otol
by infection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109: 1975; 89:1087–1094.
522–529. 40. Wolff M. Granulomas in nasal mucous membranes
17. Ogino S, Abe Y, Irifune M, et al. Histamine metabolism following local steroid injections. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;
in nasal polyps. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 62:775–782.
152–156. 41. Coup AJ, Hopper IP. Granulomatous lesions in nasal
18. Hosemann W, Gode U, Wagner W. Epidemiology, patho- biopsies. Histopathology 1980; 4:293–308.
physiology of nasal polyposis, and spectrum of endonasal
sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15:85–89.
19. Berstein JM, Gorfien J, Noble B. Role of allergy in nasal III. ANTROCHOANAL POLYPS
polyposis: a review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;
113:724–732. 1. Killian G. The origin of choanal polypi. Lancet 1906;
20. Coste A, Rateau J-G, Roudot-Thoraval F, et al. Increased 2:81–82.
epithelial cell proliferation in nasal polyps. Arch 2. Heck WE, Hallberg O, Williams HL. Antrochoanal polyp.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122:432–436. Arch Otolaryngol 1950; 52:538–548.
21. Busuttil A, Chandrachud H, Kerr AIG, et al. Simple nasal 3. Hardy G. The choanal polyp. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
polyps and allergic manifestations. J Laryngol Otol 1978; 1957; 66:306–326.
92:477–488. 4. Cook PR, Davis WE, McDonald R, et al. Antrochoanal
22. Maloney JR. Nasal polyps, nasal polypectomy, asthma and polyposis. A review of 33 cases. ENT J 1993; 72:401–410.
aspirin sensitivity. Their association in 445 cases of nasal 5. Min Y-G, Chung JW, Shin J-S, et al. Histologic structure of
polyps. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91:837–846. antrochoanal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115:543–547.
23. Schramm VL Jr, Effron MZ. Nasal polyps in children. 6. Orvidas LJ, Beatty CW, Weaver AL. Antrochoanal polyps
Laryngoscope 1980; 90:1488–1495. in children. Am J Rhinol 2001; 15:321–325.
24. Kaufman LM, Folk ER, Chow JM. Invasive sinonasal 7. Sirola R. Choanal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 1966; 61:42–48.
polyps causing ophthalmoplegia, exophthalmos, and 8. Aktas D, Yetiser S, Gerek M, et al. Antrochoanal polyps:
visual field loss. Ophthalmology 1989; 96:1667–1672. analysis of 16 cases. Rhinology 1998; 36:81–85.
25. Arab M, Friedman M, Weingarten J. Nasal polyposis 9. Chen JM, Schloss MD, Azouz ME. Antro-choanal polyp: a 10-
with invasion into the orbit. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: year retrospective study in the pediatric population with a
273–274. review of the literature. J Otolaryngol 1989; 18:168–172.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 405
10. Schramm VL Jr, Effron MZ. Nasal polyps in children. V. CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Laryngoscope 1980; 90:1488–1495.
11. Myatt HM, Cabrera M. Bilateral antrochoanal polyps in a 1. Fanconi G, Wehlinger E, Knauer C. Das cocliakie-
child: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110:272–274. syndrome be: bronchietasien. Wien Med Wochenschr
12. Basu SK, Bandyopadhyay SN, Bora H. Bilateral antrochoa- 1936; 86:753–756.
nal polyps. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115:561–562. 2. Anderson D. Cystic fibrosis of the pancreas and its relation
13. Towbin R, Dunbar JS, Bove K. Antrochoanal polyps. AJR to celiac disease: a clinical and pathological study. Am J
Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132:27–31. Dis Child 1938; 56:344–399.
14. Smith CJ, Echevarria R, McLelland CA. Pseudosarcomatous 3. Drake-Lee AB, Morgan DW. Nasal polyps and sinusitis
changes in antrochoanal polyps. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99: in children with cystic fibrosis. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103:
228–230. 753–755.
15. Batsakis JG, Sneige N. Choanal and angiomatous polyps of 4. Collins FS, Riordan JR, Tsui L-C. The cystic fibrosis gene:
the sinonasal tract. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; isolation and significance. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1990; 25:
101:623–625. 47–57.
16. Yfantis HG, Drachenberg CB, Gray W, et al. Angiectatic 5. Collins FS. Cystic fibrosis: molecular biology and thera-
nasal polyps that clinically simulate a malignant process. peutic implications. Science 1992; 256:774–779.
Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol 6. Davis PB. Cystic fibrosis: new perceptions, new strategies.
Lab Med 2000; 124:406–410. Hosp Pract (Ed) 1992; 27:79–118.
7. Neglia JP, Fitzsimmons SC, Maisonneuve P, et al. The risk
of cancer among patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med
IV. PRIMARY CILIARY DYSKINESIA 1995; 332:494–499.
(IMMOTILE CILIA SYNDROME) 8. Marx JL. The cystic fibrosis gene is found. Science 1989;
245:923–925.
1. Afzelius BA. Disorders of ciliary motion. Hosp Pract (Off 9. Rowe SM, Miller S, Sorscher EJ. Cystic fibrosis. N Engl J
Ed) 1986; 21:73–80. Med 2005; 352:1992–2001.
2. Afzelius BA. Cilia-related diseases. J Pathol 2004; 204: 10. Keren E, Corey M, Kerem B-S, et al. The relationship
470–477. between genotype and phenotype in cystic fibrosis—
3. Eliasson R, Mossberg B, Camner P, et al. The immotile- analysis of the most common mutation (DF508). N Engl J
cilia syndrome. A congenital ciliary abnormality as an Med 1990; 3232:1517–1522.
etiologic factor in chronic airway infection and male 11. Lewis MJ, Lewis EH III, Amos JA, et al. Cystic fibrosis. Am
sterility. N Eng J Med 1977; 297:1–6. J Clin Pathol 2003; 120(suppl 1):S3–S13.
4. Eavey RD, Nadol JB Jr, Holmes LB, et al. Kartagener’s 12. Tos M, Mogensen C, Thomsen J. Nasal polyps in cystic
syndrome. A blinded, controlled study of cilia ultra- fibrosis. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91:827–835.
structure. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 13. Cepero R, Smith RJH, Catlin FI, et al. Cystic fibrosis—An
112:646–650. otolaryngologic perspective. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
5. Van Der Baan S, Veerman AJP, Bezemer PD, et al. Primary 1987; 97:356–360.
ciliary dyskinesia: Quantitative investigation of the ciliary 14. Crocket DM, McGill TJ, Healey GB, et al. Nasal and para-
ultrastructure with statistical analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol nasal sinus surgery in children with cystic fibrosis. Ann
Laryngol 1987; 96:264–272. Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96:367–372.
6. Smallman LA. Primary ciliary dyskinesia and Young’s 15. Brihaye P, Clement PAR, Dab I, et al. Pathological changes
syndrome. Clin Otolaryngol 1989; 14:271–278. of the lateral nasal wall in patients with cystic fibrosis
7. Boat TF, Carson JL. Ciliary dysmorphology and (mucoviscidosis). In J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994;
dysfunction—primary or acquired. N Engl J Med 1990; 141–147.
323:1700–1702. 16. Davidson TM, Murphy C, Mitchell M, et al. Management
8. Ahmad I, Drake-Lee A. Nasal ciliary studies in children of chronic sinusitis in cystic fibrosis. Laryngoscope 1995;
with chronic respiratory tract symptoms. Rhinology 2003; 105:354–358.
41:69–71. 17. Hui Y, Gaffnery R, Crysdale WS. Sinusitis in patients with
9. Chilvers MA, Rutman A, O’Callaghan C. Ciliary beat cystic fibrosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 252:
pattern is associated with specific ultrastructural defects 191–196.
in primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 18. Halvorson DJ, Cystic fibrosis: an update for the
112:518–524. otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;
10. Carson JL, Collier AM, Hu S-CS. Acquired ciliary defects 120:502–506.
in nasal epithelium of children with acute viral upper 19. Todd NW, Martin WS. Temporal bone pneumatization
respiratory infections. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:463–468. in cystic fibrosis patients. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:
11. Rautianen M, Nuutinen J, Kiukaaniemi H, et al. 1046–1049.
Ultrastructural changes in human nasal cilia caused by 20. Haddad J Jr, Gonzalez C, Kurland G, et al. Ear disease in
the common cold and recovery of ciliated epithelium. Ann children with cystic fibrosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101:982–987. Surg 1994; 120:491–493.
12. Afzelius BA. Immotile cilia syndrome: past, present, and 21. Settipane GA. Nasal polyps: epidemiology, pathology,
prospects for the future. Thorax 1998; 53:894–897. immunology and treatment. Am J Rhinol 1987; 1:119–126.
13. Berdon WE, Ulrich W. Situs inversus, bronchiectasis, and 22. Hadfield PJ, Rowe-Jones JM, Makay IS. The prevalence of
sinusitis and its relation to immotile cilia: history of the nasal polyps in adults with cystic fibrosis. Clin Otolaryngol
disease and their discoveries—Manes Kartagener and 2000; 25:19–22.
Bjorn Afzelius. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34:38–42. 23. Schramm VL Jr, Effron MZ. Nasal polyps in children.
14. Bent JP III, Smith RJH. Intraoperative diagnosis of primary Laryngoscope 1980; 90:1488–1495.
ciliary dyskinesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 24. Stern RC. The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med
116:64–67. 1997; 336:487–491.
406 Barnes
25. Grody WW. Cystic fibrosis. Molecular diagnosis, popula- allergic fungal rhinosinusitis? Arch Otolaryngol Head
tion screening and public policy. Arch Pathol Lab Med Neck Surg 1998; 124:1174–1177.
1999; 123:1041–1046. 21. Mabry R, Marple BF, Folker RJ, et al. Immunotherapy for
26. Oppenheimer EH, Rosenstein BJ. Differential pathology of allergic fungal sinusitis: Three years’ experience.
nasal polyps in cystic fibrosis and atopy. Lab Invest 1979; Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 119:648–651.
40:449–455.
27. Rulor JT, Brown HA, Logan GB. Nasal polyps and
cystic fibrosis of the pancreas. Arch Otolaryngol 1963; VII. MUCOCELES
78:192–199.
1. Natvig K, Larsen TE. Mucocele of the paranasal sinuses. A
retrospective clinical and histological study. J Laryngol
VI. ALLERGIC MUCUS—ALLERGIC Otol 1978; 92:1075–1082.
FUNGAL RHINOSINUSITIS 2. East D. Mucoceles of the maxillary antrum. Description,
case reports and review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol
1. Katzenstein A-L, Sale SR, Greenberger PA. Pathologic 1985; 99:49–56.
findings in allergic aspergillus sinusitis. A newly recog- 3. Gardner DG, Gullane PJ. Mucoceles of the maxillary
nized form of sinusitis. Am J Surg Pathol 1983; 7:439–443. sinuses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62:538–543.
2. Ence BK, Gourley DS, Jorgenssen NL, et al. Allergic fungal 4. Stankiewicz JA. Sphenoid sinus mucocele. Arch
sinusitis. Am J Rhinol 1990; 4:169–178. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115:735–740.
3. Cody DT II, Neel HB III, Ferreiro JA, et al. Allergic fungal 5. Moriyama H, Nakajima T, Honda Y. Studies on mucoceles
sinusitis: the Mayo Clinic experience. Laryngoscope 1994; of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses: analysis of 47 cases.
104:1074–1079. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106:23–27.
4. Lara JF, Gomez JD. Allergic mucin with and without 6. Marks SC, Latoni JD, Mathog RH. Mucoceles of the maxil-
fungus. A comparative clinicopathologic analysis. Arch lary sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117:18–21.
Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125:1442–1447. 7. Bockmuhl U, Kratzsch B, Benda K, et al. Surgery for
5. Marple BF. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: current theories paranasal sinus mucoceles: efficacy of endonasal micro-
and management strategies. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: endoscopic management and long-term results of 185
1006–1019. patients. Rhinology 2006; 44:62–67.
6. Saferstein B. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with 8. Stiernberg CM, Bailey BJ, Calhoun KH, et al. Management
obstruction of the upper respiratory tract. Chest 1976; of invasive frontoethmoidal sinus mucoceles. Arch
70:788–790. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:1060–1063.
7. Miller JW, Johnston A, Lamb D. Allergic aspergillosis of 9. Lund VJ, Milroy CM. Fronto-ethmoidal mucoceles: a
the maxillary sinuses [abstr]. Thorax 1981; 36:710. histopathological analysis. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105:921–922.
8. Bent JP 3rd, Kuhn FA. Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusi- 10. Toriumi DM, Sykes JM, Russell EJ. Sphenoethmoid muco-
tis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 111:580–588. cele with intracranial extension: radiologic diagnosis.
9. Corey J, Romberger CF, Shaw GY. Fungal diseases of Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 98:254–257.
the sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 103: 11. Green DC, Calcaterra TC. Sphenoethmoid sinus mucocele
1012–1015. presenting with amenorrhea and galactorrhea. Otolaryngol
10. Friedman GC, Hartwick W, Ro JY, et al. Allergic fungal Head Neck Surg 1991; 104:856–857.
sinusitis. Report of three cases associated with dematia- 12. Crain MR, Dolan KD, Maves MD. Maxillary sinus muco-
ceous fungi. Am J Clin Pathol 1991; 96:368–372. cele. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99:321–322.
11. Allphin AL, Strauss M, Abdul-Karim FW. Allergic 13. Han MH, Chang KH, Lee CH, et al. Cystic expansile
fungal sinusitis: problems in diagnosis and treatment. masses of the maxilla: differential diagnosis with CT and
Laryngoscope 1991; 101:815–820. MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:333–338.
12. Corey J, Delsupehe KG, Ferguson BJ. Allergic fungal 14. Lidov M, Behin F, Som PM. Calcified sphenoid mucoceles.
sinusitis: allergic, infectious, or both? Otolaryngol Head Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116:718–720.
Neck Surg 1995; 113:110–119. 15. Proto E, Cruz S, Puxeddu P. Histological and ultrastruc-
13. Ferguson BJ. Eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis: a distinct tural findings on mucocele of maxillary sinus. ORL 1986;
clinicopathologic entity. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:799–813. 48:345–350.
14. Sok JC, Ferguson BJ. Differential diagnosis of eosinophilic 16. Josephson JS, Kennedy DW. Surgery of paranasal sinus
chronic rhinosinusitis. Current Allergy Asthma Reports mucoceles. Operative Techniques In Otolaryngology—
2006; 6:203–214. Head Neck Surg 1990; 1:133–141.
15. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, et al. The diagnosis and
incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;
74:877–884.
16. Waxman JE, Spector JG, Sale SR. Allergic aspergillus VIII. CHOLESTEROL GRANULOMA
sinusitis: concepts in diagnosis and treatment of a new
clinical entity. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:261–266. 1. Milton CM, Bickerton RC. A review of maxillary sinus
17. Manning SC, Vuitch F, Weinberg AG, et al. Allergic cholesterol granuloma. Brit J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;
aspergillosis: a newly recognized form of sinusitis in the 24:293–299.
pediatric population. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:681–685. 2. Kunt T, Ozturkcan S, Egilmez R. Cholesterol granuloma of
18. Goldstein MF. Allergic fungal sinusitis: an underdiag- the maxillary sinus: six cases from the same region.
nosed problem. Hosp Pract (Ed) 1992; 27:73–92. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112:65–68.
19. Ghegan MD, Lee F-S, Schlosser RJ. Incidence of skull base 3. Leon ME, Chavez C, Fyfe B, et al. Cholesterol granuloma of
and orbital erosion in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) the maxillary sinus. Arch Path Lab Med 2002; 126:217–219.
and non-AFRS. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134: 4. Bella Z, Torkos A, Tiszlavicz L, et al. Cholesterol
592–595. granuloma of the maxillary sinus resembling an invasive,
20. Ferguson BJ. What role do systemic corticosteroids, immu- destructive tumor. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262:
notherapy, and antifungal drugs play in the therapy of 531–533.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 407
5. Armengot M, Barona R, Garin L, et al. Ethmoid cholesterol granuloma faciale? A report of three cases. Histo-
granuloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109: pathology 1985; 9:1217–1225.
762–765. 3. Fageeh NA, Mai KT, Odell PF. Eosinophilic angiocentric
6. Shykhon ME, Trotter MI, Morgan DW, et al. Cholesterol fibrosis of the subglottic region of the larynx and the upper
granuloma of the frontal sinus. J Laryngol Otol 2002; trachea. J Otolaryngol 1996; 25:276–278.
116:1041–1043. 4. Altemani AM, Pilch BZ, Sakano E, et al. Eosinophilic
7. McNab AA, Wright JE. Orbitofrontal cholesterol granuloma. angiocentric fibrosis of the nasal cavity. Mod Pathol 1997;
Ophthalmology 1990; 97:28–32. 10:391–393.
8. Aferzon M, Millman B, O’Donnell TR, et al. Cholesterol 5. Matai V, Baer S, Barnes S, et al. Eosinophilic angiocentric
granuloma of the frontal bone. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg fibrosis. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114:563–564.
2002; 127:578–581. 6. Thompson LDR, Heffner DK. Sinonasal tract eosinophilic
angiocentric fibrosis. A report of three cases. Am J Clin
Pathol 2001; 115:243–248.
IX. MYOSPHERULOSIS 7. Loane J, Jaramillo M, Young HA, et al. Eosinophilic angio-
centric fibrosis and Wegener’s granulomatosis: a case
1. Kyriakos M, Conner DH, Neafie RC, et al. Myospherulosis. report and literature review. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54:640–641.
In: Binford CH, Conner DH, eds. Pathology of Tropical and 8. Burns BV, Robert PF, DeCarpentier J, et al. Eosinophilic
Extraordinary Diseases. Vol 2. Washington, DC: Armed angiocentric fibrosis affecting the nasal cavity. A mucosal
Forces Institute of Pathology, 1976:664–667. variant of the skin lesion granuloma faciale. J Laryngol
2. Kyriakos M. Myospherulosis of the paranasal sinuses, nose Otol 2001; 115:223–221.
and middle ear: a possible iatrogenic disease. Am J Clin 9. Pereira EM, Millas I, Reis-Filho JS, et al. Eosinophilic
Pathol 1977; 67:118–130. angiocentric fibrosis of the sinonasal tract: report on the
3. Rosai J. The nature of myospherulosis of the upper respi- clinicopathologic features of a case and review of the
ratory tract. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 69:475–481. literature. Head Neck 2002; 24:307–311.
4. Wheeler TM, McGavran MH. Myospherulosis—further 10. Goldman NC. Angiocentric eosinophilic fibrosis.
observations. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 685–686. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128:445–446.
5. Belfiglio EJ, Wonderlich ST, Fox LJ. Myospherulosis of the 11. Tabaee A, Zadeh MH, Proytcheva M, et al. Eosinophilic
alveolus secondary to the use of Terra-cortril and Gelfoam. angiocentric fibrosis. J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117:410–413.
Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 12. Nguyen DB, Alex JC, Calhoun B. Eosinophilic angiocentric
61:12–14. fibrosis in a patient with nasal obstruction. ENT J 2004;
6. Paugh DR, Sullivan MJ. Myospherulosis of the 83:183–186.
paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 13. Narayan J, Douglas-Jones AG. Eosinophilic angiocentric
103:117–119. fibrosis and granulomas faciale: analysis of cellular infil-
7. Shimada K, Kobayashi S, Yamadori I, et al. Myospherulosis trate and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol
in Japan. A report of two cases and an immunohistochemi- Laryngol 2005; 114:35–42.
cal investigation. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12:427–432. 14. Paun S, Lund VJ, Gallimore A. Nasal fibrosis: long term
8. Kakizaki H, Shimada K. Experimental study of the cause of follow up of four cases of eosinophilic angiocentric fibro-
myospherulosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 99:249–256. sis. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119:119–124.
9. Schryver-Kecskemeti KD, Kyriakos M. Myospherulosis: an 15. Leibovitch I, James CL, Wormald PJ, et al. Orbital eosino-
electron microscopic study of a human case. Am J Clin philic angiocentric fibrosis. Case report and review of the
Pathol 1977; 67:555–561. literature. Ophthalmology 2006; 113:148–152.
10. M c C l a t c h i e S , W a r a m b o M W , B r e m n e r A D .
Myospherulosis: a previously unreported disease? Am J
Clin Pathol 1969; 51:699–704. XI. RESPIRATORY EPITHELIAL
11. Ferrell LD. Myospherulosis of the breast: diagnosis by fine ADENOMATOID HAMARTOMA
needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1984; 28:726–728.
12. Voung PN. Spontaneous myospherulosis developing at 1. Baillie EE, Batsakis JG. Glandular (seromucinous) hamar-
contact with a mature cystic dysembryoma of the ovary: toma of the nasopharynx. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
pathogenetic discussion apropos of a case diagnosed by 1974; 38:760–762.
laparoscopic biopsy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2. Graeme-Cook F, Pilch BZ. Hamartomas of the nose and
1988; 17:15–18. nasopharynx. Head Neck 1992; 14:321–327.
13. Chait DH, Katz DA. Myospherulosis. Nebr Med 1985; 3. Terris MH, Billman GF, Pransky SM. Nasal hamartoma:
70:57–60. case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr
14. Travis WD, Li C-Y, Weiland LH. Immunostaining for Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 28:83–88.
hemoglobin in two cases of myospherulosis. Arch Pathol 4. Wenig BM, Heffner DK. Respiratory epithelial adenomatoid
Lab Med 1986; 110:763–765. hamartomas of the sinonasal tract and nasopharynx: a
15. Panayiotopoulou M, Freedman PD, Weber F, et al. The clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol
synchronous occurrence of aspergillosis and myospheru- Laryngol 1995; 104:639–645.
losis of the maxillary sinus. Report of a case with review 5. Adair CF, Thompson LDR, Wenig BM, et al. Chondro-
of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; osseous and respiratory epithelial hamartomas of the sino-
63:582–585. nasal tract and nasopharynx [abstr]. Lab Invest 1996;
74:100A.
2. Hyams VJ. Papillomas of the nasal cavity and paranasal with human papillomavirus (HPV). Rhinology 1997; 35:
sinuses. A clinicopathologic study of 315 cases. Ann Otol 74–78.
Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 80:192–206. 24. Suh KW, Facer GW, Devine KD, et al. Inverting papilloma of
3. Snyder RN, Perzin KH. Papillomatosis of nasal cavity and the nose and paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope 1977; 87:
paranasal sinuses (inverted papilloma, squamous papillo- 35–46.
ma). A clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1971; 30:668–690. 25. Lawson W, Le Benger J, Som P, et al. Inverted papilloma:
4. Weissler MC, Montgomery WW, Turner PA, et al. an analysis of 87 cases. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:1117–1124.
Inverted papilloma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 26. Myers EN, Fernau JL, Johnson JT, et al. Management of
215–221. inverted papilloma. Laryngoscope 1990; 100:481–490.
5. Michaels L, Young M. Histogenesis of papillomas of the 27. Phillips PP, Gustafson RO, Facer GW. The clinical behavior
nose and paranasal sinuses. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995; of inverted papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses:
119:821–826. report of 112 cases and review of the literature.
6. Michaels L. Benign mucosal tumors of the nose and para- Laryngoscope 1990; 100:463–469.
nasal sinuses. Semin Diagn Pathol 1996; 13:113–117. 28. Outsen KE, Grontved A, Jorgensen K, et al. Inverted
7. Lampertico P, Russell WO, MacComb WS. Squamous papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses: a study of
papilloma of the upper respiratory epithelium. Arch 67 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16:309–312.
Pathol 1963; 75:293–302. 29. Dolgin SR, Zaveri VD, Casiano RR, et al. Different options
8. Oberman HA. Papillomas of the nose and paranasal for treatment of inverting papilloma of the nose and para-
sinuses. Am J Clin Pathol 1964; 42:245–258. nasal sinuses: a report of 41 cases. Laryngoscope 1992;
9. Vrabec DP. The inverted Schneiderian papilloma. A 25-year 102:231–236.
study. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:582–605. 30. Bielamowicz S, Calcaterra TC, Watson D. Inverting papil-
10. Fu YS, Hoover L, Franklin M, et al. Human papillomavirus loma of the head and neck: the UCLA update. Otolaryngol
identified by nucleic acid hybridization in concomitant Head Neck Surg 1993; 109:71–76.
nasal and genital papillomas. Laryngoscope 1992; 31. Lawson W, Ho BT, Shaari CM, et al. Inverted papilloma:
102:1014–1019. a report of 112 cases. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:282–288.
11. Buchwald C, Franzman M-B, Jacobsen GK, et al. Human 32. Eavey RD. Inverted papilloma of the nose and paranasal
papillomavirus (HPV) in sinonasal papillomas: a study of sinuses in childhood and adolescence. Laryngoscope 1985;
78 cases using in situ hybridization and polymerase chain 95:17–22.
reaction. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:66–71. 33. Peters BW, O’Reilly RC, Willcox TO Jr, et al. Inverted
12. Weiner JS, Sherris D, Kasperbauer J, et al. Relationship of papilloma isolated to the sphenoid sinus. Otolaryngol
human papillomavirus to Schneiderian papilloma. Head Neck Surg 1995; 113:771–781.
Laryngoscope 1999; 109:21–26. 34. Kelley JH, Joseph M, Carroll E, et al. Inverted Papilloma of
13. Norris HJ. Papillary lesions of the nasal cavity and para- the nasal septum. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106:767–771.
nasal sinuses. Part I. Exophytic (squamous) papillomas. 35. Sulica RL, Wenig BM, Debo RF, et al. Schneiderian papil-
A study of 28 cases. Laryngoscope 1962; 72:1784–1797. lomas of the pharynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;
14. Christensen WN, Smith RRL. Schneiderian papillomas: a 108:392–397.
clinicopathologic study of 67 cases. Hum Pathol 1986; 36. Radcliffe A. Transitional cell papilloma of the postphar-
17:393–400. yngeal wall. J Laryngol Otol 1953; 67:682–688.
15. Buchwald C, Franzman M-B, Tos M. Sinonasal papillomas: 37. Hampal S, Hawthorne M. Hypopharyngeal inverted pap-
a report of 82 cases in Copenhagen County, including a illoma. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104:432–434.
longitudinal, epidemiological and clinical study. 38. Astor FC, Donegan O, Gluckman JL. Unusual anatomic
Laryngoscope 1995; 105:72–79. presentations of inverting papilloma. Head Neck Surg
16. Hirschfield LS, Harrison G. Human papillomavirus in 1985; 7:243–245.
sinonasal papillomas [abstr]. Mod Pathol 1990; 3:45A. 39. Ryan SJ, Font RL. Primary epithelial neoplasms of the
17. Judd R, Zaki SR, Coffield LM, et al. Sinonasal papillomas lacrimal sac. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 76:73–88.
and human papillomavirus: human papillomavirus 11 40. Wenig BM. Schneiderian-type mucosal papillomas of the
detected in fungiform Schneiderian papillomas by in situ middle ear and mastoid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;
hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. Hum 105:226–233.
Pathol 1991; 22:550–556. 41. Fechner RE, Sessions RE. Inverted papilloma of the lacri-
18. Kashima HK, Kessis T, Hruban RH, et al. Human papil- mal sac, the paranasal sinuses and the cervical region.
lomavirus in sinonasal papillomas and squamous cell Cancer 1977; 40:2303–2308.
carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:973–976. 42. Respler DS, Jahn A, Pater A, et al. Isolation and characteri-
19. McLachlin CM, Kandel RA, Colgan TJ, et al. Prevalence of zation of papillomavirus DNA from nasal inverting
human papillomavirus in sinonasal papillomas: a study (Schneiderian) papillomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
using polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization. 1987; 96:170–173.
Mod Pathol 1992; 5:406–409. 43. Syrjanen S, Happonen R-P, Virolainen E, et al. Detection of
20. Sarkar FH, Visscher DW, Kintanar EB, et al. Sinonasal human papillomavirus (HPV) structural antigens and
Schneiderian papillomas: human papillomavirus typing DNA types in inverted papillomas and squamous cell
by polymerase chain reaction. Mod Pathol 1992; 5: carcinomas of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses.
329–332. Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 104:334–341.
21. Wu T-C, Trujillo JM, Kasima HK. Association of human 44. Weber RS, Shillitoe EJ, Robbins KT, et al. Prevalence of
papillomavirus with nasal neoplasia. Lancet 1993; 341: human papillomavirus in inverted nasal papillomas. Arch
522–524. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:23–26.
22. Gaffey MJ, Frierson HF Jr, Weiss LM, et al. Prevalence of 45. Brandwein M, Steinberg B, Thung S, et al. Human
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human papillomavirus Papillomavirus 6/11 and 16/18 in Schneiderian inverted
(HPV) in sinonasal papillomas: an in-situ hybridization papillomas. In situ hybridization with human papilloma-
(ISH) study [abstr]. Lab Invest 1996; 74:101A. virus RNA probes. Cancer 1989; 63:1708–1713.
23. Buchwald C, Franzmann M-B, Jacobson GK, et al. 46. Bryan RL, Bovan IS, Crocker J, et al. Detection of HPV 6
Carcinomas occurring in papillomas of the nasal septum and 11 in tumours of the upper respiratory tract using
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 409
the polymerase chain reaction. Clin Otolaryngol 1990; 67. Califano J, Koch W, Sidranskry D, et al. Inverted sinonasal
15:177–180. papilloma. A molecular genetic appraisal of its putative
47. Klemi PJ, Joensuu H, Siivonen L, et al. Association of DNA status as a precursor to squamous cell carcinoma. Am J
aneuploidy with human papillomavirus-induced malig- Pathol 2000; 156:333–337.
nant transformation of sinonasal transitional papillomas. 68. Van Olphen AF, Lubsen H, van’t Verlaat JW. An inverted
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 100:563–567. papilloma with intracranial extension. J Laryngol Otol
48. Siivonen L, Virolainen E. Transitional papilloma of the 1988; 102:534–537.
nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Clinical course, viral 69. Busquets JM, Hwang PH. Endoscopic resection of sino-
e t i o l o gy a n d ma l i g n a n t t r a n s f o r m a t i o n . O R L J nasal inverted papilloma: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol
Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1989; 51:262–267. Head Neck Surg 2006; 134:476–483.
49. Ishibashi T, Tsunokawa Y, Matsushima S, et al. Presence of 70. Krouse JH. Development of a staging system for inverted
human papillomavirus type 6-related sequences in papilloma. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:965–968.
inverted nasal papillomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 71. Mendenhall WM, Million RR, Cassisi NJ, et al.
1990; 247:296–299. Biologically aggressive papillomas of the nasal cavity:
50. Furuta Y, Shinohara T, Sano K, et al. Molecular pathologic the role of radiation therapy. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:
study of human papillomavirus infection in inverted 344–347.
papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal 72. Ridolfi RL, Lieberman PH, Erlandson RA, et al.
cavities and paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: Schneiderian papillomas: a clinicopathologic study of
79–85. 30 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1977; 1:43–53.
51. Beck JC, McClatchey KD, Lesperance MM, et al. Presence 73. Barnes L, Bedetti C. Oncocytic Schneiderian papilloma: a
of human papillomavirus predicts recurrence of inverted reappraisal of cylindrical cell papilloma of the sinonasal
papilloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113:49–55. tract. Hum Pathol 1984; 15:344–351.
52. Ogura H, Fujiwara T, Hamaya K, et al. Detection of human 74. DeBoom GW, Jensen JL, Wuerker RB. Cylindrical
papillomavirus type 57 in a case of inverted nasal papil- cell papilloma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61:
lomatosis in Japan. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 607–610.
252:513–515. 75. Kusakari J, Hozawa K, Hanazima T, et al. Clinical report:
53. Macdonald MR, Le KT, Freeman J, et al. A majority of cylindrical cell papilloma of the paranasal sinus. Arch
inverted sinonasal papillomas carries Epstein-Barr virus Otorhinolaryngol 1987; 244:246–248.
genomes. Cancer 1995; 75:2307–2312. 76. Cunningham MJ, Brantley S, Barnes L, et al. Oncocytic
54. Momose KJ, Weber AI, Goodman M, et al. Radiologic Schneiderian papilloma in a young adult: a rare diagnosis.
aspects of inverted papilloma. Radiology 1980; 134:73–79. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 97:47–51.
55. Norris HJ. Papillary lesions of the nasal cavity and para- 77. Ward BE, Fechner RE, Mills SE. Carcinoma arising in
nasal sinuses. Part II. Inverting papillomas. A study of oncocytic Schneiderian carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol
29 cases. Laryngoscope 1963; 73:1–17. 1990; 14:364–369.
56. Abildgaard-Jensen J, Greisen O. Inverted papillomas of the 78. Kapadia SB, Barnes L, Pelzman K, et al. Carcinoma ex
nose and the paranasal sinuses. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; oncocytic Schneiderian (cylindrical cell) papilloma. Am J
10:135–143. Otolaryngol 1993; 14:332–338.
57. Myers EN, Schramm VL Jr, Barnes EL Jr. Management of 79. Maitra A, Baskin LB, Lee EL. Malignancies arising in
inverted papillomas of the nose and paranasal sinuses. oncocytic Schneiderian papillomas. A report of 2 cases
Laryngoscope 1981; 91:2071–2084. and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;
58. Orvidas LJ, Lewis JE, Olsen KD, et al. Intranasal verrucous 125:1365–1367.
carcinoma: relationship to inverting papillomas and
the human papillomavirus. Laryngoscope 1999; 109:
371–375. XIII. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
59. Skolnik EM, Loewy A, Friedman JE. Inverted papilloma of OF THE NASAL CAVITY
the nasal cavity. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 84:83–89.
60. Lasser A, Rothfeld PR, Shapiro RS. Epithelial papilloma 1. Tufano RP, Mokadam NA, Montone KT, et al. Malignant
and squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity and tumors of the nose and paranasal sinuses: Hospital of the
paranasal sinuses. A clinicopathologic study. Cancer University of Pennsylvania experience 1990-1997. Am J
1976; 38:2503–2510. Rhinol 1999; 13:117–123.
61. Woodson GE, Robbins KT, Michaels L. Inverted papilloma. 2. Calderon-Garciduenas L, Delgado R, Calderon-
Considerations in treatment. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; Garciduenas A, et al. Malignant neoplasms of the nasal
111:806–811. cavity and paranasal sinuses: a series of 256 patients in
62. Segal K, Atar E, Mor C, et al. Inverting papilloma of Mexico city and Monterrey. Is air pollution the missing
the nose and paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: link? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122:499–508.
394–398. 3. Dulguerov P, Jacobsen MS, Allal AS, et al. Nasal and
63. Lesperance MM, Esclamado RM. Squamous cell carcino- paranasal sinus carcinoma: are we making progress? A
ma arising in inverted papilloma. Laryngoscope 1995; series of 220 patients and a systematic review. Cancer 2001;
105:178–183. 92:3012–3029.
64. Schwerer MJ, Sailer A, Kraft, et al. Differentiation-related 4. Bhattachryya N. Cancer of the nasal cavity. Survival and
p53 protein expression in nondysplastic sinonasal inverted factors influencing survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
papillomas. Am J Rhinol 2001; 15:347–351. Surg 2002; 128:1079–1083.
65. Mirza N, Montone K, Sato Y, et al. Identification of p53 and 5. Carrillo JF, Guemes A, Ramirez-Ortega MC, et al.
human papillomavirus in Schneiderian papillomas. Prognostic factors in maxillary and nasal carcinoma. Eur
Laryngoscope 1998; 108:497–501. J Surg Oncol 2005, 31: 1206–1212.
66. Ingle R, Jennings TA, Goodman ML, et al. CD44 express- 6. Buchanan G, Slavin G. Tumors of the nose and sinuses. A
ion in sinonasal inverted papillomas and associated clinicopathologic study. J Laryngol Otol 1972; 86:685–696.
squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109: 7. Batsakis JG, Rice DH, Solomon AR. The pathology of head
309–314. and neck tumors: squamous and mucous-gland
410 Barnes
carcinomas of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and 31. Kagan AR, Nussbaum H, Rao A, et al. The management of
larynx, Part 6. Head Neck Surg 1980; 2:497–508. carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Head Neck Surg 1981;
8. Sisson GA, Becker SP. Cancer of the nasal cavity and the 4:125–128.
paranasal sinuses. In: Suen JY, Myers EN, eds. Cancer of the 32. Beatty CW, Pearson BW, Kern EB. Carcinoma of the nasal
Head and Neck. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1981: septum: experience with 85 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck
242–279. Surg 1982; 90:90–94.
9. Lewis JS, Castro EB. Cancer of the nasal cavity and para- 33. LeLiever WC, Bailey BJ, Griffiths C. Carcinoma of the nasal
nasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1972; 86:255–262. septum. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110:748–751.
10. Robin PE, Powell DJ. Regional node involvement and 34. Johansen LV, Hjelm-Hansen M, Anderson AP. Squamous
distant metastases in carcinoma of the nasal cavity and cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Treatment results.
paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1980; 94:301–309. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984; 23:189–192.
11. Rousch GC. Epidemiology of cancer of the nose and 35. Schalekamp W, Hordijk GJ. Carcinoma of the nasal vesti-
paranasal sinuses: current concepts. Head Neck Surg bule: prognostic factors in relation to lymph node metasta-
1979; 2:3–11. sis. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10:210–203.
12. Lareo AC, Luce D, Luclerc A, et al. History of previous 36. Wong CS, Cummings BJ, Elhakim T, et al. External irradi-
nasal diseases and sinonasal cancer: a case-control study. ation for squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule.
Laryngoscope 1992; 102:439–442. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986; 12:1943–1946.
13. Furuta Y, Takasu T, Asai T, et al. Detection of human 37. Shidnia H, Hartsough AB, Weisberger E, et al. Epithelial
papillomavirus DNA in carcinomas of the nasal cavities carcinoma of the nasal fossa. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:
and paranasal sinuses by polymerase chain reaction. 717–723.
Cancer 1992; 69:353–357. 38. Mendenhall NP, Parsons JT, Cassisi NJ, et al. Carcinoma of
14. Paulino AF, Singh B, Carew J, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in the nasal vestibule treated with radiation therapy.
squamous carcinoma of the anterior nasal cavity. Ann Laryngoscope 1987; 97:626–632.
Diagn Pathol 2000; 4:7–10. 39. Hawkins RB, Wynstra JH, Pilepich MV, et al. Carcinoma of
15. MacComb WS, Martin HE. Cancer of the nasal cavity. Am J the nasal cavity—results of primary and adjunct radiother-
Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1942; 47:11–23. apy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15:1129–1133.
16. Parker RG. Carcinoma of the nasal fossa. Am J Roentgenol 40. Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM, Mancuso AA, et al.
Radium Ther Nucl Med 1958; 80:766–774. Malignant tumors of the nasal cavity and ethmoid
17. Deutsch HJ. Carcinoma of the nasal septum. Report of a and sphenoid sinuses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;
case and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol 14:11–22.
Laryngol 1966; 75:1049–1057. 41. Chobe R, McNeese M, Weber R, et al. Radiation therapy for
18. DesPrez JD, Kiehn CI. Carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Am J Surg 1967; 114:587–591. Surg 1988; 98:67–71.
19. Boone MLM, Harle TS, Higholt HW, et al. Malignant 42. Spiro JD, Soo KC, Spiro RH. Squamous carcinoma of the
disease of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg 1989;
Importance of precise localization and extent of disease. 158:328–332.
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1968; 102:627–636. 43. Patel P, Tiwari R, Karim ABMF, et al. Squamous cell
20. Whitcomb WP. Radiation therapy of carcinoma of the carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. J Laryngol Otol 1992;
anterior nasal cavity. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 106:332–336.
Nucl Med 1969; 105:550–554. 44. Barzan L, Franchin G, Frustaci S, et al. Carcinoma of the
21. Badib AO, Kurohara SS, Webster JH, et al. Treatment of nasal vestibule. Report of 12 cases. J Laryngol Otol 1990;
cancer of the nasal cavity. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 104:9–11.
Nucl Med 1969; 106:824–830. 45. Poulsen M, Turner S. Radiation therapy for squamous cell
22. Goepfert H, Guillamandegui OM, Jesse RH, et al. carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
Squamous cell carcinoma of nasal vestibule. Arch Phys 1993; 27:267–272.
Otolaryngol 1974; 100:8–10. 46. McCollough WM, Mendenhall NP, Parsons JT, et al.
23. Haynes WD, Tapley N. Radiation treatment of carcinoma Radiotherapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the
of the nasal vestibule. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl nasal vestibule: management of the primary site and
Med 1974; 120:595–602. regional lymphatics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;
24. Wang CC. Treatment of carcinoma of the nasal vestibule by 26:73–79.
irradiation. Cancer 1976; 37:1458–1463. 47. Fradis M, Podoshin L, Gertner R, et al. Squamous cell
25. Bosch A, Vallecillo L, Frias Z. Cancer of the nasal cavity. carcinoma of the nasal septum mucosa. Ear Nose Throat J
Cancer 1976; 37:1458–1463. 1993; 72:217–221.
26. Weimert TA, Batsakis JG, Rice DH. Carcinomas of the 48. Sakashita M, Nakajima T, Tsumura M, et al. Radiotherapy
nasal septum. J Laryngol Otol 1978; 92:209–213. for squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity. Radiat
27. Mak ACA, van Andel JG, van Woerkom-Eijkenboom Oncol 1993; 11:91–94.
WMH, et al. Radiation therapy of carcinoma of the nasal 49. Pantelakos ST, McGuirt WF, Nussear DW. Squamous cell
vestibule. Eur J Cancer 1979; 16:81–85. carcinoma of the nasal vestibule and anterior nasal pas-
28. Ellingwood KE, Million RR. Cancer of the nasal cavity sages. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15:33–36.
and ethmoid/sphenoid sinuses. Cancer 1979; 43L: 50. Mendenhall WM, Stringer SP, Cassisi NJ, et al. Squamous
1517–1526. cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Head Neck 1999;
29. Schaefer SD, Hill GC. Epidermoid carcinoma of the nasal 21:385–393.
vestibule: current treatment evaluation. Laryngoscope 51. Horsmans JDJ, Godballe C, Jorgensen KE, et al. Squamous cell
1980; 90:1631–1635. carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Rhinology 1999; 37:117–121.
30. Chung CT, Rabuzzi DD, Sagerman RH, et al. Radiotherapy 52. Samaha M, Yoskovitch A, Hier MP, et al. Squamous cell
for carcinoma of the nasal cavity. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. J Otolaryngol 2000; 29:
106:763–766. 98–101.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 411
53. Kummer E, Rasch CRN, Keus RB, et al. T Stage as 14. Stern SJ, Goepfert H, Clayman G, et al. Squamous cell
prognostic factor in irradiated localized squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus. Arch Otolaryngol Head
carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Head Neck 2002; 24: Neck Surg 1993; 119:964–969.
268–273. 15. Shibuya H, Hoshima M, Shagdarsuren M, et al. Squamous
54. Landgendijk JA, Poorter R, Leemans CR, et al. cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus and the oral part of
Radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal the upper jaw. Comparison of treatment results. Acta
vestibule. Int J Radiatr Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: Oncol 1994; 33:43–47.
1319–1325. 16. Miyaguchi M, Sakai S-I, Takashima H, et al. Lymph node
55. DiLeo MD, Miller RH, Rice JC, et al. Nasal septal squa- and distant metastases in patients with sinonasal carcino-
mous cell carcinoma: a chart review and meta-analysis. mas. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109:304–407.
Laryngoscope 1996; 106:1218–1222. 17. Alvarez I, Suarez C, Rodrigo JP, et al. Prognostic factors
56. Fornelli RA, Fedok FG, Wilson EP, et al. Squamous cell in paranasal sinus cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 1995; 16:109–114.
carcinoma of the anterior nasal cavity: a dual institution 18. Paulino AC, Marks JE, Bricker P, et al. Results of treatment
review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:207–210. of patients with maxillary sinus carcinoma. Cancer 1998;
57. Lederman M. Cancer of the upper jaw and nasal chambers. 83:457–465.
Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62:65–72. 19. Le Q-T, Fu KK, Kaplan M, et al. Treatment of maxillary
58. Robin RE. Lateralization of the tumours of the nasal cavity sinus carcinoma. A comparison of the 1997 and 1977
and paranasal sinuses and its relationship to etiology. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems.
Lancet 1979; 1:695–696. Cancer 1999; 86:1700–1711.
59. American Joint Commission Cancer Staging Manual, 6th 20. Hayashi T, Nonaka S, Bandoh N, et al. Treatment outcome
edition, Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. eds, New of maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2001;
York: Springer 2002:203–208. 92:1495–1503.
21. Nibu K-I, Suqasawa M, Asai M, et al. Results of multi-
modality therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of maxillary
XIV. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA sinus. Cancer 2002; 94:1476–1483.
OF MAXILLARY SINUS 22. Kondo M, Inuyama Y, Ando Y, et al. Patterns of relapse of
squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus. Cancer
1. Pearson BW. The surgical anatomy of maxillectomy. Surg 1984; 53:2206–2210.
Clin N Am 1977; 57:701–721. 23. Spiro JD, Soo KC, Spiro RH. Squamous carcinoma of the
2. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer Staging nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg 1989;
Manual, 6th ed, Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al, 158:328–332.
eds. New York: Springer, 2002:59–67. 24. Zamora RL, Harvey JE, Sessions DG, et al. Clinical classifi-
3. Pezner RD, Moss WT, Tong D, et al. Cervical lymph node cation and staging for primary malignancies of the maxil-
metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of lary antrum. Laryngoscope 1990; 100:1106–1111.
the maxillary antrum: the role of elective irradiation of the 25. Robin PE, Powell DJ. Regional node involvement and
clinically negative neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1979; distant metastases in carcinoma of the nasal cavity and
5:1977–1980. paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1980; 94:301–309.
4. Sakai S, Hohki A, Fuchihata H, et al. Multidisciplinary 26. Chaudhry AP, Gorlin RJ, Mosser DG. Carcinoma of the
treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma. Cancer 1983; antrum. A clinical and histopathologic study. Oral Surg
52:1360–1364. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1960; 13:269–281.
5. St-Pierre S, Baker SR. Squamous cell carcinoma of the 27. Larsson LG, Martensson G. Carcinoma of the paranasal
maxillary sinus: analysis of 66 cases. Head Neck Surg sinuses and the nasal cavities. A Clinical study of 379 cases
1983; 5:508–513. treated at Radiumhemmet and the Otolaryngologic
6. Shibuya H, Horiuchi J-I, Suzuki S, et al. Maxillary sinus Department of Karolinska Sjukhuset, 1940–1950. Acta
carcinoma: result of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Radiol 1954; 42:149–172.
Biol Phys 1984; 10:1021–1026. 28. Shibuya H, Amagasa T, Hanai A, et al. Second primary
7. Hordijk GJ, Brons EN. Carcinomas of the maxillary sinus: a carcinomas in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of
retrospective study. Clin Oncol 1985; 10:285–288. the maxillary sinus. Cancer 1986; 58:1122–1125.
8. Knegt PP, DeJong PC, van Andel JG, et al. Carcinoma of 29. Miyaguchi M, Sakai S-I, Mori N, et al. Multiple primary
the paranasal sinuses. Results of a prospective pilot study. malignancies in patients with malignant tumors of the
Cancer 1985; 56:57–62. nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol
9. Lindeman P, Eklund U, Petruson B. Survival after surgical 1990; 104:696–698.
treatment in maxillary neoplasms of epithelial origin. 30. Sakaguchi M, Moriaya K, Taguchi K, et al. Bilateral carci-
J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:564–568. nomas of the maxillary sinus. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107:42–43.
10. Lavertu P, Roberts JK, Kraus DH, et al. Squamous cell 31. Kondo M, Ando Y, Inuyama Y, et al. Maxillary squamous
carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses: the Cleveland Clinic cell carcinoma staged by computed tomography. Int J
experience 1977-1986. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:1130–1136. Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986; 12:111–116.
11. Sisson GA Sr, Toriumi DM, Atiyah RA. Paranasal sinus 32. Schellhas KP, EL Deeb M, Wilkes CH, et al. Three-dimen-
malignancy: a comprehensive update. Laryngoscope 1989; sional computed tomography in maxillofacial surgical
99:143–150. planning. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;
12. Miyaguchi M, Sakai S, Mori N, et al. Symptoms in patients 114:438–442.
with maxillary sinus carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 33. Toriumi DM, Friedman CD, Sisson GA Sr. Carcinoma of
104:557–559. the maxillary sinus with pterygoid invasion. Ann Otol
13. Giri SPG, Reddy EK, Gemer LS, et al. Management of Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98:485–486.
advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the maxillary sinus. 34. Matsumoto S, Shibuya H, Tatera S, et al. Comparison of CT
Cancer 1992; 69:657–661. findings in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and squamous
412 Barnes
cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus. Acta Radiol 1992; 7. Franchi A, Moroni M, Massi D, et al. Sinonasal undifferen-
33:523–527. tiated carcinoma, a nasopharyngeal-type undifferentiated
35. Robin PE, Powell DJ. Diagnostic errors in cancers of the carcinoma, and keratinizing and nonkeratinizing squamous
nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The essential role of cell carcinoma express different cytokeratin patterns. Am J
surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1941; 107:138–140. Surg Pathol 2002; 26:1597–1604.
36. LoRusso P, Tapazoglou E, Kish JA, et al. Chemotherapy for 8. Gotte K, Riedel F, Schafer C, et al. Cylindrical cell carcinoma
paranasal sinus carcinoma. A 10-year experience at Wayne of the paranasal sinusesdo not show p53 alterations but
State University. Cancer 1988; 62:1–5. loss of heterozygosity at 3p and 17p. Int J Cancer 2000; 5:
37. Janecka IP, Sen C, Sekhar L, et al. Treatment of paranasal 740–742.
sinus cancer with cranial base surgery: results.
Laryngoscope 1994; 104:553–555.
38. Sakai S-I, Kubo T, Mori N, et al. A study of late effects of
radiotherapy and operation on patients with maxillary XVI. SINONASAL UNDIFFERENTIATED
cancer. A survey more than 10 years after initial treatment. CARCINOMA
Cancer 1988; 62:2114–2117.
39. Sakata K-I, Aoki Y, Karasawa K, et al. Analysis of the 1. Frierson HF Jr, Mills SE, Fechner RE, et al. Sinonasal
results of combined therapy for maxillary carcinoma. undifferentiated carcinoma: an aggressive neoplasm,
Cancer 1993; 71:2715–2722. derived from Schneiderian epithelium and distinct from
40. Harrison DFN. Problems in surgical management of neo- olfactory neuroblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 10:771–779.
plasms arising in the paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 2. Frierson HF Jr. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. In:
1976; 90:69–74. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. eds. World Health
41. Larson DL, Christ JE, Jesse RH. Preservation of the orbital Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and
contents in cancer of the maxillary sinus. Arch Otolaryngol Genetics. Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
1982; 108:370–372. 2005:19.
42. Perry C, Levine PA, Williamson BR, et al. Preservation of 3. Mills SE. Neuroectodermal neoplasms of the head and
the eye in paranasal sinus cancer surgery. Arch neck with emphasis on neuroendocrine carcinomas. Mod
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:632–634. Pathol 2002; 15:264–278.
43. Graamans K, Slootweg PJ. Orbital exenteration in surgery 4. Ejaz A, Wenig BM. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma.
of malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses. The Clinical and pathologic features and a discussion on clas-
value of preoperative computed tomography. Arch sification, cellular differentiation, and differential diagno-
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115:977–980. sis. Adv Anat Pathol 2005; 12:134–143.
44. Stern SJ, Geopfert H, Clayman G, et al. Orbital preservation 5. Lopategui JR, Gaffey MJ, Frierson HF Jr, et al. Detection of
in maxillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; Epstein-Barr viral RNA in sinonasal undifferentiated car-
109:111–115. cinoma from Western and Asian patients. Am J Surg
45. Boone MLM, Harle TS, Higholt HW, et al. Malignant Pathol 1994; 18:391–398.
disease of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. 6. Gallo O, DiLollo S, Graziani P, et al. Detection of Epstein-
Importance of precise localization of extent of disease. Barr virus genome in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma
AJR Am J Roentgenol 1968; 102:627–636. by use of in situ hybridization. Otolaryngol Head Neck
46. Weymuller EA Jr, Reardon EJ, Nash D. A comparison of Surg 1995; 112:659–664.
treatment modalities in carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. 7. Jeng Y-M, Sung M-T, Fang C-L, et al. Sinonasal undiffer-
Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106:625–629. entiated carcinoma and nasopharyngeal-type undifferenti-
ated carcinoma. Two clinically, biologically, and
histopathologically distinct entities. Am J Surg Pathol
XV. NONKERATINIZING CARCINOMA 2002; 26:371–376.
8. Cerilli LA, Holst VA, Brandwein MS, et al. Sinonasal
1. Pilch BZ, Bouquot J, Thompson LDR. Squamous cell carci- undifferentiated carcinoma. Immunohistochemical profile
noma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World and lack of EBV association. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;
Health Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology 25:156–163.
and Genetics, Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 9. Levine PA, Frierson HF Jr, Stewart FM, et al. Sinonasal
2005:15–17. undifferentiated carcinoma: a destructive and highly
2. Osborn DA. Nature and behavior of transitional tumors of aggressive neoplasm. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:905–908.
the upper respiratory tract. Cancer 1970; 25:50–60. 10. Greger V, Schirmacher P, Bohl J, et al. Possible involve-
3. Robin PE, Powell DJ, Stansbie JM. Carcinoma of the nasal ment of the retinoblastoma gene in undifferentiated sino-
cavity and paranasal sinuses: incidence and presentation nasal carcinoma. Cancer 1990; 66:1954–1959.
of different histologic types. Clin Otolaryngol 1979; 4: 11. Miyamoto RC, Gleich LL, Biddinger PW, et al.
431–456. Esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal undifferentiated
4. El-Mofty SK, Lu DW. Prevalence of high-risk human papil- carcinoma: impact of histological grading and clinical
lomavirus DNA in nonkeratinizing (cylindrical cell) carci- staging on survival and prognosis. Laryngoscope 2000;
noma of the sinonasal tract. A distinct clinicopathologic and 110:1262–1265.
molecular disease entity. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 12. Musy PY, Reibel JF, Levine PA. Sinonasal undifferentiated
1367–1372. carcinoma: the search for a better outcome. Laryngoscope
5. Auerbach MJ, Adair CF, Kardon D, et al. Respiratory 2002; 112:1450–1455.
epithelial carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study. Lab Invest 13. Rosenthal DI, Barker JL Jr, El-Naggar AK, et al. Sinonasal
2002; 82:215A (abstract). malignancies with neuroendocrine differentiation. Patterns
6. Manivel C, Wick MR, Dehner LP. Transitional (cylindric) of failure according to histologic phenotype. Cancer 2004;
cell carcinoma with endodermal sinus tumor-like features 101:2567–2573.
of the nasopharynx and paranasal sinuses. Clinico- 14. Rischin D, Porceddu S, Peters L, et al. Promising results
pathologic and immunohistochemical study of two cases. with chemoradiation in patients with sinonasal undiffer-
Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110:198–202. entiated carcinoma. Head Neck 2004; 26:435–441.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 413
15. Franchi A, Moroni M, Massi D, et al. Sinonasal undifferen- 4. Kameya T, Shimosato Y, Adachi I, et al. Neuroendocrine
tiated carcinoma, nasopharyngeal-type undifferentiated carcinoma of the paranasal sinus. A morphological and
carcinoma, and keratinizing and nonkeratinizing squa- endocrinological study. Cancer 1980; 45:330–339.
mous cell carcinoma express different cytokeratin patterns. 5. Silva EG, Butler JJ, Mackay B, et al. Neuroblastomas and
Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:1597–1604. neuroendocrine carcinomas of the nasal cavity. A pro-
16. Iezzoni JC, Mills SE. ‘‘Undifferentiated’’ small round cell posed new classification. Cancer 1982; 50:2388–2405.
tumors of the sinonasal tract. Pathology Patterns Reviews. 6. Ordonez NG, Mackay B. Neuroendocrine tumors of the
Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124:(suppl 1):S110–S121. nasal cavity. Pathol Annu 1993; 28:77–111.
17. Devaney K, Wenig BM, Abbondanzo SL. Olfactory neuro- 7. Raychowdhuri RN. Oat-cell carcinoma and paranasal
blastoma and other round cell lesions of the sinonasal tract. sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1965; 79:253–255.
Mod Pathol 1996; 9:658–663. 8. Rejowski JE, Campanella RS, Block LJ. Small cell carcinoma
18. Enepekides DJ. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: an of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck
update. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; Surg 1982; 90:516–517.
13:222–225. 9. Weiss MD, deFries HO, Taxy JB, et al. Primary small cell
19. Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Riggs CE Jr, et al. carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;
Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 109:341–343.
2006; 29:27–31. 10. Baugh RF, Wolf GT, McClatchey KD. Small cell carcinoma
20. Pitman KT, Costantino PD, Lassen LF. Sinonasal undiffer- of the head and neck. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8:343–354.
entiated carcinoma: current trends in treatment. Skull Base 11. Soussi AC, Benghiat A, Holgate CS, et al. Neuroendocrine
Surg 1995; 5:269–272. tumours of the head and neck. J Laryngol Otol 1990;
104:504–507.
12. Chaudhry MR, Aktar S, Kim DS. Neuroendocrine carcino-
XVII. NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA ma of the ethmoid sinus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1994;
251:461–463.
1. Baugh RF, Wolf GT, Lloyd RV, et al. Carcinoid (neuroen- 13. Pierce ST, Cibull ML, Metcalfe MS, et al. Bone marrow
docrine carcinoma) of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol metastases from small cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Laryngol 1987; 96:315–321. Head Neck 1994; 16:266–271.
2. Stanley RJ, DeSanto LW, Weiland LH. Oncocytic and 14. Perez-Ordonez B, Caruana SM, Huvos AG, et al. Small cell
oncocytoid carcinoid tumors (well-differentiated neuroen- neuroendocrine carcinoma of the nasal cavity and para-
docrine carcinomas) of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head nasal sinuses. Hum Pathol 1998; 29:826–832.
Neck Surg 1986; 112:529–535. 15. Rosenthal DI, Barker JL Jr, El-Naggar AK, et al. Sinonasal
3. Wenig BM, Gnepp DR. The spectrum of neuroendocrine malignancies with neuroendocrine differentiation. Patterns
carcinomas of the larynx. Semin Diagn Pathol 1989; of failure according to histologic phenotype. Cancer 2004;
6:329–350. 101:2567–2573.
4. Gnepp DR. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the 16. Babin E, Rouleau V, Vedrine PO, et al. Small cell neuroen-
larynx. A critical review of the literature. ORL J docrine carcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal
Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1991; 53:210–219. sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 2006; 120:289–297.
5. Benning TL, Vollmer RT, Crain BJ, et al. Neuroendocrine 17. M i n e t a H , M i u r a K , T a k e b a y a s h i S , e t a l .
carcinoma of the oral cavity. Mod Pathol 1990; 3:631–634. Immunohistochemical analysis of small cell carcinoma of
6. Silva EG, Butler JJ, Mackay B, et al. Neuroblastomas and the head and neck: a report of four patients and a review of
neuroendocrine carcinomas of the nasal cavity. A pro- 16 patients in the literature with ectopic hormone produc-
posed new classification. Cancer 1982; 50:2238–2405. tion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110:76–82.
7. Ordóñez NG, Mackay B. Neuroendocrine tumors of the 18. Cheuk W, Chan JKC. Thyroid transcription factor-1 is of
nasal cavity. Pathol Annu 1993;28:77–111. limited value in practical distinction between pulmonary
8. Baugh RF, Wolf GT, McClatchey KD. Small cell carcinoma and extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas. Am J Surg
of the head and neck. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8:343–354. Pathol 2001; 25:545 (letter to editor).
9. Taxy JB, Bharani NK, Mills SE, et al. The spectrum of 19. Iezzoni JC, Mills SE. ‘‘Undifferentiated’’ small round cell
olfactory neural tumors. A light microscopic, immunohis- tumors of the sinonasal tract. Differential diagnosis
tochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Am J Surg Pathol update. Pathology Patterns Reviews. Am J Clin Pathol
1986; 10:687–695. 2005; 124:(suppl):S-110-S121.
10. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. World Health 20. Barnes L, Brandwein M, Som PM. Diseases of the Nasal
Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and Cavity, paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx. In: Barnes L
Genetics, Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, ed. Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck, Second
2005. Edition Revised and Expanded. New York: Marcel
Dekker, 2005:439–555.
21. Perez-Ordonez B. Neuroendocrine tumours. In: Barnes L,
XVIII. SMALL CELL NEUROENDOCRINE Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. eds. World Health
CARCINOMA Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and
Genetics, Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
1. Gnepp DR. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the 2005:26–27.
larynx. A critical review of the literature. J Otorhinolaryngol
Relat Spec 1991; 53:210–219.
2. Koss LG, Spiro RH, Hajdu S. Small cell (oat cell) carcino- XIX. LYMPHOEPITHELIAL CARCINOMA
ma of minor salivary gland origin. Cancer 1972; 30:
737–741. 1. Lopategui JR, Gaffey MJ, Frierson HF Jr, et al. Detection of
3. Gnepp DR, Wick MR. Small cell carcinoma of the major Epstein-Barr viral RNA in sinonasal undifferentiated carci-
salivary glands. An immunohistochemical study. Cancer noma from Western and Asian patients. Am J Surg Pathol
1990; 66:185–192. 1994; 18:391–398.
414 Barnes
2. Leung SY, Yuen ST, Chung LP, et al. Epstein-Barr virus is 14. Acheson ED, Cowdell RH, Hadfield E, et al. Nasal cancer
present in a wide histologic spectrum of sinonasal carcino- in woodworkers in the furniture industry. Br Med J 1968;
mas. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19:994–1001. 2:587–596.
3. Dubey P, Ha CS, Ang KK, et al. Nonnasopharyngeal 15. Brinton LA, Blot WJ, Stone BJ, et al. A death certificate
lymphoepithelioma of the head and neck. Cancer 1998; 82: analysis of nasal cancer among furniture workers in North
1556–1562. Carolina. Cancer Res 1977; 37:3473–3474.
4. Zong Y, Liu K, Zong B, et al. Epstein-Barr virus infection of 16. Ironside P, Matthews J. Adenocarcinoma of the nose and
sinonasal lymphoepithelial carcinoma in Guangzhous. Chin paranasal sinuses in woodworkers in the state of Victoria,
Med J (Engl) 2001; 114:132–136. Australia. Cancer 1975; 36:1115–1121.
5. Franchi A, Moroni M, Massi D. Sinonasal undifferentiated 17. Ceccehi F, Buiatti E, Kriebel D, et al. Adenocarcinoma of
carcinoma, nasopharyngeal type undifferentiated carcino- the nose and paranasal sinuses in shoemakers and wood-
ma, and keratinizing and nonkeratinizing squamous cell workers in the province of Florence, Italy. Br J Ind Med
carcinoma express different cytokeratin pattern. Am J Surg 1980; 37:222–225.
Pathol 2002; 26:1597–1604. 18. K l i n t e n b e r g C , O l o f s s o n J , H e l l q u i s t H , e t a l .
6. Jeng Y-M, Sung M-T, Fang C-L, et al. Sinonasal undif- Adenocarcinoma of the ethmoid sinuses. A review of 28
ferentiated carcinoma and nasopharyngeal-type undiffer- cases with special reference to wood dust exposure. Cancer
entiated carcinoma. Two clinically, biologically, and 1984; 54:482–488.
histopathologically distinct entities. Am J Surg Pathol 19. Kleinsasser O, Schroeder H-G. Adenocarcinomas of the
2002; 26:371–376. inner nose after exposure to wood dust. Morphological
7. Hajiioannou JK, Kyrmizakis E, Datseris G, et al. findings and relationships between histopathology and
Nasopharyngeal-type undifferentiated carcinoma (lym- clinical behavior in 79 cases. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1988;
phoepithelioma) of paranasal sinuses: Rare case and litera- 245:1–15.
ture review. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35:147–151. 20. Kwachi I, Pearce N, Fraser J. A New Zealand cancer
registry-based study of cancer in woodworkers. Cancer
1989; 64:2609–2613.
XX. INTESTINAL-TYPE ADENOCARCINOMA 21. Shimizu H, Hozawa J, Saito H, et al. Chronic sinusitis and
woodworking as risk factors for cancer of the maxillary
1. Lewis JS, Castro EB. Cancer of the nasal cavity and para- sinus in northeast Japan. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:58–61.
nasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1972; 86:255–262. 22. Luce D, Luclerc A, Morcet J-F, et al. Occupational risk
2. Robin PE, Powell DJ, Stansbie JM. Carcinoma of the nasal factors for sinonasal cancer: a case-control study in France.
cavity and paranasal sinuses: incidence and presentation Am J Ind Med 1992; 21:163–175.
of different histological types. Clin Otolaryngol 1979; 23. Nunez F, Suarez C, Alvarez I, et al. Sino-nasal adenocarci-
4:431–456. noma: epidemiological and clinicopathological study of 34
3. Weber AL, Stanton AC. Malignant tumors of the paranasal cases. J Otolaryngol 1993; 22:86–90.
sinuses: radiologic, clinical, and histopathologic evaluation 24. Mohtashamipur E, Norpoth K, Luhmann F. Cancer epide-
of 200 cases. Head Neck Surg 1984; 6:761–776. miology of woodworking. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1989;
4. Sanchez-Casis G, Devine KD, Weiland LH. Nasal adeno- 115:503–515.
carcinomas that closely simulate colonic carcinomas. 25. Urso C, Ninu MB, Franchi A, et al. Intestinal-type adeno-
Cancer 1971; 28:714–720. carcinoma of the sinonasal tract: clinicopathologic study of
5. Schmid KO, Aubock L, Albegger K. Endocrine-amphicrine 18 cases. Tumori 1993; 79:205–210.
enteric carcinoma of the nasal mucosa. Virchows Arch A 26. Nylander LA, Dement JM. Carcinogenic effects of wood
Pathol Anat Histol 1979; 383: 329–343. dust: review and discussion. Am J Ind Med 1993; 24:
6. Mills SE, Fechner RE, Cantrell RW. Aggressive sinonasal 619–647.
lesion resembling normal intestinal mucosa. Am J Surg 27. Leclerc A, Cortes MM, Gerin M, et al. Sinonasal cancer and
Pathol 1982; 6:803–909. wood dust exposure: results from a case-control study.
7. Batsakis JG, Mackay B, Ordonez NG. Enteric-type adeno- Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140:340–349.
carcinoma of the nasal cavity. An electron microscopic and 28. Acheson ED, Cowdell RH, Jolles B. Nasal cancer in the
immunocytochemical study. Cancer 1984; 54:855–860. furniture and boot and shoe manufacturing industries.
8. Gamez-Araujo JJ, Ayala AG, Guillamondegui O. Mucinous Prev Med 1976; 5:295–315.
adenocarcinomas of nose and paranasal sinuses. Cancer 29. Rousch GC. Epidemiology of cancer of the nose and
1975; 36:1100–1105. paranasal sinuses. Current concepts. Head Neck Surg
9. Jarvi O. Heterotopic tumors with an intestinal mucous 1979; 2:3–11.
membrane structure in the nasal cavity. Acta Otolaryngol 30. Hadfield EH. A study of adenocarcinoma of the paranasal
1945; 33:471–485. sinuses in woodworkers in the furniture industry. Ann R
10. Simard LC, Jean A. Adenocarcinoma with argentaffin cells Coll Surg Engl 1970; 46:301–319.
of the nasal cavity, giving widespread metastases. Cancer 31. Wilhelmsson B, Lundh B. Nasal epithelium in wood-
1953; 6:699–703. workers in the furniture industry. A histologic and
11. Barnes L. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cytological study. Acta Otolaryngol 1984; 98:321–334.
cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 32. Spiro RH, Koss LG, Hajdu SI, et al. Tumors of minor
10:192–202. salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 492 cases.
12. Franchi A, Santucci M, Wenig BM. Adenocarcinoma. In: Cancer 1973; 31:117–129.
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. eds. World Health 33. Lopez JI, Perez A. Pharyngeal adenocarcinoma with intes-
Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and tinal features. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104:900–902.
Genetics, Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 34. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Mucinous adenocarcinoma. In: Atlas
2005:20–23. of Tumor Pathology. Tumors of the Salivary Glands, Third
13. Macbeth R. Malignant disease of the paranasal sinuses. Series. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of
J Laryngol Otol 1965; 79:592–612. Pathology, 1996:349–352.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 415
35. Salassa JR, McDonald TJ, Wieland LH. ‘‘Colonic type’’ 54. Yom SS, Rashid A, Rosenthal DI, et al. Genetic analysis of
adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. sinonasal adenocarcinoma phenotypes: distinct alterations
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88:133–135. of histologic significance. Mod Pathol 2005; 18:315–319.
36. Boor A, Dudrikova K, Kavecansky V, et al. Intestinal-type 55. Perez P, Dominguez O, Gonzalez S, et al. Ras gene muta-
sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a sporadic case. J Laryngol Otol tions in ethmoid sinus adenocarcinoma. Prognostic impli-
1996; 110:805–810. cations. Cancer 1999; 86:255–264.
37. Allessi DM, Trapp TK, Fu YS, et al. Nonsalivary sinonasal 56. Perrone F, Oggionni M, Birindelli S, et al. TP53, P14ARF,
adenocarcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; P16INK4A, and H-RAS gene molecular analysis in intestinal-
114:996–999. type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal
38. Orvidas LJ, Lewis JE, Weaver AL, et al. Adenocarcinoma of sinuses. Int J Cancer 2003; 105:196–203.
the nose and paranasal sinuses: a retrospective study of 57. Saber AT, Nielsen LR, Dictor M, et al. K-ras mutations in
diagnosis, histologic characteristics, and outcome in sinonasal adenocarcinomas in patients occupationally
24 patients. Head Neck 2005; 27:370–375. exposed to wood or leather dust. Cancer Lett 1998;
39. Franchi A, Gallo O, Santucci M. Clinical relevance of the 126:59–65.
histological classification of sinonasal intestinal-type 58. Perez-Ordonoez B, Huynh NN, Berean KW, et al.
adenocarcinomas. Hum Pathol 1999; 30:1140–1145. Expression of mismatch repair proteins, B catenin and
40. Gnepp DR, Heffner DK. Mucosal origin of sinonasal tract E cadherin in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. J Clin
adenomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol 1989; 2:365–371. Pathol 2004; 57:1080–1083.
41. Kleinsasser O, Schroeder HG, Mayer-Brix J. Preinvasive 59. Wu TT, Barnes L, Bakker A, et al. K-ras-2 and p53
stages of adenocarcinoma of the nose after exposure to genotyping of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the
wood dust. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991; 248:222–229. nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Mod Pathol 1996;
42. Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal 9:199–204.
of four main epithelial types in the mouse small intestine. 60. Ariz M, Llorenta JL, Alvarez-Marcas C, et al. Comparative
V. Unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell genomic hybridization in primary sinonasal adenocarcino-
types. Am J Anat 1974; 141:537–561. mas. Cancer 2004; 100:335–341.
43. Kirkland SC. Clonal origin of columnar, mucous, and 61. Bernstein JM, Montgomery WW, Balogh K. Metastatic
endocrine cell lineages in human colorectal epithelium. tumor to the maxilla and paranasal sinuses.
Cancer 1988; 61:1359–1363. Laryngoscope 1966; 76:621–650.
44. McKinney CD, Mills SE, Franquemont DW. Sinonasal 62. Owa AO, Gallimore AP, Ajulo SO, et al. Metastatic adeno-
intestinal-type adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemical carcinoma of the ethmoids in a patient with previous
profile and comparison with colonic adenocarcinoma. gastric adenocarcinoma: a case report. J Laryngol Otol
Mod Pathol 1995; 8:421–426. 1995; 109:759–751.
45. Kennedy MT, Jordan RCK, Berean KW, et al. Expression 63. Zhang PJ, Shah M, Spiegel GW, et al. Cytokeratin 7
pattern of CK7, CK20, CDX-2, and villin in intestinal-type immunoreactivity in rectal adenocarcinomas. Appl
sinonasal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:932–937. Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2003; 11:306–310.
46. Ortiz-Rey JA, Alvarez C, Miguel PS, et al. Expression of
CDX2, cytokeratins 7 and 20 in sinonasal-type adenocarci-
noma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2005; 13:
XXI. NON-INTESTINAL-TYPE
142–146. ADENOCARCINOMA
47. Resto VA, Krane JF, Faquin WC, et al. Immunohisto-
1. Heffner DK, Hyams VJ, Hauck KW, et al. Low-grade
chemical distinction of intestinal-type sinonasal adenocar-
adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
cinoma from metastatic adenocarcinoma of intestinal
Cancer 1982; 50:312–322.
origin. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 115:59–64.
2. Neto AG, Pineda-Daboin K, Luna MA. Sinonasal tract
48. Franchi A, Massi D, Palombra, et al. CDX-2, cytokeratin 7
seromucinous adenocarcinoma: a report of 12 cases. Ann
and cytokeratin 20 immunohistochemical expression in the
Diagn Pathol 2003; 7:154–159.
differential diagnosis of primary adenocarcinoma of the
3. Skalova A, Cardesa A, Leivo I, et al. Sinonasal tubulopa-
sinonasal tract. Virchows Arch 2004; 445:63–67. [Epub 2004,
pillary low-grade adenocarcinoma. Histopathological,
Jun 3].
immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of
49. Amre R, Ghali V, Elmberger G, et al. Sinonasal ‘‘intestinal-
a poorly recognized entity. Virchow Arch 2003; 443:
type’’ adenocarcinoma (SNITAC): an immunohistochemi-
152–158.
cal (IHC) of 22 cases. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(suppl 1):221A
4. Luna MA. Sinonasal tubulopapillary low-grade adenocarci-
(abstract).
noma. A specific diagnosis or just another seromucinous
50. Bashir AA, Robinson RA, Benda JA, et al. Sinonasal
adenocarcinoma? Adv Anat Pathol 2005; 12:109–115.
adenocarcinoma: immunohistochemical marking and
5. Cathro HP, Mills SE. Immunophenotypic differences
expression of oncoproteins. Head Neck 2003; 25:763–771.
between intestinal-type and low-grade papillary sinonasal
51. Abecasis J, Viana G, Pissarra C, et al. Adenocarcinoma of
adenocarcinomas. An immunohistochemical study of 22
the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a clinicopathologi-
cases utilizing CDX2 and MUC2. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;
cal and immunohistochemical study of 14 cases.
28:1026–1032.
Histopathology 2004; 45:254–259.
6. Amre R, Ghali V, Elmberger G, et al. Sinonasal ‘‘intestinal-
52. Choi H-R, Sturgis EM, Rashid A, et al. Sinonasal adeno-
type’’ adenocarcinoma (SNITAC): an immunohistochemical
carcinoma: evidence for histogenetic divergence of the
study of 22 cases. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(suppl 1):221 A
enteric and nonenteric phenotypes. Hum Pathol 2003;
(abstract).
34:1101–1107.
53. Cathro HP, Mills SE. Immunophenotypic differences
between intestinal-type and low-grade papillary sinonasal
adenocarcinomas. An immunohistochemical study of 22
XXII. SALIVARY-TYPE NEOPLASMS
cases utilizing CDX2 and MUC2. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 1. Heffner DK. Sinonasal and laryngeal salivary gland
28:1026–1032. lesions. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds.
416 Barnes
Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands, Major 23. Jin KL, Ding CN, Chu Q. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcino-
Problems in Pathology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991: ma arising in the nasal cavity: a case report and review of
544–559. the literature. Pathology 1999; 31:148–151.
2. Gnepp DR, Heffner DK. Mucosal origin of sinonasal tract 24. Lloreta J, Serrano S, Corominas JM, et al. Polymorphous
adenomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol 1989; 2:365–371. low-grade adenocarcinoma arising in the nasal cavities
3. Compagno J, Wong RT. Intranasal tumors (pleomorphic with an associated undifferentiated carcinoma.
adenomas). A clinicopathologic study of 40 cases. Am Ultrastruct Pathol 1995; 19:365–370.
J Clin Pathol 1977; 68:213–218. 25. Fonseca I, Soares J. Basal cell adenocarcinoma of minor
4. Narozny W, Kuczkowski J, Mikaszewksi B. Pleomorphic salivary and seromucinous glands of the head and neck.
adenoma of the nasal cavity: clinical analysis of 8 cases. Semin Diagn Pathol 1996; 13:128–137.
Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26:218. 26. Kuo T-T, Tsang N-M. Salivary gland type nasopharyngeal
5. Lee KC, Chan JKC, Chong YW. Ossifying pleomorphic carcinoma. A histologic, immunohistochemical, and
adenoma of the maxillary antrum. J Laryngol Otol 1992; Epstein-Barr virus study of 15 cases including a psam-
106:50–52. momatous mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol
6. Prager DA, Weiss MH, Buchalter WL, et al. Pleomorphic 2001; 25:80–86.
adenoma of the nasal cavity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
1991; 100:600.
7. Lam PWY, Chan JKC, Sin V-C. Nasal pleomorphic ade- XXIII. MALIGNANT MELANOMA
noma with skeletal muscle differentiation: potential mis-
diagnosis as rhabdomyosarcoma. Hum Pathol 1997; 1. Harris TJ, Hinckley DM. Melanoma of the head and neck
28:1299–1302. in Queensland. Head Neck Surg 1983; 5:197–203.
8. Cho KJ, El-Naggar AK, Mahanupab P, et al. Carcinoma 2. Thorn M, Adami H-O, Ringborg U, et al. The association
ex-pleomorphic adenoma of the nasal cavity: a report of between anatomic site and survival in malignant melano-
two cases. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109:677–679. ma. An analysis 12,353 cases from the Swedish Cancer
9. Buchanan JA, Krolls SO, Sneed WF. Oncocytoma in the nasal Registry. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25:483–491.
vestibule. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 99:63–65. 3. Fisher SR. Cutaneous malignant melanoma of the head and
10. Martin H, Janda J, Behrbohm H. Locally invasive oncocy- neck. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:822–836.
toma of the nasal cavity. Zentralbl Allg Pathol 1990; 4. Urist MM, Karnell LH. The National Cancer Data Base.
136:703–706. Report on melanoma. Cancer 1994; 74:782–788.
11. Forster C, Ostertag H. Oncocytoma of the nose. A case 5. Garbe C, Buttner P, Bertz J, et al. Primary cutaneous
report and review of the literature. Pathologe 1995; 16: melanoma. Identification of prognostic groups and estima-
431–433. tion of individual prognosis for 5093 patients. Cancer 1995;
12. Comin CE, Dini M, Russo GL. Oncocytoma of the nasal 75:2484–2491.
cavity: report of a case and review of the literature. 6. Conley JJ. Melanomas of the mucous membranes of the
J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111:671–673. head and neck. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:1248–1254.
13. Nayak DR, Pillai S, Balakrishnan R, et al. Malignant 7. Moore ES, Martin H. Melanoma of the upper respiratory
oncocytoma of the nasal cavity: a case report. Am J tract and oral cavity. Cancer 1955; 8:1167–1176.
Otolaryngol 1999; 20:323–327. 8. Allen AL, Spitz S. Malignant melanoma. Cancer 1953;
14. Ozolek JA, Hunt JL. Immunohistochemical staining char- 6:1–45.
acteristics of oncocytomas of major salivary gland: com- 9. Lund V. Malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity and
parison to conventional renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1982; 96:347–355.
2004; 17:230A (abstract). 10. Lederman M. Tumours of the upper jaw: natural history
15. Neto AG, Pineda-Daboin K, Spencer ML, et al. Sinonasal and treatment. J Laryngol Otol 1982; 96:347–355.
acinic cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of four 11. Jackson RT, Fitz-Hugh GS, Constable WC. Malignant
cases. Head Neck 2005; 27:603–607. neoplasms of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses:
16. Konno A, Ishikawa K, Numata T, et al. Analysis of factors (a retrospective study). Laryngoscope 1977; 87:726–736.
affecting long-term treatment results of adenoid cystic 12. Robin PE, Powell DJ, Stansbie JM. Carcinoma of the nasal
carcinoma of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Acta cavity and paranasal sinuses: incidence and presentation
Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998; suppl 537:67–74. of different histological types. Clin Otolaryngol 1979;
17. Kim GE, Park HC, Keum KC, et al. Adenoid cystic carci- 4:431–456.
noma of the maxillary antrum. Am J Otolaryngol 1999; 13. Gadeberg CC, Hjelm-Hansen M, Sogaard H, et al.
20:77–85. Malignant tumours of the paranasal sinuses and nasal
18. Naficy S, Disher MJ, Esclamado RM. Adenoid cystic carci- cavity. A series of 180 patients. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984;
noma of the paranasal sinuses. Am J Rhinol 1999; 13: 23:181–187.
311–314. 14. Spiro JD, Soo KC, Spiro RH. Nonsquamous cell malignant
19. Wiseman SM, Orner JB, Popat SR, et al. Adenoid cystic neoplasms of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses.
carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses or nasal cavity: a 40-year Head Neck 1995; 17:114–118.
review of 35 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2002; 81:510–517. 15. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. SEER Cancer
20. Dulguerov P, Jacobson MS, Allal AA, et al. Nasal and Statistics Review. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute,
paranasal sinus carcinoma: are we making progress? A 2003.
series of 220 patients and a systematic review. Cancer 2001; 16. Carlson JA, Slominski A, Linette GP, et al. Malignant
92:3012–3029. melanoma 2003. Predisposition, diagnosis, prognosis
21. Thompson CDR, Nelson BL, Sinonasal tract mucoepider- and staging. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120(suppl 1):
moid carcinoma: A clinicopathologic and immunopheno- S101–S127.
typic study of 19 cases. Mod Pathol 2005; 18:218A 17. Rigel DS. Epidemiology and prognostic factors in malig-
(abstract). nant melanoma. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 28:7–8.
22. Begin LR, Rochon L, Frenkiel S. Spindle cell myoepithelioma 18. Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The National Cancer
of the nasal cavity. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15:184–190. Data Base Report on Cutaneous and Noncutaneous
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 417
melanoma. A summary of 84,836 cases from the past 42. Thompson AC, Morgan DAL, Bradley PJ. Malignant mela-
decade. Cancer 1998; 83:1664–1678. noma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Clin
19. Zak FG, Lawson W. The presence of melanocytes in the Otolaryngol 1993; 18:34–36.
nasal cavity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1974; 83:515–519. 43. Kingdom TT, Kaplan MJ. Mucosal melanoma of the nasal
20. Thompson LDR, Wieneke JA, Miettinen M. Sinonasal tract cavity and paranasal sinuses. Head Neck 1995; 17:
and nasopharyngeal melanomas. A clinicopathologic 184–189.
study of 115 cases with a proposed staging system. Am J 44. Huntrakoon M, Nyongo AO. Primary malignant melano-
Surg Pathol 2003; 27:594–611. ma of the nasal cavity: report of two cases with emphasis
21. Kousseff BG. The genetics of malignant melanomas. Ann on histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 2:59–66.
Plast Surg 1992; 28:11–13. 45. Loree TR, Mullins AP, Spellman J, et al. Head and neck
22. Hoffman S, Yohn J, Robinson W, et al. Melanoma: 1. mucosal melanoma: a 32-year review. Ear Nose Throat J
Clinical characteristics. Hosp Pract (Ed) 1994; 29:37–47. 1999; 78:372–375.
23. Lewis MG, Martin JAM. Malignant melanoma of the nasal 46. Brandwein MS, Rothstein A, Lawson W, et al. Sinonasal
cavity in Ugandan Africans. Relationship of ectopic pig- melanoma. A clinicopathologic study of 25 cases and
mentation. Cancer 1967; 20:1699–1705. literature meta-analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
24. Cove H. Melanosis, melanocytic hyperplasia, and primary Surg 1997; 123:290–296.
malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity. Cancer 1979; 47. Prasad ML, Patel SG, Huvos AG, et al. Primary mucosal
44:1424–1433. melanoma of the head and neck. A proposal for micro-
25. Hofbauer GFL, Boni R, Simmen D, et al. Histological, staging localized, stage I (lymph node-negative) tumors.
immunological and molecular features of a nasal mucosa Cancer 2004; 100:1657–1664.
primary melanoma associated with a nasal melanosis. 48. Manolidis S, Donald PJ. Malignant mucosal melanoma of
Melanoma Res 2002; 12:77–82. the head and neck. Review of the literature and report of
26. Holdcraft J, Gallagher JC. Malignant melanoma of the 14 patients. Cancer 1997; 80:1373–1386.
nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa. Ann Otol Rhinol 49. Billinger KR, Wang MB, Sercarz JA, et al. Clinical and
Laryngol 1969; 78:1–16. pathologic distinction between primary and metastatic
27. Freedman HM, DeSanto LW, Devine KD, et al. Malignant mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. Otolaryngol
melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Arch Head Neck Surg 1995; 112:700–706.
Otolaryngol 1973; 97:322–325. 50. Prasad ML, Patel SG, Busam KJ. Primary mucosal desmo-
28. Conley J, Pack GT. Melanoma of the mucous membranes plastic melanoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2004;
of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99: 26:373–377.
315–319. 51. Prasad ML, Jungbluth AA, Iversen K, et al. Expression of
29. Eneroth C-M, Lundberg C. Mucosal malignant melanoma melanocytic differentiation markers in malignant melano-
of the head and neck. With special reference to cases mas of the oral and sinonasal mucosa. Am J Surg Pathol
having a prolonged clinical course. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 25:782–787.
1975; 80:452–458. 52. Van Dijk M, Sprenger S, Rombout P, et al. Distinct chro-
30. Shah JP, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Mucosal melanomas of the mosomal aberrations in sinonasal mucosa melanoma as
head and neck. Am J Surg 1977; 134:531–535. detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes
31. Snow GB, Van Der Esch EP, Van Slooten EA. Mucosal Chromosomes Cancer 2003; 36:151–158.
melanomas of the head and neck. Head Neck Surg 1978; 53. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kagershita T, et al. Distinct sets of
1:24–30. genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2005;
32. Bethelsen A, Andersen AP, Jensen TS, et al. Melanomas of 353:2135–2147.
the mucosa in the oral cavity and the upper respiratory 54. Nakleh RE, Wick MR, Rocamora A, et al. Morphologic
passages. Cancer 1984; 54:907–912. diversity in malignant melanomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;
33. Blatchford SJ, Koopmann CF Jr, Coulthard SW. Mucosal 93:731–740.
melanoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 1986; 55. Change ES, Wick MR, Swanson PE, et al. Metastatic
96:929–934. malignant melanoma with ‘‘rhabdoid’’ features. Am J
34. Panje WR, Moran WJ. Melanoma of the upper aerodiges- Clin Pathol 1994; 102:426–431.
tive tract: a review of 21 cases. Head Neck Surg 1986; 56. Das Gupta T, Brasfield R. Metastatic melanoma: a clinico-
96:929–934. pathological study. Cancer 1964; 17:1323–1339.
35. Trapp TK, Fu Y-S, Calcaterraa TC. Melanoma of the nasal 57. Berstein JM, Montgomery WW, Balogh K Jr. Metastatic
and paranasal sinus mucosa. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck tumors to the maxilla, nose and paranasal sinuses.
Surg 1987; 113:1086–1089. Laryngoscope 1966; 76:621–650.
36. Suen JY, Median J, Westbrook KC. Nasal septal melanoma. 58. Henderson LT, Robbins T, Weitzner S. Upper aerodiges-
Head Neck Surg 1988; 10:432–435. tive tract metastases in disseminated malignant melanoma.
37. Going JJ, Kean DM. Malignant melanoma of the nasal Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:659–663.
cavity. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103:231–233. 59. Bizon JG, Newman RK. Metastatic melanoma to the eth-
38. Gilligan D, Slevin NJ. Radical radiotherapy for 28 cases of moid sinus. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;
mucosal melanoma in the nasal cavity and sinuses. Br J 112:664–667.
Radiol 1991; 64:1147–1150. 60. Billings KR, Wang MB, Sercarz JA, et al. Clinical and
39. Franquemont DW, Mills SE. Sinonasal malignant melano- pathologic distinction between primary and metastatic
ma. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. Otolaryngol
of 14 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1991; 96:689–697. Head Neck Surg 1995; 112:700–706.
40. Stern SJ, Guillamondegui OM. Mucosal melanoma of the 61. Einhorn LH, Burgess MA, Vallejos C. Prognostic correla-
head and neck. Head Neck 1991; 96:689–697. tions and response to treatment in advanced metastatic
41. Guzzo M, Grandi C, Licitra L, et al. Mucosal malignant malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 1974; 34:1995–2004.
melanoma of head and neck: forty-eight cases treated at 62. Patel JK, Didolkar MS, Pickren JW, et al. Metastatic pattern
Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Eur J Surg Oncol 1993; of malignant melanoma. A study of 216 autopsy cases.
19:316–319. Am J Surg 1978; 135:807–810.
418 Barnes
63. Harwood AR, Lawson VG. Radiation therapy for melano- 14. Huang DP, Ho HC, Henle G, et al. Presence of EBNA in
mas of the head and neck. Head Neck Surg 1982; 4:468–474. nasopharyngeal carcinoma and control tissues related to
64. Trottie A, Peters LJ. Role of radiotherapy in the primary EBV serology. Int J Cancer 1978; 22:266–274.
management of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. 15. Hording U, Nielsen HW, Duagaard S, et al. Human
Semin Surg Oncol 1993; 9:246–250. papillomavirus types 11 and 16 detected in nasopharyn-
65. Medina JE, Ferlito A, Pellitteri PK, et al. Current manage- geal carcinomas by the polymerase chain reaction.
ment of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. J Surg Laryngoscope 1996; 104:99–102.
Oncol 2003; 83:116–123. 16. Punwaney R, Brandwein MS, Zhang DY, et al. Human
66. Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, et al. Head papillomavirus may be common within nasopharyngeal
and neck mucosal melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; carcinoma of Caucasian Americans: investigation of
28:626–630. Epstein-Barr virus and human papillomavirus in
67. Harrison DFS. Malignant melanomata arising in the nasal Eastern and Western nasopharyngeal carcinoma using
mucous membrane. J Laryngol Otol 1976; 90:993–1005. ligation-dependent polymerase chain reaction. Head
68. Helidonis ES, Myers EN, Barnes EL Jr. Metastasis of Neck 1999; 21:21–29.
malignant melanoma of the nasal mucosa to the small 17. Nam J-M, McLaughlin JK, Blot WJ. Cigarette smoking,
intestine. Laryngoscope 1976; 86:1734–1737. alcohol, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case-control
69. Lee Y-TN. Malignant melanoma: pattern of metastasis. study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992, 84: 619-622.
CA Cancer J Clin 1980; 30:137–142. 18. Vaugh TL, Strader C, Davis S, et al. Formaldehyde and
70. Patel SG, Prasad ML, Eserig M, et al. Primary mucosal cancer of the pharynx, sinus and nasal cavity: II.
malignant melanoma of the head and neck. Head Neck Residential exposures. Int J Cancer 1986; 38(5):685–688.
2002; 24:247–257. 19. Henderson BE, Louie E, Soohoo J, et al. Risk factors
associates with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl
J Med 1976; 295:1101–1106.
XXIV. NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA 20. Lin TM, Yang CS, Tu SM, et al. Interaction of factors
associated with cancer of the nasopharynx. Cancer 1979;
1. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, 44:1419–1423.
Pathology and Genetics. Head and Neck Tumours. 21. Jennel D, Hubert A, de Vathaire F, et al. Diet, living
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. eds. Lyon:IARC conditions and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Tunisia – a
Press, 2005. case-control study. Int J Cancer 1990; 46:421–425.
2. Adams WS. The transverse dimensions of the nasophar- 22. Hsu M-M, Tu S-M. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan.
ynx in child and adults with observations on its contrac- Clinical manifestations and results of therapy. Cancer
tile functions. J Laryngol 1958; 72:465–471. 1983; 52:362–368.
3. Lanier A, Bender T, Talbot M, et al. Nasopharyngeal 23. Gustafson RO, Neel HB III. Cancer of the nasopharynx.
carcinoma in Alaskan Eskimos, Indians, and Aleuts: In: Myers EN, Suen JY, eds. Cancer of the Head and Neck,
a review of cases and study of Epstein-Barr virus, 2nd ed. New York: Churchill-Livingstone1989:495–508.
HLA, and environmental risk factors. Cancer 1980; 24. Dickson RI. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. An evaluation of
46:2100–2106. 209 patients. Laryngoscope 1981; 91:333–354.
4. Gustafson RO, Neel HB III. Cancer of the nasopharynx. 25. Sham JST, Choy D. Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal
In: Myers EN, Suen JY, eds. Cancer of the Head and Neck, carcinoma. A review of 759 patients. Br J Radiol 1990; 63:
2nd edition. New York: Churchill-Livingstone 1989: 51–58.
495–508. 26. Dickson RI, Flores AD. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an
5. Doll R, Muir C, Waterhouse J. Cancer incidence in five evaluation of 134 patients treated between 1971–1980.
continents. UICC Monogr Ser 1970, 2: 334-338. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:276–283.
6. Buell P. The effect of migration on the risk of nasopha- 27. Qin P, Hu MY, Yan J, et al. Analysis of 1379 patients with
ryngeal cancer among Chinese. Cancer Res 1974; 34: nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radiation. Cancer
1189–1191. 1988; 61:1117–11124.
7. Dickson RL. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evaluation of 28. Huang T-B. Cancer of the nasopharynx in childhood.
209 patients. Laryngoscope 1981; 91:333–354. Cancer 1990; 66:968–971.
8. Goldsmith DB, West TM, Morton R. HLA associations 29. Singh W. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Caucasian
with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Southern Chinese: children. A 25-year study. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:
a meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2002; 27:61–67. 1248–1253.
9. Loh KS, Goh BC, Lu J. Familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma 30. Sham JST, Poon YF, Wei WI, et al. Nasopharyngeal
in a cohort of 200 patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck carcinoma in young patients. Cancer 1990; 65:2606–2610.
Surg 2006; 132:82–85. 31. Hawkins EP, Krischer JT, Smith BE, et al. Nasopharyngeal
10. Armstrong RW, Armstrong MJ, Yu MC, et al. Salted fish carcinomas in children—a retrospective review and dem-
and inhalants as risk factors for nasopharyngeal onstration of Epstein-Barr genome in tumor cell cyto-
carcinoma in Malaysian Chinese. Cancer Res 1983; plasm: a report of the Pediatric Oncology Group. Hum
43:2967–2970. Pathol 1990; 21:805–810.
11. Yu MC, Ho JHC, Lai S-H, et al. Cantonese-style salted 32. Mertens R, Granzen B, Lassay L, et al. Nasopharyngeal
fish as a cause of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a carcinoma in childhood and adolescence. Concept and
case-control study in Hong Kong. Cancer Res 1986; 46: preliminary results of the cooperative GPOH Study NPC-
956–961. 91. Cancer 1997; 80:951–959.
12. Yuan JM, Wang XL, Xiang YB, et al. Preserved foods in 33. Marks JE, Phillips JL, Menek HR. The National Cancer
relation to risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Shanghai, Data Base Report on the relationship of race and national
China. Int J Cancer 2000; 85:358–363. origin to the histology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
13. Zur Hausen H, Schulte-Holthausen H, Klein G, et al. EBV Cancer 1998; 83:582–588.
DNA in biopsies of Burkitt tumors and anaplastic 34. Skinner DW, van Hassett CA, Tsao SY. Nasopharyngeal
carcinomas of the nasopharynx. Nature 1976; 228: carcinoma: modes of presentation. Ann Otol Rhinol
1056–1058. Laryngol 1991; 100:544–551.
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 419
35. Sham JST, Cheung YK, Choy D, et al. Cranial nerve Committee stage classifications for nasopharyngeal carci-
involvement and base of the skull erosion in nasopharyn- noma. Cancer 1991; 67:434–439.
geal carcinoma. Cancer 1991; 68:422–426. 54. Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, et al. American Joint
36. Chua DTT, Sham JST, Kwong DLW, et al. Prognostic Committee on Cancer. Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th
value of paranasopharyngeal extension of nasopharyn- ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:33–38.
geal carcinoma. A significant factor in local control and 55. Ho JHC. An epidemiologic and clinical study of
distant metastasis. Cancer 1991; 78:202–210. nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
37. Peng J-C, Sheen T-S, Hsu M-M. Nasopharyngeal carcino- 1978; 4:13–187.
ma with dermatomyositis. Analysis of 12 cases. Arch 56. Harmer MH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours,
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121:1298–1301. 3rd ed. Geneva: Internal Union Against Cancer, 1978.
38. Kavanagh BD, Halpern EC, Rosenbaum LC, et al. 57. American Joint Commission Cancer Staging Manual, 6th
Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hor- edition. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. eds. New
mone in a patient with carcinoma of the nasopharynx. York: Springer, 2002.
Cancer 1992; 69:1315–1319. 58. Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH, Bauer WC, et al.
39. Tan KCB, Nicholls J, Kung AWC, et al. Unusual endocrine International Histological Classification of Tumours,
presentations of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1996; No. 19, Histological Typing of Upper Respiratory Tract
77:1967–1972. Tumours. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1978.
40. van Hassett CA, John DG. Diagnosing nasopharyngeal 59. Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH, Barnes L, et al. World
carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:103–104. Health Organization International Histological Classi-
41. Cheung YK, Sham J, Cheung YL. Evaluation of skull base fication of Tumours. Histological Typing of Tumours of
erosions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of the Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear, 2nd ed. Berlin:
plain radiography and computed tomography. Springler-Verlag, 1991.
Oncology 1994; 51:42–46. 60. Weiland LH. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In: Barnes L, ed.
42. Chan MKM, Huang DP. The value of cytologic examina- Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck, 1st edition.
tion for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ear Nose Throat J New York: Marcell Dekker Inc, 1985:453–466.
1990; 69:268–271. 61. Giffler RF, Gillespie JJ, Ayala AG, et al. Lymphoepithelioma
43. Feinmesser R, Miyazaki I, Cheung R, et al. Diagnosis of in cervical lymph nodes of children and young adults. Am J
nasopharyngeal carcinoma by DNA amplification of tis- Surg Pathol 1977; 1:293–302.
sue obtained by fine-needle aspiration. N Engl J Med 62. Carbone A, Micheau C. Pitfalls in microscopic diagnosis
1992; 326:17–21. of undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type
44. Feinmesser R, Feinmesser M, Freeman JL, et al. Detection (lymphoepithelioma). Cancer 1982; 50:1344–1351.
of occult nasopharyngeal primary tumours by means of in 63. Madri JA, Barwick KW. An immunohistochemical study
situ hybridization. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106:345–348. of nasopharyngeal neoplasms using keratin antibodies.
45. Dictor M, Siven M, Tennvall J, et al. Determination of Epithelial versus nonepithelial neoplasms. Am J Surg
nonendemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma by in situ hybrid- Pathol 1982; 6:143–149.
ization for Epstein-Barr virus EBER 1 RNA: sensitivity 64. Sugimoto T, Hshimoto H, Enjoji M. Nasopharyngeal
and specificity in cervical node metastases. Laryngoscope carcinomas and malignant lymphomas: an immunohisto-
1995; 105:407–412. chemical analysis of 74 cases. Laryngoscope 1990;
46. Chao T-Y, Chow K-C, Chang J-Y, et al. Expression of 100:742–748.
Epstein-Barr-virus –encoded RNAs as a marker for meta- 65. Carbone A, Micheau C. Pittfalls in microscopic diagnosis
static undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer of undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type
1996; 78:24–29. (lymphoepithelioma). Cancer 1982; 50:1344–1351.
47. Pearson GR, Weiland LH, Neel HB III, et al. Application 66. Khanna R, Busson P, Burrows SR, et al. Molecular
of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology to the diagnosis of characterization of antigen-processing function in naso-
North American nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1983; pharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Evidence for efficient pre-
51:260–268. sentation of Epstein-Barr virus cytoxic T-cells epitopes by
48. Takimoto T, Ishikawa S, Masuda K, et al. Antinuclear NPC cells. Cancer Res 1998; 58:310–314.
antibodies in the sera of patients with nasopharyngeal 67. Shpitzer T, Kerrebijn JDF, Freeman JL, et al. Lymphoid
carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 1989; 10:399–403. cell infiltration into Epstein-Barr virus-positive nasopha-
49. Neel HB III, Taylor WF. Epstein-Barr virus-related anti- ryngeal carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;
bodies. Changes in titer after therapy for nasopharyngeal 124:188–194.
carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 68. Looi L-M. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia in naso-
116:1287–1290. pharyngeal carcinoma. A pathologic study of 422 primary
50. Yong-Sheng Z, Sham JST, Ng MH, et al. Immunoglobulin and 138 metastatic tumors. Cancer 1987; 59:466–470.
A against viral capsid antigen of Epstein-Barr virus and 69. Leighton SEJ, Teo JGC, Leung SF, et al. Prevalence and
indirect mirror examination of the nasopharynx in the prognostic significance of tumor-associated tissue
detection of asymptomatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. eosinophilia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1996;
Cancer 1992; 69:3–7. 77:436–440.
51. Chien Y-C, Chen J-Y, Liu M-Y, et al. Serologic markers of 70. Zarate-Osorno A, Jaffe ES, Medeiros LJ. Metastatic naso-
Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal pharyngeal carcinoma initially presenting as cervical
carcinoma in Taiwanese men. N Engl J Med 2001; lymphadenopathy. A report of two cases that resembled
345:1877–1882. Hodgkin’s disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116:862–865.
52. Hao S-P, Tsang N-M, Chang K-P. Screening nasopharyn- 71. Chen CL, Su IJ, Hsu MM, et al. Granulomatous nasopha-
geal carcinoma by detection of the latent membrane ryngeal carcinoma with emphasis on difficulty in diagno-
protein 1 (LMP-1) gene with nasopharyngeal swabs. sis and favorable outcome. J Formos Med Assoc 1991;
Cancer 2003; 97:1909–1913. 9:91–98.
53. Teo PML, Leung SF, Yu P, et al. A comparison of Ho’s, 72. Shanmugaratnam K, Chan SH, De-The G, et al.
International Union Against Cancer, and American Joint Histopathology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Correlations
420 Barnes
with epidemiology, survival rates and other biological char- comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosome
acteristics. Cancer 1979; 44:1029–1044. Cancer 1999; 25:169–175.
73. Prathap K, Looi LM, Prasad U. Localized amyloidosis in 91. Sheu L-F, Chen A, Tseng H-H, et al. Assessment of p53
nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Histopathology 1984; 8:27–34. expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Hum Pathol
74. Wan S-K, Chan JKC, Lau W-H, et al. Basaloid-squamous 1995; 26:380–386.
carcinoma of the nasopharynx. An Epstein-Barr virus- 92. Roychowdhury DF, Tseng A Jr, Fu KK, et al. New
associated neoplasm with morphologically identical prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Tumor
tumors occurring in other sites. Cancer 1995; 76: angiogenesis and C-erbB2 expression. Cancer 1996;
1689–1693. 77:1419–1426.
75. Franchi A, Morani M, Massi D, et al. Sinonasal undiffer- 93. Shi W, Pataki I, MacMillan C, et al. Molecular pathology
entiated carcinoma, nasopharyngeal-type undifferentiat- parameters in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer
ed carcinoma, and keratinizing and nonkeratinizing 2002; 94:1997–2006.
squamous cell carcinoma express different cytokeratin 94. Bar-Sela, Kuten A, Ben-Eliezer S, et al. Expression of HER
patterns. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:1597–1604. 2 and C-Kit in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Implications
76. Nomori H, Watanbe S, Nakajima T, et al. Histiocytes in for new therapeutic approach. Mod Pathol 2003; 16:
nasopharyngeal carcinoma in relation to prognosis. 1035–1040.
Cancer 1986; 57:100–105. 95. Fan C-S, Wong N, Leung S-F, et al. Frequent c-myc and
77. Gallo O, Bianchi S, Gianni A, et al. Correlation between Int-2 over representations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
histopathological and biological findings in nasopharyn- Hum Pathol 2000; 31:169–178.
geal carcinoma and its prognostic significance. Laryngo- 96. Yu Y, Dong W, Li X, et al. Significance of c-Myc and Bcl-2
scope 1991; 101:487–493. expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Arch
78. Weiss LM, Mohaved LA, Butler AE, et al. Analysis of Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 2003; 129:1322–1326.
lymphoepithelioma and lymphoepithelioma-like carcino- 97. Jeng Y-M, Sung M-T, Fang C-L, et al. Sinonasal undiffer-
ma for Epstein-Barr viral genomes by in-situ hybridiza- entiated carcinoma and nasopharyngeal-type undifferen-
tion. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13:625–631. tiated carcinoma. Two clinically, biologically, and
79. Akao I, Sato Y, Mukai K, et al. Detection of Epstein-Barr histopathologically distinct entities. Am J Surg Pathol
virus DNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of 2002; 26:371–376.
nasopharyngeal carcinoma using polymerase chain reac- 98. Wang DC, Cai WM, Hu Y, et al. Long-term survival of
tion and in-situ hybridization. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 1035 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1988;
279–283. 61:2338–2341.
80. Della Torre G, Pilotti S, Donghi R, et al. Epstein-Barr virus 99. Qin D, Hu Y, Yan J, et al. Analysis of 1379 patients with
genomes in undifferentiated and squamous cell nasopha- nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radiation. Cancer
ryngeal carcinomas in Italian patients. Diagn Mol Pathol 1988; 61:1117–1124.
1994; 3:32–37. 100. Sham JST, Wei WI, Kwan WH, et al. Nasopharyngeal
81. Tsai S-T, Jin Y-T, Su I-J. Expression of EBER1 in primary carcinoma. Pattern of tumor regression after radiotherapy.
metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues using in situ Cancer 1990; 65:216–220.
hybridization. A correlation with WHO subtypes. Cancer 101. Bailet JW, Mark RJ, Abemayor E, et al. Nasopharyngeal
1996; 77:231–236. carcinoma: treatment results with primary radiation ther-
82. Pathmanathan R, Prasad U, Sadler R, et al. Clonal prolif- apy. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 965–972.
eration of cells infected with Epstein-Barr virus in pre- 102. Wei WI. Nasopharyngeal cancer: current status of man-
invasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. agement. Arch Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 2001;
N Engl J Med 1995; 333:693–698. 127:766–769.
83. Pak W, To KF, Lo YMD, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma 103. Fee WE Jr, Gilmer PA, Goffinet DR. Surgical management
in-situ (NPCIS) – Pathologic and clinical perspectives. of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiation fail-
Head Neck 2002; 24:989–995. ure at the primary site. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:1220–1226.
84. Choi PHK, Suen MWM, Huang DP, et al. Nasopharyngeal 104. Wei WI, Lam KH, Ho CM, et al. Efficacy of radical neck
carcinoma: Genetic changes, Epstein-Barr virus infection dissection for the control of cervical metastasis after
or both. A clinical and molecular study of 36 patients. radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Surg
Cancer 1993; 72:2873–2878. 1990; 160:439–442.
85. Chen Y-J, Ko J-Y, Chen P-J. Chromosomal aberrations in 105. Fee WE Jr, Roberson JB Jr, Goffinet DR. Long-term sur-
nasopharyngeal carcinoma analyzed by comparative vival after surgical resection for recurrent nasopharyngeal
genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer cancer after radiotherapy failure. Arch Otolaryngol Head
1999; 25:169–175. Neck Surg 1991; 117:1233–1236.
86. Costello F, Mason BR, Collins RJ, et al. A clinical and flow 106. King WWK, Teo PML, Li ARC. Pattern of failure after
cytometric analysis of patients with nasopharyngeal car- radical neck dissection for recurrent nasopharyngeal car-
cinoma. Cancer 1990; 66:1789–1795. cinoma. Am J Surg 1992; 164:599–602.
87. Cheng DS, Campbell BH, Clowry LJ, et al. DNA content 107. Yumoto E, Gyo K, Yanagihara N. Resection of persistent
in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 1990; nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Skull Base Surg 1994; 4:59–64.
11:393–397. 108. Decker DA, Drelichman A, Al-Sarraf M, et al.
88. Yip TTC, Lau WH, Cahn JKC, et al. Prognostic signifi- Chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A ten-
cance of DNA flow cytometric analysis in patients with year comparison. Cancer 1983; 52:602–605.
nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 83:2284–2292. 109. Rossi A, Malinari R, Boracchi P, et al. Adjuvant chemo-
89. Masudo M, Shinokuma A, Hirakawa N, et al. Expression therapy with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxoru-
of bcl-2, p53 and Ki-67 and outcome of patients with bicin after radiotherapy in local-regional nasopharyngeal
primary nasopharyngeal carcinomas following DNA- cancer: results of a 4-year randomized study. Am J Clin
damaging treatment. Head Neck 1998; 20:640–644. Oncol 1988; 6:1404–1410.
90. Chen Y-J, Ko J-Y, Chen P-J, et al. Chromosomal aberra- 110. Boussen H, Cvitkovic E, Wendling JL, et al. Chemo-
tions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma analyzed by therapy of metastatic and/or recurrent undifferentiated
Chapter 8: Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx 421
nasopharyngeal carcinoma with cisplatin, bleomycin, and 129. Cooper JS, Scott C, Marchial, et al. The relationship of
fluorouracil. Am J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:1675–1681. nasopharyngeal carcinomas and second independent
111. Chao R, Tannock I. Chemotherapy for recurrent or meta- malignancies based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology
static carcinoma of the nasopharynx. A review of the Group. Cancer 1991; 67:1673–1677.
Princess Margaret Hospital experience. Cancer 1991; 130. Chen C-L, Hsu M-M. Second primary epithelial malig-
68:2120–2124. nancy of nasopharynx and nasal cavity after successful
112. Chua DTT, Sham JST, Choy D, et al. Preliminary report curative radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
of the Asian-Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association Hum Pathol 2000; 31:227–232.
randomized trial comparing cisplatin and epirubicin
followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in
the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced XXV. PAPILLARY ADENOCARCINOMA
nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 83:2270–2283. OF THE NASOPHARYNX
113. Chan ATC, Teo PML, Leung TWT, et al. The role of
chemotherapy in the management of nasopharyngeal 1. Robin PE, Powell DJ, Holme GM. Malignant tumours of
carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 82:1003–1012. the nasopharynx: 220 cases 1957-1966. Clin Otolaryngol
114. Mahjoubi R, Bachouchi M, Munck JN, et al. Phase II trial 1980; 5:139–156.
of recombinant interferon gamma in refractory undiffer- 2. Resta L, Ricco R, Santangelo A. Morphologic and classifi-
entiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Head Neck 1993; catory considerations about 140 cases of carcinoma of the
15:115–118. nasopharynx. Tumori 1983; 69:313–321.
115. Lin CL, Lo WF, Lee TH, et al. Immunization with Epstein- 3. Kuo T-T, Tsang N-M. Salivary gland type nasopharyngeal
Barr virus (EBV) peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induces carcinoma. A histologic, immunohistochemical and
functional CD8+ T-cell immunity and may lead to tumor Epstein-Barr virus study of 15 cases including a psam-
regression in patients with EBV-positive nasopharyngeal momatous mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol
carcinoma. Cancer Res 2002; 62:6952–6958. 2001; 25:80–86.
116. Lofgren LA, Hallgren S, Nilsson E, et al. Photodynamic 4. Wenig BM, Hyams VJ, Heffner DK. Nasopharyngeal pap-
therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer. Arch illary adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of low-
Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 1995; 121:997–1002. grade carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12:946–953.
117. Kwong DLW, Nicholls J, Wei WI, et al. The time course of 5. van Hassett CA. Papillary adenocarcinoma of the naso-
histologic remission after treatment of patients with naso- pharynx. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105:853–854.
pharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 85:1446–1453. 6. Nojeg M MAM, Jalaludin M, Jayalakshmi P. Papillary
118. Nicholls JM, Sham J, Chan C-W, et al. Radiation therapy adenocarcinoma of the nasopharynx—case report and
for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Histologic appearances review of the literature. Med J Malaysia 1997; 53:104–106.
and patterns of tumor regression. Hum Pathol 1992; 7. Karkos PD, Kelleher R, Hilmi OJ, et al. Aggressive papil-
23:742–747. lary tumor of the nasopharynx followed by an aggressive
119. Tsang N-M, Chuang C-C, Tseng C-K, et al. Presence of the papillary tumour of the middle ear. A multiple site
latent membrane protein 1 gene in nasopharyngeal swabs tumour? J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117:989–991.
from patients with mucosal recurrent nasopharyngeal 8. Kennedy MT, Jordan RCK, Berean KW, et al. Expression
carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 98:2385–2392. pattern of CK7, CK20, CDX-2, and villin in intestinal-type
120. Vikram B, Mishra UB, Strong EW, et al. Patterns of failure sinonasal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:932–937.
in carcinoma of the nasopharynx: I. Failure at the primary 9. Cathro HP, Mills SE. Immunophenotypic differences
site. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985; 11:1455–1459. between intestinal-type and low-grade papillary sinonasal
121. Vikram B, Mishra UB, Strong EW, et al. Patterns of adenocarcinoma. An immunohistochemical study of 22
failure in carcinoma of the nasopharynx: Failure at distant cases utilizing CDX2 and MUC2. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;
sites. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8:276–279. 28:1026–1032.
122. Ahmad A, Stefani S. Distant metastases of nasopharynx 10. Carrizo F, Luna MA. Thyroid transcription factor-1 ex-
carcinoma: a study of 256 male patients. J Surg Oncol pression in thyroid-like nasopharyngeal papillary adeno-
1986; 3:194–197. carcinoma: report of 2 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 2005; 9:
123. Dictor M, Silven M, Tennvall J, et al. Determination of 189–192.
nonendemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma by in situ hybrid- 11. Barnes L. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal
ization for Epstein-Barr virus EBER 1 RNA: sensitivity cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg Pathol 1986;
and specificity in cervical node metastases. Laryngoscope 10:192–202.
1995; 105:407–412. 12. Lopez JI, Perez A. Pharyngeal adenocarcinoma with intes-
124. Bailet JW, Mark RJ, Abemayer E, et al. Nasopharyngeal tinal features. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104:900–902.
carcinoma: treatment results with primary radiation ther- 13. Mills SE, Garland TA, Allen MS Jr. Low-grade papillary
apy. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:965–972. adenocarcinoma of palatal salivary gland origin. Am J Surg
125. Bedwinek JM, Perez LA, Keys DJ. Analysis of failure after Pathol 1984; 8:367–374.
definitive irradiation for epidermoid carcinoma of the 14. Fliss DM, Zirkin H, Puterman M, et al. Low-grade papil-
nasopharynx. Cancer 1980; 45:2725–2729. lary adenocarcinoma of buccal mucosal salivary gland
126. Grand C, Boracchi P, Mezzanotte G, et al. Analysis origin. Head Neck 1989; 11:237–241.
of prognostic factors and proposal of a new classi- 15. Mostofi R, Wood RS, Chistison W, et al. Low-grade papil-
fication for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 1990; lary adenocarcinoma of minor salivary glands. Case report
12:31–40. and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
127. Sham JST, Cheung YK, Choy D, et al. Cranial nerve Pathol 1992; 73:591–595.
involvement and base of the skull erosion in nasopharyn- 16. Wang CP, Chang YL, Chen CT, et al. Photodynamic
geal carcinoma. Cancer 1991; 68:422–426. therapy with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid as a post-
128. Sham JST, Wei WI, Tai PTH, et al. Multiple malignant operative adjunct therapy for incompletely resected pri-
neoplasms in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. mary nasopharyngeal papillary adenocarcinoma; A case
Oncology 1990; 47:471–474. report. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38:435–438.
422 Barnes
XXVI. METASTASES TO THE NASAL CAVITY 2. Prescher A, Brors D. Metastases to the paranasal sinuses: case
AND PARANASAL SINUS report and review of the literature. Laryngorhinootologie
2001; 80:583–594.
1. Kent SE, Majumdar B. Metastatic tumours in the maxillary 3. Berstein JM, Montgomery WW, Balogh K Jr. Metastatic
sinus. A report of two cases and a review of the literature. tumors to the maxilla, nose, and paranasal sinuses.
J Laryngol Otol 1985; 99:459–462. Laryngoscope 1966; 76:621–650.
9
Bruce M. Wenig
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center,
St. Luke’s and Roosevelt Hospitals, New York, New York, U.S.A.
I. NORMAL DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURE pouch gives rise to the epithelium on the internal side,
and the mesoderm of the first and second branchial
The ear can be considered as three distinct regions or pouches gives rise to the connective tissue lying
compartments that include the external ear, the middle between the external and internal epithelia (2).
ear and temporal bone, and the inner ear. The external
ear consists of the auricle (pinna), external auditory Anatomy
canal (or meatus), and the tympanic membrane at the
medial end of the auditory canal. The middle ear cavity The outer portion of the external ear includes the
includes the ossicles, eustachian tube connecting the auricle or pinna leading into the external auditory
middle ear space to the nasopharynx, and expansion of canal. The skeleton of the auricle consists of a single
the middle ear cavity in the form of air cells in the plate of elastic cartilage conforming to the shape of the
temporal bone. The inner ear is embedded in the ear. The lobule is the only part of the auricle that is
petrous portion of the temporal bone and consists of devoid of skeletal support. The cartilage of the auricle
a membranous (otic) labyrinth that lies within a dense is continuous with that of the external auditory canal.
bone referred to as the otic capsule that is excavated to The auricle is anchored through its continuity with the
form the osseous (periotic) labyrinth (1). cartilage of the meatus and through the skin and
The ear is the sense organ for hearing and extrinsic muscles.
balance. The inner ear is the sense organ for both The external auditory canal or meatus extends
hearing and balance. The external and middle ears are from the concha (the part of the ear lying immediately
the sound-conducting apparatus for the auditory part outside the opening of the external auditory canal) to
of the inner ear. The embryology, anatomy, and its medial limit, which is the external aspect of the
histology of the ear are complex, and beyond the tympanic membrane. The lateral portion of its wall
scope of this chapter. A broad overview of these topics consists of cartilage and connective tissue (1). The
follows. For a more in-depth discussion of the embry- medial portion of its wall consists of bone. The carti-
ology, anatomy, and histology of the ear as well as the laginous part of the external auditory canal constitutes
role that the auditory and vestibular systems play in slightly less than half its total length. The bony part of
the physiological aspects of hearing and balance, the the canal is formed by both the tympanic part and the
reader is referred to additional texts (1–9). petrous part of the temporal bone. In adults, the
anterior and inferior walls of the cartilaginous canal
are closely related to the parotid gland. The anterior
A. External Ear wall of the bony canal is closely related to the man-
Embryology dibular condyle, the posterior wall to the mastoid air
cells, and the medial portion of the superior wall to
The external ear develops from the first branchial the epitympanic recess. The tympanic membrane (ear
groove. The external auricle (pinna) forms from the drum) is situated obliquely at the end of the external
fusion of the auricular hillocks or tubercles, a group of auditory canal sloping medially both from above
mesenchymal tissue swellings from the first and sec- downward and from behind forward.
ond branchial arches, which lie around the external
portion of the first branchial groove (2). The external
Histology
auditory canal is considered a normal remnant of the
first branchial groove. The tympanic membrane forms Histologically, the auricle is essentially a cutaneous
from the first and second branchial pouches and the structure composed of keratinizing, stratified squa-
first branchial groove (2). The ectoderm of the first mous epithelium with associated cutaneous adnexal
branchial groove gives rise to the epithelium on the structures that include hair follicles, sebaceous glands,
external side, the endoderm from the first branchial and eccrine sweat glands (6). In addition to the hair
424 Wenig
follicles and sebaceous glands, the outer third of the internal carotid artery; and (vi) posterior aspect delim-
external auditory canal is noteworthy because of the ited by the petrous portion of the temporal bone
presence of modified apocrine glands called cerumi- containing the mastoid antrum and mastoid air cells
nal glands that replace the eccrine glands seen in the (1,4–6). The tympanic cavity communicates anteriorly
auricular dermis. Ceruminal glands produce cerumen with the nasopharynx by way of the eustachian (audi-
and are arranged in clusters composed of cuboidal tory or pharyngotympanic) tube and posteriorly with
cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm often containing a the mastoid air cells by way of the aditus and mastoid
granular, golden-yellow pigment. These cells have antrum.
secretory droplets along their luminal border. Periph- The contents of the tympanic cavity include the
eral to the secretory cells are flattened myoepithelial ossicles (malleus, incus, and stapes), the ligaments of
cells. The ducts of the ceruminal glands terminate in the ossicles, the tendons of the ossicular muscles,
the hair follicle or on the skin. The ducts of ceruminal eustachian tube, tympanic cavity proper, epitympanic
glands lack apocrine or myoepithelial cells. In the recess, mastoid cavity, and the chorda tympani of the
inner portion of the external auditory canal, ceruminal facial (VII) nerve. The middle ear as well as the
glands, as well as the other adnexal structures are external ear function as conduits for sound conduc-
absent. The subcutaneous tissue is composed of fibro- tion for the auditory part of the internal ear.
connective tissue, fat, and elastic-type fibrocartilage,
which give the auricle its structural support. The ear Histology
lobe is devoid of cartilage and is replaced by a pad of
adipose tissue. The perichondrium is composed of Histologically, the epithelial lining of the tympanic
loose vascular connective tissue. cavity is a single layer of respiratory epithelium of
Similar to the auricle, the external auditory canal flattened to cuboidal epithelium (6). Under normal
is lined by keratinizing squamous epithelium that conditions, there are no glandular elements within the
extends to include the entire canal and covers the middle ear; the presence of glandular epithelium in
external aspect of the tympanic membrane. The the middle ear is abnormal and may represent part of
inner two-thirds of the external auditory canal contain a metaplastic response in the setting of chronic otitis
bone rather than cartilage. Because of the absence of media (COM) or can be seen in adenomatous neo-
adnexal structures, there is relatively close apposition plasms (6). Stratified squamous epithelium is not
of the epithelium to the subjacent bone. present in the tympanic cavity under normal condi-
tions nor does squamous metaplasia occur in the
middle ear (6). Ciliated pseudostratified columnar
B. Middle Ear epithelium may be found in limited patches among
the flattened or cuboidal epithelium.
Embryology The lining of the eustachian (auditory) tube is a
The middle ear space develops from invagination of low ciliated epithelium for much of its length, except
the first branchial pouch (pharyngotympanic tube) as it approaches its nasopharyngeal end, where it
from the primitive pharynx. The eustachian tube and becomes ciliated pseudostratified columnar epithelium
tympanic cavity develop from the endoderm of the containing goblet cells. In its cartilaginous portion, it
first branchial pouch; the malleus and incus develop also contains seromucinous glands. The eustachian
from the mesoderm of the first branchial arch (Meckel’s tubes contain a lymphoid component, particularly in
cartilage), while the incus develops from the children, that is referred to as Gerlach’s tubal tonsil.
mesoderm of the second branchial arch (Reichert’s Reactive hyperplasia of this lymphoid component
cartilage) (2). particularly in children may close off the eustachian
tube, providing a desirable milieu for otitis media. The
Anatomy cartilage of the nasopharyngeal portion of the eusta-
chian tube is hyaline type.
The middle ear or tympanic cavity lies within the
temporal bone between the tympanic membrane and
the squamous portions of the temporal bone laterally C. Inner Ear
and the petrous portion of the temporal bone sur- Embryology
rounding the inner ear medially. The anatomical
limits of the tympanic cavity include (i) lateral or The first division of the ear to develop is the inner ear,
internal aspect made up by the tympanic membrane which appears toward the end of the first month of
and squamous portion of the temporal bone; (ii) gestation (2,3). The membranous labyrinth, including
medial aspect bordered by the petrous portion of the the utricle, saccule, three semicircular ducts, cochlear
temporal bone; (iii) superior (roof) delimited by the duct, and endolymphatic sac arises from the placodal
tegmen tympani, a thin plate of bone that separates thickening of the ectoderm to become a closed otic
the middle ear space from the cranial cavity; (iv) vesicle (otocyst). The membranous labyrinth, which is
inferior (floor) aspect bordered by a thin plate of essentially tubular and saccular, in turn is filled with
bone separating the tympanic cavity from the superior fluid, the endolymph, or endolymphatic fluid. The
bulb of the internal jugular vein; (v) anterior aspect bony labyrinth, including the vestibule, semicircular
delimited by a thin plate of bone separating the canals, and cochlea, arises from the mesenchyme
tympanic cavity from the carotid canal housing the around the otic vesicle (4–6).
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 425
Pathology
Gross. The majority of first branchial cleft anom-
alies are cysts representing over two-thirds (68%) of
these anomalies; (14,18) sinuses and fistulas equally
make up the remainder of these lesions. The first
branchial cleft cysts appear as solitary cystic lesions
Figure 2 Histologically, accessory tragic have the appearance without an associated sinus tract.
of the normal external auricle, as the presence of skin, including Microscopy. Type I contains only ectodermal ele-
keratinizing squamous epithelium, cutaneous adnexal structures, ments, including keratinizing squamous epithelium
and a central core of cartilage demonstrate.
without adnexal structures (i.e., hair follicles, seba-
ceous glands, sweat glands) or cartilage, thereby
duplicating the membranous external auditory canal.
Pathology Type II lesions have both ectodermal and mesodermal
elements, including keratinized squamous epithelium,
Microscopy. Histologically, accessory tragi reca- cutaneous adnexae, and cartilage, thereby duplicating
pitulate the normal external auricle and include the the external auditory canal and pinna. Type II anoma-
skin, cutaneous adnexal structures, and a central core lies are more intimately associated with the parotid
of cartilage (Fig. 2). gland than type I anomalies, although parotid tissue
may be found in association with type I sinus or
Differential Diagnosis fistula tracts. Tracts associated with type II defects
may terminate short of the external auditory canal or
In contrast to accessory tragic, squamous papillomas
may open up in the external auditory canal near the
lack cutaneous adnexal structures and cartilage (13).
junction of the cartilaginous portion and osseous
portion of the canal; communication with the middle
Treatment and Prognosis ear is uncommon. For either type I or type II defects,
Simple surgical excision is curative. an associated prominent lymphoid component is not
usually present contrasting with second branchial
anomaly; only when it is inflamed or infected will
2. Branchial Cleft Anomalies there be an associated lymphoid component. Olsen
a. First Branchial Cleft Anomalies and associates (14) believed that the histological fea-
tures of type I and type II lesions overlapped and
Clinical Features therefore recommended that these anomalies should
be classified into cyst, sinus, or fistula.
First branchial cleft anomalies typically occur in the
area of the external ear and include cysts, sinuses, and Differential Diagnosis
fistulas (14). In comparison to second branchial cleft
anomalies, first branchial cleft anomalies are uncom- The differential diagnosis includes epidermoid cysts
mon, representing only 1% to 8% of all branchial and dermoid cysts. See chapter on diseases of the skin
apparatus defects. First branchial cleft anomalies for a discussion of these lesions.
may be identified in a variety of locations, including Treatment and Prognosis
preauricular, postauricular, or infra-auricular sites, at
the angle of the jaw, associated with the ear lobe, and Irrespective of the histology, complete surgical exci-
in the external auditory canal or involving the parotid sion is the treatment of choice. Inadequate excision
gland. Involvement of the external auditory canal may results in recurrence and increased risk of infection
result in otalgia or otorrhea. Parotid involvement may (19). Recurrence rates are increased when there are
result in an intraparotid or periparotid mass. The multiple preoperative infections and when there is no
fistula tract in first branchial cleft anomalies may epithelial lining identified in the specimen (19). Inci-
extend from the skin over or through the parotid sion and drainage are indicated in cases where
and open in the external auditory canal. abscesses have developed, and in this situation com-
According to Work, first branchial lesions can be plete surgical excision must wait until resolution of
divided into two types: type I and type II lesions the infection. Type II anomalies are often intimately
(15,16). Type I lesions represent a first cleft anomaly associated with the parotid gland, necessitating a
only. Type I lesions are typically located medial, superficial parotidectomy to ensure complete excision.
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 427
Although there is no consistent relationship between glial cells, histiocytes, and mature lymphocytes. Reac-
the tract and the facial nerve as it courses through the tive alterations of the neuroglial tissue (gliosis) may be
parotid gland, exposure and dissection of the nerve present. In addition, granulation tissue and keratiniz-
and its branches are required in Work type II anoma- ing squamous epithelium (cholesteatoma) may be
lies (20,21). found. Immunohistochemical confirmation of neuro-
glial tissues includes reactivity for glial fibrillary
b. Heterotopias of the Middle Ear and Mastoid acidic protein (GFAP).
Etiology
The most common organisms implicated in causing
disease are Streptococcus pneumoniae and Hemophilus
influenza. The middle ear infection is believed to result
from infection via the eustachian tube either at the
time of or following pharyngitis (bacterial or viral).
Pathology
Gross. There are no specific macroscopic fea-
tures. In general, otitis media is managed medically.
However, tissue is removed for histopathological
examination at times. The tissue specimens usually Figure 6 Chronic otitis media. The histological features of
are received as multiple small fragments of soft to chronic otitis media include a background of chronic inflamma-
rubbery granulation tissue. If tympanosclerosis is tion composed of lymphocytes with fibrosis and hemorrhage;
present, then the tissues may be firm to hard, consist- scattered, unevenly distributed (metaplastic glands) of variable
ing of calcific debris. In general, all of the tissue size and shape that contain thin (serous) fluid separated by
fragments should be processed for histological abundant stromal tissue. Foci of calcification (tympanosclerosis)
examination. are present. Although not identifiable at this magnification, cilia
Microscopy. The histology of otitis media varies were focally present in association with the glands, an indicator
depending on the disease state (39). Acute otitis media of a reactive (i.e., metaplasia) rather than neoplastic (i.e., ade-
noma) proliferation.
is virtually never a surgical disease. The middle ear
mucosa, which is also referred to as the mucoperios-
teum, responds to infection with inflammation, hyper-
emia, polypoid thickening, and edema. The
inflammatory infiltrate in acute otitis media is is confirmatory of middle ear glandular metaplasia
predominantly composed of polymorphonuclear leu- because this feature is not found in association
kocytes with a variable admixture of chronic inflam- with middle ear adenomas (MEAs). Furthermore, the
matory cells. Secretory otitis media refers to otitis haphazard arrangement of the glands in the back-
media in which associated effusion is present behind ground of changes of COM should allow the observer
an intact tympanic membrane. The exudate may be to differentiate metaplastic from neoplastic glands.
serous, hemorrhagic, fibrinous, mucoid, purulent, or In addition to the inflammatory cell infiltrate and
an admixture of types (40). Acute otitis media usually glandular metaplasia, other histopathological findings
heals by resorption by the mucoperisoteum. However, that usually are seen in association with COM or that
localized destruction of the middle ear ossicles may represent its sequelae include fibrosis, granulation
occur. Further, granulation tissue may develop, result- tissue, tympanosclerosis, cholesterol granulomas,
ing in scar formation. Fibrosing osteitis is seen in areas and reactive bone formation. Because of the presence
of bone destruction that may result in reactive of scar tissue, the middle ear ossicles may be destroyed
sclerotic bone. (partially or totally), or they may become immobi-
Acute inflammatory cells may be superimposed lized. Perforation of the tympanic membrane pars
in a case of COM. The histological changes in COM tensa may occur, with the resulting ingrowth of squa-
include a variable amount of chronic inflammatory mous epithelium potentially leading to the develop-
cells consisting of lymphocytes, histiocytes, plasma ment of cholesteatoma.
cells, and eosinophils. Multinucleated giant cells and
foamy histiocytes may be present. The middle ear low 3. Tympanosclerosis
cuboidal epithelium may or may not be seen. However,
glandular metaplasia (Fig. 6), a response of the middle Tympanosclerosis represents dystrophic mineraliza-
ear epithelium to the infectious process, may be tion (calcification or ossification) of the tympanic
present. The glands tend to be more common in non- membrane or middle ear that is associated with recur-
suppurative otitis media than in suppurative otitis rent episodes of otitis media (41). The incidence of
media. The metaplastic glands are unevenly distri- tympanosclerosis in otitis media varies from 3% to
buted in the tissue specimens, they are variably 33% (42). Tympanosclerosis of the tympanic mem-
shaped, and they are separated by abundant stromal brane can be seen in children following myringotomy
tissue. The glands are lined by columnar to cuboidal and tube insertion. In this setting, the tympanoscler-
epithelium, with or without cilia or goblet cell meta- otic foci may or may not be permanent. Tympanoscle-
plasia. Glandular secretions may or may not be pres- rosis of the middle ear typically affects older patients,
ent, so the glands may appear empty, or they may it represents the irreversible accumulation of mineral-
contain varying secretions, including thin (serous) or ized material, and it is associated with conductive
thick (mucoid) fluid content. The identification of cilia hearing loss (43,44).
430 Wenig
On gross examination, tympanosclerotic foci chronic infection, may occur and might be confused
may be localized or diffuse, and they appear as with a true gland-forming neoplasm. The differential
white nodules or plaques. Histologically, dense diagnosis of the glandular metaplasia seen in otitis
‘‘clumps’’ of mineralized, calcified, or ossified material media includes MEA. In MEAs, the histology is dom-
or debris can be seen within the stromal tissues or in inated by the presence of a diffuse glandular and/or
the middle (connective tissue) aspect of the tympanic solid cell proliferation rather than the haphazard
membrane (Fig. 6). Tympanosclerosis may cause scar- arrangement of the glands seen in a background of
ring and ossicular fixation. changes of COM. The haphazard arrangement of the
glands occurring in the background of COM and the
4. Cholesterol Granulomas identification of cilia confirmatory of middle ear glan-
dular metaplasia are features that are not found in
Cholesterol granulomas represent a foreign body association with MEAs. Other possible lesions in the
granulomatous response to cholesterol crystals that differential diagnosis of COM include cholesteatoma,
are derived from the rupture of red blood cells and the Langerhan cell histiocytosis, and rhabdomyosarcoma.
resulting breakdown of the lipid layer of the erythro- The absence of keratinizing squamous epithelium
cyte cell membrane. Cholesterol granulomas arise in within the middle ear space allows for differentiation
the middle ear and mastoid in any condition in which of COM from cholesteatoma. It should be noted that
hemorrhage occurs in combination with interference COM and cholesteatoma are not mutually exclusive,
in drainage and ventilation of the middle ear space; and in any given patient, findings diagnostic for both
otoscopic picture is referred to as ‘‘blue ear syn- COM and cholesteatoma may be present. In view of
drome’’ (45). Cholesterol granuloma of the middle the fact that the inflammatory cell infiltrate seen in
ear may present as idiopathic hemotympanum; cases of otitis media may be extremely dense, the
patients may also complain of hearing loss and tinni- pathologist must be vigilant in evaluating these speci-
tus. The involvement of the petrous apex is more mens; this is especially true in the pediatric age group
likely to be associated with sensorineural hearing as not to overlook the presence of a rhabdomyo-
loss; headaches, cranial nerve deficits, and, rarely, sarcoma or Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).
bone erosion with the involvement of the posterior
or middle cranial fossa has been reported (46,47). Treatment and Prognosis
The histology of cholesterol granulomas includes
the presence of irregular clear-appearing spaces sur- Antibiotic therapy directed at the specific pathogen is
rounded by histiocytes or multinucleated giant cells the treatment of choice and often is curative. Recur-
(foreign body granuloma) and hemosiderosis (Fig. 7). rent infections of the middle ear are common espe-
Cholesterol granulomas are not related to cholestea- cially in the pediatric population. In adults, an
tomas, but they may occur in association with them. unresolving otitis media should warrant detailed
examination of the nasopharynx in order to rule out
Differential Diagnosis the presence of a (malignant) neoplasm (e.g., nasopha-
ryngeal carcinoma). SCCs of the middle ear are rare
The pathological alterations are generally straightfor- tumors, typically occurring in older adults suffering
ward, but secondary changes, such as glandular meta- from long-standing history of COM. In the antibiotic
plasia of the surface epithelium, which is the result of era, complications associated with otitis media are not
generally seen; however, if left unchecked, complica-
tions of otitis media occur, which can be divided into
intratemporal complications (e.g., mastoiditis, petrosi-
tis, labyrinthitis, facial nerve paralysis) and intracranial
complication (e.g., meningitis, brain abscess) (38).
5. Miscellaneous Infections
Specific causes. Uncommonly, otitis media may
be caused by tuberculosis (48); syphilis (49); fungi,
including Candida, Mucor, Cryptococcus, and Aspergil-
lus (50); and actinomycosis (51). The setting for some
of these infections, particularly mycoses, is often in
patients who are diabetic or debilitated. In patients
infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
or who suffer from acquired immunodeficiency syn-
drome (AIDS), Pneumocystis carinii may be seeded by
pulmonary lesions to the middle ear and temporal
Figure 7 Cholesterol granuloma in the middle ear associated with bone (52). In this setting, the initial clinical presenta-
chronic otitis media appears as empty, irregularly shaped clefts or tion may occur as an aural polyp that, on histological
spaces surrounded by histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells. examination, shows characteristic foamy exudate con-
Fresh hemorrhage and hemosiderin pigment are present. taining the causative organisms. Viruses, including
herpes, cytomegalovirus, rubella, rubeola, and
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 431
Pathology
Gross. The gross appearance of otic polyps is
that of a polypoid, soft to rubbery, tan—white– to
pink-red–appearing lesion.
Microscopy. The polypoid mass is composed of a
cellular infiltrate that primarily consists of a chronic
inflammatory cell infiltrate, including mature lympho-
cytes, plasma cells, histiocytes, and eosinophils (Fig. 8)
(55–57). Russell bodies or Mott cells containing large
eosinophilic immunoglobules can be seen, and they Figure 8 Otic (aural) polyp. (A) This polypoid lesion originated
are indicative of a benign plasma cell proliferation in the middle ear space, perforated the tympanic membrane, and
(Fig. 8). Polymorphonuclear leukocytes may be pres- protruded from the external auditory canal. Histologically, it has
ent. The stroma includes granulation tissue varying in an exophytic or polypoid appearance with surface ulceration, a
appearance from edematous and richly vascularized dense inflammatory cell infiltrate, and granulation tissue, includ-
to fibrous with a decreased vascular component. ing numerous blood vessels oriented perpendicular toward the
surface of the lesion. (B) At higher magnification, the polyp is
Multinucleated giant cells, cholesterol granulomas,
composed of a cellular infiltrate, primarily consisting of an
and calcific debris (tympanosclerosis) may be present. admixture of mature plasma cells and polymorphonuclear leuko-
An overlying epithelium may not be seen; however, cytes. Russell bodies, which are also referred to as Mott cells,
when it is present, it appears as pseudostratified containing large eosinophilic immunoglobules, are seen in the
columnar or cuboidal cells with or without cilia. Foci left side of the illustration.
of squamous metaplasia and a glandular metaplastic
proliferation may also be seen. Special stains for
microorganisms are indicated to rule out an infectious
etiology. lying neoplastic process (e.g., rhabdomyosarcoma,
Langerhans cell granulomatosis (LCG), carcinoma).
Differential Diagnosis
In general, the presence of a mixed cell population of
Treatment and Prognosis
chronic inflammatory cells indicates that the polyp is In the absence of an infectious etiology, local surgical
benign, so a diagnosis of a malignant hematolymphoid excision is curative.
proliferation is not an issue. Rarely, lymphomatous or
leukemic involvement of the middle ear and temporal
bone occur secondary to systemic disease. The dense 7. Malakoplakia
plasma cell component may lead to consideration of a
Clinical Features
plasmacytoma. While plasma cell dyscrasia may occur
in this site in rare instances (58), the presence of mature Malakoplakia, which is derived from Greek, means
plasma cells, Russell bodies, and polyclonality by ‘‘soft plaque’’ and is an inflammatory disease that
immunohistochemistry should preclude a diagnosis usually involves the genitourinary tract. Malakoplakia
of plasmacytoma. The cellular component in otic pol- is an extremely uncommon lesion in the head and neck;
yps may be very dense, and it may obscure an under- the middle ear is one of the reported sites of occurrence
432 Wenig
Figure 9 Malakoplakia of the middle ear is characterized by the Figure 10 Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronicus helicis. The
presence of solid sheets of histiocytes with a slightly granular to lesion was painful and located along the lateral helix. Clinically, it
vacuolated cytoplasm (Hansemann cells) and a centrally located was considered to be a carcinoma.
intracytoplasmic targetoid basophilic inclusion (Michaelis-
Gutmann body).
Etiology
perichondrial involvement. The dermis lacks cutane- Although trauma has been implicated in causing these
ous adnexal structures in the area of the lesion, and the lesions, no definitive connection to a prior traumatic
vasculature appears telangiectatic. Foci of fibrinoid event has been made, and the origin(s) for this condi-
eosinophilic material or, in some cases, frank necrobio- tion remains unknown. Engel (71), the first to describe
sis of the collagen may be present. Occasionally, pali- them in the English literature, believed that these
sading histiocytes are seen in association with
necrobiotic collagen. The changes in the auricular car-
tilage deep into the ulcer range from mild perichon-
dritis through variable degrees of degenerative
changes that are characterized by edema and loss of
chondrocytes, with smudging (i.e., loss of basophilia)
and hyalinization of the chondroid matrix. The necrotic
material from the dermis and, even occasionally, frag-
ments of degenerated cartilage may protrude into the
ulcer crater. Calcification and ossification of the under-
lying cartilage may be present (64).
Differential Diagnosis
CNCH is frequently misdiagnosed as a cutaneous
malignancy, particularly as a basal cell carcinoma
(BCC) or SCC. Metzger and Goodman (61) noted a
clinical diagnosis of either a malignant or premalig-
nant lesion in 80% of the cases they reviewed. Unfor-
tunately, the same mistake may be perpetuated by
microscopical examination, particularly if the epider-
mal hyperplastic changes are misinterpreted as repre-
senting either SCC or a hypertrophic actinic keratosis.
Careful attention to the extensive dermal changes and Figure 12 Idiopathic cystic chondromalacia appearing as (pain-
usually some degree of cartilaginous alterations, along less) swelling of the auricular cartilage with intact overlying
with the well-demarcated nature of the epidermal erythematous-appearing skin.
proliferation and the lack of cytologic atypia in the
434 Wenig
Pathology
Gross. The gross appearance of ICC is that of a
fluid-filled distended mass. The excised tissue may
include only a fragment of the cyst wall, or, less often,
it is a full-thickness excision of the ear. An intact cyst
usually contains fluid that has been described as
‘‘olive oil–like’’ (71). The cyst wall consists of a 1- to
2-mm rim of cartilage. The cyst lining may be a
smooth and glistening cartilaginous surface or may
include roughened, rust-colored patches. The cyst is
usually an elongated cleft, but multifocal cystic degen-
eration may be seen.
Microscopy. Histologically, the changes are
restricted to the cartilage, within which irregular-
shaped cystic areas are seen (Fig. 13). The cysts lack a
cell lining, and they generally are devoid of content. An
epithelial lining is absent, hence the term ‘‘pseudo-
cyst.’’ The cyst is the result of the loss of cartilage. The
cystic cleft is often centrally placed in the cartilaginous Figure 13 Idiopathic cystic chondromalacia. (A, B) Histologi-
plate. A rim of fibrous tissue along the inner rim of the cally, idiopathic cystic chondromalacia is characterized by the
cyst or a granulation tissue reaction composed of cystic degeneration of the auricular cartilage. The cysts result in
fibrovascular tissue may be observed, and scattered the loss of cartilage. (B) The cysts, which lack a true epithelial
chronic inflammatory cells can be seen in association lining (pseudocysts), are composed of fibrous tissue along the
with the cysts. In long-standing cases, fibrous tissue inner rim of the cyst and granulation tissue within the wall
may essentially obliterate the cystic space. Some exam- adjacent to the cartilage.
ples of cystic chondromalacia are characterized by a
distinctly proliferative cartilaginous response in which
a thickened cartilaginous wall develops.
reaccumulation of fluid; however, when this is com-
bined with bolster suture compression, long-term
Differential Diagnosis follow-up has shown an absence of recurrences (76).
Slight cytologic atypia may be seen; however, the
orderly nature of the proliferation and the associated
central cystic degeneration facilitate the exclusion of 10. Exostosis
malignant neoplasia (68). The differential diagnosis Clinical Features
may also include relapsing polychondritis, subperi-
chondrial hematoma, and CNCH. Exostoses are localized overgrowths of bone that are
classically described as reactive lesions consisting of a
Treatment and Prognosis compact proliferation of layers of bone of varied size
and appearance, including nodular, mound-like,
Complete surgical excision without distortion of the pedunculated, or flat protuberances on the surface of
underlying cartilaginous framework is the treatment a bone. Broad-based lesions are referred to as exosto-
of choice, and is curative. Because of the potential for sis, while pedunculated lesions have been termed
surgical-related deformity, full-thickness resection is ‘‘osteoma.’’
not advocated. In addition to the obvious cosmetic Exostoses are broad-based outgrowths of bone
concerns, long-standing lesions may result in defor- arising from the wall of the external auditory canal.
mity of the ear. Steroid injection alone has been Exostoses usually are multiple and bilateral (77).
unsuccessful, and it may result in cartilage deformity. External auditory canal exostoses tend to remain
Incision and drainage or curettage has shown variable asymptomatic until they reach a size sufficient to
success. Needle aspiration alone results in the rapid interfere with the normal egress of cerumen and
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 435
Clinical Features
Cholesteatomas occur more frequently in men than in
women and are most common in the third to fourth
decades of life. The middle ear space is the most
common site of occurrence. Most acquired cholestea-
tomas arise in the pars flaccida portion of the tym-
panic membrane and extend into Prussak’s space (98).
Prussak’s space is bordered laterally by the pars
flaccida (Schrapnell’s membrane), medially by the
neck of the malleus, superiorly by the attachment of
the pars flaccida to the tympanic ring near the scutum
and inferiorly by the lateral or short process of the
malleus (6). Initially, cholesteatomas may remain clin-
ically silent until extensive invasion of the middle ear
space and mastoid has occurred. Symptoms include
hearing loss, malodorous discharge, and pain, and
they may be associated with a polyp arising in the
attic of the middle ear or with the perforation of the
Figure 15 Synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular
tympanic membrane. Otoscopic examination may
joint. (A) The lesion extended to and involved the external
auditory canal histologically appearing as subcutaneous nodules
reveal the presence of white debris within the middle
of cartilage. (B) At higher magnification, the cartilage appears ear, which is considered diagnostic.
atypical with hypercellularity, nuclear hyperchromasia, pleomor- Acquired cholesteatomas may occur in the exter-
phism, and binucleated chondrocytes but in concert with the nal auditory canal (98). External ear canal cholestea-
clinical and radiographic imaging was diagnostic for a benign tomas generally occur in older individuals, present
lesion (i.e., synovial chondromatosis) rather than a low-grade with otorrhea and unilateral chronic pain, and does
malignancy (e.g., chondrosarcoma). not produce a conductive hearing loss.
Radiology
examples, correlation with the radiographic appear- Given the localization to Prussak’s space, most
ance is essential to differentiate these lesions. The acquired cholesteatomas displace the malleus medial-
radiographic features of synovial chondromatosis ly and erode the adjacent bony scutum; from there, the
include the presence of numerous radiopaque loose mass may extend posteriorly via the epitympanum in
bodies within the region of the joint (88,89). the superior incudal space to the posterolateral attic
and then via the aditus ad antrum to the antrum and
Treatment and Prognosis mastoid air spaces (47). Radiographic evidence of
widening of the aditus is an important diagnostic
Intraoperatively, the lesion is usually confined to the finding.
joint space, and it is easily enucleated. On occasion,
the tumor may extend beyond the joint capsule into Pathogenesis
the parotid gland, the auditory canal, the temporal
bone, or the cranium (91). Conservative surgical man- The majority of cholesteatomas are acquired and arise
agement is the treatment of choice (92). Reported cases either de novo without a history of middle ear disease
of synovial chondrosarcoma have suggested the pos- or following a middle ear infection. A small percent-
sibility of malignant transformation of synovial chon- age of cases are congenital. The latter have also been
dromatosis (93,94). Cell proliferation studies of referred to as epidermoid cysts (98,99). The pathogen-
synovial chondromatosis have shown proliferative esis is thought to occur via the migration of squamous
activity that is intermediate between enchondromas epithelium from the external auditory canal or the
and chondrosarcomas (95). external surface of the tympanic membrane into the
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 437
Pathogenesis
Small colonies of epidermoid cells referred to as
epidermoid formations are found on the lateral ante-
rior superior surface of the middle ear in temporal Figure 17 Cholesteatoma involving a middle ear ossicles.
bones after 15 weeks of gestation (6,102,103). During Although considered a nonneoplastic process and comprised
the first postpartum year, the epidermoid colonies of benign squamous epithelium, cholesteatomas may have infil-
disappear; however, if the epidermoid cells do not trative growth and destructive capability.
disappear but continue to grow, they will become
congenital cholesteatomas (102,103).
Pathology of Cholesteatoma
without evidence of dysplasia. In spite of its benign
Gross. Cholesteatomas appear as cystic, white- histology, cholesteatomas are ‘‘invasive,’’ and they
to pearly appearing masses of varying size that con- have widespread destructive capabilities (Fig. 17).
tain creamy or waxy granular material (100). The destructive properties of cholesteatoma result
Microscopy. The histological diagnosis is made from a combination of interrelated reasons, including
on the basis of the presence of stratified keratinizing mass effect with pressure erosion of the surrounding
squamous epithelium, subepithelial fibroconnective or structures and the production of collagenase, which
granulation tissue, and keratin debris (Fig. 16) (97,98). has osteodestructive capabilities (104). Collagenase is
The essential diagnostic feature is the keratinizing produced by both the squamous epithelial and the
squamous epithelium. It is important to note that the fibrous tissue components of the cholesteatoma.
presence of keratin debris alone is not diagnostic of a External auditory canal cholesteatomas are com-
cholesteatoma. The keratinizing squamous epithelium posed of loosely packed, irregularly arranged keratin
is cytologically bland, and it shows cellular maturation squames (105).
438 Wenig
Pathology
Microscopy. Histologically, LCH is characterized
by a proliferation of LCs, which are arranged in sheets,
nests, or clusters and are composed of cells with
reniform nuclei characterized by nuclear membrane
lobations or indentations (Fig. 18). The nuclei have
vesicular chromatin with inconspicuous to small, cen-
trally located basophilic nucleoli and a moderate
amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm. The LC may show
Figure 19 Langerhans cells are immunoreactive for (A) S-100
mild pleomorphism, and mitotic figures are uncom- protein and (B) CD1a.
mon. An inflammatory cell infiltrate that primarily
consists of eosinophils accompanies the LC. Other
inflammatory cells are present, including polymorpho-
nuclear leukocytes, plasma cells, and lymphocytes. In malignant lymphoma. Rosai-Dorfman disease may
addition, foamy histiocytes and multinucleated giant occasionally involve the ear and temporal bone region
cells may also be observed. These histiocytes may show (126). Like LC, the cells of Rosai-Dorfman disease are
phagocytosis of mononuclear cells. S-100 protein reactive; they differ from LCs in that they
The diagnosis of LCH is facilitated by an immu- are nonreactive for CD1a and Langerin (124). Differen-
nohistochemical evaluation. LCs are diffusely immu- tiating LCH from a malignant lymphoproliferative
noreactive with S-100 protein (121,122) and CD1a disease is usually not problematic by light microscopy.
(Fig. 19) (123). Langerin, a type II transmembrane If necessary, immunohistochemical stains help in differ-
C-type lectin associated with the formation of Birbeck entiating LCH from a malignant lymphoma.
granules in LC, represents a highly selective marker
for LCs and the lesional cells of LCH (124). Langerin Treatment and Prognosis
immunoreactivity (membranous and granular cyto-
Surgical excision (curettage) and low-dose radiation
plasmic pattern) assists in substantiating the diagnosis
therapy (500 to 1500 rads) are the treatments of choice.
of LCH and in differentiating LCH from other non-LC
The prognosis is considered very good (120). Recur-
histiocytic proliferations (124). On electron microsco-
rence, which may be part of a systemic or multifocal
py, elongated granules referred to as Langerhans or
process, generally occurs within six months of the
Birbeck granules can be seen within the cytoplasm of
diagnosis. Failure of a new bone lesion to occur within
the LC (125). The foamy histiocytes and multinucleat-
one year of diagnosis is considered a cure. Chemo-
ed giant cells are S-100 protein and CD1a-negative,
therapy is used for multifocal and/or systemic disease
but they do react for CD68 (KP1).
(120). In general, the younger the patient is at the onset
of disease and the more extensive the involvement
Differential Diagnosis
(i.e., multiple sites including bone and viscera), the
The histological differential diagnosis of LCG includes worse the prognosis. Survival rates for children with
extranodal sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphade- multifocal disease have been reported to be 60% to
nopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) and non-Hodgkin 100% (120).
440 Wenig
Pathogenesis
Generally (but not always), acquired encaphaloceles
represent herniation of the brain into the middle ear
and mastoid via compromise of the tegmen, a thin
bony shell that separates the middle ear and mastoid
cavity from the temporal lobe. The connection to the
CNS may not always be identified. The tegmen may
be compromised or destroyed secondary to trauma,
prior surgery, complication of otitis media, or congen-
ital defect (127,128). Fracture of the temporal bone
may also result in representing herniation of the brain
Figure 20 Acquired encephalocele in a patient with long-
into the middle ear and mastoid (129).
standing chronic otitis media who had undergone several oper-
ations. Histologically, (A) the excised tissue includes normal brain,
Pathology including all cellular components of CNS tissue, and (B) reactive
Histology. All components of CNS tissue are alterations of the neuroglial tissue (gliosis) may be identified.
present (Fig. 20); reactive alterations of the neuroglial
tissue (gliosis) may be present (Fig. 20). Meninges are
generally not present. The CNS tissue may be present
in association with findings of other pathological
16. Relapsing Polychondritis
processes, including COM, as well as cholesteatoma Clinical Features
(keratinizing).
Immunohistochemical confirmation of neurogli- Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is an uncommon sys-
al tissues includes reactivity with GFAP. temic episodic or relapsing disease that is character-
ized by the progressive degeneration of cartilaginous
structures throughout the body. RP is also referred to
Differential Diagnosis as polychondropathia (130).
RP primarily occurs in whites, and it affects men
COM in which a fibrillary stroma is often present may and women equally. RP may occur at any age, but the
simulate the appearance of neurofibrillary matrix. symptoms are most frequent in the fifth to seventh
Staining for GFAP will assist in confirming or exclud- decades of life. The auricular cartilage is involved,
ing neuroglial tissues. usually bilaterally, in nearly 90% of patients with RP
(131–137). The affected ear is erythematous, swollen,
Treatment and Prognosis and very tender (Fig. 21). In advanced cases, the pinna
may be distorted because of destruction of the carti-
Management of the condition is surgical. For defects lage. The overlying skin is not ulcerated. The disease
smaller than 1 cm in diameter, the transmastoid manifestations relapse with marked variability in both
approach can be used (127). For defects larger than the severity and frequency of occurrence. The pro-
1 cm, the combined transmastoid-minicraniotomy gression of disease may result in ‘‘cauliflower’’ ears
approach provides good access (127). Possible com- and ‘‘saddle’’ nose deformities. The involvement of
plications include brain abscess. the audiovestibular system may result in hearing loss
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 441
Pathology
The histological findings in RP include perichondrial
Figure 21 Relapsing polychondritis. The affected ear is ery- inflammation with a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes,
thematous and swollen with intact (nonulcerated) overlying skin.
plasma cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and
occasional eosinophils that blurs the interface between
the perichondrium and the auricular cartilage (Fig. 22).
(conductive, sensorineural, or mixed) (133). Other Loss of the usual basophilia occurs in the cartilage,
cartilaginous sites, as well as noncartilaginous loca- which assumes an eosinophilic appearance with hema-
tions of the body, may be involved, including arthrop- toxylin and eosin staining. At the advancing edge of
athy (large and small joints), laryngotracheal and the inflammation, loss of chondrocytes and destruction
bronchial chondritis, nasal chondritis, cardiovascular of the lacunar architecture are observed. As cartilage is
complications (valvular insufficiency, aneurysm), ocu- destroyed, it is eventually replaced by fibrous tissue.
lar manifestations (episcleritis, conjunctivitis, retinop- The immunomicroscopical findings include the
athy), and cutaneous involvement (oral and genital diffuse granular deposition of immunoglobulin G
ulcers) (131–147). (IgG) and complement protein 3 (C3) in the perichon-
The current clinical diagnostic criteria for RP are drial fibrous tissue (148).
defined by three or more of the following: (i) recurrent
chondritis of both auricles; (ii) nonerosive inflamma-
tory arthritis; (iii) chondritis of nasal cartilages;
(iv) ocular inflammation, including conjunctivitis,
keratitis, scleritis and/or episcleritis, and/or uveitis;
(v) chondritis of the upper respiratory tract that
involves the larynx and/or tracheal cartilages; and
(vi) cochlear and/or vestibular damage manifested by
sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, and/or vertigo.
The diagnosis can be confirmed when one or more of
the above criteria occur in association with histologi-
cal confirmation or by the presence of chondritis in
two or more separate anatomical locations that
respond to steroids and/or dapsone.
The laboratory findings are nonspecific, includ-
ing an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate; mild
leukocytosis; and normochromic, normocytic anemia.
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) titers
are usually negative in RP (138–140); however, elevated
ANCA titers have been reported (141).
Figure 22 Relapsing polychondritis. The histological features
Etiology associated with relapsing polychondritis include a mixed inflam-
matory cell infiltrate extending into the cartilage with blurring or
The etiology of RP has not been clearly elucidated; obliteration of the interface between the cartilaginous plate and
however, evidence has implicated an autoimmune the adjacent fibroconnective tissues. The involved cartilage
process. In association with RP, some patients suffer shows a loss of its normal basophilic appearance.
from other autoimmune disorders, including systemic
442 Wenig
change color from yellow to blue when rotating the may be lost. A foreign body granulomatous reaction
polarizing lenses from parallel to perpendicular. can be seen in association with the crystal deposition.
Chondroid metaplasia is often present in and around
Differential Diagnosis the areas of CPPD deposition. Some evidence indi-
cates that metaplastic chondrocytes may play a role in
Tophaceous gout may share similar features with the initial precipitation of CPPD crystals. Synovial
tophaceous pseudogout. The designation of pseudog- chondrometaplasia may be seen in patients with
out was initially coined by McCarty and associates pyrophosphate arthropathy. The metaplastic chondro-
(151) to describe the presence of calcium pyrophos- cytes may show cytologic atypia that could lead to a
phate dihydrate crystal deposition in the synovial diagnosis of chondrosarcoma. This is particularly true
fluid of patients with gout-like symptoms but without in decalcified sections from which CPPD crystals are
sodium urate crystals. Other designations include lost. In contrast to pseudogout, radiographic calcifica-
tumoral calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) tion in gouty tophi is relatively uncommon. In addi-
deposition disease (152), chondrocalcinosis, and pyro- tion, the identification of the specific positive
phosphate arthropathy. More recently, this disease birefringence of the calcium pyrophosphate crystals
has been designated as CPPD crystal deposition dis- that is seen in tophaceous pseudogout is not a feature
ease (153). Histologically, tophaceous pseudogout is of gouty tophi.
characterized by the presence of a variably cellular,
chondroid-appearing tissue in which crystalline mate- Treatment and Prognosis
rial is found (Fig. 25). The crystalline material appears
rhomboid or needle shaped, and, under polarized The treatment is directed toward the systemic disorder.
light microscopy, the crystals show weak, positive
birefringence. In decalcified material, the crystals 18. Wegener’s Granulomatosis
Clinical Features
WG is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis that typically
involves the kidneys, lung, and upper aerodigestive
tract. Otologic involvement by WG occurs in 20% to
60% of patients who have disease at these more usual
sites (154–157). The most common otologic manifes-
tations include unilateral or bilateral otitis media
(serous or suppurative), perforation of the tympanic
membrane, and sensorineural hearing loss (158,159).
Cutaneous involvement of the external ear can include
perforation of the ear lobes and external otitis
(154,156–159). Facial palsy may occur as the initial
manifestation of disease (155). The involvement of
the middle ear may occur secondary to nasopharyn-
geal and sinonasal disease via the eustachian tube, or
it may be due to direct involvement by disease.
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies
(ANCA) should be elevated in the active phase of
WG. Two distinct staining patterns of ANCA posi-
tivity are found, including cytoplasmic (C-ANCA)
and perinuclear (P-ANCA). WG is associated with
C-ANCA and infrequently with P-ANCA; (160–162)
P-ANCA is more often associated with rheumatic
diseases. Patients with generalized WG have a 60%
to 100% C-ANCA positivity, while patients with lim-
ited WG have a 50% to 67% C-ANCA positivity
(160,161). C-ANCA results can be used in establishing
a diagnosis of WG in clinically suspect lesions in
which the biopsies are not entirely diagnostic; false-
positive results are uncommon. C-ANCA titers corre-
late with disease activity and recurrent disease.
Proteinase-3 (PR-3) is a neutral serine proteinase pres-
ent in azurophil granules of human polymorphonu-
Figure 25 Tophaceous pseudogout. (A) Variably cellular chon- clear leukocytes and monocyte lysosomal granules.
droid-appearing tissue within which are identifiable crystalline PR-3 serves as the major target antigen of ANCAs
material appearing rhomboid or needle shaped (under polarized with a cytoplasmic staining pattern (c-ANCA) in WG
light microscopy, the crystals showed weak positive birefrin- (163,164). ANCA with specificity for PR3 are charac-
gence, not shown). (B) Chondroid metaplasia is present, which teristic for patients with WG. Patients with WG dem-
may show cytological atypia. onstrate a significantly higher percentage of mPR3þ
neutrophils than healthy controls and patients with
444 Wenig
other inflammatory diseases. The detection of ANCA ening of the ear and is derived from Greek (ous, ear;
directed against PR-3 (PR3-ANCA) is highly specific skleros, hard; osis, condition), osseous ankylosis
for WG (163,164). ANCA positivity is found only in (Greek: ankoulon, to stiffen).
about 50% of the patients with localized WG, whereas Otosclerosis affects women more often than
PR3-ANCA positivity is seen in 95% of the patients men; it usually begins in the second and third decades
with generalized WG (164). The pathogenesis of vas- of life and is slowly progressive. The prevalence of
cular injury in WG is ascribed to ANCAs directed otosclerosis varies with race; it is more common in
mainly against PR-3, and the interaction of ANCA whites than in blacks, Asians, or Native Americans
with neutrophilic ANCA antigens is necessary for the (168). Otosclerosis primarily causes conductive hear-
development of ANCA-associated diseases. In ing loss that usually begins in the second and third
patients with WG, high expression of PR-3 on the decades of life and slowly progresses. The extent of
surface of nonprimed neutrophils is associated with the hearing loss directly correlates with the degree of
an increased incidence and rate of relapse. stapedial footplate fixation. For patients with otoscle-
rosis also to have vestibular disturbances is not
Pathology uncommon (169,170). Otosclerosis usually involves
both ears; however, unilateral disease can occur in
The histological features are similar to those described up to 15% of cases (171).
in the upper aerodigestive tract (see chapter on mid-
facial destructive diseases for the histological find- Radiology
ings). Elevated serum levels of ANCA are of great
assistance in those cases in which the diagnosis is Imaging studies can confirm the clinical consideration
suspected, but the histology may not be definitively of otosclerosis. High-resolution CT is the modality of
diagnostic of WG. choice for evaluating middle and inner ear structures,
including labyrinthine windows, stapes foot plate,
Differential Diagnosis and cochlear capsule (172,173).
Other autoimmune or systemic diseases that may Etiology
involve the middle or inner ear include polyarteritis
nodosa and rheumatoid arthritis. Polyarteritis nodosa Although many theories appear in the literature, the
is a necrotizing vasculitis of small and medium-sized etiology of otosclerosis is unclear. Hereditary factors
muscular arteries. The aural-related symptoms are often cited, although the mode of inheritance is
include otitis media with effusion (165,166). Sensori- still uncertain (174). A family history is present in a
neural hearing loss may be the initial presentation, or majority of cases. The majority of epidemiological
it may develop after the diagnosis has already been studies on families with otosclerosis suggest an auto-
established (166). The histological diagnosis is depen- somal dominant mode of inheritance with reduced
dent on the presence of necrotizing vasculitis. The penetrance of approximately 40% (174). Genetic link-
treatment includes corticosteroids and immunosup- age studies have demonstrated the presence of six loci
pressant agents. The manifestations of rheumatoid (OTSC1, OTSC2, OTSC3, OTSC4, OTSC5, and OTSC7)
arthritis of the audiovestibular system include con- located on chromosomes 15q, 7q, 6p, 16q, 3q, and 6q,
ductive hearing loss due to the involvement of the respectively. Although these loci have been mapped,
incudomalleal and incudostapedial articulations (167). no causative genes have been identified (174).
High-dose salicylates used in combination with ste-
roids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents are Pathology
the treatment of choice. Microscopy. Histologically, the initial alterations
Treatment and Prognosis include the resorption of bone around blood vessels.
Cellular fibrovascular tissue replaces the resorbed
Combined corticosteroid and immunosuppressive bone, resulting in the softening of the bone (otospon-
therapy may result in long-term remissions, and treat- giosis). Immature bone is laid down with continuous
ment is capable of reversing the hearing loss and facial active resorption and remodeling. The new bone is rich
palsy if the diagnosis can be established and manage- in ground substance and is deficient in collagen, but,
ment can be initiated early in the disease course. The over time, more mature bone with increased collagen
prognosis for hearing is poor when appropriate treat- and less ground substance is produced, resulting in
ment is not given in the early stages of the disease densely sclerotic bone. This process most often begins
(157). Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are anterior to the oval window, eventually involving the
important to prevent irreversible changes in the mid- footplate of the stapes (Fig. 26). Stapedial involvement
dle ear and inner ear. causes fixation of the stapes and the inability to
transmit sound waves, resulting in conductive hearing
19. Otosclerosis loss. Similar pathological involvement of the inner ear
may produce sensorineural hearing loss.
Clinical Features
Differential Diagnosis
Otosclerosis is a disorder of the bony labyrinth and
stapedial footplate that exclusively occurs in humans The differential diagnosis includes Paget disease (see
and is of unknown etiology. Otosclerosis means hard- below).
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 445
Etiology
The etiology of Paget disease is unknown, but consid-
eration has been given for an infectious (viral) etiology
in genetically predisposed individuals.
Pathology
Paget disease is characterized by three histological
phases. In the first or osteolytic phase, excessive
osteoclastic activity results in bone resorption. In the
second mixed or combined phase, new bone forma-
tion (osteoblastic activity) predominates over bone
resorption (osteoclastic activity), with deposition of
new bone next to areas of bone resorption. In the third
or osteoblastic phase, increased new bone that is
characterized by dense irregular masses showing a
mosaic pattern of cement lines is observed.
Figure 26 Otosclerosis of the stapedial footplate. This entity is
characterized by densely sclerotic bone resulting in fixation of the
Differential Diagnosis
stapes. The differential diagnosis includes otosclerosis. Fea-
tures in Paget disease that assist in separating this
from otosclerosis include a later age of onset, greater
sensorineural hearing loss, enlarging calvaria, and
Treatment and Prognosis enlargement and tortuosity of the superficial temporal
artery and its anterior branches (176).
Surgical management of the conductive hearing loss
caused by stapes fixation (stapedectomy) is the treat- Treatment and Prognosis
ment of choice.
Treatment is directed at slowing or preventing pro-
gression of disease by suppressing increased bone
20. Paget Disease of Bone turnover using oral administration of biphosphanates,
Clinical Features which acts by decreasing the number of osteoclasts
with deposition of structurally normal bone as
Paget disease of bone, also referred to as osteitis opposed to less disordered bone deposition. Anti-
deformans, is a chronic progressive disorder of inflammatory medications are used in relieving bone
unknown etiology. The skull and temporal bone are and joint pain. Hearing loss is permanent and cannot
involved in approximately 70% of cases (175). Other be reversed by medical therapy. Sarcomatous trans-
sites of involvement include the external auditory formation occurs in roughly 1% of cases, usually as an
canal, the tympanic membrane, the eustachian tube, osteosarcoma. Osteosarcomas arising in Paget disease
the ossicles, the oval window, the round window, the are highly malignant, with five-year survival rates of
internal auditory canal, the cochlea, and the endolym- less than 10% (178,179).
phatic sac (175). It is slightly more common in men
than in women. Paget disease affects approximately
3% of the population older than 40 years and as high
as 11% of the population older than 80 years (176). The
21. Meniere Disease (Endolymphatic Hydrops,
symptoms include hearing loss, tinnitus, and vertigo.
Idiopathic Endolymphatic Hydrops, or
The facial nerve is spared. The hearing loss is sensori-
Lermoyez Syndrome)
neural; mixed sensorineural and conductive; or, less Clinical Features
often, only conductive. The hearing losses are pro-
gressive, and they are due to involvement of the Meniere disease is an idiopathic disorder of the inner
osseous portion of the external auditory canal, of the ear associated with a symptom complex of spontane-
ossicles, and/or of the cochlea and labyrinth. ous, episodic attacks of vertigo; sensorineural hearing
loss; tinnitus; and a sensation of aural fullness.
Radiology The incidence of Meniere disease varies in the
literature from 157 per 100,000 people in England to 46
High-resolution CT of the temporal bone may show per 100,000 in Sweden to 7.5 per 100,000 in France
mixed appearance of bone thickening and sclerosis (180). Meniere disease occurs slightly more frequently
(177). In the temporal bone, the disease begins at the in women than in men (1.6:1). The peak incidence is in
petrous apex and progresses inferolaterally; with pro- the fifth to seventh decades of life, but it may occur in
gression, demineralization of the otic capsule may children as well as in older individuals (9th and 10th
occur. The stapedial footplate may become involved decades). The onset of the vertigo is frequently sud-
(i.e., thickened) contributing to the (conductive) hear- den, reaching maximum intensity within a few
ing loss. Frequently, the central skull is also involved. minutes and lasting for an hour or more. It then either
446 Wenig
in this chapter; readers are referred to the chapter on Ulceration is uncommon, and it may suggest a malig-
selected skin lesion for a complete discussion of these nant neoplasm.
tumor types. However, selective cutaneous type neo- Microscopy. Histologically, ceruminal gland ade-
plasms of the ear will be discussed in this chapter, nomas are unencapsulated but well-demarcated glan-
including SCC and BCC of the pinna and external dular proliferations (Fig. 27). The glands vary in size,
auditory canal. Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs) occur in and they may have various combinations of growth
the head and neck, and in children, they represent the patterns, including solid, cystic, and papillary. A
most common aural-related malignant neoplasm. The cribriform or back-to-back glandular pattern is com-
reader is referred to the chapter on diseases of soft monly seen. The glands are composed of two cell
tissues for the discussion on RMS of the head and neck. layers (Fig. 27). The inner or luminal epithelial cell is
cuboidal or columnar with eosinophilic cytoplasm and
the decapitation-type secretion (apical ‘‘snouts’’) char-
A. Benign Neoplasms of the External Auditory acteristic for apocrine cells, while the outer cell layer,
Canal which is of myoepithelial differentiation, is spindled
1. Ceruminal Gland Neoplasms with hyperchromatic nucleic (Fig. 27). A golden yellow-
brown, granular-appearing pigment can be seen in the
Ceruminal gland neoplasms are benign tumors of cells of the inner lining, and this represents cerumen.
cerumen-secreting modified apocrine glands (cerumi- Cellular pleomorphism and mitotic figures can be seen,
nal glands) located in the external auditory canal. but they are not prominent.
These glands are located in the dermis of the cartilagi- Diastase-resistant, PAS-positive, or mucicarmine-
nous (inner) portion of the external auditory canal. In positive intracytoplasmic or intraluminal material
general, ceruminal gland neoplasms are uncommon, may be seen. Immuonhistochemical stains show the
but they represent one of the more common tumors of luminal cells to be strongly and diffusely immunore-
the external auditory canal. The generic designation of active with CK7 as well as with CD117 positivity (193).
ceruminoma should be avoided. Ceruminal gland neo- The basal cells are CK5/6, S-100 protein, and p63-
plasms should be specifically diagnosed according to positive (193). Ultrastructure evaluation includes the
the tumor type. The classification of ceruminal gland presence of epithelial (apocrine cell) and myoepithe-
neoplasms includes benign and malignant tumors lial cell differentiation. Epithelial cells show features
(Table 3). The benign ceruminal gland tumors include of apocrine cells, including apocrine caps, microvilli,
ceruminal gland adenoma (ceruminoma), pleomorphic cell junctions, secretory granules, vacuoles, lipid drop-
adenoma, and syringocystadenoma papilliferum (189). lets, and siderosomes (194).
The malignant ceruminal gland tumors include ceru-
minal gland adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcino- b. Ceruminal Gland Pleomorphic Adenoma
ma, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (189).
Ceruminal gland pleomorphic adenomas are uncom-
mon tumors. The histological composition is similar to
a. Ceruminal Gland Adenoma that of pleomorphic adenomas of salivary gland ori-
Clinical Features gin, including a variable admixture of epithelial and
myoepithelial components set in a myxoid to chon-
Ceruminal gland adenomas (ceruminomas) are dromyxoid stroma.
benign neoplasms of cerumen-secreting modified apo-
crine glands (ceruminal glands) located in the external c. Syringocystadenoma Papilliferum of
auditory canal. Ceruminal gland adenomas tend to Ceruminal Gland Origin
affect men more than women, and they occur over a
wide age range; but they are seen most frequently in Syringocystadenoma papilliferum is a benign tumor
the fourth to sixth decades of life. The symptoms of apocrine gland origin that usually occurs on the
include a slow-growing external auditory canal mass scalp and face area but may originate in the external
or blockage; hearing difficulty; and, infrequently, otic auditory canal from ceruminal glands. The histology
discharge (189–193). is similar to tumors of the more common cutaneous
sites and to the salivary gland tumor termed ‘‘siala-
denoma papilliferum’’ (for more details see the chap-
Pathology ters on diseases of the salivary glands and skin).
Gross. The gross appearance of ceruminal gland Differential Diagnosis
neoplasms includes skin-covered, circumscribed, pol-
ypoid, or rounded masses from 1 to 4 cm in diameter. The differential diagnosis for ceruminal gland adeno-
ma includes MEA and ceruminal gland adenocarcino-
Table 3 Classification of Ceruminal Gland Neoplasms ma. The origin from the middle ear should allow for
Benign ceruminal gland tumors the identification of a MEA. However, occasionally,
Ceruminal gland adenoma (ceruminoma) MEAs may perforate the tympanic membrane and
Pleomorphic adenoma (benign mixed tumor) appear to present as an external auditory canal
Syringocystadenoma papilliferum mass, creating some difficulty in differentiating from
Malignant ceruminal gland tumors a ceruminal gland adenoma. The histological features
Ceruminal gland adenocarcinoma diagnostic for ceruminal gland adenoma, including
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (but not limited to) the presence of apocrine type
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma secretion and intracytoplasmic cerumen should
448 Wenig
Table 4 Immunohistochemical Reactivity of selected Middle Ear and Temporal Bone Neoplasms
CK EMA CG SYN S100 NSE GFAP VIM DES Myf4
MEA þ þ
MEA-NE þ þ þ þ V þ
JTP þ þ þa þ
MEN þ þ
AN þ þ
ESPT v v v V v v
RMS þ þ þ
a
Positive in the peripherally situated sustentacular cells.
Abbreviations: MEA, middle ear adenoma; NE, neuroendocrine features; JTP, jugulotympanic paraganglioma; MEN, meningioma; AN, acoustic neuroma;
ESPT, endolymphatic sac papillary tumor; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; CG, chromogranin; SYN,
synaptophysin; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; VIM, vimentin; DES, desmin; þ = positive; = negative; þ/ = variably
positive.
Source: From Ref. 202.
structures (Fig. 29). A paranuclear clear zone is not tivity for one or more neuroendocrine markers,
present. Cellular pleomorphism may be prominent, including chromogranin and synaptophysin, is pres-
but mitotic figures are uncommon. The stromal compo- ent (Fig. 31) (Table 4). In addition, NSE, serotonin, and
nent is sparse, and it may appear fibrous or myxoid. human pancreatic polypeptide also may be present.
Histochemical stains show the presence of intra- Despite the presence of vasoactive compounds in
luminal, but not intracytoplasmic, mucin-positive these tumors, carcinoid syndrome is extraordinarily
material. PAS-positive material is not present. On rare in association with these middle ear neoplasms.
immunohistochemical evaluation (Table 4), the neo- These MEAs with neuroendocrine differentiation have
plastic cells are cytokeratin-positive, including dif- been termed ‘‘carcinoid tumors of the middle ear’’
fusely positive for AE1/AE3, CAM 5.2, and CK7,
and focal and weak CK20 reactivity (203). Neuroen-
docrine differentiation may be seen (see below), as is
seen by chromogranin, synaptophysin, and neuron-
specific enolase (NSE) immunoreactivity. Serotonin
and human pancreatic polypeptide also may be pres-
ent. S-100 protein and vimentin staining may be
present. Desmin and actin are negative.
Middle Ear Adenomas with Neuroendocrine
Differentiation. In some MEAs, the cells may have
dispersed or stippled nuclear chromatin with the ‘‘salt
and pepper’’ pattern seen in neuroendocrine tumors
(Fig. 30) and/or demonstrate architectural characteristics
seen in association with neuroendocrine neoplasms
(e.g., ribbons, cords, organoid growth). Immunoreac-
nerve (tympanic branch of the glossopharyngeal Table 6 Glassock–Jackson Classification of Glomus Tumors
nerve) and present as a middle ear tumor (200).
Glomus tympanicum
Roughly, 3% begin from the Arnold nerve (posterior Type I Small mass limited to promontory
auricular branch of the vagus nerve) and arise in the Type II Tumor completely filling the middle ear
external auditory canal (200). The most common space
symptom is conductive hearing loss. Other symptoms Type III Tumor filling the middle ear and extending
include tinnitus, fullness, otic discharge, pain, hemor- into the mastoid
rhage, facial nerve abnormalities, and vertigo. JTPs are Type IV Tumor filling the middle ear, extending into
often locally invasive neoplasms that destroy the the mastoid or through the tympanic
adjacent structures, including the temporal bone and membrane to fill the external auditory
mastoid (200,211). Neurological abnormalities, includ- canal; may also extend anterior to the
internal carotid artery
ing cranial nerve palsies, cerebellar dysfunction, dys-
Glomus jugulare
phagia, and hoarseness, may be seen, and these relate Type I Small tumor involving the jugular bulb,
to the invasive capabilities of this neoplasm. middle ear, and mastoid
Type II Tumor extending under the internal
Radiology auditory canal; may have intracranial
Computed tomography scan shows a soft tissue mass extension
Type III Tumor extending into petrous apex; may
often with evidence of extensive destruction of adja-
have intracranial extension
cent structures. Since JTPs are vascularized lesions, Type IV Tumor extending beyond the petrous
carotid angiography will show the lesion fed by apesx into the clivus or infratemporal
branches of nearby large arteries (211,212). By mag- fossa; may have intracranial extension
netic resonance imaging (MRI), tumors larger than 2
cm have a unique salt and pepper pattern of hyper-
intensity and hypointensity on T1-weighted and T-2 the basis of site of origin and extent of tumor involve-
weighted imaging (212). ment have been developed (Table 6) (212).
Etiology Pathology
JTPs may be familial (213). Familial JTPs may be Gross. Grossly, JTPs are polypoid, red, friable
multifocal, including jugulotympanic and carotid masses that are identified behind an intact tympanic
body. An autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance membrane or within the external auditory canal
is favored. Genetic analysis has shown linkage with (Fig. 33). They vary in size from a few millimeters to
two different loci, including 11q13.1 and 11q22.3–q23 a large mass that completely fills the middle ear space.
(214,215). Microscopy. The histological appearance of all
extra-adrenal paragangliomas is the same. The hall-
Classification mark feature is the presence of cell nests or a so-called
zellballen pattern (Fig. 34). The stroma surrounding
Jugular and tympanic paragangliomas have been
and separating the nests is composed of prominent
reported as a single entity (i.e., temporal bone para-
fibrovascular tissue. While this pattern is characteris-
gangliomas), but their distinction has important clini-
tic of paragangliomas, it can be seen in other tumors,
cal and therapeutic implications; as such, classification
including other neuroendocrine tumors, melanomas,
schemes on the basis of site of origin (Table 5) or on
Figure 34 Jugulotympanic paraganglioma. This lesion shows Figure 35 The immunohistochemical antigenic profile of all
the classic organoid or the cell nest growth pattern, including paragangliomas irrespective of site, including this jugulotympanic
round or oval cells with uniform nuclei, a dispersed chromatin paraganglioma includes chromogranin positivity in the chief cells
pattern, and abundant eosinophilic granular or vacuolated cyto- (left) and S-100 protein staining localized to the peripheral
plasm. The sustentacular cells are located at the periphery of the sustentacular cells (right).
cell nests, but these are difficult to identify by light microscopy.
3. Acoustic Neuroma
Clinical Features
AN is a benign neoplasm that originates from
Schwann cells, specifically from cranial nerve VIII.
Synonyms include neurilemoma, acoustic Schwan-
noma, and benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Figure 37 Jugulotympanic paraganglioma. The typical orga- AN accounts for up to 10% of all intracranial
noid growth pattern is obscured (left); reticulin stain is helpful in neoplasms and represents up to 90% of all cerebello-
delineating the cell nest growth pattern (right). pontine angle tumors (200,201). ANs are more com-
mon in women than in men, and they may affect any
age; they are, however, most common in the fourth to
seventh decades of life. The majority of ANs involve
Differential Diagnosis the superior or vestibular portion rather than the
The differential diagnosis of JTP primarily includes cochlear portion of cranial nerve VIII. Symptoms
MEA, meningioma, and AN. If the histology is not include progressive (sensorineural) hearing loss, tin-
distinctive in separating JTP from these other tumors, nitus, and loss of equilibrium. With progression, the
the immunohistochemical reactivity differentiates these tumor enlarges, and it may compress adjacent cranial
tumors (Table 4). nerves (V, VII, IX, X, XI), the cerebellum, and the brain
stem, leading to facial paresthesia and numbness,
Treatment and Prognosis headaches, nausea, vomiting, diplopia, and ataxia.
Up to 8% may be bilateral (223–227), a potential
Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice; indicator of neurofibromatosis type 2 (226,227).
however, the location and invasive nature of these
lesions often preclude complete resection. Unresect- Radiology
able paragangliomas include those with extensive
skull base involvement or intracranial extension, and The radiological features of AN include flaring, asym-
patients who might be poor surgical candidates, metric widening, or erosion of the internal auditory
including medically infirm and elderly. In such canal (200,201). Tumors as small as 1 cm or less are
cases, radiation therapy is a useful adjunct to surgery. capable of being detected with CT or MRI.
Radiotherapy results in a decrease or ablation of
vascularity and promotes fibrosis. Radiotherapy has Etiology
been primarily used to treat jugular paragangliomas NF-2 is an autosomal dominant condition. The gene
of the temporal bone. As there is rarely total resolution for NF-2 has been mapped to the long arm of chromo-
of the tumor following radiotherapy, successful treat- some 22 (22q12) (227). The hallmark of NF-2 is bilat-
ment of paragangliomas with radiotherapy is defined eral ANs (228). Patients with NF-2 also experience an
as local control in the form of stability or regression of increased incidence of multiple, separate-occurring
tumor size and nonprogression or improvement of meningiomas in intra- and extracranial sites. Symp-
neurological symptoms (218,219). Preoperative embo- toms of neurofibromatosis may be seen in up to 16%
lization is useful in decreasing the vascularity of the of patients and those with neurofibromatosis who
tumor and facilitating surgical resection. Postemboli- develop ANs generally are symptomatic at an earlier
zation angiography should document absence of age (2nd decade) and have a higher incidence of
tumor ‘‘blush’’ with continued patency of the external bilateral ANs. Patients with AN (or meningioma)
carotid systems; not all paragangliomas should be who are younger than 30 years should raise concern
embolized. The decision is dependent on the location for a diagnosis of NF-2.
and extent of tumor, and the experience of the surgeon
and interventional radiologist. Local recurrences can
Pathology
be seen in up to 50% of cases. The histological appear-
ance of paragangliomas does not correlate to the Gross. The gross appearance of AN includes a
biological behavior of the tumor. Intracranial exten- circumscribed, tan-white, rubbery-to-firm mass that
sion may occur in up to 15% of cases (220). Function- may appear yellow and show cystic change. The
ing JTPs, which are evidenced by endocrinopathic tumor ranges in size from a few millimeters up to 4
manifestations, occur, but they are extremely uncom- to 5 cm at its greatest diameter.
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 455
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes MEA, JTP, and
meningioma. The differentiation of these tumor types
can be achieved by the light microscopical and immu-
nohistochemical features for each tumor type (Table 4).
4. Meningioma
Clinical Features
Microscopy. Histologically, the tumors are unen-
capsulated, and they are similar in appearance to Meningiomas are benign neoplasms arising from
benign schwannomas of all other locations. The cellu- arachnoid cells forming the arachnoid villi that are
lar component includes elongated and twisted nuclei seen in relation to the dural sinuses.
with indistinct cytoplasmic borders. The cells are Meningiomas represent from 13% to 18% of all
arranged in short, interlacing fascicles, and whorling intracranial tumors, and they are the second most
or palisading of nuclei called Verocay bodies may be common tumors of the cerebellopontine angle
seen (Fig. 38). The cellularity varies, and some benign (200,201). Meningiomas are more common in women
schwannomas can be highly cellular (so-called cellular than in men, and they are most often seen in the fifth
schwannoma). Mitotic figures are usually sparse in decade of life (229). They infrequently occur in children.
number. Cellular pleomorphism with hyperchromasia The occurrence of a meningioma outside the CNS is
can be identified, but it is not a feature of malignancy. considered ectopic, and it can be divided into those
Retrogressive changes, including cystic degeneration, tumors with no identifiable CNS connection (primary)
necrosis, hyalinization, calcification, and hemorrhage, and those with a CNS connection (secondary). The
may also be seen. Schwannomas have prominent development of primary meningiomas in the middle
vascularity composed of large vessels with thickened ear and temporal bone results either from direct exten-
(hyalinized) walls. sion or the presence of ectopic arachnoid cells. The
Immunohistochemical staining shows the pres- middle ear and temporal bone are the most common
ence of diffuse, intense S-100 protein reactivity (Fig. 39). sites of ectopically located meningiomas in the head
No immunoreactivity for cytokeratin or the neuroen- and neck region. Sites of involvement include the
docrine markers chromogranin and synaptophysin is internal auditory canal, jugular foramen, geniculate
present. ganglion, the roof of the eustachian tube, and the sulcus
456 Wenig
Etiology
Meningiomas may be associated with neurofibromato-
sis type 2. Mutations in the NF2 gene probably account
for the formation of more than half of all meningiomas
(230). Patients with NF-2 also experience increased
incidence of multiple, separate-occurring meningiomas
in intra- and extracranial sites. Patients with a meningi-
oma (or AN) who are younger than 30 years should
raise concern for a diagnosis of NF-2.
Radiology
The radiological findings include a soft tissue mass Figure 41 Immunoreactivity of meningiomas include epithelial
with variable vascularity. A pathognomonic feature membrane antigen (EMA) (left) and vimentin (right).
for meningioma in this location is the presence of
speckled calcification in a soft tissue mass (200).
Pathology
achieved by the light microscopical and immunohis-
Microscopy. The histological features of middle tochemical features for each tumor type (Table 4).
ear and temporal bone meningioma are similar to
their intracranial counterparts (Fig. 40). The immuno- Treatment and Prognosis
histochemical antigenic profile of meningiomas
includes reactivity for EMA and vimentin (Fig. 41). In Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice,
contrast to MEAs, meningiomas are generally nonreac- and it is curative. Malignant change rarely, if ever,
tive for cytokeratin, and, in contrast to JTPs, meningio- occurs. A diagnosis of middle ear meningioma should
mas are nonreactive for neuroendocrine markers (i.e., be made only after clinical evaluation has excluded
chromogranin and synaptophysin) (Table 4). secondary extension from an intracranial neoplasm
(231).
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes MEA, JTP, and 5. Other Benign Neoplasms of the Middle Ear
AN. The differentiation of these tumor types can be and Temporal Bone
While uncommon, a number of other primary benign
neoplasms can be found in the middle ear or temporal
bone. Among these uncommon middle ear neoplasms
are the Schneiderian-type mucosal papillomas of the
middle ear, which are histologically identical to sino-
nasal or Schneiderian papillomas (232). Such neo-
plasms are more common in women than in men.
They occur over a wide age range with an average
age of occurrence in the fifth decade of life, and present
with conductive hearing loss, otalgia, and otorrhea,
and often occur in patients with a history of COM.
Schneiderian-type mucosal papillomas of the middle
ear arise de novo without evidence of sinonasal tract
papillomas, although some have occurred in patients
with sinonasal tract papillomas (232). Their histology is
identical to that of inverted Schneiderian papillomas of
the sinonasal tract (Fig. 42). Rarely, an associated SCC
has been reported (232). Complete excision usually
Figure 40 Meningioma of the internal auditory canal showing a necessitating radical tympanomastoidectomy is the
cell nest or lobular growth separated by fibrovascular tissue. The treatment of choice.
cells are composed of round to oval or spindle-shaped nuclei Other uncommon primary benign tumors of the
with pale-staining cytoplasm and indistinct cell borders; the middle ear and temporal bone are primarily mesen-
nuclei show a characteristic punched-out or empty appearance chymal, including hemangiomas (233–235), lipoma
because of intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions. (236,237), osteoma (238–240), osteoblastoma (241),
chondroblastoma (242), and teratomas (243).
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 457
Etiology
A diagnosis of ESPT should prompt the clinician to
consider the possibility that the patient has VHL
syndrome (244,245). VHL is an autosomal dominant
disorder with variable expression. Tumor suppressor
gene for VHL has been identified at chromosome
3p25–p26 (249). Patients with VHL have a predisposi-
Figure 42 Middle ear papilloma with histological features of a
sinonasal (Schneiderian)-type cylindrical cell papilloma.
tion to the development of numerous CNS and
abdominal organ tumors (Table 7).
Histogenesis
An endolymphatic sac origin for these tumors is
C. Middle Ear and Temporal Bone Tumors of supported by the following: (i) early clinical manifes-
Indeterminant Biologic Behavior tations of vestibular disease, including sensorineural
hearing loss, tinnitus, and episodic vertigo; (ii) radio-
1. Endolymphatic Sac Papillary Tumor graphic features showing a tumor in the posterior-
medial petrous ridge, a site where the endolymphatic
Clinical Features sac is located; (iii) identification of an in situ tumor (i.
The ESPT is an uncommon but distinct neoplasm that e., originating from within the endolymphatic sac);
possibly is a manifestation of von Hippel–Lindau and (iv) the morphological, immunohistochemical,
(VHL) syndrome (244,245). ESPT has had a variety and ultrastructural similarities of the tumor with the
of names, including adenoma of endolymphatic sac; normal endolymphatic sac epithelium (246).
adenoma and/or adenocarcinoma of temporal bone or
mastoid; low-grade adenocarcinoma of probable Pathology
endolymphatic sac origin; papillary adenoma of tem- Microscopy. The histopathological appearance of
poral bone; aggressive papillary tumor of temporal ESPT is quite variable. The papillary structures are
bone; aggressive papillary middle ear tumor; and, generally not complex in their growth. The neoplastic
more recently, the Heffner tumor (246,247). cells vary from flattened- or attenuated-appearing
There is no gender predilection. ESPT occurs cells to columnar-appearing cells (Fig. 43). Most
over a wide age range from the second to eighth often, only a single row of cells is present. Occasional-
decades of life. The most common symptom is unilat- ly, the surface epithelial cells may have an appearance
eral hearing loss ranging from 6 months to 18 years; that suggests a double layer of cells (epithelial and
the hearing loss is most frequently sensorineural myoepithelial); however, the ‘‘outer’’ row of cells in
rather than conductive, but mixed types of hearing all probability represents a stromal element, as these
loss also occur. Other symptoms include tinnitus, cells have not been shown to be immunoreactive with
vertigo, ataxia, and cranial nerve deficits. myoepithelial markers (248). The epithelial cells have
uniform nuclei that are usually situated either in the
center of the cells or toward the luminal aspect, and
Radiology
they have a pale eosinophilic- to clear-appearing
CT scan and MRI may show a lytic temporal bone cytoplasm. The latter may predominate in any given
lesion measuring from 4 to 6 cm (248). The center of tumor. Cell borders may be seen, but, not infrequent-
the lesion most often is seen at or near the posterior- ly, the neoplastic cells lack a distinct cell membrane. In
medial face of the petrous bone. Extension of tumor to some cases, hypercellular areas with crowded, vari-
the posterior cranial cavity has led to suggestions that ably sized cystic glandular spaces that contain eosino-
the tumor took origin from the cerebellopontine angle; philic (colloid-like) material are noted (Fig. 44). The
extension results in cerebellar involvement and evi- latter appear remarkably similar to thyroid tissue. In
dence of compression and/or shifting of the fourth all cases, pleomorphism is minimal, and mitotic activ-
ventricle, brain stem, or pineal gland. Angiographic ity and necrosis are rarely present.
studies show a vascular or hypervascular lesion (244). A granulation tissue reaction is seen in associa-
The diagnosis of this tumor is based on clinical, tion with the neoplastic cells, and it includes the small
radiographic, and pathological correlation. vascular spaces lying in close proximity to the surface
458 Wenig
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes MEA. However,
Figure 43 Endolymphatic sac papillary tumor. (A) The lesion is the clinical, radiographic, and pathological features
characterized by a papillary growth pattern. (B) In this example, that are unique to ESPT should allow for distinction.
the epithelial component is composed of a distinct layer of cuboi- The same would apply for the other common neo-
dal- to columnar-appearing cells with delineated cell borders. plasms of the middle ear and temporal bone. The
differential diagnosis also includes choroid plexus
papilloma and metastatic carcinoma of thyroid or
renal origin. Choroid plexus papillomas are intracra-
nial (i.e., intraventricular) tumors with histological
features that are different from those of ESPT (246).
The absence of thyroglobulin reactivity and thyroid
transcription factor 1 (TTF1) differentiates ESPT from
metastatic thyroid papillary carcinoma. Metastatic
renal cell carcinoma is immunoreactive for renal cell
marker and CD10, markers not identified in ESPT.
Further, the immunohistochemical antigenic features
seen in ESPT are not found in renal cell carcinoma.
D. Malignant Neoplasms of the External Ear BCCs may be inherited in the autosomal domi-
and Auditory Canal nant disorder called nevoid BCC syndrome caused by
mutations in patched (PTCH), a tumor suppressor
1. Basal Cell Carcinoma gene mapped to chromosome 9q22.3q31 (252,253). In
Clinical Features few cases, the syndrome is due to a microdeletion at
9q22 (254,255). The nevoid BCC syndrome includes
BCC is a slow growing, locally infiltrative malignant multiple BCCs most commonly involving the nose,
neoplasm of the skin and subcutaneous adnexal tis- mouth, eyes, and ear regions, occurrence in childhood,
sue. BCCs take origin from a pluripotential cell in association with palmar and plantar pitting, odonto-
either the basal cell layer of the surface epithelium or genic keratocysts of the jaws, skeletal developmental
the epithelium of the subcutaneous adnexae. abnormalities (bifid ribs, brachymetacarpalism, and
BCC represents the most common cutaneous vertebral anomalies), ectopic calcification in dermal
malignancy. BCC is more common in men than in and soft tissue sites, and neurological abnormalities
women; generally, a tumor affecting adults and is most (mental retardation).
commonly seen in the seventh decade of life. The sun-
exposed areas of the head and neck are the most Pathology
frequent sites of occurrence. BCC may occur in virtu-
ally all cutaneous sites of the head and neck but among See the chapter on diseases of the skin for a discussion
the more common locations include the nose, eyelids, of the pathology of BCCs.
nasolabial area, and the auricular area (pinna). In
general, BCCs are asymptomatic; presentation usually Differential Diagnosis
occurs because the patient notices a growth. BCCs of See the chapter on diseases of the skin for a discussion
the external auditory canal are uncommon (250). How- of the differential diagnosis of BCCs.
ever, when this area is involved, it typically has
extensive subcutaneous involvement, which may not Treatment and Prognosis
be clinically appreciated (250).
Initially, the lesion is a raised papule or nodule Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice.
with a waxy or translucent appearance covered by a Electrodessication and irradiation may be used, the
fine capillary network (telangiectasia) (Fig. 45). With latter particularly in cases that cannot be completely
time, the central portion ulcerates and is surrounded excised. The prognosis is excellent following complete
by raised, pearly appearing borders, creating a typical excision. Local recurrence is not uncommon and is
papulonodular ulcerative lesion referred to as ‘‘rodent especially high in the morphea or sclerosing type of
ulcer’’ (Fig. 45). BCC. Metastases are rare except for neglected or long-
standing tumors, which attain large size and become
Etiology deeply and extensively infiltrative (256,257), as well as
in association with the basosquamous (metatypical)
The development of BCC is related to prolonged sun carcinoma, which for all intents and purposes behaves
exposure with resulting actinic damage (251). as an SCC, including metastatic rates seen in approxi-
mately 7% of patients (258,259). This form of BCC
requires a more aggressive surgical approach and a
closer follow-up than other types of BCCs. When metas-
tases occur, they usually spread to regional lymph
nodes and to the lungs; metastatic disease is associated
with poor prognosis irrespective of any therapeutic
intervention. BCCs of the external auditory canal are
notorious for extensive local invasion and extension to
the middle ear, mastoid region, temporal bone, and
potentially into the cranial cavity. For BCC of the exter-
nal auditory canal, radical surgical excision may be
necessary to eradicate tumors in this location (250).
SCCs of the external auditory canal are more servative (limited) local resection can be performed
common in women than in men, most frequently seen for small lesions limited in extent without osseous
in the sixth to seventh decades of life and present with invasion or invasion of the middle ear. Ogawa et al.
symptoms mimicking those of COM, including pain, (266) recommended radiotherapy in the treatment of
hearing deficits, and otorrhea (bloody or purulent) early (T1) lesions. For advanced (higher stage) SCCs,
(261,262). Suspicion for the presence of a malignancy more aggressive management is recommended,
should be considered in patients with chronic ear including radical surgical resection plus radiotherapy
infections who suddenly have a change in symptoms, and/or chemotherapy (263,266–269). Elective paroti-
including pain, bleeding, or facial paralysis. dectomy for control of occult parotid node metastasis
SCCs of the external ear often are polypoid, is necessary only in advanced SCC, whereas parotid
rubbery to firm nodules that frequently have ulcera- management to secure adequate safety margins is
tion (Fig. 46). Given difficulties in their visualization mandatory for advanced SCC (270).
due to location within the external auditory canal and For SCC of the external auditory canal, complete
concealment by purulent or hemorrhagic exudates, surgical excision is the treatment of choice; this often
the gross characteristics of external auditory canal requires a radical procedure (mastoidectomy or tem-
SCCs are not fully appreciated. Further, the extent of poral bone resection). Radiotherapy may be indicated
invasiveness may be underestimated on the basis of depending on the extent of disease. Prognosis is
the gross appearance, making radiological assessment considered poor. SCCs in this location often go unde-
imperative in determining the extent of disease. tected for long periods of time and often present with
advanced disease involving the mastoid and/or mid-
Radiology dle ear. In general, early detection and complete
removal result in good prognosis (263,266–269).
Radiological assessment is helpful in the diagnosis of Nakagawa et al. (269) reported a three-year estimated
SCC of the external auditory canal. In the face of lesion survival for T1 and T2 lesions to be 100% and a five-
that may appear to be limited to the canal belying its year estimated survival for T3 and T4 to be 80% and
invasive nature, radiological imaging (e.g., CT scan) 35%, respectively. Prognosis is dependent on the
accurately assesses the extent of the tumor (264,265). extent of disease (i.e., stage), completeness of surgery
Evidence of destruction of adjacent structures can be with tumor-free margins, recurrence, and metastasis
seen, including bone and other soft tissue structures, (263,266–269). Local recurrence may occur in up to
extension into the middle ear and growth into the 25% of patients and may correlate with tumor size
middle cranial fossa, mastoid, and soft tissues beneath (268). Owing to the low risk of nodal metastasis occur-
the temporal bone. ring in less than 20% of patients (260,265,271–273),
elective neck dissection is not advocated.
Pathology In a large study of SCCs of the skin by Rowe and
colleagues (268), several pathological factors were
See the chapter on diseases of the skin for a discussion linked to a propensity for local recurrence and metas-
of the pathology of SCCs. tases. These factors included a diameter greater
than 2 cm, a depth greater than 4 mm, poor differen-
Differential Diagnosis tiation, perineural invasion, development within a
Relative to external auditory canal SCCs, a key con- scar, previously treated squamous carcinoma in the
cern is differentiating SCC from SK, especially those site, and host immunosuppression. Death is generally
SKs that are inflamed. Histologically, the diagnostic attributed to invasion of regional structures, particu-
challenges in differentiation of SK from SCC may larly intracranial extension. Histological differentia-
directly relate to limited tissue sampling as well as tion does not correlate with prognosis.
the presence of cytological atypia in SK that are On the basis of clinical radiographic-histopatho-
irritated. The key differentiating feature is the absence logical correlation, a TNM staging system for external
(SK) or presence (SCC) of stromal invasion, which is auditory meatus carcinoma was proposed (Tables 8
not as simple to determine in practice as it is in theory. and 9) using preoperative CT and physical examina-
In equivocal cases, identification of lesion extent by tion (274). Arriaga et al. (274) found two-year deter-
radiological imaging may be the critical determinant minant survivals as follows: stage A, 100%; stage B,
in the diagnosis. Further, tissue sampling, including 50%; and stage C, 18%. Using the T system, Arriaga
deeper tissues, is recommended. Presumptively, if et al. (274) found mortality rates at two years to be as
tissue is sampled from deeper portions of the canal follows: T1 and T2, 0%; T3, 44%; and T4, 83%. More
and/or deeper to the lesion itself, then the presence of recently, Moody and colleagues (275) conducted a
squamous epithelium even with limited cytological review of the staging system proposed by the University
atypia likely represents well-differentiated SCC, as of Pittsburgh (274) for temporal bone cancer to
such epithelia should would not be expected to be evaluate survival status according to stage, treatment,
so located in the setting of SK. and other certain prognostic factors. On the basis of
T staging, these authors found that the two-year
survival rates for primary SCC of the temporal bone
Treatment and Prognosis
were T1 lesions, 100%; T2, 80%; T3, 50%; and T4, 7%.
For SCC of the external ear, complete surgical excision Survival for T3 tumors was 75% with postoperative
is the treatment of choice and/or radiotherapy. Con- radiotherapy, compared with 0% with surgery alone.
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 461
Figure 46 (A–H) The spectrum of clinical appearances of squamous cell carcinoma of the external ear involving a variety of primary
sites on the pinna, as well as in the external auditory canal. Source: Images courtesy of Mark Persky, M.D.
462 Wenig
Pathology
Microscopy. Histologically, features that may Figure 47 Ceruminal gland adenocarcinoma. (A) This external
assist in differentiating the ceruminal gland adenocar- auditory canal glandular lesion is extensively infiltrative with a
complex growth, including cribriform and solid patterns. (B) At
cinomas from the adenomas include a loss of the higher magnification, the glands are characterized by the pres-
glandular double cell layer, with identification of ence of cellular pleomorphism with nuclear anaplasia and by the
only the inner or luminal epithelial cell, the presence loss of the dual cell layers seen in ceruminal gland adenomas,
of cell pleomorphism with nuclear anaplasia, although on the outer aspects there is retention of apocrine type
increased mitotic activity, and invasive growth differentiation. (C) Perineural invasion and invasion of cartilage
(Fig. 47). However, well-differentiated ceruminal gland are present.
adenocarcinomas may appear similar to their benign
counterparts, and these are differentiated only on the
basis of invasive growth. At the other end of the addition to the more ‘‘conventional’’ type of cerumi-
spectrum, poorly differentiated ceruminal adenocarci- nal gland adenocarcinomas, other types of ceruminal
nomas do occur; these are recognized on the basis of gland malignant tumors include adenoid cystic carci-
their localization in the external auditory canal. In noma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma. These tumors
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 463
Differential Diagnosis
Given the proximity of the parotid gland to the external
auditory canal, the differential diagnosis for ceruminal
gland adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid
carcinoma includes the direct extension of similar
tumors of primary parotid origin. Therefore, parotid
gland adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid
carcinoma should be excluded before such tumors are
diagnosed as being of primary ceruminal gland origin.
The same applies for ceruminal gland pleomorphic
adenoma. Wolf and associates (192) have also cautioned
about misdiagnosing a benign dermal eccrine cylin-
droma of the external auditory canal as an adenoid
cystic carcinoma.
Pathology
4. Atypical Fibroxanthoma (Pleomorphic Gross. AFX of the ear presents as an asymptom-
Undifferentiated Sarcoma of Skin) atic, firm nodule measuring from 1 to 2 cm in diame-
Clinical Features ter, often associated with ulceration.
Microscopy. Histologically, AFX is an unencap-
Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a pleomorphic, pre- sulated, but generally circumscribed, spindle cell neo-
dominantly dermal mesenchymal tumor found primar- plasm arising in the dermis. The cellular component is
ily on actinic-damaged cutaneous sites of older patients varied, including a spectrum of elongated spindle-
or occasionally in younger patients involving the shaped to pleomorphic cells with hyperchromatic
superficial soft tissues of the extremities and trunk nuclei and bizarre multinucleated cells (Fig. 49). The
(278). Synonyms have included superficial (low larger cells may have foamy cytoplasm and are remi-
grade) MFH, pseudosarcoma of skin, and pseudosar- niscent of lipid-rich histiocytic cells. In some AFXs, a
comatous dermatofibroma. pleomorphic component may be absent and the
AFX occurs in two clinical forms, neither having tumors appear as a predominantly spindle cell, non-
a specific gender predilection. The most common pleomorphic lesion (280). Increased mitotic figures,
form, accounting for approximately 75% of cases, including atypical forms, are readily identified.
affects elderly patients and commonly involves the Areas may exhibit a storiform pattern, but this is not
head and neck (ears, cheeks, nose). A less common usually prominent. Junctional activity is absent.
form, accounting for approximately 25% of cases, Superficial areas adjacent to the tumor show solar
affects younger patients, commonly involving super- elastosis and vascular proliferation; prominent stro-
ficial sites on the limbs and trunk. However, more mal sclerosis may be present (281). A chronic inflam-
recently, the latter form of AFX is now thought to matory infiltrate may present. Vascular invasion may
represent atypical fibrous histiocytomas (278). AFX be seen, but necrosis is uncommon.
most often presents as an asymptomatic solitary Unusual variants include clear cell and granular
growth on the affected body site (Fig. 48). Patients cell (282,283). The clear cell variant of AFX is charac-
may complain of bleeding, pruritus, and pain. terized by sheets of large cells with foamy cytoplasms
464 Wenig
Etiology
The development of ME-SCC is also linked to radia-
tion treatment for intracranial neoplasms and radia-
tion therapy for middle ear inflammatory conditions,
although the latter is no longer used. High-risk human
papillomavirus types 16 and 18 identified in ME-SCC
raises HPV as a possible etiological factor, although a
direct cause and effect has not been established (295).
Although concomitant cholesteatomas can be seen in
up to 25% of cases, there is no correlation between
cholesteatomas and the development of an ME-SCC.
Pathology
Microscopy. The histology of ME-SCC is similar
to that of squamous carcinomas of other sites. The Figure 50 Squamous cell carcinoma of the middle ear. (A)
Infiltrative nests and cords of squamous epithelium is present in
tumors vary from well to poorly differentiated, and
association with histological findings of chronic otitis media,
they include infiltrative malignant cells with associated including dense inflammatory cell infiltrate, glandular metaplasia,
keratinization and/or intercellular bridges (Fig. 50). A and tympanoscleortic foci. (B) At higher magnification, their
background of COM, including chronic inflammation, nests are irregularly shaped with associated nuclear pleomor-
tympanosclerosis, glandular metaplasia, and fibrosis, phism and hyperchromasia and keratinization. The findings are
can be identified. those of a well-differentiated keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma
arising in the background of chronic otitis media.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes cholesteatoma and
metastatic SCC. Cholesteatomas are characterized by Treatment and Prognosis
the presence of keratinizing squamous epithelium lack-
ing prominent rete pegs and an absence of dysplastic Radical surgery (i.e., radical mastoidectomy, temporal
cytological changes. In contrast, SCC (even well-differ- bone resection) with postoperative radiation therapy
entiated cancers) has dysplastic cytological changes, is the treatment of choice. In advanced disease, che-
increased mitotic activity, and possibly dyskeratotic motherapy may be beneficial. The prognosis has gen-
cells. Further, in adequately sampled tissue, an infiltra- erally been poor with 5- and 10-year survival rates of
tive growth with associated desmoplasia and scattered 39% and 21%, respectively (294). More recently,
irregular shaped nests of squamous epithelium is a Moore et al. (296) reported a five-year overall survival
growth pattern not seen in cholesteatomas. (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free
Metastatic SCC from a distant site must also be survival (DFS) of 77%, 79%, and 52%, respectively.
considered. Alternatively, a cutaneous SCC from an These authors found that upfront complete resection
adjacent site (e.g., external ear, nasopharynx, parotid (i.e., lateral temporal bone resection) when combined
gland, skin) can directly invade the middle ear or with postoperative radiation therapy may improve
temporal bone. These possibilities must be excluded survival and decrease recurrence. They reported an
before accepting an SCC as primary in the middle ear. improved OS, DSS, and DFS (p < 0.004 for each) and
466 Wenig
5. Nager GT. Anatomy. In: Nager GT, ed. Pathology of the 28. Glassock ME III, Dickins JRE, Jackson CR, et al. Surgical
Ear and Temporal Bone. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, management of brain tissue herniation into the middle ear
1993:3–187. and mastoid. Laryngoscope 1979; 89:1743–1754.
6. Wenig BM, Michaels LM. The ear and temporal bone. In: 29. Moore PJ, Benjamin BNP, Kan AE. Salivary gland chori-
Mills SE, ed. Histology for Pathologists. 3rd ed. Philadel- stoma of the middle ear. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
phia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007:371–401. 1984; 8:91–95.
7. Baloh RW, Honrubia V. Vestibular physiology. In: 30. Saeed YM, Bassis ML. Mixed tumor of the middle ear. A
Cummings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker LA, et al., eds. case report. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 93:433–434.
Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery. 3rd ed. St. Louis: 31. Nager GT. Necrotizing (‘‘malignant’’) granulomatous
Mosby, 1998:2584–2622. external otitis and osteomyelitis. In: Nager GT, ed. Pathol-
8. Lysakowski A, McCrea RA, Tomlinson RD. Anatomy of ogy of the Ear and Temporal Bone. Baltimore: Williams &
vestibular end organs and neural pathways. In: Cum- Wilkins, 1993:192–206.
mings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker LA, et al., eds. 32. Weinroth SE, Schessel D, Tuazon CU. Malignant otitis
Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 3rd ed. St. externa in AIDS patients: case report and review of the
Louis: Mosby, 1998:2561–2583. literature. Ear Nose Throat J 1994; 73:772–774.
9. Schuknecht HF. Pathophysiology. In: Schuknecht HF, ed. 33. Shpitzer T, Stern Y, Cohen O, et al. Malignant external
Pathology of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, otitis in nondiabetic patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
1993:77–113. 1993; 102:870–872.
10. Schuknecht HF. Developmental defects. In: Schuknecht 34. Bernheim J, Sade J. Histopathology of the soft parts in
HF, ed. Pathology of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & 50 patients with malignant external otitis. J Laryngol Otol
Febiger, 1993:115–189. 1989; 103:366–368.
11. Nager GT. Dysplasia of the external and middle ear. In: 35. Al-Shihabi BA. Carcinoma of the temporal bone present-
Nager GT, ed. Pathology of the Ear and Temporal Bone. ing as malignant otitis externa. J Laryngol Otol 1992;
Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:83–118. 106:908–910.
12. Nager GT. Dysplasia of the osseous and membranous 36. Grandis JR, Hirsch BE, Yu VL. Simultaneous presentation
cochlea and vestibular labyrinth. In: Nager GT, ed. of malignant external otitis and temporal bone cancer.
Pathology of the Ear and Temporal Bone. Baltimore: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119:687–689.
Williams & Wilkins, 1993:119–146. 37. Chandler JR. Pathogenesis and treatment of facial paraly-
13. Brownstein MH, Wanger N, Helwig EB. Accessory tragi. sis due to malignant otitis externa. Ann Otol Rhinol
Arch Dermatol 1971; 104:625–631. Laryngol 1972; 81:1–11.
14. Olsen KD, Maragos NE, Weiland LH. First branchial cleft 38. Damiani JM, Damiani KK, Kinney SE. Malignant external
anomalies. Laryngoscope 1980; 90:423–436. otitis with multiple cranial nerve involvement. Am J Otol
15. Work WP. Newer concepts of first branchial cleft defects. 1979; 1:115–120.
Laryngoscope 1972; 81:1581–1593. 39. Nager GT. Acute and chronic otitis media (tympanomas-
16. Aronsohn RS, Bataskis JG, Rice DH, et al. Anomalies toiditis) and their regional and endocranial complications.
of the first branchial cleft. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102: In: Nager GT, ed. Pathology of the Ear and Temporal
737–740. Bone. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:220–297.
17. Lim LH, Hartnick CJ, Willging JP. A rare case of com- 40. Goycoolea MV, Hueb MM, Ruah C. Definitions
bined type I and II first branchial sinus. J Pediatr Surg and terminology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991;
2003; 38:E12–E13. 24:757–761.
18. Greenway RE, Hurst L, Fenton NA. An unusual first 41. Wenig BM. Otitis media. In: Wenig BM, ed. Atlas of Head
branchial cleft cyst. J Otolaryngol 1981; 10:219–225. and Neck Pathology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier,
19. Schroeder JW Jr, Mohyuddin N, Maddalozzo J. Branchial 2008:740–745.
anomalies in the pediatric population. Otolaryngol Head 42. Barnes EL, Peel RL. Tympanosclerosis. In: Barnes L, ed.
Neck Surg 2007; 137:289–295. Diseases of the External Auditory Canal, Middle Ear, and
20. Triglia JM, Nicollas R, Ducroz V, et al. First branchial cleft Temporal Bone. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker,
anomalies: a study of 39 cases and a review of the 2001:557–599.
literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 43. Bhaya MH, Scachern PA, Morizono T, et al. Pathogenesis
124:291–295. of tympanosclerosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;
21. D’Souza AR, Uppal HS, De R, et al. Updating concepts of 109:413–420.
first branchial defects: a literature review. Int J Pediatr 44. Gibb AG, Pang YT. Current considerations in the etiology
Otorhinolaryngol 2002;62:103–109. and diagnosis of tympanosclerosis. Eur Arch Otorhino-
22. Bottrill ID, Chawla OP, Ramsay AD. Salivary gland laryngol 1994; 251:439–451.
choristoma of the middle ear. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 45. Nager GT, Vanderveen TS. Cholesterol granuloma involv-
106:630–632. ing the temporal bone. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976;
23. Cannon CR. Salivary gland choristoma of the middle ear. 85:204–209.
Am J Otol 1980; 1:250–251. 46. Nager GT. Cholesterol granulomas. In: Nager GT, ed.
24. Kenneth KL, Gruskin P, Carberry JN. Salivary gland Pathology of the Ear and Temporal Bone. Baltimore:
choristoma of the middle ear. Arch Pathol Lab Med Williams & Wilkins, 1994:914–939.
1982; 106:39–40. 47. Thedinger BA, Nadol JB Jr., Montgomery WW, et al.
25. Kartush JM, Graham MD. Salivary gland choristoma of Radiographic diagnosis, surgical treatment, and long-
the middle ear: a case report and review of the literature. term follow—up of cholesterol granulomas of the petrous
Laryngoscope 1984; 94:228–230. apex. Laryngoscope 1989; 99:896–907.
26. Gulya AJ, Gassock ME III, Pensak ML. Neural choristoma 48. Windle-Taylor PC, Bailey CM. Tuberculous otitis media: a
of the middle ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; series of 22 patients. Laryngoscope 1980; 90:1039–1044.
97:52–56. 49. McNulty JS, Fassett RL. Syphilis: an otolaryngolic per-
27. Wazen J, Silverstein H, McDaniel A, et al. Brain tissue spective. Laryngoscope 1981; 91:889–905.
heterotopia in the eighth cranial nerve. Otolaryngol Head 50. McGill TJI. Mycotic infections of the temporal bone. Arch
Neck Surg 1987; 96:373–378. Otolaryngol 1978; 104:140–144.
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 469
51. Leek JH. Actinomycosis of the tympanomastoid. 76. Ophir D, Marshak G. Needle aspiration and pressure
Laryngoscope 1974; 84:290–301. sutures for auricular pseudocyst. Plast Reconstr Surg
52. Sandler ED, Sandler JM, Leboit P, et al. Pneumocystis 1991; 87:783–784.
carinii otitis media in AIDS: a case report and review of 77. Shuknecht H. Exostoses of the external auditory canal. In:
the literature regarding extrapulmonary pneumocystosis. Shuknecht H, ed. Pathology of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadel-
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 103:817–821. phia: Lea & Febiger, 1993:398–399.
53. Schuknecht HF. Infections. In: Schuknecht HF, ed. Pathol- 78. Whitaker SR, Cordier A, Kosjakov S, et al. Treatment of
ogy of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, external auditory canal exostoses. Laryngoscope 1998;
1993:191–253. 108:195–199.
54. Wilson WR. The relationship of herpesvirus family to 79. Fisher EW, McManus TC. Surgery for external auditory
sudden hearing loss: a prospective clinical study and canal exostoses and osteomata. J Laryngol Otol 1994;
literature review. Laryngoscope 1986; 96:870–877. 108:106–110.
55. Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L. Inflammatory polyps 80. Graham MD. Osteomas and exostoses of the external
of the middle ear. In: Hartmann WH, Sobin LH, eds. auditory canal. A clinical, histopathological, and scanning
Tumors of the Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear. Atlas of electron microscopic study. Ann Otol 1979; 88:566–572.
Tumor Pathology, Fascicle 25, 2nd Series. Washington, 81. Nager GT. Osteomas and exostoses. In: Nager GT, ed.
DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1988:301. Pathology of the Ear and Temporal Bone. Baltimore:
56. Gaafar H, Maher A, Al-Ghazzawi E. Aural polypi: a Williams & Wilkins, 1993:483–493.
histopathological and histochemical study. ORL J Otorhi- 82. Fenton JE, Turner J, Fagan PA. A histopathologic review
nolaryngol Relat Spec 1982; 44:108–115. of temporal bone exostoses and osteomata. Laryngoscope
57. Wenig BM. Otitis media. In: Wenig BM, ed. Atlas of head 1996; 106:624–628.
and neck pathology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier, 83. Villacin AB, Brigham LN, Bullough PG. Primary and
2008:745–746. secondary synovial chondrometaplasia: histopathologic
58. Marks PV, Brookes GB. Myelomatosis presenting as an and clinicoradiologic differences. Hum Pathol 1979;
isolated lesion in the mastoid. Laryngoscope 1985; 99:903–906. 10:439–451.
59. Azadeh B, Ardehali S. Malakoplakia of middle ear: a case 84. Allias-Montmayeur F, Durroux R, Dodart L, et al.
report. Histopathology 1983; 7:129–134. Tumours and pseudotumorous lesions of the temporo-
60. Azadeh B, Dabiri S, Moshfegh I. Malakoplakia of the mandibular joint: a diagnostic challenge. J Laryngol Otol
middle ear. Histopathology 1991; 19:276–278. 1997; 111:776–781.
61. Metzger SA, Goodman ML. Chondrodermatitis helicis: a 85. Nussenbaum B, Roland PS, Gilcrease MZ, et al. Extra-
clinical re-evaluation and pathological review. Laryngo- articular synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandib-
scope 1976; 86:1402–1412. ular joint: pitfalls in diagnosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head
62. Shuman R, Helwig EB. Chondrodermatitis helicis. Am J Neck Surg 1999; 125:1394–1397.
Clin Pathol 1954; 24:126–144. 86. Psimopoulou M, Karakasis D, Magoudi D, et al. Synovial
63. Winkler M. Knotchenformige erkrankung am helix chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral
(Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis). Arch Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36:317–318.
Dermatol Syphilol 1915; 212:278–285. 87. Wu CW, Chen YK, Lin LM, et al. Primary synovial
64. Goette DK. Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis: chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint.
a perforating necrobiotic granuloma. J Am Acad Dermatol J Otolaryngol 2004; 33:114–119.
1980; 2:148–154. 88. Deahl ST, Ruprecht A. Asymptomatic radiographically
65. Kitchens GG. Auricular wedge resection and reconstruc- detected chondrometaplasia in the temporomandibular
tion. Ear Nose Throat J 1989; 68:673–683. joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72:371–374.
66. Lawrence CM. The treatment of chondrodermatitis nod- 89. Yu Q, Yang J, Wang P, et al. CT features of synovial
ularis with cartilage removal alone. Arch Dermatol 1991; chondromatosis in the temporomandibular joint. Oral
127:530–535. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;
67. Hansen JE. Pseudocysts of the auricle in Caucasians. Arch 97:524–528.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1967; 85:13–14. 90. Sciot R, Dal Cin P, Bellemans J, et al. Synovial chondro-
68. Heffner DK, Hyams VJ. Cystic chondromalacia (endo- matosis: clonal chromosome changes provide further evi-
chondral pseudocyst) of the auricle. Arch Pathol Lab dence for a neoplastic disorder. Virchows Arch 1998;
Med 1986; 110:740–743. 433:189–191.
69. Lazar RH, Heffner DK, Huges GB, et al. Pseudocyst of the 91. Karlis V, Glickman RS, Zaslow M. Synovial chondroma-
auricle: a review of 21 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg tosis of the temporomandibular joint with intracranial
1986; 94:360–361. extension. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
70. Kontis TC, Goldstone A, Brown M, et al. Pathological Endod 1998; 86:664–666.
quiz: auricular pseudocyst. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck 92. Bell G, Sharp CW, Fourie LR, et al. Conservative surgical
Surg 1992; 118:1128–1130. management of synovial chondromatosis. Oral Surg Oral
71. Engel D. Pseudocysts of the auricle in Chinese. Arch Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84:592–593.
Otolaryngol 1966; 83:197–202. 93. Davis RI, Hamilton A, Biggart JD. Primary synovial
72. Borroni G, Brazzeli V, Merlino M. Pseudocyst of the chondromatosis: a clinicopathologic review and assessment
auricle. A birthday ear pull. Br J Dermatol 1991; of malignant potential. Hum Pathol 1998; 29:683–688.
125:292–294. 94. Ichikawa T, Miyauchi M, Nikai H, et al. Synovial chon-
73. Glamb R, Kim R. Pseudocyst of the auricle. J Am Acad drosarcoma arising in the temporomandibular joint.
Dermatol 1984; 11:58–63. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56:890–894.
74. Grabski WJ, Salasche SJ, McCollough ML, et al. Pseudo- 95. Davis RI, Foster H, Arthur K, et al. Cell proliferation
cyst of the auricle associated with trauma. Arch Dermatol studies in primary synovial chondromatosis. J Pathol
1989; 125:528–530. 1998; 184:18–23.
75. Choi S, Lam KH, Chan KW, et al. Endochondral pseudo- 96. Ferlito A, Devaney KO, Rinaldo A, et al. Ear cholestea-
cyst of the auricle in Chinese. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; toma versus cholesterol granuloma. Ann Otol Rhinol
110:792–796. Laryngol 1997; 106:79–85.
470 Wenig
97. Michaels L. Pathology of cholesteatomas: a review. J R Soc 119. Cochrane LA, Prince M, Clarke K. Langerhans’ cell his-
Med 1979; 72:366–369. tiocytosis in the paediatric population: presentation and
98. Schuknecht HF. Cholesteatoma. In: Schuknecht HF, ed. treatment of head and neck manifestations. J Otolaryngol
Pathology of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 2003; 32:33–37.
1993:204–206. 120. Saliba I, El Fata F, Arcand P, et al. Langerhans’ cell histio-
99. Michaels L. An epidermoid formation in the developing cytosis of the temporal bone in children. Int J Pediatr
middle ear: possible source of cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 72(6):775–786.
Otol 1986; 15:169–174. 121. Azumi N, Sheibani K, Swartz WG, et al. Antigenic phe-
100. Abramson M, Moriyama H, Huang CC. Histology, path- notype of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: an immunohisto-
ogenesis, and treatment of cholesteatoma. Ann Otol chemical study demonstrating the value of LN-2, LN-3
Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1984; 112:125–128. and vimentin. Hum Pathol 1988; 19:1376–1382.
101. Sudhoff H, Tos M. Pathogenesis of attic cholesteatoma: 122. Beckstead JH, Wood GS, Turner RR. Histiocytosis X cells
clinical and immunohistochemical support for combina- and Langerhans cells: enzyme histochemical and immu-
tion of retraction theory and proliferation theory. Am nologic similarities. Hum Pathol 1984; 15:826–833.
J Otol 2000; 21:786–792. 123. Emile JF, Wechsler J, Brousse N, et al. Langerhans’ cell
102. Kazahaya K, Potsic WP. Congenital cholesteatoma. Curr histiocytosis. Definitive diagnosis with the use of mono-
Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12:398–403. clonal antibody O10 on routinely paraffin-embedded
103. Persaud R, Hajioff D, Trinidade A, et al. Evidence-based samples. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19:636–641.
review of aetiopathogenic theories of congenital and 124. Lau SK, Chu PG, Weiss LM. Immunohistochemical
acquired cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121:1013–1019. expression of Langerin in Langerhans cell histiocytosis
104. Abramson M, Huang CC. Localization of collagenase in and non-Langerhans cell histiocytic disorders. Am J Surg
human middle ear cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 1977; Pathol 2008; 32:615–619.
87:771–791. 125. Ide F, Iwase T, Saito I, et al. Immunohistochemical and
105. Piepergerdes MC, Kramer BM, Behnke EE. Keratosis ultrastructural analysis of the proliferating cells in histio-
obturans and external auditory canal cholesteatoma. cytosis X. Cancer 1984; 53:917–921.
Laryngoscope 1980; 90:383–391. 126. Wenig BM, Abbondanzo SL, Childers E, et al. Extranodal
106. Desloge RB, Carew JF, Finstad CL, et al. DNA analysis of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy
human cholesteatomas. Am J Otol 1997; 18:155–159. (Rosai-Dorfman disease) of the head and neck. Hum
107. Tokuriki M, Noda I, Saito T, et al. Gene expression Pathol 1993; 24:483–492.
analysis of human middle ear cholesteatoma using com- 127. Ramalingam KK, Ramalingam R, Sreenivasamurthy
plementary DNA arrays. Laryngoscope 2003; 113:808–814. TM, et al. Management of temporal bone meningo-
108. Yamamoto-Fukuda T, Aoki D, Hishikawa Y, et al. Possi- encephalocoele. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 17:1–7.
ble involvement of keratinocyte growth factor and its 128. Sdano MT, Pensak ML. Temporal bone encephaloceles.
receptor in enhanced epithelial-cell proliferation and Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 13:287–289.
acquired recurrence of middle-ear cholesteatoma. Lab 129. Johnson F, Semaan MT, Megerian CA. Temporal bone
Invest 2003; 83:123–136. fracture: evaluation and management in the modern era.
109. Sudhoff H, Dazert S, Gonzales AM, et al. Angiogenesis Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008; 41:597–618.
and angiogenic growth factors in middle ear cholestea- 130. Jaksch-Wartenhorst R. Polychondropathia. Wien Arch
toma. Am J Otol 2000; 21:793–798. Intern Med 1923; 6:93–100.
110. Vikram BK, Udayashankar SG, Naseeruddin K, et al. 131. Damiani JM, Levine HL. Relapsing polychondritis—
Complications in primary and secondary acquired cho- report of ten cases. Laryngoscope 1979; 89:929–946.
lesteatoma: a prospective comparative study of 62 ears. 132. McAdam LP, O’Hanlan MA, Bluestone R, et al. Relapsing
Am J Otolaryngol 2008; 29:1–6. polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a
111. Smith JA, Danner CJ. Complications of chronic otitis review of the literature. Medicine 1976; 55:193–215.
media and cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 133. Cody DT, Sones DA. Relapsing polychondritis: audioves-
2006; 39:1237–1255. tibular manifestations. Laryngoscope 1971; 81:1208–1222.
112. Bennett M, Warren F, Jackson GC, et al. Congenital 134. McCaffrey TV, McDonald TJ, McCaffrey LA. Head and
cholesteatoma: theories, facts, and 53 patients. Otolar- neck manifestations of relapsing polychondritis: review of
yngol Clin North Am 2006; 39:1081–1094. 29 cases. Otolaryngol 1978; 86:473–478.
113. Lazard DS, Roger G, Denoyelle F, et al. Congenital 135. Letko E, Zafirakis P, Baltatzis S, et al. Relapsing poly-
cholesteatoma: risk factors for residual disease and retrac- chondritis: a clinical review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2002;
tion pockets—a report on 117 cases. Laryngoscope 2007; 31:384–395.
117:634–637. 136. Rapini RP, Warner NB. Relapsing polychondritis. Clin
114. Willman CL. Detection of clonal histiocytes in Langerhans Dermatol 2006; 24:482–485.
cell histiocytosis: biology and clinical significance. Br J 137. Bachor E, Blevins NH, Karmody C, et al. Otologic man-
Cancer Suppl 1994; 23:S29–S33. ifestations of relapsing polychondritis. Review of litera-
115. Willman CL, Busque L, Griffith BB, et al. Langerhans’— ture and report of nine cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 2006;
cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X)—a clonal proliferative 33:135–141.
disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:154–160. 138. Tesche S, Wenzel S, Sagowski C. Relapsing polychondritis—
116. Lieberman PH, Jones CR, Steinman RM, et al. Langerhans a case report and review of the literature. Laryngorhinoo-
cell (eosinophilic) granulomatosis: a clinicopathologic tologie 2005; 84:352–356.
study encompassing 50 years. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 139. Ogawa H, Nishi E, Kameda H, et al. Manifestations
20:519–552. mimicking relapsing polychondritis in a patient with
117. Appling D, Jenkins HA, Parton GA. Eosinophilic granu- microscopic polyangiitis. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai
loma in the temporal bone and skull. Otolaryngol Head Kaishi 2005; 28:104–108.
Neck Surg 1983; 91:358–365. 140. Tsuda T, Nakajima A, Baba S, et al. A case of relapsing
118. al-Ammar AY, Tewfik TL, Bond M, et al. Langerhans’ polychondritis with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
cell histiocytosis: paediatric head and neck study. and perforation of the nasal septum at the onset. Mod
J Otolaryngol 1999; 28:266–272. Rheumatol 2007; 17:148–152.
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 471
141. Schumacher HR Jr. Relapsing polychondritis. In: Wegener’s granulomatosis. Immunolocalization in normal
Goldman L, Bennett JC, eds. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. and pathologic tissues. Am J Pathol 1991; 139:831–838.
21st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000:1550. 164. Csernok E, Holle J, Hellmich B, et al. Evaluation of
142. Harisdangkul V, Johnson WW. Association between capture ELISA for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic
relapsing polychondritis and systemic lupus erythemato- antibodies directed against proteinase 3 in Wegener’s
sus. South Med J 1994; 87:753–757. granulomatosis: first results from a multicentre study.
143. Dolan DL, Lemmon GB Jr., Teitelbaum SL. Relapsing Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43:174–180.
polychondritis: analytical literature review and studies 165. McDonald TJ, Remee RA. Wegener’s granulomatosis.
on pathogenesis. Am J Med 1966; 41:285–299. Laryngoscope 1983; 93:220–231.
144. Ebringer B, Rook G, Swana T, et al. Autoantibodies to 166. Wolf M, Kronenberg J, Engelberg S, et al. Rapidly pro-
cartilage and type II collagen in relapsing polychondritis gressive hearing loss as a symptom of polyarteritis
and other rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; nodosa. Am J Otolaryngol 1987; 8:105–108.
40:473–479. 167. Gussen R. Atypical ossicle joint lesions in rheumatoid
145. Valenzuela R, Cooperrider PA, Gogate P, et al. Relapsing arthritis with sicca syndrome (Sjögren’s syndrome). Arch
polychondritis: immunomicroscopic findings in cartilage Otolaryngol 1977; 103:284–286.
of ear biopsy specimens. Hum Pathol 1980; 11:19–22. 168. House JW. Otosclerosis. In: Cummings CW, Frederickson
146. Helm TN, Valenzuela R, Glanz S, et al. Relapsing poly- JM, Harker LA, et al., eds. Otolaryngology—Head and
chondritis: a case diagnosed by direct immunofluores- Neck Surgery. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:3126–3135.
cence and coexisting with pseudocyst of the auricle. J Am 169. Cody DT, Baker HL Jr. Otosclerosis: vestibular symptoms
Acad Dermatol 1992; 26:315–318. and sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
147. Irani BS, Martin-Hirsch DP, Clark D, et al. Relapsing 1978; 87:778–796.
polychondritis—a study of four cases. J Laryngol Otol 170. Morales-Garcia C. Cochleo-vestibular involvement in oto-
1992; 106:911–914. sclerosis. Acta Otolaryngol 1972; 73:484–492.
148. Lang B, Rothenfusser A, Lanchbury JS, et al. Susceptibility 171. Schuknecht HF. Otosclerosis. In: Schuknecht HF, ed.
to relapsing polychondritis is associated with HLA-DR4. Pathology of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger,
Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36:660–664. 1993:365–379.
149. Grahame R, Scott JT. Clinical survey of 354 patients with 172. Vicente Ade O, Yamasita HK, Albernaz PL, et al.
gout. Ann Rheum Dis 1970; 29:461–468. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of otosclerosis.
150. Resnick D, Nikiyama G. Gouty arthritis. In: Resnick D, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134:685–692.
Niwayama G, eds. Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders. 173. Lescanne E, Bakhos D, Metais JP, et al. Otosclerosis in
2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1988:1618–1671. children and adolescents: a clinical and CT-scan survey
151. McCarty DJ, Hollander JL. Identification of urate crystals with review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolar-
in gouty synovial fluid. Ann Intern Med 1961; 54:452–460. yngol 2008; 72:147–152.
152. Ishida T, Dorfman HD, Bullough PG. Tophaceous pseu- 174. Moumoulidis I, Axon P, Baguley D, et al. A review on
dogout (tumoral calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crys- the genetics of otosclerosis. Clin Otolaryngol 2007; 32:
tal deposition disease). Hum Pathol 1995; 26:587–593. 239–247.
153. Vargas A, Teruel J, Trull J, et al. Calcium pyrophosphate 175. Schuknecht HF. Paget’s disease. In: Schuknecht HF, ed.
dihydrate crystal deposition disease presenting as a pseu- Pathology of the Ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger,
dotumor of the temporomandibular joint. Eur Radiol 1993:379–390.
1997; 7:1452–1453. 176. Davies DG. Paget’s disease of the temporal bone. A
154. Illum P, Thorling K. Otologic manifestations of Wegener’s clinical and histopathological survey. Acta Otolaryngol
granulomatosis. Laryngoscope 1982; 92:801–804. 1968; (suppl 242):7–47.
155. Kornblut AD, Wolff SM, Fauci AS. Ear disease in patients 177. D’Archambeau O, Parizel PM, Koelkelkoren E, et al. CT
with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Laryngoscope 1982; diagnosis and differential diagnosis of otodystrophic
92:713–717. lesions of the temporal bone. Eur J Radiol 1990; 11:22–30.
156. McCaffrey TV, McDonald TJ, Facer GW, et al. Otologic 178. Haibach H, Farrell C, Dittrich FJ. Neoplasms arising in
manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Otolaryngol Paget’s disease of bone: a study of 82 cases. Am J Clin
Head Neck Surg 1980; 88:586–593. Pathol 1985; 83:594–600.
157. Takagi D, Nakamura Y, Maguschi S, et al. Otologic 179. Wick MR, McLeod RA, Siegel GP, et al. Sarcomas of bone
manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Laryngo- arising complicating osteitis deformans (Paget’s disease).
scope 2002; 112:1684–1690. Fifty years’ experience. Am J Surg Pathol 1981; 5:47–59.
158. Okamura H, Ohtani I, Anzai T. The hearing loss in 180. Nager GT. Meniere’s disease. In: Nager GT, ed. Pathology
Wegener’s granulomatosis: relationship between hearing of the Ear and Temporal Bone. Baltimore: Williams &
loss and serum ANCA. Auris Nasus Larynx 1992; 19:1–6. Wilkins, 1994:1213–1228.
159. Fauci AS, Haynes BF, Katz P, et al. Wegener’s granulo- 181. Morrison AW, Mowbray JF, Williamson R, et al. On
matosis: prospective clinical and therapeutic experience genetic and environmental factors in Meniere’s disease.
with 85 patients for 21 years. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: Am J Otol 1994; 15:35–39.
76–85. 182. Ruckenstein MJ, Rutka JA, Hawke M. The treatment of
160. Nolle B, Specks U, Ludemann Jet al. Anticytoplasmic Meniere’s disease: torok revisited. Laryngoscope 1991;
autoantibodies: their immunodiagnostic value in Wegener’s 101:211–218.
granulomatosis. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111:28–40. 183. Xenellis J, Morrison AW, McClowskey D, et al. HLA
161. DeRemee RA. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody- antigen in the pathogenesis of Meniere’s disease.
associated diseases: a pulmonologist’s perspective. Am J J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100:21–24.
Kidney Dis 1991; 18:180–183. 184. Birgerson L, Gustavson K, Stahle J. Familial Meniere’s
162. Specks U, Wheatley CL, McDonald TJ, et al. Anticytoplasmic disease: a genetic investigation. Am J Otol 1987; 8:323–826.
autoantibodies in the diagnosis and follow-up of 185. Paparella MM. The cause (multifactorial inheritance)
Wegener’s granulomatosis. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64:28–36. and pathogenesis (endolymphatic malabsorption) of
163. Braun MG, Csernok E, Gross WL, et al. Proteinase 3, the Meniere’s disease and its symptoms (mechanical and
target antigen of anticytoplasmic antibodies circulating in chemical). Acta Otolaryngol 1985; 99:445–451.
472 Wenig
186. Klis SFL, Buijs J, Smoorenburg GF. Quantification of the 207. Faverly DR, Manni J, Smedts Fet al. Adenocarcinoid or
relationship between electrophysiologic and morphologic amphicrine tumors of the middle ear. Pathol Res Pract
changes in experimental endolymphatic hydrops. Ann 1992; 188:162–171.
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99:566–570. 208. Batsakis JG. Adenomatous tumors of the middle ear. Ann
187. Schessel DA, Minor LB, Nedzelski J. Meniere’s disease Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98:749–752.
and other peripheral vestibular disorders. In: Cummings 209. El-Naggar AK, Pflatz M, Ordóñez NG, et al. Tumors of
CW, Frederickson JM, Harker LA, et al., eds. Otolaryngology— the middle ear and endolymphatic sac. Pathol Annu 1994;
Head and Neck Surgery. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 29:199–231.
1998:2672–2705. 210. Ramsey MJ, Nadol JB Jr., Pilch BZ, et al. Carcinoid tumor
188. Torok N. Old and new in Meniere’s disease. Laryngo- of the middle ear: clinical features, recurrences, and
scope 1977; 87:1870–1877. metastases. Laryngoscope 2005; 115:1660–1666.
189. Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L. Adenomatous neo- 211. Larson TC, Reese DF, Baker HL, et al. Glomus tympani-
plasms of ceruminal gland origin. In: Hartmann W, Sobin, cum chemodectomas: radiographic and clinical character-
LS, eds. Tumors of the Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear. istics. Radiology 1987; 163:801–806.
Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Fascicle 25, 2nd Series. Wash- 212. Persky MS, Hu KS, Berenstein A. Paragangliomas of the
ington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, head and neck. In: Harrison LB, Sessions RB, Hong WK,
1988:285–291. eds. Head and Neck Cancer. A Multidisciplinary
190. Wetli CV, Prado V, Millard M, et al. Tumors of cerumi- Approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
nous glands. Cancer 1972; 29:1169–1178. Wilkins, 2004:678–713.
191. Pulec JL. Glandular tumors of the external auditory canal. 213. Lemaire M, Persu A, Hainaut P, et al. Hereditary para-
Laryngoscope 1977; 87:1601–1612. ganglioma. J Intern Med 1999; 246:113–116.
192. Wolf BA, Gluckman JL, Wirman JA. Benign dermal 214. Bikhazi PH, Messina L, Mhatre AN, et al. Molecular
cylindroma of the external auditory canal: a clinicopatho- pathogenesis in sporadic head and neck paraganglioma.
logic report. Am J Otolaryngol 1985; 6:35–38. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:1346–1348.
193. Thompson LD, Nelson BL, Barnes EL. Ceruminous ade- 215. Petropoulos AE, Luetje CM, Camarata PJ, et al. Genetic
nomas: a clinicopathologic study of 41 cases with a review analysis in the diagnosis of familial paragangliomas.
of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28:308–318. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:1225–1229.
194. Schenk P, Handisurya A, Steurer M. Ultrastructural mor- 216. Johnson TL, Zarbo RJ, Lloyd RV, et al. Paragangliomas of
phology of a middle ear ceruminoma. ORL J Otorhinolar- the head and neck: immunohistochemical neuroendocrine
yngol Relat Spec 2002; 64:358–363. and intermediate filament typing. Mod Pathol 1998;
195. Tran LP, Grunfast KM, Selesnick SH. Benign lesions of the 1:216–223.
external auditory canal. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996; 217. Kliewer KE, Wen DR, Cancilla PA, et al. Paragangliomas:
29:807–825. assessment of prognosis by histologic, immunohisto-
196. Johnson IJ, Tadpatrikar MH, Sharp JF. Chondroma of the chemical, and ultrastructural techniques. Hum Pathol
external auditory canal. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112:278–279. 1989; 20:29–39.
197. Petschenik AJ, Linstrom CJ, McCormick SA. Leiomyoma 218. Hu K, Persky MS. Multidisciplinary management of para-
of the external auditory canal. Am J Otol 1996; 17:133–136. gangliomas of the head and neck, Part 1. Oncology 2003;
198. Lewis WB, Mattucci KF, Smilari T. Schwannoma of the 17:983–993.
external auditory canal: an unusual finding. Int Surg 1995; 219. Barnes L, Taylor SR. Carotid body paragangliomas. A
80:287–290. clinicopathologic and DNA analysis of 13 cases. Arch
199. Ferreiro JA, Carney JA. Myxomas of the external ear and Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116:447–453.
their significance. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18:274–280. 220. Spector GJ, Ciralsky RH, Ogura JH. Glomus tumors in the
200. Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L. Neoplasms of the head and neck. III. Analysis of clinical manifestations.
middle ear. In: Hartmann W, Sobin LS, eds. Tumors of the Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84:73–79.
Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear. Atlas of Tumor Pathol- 221. Taylor DM, Alford BR, Greenberg SD. Metastases of
ogy, Fascicle 25, 2nd Series. Washington, DC: Armed glomus jugulare tumors. Arch Otolaryngol 1965; 82:5–13.
Forces Institute of Pathology, 1986:306–330. 222. Johnstone PA, Foss RD, Desilets DJ. Malignant jugulo-
201. Mills SE, Frierson H Jr., Gaffney M. Neoplasms of the tympanic paraganglioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;
middle ear. In: Rosai J, Sobin LS, eds. Tumors of the 114:976–979.
Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear. Atlas of Tumor Pathol- 223. Erickson LS, Sorenson GD, McGavran MH. A review of
ogy, Fascicle 25, 2nd Series. Washington, DC: Armed 140 acoustic neurinomas (neurilemmoma). Laryngoscope
Forces Institute of Pathology, 2001:383–450. 1965; 75:601–627.
202. Wenig BM. Immunohistochemistry of middle ear neo- 224. Kasantikul V, Netsky MG, Glassock ME III, et al. Acoustic
plasms. In: Wenig BM, ed. Atlas of head and neck neurilemmoma. Clinicoanatomical study of 103 patients.
pathology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier, J Neurosurg 1980; 52:28–35.
2008:812. 225. Martuza RL, Ojemann RG. Bilateral acoustic neuromas:
203. Torske KR, Thompson LD. Adenoma versus carcinoid clinical aspects, pathogenesis and treatment. Neurosur-
tumor of the middle ear: a study of 48 cases and review of gery 1982; 10:1–12.
the literature. Mod Pathol 2002; 15:543–555. 226. Anand T, Byrnes DP, Walby AP, et al. Bilateral acoustic
204. Stanley MW, Horwitz CA, Levinson RM, et al. Carcinoid neuromas. Clin Otolaryngol 1993; 18:365–371.
tumors of the middle ear. Am J Clin Pathol 1987; 87: 227. Moffat DA, Irving RM. The molecular genetics of vestib-
592–600. ular schwannomas. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109:381–384.
205. Latif MA, Madders DJ, Shaw PA. Carcinoid tumour of 228. Kishore A, O’Reilly BF. A clinical study of vestibular
the middle ear associated with systemic symptoms. schwannomas in type 2 neurofibromatosis. Clin Otolar-
J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:480–486. yngol 2000; 25:561–565.
206. Manni J, Faverly DR, van Haelst UJ. Primary carcinoid 229. Thompson LD, Bouffard JP, Sandberg GD, et al. Primary
tumor of the middle ear: report of four cases and a review ear and temporal bone meningiomas: a clinicopathologic
of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; study of 36 cases with a review of the literature. Mod
118:1341–1347. Pathol 2003; 16:236–245.
Chapter 9: Diseases of the External Ear, Middle Ear, and Temporal Bone 473
230. Simon M, Boström JP, Hartman C. Molecular genetics of 254. Boonen SE, Stahl D, Kreiborg S, et al. Delineation of an
meningiomas: from basic research to potential clinical interstitial 9q22 deletion in basal cell nevus syndrome.
applications. Neurosurgery 2007; 60:787–798. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 132A:324–328.
231. Rietz DR, Ford CN, Kurtycz DF, et al. Significance of 255. Midro AT, Panasiuk B, Tumer Z, et al. Interstitial deletion
apparent intratympanic meningiomas. Laryngoscope 9q22.32-q33.2 associated with additional familial
1983; 93:1397–1404. translocation t(9;17)(q34.11;p11.2) in a patient with
232. Wenig BM. Schneiderian papillomas of the middle ear. Gorlin-Goltz syndrome and features of Nail-Patella
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105:226–233. syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 124:179–191.
233. Andrade JM, Gehris CW Jr, Breitnecker R. Cavernous 256. Ting PT, Kaspar R, Arlette JP. Metastatic basal cell carci-
haemangioma of the tympanic membrane. A case report. noma: report of two cases and literature review. J Cutan
Am J Otol 1993; 4:198–199. Med Surg 2005; 9:10–15.
234. Jackson CG, Levine SC, McKennan KX. Hemangioma of 257. Martin RC 2nd, Edwards MJ, Cawte TG, et al. Basosqu-
the middle ear. Am J Otol 1987; 8:131–132. amous carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors influenc-
235. Eby TL, Fisch U, Malek MS. Facial nerve management ing recurrence. Cancer 2000; 88:1365–1369.
in temporal bone hemangiomas. Am J Otol 1992; 13: 258. Lehnerdt G, Manz D, Jahnke K, et al. Cutaneous basosqu-
223–232. amous cell carcinoma. HNO 2008; 56:306–311.
236. Olson JE, Glassock ME III, Britton BH. Lipomas of the 259. Bowman PH, Ratz JL, Knoepp TG, et al. Basosquamous
internal auditory canal. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104:431–436. carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29:830–832.
237. Huang TS. Primary intravestibular lipoma. Ann Otol 260. Byers R, Kesler K, Redmon B, et al. Squamous carcinoma
Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98:393–395. of the external ear. Am J Surg 1983; 146:447–450.
238. Ishikawa T, Saito H, Takahashi K. Osteoma of the mas- 261. Conley J, Schuller DE. Malignacies of the ear. Laryngo-
toid. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 217:93–97. scope 1976; 86:1147–1163.
239. Denia A, Perez F, Canalis RR, et al. Extracanalicular 262. Johns ME, Headington JT. Squamous cell carcinoma of the
osteomas of the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; external auditory canal. A clinicopathologic study of
105:706–709. 20 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1974; 100:45–49.
240. Marlowe FI, Dave U, Wolfson RJ. Giant osteoma of the 263. Yin M, Ishikawa K, Honda K. Analysis of 95 cases of
mastoid. Am J Otolaryngol 1980; 1:191–193. squamous cell carcinoma of the external and middle ear.
241. Potter C, Conner GH, Sharkey FE. Benign osteoblastoma Auris Nasus Larynx 2006; 33:251–257.
of the temporal bone. Am J Otol 1983; 4:318–322. 264. Olsen KD, DeSanto LW, Forbes GS. Radiographic assess-
242. Bertoni F, Unni KK, Beabout JW, et al. Chondroblastoma ment of squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone.
of the skull and facial bones. Am J Clin Pathol 1987; 88: Laryngoscope 1983; 93:1162–1167.
1–9. 265. Arriaga M, Curtin HD, Takahashi H, et al. The role of
243. Silverstein H, Griffin WL Jr., Balough K Jr. Teratoma of preoperative CT scans in staging external auditory mea-
the middle ear and mastoid process. A case with aberrant tus carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation study.
innervation of the facial musculature. Arch Otolaryngol Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 105:6–11.
1967; 85:243–248. 266. Ogawa K, Nakamura K, Hatano K, et al. Treatment and
244. Megerian CA, McKenna MJ, Nuss RC, et al. Endolym- prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the external
phatic sac tumors: histopathologic confirmation, clinical auditory canal and middle ear: a multi-institutional retro-
characterization, and implication in von Hippel-Lindau spective review of 87 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
disease. Laryngoscope 1995; 105:801–808. Phys 2007; 68:1326–1334.
245. Manski TJ, Heffner DK, Glenn GM, et al. Endolymphatic 267. Arriaga M, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, et al. Squamous cell
sac tumors: the basis of morbid hearing loss in von carcinoma of the external auditory meatus (canal). Otolar-
Hippel-Lindau disease. JAMA 1997; 277:1461–1466. yngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 101:330–337.
246. Wenig BM, Heffner DK. Endolymphatic sac tumors: fact 268. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL. Prognostic factors for local
or fiction? Adv Anat Pathol 1996; 3:378–387. recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous
247. Batsakis JG, El-Naggar AK. Papillary neoplasms cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. J Am Acad
(Heffner’s tumors) of the endolymphatic sac. Ann Otol Dermatol 1992; 26:976–990.
Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:648–651. 269. Nakagawa T, Kumamoto Y, Natori Y, et al. Squamous cell
248. Heffner DK. Low-grade adenocarcinoma of probable carcinoma of the external auditory canal and middle ear: an
endolymphatic sac origin. A clinicopathologic study of operation combined with preoperative chemoradiotherapy
20 cases. Cancer 1989; 64:2292–2302. and a free surgical margin. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27:242–248.
249. Sgambati MT, Stolle C, Choyke PL, et al. Mosaicism in 270. Choi JY, Choi EC, Lee HK, et al. Mode of parotid
von Hippel-Lindau disease: lessons from kindreds with involvement in external auditory canal carcinoma. J
germline mutations identified in offspring with mosaic Laryngol Otol 2003; 117:951–954.
parents. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66:84–91. 271. Shockley WW, Stucker FJ Jr. Squamous cell carcinoma of
250. Vandeweyer E, Thill MP, Deraemaecker R. Basal cell the external ear: a review of 75 cases. Otolaryngol Head
carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Acta Chir Belg Neck Surg 1987; 97:308–312.
2002; 102:137–140. 272. Thomas SS, Matthews RN. Squamous cell carcinoma of
251. Ahmad I, Das Gupta AR. Epidemiology of basal cell the pinna: a 6-year study. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47:81–85.
carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the pinna. 273. Lee D, Nash M, Har-El G. Regional spread of auricular
J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115:85–86. and periauricular cutaneous malignancies. Laryngoscope
252. Unden AB, Holmberg C, Lund-Rozell B, et al. Mutations 1996; 106:998–1001.
in the human homologue of drosphilia patched (PTCH) in 274. Arriaga M, Curtin H, Takahashi H, et al. Staging proposal
basal cell carcinoma and the Gorlin syndrome: different in for external auditory meatus carcinoma based on preop-
vivo mechanisms of PTCH inactivation. Cancer Res 1996; erative clinical examination and computed tomographic
56:4562–4565. findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99:714–721.
253. Manfredi M, Vescovi P, Bonanini M. Nevoid basal cell 275. Moody SA, Hirsch BE, Myers EN. Squamous cell carcinoma
carcinoma syndrome: a review of the literature. Int J Oral of the external auditory canal: an evaluation of a staging
Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33:117–124. system. Am J Otol 2000; 21:582–588.
474 Wenig
276. Hicks GW. Tumors arising from the glandular structures of fibroxanthoma and undifferentiated high grade pleomor-
the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1983; 93:326–340. phic sarcoma. Anticancer Res 2004; 24:19–26.
277. Perzin KH, Gullane P, Conley J. Adenoid cystic carcinoma 292. Sakamoto A, Oda Y, Itakura E, et al. H-, K-, and N-ras
involving the external auditory canal. A clinicopathologi- gene mutation in atypical fibroxanthoma and malignant
cal study of 16 cases. Cancer 1982; 50:2873–2883. fibrous histiocytoma. Hum Pathol 2001; 32:1225–1231.
278. Weiss SW, Goldblum JR. Malignant fibrohistiocytoma 293. Kenyon GS, Marks PV, Scholtz CL, et al. Squamous cell
(pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma) In: Weiss SW, carcinoma of the middle ear. A 25-year retrospective
Goldblum JR, eds. Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94:273–277.
Tumors. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2008: 294. Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L. Squamous cell carci-
403–427. noma of the middle ear. In: Hartmann WH, Sobin LH, eds.
279. Dei Tos AP, Maestro R, Doglioni C, et al. Ultraviolet Tumors of the Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear. Atlas of
induced p53 mutations in atypical fibroxanthoma. Am J Tumor Pathology, Fascicle 25, 2nd Series. Washington, DC:
Pathol 1994; 145:11–17. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1986:326–327.
280. Calonje E, Wadden C, Wilson-Jones E, et al. Spindle-cell 295. Tsai ST, Li C, Jun YT, et al. High prevalence of human
non-pleomorphic atypical fibroxanthoma: analysis of a papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in middle ear carcinomas.
series and delineation of a distinctive variant. Histopathol Int J Cancer 1997; 71:208–212.
1993; 22:247–254. 296. Moore MG, Deschler DG, McKenna MJ, et al. Manage-
281. Bruecks AK, Medlicott SA, Trotter MJ. Atypical fibrox- ment outcomes following lateral temporal bone resection
anthoma with prominent sclerosis. J Cutan Pathol 2003; for ear and temporal bone malignancies. Otolaryngol
30:336–339. Head Neck Surg 2007; 137:893–898.
282. Crowson AN, Carlson-Sweet K, Macinnis C, et al. Clear 297. Pemberton LS, Swindell R, Sykes AJ. Primary radical
cell atypical fibroxanthoma: a clinicopathologic study. radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle
J Cutan Pathol 2002; 29:374–381. ear and external auditory canal—a historical series. Clin
283. Orosz Z, Kelemen J, Szentirmay Z. Granular cell variant of Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18:390–394.
atypical fibroxanthoma. Pathol Oncol Res 1996; 2:244–247. 298. Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L. Adenocarcinoma of
284. Orlandi A, Bianchi L, Ferlosio A, et al. The origin the middle ear. In: Hartmann, WH, Sobin LH, eds.
of osteoclast-like giant cells in atypical fibroxanthoma. Tumors of the Upper Respiratory Tract and Ear.
Histopathology 2003; 42:407–410. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Fascicle 25, 2nd Series.
285. Diaz-Cascajo C, Weyers W, Borghi S. Pigmented atypical Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,
fibroxanthoma: a tumor that may be easily mistaken for 1986:320–323.
malignant melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol 2003; 25:1–5. 299. Nora FE, Unni KK, Pritchard DJ. Osteosarcoma of extra-
286. Ma CK, Zarbo RJ, Gown AM. Immunohistochemical gnathic craniofacial bones. Mayo Clin Proc 1983; 58:268–272.
characterization of atypical fibroxanthoma and dermato- 300. Huvos AG, Sandaresan N, Bretsky SS. Osteogenic sarcoma
fibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 97: of the skull. A clinicopathologic study of 19 patients. Cancer
478–483. 1985; 56:1214–1221.
287. Longacre TA, Smoller BR, Rouse RV. Atypical fibroxan- 301. Caron AS, Hajdu SI, Strong EW. Osteogenic sarcoma of
thoma. Multiple immunohistologic profiles. Am J Surg the facial and cranial bones. A review of forty-three cases.
Pathol 1993; 17:1199–1209. Am J Surg 1971; 122:719–725.
288. Monteagudo C, Calduch L, Navarro S, et al. CD99 immu- 302. Coltera MC, Googe PB, Harrist TJ, et al. Chondrosarcoma
noreactivity in atypical fibroxanthoma: a common feature of the temporal bone. Diagnosis and treatment in 13 cases
of diagnostic value. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117:126–131. and review of the literature. Cancer 1986; 58:2689–2696.
289. Smith-Zagone MJ, Prieto VG, Hayes RA, et al. HMB-45 303. Schuknecht HF. Neoplastic growths. In: Schuknecht HF,
(gp103) and MART-1 expression within giant cells in an ed. Pathology of the Ear. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger,
atypical fibroxanthoma: a case report. J Cutan Pathol 1993:447–498.
2004; 31:284–286. 304. Davis GL. Secondary tumours. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
290. Barr RJ, Wueker RB, Graham JH. Ultrastructure of atypi- Reichart P, et al, eds. World Health Organization Classifi-
cal fibroxanthoma. Cancer 1977; 40:736–743. cation of Tumours. Pathology & Genetics Head and Neck
291. Mihic-Probst D, Zhao J, Saremaslani P, et al. CGH analy- Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:360.
sis shows genetic similarities a and differences in atypical
10
Figure 1 (A) Parotid gland showing purely serous acinar cells and conspicuous striated ducts. (B) Submandibular gland showing serous
acinar cells forming demilunes over the mucous acinar cells. (C) Dendritic myoepithelial cells. Cytokeratin 14 stain. (D) Sebaceous gland
in parotid gland.
on the periphery of the mucous cells. The intercalated the tongue especially can be deeply located in the
ducts are shorter and the striated ducts more conspic- underlying muscle.
uous than those of the parotid gland. Sebaceous cells
are seen much less frequently in this gland (*5%)
(15). The sublingual gland is predominantly mucous II. NONNEOPLASTIC DISORDERS
in type. The mucous acini form elongated tubules
with peripheral seromucous demilunes. Sebaceous A. Developmental Defects
glands are only occasionally seen (*4%) (15). Aplasia, Hypoplasia, Atresia
Minor salivary glands are most numerous at the
junction of the hard and soft palate, lips, buccal Congenital aplasia of salivary glands, particularly the
mucosa, tongue, floor of the mouth, and retromolar parotid gland, is very rare (1). It may be associated
pad. They are present on the lateral aspects of the with other developmental abnormalities of the head
tongue, particularly in relation to the foliate papillae. and neck, especially those involving the first branchial
In addition, minor glands are present in the ventral arch. These include the lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital
surface (glands of Blandin and Nuhn). These are (LADD) syndrome and aplasia of the lacrimal and
typically located toward the midline and extend salivary glands (ALSG), both of which appear to be
from the insertion of the tongue into the floor of the caused by FGF10 mutations (2). An association
mouth to the tip. Glands in the lips and buccal mucosa between salivary gland aplasia and ectodermal dyspla-
are seromucous, whereas those in the ventral tongue, sia has also been described (3). Aplasia may be unilat-
palate, glossopharyngeal area, and retromolar pad are eral or bilateral and can cause severe xerostomia,
predominantly mucous. Minor glands opening into candidosis, and accelerated dental caries. Hypoplasia
the groove surrounding the circumvallate papillae of one or more glands may be less uncommon than
(von Ebner’s glands) are purely serous in type. previously considered, as cases are usually asymptom-
The minor glands are not encapsulated, and those in atic and are sometimes detected fortuitously in
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 477
with a mean of about 17 years (32). There is a female predominantly mucous salivary tissue that is usually
predominance of approximately 2:1. In addition, there is in continuity with the adjacent sublingual gland.
a striking left-sided prevalence. The most common Heterotopic salivary gland tissue elsewhere in the
presenting features are unilateral conductive hearing jaws, particularly within marrow spaces, has rarely
loss, otorrhea, and tinnitus. There is frequent ossicular been reported. In a study of 5034 marrow samples,
deformity or absence, mainly affecting the incus and 13 cases (0.3%) contained heterotopic salivary tissue (3).
stapes, and abnormalities in the horizontal portion of An additional four cases were found in the condyle.
the facial nerve, which may show dehiscence. Less Sampling limitations in such a study mean that the true
common associated abnormalities include absence of frequency of intraosseous heterotopic salivary tissue is
the oval window, cholesteatomas (36), and malforma- likely to be much higher. Although uncommon and
tions of the external ear (36,37). typically symptomless, intrabony heterotopic salivary
Macroscopically, the lesion forms a smooth or tissue may be the source of primary intraosseous
bosselated, gray-to-yellow mass (1). It usually lies (central) salivary gland tumors (3). [See the section
against, or close to, the facial nerve, which can make ‘‘Intraosseous (Central) Tumors.’’]
surgical excision challenging. Microscopically, it is
composed of mixed mucous and serous acini and Polycystic (Dysgenetic) Disease
adipose tissue and variably present excretory ducts.
The tissue is usually covered by normal respiratory This is a very rare condition of developmental origin
type mucosa. Even incomplete excision is not associ- characterized by the formation of multiple cysts, usu-
ated with recurrence (31). Rare pleomorphic adeno- ally in one or both parotid glands (1–4). A single case
mas reported in the middle ear may have arisen from has been reported bilaterally in the submandibular
this tissue (38,39). glands (5). Most patients (90%) are female, and there
The pathogenesis of middle ear salivary chori- are two case reports of a familial association (1,4),
stoma has been linked with anomalous development suggesting an autosomal dominant mode of transmis-
of the first and second branchial arches before the sion. Symptoms typically begin in childhood and
fourth month of intrauterine development (40–43). include recurrent, painless parotid gland swellings
Primordial salivary tissue becomes enclosed within at mealtimes. There is no associated clinical abnormal-
the temporal bone and then grows within the middle ity of salivation.
ear until somatic growth ceases (37). Microscopy shows preservation of the lobular
Intraosseous heterotopic salivary gland tissue. Sali- architecture, but the salivary parenchyma is extensive-
vary gland tissue is occasionally present within the ly replaced by a honeycomb of cysts of varying sizes.
mandible, and more rarely, the maxilla. The most These appear to be derived from the intercalated
common location is in the medial aspect of the man- ducts. Between the cysts, there is residual parenchy-
dible, anterior to the angle and below the mylohyoid ma, excretory ducts, and interlobular septa. The cysts
line. An extension of the submandibular gland are lined mainly by cytologically bland cuboidal or
becomes partially incarcerated in a bony invagination. more flattened cells. Some lining cells may be onco-
Less commonly, the defect contains only fat and cytic or vacuolated, and there may be luminal apo-
fibrous tissue. This is symptomless and is usually crine blebbing. Foci of mural thickening can give a
detected fortuitously during radiographic investiga- pseudopapillary appearance. Some cysts show nar-
tions and a radiographic frequency of 0.48% has been rowing, producing an hourglass shape (Fig. 4). Incom-
reported (44). It appears as a sharply demarcated, plete septa extending into the cystic lumina are
cyst-like, radiolucent area with a corticated periphery another characteristic appearance (Fig. 5). The cyst
and is known as a Stafne or static bone cavity (45–48). lining may fuse with striated ducts or distended
These defects are seen much more frequently in men acini. The cysts may contain amorphous eosinophilic
(over 80%) and are typically discovered in the fifth and material or concentrically laminated spheroliths.
sixth decades. The pathogenesis of these lingual man- There is usually no inflammatory component.
dibular bone defects is uncertain. It has been suggested The microscopic differential diagnosis includes
that part of the submandibular gland becomes sclerosing polycystic adenosis, cystadenoma, and cys-
entrapped within the mandible during development tadenocarcinoma. The generalized nature of polycys-
(49). However, this does not explain the age distribu- tic (dysgenetic) disease, the clinical history, and
tion of the patients. An alternative theory is that a lobe characteristic microscopic features mean that making
of the submandibular gland becomes hyperplastic and a definitive diagnosis is unlikely to be problematic.
produces pressure atrophy of the adjacent mandible The condition is benign, and treatment need only
(50). Analogous defects are seen much less frequently be used for cosmetic reasons.
in the lingual aspect of the anterior mandible (51,52).
These also typically manifest in middle life with an
unexplained 80% male predominance. They mostly Cystic Fibrosis (Mucoviscidosis)
present as unilateral radiolucent areas below or cover- Cystic fibrosis is a life-threatening disease that is
ing the roots of the canine or premolar teeth and can inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. It involves
mimic a radicular cyst (53). A small number form most exocrine, mucous-secreting glands including the
midline radiolucencies associated with the incisor salivary glands. There is secretion of abnormally viscid
teeth. There is a bony depression containing mucus that produces duct obstruction and consequent
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 479
Figure 4 Polycystic (dysgenetic) disease showing parotid Figure 6 Mucoviscidosis. Minor salivary gland biopsy shows
tissue extensively replaced by multiple cysts, some of which ductal dilatation, eosinophilic plugs, and acinar atrophy.
show central constrictions (hourglass shape). In addition there
are concentrically laminated spheroliths.
Sebaceous Glands
Sebaceous differentiation is common in normal major
parenchymal atrophy. The submandibular, sublin- salivary glands, with an incidence of 10% to 42% in
gual, and minor salivary glands may be involved, parotid glands, 5% to 6.4% in submandibular glands,
but the purely serous parotid gland is rarely, if ever, and 4.2% of sublingual glands (1–3). The higher inci-
affected (1). The sublingual gland is the most severely dence of sebaceous elements in the parotid gland has
affected, but most histologic studies have been under- been related to its origin from ectoderm compared
taken on minor labial glands where the changes are with the probable endodermal origin of the subman-
extremely variable and many glands appear normal dibular and sublingual glands (1). The frequency of
(2–4). There is occlusion of the dilated ducts and sebaceous foci varies with age with bimodal peaks
glandular acini by inspissated, eosinophilic material, between the ages of 10 and 20 years and individuals
which may be concentrically laminated (Fig. 6). Some over 70 years of age (2,4,5). There is no sex predilec-
of the ducts, especially in the sublingual gland, contain tion. Sebaceous cells may appear as isolated cells in
microliths consisting of mucoprotein and calcium the walls of intercalated or striated ducts or form
complexes. There is chronic inflammation and inter- recognizable sebaceous glands that are connected to
stitial fibrosis, together with acinar atrophy. Despite these intralobular ducts (Fig. 7). Cells at the periphery
the sometimes striking histologic changes in these of the gland are flattened and have round or oval
glands, oral symptoms are uncommon and mild. nuclei, and central cells have abundant, vacuolated
cytoplasm, rich in lipids, and irregular or pyknotic
nuclei (1). The holocrine secretion eventually
graft-versus-host disease (7,8). In clinical practice, Microscopically, they usually have a patchily inflamed,
these lesions are not uncommon. Because they form thick, fibrous wall lined by stratified squamous,
subepithelial blisters, they are sometimes confused columnar, or cuboidal epithelium (Fig. 12). There
with mucocutaneous vesiculating disorders, especial- may be focal mucous or oncocytic metaplasia. Occa-
ly mucous membrane pemphigoid and bullous lichen sionally, there is partial calcification of the cyst con-
planus, both clinically and microscopically. tents, and granulomatous inflammation may be
present in the cyst wall and adjacent gland. Complete
surgical excision is curative.
Salivary Duct Cyst
Salivary duct cysts (sialocysts) are a rare type of reten- Lymphoepithelial Cyst
tion cyst seen in the major salivary glands, particularly
the parotid (9). They may be associated with an obvi- Lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs) are uncommon, and
ous duct obstruction, and occasionally, the cyst itself most arise in the parotid gland although microscopi-
leads to obstructive symptoms. There is no sex predi- cally similar lesions have been described in the ante-
lection, and most patients are in their fourth decade or rior floor of the mouth (10,11).
older. The cyst usually presents as a unilocular, pain- The proposed origin of these cysts from the
less swelling that rarely exceeds 3 cm in diameter. branchial arch system (12) has been disputed and an
Figure 11 Superficial mucocele. There is a subepithelial blister Figure 12 Salivary duct cyst. Low-power view showing a thick,
with overlying attenuated epithelium. The duct of a minor salivary fibrous-walled cyst lined by a double-layered columnar
gland is visible under the floor of the blister. epithelium.
482 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 13 Lymphoepithelial cyst lined by irregular stratified Figure 14 Obstructive sialadenitis with acinar atrophy, interstial
squamous epithelium with a dense lymphoid infiltrate in the fibrosis and extensive fatty infiltration.
cyst wall.
origin from Neisse Nicholson rests appears to be more cells are characterized by abundant granular and
likely (13,14). They resemble salivary duct cysts in brightly eosinophilic cytoplasm, which contains
clinical presentation, and the average age of patients is increased numbers of mitochondria. The nuclei are
45 years. Microscopy shows an epithelial-lined cyst typically round and centrally placed, and the nucleoli
with dense lymphoid aggregates containing promi- are usually single and conspicuous. The cells are
nent germinal centers in the cyst wall (Fig. 13). The generally cuboidal or polygonal, and there is a low
epithelial lining is usually stratified squamous, but nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. In contrast to this type of
there may be focal areas of cuboidal or respiratory- ‘‘light’’ form of oncocytic cell, some oncocytes have
type epithelium, and both mucous and sebaceous more intensely staining, eosinophilic cytoplasm and
metaplasia have been reported (15,16). densely basophilic, shrunken nuclei. These are termed
‘‘dark’’ cells, or pyknocytes; they are probably a
degenerative form of the light cell. Oncocytic cyto-
C. Infiltrations plasmic granules stain positively with phosphotungs-
Lipomatosis tic acid hematoxylin after 48 hours incubation. The
mitochondrial nature of the granules has been con-
Fat is a normal but highly variable component of the firmed by staining with antimitochondrial antibodies
parotid gland and, to a much lesser extent, the sub- (2) and electron microscopy (3). It has been speculated
mandibular, sublingual, and minor salivary glands. that oncocytosis and oncocytic neoplasia are the result
The fat content appears to increase with age, in obese of progressively acquired mitochondriopathies due to
individuals and those with diabetes. The fat is distrib- mtDNA errors (4).
uted interstially and separates the salivary parenchyma. Focal and diffuse oncocytosis. Focal oncocytosis of
There may be fatty infiltration and replacement of ducts, and less commonly acini, is common in both
atrophic parenchyma for any cause, but this is most major and minor salivary glands with increasing age
commonly seen in chronic obstructive sialadenitis (Fig. 15A). It is rare in patients younger than 50 years,
(Fig. 14). Increased fat deposition has also been common in patients between 50 and 70 years and
reported in Sjögren’s syndrome using in vivo techni- virtually always present in older individuals (5,6).
ques (1). Occasionally, almost the whole of the parotid Diffuse oncocytosis of the parotid gland, however, is
or submandibular gland is replaced by fat (lipomatous rare and may be bilateral (Fig. 15B) (7–10). The entire
salivary atrophy). Seifert (2) described a case of lipo- gland, including both ducts and acini, can be
matous parotid atrophy in a child with lipomatous involved. There are both light and dark oncocytic
pancreatic atrophy and speculated on an association cells. This condition affects elderly patients and
with coxsackie B virus. Some cases in infants have may be associated with fatty infiltration and acinar
been rapidly progressive (3). A case of salivary lip- atrophy (11).
omatosis has also been reported in a minor gland (4). Ductal oncocytosis. There may be extensive ductal
oncocytosis with associated dilatation in minor
glands, particularly in the larynx (Fig. 15C) (see Chap-
Oncocytic Lesions
ter 3). This is less common in the oral cavity, where the
Introduction. The term ‘‘oncocyte,’’ which is floor of the mouth is the usual location. It usually
derived from the Greek word oukoustai meaning ‘‘to presents clinically as a small, painless mass. Micros-
swell,’’ was first coined by Hamperl in 1931 (1). These copy shows unilocular or multilocular dilated ducts
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 483
Figure 15 (A) Focal oncocytosis. (B) Diffuse oncocytosis involving the entire parotid gland and showing characteristic light and dark
cells. (C) Ductal oncocytosis and hyperplasia in minor salivary gland. (D) Multifocal nodular oncocytic hyperplasia that gives an
erroneous impression of invasion of surrounding salivary parenchyma.
Amyloidosis
Amyloidosis of salivary glands appears to be rare, and
in some large series, no cases of clinical salivary
involvement were found (1,2). Localized amyloidosis
has been reported in the parotid (3), submandibular
(4) and sublingual glands (5). Both major and minor
salivary gland involvement can be seen in systemic
amyloidosis, which can be primary or secondary. In
primary amyloidosis, there is an immunocyte dyscra-
sia that results in excess production of abnormal light
chain immunoglobulin (AL-type amyloid). This over-
production is usually associated with multiple myeloma
or is idiopathic. Extensive amyloid deposition has been
reported in association with an extramedullary plasma-
cytoma within the parotid gland (6). Amyloidosis is
occasionally seen in patients presenting with primary
Sjögren syndrome (7,8). Secondary or reactive amyloid- Figure 18 Hemochromatosis in minor labial gland biopsy show-
osis (AA-type amyloid) is due to long-standing chronic ing granular, golden-brown hemosiderin deposition.
inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and
tuberculosis and can be associated with a variety of
carcinomas. Although there are few cases of clinical
salivary gland involvement in secondary amyloidosis,
deposits of amyloid have been detected in labial salivary Sjögren syndrome (1–3). It can also be a feature of
glands in the large majority of cases (9,10). thalassemia major, with or without secretory
Microscopy shows replacement of salivary impairment, usually in patients receiving multiple
parenchyma by homogeneous, eosinophilic material, transfusions (4–6). Histologic changes include acinar
patchy chronic inflammation, and sporadic multinu- atrophy, duct dilatation, interstitial fibrosis, and mild
cleated giant cells (Fig. 17). The amyloid shows orange chronic inflammation. Reddish-brown hemosiderin
staining with Congo and Sirius red stains, and there is deposits are seen in ducts and at the periphery of acinar
characteristic green/orange birefringence under cells (Fig. 18). They can be visualized more easily by
polarized light. In minor salivary glands, the amyloid using a Perl’s Prussian blue stain. Iron deposition in
deposition is predominantly periductal or periacinar, lower labial salivary gland biopsies has been used to
with less frequent perivascular or interstitial deposi- establish early diagnosis in neonatal hemochromatosis
tion (9). (7), allowing prompt medical intervention. In these
patients, the histologic features are more subtle, as the
Iron Deposition gland structure is relatively unchanged and the amount
of intracellular hemosiderin deposition may be
In hemochromatosis, iron can be deposited as hemo- minimal.
siderin in both major and minor salivary glands,
leading to a clinical presentation similar to primary
D. Sialadenitis
Acute Suppurative Sialadenitis
Acute suppurative sialadenitis most frequently involves
the parotid gland followed by the submandibular
gland. This may be explained because the serous
saliva produced by the parotid gland has less bacteri-
ostatic activity than that of the mucinous saliva of the
submandibular gland. The reduction of the secretory
flow and stasis of saliva, typically as a result of
dehydration, is an integral pathogenetic factor of
acute suppurative sialadenitis (1–5). Acute bacterial
submandibular infection often is associated with
obstruction of Wharton’s duct by stones or strictures.
Although acute suppurative parotitis can occur
in individuals of any age, patients aged from 50 to
70 years are the most frequently affected, with an equal
sex distribution. Parotid infections are occasionally
Figure 17 Amyloidosis of submandibular gland showing exten- observed in premature infants who have a greater
sive acinar destruction by globular hyaline deposits and patchy propensity for dehydration than term infants. Acute
chronic inflammation. suppurative sialadenitis accounts for 0.03% of hospital
admissions, with 30% to 40% of these occurring in
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 485
postoperative patients (5). Acute postoperative parotitis accumulation of bacteria and neutrophils. As the
is often observed in patients with debilitating disease or inflammatory process progresses, marked periductal
postoperative complications, particularly after major and interstitial neutrophilic infiltration with develop-
gastrointestinal surgery. Predisposing factors are dehy- ment of microabscesses leads to destruction of the
dration, malnutrition, oral neoplasms, liver cirrhosis, ductal epithelium with necrosis and loss of the
and diabetes mellitus (1–5). The use of drugs with an acinar tissue and eventually macroabscess and fistula
antisialogogue action, the most common being tricyclic formation.
antidepressants and diuretics, has been also associated
with acute suppurative sialadenitis. Obstructive Sialadenitis and Sialolithiasis
In acute suppurative sialadenitis, bacterial
organisms usually enter from the oral cavity in a Introduction. Obstructive sialadenitis is the
retrograde fashion. Staphylococcus aureus is the most most frequent type of chronic sialadenitis, accounting
common causative agent, and accounts for 50% to 90% for about 30% of all chronic sialadenitis cases and
of cases (1–5). Other aerobic organisms cultured approximately 1% of all salivary gland diseases (1,2).
from the disease include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Although sialolithiasis is by far the most common
Streptococcus pyogenes (b-hemolytic Streptococcus), cause of obstructive sialadenitis, there are two major
Streptococcus viridans, Hemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella factors playing a role in the pathogenesis of the
pneumonia, and Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeru- disease (2). One is a mechanical obstruction by sialo-
ginosa. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus liths, salivary gland cysts and tumors, and lesions of
(MRSA) has also been reported. More recently, anaer- the oral mucosa. The other factor is a disturbance of
obic organisms in acute salivary infections have been the electrolyte concentration of saliva, resulting in the
recognized, including Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, development of viscous secretory products. Most sia-
and Fusobacterium species. Acute suppurative parotitis loliths, also referred to as salivary calculi or stones, are
is usually a unilateral disease, but 10% to 25% of cases composed primarily of calcium phosphate together
have been bilateral involvement (3). The usual clinical with an organic matrix of various amino acids and
presentation is sudden onset of diffuse swelling of the carbohydrates (1,3,4). Sialoliths develop as a result of
affected gland associated with tenderness, induration, deposition of calcium salts around a nidus such as
erythema, and pain. Some patients complain of limited bacterial colonies, cellular debris, mucous plugs, or
movement of the mandible and difficulty in swal- foreign bodies. The precise cause of the development
lowing. Patients frequently have systemic signs of of sialoliths has not been fully elucidated, but infec-
toxemia, including delirium, high fever, and leukocy- tion or inflammation of the ducts as well as increased
tosis. Association with systemic sepsis is far more viscosity and stasis of saliva have been suggested as
common in infections of the parotid gland than in predisposing factors (3,4). Gout is associated with the
those of the submandibular gland. The respective formation of sialoliths, in which case, they are com-
intraoral duct orifice may become red and swollen posed of uric acid.
with purulent discharge recognized on massage of the Clinical features. The peak age of incidence of
gland. Fluctuation of the parotid gland does not occur sialolithiasis is between 30 and 60 years, with a mean
until late in the course of the disease because of the of about 45 years (1). Its occurrence in patients youn-
presence of multiple investing fascias enveloping the ger than 20 years, or older than 70 years, is rare. There
gland. The infection can extend locally by rupture of is a slight male preponderance. About 80% of cases of
the abscess into surrounding tissues, resulting in sialolithiasis develop in the submandibular gland,
osteomyelitis and fistula formation. The diagnosis of followed by less than 20% in the parotid gland.
acute suppurative sialadenitis is based on the clinical Involvement of the sublingual and minor salivary
presentation with culture of the purulent material glands is relatively rare (1). The upper lip and buccal
from the duct. Any abscess formation can be located mucosa are the most common minor salivary gland
using ultrasound or computerized tomography (CT) sites. The submandibular gland is more susceptible to
scanning. Sialograms are contraindicated in cases of sialolithiasis than the other salivary glands because its
acute suppurative infection of the salivary glands. saliva has higher mucin content, increased viscosity, a
Patients with acute suppurative sialadenitis may more alkaline pH, higher concentrations of calcium
eventually develop profound dehydration, sepsis, and phosphate, and antigravity flow within the duct
and multiorgan system failure. (5). In the majority of patients with sialolithiasis, only
Initial treatment of acute suppurative sialadeni- a single stone is found. Multiple stone formation
tis should be conservative, with eliminating the involving unilateral or bilateral glands is uncommon.
causes, improved oral hygiene, adequate hydration Sialoliths may be present both within the main ducts
to increase the salivary flow, repeated massage of the and within the gland parenchyma. In the submandib-
affected gland, and administration of appropriate ular gland, 57% of stones are localized near the hilum,
oral or intravenous systemic antibiotics, usually for a 34% in the distal area of the submandibular duct
penicillinase-resistant Staphylococcus. Irradiation of the (Wharton’s duct), and 9% in the intraglandular ducts
glands is no longer recommended. In cases involving (6). The formation of sialoliths in the main ducts
abscess formation, incision and drainage by surgical produces swelling of the distal salivary gland tissue
intervention are indicated. with or without pain. The episodes of the symptoms
Histologically, early acute suppurative sialade- are frequently recurrent and exacerbated by eating.
nitis is characterized by edema, hyperemia, and an There are distinct correlations between the severity of
486 Eveson and Nagao
Radiation Sialadenitis
Radiotherapy is the most commonly used modality
for treatment of the head and neck cancers (1). When
the major salivary glands are included within the
fields of radiotherapy, many patients develop swell-
ing and tenderness of the irradiated glands as well as
elevation of the serum amylase level within hours of
receiving even the first treatment in a course of
fractionated radiotherapy. These symptoms may be
transient, but a significant proportion of the patients
will suffer persistent salivary gland dysfunction,
resulting in xerostomia accompanied by a variety of
complications, such as dysphagia, abnormal taste
sensations, oral mucositis, dental caries, and peri-
odontal disease (2). These complaints may persist as
a long-term consequence of the radiation damage to
the salivary glands, even after cessation of radiotherapy.
In addition to the reduction in quantity, the composi-
Figure 23 Chronic sclerosing sialadenitis (Küttner tumor) of the tion of the secreted saliva also changes because of the
submandiular gland. Immunohistochemistry. Many IgG4-positive influence of radiotherapy. Saliva secreted from irradi-
plasma cells are seen within the lesion. ated salivary glands has a lower pH, lower protein
and secretory antibody contents, higher salinity,
and increased numbers of cariogenic microorganisms
(3). The severity of salivary gland damage and dys-
function depends on the dose and the duration of
Kimura’s disease, malignant lymphoma including irradiation.
extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MALT The important pathogenetic factor of radiation
lymphoma), sclerosing variant of follicular lymphoma, sialadenitis is the direct irradiation effect on the sali-
and inflammatory pseudotumor (inflammatory myofi- vary gland tissue rather than the result of radiation-
broblastic tumor) (2). induced changes in the vasculature (4). Serous acinar
Obstructive sialadenitis due to primary sialoli- tissue of the parotid gland is considerably more
thiasis exhibits more prominent ductal ectasia and less radiosensitive than mucous glandular tissue of
evident lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis than chronic the submandibular gland (5). The radiosensitivity of
sclerosing sialadenitis. Lymphoepithelial islands the acinar cells depends on the content of secretory
(‘‘epimyoepithelial islands’’) characteristic of LESA granules, which contain a large amount of heavy
(benign lymphoepithelial lesion) are scarce or absent metals limited by the membrane (6). Released
in chronic sclerosing sialadenitis. In addition, chronic heavy metals as a result of the irradiation may cause
sclerosing sialadenitis is typically much more fibrous membrane lipid peroxidation by means of a redox
than LESA. Furthermore, obstructive sialadenitis and system, thus enhancing the process of apoptotic cellu-
LESA lack the feature of abundant IgG4-positive lar death (6).
plasma cells seen in chronic sclerosing sialadenitis. Generally, the acute alterations progress to a
Eosinophilic infiltration can be present in chronic chronic stage, with depletion of acinar structures, and
sclerosing sialadenitis, but it is much less common resulting interlobular and periductal fibrosis and chron-
than in Kimura’s disease. ic inflammatory cellular infiltrate. It has been suggested
Chronic sclerosing sialadenitis is distinguished that the histologic changes in the irradiated salivary
from extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma glands can be divided into three stages according to the
(MALT lymphoma) by the absence of true lymphoe- degree of severity of the inflammatory process and the
pithelial lesions permeated by monocytoid B cells destruction of gland structure (7). These correlate close-
and the polytypic nature of lymphocytes proved by ly with the clinical symptoms and the outcome of late
means of immunohistochemistry and polymerase radiation-induced sequelae (7).
chain reaction (16). Follicular lymphoma can also Stage I is characterized by marked swelling and
histologically mimic chronic sclerosing sialadenitis, vacuolization of the serous glandular acinar cells with
especially its sclerosing variant. Unlike chronic sclerosing a reduction of secretory granules. However, mucous
sialadenitis, however, follicular lymphoma contains a glands may manifest few histologic changes. There is
monoclonal tumor population with CD10-positive also moderate atrophy of isolated glandular acini
and bcl-6-positive immunophenotypes (17). with a scant lymphocytic infiltration and moderate
Both chronic sclerosing sialadenitis and inflam- fibrosis. Stage I corresponds to an acute response to
matory pseudotumor possess extensive fibrosis with relatively low-level irradiation that lasts only several
chronic inflammatory cell infiltration. However, days.
inflammatory pseudotumor forms a discrete mass In Stage II, significant atrophy of the glandular
with proliferation of myofibroblastic cells and lacks acini is accompanied by ectasia of the excretory ducts
a lobulated architecture. filled with secretion. Goblet cell and squamous cell
490 Eveson and Nagao
metaplasia may be seen focally in the ductal epitheli- or mucoepidermoid carcinoma. These histologic fea-
um. Moderate periductal fibrosis and significant tures are observed most frequently after more than
lymphocytic infiltration are usually also present. Inter- three months of irradiation and after high irradiation
stitial lipomatosis may develop in some areas. Stage II doses. The resultant changes are completely irrevers-
corresponds to changes observed after higher irradia- ible and are associated with permanent damage and
tion doses in experimental studies. The resultant impaired glandular secretory function.
changes are no longer completely reversible and On immunohistochemistry, a loss of amylase reac-
cause functional loss of the glandular tissue. tion and an increasing expression of lysozyme, lacto-
Stage III is characterized by marked parenchy- ferrin, and secretory component may be observed in the
mal loss with destruction of the lobular structure, salivary ducts (7). The great majority of periacinar
extensive lymphocytic infiltration, interstitial fibrosis, lymphocytic infiltrates are CD8-positive cytotoxic
and ductal ectasia with intraluminal accumulation of T cells associated with acinar cell destruction (8).
secretions (Fig. 24A). Metaplastic changes of the duc-
tal epithelium may be prominent, sometimes together Cheilitis Glandularis
with cellular atypia (Fig. 24B), and may potentially be
difficult to distinguish from squamous cell carcinoma Introduction. Cheilitis glandularis is a rare
inflammatory disease affecting the minor salivary
glands of the lip that was first described by von
Volkman in 1870 (1). He described a suppurative
chronic inflammatory condition of the lower lip char-
acterized by mucopurulent discharge through the
ductal orifices of the labial minor salivary glands.
Cheilitis glandularis is a poorly understood enti-
ty, and its etiology is still unknown, but various
predisposing factors have been suggested, including
genetic predisposition (autosomal dominant pattern
of inheritance), chronic exposure to sunlight and
wind, smoking, poor oral hygiene, mouth breathing,
trauma (habitual lip licking), and a compromised
immune system human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) infection (2–11).
Clinical features. The condition is seen most
frequently in adult men between the fourth and sev-
enth decades. However, a few cases have been
reported in women and children. It is most commonly
seen in the lower lip, although it has also been reported
in the upper lip and the palate. When the lesion
extends to the buccal mucosa, the term ‘‘suppurative
stomatitis glandularis’’ may be applied (12,13).
According to the clinical stages of progression of
the disease, cheilitis glandularis has historically been
subclassified into three types: simple, superficial
suppurative, and deep suppurative (8). Each subtype
represents part of a continuous spectrum of the
same disease category wherein, in the simple type,
the disease may progress from the superficial to the
deep suppurative types. The simple type is described
as multiple, painless, papular surface lesions with
central depressions and red or black puncta. The
lesions may extrude clear mucinous material upon
manipulation. The superficial suppurative type, also
referred to as Baelz’s disease, presents as multiple,
painless, indurated swellings of the lip with ulceration
and crust formation. Digital palpation of the lip will
Figure 24 Radiation sialadenitis of the submandibular gland.
produce clear-to-cloudy fluid from the ductal orifices.
(A) Marked parenchymal loss with destruction of the lobular The deep suppurative type, also called cheilitis glan-
structure, interstitial fibrosis, lymphocytic infiltration, and ductal dularis apostematosa, cheilitis glandularis suppura-
ectasia with intraluminal accumulation of secretions containing tive profunda, or myxadenitis labialis, demonstrates a
cell debris are evident. (B) Prominent squamous and goblet cell deep-seated infection accompanied by formation of
metaplasia of the ductal epithelium, together with cellular atypia. abscesses, sinus tracts and fistulae, and scarring,
Source: Courtesy of Dr. Jean E. Lewis, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, resulting in nodular enlargement of the lip. Viscous
Minnesota, U.S.A. secretion and mucopurulent material may spontane-
ously exude onto the mucosal surface.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 491
Cheilitis glandularis, especially its deep suppura- In an experimental study using a rat model, local
tive type, has been closely associated with the develop- anesthetic injections and ligation of the arteries
ment of squamous cell carcinoma. The incidence of induced histologic changes similar to those of necro-
malignant transformation of cheilitis glandularis has tizing sialometaplasia (8).
been reported to range from 18% to 35% (3). Clinical features. Necrotizing sialometaplasia is
Pathology. Incisional biopsy consisting of sur- a rare disorder, involving an estimated 0.3% of all
face epithelium and an adequate amount of minor biopsied lesions from the oral cavity (2). Most cases
salivary glands is often recommended to establish a occur in the intraoral minor salivary glands, especially
definitive diagnosis and to rule out other specific the palate (77.2% of the cases) (3). Other salivary gland
granulomatous diseases, actinic cheilitis, or carcinoma. sites include the minor glands of the lower lip, retro-
The histologic features of cheilitis glandularis have molar pad area, tongue and buccal mucosa (9.8%), and
been described as nonspecific inflammation of minor the major salivary glands (8.7%) (10), particularly the
salivary gland tissue with broad variations. The histo- parotid. Necrotizing sialometaplasia has also rarely
logic changes can include ductal ectasia or hyperplasia been reported in the extrasalivary seromucinous
with or without squamous metaplasia, atrophy or glands of the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, paranasal
distention of acini, periductal acute and chronic inflam- sinuses, larynx, and trachea (3). Similar lesions have
matory infiltration, and interstitial fibrosis. Suppura- been recognized in the skin, breast, and lung (11–13).
tion and sinus tracts may be present in cases that The average age of the patients with necrotizing
involve bacterial infection. Oncocytic metaplasia and sialometaplasia is 45.9 years, with a range of 1.5 to
mucous cell metaplasia of the duct epithelium may be 83 years (3). There is a male preponderance; the male-
observed and are sometimes prominent. Oncocytic to-female ratio being approximately 2:1 (3).
metaplasia with papillary projections can be confused The typical clinical presentation is that of a deep,
with oncocytic variant of papillary cystadenoma (11). crater-like ulcer of the palate that resembles a malig-
Other histologic findings include surface hyperkerato- nant process. These ulcerated lesions range from 0.7 to
sis, erosion, or ulceration. 5.0 cm, with an average size of 1.8 cm (3). Palatal
Treatment of cheilitis glandularis ranges from a lesions are usually unilateral, but bilateral synchro-
preventive approach to surgical intervention. Reduc- nous lesions and metachronous lesions can occur.
tion or elimination of predisposing factors is the first Some lesions of necrotizing sialometaplasia may pres-
step in management. Conservative treatment includes ent as a submucosal swelling, without ulceration of
the usage of topical or intralesional corticosteroids the overlying mucosa. Patients with necrotizing sialo-
combined with antibiotic therapy. Patients with the metaplasia often complain of pain (63% of patients) or
deep suppurative type of cheilitis glandularis should numbness (13%) (3). Erosion of the palatal bone may
be considered for surgical excision because of the high occur in both ulcerated and nonulcerated lesions.
risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma. Recur- The average duration of the symptoms is three
rence after surgery is rare. weeks with an upper range of up to six months.
Most cases of necrotizing sialometaplasia appear to
Necrotizing Sialometaplasia arise spontaneously, whereas others are associated
with a history of trauma, vomiting, radiation therapy,
Introduction. Necrotizing sialometaplasia is a surgery, inflammatory disease, and either benign or
benign, self-limiting, reactive inflammatory condition malignant neoplasms.
of the salivary glands. It was first reported as a The suggested evolution of the lesions of necro-
distinct clinicopathologic entity of the minor salivary tizing sialometaplasia includes five stages: infarction,
gland of the hard palate by Abrams et al. in 1973 (1). sequestration, ulceration, reparation, and eventual
Since the clinical and histopathologic features of nec- healing (14). The prognosis for necrotizing sialometa-
rotizing sialometaplasia often simulate those of malig- plasia is excellent and spontaneous complete healing
nancies, including squamous cell carcinoma and occurs within 3 to 12 weeks, with an average healing
mucoepidermoid carcinoma, the report of Abrams time of approximately five weeks, depending on the
et al. and subsequent reports have emphasized the size of the lesion and the presence or absence of bony
importance of its correct diagnosis (1–6). Familiarity perforation. No specific treatment is necessary, but
with this disease can avoid misdiagnosis and inappro- biopsy of the lesion may be required to establish a
priate treatment. Ischemia caused by the impairment correct diagnosis.
of the vasculature supplying the salivary gland tissue Pathology. The principal histologic features of
has been implicated as the most likely etiology for necrotizing sialometaplasia are described as follows:
necrotizing sialometaplasia by both clinical and exper- (i) lobular infarction or necrosis of salivary gland
imental evidence (7,8), but the predisposing cause is tissue, (ii) simultaneous squamous metaplasia of
unclear in many cases. The factors believed to lead to ducts and acini, (iii) bland-appearing nuclear mor-
ischemia include traumatic injury, administration of phology of squamous cells, (iv) prominent granulation
local anesthetics, smoking, alcohol consumption, radi- tissue and inflammatory components, and (v) mainte-
ation, infection, intubation, and surgical procedures nance of the general lobular architecture in spite
(3). Necrotizing sialometaplasia has also been of fairly extensive inflammatory and metaplastic
described in a patient with embolization from carotid changes, often involving more than one lobule (1)
endarterectomy, Buerger’s disease, or Raynaud phe- (Fig. 25). The last feature is most helpful in distin-
nomenon, supporting this pathogenic mechanism (9). guishing necrotizing sialometaplasia from a malignant
492 Eveson and Nagao
Table 1 Comparison of Clinicopathologic Features Between Necrotizing Sialometaplasia and Subacute Necrotizing Sialadenitis
Necrotizing sialometaplasia Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis
Clinical features:
- No. of cases Approximately 200 31
- Age range (yr) 1.5–83 (mean, 45.9) 15–70 (mean, 26.7)
- Gender (M:F) 3:1 3:1
- Site Palate: 142 Palate: 24
Other locations: 58 Other locations: 7
- Lesion size, cm 0.7–5.0 0.3–2.5
- Symptoms 67 of 200 cases had pain Painful
- Appearance Usually ulcerated Nonulcerated
- Duration 4 days–3 mo (mean, 21 days) 1 day–1 wk
- Healing time /recurrence Healing usually after excisional biopsy/none 3 wk/none
Pathologic features:
- Surface ulcer Deep ulcer Absent
- Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia Usually present Absent
- Necrosis/pattern All stages/usually lobular Early and moderate/focally acinar
- Ductal squamous metaplasia Always present Mild or absent
- Atrophy of ducts Severe Mild
- Inflammatory cells Chronic Mixed/subacute
- Eosinophils Usually absent Conspicuous
Source: From section ‘‘Necrotizing Sialometaplasia’’ Refs. 3 and 18.
self-limiting inflammatory condition characterized by there was an association with upper respiratory tract
a diffuse inflammatory infiltrate and acinar necrosis infection, with a peak incidence in the fall and winter
similar to necrotizing sialometaplasia, but without seasons. The palate, particularly the hard palate, is
squamous metaplasia of the salivary ducts (15). The most commonly involved, as in the case of necrotizing
relationship between subacute necrotizing sialadenitis sialometaplasia (6). Other sites of occurrence include
and necrotizing sialometaplasia is still under discus- the tonsillar area, buccal mucosa, ventral surface of
sion (16). The clinicopathologic features of these enti- the tongue, and the upper lip. Clinically, the lesion
ties are summarized in Table 1 (17,18). typically presents as a nonulcerated, erythematous,
nodular swelling accompanied by an abrupt onset of
pain. The size ranges from 0.3 to 2.5 cm. The duration
Subacute Necrotizing Sialadenitis of the symptoms before diagnosis is usually less than
Introduction. Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis is a week. The lesions generally heal within two to three
a rare, self-limiting, nonspecific inflammatory condi- weeks after incisional or excisional biopsy, without
tion of the intraoral minor salivary glands. It was first any additional medications. Clinical differences
described by Werning et al. in 1990 (1), and there have between subacute necrotizing sialadenitis and necro-
been 31 cases reported to date (1–6). Although there are tizing sialometaplasia include age distribution, pres-
considerable clinical and histologic differences between ence or absence of pain and ulceration, length of
the two conditions (Table 1) (3,6), it remains controver- duration, and healing time (Table 1) (3,6).
sial whether subacute necrotizing sialadenitis is a Pathology. Histologically, subacute necrotizing
distinct, specific entity, or whether it belongs to the sialadenitis is characterized by marked acute and
spectrum of necrotizing sialometaplasia (5). Even if the chronic inflammatory cell infiltration accompanied
latter is the case, subacute necrotizing sialadenitis and by focal necrosis and loss of acinar cells (Fig. 26).
early lesions of necrotizing sialometaplasia share some The inflammatory infiltrate is composed of neutro-
common histologic features, suggesting a possible rela- phils, lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils. Eosi-
tionship between them (5). The exact etiology of sub- nophils are sometimes a predominant element. The
acute necrotizing sialadenitis has not been defined, but inflammation may appear to be the earliest event,
an infectious process or immune responses to an occurring before the development of acinar necrosis.
unknown allergen have been postulated (1,3). Acinar necrosis is identified in only a part of the
Clinical features. The age of the patients ranges lesion, and the lobular-type acinar necrosis, typical
between 15 and 70 years, with a mean age of of necrotizing sialometaplasia, is not seen. Residual
26.7 years and the majority of cases occurring in the ducts may show slight atrophy and mild dilatation.
second and third decades (6). Subacute necrotizing Acinar and/or ductal squamous metaplasia, a defin-
sialadenitis shows a male predominance with male-to- ing criterion of necrotizing sialometaplasia, is not the
female ratio of 3:1 (6). These epidemiologic descrip- feature of subacute necrotizing sialadenitis. No signif-
tions might have a case selection bias since a signifi- icant fibrosis is observed. There is no pseudoepithe-
cant number of the reported patients belonged to a liomatous hyperplasia of the overlying mucosal
military population (1,3). Many patients with subacute epithelium. Ultrastructurally, electron-dense, virus-
necrotizing sialadenitis in previous reports shared like particles have been reported in some cases of
close living quarters such as military barracks, and subacute necrotizing sialadenitis (1).
494 Eveson and Nagao
E. Tumor-Like Lesions
Sclerosing Polycystic Adenosis
This is a recently described, rare lesion of salivary
glands of uncertain histogenesis that can simulate
neoplasia clinically, radiographically, and histologi-
cally (1). The appearances resemble those of benign
fibrocystic disease and sclerosing adenosis of the
breast. There have been over 40 reported cases: four
involved minor glands, including the buccal mucosa,
hard palate, and floor of mouth (2,3), two the sub-
mandibular gland, and the remainder affected the
parotid gland (1–8). The typical history is the presence
of a slow-growing mass of less than two years dura-
tion with occasional pain and tenderness. The age
range is from 9 to 80 years (3,6). Macroscopically,
most lesions are well circumscribed but unencapsu-
lated, with a minority forming multifocal nodules.
They may contain multiple, small cysts. The maxi-
mum reported size is 7 cm in diameter. Microscopi-
cally, the lesions show a diverse range of appearances.
They are characterized by densely collagenized,
sparsely cellular fibrous tissue surrounding ill-defined
Figure 29 HIV-associated lymphoepithelial cyst of the parotid salivary gland ductal and acinar lobules, and areas of
gland. (A) A cystic structure surrounded by dense lymphoid cystically dilated ductal structures (Fig. 30). The latter
infiltrates with florid lymphoid follicular hyperplasia. (B) The are lined by epithelium, which can be attenuated or
cyst is lined by non-keratinized stratified squamous epithelium hyperplastic and may show intraluminal papillary
permeated by monocytoid lymphoid cells. (C) Irregularly shaped,
projections. In addition, the lining may contain muco-
large lymphoid follicle with germinal center. Source: Courtesy of
Dr. Jean E. Lewis, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A. cytes, vacuolated cells, sebaceous-like cells, apocrine
cells, and foci of squamous metaplasia (Fig. 30D). In
some areas, interconnecting cellular bridges form a
cribriform pattern (Fig. 30C), and this is occasionally
(Fig. 29B) (8). Monocytoid and/or marginal zone B associated with hyaline globules of basement mem-
cells do not expand into the interfollicular region, brane material forming collagenous spherules. Areas
forming broad sheets. Lymphoepithelial lesions may of atypical hyperplasia of densely granular,
498 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 30 Sclerosing polycystic adenosis. (A) Well-circumscribed tumorous lesion composed of dilated ductal structures and fibrous
stroma. (B) Densely collagenized fibrous tissue surrounding salivary gland ductal and acinar lobules. (C) Cystically dilated ductal
structures and foci of cribriform areas accompanied by intervening collagenous stroma. (D) Ductal structures consisting of various cell
types, including apocrine, acinar-like, vacuolated, and sebaceous-like cells. Note acinar-like cells exhibiting intracytoplasmic eosinophilic
granules and conspicuous nucleoli.
eosinophilic, acinar cells can be readily mistaken for The most important differential diagnoses are
acinic cell carcinoma (Fig. 30D). In addition, there may acinic cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma [not otherwise
be islands of more basophilic acinar cells in micro- specified (NOS)] and cystadenocarcinoma. The lobular
cystic and solid configurations. In some cases, ducts nature of polycystic sclerosing adenosis, together with
show dysplastic changes resembling in situ carcino- the presence of a peripheral myoepithelial layer and the
ma, and focal islands of similar cells have also been lack of evidence of infiltration, should prevent confusion.
described (4). However, the lobular architecture is The treatment of choice appears to be a complete
preserved, and staining with markers such as calpo- but conservative local excision. About 30% of cases
nin (Fig. 31), smooth muscle actin, and muscle-specific with adequate follow-up, however, have recurred
actin shows a layer of myoepithelial cells surrounding with intervals ranging from approximately 5 to
the ducts and lobules (6). There is a variable mixed 22 years, and in a few cases, the recurrences were
chronic inflammatory infiltrate, and in some areas multiple. Although these recurrences are probably
xanthomatous macrophages are a conspicuous feature due to the presence of multifocal disease, the relatively
(Fig. 32). Two cases with a significant lipomatous high rate, together with the presence of dysplasia
component have been reported, and oncocytic change and/or carcinoma in situ means that the possible
may also be seen (6). Immunoreactivity for estrogen neoplastic potential of this process has yet to be
and progesterone receptors has been demonstrated, fully characterised (4). A recent study using the poly-
suggesting the possible participation of hormone stim- morphism of the human androgen receptor
ulation in the pathogenesis (4). (HUMARA) locus as a marker has shown sclerosing
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 499
Table 2 Causes of Sialosis to diabetes and chronic alcohol misuse, sialosis usual-
ly persists despite treatment (22). Superficial paroti-
Drugs induced Endocrine/metabolic Nutritional
dectomy is sometimes undertaken to correct
Antihypertensives Acromegaly Beriberi unacceptable cosmetic deformity (2).
Guanacline Alcoholism Bulimia
Iodine Diabetes insipidus Gastrointestinal
disease Salivary Gland Hyperplasia
Isoprenaline Diabetes mellitus Malnutrition
Lead Hypothyroidism Pellagra The terminal duct of salivary glands is a unit consist-
Mercury Cirrhosis of the liver Amylophagia ing of the secretory acinus, intercalated duct, and
Naproxen Uremia Vitamin A associated myoepithelial cells. Hyperplasia of this
deficiency complex can result in two distinct forms: acinar
Oxphenbutazone adenomatoid hyperplasia and ductal adenomatoid
Phenylbutazone hyperplasia (1,2).
Sulfisoxazole Acinar adenomatoid hyperplasia is a rare, idiopathic
Thiocyanate
condition, which usually affects the intraoral minor
Thiouracil
Valproic acid
salivary glands, with the palate accounting for the
majority of cases (3). It typically presents as a painless,
sessile swelling at the junction of the hard and soft
palates and clinically it can mimic a salivary gland
tumor. The sex ratio is equal, and the majority of
patients are middle aged or elderly. Most cases have
sixth decades, and the main complaint is a slowly been reported in Caucasians, and the condition
enlarging and cosmetically unsightly swelling of the appears to be very uncommon in Asians (4). There is
parotids. Occasionally, patients may experience a dry no association with sialosis (sialadenosis) of the major
mouth or sialorrhea. Although raised salivary levels of salivary glands.
potassium and amylase have been reported, this is of Microscopy shows lobules of hyperplastic but
limited, if any, practical value in diagnosis (4). Sialosis otherwise unremarkable mucous acinar cells and
has been associated with a wide variety of factors that essentially normal-appearing ducts (Fig. 34). In most
are predominantly nutritional, metabolic or pharmaceu- cases, the overlying palatal epithelium is normal, but
tical (4,8) (Table 2). It is thought that a unifying etiopa- one case showed a lichenoid reaction, and in another,
thogenesis could be related to peripheral autonomic pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia was reported.
nerve dysfunction (9). A relationship with salivary aqua- Occasionally, there are areas of interstitial mucous
porin water channels has been recently suggested (10). extravasation with an associated inflammatory reac-
The most common causes are diabetes mellitus tion. The condition is entirely benign, and excision is
and alcohol misuse. The reported prevalence of sialo- curative. A similar condition causing swelling in the
sis in diabetes ranges from 10% to 80% (11), and in sublingual region has been called ‘‘idiopathic hyper-
recent study, nearly half the patients with sialosis plasia of the sublingual gland’’ (5,6) or ‘‘pouting’’
were diabetic (4). Sialosis can occasionally precede sublingual glands. This is seen as an enlargement in
clinically detectable hyperglycemia. Alcohol misuse, the floor of the mouth in totally or partially edentu-
particularly when associated with cirrhosis, has been lous patients. The sublingual glands may be otherwise
reported to lead to sialosis in 30% to 60 % of these normal or show nonspecific chronic inflammation.
patients (7,12–14), but this high frequency has been Ductal adenomatoid hyperplasia (also known as
questioned (4). Any long-standing nutritional disor- intercalated duct hyperplasia) is also very rare and
der can result in sialosis, and this may also be a factor is usually seen as a chance finding in surgical speci-
in some alcoholic patients. A number of cases related mens from major salivary glands, especially tumor
to patients with bulimia or anorexia nervosa have resections. There is a 3:1 male predominance, and
been reported (15,16), and these may also be associat- most cases are seen in the sixth decade.
ed with palatal necrotising sialometaplasia (17). How- Microscopy shows one or several unencapsu-
ever, in a significant number of patients with sialosis, lated foci of proliferation of ducts with structural
no cause is found (18). similarities to the normal intercalated ducts (Fig. 35).
Sialosis is rarely biopsied. Microscopy shows These are densely packed with little supporting stro-
acinar cell hypertrophy, and the cells can be two or ma and consist of an inner layer of cuboidal cells and
three times the normal size (19). The enlarged cells can an outer layer of myoepithelial cells. There may be
have granular cytoplasm packed with densely stain- residual areas showing acinar differentiation with
ing zymogen granules (Fig. 33B), or the cytoplasm can cells containing basophilic zymogen granules.
be vacuolated (Fig. 33C). Some cases show a mixed The salivary gland tumor most frequently
population. Compression of the striated ducts has associated with ductal adenomatoid hyperplasia is
been described (20), but inflammation is not a feature. epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. This has raised
In long-standing cases, parenchymal atrophy and speculation that it may be a precursor of this tumor.
fatty replacement can be seen (21). Nutritional and This could also explain the frequent presence of an
drug-related sialosis will often regress if the underly- element of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas in
ing causative factors are eliminated, but in cases due hybrid salivary tumors (2,7).
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 501
cytometric, and molecular genetic studies, were actu- on the underlying cause of Sjögren’s syndrome, the
ally lymphomas (1,9,10). Furthermore, the term myoe- exact etiology and pathogenesis remain unresolved.
pithelial sialadenitis, alternatively applied for the Comprehensive reviews of recent progress on the
lesion later, is also misleading from the morphogenetic clinical aspects and the putative pathogenetic mecha-
aspects; the constituting nonlymphoid cells are mainly nism operating in the development of Sjögren’s syn-
basal type of epithelial cells rather than myoepithelial drome are available elsewhere (16,17).
cells (11,12). LESA, introduced by Harris in 1999, Until recently, several schemes of diagnostic
seems to be an accurate term that refers to the specific criteria for primary Sjögren’s syndrome have been
histopathologic features, and it has now become proposed. In 2002, an American-European consensus
generally accepted (1). group suggested a set of diagnostic criteria (Table 3)
(18). Diagnosis of primary Sjögren’s syndrome
Clinical features requires four of six criteria, including subjective or
objective signs and symptoms of dryness, a character-
Patients with LESA and Sjögren’s syndrome are typi- istic appearance of a biopsy sample from a minor
cally women, with the female-to-male ratio being 9:1. salivary gland, and the presence of an autoantibody
The disease can present at any age, with a significant such as anti-SS-A/SS-B. Exclusions from the assess-
peak incidence from fourth to sixth decades. The ment of the criteria include previous radiotherapy to
lesion presents as unilateral or bilateral diffuse, pain- the head and neck, lymphoma, infection with HCV,
less or mildly painful, firm enlargement of the salivary human T-lymphotropic virus type I, or HIV, sarcoido-
glands and/or lacrimal glands. LESA most frequently sis, and graft-versus-host disease. Also, measurements
involves the parotid gland (80–85%), followed by the of tear and saliva flow must be made in the absence of
submandibular gland (10–15%) usually in combina- drugs that have anticholinergic side effects.
tion with the parotid enlargement (7). Swellings of the The majority of LESA cases are of a chronic and
minor glands are rare, but subclinical focal periductal indolent nature. However, patients with LESA, wheth-
lymphocytic infiltrates are almost always seen in the er or not associated with Sjögren’s syndrome, have a
labial salivary glands in patients with Sjögren’s 44-fold increased risk of developing lymphoma, of
syndrome. which 80% are extranodal marginal zone B-cell lym-
Population prevalence of Sjögren’s syndrome is phoma (MALT lymphoma) (1). The rate of develop-
about 0.5%; it is one of the most common autoimmune ment of lymphoma is estimated to be approximately
disorders together with rheumatoid arthritis and sys- 4% to 7% of the patients with LESA (1). The presence of
temic lupus erythematosus (13). Sjögren’s syndrome is progressive unilateral swelling of an enlarged parotid
clinically characterized by the presence of keratocon- gland, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, anemia, lym-
junctivitis sicca or xerophthalmia (dry eyes) and xero- phopenia, peripheral neuropathy, cutaneous vasculi-
stomia (dry mouth), caused by the involvement of the tis, and type II mixed monoclonal cryoglobulinemia is
lacrimal and salivary glands. Sjögren’s syndrome is suggestive of lymphoma (16). Therefore, careful obser-
classified into two forms: primary (or sicca complex) vation with close follow-up is required for patients
and secondary. Both types have dry mouth and eyes, with LESA and Sjögren’s syndrome. Therapy for
but in secondary Sjögren’s syndrome, there is the symptomatic control includes topical agents to
presence of one or more additional autoimmune dis- improve moisture and decrease inflammation for dry
orders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus mouths. Systemic steroids may be used, but at present
erythematosus, progressive systemic sclerosis, poly- there are no established medication strategies for
myositis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and others. The the treatment of patients with severe systemic
involvement of the lacrimal and salivary glands by manifestations.
lymphocytic infiltration impairs the production of
tears and saliva, leading to dry eyes and dry mouth. Pathology
Dry mouth is accompanied by difficulty in swallow-
ing and speaking, alterations in taste, dental caries, Grossly, LESA presents as a diffuse enlargement of
and candidiasis. One-third of the patients also present the salivary glands or a nodular formation, which is
with systemic extraglandular manifestations involv- yellow to tan and resembles lymph node tissue. The
ing predominantly skin, lung, heart, kidneys, nervous latter appearance is sometimes mistaken for a true
and hematolymphoid systems. neoplasm. The overall lobular architecture and the
Autoantibodies specific for Ro (SS-A) and La capsule of the major salivary glands are maintained.
(SS-B) are strongly associated with Sjögren’s syn- The histologic hallmarks of LESA are dense
drome and are of major importance in diagnosis. lymphocytic infiltration, acinar atrophy, and areas of
Clinically, the Ro/La immunoglobulin A (IgA) titers lymphoepithelial lesion, previously referred to by the
are proven to be positively correlated with sicca inaccurate term epimyoepithelial islands, which show
symptoms and anti-Ro levels with the occurrence of various developmental stages (Figs. 36, 37). Initially,
diverse systemic disease manifestations. Rheumatoid small lymphocytic infiltrates are limited to around the
factors are also positive in approximately 60% of the intralobular salivary ducts (Fig. 36). Subsequently,
patients. Several viruses and genetic predispositions lymphocytic infiltration gradually increases and
have been implicated in the development of Sjögren’s replaces the parenchyma, resulting in marked acinar
syndrome. Histologically similar changes to LESA can atrophy or loss (Fig. 37A). The lobular architecture of
occur in HIV- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected the normal glands and interlobular septa are generally
patients (14,15). However, despite extensive research preserved. Lymphoid follicles with germinal center
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 503
Table 3 International Classification Criteria for Sjögren’s Syndrome Proposed by the American-European Consensus Group
I. Ocular symptoms:
— A positive response to at least one of the following questions:
1. Have you had daily, persistent, troublesome dry eyes for more than 3 months?
2. Do you have a recurrent sensation of sand or gravel in the eyes?
3. Do you use tear substitutes more than 3 times a day?
II. Oral symptoms:
— A positive response to at least one of the following questions:
1. Have you had a daily feeling of dry mouth for more than 3 months?
2. Have you had recurrently or persistently swollen salivary glands as an adult?
3. Do you frequently drink liquids to aid in swallowing dry food?
III. Ocular signs:
— That is, objective evidence of ocular involvement defined as a positive result for at least one of the following two tests:
1. Schirmer’s I test, performed without anaesthesia (5 mm in 5 min)
2. Rose Bengal score or other ocular dye score (4 according to van Bijsterveld’s scoring system)
IV. Histopathology:
— In minor salivary glands (obtained through normal-appearing mucosa) focal lymphocytic sialadenitis, evaluated by an expert
histopathologist, with a focus score 1, defined as a number of lymphocytic foci (which are adjacent to normal-appearing mucous
acini and contain more than 50 lymphocytes) per 4 mm2 of glandular tissue
V. Salivary gland involvement:
— Objective evidence of salivary gland involvement defined by a positive result for at least one of the following diagnostic tests:
1. Unstimulated whole salivary flow (1.5 mL in 15 min)
2. Parotid sialography showing the presence of diffuse sialectasias (punctate, cavitary, or destructive pattern), without evidence of
obstruction in the major ducts
3. Salivary scintigraphy showing delayed uptake, reduced concentration, and/or delayed excretion of tracer
VI. Autoantibodies:
— Presence in the serum of the following autoantibodies:
1. Antibodies to Ro(SSA) or La(SSB) antigens, or both
Rules for classification
- For primary Sjögren’s syndrome:
— In patients without any potentially associated disease, primary Sjögren’s syndrome may be defined as follows:
a. The presence of any 4 of the 6 items is indicative of primary Sjögren’s syndrome, as long as either item IV (Histopathology) or VI
(Serology) is positive.
b. The presence of any 3 of the 4 objective criteria items (i.e., items III, IV, V, VI).
c. The classification tree procedure represents a valid alternative method for classification, although it should be more properly
used in clinical-epidemiologic survey.
- For secondary Sjögren’s syndrome:
— In patients with a potentially associated disease (for instance, another well defined connective tissue disease), the presence of
item I or item II plus any 2 from among items III, IV, and V may be considered as indicative of secondary Sjögren’s syndrome.
Exclusion criteria:
- Past head and neck radiation treatment
- Hepatitis C infection
- AIDS
- Preexisting lymphoma
- Sarcoidosis
- Graft-versus-host disease
- Use of anticholinergic drugs (since a time shorter than 4-fold the half life of the drug)
Abbreviation: AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
Source: From Ref. 18.
formation may be present in areas of dense lymphoid marginal zone B cells are confined within the lymphoe-
infiltration. The interfollicular lymphoid infiltrate con- pithelial lesions. Monoclonality of lymphocytes by
stitutes a mixed population of polyclonal small B- and means of gene rearrangement analysis using polymer-
T-cell lymphocytes, scattered immunoblasts, histio- ase chain reaction can be demonstrated in LESA with-
cytes, and sometimes considerable numbers of plasma out any histologic evidence indicative of lymphoma
cells. (1,15,19,20). The irregularly shaped epithelial compo-
Residual ductal epithelium, on the other hand, nent of the lymphoepithelial lesions consists of polygo-
proliferates together with the permeation of lympho- nal or plump spindle cells exhibiting uniform elongated
cytes into the epithelium (Fig. 37B). Eventually, there nuclei with fine chromatin and indistinct nucleoli. The
is luminal obliteration, and the characteristic lym- epithelial cells exhibit no atypia, and mitoses are rare.
phoepithelial lesions develop. The permeating lym- The lymphoepithelial lesions may undergo squamous
phocytes are monocytoid and/or marginal zone B metaplasia, in rare cases being accompanied with kera-
cells. They are intermediate in size with irregularly tinization. Foci of hyaline basement membrane-like
shaped nuclei and abundant pale cytoplasm, some- material may be occasionally observed among the
what resembling centrocytes. The monocytoid and/or cells of the lesions. These lymphoepithelial lesions
504 Eveson and Nagao
the elderly population (10–13). In the United States, in nonendemic regions (32). Most studies have not
there appears to have been a significant increase in detected EBV in other salivary gland tumors or nor-
the incidence of malignant salivary gland tumors mal parotid gland (28,33). However, EBV has been
during the period 1974 to 1999 (1.0–1.1/100,000 pop- reported in several cases of intranasal pleomorphic
ulation). In addition, salivary neoplasms accounted adenoma (34). No etiologic role has been found for
for 8.1% of all head and neck tumors during this cytomegalovirus in benign parotid tumors (33).
period (14). In the older literature there is an equal Pleomorphic adenomas have been shown to contain
sex incidence in white Americans and a slightly Simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequences and express
increased incidence in the black population (15). the SV40 large T antigen (35), but no association has
However, a more recent study showed a slight male been found with polyoma virus or papillomavirus in
predominance (M:F 1.5:1) (6). Although the data on human salivary tumors.
geographic distribution and ethnicity are limited, in Radiation. There is strong evidence for a close
most reports there appears to be minimal variation in association between ionizing radiation and salivary
incidence or the distribution of individual tumor gland tumors. In survivors of the atom bomb explo-
types. One exception to this was the very high inci- sions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there was a 3.5
dence of lymphoepithelial carcinomas in the North relative risk of developing benign salivary tumors
American Inuit population in the middle of the twen- and an 11 increased risk for malignant tumors
tieth century (16,17). At that time these tumors (36–39). In addition, the relative risk was directly
accounted for 25% of all malignancies in this popula- related to the distance from the epicenter of the
tion. Since then there has been a significant decline in explosions and the level of exposure to ionizing
its frequency. In Malaysia there is a higher frequency radiation. There was a high frequency of both War-
of salivary tumors in ethnic Malays than Indians or thin’s tumor and mucoepidermoid carcinoma in
Chinese (18). A higher relative frequency of malignant these patients (40). Therapeutic radiation of the
intraoral salivary gland tumors has been reported in a head and neck has also been implicated in salivary
Chinese population (19). gland neoplasia. This is typically a late consequence
and can result in both benign and malignant tumors
Site, Age, and Sex Distribution (41–44). Iodine131 used to treat thyroid disease is also
concentrated in salivary glands and increases the risk
In major series, the parotid gland is the site of between of salivary tumors (45). Routine dental diagnostic
64% and 80% of all salivary primary epithelial tumors radiographs may also be associated with an
(20). Seven percent to eleven percent of tumors increased risk (46,47). There is also evidence of an
involve the submandibular glands, and less than 1% association between cutaneous and salivary neo-
occur in the sublingual glands. Tumors in the minor plasms, with both showing a pattern of incidence
glands account for 9% to 23% of cases (5,21–24). Fifty- suggestive of susceptibility to ultraviolet radiation
four percent to seventy-nine percent of these are exposure (48,49). There is an increased risk of pre-
benign and 21% to 46% are malignant. There are dominantly malignant salivary tumors in survivors
striking variations in the ratio of benign to malignant of childhood cancer in the head and neck region that
tumors in different sites. For example, malignant had been treated by a combination of chemotherapy
tumors comprise 15% to 32% of parotid tumor, 41% and radiotherapy (50). The relationship, in any,
to 45% of submandibular tumors, and the large major- between salivary tumors and high-frequency electro-
ity of sublingual tumors (*90%). About half of minor magnetic fields from cellular telephones is conten-
gland tumors are malignant (19,25), and there appears tious, but most large-scale studies show no increased
to be variations in the frequency, age distribution, and risk (51,52). However, a recent study of a population
sex ratio in different populations (26). In the floor of with higher than average mobile telephone use
the mouth, tongue, and retromolar trigone between appears to show a higher frequency of benign parotid
80% and 90% of salivary tumors are malignant (5). tumors (53). There in no excess incidence of salivary
Although there is a slight overall female predomi- tumors in those exposed to radon gas (54).
nance, the sex ratio varies in different tumor types. Occupation. There is increased risk of develop-
There is a wide age distribution with a peak incidence ing salivary gland tumors in a diverse range of indus-
in the fifth decade. Pleomorphic adenoma is the most tries, including rubber manufacturing (55,56),
common tumor and accounts for over half of salivary plumbing (57), and woodworking in the automobile
tumors in most large series. The second most common industry (58). Exposure to nickel compounds (56),
neoplasm is Warthin’s tumor, which typically forms formaldehyde, and solvents has been implicated
about 10% to 15% of cases. (59). There appears to be a higher incidence of salivary
gland cancer in women working in hairdressing and
Etiology beauty shops (60,61). However, there is no increased
risk from the personal use of hair dyes (62). In Quebec
Viruses. Several viruses have been implicated there was an increased risk in populations living close
in the development of salivary tumors. However, the to asbestos mines, and the risk was directly related to
only strong association is between EBV and lymphoe- the distance from the mines (63).
pithelial carcinoma (27–29). Although the large major- Lifestyle and nutrition. The majority of studies
ity of cases of this tumor affect Asians (30) and have failed to demonstrate an association between
Greenlandic Inuits (31), sporadic cases are reported most salivary gland tumors and either cigarette
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 507
infiltration into the adjacent extraglandular spaces, widely used among clinicians and pathologists in the
which can be detected by both MRI and CT. Color diagnosis of salivary gland tumors. The main pur-
Doppler ultrasound may also be useful, as malignant poses of FNAC of the salivary gland lesions are to
salivary gland neoplasms frequently show a higher determine whether a process is inflammatory or neo-
grade of vascularity compared with benign neoplasms plastic; is benign or malignant; represents a carcinoma
(11). Positron emission tomography can be used to or a malignant lymphoma; to render a specific diag-
diagnose and plan treatment of salivary gland malig- nosis, if possible (3). In about one-third of cases,
nancies by detecting lymph node metastases and/or unnecessary surgery can be avoided by means of
distant metastases. FNAC diagnosis, especially when the lesions are
Ultrasound or CT is the examination of choice in inflammatory, lymphoproliferative disease including
patients with inflammatory salivary gland diseases malignant lymphoma, generalized disease, or metas-
(12). Plain radiography is still a helpful method to tasis to a salivary gland or adjacent lymph node (1,3).
diagnose sialolithiasis; 90% of submandibular stones FNAC of salivary gland tumors can be challeng-
are radiopaque, while most parotid stones are radio- ing. Factors causing diagnostic difficulties in cytopa-
lucent. Ultrasound and CT also easily detect calcified thologic evaluation of salivary gland neoplasms
stones. The latter is often the best initial study for the include diverse cytomorphology, scanty structural
evaluation to identify the calculi in the gland. On information as to cell to cell or cell to stromal compo-
ultrasound, sialolithiasis is always hyperechogenic nent, sampling problems, and the infrequency of
enclosed in a hypoechogenic halo representing the many tumor types resulting in limited experience
dilation of the duct. However, ultrasound is less and lack of familiarity by cytotechnologists and path-
accurate than CT in distinguishing multiple clusters ologists. The salivary gland tumors are unique in their
of stones from single large stones. Sialography is histologic complexity and morphologic variability,
contraindicated in the acute setting of sialadenitis reflecting in the cytologic material. While architecture
because of the possibility of exacerbating the symp- and circumscription are frequently helpful in the
toms associated with the infection. histopathologic differential diagnosis of salivary
Conventional and/or MR sialography are useful gland neoplasms, these clues are usually lacking in
in staging Sjögren’s syndrome, since patients’ symptoms cytologic preparations. If necessary, a cell block is
may not correlate well with severity of the disease. On prepared from cells entrapped in a blood clot or tiny
conventional sialography, the gland texture of patients tissue particles obtained by FNAC. The cell block
with Sjögren’s syndrome becomes heterogeneous and enables the pathologist to examine the tissue like a
reticulated, and multiple cysts may also be observed biopsy, and multiple sections can be obtained from
corresponding with sialectatic changes. MR sialography paraffin-embedded material for immunohistochemi-
may replace conventional sialography because MR sia- cal study. The cytologic examination is very limited
lography has the advantage of not requiring cannulation because the needle targets only a small area of the
of the duct (13,14). Salivary glands in patients with neoplasm. The sampled area in an aspiration biopsy
Sjögren’s syndrome show punctate, globular, and may represent only one of the patterns if a given
destructive patterns by MR sialography. However, in neoplasm shows diverse morphology.
most cases, the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome is Because of the relatively high false-negative rate,
clinically based on the sicca syndrome, association ranging from 5% to 48% in the literature, treatment
with other connective tissue disorders, serology of anti- and follow-up of patients with salivary gland tumors
nuclear antibodies, and a lip biopsy. should not be based on FNAC results alone (2,4–6).
Negative FNAC findings alone should not prevent
Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology surgical intervention when it is otherwise clinically
indicated. Fine-needle aspiration cytology combined
Since major salivary glands are superficially located with careful clinical examinations and imaging stud-
and easily accessible organs, they are optimal targets ies can lead to correct diagnosis and may help avoid
for fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). This is a unnecessary surgery. False-negative results can be
quick, minimally invasive, and technically simple attributed to various factors including the quality
procedure that can be performed in any outpatient and quantity of FNAC material and sampling errors.
setting. However, there are some controversies about Ultrasonographic or CT guidance may help reduce
the use of FNAC in the diagnosis of salivary gland these problems.
tumors. The issues include rare but potentially serious Generally, FNAC is considered to have high
complications arising from the procedure, such as sensitivity and specificity in detecting salivary gland
tumor seeding along the needle tract, tumor dissemi- lesions (2,4–9). The diagnostic sensitivity and specifici-
nation, injury to the seventh cranial nerve and hemor- ty for neoplastic or nonneoplastic lesions have been
rhage. In addition, the FNAC procedure itself can reported as 62% to 98% and 85% to 100%, respectively
induce traumatic tissue injury and infarcts, causing (2). The reported overall accuracy rate of FNAC in
reactive pseudomalignant changes, which may be establishing a diagnosis as benign or malignant has
misdiagnosed as malignant (1). Despite these misgiv- been reported to be from 81% to 100% (2,3,6). However,
ings, it has been shown that FNAC of the salivary the rate of a correct specific diagnosis falls into the
gland lesions is a basically safe and effective diagnos- range from 48% to 75% (1,6). The benign lesions that are
tic technique (1,2). Thus, FNAC has gained wide most often misdiagnosed as malignant are basal cell
acceptance as a first-line diagnostic procedure and is adenoma, intraparotid lymph node, oncocytoma, and
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 509
granulomatous sialadenitis (6). The malignant lesions Frozen section diagnosis depends on both the
that are most frequently misdiagnosed as benign are ability of the pathologist to give an accurate histologic
lymphoma, acinic cell carcinoma, low-grade mucoepi- diagnosis and the experience of the surgeon to inter-
dermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and pret the results and provide optimal surgical therapy.
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. Although frozen section diagnosis of salivary gland
Since many benign and malignant salivary gland neoplasia frequently is challenging for the general
tumors share similar or overlapping cytologic features, pathologist, it is reported to be highly reliable in
FNAC may occasionally suffer from certain pitfalls in differentiating between benign and malignant dis-
the diagnosis of these tumors (6,9,10). The most com- eases. According to a review of 2460 frozen section
mon difficulty in FNAC is the distinction of benign diagnoses from 24 series, an overall accuracy rate for
neoplasms, such as cellular pleomorphic adenoma, identifying lesions as a benign or malignant, excluding
basal cell adenoma, and myoepithelioma, from malig- deferred diagnoses, was 96.3% (2). However, frozen
nant neoplasms, such as polymorphous low-grade section diagnosis for malignant salivary gland tumors
adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and epithe- is more difficult and less accurate than for benign
lial-myoepithelial carcinoma. These lesions have very tumors, the accuracy rate for benign and malignant
similar nuclear features of relatively small, bland, nuclei tumors being 98.7% and 85.9%, respectively. Therefore,
of the epithelial and/or myoepithelial-type cells and a therapeutic decision should never be made on the
basement membrane–like stromal material. The distinc- basis of a frozen section diagnosis alone, but always in
tion between different subtypes of pleomorphic aden- conjunction with the clinical findings. False-positive
oma, basal cell adenoma, and myoepithelioma is not rates (benign tumors initially diagnosed as malignant)
critical, as the clinical management is identical and the and false-negative rates (malignant tumors initially
clinical course is benign. However, it is especially diagnosed as benign) were 1.1% and 2.6%,
important for proper surgical management to distin- respectively.
guish adenoid cystic carcinoma from the other lesions The most common benign tumor overdiagnosed
in this group because adenoid cystic carcinomas often as malignant was pleomorphic adenoma, which
require more radical treatment. Other common diag- was frequently misdiagnosed as mucoepidermoid
nostic dilemmas in salivary gland FNAC include carcinoma or adenoid cystic carcinoma (2). Oncocy-
mucoepidermoid carcinoma versus reactive processes, toma, basal cell adenoma, Warthin’s tumor, lymphoe-
such as necrotizing sialometaplasia and chronic siala- pithelial sialadenitis, lymphoepithelial cyst, and
denitis with squamous or goblet cell metaplasia of the sarcoidosis have also caused difficulty. On the other
salivary ductal epithelial cells and acinic cell carcinoma hand, mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the tumor
versus normal salivary gland acinar cells. most commonly involved in false-negative diagnosis,
followed by acinic cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic
Frozen Section Diagnosis carcinoma, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, and
malignant lymphoma. Chronic sialadenitis and necro-
Preoperative imaging examinations, such as ultra- tizing sialometaplasia were most important
sound, CT, and MRI, are frequently employed to in the differential diagnosis for mucoepidermoid
characterize a salivary gland lesion before surgery. carcinoma (1).
However, while certain imaging features can favor or The main reason for the false-negative errors is
suggest a diagnosis of malignancy, they are often not inadequate sampling, by either the surgeon or by the
sufficiently characteristic or reliable to make a specific pathologist (2). Sampling errors can be minimized if
diagnosis. FNAC has also been widely used for the pathologists receive and examine the entire speci-
assessing salivary gland lesions preoperatively. men. Since several types of salivary gland malignancy
Although high sensitivity and specificity of the proce- can be identified only on the basis of their invasive
dure are reported, there are some controversies regard- nature rather than cellular or architectural features,
ing the accuracy in the diagnosis of salivary gland frozen sections should always include the neoplasm,
tumors, especially that of malignant lesions. Histologic tumor capsule if present, and surrounding salivary
diagnosis of the major salivary gland lesions by inci- gland tissue and/or soft tissue to evaluate tumor
sional biopsy is generally contraindicated because of circumscription as possible. Sampling should never
the possibility of facial nerve injury and tumor seed- be limited to the middle of the tumor. Benign tumors
ing. On the other hand, frozen section diagnosis is a with multinodularity, such as recurrent pleomorphic
potentially useful modality for the surgical manage- adenoma, oncocytoma, the membranous type of basal
ment of salivary gland lesions (1–7). The role of frozen cell adenoma, and canalicular adenoma, must not be
section diagnosis of salivary gland lesions is to provide misinterpreted as malignancy.
information that would influence immediate surgical Finally, if a definite diagnosis cannot be made by
treatment. When the preoperative diagnosis is disput- frozen section assessment, further surgery should be
ed, frozen section diagnosis is often requested to deferred until a final histopathologic diagnosis on
determine whether the lesion is benign or malignant. permanent sections is obtained (1). However, the
If the lesion is malignant, frozen section diagnosis is surgeon often has immediate need of the information
recommended to establish the exact type of malignan- whether the tumor is benign or malignant. Close
cy. Frozen section diagnosis is also performed to discussion between the pathologist and surgeon is
examine the extent of tumors, status of resection essential to reach an accurate diagnosis and to prevent
margins, and the involvement of lymph nodes. any unnecessary extensive surgery.
510 Eveson and Nagao
included transcription factors SOX-4 and AP-2 family, Table 4 WHO Histologic Classification of Tumors of the
and members of the Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway, Salivary Glands, 2005
such as casein kinase 1, epsilon, and frizzled-7. Compar- Malignant epithelial tumors Benign epithelial tumors
ative gene expression profiles were studied in mucoe- Acinic cell carcinoma Pleomorphic adenoma
pidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and Mucoepidermoid Myoepithelioma
salivary duct carcinoma (30). Only 5 out of 162 carcinoma Basal cell adenoma
genes were overexpressed in all carcinomas, including Adenoid cystic carcinoma Warthin’s tumor
fibronectin 1 (FN1), tissue metalloproteinase inhibitor Polymorphous low-grade Oncocytoma
1 (TIMP1), BGN, tenascin-C (HXB), and insulin-like adenocarcinoma Canalicular adenoma
growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP5), whereas 16 Epithelial-myoepithelial Sebaceous adenoma
genes, which are related to cell-cycle proteins, proteins carcinoma Lymphadenoma
Clear cell carcinoma, not Sebaceous
of signal transduction and translation, were underex- otherwise specified Nonsebaceous
pressed. Other microarray studies demonstrated dif- Basal cell Ductal papillomas
ferential gene expression profiles in pleomorphic adenocarcinoma Inverted ductal
adenoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid Sebaceous carcinoma papilloma
carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, Sebaceous Intraductal papilloma
and salivary duct carcinoma (31). lymphadenocarcinoma Sialadenoma
Methylation is one of the epigenetic modifica- Cystadenocarcinoma papilliferum
tions that play an important role in the transcriptional LGCCC Cystadenoma
inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in human Mucinous Soft tissue tumors
cancer. Recent methylation studies revealed that adenocarcinoma Haemangioma
Oncocytic carcinoma Hematolymphoid tumors
methylation in promoter regions at E-cadherin gene Salivary duct carcinoma Hodgkin’s lymphoma
has been often identified in adenoid cystic carcino- Adenocarcinoma, not Diffuse large B-cell
mas (32,33). Also, in adenoid cystic carcinomas, otherwise specified lymphoma
frequent promoter methylation was found in cyclin- Myoepithelial carcinoma Extranodal marginal
dependent kinase inhibitors genes; such as p15, Carcinoma ex pleomor- zone-B cell lymphoma
p16INK4a, p18, p19, and p21; ras-association domain phic adenoma Secondary tumors
isoform A (RASSF1A); and the death-associated pro- Carcinosarcoma
tein kinase (DAPK) (34,35). About one-third of Metastasizing
mucoepidermoid carcinomas showed methylation pleomorphic adenoma
of the p16INK4a gene–promoter region (36). High Squamous cell
carcinoma
percentage of methylation occurred at RASSF1 and Small cell carcinoma
retinoic acid receptor b2 (RARb2) genes in salivary Large cell carcinoma
duct and acinic cell carcinomas (37). Furthermore, Lymphoepithelial
relatively high frequency of promoter methylation in carcinoma
tumor suppressor gene RB1 was detected in salivary Sialoblastoma
gland carcinomas (38). Abbreviation: LGCCC, Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma.
Classification
Salivary gland tumors can show a strikingly diverse Staging
range of histomorphologic differentiation and archi-
tectural configurations. This has led to a plethora of The TNM Classification only applies to carcinomas of
individual tumor types and a frequently changing the major salivary glands: parotid (C07.9), submandib-
terminology. In addition, this variability is seen within ular (C08.0), and sublingual (C08.1) glands (1, 2, 3).
many of these tumor entities, each of which may have Tumors arising in minor salivary (mucus-secreting
several named subtypes. Classification is further com- glands in the lining membrane of the upper aerodiges-
plicated by the presence of dedifferentiated and tive tract) are not included in this classification but at
hybrid tumors. As emphasized by Ellis and Auclair their anatomic site of origin. There should be anatomi-
(1), the classification of salivary tumors, as with any cal confirmation of the disease. The regional lymph
other type of neoplasm, is a dynamic rather than a nodes are the cervical nodes. The TNM Clinical Classi-
static process. Any tendency to regard a classification fication of salivary gland tumors is shown in Table 5.
as immutable should be firmly resisted. Formal clas-
sifications merely represent the consensus of a group
of individuals at a given moment in time. In this H. Benign Tumors
chapter we will follow closely the classification pro-
Pleomorphic Adenoma
posed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in
2005 (Table 4) (2). However, several entities, including Introduction. Pleomorphic adenoma has been
keratocystoma and sialolipoma, that were not includ- defined as ‘‘a tumor of variable capsulation character-
ed in the WHO classification will be discussed to ized microscopically by architectural rather than cel-
broaden awareness and promote discussion. In addi- lular pleomorphism. Epithelial and modified
tion, we have included sections on intraosseous (cen- myoepithelial elements intermingle most commonly
tral) and hybrid tumors. with tissue of mucoid, myxoid or chondroid
512 Eveson and Nagao
T – Primary tumour
TX Primary tumour cannot be assessed
T0 No evidence of primary tumour
T1 Tumour 2 cm or less in greatest dimension without extraparenchymal extension*
T2 Tumour more than 2 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest dimension without extraparenchymal extension*
T3 Tumour more than 4 cm and/or tumour with extraparenchymal extension*
T4a Tumour invades skin, mandible, ear canal, or facial nerve
T4b Tumour invades base of skull, pterygoid plates, or encases carotid artery
Note: *Extraparenchymal extension is clinical or macroscopic evidence of invasion of soft tissues or nerve, except those listed under T4a
and 4b. Microscopic evidence alone does not constitute extraparenchymal extension for classification purposes.
N – Regional lymph nodes#
NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension
N2 Metastasis as specified in N2a, 2b, 2c below
N2a Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, more than 3 cm but not more than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N2b Metastasis in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N2c Metastasis in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N3 Metastasis in a lymph node more than 6 cm in greatest dimension
Note: Midline nodes are considered ipsilateral nodes.
M–Distant metastasis
MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis
Stage Grouping
Stage 1 T1 N0 M0
Stage II T2 N0 M0
Stage III T3 N0 M0
T1, T2, T3 N1 M0
Stage IV A T1, T2, T3 N2 M0
T4a N0, N1, N2 M0
Stage IV B T4b Any N M0
Any T N3 M0
Stage IV C Any T Any N M1
#
The regional lymph nodes at the cervical nodes.
appearances’’ (1). Synonyms include mixed tumor accessory parotid gland. The most common minor
and benign mixed tumor. salivary gland sites are the palate, lip, and buccal
Clinical features. Pleomorphic adenoma is the mucosa. Pleomorphic adenomas have been reported
most common salivary neoplasm and accounts for in a wide variety of other sites, including cervical
60% to 70% of all parotid tumors, 40% to 60% of lymph nodes, mandible, lung, breast, pituitary fossa,
submandibular tumors, and 40% to 70% of all minor lacrimal gland and sac, ear, and lung (19–27). Histo-
salivary neoplasia (2–6). There is an annual incidence logically similar tumors in the skin are termed ‘‘chon-
rate of approximately 2.4 to 3.05 per 100,000 persons droid syringomas.’’ Pleomorphic adenoma may show
(7,8). Pleomorphic adenoma can also arise in the nasal a synchronous or metachronous association with other
cavity, paranasal sinuses, and larynx (9–11). The mean salivary neoplasms, particularly Warthin’s tumors, in
age at presentation is 46 years (2), but cases occur over the same or other glands (12).
a wide age range and can occasionally be seen in Pleomorphic adenoma in the major glands usual-
young children (6,12). Some studies have shown a ly presents as a slow-growing, painless mass. Small
bimodal age distribution (13). There is a female pre- tumors typically form smooth, firm, and mobile lumps,
ponderance of 1.9:1 (6). Familial cases of pleomorphic but larger tumors tend to be bosselated and may
adenoma are rare, with only four case reports in the attenuate and discolor the overlying skin. Deep-lobe
literature (14–17). The large majority (*80%) of parotid tumors may present as an intraoral or para-
tumors arise in the parotid gland, with most of the pharyngeal mass (28). Pain or facial nerve palsy may
remainder involving the submandibular gland occasionally be seen in tumors that are infected or have
(*10%) and minor seromucous glands (*10%). infarcted. Pleomorphic adenomas of the minor salivary
Pleomorphic adenomas of the sublingual gland are glands usually present as painless, submucosal swel-
exceptionally rare (18). Parotid tumors usually arise lings. The most common site is the junction of the hard
within the superficial lobe, especially its lower pole, and soft palate unilaterally, and here the tumors are
but 10% may occur in the deep lobe, or from an often adherent to the adjacent mucoperiosteum.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 513
Figure 39 Pleomorphic adenoma showing a discrete fibrous Figure 40 Pleomorphic adenoma showing ‘‘satellite’’ nodule
capsule, cartilage, and duct-like structures. that is typically attached to the main tumor mass.
Figure 42 (A) Duct-like structures in fibromucinous stroma. (B) Double-layered duct-like structures with a conspicuous abluminal layer
of clear myoepithelial cells. (C) Sheets of epithelioid and clear myoepithelial cells in mucoid stroma. (D) Pleomorphic adenoma showing a
focus of mucous metaplasia.
cords, or ductal structures (Fig. 42). The latter are may be myxoid, cartilaginous, or hyalinized, is a
composed of an inner layer of cytologically bland, product of the modified myoepithelial cells. These
large, cuboidal cells with vacuolated nuclei without cells have a wide range of appearances, which
prominent nucleoli, surrounded by an outer layer of includes polygonal, plasmacytoid (hyaline cell), spin-
myoepithelial cells. The myoepithelial cells may be dle-shaped, or clear cell (Fig. 44) (36). Polygonal cells
morphologically similar to the duct lining cells or may a have a fine reticular arrangement, and a promi-
have variably eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm and nent spindle cell component can occasionally display
condensed, small, hyperchromatic nuclei, which are a schwannoma-like palisading growth pattern. Plas-
flattened or triangular. The ducts may contain eosino- macytoid myoepithelial cells are distinctive round to
philic secretory material and, although usually small, oval cells with eccentric nuclei and dense eosinophilic
they may become distended to form microcysts. More cytoplasm. They usually form sheets and small islands
solid areas of epithelial cells lacking ductal lumini within a hyalinized stroma. Plasmacytoid cells have a
may be seen admixed with myoepithelial cells. There distinct tendency to separate from one another. Squa-
can be moderate degrees of nuclear atypia and an mous metaplasia, sometimes with keratin pearl forma-
increased mitotic frequency, particularly in dense, tion, is a common feature, which can involve both ducts
cellular foci. Occasionally tumors contain multinucle- and sheets of cells (Fig. 45). Extensive areas of squa-
ated and other bizarre neoplastic cells (34). This find- mous metaplasia are uncommon unless there has been
ing does not appear to have any prognostic surgical intervention or infarction (Fig. 46). Infrequent-
significance. Crystalloids, including collagenous mate- ly, tumors have areas of sebaceous metaplasia, clear cell
rial, tyrosine-rich crystals, which form flowerlike change, and mucoepidermoid-like metaplasia. Focal
(‘‘daisy head’’) structures (Fig. 43A,B), and oxalate- oncocytosis is relatively common but occasionally the
like crystals, may be present (6). Intraductal, concen- entire tumor can be affected, making diagnosis difficult
trically laminated, corpora amylacea–like condensa- (Fig. 47) (37,38).
tions (Fig. 43C), and stromal amyloid are occasional The mesenchymal component is myxoid, carti-
features (35). The mesenchymal component, which laginous, or hyalinized and sometimes forms the
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 515
Figure 44 (A) Plasmacytoid (hyaline) myoepithelial cells. (B) Spindle-shaped myoepithelial cells forming a neurilemmoma-like pattern.
(C) Numerous clear myoepithelial cells. (D) Myoepithelial cells forming a reticular pattern.
Figure 45 Pleomorphic adenoma showing focal squamous Figure 46 Infarcted pleomorphic adenoma showing florid squa-
metaplasia. mous metaplasia.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 517
Figure 48 (A) Cartilaginous differentiation. The inset shows staining for keratan sulfate. (B) Pleomorphic adenoma showing bone
formation by endochondral ossification. (C) Pleomorphic adenoma showing bone forming by osseous metaplasia in stroma.
(D) Pleomorphic adenoma with cribriform areas resembling adenoid cystic carcinoma.
518 Eveson and Nagao
more vesicular. However, in small biopsies it may however, may remain necessary for deep-lobe tumors
not be possible to make a confident distinction (94). There is a particular tendency for predominantly
between these tumors, and a circumspect report myxoid pleomorphic adenomas to recur. These
should be considered. In such specimens, the value tumors are diffluent, have thinner capsules, and nod-
of c-kit expression in differentiating pleomorphic ules of tumor may bulge through the capsule. There is
adenoma from adenoid cystic carcinoma is yet to be a higher risk of rupture during surgery, and these
established (80). neoplasms appear to have a greater rate of recurrence
Squamous cell carcinoma or mucoepidermoid than predominantly cellular tumors (81,85). In this
carcinoma may need to be considered in the differen- context, a recent study showed that expression of the
tial diagnosis, particularly in limited biopsy tissue of mucin MUC1/DF3 in pleomorphic adenoma was a
a pleomorphic adenoma showing squamous or potential marker of the risk of recurrence (95).
mucoepidermoid metaplasia. This is especially the Patients with more than one recurrence usually had
case in pleomorphic adenomas of minor glands such their first recurrence earlier than patients who were
as the palate, as tumors in this location can be partic- cured after re-excision of their only recurrence (47 vs.
ularly cellular and often lack cartilaginous or myxoid 105 months) (83). It appears that recurrences are more
differentiation. The presence of plasmacytoid myoe- likely in young patients (81,96). Radiotherapy has
pithelial cells provides strong support for a diagnosis been used to treat recurrences and sometimes follow-
of pleomorphic adenoma and effectively eliminates ing rupture of the tumor during surgery, but its value
the possibility of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and remains uncertain (97,98).
squamous carcinoma.
Treatment and prognosis. The main problems in Myoepithelioma
the clinical management of pleomorphic adenoma
are the tendency of tumors to recur following surgery Introduction. Myoepithelioma is defined as ‘‘a
and the risk of malignant transformation. Recurrent benign salivary gland tumor composed almost exclu-
tumor is usually multifocal and occasionally becomes sively of sheets, islands or cords of cells with myoepi-
inoperable (Fig. 51) (81,82). In addition, treatment of thelial differentiation that may exhibit spindle,
recurrent tumors carries a high risk of facial nerve plasmacytoid, epithelioid or clear cytoplasmic features’’
injury, further recurrences, and an increased risk of (1). While myoepithelioma can be accepted as a separate
malignant progression (80). In pleomorphic adenoma and distinct entity (1,2), this tumor may represent one
of minor salivary glands recurrences are rare, and end of the histologic spectrum of pleomorphic adenoma
most of the problems are seen in tumors of the (3–7).
parotid gland. A meta-analysis of parotid pleomor- Clinical features. The incidence of myoepithe-
phic adenoma showed 3.4% of tumors recurred after lioma is 1.5% of all salivary gland neoplasms and it
five years and 6.8% after 10 years (83). Since superfi- accounts for 2.2% and 5.7% of all benign major and
cial parotidectomy, either total or partial, became a minor salivary gland tumors, respectively (2). How-
more widely used treatment, the recurrence rate has ever, myoepithelioma is probably not as rare as has
usually been less than 5% (84–87). In recent years, been previously suggested. The age of patients ranges
more conservative surgical techniques have been from 9 to 85 years, with an average of 44 years, but
adopted in an attempt to avoid the risks of facial there is no significant gender predilection (1). Myoe-
nerve palsy and Frey syndrome (88–93). Total paroti- pithelioma occurs most frequently in the parotid
dectomy with preservation of the facial nerve, gland (40%), followed by the palate (21%) and sub-
mandibular gland (10%) (1). Other minor salivary and
seromucinous gland sites can also be affected. The
skin, lung, and soft tissue have rarely been reported as
the primary site of myoepithelioma (8–10). It presents
as a slow-growing, painless mass, which is clinically
indistinguishable from pleomorphic adenoma. Rarely,
myoepithelial carcinoma arises from a preexisting
myoepithelioma (11).
Pathology. Grossly, myoepithelioma presents as a
well-circumscribed solid mass with a white to tan col-
ored cut surface (Fig. 52). The size of the tumor ranges
from 1 to 5 cm in diameter, but is usually less than 3 cm.
Microscopically, the tumor is surrounded by a
thin fibrous capsule in the parotid gland but is often
not encapsulated when located in the minor salivary or
seromucinous gland sites. As with pleomorphic adeno-
ma, a pushing margin with pseudopodia can be seen in
myoepithelioma, but the tumor does not show destruc-
tive invasive growth. It is composed of solid, sheetlike,
Figure 51 Multifocal recurrent pleomorphic adenoma in peri- myxoid, microcystic, or reticular growth patterns of
parotid adipose tissue. neoplastic myoepithelial cells exhibiting variable mor-
phologies (Fig. 53) (4). In many myoepitheliomas,
520 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 54 Myoepithelioma. (A) Spindle cell type. The spindle cells are arranged in an interlacing fascicular pattern. (B) Plasmacytoid
cell type. The plasmacytoid cells exhibiting eccentrically located nuclei and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm are surrounded by a myxoid
matrix. Note the lack of perinuclear halos seen in the true plasma cells. (C) Epithelioid cell type. Solid and trabecular growth patterns of
polygonal epithelial cells with central nuclei, and eosinophilic cytoplasm. (D) Clear cell type. Solid growth of polygonally shaped clear
cells with intercellular hyaline depositions.
is usually negative. Positive immunoreactivity for and spindle cell mesenchymal tumors or plasmacytoma.
pan-cytokeratin in conjunction with one or more In addition, myoepithelioma should be differentiated
myoepithelial markers may be required for the diag- from its malignant counterpart, myoepithelial carcino-
nosis of myoepithelioma. ma. In most instances, these two neoplasms can easily
Differential diagnosis. Since neoplastic myoepi- be distinguished by histologic hallmarks such as
thelial cells exhibit considerable morphogenic hetero- invasiveness, cellular pleomorphism, necrosis, and
geneity, myoepithelioma must be distinguished frequency of mitosis. Immunohistochemical assess-
from various other tumor types. Spindle cell mesen- ment of the Ki-67 labeling index is helpful in the
chymal tumors, such as extracranial meningioma, differential diagnosis between myoepithelioma
schwannoma, leiomyoma, benign fibrous histiocy- (range: 0.9–9.1%, mean: 5.4%) and myoepithelial
toma, and synovial sarcoma, should be considered carcinoma (range: 15.6–65.3%, mean: 35.0%) (11).
in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell variant of Treatment and prognosis. The treatment and
myoepithelioma. prognosis of myoepithelioma are essentially the
The plasmacytoid variant must not be misdiag- same as those of pleomorphic adenoma, because
nosed as plasmacytoma. Immunohistochemical exam- both tumors have a similar biologic behavior. Com-
ination for cytokeratin and specific myoepithelial plete surgical excision is the treatment of choice for
markers, including calponin and smooth muscle actin, myoepithelioma. Recurrence after appropriate treat-
is useful in distinguishing between myoepithelioma ment is unusual and the prognosis is excellent. Rarely,
522 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 57 Basal cell adenoma. Cut surface of the parotid gland Figure 58 Basal cell adenoma. Typical feature of the tumor
tumor shows well-circumscribed, grayish-white, solid mass. composed of basaloid cells forming solid islands, cords, and
ducts within a fibrous stroma. Note that each nest is sharply
demarcated from the stroma by basement membrane-like mate-
rial, and the myxochondroid stroma characteristically observed in
adenoma (14). Although rare examples of congenital pleomorphic adenoma, is absent.
basal cell adenoma have been described, these tumors
are best classified as sialoblastoma rather than as a
special form of basal cell adenoma (11,15). There is a
2:1 female predominance for most subtypes of basal
cell adenomas, although the membranous variant has Importantly, the myxochondroid stroma characteristi-
no gender predilection (11). Clinically, typical basal cally observed in pleomorphic adenoma is absent in
cell adenomas present as a solitary and freely mobile, basal cell adenoma. Scattered tubular structures are
superficial parotid tumor indistinguishable from pleo- seen within the cell nests with occasional squamous
morphic adenomas. However, they tend to be smaller eddies. The tumor cells have two basic cell types; one
than pleomorphic adenomas, usually not exceeding has scant cytoplasm and a round, basophilic nucleus
3 cm in diameter (14). with indistinct nucleoli, and the other has a larger,
Pathology. Basal cell adenoma is a well- paler nucleus and more abundant cytoplasm. The
circumscribed round or ovoid tumor with a distinct former cells tend to be located at the peripheral portion
fibrous capsule, except for the membranous type, of the nests, whereas the latter form tubular structures.
which has a multifocal or multinodular growth pat- The tumor cells are isomorphic without nuclear pleo-
tern. The cut surface is typically uniform and solid morphism. Mitotic figures and apoptotic cells may be
and varies from grayish-white to brown (Fig. 57). encountered but are scanty.
Their appearance has been described as similar to The solid variant of basal cell adenoma is char-
that of an enlarged lymph node. Formation of cysts acterized by large sheets, broad bands, and islands of
filled with brown, mucinous material is not uncom- basaloid cells with peripheral palisading (Fig. 59A).
mon, though its histogenesis has not yet been eluci- Whorling patterns or squamous eddies and occasional
dated. Basal cell adenomas tend to be under keratin pearl formation may be observed within the
3 cm in diameter with a range of 1.2 to 8 cm. cell nests. Only a few ductal structures are seen in this
Microscopically, basal cell adenoma is composed variant of basal cell adenoma. Cystic change is com-
of basaloid cells that form solid sheets, nests, cords, mon. An adenoid cystic pattern with multiple, pseu-
and ducts within a fibrous stroma (Fig. 58). Basal cell docystic formations may sometimes be observed in
adenomas are histologically subclassified into solid, basal cell adenoma, in which dilated lumina usually
trabecular, tubular, and membranous (dermal ana- contain Alcian blue–positive material (Fig. 60) (14,16).
logue) types, according to their cellular growth pattern The stroma is usually loose and scanty.
(Fig. 59). Although the most common type of basal cell In the trabecular variant, cellular features are the
adenoma is the solid variant, a mixture of several same as those seen in the solid variant, but the epithe-
architectural growth patterns is commonly seen. lial islands are narrower and form an interconnecting
Despite these different growth patterns, there are cordlike architecture (Fig. 59B). Rarely, a richly cellular
basic underlying histologic features that facilitate the stroma composed of S-100 protein-positive, modified
diagnosis. The peripherally located cells in the basa- myoepithelial cells is seen between tumor cords (17).
loid cell nests frequently show a palisading arrange- The tubular variant has prominent duct-like
ment and each nest is sharply demarcated from the structures with luminal cuboidal cells surrounded by
stroma by basement membrane–like material. one or more layers of basaloid cells (Fig. 59C).
524 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 59 Basal cell adenoma. (A) Solid type. Large sheets and broad bands of basaloid cells with peripheral palisading.
(B) Trabecular type. Narrow epithelial islands forming an interconnecting cordlike architecture. (C) Tubular type. Prominent duct-like
structures with intraluminal eosinophilic secretion. (D) Membranous type. Thick, hyaline, basement membrane–like material surrounds
large lobules. This material is also present within the epithelial nests forming coalescing, hyaline droplets.
Eosinophilic secretion is present within the ductal Electron microscopy. Ultrastructural observa-
lumina. Since a tubular pattern may often be seen in tions have confirmed both ductal and myoepithelial
conjunction with the trabecular pattern, some authors differentiation of the tumor cells (11,18). Luminal cells
merge the tubular and trabecular variants into a exhibit microvilli, tight junctional complexes, and
tubulotrabecular variant. Occasionally, focal or exten- occasional secretory granules characteristic of ductal
sive oncocytic change may be observed. differentiation. Abluminal cells include centrally
The membranous (dermal analogue) variant placed squamous cells, intermediate cells, and periph-
histologically resembles eccrine dermal cylindroma eral myoepithelial-type cells. In the membranous vari-
(Fig. 59D). Although the growth pattern and cellular ant, abundant stroma and intercellularly reduplicated,
features are similar to those of the solid variant, multilayered basal lamina are evident.
membranous basal cell adenoma is usually multinod- Immunohistochemistry. Basal cell adenomas
ular and is often not encapsulated. This multinodular show both ductal and myoepithelial differentiation
growth pattern should not be misinterpreted as malig- of variable degrees (19–21). Cytokeratin is detected
nancy. The tumor cell nests tend to be arranged in in luminal as well as abluminal cells in all tumors.
large lobules surrounded by thick, PAS-positive, hya- Epithelial membrane antigen is also expressed in
line, basement membrane–like material, forming nearly all tumors, but its distribution is confined to
‘‘jigsaw puzzle’’-like patterns. This material is also the apical portions of the luminal cells. The luminal
present within the epithelial nests forming coalescing, aspect of cell borders and the intraluminal secretion
hyaline droplets. show positive reaction for carcinoembryonic antigen.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 525
ducts (49). All lack the characteristic bilayered onco- bright eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (oncocytic
cytic epithelium of Warthin’s tumor, and lymphoepi- cells)’’ (1). Synonyms include oncocytic adenoma
thelial lesions (epimyoepithelial islands) are usually and oxyphil adenoma.
found in LESA, MALT lymphoma, and cystic lym- Clinical features. Oncocytoma is an uncommon
phoid hyperplasia of AIDS, but not in Warthin’s tumor and accounted for about 1.4% of primary epithe-
tumor. An important differential is from cystic metas- lial salivary gland neoplasms in an Armed Forces Insti-
tases in intra- and periparotid lymph nodes. The tute of Pathology (AFIP) series (2). It is seen
malignant nature of most should be obvious, but a predominantly in elderly patients, with an average age
recently reported variant of papillary thyroid carcino- of about 64 years. There is no racial or gender predilec-
ma has been described as ‘‘Warthin-like’’ (67,68). It is tion. In one major study 20% of patients gave a history of
characterized by a heavy lymphoid stroma and onco- previous radiotherapy to the head and neck or upper
cytic metaplasia of the epithelium. The best guide to torso or long-term occupational exposure (3). The aver-
its true nature is that the nuclei display typical chro- age age of these patients was 20 years younger than
matin clearing, inclusions and groove formation, and those not exposed to radiation (43 vs. 63 years) (3). The
the epithelial cells show immunohistochemical large majority of oncocytomas arise in the parotid (78%)
expression of thyroglobulin. and submandibular (9%) glands (2,4). Less commonly
If there is marked cytologic atypia and mitotic they occur in the minor salivary glands of the buccal
activity, the metaplastic variant can be mistaken for mucosa, palate, lip, tongue, and elsewhere (2,5–7). They
squamous or mucoepidermoid carcinoma, either pri- usually present as a unilateral painless swelling. Rare
mary or metastatic (40). The resemblance is particu- bilateral tumors have been reported (8–10).
larly close if there has been total infarction of the Pathology. Grossly, oncocytomas in major
original Warthin’s tumor. Also, the squamous meta- glands form a single, well-circumscribed but often
plasia lacks keratinization (seen in most squamous lobulated mass, which rarely exceeds 4 cm in diame-
carcinomas), and mucocytes are usually much less ter. The cut surface is uniform pink to rust-colored,
numerous than in low-grade cystic mucoepidermoid and occasionally there are small cysts or central stel-
carcinoma. late scarring.
Treatment and prognosis. In some cases, if the Microscopically, oncocytomas are encapsulated
diagnosis can be confidently established, active treat- and are solid with a variable cystic component. They
ment may not be necessary. Surgery, either superficial are composed predominantly of typical ‘light’ onco-
or limited parotidectomy, or local resection, is usually cytes with smaller numbers of dark cells (pyknocytes)
curative (69). The low reported rate of recurrence in (Fig. 68). These cells are arranged in sheets, nests,
most series (about 2–5.5%) (3,10) is probably the result trabeculae, or duct-like structures separated by thin,
of multifocal tumors. fibrovascular stroma. Microcysts or macrocysts are
Malignant change is seen in less than 1% of cases occasionally seen. Focal clear cell change is common
(46,70). It can involve the epithelial or lymphoid and occasionally the entire tumor consists of clear cells
components and in some cases there is a history of (Fig. 69) (11). It has been shown that the clear cell
previous radiation (34,46). Carcinomas that have been change is due to a combination of fixation artefact and
reported include squamous (71), adenocarcinoma (46), intracytoplasmic glycogen accumulation (11,12). Occa-
mucoepidermoid (72,73), oncocytic (74), Merkel cell sionally there may be binucleated or atypical nuclear
(75), and undifferentiated. Lymphoproliferative disor- forms. Foci of sebaceous and squamous metaplasia
ders associated with Warthin’s tumor include follicu- may also be apparent (3). Areas of chronic
lar lymphomas (76,77), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (78,79)
and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (80). Unique cases of
a MALT-type lymphoma and Warthin’s tumor pre-
senting in the same parotid gland (81), and a small
lymphocytic lymphoma forming a collision tumor,
have been reported (82).
Warthin’s tumor is the most common neoplasm
seen in association with other salivary tumors, par-
ticularly pleomorphic adenoma (14,83–85). In addi-
tion, there may be an increased association with the
development of extrasalivary neoplasms. This may
be due to a common etiology of cigarette smoking in
carcinomas of the lung, larynx, and possibly the
bladder, but in sites such as the hematolymphoid
system, kidney, and breast, the relationship could be
coincidental (17).
Oncocytoma
Introduction. Oncocytoma is defined as ‘‘a Figure 68 Oncocytoma consisting of characteristic light and
benign tumor of salivary gland origin composed dark cells.
exclusively of large epithelial cells with characteristic
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 531
Canalicular Adenoma
Introduction. Canalicular adenoma is defined as
‘‘a tumor composed of columnar epithelial cells
arranged in thin, anastomosing cords with a beaded
pattern. The stroma is characteristically paucicellular
and highly vascular’’ (1). Synonyms include basal cell
adenoma (canalicular type), monomorphic adenoma
(canalicular type), and adenomatosis of minor salivary
glands.
Clinical features. Canalicular adenoma is an
uncommon, benign salivary tumor that arises almost
Figure 69 Oncocytoma with clear cell change. exclusively in minor glands where it accounts for 4%
to 6% of all tumors (2,3). It is seen predominantly in
adults, with a mean age of 65 years and a range from
33 to 88 years; it is uncommon before the sixth decade
inflammation are occasionally present. Oncocytomas (2–5). The sex ratio has varied from a definite female
may be seen in combination with multifocal nodular preponderance of 1.8:1 (2) to a slight male predomi-
oncocytic hyperplasia (13). nance (5) or no significant gender difference (6). The
Differential diagnosis. The differential diagnosis upper lip is the most common site, accounting for
of oncocytoma includes other salivary gland tumors about 70% to 80% of cases (2,4,5). The buccal mucosa
with an oncocytic component, salivary tumors con- and palate are the next most common sites (3,7). It is
sisting of large cells with granular cytoplasm, and rare in the parotid gland (3–9) and no cases have been
clear cell neoplasms. Oncocytic metaplasia can be reported in the submandibular or sublingual glands
seen in a wide range of salivary gland tumors, includ- (3). Canalicular adenomas are occasionally bilateral
ing pleomorphic adenoma, basal cell adenoma, (10,11) or multifocal, usually in the upper lip and
mucoepidermoid carcinoma, epithelial-myoepithelial buccal mucosa (6,12–14). Tumors typically present as
carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, polymorphous slow-growing, painless masses but infarcted (15) or
low-grade adenocarcinoma, and adenocarcinoma traumatically ulcerated tumors (4,16) may be painful.
(14–16). This metaplasia is usually focal and rarely The mass is usually mobile and can be solid or
causes diagnostic difficulties. However, occasionally fluctuant. The overlying mucosa may be normal in
in pleomorphic adenoma (17) and mucoepidermoid color, or bluish, when the tumor resembles a salivary
carcinoma (18–20) almost the entire tumor may show mucocele. Canalicular adenomas rarely exceed 2 cm in
oncocytic change. Careful examination usually reveals diameter and the mean size is 1.7 cm (2). The duration
more specific features of these tumors such as hyaline of the tumor has varied from a few months to 15 years,
cells and myxochondroid matrix in pleomorphic ade- with a mean of 8.4 years (2).
noma and mucocytes in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Pathology. Grossly, most canalicular adenomas
An ‘‘oncocytoid’’ artefact due to diathermy used range between 0.5 and 2 cm in maximum diameter,
during surgery has been described, and this can be and they are well circumscribed and variably encap-
confused with oncocytosis or oncocytoma (21). sulated. In one series nearly a quarter of tumors had
Tumors with a significant granular cell component multifocal nodules (5). The cut surface varies from
include acinic cell carcinoma and granular cell tumor. light yellow to tan, and there are frequently cystic
Staining with PAS with prior diastase digestion spaces filled with clear or lightly stained gelatinous
shows that the intracytoplasmic granules of acinic material. Microscopy of larger tumors usually con-
cell carcinoma are positive, whereas those in oncocy- firms the circumscribed and encapsulated nature of
tomas are negative. Staining with PTAH may also aid the neoplasm but smaller tumors and multifocal nod-
distinction. Granular cell tumors have been rarely ules frequently lack a capsule (2,12). Small foci of
reported in salivary glands (22). The cells of this adenomatous change may be seen in adjacent minor
tumor are S-100 protein-positive, and distinction glands. The most distinctive feature of canalicular
from oncocytoma should not be difficult. The differ- adenoma is the formation of parallel rows of cuboidal
ential diagnosis of clear cell salivary neoplasms is or columnar cells forming a single layer (Fig. 70). The
considered on page 562. rows of cells may be closely opposed or show focal
Treatment and prognosis. Although oncocyto- areas where they separate to form a characteristic
mas are benign tumors, reported rates of recurrence beaded pattern. The cells are cytologically bland and
vary from 0% to 30% within periods ranging from have moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm
6 months to 13 years (23). Recurrences are probably and uniform, oval, or round basophilic nuclei. The
due to incomplete resections or multifocal disease. latter contain diffuse, finely granular chromatin, and
Both primary and recurrent oncocytomas should be prominent nucleoli are uncommon. Mitoses are rarely
532 Eveson and Nagao
seen in the absence of an inflammatory overlay (15). trabecular or tubulotrabecular basal cell adenomas. In
There may be foci of mucous, or more rarely onco- addition, the tumors have distinctive immunohisto-
cytic, metaplasia (2,16). The cellular strands are usu- chemical profiles, particularly in regard to myoepi-
ally sharply demarcated from the surrounding thelial differentiation (21). However, occasional
stroma. This may be loosely collagenized but it is tumors show a hybrid morphology making meaning-
frequently sparsely cellular and myxoid, producing ful distinction impossible (23). As both tumors
a microcystic appearance. In addition, the stroma may behave in a similar fashion, the separation has little
contain a conspicuous network of congested capillar- clinical importance. Notable features that help dis-
ies with surrounding cuffs of eosinophilic collagen (1). tinguish canalicular adenoma from adenoid cystic
There may be areas of hemorrhage and associated carcinoma include its circumscribed nature, with no
hemosiderin deposition, together with patchy inflam- evidence of invasion, and the characteristic vascular-
matory infiltration. Extensive necrosis may follow ity of the stromal component (24). In equivocal cases,
infarction of the tumor (15). Occasionally, the solid or when there is evidence of multifocality, the
tumor element forms no more than a mural thickening absence of staining with myoepithelial markers may
projecting into a unilocular cystic space. There may be aid distinction.
papillary epithelial projections into the cystic spaces, Treatment and prognosis. Complete but conser-
and this is sometimes associated with the presence of vative surgical removal usually results in a cure.
psammoma bodies (2,16). When there is recurrence it is difficult to know if
Immunohistochemistry. Canalicular adenomas this is merely a manifestation of multifocal disease
are positive for cytokeratins and S-100 protein and (4,7,25). Indeed, given the frequency of multifocal
may show more variable staining for vimentin and tumor, it is surprising that the recurrence rate is so
glial fibrillary acid protein (17–20). They are negative low (26). An exceptional case of a histologically con-
for more sensitive markers of myoepithelial differen- ventional canalicular adenoma of the palate behaved
tiation such as calponin, a smooth muscle actin, and aggressively and invaded into the maxillary sinus and
smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (21). In addition, nasal cavity (27).
the tumor is negative for carcinoembryonic antigen,
p53, p63, and p73 (18,22). Analysis of the cytokeratin Sebaceous Adenoma
subsets showed that most of the cells stained strongly
for cytokeratins 7 and 13, but staining for cytokeratin Introduction. Sebaceous adenoma is defined as
19 was weak (20). Cytokeratins 8 and 19 were only ‘‘a rare, usually well-circumscribed tumor composed
found in occasional cellular aggregates or scattered of irregularly sized and shaped nests of sebaceous
individual cells. cells without cytologic atypia, often with areas of
Differential diagnosis. The main differential squamous differentiation and cystic change’’ (1).
diagnoses are basal cell adenoma and adenoid cystic Clinical features. Sebaceous adenoma is very rare
carcinoma. The characteristic bilayered cellular and accounts for only 0.1% of all salivary tumors (2). It
strands and distinctive stromal degeneration of is typically seen in adults with a mean age at diagnosis
canalicular adenoma should aid the separation from of 58 years and a range of 22 to 90 years. There is a
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 533
slight male preponderance (M:F, 1.6:1) (3,4). About half Striking oncocytic metaplasia is occasionally seen,
of reported cases involved the parotid gland (5) with and there may be small areas of xanthogranuloma-
buccal mucosa (6), retromolar trigone (7), and subman- tous inflammation (1). Very rarely, sebaceous adeno-
dibular gland in that order accounting for the remain- mas form part of a hybrid tumor (8).
der (4). They usually present as painless masses. Treatment and prognosis. Sebaceous adenoma is
Pathology. Tumors have ranged in size from a benign tumor that is easily eradicated by complete
0.4 to 3 cm in diameter and are usually circumscribed surgical excision.
or encapsulated. The cut surface is yellow or grayish
white and can be solid or cystic (3,4). Microscopically Lymphadenomas
they consist of nests of cytologically bland sebaceous
cells often with foci of squamous differentiation, Lymphadenomas are rare benign salivary gland
aggregated into nests and surrounded by fibrous neoplasms that are histologically characterized by
stroma (Figs. 71, 72). The tumor cells show positive well-circumscribed tumors composed of proliferating
reactivity for cytokeratin and epithelial membrane epithelial nests in a lymphocytic background. In the
antigen but are not reactive with myoepithelial 2005 WHO Classification of Salivary Gland Tumors, they
markers such as vimentin, S-100 protein, or smooth were subclassified into sebaceous and nonsebaceous
muscle actin (7). The cell nests may be microcystic, types, depending on the presence or absence of seba-
and some tumors consist mainly of dilated ductal ceous differentiation (1); the former has been generally
structures with focal sebaceous differentiation. called a ‘‘sebaceous lymphadenoma’’ and the latter is
often referred to as simply ‘‘lymphadenoma.’’
Sebaceous lymphadenoma. Sebaceous cells are
commonly found within normal salivary gland paren-
chyma, and sebaceous differentiation can be seen
infrequently in a wide variety of well-recognized
salivary gland tumors (2). However, primary seba-
ceous neoplasms arising in the salivary glands are rare
and are histologically classified into sebaceous adenoma,
sebaceous lymphadenoma, sebaceous carcinoma, and
sebaceous lymphadenocarcinoma (2,3). The term
sebaceous lymphadenoma was designated by McGav-
ran and Bauer in 1960 (4), but a similar tumor was first
described by Rawson and Horn in 1950 (5).
Clinical Features. Sebaceous lymphadenoma
presents as a slowly enlarging, painless mass, almost
exclusively in or around the parotid gland. One tumor
occurred in the anterior midline of the neck. Slightly
over 50 cases of sebaceous lymphadenoma have been
reported to date (6,7). The majority of the patients
Figure 71 Sebaceous adenoma showing nests of sebaceous are adults in the sixth to eighth decade, with an age
cells with peripheral squamous differentiation. range of 25 to 89 years (6). There is no gender
predilection. Synchronous presentation with other
salivary gland tumors, such as squamous cell carcino-
ma, acinic cell carcinoma, and Warthin’s tumor, has
been reported (2).
Pathology. Grossly, the tumor appears as a
well-defined and usually encapsulated mass, ranging
in size from 1.3 to 6.0 cm in greatest dimension. It
presents as a yellow to tan, solid, microcystic or,
uncommonly, unicystic lesion on the cut surface.
Sebum is commonly observed in the cystic tumor.
Microscopically, sebaceous lymphadenoma is a
well-circumscribed tumor composed of uniformly
distributed, variably shaped epithelial nests contain-
ing sebaceous cells, salivary duct-like structures, and
cystic formations with a lymphoid background
(Fig. 73). Cysts consist of numerous haphazardly
arranged spaces lined by squamous, cuboidal to
columnar, or sebaceous-type epithelium. Oncocytic
change may be present. In addition, scattered mucous
cells may also be found in ductal epithelial structures.
Figure 72 Sebaceous adenoma consisting solely of sebaceous The surrounding lymphoid stroma often shows reac-
cells of varying sizes. tive follicles with germinal centers. Foreign body giant
cell reactions against the extravasated sebum are
534 Eveson and Nagao
Keratocystoma
Introduction. Squamous cells are known to be
present in a variety of salivary gland diseases. How-
ever, benign salivary gland tumors composed of purely
squamous cells are quite unusual. Keratocystoma is a
rare, benign salivary gland tumor characterized by
multicystic spaces lined by stratified squamous epi-
thelium containing keratotic lamellae and focal solid
epithelial nests (1,2). In 1999, Seifert et al. reported the
Figure 79 Oncocytic cystadenoma. (A) Papillary-cystic prolifer- first example of this tumor, which they called ‘‘chori-
ation of oncocytic epithelium in the parotid gland. Note the stoma,’’ resembling trichoadenoma (1). In 2002, Nagao
absence of lymphoid infiltration in fibrous stroma separating et al. described two histologically identical cases and
cystic spaces. (B) The cysts are lined by a double-layered
designated them ‘‘keratocystoma,’’ a term that refers
oncocytic epithelium, resembling that seen in Warthin tumor.
Source: Courtesy of Dr. Jean E. Lewis, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, to the specific histopathologic features of the tumor
Minnesota, U.S.A. (2). In the 2005 WHO Histological Classification of Sali-
vary Gland Tumors, keratocystoma was not adopted as
an independent entity, and instead was briefly men-
tioned in the section of squamous cell carcinoma (3).
Salivary duct cyst is a unilocular lesion lined by Clinical features. Only three cases of keratocys-
a smoothly outlined epithelium without intracystic toma have been reported (1,2). The patients, two
papillary proliferations. Duct ectasia secondary to males and one female, were from 8 to 38 years old.
obstruction often displays a multicystic appearance, However, increased recognition of the tumor may
but this lesion involves several duct segments usu- alter the epidemiologic characteristics. All three
ally associated with acinar atrophy, fibrosis, and reported tumors arose in the parotid gland. Clinically,
chronic inflammatory cell infiltration in the adjacent the tumor manifests as a painless, slowly growing
salivary gland. Unlike the well-circumscribed tumor mass in the parotid gland. CT shows a low-density
formation of cystadenoma, polycystic disease is a multilocular cystic mass with enhanced septa. Kera-
diffuse lesion throughout the affected salivary tocystoma is a completely benign tumor. After subto-
gland. tal parotidectomy, no additional therapy is needed.
The oncocytic variant of papillary cystadenoma Pathology. The cut surface of the tumor shows a
lacks a dense lymphoid stroma characteristic of War- multilocular cystic lesion filled with a keratin-like
thin’s tumor. Additionally, the lining epithelium of substance (Fig. 80A). The three reported tumors had
oncocytic cystadenoma may focally be admixed with a maximum dimension of 1.3 to 4.0 cm.
cuboidal or columnar cells. Multicystic and papillary Histopathologically, the tumor consists mainly
pattern of low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma can of multiple cysts that contain keratotic lamellae
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 541
areas, however, are usually accompanied by exten- Acinic cell carcinoma usually presents as a slow-
sive necrosis, and immunoreactivity for cytokeratins growing, painless, mobile mass, although some cases
may reveal columnar cell phenotypes but no squa- may be fixed and nodular. The duration ranges from a
mous differentiation (5). In addition, foci with few weeks to over 40 years with an average of 6 to
characteristic double cell layer of oncocytic cells are 7 years (2,15,21–23). Pain or tenderness is present in
present at least focally even in such type of Warthin’s about half of the cases and facial nerve involvement is
tumor. seen in 5% to 10% of patients (15,22,24,25).
Other lesions that can be mistaken for keratocys- Pathology. Grossly, tumors form rubbery or
toma are necrotizing sialometaplasia and epidermal firm, round or lobulated, circumscribed masses that
and dermoid cysts. Necrotizing sialometaplasia is an are usually less than 3 cm in diameter. A minority of
inflammatory and usually self-limiting disorder of the tumors have ill-defined margins or appear multifocal.
salivary glands that occurs commonly in the hard or The cut surfaces vary from white to yellow to tan and
soft palate but can also be found in the parotid gland red. They may be homogeneous or show extensive
(6–8). In keratocystoma, the lack of the lobular infarc- cystic change. Recurrent tumors form multifocal and
tion or necrosis and the general lobular morphology, often poorly defined nodules.
the formation of much larger cysts, and the absence of Microscopically, there is a surprisingly wide
a granular layer in the squamous lining may be range of cell types and architectural configurations
helpful for distinguishing it from necrotizing sialome- with a unifying feature of serous acinar differentiation
taplasia. Rarely, epidermal and dermoid cysts may in some part of the tumor. The cell types present, other
occur in the parotid gland (9,10). Most epidermal cysts than serous acinar cells, include intercalated ductal,
show unilocular cystic formation with a granular layer nonspecific glandular, vacuolated, and clear cells.
in their lining. Unlike in dermoid cysts, skin appen- Acinar cells (Fig. 81) are the commonest and most
dages such as hair follicles and sebaceous glands are characteristic cells. They resemble the normal serous
absent in keratocystoma. acinar cells and are round or polyhedral and have
abundant, pale, basophilic cytoplasm. These contain
dense, grayish, or blue zymogen granules that may be
I. Malignant Tumors fine or moderately coarse and are PAS positive and
Acinic Cell Carcinoma diastase resistant (Fig. 82). The nuclei are round,
uniform, and typically located peripherally. They are
Introduction. Acinic cell carcinoma is defined as usually darkly stained and basophilic or occasionally
‘‘a malignant epithelial neoplasm of salivary glands in more vesicular. Intercalated duct-type cells are
which at least some of the neoplastic cells demonstrate smaller, cuboidal in shape, and have less cytoplasm
serous acinar differentiation, which is characterized that, in contrast, is eosinophilic or amphophilic. The
by cytoplasmic zymogen secretory granules. Salivary nuclei are usually centrally located. These cells sur-
ductal cells are also a component of this neoplasm’’ round duct-like spaces of variable sizes. Vacuolated
(1). Synonyms include acinic cell adenocarcinoma and cells are a common and sometimes conspicuous com-
acinous cell carcinoma. ponent of the tumor (26). They contain clear, PAS/D-
Clinical features. Acinic cell carcinoma accounts negative cytoplasmic vacuoles of variable sizes or, less
for about 3% to 6% of all salivary gland tumors and frequently, occasional zymogen granules can also be
between 7% and 17.5% of malignant salivary neo- identified. The nuclei have an open chromatin pattern
plasms in major series (2–5). The parotid gland is the and may show more pleomorphism than acinar or
most common site accounting for about 80% to 90% of
cases (2), with tumors of the minor glands of the oral
cavity forming the second most common site (2,5).
Intraoral tumors are most frequent in the upper lip,
buccal mucosa, and palate. Acinic cell carcinoma is
relatively uncommon in the submandibular gland
(*4%) and rare in the sublingual gland (2). Occasional
cases are reported in the lacrimal gland (6) and sero-
mucous glands of the upper and lower respiratory tract
(7,8). Central tumors in the mandible have also been
described (9). It is the most common malignant salivary
gland tumor to arise bilaterally (3%) (10,11). Acinic cell
carcinoma may be a component of a hybrid tumor (12).
There is a slight female predominance in most
published series (2,4,13–15), and tumors are seen over
a wide age range (3–91 years) with a fairly uniform
age distribution from the third to seventh decades (2).
The mean age in the largest series was 44 years (2). It
is the second most common salivary malignancy in
children (16–19). There is no ethnic predilection, and Figure 81 Acinic cell carcinoma showing basophilic, granular
there are only two case reports suggesting a familial cells that resemble normal serous acinar cells.
association (11,20).
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 543
Figure 82 Acinic cell carcinoma. Periodic acid Schiff stain Figure 84 Acinic cell carcinoma with solid and microcystic
highlighting zymogen granules on the luminal aspect. pattern.
Figure 83 Acinic cell carcinoma showing focal clear cell Figure 85 Acinic cell carcinoma with microcystic pattern and
change. lymphocyte-rich stroma.
Figure 86 (A) Acinic cell carcinoma. Papillary-cystic variant consisting of basophilic cells. (B) Acinic cell carcinoma. Papillary-cystic
variant consisting of nonspecific glandular and clear cells. In this variant there is characteristic luminal blebbing. (C) Acinic cell carcinoma
with basophilic acinar cells forming follicles. (D) Acinic cell carcinoma with nonspecific glandular cells forming follicles containing colloid
material and resembling thyroid tissue.
cell carcinomas suggesting that it is not commonly In 1945, Stewart et al. were the first to describe
mutated (57). However, phosphorylation of serine 795 this neoplasm as ‘‘mucoepidermoid tumor’’ (3). They
resulting from cyclin D over-expression was more divided this tumor into two varieties: ‘‘relatively
frequent in tumors than normal salivary gland tissue. favorable’’ (benign) and ‘‘highly unfavorable’’ (malig-
In addition, there appeared to be no changes in nant). In 1953, Foote and Frazell reported that some
p16INK4a expression in the tumors compared with patients with ‘‘relatively favorable’’ tumors, included
normal tissue. This observation correlates with those in the previous citation, developed distant metastases
reports showing there was no loss of heterozygosity in (4). Nevertheless, the 1st edition of the WHO Histolog-
these tumors (58). ical Classification of Salivary Gland Tumors, published in
Treatment and prognosis. There is considerable 1972, retained the term mucoepidermoid tumor, for
variation in the reported rates of local recurrence (8– the reason that only minority do eventually metasta-
60%) and both regional and distant metastasis (7–29%) size and in only a very few does invasiveness assume
(59). The wide range of incidence may reflect inappro- a serious degree, though these tumors must be
priately conservative initial management in earlier regarded as potentially malignant (5). Now, all of
cases. The average recurrence rate is about 35%, and these tumors are considered to be malignant with
the average rate of metastasis and disease-associated the capability to recur or metastasize to regional
death is about 16% (2). In a meta-analysis of over lymph nodes or to distant viscera, regardless of their
2000 cases, the 5- and 10-year survival was 82% and macroscopic or microscopic appearances. Thus, the
68%, respectively (60). Multiple recurrences, locore- 2nd and 2005 editions of the WHO classification
gional or distant metastases, usually to lung or bone, adopted the term mucoepidermoid carcinoma (2,6).
are associated with a very poor prognosis (23,61). Mucoepidermoid carcinoma has been defined as ‘‘a
Tumors in the minor glands have a better outcome malignant glandular epithelial neoplasm character-
than those in major glands (24,62–65), and subman- ized by mucous, intermediate, and epidermoid cells,
dibular gland tumors have the worst prognosis. His- with columnar, clear cell and oncocytoid features (2).
tologic grading is of limited value in assessing Clinical features. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is
outcome (15,59). Features associated with more clini- the most common malignant salivary gland tumor in
cally aggressive tumors include a high mitotic fre- both major and minor salivary gland sites, accounting
quency, cellular pleomorphism, necrosis, perineural for about 2% to 16% of all salivary gland tumors and
or vascular invasion, stromal desmoplasia, and wide- 12% to 29% of all salivary gland malignancies (1,7,8).
spread invasion (14,39,59,61,66). Attempts to devise a Slightly over half of the tumors arise in the major
histopathologic grading system based on architectural salivary glands. In the major salivary glands, the
characteristics, invasion, and vascular involvement parotid gland is the most frequent site (45%), followed
have not received universal acceptance (66). One by 7% in the submandibular gland and 1% in the
study found that a predominantly solid architecture sublingual gland (1). The palate is the most frequently
was a strong predictor of recurrence (67). Ki-67 pro- involved minor salivary gland site, but the buccal
liferation index may be a useful predictor of clinical mucosa, upper and lower lips, retromolar region,
behavior (68,69). DNA studies have produced con- and tongue may be affected (1,7).
flicting results in predicting likely outcome (70–73). Mucoepidermoid carcinoma can arise from
Dedifferentiated acinic cell carcinoma is associated ectopic salivary gland tissue in periparotid lymph
with a particularly poor prognosis. Clinical staging nodes as well as in the larynx, lacrimal gland, nose,
appears to be the best indicator of clinical outcome. paranasal sinuses, lung, and trachea (9). Rarely, it
Large tumors (>6 cm diameter) and involvement of originates in the mandible and maxilla as an intra-
the deep lobe of the parotid gland (4,15,21,61) are osseous tumor, referred to as ‘‘central mucoepider-
associated with a worse outcome. moid carcinoma’’ (1,10–13). The histogenesis of central
Surgical excision is the treatment of choice, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma remains controversial,
failure to excise the tumor completely in the initial but one highly possible theory is that this malignancy
operation is an indicator of poor prognosis (22). arises from the lining epithelium of odontogenic cysts
Superficial parotidectomy is the most commonly (1,10–13).
employed surgical procedure, and neck dissection is The majority of mucoepidermoid carcinoma
not undertaken unless there is a specific indication, as occurs between the third and sixth decades of life
there is a low reported incidence of regional metasta- with a mean patient age of about 45 years, but it may
ses. Radiotherapy appears to be of limited value present at any age (2). Patients with palatal tumors are
(59,61). about 7 years younger than those with other intraoral
minor salivary gland tumors (1). It is the most com-
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma mon salivary gland malignancy of children, and most
tumors in this age group are low grade (14,15). There
Introduction. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a is a slight female predominance with a 3:2 female to
malignant epithelial neoplasm characterized by the male ratio (1).
proliferation of epidermoid, mucous, and intermedi- Prior exposure to ionizing radiation is the most
ate type cells in various proportions (1,2). This malig- common etiologic factor associated with the devel-
nancy exhibits varying degrees of differentiation and opment of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Atomic
histologic grade as well as widely diverse biologic bomb survivors exposed to radiation in Hiroshima
behavior. and Nagasaki have suffered mucoepidermoid
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 547
Figure 92 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. (A) Clear cell variant. Figure 93 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. (A) Abundant hyali-
(B) Oncocytic variant. nized stroma is evident. (B) Extensive secondary lymphoid cell
infiltration, referred to as tumor-associated lymphoid
proliferation.
Cystic spaces contain mucinous material, which occa- into low grade, intermediate grade, or high grade.
sionally leaks into the stromal tissue, forming mucin Low- and intermediate-grade mucoepidermoid carci-
pools. The ductal structures are formed by clear and nomas tend to have a more favorable outcome than
columnar cells. The solid nests are composed mainly high-grade tumors, which have a greater tendency to
of intermediate cells admixed with epidermoid, recur and metastasize.
mucous, clear, and uncommonly oncocytic cells. The Many investigators have tried to define histolog-
fibrous stroma is usually abundant and sometimes ic features that have prognostic significance and pro-
hyalinized (Fig. 93A). Hyalinization may be pro- posed various grading schemes (3,4,27–33). In the
nounced and rarely is accompanied by dense eosino- literature, the histopathologic grading criteria of
philic cell infiltration (sclerosing mucoepidermoid mucoepidermoid carcinoma remain controversial.
carcinoma with eosinophilia) (23–25). Extensive sec- However, the AFIP scoring system offers good corre-
ondary lymphoid cell infiltration, referred to as lation with clinical outcome and high reproducibility
tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation (26), is com- (1,29,31,34) (Table 6). The grading is based on a
monly present (Fig. 93B); the feature may be confused scoring system of five histologic features: intracystic
with metastasis to or origin from ectopic salivary component <20% (þ2), neural invasion (þ2), necrosis
gland tissue in intraparotid lymph nodes. (þ3), 4 or more mitotic figures per high-power fields
The histopathologic features of mucoepidermoid (þ3), and anaplasia (þ4); and based on the total score
carcinoma are complex and largely depend on the a case is categorized as low grade (score 0–4), interme-
histologic grade; these tumors are generally classified diate grade (score 5–6), or high grade (score > 6)
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 549
Table 6 Histologic Grading System (Armed Forces Institute of Table 7 Histologic Grading System Proposed by Brandwein
Pathology) et al.
Parameter Point value Characteristic features Defining features
Intracystic component <20% þ2 Grade I – Prominent goblet cell – Lack of grade III defining
Neural invasion present þ2 component features
Necrosis present þ3 – Cyst formation and – Lack of aggressive
Four or more mitoses per 10 HPFs þ3 intermediate cells may invasion pattern
Anaplasia þ4 be prominent
– Circumscribed growth
Grade Total score Death of diseasea pattern
Low grade 0–4 3.3%
Grade II – Intermediate cells – Aggressive invasion
Intermediate grade 5–6 9.7%
predominate over pattern
High grade 7 or more 46.3%
mucinous cells
a – Mostly solid tumor – Lack of grade III defining
Five-year mortality rate.
Abbreviation: HPFs, high-power fields. features
Source: From Ref. 31. – Squamous cells may be
seen
Grade III – Squamous cells – Necrosis, perineural
(Table 6). The cellular anaplasia is represented by
predominate spread, vascular
cellular and nuclear pleomorphism, increased nuclear- – Intermediate and invasion, bony
cytoplasmic ratio, prominent or multiple nucleoli, and mucinous cells must invasion, >4 mitosis/10
hyperchromasia. This system is applicable to the parotid also be present HPFs, high-grade
gland and intraoral minor salivary gland tumors, but it – Mostly solid nuclear pleomorphism
does not predict outcome of submandibular tumors,
which have a significant metastatic potential irrespec- Features Points
tive of histologic grade (29,31). On the other hand, Intracystic component < 25% 2
Brandwein et al. noted that the AFIP scoring system Tumor front invades in small nests and islands 2
tends to downgrade mucoepidermoid carcinomas (32) Pronounced nuclear atypia 2
(Table 7). Their modified grading system adds three- Lymphatic or vascular invasion 3
additional parameters (invasion in the form of small Bony invasion 3
nests or islands, lymphovascular invasion, and bony > 4 mitoses/10 HPFs 3
invasion). Perineural spread 3
Necrosis 3
Low-grade tumors are characteristically composed
of multiple cystic structures of variable sizes that are Grade Total points Death of diseasea
lined predominantly by mucous cells (Fig. 94). Some I 0 0%
cysts may have focal papillary projections of lining II 2 or 3 5%
epithelial cells. Usually, mucous cells are more com- III 4 or more 63%
mon than intermediate- and high-grade tumors. Solid a
nests are a minor component and are composed Mortality rate at 36 months.
Abbreviation: HPFs, high-power fields.
mainly of intermediate cells. Squamous cell differenti- Source: From Ref. 32.
ation and clear cell change may be present, at least
focally. In low-grade tumors, cellular or nuclear pleo-
morphism is absent, and mitotic figures are rare.
Tumor borders are generally well circumscribed and
minimally invasive. However, a case of dedifferentia- tumors are composed primarily of epidermoid cells
tion to anaplastic, undifferentiated carcinoma from and a small proportion of intermediate cells, which
histologically low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma usually have marked cellular pleomorphism and high
has been reported (35). mitotic activity. Necrosis may be present, and peri-
Intermediate-grade tumors have less tendency to neural and lymphovascular invasion is common.
form cystic structures and contain smaller cystic Some areas of high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma
spaces (Fig. 95). In most cases, cyst-lining cells are may resemble nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcino-
mainly columnar cells with occasional mucous cells. ma. Since mucous cells are few and are scattered
Solid sheets or nests, consisting of intermediate cells within the tumor cell nests, mucin stains are often
as well as epidermoid cells, become a conspicuous required to identify them. Foci of low-grade mucoe-
component in intermediate-grade tumors compared pidermoid carcinoma are rarely present within high-
with low-grade tumors. Intermediate-grade tumors grade tumors. In addition, a case of high-grade
show an invasive growth pattern, at least focally. mucoepidermoid carcinoma with a spindle cell sarco-
Mild to moderate cellular pleomorphism and a few matoid component has been reported (36).
mitotic figures may be seen. A few examples of mucoepidermoid carcinoma
High-grade tumors manifest as predominantly arising in or associated with Warthin’s tumor (37),
solid nests with scanty cystic structures (Fig. 96). pleomorphic adenoma (38), salivary duct cyst (39),
They have markedly infiltrative borders. These and odontogenic cyst (10) have been reported.
550 Eveson and Nagao
have local recurrence only, 5% develop metastasis and b-catenin is correlated with adverse outcome (59).
survive, and 11% die of disease (31). High expression of MUC1 is related to high histologic
The clinical stage appears to be the most signifi- grades, high recurrence and metastasis rates, and a
cant prognostic indicator of mucoepidermoid carcino- shorter disease-free interval (48,49). On the other
ma. Five-year survival rates of the patients have been hand, high MUC4 expression is associated with low-
reported to be 97% to 100%, 70% to 83%, and 20% to grade tumors, lower recurrence rates, and a longer
37% for stage I, II, and III cases, respectively (7,33,52). disease-free interval (49).
Histologic grade also closely correlates with patient Complete surgical excision is the treatment of
outcome. However, the clinical stage is a stronger choice for mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Adequate
prognostic indicator than the histologic grade. excision is important in all grades of tumor, with
There are some differences in survival rate much higher recurrence rates reported with positive
among the histologic grades reported in the literature, surgical margins (27). Radiation therapy should be
because of the variable histologic grading criteria used added in high-grade tumors and for patients with
(3,4,27–32) (Tables 6 and 7). Low-grade tumors rarely questionable or positive surgical margins or for
recur or metastasize. According to the AFIP, 5% of those with positive lymph nodes. For the patients
major gland and 2.5% of minor gland low-grade with positive surgical margins, postoperative radio-
mucoepidermoid carcinomas metastasized to regional therapy may improve local control. Neck dissection is
lymph nodes or resulted in death of the patient (1). indicated when there is clinical evidence of regional
Most investigators have indicated that the five-year metastasis, high clinical stage, high histologic grade,
survival rate is over 92% in the low-grade tumor or proximity of tumor to regional lymph nodes.
group. Intermediate-grade tumors have a slightly
higher tendency of recurrence and metastasis than
low-grade tumor. Healey et al. reported that recur- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
rence rate following surgery of intermediate tumor is
20% compared with 6% for low-grade tumor (27). The Introduction. Adenoid cystic carcinoma is
five-year survival rate of intermediate-grade mucoe- defined as ‘‘a basaloid tumor consisting of epithelial
pidermoid carcinoma ranges from 62% to 92%. and myoepithelial cells in variable morphologic con-
High-grade tumors are much more likely to have figurations, including tubular, cribriform, and solid
recurrence and metastases than low- and intermediate- patterns’’ (1). Synonyms include cylindroma, adeno-
grade tumors. The recurrence rate has been reported cystic carcinoma, adenoepithelioma, and basaloma.
as 59% in high-grade tumors (31). Common sites for Clinical features. Adenoid cystic carcinoma
distant metastasis include the lungs, bones, liver, and accounted for 4.4% of all salivary gland tumors and
brain. Distant metastases imply a poor prognosis; 11.8% of malignant salivary neoplasms in the largest
patients with minor and major salivary gland tumors reported series (2). It affects a wide age range (9–103
with distant metastases survive 2.3 and 2.6 years on years) with a peak incidence in the fifth to seventh
average, respectively (1). The five-year survival rate of decades, but it is very rare in children (3,4). There is a
high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma is up to 53%. slight female preponderance in most large series,
Regarding the tumor location, submandibular gland particularly in the submandibular gland (5–10). In a
tumors metastasize to the regional lymph nodes more combined series of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the
frequently than other major and minor salivary gland upper aerodigestive tract where the site was recorded,
tumors (7). The margin status of the initial excision 42% involved the major glands and 58% the minor
closely correlates with the recurrence rate, regardless glands (2,11–15). The most common sites were the
of tumor grade (27). parotid (21%), palate (17%), and submandibular gland
Many investigators have attempted to correlate (13%). The tumor is rare in the sublingual gland (16).
nuclear DNA content and immunohistochemical The palate accounts for nearly half of the cases in the
markers of salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma glands of the mouth and the upper aerodigestive tract
with prognosis. DNA ploidy pattern analysis has (17), and the sinonasal tract is the next most common
demonstrated that aneuploid tumors have a poorer site (18). Rare central (intraosseous) cases have been
clinical outcome than diploid tumors (52). Immuno- reported, the large majority involving the body and
histochemical prognostic factors include expression of angle of mandible (19). Adenoid cystic carcinomas
Ki-67 (53-56), HER-2/neu (55), p53 (56), p27 (54), bcl-2 have been reported in wide range of other anatomical
(57), caveolin-1 (58), b-catenin (59), and certain types sites including the lacrimal gland (20), ceruminous
of mucins (48,49). A Ki-67 labeling index higher than glands of the external ear (21), esophagus (22), trachea
10% is associated with high histologic grade, increas- (23), bronchus (24), peripheral lung (25), breast (26),
ing rate of recurrence and metastasis, and decreasing skin (27), uterine cervix (28), ovary (29), Bartholin
survival rates in patients with mucoepidermoid carci- gland (30), and prostate (31).
noma (53). Over-expression of HER-2/neu and p53 Tumors usually present as a slow growing but
correlates with poor prognosis (55,56); conversely, widely infiltrative mass of long duration, and they can
high expression for p27 and bcl-2 is associated with be mobile or fixed. They may be tender or painful, and
a favorable outcome (54,57). Downregulation of cav- cranial nerve lesions, particularly facial nerve palsy,
eolin-1, which has been proposed as a candidate can be the presenting feature (9,20). Patients with
tumor suppressor, is identified as a negative prognos- tumors involving the deep lobe of the parotid gland
tic factor (58). Nuclear/cytoplasmic accumulation of can present with trismus. It is common for tumors of
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 553
Figure 99 (A) Adenoid cystic carcinoma. Tubular variant showing morphologically similar luminal and abluminal cells. (B) Adenoid
cystic carcinoma. Tubular variant showing morphologically clear abluminal cells. (C) Adenoid cystic carcinoma showing squamous
metaplasia. (D) Adenoid cystic carcinoma showing oncocytic metaplasia.
been reported, but there is no consistent relationship RASSF1A promotor methylation in high-grade tumors
between these observations and the histologic tumor (70). Mutations of p53 are relatively uncommon
types, clinical stage or survival (56–58). CD43, a sialo- (71,72). Alterations in p53 and RB genes have been
glyoprotein that is typically expressed by hemopoietic reported and correlated with behavior (73).P53 muta-
cells, has been shown to be differentially and selec- tion, loss of expression of RB, and overexpression of
tively expressed in adenoid cystic carcinoma (59,60). both Her2/neu and cyclin D1 have been reported in
Molecular-genetic data. Alterations in chromo- adenoid cystic carcinomas showing high-grade trans-
somes 6q, 9p, and 17p12-13 are the most frequent formation (37,38). Frequent and plural methylation of
cytogenetic alterations reported (61,62). t(6;9)(q21-24; the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes promotor
p13-23) appears to be a nonrandom, primary aberra- regions has recently been reported (74). Microarrays
tion (63). There are frequent losses at 12q, 6q23-qter, and comparative genomic hybridization have been
13q21-q22, and 19q regions (64). A high frequency of used to identify candidate genes for adenoid cystic
loss of heterozygosity at 6q23-25 has been reported carcinoma (75).
and, although not specific for adenoid cystic carcino- Differential diagnosis. It is particularly important
ma, this has been correlated with both tumor grade to distinguish adenoid cystic carcinoma from poly-
and behavior (65,66). Over half of cases show genomic morphous low-grade adenocarcinoma in tumors from
deletions of chromosome 6 (67), and candidate sup- minor salivary glands. Polymorphous low-grade ade-
pressor genes have also been mapped to chromosome nocarcinoma consists of a uniform cell population
12 (68). Hypermethylation of the promotor region of with cytologically bland, round or oval and vesicular
the p16 gene was found in 4/22 of adenoid cystic nuclei and pale, eosinophilic cytoplasm, whereas cells
carcinoma and was associated with higher histologic in adenoid cystic carcinoma often have clear cyto-
grades of malignancy (69). In addition, promotor plasm and angular, hyperchromatic nuclei and may
methylation of p16INK4a, RASSF1A, and DAPK has show mitotic activity (76,77). The Ki-67 proliferative
been reported, and there was a high frequency of index is reported to be nearly 10 higher in adenoid
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 555
Figure 100 (A) Adenoid cystic carcinoma. Solid variant. (B) Adenoid cystic carcinoma. Solid variant higher power showing scattered
duct-like structures within the tumor sheet. (C) Adenoid cystic carcinoma. Solid variant showing extensive comedo necrosis. (D) Adenoid
cystic carcinoma showing extensive stromal hyalinization attenuated the tumor into thin strands.
cystic carcinoma than polymorphous low-grade ade- distinction between polymorphous low-grade adeno-
nocarcinoma with no overlap zone (78). Smooth mus- carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma, but recent
cle markers of myoepithelial differentiation are studies suggest the value of these immunoagents is
positive in adenoid cystic carcinoma but negative in limited (48,49). In addition, c-kit expression in ade-
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. In a hier- noid cystic carcinoma does not appear to correlate
archical cluster analysis of myoepithelial/basal cell with behavior (50,79). Occasional foci in pleomorphic
markers, the diffuse expression of smooth muscle adenoma can resemble adenoid cystic carcinoma but
actin was the most reliable marker in support of a the presence of typical myxochondroid matrix and
diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma (53). In addi- plasmacytoid or spindle-shaped cells helps to avoid
tion, polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma confusion (80). Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma
shows a much wider spectrum of histomorphologic can resemble solid variants of adenoid cystic carci-
differentiation. Even when cribriform areas are pres- noma but typically involves the hypopharynx and
ent in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, they larynx, which are uncommon sites for adenoid cystic
are typically focal, and adenoid cystic carcinoma does carcinoma. Both can show islands with cribriform
not show papillary differentiation or the single cord configurations, hyaline material surrounding tumor
arrangement of cells seen in polymorphous low-grade nests, and solid areas with comedonecrosis, but
adenocarcinoma. Although both adenoid cystic carci- basaloid squamous carcinoma also has evidence of
noma and polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma squamous differentiation and usually involves the
show neural invasion, in polymorphous low-grade overlying mucosa. In addition, the different patterns
adenocarcinoma this is often associated with a striking of p63 staining may aid distinction (51). Both epithelial-
whorling arrangement of single-file cords of cells or myoepithelial carcinoma and the tubular variant of
small ducts, and is seen predominantly within, or very adenoid cystic carcinoma can show double-layered,
close to, the main tumor mass. It has been postulated duct-like structures with an abluminal layer of clear
that staining with c-kit or galectin 3 aids the cells (see page 563).
556 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 101 (A) Adenoid cystic carcinoma showing perineural invasion. (B) Adenoid cystic carcinoma showing bone invasion but
absence of osteoclastic bone resorption. (C) Adenoid cystic carcinoma showing contiguous spread into a lymph node. (D) Adenoid cystic
carcinoma. P63 staining of myoepithelial component.
Treatment and prognosis. The average 5- and 10- The relationship between perineural invasion and
year survival rates are about 80% and 50%, respectively, survival is also contentious, but invasion of larger
but the majority of patients usually die of, or with, the nerves appears to correlate with more aggressive
tumor (81). Local recurrence is very common, espe- behavior (14,85). In a review of the literature, Barrett
cially in the first 5 years after surgery. The main and Speight (91) found 23% (range 2–86%) of patients
prognostic factors are site, clinical stage, and histologic had clinical evidence of neurologic deficit. Histologic
pattern (9,12,82). Tumors in the submandibular gland evidence of perineural invasion was reported in 51%
have a poorer prognosis than those in the parotid (83). (range 8–86%) of cases. Clinical evidence of nerve
Bone involvement and failure of primary surgery are involvement such as facial nerve palsy was an indica-
associated with poor prognosis. Correlations between tor of poor prognosis, but histologic evidence of
tumor morphology, grading, and outcome have perineural invasion appeared not to be an indepen-
yielded conflicting results, particularly after 10-year dent factor but was associated with other adverse
follow-up due to the overall poor long-term progno- features such as clinically large and more aggressive
sis (81,83). The tubular and cribriform variants have tumors. In addition, Spiro et al. in large follow-up
been reported to have a better outcome than studies of patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma
tumors with a solid component, especially if this found that both histologic grade and perineural inva-
exceeds 30% of the tumor volume (6,8,58,83–86). sion are unreliable predictors of behavior (9,82). Clini-
DNA studies have shown that there is a higher inci- cal stage is a better guide to prognosis (12,58). Lymph
dence of aneuploidy in solid tumors and this, not node involvement is relatively uncommon but distant
surprisingly, correlates with more aggressive behavior metastases to lung, bone, brain, and liver are seen in
(87–89). High Ki-67 expression is also associated with 40–60% of cases (92).
solid and clinically more aggressive tumors (90). Wide local excision, together with adjuvant
Tumors showing high-grade transformation (dediffer- radiotherapy, offers the best hope of local control
entiation) usually have a very poor prognosis (35–39). (93,94). Elective neck dissection is not indicated. The
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 557
use of the tyrosine kinase receptor (CD117) inhibitor, carcinoma (5). Although there are several reports
Imatinib mesylate (95), and the dual inhibitor of the describing polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma
tyrosine kinase domains of the epidermal growth of the major salivary glands, most of them are single
factor receptor and erbB2, Lapatinib (96), have not cases, and there are very few histologically convincing
shown any significant clinical benefit. examples. Only eight possibly acceptable polymor-
phous low-grade adenocarcinoma cases of major sali-
Polymorphous Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma vary gland origin, including three of our own proven
cases, have been identified to date as far as we can
Introduction. Polymorphous low-grade adeno- judge from reviewing the literature (7). In the major
carcinoma was first described as a distinctive minor salivary glands, polymorphous low-grade adenocarci-
salivary gland tumor by Evans and Batsakis in 1984 noma occurred in the parotid (5 cases), submandibu-
(1). Almost at the same time, this neoplasm was lar (2 cases), and sublingual (1 case) glands. The
reported in two other publications as ‘‘terminal duct lacrimal glands, nasopharynx, and sinonasal cavity
carcinoma’’ (2) and ‘‘lobular carcinoma’’ (3). The WHO have also been rarely described as the site of the
Classification of Salivary Gland Tumors adopted the term occurrence of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcino-
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma for this ma (15,16).
tumor, and it is now a well-recognized entity in the In the minor salivary glands, polymorphous
minor salivary glands (4). It has been defined as ‘‘a low-grade adenocarcinoma has been reported to
malignant epithelial tumor characterized by cytologic exhibit a nearly 2:1 female to male ratio and a wide
uniformity, morphologic diversity, an infiltrative age range (16–94 years) with a mean of 59 years (4).
growth pattern, and low metastatic’ potential’’ (4). Several reports indicate that there are some differ-
Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma is the sec- ences in the occurrence of polymorphous low-grade
ond most common type of malignant neoplasm of adenocarcinoma among ethnic groups: there is a pre-
minor salivary glands, after mucoepidermoid carcinoma dilection for this tumor in blacks, while it is rare
(5,6), but is exceedingly rare in the major glands (7). among Japanese (5,17). Polymorphous low-grade ade-
The 2005 WHO Blue Book introduced a recently nocarcinoma is generally an asymptomatic, slow-
described tumor, ‘‘cribriform adenocarcinoma of the growing mass or swelling of the palate, cheek, or
tongue,’’ as a possible variant of polymorphous low- upper lip, occasionally associated with bleeding, tel-
grade adenocarcinoma, but its relationship to this angiectasia, or ulceration of the overlying mucosa.
tumor remains controversial (4). The authors hypoth- Multiple, synchronous occurrence has been reported
esized that this tumor might be derived from the (18). Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma may
thyroglossal duct anlage. Only one series consisting occur as a malignant component of carcinoma ex
of eight such cases has been reported (8). The tumor pleomorphic adenoma (19).
occurred in adults with a mean age of 50 years, and Pathology. Grossly, the tumor typically appears
there was no gender predilection. Unlike typical poly- as a relatively well-circumscribed, tan-to-gray mass
morphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, all patients but with infiltrative margins. Tumor size ranges from
with this neoplasm had cervical lymph node metasta- 0.4 to 6 cm with an average of 2.2 cm (12).
ses at the time of clinical presentation, but all were Microscopically, the tumor invades into the sali-
reported to be alive with no distant metastases after vary gland parenchyma (Fig. 102) and surrounding
the initial surgery. Histologically, the tumor is charac-
terized by predominantly solid and microcystic
growth patterns composed of cells with pale, vesicular
ground glass nuclei, closely resembling solid, and
follicular variant of papillary carcinoma of the thy-
roid. On immunohistochemistry, cytokeratins and
S-100 protein are strongly positive, whereas myoepi-
thelial markers show only limited patchy positivity.
Clinical features. Polymorphous low-grade ade-
nocarcinoma is one of the most common malignant
neoplasms of the minor salivary glands. Over 400
cases of minor salivary gland, polymorphous low-
grade adenocarcinoma have been reported (1,9–14).
It accounts for approximately 10% of all intraoral
minor salivary gland tumors, and 26% of all malig-
nancies in these sites (6). Of the minor salivary gland
cases, the palate is the most frequent site (12). Other
minor salivary sites include the buccal mucosa, upper
lip, retromolar region, and the base of the tongue.
Among AFIP cases of minor salivary gland tumors,
only pleomorphic adenoma and mucoepidermoid car-
cinoma are more common than polymorphous low- Figure 102 Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. Tumor
grade adenocarcinoma, and polymorphous low-grade invades into the minor salivary gland parenchyma.
adenocarcinoma is twice as frequent as adenoid cystic
558 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 104 Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. Variable morphologic combinations of solid (A and B), tubular (C), fascicular
(D), cribriform (E), and papillary (F) growth patterns. (A) Sheet-like solid growth of the tumor cells exhibiting uniform oval nuclei without
any pleomorphism. (B) Lobular configuration with peripheral palisading arrangement. (C) Tubular structures are predominantly lined by a
single layer of small cuboidal cells. (D) Fusiform cells are arranged in a fascicular pattern. (E) Multiple pseudocystic spaces with pale-
staining amphophilic mucoid contents resulting in a cribriform appearance. (F) Papillary configurations of columnar or cuboidal cells.
560 Eveson and Nagao
Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma
Introduction. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma
is defined as ‘‘a malignant tumor composed of vari-
able proportions of two cell types, which typically
form duct-like structures. The biphasic morphology is
represented by an inner layer of duct-lining, epithelial-
type cells, and an outer layer of clear, myoepithelial-
type cells’’ (1). It has many synonyms that cover
a wide variety of benign and malignant tumors
including: clear cell adenoma (2,3), glycogen-rich
adenoma (4), tubular carcinoma (5), clear cell myoe- Figure 107 Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma showing double
pithelioma (5), glycogen-rich adenocarcinoma (6), layered duct-like structures separated by acellular fibrous tissue.
clear cell carcinoma (7), epithelial-myoepithelial carci-
noma of intercalated duct origin (8), and adenomyoe-
pithelioma (9).
Clinical features. Epithelial-myoepithelial carci-
noma is uncommon and represents about 0.5% to 1%
of salivary gland tumors. There is a female predomi-
nance of about 2:1 and the age range is wide (6–92
years) with a mean age at diagnosis of about 60 years
(8,10–14). The tumor is rare in children (12,14,15).
The parotid gland (75%) and submandibular
gland (10–12%) account for most cases. In the
major glands, the tumor usually presents as a slow-
growing, painless mass and facial nerve palsy is
uncommon. It occasionally arises in oral minor
salivary glands, particularly in the palate and tongue,
and very rarely involves seromucous glands in the
upper (8,11–13) and lower respiratory tracts (16–19); in
these sites there is a tendency for the tumors to
ulcerate. Involvement of the sublingual and lacrimal
glands is exceptional. Adenomyoepithelioma is a
Figure 108 Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma with trabecular
histologically identical tumor that arises in the arrangement and predominantly noncanalized ducts.
breast (20).
Pathology. Macroscopically, epithelial-
myoepithelial carcinomas are usually well defined,
firm swellings that are frequently nodular or multi-
nodular. About a third of cases are encapsulated and
areas invading the surrounding gland are not com-
monly seen. The cut surface is yellow to gray-white and
cystic areas are common. Most tumors are 2 to 8 cm in
diameter with a mean of about 3 cm (14) but larger
examples have been reported (13).
The characteristic microscopic feature of epithelial-
myoepithelial carcinoma is the formation of double-
layered, duct-like structures. The luminal cells are
typically arranged as single, cuboidal, or columnar
luminal cells that have a central round or oval nucleus
with finely granular, densely eosinophilic cytoplasm
(Figs. 107–109). The polygonal abluminal cells form
single or multiple layers and have clear cytoplasm
and vesicular, eccentrically placed nuclei. The propor-
tion of these two cell types and their morphologic
distribution is widely variable. The duct-like struc- Figure 109 Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma consisting pre-
tures may be separated by dense fibrous tissue but dominantly of nests of clear cells with scanty luminal cells.
aggregated into theques or nests. In other areas,
562 Eveson and Nagao
Differential diagnosis. The differential diagnosis associated with recurrence and metastasis (8,10–14).
of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma includes tumors The poorer prognosis seen in tumors located in minor
showing the formation of double-layered, duct-like salivary and sero-mucinous glands may be because of
structures and those consisting predominantly of a higher frequency of recurrences resulting from
clear cells. Double-layered, duct-like structures can incomplete excision (1). In a recent large study, no
be seen in pleomorphic adenoma and the tubular cases that were encapsulated or were minimally inva-
variant of adenoid cystic carcinoma. In these tumors sive recurred (14). Size and rapid tumor growth may
the clear cells tend to have less abundant cytoplasm be associated with a worse prognosis (20,22) but some
and their nuclei are usually hyperchromatic and studies have failed to show this correlation (14). No
angular. However, these variants usually only form correlation was found between proliferative activity
focal areas of more typical tumors and the main and histologic pattern and prognosis in a cytophoto-
problem arises in the interpretation of limited biopsy metric study (39). Other factors associated with poorer
material. In such circumstances it may not be possible prognosis include angiolymphatic invasion, necrosis,
to distinguish between these three tumor-types with and myoepithelial anaplasia. The presence of nuclear
confidence and a circumspect report may be neces- hyperchromasia and irregularity in over 20% of tumor
sary. Some epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas con- cells has been associated with more aggressive behav-
sist almost entirely of clear cells and it may require ior (13). In addition, aneuploidy and high mitotic
extensive sampling to identify characteristic double- counts have been reported in cases with unfavorable
layered ducts or obvious duct-lining cells. A wide prognosis (13). Although areas of dedifferentiation
range of benign and malignant salivary tumors can have been related to poor prognosis (22,23), this has
show focal or extensive areas consisting predominant- not been universally confirmed (14); the size and
ly of clear cells. These include clear cell variants of distribution of such areas may be important in deter-
pleomorphic adenoma, myoepithelioma, oncocytoma, mining outcome.
mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, The treatment of choice is complete surgical
sebaceous neoplasms, and clear cell carcinoma removal with neck dissection only when there is
(NOS). Clear cells in pleomorphic adenoma are usually evidence of regional lymph node metastases. Adju-
focal and readily identified, but epithelial-myoepithelial vant radiotherapy has no proven role.
carcinoma may be a component of carcinoma ex
pleomorphic adenoma. In epithelial-myoepithelial
carcinomas the clear cells are positive for glycogen Clear Cell Carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified
and myoepithelial markers and unlike mucoepider-
moid carcinomas they are mucicarmine negative and Introduction. Clear cell carcinoma, not otherwise
intermediate cells are not seen. Clear cells in acinic cell specified (NOS), has been defined as ‘‘a malignant
carcinoma are usually focal and the distinction is epithelial neoplasm composed of a monomorphous
rarely problematical. Similarly, in sebaceous tumors, population of cells that have optically clear cytoplasm
most of the cells have foamy rather than clear cyto- with standard hematoxylin and eosin stains. Because
plasm, although focally there may be genuinely clear many types of salivary gland neoplasms commonly or
cells. In clear cell oncocytomas, phosphotungstic acid consistently have a component of clear cells, clear cell
hematoxylin positive granules can usually be identi- carcinoma is distinguished by the absence of features
fied in at least some of the cells. Clear cell carcinoma characteristic of these neoplasms and its monomor-
(NOS), including the hyalinizing variant, lacks the phous population of clear cells’’ (1). Synonyms include
biphasic pattern of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma clear cell adenocarcinoma, glycogen-rich clear cell car-
and usually stains negatively, or weakly, for myoepi- cinoma, and hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma.
thelial markers. In addition, metastases from the kid- Clinical features. Clear cell carcinoma is an
ney and thyroid gland may need to be considered by uncommon salivary tumor that is found predomin-
staining for CD10, renal cell carcinoma marker or antly in the minor glands of the mouth (*60%),
thyroglobulin, or by using ultrasound as appropriate. particularly in the base of tongue and palate (2–4).
Myoepithelial markers are helpful in distinguishing Other sites include the lip, buccal mucosa, floor of the
epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma showing seba- mouth, retromolar trigone, and tonsil. There is a single
ceous differentiation from sebaceous carcinoma (21). reported case involving the gingiva (4). The tumor is
Treatment and prognosis. Despite its relatively less common in the parotid (*28%) and submandib-
bland cytologic features, epithelial-myoepithelial car- ular (*12%) glands (2,5,6). Cases developing intra-
cinoma is a low- to intermediate-grade tumor. Local osseously within the maxilla and mandible have been
recurrence is common but rates in the literature are reported (7). Clear cell carcinoma can form the malig-
variable and range from 23% to 80% (14) with a mean nant component of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adeno-
of about 30%. The incidence of metastasis to regional ma (8). The majority of clear cell carcinomas arise in
lymph nodes and distant sites such as lung, liver, and the 40 to 70 year age range with a mean of 58 years
kidney, also shows a wide range, varying from 5% to and they are rare in children (2,9). There appears to be
25% of cases. Despite this, the prognosis is relatively no significant sex predilection. Tumors usually pres-
good and in one large study the disease-specific sur- ent as a nondescript, painless swelling but there may
vivals were 93.5% at 5 years and 81.8% at 10 years be ulceration and pain in tumors involving mucosal
(14). Margin status is the most significant pathologic glands. Palatal tumors can invade the underlying
prognostic factor. Incomplete surgical excision is bone (10).
564 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 114 Basal cell adenocarcinoma. (A) Solid type. Note a palisade-like arrangement of the carcinoma cells at the periphery of the
tumor cell nests. (B) Trabecular type. Cordlike architecture of the atypical basaloid cells. (C) Tubular type. Duct-like structures with
intraluminal eosinophilic secretion. (D) Membranous type. Thick, hyaline, basement membrane-like material surrounds individual tumor
islands.
proliferation index, apoptosis, expression of p53, cell adenocarcinoma are points of difference from
epidermal growth factor receptor, and bcl-2 may be small or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which
helpful (see the section ‘‘Basal Cell Adenoma’’) (7). may exhibit peripheral palisading patterns and comedo
The distinction between basal cell adenocarcino- necrosis (19).
mas and the solid type of adenoid cystic carcinoma is Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma is a specific
also essential because of the significant difference in clinicopathologic entity of high-grade malignancy,
prognosis between these two entities (Table 8). The mainly arising in the hypopharynx, base of tongue,
presence of peripheral palisading and foci of squa- and supraglottic regions (20). Similar to basal cell
mous metaplasia favor the diagnosis of basal cell adenocarcinoma, this malignancy may exhibit lobular
adenocarcinoma. Even in the solid type, cribriform growth pattern with peripheral nuclear palisading
growth pattern and pseudocysts with amorphous and often displays comedo necrosis. In basaloid squa-
basophilic material characteristic of adenoid cystic mous cell carcinoma, however, the tumor shows
carcinoma is only rarely encountered in basal cell multiple attachments to the overlying epithelium.
adenocarcinoma. In addition, tumor cell nuclei of Definitive differential diagnosis is possible when
adenoid cystic carcinoma tend to be more hyperchro- absence of dual ductal and myoepithelial differentia-
matic and angular when compared with polygonal tion is confirmed immunohistochemically. Moreover,
nuclei found in basal cell adenocarcinomas. most basal cell adenocarcinomas arise in the major
The lack of neuroendocrine differentiation and salivary glands, a site where basaloid squamous cell
the presence of myoepithelial differentiation in basal carcinoma does not occur.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 567
Figure 115 Basal cell adenocarcinoma. Solid nests of mildly Figure 116 Basal cell adenocarcinoma. Focal squamous dif-
atypical basaloid cells with peripheral palisading. ferentiation with keratin pearl formations.
Treatment and Prognosis. In general, basal cell bimodal age distribution with the incidence peaking
adenocarcinoma is considered to be a low-grade in the third and seventh and eighth decades and there
malignancy with a relatively high recurrence rate is a wide age range (17–93 years) (5). The mean age is
but good prognosis (4,6–8). Local recurrence in the 69 years and the sex distribution is equal. The dura-
major salivary gland cases occurs in about 40% of tion of the tumor ranges from a few months to
cases, but locoregional and distant metastases are 20 years (8,15). Tumors typically present as slow-
infrequent, with less than 10% occurrence, and death growing swellings with variable pain, facial nerve
from tumor is extremely rare. Basal cell adenocarcino- involvement, and fixation to the overlying skin. Rare
ma arising in intraoral minor salivary glands or sino- cases have arisen from a preexisting pleomorphic
nasal sero-mucinous glands appears to have a adenoma (9).
somewhat higher recurrence rate, and is accompanied Pathology. Grossly, tumors range in size from
by worse prognosis (5,9–11). Complete surgical exci- 0.6 to 8.5 cm and frequently appear to be well circum-
sion is the recommended treatment. In major salivary scribed or partially encapsulated (1). The color of the
gland cases, with proper surgical resection and ade- cut surface varies from yellow to pink, gray, or white.
quate margins, additional therapy may not be Microscopically, the tumor consists of sheets, nests, or
required. Cervical lymph node dissection is not war- cords of pleomorphic cells with variable degrees of
ranted, except for patients with clinical evidence of cytologic atypia. In well-differentiated tumors, the
lymph node metastasis. cells have hyperchromatic nuclei and abundant, vac-
uolated cytoplasm giving a typical sebaceous appear-
Sebaceous Carcinoma ance (Fig. 117). More poorly differentiated tumors
have greater degrees of pleomorphism and may
Introduction. Sebaceous carcinoma is defined as have clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm, making recogni-
‘‘a malignant tumor composed of sebaceous cells of tion of the sebaceous phenotype more difficult
varying maturity that are arranged in sheets and/or (Fig. 118). Duct-like structures may be numerous
nests with different degrees of pleomorphism, nuclear and cystic spaces of varying sizes are occasionally
atypia, and invasiveness’’ (1). The term sebaceous present. Scattered mucous cells are a rare feature.
adenocarcinoma has also been used (2). Squamous differentiation is common and basaloid
Clinical features. Sebaceous carcinomas of sali- differentiation can be seen, particularly in cells at the
vary glands are very uncommon with about periphery of cellular islands. Spindle cell myoepithe-
30 reported cases arising from major glands (2–10). lial differentiation has also been reported (7). A xan-
The large majority of these tumors developed in the thogranulomatous reaction to extravasated sebum and
parotid gland, with two cases in the submandibular oncocytic metaplasia are occasional findings. In
gland (7,10) and a single case in the sublingual gland higher-grade tumors, particularly, there may be
(1). Sebaceous carcinomas in the oral cavity may areas of necrosis and fibrosis. The tumor has infiltra-
develop from Fordyce granules rather than intraoral tive margins and perineural invasion is seen in about
minor glands (11) and probably should not be 20% of cases but vascular invasion is exceptional (5).
recorded as salivary tumors. Similarly, the histogene- Treatment and Prognosis. There are too few
sis of rare cases reported in the vallecula, epiglottis, recorded cases to make accurate prognostic state-
and hypopharynx is uncertain (12–14). There is a ments. However, most tumors appear to be
568 Eveson and Nagao
may be present. Cysts vary in size and shape and are The papillary-cystic variant of acinic cell carci-
usually accompanied by intracystic papillary projec- noma may be difficult to distinguish from cystadeno-
tions with or without branching fibrovascular cores at carcinoma. Cystadenocarcinoma lacks microcystic or
least focally (Fig. 120B). About 75% of cases have a follicular growth pattern and the presence of cells
conspicuous papillary growth pattern (8). The term with diastase-resistant PAS-positive secretory gran-
papillary cystadenocarcinoma is often applied to these ules in the cytoplasm that are characteristic of acinic
tumors. Limited areas of ductal structures or small solid cell carcinoma.
cells nests are seen in minority of the cases. The lining The tumor cells of salivary duct carcinoma are
epithelium of the cysts, papillary fronds, and ductal larger and have more pleomorphic nuclei with promi-
structures are usually composed of a single cell layer, nent nucleoli and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and
but may be double cell layered or pseudostratified. higher mitotic activity than those of cystadenocarci-
In the majority of cases, the lining cells consist noma. Furthermore, marked necrosis and a scirrhous
predominantly of small cuboidal cells, but large cuboi- invasive growth pattern are features distinguishing
dal, tall columnar, mucous, clear, oncocytic, and simple salivary duct carcinoma from cystadenocarcinoma.
squamous cells can be seen, frequently with an admix- Metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma can be
ture of these cell types. Usually, nuclear pleomorphism distinguished from cystadenocarcinoma by its charac-
is mild to moderate and mitotic activity is low teristic ground-glass tumor cell nuclei, often with
(Fig. 120C). However, occasional tumors have marked nuclear grooves and pseudonuclear inclusions, as
nuclear pleomorphism with prominent nucleoli and well as positive immunostaining for thyroglobulin or
numerous mitotic figures (11,12). The columnar cells thyroid transcription factor-1.
tend to show more nuclear atypia, suggestive of a Treatment and prognosis. According to the AFIP
relatively higher-grade malignancy than tumors con- series, in which follow-up data were available in 39
sisting predominantly of cuboidal cells (10). Therefore, out of 57 cases of cystadenocarcinoma, no patients
cystadenocarcinomas present a broader histologic spec- died of disease at a mean interval of 52 months after
trum than is generally thought, and at least some may the initial surgery, 10% developed regional lymph
be considered as high-grade malignancies. nodal metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 7.7%
Immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemi- had local recurrences at an average of 76 months after
cal features indicate that cystadenocarcinoma is com- the initial treatment (10). These data suggest that
posed of cells with ductal differentiation. The tumor cystadenocarcinoma is a low-grade malignancy. How-
cells are usually positive for pan-cytokeratin, epithelial ever, despite this there have been several reports
membrane antigen, and carcinoembryonic antigen (13). indicating that some cases of cystadenocarcinoma
CA19-9 and CA125 may be expressed in cystadenocar- may have more aggressive behavior and higher-grade
cinoma (14). pathologic features (11,12). The general therapeutic
Differential diagnosis. The differential diagnosis approach is complete local resection with cervical
of papillary cystadenocarcinoma includes salivary lymph node dissection, if there is lymphadenopathy,
gland tumors with predominantly papillary and cystic together with postoperative radiotherapy for high-
pattern of growth, such as cystadenoma, low-grade grade or recurrent, inoperable tumors.
mucoepidermoid carcinoma, polymorphous low- Low-Grade Cribriform Cystadenocarcinoma.
grade adenocarcinoma, the papillary-cystic variant of LGCCC is a rare tumor first reported by Delgado
acinic cell carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, and et al. in 1996 as a variant of salivary duct carcinoma,
metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma (8). termed low-grade salivary duct carcinoma (15). There
Cystadenocarcinoma can have bland cytology are considerable histologic and biologic differences
and low mitotic activity, hardly distinguishable from and controversies regarding the relationship between
cystadenoma, but unlike cystadenoma, cystadenocar- this tumor entity and conventional salivary duct car-
cinoma always shows invasive growth. cinoma, which is a much more aggressive neoplasm
Low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma is often (16,17). The 2005 WHO classification categorized low-
composed of conspicuous multicystic and papillary grade salivary duct carcinoma as a variant of cysta-
structures, resembling cystadenocarcinoma. However, denocarcinoma and adopted a new term LGCCC in an
in contrast to cystadenocarcinoma, low-grade mucoe- attempt to avoid confusion (9). However, because it
pidermoid carcinoma has solid nests consisting of a bears a striking resemblance to atypical ductal hyper-
mixture of epidermoid, mucous, and intermediate plasia or low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the
cells at least focally. breast, some investigators have strongly recom-
Like cystadenocarcinoma, areas of papillary and mended that the term LGCCC should be replaced by
cystic proliferation are sometimes seen focally in ‘‘(low-grade) intraductal carcinoma’’ (18,19).
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, but the LGCCC almost exclusively occurs in the parotid
predominant features of polymorphous low-grade gland, but in rare cases the submandibular gland and
adenocarcinoma are characterized by the admix- minor salivary glands may be affected (15,16,20). The
ture of variable histologic architectures, such as majority of patients are in the sixth and seventh
solid, tubular, fascicular, and cribriform patterns. In decades. Unlike salivary duct carcinoma, this tumor
addition, perineural invasion is frequent in polymor- has a female predominance, the female to male ratio
phous low-grade adenocarcinoma, often with a con- being 2:1 (9). Histologically, LGCCC is generally a
centric, targetoid pattern, but is uncommon in well-circumscribed, but not encapsulated, tumor
cystadenocarcinoma. composed of multicystically dilated duct-like
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 571
Mucinous Adenocarcinoma
Introduction. Mucinous adenocarcinoma is amounts of intracellular mucin. Mucin-containing
defined as ‘‘a rare malignant tumor composed of cells may form papillary projections into the mucous
epithelial clusters with large pools of extracellular pools or form acinus-like clusters. Focal necrosis is
mucin. The mucin component usually occupies the sometimes present. In a unique case of mucinous
bulk of the tumor mass’’ (1). A commonly used adenocarcinoma involving mandibular bone, neuro-
synonym is colloid carcinoma. endocrine differentiation was demonstrated (7). The
Clinical features. This is a very rare salivary intra- and extracellular mucus stains positively with
tumor and most examples have been reported as PAS, Alcian blue, and mucicarmine.
single cases or as short series. An analysis of Immunohistochemistry. The limited number of
10 cases, including five from the literature (2), and a immunocytochemical studies of mucinous adenocar-
series of six cases published in the Chinese literature cinoma show that the tumor is strongly positive for
(3), together with four further cases (4–7) shows that pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and cytokeratin 7 (3,4).
patients’ ages ranged from 42 to 86 years with a mean Most tumor cells also express keratins 8, 18, and 19.
age of about 65 years. There is no consistent sex There is minimal expression of keratins 4 and 13 and
predilection. About half the cases involved minor no expression of keratins 5/6, 10, 14, and 17. The
glands, particularly the palate; there were three cases tumor is also negative for smooth muscle actin, estro-
each in the sublingual and parotid glands and two gen, and progesterone (4).
cases affected the submandibular glands (8). The Differential diagnosis. The tumors to be consid-
usual presentation is a slow-growing mass of several ered in the differential diagnosis include mucoepider-
months’ duration, but in one case the tumor had been moid carcinoma, cystadenocarcinoma, and the mucin-
present for 11 years. In the minor glands, tumors are rich variant of salivary duct carcinoma (9). Although
firm and elevated and some are ulcerated. In tumors low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas frequently
arising in the sublingual gland, a presumptive diag- show extravasated mucous pools, the other character-
nosis of salivary calculi may be made. istic features of the tumor make diagnostic confusion
Pathology. Tumors range in size from 2.5 to unlikely. The distinction from cystadenocarcinoma
7.6 cm and are usually bosselated and ill defined. can be more problematical but in the latter, the
The cut surface is grayish white and shows multiple tumor cells tend to line the cystic spaces and there is
cystic spaces containing gelatinous fluid. a lack of cell clusters floating in the mucous compo-
Microscopically, the epithelial component con- nent. In the mucus-rich variant of salivary duct carci-
sists of cells, which may be single or form duct-like noma, there are mucin lakes but there are also areas
structures or solid clusters of variable sizes. These are composed of the high-grade carcinoma cells typical of
floating in abundant, mucus-filled lakes that are sepa- this tumor.
rated by fibrous septa (Fig. 123). The epithelial cells Treatment and prognosis. Surgery, with or with-
may be cuboidal, columnar, or irregular in shape (1). out adjuvant radiotherapy, has been the treatment of
The cytoplasm is typically clear and there is a central- choice in most cases, although the efficacy of radio-
ly placed, hyperchromatic nucleus. Although cells therapy has been questioned (1). There is a strong
may show nuclear atypia, mitoses are infrequent. tendency for local recurrence and metastasis to
Some of the solid clusters of tumor cells may develop regional lymph nodes. The tumor is aggressive, with
secondary lumina and scattered cells may have small about half the reported cases dying from the disease.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 573
Oncocytic Carcinoma
Introduction. Oncocytic carcinoma is defined as
‘‘a proliferation of cytomorphologically malignant
oncocytes and adenocarcinomatous architectural phe-
notypes, including infiltrative qualities. These may
arise de novo, but are usually seen in association
with preexisting oncocytoma’’ (1). Synonyms include
oncocytic adenocarcinoma, malignant oncocytoma,
and malignant oxyphilic adenoma.
Clinical features. Oncocytic carcinoma is one
of the rarest salivary gland tumors with about
60 reported cases (2–21). The mean age is about
60 years and there is a wide age range (25–91 years).
There is a male predominance of about 2:1 (3,7). The
large majority arise in the parotid (*80%) and sub-
mandibular glands (*10%), with the remainder
reported in a wide range of intraoral and upper Figure 125 Oncocytic carcinoma showing neural invasion.
respiratory tract sites. Clinically, oncocytic carcinomas
usually present as painless, slow-growing swellings,
but in about a third of cases there is pain or facial
nerve palsy. In carcinomas arising in preexisting and surrounding tissue, and many cases show evi-
oncocytomas, there may be a history of a recent dence of neural and vascular invasion (Fig. 125).
rapid enlargement of a long-standing swelling. Immunohistochemistry. There is usually a higher
Pathology. Grossly, oncocytic carcinomas can Ki-67 proliferative index in oncocytic carcinoma than
appear as single or multifocal masses, which are oncocytoma and this may be useful in differentiating
firm, tan to gray-brown, and may show areas of the tumor from an atypical oncocytoma (21). Staining
necrosis. Some cases have variable capsulation but for alpha-1-antitrypsin (5) and antimitochondrial anti-
many tumors show extensive local invasion. bodies (22) has been reported.
Microscopically, oncocytic carcinoma shows var- Differential diagnosis. The main differential
iable pleomorphism. Most consist of large tumor cells, diagnoses include multifocal nodular oncocytic hyper-
which are round or polyhedral (Fig. 124). The cyto- plasia, oncocytoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and
plasm is granular and eosinophilic and the round, salivary duct carcinoma. Multifocal nodular oncocytic
vesicular, and centrally placed nuclei often contain hyperplasia can simulate an infiltrative tumor. This
one or more prominent nucleoli. There is usually a impression may be reinforced when there is age-
moderate mitotic frequency but in some cases, mitoses related fatty change or when the oncocytic cells
are numerous and there may be abnormal forms. involve the hila of intraparotid lymph nodes. The
Occasionally, multinucleated tumor cells are present. multifocal nature of the hyperplasia and the presence
The tumor is arranged in sheets, nests, and trabeculae of cytologically bland cells should prevent confusion.
and infrequently there may be ductal differentiation. Oncocytomas show variable capsulation and occa-
Some cases show focal areas of necrosis. There is sionally there are atypical nuclei. In one study, benign
usually widespread infiltration of the salivary gland oncocytomas were diploid but oncocytic carcinomas
were associated with aneuploidy (23). In addition,
oncocytomas show minimal or no mitotic activity
and there is no evidence of invasion into salivary
parenchyma. Although perineural invasion has been
reported in benign oncocytomas (4), this observation
has been disputed (3). Some mucoepidermoid carci-
nomas are almost entirely oncocytic (24,25) but the
presence of intermediate cells and mucocytes aids
diagnosis. Salivary duct carcinoma often consists of
large, pleomorphic cells with eosinophilic, granular
cytoplasm. However, there are duct-like structures
and frequently luminal papillary ingrowths or cystic
structures. In addition, the cells of salivary duct carci-
noma are PTAH negative and are frequently androgen
receptor positive (26).
Treatment and prognosis. Oncocytic carcinomas
of the major salivary glands appear to be high-grade
and aggressive from the outset, except in the rare
Figure 124 Oncocytic carcinoma showing cellular atypia and cases where there was preexisting benign oncocytoma
focal necrosis. or multifocal nodular oncocytosis (8,27). They are
locally infiltrative (8,9) and can show locoregional
574 Eveson and Nagao
Salivary Duct Carcinoma Figure 126 Salivary duct carcinoma. Cut surface of the tumor
shows gray-white, solid mass with foci of necrosis.
Introduction. Salivary duct carcinoma is defined
as ‘‘an aggressive adenocarcinoma that resembles
high-grade breast ductal carcinoma’’ (1). It has intra-
ductal and invasive components. Although many
salivary carcinomas are postulated to originate from
ductal cells and often demonstrate ductal structures, growth pattern (Fig. 127B). However, cribriform ductal
the term salivary duct carcinoma should be restricted structures may also be seen in the invasive portion as
only to those tumors histologically resembling mam- well as in the metastatic foci. Cribriform carcinoma
mary ductal carcinomas. They were originally epithelium may form tumor cell arches over relatively
described by Kleinsasser et al. in 1968 (2) and were large intercellular spaces, called ‘‘Roman-bridge’’
included in the 2nd edition of the WHO Classification architecture. The central portion of the ductal cell
of Salivary Gland Tumors in 1991 (3). nests often undergoes comedo-like necrosis. Psam-
Clinical features. Salivary duct carcinomas are moma bodies and focal squamous differentiation,
an uncommon but not a rare tumor. More than 200 some with keratinization, can be seen in the carcinoma
such cases have been reported (2,4–10). They account nests.
for 2% of all salivary gland tumors and 9% of all The invasive component consists of irregular
salivary gland malignancies (1). Salivary duct carci- glands and cords of cells that frequently elicit a
noma has been reported to exhibit a distinct male prominent desmoplastic reaction (Fig. 127C). Salivary
predominance of nearly 4:1 and an age range from 22 duct carcinomas exhibiting a purely intraductal or
to 91 years, with a peak incidence in the sixth and minimally invasive form may be associated with a
seventh decades (1,11). Most tumors arise from the better prognosis. A preexisting pleomorphic adenoma
parotid gland, but a few have been described in the component, often hyalinized, may be present in the
submandibular gland and intraoral minor salivary minority of cases. It has been rarely reported that
glands as well as the sinonasal tract and larynx (1). salivary duct carcinomas coexist with other specific
Salivary duct carcinoma presents as a rapidly growing types of salivary gland carcinoma component within
tumor with frequent pain and facial nerve palsy. the same topographical area, those being referred to as
Many salivary duct carcinomas occur de novo, but hybrid carcinomas (13). Cytologic features of the sali-
some develop as the malignant component of carcino- vary duct carcinoma are characterized by large pleo-
ma ex pleomorphic adenoma (12). morphic nuclei with coarse chromatin and prominent
Pathology. Grossly, most tumors are unencap- nucleoli (Fig. 127D). The cytoplasm is abundant and
sulated, highly infiltrative, and gray to white solid granularly eosinophilic. Mitotic figures are frequently
masses with occasional small areas of cystic change observed in most cases. Apocrine-like metaplasia is
and foci of necrosis on their cut surfaces (Fig. 126). seen when they display papillary arrangement along
Mean tumor size is about 3.0 cm, with a range of 1.0 the dilated cystic wall. Usually, no goblet-type
cm to over 6.0 cm in diameter (11). mucous cells are seen in the conventional salivary
Histologically, infiltration into adjacent salivary duct carcinoma. Both lymphovascular and perineural
gland tissue and soft tissue is usually evident. The invasion are a frequent feature.
tumor bears a striking resemblance to high-grade Immunohistochemistry. Similar to breast carcino-
ductal carcinoma of the breast, with a mixture of two mas, both electron microscopy and immunohis-
components: intraductal and invasive (Fig. 127A). The tochemistry show that salivary duct carcinoma cells
intraductal component is described as multiple large exhibit purely ductal cell differentiation with immu-
ductal structures with a cribriform, papillary, or solid noreactivity for cytokeratin, carcinoembryonic
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 575
Figure 127 Salivary duct carcinoma. (A) A mixture of both intraductal and invasive growth patterns, which bears a striking resemblance
to high-grade mammary ductal carcinoma of the breast. (B) Intraductal component comprised of cribriform structures with ‘‘Roman-
bridge’’ architecture. Note that the central portion of the ductal cell nests undergoes comedo-like necrosis. (C) The invasive component
consists of irregular glands and cords of cells that elicit a prominent desmoplastic reaction. (D) Carcinoma cells exhibiting large
pleomorphic nuclei with coarse chromatin and prominent nucleoli. The cytoplasm is abundant and granularly eosinophilic.
antigen, epithelial membrane antigen, and gross cystic myoepithelial cells rimming carcinoma cell nests, con-
disease fluid protein-15 (5,7,14). However, unlike firming their intraductal nature (21).
breast carcinomas, salivary duct carcinomas are Histologic variants. Several histologic variants
almost always positive for androgen receptor (Fig. of salivary duct carcinoma have already been
128A), and negative for estrogen receptor and proges- described, including sarcomatoid (22–26), mucin-rich
terone receptor (7,14–16). Prostate-specific antigen is (27,28), and invasive micropapillary carcinomas
detectable in some cases (16). The Ki-67 labeling index (Fig. 55) (29). The tumor originally reported as low-
is high (average 43%) (1). Diffuse p53 immunoreactiv- grade salivary duct carcinoma has been renamed low-
ity and mutation of p53 gene are frequent (7,10,13). grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma in the 2005 WHO
Most salivary duct carcinomas show diffuse and classification (see the section ‘‘Cystadenocarcinoma’’),
strong membranous staining for HER-2/neu (Fig. because it differs from conventional salivary duct car-
128B) with or without amplification of the gene dem- cinoma in some of its clinical and histopathologic
onstrated by fluorescence or chromogenic in situ features, has a good prognosis, and is a purely intra-
hybridization analysis (17–20). The tumor cells them- ductal carcinoma lesion composed of bland tumor cells
selves are negative for S-100 protein and any other (30–32). The question of a relationship between the two
myoepithelial markers. However, the myoepithelial neoplasms remains controversial.
markers, such as cytokeratin 14, smooth muscle The sarcomatoid variant is characterized histolog-
actin, calponin, and p63, clearly highlight supportive ically by a biphasic neoplasm with both typical salivary
576 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 129 Histologic variants of salivary duct carcinoma. (A) Sarcomatoid variant. A biphasic neoplasm with both typical salivary duct
carcinoma and sarcomatoid elements with a fascicular pattern of spindle cells. (B) Mucin-rich variant. Mucin lakes containing islands of
carcinoma cells (right) in addition to the typical salivary duct carcinoma component (left). (C) Invasive micropapillary variant. Morula-like
small cell clusters without fibrovascular cores, surrounded by a clear space. (D) Invasive micropapillary variant. Immunohistochemistry.
Epithelial membrane antigen-positive reaction rimming cell clusters showing a distinctive ‘‘inside-out’’ staining pattern.
Since salivary duct carcinoma is histologically patients with salivary duct carcinoma had local recur-
almost indistinguishable from the mammary ductal rence, 60% had regional lymph node metastasis, and
carcinoma, the possibility of primary breast carcinoma 50% had distant metastasis (6,8,10). Sites for distant
metastatic to salivary gland must be excluded. In metastasis include lungs, bones, liver, brain, and skin.
contrast to breast cancer, salivary duct carcinoma is Of the reported patients with salivary duct carcinoma,
more common in males. The presence of the true 55% to 65% died of disease between 5 months and
intraductal components revealed by immunohisto- 10 years after diagnosis, usually within 4 years (mean
chemical staining for the myoepithelial markers in survival, 29 months) (6,8,10).
the salivary gland tumor suggests the primary origin. The putative prognostic factors of salivary duct
In addition, androgen receptor positive, estrogen carcinoma include tumor size (tumors less than 3 cm in
receptor negative, and progesterone receptor negative diameter having a better outcome), distant metastasis,
immunophenotype favor a diagnosis of salivary duct lymph node metastasis, surgical margins, HER2/neu
carcinoma rather than metastatic breast carcinoma over-expression, Ki-67 labeling index, expression of
(15). However, clinical examinations to identify a estrogen receptor-b (estrogen receptor-b downregula-
breast mass are most important for accurate diagnosis. tion being associated with adverse clinical features),
Treatment and Prognosis. It should be empha- invasive micropapillary morphology, and proportion
sized that salivary duct carcinoma is one of the most of intraductal component (5,7,10,17,29,34,35). The prog-
aggressive malignant salivary tumors. A review of the nostic significance of the expression of p53 and DNA
literature confirmed that approximately 30% of the ploidy pattern is controversial (10,35). Treatment
578 Eveson and Nagao
usually consists of total glandectomy, accompanied by predominance (9). The major salivary glands, mostly
radical neck dissection and radiotherapy. Although the parotid gland, are more frequently affected than
sufficient conclusive data are lacking, anti-androgen the minor salivary glands. Patients with adenocarci-
and transtuzumab (Herceptin) might provide hope noma NOS usually present with a solitary painless
for systemic therapy for patients with advanced stage mass, but approximately 20% of the patients with
salivary duct carcinoma (36,37). parotid tumors complain of pain or facial nerve weak-
ness, and nearly half of the tumors are fixed to the
Adenocarcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified skin or deep tissues (11). Palatal tumors may ulcerate
and involve the underlying bone.
Introduction. Adenocarcinoma, not otherwise Pathology. Grossly, the tumor shows ill-defined
specified (NOS), is defined as ‘‘a malignant salivary infiltrative borders, but it may be focally circum-
gland tumor that exhibits ductal differentiation but scribed. The cut surface is mostly tan to gray-white,
lacks any of the histomorphologic features that charac- and the tumor forms a solid mass, often with foci of
terize the other defined types of salivary carcinoma’’ (1). hemorrhage or necrosis.
Although many salivary gland carcinomas originate Histologically, the tumors are characterized by
from the salivary duct unit and generically belong to variable glandular or duct-like structures and inva-
the large category of ‘‘adenocarcinoma,’’ the modifying sion into the adjacent salivary gland parenchyma and
term ‘‘NOS’’ is only applied to those tumors that lack sometimes surrounding connective tissue, as well as
sufficient histologic features of the specific categories of muscle or bone. Apart from the glandular structures,
salivary gland carcinoma (1). adenocarcinoma NOS exhibits a variety of architectural
Various types of adenocarcinomas have been patterns, including solid sheets, papillary, cystic, crib-
recognized and separated from the adenocarcinoma riform, cords, lobular, and trabecular (Fig. 130). A
NOS group since the 1st edition of the WHO Classifi- mixture of several architectural growth patterns is
cation of Salivary Gland Tumors appeared in 1972 (2). common, but one architectural pattern may predomi-
Accordingly, the second edition of the WHO classifi- nate. Diverse tumor-cell types can be seen in adenocar-
cation published in 1991 significantly increased the cinoma NOS. In most tumors, cuboidal-, oval-, or
numbers of the tumor entities (3). In particular, the polygonal-cell type dominates, but scattered oncocy-
recognition of polymorphous low-grade adenocarci- toid-, clear-, melanoma-like-, mucinous-, or sebaceous-
noma, salivary duct carcinoma, epithelial-myoepithe- cell types may occasionally be present. Tumor necrosis
lial carcinoma, basal cell adenocarcinoma, and and perineural and vascular invasion are common. By
papillary cystadenocarcinoma have probably greatly definition, adenocarcinomas NOS lack the characteris-
contributed to the decrease in the number of cases tic histologic features of other recognized salivary
included in adenocarcinoma NOS group (4–8). How- adenocarcinomas, but limited foci that resemble specif-
ever, according to the AFIP series, for example, ade- ic tumor entities, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma,
nocarcinoma NOS still constitutes a considerable acinic cell carcinoma, epithelial-myoepithelial carci-
proportion, being only the second most common noma, cystadenocarcinoma, or salivary duct carcinoma,
type of all salivary gland malignancies next to mucoe- may be seen and the presence of these features does not
pidermoid carcinoma (9). Because the 2005 WHO preclude a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma NOS.
classification added only three relatively rare tumor Generally, the histologic grading system of low,
entities, namely, clear cell carcinoma NOS, low-grade intermediate, and high is applied to adenocarcinoma
cribriform cystadenocarcinoma, and sialoblastoma, it NOS and is based on differentiation or degree of gland
seems likely that the frequency of adenocarcinoma formation, cytologic atypia, mitotic count, and tumor
NOS has not been substantially decreased after the necrosis (Fig. 130) (11,13). Gland formation tends to be
recognition of the scheme (1). prominent in low-grade tumors but not in high-grade
In 2004, Ghannoum and Freedman introduced a tumors, but the extent of gland formation alone may
new type of salivary gland carcinoma they called not be enough for the assessment of the grade of
‘‘signet-ring cell (mucin-producing) adenocarcinoma adenocarcinoma NOS. It has been proposed that
of minor salivary glands,’’ and distinguished it from high-grade tumors should be distinguished from
the adenocarcinoma NOS group (10). This tumor low-grade tumors by the presence of one or more of
entity is not included in the 2005 WHO Classification the following features: nuclear atypia, high mitotic
of the Salivary Gland Tumors; thus it will be briefly rate, atypical mitotic figures, necrosis, perineural inva-
described later in this section. sion, bony invasion, angiolymphatic invasion, or
Clinical features. The incidence of adenocarci- aggressive invasion pattern. An aggressive pattern of
noma NOS is variable in several major series (5–9,11– invasion is seen as infiltration at the tumor interface
14). Based on recent series data, adenocarcinoma NOS composed of small islands or strands, or 1 mm or
represents an uncommon, but not rare, salivary gland more of normal tissue between tumor islands (8). Most
malignancy, accounting for approximately 3% to 9% adenocarcinomas NOS are considered to be high-
of all salivary gland tumors and 8% to 17% of all grade histologically.
salivary gland carcinomas (5–9,14). Age ranges from Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are
10 to 93 years, with a peak incidence in the sixth and usually positive for pan-cytokeratin and negative for
seventh decades. Reported gender differences of ade- S-100 protein, smooth muscle actin, and calponin.
nocarcinoma NOS are inconsistent. The AFIP files Differential diagnosis. The diagnosis of adeno-
show these tumors to have a slight female carcinoma NOS is essentially based on the exclusion
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 579
Figure 133 Myoepithelial carcinoma. (A) Epithelioid cell type. The epithelioid cells forming solid nests, cords, or trabeculae in a
hyalinized stroma. (B) Spindle cell type. The spindle cells arranged in a vaguely interlacing fascicular pattern. (C) Plasmacytoid cell type.
The plasmacytoid cells exhibiting eccentrically located nuclei and abundant cytoplasm in a myxoid background. (D) Clear cell type. Solid
nests of epithelioid type carcinoma cells with clear cytoplasm.
intermixing with variable amounts of myxoid or hya- is the most common cell type, a mixture of several cell
line material (Fig. 132). The center of the tumor cell types within a tumor is frequently seen. The epitheli-
nests often undergoes necrosis or paucicellular myx- oid cells are polygonal, with central nuclei, coarse
oid degeneration, sometimes creating a pseudocystic chromatin and prominent nucleoli (Fig. 133A). These
appearance. It is unclear whether a tumor exhibiting cells may be arranged in patternless sheets, cords, or
predominantly myoepithelial differentiation with trabeculae in hyalinized stroma. Loose clusters in a
focal ductal differentiation can be diagnosed as myoe- myxoid background with pseudoglandular structures
pithelial carcinoma or should be considered in the forming cleft-like spaces can also be observed. The
category of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. In spindle cells have centrally located nuclei and are
addition, recent reports have broadened the histomor- sometimes arranged in a vaguely interlacing fascicular
phologic spectrum of epithelial-myoepithelial carcino- pattern (Fig. 133B). The plasmacytoid cells have eccen-
ma (16). Although very limited foci of ductal trically located nuclei and abundant cytoplasm, super-
differentiation may not preclude the diagnosis of ficially mimicking plasma cells (Fig. 133C). Clear
myoepithelial carcinoma (4), in order to avoid confu- cytoplasm, because of accumulation of granular
sion, we propose that any true ductal structures PAS-positive glycogen, is usually seen in the epitheli-
should not be present in this tumor. oid type cells (Fig. 133D) (10,14). The clear-cell type
As in myoepithelioma, the tumor cells in myoe- may resemble a vacuolated signet-ring cell or lip-
pithelial carcinoma show wide morphologic variation, oblast-like cell (5). Sometimes, cells of intermediate
consisting of epithelioid, spindle, plasmacytoid and appearance are present among the cells of different
clear cell subtypes (Fig. 133). Although epithelioid cell types. Small foci of squamous differentiation with or
582 Eveson and Nagao
The clear cell variant of myoepithelial carcinoma 2.8–42.4%), and 6.2% of all pleomorphic adenomas
should be distinguished from various types of salivary (range, 1.9–23.3%) (2). It is probable that the true
gland tumors with predominant clear cell morphology, incidence of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is
including epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma, clear cell higher because the malignant component may over-
carcinoma (NOS), mucoepidermoid carcinoma, onco- grow and efface the original pleomorphic adenoma
cytoma, acinic cell carcinoma, sebaceous carcinoma, masking the origin of the tumor (4). The parotid gland
and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (see the section is the most frequent major gland site (82%) but tumors
‘‘Clear Cell Carcinoma, NOS’’) (10,18,19). The distinc- may also develop in the submandibular gland (18%)
tion between myoepithelial carcinoma and epithelial- and very rarely the sublingual gland (0.3%) (2). In the
myoepithelial carcinoma is based on the presence or minor salivary glands, about 60% of carcinoma ex
absence of the true ductal formation. pleomorphic adenoma involve the palate with lesser
Treatment and prognosis. The clinical behavior of numbers forming in the lips, tongue, buccal mucosa,
myoepithelial carcinoma varies, but it is generally and tonsil (5). There is a wide overall age distribution
considered to be of intermediate- to high-grade malig- but tumors rarely present before the age of 20 and
nancy (5,7,11). Approximately, one third of the most cases are seen in the sixth or seventh decades of
patients die of the disease, usually with distant metas- life. This is approximately a decade later than in
tases, another third develop recurrences but do not die patients with benign pleomorphic adenomas. The
of disease, and the remaining third are free of disease typical history is a rapid increase in size of a mass
(4). Common sites for metastasis include the cervical that has been present for many years. However,
lymph nodes and distant organs, such as the lungs, occasionally the initial presentation may be a rapidly
liver, bones, kidney, and brain (5,11). enlarging tumor with no history of a preexisting mass
Myoepithelial carcinomas exhibiting high prolif- (2,6). The risk of malignant transformation in pleo-
erative activity assessed by mitotic count and/or Ki-67 morphic adenoma appears to increase progressively
labeling index, histologic aggressiveness such as peri- with time (7). However, a significant proportion of
neural permeation and extensive invasion into the patients, particularly those in the younger age groups,
surrounding tissue, and marked cellular pleomor- have a clinical history of less than three years (2,8).
phism have a poor prognosis (11). p53 over-expression Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma usually forms a
suggests an unfavorable course (11). DNA content and painless mass but pain, nerve palsy, and skin fixation
S-phase fraction of tumor cells are good predictors of or ulceration may be seen in progressive disease.
aggressive biologic behavior (20). There is no differ- Regional metastases are common at presentation
ence in outcome with regard to the presence or and the tumor often becomes more widely dissemi-
absence of preexisting pleomorphic adenoma or nated (9).
myoepithelioma (5,11). No correlation between Pathology. The size of carcinoma ex pleomor-
nucleolar organizer regions (an indicator of cell pro- phic adenoma ranges from 1.5 to 25 cm in greatest
liferative activity) and clinical outcome has been diameter (4,10). On average, this is twice the size of
reported (21). There is no apparent association benign pleomorphic adenomas. Large or densely
between the cell type and clinical behavior of myoe- hyalinized tumors and the presence of necrosis,
pithelial carcinoma (5,11). hemorrhage, or cystic degeneration should raise
Complete wide surgical excision is the recom- the suspicion of malignancy and such tumors may
mended treatment for myoepithelial carcinoma. The require extensive sampling. Grossly, carcinoma
effectiveness of chemotherapy or radiation therapy, or ex pleomorphic adenomas are usually poorly cir-
both, for this tumor remains unknown. cumscribed and many are extensively infiltrative.
Occasional tumors resemble their benign counter-
Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma part and are well circumscribed or completely
encapsulated (10,11). Sometimes the preexisting
Introduction. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adeno- pleomorphic adenoma is represented by no more
ma has been defined as ‘‘a pleomorphic adenoma than an area of scarring. About 40% of carcinoma
from which an epithelial malignancy is derived’’ (1). ex pleomorphic adenomas show macroscopic evi-
Synonyms include carcinoma arising in a benign dence of facial nerve involvement (9).
mixed tumor, carcinoma ex benign mixed tumor, The most common malignant component is a
carcinoma arising in pleomorphic adenoma, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (NOS) or sali-
malignant mixed tumor. In the past, the term malig- vary duct carcinoma (Figs. 136,137). Other malignant
nant mixed tumor has also included carcinosarcoma elements include mucoepidermoid, polymorphous
and metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma. This is a low-grade adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma,
particularly unhelpful name as these tumors are now clear cell or myoepithelial carcinoma (9,12). In addi-
regarded as independent entities. tion, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma can show
Clinical features. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic multiple distinct carcinoma types in the same tumor
adenoma forms the large majority of malignant mass. Occasionally, no histologically benign remnant
tumors associated with pleomorphic adenoma can be found. If there is extensive scarring or calcifi-
(>95%) (2–4). In a major review of the literature, cation or if there is evidence of a previously excised
carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma accounted for pleomorphic adenoma at that site, a diagnosis of
approximately 3.6% of all salivary tumors (range, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is probable.
0.9–14%), 12% of all salivary malignancies (range, Some consider the history of a long-standing mass in
584 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 136 Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma showing ade- Figure 138 Perineural invasion next to remnant of scarred
nocarcinoma developing next to cartilaginous area. pleomorphic adenoma.
(4,6,7,9,10,25). It is important, therefore, to identify with a range of 14 to 90 years and there appears to be
carcinomas ex pleomorphic adenoma that are intra- no significant sex predilection (2). Most cases appear
capsular and those invading through the capsule as to arise de novo but occasionally there is a history of a
noninvasive or invasive, respectively, and to separate concurrent or recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (6). In
within the latter group minimally and widely invasive these cases, the tumor should strictly be termed carci-
tumors. nosarcoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Carcinosarcoma
Several other studies have shown that depth of usually presents clinically as a mass, which may be
invasion is an important indicator of prognosis. painful. Nerve palsy, fixation, and ulceration are
However, the depth chosen varies widely in differ- common, but regional lymph node involvement is
ent studies making interpretation of the data prob- infrequent (8).
lematical. One study found that no patients with less Pathology. Carcinosarcoma is a biphasic tumor
than 8 mm invasion from the capsule died from the composed of a mixture of carcinomatous and sarco-
tumor, whereas all patients with invasion greater matous elements, usually with a predominance of
than 8 mm beyond the capsule ultimately died of the sarcomatous component. The most common sar-
disease (10). The local recurrence rate in this series comatous elements are chondrosarcoma, osteo-
also correlated with extent of invasion. There was a sarcoma (Fig. 141), and fibrosarcoma; moderate to
local recurrence rate of 70.5% in tumors with inva- poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (NOS)
sion beyond 6 mm from the capsule, as compared (Fig. 142), or an undifferentiated carcinoma are the
with 16.6% for tumors with invasion of less than 6 most common carcinomatous components. More
mm. Another study showed that of four patients
with carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma invading
5 mm beyond the capsule, two died of the disease.
Two patients with invasion less than 5 mm had no
tumor progression (9). The improved prognosis for
minimally invasive tumors (1.5 mm) has been
shown by eight patients having recurrence-free peri-
ods ranging from 1 to 4 years (mean, 2.5 years) (11).
Further studies using larger numbers of patients and
more exact histologic criteria are necessary to estab-
lish more clearly the relationship between depth of
invasion and prognosis.
The reported effect of tumor size on prognosis
has also been variable. Some studies have shown a
poorer prognosis in larger tumors (3,9) whereas others
could find no significant relationship between size
and survival (7,10). Lewis et al. (9) could find no
correlation with tumor subtype, unlike Tortoledo et
al. (10) who reported a correlation between the sub-
type of the carcinomatous component and the five-
year survival rates. In their study there was a 30% Figure 141 Carcinosarcoma showing mixture of adenocarcino-
survival rate for undifferentiated carcinomas, 50% for matous and osteosarcomatous differentiation.
myoepithelial carcinomas, 62% for adenocarcinomas
(NOS), and 96% for polymorphous low-grade adeno-
carcinomas (10). Additional factors reported to be of
prognostic significance have included pathologic
stage, grade, proliferation index, and the proportion
of benign to malignant tumor (9).
Carcinosarcoma
Introduction. Carcinosarcoma is defined as ‘‘a
malignant tumor composed of a mixture of both
carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements’’ (1). Syno-
nyms include true malignant mixed tumor and sarco-
matoid carcinoma (see discussion of terminology in
the section ‘‘Salivary Duct Carcinoma’’.
Clinical features. Carcinosarcoma is a very rare
tumor, which accounts for only 0.2% of malignant
tumors of major salivary glands (2) and to
date, there have been over 70 published cases (2–22).
Two-thirds have arisen in the parotid, approximately
19% in the submandibular glands and 14% in the Figure 142 Carcinosarcoma showing poorly differentiated ade-
nocarcinoma and sarcomatoid stroma.
palate (1) and a single case has been reported in the
tongue (5). The mean age at presentation was 58 years
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 587
Figure 143 Metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma. Cytologically benign pleomorphic adenoma metastatic to supraclavicular lymph node.
588 Eveson and Nagao
lymphatic or venous access and allowing the cytolog- reported. There is a male-female ratio of about 2:1.
ically benign tumor metastasize. Most cases arise in the 50- to 70-year age range with a
Immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemi- mean of 60 to 65 years (1); tumors in children are
cal features are similar to those of conventional pleo- exceptional (12,13). Some tumors are associated with
morphic adenoma. previous radiotherapy, often following a long latent
Molecular-genetic data. There have been limited period (5,7,14). About half of the patients present with
genetic studies on these tumors. The majority of cases a painless mass (5–7), and others give a history of a
are found to have a normal diploid complement but in rapidly enlarging mass, which may be associated with
one study 2/11 cases showed aneuploid DNA (9). pain, fixation, and facial nerve palsy. Many cases
Karyotypic chromosomal analysis and fluorescent in present with a high clinical staging (5–7).
situ hybridization in a single case have shown numer- Pathology. Grossly, most tumors form firm
ous translocations. These have included unbalanced masses that are larger than 3 cm in diameter and
rearrangements of chromosomes 1-13 and 9-21 and show evidence of invasion. The cut surface is usually
monosomy 22. These differ from the typical balanced white or light gray, and there may be areas of necrosis.
8q or 12q translocations associated with conventional Histologically, the tumor is similar to other squamous
pleomorphic adenoma (13). It has been suggested that cell carcinomas of the head and neck region
genetic factors rather than coincidence or mechanical (Figs. 144,145). Most are well or moderately differen-
dislodgement may be involved in the metastatic pro- tiated, with less than 10% of poorly differentiated
gression in these tumors. tumors (14). There may be ductal dysplasia and squa-
Treatment and prognosis. The main sites of mous metaplasia. There is usually extensive local
metastasis are bone (45%), locoregional head and invasion, and perineural involvement is common.
neck (43%), and lung (36%) (2). Distant spread is
associated with a significantly adverse outcome with
five-year disease-specific and disease-free survivals of
only 58% and 50%, respectively. Other indicators of
poor prognosis include the development of distant
metastases within 10 years of the initial diagnosis of
pleomorphic adenoma and the presence of metastases
in multiple sites. Radical surgery is the treatment of
choice as the evidence for the value of radiotherapy or
chemotherapy is minimal.
hypercellular nests, and the outer layer may show more histologically distinct types of tumor within the
nuclear palisading. There may be small, duct-like same topographical area and proposed the term
structures lined by cuboidal cells, occasionally associ- ‘‘hybrid tumor’’ (1). Examples of both benign and
ated with solid, acinar-like nests resembling the anlage malignant hybrid tumors have been reported, most
of the developing salivary gland. Myoepithelial cells being the latter and referred to as hybrid carcinomas.
have been associated with these structures, and focal Some controversial issues regarding the criteria
areas of sebaceous or squamous differentiation may be for hybrid carcinomas have been raised. Since in the
present (17,18). Cribriform areas may be seen focally, salivary glands, shared foci of similar phenotypic
and occasionally, calcospherites are present. The stro- differentiation may be seen among the different histo-
ma is variable and can consist of thin, fibrous septa, logic tumor types, Gnepp et al. proposed that in
sparsely cellular myxoid tissue or more primitive, hybrid carcinomas, each element needs to differentiate
abundant, and cellular fibroblastic areas. toward distinctly different salivary gland elements:
Immunohistochemistry. Sialoblastoma is positive for example, excretory duct versus acini or excretory
for a variety of keratin markers, including pan- duct versus intercalated duct (2). Grenko et al.
cytokeratin cocktail, epithelial membrane antigen, cyto- described three adenoid cystic carcinomas and two
keratins 5/6, 7, and 14, but negative for cytokeratin epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas that focally
20 (3,11,18,23). The abluminal cells stain with a variety shared both histologic features (3). They suggested
of myoepithelial markers including smooth muscle that these two entities shared common differentiation
actin, calponin, S-100 protein, cytokeratin 14, p63, and pathways and did not categorize these examples as
pan-cytokeratin (18). a-fetoprotein reactivity has been hybrid carcinomas. On the other hand, Seifert and
reported (16,23), but tumors are negative for glial Donath, and Croitoru et al. did not take account of the
fibrillary acidic protein (11,23). There is a wide varia- cellular phenotypes constituting hybrid tumors (1,4).
tion in Ki-67 expression (3–80%) (23). Chetty et al. suggested that completely divergent
Differential diagnosis. Sialoblastoma needs to differentiation may lead to the appearance of two
be distinguished from other basaloid neoplasms, distinct tumor entities (hybrid tumors), whereas
including basal cell adenoma, basal cell adenocarci- incomplete divergence may lead to tumors harboring
noma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma. The degree of overlapping histologic features (5). It has been postu-
cytologic atypia, primitive cellular features, mitotic lated that the two tumor components have an identi-
frequency, and local infiltrative growth pattern are cal origin because of the consistent presence of a
not seen in basal cell adenoma, and this tumor is transitional zone between the two. We recommend
exceptional in children. Basal cell adenocarcinoma that in hybrid carcinomas, each carcinoma component
and adenoid cystic carcinoma are also not seen in the should occupy at least 10% of the tumor mass and
perinatal period. should be separated from the other component (6).
Treatment and Prognosis. Sialoblastoma is an
aggressive and potentially low-grade malignant neo- Clinical Features
plasm. About 20% of cases recur, and occasionally, the
tumor metastases to regional lymph nodes or distant Hybrid carcinomas are very rare and, to the best of our
sites (12,23,27). Their relative rarity makes it difficult knowledge, only 26 such cases have been described
to make accurate prognostic statements. However, on (1,3–13). The prevalence is up to 0.4% of all salivary
the basis of an admittedly small series, it has been gland tumors. In hybrid carcinomas, there is no gender
suggested that sialoblastomas can be divided into predilection and an age range from 28 to
favorable and unfavorable subtypes on the basis of 81 years (mean 59 years). In terms of tumor location,
their histology (23). Favorable tumors are partially most hybrid carcinomas (17 cases) arise in the parotid
capsulated, cytologically relatively bland, and have gland with additional cases from the palate (5 cases),
abundant stroma. Unfavorable tumors consist of ana- submandibular gland (2 cases), and lacrimal gland (1 case).
plastic, basaloid cells, have minimal stroma, and may
show evidence of vascular or perineural invasion. In Pathology
addition, they may express a-fetoprotein reactivity
and have a high Ki-67 proliferative index. Complete Tumor size of hybrid carcinomas ranges from 2 to
surgical excision appears to be the treatment of choice. 10 cm (mean 4 cm). Microscopically, hybrid carcinoma
Although the successful treatment of metastatic dis- shows a single tumor mass consisting of two distinct
ease with adriamycin has been reported (20), the histologic types with invasion into the surrounding
overall role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is salivary gland tissue (Fig. 153). Various carcinoma
difficult to assess (17,23,27). combinations have been described in hybrid carcino-
mas (1,3–13); salivary duct carcinoma, epithelial-
myoepithelial carcinoma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma
J. Hybrid Tumors are frequently involved. Others include mucoepider-
Introduction moid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, squamous cell
carcinoma, basal cell adenocarcinoma, myoepithelial
Salivary gland tumors are known to have diverse carcinoma, and polymorphous low-grade adeno-
histologic features, sometimes exhibiting combined carcinoma. Rare hybrid adenomas show combinations
histologic patterns observed in different tumor enti- of basal cell adenoma with canalicular adenoma,
ties. In 1996, Seifert and Donath defined a salivary Warthin’s tumor with sebaceous adenoma, and
gland tumor entity characterized by containing two or Warthin’s tumor with oncocytoma (1).
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 597
in association with a radicular cyst or an impacted treatment was 13% (1). However, this increased to
tooth (1), and these may be mistaken for dental 40% when conservative treatments such as marginal
pathology (6,7). There is a wide age distribution (1– resection or curettage were used (1). The rate of
85) years, with a mean age of about 50 years (1,4). metastatic disease is 9% in mucoepidermoid carcino-
Many cases are symptomless and are discovered ma but rises to 50% in adenoid cystic carcinoma.
during routine radiographic investigations. The most
common presenting complaint is swelling, and other
symptoms include pain, paresthesia or anesthesia, L. Soft Tissue Tumors
loosening or spontaneous avulsion of teeth, discharge,
and hemorrhage. Mesenchymal soft tissue tumors, other than hemato-
lymphoid tumors, are uncommon in the salivary
glands, accounting for 1.9% to 5% of all salivary
Pathology
gland tumors (1–5). Benign soft tissue tumors occur
The overwhelming majority of central salivary gland more commonly than sarcomas, with the ratio varying
tumors are malignant (*95%) (1,4). Mucoepidermoid from 18:1 to 2.4:1 (5). They are observed mainly in the
carcinoma is the most common tumor, forming 64% to major salivary glands, mostly the parotid gland, and
77% of the cases in two major series (1,4). The second only a few have been described as minor salivary
most frequent tumor is adenoid cystic carcinoma gland in origin. Virtually any entity of benign and
(11–18%) (8), with smaller numbers of adenocarcino- malignant soft tissue tumors can originate from the
ma NOS (3–4%), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma salivary glands, but the frequency may differ accord-
(3–5%), and acinic cell carcinoma (2–3%). Other rare ing to the tumor types (1–7). Pathologic and biologic
central malignant salivary gland tumors include hya- features of each tumor are essentially identical to
linizing clear cell carcinoma (9), epithelial-myoepithe- those arising in other sites in the body, with a few
lial carcinoma (10), and salivary duct carcinoma (11). exceptions.
Benign tumors, which include pleomorphic adenoma Of the 220 cases of benign soft tissue tumors of
(12), myoepithelioma (13), and monomorphic adeno- the salivary glands deposited in the AFIP files, about
ma, are uncommon and account for about 5% of 40% are vascular tumors, followed by 30% neural
reported cases (1,4). tumors, 19% fibrous tumors, and 9% lipomas (2).
The most common vascular tumors are hemangiomas,
Differential Diagnosis especially the juvenile type in infants (8–10), followed
by lymphangiomas. Schwannoma and neurofibroma
The differential diagnosis of central mucoepidermoid are the two major neural tumors (Fig. 154), and other
carcinomas includes glandular odontogenic cyst rare tumors include extracranial meningioma (2).
(sialo-odontogenic cyst), clear cell odontogenic carci- Among the fibrohistiocytic/myofibroblastic tumor
noma, calcifying epithelial odontogenic carcinoma, groups, nodular fasciitis, fibrous histiocytoma, fibro-
and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Both mucoepider- matosis, myofibromatosis, fibroma, desmoid tumor,
moid carcinoma and glandular odontogenic cyst can solitary fibrous tumor (Fig. 155) (11,12), and inflam-
have cystic components and may have areas showing matory pseudotumor (inflammatory myofibroblastic
nonkeratinized squamous epithelium and goblet cells. tumors) (13–15) have been described (2). However, the
However, glandular odontogenic cysts lack the inter- latter two tumors encompass a wide spectrum, rang-
mediate cells that are frequently a predominant com- ing from benign to low-grade malignancy, with a risk
ponent of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and may show of local recurrence but no significant metastatic poten-
characteristic whorled epithelial plaques. In addition, tial. Although lipoma is generally a quite common soft
the epithelium lining glandular odontogenic cysts is tissue tumor, salivary gland origin is rare, accounting
often columnar or pseudostratified columnar in type for less than 0.5% of all salivary gland tumors (4).
and frequently shows luminal blebbing or filiform Several microscopic variants of lipoma of the salivary
extensions. Furthermore, although glandular odonto- glands, such as angiolipoma, fibrolipoma, pleomor-
genic cyst is multilocular, it does not show the infil- phic lipoma, spindle cell lipoma, and sialolipoma,
trative growth pattern of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. have been reported (16–19). Miscellaneous other
In difficult cases, the differential staining of cytoker- tumors include granular cell tumor (Fig. 156), angio-
atin 18 in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and cytokeratin myoma (vascular leiomyoma), glomangioma, and
19 in glandular odontogenic cyst may aid distinction osteochondroma (2,5).
(14,15). The clear cell variant of calcifying epithelial Salivary gland sarcomas are very rare, accounting
odontogenic tumor usually contains either amyloid or for 0.5% of all salivary gland tumors and 1.5% of all
calcospherites or both. Clear cell odontogenic carci- salivary gland malignancies (4). Because of their rarity,
noma and metastatic renal carcinoma do not have a before making a diagnosis of salivary gland sarcomas,
squamous or intermediate cell component and lack many primary or metastatic neoplasms, such as ana-
evidence of intracellular mucin. plastic undifferentiated carcinoma, carcinosarcoma,
myoepithelial carcinoma, and metastatic malignant
Treatment and Prognosis melanoma, must first be excluded by careful clinical
and pathologic examinations, including extensive
Malignant intraosseous salivary gland tumors should immunohistochemical analysis. The 85 cases of salivary
be treated by radical surgical excision. The recurrence gland sarcomas in the AFIP files include hemangioper-
rate for mucoepidermoid carcinoma following such icytoma, malignant schwannoma (malignant peripheral
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 599
Figure 159 Juvenile hemangioma in the parotid gland. (A) Tumor diffusely and uniformly involves the parotid gland lobules, leaving
scattered striated ducts. (B) The tumor cells produce solid cellular nests with scattered vascular structures containing red blood cells.
(C) Proliferation of the plump endothelial cells with mild nuclear atypia. (D) Endothelial tumor cells are immunoreactive for CD31.
Differential diagnosis. The most important dif- conventional lipomas of the salivary glands. The
ferential diagnosis of juvenile hemangioma is angio- patients have been from birth to 84 years old, with
sarcoma. The presence of plump cells in juvenile an average of 55.7 years except for two congenital
hemangioma may cause confusion. In angiosarcomas, cases (19,27–29). Male cases are slightly more common
even in well-differentiated cases, plump cells exhibit than female ones. It occurs in both major and minor
more frequent mitotic figures and higher nuclear salivary glands. Eleven of the reported tumors arose
atypia than juvenile hemangioma. In addition, in the parotid gland, and eight in intraoral minor
clinically, angiosarcoma is extremely rare in infants. salivary glands including four involving the palate;
one case each occurred in the floor of the mouth,
tongue, and buccal mucosa.
Sialolipoma Sialolipoma presents as a slow-growing, painless
mass with the duration varying from 2 months to
Introduction. Sialolipoma is a recently described 10 years. CT and MRI show a well-circumscribed
variant of salivary gland lipoma defined by Nagao tumor with a low-intensity CT signal and high-inten-
et al. (19). It is histologically characterized by islands sity MRI signal. MRI may show scattered or heteroge-
of salivary gland parenchyma enclosed in mature neous glandular elements. No concurrent history of
lipomatous tissue. diabetes mellitus or chronic alcoholism has been
Clinical features. Sialolipoma is a rare, benign reported for any patient with sialolipoma. Superficial
neoplasm; at least 19 cases of a tumor with similar parotidectomy or, in the case of minor salivary gland
histologic features have been reported (19,27–29). Sia- origin, surgical excision is the appropriate treatment
lolipomas share similar clinical features with for this benign tumor.
602 Eveson and Nagao
Figure 160 Sialolipoma. (A) A well-circumscribed, yellow mass in the parotid gland. (B) Low-power view showing a tumor sharply
separated from the surrounding normal parotid gland tissue. The tumor is composed of mature lipomatous tissue with enclosed islands of
salivary gland parenchyma. (C) The glandular components closely resemble the cellular and structural features of a normal salivary
gland. (D) Oncocytic change in glandular component.
Pathology. Grossly, sialolipomas are well- with some minor variations. The salivary gland paren-
circumscribed, soft, and yellow or yellow-white, chymal tissue elements are either distributed sparsely
with a maximum dimension of 1 to 6 cm in the parotid or clustered throughout the tumor. Generally, the
gland (Fig. 160A) and 1 to 3 cm in the minor salivary glandular components are atrophic. Rarely, a small
glands. lymph node, peripheral nerve, or dense lymphoid
Histopathologically, the tumor is a well-circumscribed infiltration is seen at the tumor’s periphery. Focal
mass confined by a fibrous capsule and composed of oncocytic (Fig. 160D), sebaceous, and squamous meta-
mature adipose tissue and islands of salivary gland plasia may be observed in the glandular component.
parenchymal tissue (Fig. 160B). The amount of fatty Occasionally, marked ductal dilatation with fibrosis is
tissue in the tumor is higher than that observed in evident. Myxoid change can occur in the adipose
adjacent nontumorous salivary gland tissue. However, element. It is likely that the glandular components in
the area occupied by the lipomatous component may sialolipoma become entrapped during lipomatous
differ, depending on the site of origin. Tumors in the proliferation, rather than representing true neoplastic
parotid gland have a greater abundance of adipose elements.
tissue, usually constituting 90% or more of the tumor, Ultrastructurally, the glandular elements, con-
than those in minor salivary glands. sisting of ductal, acinar, basal, and myoepithelial
The glandular component consists of ductal, cells have features compatible with those observed
acinar, basal, and myoepithelial cells without atypia, in the parenchyma of normal parotid gland. The
and closely resembles the cellular and structural fea- adipose cells have lipid droplets without tonofila-
tures of a normal salivary gland (Fig. 160C), albeit ments or myofilaments.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 603
Immunohistochemical studies confirm that the with approximately 70% of cases, but the submandib-
glandular components within the tumor are com- ular glands and minor salivary glands are also
posed of regularly organized ductal, acinar, and involved in the incidence of 20% to 25% and 5% to
myoepithelial cell elements that have cell-specific 10%, respectively (1). About 10% of the tumors arise in
phenotypes of normal glands. Focally observed onco- multiple glands (1). Usually, the salivary gland lym-
cytic cells are strongly immunoreactive for mitochon- phoma presents clinically as a slow-growing salivary
dria. The adipose cells stain positively for S-100 gland swelling in a patient over 50 years old.
protein. Cell proliferative activity, as assessed by The majority of the primary salivary gland lym-
Ki-67 immunostaining, is low. phomas are non-Hodgkin lymphomas of B-cell type;
Differential diagnosis. Several salivary gland both Hodgkin lymphomas and T-cell lymphomas are
conditions or tumors with lipomatous components extremely rare (5,6). The most common non-Hodgkin
might be confused with sialolipoma (19). The presence lymphomas arising in the salivary glands are extra-
of a fibrous capsule distinguishes sialolipomas from nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas (MALT lym-
lipomatosis, which constitutes a nontumoral deposi- phomas), which account for up to 80% of lymphoma
tion of adipose tissue throughout the gland, resulting cases (5,7). This type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
in its diffuse enlargement. Lipomatosis may occur in develops in the setting of acquired lymphoid tissue
association with diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, secondary to long-standing chronic inflammation or,
chronic alcoholism, malnutrition, and hormonal dis- more commonly, to an autoimmune process, such as
turbance, although the exact pathophysiology is still Sjögren’s syndrome (7–11). Other non-Hodgkin lym-
unclear. Unlike lipomatosis, the patients with sialoli- phomas involving the salivary glands are usually
poma do not have any of these conditions. In the considered to arise in lymph nodes adjacent to or
parotid gland, advancing age is accompanied by aci- embedded within the gland and extending into the
nar atrophy together with the increase in adipose glandular parenchyma (5). These include follicular
tissue. Sialolipoma, however, shows that the propor- lymphoma (Fig. 161), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,
tion of adipose tissue elements in the tumor is obvi- and small lymphocytic lymphoma, with the former
ously higher than that in nontumorous salivary gland two tumors being the most commonly reported, but
tissue, regardless of age. almost all types of nodal lymphomas can occur (5). It
Recently, a few case reports of similar tumors is important to recognize that the natural history and
have been published; these were categorized as ‘‘lip- the therapeutic approaches of these nodal-type lym-
oadenomas’’ (30) and ‘‘oncocytic lipoadenomas’’ (31). phomas are different from those of MALT lymphoma
In the former, the glandular tumor components are (5). Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas may develop de
described as tubules showing a sertoliform pattern novo or secondarily by transformation from either
without myoepithelial cells and acinar differentiation. MALT lymphoma or follicular lymphoma. Rarely,
Such unique findings are absent, while both myoepi- low-grade lymphomas, in particular, follicular lym-
thelial and acinar cells are present in sialolipomas. phoma, may arise in the lymphoid tissue of Warthin’s
Unlike sialolipomas, the latter tumors are character- tumors (12). The histopathologic features and progno-
ized by diffuse oncocytic metaplasia of the glandular sis of these other non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the
elements. In contrast, the metaplastic change is only salivary glands are identical to those of primary
focally observed, if at all, in sialolipomas. However, nodal disease of the same type (5).
since sialolipoma and lipoadenoma share many com- Comprehensive reviews and textbooks dealing
mon histologic features, it is a subject of debate with these fields are currently available elsewhere
whether these are distinct salivary gland tumors or
belong to the same tumor spectrum.
Pleomorphic adenomas rarely contain extensive
fatty components, but if these components are present,
they may derive from the pluripotential reserve cells
of pleomorphic adenoma via a metaplastic process
(32). Such a rare variant of pleomorphic adenoma
should also be considered in the differential diagnosis
of sialolipoma. In sialolipoma, however, the epithelial
components are sharply separated from the adipose
element. In addition, the presence of normal-
appearing acinar cells may exclude the possibility of
pleomorphic adenoma.
M. Malignant Lymphomas
Primary salivary gland lymphomas are uncommon,
accounting for less than 5% of lymphomas of all sites,
10% of lymphomas arising in the head and neck, and
2% of all salivary gland tumors (1–5). The most Figure 161 Follicular lymphoma involving the parotid gland.
common sites of occurrence are the parotid gland,
604 Eveson and Nagao
(5,7,10,13). In this section, only extranodal marginal hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and in immunocom-
zone B-cell lymphoma (MALT lymphoma) is petent children (7–11). However, the role of hepatitis
discussed. C virus (HCV) in the pathogenesis of MALT lympho-
ma remains to be defined (21). Monoclonal gammop-
Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma athy may be present.
(MALT Lymphoma) MALT lymphoma occurs predominantly in
patients aged 55 to 65 years, with an average of
Introduction. Since Isaacson and Wright first 61 years, mainly in women (5). Most MALT lympho-
described MALT lymphoma of the gastrointestinal mas arise in the parotid gland, but small numbers of
tract in 1983 (14), this type of lymphoma has been cases have been reported in the submandibular, sub-
found in many other organs, such as the salivary lingual, and minor salivary glands (5). Bilateral parot-
gland, thyroid gland, lung, skin, conjunctiva, breast, id involvement of MALT lymphoma may occur. The
and larynx (13,15). The salivary gland is the second patients typically present with a painless, slowly
most common site of involvement of MALT lympho- progressive swelling of the parotid area. The regional
ma following the stomach, which is far more frequent- lymph nodes may be enlarged because of involve-
ly affected, accounting for 70% of all cases (13,15). ment, but general lymphadenopathy and bone mar-
The characteristic feature of MALT lymphoma is row involvement are unusual in MALT lymphoma.
the proliferation of small- to medium-sized marginal Pathology. Grossly, the tumor presents as an ill-
zone cells that infiltrate the ductal epithelium, forming defined, firm mass, yellow to tan on the cut surface. It
lymphoepithelial lesions. Thus, MALT lymphomas is usually homogeneous, but microcysts may be
are now definitively considered as extranodal margin- observed.
al zone B-cell lymphomas (5,9,13). MALT is not nor- Histologically, the tumor entirely or partially
mally present in salivary glands, but it may be replaces the salivary gland parenchyma by a dense
acquired as a result of chronic inflammatory or auto- lymphoid infiltrate (Fig. 162), but in either case, lobu-
immune processes that leads to the pathologic condi- lar structure may be maintained. Features of LESA are
tion referred to as lymphoepithelial sialadenitis usually present. MALT lymphoma is characteristically
(LESA), which was formerly reported as myoepithe- composed of a diverse range of lymphoid cells with
lial sialadenitis or benign lymphoepithelial lesion. reactive lymphoid follicles and formation of lymphoe-
MALT lymphomas usually arise in the context of pithelial lesions. The neoplastic cells infiltrate sur-
LESA in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. The trans- rounding reactive secondary lymphoid follicles in a
formation from LESA to MALT lymphoma is postu- marginal zone distribution and spread outward to
lated to be a multistep process (7,17). Chronic long- form diffuse interfollicular sheets or, in some cases,
term immune stimulation will promote proliferation a vaguely nodular pattern.
of the lymphoid cells, and there may be selection or The neoplastic lymphoid cells include centrocyte-
emergence of one or more dominant B-cell clones. like (cleaved) cells, monocytoid B cells, small lymphoid
Sequentially, sufficient genetic alterations may lead cells, lymphoplasmacytic and plasma cells, and large
to clonal escape from control of proliferation, and transformed cells in varying numbers. Monocytoid B
overt lymphoma could eventually develop. Therefore, cells are described as medium-sized cells with lobated
the monoclonality in itself could be identified in or indented nuclei and abundant, pale cytoplasm,
lymphoproliferative disorders with lack of morpho- often with distinct cell borders. Centrocyte-like cells
logic features of lymphoma (7–10,16–20). These lesions are slightly smaller cells with less cytoplasm than
are considered by different authors as pseudolympho- monocytoid B cells, resembling marginal zone B cells
mas or prelymphomas, as neoplasms of ‘‘uncertain (7). In some cases, plasma cell differentiation may be
malignant potential’’ or as early true lymphomas. prominent. In about half of the cases, the neoplastic
Various criteria have been utilized to define lympho- plasma and lymphoplasmacytic cells may contain
ma, although none is universally accepted (7–10,16– PAS-positive Dutcher bodies in their nuclei.
20). Whatever the event, MALT lymphomas are often One of the most important histologic hallmarks
localized at presentation and are usually indolent of MALT lymphoma is the presence of lymphoepithe-
disease entities with a prolonged course; sometimes lial lesions, defined by the infiltration and distortion
they involve different anatomic sites and, after some of epithelial structures by aggregates of neoplastic
years, may develop into high-grade lymphoma (7,9). lymphoid cells, usually monocytoid B cells or centrocyte-
Clinical features. MALT lymphoma usually like cells (Fig. 162C). The affected ducts are often
arises in the patients with a preceding history of hyperplastic with luminal obliteration or, occasional-
LESA induced by an autoimmune disease, most ly, cystic dilatation, causing a multicystic appearance.
often Sjögren’s syndrome. The period of LESA pre- The early histologic manifestation of the emergence
senting prior to the development of MALT lymphoma of MALT lymphoma in LESA is the presence of haloes
varies, ranging from 6 months to 29 years (9). About or collars of pale monocytoid B cells and centrocyte-
4% to 7% of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome will like cells around the epimyoepithelial islands (lym-
develop lymphoma, and the risk of MALT lymphoma phoepithelial lesion) (Fig. 162A) (5). Areas of these
in Sjögren’s syndrome is 44 times higher than in the tumor cells gradually expand and form broad bands,
normal population (7,10). Development of salivary often linking together several lymphoepithelial lesions
gland MALT lymphoma has also been described in or diffuse sheets, which eventually replace reactive
patients with human immunodeficiency virus and follicles (Fig. 162B). On the other hand, some reactive
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 605
frank lymphoma. Therefore, demonstration of mono- lymphomas (7–10,16–20). In the literature, trisomies 3
clonality by molecular methods is not sufficient to and 18, and four distinct chromosomal translocations
establish a diagnosis of lymphoma. An extensive, have been demonstrated in MALT lymphoma of vari-
dense infiltrate of B cells and aberrant expression of ous anatomic sites: t(11;18)(q21;q21): API2-MALT1, t
CD43 in the neoplastic B cells are also highly sugges- (14;18)(q32;q21): IGH-MALT1, t(1;14)(p22;q32): BCL10-
tive of lymphoma. IGH, and t(3;14)(p14.1;q32): IGH-FOXP1 (22–28). These
The infiltration of neoplastic B cells into reactive different chromosomal translocations share the final
follicles in MALT lymphoma may produce a promi- common pathway leading to the activation of nuclear
nent nodular appearance, leading to confusion with factor-kB, a transcription factor that regulates the
follicular lymphoma. Although both colonized B cells expression of genes associated with lymphocyte pro-
in MALT lymphoma and tumor cells of follicular liferation and survival. The specific translocations
lymphoma may be positive for bcl-2, only the latter occur at variable frequencies in MALT lymphomas
express germinal center cell markers, such as CD10 depending on the sites. The t(11;18)(q21;q21): API2-
and bcl-6. Alternatively, small lymphocytic lympho- MALT1 is the most common chromosomal transloca-
ma and mantle cell lymphoma are characteristically tion, found most often in gastric and pulmonary cases
immunoreactive for CD5 coexpressing CD23 and but uncommonly in MALT lymphomas of the salivary
cyclin D1, respectively, but MALT lymphoma is con- glands. The t(14;18)(q32;q21): IGH-MALT1 is found
sistently negative for these markers. most often in MALT lymphomas arising at nongastric
Molecular-genetic data. Monoclonal rearrange- sites including the salivary glands and is identified in
ments of both heavy- and light-chain immunoglobulin approximately 20% of cases. The t(1;14)(p22;q32):
genes are detected in the majority of MALT BCL10-IGH is rarely detected in salivary MALT
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 607
lymphomas, resulting in strong aberrant nuclear bcl- or paraparotid lymph nodes or the salivary gland
10 immunostaining. MALT lymphomas harbor t(3;14) parenchyma. The most common primary tumors are
(p14.1;q32): IGH-FOXP1–comprising tumors of the squamous cell carcinomas and malignant melanomas,
thyroid, ocular adnexa, and skin but not those of the which together account for nearly half of parotid
salivary glands. metastases. Other relatively less common tumor
Treatment and prognosis. Most MALT lympho- types include poorly or undifferentiated carcinomas,
mas have a favorable outcome with five-year survival adenocarcinomas, and carcinomas or malignant
of 85%, and the tumor usually remains localized to the tumors (NOS). Metastases from sarcomas and neural
salivary gland, often for many years (5,9). Lymph malignancies are exceptionally rare. Clear cell carcino-
node involvement is usually a late event and may mas, including tumors from the kidney and thyroid
involve intraglandular lymph nodes or adjacent cervi- gland, may be difficult to distinguish from primary
cal lymph nodes. The prognosis of the patients with salivary neoplasms. The differential diagnosis of clear
lymph node involvement is similar to that of primary cell malignancies is discussed in page 562. Some sali-
nodal low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Dissemination to vary gland tumors, particularly acinic cell carcinoma
other sites is uncommon in MALT cases, but can and mucoepidermoid carcinoma, can have abundant
include the lung, conjunctiva, or stomach. Typical tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation. This should
low-grade MALT lymphoma may undergo transfor- not be interpreted as lymph node metastases (5).
mation into frank diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Although the optimal management of MALT
lymphoma remains to be established, local treatment Treatment and Prognosis
with surgical excision, if possible, or radiotherapy
Metastatic tumors in the parotid region are often
seems appropriate. Subsequent chemotherapy may
associated with a very poor prognosis, with five-year
be necessary in case of disseminated disease.
survival rates of 11.5% and 14.5% for melanoma and
squamous cell carcinoma, respectively (6). The prog-
N. Secondary Tumors nosis for noncutaneous metastases appears to be even
worse (7). In more recent studies, there appears to
Introduction have been an improvement in the survival rates (8).
A secondary tumor of salivary glands is defined as ‘‘a
metastatic tumor involving salivary glands that orig-
inates in a distant site’’ (1). REFERENCES
ANATOMY
Clinical Features
1. Cheuk W, Chan JK. Advances in salivary gland pathology.
In most large series, metastases account for 1% to 4% of Histopathology 2007; 51(1):1–20.
malignant salivary tumors (2). In a recent review, the 2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. The normal salivary glands. In: Atlas
incidence was 6.5% (3). A major literature review of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd
series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute
showed that most salivary secondaries involved the
of Pathology, 1996:20.
parotid gland (*90%), with about 8% affecting the 3. Tatemoto Y, Kumasa S, Watanabe Y, et al. Epithelial
submandibular gland. The peak age of incidence is membrane antigen as a marker of human salivary gland
sixth to eighth decades, with a mean age of about acinar and ductal cell function. Acta Histochem 1987; 82(2):
60 years. Metastases are rare in the pediatric age 219–226.
range. About 80% of secondary tumors in the parotid 4. Caselitz J, Seifert G, Jaup T. Presence of carcinoembryonic
gland arise from head and neck malignancies (4). The antigen (CEA) in the normal and inflamed human parotid
most common sites are the skin of the preauricular area, gland. An immunohistochemical study of 31 cases. J Cancer
ear, face, and neck. In the noncutaneous orofacial tis- Res Clin Oncol 1981; 100(2):205–211.
sues, the mouth, nasopharynx, and oropharynx are the 5. Prasad AR, Savera AT, Gown AM, et al. The myoepithelial
immunophenotype in 135 benign and malignant salivary
most frequent sites of primary involvement. Metastases
gland tumors other than pleomorphic adenoma. Arch
from more distant sites account for about 10% of cases, Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123(9):801–806.
and lung, kidney, breast, and colorectal tumors form the 6. Simpson RHW. Myoepithelial tumours of the salivary
majority of primary sites. In Gnepp’s series, over 15% of glands. Curr Diagn Pathol 2002; 8(5):328–337.
cases had an undefined site of origin (2). In the subman- 7. Jones H, Moshtael F, Simpson RH. Immunoreactivity of
dibular gland, however, the majority of secondaries are alpha smooth muscle actin in salivary gland tumours: a
from tumors below the clavicle and result from hema- comparison with S100 protein. J Clin Pathol 1992; 45(10):
togenous dissemination (2). The most common distant 938–940.
primary sites are the breast, kidney, and lung. 8. Grandi D, Campanini N, Becchi G, et al. On the myoepi-
thelium of human salivary glands. An immunocytochemi-
cal study. Eur J Morphol 2000; 38(4):249–255.
Pathology 9. Nakazato Y, Ishida Y, Takahashi K, et al. Immunohisto-
chemical distribution of S-100 protein and glial fibrillary
It is important for the pathologist to consider the acidic protein in normal and neoplastic salivary glands.
possibility of a secondary tumor when reporting sali- Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1985; 405(3):
vary gland neoplasms. Tumors can affect intraparotid 299–310.
608 Eveson and Nagao
10. Foschini MP, Scarpellini F, Gown AM, et al. Differential with a review of the literature on heterotopic salivary
expression of myoepithelial markers in salivary, sweat and gland tissue. J Laryngol Otol 1976; 90(6):577–584.
mammary glands. Int J Surg Pathol 2000; 8(1):29–37. 8. Cameselle-Teijeiro J, Varela-Durån J. Intrathyroid salivary
11. Navarro Rde L, Martins MT, de Araújo VC. Maspin gland-type tissue in multinodular goiter. Virchows Arch
expression in normal and neoplastic salivary gland. 1994; 425(3):331–334.
J Oral Pathol Med 2004; 33(7):435–440. 9. Edwards PC, Bhuiya T, Kahn LB, et al. Salivary heterotopia
12. Ogawa Y. Immunocytochemistry of myoepithelial cells in of the parathyroid gland: a report of two cases and review
the salivary glands. Prog Histochem Cytochem 2003; 38(4): of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
343–426. Radiol Endod 2005; 99(5):590–593.
13. Bilal H, Handra-Luca A, Bertrand JC, et al. P63 is expressed 10. Curry B, Taylor CW, Fisher AW. Salivary gland hetero-
in basal and myoepithelial cells of human normal and topia: a unique cerebellopontine angle tumor. Arch Pathol
tumor salivary gland tissues. J Histochem Cytochem Lab Med 1982; 106(1):35–38.
2003; 51(2):133–139. 11. Chen CH, Hsu SS, Lai PH, et al. Intrasellar symptomatic
14. McKean ME, Lee K, McGregor IA. The distribution of salivary gland rest. J Chin Med Assoc 2007; 70(5):215–217.
lymph nodes in and around the parotid gland: an anatom- 12. Feigin GA, Robinson B, Marchevsky A. Mixed tumor of the
ical study. Br J Plast Surg, 1985; 38(1):1–5. mediastinum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110(1):80–81.
15. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary gland origin: 13. Shin CE, Kim SS, Chwals WJ. Salivary gland choristoma of
a review. Pathol Ann Part 1 1983; 18:71–102. the anterior chest wall. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35(10):1506–1507.
16. Takeda Y. Melanocytes in the human parotid gland. Pathol 14. Dikman SH, Toker C. Seromucinous gland ectopia within
Int 1997; 47(8):581–583. the prostatic stroma. J Urol 1973; 109(5):852–854.
15. Marwah S, Berman ML. Ectopic salivary gland in the vulva
Aplasia, Hypoplasia, Atresia (choristoma): report of a case and review of the literature.
Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56(3):389–391.
1. Antoniades DZ, Markopoulos AK, Deligianni E, et al. 16. Downs-Kelly E, Hoschar AP, Prayson RA. Salivary gland
Bilateral aplasia of parotid glands correlated with accesso- heterotopia in the rectum. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003; 7(2):
ry parotid tissue. J Laryngol Otol 2006; 120(4):327–329. 124–126.
2. Milunsky JM, Zhao G, Maher TA, et al. LADD syndrome 17. Batsakis JG. Heterotopic and accessory salivary tissues.
is caused by FGF10 mutations. Clin Genet 2006; 69(4): Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95(4 pt 1):434–435.
349–354. 18. Batsakis JG. Accessory parotid gland. Ann Otol Rhinol
3. Singh P, Warnakulasuriya S. Aplasia of submandibular Laryngol 1988; 97(4 pt 1):434–435.
salivary glands associated with ectodermal dysplasia. 19. Youngs LA, Scofield HH. Heterotopic salivary gland tissue
J Oral Pathol Med 2004; 33(10):634–636. in the lower neck. Arch Pathol 1967; 83(6):550–556.
4. Codjambopoulo P, Ender-Griepekoven I, Broy H. Bilateral 20. Lassaletta-Atienza L, López-Rı́os F, Martı́n G, et al. Sali-
duplication of the submandibular gland and the subman- vary gland heterotopia in the lower neck: a report of five
dibular duct. Rofo 1992; 157(2):185–186. cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 43(2):153–161.
5. Walker P. Imperforate submandibular duct. Otolaryngol 21. Haemel A, Gnepp DR, Carlsten J, et al. Heterotopic
Head Neck Surg 2005; 132(4):653–654. salivary gland tissue in the neck. J Am Acad Dermatol
6. Pownell PH, Brown OE, Pransky SM, et al. Congenital 2008; 58(2):251–256.
abnormalities of the submandibular duct. Int J Pediatr 22. Hsu RF, Hsu YC, Huang SC. Hereditary ectopic salivary
Otorhinolaryngol 1992; 24(2):161–169. gland: survey of three generations. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;
126(3):330–333.
Heterotopia 23. Bothra AC, Agarwal RK, Dube MK, et al. Mixed salivary
tumor in heterotopic salivary tissue at the base of the neck.
1. Warnock GR, Jensen JL, Kratochvil FJ. Developmental Int Surg 1977; 62(4):228–229.
diseases. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical 24. Ashraf MJ, Azarpira N, Khademi B. Diagnosis of pleomor-
Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB phic adenoma in a heterotopic salivary gland: a case report.
Saunders, 1991:10–14. Acta Cytol 2007; 51(2):97–99.
2. Goodman RS, Daly JF, Valensi Q. Heterotopic salivary 25. Singer MI, Applebaum EL, Loy KD. Heterotopic salivary
tissue and branchial cleft sinus. Laryngoscope 1981; tissue in the neck. Laryngoscope 1979; 89(11):1772–1778.
91(2):260–264. 26. Adams WP, Donahoe PK. Salivary gland heterotopia in the
3. Bouquot JE, Gnepp DR, Dardick I, et al. Intraosseous lower part of the neck. Arch Surg 1979; 114(1):79–81.
salivary tissue: jawbone examples of choristomas, hamar- 27. Himalstein MR. Heterotopic salivary tissue and branchial
tomas, embryonic rests, and inflammatory entrapment: cleft sinus. Laryngoscope 1981; 91(7):1200–1201.
another histogenetic source for intraosseous adenocarci- 28. Taylor GD, Martin HF. Salivary gland tissue in the middle
noma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod ear. A rare tumor. Arch Otolaryngol 1961; 73:651–653.
2000; 90(2):205–217. 29. Namdar I, Smouha EE, Kane P. Salivary gland choristoma
4. Brannon RB, Houston GD, Wampler HW. Gingival salivary of the middle ear: role of intraoperative facial nerve moni-
gland choristoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61 toring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 112(4):616–620.
(2):185–188. 30. Hinni ML, Beatty CW. Salivary gland choristoma of the
5. Ledesma-Montes C, Fernández-López R, Garcés-Ortı́z M, middle ear: report of a case and review of the literature. Ear
et al. Gingival salivary gland choristoma. A case report. Nose Throat J 1996; 75(7):422–424.
J Periodontol 1998; 69(10):1164–1166. 31. Morimoto N, Ogawa K, Kanzaki J. Salivary gland chori-
6. Braun GA, Lowry LD, Meyers A. Bilateral choristomas of stoma in the middle ear: a case report. Am J Otolaryngol
the external auditory canals. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104(8): 1999; 20(4):232–235.
467–470. 32. Ha SL, Shin JE, Yoon TH. Salivary gland choristoma of the
7. Pesavento G, Ferlito A. Benign mixed tumour of hetero- middle ear: a case report. Am J Otolaryngol 2000; 21(2):
topic salivary gland tissue in upper neck. Report of a case 127–130.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 609
33. Ookouchi Y, Honda N, Gyo K. Salivary gland choristoma differential diagnosis of a rare disease of the salivary glands.
of the middle ear in a child: a case report. Otolaryngol Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1981; 390(3): 273–288.
Head Neck Surg 2003; 128(1):160–162. 2. Dobson CM, Ellis HA. Polycystic disease of the parotid
34. Rinaldo A, Ferlito A, Devaney KO. Salivary gland chori- glands: case report of a rare entity and review of the
stoma of the middle ear. A review. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol literature. Histopathology 1987; 11(9):953–961.
Relat Spec 2004; 66(3):141–147. 3. Batsakis JG, Bruner JM, Luna MA. Polycystic (dysgenetic)
35. Enoz M, Suoglu Y. Salivary gland choristoma of the middle disease of the parotid glands. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
ear. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(6):1033–1034. Surg 1988; 114(10):1146–1148.
36. Caplinger CB, Hora JF. Middle ear choristoma with absent 4. Smyth AG. Ward-Booth RP, High AS. Polycystic disease of
oval window. A report of one case. Arch Otolaryngol 1967; the parotid glands: two familial cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac
85(4):365–366. Surg 1993; 3(1):38–40.
37. Peron DL, Schuknecht HF. Congenital cholesteatomata 5. Garcia S, Martini F, Caces F, et al. Polycystic disease of the
with other anomalies. Arch Otolaryngol 1975; 101(8): salivary glands: report of an attack of the submaxillary
498–505. glands. (Article in French) Ann Pathol 1998; 18(1):58–60.
38. Saeed YM, Bassis ML. Mixed tumor of the middle ear. A
case report. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 93(4):433–434. Cystic Fibrosis (Mucoviscidosis)
39. Peters BR, Maddox HE III, Batsakia JG. Pleomorphic ade-
noma of the middle ear and mastoid with posterior fossa 1. Mandel ID, Kutscher A, Denning CR, et al. Salivary studies
extension. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114(6): in cystic fibrosis. Am J Dis Child 1967; 113(4):431–438.
676–678. 2. Doggett RG, Bentinck B, Harrison GM. Structure and
40. Quaranta A, Mininni F, Resta L. Salivary gland choristoma ultrastructure of the labial salivary glands in patients
of the middle ear: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95(9): with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Pathol 1971; 24(3):270–282.
953–956. 3. Tandler B. Salivary gland changes in disease. J Dent Res
41. Saeger KL, Gruskin P, Carberry JN. Salivary gland chori- 1987; 66(2):398–406.
stoma of the middle ear. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1982; 106(1): 4. Davis PB. Pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis with emphasis
39–40. on salivary gland involvement. J Dent Res 1987; 66 Spec
42. Abadir WF, Pease WS. Salivary gland choristoma of the No, 667–671.
middle ear. J Laryngol Otol 1978; 92(3):247–252.
43. Hanson JR, Anson BJ, Strickland EM. Branchial sources of Sebaceous Glands
the auditory ossicles in man. II. Observations of embryonic 1. Martinez-Madrigal F, Micheau C. Histology of the major
stages from 7 mm. to 28 mm. (CR length). Arch Otolar- salivary glands. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13(10):879–899.
yngol 1962; 76:200–215.
2. Linhartova A. Sebaceous glands in salivary gland tissue.
44. Correll RW, Jensen JL, Rhyne RR. Lingual cortical mandib-
Arch Pathol 1974; 98(5):320–324.
ular defects: a radiographic incidence study. Oral Surg 3. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary gland origin:
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50(3):287–291. a review. Pathol Ann Part 1 1983; 18:71–102.
45. Stafne EC. Bone cavities situated near the angle of the
4. Meza-Chávez L. Sebaceous glands in normal and neoplastic
mandible. J Am Dent Assoc 1942; 29:1969–1972.
parotid glands. Am J Pathol 1949; 98:627–645.
46. Lello GE, Makek M. Stafne’s mandibular lingual cortical 5. Batsakis JG, el-Naggar AK. Sebaceous lesions of salivary
defect. Discussion of aetiology. J Maxillofac Surg 1985; 13(4): glands and oral cavity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(5):
172–176.
416–418.
47. Uemura S, Fujishita M, Fuchihata H. Radiographic inter-
pretation of so-called developmental defect of mandible.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41(1):120–128. Salivary Gland Cysts
48. Shimizu M, Osa N, Okamura K, et al. CT analysis of the
Stafne’s bone defects of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac 1. Kundu S, Cheng J, Maruyama S, et al. Lymphatic involve-
Radiol 2006; 35(2):95–102. ment in the histopathogenesis of mucous retention cyst.
49. Choukas NC, Toto PD. Etiology of static bone defects of Pathol Res Pract 2007; 203(2):89–97.
the mandible. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 1960; 2. Shear M, Speight PM. Cysts of the Oral and Maxillofacial
18:16–20. Regions. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2007:
50. Shear M, Speight PM. Cysts of the Oral and Maxillofacial 171–180.
Regions. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2007: 3. Porter SR, Scully C, Kainth B, et al. Multiple salivary
160–161. mucoceles in a young boy. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998; 8(2):
51. Buchner A, Carpenter WM, Merrell PW, et al. Anterior 149–151.
lingual mandibular salivary gland defect. Evaluation of 4. Southam JC. Retention mucoceles of the oral mucosa. J Oral
twenty-four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; Pathol 1974; 3(4):197–202.
71(2):131–136. 5. Eversole LR. Oral sialocysts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
52. Dorman M, Pierse D. Ectopic salivary gland tissue in the Surg 1987; 113(1):51–56.
anterior mandible: a case report. Br Dent J 2002; 193(10): 6. Eveson JW. Superficial mucoceles: pitfall in clinical and
571–572. microscopic diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
53. de Courten A, Küffer R, Samson J, et al. Anterior lingual 1988; 66(3):318–322.
mandibular salivary gland defect (Stafne defect) presenting 7. Campana F, Sibaud V, Chauvel A, et al. Recurrent superfi-
as a residual cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral cial mucoceles associated with lichenoid disorders. J Oral
Radiol Endod 2002; 94(4):460–464. Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64(12):1830–1833.
8. Garcia-F-Villalta MJ, Pascual-Lopez M, Elices M, et al. Super-
ficial mucoceles and lichenoid graft versus host disease:
Polycystic (Dysgenetic) Disease report of three cases. Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82(6):453–455.
9. Richardson GS, Clairmont AA, Erickson ER. Cystic
1. Seifert G, Thomsen S, Donath K. Bilateral dysgenetic lesions of the parotid gland. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;
polycystic parotid glands. Morphological analysis and 61(2):364–370.
610 Eveson and Nagao
10. Chaudhry AP, Yamane GM, Scharlock SE, et al. A clinico- 10. Mandel L, Carrao V. Bilateral parotid diffuse hyperplastic
pathological study of intraoral lymphoepithelial cysts. oncocytosis: case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(4):
J Oral Med 1984; 39(4):79–84. 560–562.
11. Buchner A, Hansen LS. Lymphoepithelial cysts of the oral 11. Palmer TJ, Gleeson MJ, Eveson JW, et al. Oncocytic adenomas
cavity. A clinicopathologic study of thirty-eight cases. Oral and oncocytic hyperplasia of salivary glands: a clinicopatho-
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50(5):441–449. logical study of 26 cases. Histopathology 1990; 16(5):487–493.
12. Olsen KD, Maragos NE, Weiland LH. First branchial cleft 12. Srensen M, Baunsgaard P, Frederiksen P, et al. Multifocal
anomalies. Laryngoscope 1980; 90(3):423–436. adenomatous oncocytic hyperplasia of the parotid gland.
13. Bernier JL, Bhaskar SN. Lymphoepithelial lesions of sali- (Unusual clear cell variant in two female siblings.) Pathol
vary glands. Cancer 1958; 11(6):1156–1178. Res Pract 1986; 181(2):254–257.
14. Cleary KR, Batsakis JG. Lymphoepithelial cysts of the 13. Brandwein MS, Huvos AG. Oncocytic tumors of major
parotid region: a ‘‘new face’’ on an old lesion. Ann Otol salivary glands. A study of 68 cases with follow-up of
Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(2 pt 1):162–164. 44 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(6):514–528.
15. Gnepp DR, Sporck FT. Benign lymphoepithelial parotid 14. Hartwick RW, Batsakis JG. Non-Warthin’s tumor oncocytic
cyst with sebaceous differentiation—cystic sebaceous lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(8):674–677.
lymphadenoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1980; 74(5):683–687.
16. Pieterse AS, Seymour AE. Parotid cysts. An analysis of 16 Amyloidosis
cases and suggested classification. Pathology 1981; 13(2):
225–234. 1. Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Amyloidosis (AL). Clinical and
laboratory features in 229 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1983;
58(10): 665–683.
2. Browning MJ, Banks RA, Tribe CR, et al. Ten years experi-
Infiltration ence of an amyloid clinic—a clinicopathological survey. Q J
Med 1985; 54(215):213–227.
Lipomatosis 3. Stimson PG, Tortoledo ME, Luna MA, et al. Localized
1. Izumi M, Eguchi K, Nakamura H, et al. Premature fat primary amyloid tumor of the parotid gland. Oral Surg
deposition in the salivary glands associated with Sjögren Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 66(4):466–469.
syndrome: MR and CT evidence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 4. Mateo Arias J, Molina Martinez M, Borrego A, et al. Amy-
1997; 18(5):951–958. loidosis of the submaxillary gland. Med Oral 2003; 8(1):
2. Seifert G. Lipomatous cystic pancreas fibrosis and lipoma- 66–70.
tous pancreas atrophy in childhood. Beitr Pathol Anat 5. Kurokawa H, Takuma C, Tokudome S, et al. Primary
1959; 121:64–80. localization amyloidosis of the sublingual gland. Fukuoka
3. Al-Arfaj AA, Arora RK, El Hassan AY, et al. Lipomatosis Igaku Zasshi 1998; 89(7):216–220.
of the parotid gland in children. Saudi Med J 2003; 24(8): 6. Ustün MO, Ekinci N, Payzin B. Extramedullary plasmacy-
898–900. toma of the parotid gland. Report of a case with extensive
4. Saleh HA, Ram B, Harmse JL, et al. Lipomatosis of the amyloid deposition masking the cytologic and histopatho-
minor salivary glands. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112(9):895–897. logic picture. Acta Cytol 2001; 45(3):449–453.
7. Jardinet D, Westhovens R, Peeters J. Sicca syndrome as an
initial symptom of amyloidosis. Clin Rheumatol 1998; 17(6):
Oncocytic Lesions 546–548.
8. Delèvaux I, André M, Amoura Z, et al. Concomitant
1. Hamperl H. Das Onkocytom der Speichheldrusen. diagnosis of primary Sjögren’s syndrome and systemic
Z Krebsforsch 1962; 64:427–440. AL amyloidosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60(7):694–695.
2. Shintaku M, Honda T. Identification of oncocytic lesions of 9. Delgado WA, Mosqueda A. A highly sensitive method for
salivary glands by anti-mitochondrial immunohistochem- diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis by labial salivary
istry. Histopathology 1997; 31(5):408–411. gland biopsy. J Oral Pathol Med 1989; 18(5):310–314.
3. Johns ME, Regezi JA, Batsakis JG. Oncocytic neoplasms of 10. Hachulla E, Janin A, Flipo RM, et al. Labial salivary gland
salivary glands: an ultrastructural study. Laryngoscope biopsy is a reliable test for the diagnosis of primary and
1977; 87(6):262–271. secondary amyloidosis. A prospective clinical and immu-
4. Capone RB, Ha PK, Westra WH, et al. Oncocytic neoplasms nohistologic study in 59 patients. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36(5):
of the parotid gland: a 16-year institutional review. Otolar- 691–697.
yngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126(6):657–662.
5. Batsakis JG, Regezi JA. Selected controversial lesions of Iron Deposition
salivary tissues. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1977; 10(2):
309–328. 1. Blandford RL, Dowdle JR, Stephens MR, et al. Sicca syn-
6. Meza-Chavel L. Oxyphilic granular cell adenoma of the drome associated with idiopathic haemochromatosis. Br
parotid gland (oncocytoma). Report of five cases and study Med J 1979; 1(6174):1323.
of oxyphilic granular cells (oncocytes) in normal parotid 2. Ward-Booth P, Ferguson MM, MacDonald DG. Salivary
glands. Am J Pathol 1949; 25:523–538. gland involvement in hemochromatosis. Oral Surg Oral
7. Vigliani R, Genetta C. Diffuse hyperplastic oncocytosis Med Oral Pathol 1981; 51(5):487–488.
of the parotid gland. Case report with histochemical 3. Takeda Y, Ohya T. Sicca symptom in a patient with hemo-
observations. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat 1982; 397(2): chromatosis: minor salivary gland biopsy for differential
235–240. diagnosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 16(6):745–748.
8. Schwartz IS, Feldman M. Diffuse multinodular oncocy- 4. Goldfarb A, Nitzan DW, Marmary Y. Changes in the
toma (‘‘oncocytosis’’) of the parotid gland. Cancer 1969; parotid salivary gland of beta-thalassemia patients due to
23(3):636–640. hemosiderin deposits. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12(2):115–119.
9. Loreti A, Sturla M, Gentileschi S, et al. Diffuse hyperplastic 5. Borgna-Pignatti C, Cammareri V, De Stefano P, et al. The
oncocytosis of the parotid gland. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55(2): sicca syndrome in thalassaemia major. Br Med J (Clin Res
151–152. Ed) 1984; 288(6418):668–669.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 611
6. Vaiopoulos G, Konstantopoulos K, Kittas C, et al. Histo- 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces
logical and functional changes in the salivary glands in Institute of Pathology, 1996:419–421.
thalassaemia major. Haematologia (Budap) 1995; 27(1): 4. Harrison JD, Epivatianos A, Bhatia SN. Role of microliths
33–38. in the aetiology of chronic submandibular sialadenitis: a
7. Smith SR, Shneider BL, Magid M, et al. Minor salivary clinicopathological investigation of 154 cases. Histopathol-
gland biopsy in neonatal hemochromatosis. Arch Otolar- ogy 1997; 31(3):237–251.
yngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130(6):760–763. 5. Seifert G, Donath K. On the pathogenesis of the Küttner
tumor of the submandibular gland: analysis of 349 cases
Sialadenitis with chronic sialadenitis of the submandibular gland.
HNO 1977; 25(3):81–92.
Acute Suppurative Sialadenitis 6. Tiemann M, Teymoortash A, Schrader C, et al. Chronic
sclerosing sialadenitis of the submandibular gland is main-
1. Krippaehne WW, Hunt TK, Dunphy JE. Acute suppurative ly due to a T lymphocyte immune reaction. Mod Pathol
parotitis: a study of 161 cases. Ann Surg 1962; 156(2): 2002; 15(8):845–852.
251–257. 7. Kitagawa S, Zen Y, Harada K, et al. Abundant IgG4-
2. Brook I. Diagnosis and management of parotitis. Arch positive plasma cell infiltration characterizes chronic scle-
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118(5):469–471. rosing sialadenitis (Kuttner’s tumor). Am J Surg Pathol
3. McQuone SJ. Acute viral and bacterial infections of the 2005; 29(6):783–791.
salivary glands. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999; 32(5): 8. Kamisawa T, Nakajima H, Hishima T. Close correlation
793–811. between chronic sclerosing sialadenitis and immunoglobu-
4. Brooke I. Acute bacterial suppurative parotitis: microbiol- lin G4. Intern Med J 2006; 36(8):527–529.
ogy and management. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14(1):37–40. 9. Kamisawa T, Nakajima H, Egawa N, et al. IgG4-related
5. Malloy KM, Rosen DR, Rosen MR. Sialadenitis. In: Witt RL sclerosing disease incorporating sclerosing pancreatitis,
ed. Salivary Gland Diseases: Surgical and Medical Man- cholangitis, sialadenitis and retroperitoneal fibrosis with
agement. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc, lymphadenopathy. Pancreatology 2006; 6(1–2):132–137.
2005:54–70. 10. Tanabe T, Tsushima K, Yasuo M, et al. IgG4-associated
multifocal systemic fibrosis complicating sclerosing
Obstructive Sialadenitis and Sialolithiasis sialadenitis, hypophysitis, and retroperitoneal fibrosis,
but lacking pancreatic involvement. Intern Med 2006; 45(21):
1. Koudelka BM. Obstructive disorders. In: Ellis GL, Auclair 1243–1247.
PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary 11. Cheuk W, Yuen HK, Chu SY, et al. Lymphadenopathy of
Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:26–38. IgG4-related sclerosing disease. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32
2. Seifert G. Aetiological and histological classification of (5):671–681.
sialadenitis. Pathologica 1997; 89(1):7–17. 12. Blanco M, Mesko T, Cura M, et al. Chronic sclerosing
3. Marchal F, Dulguerov P. Sialolithiasis management: the sialadenitis (Küttner’s tumor): unusual presentation with
state of the art. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; bilateral involvement of major and minor salivary glands.
129(9):951–956. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003; 7(1):25–30.
4. Harrison JD. Histology and Pathology of Sialolithiasis. In 13. Ochoa ER, Harris NL, Pilch BZ. Marginal zone B-cell
Witt RL, ed. Salivary Gland Diseases: Surgical and Medical lymphoma of the salivary gland arising in chronic scleros-
Management. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., ing sialadenitis (Küttner tumor). Am J Surg Pathol 2001;
2005:71–78. 25(12):1546–1550.
5. Peel RL. Diseases of the salivary gland. In: Barnes L, ed. 14. Van der Walt JD, Leake J. Granulomatous sialadenitis of
Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck. New York: the major salivary glands. A clinicopathological study of 57
Marcel Dekker Inc, 2001:633–758. cases. Histopathology 1987; 11(2):131–144.
6. Iro H, Dlugaiczyk J, Zenk J. Current concepts in diagnosis 15. Seifert G. Tumour-like lesions of the salivary glands.
and treatment of sialolithiasis. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2006; The new WHO classification. Pathol Res Pract 1992; 188(7):
67(1):24–28. 836–846.
7. Isacsson G, Ahlner B, Lundquist PG. Chronic sialadenitis 16. Kojima M, Nakamura S, Itoh H, et al. Kuttner’s tumor of
of the submandibular gland. A retrospective study of 108 salivary glands resembling marginal zone B-cell lympho-
case. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1981; 232(1):91–100. ma of the MALT type: a histopathologic and immunohis-
8. Marchal F, Kurt AM, Dulguerov P, et al. Histopathology of tochemical study of 7 cases. Int J Surg Pathol 2004; 12(4):
submandibular glands removed for sialolithiasis. Ann Otol 389–393.
Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110(5 pt 1):464–469. 17. Kojima M, Nakamura S, Itoh H. Sclerosing variant of
9. Teymoortash A, Tiemann M, Schrader C, et al. Characteri- follicular lymphoma arising from submandibular glands
zation of lymphoid infiltrates in chronic obstructive siala- and resembling ‘‘Küttner tumor’’: a report of 3 patients. Int
denitis associated with sialolithiasis. J Oral Pathol Med J Surg Pathol 2003; 11(4):303–307.
2004; 33(5):300–304.
Radiation Sialadenitis
Chronic Sclerosing Sialadenitis (Küttner Tumor) 1. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM, et al. Head and
neck cancer. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(3):184–194.
1. Küttner H. Über entzündliche Tumoren der Submaxillar- 2. Bansal M, Mohanti BK, Shah N, et al. Radiation related
speicheldrüse. Bruns Beitr Klin Chir 1896; 15:815–828. morbidities and their impact on quality of life in head and
2. Chan JKC. Kuttner tumor (chronic sclerosing sialadenitis) neck cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy. Qual
of the submandibular gland: an underrecognized entity. Life Res 2004; 13(2):481–488.
Adv Anat Pathol 1998; 5(4):239–251. 3. Mossman KL, Shatzman AR, Chencharick JD. Effects of
3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Chronic sclerosing sialadenitis. In: radiotherapy on human parotid saliva. Radiat Res 1981;
Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 88(2):403–412.
612 Eveson and Nagao
4. Stephens LC, King GK, Peters LJ, et al. Acute and late 4. Sneige N, Batsakis JG. Necrotizing sialometaplasia. Ann
radiation injury in rhesus monkey parotid glands. Evi- Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(3):282–284.
dence of interphase cell death. Am J Pathol 1986; 124(3): 5. Sandmeier D, Bouzourene H. Necrotizing sialometaplasia:
469–478. a potential diagnostic pitfall. Histopathology 2002; 40(2):
5. Stephens LC, King GK, Peters LJ, et al. Unique radiosensi- 200–201.
tivity of serous cells in rhesus monkey submandibular 6. Rizkalla H, Toner M. Necrotizing sialometaplasia versus
glands. Am J Pathol 1986; 124(3):479–487. invasive carcinoma of the head and neck: the use of
6. Nagler RM. Effects of head and neck radiotherapy on myoepithelial markers and keratin subtypes as an adjunct
major salivary glands—animal studies and human impli- to diagnosis. Histopathology 2007; 51(2):184–189.
cations. In Vivo 2003; 17(4):369–375. 7. Anneroth G, Hansen LS. Necrotizing sialometaplasia. The
7. Dreyer JO, Sakuma Y, Seifert G. (Radiation-induced sialade- relationship of its pathogenesis to its clinical character-
nitis. Stage classification and immunohistology) Pathologe istics. Int J Oral Surg 1982; 11(5):283–291.
1989; 10(3):165–170. 8. Shigematsu H, Shigematsu Y, Noguchi Y, et al. Experimen-
8. Teymoortash A, Simolka N, Schrader C, et al. Lymphocyte tal study on necrotizing sialometaplasia of the palate in
subsets in irradiation-induced sialadenitis of the subman- rats. Role of local anesthetic injections. Int J Oral Maxillofac
dibular gland. Histopathology 2005; 47(5):493–500. Surg 1996; 2(3):239–241.
9. Rye LA, Calhoun NR, Redman RS. Necrotizing sialometa-
plasia in a patient with Buerger’s disease and Raynaud’s
Cheilitis Glandularis phenomenon. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49(3):
233–236.
1. von Volkman R. Einege Falle von Cheilitis Glandularis 10. Batsakis JG, Manning JT. Necrotizing sialometaplasia
Apostematosa (Myxadenitis Labialis). Virchows Arch of major salivary glands. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101(9):
Pathol Anat [A] 1870; 50:142–144. 962–966.
2. Michalowski R. Cheilitis glandularis, heterotopic salivary 11. Hurt MA, Diaz-Arias AA, Rosenholtz MJ, et al. Posttrau-
glands and squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. Br J matic lobular squamous metaplasia of breast. An unusual
Dermatol 1962; 74:445–449. pseudocarcinomatous metaplasia resembling squamous
3. Doku HC, Shklar G, McCarthy PL. Cheilitis glandularis. (necrotizing) sialometaplasia of the salivary gland. Mod
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 20(5):563–571. Pathol 1988; 1(5):385–390.
4. Weir TW, Johnson WC. Cheilitis glandularis. Arch Derma- 12. King DT, Barr RJ. Syringometaplasia: mucinous and squa-
tol 1971; 103(4):433–437. mous variants. J Cutan Pathol 1979; 6(4):284–291.
5. Oliver ID, Pickett AB. Cheilitis glandularis. Oral Surg Oral 13. Zschoch H. (Mucus gland infarct with squamous epithelial
Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49(6):526–529. metaplasia in the lung. A rare site of so-called necrotizing
6. Stuller CB, Schaberg SJ, Stokos J, et al. Cheilitis glandularis. sialometaplasia). Pathologe 1992; 13(1):45–48.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53(6):602–605. 14. Imbery TA, Edwards PA. Necrotizing sialometaplasia:
7. Swerlick RA, Cooper PH. Cheilitis glandularis: a re-evaluation. literature review and case reports. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;
J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 10(3):466–472. 127(7):1087–1092.
8. Winchester L, Scully C, Prime SS, et al. Cheilitis glandu- 15. Werning JT, Waterhouse JP, Mooney JW. Subacute necro-
laris: a case affecting the upper lip. Oral Surg Oral Med tizing sialadenitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;
Oral Pathol 1986; 62(6):654–656. 70(6):756–759.
9. Yacobi R, Brown DA. Cheilitis glandularis: a pediatric case 16. Lombardi T, Samson J, Küffer R. Subacute necrotizing
report. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118(3):317–318. sialadenitis: a form of necrotizing sialometaplasia? Arch
10. Leao JC, Ferreira AM, Martins S, et al. Cheilitis glandularis: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129(9):972–975.
an unusual presentation in a patient with HIV infection. 17. Fowler CB, Brannon RB. Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis:
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; report of 7 cases and a review of the literature. Oral
95(2):142–144. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89(5):
11. Stoopler ET, Carrasco L, Stanton DC, et al. Cheilitis 600–609.
glandularis: an unusual histopathologic presentation. 18. Suresh L, Aguirre A. Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis: a
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; clinicopathological study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
95(3):312–317. Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(3):385–390.
12. Lederman DA. Suppurative stomatitis glandularis. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78(3):319–322.
13. Musa NJ, Suresh L, Hatton M, et al. Multiple suppurative Subacute Necrotizing Sialadenitis
cystic lesions of the lips and buccal mucosa: a case of
1. Werning JT, Waterhouse JP, Mooney JW. Subacute necro-
suppurative stomatitis glandularis. Oral Surg Oral Med
tizing sialadenitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99(2):175–179.
70(6):756–759.
2. Van der Wal JE, Kraaijenhagen HA, van der Waal I.
Necrotizing Sialometaplasia Subacute necrotising sialadenitis: a new entity? Br J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33(5):302–303.
1. Abrams AM, Melrose RJ, Howell FV. Necrotizing sialome- 3. Fowler CB, Brannon RB. Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis:
taplasia. A disease simulating malignancy. Cancer 1973; 32 report of 7 cases and a review of the literature. Oral Surg
(1):130–135. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89(5):
2. Mesa ML, Gertler RS, Schneider LC. Necrotizing sialome- 600–609.
taplasia: frequency of histologic misdiagnosis. Oral Surg 4. Castro WH, Drummond SN, Gomez RS. Subacute necro-
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57(1):71–73. tizing sialadenitis in the buccal mucosa. J Oral Maxillofac
3. Brannon RB, Fowler CB, Hartman KS. Necrotizing sialo- Surg 2002; 60(12):1494–1496.
metaplasia. A clinicopathologic study of sixty-nine cases 5. Lombardi T, Samson J, Küffer R. Subacute necrotizing
and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral sialadenitis: a form of necrotizing sialometaplasia? Arch
Pathol 1991; 72(3):317–325. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129(9):972–975.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 613
6. Suresh L, Aguirre A. Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis: a 2. Gnepp DR. Sclerosing polycystic adenosis of the salivary
clinicopathological study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol gland: a lesion that may be associated with dysplasia and
Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(3):385–390. carcinoma in situ. Adv Anat Pathol 2003; 10(4):218–222.
3. Noonan VL, Kalmar JR, Allen CM, et al. Sclerosing poly-
Recurrent Parotitis cystic adenosis of minor salivary glands: report of three
cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
1. Ericson S, Zetterlund B, Ohman J. Recurrent parotitis and Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(4):516–520.
sialectasis in childhood. Clinical, radiologic, immunologic, 4. Skálová A, Michal M, Simpson RH, et al. Sclerosing
bacteriologic, and histologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol polycystic adenosis of parotid gland with dysplasia and
Laryngol 1991; 100(7):527–535. ductal carcinoma in situ. Report of three cases with immu-
2. Chitre VV, Premchandra DJ. Recurrent parotitis. Arch Dis nohistochemical and ultrastructural examination. Virch-
Child 1997; 77(4):359–363. ows Arch 2002; 440(1):29–35.
3. Sitheeque M, Sivachandran Y, Varathan V, et al. Juvenile 5. Bharadwaj G, Nawroz I, O’Regan B. Sclerosing polycystic
recurrent parotitis: clinical, sialographic and ultrasono- adenosis of the parotid gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
graphic features. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17(2):98–104. 2007; 45(1):74–76.
4. Konno A, Ito E. A study on the pathogenesis of recurrent 6. Gnepp DR, Wang LJ, Brandwein-Gensler M, et al. Scleros-
parotitis in childhood. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl ing polycystic adenosis of the salivary gland: a report of 16
1979; 88(6 pt 4 suppl 63):1–20. cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30(2):154–164.
5. Nahlieli O, Shacham R, Shlesinger M, et al. Juvenile recur- 7. Imamura Y, Morishita T, Kawakami M, et al. Sclerosing
rent parotitis: a new method of diagnosis and treatment. polycystic adenosis of the left parotid gland: report of a
Pediatrics 2004; 114(1):9–12. case with fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 2004;
6. Patey DH, Thackray AC. Chronic ‘‘sialectatic’’ parotitis in 48(4):569–573.
the light of pathological studies on parotidectomy material. 8. Kloppenborg RP, Sepmeijer JW, Sie-Go DM, et al. Scleros-
Br J Surg 1955; 43(177):43–50. ing polycystic adenosis: a case report. B-ENT 2006; 2(4):
189–192.
9. Skálová A, Gnepp DR, Simpson RH, et al. Clonal nature of
Viral Sialadenitis Including Mumps, Cytomegalovi- sclerosing polycystic adenosis of salivary glands demon-
rus, and HIV-Associated Lymphoepithelial Cyst strated by using the polymorphism of the human androgen
receptor (HUMARA) locus as a marker. Am J Surg Pathol
1. McQuone SJ. Acute viral and bacterial infections of the
2006; 30(8):939–944.
salivary glands. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999; 32(5):
793–811.
2. Hviid A, Rubin S, Mühlemann K. Mumps. Lancet 2008; 371 Sialosis
(9616):932–944.
3. Werning JT. Infectious and systemic diseases. In: Ellis GL, 1. Seifert G. Tumour-like lesions of the salivary glands. The new
Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the WHO classification. Pathol Res Pract 1992; 188(7):836–846.
Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:39–59. 2. Pape SA, MacLeod RI, McLean NR, et al. Sialadenosis of
4. Schiodt M. HIV-associated salivary gland disease: a review. the salivary glands. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48(6):419–422.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73(2):164–167. 3. Kelly SA, Black MJ, Soames JV. Unilateral enlargement of
5. Labouyrie E, Merlio JP, Beylot-Barry M, et al. Human the parotid gland in a patient with sialosis and contra-
immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication within cystic lateral parotid aplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28(6):
lymphoepithelial lesion of the salivary gland. Am J Clin 409–412.
Pathol 1993; 100(1):41–46. 4. Scully C, Bagán JV, Eveson JW, et al. Sialosis: 35 cases of
6. Ihrler S, Zietz C, Riederer A, et al. HIV-related parotid persistent parotid swelling from two countries. Br J Oral
lymphoepithelial cysts. Immunohistochemistry and 3-D Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46(6):468–472.
reconstruction of surgical and autopsy material with spe- 5. Mignogna MD, Fedele S, Lo Russo L. Anorexia/bulimia-
cial reference to formal pathogenesis. Virchows Arch 1996; related sialadenosis of palatal minor salivary glands. J Oral
429(2–3):139–147. Pathol Med 2004; 33(7):441–442.
7. Maiorano E, Favia G, Viale G. Lymphoepithelial cysts of 6. Seifert G, Miehlke A, Haubrich J, et al. Diseases of the
salivary glands: an immunohistochemical study of HIV- Salivary Glands. Pathology—Diagnosis—Treatment—
related and HIV-unrelated lesions. Hum Pathol 1998; 29 Facial Nerve Surgery. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag,
(3):260–265. 1986:78–84.
8. Chetty R. HIV-associated lymphoepithelial cysts and 7. Brick IB. Parotid enlargement in cirrhosis of the liver. Ann
lesions: morphological and immunohistochemical study Intern Med 1958; 49(2):438–451.
of the lymphoid cells. Histopathology 1998; 33(3):222–229. 8. Buchner A, Sreebny LM. Enlargement of salivary glands.
9. Mandel L, Hong J. HIV-associated parotid lymphoepithe- Review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
lial cysts. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130(4):528–532. 1972; 34(2):209–222.
10. Dave SP, Pernas FG, Roy S. The benign lymphoepithelial 9. Donath K, Spillner M, Seifert G. The influence of the
cyst and a classification system for lymphocytic parotid autonomic nervous system on the ultrastructure of the
gland enlargement in the pediatric HIV population. Laryn- parotid acinar cells. Experimental contribution to the neu-
goscope 2007; 117(1):106–113. rohormonal sialadenosis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat
Histol 1974; 364(1):15–33.
10. Mandic R, Teymoortash A, Kann PH, et al. Sialadenosis of
Tumor-Like Lesions the major salivary glands in a patient with central diabetes
insipidus—implications of aquaporin water channels in the
Sclerosing Polycystic Adenosis pathomechanism of sialadenosis. Exp Clin Endocrinol
Diabetes 2005; 113(4):205–207.
1. Smith BC, Ellis GL, Slater LJ, et al. Sclerosing polycystic 11. Davidson D, Leibel BS, Berris B. Asymptomatic parotid
adenosis of major salivary glands. A clinicopathologic anal- gland enlargement in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med
ysis of nine cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20(2):161–170. 1969; 70(1):31–38.
614 Eveson and Nagao
12. Duggan JJ, Rothbell EN. Asymptomatic enlargement of the 5. Morgan WS, Castleman BA. A clinicopathologic study of
parotid glands. N Engl J Med 1957; 257(26):1262–1267. ‘‘Mikulicz’s disease’’. Am J Pathol 1953; 29:471–489.
13. Mandel L, Baurmash H. Parotid enlargement due to alco- 6. Yamamoto M, Takahashi H, Ohara M, et al. A new
holism. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 82(2):369–373. conceptualization for Mikulicz’s disease as an IgG4-related
14. Rothbell EN, Duggan JJ. Enlargement of the parotid gland plasmacytic disease. Mod Rheumatol 2006; 16(6):335–340.
in disease of the liver. Am J Med 1957; 22(3):367–372. 7. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Benign lymphoepithelial lesion. In:
15. Vavrina J, Müller W, Gebbers JO. Enlargement of salivary Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands,
glands in bulimia. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108(6):516–518. 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Insti-
16. Coleman H, Altini M, Nayler S, et al. Sialadenosis: a tute of Pathology, 1996:411–413.
presenting sign in bulimia. Head Neck 1998; 20(8): 8. Godwin JT. Benign lymphoepithelial lesion of the parotid
758–762. gland adenolymphoma, chronic inflammation, lymphoepi-
17. Scully C, Eveson J. Sialosis and necrotising sialometaplasia thelioma, lymphocytic tumor, Mikulicz disease. Cancer
in bulimia; a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33 1952; 5:1089–1103.
(8):808–810. 9. Bridges AJ, England DM. Benign lymphoepithelial
18. Kim D, Uy C, Mandel L. Sialosis of unknown origin. N Y lesion: relationship to Sjögren’s syndrome and evolving
State Dent J 1998; 64(7):38–40. malignant lymphoma. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989; 19(3):
19. Donath K, Seifert G. Ultrastructural studies of the parotid 201–208.
glands in sialadenosis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat 10. Falzon M, Isaacson PG. The natural history of benign
Histol 1975; 365(2):119–135. lymphoepithelial lesion of the salivary gland in which
20. Thackray AC, Lucas RB. Sialosis. In: Atlas of Tumor there is a monoclonal population of B cells. A report of
Pathology: Tumors of the Major Salivary Glands, 2nd two cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(1):59–65.
series, fascicle 10. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute 11. Palmer RM, Eveson JW, Gusterson BA. ‘‘Epimyoepithelial’’
of Pathology, 1974:133–134. islands in lymphoepithelial lesions: an immunocytochemical
21. Batsakis JG. Pathology consultation. Sialadenosis. Ann Otol study. Virchows Arch [Pathol Anat] 1986; 408(6):603–609.
Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97(1):94–95. 12. Ihrler S, Zietz C, Sendelhofert A, et al. Lymphoepithelaial
22. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Sialadenosis. In: Tumors of the Sali- duct lesions in Sjögren-type sialadenitis. Virchows Arch
vary Glands. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, 3rd series, fascicle 1999; 434(4):315–323.
17. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 13. Bowman SJ, Ibrahim GH, Holmes G, et al. Estimating the
1996:434–435. prevalence among Caucasian women of primary Sjögren’s
syndrome in two general practices in Birmingham, UK.
Salivary Gland Hyperplasia Scand J Rheumatol 2004; 33(1):39–43.
14. Scott CA, Avellini C, Desinan L, et al. Chronic lymphocytic
1. Yu GY, Donath K. Adenomatous ductal proliferation of the sialadenitis in HCV-related chronic liver disease: compari-
salivary gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol son with Sjögren’s syndrome. Histopathology 1997; 30(1):
Endod 2001; 91(2):215–221. 41–48.
2. Luna MA. Salivary gland hyperplasia. Adv Anat Pathol 15. Jaffe ES. Lymphoid lesions of the head and neck: a model
2002; 9(4):251–255. of lymphocyte homing and lymphomagenesis. Mod Pathol
3. Arafat A, Brannon RB, Ellis GL. Adenomatoid hyperplasia 2002; 15(3):255–263.
of mucous salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 16. Fox RI. Sjogren’s syndrome. Lancet 2005; 366(9482):321–331.
1981; 52(1):51–55. 17. Delaleu N, Jonsson R, Koller MM. Sjögren’s syndrome. Eur
4. Nozaki S, Araki A, Nakagawa K, et al. Adenomatoid J Oral Sci 2005; 113(2):101–113.
hyperplasia of the palate in an Asian child. J Oral 18. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, et al. Classification
Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54(5):627–678. criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the
5. Campos LA. Hyperplasia of the sublingual glands in adult European criteria proposed by the American-European
patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61(6):554–558.
Endod 1996; 81(5):584–585. 19. Quintana PG, Kapadia SB, Bahler DW, et al. Salivary gland
6. Domaneschi C, Mauricio AR, Modolo F, et al. Idiopathic lymphoid infiltrates associated with lymphoepithelial
hyperplasia of the sublingual glands in totally or partially lesions: a clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and geno-
edentulous individuals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol typic study. Hum Pathol 1997; 28(7):850–861.
Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3):374–377. 20. Bahler DW, Swerdlow SH. Clonal salivary gland infiltrates
7. Chetty R. Intercalated duct hyperplasia: possible relationship associated with myoepithelial sialadenitis (Sjörgen’s syn-
to epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and hybrid tumours of drome) begin as non-malignant antigen-associated expan-
salivary gland. Histopathology 2000; 37(3):260–263. sions. Blood 1998; 91(6):1864–1872.
21. Mahlstedt K, Ussmuller J, Donath K. Value of minor
salivary gland biopsy in diagnosing Sjögren’s syndrome.
Lymphoepithelial Sialadenitis J Otolaryngol 2002; 31(5):299–303.
and Sjögren’s Syndrome 22. Harris NL, Isaacson PG. What are the criteria for distin-
guishing MALT from non-MALT lymphoma at extranodal
1. Harris NL. Lymphoid proliferations of the salivary glands. sites? Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111(suppl 1):S126–S132.
Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111(suppl 1):S94–S103. 23. Nagao T, Ishida Y, Sugano I, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-associated
2. Mikulicz J. Über eine eigenartige symmetrische Erkran- undifferentiated carcinoma with lymphoid stroma of the
kung der Trännen- und Mundspeicheldrüsen. Beitr Z Chir salivary gland in Japanese patients: comparison with benign
Festschr Theodor Billroth 1892; 2:610–630. lymphoepithelial lesion. Cancer 1996; 78(4):695–703.
3. Schaffer AJ, Jacobsen AW. Mikulicz’s disease: a report of 24. Ma J, Chan JK, Chow CW, et al. Lymphadenoma: a report
ten cases. Am J Dis Child 1927; 34:327–346. of three cases of an uncommon salivary gland neoplasm.
4. Sjögren H. Zur Kenntnis der Keratoconjunctivitis sicca Histopathology 2002; 41(4):342–350.
(Keratitis filiformis bei Hypofunktion der Trännendrüssen). 25. Daniels TE. Benign lymphoepithelial lesion and Sjögren’s
Acta Ophthalmol (suppl) 1933; 2:1–151. syndrome. In Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 615
Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: W B Saun- 20. Eveson JW, Auclair P, Gnepp DR, et al. Tumours of the
ders Co, 1991:83–106. salivary gland: introduction. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
26. Chetty R. HIV-associated lymphoepithelial cysts and Reichart P, eds. World Health Organization Classification
lesions: morphological and immunohistochemical of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck
study of the lymphoid cells. Histopathology 1998; 33(3): Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:212–215.
222–229. 21. Eneroth CM. Salivary gland tumors in the parotid gland,
submandibular gland, and the palate region. Cancer 1971;
Introduction to Salivary Gland Tumors 27(6):1415–1418.
22. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Salivary gland tumours. A review
1. Pinkston JA, Cole P. Incidence rates of salivary gland of 2410 cases with particular reference to histological types,
tumors: results from a population-based study. Otolaryngol site, age and sex distribution. J Pathol 1985; 146(1):51–58.
Head Neck Surg 1999; 120(6):834–840. 23. Spiro RH. Salivary neoplasms: overview of a 35-year experi-
2. Evans RW, Cruikshank AH. Epithelial Tumours of the ence with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(3):177–184.
Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1970:9–10. 24. Seifert G, Miehlke A, Haubrich J, et al. Diseases of the
3. Lennox B, Clarke JA, Drake F, et al. Incidence of salivary Salivary Glands. Pathology – Diagnosis – Treatment –
gland tumours in Scotland: accuracy of national records. Br Facial Nerve Surgery. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag,
Med J 1978; 1(6114):687–689. 1986.
4. Gunn A, Parrott NR. Parotid tumours: a review of parotid 25. Pires FR, Pringle GA, de Almeida OP, et al. Intra-oral
tumour surgery in the Northern Regional Health Authority minor salivary gland tumors: a clinicopathological study
of the United Kingdom 1978–1982. Br J Surg 1988; 75(11): of 546 cases. Oral Oncol 2007; 43(5):463–470.
1144–1146. 26. Pires FR, de Almeida OP, Pringle G, et al. Differences on
5. Auclair PL, Ellis GL, Gnepp DR, et al. Salivary gland clinicopathological profile from intraoral minor salivary
neoplasms: general considerations. In: Ellis GL, Auclair gland tumors around the world. Oral Surg Oral Med
PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105(2):136–138.
Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:135–164. 27. Saw D, Lau WH, Ho JH, et al. Malignant lymphoepithe-
6. Sun EC, Curtis R, Melbye M, et al. Salivary gland cancer in lial lesion of the salivary gland. Hum Pathol 1986; 17(9):
the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999; 914–923.
8(12):1095–1100. 28. Tsai CC, Chen CL, Hsu HC. Expression of Epstein-Barr
7. Ostman J, Anneroth G, Gustafsson H, et al. Malignant virus in carcinomas of major salivary glands: a strong
salivary gland tumours in Sweden 1960–1989–an epidemi- association with lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Hum
ological study. Oral Oncol 1997; 33(3):169–176. Pathol 1996; 27(3):258–262.
8. Koivunen P, Suutala L, Schorsch I, et al. Malignant epithe- 29. Wang CP, Chang YL, Ko JY, et al. Lymphoepithelial
lial salivary gland tumors in northern Finland: incidence carcinoma versus large cell undifferentiated carcinoma of
and clinical characteristics. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol the major salivary glands. Cancer 2004; 101(9):2020–2027.
2002; 259(3):146–149. 30. Iezzoni JC, Gaffey MJ, Weiss LM. The role of Epstein-Barr
9. Rees LAG, Hankey BF, Miller BA, et al. Cancer statistics virus in lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas. Am J Clin
review 1973–88. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, Pathol 1995; 103(3):308–315.
1991 (NIH publication no. 91–2789). 31. Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Therkildsen MH, Neilsen NH, et al.
10. Horn-Ross PL, West DW, Brown SR. Recent trends in the Undifferentiated carcinoma of the salivary gland in Green-
incidence of salivary gland cancer. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20 landic Eskimos: demonstration of Epstein-Barr virus DNA
(3):628–633. by in situ nucleic acid hybridization. Hum Pathol 1991; 22
11. Rippin JW, Potts AJ. Intra-oral salivary gland tumours in (8):811–815.
the West Midlands. Br Dent J 1992; 173(1):17–19. 32. Manganaris A, Patakiouta F, Xirou P, et al. Lymphoepithe-
12. Zheng T, Holford TR, Chen Y, et al. Are cancers of the lial carcinoma of the parotid gland: is an association with
salivary gland increasing? Experience from Connecticut, Epstein-Barr virus possible in non-endemic areas? Int J
USA. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26(2):264–271. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36(6):556–559.
13. Davies L, Welch HG. Epidemiology of head and neck 33. Laane CJ, Murr AH, Mhatre AN, et al. Role of Epstein-Barr
cancer in the United States. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg virus and cytomegalovirus in the etiology of benign parot-
2006; 135(3):451–457. id tumors. Head Neck 2002; 24(5):443–450.
14. Carvalho AL, Nishimoto IN, Califano JA, et al. Trends in 34. Malinvaud D, Couloigner V, Badoual C, et al. Pleomorphic
incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the adenoma of the nasal septum and its relationship with
United States: a site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Epstein-Barr virus. Auris Nasus Larynx 2006; 33(4):417–421.
Int J Cancer 2005; 114(5):806–816. 35. Martinelli M, Martini F, Rinaldi E, et al. Simian virus 40
15. Dorn HF, Cutler SJ. Morbidity from cancer in the United sequences and expression of the viral large T antigen
States. In: Public Health Monograph No 56. Washington oncoprotein in human pleomorphic adenomas of parotid
DC. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959,186. glands. Am J Pathol 2002; 161(4):1127–1133.
16. Schaefer O, Hildes JA, Medd LM, et al. The changing 36. Belsky JL, Tachikawa K, Cihak RW, et al. Salivary gland
pattern of neoplastic disease in Canadian Eskimos. Can tumors in atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima-Nagasaki,
Med Assoc J 1975; 112(12):1399–1404. 1957 to 1970. JAMA 1972; 219(7):864–868.
17. Hildes JA, Schaefer O. The changing picture of neoplastic 37. Belsky JL, Takeichi N, Yamamoto T, et al. Salivary gland
disease in the western and central Canadian Arctic neoplasms following atomic radiation: additional cases and
(1950–1980). Can Med Assoc J 1984; 130(1):25–32. reanalysis of combined data in a fixed population, 1957–
18. Loke YW. Salivary gland tumours in Malaya. Br J Cancer 1970. Cancer 1975; 35(2):555–559.
1967; 21(4):665–674. 38. Takeichi N, Hirose F, Yamamoto H. Salivary gland tumors
19. Wang D, Li Y, He H, et al. Intraoral minor salivary gland in atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima, Japan. I. Epidemio-
tumors in a Chinese population: a retrospective study on logic observations. Cancer 1976; 38(6):2462–2468.
737 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 39. Takeichi N, Hirose F, Yamamoto H, et al. Salivary gland
Endod 2007; 104(1):94–100. tumors in atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima, Japan. II.
616 Eveson and Nagao
Pathologic study and supplementary epidemiologic obser- 61. Swanson GM, Burns PB. Cancers of the salivary gland:
vations. Cancer 1983; 52(2):377–385. workplace risks among women and men. Ann Epidemiol
40. Saku T, Hayashi Y, Takahara O, et al. Salivary gland 1997; 7(6):369–374.
tumors among atomic bomb survivors, 1950–1987. Cancer 62. Takkouche B, Etminan M, Montes-Martı́nez A. Personal
1997; 79(8):1465–1475. use of hair dyes and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA
41. Schneider AB, Favus MJ, Stachura ME, et al. Salivary gland 2005; 293(20):2516–2525.
neoplasms as a late consequence of head and neck irradia- 63. Graham S, Blanchet M, Rohrer T. Cancer in asbestos-
tion. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87(2):160–164. mining and other areas of Quebec. J Natl Cancer Inst
42. Ron E, Saftlas AF. Head and neck radiation carcinogenesis: 1977; 59(4):1139–1145.
epidemiologic evidence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64. Muscat JE, Wynder EL. A case/control study of risk factors
1996; 115(5):403–408. for major salivary gland cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck
43. Modan B, Chetrit A, Alfandary E, et al. Increased risk of Surg 1998; 118(2):195–198.
salivary gland tumors after low-dose irradiation. Laryngo- 65. Keller AZ. Residence, age, race and related factors in the
scope 1998; 108(7):1095–1097. survival and associations with salivary tumors. Am J
44. Mihailescu D, Shore-Freedman E, Mukani S, et al. Multiple Epidemiol 1969; 90(4):269–277.
neoplasms in an irradiated cohort: pattern of occurrence 66. Williams RR, Horm JW. Association of cancer sites with
and relationship to thyroid cancer outcome. J Clin tobacco and alcohol consumption and socioeconomic sta-
Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87(7):3236–3241. tus of patients: interview study from the Third National
45. Hoffman DA, McConahey WM, Fraumeni JF Jr., et al. Cancer Survey. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 5(3):525–547.
Cancer incidence following treatment of hyperthyroidism. 67. Horn-Ross PL, Morrow M, Ljung BM. Diet and the risk of
Int J Epidemiol 1982; 11(3):218–224. salivary gland cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 146(2):
46. Preston-Martin S, Thomas DC, White SC, et al. Prior expo- 171–176.
sure to medical and dental x-rays related to tumors of the 68. Zheng W, Shu XO, Ji BT, et al. Diet and other risk factors
parotid gland. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988; 80(12):943–949. for cancer of the salivary glands: a population-based case-
47. Preston-Martin S, White SC. Brain and salivary gland control study. Int J Cancer 1996; 67(2):194–198.
tumors related to prior dental radiography: implications 69. Dietz A, Barme B, Gewelke U, et al. The epidemiology
for current practice. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120(2):151–158. of parotid tumors. A case control study. HNO 1993; 41(2):
48. Spitz MR, Sider JG, Newell GR, et al. Incidence of salivary 83–90.
gland cancer in the United States relative to ultraviolet 70. Suba Z, Barabás J, Szabó G, et al. Increased prevalence of
radiation exposure. Head Neck Surg 1988; 10(5):305–308. diabetes and obesity in patients with salivary gland
49. Spitz MR, Sider JG, Newell GR. Salivary gland cancer and risk tumors. Diabetes Care 2005; 28(1):228.
of subsequent skin cancer. Head Neck 1990; 12(3):254–256. 71. Dimery IW, Jones LA, Verjan RP, et al. Estrogen receptors
50. Whatley WS, Thompson JW, Rao B. Salivary gland tumors in normal salivary gland and salivary gland carcinoma.
in survivors of childhood cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113(10):1082–1085.
Surg 2006; 134(3):385–388. 72. Dori S, Trougouboff P, David R, et al. Immunohistochemi-
51. Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Christensen HC, et al. Mobile phone cal evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors in
use and risk of parotid gland tumor. Am J Epidemiol 2006; adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Oral
164(7):637–643. Oncol 2000; 36(5):450–453.
52. Schüz J, Jacobsen R, Olsen JH, et al. Cellular telephone use 73. Jeannon JP, Soames JV, Bell H, et al. Immunohistochemical
and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort. detection of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in sali-
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98(23):1707–1713. vary tumours. Clin Otolaryngol 1999; 24(1):52–54.
53. Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, et al. Cellular phone 74. Shick PC, Riordan GP, Foss RD. Estrogen and progesterone
use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland receptors in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oral
tumors—a nationwide case-control study. Am J Epidemiol Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80(4):
2008; 167(4):457–467. 440–444.
54. Miller AS, Harwick RD, Alfaro-Miranda M, et al. Search for 75. Miller AS, Hartman GG, Chen SY, et al. Estrogen receptor
correlation of radon levels and incidence of salivary gland assay in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma and
tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75(1): adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. An
58–63. immunohistochemical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
55. Mancuso TF, Brennan MJ. Epidemiological considerations Pathol 1994; 77(1):36–40.
of cancer of the gallbladder, bile ducts and salivary glands 76. Pires FR, da Cruz Perez DE, de Almeida OP, et al. Estrogen
in the rubber industry. J Occup Med 1970; 12(9):333–341. receptor expression in salivary gland mucoepidermoid
56. Horn-Ross PL, Ljung BM, Morrow M. Environmental carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Pathol Oncol
factors and the risk of salivary gland cancer. Epidemiology Res 2004; 10(3):166–168.
1997; 8( 4):414–419. 77. Molteni A, Warpeha RL, Brizio-Molteni L, et al. Estradiol
57. Milham S Jr. Cancer mortality pattern associated with receptor-binding protein in head and neck neoplastic and
exposure to metals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1976; 271:243–249. normal tissue. Arch Surg 1981; 116(2):207–210.
58. Swanson GM, Belle SH. Cancer morbidity among wood- 78. Onitsuka T. Sex hormones in papillary carcinoma of thy-
workers in the US automotive industry. J Occup Med 1982; roid gland and pleomorphic adenoma of parotid gland.
24(4):315–319. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114(12):218–222.
59. Wilson RT, Moore LE, Dosemeci M. Occupational expo- 79. Nasser SM, Faquin WC, Dayal Y. Expression of androgen,
sures and salivary gland cancer mortality among African estrogen, and progesterone receptors in salivary gland
American and white workers in the United States. J Occup tumors. Frequent expression of androgen receptor in a
Environ Med 2004; 46(3):287–297. subset of malignant salivary gland tumors. Am J Clin
60. Swanson GM, Burns PB. Cancer incidence among women Pathol 2003; 119(6):801–806.
in the workplace: a study of the association between 80. Williams MD, Roberts D, Blumenschein GR Jr., et al.
occupation and industry and 11 cancer sites. J Occup Differential expression of hormonal and growth factor
Environ Med 1995; 37(3):282–287. receptors in salivary duct carcinomas: biologic significance
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 617
2. Cheuk W, Chan JK. Advances in salivary gland pathology. 20. Möller E, Stenman G, Mandahl N, et al. POU5F1, encoding a
Histopathology 2007; 51(1):1–20. key regulator of stem cell pluripotency, is fused to EWSR1 in
3. Bullerdiek J, Wobst G, Meyer-Bolte K, et al. Cytogenetic hidradenoma of the skin and mucoepidermoid carcinoma of
subtyping of 220 salivary gland pleomorphic adenomas: the salivary glands. J Pathol 2008; 215(1):78–86.
correlation to occurrence, histological subtype, and in vitro 21. Yu Y, Baras AS, Shirasuna K, et al. Concurrent loss of
cellular behavior. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1993; 65(1): heterozygosity and copy number analysis in adenoid cystic
27–31. carcinoma by SNP genotyping arrays. Lab Invest 2007; 87(5):
4. Eveson JW, Kusafuka K, Stenman G, et al. Pleomorphic 430–439.
adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, eds. World 22. Stallmach I, Zenklusen P, Komminoth P, et al. Loss of
Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology heterozygosity at chromosome 6q23-25 correlates with
and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC clinical and histologic parameters in salivary gland ade-
Press, 2005:254–258. noid cystic carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2002; 440(1):77–84.
5. Kas K, Voz ML, Röijer E, et al. Promoter swapping between 23. El-Naggar AK, Abdul-Karim FW, Hurr K, et al. Genetic
the genes for a novel zinc finger protein and beta-catenin in alterations in acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland
pleiomorphic adenomas with t(3;8)(p21;q12) translocations. determined by microsatellite analysis. Cancer Genet Cyto-
Nat Genet 1997; 15(2):170–174. genet 1998; 102(1):19–24.
6. Voz ML, Aström AK, Kas K, et al. The recurrent transloca- 24. El-Naggar AK, Callender D, Coombes MM, et al. Molecular
tion t(5;8)(p13;q12) in pleomorphic adenomas results in genetic alterations in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma:
upregulation of PLAG1 gene expression under control of a putative progression model? Genes Chromosomes
the LIFR promoter. Oncogene 1998; 16(11):1409–1416. Cancer 2000; 27(2):162–168.
7. Aström AK, Voz ML, Kas K, et al. Conserved mechanism of 25. Choi HR, Batsakis JG, Callender DL, et al. Molecular
PLAG1 activation in salivary gland tumors with and without analysis of chromosome 16q regions in dermal analogue
chromosome 8q12 abnormalities: identification of SII as a tumors of salivary glands: a genetic link to dermal cylin-
new fusion partner gene. Cancer Res 1999; 59(4): 918–923. droma? Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26(6):778–783.
8. Asp J, Persson F, Kost-Alimova M, et al. CHCHD7-PLAG1 26. Skálová A, Stárek I, Vanecek T, et al. Expression of HER-2/
and TCEA1-PLAG1 gene fusions resulting from cryptic, neu gene and protein in salivary duct carcinomas of
intrachromosomal 8q rearrangements in pleomorphic sali- parotid gland as revealed by fluorescence in-situ hybridiza-
vary gland adenomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006; tion and immunohistochemistry. Histopathology 2003; 42(4):
45(9):820–828. 348–356.
9. Voz ML, Agten NS, Van de Ven WJ, et al. PLAG1, the main 27. Glisson B, Colevas AD, Haddad R, et al. HER2 expression
translocation target in pleomorphic adenoma of the sali- in salivary gland carcinoma: Dependence on histological
vary glands, is a positive regulator of IGF-II. Cancer Res subtype. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10(3):944–946.
2000; 60(1):106–113. 28. Cornolti G, Ungari M, Morassi ML, et al. Amplification and
10. Van Dyck F, Declercq J, Braem CV, et al. PLAG1, the overexpression of HER2/neu gene and HER2/neu protein
prototype of the PLAG gene family: versatility in tumour in salivary duct carcinoma of the parotid gland. Arch
development (review). Int J Oncol 2007; 30(4):765–774. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133(10):1031–1036.
11. Geurts JM, Schoenmakers EF, Röijer E, et al. Expression of 29. Frierson HF Jr., El-Naggar AK, Welsh JB, et al. Large scale
reciprocal hybrid transcripts of HMGIC and FHIT in a molecular analysis identifies genes with altered expression
pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland. Cancer Res in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2002;
1997; 57(1):13–17. 161(4):1315–1323.
12. Geurts JM, Schoenmakers EF, Röijer E, et al. Identification 30. Leivo I, Jee KJ, Heikinheimo K, et al. Characterization of
of NFIB as recurrent translocation partner gene of gene expression in major types of salivary gland carcino-
HMGIC in pleomorphic adenomas. Oncogene 1998; 16(7): mas with epithelial differentiation. Cancer Genet Cytoge-
865–872. net 2005; 156(2):104–113.
13. Queimado L, Lopes CS, Reis AM. WIF1, an inhibitor of the 31. Pastore A, Carinci F, Pelucchi S. Genetic expression profil-
Wnt pathway, is rearranged in salivary gland tumors. ing of parotid neoplasms by cDNA microarrays. Acta
Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2007; 46(3):215–225. Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2005; 25(3):153–160.
14. Röijer E, Nordkvist A, Ström AK, et al. Translocation, 32. Maruya S, Kurotaki H, Wada R, et al. Promoter methyla-
deletion/amplification, and expression of HMGIC and tion and protein expression of the E-cadherin gene in the
MDM2 in a carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Am J clinicopathologic assessment of adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Pathol 2002; 160(2):433–440. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(6):637–645.
15. Cleynen I, Van de Ven WJ. The HMGA proteins: a myriad 33. Zhang CY, Mao L, Li L, et al. Promoter methylation as a
of functions. Int J Oncol 2008; 32(2):289–305 (review). common mechanism for inactivating E-cadherin in human
16. Behboudi A, Enlund F, Winnes M, et al. Molecular classifi- salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer 2007;
cation of mucoepidermoid carcinomas-prognostic signifi- 110(1):87–95.
cance of the MECT1-MAML2 fusion oncogene. Genes 34. Li J, El-Naggar A, Mao L. Promoter methylation of
Chromosomes Cancer 2006; 45(5):470–481. p16INK4a, RASSF1A, and DAPK is frequent in salivary
17. Okabe M, Miyabe S, Nagatsuka H, et al. MECT1-MAML2 adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 104(4):771–776.
fusion transcript defines a favorable subset of mucoepider- 35. Daa T, Kashima K, Kondo Y, et al. Aberrant methylation in
moid carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12(13):3902–3907. promoter regions of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor
18. Tirado Y, Williams MD, Hanna EY, et al. CRTC1/MAML2 genes in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland.
fusion transcript in high grade mucoepidermoid carcino- APMIS 2008; 116(2):21–26.
mas of salivary and thyroid glands and Warthin’s tumors: 36. Guo XL, Sun SZ, Wang WX, et al. Alterations of p16INK4a
implications for histogenesis and biologic behavior. Genes tumour suppressor gene in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of
Chromosomes Cancer 2007; 46(7):708–715. the salivary glands. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36(4):
19. Tonon G, Modi S, Wu L, et al. t(11;19)(q21;p13) transloca- 350–353.
tion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma creates a novel fusion 37. Williams MD, Chakravarti N, Kies MS, et al. Implications
product that disrupts a Notch signaling pathway. Nat of methylation patterns of cancer genes in salivary gland
Genet 2003; 33(2):208–213. tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12(24):7353–7358.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 619
38. Kishi M, Nakamura M, Nishimine M, et al. Genetic and 12. Seifert G, Donath K. Multiple tumours of the salivary
epigenetic alteration profiles for multiple genes in salivary glands - terminology and nomenclature. Eur J Cancer B
gland carcinomas. Oral Oncol 2005; 41(2):161–169. Oral Oncol 1996; 32(1):3–7.
13. Farina A, Pelucchi S, Carinci F. Evidence of bimodal
distribution of age in patients affected by pleomorphic
Classification adenoma of the parotid gland. Oral Oncol 1997; 33(4):
1. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Classification of salivary gland neo- 288–289.
plasms. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical 14. Cameron JM. Familial incidence of inverted question mark
Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saun- mixed salivary tumours’. Scott Med J 1959; 4:455–456.
ders, 1991:129–134. 15. Ahn MS, Hayashi GM, Hilsinger RL Jr., et al. Familial
2. Eveson JW. WHO histological classification of tumours of mixed tumors of the parotid gland. Head Neck 1999; 21
the salivary glands. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, (8):772–775.
eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: 16. Hayter JP, Robertson JM. Familial occurrence of pleomor-
Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: phic adenoma of the parotid gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac
IARC Press, 2005:210. Surg 1990; 28(5):333–334.
17. Klausner RD, Handler SD. Familial occurrence of pleomor-
phic adenoma. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 30(3):
Staging 205–210.
18. Okura M, Hiranuma T, Shirasuna K, et al. Pleomorphic
1. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. American Joint
adenoma of the sublingual gland: report of a case. J Oral
Committee on Cancer. Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed.
Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54(3):363–366.
New York: Springer, 2002.
19. Pesavento G, Ferlito A. Benign mixed tumor of heterotopic
2. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM: Classification of Malignant
salivary gland tissue in upper neck. Report of a case with
Tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2002.
review of the literature on heterotopic salivary gland
3. Wittekind Ch, Greene FL, Hutter RVP, et al. TNM Atlas:
tissue. J Laryngol 1976; 90(6):577–584.
Illustrated Guide to the TNM Classification of Malignant
20. Shinohara M, Ikebe T, Nakamura S, et al. Multiple pleo-
Tumours. 5th ed. New Jersey: Wiley and Sons Inc, 2005.
morphic adenomas arising in the parotid and submandib-
ular lymph nodes. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34(6):
Benign Tumors 515–519.
21. Feigin GA, Robinson B, Marchevsky A. Mixed tumor of the
1. Eveson JW, Kusafuka K, Stenman G et al. Pleomorphic mediastinum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110(1):80–81.
adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, eds. World 22. Ojha J, Bhattacharyya I, Islam MN, et al. Intraosseous
Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology pleomorphic adenoma of the mandible: report of a case
and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Press, 2005:254–258. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(2):e21–e26.
2. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Salivary gland tumors: A review 23. Surana R, Moloney R, Fitzgerald RJ. Tumours of hetero-
of 2410 cases with particular reference to histologic types, topic salivary tissue in the upper cervical region in chil-
site, age, and sex distribution. J Pathol 1985; 146(1):51–58. dren. Surg Oncol 1993; 2(2):133–136.
3. Spiro RH. Salivary neoplasms: Overview of a 35 year 24. Moran CA. Primary salivary gland–type tumors of the
experience with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(3): lung. Semin Diagn Pathol 1995; 12(2):106–122.
177–184. 25. Hampton TA, Scheithauer BW, Rojiani AM, et al. Salivary
4. Eneroth CM. Salivary gland tumors in the parotid gland, gland–like tumors of the sellar region. Am J Surg Pathol
submandibular gland and the palate region. Cancer 1971; 1997; 21(4):424–434.
27(6):1415–1418. 26. Porter N, Sandhu A, O’Connell TB, et al. Pleomorphic
5. Waldron CA, El-Mofty S, Gnepp DR. Tumors of the adenoma of the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland.
intraoral minor salivary glands: A demographic and histo- Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136(2):328–329.
logic study of 426 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 27. Cuadros CL, Ryan SS, Miller RE. Benign mixed tumor
1988; 66(3):323–333. (pleomorphic adenoma) of the breast: Ultrastructural
6. Waldron CA. Mixed tumor (pleomorphic adenoma) and study and review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 1987; 36(1):
myoepithelioma. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. 58–63.
Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: 28. Hughes KV III, Olsen KD, McCaffrey TV. Parapharyngeal
WB Saunders, 1991:165–186. space neoplasms. Head Neck 1995; 17(2):124–130.
7. Bouquot JE, Kurland LT, Weiland LH. Primary salivary 29. Buenting JE, Smith TL, Holmes DK. Giant pleomorphic
epithelial neoplasms in the Rochester, Minnesota popula- adenoma of the parotid gland: Case report and review of
tion. J Dent Res 1979; 58:419 (abstr). the literature. Ear Nose Throat J 1998; 77(8):634–640.
8. Pinkston JA, Cole P. Incidence rates of salivary gland 30. Lee PS, Sabbath-Solitare M, Redondo TC, et al. Molecular
tumors: results from a population-based study. Otolar- evidence that the stromal and epithelial cells in pleomor-
yngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120(6):834–840. phic adenomas of salivary gland arise from the same
9. Uquz MZ, Onal K, Demiray U, et al. Tumoral mass origin: clonal analysis using human androgen receptor
presenting in the nasomalar region arising from the lateral gene (HUMARA) assay. Hum Pathol 2000; 31(4):498–503.
nasal wall: pleomorphic adenoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolar- 31. Webb AJ, Eveson JW. Pleomorphic adenomas of the major
yngol 2007; 264(11):1377–1379. salivary glands: a study of the capsular form in relation to
10. Berenholz L, Kessler A, Segal S. Massive pleomorphic surgical management. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001; 26
adenoma of the maxillary sinus. A case report. Int J Oral (2):134–142.
Maxillofac Surg 1998; 27(5):372–373. 32. Patey DH, Thackray AC. The treatment of parotid tumours
11. Heffner DK. Sinonasal and laryngeal salivary gland in the light of a pathological study of parotidectomy
lesions. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical material. Br J Surg 1958; 45(193):477–487.
Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saun- 33. Lam KH, Wei WI, Ho HC, et al. Whole organ sectioning of
ders, 1991:544–559. mixed parotid tumors. Am J Surg 1990; 160(4):377–381.
620 Eveson and Nagao
34. Takeda Y. An immunohistochemical study of bizarre neo- 56. Savera AT, Gown AM, Zarbo RJ. Immunolocalization of
plastic cells in pleomorphic adenoma: its cytological nature three novel smooth muscle specific proteins in salivary
and proliferative activity. Pathol Int 1999; 49(2):993–999. gland pleomorphic adenoma: Assessment of the morpho-
35. Tandler B. Amyloid in a pleomorphic adenoma of the genetic role of myoepithelium. Mod Pathol 1997; 10(11):
parotid gland. Electron microscopic observations. J Oral 1093–1100.
Pathol 1981; 10(3):158–163. 57. Mori M, Yamada K, Tanaka T, et al. Multiple expression of
36. Lomax-Smith JD, Azzopardi JG. The hyaline cell: A dis- keratins, vimentin, and S-100 protein in pleomorphic sali-
tinctive feature of ‘‘mixed’’ salivary tumours. Histopathol vary adenomas. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol
1978; 2(2):77–92. Pathol 1990; 58(6):435–444.
37. Palmer TJ, Gleeson MJ, Eveson JW, et al. Oncocytic adeno- 58. Furuse C, Sousa SO, Nunes FD, et al. Myoepithelial cell
mas and oncocytic hyperplasia of salivary glands: a clini- markers in salivary gland neoplasms. Int J Surg Pathol
copathological study of 26 cases. Histopathology 1990; 16 2005; 13(1):57–65.
(5):487–493. 59. Bilal H, Handra-Luca A, Bertrand JC, et al. P63 is expressed
38. Di Palma S, Lambros MB, Savage K, et al. Oncocytic change in basal and myoepithelial cells of human normal and
in pleomorphic adenoma: molecular evidence in support of tumor salivary gland tissues. J Histochem Cytochem
an origin in neoplastic cells. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60(5):492–499. 2003; 51(2):133–139.
39. Auclair PL, Ellis GL. Atypical features in salivary gland 60. Andreadis D, Epivatianos A, Poulopoulos A. Detection of
mixed tumors: Their relationship to malignant transforma- C-KIT (CD117) molecule in benign and malignant salivary
tion. Mod Pathol 1996; 9(6):652–657. gland tumours. Oral Oncol 2006; 42(1):57–65.
40. Ng WK, Ma L. Pleomorphic adenoma with extensive 61. Morinaga S, Nakajima T, Shimosato Y. Normal and neo-
lipometaplasia. Histopathology 1995; 27(3):285–288. plastic myoepithelial cells in salivary glands: an immuno-
41. Seifert G, Donath K, Schäfer R. Lipomatous pleomorphic histochemical study. Hum Pathol 1987; 18(12):1218–1226.
adenoma of the parotid gland. Classification of lipomatous 62. Kusafuka K, Yamaguchi A, Kayano T, et al. Immunohisto-
tissue in salivary glands. Pathol Res Pract 1999; 195(4): 247–252. chemical localization of members of the transforming
42. Ide F, Kusama K. Myxolipomatous pleomorphic adenoma: growth factor (TGF)-beta superfamily in normal human
an unusual oral presentation. J Oral Pathol Med 2004; 33 salivary glands and pleomorphic adenomas. J Oral Pathol
(1):53–55. Med 2001; 30(7):413–420.
43. Allen CM, Damm D, Neville B, et al. Necrosis in benign 63. Kusafuka K, Yamaguchi A, Kayano T, et al. Expression of
salivary gland neoplasms. Not necessarily a sign of malig- bone morphogenetic proteins in salivary pleomorphic ade-
nant transformation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; nomas. Virchows Arch 1998; 432(3):247–253.
78(4):455–461. 64. Kusafuka K, Yamaguchi A, Kayano T, et al. Immunohisto-
44. Behzatoglu K, Bahadir B, Huq GE, et al. Spontaneous chemical localization of the bone morphogenetic protein-6
infarction of a pleomorphic adenoma in parotid gland: in salivary pleomorphic adenomas. Pathol Int 1999; 49(12):
diagnostic problems and review. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 1023–1027.
32(6):367–369. 65. Kusafuka K, Hiraki Y, Shukunami C, et al. Cartilage-
45. Chen YK, Lin CC, Lai S, et al. Pleomorphic adenoma with specific matrix protein chondromodulin-I is associated
extensive necrosis: report of two cases. Oral Dis 2004; 10(1): with chondroid formation in salivary pleomorphic adeno-
54–59. mas: immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Pathol 2001; 158
46. Dardick I, van Nostrand AWP, Phillips MJ. Histogenesis of (4):1465–1472.
salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma (mixed tumor) with 66. Mark J, Dahlenfors R, Wedell B. Impact of the in vitro
an evaluation of the role of the myoepithelial cell. Hum technique used on the cytogenetic patterns in pleomorphic
Pathol 1982; 13(1):60–75. adenomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997; 95(1):9–15.
47. Donath K, Seifert G. Tumour-simulating squamous cell 67. Bullerdiek J, Wobst G, Meyer-Bolte K, et al. Cytogenetic
metaplasia (SCM) in necrotic areas of salivary gland subtyping of 220 salivary gland pleomorphic adenomas:
tumours. Pathol Res Pract 1997; 193(1):689–693. correlation to occurrence, histological subtype, and in vitro
48. Lam KY, Ng IOL, Chan GSW. Palatal pleomorphic adeno- cellular behavior. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1993; 65(1):
ma with florid squamous metaplasia: A potential diagnos- 27–31.
tic pitfall. J Oral Pathol Med 1998; 27(8):407–410. 68. Aström AK, Voz ML, Kas K, et al. Conserved mechanism
49. Li S, Baloch ZW, Tomaszewski JE, LiVolsi VA. Worrisome of PLAG1 activation in salivary gland tumors with and
histologic alterations following fine-needle aspiration of without chromosome 8q12 abnormalities: identification of
benign parotid lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(1): SII as a new fusion partner gene. Cancer Res 1999; 59(4):
87–91. 918–923.
50. Batsakis JG. Recurrent mixed tumors. Ann Otol Rhinol 69. Kas K, Voz ML, Röijer E, et al. Promoter swapping
Laryngol 1986; 95(5):543–544. between the genes for a novel zinc finger protein and
51. Gnepp DR, Schroeder W, Heffner D. Synchronous tumors beta-catenin in pleiomorphic adenomas with t(3;8)(p21;
arising in a single major salivary gland. Cancer 1989; 63 q12) translocations. Nat Genet 1997; 15(2):170–174.
(6):1219–1224. 70. Voz ML, Aström AK, Kas K, et al. The recurrent transloca-
52. Ishikawa N, Hashimoto K. Bilateral pleomorphic adenoma tion t(5;8)(p13;q12) in pleomorphic adenomas results in
of the parotid gland. J Otolaryngol 1998; 27(2):94–96. upregulation of PLAG1 gene expression under control of
53. Coleman H, Altini M. Intravascular tumour in intra-oral the LIFR promoter. Oncogene 1998; 16(11):1409–1416.
pleomorphic adenomas: A diagnostic and therapeutic 71. Voz ML, Agten NS, Van de Ven WJ, et al. PLAG1, the main
dilemma. Histopathol 1999; 35(5):439–444. translocation target in pleomorphic adenoma of the sali-
54. Burns BF, Dardick I, Parks WR. Intermediate filament vary glands, is a positive regulator of IGF-II. Cancer Res
expression in normal parotid glands and pleomorphic 2000; 60(1):106–113.
adenomas. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 72. Martins C, Fonseca I, Roque L, et al. PLAG1 gene alter-
1988; 413(2):103–112. ations in salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma and carci-
55. Ogawa Y, Kishino M, Atsumi Y, et al. Plasmacytoid cells noma ex-pleomorphic adenoma: a combined study using
in salivary-gland pleomorphic adenomas: evidence of luminal chromosome banding, in situ hybridization and immuno-
cell differentiation. Virchows Arch 2003; 443(5):625–634. cytochemistry. Mod Pathol 2005; 18(8):1048–1055.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 621
73. Stenman G, Sandros J, Mark J, et al. High p21RAS expres- 93. Witt RL. The significance of the margin in parotid surgery
sion levels correlate with chromosome 8 rearrangements in for pleomorphic adenoma. Laryngoscope 2002; 112(5):
benign human mixed salivary gland tumors. Genes Chro- 2141–2154.
mosomes Cancer 1989; 1(1):59–66. 94. Carr RJ, Bowerman JE. A review of tumours of the deep
74. Milasin J, Pujić N, Dedović N, et al. H-ras gene mutations lobe of the parotid salivary gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
in salivary gland pleomorphic adenomas. Int J Oral Max- 1986; 24(3):155–168.
illofac Surg 1993; 22(6):359–361. 95. Hamada T, Matsukita S, Goto M, et al. Mucin expression in
75. Stenman G, Sandros J, Nordkvist A, et al. Expression of the pleomorphic adenoma of salivary gland: a potential role
ERBB2 protein in benign and malignant salivary gland for MUC1 as a marker to predict recurrence. J Clin Pathol
tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1991; 3(2):128–135. 2004; 57(8):813–821.
76. Rosa JC, Felix A, Fonseca I, et al. Immunoexpression of 96. Laskawi R, Schott T, Schröder M. Recurrent pleomorphic
c-erbB-2 and p53 in benign and malignant salivary neo- adenomas of the parotid gland: Clinical evaluation and
plasms with myoepithelial differentiation. J Clin Pathol long-term follow-up. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36(1):
1997; 50(8):661–663. 48–51.
77. Nordkvist A, Röijer E, Bang G, et al. Expression and 97. Yugueros P, Goellner JR, Petty PM, et al. Treating recur-
mutation patterns of p53 in benign and malignant salivary rence of parotid benign pleomorphic adenomas. Ann Plast
gland tumors. Int J Oncol 2000; 16(3):477–483. Surg 1998; 40(6):573–576.
78. Weber A, Langhanki L, Schütz A, et al. Expression profiles 98. Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Werning JW, et al.
of p53, p63, and p73 in benign salivary gland tumors. Salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma. Am J Clin Oncol
Virchows Arch 2002; 441(5):428–436. 2008; 31(1):95–99.
79. Martinelli M, Martini F, Rinaldi E, et al. Simian virus 40
sequences and expression of the viral large T antigen
Myoepithelioma
oncoprotein in human pleomorphic adenomas of parotid
glands. Am J Pathol 2002; 161(4):1127–1133. 1. Cardesa A, Alos L. Myoepithelioma. In: Barnes L, Eveson
80. Chandan VS, Wilbur D, Faquin WC, et al. Is c-kit (CD117) JW, Reichart P, eds. World Health Organization Classifica-
immunolocalization in cell block preparations useful in the tion of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and
differentiation of adenoid cystic carcinoma from pleomor- Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:259–260.
phic adenoma? Cancer 2004; 102(4):207–209. 2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Myoepithelioma. In: Atlas of Tumor
81. Stennert E, Wittekindt C, Klussmann JP, et al. Recurrent Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd series,
pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: a prospective fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of
histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Laryn- Pathology, 1996:57–68.
goscope 2004; 114(1):158–163. 3. Scuibba JJ, Brannon RB. Myoepithelioma of salivary
82. Zbären P, Tschumi I, Nuyens M, et al. Recurrent pleomor- glands: Report of 23 cases. Cancer 1982; 49(3):562–572.
phic adenoma of the parotid gland. Am J Surg 2005; 189(2): 4. Dardick I, Thomas MJ, van Nostrand AWP. Myoepithelioma—
203–207. new concepts of histology and classification: A light
83. Hickman RE, Cawson RA, Duffy SW. The prognosis of and electron microscopic study. Ultrastruct Pathol 1989;
specific types of salivary gland tumors. Cancer 1984; 54(8): 13(2–3):187–224.
1620–1624. 5. Dardick I. Myoepithelioma: Definitions and diagnostic
84. Myssiorek D, Ruah CB, Hybels RL. Recurrent pleomorphic criteria. Ultrastruct Pathol 1995; 19(5):335–345.
adenomas of the parotid gland. Head Neck 1990; 12(4):332– 6. Barnes L, Appel BN, Perez H, et al. Myoepitheliomas of the
336. head and neck: Case report and review. J Surg Oncol 1985;
85. McGregor AD, Burgoyne M, Tan KC. Recurrent pleomor- 28(1):21–28.
phic salivary adenoma: The relevance of age at first pre- 7. Simpson RH, Jones H, Beasley P. Benign myoepithelioma
sentation. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41(2):177–181. of the salivary glands: A true entity? Histopathology 1995;
86. Henriksson G, Westrin KM, Carlsoo B, et al. Recurrent 27(1):1–9.
primary pleomorphic adenomas of salivary gland origin: 8. Kutzner H, Mentzel T, Kaddu S, et al. Cutaneous myoepi-
Intrasurgical rupture, histopathologic features, and pseu- thelioma: an under-recognized cutaneous neoplasm com-
dopodia. Cancer 1998; 82(4):617–620. posed of myoepithelial cells. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25
87. Renehan A, Gleave EN, Hancock BD, et al. Long term (3):348–355.
follow up of over 1000 patients with salivary gland 9. Veeramachaneni R, Gulick J, Halldorsson AO, et al. Benign
tumours treated in a single centre. Br J Surg 1996; 83(12): myoepithelioma of the lung: a case report and review of the
1750–1754. literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125(11):1494–1496.
88. Leverstein H, van der Wal JE, Tiwari RM, et al. Surgical 10. Hornick JL, Fletcher CDM. Myoepithelial tumors of soft
management of 246 previously untreated pleomorphic ade- tissue: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical
nomas of the parotid gland. Br J Surg 1997; 84(3):399–403. study of 101 cases with an evaluation of prognostic param-
89. Debets JM, Munting JD. Parotidectomy for parotid eters. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27(9):1183–1196.
tumours: 19-year experience from The Netherlands. Br J 11. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Salivary gland malignant
Surg 1992; 79(11):1159–1161. myoepithelioma: A clinicopathologic and immunohisto-
90. O’Brien CJ. Current management of benign parotid chemical study of 10 cases. Cancer 1998; 83(7):1292–1299.
tumors–the role of limited superficial parotidectomy. 12. Skálová A, Leivo I, Michal M, et al. Analysis of collagen
Head Neck 2003; 25(11):946–952. isotypes in crystalloid structures of salivary gland tumors.
91. Ghosh S, Panarese A, Bull PD, et al. Marginally excised Hum Pathol 1992; 23(7):748–754.
parotid pleomorphic salivary adenomas: risk factors for 13. Skálová A, Stárek I, Simpson RH, et al. Spindle cell
recurrence and management. A 12.5-year mean follow-up myoepithelial tumours of the parotid gland with extensive
study of histologically marginal excisions. Clin Otolaryngol lipomatous metaplasia. A report of four cases with immu-
Allied Sci 2003; 28(3):262–266. nohistochemical and ultrastructural findings. Virchows
92. Bradley PJ. Pleomorphic salivary adenoma of the parotid Arch 2001; 439(6):762–767.
gland: which operation to perform? Curr Opin Otolaryngol 14. Franquement DW, Mills SE. Plasmacytoid monomorphic
Head Neck Surg 2004; 12(2):69–70. adenoma of salivary glands: Absence of myogenous
622 Eveson and Nagao
differentiation and comparison to spindle cell myoepithe- 12. Ferreiro JA. Canalicular adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
lioma. Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17(2):146–153. Reichart P, eds. World Health Organization Classification
15. Skálová A, Michal M, Ryska A, et al. Oncocytic myoepi- of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck
thelioma and pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary glands. Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:267.
Virchows Arch 1999; 434(6):537–546. 13. Daley TD, Gardner DG, Smout MS. Canalicular adenoma:
16. Mori M, Ninomiya T, Okada Y, et al. Myoepitheliomas Not a basal cell adenoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
and myoepithelial adenomas of salivary gland origin: 1984; 57(2):181–188.
Immunohistochemical evaluation of filament proteins, 14. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. Histopathologic
S-100a and b, glial fibrillary acidic proteins, neuron- studies of basal cell adenoma of the parotid gland. Cancer
specific enolase, and lactoferrin. Pathol Res Pract 1989; 1982; 50(4):736–745.
184(2):168–178. 15. Seifert G, Donath K. The congenital basal cell adenoma of
17. Takai Y, Dardick I, MacKay A, et al. Diagnostic criteria for salivary glands: Contribution to the differential diagnosis
neoplastic myoepithelial cells in pleomorphic adenomas of congenital salivary gland tumours. Virchows Archiv
and myoepitheliomas: Immunocytochemical detection of 1997; 430(4):311–319.
muscle-specific actin, cytokeratin 14, vimentin and glial 16. Dardick I, Lytwyn A, Bourne AJ, et al. Trabecular and
fibrillary acidic protein. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol solid-cribriform types of basal cell adenoma: A morpho-
Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79(3):330–341. logic study of two cases of an unusual variant of mono-
18. Alós L, Cardesa A, Bombi JA, et al. Myoepithelial tumors morphic adenoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;
of salivary glands: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochem- 73(1):75–83.
ical, ultrastructural, and flow-cytometric study. Sem Diagn 17. Dardick I, Daley TD, van Nostrand AWP. Basal cell adenoma
Pathol 1996; 13(2):138–147. with myoepithelial-derived ‘‘stroma’’: A new major
19. Savera AT, Zarbo RJ. Defining the role of myoepithelium in salivary gland tumor entity. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(4):
salivary gland neoplasia. Adv Anat Pathol 2004; 11(2):69–85. 257–267.
20. Bombı́ JA, Alós L, Rey MJ, et al. Myoepithelial carcinoma 18. Dardick I, Kahn HJ, van Nostrand AWP, et al. Salivary
arising in a benign myoepithelioma: immunohistochemi- gland monomorphic adenoma: Ultrastructural, immuno-
cal, ultrastructural, and flow-cytometrical study. Ultra- peroxidase, and histogenetic aspects. Am J Pathol 1984; 115
struct Pathol 1996; 20(2):145–454. (3):334–348.
19. Ogawa I, Nikai H, Takata T, et al. The cellular composition
of basal cell adenoma of the parotid. An immunohisto-
Basal Cell Adenoma chemical analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70
(5):619–626.
1. Seifert G. Classification and differential diagnosis of clear 20. Ferreiro JA. Immunohistochemistry of basal cell adenoma
and basal cell tumors of the salivary glands. Semin Diagn of the major salivary glands. Histopathology 1994; 24(6):
Pathol 1996; 13(2):95–103. 539–542.
2. Kleinsasser O, Klein HJ. Basalzelladenome der Speichel- 21. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Basal cell adenocarcinoma
drusen. Archiv Klin Exper Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopf- of the salivary glands: Comparison with basal cell adenoma
heilk 1967; 189:302–316. through assessment of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and
3. Thackray AC, Sobin LH. World Health Organization Inter- expression of p53 and bcl-2. Cancer 1998; 82(3): 439–447.
national Histological Classification of Tumours: Histologi- 22. Zarbo RJ, Prasad AR, Regezi JA, et al. Salivary gland basal
cal Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours. Berlin: Springer- cell and canalicular adenomas: Immunohistochemical
Verlag, 1972. demonstration of myoepithelial cell participation and mor-
4. Crumpler C, Scharfenberg JC, Reed RJ. Monomorphic phogenetic considerations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124
adenomas of salivary glands: Trabecular-tubular, canalicu- (3):401–405.
lar, and basaloid variants. Cancer 1976; 38(1):193–200. 23. Choi HR, Batsakis JG, Callender DL, et al. Molecular
5. Batsakis JG, Brannon RB, Sciubba JJ. Monomorphic adeno- analysis of chromosome 16q regions in dermal analogue
mas of major salivary glands: A histologic study of 96 tumors of salivary glands: a genetic link to dermal cylin-
tumours. Clin Otolaryngol 1981; 6(2):129–143. droma? Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26(6):778–783.
6. Gardner DG, Daley TD. The use of the terms monomorphic 24. Luna MA, Tortoledo ME, Allen M. Salivary dermal ana-
adenoma, basal cell adenoma, and canalicular adenoma as logue tumors arising in lymph nodes. Cancer 1987; 59
applied to salivary gland tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral (6):1165–1169.
Pathol 1983; 56(6):608–615. 25. Schmidt KT, Ma A, Golberg R, et al. Multiple adnexal
7. Chaudhry AP, Cutler LS, Satchidanand S, et al. Monomor- tumors and a parotid basal cell adenoma. J Am Acad
phic adenomas of the parotid glands: Their ultrastructure Dermat 1991; 25(5 pt2):960–964.
and histogenesis. Cancer 1983; 52(1):112–120. 26. Jungehülsing M, Wagner M, Damm M. Turban tumour
8. Batsakis JG, Luna MA, El Naggar AK. Basaloid monomor- with involvement of the parotid gland. J Laryngol Otol
phic adenomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100(8): 1999; 113(8):779–783.
687–690. 27. Luna MA, Batsakis JG, Tortoledo ME, et al. Carcinomas ex
9. Seifert G, Sobin LH. World Health Organization Interna- monomorphic adenoma of salivary glands. J Laryngol Otol
tional Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic 1989; 103(8):756–759.
Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer- 28. Hyman BA, Scheithauer BW, Weiland LH, et al. Membra-
Verlag, 1991. nous basal cell adenoma of the parotid gland: Malignant
10. de Araujo VC. Basal cell adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, transformation in a patient with multiple dermal cylindro-
Reichart P, eds. World Health Organization Classification mas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988; 112(2):209–211.
of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck 29. Nagao T, Ishida Y, Sugano I, et al. Carcinoma in basal cell
Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:261–262. adenoma of the parotid gland. Pathol Res Pract 1997; 193(3):
11. Ellis GL, Auclair PLB. Basal cell adenoma. Atlas of Tumor 171–178.
Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd series, 30. Yu GY, Ubsmuller J, Donath K. Membranous basal cell
fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of adenoma of the salivary gland: A clinicopathologic study
Pathology, 1996:80–94. of 12 cases. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118(4):588–593.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 623
Warthin’s Tumor 22. Michaels L, Hellquist HB. Part F: Major salivary glands:
Chapter 41 benign epithelial neoplasms. In Ear, Nose and
1. Ma J, Chan JKC, Chow CW, et al. Lymphadenoma: a report Throat Histopathology. 2nd ed. London: Springer-Verlag,
of three cases of an uncommon salivary gland neoplasm. 2001:470–490.
Histopathology 2002; 41(4):250–259. 23. McGurk FM, Main JH, Orr JA. Adenolymphoma of the
2. Simpson RHW, Eveson JW. Warthin tumour. In: Barnes L, parotid gland. Br J Surg 1970; 57(5):321–325.
Eveson JW, Reichart P, eds. World Health Organization 24. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Infarcted (‘infected’) adenolym-
Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head phomas. A clinicopathological study of 20 cases. Clin
and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:263–265. Otolaryngol 1989; 14(3):205–210.
3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Warthin’s tumor (papillary cystade- 25. Maini S, Osborne JE. Ischaemic necrosis and facial palsy in
noma lymphomatosum). In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Warthin’s tumour of the parotid gland. Auris Nasus Lar-
Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd series, fascicle 17. ynx 2002; 29( 1):99–101.
Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 26. Marioni G, de Filippis C, Gaio E, et al. Facial nerve
1996:68–79. paralysis secondary to Warthin’s tumour of the parotid
4. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Salivary gland tumours. A review gland. J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117(6):511–513.
of 2410 cases with particular reference to histological types, 27. Motoori K, Ueda T, Uchida Y, et al. Identification of
site, age and sex distribution. J Pathol 1985; 146(1):51–58. Warthin tumor: magnetic resonance imaging versus sali-
5. Poulsen P, Jorgensen K, Grontved A. Benign and malignant vary scintigraphy with technetium-99m pertechnetate.
neoplasms of the parotid gland: incidence and histology in J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29(4):506–512.
the Danish county of Funen. Laryngoscope 1987; 97(1): 28. Ebbs SR, Webb AJ. Adenolymphoma of the parotid:
102–104. aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Br J Surg 1992; 73(8):
6. Monk JS, Church JS. Warthin’s tumor: a high incidence and 627–630.
no sex predominance in central Pennsylvania. Arch Oto- 29. Pinkston JA, Cole P. Cigarette smoking and Warthin’s
laryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118(5):477–478. tumor. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144(2):183–187.
7. Chung YFA, Khoo MLC, Heng MKD, et al. Epidemiology 30. Kotwall CA. Smoking as an etiologic factor in the develop-
of Warthin’s tumour of the parotid gland in an Asian ment of Warthin’s tumor of the parotid gland. Am J Surg
population. Br J Surg 1999; 86(5):661–664. 1992; 164(6):646–647.
8. Thomas KM, Hutt MS, Borgstein J. Salivary gland tumors 31. Peter Klussmann J, Wittekindt C, Florian Preuss S, et al.
in Malawi. Cancer 1980; 46(10):2328–2334. High risk for bilateral Warthin tumor in heavy smokers–
9. Yoo GH, Eisele DW, Askin FB, et al. Warthin’s tumor: a review of 185 cases. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126(11):
40-year experience at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Laryn- 1213–1217.
goscope 1994; 104(7):799–803. 32. Lamellas J, Terry JH, Alfonso AE. Warthin’s tumor: multi-
10. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Warthin’s tumor (cystadenolym- centricity and increasing incidence in women. Am J Surg
phoma) of salivary glands. A clinicopathologic investiga- 1987; 154(4):347–351.
tion of 278 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61 33. Yu GY, Liu XB, Li ZL, et al. Smoking and the development
(3):256–262. of Warthin’s tumour of the parotid gland. Br J Oral
11. Skerlavay MA, Gardner B, Nacastri AD. Warthin’s tumor Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36(3):183–185.
in two brothers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1976; 100(9):508. 34. Saku T, Hayashi Y, Takahara O, et al. Salivary gland
12. Noyek AM, Pritzker KPH, Greyson ND, et al. Familial tumors among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1987. Cancer
Warthin’s tumor 1. Its synchronous occurrence in mother 1997; 79(8):1465–1475.
and son, 2. its association with cystic oncocytic metaplasia 35. Gallo O, Bocciolini C. Warthin’s tumour associated with
of the larynx. J Otolaryngol 1980; 9(1):90–96. autoimmune diseases and tobacco use. Acta Otolaryngol
13. Ellies M, Laskawi R, Arglebe C. Extraglandular Warthin’s 1997; 117(4):623–627.
tumours: clinical evaluation and long-term follow-up. Br J 36. Santucci M, Gallo O, Calzolari A, et al. Detection of
Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36(1):52–53. Epstein-Barr viral genome in tumor cells of Warthin’s
14. van derWal JE, Davids JJ, van der Waal I. Extraparotid tumor of parotid gland. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 100(6):
Warthin’s tumours – report of 10 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac 662–665.
Surg 1993; 31(1):43–44. 37. Van Heerden WFP, Kraft K, Hemmer J, et al. Warthin’s
15. Foote FW, Frazell EL. Tumors of the major salivary glands. tumour is not an Epstein-Barr virus related disease. Anti-
Cancer 1953; 6(6):1065–1113. cancer Res 1999; 19(4B):2881–2884.
16. Kawakami M, Ito K, Tanaka H, et al. Warthin’s tumor of 38. Webb AJ, Farndon JR. Epidemiology of Warthin’s tumour
the nasopharynx: a case report. Auris Nasus Larynx 2004; of the parotid gland in an Asian population. Br J Surg 2000;
31(3):293–298. 87(5):681 (lettr).
17. Bonavolonta G, Tranfa F, Staibano S, et al. Warthin tumor of 39. Webb AJ, Eveson JW. Parotid Warthin’s tumour Bristol
the lacrimal gland. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 124(6):857–858. Royal Infirmary (1985-1995): a study of histopathology in
18. Gnepp DR, Brandwein MS, Henley JD. Salivary and lacri- 33 cases. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(2):163–171.
mal glands. In: Gnepp DR, eds. Diagnostic Surgical Pathol- 40. Di Palma S, Simpson RHW, Skálová A, et al. Metaplastic
ogy of the Head and Neck. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, (infarcted) Warthin’s tumour of the parotid gland: a possi-
2001:325–430. ble consequence of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Histopa-
19. Maiorano E, Lo Muzio L, Favia G, et al. Warthin’s tumour: thology 1999; 35(5):432–438.
a study of 78 cases with emphasis on bilaterality, multi- 41. Kern SB. Necrosis of a Warthin’s tumor following fine
focality and association with other malignancies. Oral needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(2):207–208.
Oncol 2002; 38(1):35–40. 42. Batsakis JG, Sneige N, El-Naggar AK. Fine-needle aspira-
20. Lam KH, Ho HC, Ho CM, et al. Multifocal nature of adeno- tion of salivary glands: its utility and tissue effects. Ann
lymphoma of the parotid. Br J Surg 1994; 81(11): 1612–1614. Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(2 pt1):185–188.
21. White RR, Arm RN, Randall P. A large Warthin’s tumor of 43. Li S, Baloch ZW, Tomaszewski JE, et al. Worrisome histo-
the parotid: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61(3): logic alterations following fine-needle aspiration of benign
452–454. parotid lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(1):87–91.
624 Eveson and Nagao
44. Sironi M, Claren R, Spinelli M, et al. Could Warthin’s 65. Martins C, Cavaco B, Tonon G, et al. A study of MECT1-
tumor become metaplastic after fine needle aspiration? MAML2 in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and Warthin’s
Acta Cytol 2002; 46(2):436–438. tumor of salivary glands. J Mol Diagn 2004; 6(3):205–210.
45. Rawson AJ, Horn RC Jr. Sebaceous glands and sebaceous 66. Enlund F, Behboudi A, Andren Y, et al. Altered Notch
gland-containing tumors of the parotid salivary gland; signaling resulting from expression of a WAMTP1-
with a consideration of the histogenesis of papillary cys- MAML2 gene fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinomas
tadenoma lymphomatosum. Surgery 1950; 27(1):93–101. and benign Warthin’s tumors. Exp Cell Res 2004; 292
46. Seifert G, Bull HG, Donath K. Histological subclassification of (1):21–28.
the cystadenoma of the parotid gland: analysis of 275 cases. 67. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Warthin-like papillary carcinoma of
Virchows Archiv A Pathol Anat Histol 1980; 388(1): 13–38. the thyroid. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(8):1192–1195.
47. To EW, Tsang WM, Leung CY, et al. Warthin’s tumor with 68. Ludviková M, Ryška A, Korabecná M, et al. Oncocytic
multiple sarcoid-like granulomas: a case report. J Oral papillary carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (Warthin-like
Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60(5):585–588. tumour) of the thyroid: a distinct entity with favourable
48. Watanabe M, Nakayama T, Koduka Y, et al. Mycobacteri- prognosis. Histopathology 2001; 39(1):17–24.
um tuberculosis infection within Warthin’s tumor: report 69. Iwai H, Yamashita T. Local excision procedure for Warthin;
of two cases. Pathol Int 2001; 51(10):797–801. s tumor of the parotid gland. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
49. Simpson RHW, Sarsfield PTL. Benign and malignant lymphoid 2005; 132(4):577–580.
lesions of the salivary glands. Curr Diagn Pathol 1997; 4:91–99. 70. Warnock GR. Papillary cystadenoma lymphomatosum
50. Auclair PL. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation in (Warthin’s tumor). In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR,
the parotid gland: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Oral Surg eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadel-
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77(1):19–26. phia: WB Saunders, 1991:187–201.
51. Michal M, Skálová A, Simpson RHW, et al. Well differenti- 71. Skálová A, Michal M, Nathanský Z. Epidermoid carcinoma
ated acinic cell carcinoma of salivary glands associated arising in Warthin’s tumour: a case study. J Oral Pathol
with lymphoid rich stroma: clinicopathologic and immu- Med 1994; 23(7):330–333.
nohistochemical study using a proliferative marker MIB1. 72. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Mucoepidermoid
Human Pathol 1997; 28(5):595–600. carcinoma arising in Warthin’s tumour of the parotid
52. Aguirre JM, Echebarrı́a MA, Martı́nez-Conde R, et al. gland: report of two cases with histopathological, ultra-
Warthin tumor: a new hypothesis concerning its develop- structural and immunohistochemical studies. Histopathol-
ment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod ogy 1998; 33(4):379–386.
1998; 85(1):60–63. 73. Williamson JD, Simmons BH, el-Naggar A, et al. Mucoe-
53. Honda K, Kashima K, Daa T, et al. Clonal analysis of the pidermoid carcinoma involving Warthin tumor. A report
epithelial component of Warthin’s tumor. Human Pathol of five cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol
2000; 31(11):1377–1380. 2000; 114(4):564–570.
54. Teymoortash A, Werner JA. Tissue that has lost its track: 74. Foschini MP, Malvi D, Betts CM. Oncocytic carcinoma
Warthin’s tumour. Virchows Arch 2005; 446(6):585–588. arising in Warthin tumour. Virchows Arch 2005; 446(1):
55. Suster S, Rosai J. Multilocular thymic cyst: an acquired 88–90.
reactive process: study of 18 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 75. Fornelli A, Eusebi V, Pasquinelli G, et al. Merkel cell
15(5):388–398. carcinoma of the parotid gland associated with Warthin
56. Schwerer MJ, Kraft K, Baczako K, et al. Cytokeratin expres- tumour: report of two cases. Histopathology 2001; 39(4):
sion and epithelial differentiation in Warthin’s tumour and its 342–346.
metaplastic (infarcted) variant. Histopathology 2001; 39(4): 76. Park CK, Manning JT Jr., Battifora H, et al. Follicle center
347–352. lymphoma and Warthin tumor involving the same ana-
57. Chu PG, Weiss LM. Cytokeratin 14 immunoreactivity dis- tomic site. Report of two cases and review of the literature.
tinguishes oncocytic tumour from its renal mimics: an Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 113(1):13–119.
immunohistochemical study of 63 cases. Histopathology 77. Medeiros LJ, Rizzi R, Lardelli P, et al. Malignant lympho-
2001; 39(5):455–462. ma involving a Warthin’s tumor: a case with immunophe-
58. Gurbuz YG, Yildiz K, Aydin Ö, et al. An unusual cytoker- notypic and gene rearrangement analysis. Human Pathol
atin expression at Warthin’s tumour: an immunohisto- 1990; 21(9):974–977.
chemical study of 30 cases of salivary gland tumours. 78. Melato M, Falconieri G, Fanin R, et al. Hodgkin’s disease
Histopathology 2002; 41(suppl 1):106 (abstr). occurring in a Warthin’s tumor: first case report. Pathol Res
59. Luna MA. Salivary glands. In: Pilch BZ, eds. Head and Pract 1986; 181(5):615–620.
Neck Surgical Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Wil- 79. Badve S, Evans G, Mady S, et al. A case of Warthin’s
liams & Wilkins, 2001:284–349. tumour with coexistent Hodgkin’s disease. Histopathology
60. Chin KW, Billings KR, Ishiyama A, et al. Characterization 1993; 22(5):280–281.
of lymphocyte subpopulations in Warthin’s tumor. Laryn- 80. Pescarmona E, Perez M, Faraggiana T, et al. Nodal periph-
goscope 1995; 105(9 pt1):928–933. eral T-cell lymphoma associated with Warthin’s tumour.
61. Kataoka R, Hyo Y, Hoshiya T, et al. Ultrastructural study of Histopathology 2005; 47(2):221–222.
mitochondria in oncocytes. Ultrastruct Pathol 1991; 15(3): 81. Marioni G, Marchese-Ragona R, Marino F, et al. MALT-
231–239. type lymphoma and Warthin’s tumour presenting in
62. Dardick I, Claude A, Parks WR, et al. Warthin’s tumor: an the same parotid gland. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124(3):
ultrastructural study and immunohistochemical study of 318–323.
basilar epithelium. Ultrastruct Pathol 1988; 12(4):419–432. 82. Saxena A, Memauri B, Hasegawa W. Initial diagnosis of
63. Lewis PD, Baxter P, Griffiths AP, et al. Detection of damage small lymphocytic lymphoma in parotidectomy for
to the mitochondrial genome in the oncocytic cells of Warthin tumour, a rare collision tumour. J Clin Pathol
Warthin’s tumour. J Pathol 2000; 191(1):274–281. 2005; 58(3):331–333.
64. Hunt JL. Warthin tumors do not have microsatellite insta- 83. Gnepp DR, Schroeder W, Heffner D. Synchronous tumors
bility and express normal DNA mismatch repair proteins. arising in a single major salivary gland. Cancer 1989; 63(6):
Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130(1):52–56. 1219–1224.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 625
84. Lefor AT, Ord RA. Multiple synchronous bilateral War- 20. Brannon RB, Willard CC. Oncocytic mucoepidermoid car-
thin’s tumors of the parotid glands with pleomorphic cinoma of parotid gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
adenoma: case report and review of the literature. Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96(6):727–733.
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76(3):319–324. 21. Shick PC, Brannon RB. Oncocytoid artifact of the parotid
85. Slavin JL, Woodford NW, Busmanis I. Synchronous parot- gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
id myoepithelioma and Warthin’s tumor. Pathology 1995; 1998; 86(6):720–722.
27(2):199–200. 22. Said-Al-Naief N, Ivanov K, Jones M, et al. Granular cell
tumor of the parotid. Ann Diagn Pathol 1999; 3(1):35–38.
23. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Oncocytoma. In: Atlas of Tumor
Oncocytoma
Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd series,
1. Huvos AG. Oncocytoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of
P, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Pathology, 1996:103–114.
Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck 24. Blanck C, Eneroth CM, Jakobsson PA. Oncocytoma of the
Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:266. parotid gland: neoplasm or nodular hyperplasia? Cancer
2. Goode RK. Oncocytoma. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp 1970; 25(4):919–925.
DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Phila-
delphia: WB Saunders, 1991:225–237.
3. Brandwein MS, Huvos AG. Oncocytic tumors of major Canalicular Adenoma
salivary glands. A study of 68 cases with follow-up of 44
patients. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(6):514–528. 1. Ferreiro JA. Canalicular adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
4. Thompson LD, Wenig BM, Ellis GL. Oncocytomas of the Reichart P, et al, , eds. World Health Organization Classifi-
submandibular gland. A series of 22 cases and a review of cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and
the literature. Cancer 1996; 78(11):2281–2287. Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:267.
5. Damm DD, White DK, Geissler RH Jr., et al. Benign solid 2. Kratchovil FJ. Canalicular adenoma and basal cell adeno-
oncocytoma of intraoral minor salivary glands. Oral Surg ma. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67(1):84–86. Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saun-
6. Kanazawa H, Furuya T, Murano A, et al. Oncocytoma of an ders, 1991:202–224.
intraoral minor salivary gland: report of a case and review of 3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Canalicular adenoma. In: Atlas of
literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58(8): 894–897. Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd
7. Sugiyama T, Nakagawa T, Narita M, et al. Pedunculated series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute
oncocytic carcinoma in buccal mucosa: immunohistochemi- of Pathology, 1996:95–103.
cal and ultrastructural studies. Oral Dis 2006; 12(3):324–328. 4. Daley TD, Gardner DG, Smout MS. Canalicular adenoma:
8. Deutsch E, Elion A, Zelig S, et al. Synchronous bilateral not a basal cell adenoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
oncocytoma of the parotid glands. A case report. J Otol 1984; 57(2):181–188.
Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 46(2):66–68. 5. Nelson JF, Jacoway JR. Monomorphic adenoma (Canalic-
9. Boley JO, Robinson DW. Bilateral oxyphilic granular cell ular type). Report of 29 cases. Cancer 1973; 31(6):
adenoma of the parotid. Report of a case. Arch Pathol 1954; 1511–1512.
58(6):564–567. 6. Regezi JA, Lloyd RV, Zarbo RJ, et al. Minor salivary gland
10. Blanck C, Eneroth CM, Jakobsson PA. Bilateral tumors of tumors. A histologic and immunohistochemical study.
the parotid gland. Opusc Med Bd 1974; 19:30–33. Cancer 1985; 55(1):108–115.
11. Ellis GL. ‘‘Clear cell’’ oncocytoma of the salivary gland. 7. Suarez P, Hammond HL, Luna MA, et al. Palatal canalicu-
Human Pathol 1988; 19(7):862–867. lar adenoma: report of 12 cases and review of the literature.
12. Davy CL, Dardick I, Hammond E, et al. Relationship of clear Ann Diagn Pathol 1998; 2(4):224–228.
cell oncocytoma to mitochondrial-rich (typical) oncocytomas 8. Rossiello R, Rossiello L, de Simone S, et al. Canalicular
of parotid salivary gland. An ultrastructural study. Oral Surg adenoma of the parotid gland: a case report. Anticancer
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77(5):469–469. Res 2003; 23(5b):4101–4103.
13. Seifert G. Classification and differential diagnosis of clear 9. Philpott CM, Kendall C, Murty GE. Canalicular adenoma
and basal cell tumors of the salivary gland. Semin Diagn of the parotid gland. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119(1):59–60.
Pathol 1996; 13(2):95–103. 10. Nelson ZL, Newman L, Loukota RA, et al. Bilateral multi-
14. Sorensen M, Baunsgaard P, Frederiksen P, et al. Multifocal focal canalicular adenomas of buccal minor salivary
adenomatous oncocytic hyperplasia of the parotid gland. glands: a case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33(5):
(Unusual clear cell variant in two female siblings.) Pathol 299–301.
Res Pract 1986; 181(2):254–257. 11. Yoon AJ, Beller DE, Woo VL, et al. Bilateral canalicular
15. Gray SR, Cornog JL, Sei IS. Oncocytic neoplasms of sali- adenomas of the upper lip. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
vary glands: A report of 15 cases including two malignant Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102(3):341–343.
oncocytomas. Cancer 1976; 38(3):1306–1317. 12. Rosseau A, Mock D, Dover DG, et al. Multiple canalicular
16. Busuttil A. Oncocytic lesions of the upper respiratory tract. adenomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
J Laryngol Otol 1976; 90(3):277–288. Endod 1999; 87(3):346–350.
17. Dardick I, Birek C, Lingen MW, et al. Differentiation and the 13. Khullar SM, Best PV. Adenomatosis of minor salivary
cytomorphology of salivary gland tumors with specific ref- glands. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
erence to oncocytic metaplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 1992; 74(6):783–787.
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88(6): 691–701. 14. Waldron CA, el-Mofty SK, Gnepp DR. Tumors of the
18. Palmer TJ, Gleeson MJ, Eveson JW, et al. Oncocytic adeno- intraoral minor salivary glands: a demographic and histo-
mas and oncocytic hyperplasia of salivary glands: a clini- logic study of 426 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
copathological study of 26 cases. Histopathology 1990; 16(5): 1988; 66(3):323–333.
487–493. 15. Allen CM, Damm D, Neville B, et al. Necrosis in benign
19. Jahan-Parwar, Huberman RM, Donovan DT, et al. Onco- salivary gland neoplasms. Not necessarily a sign of malig-
cytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. nant transformation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;
Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23(5):523–529. 78(4):455–461.
626 Eveson and Nagao
16. Mintz GA, Abrams AM, Melrose RJ. Monomorphic adeno- Lymphadenomas
mas of the major and minor salivary glands. Report of
twenty-one cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg 1. Gnepp DR, Cheuk W, Chan JKC, et al. Lymphadenomas:
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53(4):375–386. sebaceous and non-sebaceous. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
17. Zarbo RJ, Regezi JA, Batsakis JG. S-100 protein in salivary Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi-
gland tumors: an immunohistochemical study of 129 cases. cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and
Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(4):268–275. Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:269.
18. Pereira MC, Pereira AA, Hanemann JA. Immunohisto- 2. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary gland origin:
chemical profile of canalicular adenoma of the upper lip: a review. Pathol Annu 1983; 18(pt 1):71–102.
a case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007; 12:E1–E3. 3. Gnepp DR, Brannon R. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary
19. Ferreiro JA. Immunohistochemical analysis of salivary gland origin. Report of 21 cases. Cancer 1984; 53(10):
gland canalicular adenoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 2155–2170.
Pathol 1994; 78(6):761–765. 4. McGavran MH, Bauer WC, Ackerman LV. Sebaceous lym-
20. Machado de Sousa SO, Soares de Araujo N, Correa L, et al. phadenoma of the parotid salivary gland. Cancer 1960;
Immunohistochemical aspects of basal cell adenoma and 13:1185–1187.
canalicular adenoma of salivary glands. Oral Oncol 2001; 5. Rawson AJ, Horn RC Jr. Sebaceous glands and sebaceous
37(4):365–368. gland-containing tumors of the parotid salivary gland; with a
21. Zarbo RJ, Prasad AR, Regezi JA, et al. Salivary gland basal consideration of the histogenesis of papillary cystadenoma
cell and canalicular adenomas: immunohistochemical dem- lymphomatosum. Surgery 1950; 27(1):93–101.
onstration of myoepithelial cell participation and morpho- 6. Auclair PL, Ellis GL, Gnepp DR. Other benign epithelial
genetic considerations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(3): neoplasms. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds.
401–405. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia:
22. Weber A, Langhanki L, Schutz A, et al. Expression profiles WB Saunders, 1991:252–268.
of p53, p63, and p73 in benign salivary gland tumors. 7. Hayashi D, Tysome JR, Boyei E, et al. Sebaceous lympha-
Virchows Arch 2002; 441(5):428–436. denoma of the parotid gland: report of two cases and
23. Seifert G, Donath K. Hybrid tumours of salivary glands. review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2007;
Definition and classification of five rare cases. Eur J Cancer 27(3):144–146.
B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(4):251–259. 8. Peel RL. Diseases of the salivary gland. In: Barnes L, eds.
24. Fantasia JE, Neville BW. Basal cell adenomas of the minor Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck. New York:
salivary glands. A clinicopathologic study of seventeen Marcel Dekker Inc., 2001:633–758.
new cases and a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral 9. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Sebaceous lymphadenoma. In: Atlas
Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50(5):433–440. of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd
25. Harmse JL, Saleh HA, Odutoye T, et al. Recurrent canalic- series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute
ular adenoma of the minor salivary glands in the upper lip. of Pathology, 1996:133–136.
J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111(10):985–987. 10. Auclair PL. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation in
26. Mair IW, Stalsberg H. Basal cell adenomatosis of minor the parotid gland. A potential diagnostic pitfall. Oral
salivary glands of the upper lip. Arch Otorhinolaryngol Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77(1):19–26.
1988; 245(3):191–195. 11. Ma J, Chan JK, Chow CW, et al. Lymphadenoma: a report
27. Smullin SE, Fielding AF, Susarla SM, et al. Canalicular of three cases of an uncommon salivary gland neoplasm.
adenoma of the palate: case report and literature review. Histopathology 2002; 41(4):342–350.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 12. Kwon GY, Kim EJ, Go JH. Lymphadenoma arising in the
98(1):32–36. parotid gland: a case report. Yonsei Med J 2002; 43(4):
536–538.
13. Musthyala NB, Low SE, Seneviratne RH. Lymphadenoma
Sebaceous Adenoma
of the salivary gland: a rare tumour. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57(9):
1. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, 1007.
Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi- 14. Bos I, Meyer S, Merz H. [Lymphadenoma of the parotid
cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and gland without sebaceous differentiation. Immunohisto-
Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:268. chemical investigations]. Pathologe 2004; 25(1):73–78.
2. Seifert G, Miehlke A, Haubrich J, et al. Diseases of the 15. Chang JY, Hsiao CH. Lymphadenoma lacking sebaceous
Salivary Glands. Pathology-Diagnosis-Treatment-Facial differentiation in the parotid gland. J Formos Med Assoc
Nerve Surgery. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1986; 2004; 103(6):459–462.
pp. 171, 215, 216. 16. Yang S, Chen X, Wang L, et al. Non-sebaceous lym-
3. Gnepp DR, Brannon R. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary phadenoma of the salivary gland: case report with immu-
gland origin, report of 21 cases. Cancer 1984; 53(10):2155–2170. nohistochemical investigation. Virchows Arch 2007; 450
4. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary gland origin: (5):595–599.
a review. Pathol Ann, 1983; 18(pt 1):71–102. 17. Dardick I, Thomas MJ. Lymphadenoma of parotid gland:
5. de Vicente Rodriguez JC, Fresno Forcelledo MF, Gonzalez two additional cases and a literature review. Oral Surg
Garcia M, et al. Sebaceous adenoma of the parotid gland. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105(4):
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11:E446–E448. 491–494.
6. Iezzi G, Rubini C, Fioroni M, et al. Sebaceous adenoma of
the cheek. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(1):111–113.
7. Izutsu T, Kumamoto H, Kimizuka S, et al. Sebaceous Ductal Papillomas
adenoma in the retromolar region: report of a case with a
review of the English literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1. Brannon RB, Sciubba JJ. Ductal papillomas. In: Barnes L,
2003; 32(4):423–426. Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health
8. Seifert G, Donath K. Hybrid tumours of salivary glands. Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and
Definition and classification of five rare cases. Eur J Cancer Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(4):251–259. 2005:270–272.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 627
2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Ductal papillomas. In: Atlas of Tumor 23. Shimoda M, Kameyama K, Morinaga S, et al. Malignant
Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd series, transformation of sialadenoma papilliferum of the palate: a
fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of case report. Virchows Arch 2004; 445(6):641–646.
Pathology, 1996:120–130. 24. Ponniah I. A rare case of sialadenoma papilliferum with
3. Abbey LM. Solitary intraductal papilloma of the minor epithelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Oral Surg
salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975; 40 Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(2):
(1):135–140. e27–e29.
4. King PH, Hill J. Intraductal papilloma of the parotid gland. 25. Mahajan D, Khurana N, Setia N. Sialadenoma papilliferum
J Clin Pathol 1993; 46(2):175–176. in a young patient: a case report and review of the litera-
5. Ishikawa T, Imada S, Ijuhin N. Intraductal papilloma of the ture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
anterior lingual salivary gland: case report and immuno- 2007; 103(3):e51–e54.
histochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 22(2): 26. White DK, Miller AS, McDaniel RK, et al. Inverted ductal
116–117. papilloma: a distinctive lesion of minor salivary gland.
6. Shiotani A, Kawaura M, Tanaka Y, et al. Papillary adeno- Cancer 1982; 49(3):519–524.
carcinoma possibly arising from an intraductal papilloma 27. Clark DB, Priddy RW, Swanson AE. Oral inverted ductal
of the parotid gland. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec papilloma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69(4):
1994; 56(2):112–115. 487–490.
7. Saleh HA, Abbarah T. Intraductal papilloma of the minor 28. Koutlas IG, Jessurun J, Iamaroon A. Immunohistochemical
salivary gland involving the nasal cavity: is it a distinct evaluation and in situ hybridization in a case of oral
histopathologic entity? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; inverted ductal papilloma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;
118(6):850–852. 52(5):503–506.
8. Nagao T, Sugano I, Matsuzaki O, et al. Intraductal papil- 29. Huberland-Carrodeguas C, Fornatora ML, Reich RF, et al.
lary tumors of the major salivary glands: case reports of Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in oral inverted
benign and malignant variants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; ductal papillomas. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56(12):910–913.
124(2):291–295. 30. Cabov T, Macan D, Manojlović S, et al. Oral inverted ductal
9. Brannon RB, Sciubba JJ, Giulani M. Ductal papillomas of papilloma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 42(1):75–77.
salivary gland origin: a report of 19 cases and a review of 31. Kubota N, Suzuki K, Kawai Y, et al. Inverted ductal
the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol papilloma of minor salivary gland: case report with immu-
Endod 2001; 92(1):68–77. nohistochemical study and literature review. Pathol Int
10. Tanimoto H, Kaneshiro T, Yonezawa K, et al. Intraductal 2006; 56(8):457–461.
papilloma arising from Stensen’s duct. J Otolaryngol 2005;
34(6):432–433. Cystadenoma
11. Noseri H, Erden T, Toros S, et al. Intraductal papilloma of
the parotid gland in a child. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1. Skálová A, Michal M. Cystadenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
2007; 264(11):1385–1386. Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifica-
12. Brandwein-Gensler MS, Gnepp DR. Low-grade cribriform tion of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the
cystadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Head and Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:273–274.
et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of 2. Auclair PL, Ellis GL, Gnepp DR. Other benign epithelial
Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck neoplasms. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds.
Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:233. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia:
13. Abrams AM, Finck FM. Sialadenoma papilliferum. Cancer WB Saunders, 1991:252–268.
1969; 24(5):1057–1063. 3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Cystadenoma. In: Atlas of Tumor
14. Shirasuna K, Watatani K, Miyazaki T. Ultrastructure of Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd series,
sialadenoma papilliferum. Cancer 1984; 53(3):468–474. fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of
15. Fantasia JE, Nocco CE, Lally ET. Ultrastructure of sial- Pathology, 1996:115–120.
adenoma papilliferum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110 4. Waldron CA, El-Mofty SK, Gnepp DR. Tumors of the
(6):523–527. intraoral minor salivary glands: a demographic and histo-
16. Pimentel MT, Lopez Amado M, Garcia Sarandesa A. logic study of 426 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Recurrent sialadenoma papilliferum of the buccal mucosa. 1988; 66(3):323–333.
J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109(8):787–790. 5. Loyola AM, de Araújo VC, de Sousa SO, et al. Minor
17. Maiorano E, Favia G, Ricco R. Sialadenoma papilliferum: salivary gland tumours. A retrospective study of 164
an immunohistochemical study of five cases. J Oral Pathol cases in a Brazilian population. Eur J Cancer B Oral
Med 1996; 25(6):336–342. Oncol 1995; 31B(3):197–201.
18. Su JM, Hsu HK, Hsu PI, et al. Sialadenoma papilliferum of 6. Toida M, Shimokawa K, Makita H, et al. Intraoral minor
the esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93(3):461–462. salivary gland tumors: a clinicopathological study of 82
19. Argyres MI, Golitz LE. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34(5):528–532.
palate: case report and literature review. J Cutan Pathol 7. Buchner A, Merrell PW, Carpenter WM. Relative frequency
1999; 26(5):259–262. of intra-oral minor salivary gland tumors: a study of
20. Ubaidat MA, Robinson RA, Belding PJ, et al. Sialadenoma 380 cases from northern California and comparison to
papilliferum of the hard palate: report of 2 cases and reports from other parts of the world. J Oral Pathol Med
immunohistochemical evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 36(4):207–214.
2001; 125(12):1595–1597. 8. Kroe DJ, Pitcock JA, Cocke EW. Oncocytic papillary cys-
21. Bobos M, Hytiroglou P, Karkavelas G, et al. Sialadenoma tadenoma of the larynx. Presentation of two cases. Arch
papilliferum of bronchus. Virchows Arch 2003; 443(5): Pathol 1967; 84(4):429–432.
695–699. 9. Gnepp DR, Heffner DK. Mucosal origin of sinonasal tract
22. Gomes AP, Sobral AP, Loducca SV, et al. Sialadenoma adenomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol 1989; 2(4): 365–371.
papilliferum: immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Max- 10. Alexis JB, Dembrow V. Papillary cystadenoma of a minor
illofac Surg 2004; 33(6):621–624. salivary gland. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53(1):70–72.
628 Eveson and Nagao
11. Guccion JG, Redman RS, Calhoun NR, et al. Papillary Malignant Tumors
cystadenoma of the palate: a case report and ultrastructural
study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55(7):759–764. Acinic Cell Carcinoma
12. Chaushu G, Buchner A, David R. Multiple oncocytic cysts
with tyrosine-crystalloids in the parotid gland. Hum Pathol 1. Ellis G, Simpson RHW. Acinic cell carcinoma. In: Barnes L,
1999; 30(2):237–239. Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organiza-
13. Skálová A, Leivo I, Wolf H, et al. Oncocytic cystadenoma of tion Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics
the parotid gland with tyrosine-rich crystals. Pathol Res of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:
Pract 2000; 196(12):849–851. 216–218.
14. Matsuzaka K, Kokubu E, Takeda E, et al. Papillary cysta- 2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Acinic cell adenocarcinoma. In: Ellis
denoma arising from the upper lip: a case report. Bull GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the
Tokyo Dent Coll 2003; 44(4):213–216. Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:299–317.
15. Michal M, Hrabal P, Skálová A. Oncocytic cystadenoma of 3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Acinic cell adenocarcinoma. In: Atlas
the parotid gland with prominent signet-ring features. of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd
Pathol Int 1998; 48(8):629–633. series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute
16. Auclair PL. Cystadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, of Pathology, 1996:183–203.
Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi- 4. Spiro RH. Salivary neoplasms: overview of a 35-year experi-
cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of ence with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(3): 177–184.
the Head and Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:232. 5. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Salivary gland tumours. A review
17. Brandwein-Gensler MS, Gnepp DR. Low-grade cribriform of 2410 cases with particular reference to histological types,
cystadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, site, age and sex distribution. J Pathol 1985; 146(1):51–58.
et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of 6. Jang J, Kie JH, Lee SY, et al. Acinic cell carcinoma of the
Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Head lacrimal gland with intracranial extension: a case report.
and Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:233. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 17(6):454–457.
18. Delgado R, Klimstra D, Albores-Saavedra J. Low grade 7. Crissman JD, Rosenblatt A. Acinous cell carcinoma of the
salivary duct carcinoma. A distinctive variant with a low larynx. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1978; 102(5):233–236.
grade histology and a predominant intraductal growth 8. Tsukayama S, Omura K, Kanehira E, et al. Acinic cell
pattern. Cancer 1996; 78(5):958–967. carcinoma of the trachea: report of a case. Surg Today
19. Michal M, Skálová A, Mukensnabl P. Micropapillary carci- 2004; 34(9):764–768.
noma of the parotid gland arising in mucinous cystade- 9. Hara I, Ozeki S, Okamura K, et al. Central acinic cell
noma. Virchows Arch 2000; 437(4):465–468. carcinoma of the mandible. Case report. J Craniomaxillofac
Surg 2003; 31(6):378–382.
10. Gnepp DR, Schroeder W, Heffner D. Synchronous tumors
Keratocystoma arising in a single major salivary gland. Cancer 1989; 63
(6):1219–1224.
1. Seifert G, Donath K, Jautzke G. Unusual choristoma of the 11. Delides A, Velegrakis G, Kontogeorgos G, et al. Familial
parotid gland in a girl: a possible trichoadenoma. Virchows bilateral acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid synchronous
Arch 1999; 434(4):355–359. with pituitary adenoma: case report. Head Neck 2005; 27
2. Nagao T, Serizawa H, Iwaya K, et al. Keratocystoma of the (9):825–828.
parotid gland: a report of two cases of an unusual patho- 12. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Hybrid carcinomas of
logic entity. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(9):1005–1010. the salivary glands: report of nine cases with clinicopatho-
3. Lewis JE, Olsen KD. Squamous cell carcinoma. In: Barnes logic, immunohistochemical, and p53 gene alteration anal-
L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health ysis. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(7):724–733.
Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and 13. Eneroth CM, Jakobsson PA, Blanck C. Acinic cell carcino-
Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, ma of the parotid gland. Cancer 1966; 19(12):1761–1772.
2005:245–246. 14. Batsakis JG, Chinn EK, Weimert TA, et al. Acinic cell
4. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Infarcted (infected) adenolym- carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of thirty-five cases.
phomas: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases. Clin J Laryngol Otol 1979; 93(4):325–340.
Otolaryngol 1989; 14(3):205–210. 15. Ellis GL, Corio RL. Acinic cell adenocarcinoma. A clinico-
5. Schwerer MJ, Kraft K, Baczako K, et al. Cytokeratin expres- pathologic analysis of 294 cases. Cancer 1983; 52(3):542–549.
sion and epithelial differentiation in Warthin’s tumor and its 16. Shapiro NL, Bhattacharyya N. Clinical characteristics and
metaplastic (infarcted) variant. Histopathology 2001; 39(4): survival for major salivary gland malignancies in children.
347–352. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134(4):631–634.
6. Abrams AM, Melrose RJ, Howell FV. Necrotizing sialome- 17. Kessler A, Handler SD. Salivary gland neoplasms in
taplasia: a disease simulating malignancy. Cancer 1973; children: a 10-year survey at the Children’s Hospital of
32(1):130–135. Philadelphia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29(3):
7. Brannon RB, Fowler CB, Hartman KS. Necrotizing sialo- 195–202.
metaplasia: a clinicopathologic study of sixty-nine cases 18. Orvidas LJ, Kasperbauer JL, Lewis JE, et al. Pediatric
and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral parotid masses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;
Pathol 1991; 72(3):317–325. 126(2):177–184.
8. Sneige N, Batsakis JG. Necrotizing sialometaplasia. Ann 19. Castro EB, Huvos AG, Strong EW, et al. Tumors of the major
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(3):282–284. salivary glands in children. Cancer 1972; 29(2):312–317.
9. Pieterse AS, Seymour AE. Parotid cysts. An analysis of 20. Depowski PL, Setzen G, Chui A, et al. Familial occurrence
16 cases and suggested classification. Pathology 1981; 13(2): of acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland. Arch Pathol
225–234. Lab Med 1999; 123(11):1118–1120.
10. Moody AB, Avery CME, Harrison JD. Dermoid cyst of 21. Abrams AM, Cornyn J, Scofield HH, et al. Acinic cell
the parotid gland. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 27(6): adenocarcinoma of the major salivary glands. A clinico-
461–462. pathologic study of 77 cases. Cancer 1965; 18(9):1145–1162.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 629
22. Chong GC, Beahrs OH, Woolner LB. Surgical management 44. Sakurai K, Urade M, Noguchi K, et al. Increased expression
of acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland. Surg Gynecol of cyclooxygenase-2 in human salivary gland tumors.
Obstet 1974; 138(1):65–68. Pathol Int 2001; 51(10):762–769.
23. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Acinic cell carcinoma of 45. Heikinheimo KA, Laine MA, Ritvos OV, et al. Bone mor-
salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 67 cases. phogenetic protein-6 is a marker of serous acinar cell
Cancer 1978; 41(3):924–935. differentiation in normal and neoplastic human salivary
24. Abrams AM, Melrose RJ. Acinic cell tumors of minor gland. Cancer Res 1999; 59(22):5815–5821.
salivary gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 46. Jeannon JP, Soames JV, Bell H, et al. Immunohistochemical
1978; 46(2):220–233. detection of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in salivary
25. Colmenero C, Patron M, Sierra I. Acinic cell carcinoma of tumours. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999; 24(1): 52–54.
the salivary glands. A review of 20 new cases. J Cranio- 47. Tazawa K, Kurihara Y, Kamoshida S, et al. Localization of
maxillofac Surg 1991; 19(6):260–266. prostate-specific antigen-like immunoreactivity in human
26. Ellis GL. Clear cell neoplasms in salivary glands: clearly a salivary gland and salivary gland tumors. Pathol Int 1999;
diagnostic challenge. Ann Diagn Pathol 1998; 2(1):61–78. 49(6):500–505.
27. Chaudhry AP, Cutler LS, Leifer C, et al. Histogenesis of 48. Prasad AR, Savera AT, Gown AM, et al. The myoepithelial
acinic cell carcinoma of the major and minor salivary glands. immunophenotype in 135 benign and malignant salivary
An ultrastructural study. J Pathol 1986; 148(4):307–320. gland tumors other than pleomorphic adenoma. Arch
28. Whitlatch SP. Psammoma bodies in fine-needle aspiration Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123(9):801–806.
biopsies of acinic cell tumor. Diagn Cytopathol 1986; 2(3): 49. Bilal H, Handra-Luca A, Bertrand JC, et al. P63 is expressed
268–269. in basal and myoepithelial cells of human normal and
29. Mukunyadzi P, Bardales RH, Palmer HE, et al. Tissue tumor salivary gland tissues. J Histochem Cytochem
effects of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration. Does this 2003; 51(2):133–139.
procedure preclude accurate histologic diagnosis? Am J 50. Gürbüz Y, Yildiz K, Aydin O, et al. Immunophenotypical
Clin Pathol 2000; 114(5):741–745. profiles of salivary gland tumours: a new evidence for their
30. Auclair PL. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation in histogenetic origin. Pathologica 2006; 98(2):147–152.
the parotid gland. A potential diagnostic pitfall. Oral 51. Gnepp DR, Brandwein MS, Henley JD. Salivary and lacri-
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77(1):19–26. mal glands: acinic cell carcinoma. In: Gnepp DR, ed.
31. Michal M, Skálová A, Simpson RHW, et al: Well differenti- Diagnostic Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck.
ated acinic cell carcinoma of salivary glands associated Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001:376–379.
with lymphoid stroma. Hum Pathol 1997; 28(5):595–600. 52. Ihrler S, Blasenbreu-Vogt S, Sendelhofert A, et al. Differen-
32. Stanley RJ, Weiland LH, Olsen KD, et al. Dedifferentiated tial diagnosis of salivary acinic cell carcinoma and adeno-
acinic cell (acinous) carcinoma of the parotid gland. Oto- carcinoma (NOS). A comparison of immuno-histochemical
laryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 98(2):155–161. markers. Pathol Res Pract 2002; 198(12):777–783.
33. Henley JD, Geary WA, Jackson C, et al. Dedifferentiated 53. Sandros J, Mark J, Happonen RP, et al. Specificity of
acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland: a distinctive 6q- markers and other recurrent deviations in human
rarely described entity. Hum Pathol 1997; 28(7):869–873. malignant salivary gland tumors. Anticancer Res 1988; 8(4):
34. Di Palma S, Corletto V, Lavarino C, et al. Unilateral 637–643.
aneuploid dedifferentiated acinic cell carcinoma associated 54. Martins C, Fonseca I, Roque L, et al. Malignant salivary
with bilateral low grade diploid acinic cell carcinoma of the gland neoplasms: a cytogenetic study of 19 cases. Eur J
parotid gland. Virchows Arch 1999; 434(4):361–365. Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(2):128–132.
35. Timon CI, Dardick I. The importance of dedifferentiation in 55. Jin C, Jin Y, Höglund M, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular
recurrent acinic cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115(8): genetic demonstration of polyclonality in an acinic cell
639–644. carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1998; 78(3):292–295.
36. Piana S, Cavazza A, Pedroni C, et al. Dedifferentiated 56. el-Naggar AK, Abdul-Karim FW, Hurr K, et al. Genetic
acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland with myoepithe- alterations in acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland
lial features. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126(9):1104–1105. determined by microsatellite analysis. Cancer Genet Cyto-
37. Henley JD, Rehan J, Oda D, et al. Metaplastic tumors of genet 1998; 102(1):19–24.
salivary gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral 57. Liu T, Zhu E, Wang L, et al. Abnormal expression of Rb
Radiol Endod 1997; 8: 197–188 (abstr). pathway-related proteins in salivary gland acinic cell car-
38. Seifert G, Caselitz J. Tumor markers in parotid gland cinoma. Hum Pathol 2005; 36(9):962–970.
carcinomas: immunohistochemical investigations. Cancer 58. Cerilli LA, Swartzbaugh JR, Saadut R, et al. Analysis of
Detect Prev 1983; 6(1–2):119–130. chromosome 9p21 deletion and p16 gene mutation in sali-
39. Takahashi H, Fujita S, Okabe H, et al. Distribution of tissue vary gland carcinomas. Hum Pathol 1999; 30(10):1242–1246.
markers in acinic cell carcinomas of salivary gland. Pathol 59. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Weiland LH. Acinic cell carcinoma.
Res Pract 1992; 188(6):692–700. Clinicopathologic review. Cancer 1991; 67(1):172–179.
40. Caselitz J, Seifert G, Grenner G, et al. Amylase as an 60. Hickman RE, Cawson RA, Duffy SW. The prognosis of
additional marker of salivary gland neoplasms. An immu- specific types of salivary gland tumors. Cancer 1984; 54
noperoxidase study. Pathol Res Pract 1983; 176(2–4): 276–283. (8):1620–1624.
41. Childers EL, Ellis GL, Auclair PL. An immunohistochemi- 61. Perzin KH, LiVolsi VA. Acinic cell carcinomas arising in
cal analysis of anti-amylase antibody reactivity in acinic salivary glands: a clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1979; 44
cell adenocarcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral (4):1434–1457.
Radiol Endod 1996; 81(6):691–694. 62. Chen SY, Brannon RB, Miller AS, et al. Acinic cell adeno-
42. Hamper K, Schmitz-Wätjen W, Mausch HE, et al. Multiple carcinoma of minor salivary glands. Cancer 1978; 42(2):
expression of tissue markers in mucoepidermoid carcinomas 678–685.
and acinic cell carcinomas of the salivary glands. Virchows 63. Castellanos JL, Lally ET. Acinic cell tumor of the minor
Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1989; 414(5): 407–413. salivary glands. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982; 40(7):428–431.
43. Hayashi Y, Nishida T, Yoshida H, et al. Immunoreactive 64. Gardner DG, Bell ME, Wesley RK, et al. Acinic cell tumors
vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in acinic cell carcinoma of of minor salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
the parotid gland. Cancer 1987; 60(5):962–968. 1980; 50(6):545–551.
630 Eveson and Nagao
65. Zbaeren P, Lehmann W, Widgren S. Acinic cell carcinoma literature and discussion of the relationship to mucoepi-
of minor salivary gland origin. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105(9): dermoid, sialodontogenic, and glandular odontogenic
782–785. cysts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48(8):871–877.
66. Batsakis JG, Luna MA, el-Naggar AK. Histopathologic 11. Brookstone MS, Huvos AG. Central salivary gland tumors
grading of salivary gland neoplasms: II. Acinic cell carci- of the maxilla and mandible: a clinicopathologic study of
nomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(11):929–933. 11 cases with an analysis of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac
67. Timon CI, Dardick I, Panzarella T, et al. Clinico-pathological Surg 1992; 50(3):229–236.
predictors of recurrence for acinic cell carcinoma. Clin 12. Martı́nez-Madrigal F, Pineda-Daboin K, Casiraghi O, et al.
Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995; 20(5):396–401. Salivary gland tumors of the mandible. Ann Diagn Pathol
68. Skálová A, Leivo I, Boguslawsky K, et al. Cell proliferation 2000; 4(6):347–353.
correlates with prognosis in acinic cell carcinomas of sali- 13. Pires FR, Chen SY, da Cruz Perez DE, et al. Cytokeratin
vary gland origin. Immunohistochemical study of 30 cases expression in central mucoepidermoid carcinoma
using the MIB 1 antibody in formalin-fixed paraffin sec- and glandular odontogenic cyst. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(5):
tions. J Pathol 1994; 173(1):13–21. 545–551.
69. Hellquist HB, Sundelin K, Di Bacco A, et al. Tumor growth 14. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. Histopathological
fraction and apoptosis in salivary gland acinic cell carcino- studies on parotid gland tumors in Japanese children.
mas: prognostic implications of Ki-67 and bcl-2 expression Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1980; 388(3):
and of in situ end labelling (TUNEL). J Pathol 1997; 181(3): 263–272.
323–329. 15. Guzzo M, Ferrari A, Marcon I, et al. Salivary gland neo-
70. Hamper K, Mausch HE, Caselitz J, et al. Acinic cell plasms in children: the experience of the Istituto Nazionale
carcinoma of the salivary glands: the prognostic relevance Tumori of Milan. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006; 47(6):806–810.
of DNA cytophotometry in a retrospective study of long 16. Saku T, Hayashi Y, Takahara O, et al. Salivary gland
duration (1965-1987). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; tumors among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1987. Cancer
69(1):68–75. 1997; 79(8):1465–1475.
71. el-Naggar AK, Batsakis JG, Luna MA, et al. DNA flow 17. Whatley WS, Thompson JW, Rao B. Salivary gland tumors
cytometry of acinic cell carcinomas of major salivary in survivors of childhood cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck
glands. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104(5):410–416. Surg 2006; 134(3):385–388.
72. Gustafsson H, Lindholm C, Carlsöö B. DNA cytophotome- 18. Ogawa I, Nikai H, Takata T, et al. Clear-cell variant of
try of acinic cell carcinoma and its relation to prognosis. mucoepidermoid carcinoma: report of a case with immu-
Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 104(3–4):370–376. nohistochemical and ultrastructural observations. J Oral
73. Timon CI, Dardick I, Panzarella T, et al. Acinic cell carci- Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50(8):906–910.
noma of salivary glands. Prognostic relevance of DNA flow 19. Ellis GL. Clear cell neoplasms in salivary glands: clearly a
cytometry and nucleolar organizer regions. Arch Otolar- diagnostic challenge. Ann Diagn Pathol 1998; 2(1):61–78.
yngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120(7):727–733. 20. Brannon RB, Willard CC. Oncocytic mucoepidermoid car-
cinoma of parotid gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96(6):727–733.
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
21. Corcione L, Giordano G, Gnetti L, et al. Oncocytic mucoe-
1. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. In: Atlas pidermoid carcinoma of a submandibular gland: a case
of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd report and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac
series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute Surg 2007; 36(6):560–563.
of Pathology, 1996:155–175. 22. Takeda Y, Kurose A. Pigmented mucoepidermoid carcino-
2. Goode RK, El-Naggar AK. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma. In: ma, a case report and review of the literature on melanin-
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health pigmented salivary gland tumors. J Oral Sci 2006; 48
Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and (4):253–256.
Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 23. Chan JK, Saw D. Sclerosing mucoepidermoid tumour of
2005:219–220. the parotid gland: report of a case. Histopathology 1987; 11
3. Stewart FW, Foote FW, Becker WF. Mucoepidermoid (2):203–207.
tumors of salivary glands. Ann Surg 1945; 122(5):820–844. 24. Urano M, Abe M, Horibe Y, et al. Sclerosing mucoepider-
4. Foote FW, Frazell EI. Tumors of the major salivary glands. moid carcinoma with eosinophilia of the salivary glands.
Cancer 1953; 6(6):1065–1133. Pathol Res Pract 2002; 198(4):305–310.
5. Thackray AC, Sobin LH. World Health Organization Inter- 25. Veras EF, Sturgis E, Luna MA. Sclerosing mucoepidermoid
national Histological Classification of Tumours: Histologi- carcinoma of the salivary glands. Ann Diagn Pathol 2007;
cal Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours. Berlin: Springer- 11(6):407–412.
Verlag, 1972. 26. Auclair PL. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation in
6. Seifert G, Sobin LH. World Health Organization Interna- the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;
tional Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic 77(1):19–26.
Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer- 27. Healey WV, Perzin KH, Smith L. Mucoepidermoid
Verlag, 1991. carcinoma of salivary gland origin: classification, clinical-
7. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Berk R, et al. Mucoepidermoid pathologic correlation, and results of treatment. Cancer
carcinoma of salivary gland origin: a clinicopathologic 1970; 26(2):368–388.
study of 367 cases. Am J Surg 1978; 136(4):461–468. 28. Batsakis JG, Luna MA. Histopathologic grading of salivary
8. Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Salivary gland tumours. A review gland neoplasms: I. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Ann
of 2410 cases with particular reference to histological types, Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(10 pt1):835–838.
site, age and sex distribution. J Pathol 1985; 146(1):51–58. 29. Auclair PL, Goode RK, Ellis GL. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma
9. Daniel E, McGuirt WF Sr. Neck masses secondary to of intraoral salivary glands: evaluation and application of
heterotopic salivary gland tissue: a 25-year experience. grading criteria in 143 cases. Cancer 1992; 69(8):
Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26(2):96–100. 2021–2030.
10. Waldron CA, Koh ML. Central mucoepidermoid carcino- 30. Hicks MJ, El-Naggar AK, Flaitz CM, et al. Histocytologic
ma of the jaws: report of four cases with analysis of the grading of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of major salivary
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 631
glands in prognosis and survival: a clinicopathologic and 49. Alos L, Lujan B, Castillo M, et al. Expression of membrane-
flow cytometric investigation. Head Neck 1995; 17(2):89–95. bound mucins (MUC1 and MUC4) and secreted mucins
31. Goode RK, Auclair PL, Ellis GL. Mucoepidermoid carcino- (MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6 and MUC7) in mucoe-
ma of the major salivary glands: clinical and histopatho- pidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Am J Surg Pathol
logic analysis of 234 cases with evaluation of grading 2005; 29(6):806–813.
criteria. Cancer 1998; 82(7):1217–1224. 50. Nikitakis NG, Tosios KI, Papanikolaou VS, et al. Immuno-
32. Brandwein MS, Ivanov K, Wallace DI, et al. Mucoepider- histochemical expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in
moid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 80 patients malignant salivary gland tumors. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(4):
with special reference to histologic grading. Am J Surg 407–415.
Pathol 2001; 25(7):835–845. 51. Maiorano E, Altini M, Favia G. Clear cell tumors of the
33. Luna MA. Salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: revisited. salivary glands, jaws and oral mucosa. Semin Diagn Pathol
Adv Anat Pathol 2006; 13(6):293–307. 1997; 14(3):203–212.
34. Guzzo M, Andreola S, Sirizzotti G, et al. Mucoepidermoid 52. Hicks MJ, El-Naggar AK, Byers RM, et al. Prognostic
carcinoma of the salivary glands: clinicopathologic review factors in mucoepidermoid carcinomas of major salivary
of 108 patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of glands: a clinicopathologic and flow cytometric study. Eur
Milan. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9(7):688–695. J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1994; 30B(5):329–334.
35. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Kay PA, et al. Dedifferentiation in 53. Skalova A, Lehtonen H, von Boguslawsky K, et al. Prog-
low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid nostic significance of cell proliferation in mucoepidermoid
gland. Hum Pathol 2003; 34(10):1068–1072. carcinomas of the salivary gland: clinicopathological study
36. Love GL, Sarma DP. Spindle cell mucoepidermoid carcino- using MIB 1 antibody in paraffin sections. Hum Pathol
ma of submandibular gland. J Surg Oncol 1986; 31(1):66–68. 1994; 25(9):929–935.
37. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Mucoepidermoid 54. Okabe M, Inagaki H, Murase T, et al. Prognostic signifi-
carcinoma arising in Warthin’s tumour of the parotid cance of p27 and Ki-67 expression in mucoepidermoid
gland: report of two cases with histopathological, ultra- carcinoma of the intraoral minor salivary gland. Mod
structural and immunohistochemical studies. Histopathol- Pathol 2001; 14(10):1008–1014.
ogy 1998; 33(4):379–386. 55. Nguyen LH, Black MJ, Hier M, et al. HER2/neu and Ki-67
38. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic as prognostic indicators in mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
adenoma: pathologic analysis of 73 cases. Hum Pathol J Otolaryngol 2003; 32(5):328–331.
2001; 32(6):596–604. 56. Pires FR, de Almeida OP, de Araújo VC, et al. Prognostic
39. Seifert G. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a salivary duct factors in head and neck mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Arch
cyst of the parotid gland. Contribution to the development Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130(2):174–180.
of tumours in salivary gland cysts. Pathol Res Pract 1996; 57. Yin HF, Okada N, Takagi M. Apoptosis and apoptotic-
192(12):1211–1217. related factors in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the oral
40. Rizkalla H, Toner M. Necrotizing sialometaplasia versus minor salivary glands. Pathol Int 2000; 50(8):603–609.
invasive carcinoma of the head and neck: the use of 58. Shi L, Chen XM, Wang L, et al. Expression of caveolin-1 in
myoepithelial markers and keratin subtypes as an adjunct mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands: corre-
to diagnosis. Histopathology 2007; 51(2):184–189. lation with vascular endothelial growth factor, microvessel
41. El-Naggar AK, Lovell M, Killary AM, et al. A mucoepi- density, and clinical outcome. Cancer 2007; 109(8):
dermoid carcinoma of minor salivary gland with t(11;19) 1523–1531.
(q21;p13.1) as the only karyotypic abnormality. Cancer 59. Shiratsuchi H, Nakashima T, Hirakawa N, et al. b-Catenin
Genet Cytogenet 1996; 87(1):29–33. nuclear accumulation in head and neck mucoepidermoid
42. Behboudi A, Enlund F, Winnes M, et al. Molecular classifi- carcinoma: its role in cyclin D1 overexpression and tumor
cation of mucoepidermoid carcinomas-prognostic signifi- progression. Head Neck 2007; 29(6):577–584.
cance of the MECT1-MAML2 fusion oncogene. Genes
Chromosomes Cancer 2006; 45(5):470–481.
43. Okabe M, Miyabe S, Nagatsuka H, et al. MECT1-MAML2 Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
fusion transcript defines a favorable subset of mucoepider-
moid carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12(13):3902–3907. 1. El-Naggar AK, Huvos AG. Adenoid cystic carcinoma. In:
44. Tirado Y, Williams MD, Hanna EY, et al. CRTC1/MAML2 Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health
fusion transcript in high grade mucoepidermoid carcino- Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and
mas of salivary and thyroid glands and Warthin’s tumors: Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
implications for histogenesis and biologic behavior. Genes 2005:221–222.
Chromosomes Cancer 2007; 46(7):708–715. 2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, et al. Salivary gland
45. Tonon G, Modi S, Wu L, et al. t(11;19)(q21;p13) transloca- neoplasms: general considerations. In: Ellis GL, Auclair
tion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma creates a novel fusion PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary
product that disrupts a Notch signaling pathway. Nat Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:144–145.
Genet 2003; 33(2):208–213. 3. Tomich CE. Adenoid cystic carcinoma. In: Ellis GL, Auclair
46. Möller E, Stenman G, Mandahl N, et al. POU5F1, encoding a PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary
key regulator of stem cell pluripotency, is fused to EWSR1 in Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:333–349.
hidradenoma of the skin and mucoepidermoid carcinoma of 4. Jones DC, Bainton R. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the
the salivary glands. J Pathol 2008; 215(1):78–86. palate in a 9-year-old boy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
47. Kaye FJ. Emerging biology of malignant salivary gland 1990; 69(4):483–486.
tumors offers new insights into the classification and 5. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Adenoid cystic carcinoma. In: Atlas of
treatment of mucoepidermoid cancer. Clin Cancer Res Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd
2006; 12(13):3878–3881. series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute
48. Handra-Luca A, Lamas G, Bertrand JC, et al. MUC1, of Pathology, 1996:203–216.
MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC expression in salivary 6. Matsuba HM, Thawley SE, Simpson JR, et al. Adenoid
gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: diagnostic and prog- cystic carcinoma of major and minor salivary gland origin.
nostic implications. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29(7):881–889. Laryngoscope 1984; 94(10):1316–1318.
632 Eveson and Nagao
7. Nascimento AG, Amaral AL, Prado LA, et al. Adenoid cystic 29. Zámecnı́k M, Michal M, Curı́k R. Adenoid cystic carcinoma
carcinoma of salivary glands. A study of 61 cases with of the ovary. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(10):1529–1531.
clinicopathologic correlation. Cancer 1986; 57(2):312–319. 30. Woida FM, Ribeiro-Silva A. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of
8. Perzin KH, Gullane P, Clairmont AC. Adenoid cystic the Bartholin gland: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med
carcinomas arising in salivary glands: a correlation of 2007; 131(5):796–798.
histologic features and clinical course. Cancer 1978; 42(1): 31. Begnami MD, Quezado M, Pinto P, et al. Adenoid cystic/
265–282. basal cell carcinoma of the prostate: review and update.
9. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Adenoid cystic carcino- Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131(4):637–640.
ma of salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 242 32. Warren CJ, Gnepp DR, Rosenblum BN. Adenoid cystic
cases. Am J Surg 1974; 128(4):512–520. carcinoma metastasizing before detection of the primary
10. Cohen AN, Damrose EJ, Huang RY, et al. Adenoid cystic lesion. South Med J 1989; 82(10):1277–1279.
carcinoma of the submandibular gland: a 35-year review. 33. Wal van der JE, Snow GB, Karim AB, et al. Adenoid cystic
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131(6):994–1000. carcinoma of the palate with squamous metaplasia or
11. Gnepp DR, Brandwein MS, Henley JD. Salivary and lacrimal basaloid-squamous carcinoma? Report of a case. J Oral
glands. In: Gnepp DR, eds. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology of Pathol Med 1994; 23(10):461–464.
the Head and Neck. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000:380. 34. Cramer SF, Gnepp DR, Kiehn CL, et al. Sebaceous differ-
12. Spiro RH, Huvos AG. Stage means more than grade in entiation in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland.
adenoid cystic carcinoma. Am J Surg 1992; 164(6):623–628. Cancer 1980; 46(6):1405–1410.
13. Conley J, Caster JD. Adenoid Cystic Cancer of the Head 35. Moles MA, Avila IR, Archilla AR. Dedifferentiation
and Neck. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1991. occurring in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the tongue. Oral
14. Garden AS, Weber RS, Morrison WH, et al. The influence Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88(2):
of positive margins and nerve invasion in adenoid cystic 177–180.
carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and 36. Cheuk W, Chan JK, Ngan RK. Dedifferentiation in adenoid
radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32(3):619–626. cystic carcinoma of salivary gland: an uncommon compli-
15. Kim KH, Sung MW, Chung PS, et al. Adenoid cystic cation associated with an accelerated clinical course. Am J
carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Surg Pathol 1999; 23(4):465–472.
Neck Surg 1994; 120(7):721–726. 37. Chau Y, Hongyo T, Aozasa K, et al. Dedifferentiation of
16. Yu T, Gao QH, Wang XY, et al. Malignant sublingual gland adenoid cystic carcinoma: report of a case implicating p53
tumors: a retrospective clinicopathologic study of 28 cases. gene mutation. Hum Pathol 2001; 32(12):1403–1407.
Oncology 2007; 72(1-2):39–44. 38. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Serizawa H, et al. Dedifferentiated
17. Spiro RH, Koss LG, Hajdu SI, et al. Tumors of minor adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 6
salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 492 cases. cases. Mod Pathol 2003; 16(12):1265–1272.
Cancer 1973; 31(1):117–129. 39. Seethala RR, Hunt JL, Baloch ZW, et al. Adenoid cystic
18. Lupinetti AD, Roberts DB, Williams MD, et al. Sinonasal carcinoma with high-grade transformation: a report of 11
adenoid cystic carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;
Center experience. Cancer 2007; 110(12):2726–2731. 31(11):1683–1694.
19. Al-Sukhun J, Lindqvist C, Hietanen J, et al. Central adenoid 40. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Hybrid carcinomas of
cystic carcinoma of the mandible: case report and literature the salivary glands: report of nine cases with a clinicopath-
review of 16 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral ologic, immunohistochemical, and p53 gene alteration
Radiol Endod 2006; 101(3):304–308. analysis. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(7):724–733.
20. Friedrich RE, Bleckmann V. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of 41. Azzopardi JG, Zayid I. Elastic tissue in tumours of salivary
salivary and lacrimal gland origin: localization, classifica- glands. J Pathol 1972; 107(3):149–156.
tion, clinical pathological correlation, treatment results and 42. Adkins KF, Daley TJ. Elastic tissue in adenoid cystic
long-term follow-up control in 84 patients. Anticancer Res carcinomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38
2003; 23(2A):931–940. (4):562–569.
21. Garbyal RS, Kumar M, Bohra A. Adenoid cystic carcinoma 43. Albores-Saavedra J, Wu J, Uribe-Uribe N. The sclerosing
of ceruminous gland: a case report. Indian J Pathol Micro- variant of adenoid cystic carcinoma: a previously unrecog-
biol 2006; 49(4):587–589. nized neoplasm of major salivary glands. Ann Diagn
22. Karaoglanoglu N, Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, et al. Oesopha- Pathol 2006; 10(1):1–7.
geal adenoid cystic carcinoma and its management 44. Allen MS Jr., Marsh WL Jr. Lymph node involvement by
options. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59(9):1101–1103. direct extension in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Absence of
23. Hajdu SI, Huvos AG, Goodner JT, et al. Carcinoma of the classic embolic lymph node metastasis. Cancer 1976; 38
trachea. Clinicopathologic study of 41 cases. Cancer 1970; (5):2017–2021.
25(6):1448–1456. 45. Cheng J, Saku T, Okabe H, et al. Basement membranes in
24. Azukari K, Yoshioka K, Seto S, et al. Adenoid cystic adenoid cystic carcinoma. An immunohistological study.
carcinoma arising in the intrapulmonary bronchus. Intern Cancer 1992; 69(11):2631–2640.
Med 1996; 35(5):407–409. 46. Kumamoto M, Kuratomi Y, Yasumatsu R, et al. Expression
25. Yokouchi H, Otsuka Y, Otoguro Y, et al. Primary peripheral of laminin 5 basement membrane components in invading
adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung and literature and recurring adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and
comparison of features. Intern Med 2007; 46(21):1799–1803. neck. Auris Nasus Larynx 2006; 33(2):167–172.
26. Muslimani AA, Ahluwalia MS, Clark CT, et al. Primary 47. Chen JC, Gnepp DR, Bedrossian CW. Adenoid cystic carci-
adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: case report and noma of the salivary glands: an immunohistochemical anal-
review of the literature. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2006; 3:17. ysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65(3):316–326.
27. Urso C, Bondi R, Paglierani M, et al. Carcinomas of sweat 48. Jeng YM, Lin CY, Hsu HC. Expression of the c-kit protein is
glands: report of 60 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125 associated with certain subtypes of salivary gland carcinoma.
(4):498–505. Cancer Lett 2000; 154(1):107–111.
28. Koyfman SA, Abidi A, Ravichandran P, et al. Adenoid 49. Edwards PC, Bhuiya T, Kelsch RD. C-kit expression in the
cystic carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99(2): salivary gland neoplasms adenoid cystic carcinoma, poly-
477–480. morphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, and monomorphic
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 633
adenoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 68. Rutherford S, Hampton GM, Frierson HF, et al. Mapping of
Endod 2003; 95(5):586–593. candidate tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 12 in
50. Mino M, Pilch BZ, Faquin WC. Expression of KIT (CD117) adenoid cystic carcinoma. Lab Invest 2005; 85(9):1076–1085.
in neoplasms of the head and neck: an ancillary marker 69. Maruya S, Kurotaki H, Shimoyama N, et al. Expression of
for adenoid cystic carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2003; 16(12): p16 protein and hypermethylation status of its promoter
1224–1231. gene in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck.
51. Emanuel P, Wang B, Wu M, et al. p63 Immunohistochem- ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2003; 65(1):26–32.
istry in the distinction of adenoid cystic carcinoma from 70. Li J, El-Naggar A, Mao L. Promoter methylation of
basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2005; 18 p16INK4a, RASSF1A, and DAPK is frequent in salivary
(5):645–650. adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 104(4):771–776.
52. Prasad AR, Savera AT, Gown AM, et al. The myoepithelial 71. Papadaki H, Finkelstein SD, Kounelis S, et al. The role of
immunophenotype in 135 benign and malignant salivary p53 mutation and protein expression in primary and
gland tumors other than pleomorphic adenoma. Arch recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1996; 27(6):
Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123(9):801–806. 567–572.
53. Prasad ML, Barbacioru CC, Rawal YB, et al. Hierarchical 72. Kiyoshima T, Shima K, Kobayashi I, et al. Expression of
cluster analysis of myoepithelial/basal cell markers in p53 tumor suppressor gene in adenoid cystic and mucoe-
adenoid cystic carcinoma and polymorphous low-grade pidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Oral Oncol 2001;
adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 2008; 21(2):105–114. 27(3):315–322.
54. Luo X-L, Sun M-Y, Lu C-T, et al. The role of Schwann cell 73. Yamamoto Y, Virmani AK, Wistuba II, et al. Loss of
differentiation in perineural invasion of adenoid cystic and heterozygosity and microsatellite alterations in p53 and
mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary gland. Int J RB genes in adenoid cystic carcinomas of the salivary
Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35(8):733–739. glands. Hum Pathol 1996; 27(11):1204–1210.
55. Shang J, Sheng L, Wang K, et al. Expression of neural cell 74. Daa T, Kashima K, Kondo Y, et al. Aberrant methylation in
adhesion molecule in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma promoter regions of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor
and its correlation with perineural invasion. Oncol Rep genes in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland.
2007; 18(6):1413–1416. APMIS 2008; 116(1):21–26.
56. Yamamoto Y, Wistuba II, Kishimoto Y, et al. DNA analysis 75. Kamsamatsu A, Endo Y, Uzawa K, et al. Identification of
at p53 locus in adenoid cystic carcinoma: comparison of candidate genes associated with salivary adenoid cystic
molecular study and p53 immunostaining. Pathol Int 1998; carcinomas using combined comparative genomic hybrid-
48(4):273–280. ization and oligonucleotide microarray analyses. Int J Bio-
57. Carlinfante G, Lazzaretti M, Ferrari S, et al. p53, bcl-2 and chem Cell Biol 2005; 37(9):1869–1880.
Ki-67 expression in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the palate. 76. Castle JT, Thompson LD, Frommelt RA, et al. Polymor-
A clinico-pathologic study of 21 cases with long-term phous low grade adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic
follow-up. Pathol Res Pract 2005; 200(11–12):791–799. study of 164 cases. Cancer 1999; 86(2):207–219.
58. da Cruz Perez DE, de Abreu Alves F, Nobuko Nishimoto I, 77. Gnepp DR, Chen JC, Warren C. Polymorphous low-grade
et al. Prognostic factors in head and neck carcinoma. Oral adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland. An immunohis-
Oncol 2006; 42(2):139–146. tochemical and clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol
59. Woo VL, Bhuiya T, Kelsch R. Assessment of CD43 expres- 1988; 12(6):461–468.
sion in adenoid cystic carcinomas, polymorphous low- 78. Skalova A, Simpson RH, Lehtonen H, et al. Assessment of
grade carcinomas, and monomorphic adenomas. Oral proliferative activity using the MIB1 antibody help to
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 2006; 102 distinguish polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma
(4):495–500. from adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands. Pathol
60. Seethala RR, Pasha TL, Raghunath PN, et al. The selective Res Pract 1997; 193(10):695–703.
expression of CD43 in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Appl 79. Aslan DL, Oprea GM, Jagush SM, et al. c-kit expression in
Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2008; 16(2):165–172. adenoid cystic carcinoma does not have an impact on
61. Sandros J, Mark J, Happonen RP, et al. Specificity of 6q- local or distant tumor recurrence. Head Neck 2005; 27(12):
markers and other recurrent deviations in human malignant 1028–1034.
salivary gland tumors. Anticancer Res 1988; 8(4):637–643. 80. Ogawa I, Miyauchi M, Matsuura H, et al. Pleomorphic
62. Jin C, Martins C, Jin Y, et al. Characterization of chromo- adenoma with extensive adenoid cystic carcinoma-like
some aberrations in salivary gland tumors by FISH, includ- cribriform areas of parotid gland. Pathol Int 2003; 53
ing multicolor COBRA-FISH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (1):30–34.
2001; 30(2):161–167. 81. Spiro R. The controversial adenoid cystic carcinoma. Is this
63. Nordkvist A, Mark J, Gustafsson H, et al. Non-random cancer curable and where does it fail? The nature of
chromosome rearrangements in adenoid cystic carcinoma adenoid cystic carcinoma. In: McGurk M, Renehan A,
of the salivary glands. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1994; eds. Controversies in The Management of Salivary Gland
10(2):115–121. Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002:207–211.
64. El-Rifai W, Rutherford S, Knuutila S, et al. Novel DNA 82. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Adenoid cystic carcinoma:
copy number losses in chromosome 12q12–q13 in adenoid factors influencing survival. Am J Surg 1979; 138(4):
cystic carcinoma. Neoplasia 2001; 3(3):173–178. 579–583.
65. Stallmach I, Zenklusen P, Komminoth P, et al. Loss of 83. Szanto PA, Luna MA, Tortoledo ME, et al. Histologic
heterozygosity at chromosome 6q23-25 correlates with grading of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands.
clinical and histologic parameters in salivary gland ade- Cancer 1984; 54(6):1062–1069.
noid cystic carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2002; 440(1):77–84. 84. Batsakis JG, Luna MA, el-Naggar A. Histopathologic grad-
66. Queimado L, Reis A, Fonseca I, et al. A refined localization ing of salivary gland neoplasms: III. Adenoid cystic carci-
of two deleted regions in chromosome 6q associated with nomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(12):1007–1009.
salivary gland carcinomas. Oncogene 1998; 16(1):83–88. 85. Fordice J, Kershaw C, El-Naggar A, et al. Adenoid cystic
67. Rutherford S, Yu Y, Rumpel CA, et al. Chromosome 6 carcinoma of the head and neck: predictors of morbidity
deletion and candidate tumor suppressor genes in adenoid and mortality. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;
cystic carcinoma. Cancer Lett 2006; 236(2):309–317. 125(2):149–152.
634 Eveson and Nagao
86. Jones AS, Hamilton JW, Rowley H, et al. Adenoid cystic 8. Michal M, Skálová A, Simpson RHW, et al. Cribriform
carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Otolaryngol Allied adenocarcinoma of the tongue: a hitherto unrecognized
Sci 1997; 22(5):434–443. type of adenocarcinoma characteristically occurring in the
87. Luna MA, el-Naggar A, Batsakis JG, et al. Flow cytometric tongue. Histopathology 1999; 35(6):495–501.
DNA content of adenoid cystic carcinoma of submandibu- 9. Aberle AM, Abrams AM, Bowe R, et al. Lobular (polymor-
lar gland. Correlation of histologic features and prognosis. phous low-grade) carcinoma of minor salivary glands: a
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116(11):1291–1296. clinicopathologic study of twenty cases. Oral Surg Oral
88. Franzén G, Klausen OG, Grenko RT, et al. Adenoid cystic Med Oral Pathol 1985; 60(4):387–395.
carcinoma: DNA as a prognostic indicator. Laryngoscope 10. Vincent SD, Hammond HL, Finkelstein MW. Clinical
1991; 101(6 pt 1):669–673. and therapeutic features of polymorphous low-grade ade-
89. Tytor M, Gemryd P, Grenko R, et al. Adenoid cystic nocarcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77(1):
carcinoma: significance of DNA ploidy. Head Neck 1995; 41–47.
17(4):319–327. 11. Perez-Ordonez B, Linkov L, Huvos AG. Polymorphous
90. Nordgård S, Franzén G, Boysen M, et al. Ki-67 as a low-grade adenocarcinoma of minor salivary glands: a
prognostic marker in adenoid cystic carcinoma assessed study of 17 cases with emphasis on cell differentiation.
with the monoclonal antibody MIB1 in paraffin sections. Histopathology 1998; 32(11):521–529.
Laryngoscope 1997; 107(4):531–536. 12. Castle JT, Thompson LDR, Frommelt RA, et al. Polymor-
91. Barrett A, Speight P. The controversial adenoid cystic phous low-grade adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic
carcinoma. The implications of histological grade and study of 164 cases. Cancer 1999; 86(2):207–219.
perineural invasion. In: McGurk M, Renehan A, eds. Con- 13. Evans HL, Luna MA. Polymorphous low-grade adenocar-
troversies in The Management of Salivary Gland Disease. cinoma: a study of 40 cases with long-term follow up and
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002:211–217. an evaluation of the importance of papillary areas. Am J
92. Spiro RH. Distant metastasis in adenoid cystic carcinoma Surg Pathol 2000; 24(10):1319–1328.
of salivary origin. Am J Surg 1997; 174(5):495–498. 14. Paleri V, Robinson M, Bradley P. Polymorphous low-grade
93. Gurney TA, Eisele DW, Weinberg V, et al. Adenoid cystic adenocarcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolar-
carcinoma of the major salivary glands treated with sur- yngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16(2):163–169.
gery and radiation. Laryngoscope 2005; 115(7):1278–1282. 15. Selva D, Davis GJ, Dodd T, et al. Polymorphous low-grade
94. Gomez DR, Hoppe BS, Wolden SL, et al. Outcomes and adenocarcinoma of the lacrimal gland. Arch Ophthalmol
prognostic variables in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the 2004; 122(6):915–917.
head and neck: a recent experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 16. Wenig BM, Harpaz N, DelBridge C. Polymorphous low-
Phys 2008; 70(5):1365–1372. grade adenocarcinoma of seromucous glands of the naso-
95. Hotte SJ, Winquist EW, Lamont E, et al. Imatinib mesylate pharynx: a report of a case and a discussion of the
in patients with adenoid cystic cancers of the salivary morphologic and immunohistochemical features. Am J
glands expressing c-kit: a Princess Margaret Hospital Clin Pathol 1989; 92(1):104–109.
phase II consortium study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(3):585–590. 17. Toida M, Shimokawa K, Makita H, et al. Intraoral minor
96. Agulnik M, Cohen EW, Cohen RB, et al. Phase II study of salivary gland tumors: a clinicopathological study of 82
lapatinib in recurrent or metastatic epidermal growth factor cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34(5):528–532.
receptor and/or erbB2 expressing adenoid cystic carcinoma 18. Clayton JR, Pogrel A, Regezi JA. Simultaneous multifocal
and non adenoid cystic carcinoma malignant tumors of the polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma: report of two
salivary glands. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(25): 3978–3984. cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
1995; 80(1):71–77.
19. Tortoledo ME, Luna MA, Batsakis JG. Carcinomas ex
Polymorphous Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma
pleomorphic adenoma and malignant mixed tumors:
1. Evans HL, Batsakis JG. Polymorphous low-grade adeno- histomorphologic indexes. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110(3):
carcinoma of minor salivary glands: a study of 14 cases of a 172–176.
distinctive neoplasm. Cancer 1984; 53(4):935–942. 20. Foss R, Ellis G, Auclair P. Salivary gland cystadenocarci-
2. Batsakis JG, Pinkston GR, Luna MA, et al. Adenocarcino- nomas: a clinicopathologic study of 57 cases. Am J Surg
mas of the oral cavity: a clinicopathologic study of terminal Pathol 1996; 20(12):1440–1447.
duct adenocarcinomas. J Laryngol Otol 1983; 97(9):825–835. 21. Raubenheimer EJ, van Heerden WF, Thein T. Tyrosine-rich
3. Freedman PD, Lummerman H. Lobular carcinoma of crystalloids in a polymorphous low-grade adenocarcino-
intraoral minor salivary gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med ma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70(4):480–482.
Oral Pathol 1983; 56(2):157–165. 22. Pelkey TJ, Mills SE. Histologic transformation of polymor-
4. Luna MA, Wenig BM. Polymorphous low-grade adenocar- phous low-grade adenocarcinoma of salivary gland. Am J
cinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. Clin Pathol 1999; 111(6):785–791.
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: 23. Simpson RHW, Reis-Filho JS, Pereira EM, et al. Polymor-
Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. phous low- grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands
Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:223–224. with transformation to high-grade carcinoma. Histopathol-
5. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Polymorphous low-grade adenocarci- ogy 2002; 41(3):250–259.
noma. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Sali- 24. Gnepp DR, El-Mofty S. Polymorphous low-grade adeno-
vary Glands, 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: carcinoma: glial fibrillary acidic protein staining in the
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1996:216–228. differential diagnosis with cellular mixed tumors. Oral
6. Waldron CA, El-Mofty SK, Gnepp DR. Tumors of the Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83
intraoral minor salivary glands: a demographic and histo- (6):691–695.
logic study of 426 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 25. Araújo V, Sousa S, Jaeger M, et al. Characterization of the
1988; 66(3):323–333. cellular component of polymorphous low-grade adenocar-
7. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Kay PA, et al. Polymorphous low- cinoma by immunohistochemistry and electron microsco-
grade adenocarcinoma of the major salivary glands: report py. Oral Oncol 1999; 35(2):164–172.
of three cases in an unusual location. Histopathology 2004; 26. Curran AE, White DK, Damm DD, et al. Polymorphous
44(2):164–171. low-grade adenocarcinoma versus pleomorphic adenoma
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 635
of minor salivary glands: resolution of a diagnostic dilem- 13. Fonseca I, Soares J. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of
ma by immunohistochemical analysis with glial acidic the salivary glands. A study of 22 cases. Virchows Archiv
protein. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1993; 422(5):389–396.
Endod 2001; 91(2):194–199. 14. Seethala RR, Barnes EL, Hunt JL. Epithelial-myoepithelial
27. Prasad ML, Barbacioru CC, Rawal YB, et al. Hierarchical carcinoma: a review of the clinicopathologic spectrum and
cluster analysis of myoepithelial/basal cell markers in immunophenotypic characteristics in 61 tumors of the
adenoid cystic carcinoma and polymorphous low-grade salivary glands and upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg
adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 2008; 21(2):105–114. Pathol 2007; 31(1):44–57.
28. Skálová A, Simpson RH, Lehtonen H, et al. Assessment of 15. Morinaga S, Hashimoto S, Tezuka F. Epithelial-myoepithelial
proliferation activity using the MIB1 antibody help to carcinoma of the parotid gland in a child. Acta Pathol
distinguish polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma Jpn 1992; 42(5):358–363.
from adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands. Pathol 16. Horinouchi H, Ishihara T, Kawamura M, et al. Epithelial
Res Pract 1997; 193(10):695–703. myoepithelial tumour of the tracheal gland. J Clin Pathol
29. Penner CR, Folpe AL, Budnick SD. C-kit expression dis- 1993; 46(2):185–187.
tinguishes salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma from 17. Imate Y, Yamashita H, Endo S, et al. Epithelial-myoepithe-
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol lial carcinoma of the nasopharynx. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol
2002; 15(7):687–691. Relat Spec 2000; 62(5):282–285.
30. Edwards PC, Bhuiya T, Kelsch RD. C-kit expression in the 18. Pelosi G, Fraggetta F. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas
salivary gland neoplasms adenoid cystic carcinoma, poly- of the bronchus. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26(7):950–951.
morphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, and monomorphic 19. Doganay L, Bilgi S, Ozdil A, et al. Epithelial-myoepithelial
adenoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol carcinoma of the lung. A case report and review of the
Endod 2003; 95(5):586–593. literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127(4):177–180.
31. Slootweg PJ. Low-grade adenocarcinoma of the oral cavity: 20. Seifert G. Are adenomyoepithelioma of the breast and
polymorphous or papillary? J Oral Pathol Med 1993; 22(7): epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary glands
327–330. identical tumours? Virchows Arch 1998; 433(3):285–288.
21. Shinozaki A, Nagao T, Endo H, et al. Sebaceous Epithelial-
Myoepithelial Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland: clinico-
Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma
pathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of 6 Cases
1. Fonseca I, Soares J. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. In: of a New Histologic Variant. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, eds. World (6):913–923.
Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology 22. Alòs L, Carrillo R, Ramos J, et al. High-grade carcinoma
and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC component in epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of sali-
Press, 2005:225–226. vary glands. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical
2. Corridan M. Glycogen-rich clear-cell adenoma of the parotid and flow-cytometric study of three cases. Virchows Arch
gland. J Pathol Bacteriol 1956; 72:623–626. 1999; 434(4):291–299.
3. Saksela E, Tarkkanen J, Wartiovaara J. Parotid clear cell 23. Fonseca I, Felix A, Soares J. Dedifferentiation in salivary
adenoma of possible myoepithelial origin. Cancer 1972; gland carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24(3):469–471.
30(3):742–748. 24. Daa T, Kashima K, Gamachi A, Nakayama I, et al. Epithelial-
4. Goldman RL, Klein HZ. Glycogen-rich adenoma of the myoepithelial carcinoma harboring p53 mutation. APMIS
parotid gland. An uncommon benign clear-cell tumor 2001; 109(4):316–320.
resembling certain clear-cell carcinomas of salivary origin. 25. Kusafuka K, Takizawa Y, Ueno T et al. Dedifferentiated
Cancer 1972; 30(3):749–754. epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland: a
5. Batsakis JG. Clear cell tumors of salivary glands. Ann Otol rare case report of immunohistochemical analysis and
Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89(2 pt 1):196–197. review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
6. Mohamed AH, Cherrick HM. Glycogen-rich adenocarcino- Oral Radiol Endod 2008 [Epub ahead of print]
ma of minor salivary glands. A light and electron micros- 26. Daneshbod Y, Negahban S, Khademi B, et al. Epithelial
copy study. Cancer 1975; 36(3):1057–1066. myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland with malig-
7. Chen KT. Clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland. Hum nant ductal and myoepithelial components arising in a
Pathol 1983; 14(1):91–93. pleomorphic adenoma: a case report with cytologic, histo-
8. Corio RL, Sciubba JJ, Brannon RB, et al. Epithelial- logic and immunohistochemical correlation. Acta Cytol
myoepithelial carcinoma of intercalated duct origin: a 2007; 51(5):807–813.
clinicopathologic and ultrastructural assessment of sixteen 27. Seifert G, Donath K. Hybrid tumours of salivary glands.
cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53(3):280–287. Definition and classification of five rare cases. Eur J Cancer
9. Bauer WH, Fox RA. Adenomyoepithelioma (cylindroma) Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(4):251–259.
of palatal mucous glands. Arch Pathol 1945; 39:96–102. 28. Seifert G, Donath K. Multiple tumours of the salivary
10. Donath K, Seifert G, Schmitz R. [Diagnosis and ultrastruc- glands—terminology and nomenclature. Eur J Cancer
ture of the tubular carcinoma of salivary gland ducts. Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(1):3–7.
Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the intercalated 29. Grenko RT, Abendroth CS, Davis AT, et al. Hybrid
ducts] Virchows Arch A Pathol Pathol Anat 1972; 356(1): tumors or salivary gland tumors sharing common differ-
16–31. entiation pathways? Reexamining adenoid cystic
11. Luna MA, Ordonez NG, Mackay B, et al. Salivary carcinoma and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas.
epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas of intercalated ducts: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
a clinical, electron microscopic, and immunocytochemical 1998; 86(2):188–195.
study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 59(5):482–490. 30. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Hybrid carcinomas of
12. Cho KJA, El-Nagar AK, Ordonez NG, et al. Epithelial- the salivary glands: report of nine cases with a clinicopath-
myoepithelial carcinoma of salivary glands. A clinicopath- ologic, immunohistochemical, and p53 gene alteration
ologic, DNA flow cytometric, and immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(7):724–733.
study of Ki-67 and HER-2/neu oncogene. Am J Clin Pathol 31. Chetty R, Medley P, Essa A. Hybrid carcinomas of salivary
1995; 103(4):432–437. glands. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(4):494–496.
636 Eveson and Nagao
32. Croitoru CM, Suarez PA, Luna MA. Hybrid carcinomas of 10. Simpson RH, Sarsfield PT, Clarke T, et al. Clear cell
salivary glands. Report of 4 cases and review of the carcinoma of minor salivary glands. Histopathology 1990;
literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123(8):698–702. 17(5):433–438.
33. Di Palma S. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma with co- 11. Milchgrub S, Gnepp DR, Vuitch F, et al. Hyalinizing clear
existing multifocal intercalated duct hyperplasia of the cell carcinoma of salivary gland. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18(1):
parotid gland. Histopathology 1994; 25(5):494–496. 74–82.
34. Chetty R. Intercalated duct hyperplasia: possible relation- 12. O’Regan E, Shandilya M, Gnepp DR, et al. Hyalinizing
ship to epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and hybrid clear cell carcinoma of salivary gland: an aggressive vari-
tumours of salivary gland. Histopathology 2000; 37(3): ant. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(3):348–352.
260–263. 13. Hayashi K, Ohtsuki Y, Sonobe H, et al. Glycogen-rich clear
35. el-Naggar AK, Lovell M, Ordonez NG, et al. Multiple cell carcinoma arising from minor salivary glands of
unrelated translocations in a metastatic epimyoepithelial the uvula. A case report. Acta Pathol Jpn 1988; 38(9):
carcinoma of the parotid gland. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1227–1234.
1998; 100(2):155–158. 14. Ogawa I, Nikai H, Takata T, et al. Clear cell tumors of
36. Mitelman F, Johansson B, Mertens F, eds. Mitelman data- minor salivary gland origin. An immunohistochemical and
base of chromosome aberrations in cancer (2003). Available ultrastructural analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
at: http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman. 1991; 72(2):200–207.
37. Martins C, Fonseca I, Roque L, et al. Malignant salivary 15. Shrestha P, Yang LT, Liu BL, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of
gland neoplasms: a cytogenetic study of 19 cases. Eur J salivary glands: immunohistochemical evaluation of clear
Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(2):128–132. tumor cells. Anticancer Res 1994; 14(3A):825–836.
38. Kleist B, Poetsch M, Breitsprecher C, et al. Epithelial- 16. Chao TK, Tsai CC, Yeh SY, et al. Hyalinizing clear cell
myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland-evidence of carcinoma of the hard palate. J Laryngol Otol 2004; 118
contrasting DNA patterns in two different histological (5):382–384.
parts. Virchows Arch 2003; 442(6):585–590. 17. Felix A, Rosa JC, Nunes JF, et al. Hyalinizing clear cell
39. Hamper K, Brugmann M, Koppermann R, et al. Epithelial- carcinoma of salivary glands: a study of extracellular
myoepithelial duct carcinoma of salivary glands: a follow- matrix. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(4):364–368.
up and cytophotometric study of 21 cases. J Oral Pathol 18. Batsakis JG, el-Naggar AK, Luna MA. Hyalinizing clear
Med 1989; 18(5):299–304. cell carcinoma of salivary origin. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
1994; 103(9):746–748.
19. Grenevicki LF, Barker BF, Fiorella RM, et al. Clear cell
Clear Cell Carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified
carcinoma of the palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30
1. Ellis GL. Clear cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In: (5):452–454.
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. , eds. World Health
Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Basal Cell Adenocarcinoma
Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
2005:227–228. 1. Batsakis JG, Luna MA. Basaloid salivary carcinoma. Ann
2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Clear cell carcinoma. In: Ellis GL, Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100(9 pt1):785–787.
Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the 2. Simpson PR, Rutledge JC, Shaefer SD, et al. Congenital
Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:379–389. hybrid basal cell adenoma-adenoid cystic carcinoma of the
3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Clear cell adenocarcinoma. In: Atlas salivary gland. Pediatr Pathol 1986; 6(2–3):199–208.
of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd 3. Ellis GL. Basal cell adenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson
series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization
of Pathology, 1996:251–257. Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head
4. Suzuki H, Yamauchi G, Hashimoto K. Clear cell carcinoma and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:229–230.
of the mandibular gingiva ‘minor salivary gland’: a case 4. Ellis GL, Wiscovitch JG. Basal cell adenocarcinomas of the
report with immunohistochemical study. Oral Surg major salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3): 1990; 69(4):461–469.
e36–e40. 5. Fonseca I, Soares J. Basal cell adenocarcinoma of minor
5. Rinaldo A, McLaren KM, Boccato P, et al. Hyalinizing clear salivary and seromucous glands of the head and neck
cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and of the parotid gland. region. Semin Diagn Pathol 1996; 13(2):128–137.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999; 61(1):48–51. 6. Muller S, Barnes L. Basal cell adenocarcinoma of the
6. Wang B, Brandwein M, Gordon R, et al. Primary salivary salivary glands: report of seven cases and review of the
clear cell tumors—a diagnostic approach: a clinicopatho- literature. Cancer 1996; 78(12):2471–2477.
logic and immunohistochemical study of 20 patients with 7. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Basal cell adenocarcinoma
clear cell carcinoma, clear cell myoepithelial carcinoma, of the salivary glands: comparison with basal cell adenoma
and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab through assessment of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and
Med 2002; 126(6):676–685. expression of p53 and bcl-2. Cancer 1998; 82(3): 439–447.
7. Berho M, Huvos AG. Central hyalinizing clear cell carcino- 8. Quddus MR, Henley JD, Affify AM, et al. Basal cell
ma of the mandible and the maxilla a clinicopathologic adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland: an ultrastructural
study of two cases with an analysis of the literature. Hum and immunohistochemical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 1999; 30(1):101–105. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87(4):485–492.
8. Negahban S, Daneshbod Y, Shishegar M. Clear cell carci- 9. Jayakrishnan A, Elmalah I, Hussain K, et al. Basal cell
noma arising from pleomorphic adenoma of a minor sali- adenocarcinoma in minor salivary glands. Histopathology
vary gland: report of a case with fine needle aspiration, 2003; 42(6):610–614.
histologic and immunohistochemical findings. Acta Cytol 10. Parashar P, Baron E, Papadimitriou JC, et al. Basal cell
2006; 50(6):687–690. adenocarcinoma of the oral minor salivary glands: review
9. Uri AK, Wetmore RF, Iozzo RV. Glycogen-rich clear cell of the literature and presentation of two new cases. Oral
carcinoma in the tongue. A cytochemical and ultrastruc- Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(1):
tural study. Cancer 1986; 57(9):1803–1809. 77–84.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 637
11. Farrell T, Chang YL. Basal cell adenocarcinoma of minor 10. Diedhiou A, Cazals-Hatem D, Rondini E, et al. Sebaceous
salivary glands. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131(10): carcinoma of the submandibular gland: a case report. Ann
1602–1604. Pathol 2001; 21(4):348–351.
12. Klima M, Wolfe SK, Johnson PE. Basal cell tumors of the 11. Handschel J, Herbst H, Brand B, et al. Intraoral sebaceous
parotid gland. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104(2):111–116. carcinoma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41(2):84–87.
13. Chomette G, Auriol M, Vaillant JM, et al. Basaloid carci- 12. Baiocco R, Palma O, Locatelli G. Squamous carcinoma of
noma of salivary glands, variety of undifferentiated the epiglottis with sebaceous differentiation. Report of a
adenocarcinoma: immunohistochemical study of interme- case. Pathologica 1995; 87(5):531–533.
diate filament proteins in 24 cases. J Pathol 1991; 163(1): 13. Esnal Leal F, Garcia GM, Perez R, et al. Sebaceous carcino-
39–45. ma of the salivary gland. Report of two cases of infrequent
14. Luna MA, Batsakis JG, Tortoledo ME, et al. Carcinomas ex location. An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am 1997; 24(4):401–413.
monomorphic adenoma of salivary glands. J Laryngol Otol 14. Martinez-Madrigal F, Casiraghi O, Khattech A, et al.
1989; 103(8):756–759. Hypopharyngeal sebaceous carcinoma: a case report.
15. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Basal cell adenocarcinoma. In: Atlas of Hum Pathol 1991; 22(9):929–931.
Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd 15. Granström G, Aldenborg F, Jeppsson PH. Sebaceous carci-
series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute noma of the parotid gland: report of a case and review of
of Pathology, 1996:257–267. the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45(8):731–733.
16. Hyman BA, Scheithauer BW, Weiland LH, et al. Membra-
nous basal cell adenoma of the parotid gland: malignant
transformation in a patient with multiple dermal cylindro- Sebaceous Lymphadenocarcinoma
mas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988; 112(2):209–211. 1. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous lymphadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes
17. Williams SB, Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Immunohistochemical L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health
analysis of basal cell adenocarcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and
Oral Pathol 1993; 75(1):64–69. Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
18. Seifert G. Classification and differential diagnosis of clear 2005:231.
and basal cell tumors of the salivary glands. Semin Diagn 2. Ahn SH, Park SY. Sebaceous lymphadenocarcinoma of
Pathol 1996; 13(2):95–103. parotid gland. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 263
19. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Primary large-cell (10):940–942.
neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid gland: immuno- 3. Gnepp DR, Brannon R. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary
histochemical and molecular analysis of two cases. Mod gland origin. Report of 21 cases. Cancer 1984; 53(10):
Pathol 2000; 13(5):554–562. 2155–2170.
20. Banks ER, Frierson HF Jr., Mills SE, et al. Basaloid squa- 4. Linhartova A. Sebaceous glands in salivary gland tissue.
mous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a clinicopatho- Arch Pathol 1974; 98(5):320–324.
logic and immunohistochemical study of 40 cases. Am J 5. Croitoru CM, Mooney JE, Luna MA. Sebaceous lymphade-
Surg Pathol 1992; 16(10):939–946. nocarcinoma of salivary glands. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003; 7
(4):236–239.
Sebaceous Carcinoma
1. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous carcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Cystadenocarcinoma
Reichart P, Sidransky D, eds. World Health Organization
Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head 1. Seifert G, Sobin L. World Health Organization Internation-
and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:231. al Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic Typing
2. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Sebaceous adenocarcinoma. In: Atlas of Salivary Gland Tumours. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd 2. Rawson AJ, Howard JM, Royster HP, et al. Tumors of the
series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute salivary glands; a clinicopathological study of 160 cases.
of Pathology, 1996:333–334. Cancer 1950; 3(3):445–458.
3. Gnepp DR, Brannon R. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary 3. Blanck C, Eneroth CM, Jakobsson PA. Mucus-producing
gland origin. Report of 21 cases. Cancer 1984; 53(10): adenopapillary (non-epidermoid) carcinoma of the parotid
2155–2170. gland. Cancer 1971; 28(3):676–685.
4. Gnepp DR. Sebaceous neoplasms of salivary gland origin: 4. Kardos TB, Ferguson JW, McMillan MD. Mucus-producing
a review. Pathol Annu 1983; 18(pt 1):71–102. adenopapillary carcinoma of the oral cavity. Int J Oral
5. Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, et al. Other malignant Maxillofac Surg 1992; 21(3):160–162.
epithelial neoplasms. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, 5. Allen MS Jr., Fitz-Hugh GS, March WL Jr. Low-grade
eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadel- papillary adenocarcinoma of the palate. Cancer 1974; 33(1):
phia: WB Saunders, 1991:471–476. 153–158.
6. Mighell AJ, Stassen LF, Soames JV. Sebaceous carcinoma 6. Mills SE, Garland TA, Allen MS Jr. Low-grade papillary
of the parotid gland. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25(1): adenocarcinoma of palatal salivary gland origin. Am J Surg
51–53. Pathol 1984; 8(5):367–374.
7. Ohara N, Taguchi K, Yamamoto M, et al. Sebaceous 7. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Adenocarcinoma of
carcinoma of the submandibular gland with high-grade salivary origin. Clinicopathologic study of 204 patients.
malignancy: report of a case. Pathol Int 1998; 48(4): Am J Surg 1982; 144(4):423–431.
287–291. 8. Auclair PL. Cystadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
8. Siriwardena BS, Tilakaratne WM, Rajapakshe RM. A case Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi-
of sebaceous carcinoma of the parotid gland. J Oral Pathol cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of
Med 2003; 32(2):121–123. the Head and Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:232.
9. Cohn ML, Callender DL, El-Naggar AK. Sebaceous carci- 9. Brandwein-Gensler MS, Gnepp DR. Low-grade cribriform
noma ex-pleomorphic adenoma: a rare phenotypic occur- cystadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P,
rence. Ann Diagn Pathol 2004; 8(4):224–226. et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of
638 Eveson and Nagao
Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Head 8. Osaki T, Hirota J, Ohno A, et al. Mucinous adenocarcinoma
and Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:233. of the submandibular gland. Cancer 1990; 66(8):1796–1801.
10. Foss R, Ellis G, Auclair P. Salivary gland cystadenocarcino- 9. Simpson RH, Prasad AR, Lewis JE, et al. Mucin-rich vari-
mas: a clinicopathologic study of 57 cases. Am J Surg Pathol ant of salivary duct carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and
1996; 20(12):1440–1447. immunohistochemical study of four cases. Am J Surg
11. Pollett A, Perez-Ordonez B, Jordan RCK, et al. High-grade Pathol 2003; 27(8):1070–1079.
papillary cystadenocarcinoma of the tongue. Histopatholo-
gy 1997; 31(2):185–188.
Oncocytic Carcinoma
12. Cavalcante RB, da Costa Miguel MC, Souza Carvalho AC,
et al. Papillary cystadenocarcinoma: report of a case of 1. Sciubba JJ, Shimono M. Oncocytic carcinoma. In: Barnes L,
high-grade histopathologic malignancy. Auris Nasus Lar- Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organi-
ynx 2007; 34(2):259–262. zation Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics
13. Shrestha P, Namba M, Yang L, et al. Papillary cystadeno- of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:235.
carcinoma of salivary glands: an immunohistochemical 2. Auclair PL, Ellis GL, Gnepp DR, et al. Salivary gland
study. Int J Oncol 1994; 4:587–597. neoplasms: general considerations. In: Ellis GL, Auclair
14. Kobayashi I, Kiyoshima T, Ozeki S, et al. Immunohisto- PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary
chemical and ultrastructural study of a papillary cystade- Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:135–164.
nocarcinoma arising from the sublingual gland. J Oral 3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Oncocytic carcinoma. In: Atlas of
Pathol Med 1999; 28(6):282–286. Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands, 3rd
15. Delgado R, Klimstra D, Albores-Saavedra J. Low grade series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute
salivary duct carcinoma. A distinctive variant with low of Pathology, 1996:318–324.
grade histology and a predominant intraductal growth 4. Brandwein MS, Huvos AG. Oncocytic tumors of major
pattern. Cancer 1996; 78(5):958–967. salivary glands. A study of 68 cases with follow-up of 44
16. Brandwein-Gensler M, Hille J, Wang BY, et al. Low-Grade patients. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(6):514–528.
Salivary Duct Carcinoma. Description of 16 Cases. Am J 5. Coli A, Bigotti G, Bartolazzi A. Malignant oncocytoma of
Surg Pathol 2004; 28(4):1040–1044. the major salivary glands. Report of a post-radiation case. J
17. Brandwein-Gensler MS, Skálová A, Nagao T. Salivary duct Exp Clin Cancer Res 1998; 17(1):65–70.
carcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. 6. Mahnke CG, Janig U, Werner JA. Metastasizing malignant
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: oncocytoma of the submandibular gland. J Laryngol Otol
Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Head and 1998; 112(1):106–109.
Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:236–237. 7. Nakada M, Nishizaki K, Akagi H, et al. Oncocytic carcino-
18. Cheuk W, Miliauskas JR, Chan JK. Intraductal carcinoma of ma of the submandibular gland: a case report and litera-
the oral cavity: a case report and a reappraisal of the ture review. J Oral Pathol Med 1998; 27(5):225–228.
concept of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in salivary duct 8. Gray SR, Cornog JL, Sei IS. Oncocytic neoplasms of sali-
carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28(2):266–270. vary glands: a report of 15 cases including two malignant
19. Weinreb I, Tabanda-Lichauco R, van der Kwast T, et al. oncocytomas. Cancer 1976; 38(3):1306–1317.
Low-grade intraductal carcinoma of salivary gland: report 9. Goode RK, Corio RL. Oncocytic adenocarcinoma of salivary
of 3 cases with marked apocrine differentiation. Am J Surg glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65(1): 61–66.
Pathol 2006; 30(8):1014–1021. 10. Haberman RS, Rodger WA, Haberman PH. Malignant
20. Tatemoto Y, Ohno A, Osaki T. Low malignant intraductal oncocytic adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland with metas-
carcinoma on the hard palate: a variant of salivary duct tasis to bone. Surg Pathol 1990; 3:221–226.
carcinoma?. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(4):275–277. 11. Sikorowa L. Oncocytoma malignum. Nowotwory 1957;
7:125–131.
Mucinous Adenocarcinoma 12. Felix A, Fonseca I, Soares J. Oncocytic tumors of salivary
gland type: a study with emphasis on nuclear DNA ploidy.
1. Sun KH, Goa Y, Li TJ. Mucinous adenocarcinoma. In: Barnes J Surg Oncol 1993; 52(4):217–222.
L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organi- 13. Sugimoto T, Wakizono S, Uemura T, et al. Malignant
zation Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of oncocytoma of the parotid gland: a case report with an
Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:234. immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Lar-
2. Gnepp D, Estalilla O, Henley J, et al. Primary colloid yngol Otol 1993; 107(1):69–74.
(mucinous) carcinoma of the salivary glands. Oral Surg 14. Ardekian L, Manor R, Peled M, et al. Malignant oncocy-
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1997; 84(188 (abstr) . toma of the parotid gland: case report and analysis of the
3. Gao Y, Di P, Peng X, et al. Mucinous adenocarcinoma of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57(3):325–328.
salivary glands. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2002; 15. Capone RB, Ha PK, Westra WH, et al. Oncocytic neoplasms
37(5):356–358. of the parotid gland: a 16-year institutional review. Otolar-
4. Krogdahl AS, Schou C. Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the yngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126(6):657–662.
sublingual gland. J Oral Pathol Med 1997; 26(4):198–200. 16. Cinar U, Vural C, Basak T, et al. Oncocytic carcinoma of the
5. Tambouret RH, Yantiss RK, Kirby R, et al. Mucinous parotid gland: report of a new case. Ear Nose Throat J 2003;
adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland. Report of a case 82(9):699–701.
with fine needle aspiration findings and histologic correla- 17. Muramatsu T, Hashimoto S, Lee MW, et al. Oncocytic
tion. Acta Cytol 1999; 43(5):842–846. carcinoma arising in submandibular gland with immuno-
6. Notani K, Iizuka T, Yamazaki Y, et al. Mucinous adenocarci- histochemical observations and review of the literature.
noma of probable minor salivary gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Oral Oncol 2003; 39(2):199–203.
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94(6):738–740. 18. Guclu E, Oghan F, Ozturk O, et al. A rare malignancy of the
7. Hashitani S, Sakurai K, Noguchi K, et al. Mucinous adeno- parotid gland: oncocytic carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolar-
carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation of the yngol 2005; 262(7):567–569.
mandibular ramus: report of a case. J Oral Pathol Med 19. Foschini MP, Malvi D, Betts CM. Oncocytic carcinoma arising
2004; 33(1):59–63. in Warthin tumour. Virchows Arch 2005; 446(1):88–90.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 639
20. Sugiyama T, Nakagawa T, Narita M, et al. Pedunculated Series, fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute
oncocytic carcinoma in buccal mucosa: immunohisto- of Pathology, 1996:324–333.
chemical and ultrastructural studies. Oral Dis 2006; 12(3): 12. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic
324–328. adenoma: pathologic analysis of 77 cases. Hum Pathol
21. Ito K, Tsukuda M, Kawabe R, et al. Benign and malignant 2001; 32(6):596–604.
oncocytoma of the salivary glands with an immunohisto- 13. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Hybrid carcinomas of
chemical evaluation of Ki-67. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat the salivary glands: report of nine cases with a clinicopath-
Spec 2000; 62(6):338–341. ologic, immunohistochemical, and p53 gene alteration
22. Kimura M, Furuta T, Hashimoto S, et al. Oncocytic carci- analysis. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(7):724–733.
noma of the parotid gland. A case report. Acta Cytol 2003; 14. Kapadia SB, Barnes L. Expression of androgen receptor,
47(6):1099–1102. gross cystic disease fluid protein, and CD44 in salivary
23. Felix A, Fonseca I, Soares J. Oncocytic tumors of salivary duct carcinoma. Mod Pathol 1998; 11(11):1033–1038.
gland type: a study with emphasis on nuclear DNA ploidy. 15. Wick MR, Ockner DM, Mills SE, et al. Homologous
Surg Oncol 1993; 52(4):217–222. carcinomas of the breasts, skin, and salivary glands: a
24. Jahan-Parwar, Huberman RM, Donovan DT, et al. Onco- histologic and immunohistochemical comparison of duc-
cytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. tal mammary carcinoma, ductal sweat gland carcinoma,
Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23(9):523–529. and salivary duct carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109
25. Brannon RB, Willard CC. Oncocytic mucoepidermoid car- (1):75–84.
cinoma of parotid gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 16. Fan CY, Wang J, Barnes EL. Expression of androgen
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96(6):727–733. receptor and prostatic specific markers in salivary duct
26. Kapadia SB, Barnes L. Expression of androgen receptor, carcinoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 13 cases
gross cystic disease fluid protein, and CD44 in salivary and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24(4):
duct carcinoma. Mod Pathol 1998; 11(11):1033–1038. 579–586.
27. Jensen ML. Multifocal adenomatous oncocytic hyperplasia 17. Skálová A, Stárek I, Vanecek T, et al. Expression of HER-2/
in parotid glands with metastatic deposits or primary malig- neu gene and protein in salivary duct carcinomas of
nant transformation? Pathol Res Pract 1989; 185(4): 514–521. parotid gland as revealed by fluorescence in-situ hybrid-
28. Johns ME, Regezi JA, Batsakis JG. Oncocytic neoplasms of ization and immunohistochemistry. Histopathology 2003;
salivary glands. An ultrastructural study. Laryngoscope 42(4):348–356.
1977; 87(6):262–271. 18. Glisson B, Colevas AD, Haddad R, et al. HER2 expression
in salivary gland carcinoma: dependence on histological
subtype. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10(3):944–946.
Salivary Duct Carcinoma
19. Cornolti G, Ungari M, Morassi ML, et al. Amplification and
1. Brandwein-Gensler MS, Skálová A, Nagao T. Salivary duct overexpression of HER2/neu gene and HER2/neu protein
carcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. in salivary duct carcinoma of the parotid gland. Arch
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133(10):1031–1036.
Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. 20. Johnson CJ, Barry MB, Vasef MA, et al. Her-2/neu expres-
Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:236–237. sion in salivary duct carcinoma: an immunohistochemical
2. Kleinsasser O, Klein HJ, Hübner G, Speichelgangcarci- and chromogenic in situ hybridization study. Appl Immu-
noms: ein den Milchgangcarcinomen der Brustdrüse ana- nohistochem Mol Morphol 2008; 16(1):54–58.
loge Gruppe von Speicheldrudentumoren. Arch Klin Exp 21. de Araújo VC, Kowalski LP, Soares F, et al. Salivary duct
Ohre Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 1968; 192(1):100–105. carcinoma: cytokeratin 14 as a marker of in-situ intraductal
3. Seifert G, Sobin LH. World Health Organization International growth. Histopathology 2002; 41(3):244–249.
Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic Typing 22. Henley JD, Seo IS, Dayan D, et al. Sarcomatoid salivary
of Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin:Springer- duct carcinoma of the parotid gland. Hum Pathol 2000; 31
Verlag, 1991. (2):208–213.
4. Brandwein MS, Jagirdar J, Patil J, et al. Salivary duct 23. Ide F, Mishima K, Saito I. Sarcomatoid salivary duct
carcinoma (cribriform salivary carcinoma of excretory carcinoma of the oral cavity. Virchows Arch 2003; 443
ducts): a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (5):686–689.
study of 12 cases. Cancer 1990; 65(10):2307–2314. 24. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Serizawa H, et al. Sarcomatoid variant
5. Delgado R, Vuitch F, Albores-Saavedra J. Salivary duct of salivary duct carcinoma: clinicopathologic and immuno-
carcinoma. Cancer 1993; 72(5):1503–1512. histochemical study of eight cases with review of the
6. Barnes L, Rao U, Krause J, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma: literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122(2):222–231.
Part I. A clinicopathologic evaluation and DNA image 25. Padberg BC, Sasse B, Huber A, et al. Sarcomatoid salivary
analysis of 13 cases with review of the literature. Oral duct carcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2005; 9(2):86–92.
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78(1):64–73. 26. Jeong HS, Son YI, Ko YH, et al. Sarcomatoid salivary duct
7. Lewis JE, McKinney BC, Weiland LH, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma of the larynx. J Laryngol Otol 2006; 120(2):154–157.
carcinoma: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical 27. Simpson RHW, Prasad AR, Lewis JE, et al. Mucin-rich
review of 26 cases. Cancer 1996; 77(2):223–230. variant of salivary duct carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and
8. Guzzo M, Di Palma S, Grandi C, et al. Salivary duct immunohistochemical study of four cases. Am J Surg
carcinoma: clinical characteristics and treatment strategies. Pathol 2001; 27(8):1070–1079.
Head Neck 1997; 19(2):126–133. 28. Henley J, Summerlin DJ, Potter D, et al. Intraoral mucin-
9. Van Heerden WF, Raubenheimer EJ, Swart TJ, et al. rich salivary duct carcinoma. Histopathology 2005; 47(4):
Intraoral salivary duct carcinoma: a report of 5 cases. 429–441.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61(1):126–131. 29. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Visscher DW, et al. Invasive micro-
10. Jaehne M, Roeser K, Jaekel T, et al. Clinical and immuno- papillary salivary duct carcinoma: a distinct histologic
histologic typing of salivary duct carcinoma: a report of 50 variant with biologic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;
cases. Cancer 2005; 103(12):2526–2533. 28(3):319–326.
11. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Salivary duct carcinoma. In: Atlas of 30. Delgado R, Klimstra D, Albores-Saavedra J. Low-grade sali-
Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd vary duct carcinoma: a distinctive variant with a low-grade
640 Eveson and Nagao
histology and predominant intraductal growth pattern. Can- 11. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Adenocarcinoma of
cer 1996; 78(5):958–967. salivary origin. Clinicopathologic study of 204 patients.
31. Brandwein-Gensler M, Hille J, Wang BY, et al. Low-grade Am J Surg 1982; 144(4):423–431.
salivary duct carcinoma: description of 16 cases. Am J Surg 12. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. Histopathologic
Pathol 2004; 28(8):1040–1044. studies on adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland. Acta
32. Brandwein-Gensler MS, Gnepp DR. Low-grade cribriform Pathol Jpn 1986; 36(3):337–347.
cystadenocarcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, 13. Matsuba HM, Mauney M, Simpson JR, et al. Adenocarci-
et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of nomas of major and minor salivary gland origin: a histo-
Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Head and pathologic review of treatment failure patterns.
Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:233. Laryngoscope 1988; 98(7):784–788.
33. Nassar H. Carcinomas with micropapillary morphology: 14. Wahlberg P, Anderson H, Biörklund A, et al. Carcinoma of
clinical significance and current concepts. Adv Anat Pathol the parotid and submandibular glands-a study of survival
2004; 11(6):297–303. in 2465 patients. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(7):706–713.
34. Williams MD, Roberts D, Blumenschein GR Jr., et al.
Differential expression of hormonal and growth factor
receptors in salivary duct carcinomas: biologic significance Myoepithelial Carcinoma
and potential role in therapeutic stratification of patients.
Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31(11):1645–1652. 1. Stromeyer FW, Haggitt RC, Nelson JF, et al. Myoepithe-
35. Felix A, El-Naggar AK, Press MF, et al. Prognostic signifi- lioma of minor salivary gland origin. Light and electron
cance of biomarkers (c-erbB-2, p53, proliferating cell nucle- microscopical study. Arch Pathol 1975; 99(5):242–245.
ar antigen, and DNA content) in salivary duct carcinoma. 2. Seifert G, Sobin L. World Health Organization International
Hum Pathol 1996; 27(6):561–566. Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic Typing of
36. Laurie SA, Licitra L. Systemic therapy in the palliative Salivary Gland Tumours 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
management of advanced salivary gland cancers. J Clin 1991.
Oncol 2006; 24(17):2673–2678. 3. Skálová A, Jäkel KT. Myoepithelial carcinoma. In: Barnes
37. Nabili V, Tan JW, Bhuta S, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma: a L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health
clinical and histologic review with implications for trastu- Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and
zumab therapy. Head Neck 2007; 29(10):907–912. Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
2005:240–241.
4. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Myoepithelial carcinoma. In: Atlas of
Adenocarcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd
Series, fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute
1. Auclair P, van der Wal JE. Adenocarcinoma, not otherwise of Pathology, 1996:337–343.
specified. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. 5. Savera AT, Sloman A, Huvos A, et al. Myoepithelial
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: carcinoma of the salivary glands: a clinicopathologic
Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Head and study of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24(6):761–774.
Neck. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:238–239. 6. Crissman JD, Wirman JA, Harris A. Malignant myo-
2. Thackray AC, Sobin LH. World Health Organization Inter- epithelioma of the parotid gland. Cancer 1977; 40(6):
national Histological Classification of Tumours: Histologi- 3042–3049.
cal Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours. Berlin: Springer- 7. Di Palma S, Guzzo M. Malignant myoepithelioma of sali-
Verlag, 1972. vary glands: clinicopathological features of ten cases.
3. Seifert G, Sobin LH. World Health Organization International Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1993; 423
Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic Typing of (5):389–396.
Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 8. El-Mofty SK, O’Leary TR, Swanson PE. Malignant myoe-
1991. pithelioma of salivary glands: clinicopathologic and immu-
4. Batsakis JG, El Naggar AK, Luna MA. ‘‘Adenocarcinoma, nophenotypic features. Review of literature and report of
not otherwise specified’’: a diminishing group of salivary two cases. Int J Surg Pathol 1994; 2:133–140.
carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(1): 9. Alós L, Cardesa A, Bombi JA, et al. Myoepithelial tumors
102–104. of salivary glands: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemi-
5. Van der Wal JE, Snow GB, van der Waal I. Histological cal, ultrastructural, and flow-cytometric study. Semin
reclassification of 101 intraoral salivary gland tumors Diagn Pathol 1996; 13(2):138–147.
(new WHO classification). J Clin Pathol 1992; 45(9): 10. Michal M, Skálová A, Simpson RHW, et al. Clear cell
834–835. malignant myoepithelioma of the salivary glands. Histopa-
6. Cesinaro AM, Crisculol M, Collina G, et al. Salivary gland thology 1996; 28(4):309–315.
tumors: revision of 391 cases according to the new WHO 11. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Salivary gland malig-
classification. Pathologica 1994; 86(6):602–605. nant myoepithelioma: a clinicopathologic and immuno-
7. Van der Wal J, Leverstein H, Snow GB, et al. Parotid gland histochemical study of 10 cases. Cancer 1998; 83(7):
tumors: histologic reevaluation and reclassification of 478 1292–1299.
cases. Head Neck 1998; 20(3):204–207. 12. Chhieng DC, Paulino AF. Cytology of myoepithelial carci-
8. Li J, Wang BY, Nelson M, et al. Salivary adenocarcinoma, noma of the salivary gland. Cancer 2002; 96(1):32–36.
not otherwise specified: a collection of orphans. Arch 13. Hungermann D, Roeser K, Buerger H, et al. Relative
Pathol Lab Med 2004; 128(12):1385–1394. paucity of gross genetic alterations in myoepitheliomas
9. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Adenocarcinoma, not otherwise spec- and myoepithelial carcinomas of salivary glands. J Pathol
ified. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary 2002; 198(4):487–494.
Glands, 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed 14. Losito NS, Botti G, Ionna F, et al. Clear-cell myoepithelial
Forces Institute of Pathology, 1996:175–183. carcinoma of the salivary glands: a clinicopathologic,
10. Ghannoum JE, Freedman PD. Signet-ring cell (mucin-pro- immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of two
ducing) adenocarcinoma of minor salivary glands. Am J cases involving the submandibular gland with review of
Surg Pathol 2004; 28(1):89–93. the literature. Pathol Res Pract 2008; 204(5):335–344.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 641
15. Graadt van Roggen JF, Baatenberg-de Jong RJ, Verschuur 12. Klijanienko J, El-Naggar AK, Servois V, et al. Mucoepider-
HP, et al. Myoepithelial carcinoma (malignant myoepithe- moid carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: nonspecific
lioma): first report of an occurrence in the maxillary sinus. preoperative cytologic findings in six cases. Cancer 1998;
Histopathology 1998; 32(3):239–241. 84(4):231–234.
16. Seethala RR, Barnes EL, Hunt JL. Epithelial-myoepithelial 13. Ihrler S, Weiler C, Hirschmann A, et al. Intraductal carci-
carcinoma: a review of the clinicopathologic spectrum and noma is the precursor of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adeno-
immunophenotypic characteristics in 61 tumors of the ma and is often associated with dysfunctional p53.
salivary glands and upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg Histopathology 2007; 51(3):362–371.
Pathol 2007; 31(1):44–57. 14. Altemani A, Martins MT, Freitas L, et al. Carcinoma ex
17. Ogawa I, Nishida T, Miyauchi M, et al. Dedifferentiated pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA): immunoprofile of the cells
malignant myoepithelioma of the parotid gland. Pathol Int involved in carcinomatous progression. Histopathology
2003; 53(10):704–709. 2005; 46(6):635–641.
18. Seifert G. Classification and differential diagnosis of clear 15. Luna MA, Batsakis JG, Tortoledo ME, et al. Carcinomas ex
and basal cell tumors of the salivary glands. Semin Diagn monomorphic adenoma of salivary glands. J Laryngol Otol
Pathol 1996; 13(2):95–103. 1989; 103(8):756–759.
19. Wang B, Brandwein M, Gordon R, et al. Primary salivary 16. Di Palma S, Skalova A, Vanieek T. Non-invasive (intra-
gland clear cell tumors—a diagnostic approach: a clinico- capsular) carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: recognition
pathologic and immunohistochemical study of 20 patients of focal carcinoma by HER-2/neu and MIB1 immunohis-
with clear cell carcinoma, clear cell myoepithelial carcino- tochemistry. Histopathology 2005; 46(2):144–152.
ma, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Arch Pathol 17. Rao PH, Murty VV, Louie DC, et al. Nonsyntenic amplifi-
Lab Med 2002; 126(6):676–685. cation of MYC with CDK4 and MDM2 in a malignant
20. El-Naggar A, Batsakis JG, Luna MA, et al. DNA content mixed tumor of salivary gland. Cancer Genet Cytogenet
and proliferative activity of myoepitheliomas. J Laryngol 1998; 105(2):160–163.
Otol 1989; 103(12):1192–1197. 18. Roijer E, Nordkvist A, Strom AK, et al. Translocation,
21. Carrillo R, El-Naggar AK, Luna MA, et al. Nucleolar deletion/amplification, and expression of HMGIC and
organizer regions (NORs) and myoepitheliomas: a compar- MDM2 in a carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Am J
ison with DNA content and clinical course. J Laryngol Otol Pathol 2002; 160(2):433–440.
1992; 106(7):616–620. 19. El-Naggar AK, Callender D, Coombes MM. Molecular
genetic alterations in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma:
a putative progression model? Genes Chromosomes Can-
Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma
cer 2000; 27(2):162–168.
1. Gnepp DR, Brandwein-Gensler M, El-Naggar AK, et al. 20. Gillenwater A, Hurr K, Wolf P, et al. Microsatellite alter-
Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson ations at chromosome 8q loci in pleomorphic adenoma.
JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117(5):448–452.
Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head 21. Ohtake S, Cheng J, Ida H, et al. Precancerous foci in pleo-
and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:242–243. morphic adenoma of the salivary gland: recognition of focal
2. Gnepp DR. Malignant mixed tumors of the salivary glands: carcinoma and atypical tumor cells by P53 immunohis-
a review. Pathol Annu 1993; 28(pt 1):279–328. tochemistry. J Oral Pathol Med 2002; 31(10): 590–597.
3. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Malignant mixed tumor 22. Freitas LL, Arajo VC, Martins MT, et al. Biomarker analysis
of salivary origin: a clinicopathologic study of 146 cases. in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma at an early phase of
Cancer 1977; 39(2):388–396. carcinomatous transformation. Int J Surg Pathol 2005; 13
4. Foote FW Jr., Frazell EL. Tumors of the major salivary (4):337–342.
glands. Cancer 1953; 6(6):1065–1133. 23. Suzuki H, Fujioka Y. Deletion of the p16 gene and microsat-
5. Auclair PA, Ellis GL, Gnepp DR, et al. Salivary gland ellite instability in carcinoma arising in pleomorphic adeno-
neoplasms: general considerations. In: Ellis GL, Auclair ma of the parotid gland. Diagn Mol Pathol 1998; 7(4):224–231.
PA, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary 24. Felix A, Rosa-Santos J, Mendonca ME. Intracapsular carcinoma
Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:144–145. ex pleomorphic adenoma. Report of a case with unusual
6. Gerughty RM, Scofield HH, Brown FM, et al. Malignant metastatic behaviour. Oral Oncol 2002; 38(1): 107–110.
mixed tumors of salivary gland origin. Cancer 1969; 24(3): 25. Thomas WH, Coppola ED. Distant metastases from mixed
471–486. tumors of the salivary glands. Am J Surg 1965; 109:724–730.
7. Eneroth CM, Zetterberg A. Malignancy in pleomorphic
adenoma. A clinical and microspectrophotometric study. Carcinosarcoma
Acta Otolaryngol 1974; 77(6):426–432.
8. LiVolsi VA, Perzin KH. Malignant mixed tumors arising in 1. Gnepp DR. Carcinosarcoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
salivary glands I. Carcinomas arising in benign mixed tumors: Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi-
a clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1977; 39(5): 2209–2230. cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and
9. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:244.
adenoma: pathologic analysis of 73 cases. Hum Pathol 2. Gnepp DR. Malignant mixed tumors of the salivary glands:
2001; 32(6):596–604. a review. Pathol Annu 1993; 28(pt 1):279–328.
10. Tortoledo ME, Luna MA, Batsakis JG. Carcinomas ex 3. Bleiweiss IJ, Huvos AG, Lara J, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the
pleomorphic adenoma and malignant mixed tumors. submandibular salivary gland. Immunohistochemical find-
Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110(3):172–176. ings. Cancer 1992; 69(8):2031–2035.
11. Brandwein M, Huvos AG, Dardick I, et al. Noninvasive 4. Bocklage T, Feddersen R. Unusual mesenchymal and mixed
and minimally invasive carcinoma ex mixed tumor. A tumors of the salivary gland. An immunohistochemical and
clinicopathologic and ploidy study of 12 patients with flow cytometric analysis of three cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med
major salivary tumors of low (or no?) malignant potential. 1995; 119(1):69–74.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 5. Takata T, Nikai H, Ogawa I, et al. Ultrastructural and
81(6):655–664. immunohistochemical observations of a true malignant
642 Eveson and Nagao
mixed tumor (carcinosarcoma) of the tongue. J Oral Pathol 2. Nouraei SA, Ferguson MS, Clarke PM, et al. Metastasizing
Med 1990; 19(6):261–265. pleomorphic salivary adenoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head
6. Stephen J, Batsakis JG, Luna MA, et al. True malignant Neck Surg 2006; 132(7):788–793.
mixed tumors (carcinosarcoma) of salivary glands. Oral 3. Steele NP, Wenig BM, Sessions RB. A case of pleomorphic
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61(6):597–602. adenoma of the parotid gland metastasizing to a mediasti-
7. Garner SL, Robinson RA, Maves MD, et al. Salivary gland nal lymph node. Am J Otolaryngol 2007; 28(2):130–133.
carcinosarcoma: true malignant mixed tumor. Ann Otol 4. Van der Schroeff MP, de Ru JA, Slootweg PJ. Case-report:
Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98(8):611–614. metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland.
8. Alvarez-Canas C, Rodilla IG. True malignant mixed tumor B-ENT 2007; 3(1):21–25.
(carcinosarcoma) of the parotid gland. Report of a case 5. Bradley PJ. ‘Metastasizing pleomorphic salivary adenoma’
with immunohistochemical study. Oral Surg Oral Med should now be considered a low-grade malignancy with a
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 81(4):454–458. lethal potential. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
9. Julie C, Aidan D, Arkwright S, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the 2005; 13(2):123–126.
submaxillary gland. Ann Pathol 1997; 17(1):35–37. 6. Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Strong EW. Malignant mixed tumor
10. Ueo T, Kaku N, Kashima K, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the of salivary origin: a clinicopathologic study of 146 cases.
parotid gland: an unusual case with large-cell neuroendo- Cancer 1977; 39(2):388–396.
crine carcinoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. APMIS 2005; 7. Gnepp DR. Malignant mixed tumors of the salivary glands:
113(6):456–464. a review. Pathol Annu 1993; 28(pt 1):279–328.
11. Gotte K, Riedel F, Coy JF, et al. Salivary gland carcinosar- 8. Gnepp DR, Wenig BM. Malignant mixed tumors. In: Ellis
coma: immunohistochemical, molecular genetic and GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the
electron microscope findings. Oral Oncol 2000; 36(4):360–364. Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:350–368.
12. Kim T, Yoon GS, Kim O, et al. Fine needle aspiration 9. Wenig BM, Hitchcock CL, Ellis GL, et al. Metastasizing
diagnosis of malignant mixed tumor (carcinosarcoma) mixed tumor of salivary glands. A clinicopathologic and flow
arising in pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland. A cytometric analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16(9):845–858.
case report. Acta Cytol 1998; 42(4):1027–1031. 10. Hoorweg JJ, Hilgers FJM, Keus RB, et al. Metastasizing
13. Gogas J, Markopoulos C, Karydakis V, et al. Carcinosar- pleomorphic adenoma: a report of three cases. Eur J Surg
coma of the submandibular salivary gland. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998; 24(5):452–455.
Oncol 1999; 25(3):333–335. 11. Goodisson DW, Buff RGM, Creedon AJ, et al. A case of
14. King AD, Ahuja AT, To EW. Carcinosarcoma of the parotid metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma. Oral Med Oral Surg
gland: ultrasound and computed tomography findings. Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87(3):341–345.
Australas Radiol 1999; 43(4):520–522. 12. el-Naggar A, Batsakis JG, Kessler S. Benign metastatic
15. Kwon MY, Gu M. True malignant mixed tumor (carcino- mixed tumours or unrecognised salivary carcinomas.
sarcoma) of parotid gland with unusual mesenchymal J Larygol Otol 1988; 102(9):810–812.
component: a case report and review of the literature. 13. Jin Y, Jin C, Arheden K, et al. Unbalanced chromosomal
Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125(6):812–815. rearrangements in a metastasizing salivary gland tumor
16. Sironi M, Isimbaldi G, Claren R. Carcinosarcoma of the with benign histology. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998; 102(1):
parotid gland: cytological, clinicopathological and immu- 59–64.
nohistochemical study of a case. Pathol Res Pract 2000; 196
(7):511–517. Squamous Cell Carcinoma
17. Thome Capuano AC, Dos Santos Pinto Junior D, Carval-
hosa AA, et al. Immunoprofile of a carcinosarcoma of the 1. Lewis JE, Olsen KD. Squamous Cell Carcinoma. In: Barnes
submandibular gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health
Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3):398–402. Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and
18. Fowler MH, Fowler J, Ducatman B, et al. Malignant mixed Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press,
tumors of the salivary gland: a study of loss of heterozy- 2005:245–246.
gosity in tumor suppressor genes. Mod Pathol 2006; 19 2. Sakurai K, Urade M, Kishimoto H, et al. Primary squamous
(3):350–355. cell carcinoma of the accessory parotid duct epithelium.
19. Morey-Mas M, Caubet-Biayna J, Gomez-Bellvert C, et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;
Carcinosarcoma of the submandibular and sublingual sali- 85(4):447–451.
vary glands. A case report and review of the literature. 3. Batsakis JG, McClatchey KD, Johns M, et al. Primary
Acta Stomatol Belg 1997; 94(2):69–73. squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland. Arch Oto-
20. Galli J, Parrilla C, Corina L et al. Carcinosarcoma of the laryngol 1976; 102(6):55–357.
submandibular salivary gland: clinical case and review of 4. Batsakis JG. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the major
the literature. J Otolaryngol 2005; 34(1):66–69. salivary glands. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92(1):97–98.
21. Tanahashi J, Daa T, Kashima K, et al. Carcinosarcoma ex 5. Gaughan RK, Olsen KD, Lewis JE. Primary squamous cell
recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the submandibular carcinoma of the parotid gland. Arch Otolaryngol Head
gland. APMIS 2007; 115(6):789–794. Neck Surg 1992; 118(8):798–801.
22. Staffieri C, Marioni G, Ferraro SM, et al. Carcinosarcoma de 6. Sterman BM, Kraus DH, Sebek BA, et al. Primary squa-
novo of the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol mous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland. Laryngoscope
Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(2):e35–e40. 1990; 100(2 pt 1):146–148.
7. Shemen LJ, Huvos AG, Spiro RH. Squamous cell carcinoma
Metastasizing Pleomorphic Adenoma of salivary gland origin. Head Neck Surg 1987; 9(4):235–240.
8. Ying YL, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Squamous cell carcinoma
1. Gnepp DR. Metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma. In: of the parotid gland. Head Neck 2006; 28(7):626–632.
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health 9. Hong TS, Kriesel KJ, Hartig GK, et al. Parotid area lymph
Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and node metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma:
Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Head
2005:245. Neck 2005; 27(10):851–856.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 643
10. Lee S-W, Kim GE, Park CS, et al. Primary squamous cell neuroendocrine) carcinomas and salivary gland small cell
carcinoma of the parotid gland. Am J Otolaryngol 2001; 22 carcinomas from small cell carcinomas of various sites. Am
(6):400–406. J Surg Pathol 1997; 21(2):226–234.
11. Steiner M, Gould AR, Miller RL, et al. Malignant tumors of 10. Koss LG, Spiro RH, Hajdu S. Small cell (oat cell) carcino-
Stensen’s duct. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol ma of minor salivary gland origin. Cancer 1972; 30(3):
Endod 1999; 87(1):73–77. 737–741.
12. Auclair PL, Ellis GL. Primary squamous cell carcinoma. In: 11. Wirman JA, Battifora HA. Small cell undifferentiated car-
Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology cinoma of salivary gland origin: an ultrastructural study.
of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, Cancer 1976; 37(4):1840–1848.
1991:369–378. 12. Kraemer BB, Mackay B, Batsakis JG. Small cell carcinomas
13. Cartei G, Zorat P, Cartei F, et al. Poorly differentiated of the parotid gland: a clinicopathologic study of three
squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland in a 13- cases. Cancer 1983; 52(11):2115–2121.
year-old girl [letter]. Med Pediatr Oncol 1998; 30(6):374–375. 13. Gnepp DR, Corio RL, Brannon RB. Small cell carcinoma of
14. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Primary squamous cell carcinoma. In: the major salivary glands. Cancer 1986; 58(3):705–714.
Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 14. Huntrakoon M. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid
3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed Forces gland: a report of two cases with ultrastructural and
Institute of Pathology, 1996:251–257. immunohistochemical studies. Hum Pathol 1987; 18(12):
15. Sandros J, Mark J, Happonen RP, et al. Specificity of 6q- 1212–1217.
markers and other recurrent deviations in human malignant 15. Hayashi Y, Nagamine S, Yanagawa T, et al. Small cell
salivary gland tumors. Anticancer Res 1988; 8(4):637–643. undifferentiated carcinoma of the minor salivary gland
16. Mark J, Nordkvist A, Dahlenfors R, et al. Complex chro- containing exocrine, neuroendocrine, and squamous cells.
mosomal changes in a primary squamous carcinoma of the Cancer 1987; 60(7):1583–1588.
parotid gland. Anticancer Res 1993; 13(4):897–899. 16. Mair S, Phillips JI, Cohen R. Small cell undifferentiated
17. Jin Y, Mertens F, Mandahl N, et al. Tetraploidization and carcinoma of the parotid gland: cytologic, histologic,
progressive loss of 6q in a squamous cell carcinoma of immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of a
the parotid gland. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1995; 79(2): neuroendocrine variant. Acta Cytol 1989; 33(2):164–168.
157–159. 17. Hui KK, Luna MA, Batsakis JG, et al. Undifferentiated
18. Nagao T, Serizawa H, Iwaya K, et al. Keratocystoma of the carcinoma of the major salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral
parotid gland: a report of two cases of an unusual patho- Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69(1):76–83.
logic entity. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(9):1005–1010. 18. Pierce ST, Cibull ML, Metcalfe MS, et al. Bone marrow
19. Flynn MB, Maguire S, Martinez S, et al. Primary squamous metastases from small cell cancer of the head and neck.
cell carcinoma of the parotid gland: the importance of correct Head Neck 1994; 16(3):266–271.
histological diagnosis. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6(8): 768–770. 19. Toyosawa S, Ohnishi A, Ito R, et al. Small cell undifferenti-
ated carcinoma of the submandibular gland: immunohis-
tochemical evidence of myoepithelial, basal and luminal
Small Cell Carcinoma
cell features. Pathol Int 1999; 49(10):887–892.
1. Seifert G, Sobin L. World Health Organization International 20. Vural C, Dogan O, Yavuz E, et al. Small cell neuroendo-
Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic Typing crine tumor of the parotid gland. Otolaryngol Head Neck
of Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer- Surg 2000; 122(1):151–152.
Verlag, 1991. 21. Siciliano S, Crevecoeur H, Weynand B, et al. Primary
2. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. Histopathologic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid gland: a case
studies of undifferentiated carcinoma of the parotid gland. report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59(11):1359–1362.
Cancer 1982; 50(8):1572–1579. 22. Mineta H, Miura K, Takebayashi S, et al. Immunohisto-
3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Undifferentiated carcinomas. In: Atlas chemical analysis of small cell carcinoma of the head and
of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd neck: a report of four patients and a review of sixteen
series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute patients in the literature with ectopic hormone production.
of Pathology, 1996:296–311. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110(1):76–82.
4. Nagao T. Small cell carcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, 23. de Vicente Rodrı́guez JC, Fresno Forcelledo MF, Junquera
Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi- Gutiérrez LM, et al. Small cell undifferentiated carcinoma
cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and of the submandibular gland with neuroendocrine features.
Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:247–248. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2004; 113(1):55–59.
5. Nagao T. Large cell carcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, 24. Cheuk W, Kwan MY, Suster S, et al. Immunostaining for
Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi- thyroid transcription factor 1 and cytokeratin 20 aids the
cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and distinction of small cell carcinoma from Merkel cell carcino-
Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:249–250. ma, but not pulmonary from extrapulmonary small cell
6. Tsang WYW, Kuo TT, Chan JKC. Lymphoepithelial carci- carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125(2): 228–231.
noma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. 25. Gnepp DR. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: larynx. A critical review of the literature. ORL J Otorhino-
Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. laryngol Relat Spec 1991; 53(4):210–219.
Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:251–252.
7. Gnepp DR, Wick MR. Small cell carcinoma of the major Large Cell Carcinoma
salivary glands: an immunohistochemical study. Cancer
1990; 66(1):185–192. 1. Nagao T. Large cell carcinoma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW,
8. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Olsen KD, et al. Small cell carcinoma Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi-
of the major salivary gland: clinicopathologic study with cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and
emphasis on cytokeratin 20 immunoreactivity and clinical Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:249–250.
outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28(6):762–770. 2. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. Histopathologic
9. Chan JK, Suster S, Wenig BM, et al. Cytokeratin 20 immu- studies of undifferentiated carcinoma of the parotid gland.
noreactivity distinguishes Merkel cell (primary cutaneous Cancer 1982; 50(8):1572–1579.
644 Eveson and Nagao
3. Hui KK, Luna MA, Batsakis JG, et al. Undifferentiated 22. Wang CP, Chang YL, Ko JK, et al. Lymphoepithelial
carcinomas of the major salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral carcinoma versus large cell undifferentiated carcinoma of
Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69(1):76–83. the major salivary glands. Cancer 2004; 101(9):2020–2027.
4. Batsakis JG, Luna MA. Undifferentiated carcinomas of sali-
vary glands. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100(1): 82–84. Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma
5. Moore JG, Bocklage T. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of
large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the salivary 1. Chan JKC, Yip TT, Tsang WY, et al. Specific association of
glands: presentation of two cases, literature review, and Epstein-Barr virus with lymphoepithelial carcinoma
differential cytodiagnosis of high-grade salivary gland among tumors and tumorlike lesions of the salivary
malignancies. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 19(1):44–50. gland. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118(10):994–997.
6. Uemaetomari I, Ito Z. Large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma 2. Leung SY, Chung LP, Yuen ST, et al. Lymphoepithelial
of the submandibular gland. Auris Nasus Larynx 2005; carcinoma of the salivary gland: in situ detection of
32(4):431–434. Epstein-Barr virus. J Clin Pathol 1995; 48(11):1022–1027.
7. Seifert G, Sobin L. World Health Organization International 3. Kountakis SE, SooHoo W, Maillard A. Lymphoepithelial
Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic Typing of carcinoma of the parotid gland. Head Neck 1995; 17
Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (5):445–450.
1991. 4. Abdulla AK, Mian MY. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of
8. Larsson LG, Donner LR. Large cell neuroendocrine carci- salivary glands. Head Neck 1996; 18(6):577–581.
noma of the parotid gland: fine needle aspiration, and light 5. Worley NK, Daroca PJ Jr. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of
microscopic and ultrastructural study. Acta Cytol 1999; the minor salivary gland. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
43(3):534–536. Surg 1997; 123(6):638–640.
9. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Primary large-cell 6. Wang CP, Chang YL, Ko JY, et al. Lymphoepithelial
neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid gland: immuno- carcinoma versus large cell undifferentiated carcinoma of
histochemical and molecular analysis of two cases. Mod the major salivary glands. Cancer 2004; 101(9):2020–2027.
Pathol 2000; 13(5):554–561. 7. Tsang WYW, Kuo TT, Chan JKC. Lymphoepithelial carci-
10. Casas P, Bernáldez R, Patrón M, et al. Large cell neuroen- noma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds.
docrine carcinoma of the parotid gland: case report and World Health Organization Classification of Tumours:
literature review. Auris Nasus Larynx 2005; 32(1):89–93. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumors.
11. Hayashi Y, Aoki N. Undifferentiated carcinoma of the Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:251–252.
parotid gland with bizarre giant cells: clinicopathologic 8. Seifert G, Sobin LH. World Health Organization Interna-
report with ultrastructural study. Acta Pathol Jpn 1983; tional Histologic Classification of Tumours: Histologic
33(1):169–176. Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours. 2nd ed. Berlin: Spring-
12. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. Histopathologic er-Verlag, 1991:30–31.
studies on carcinoma in pleomorphic adenoma of the 9. Cleary KR, Batsakis JG. Undifferentiated carcinoma with
parotid gland. Cancer 1981; 48(1):113–121. lymphoid stroma of the major salivary glands. Ann Otol
13. Stanley RJ, Weiland LH, Olsen KD, et al. Dedifferentiated Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99(3 pt 1):236–238.
acinic cell (acinous) carcinoma of the parotid gland. Oto- 10. Nagao T, Ishida Y, Sugano I, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-
laryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 98(2):155–161. associated undifferentiated carcinoma with lymphoid stroma
14. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Kay PA, et al. Dedifferentiation in of the salivary gland in Japanese patients: comparison with
low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid benign lymphoepithelial lesion. Cancer 1996; 78(4): 695–703.
gland. Hum Pathol 2003; 34(10):1068–1072. 11. Evans AT, Guthrie W. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma
15. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Serizawa H, et al. Dedifferentiated of the uvula and palate: a rare lesion in an unusual site.
adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 6 Histopathology 1991; 19(2):184–186.
cases. Mod Pathol 2003; 16(12):1265–1272. 12. Kuo T, Hsueh C. Lymphoepithelioma-like salivary gland
16. Alos L, Carrillo R, Ramos J, et al. High-grade carcinoma carcinoma in Taiwan: a clinicopathological study of nine
component in epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of sali- cases demonstrating a strong association with Epstein-Barr
vary glands clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and virus. Histopathology 1997; 31(1):75–82.
flow-cytometric study of three cases. Virchows Arch 1999; 13. Ferlito A, Donati LF. Malignant lymphoepithelial lesions
434(4):291–299. (undifferentiated ductal carcinomas of the parotid gland). J
17. Lloreta J, Serrano S, Corominas JM, et al. Polymorphous Laryngol Otol 1977; 91(10):869–885.
low-grade adenocarcinoma arising in the nasal cavities 14. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Saiga H, et al. A histopathologic
with an associated undifferentiated carcinoma. Ultrastruct study of benign and malignant lymphoepithelial lesions of
Pathol 1995; 19(5):365–370. the parotid gland. Cancer 1983; 52(6):1044–1052.
18. Soini Y, Kamel D, Nuorva K, et al. Low p53 protein 15. Yazdi HM, Hogg GR. Malignant lymphoepithelial lesion
expression in salivary gland tumours compared with of the submandibular gland. Am J Clin Pathol 1984; 82(3):
lung carcinomas. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopa- 344–348.
thol 1992; 421(3):415–420. 16. Saw D, Lau WH, Ho JH, et al. Malignant lymphoepithelial
19. Mutoh H, Nagata H, Ohno K, et al. Analysis of the p53 lesion of the salivary gland. Hum Pathol 1986; 17(9):914–923.
gene in parotid gland cancers: a relatively high frequency 17. Bosch JD, Kudryk WH, Johnson GH. The malignant lym-
of mutations in low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas. phoepithelial lesion of the salivary glands. J Otolaryngol
Int J Oncol 2001; 18(4):781–786. 1988; 17(4):187–190.
20. Yaku Y, Kanda T, Yoshihara T, et al. Undifferentiated 18. Christiansen MS, Mourad WA, Hales ML, et al. Spindle cell
carcinoma of the parotid gland: case report with electron malignant lymphoepithelial lesion of the parotid gland:
microscopic findings. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat His- clinical, light microscopic, ultrastructural, and in situ
topathol 1983; 401(1):89–97. hybridization findings in one case. Mod Pathol 1995; 8
21. Takata T, Caselitz J, Seifert G. Undifferentiated tumors of (7):711–715.
salivary glands: immunocytochemical investigations and 19. Wu DLL, Shemen L, Brady T, et al. Malignant lymphoepi-
differential diagnosis of 22 cases. Pathol Res Pract 1987; 182 thelial lesion of the parotid gland: a case report and review
(2):161–168. of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J 2001; 80(11):803–806.
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 645
20. Chen KTK. Carcinoma arising in a benign lymphoepithe- 8. Garrido A, Humphrey G, Squire RS, et al. Sialoblastoma. Br
lial lesion. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109(9):619–621. J Plast Surg 2000; 53(8):697–699.
21. Wallace AG, McDougall JT, Hildes JA, et al. Salivary 9. Green RS, Tunkel DE, Small D, et al. Sialoblastoma: associ-
gland tumors in Canadian Eskimos. Cancer 1963; 16: ation with cutaneous hamartoma (organoid nevus)?
1338–1353. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2000; 3(5):504–505.
22. Nielsen NH, Mikkelsen F, Hansen JP. Incidence of salivary 10. Harris MD, McKeever P, Robertson JM. Congenital
gland neoplasms in Greenland with special reference to an tumours of the salivary gland: a case report and review.
anaplastic carcinoma. Acta Path Microbiol Scand [A] 1978; Histopathology 1990; 17(2):155–157.
86(2):185–193. 11. Hsueh C, Gonzalez-Crussi F. Sialoblastoma: a case report
23. Saemundsen AK, Albeck H, Hansen JPH, et al. Epstein- and review of the literature on congenital epithelial
Barr virus in nasopharyngeal and salivary carcinomas of tumors of salivary gland origin. Pediatr Pathol 1992; 12(2):
Greenland Eskimos. Br J Cancer 1982; 46(5):721–728. 205–214.
24. Krishnamurthy S, Lanier AP, Dohan P, et al. Salivary gland 12. Huang R, Jaffer S. Imprint cytology of metastatic sialoblas-
cancer in Alaskan natives, 1966-1980. Hum Pathol 1987; 18 toma. A case report. Acta Cytol 2003; 47(6):1123–1126.
(10):986–996. 13. Luna MA. Sialoblastoma and epithelial tumors in children:
25. Huang DP, Ng HK, Ho YH, et al. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)- their morphologic spectrum and distribution by age. Adv
associated undifferentiated carcinoma of the parotid gland. Anat Pathol 1999; 6(5):287–292.
Histopathology 1988; 13(5):509–517. 14. Mostafapour SP, Folz B, Barlow D, et al. Sialoblastoma of
26. Sheen TS, Tsai CC, Ko JY, et al. Undifferentiated carcinoma the submandibular gland: report of a case and review of
of the major salivary glands. Cancer 1997; 80(3):357–363. the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 53(2):
27. Merrick Y, Albeck H, Nielsen NH, et al. Familial clustering 157–161.
of salivary gland carcinoma in Greenland. Cancer 1986; 57 15. Ortiz-Hidalgo C, de Leon-Bojorge B, Fernandez-Sobrino G,
(10):2097–2102. et al. Sialoblastoma: report of a congenital case with
28. Autio-Harmainen H, Pääkkö P, Alavaikko M, et al. Familial dysembryogenic alterations of the adjacent parotid gland.
occurrence of malignant lymphoepithelial lesion of the Histopathology 2001; 38(1):79–80.
parotid in a Finnish family with dominantly inherited 16. Ozdemir I, Simsek E, Silan F, et al. Congenital sialoblas-
trichoepithelioma. Cancer 1988; 61(1):161–166. toma (embryoma) associated with premature centromere
29. Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Therkildsen MH, Neilsen NH, et al. division and high level of alpha-fetoprotein. Prenat Diagn
Undifferentiated carcinoma of the salivary gland in Green- 2005; 25(8):687–689.
landic Eskimos: demonstration of Epstein-Barr virus DNA 17. Roth A, Micheau C. Embryoma (or embryonal tumor) of
by in situ nucleic acid hybridization. Hum Pathol 1991; the parotid gland: report of two cases. Pediatr Pathol 1986;
22(8):811–815. 5(1):9–15.
30. Kotsianti A, Costopoulos J, Morgello S, et al. Undifferenti- 18. Seifert G, Donath K. The congenital basal cell adenoma of
ated carcinoma of the parotid gland in a white patient: salivary glands. Contribution to the differential diagnosis
detection of Epstein-Barr virus by in situ hybridization. of congenital salivary gland tumours. Virchows Arch 1997;
Hum Pathol 1996; 27(1):87–90. 430(4):311–319.
31. Sehested M, Hainau B, Albeck H, et al. Ultrastructural 19. Siddiqi SH, Solomon MP, Haller JO. Sialoblastoma and
investigation of anaplastic salivary gland carcinoma in hepatoblastoma in a neonate. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30
Eskimos. Cancer 1985; 55(11):2732–2736. (5):349–351.
32. Jen KY, Cheng J, Li J, et al. Mutational events in LMP1 gene 20. Simpson PR, Rutledge JC, Schaefer SD, et al. Congenital
of Epstein-Barr virus in salivary gland lymphoepithelial hybrid basal cell adenoma–adenoid cystic carcinoma of the
carcinomas. Int J Cancer 2003; 105(5):654–660. salivary gland. Pediatr Pathol 1986; 6(2–3):199–208.
33. Ma J, Chan JK, Chow CW, et al. Lymphadenoma: a report 21. Tatlidede S, Karsidag S, Ugurlu K, et al. Sialoblastoma: a
of three cases of an uncommon salivary gland neoplasm. congenital epithelial tumor of the salivary gland. J Pediatr
Histopathology 2002; 41(4):342–350. Surg 2006; 41(7):1322–1325.
22. Verret DJ, Galindo RL, DeFatta RJ, et al. Sialoblastoma: a
rare submandibular gland neoplasm. Ear Nose Throat J
Sialoblastoma
2006; 85(7):440–442.
1. Brandwein-Gensler MS. Sialoblastoma. In: Barnes L, Eve- 23. Williams SB, Ellis GL, Warnock GR. Sialoblastoma: a
son JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 7
Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 2006; 10(6):320–326.
and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:253. 24. Yekeler E, Dursun M, Gun F, et al. Sialoblastoma: MRI
2. Vawter GF, Tefft M. Congenital tumors of the parotid findings. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34(12):1005–1007.
gland. Arch Pathol 1966; 82(3):242–245. 25. Shet T, Ramadwar M, Sharma S. An eyelid sialoblastoma
3. Taylor GP. Congenital epithelial tumor of the parotid- like tumor with a sarcomatoid myoepithelial component.
sialoblastoma. Pediatr Pathol 1988; 8(4):447–452. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2007; 10(4):309–314.
4. Adkins GF. Low grade basaloid adenocarcinoma of sali- 26. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Sialoblastoma. In: Atlas of Tumor
vary gland in childhood–the so-called hybrid basal cell Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. 3rd series, fascicle
adenoma–adenoid cystic carcinoma. Pathology 1990; 22(4): 17. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,
187–190. 1996:136–142.
5. Batsakis JG, Frankenthaler R. Embryoma (sialoblastoma) of 27. Scott JX, Krishnan S, Bourne AJ, et al. Treatment of meta-
salivary glands. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101(11): static sialoblastoma with chemotherapy and surgery.
958–960. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50(1):134–137.
6. Alvarez-Mendoza A, Calderon-Elvir C, Carrasco-Daza D.
Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to sialoblastoma: Hybrid Tumors
report of a case. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34(12):1875–1877.
7. Brandwein M, Al-Naeif NS, Manwani D, et al. Sialoblas- 1. Seifert G, Donath K. Hybrid tumors of salivary glands:
toma: clinicopathological/immunohistochemical study. definition and classification of five rare cases. Eur J Cancer
Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23(3):342–348. B Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(4):251–259.
646 Eveson and Nagao
2. Gnepp DR, Brandwein MS, Henley JD. Hybrid tumors. In: 22. Seethala RR, Hunt JL, Baloch ZW, et al. Adenoid cystic
Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck. carcinoma with high-grade transformation: a report of 11
Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001:406–407. cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;
3. Grenko RT, Abendroth CS, Davis AT, et al. Hybrid tumors 31(11):1683–1694.
or salivary gland tumors sharing common differentiation 23. Alos L, Carrillo R, Ramos J, et al. High-grade carcinoma
pathways? Reexamining adenoid cystic and epithelial- component in epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of sali-
myoepithelial carcinomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol vary glands clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and
Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86(2):188–195. flow-cytometric study of three cases. Virchows Arch 1999;
4. Croitoru CM, Suarez PA, Luna MA. Hybrid carcinomas of 434(4):291–299.
salivary glands: report of 4 cases and review of the litera- 24. Pelkey TJ, Mills SE. Histologic transformation of polymor-
ture. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123(8):698–702. phous low-grade adenocarcinoma of salivary gland. Am J
5. Chetty R, Medley P, Essa A. Hybrid carcinomas of salivary Clin Pathol 1999; 111(6):785–791.
glands. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(4):494–496. 25. Simpson RH, Pereira EM, Ribeiro AC, et al. Polymorphous
6. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Hybrid carcinomas of low-grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands with
the salivary glands: report of nine cases with a clinicopath- transformation to high-grade carcinoma. Histopathology
ologic, immunohistochemical, and p53 gene alteration 2002; 41(3):250–259.
analysis. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(7):724–733.
7. Ballestin C, Lopez-Carreira M, Lopez JI. Combined acinic Intraosseous (Central) Salivary Gland Tumors
cell mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland:
report of a case with immunohistochemical study. APMIS 1. Brookstone MS, Huvos AG. Central salivary gland tumors
1996; 104(2):99–102. of the maxilla and mandible: a clinicopathologic study of
8. Kamio N, Tanaka Y, Mukai M, et al. A hybrid carcinoma: 11 cases with an analysis of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac
adenoid cystic carcinoma and salivary duct carcinoma of Surg 1992; 50(3):229–236.
the salivary gland: an immunohistochemical study. Virch- 2. Waldron CA, Koh ML. Central mucoepidermoid carcino-
ows Arch 1997; 430(6):495–500. ma of the jaws: report of four cases with analysis of the
9. Simpson PR. Pitfalls in salivary gland pathology: hybrid literature and discussion of the relationship to mucoepi-
epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma and adenoid cystic car- dermoid, sialodontogenic, and glandular odontogenic
cinoma [abst 067]. Pathol Res Pract 1997; 193:342. cysts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48(8):871–877.
10. Snyder ML, Paulino AF. Hybrid carcinoma of the salivary 3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
gland: salivary duct adenocarcinoma adenoid cystic carci- In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Salivary
noma. Histopathology 1999; 35(4):380–383. Glands. 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington, DC: Armed
11. Zardawi IM. Hybrid carcinoma of the salivary gland. Forces Institute of Pathology, 1996:172–175.
Histopathology 2000; 37(3):283–284. 4. Bouquot JE, Gnepp DR, Dardick I, et al. Intraosseous
12. Ruiz-Godoy LM, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Suarez-Roa L, et al. salivary tissue: jawbone examples of choristomas, hamar-
Hybrid tumours of the salivary glands. A report of two tomas, embryonic rests and inflammatory entrapment.
cases involving the palate and a review of the literature. Another histogenetic source for intraosseous adenocarci-
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 260(6):312–315. noma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
13. Murphy JG, Lonsdale R, Premachandra D, et al. Salivary 2000; 90(2):205–217.
hybrid tumour: adenoid cystic carcinoma and basal cell 5. Capodiferro S, Scully C, Macaita MG, et al. Bilateral intra-
adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch 2006; 448(2):236–238. osseous adenoid cystic carcinoma of the mandible: report
14. Seifert G, Donath K. Multiple tumours of the salivary of a case with lung metastases at first clinical presentation.
glands: terminology and nomenclature. Eur J Cancer B Oral Dis 2005; 11(2):109–112.
Oral Oncol 1996; 32B(1):3–7. 6. Chen YK, Chen CH, Lin CC, et al. Central adenoid cystic
15. Gnepp DR, Schroeder W, Heffner D. Synchronous tumors carcinoma of the mandible manifesting as an endodontic
arising in a single major salivary gland. Cancer 1989; 63 lesion. Int Endod J 2004; 37(10):711–716.
(6):1219–1224. 7. Favia G, Maiorano E, Orsini G, et al. Central (intraoss-
16. Brandwein MS, Jagirdar J, Patil J, et al. Salivary duct eous) adenoid cystic carcinoma of the mandible: report of
carcinoma (cribriform salivary carcinoma of excretory a case with periapical involvement. J Endod 2000; 26
ducts). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (12):760–763.
study of 12 cases. Cancer 1990; 65(10):2307–2314. 8. Al-Sukhun J, Lindqvist C, Hietanen J, et al. Central adenoid
17. Seethala RR, Barnes EL, Hunt JL. Epithelial-myoepithelial cystic carcinoma of the mandible: case report and literature
carcinoma: a review of the clinicopathologic spectrum and review of 16 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
immunophenotypic characteristics in 61 tumors of the Radiol Endod 2006; 101(3):304–308.
salivary glands and upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg 9. Berho M, Huvos AG. Central hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma
Pathol 2007; 31(1):44–57. of the mandible and the maxilla: a clinicopathologic study of
18. Shinozaki A, Nagao T, Endo H, et al. Sebaceous epithelial- two cases with an analysis of the literature. Hum Pathol 1999;
myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland: clinicopatho- 30(1):101–105.
logic and immunohistochemical analysis of six cases of a new 10. Martinez-Madrigal F, Pineda-Daboin K, Casiraghi O, et al.
histologic variant. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32(6):913–923. Salivary gland tumors of the mandible. Ann Diagn Pathol
19. Stanley RJ, Weiland LH, Olsen KD, et al. Dedifferentiated 2000; 4(6):347–353.
acinic cell (acinous) carcinoma of the parotid gland. Oto- 11. Kikuchi Y, Hirota M, Iwai T, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma
laryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 98(2):155–161. in the mandible: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
20. Cheuk W, Chan JK, Ngan RK. Dedifferentiation in adenoid Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3):e41–e46.
cystic carcinoma of salivary gland: an uncommon compli- 12. Ojha J, Bhattacharyya I, Islam MN, et al. Intraosseous
cation associated with an accelerated clinical course. Am J pleomorphic adenoma of the mandible: report of a case
Surg Pathol 1999; 23(4):465–472. and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
21. Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Serizawa H, et al. Dedifferentiated Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(2):e21–e26.
adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 6 13. Cuesta Gil M, Bucci T, Navarro Cuellar C, et al. Intra-
cases. Mod Pathol 2003; 16(12):1265–1272. osseous myoepithelioma of the maxilla: clinicopathologic
Chapter 10: Diseases of the Salivary Glands 647
features and therapeutic considerations. J Oral Maxillofac 18. Fregnani ER, Pires FR, Falzoni R, et al. Lipomas of the oral
Surg 2008; 66(4):800–803. cavity. Clinical findings, histological classification and
14. Pires FR, Chen SY, da Cruz Perez DE, et al. Cytokeratin proliferative activity of 46 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac
expression in central mucoepidermoid carcinoma and Surg 2003; 32(1):49–53.
glandular odontogenic cyst. Oral Oncol 2004; 40(1):545–551. 19. Nagao T, Sugano I, Ishida Y, et al. Sialolipoma: a report of
15. Shen J, Fan M, Chen X, et al. Glandular odontogenic cyst in seven cases of a new variant of salivary gland lipoma.
China: report of 12 cases and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 2001; 38(1):30–36.
J Oral Pathol Med 2006; 35(3):175–182. 20. Fanburg-Smith JC, Furlong MA, Childers EL. Oral and
salivary gland angiosarcoma. A clinicopathologic study
of 29 cases. Mod Pathol 2003; 16(3):263–271.
Soft Tissue Tumors
21. Castle JT, Thompson LD. Kaposi sarcoma of major salivary
1. Seifert G, Oehne H. Mesenchymal (non-epithelial) salivary gland origin. A clinicopathologic series of six cases. Cancer
gland tumors. Analysis of 167 tumor cases of the salivary 2000; 88(1):15–23.
gland register. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 1986; 65(9): 22. Fanburg-Smith JC, Furlong MA, Childers EL. Liposarcoma
485–491. of the oral and salivary gland region. A clinicopathologic
2. McDaniel RK. Benign mesenchymal neoplasms. In Ellis GL, study of 18 cases with emphasis on specific sites, morpho-
Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the logic subtypes, and clinical outcome. Mod Pathol 2002; 15
Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:489–513. (10):1020–1031.
3. Auclair PL, Ellis GL. Nonlymphoid sarcomas of the major 23. Tse LL, Finkelstein SD, Siegler RW, et al. Osteoclast-type
salivary glands. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. giant cell neoplasm of salivary gland. A microdissection-
Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: based comparative genotyping assay and literature review:
WB Saunders, 1991:514–527. extraskeletal ‘‘giant cell tumor of bone’’ or osteoclast-type
4. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Nonlymphoid mesenchymal neo- giant cell ‘‘carcinoma’’? Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28(7):
plasms. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the 953–961.
Salivary Glands. 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington DC: 24. Kadivar M, Nilipour Y, Sadeghipour A. Osteoclast-like giant-
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1996:375–385. cell tumor of the parotid with salivary duct carcinoma: case
5. Gnepp DR. Soft tissue tumours. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, report and cytologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical
Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classifi- findings. Ear Nose Throat J 2007; 86(10):628–630.
cation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and 25. Luna MA, Tortoledo ME, Ordóñez NG, et al. Primary
Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:275. sarcomas of the major salivary glands. Arch Otolaryngol
6. Auclair PL, Langloss JM, Weiss SW, et al. Sarcomas and Head Neck Surg 1991; 117(3):302–306.
sarcomatoid neoplasms of the major salivary gland 26. Drut R, Altamirano E. Endothelial cells of intramuscular
regions. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (infantile) hemangioma express glut1. Int J Surg Pathol
study of 67 cases and review of the literature. Cancer 2007; 15(2):166–168.
1986; 58(6):1305–1315. 27. Hornigold R, Morgan PR, Pearce A, et al. Congenital
7. Cho KJ, Ro JY, Choi J, et al. Mesenchymal neoplasms of the sialolipoma of the parotid gland first reported case and
major salivary glands: clinicopathological features of 18 review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007, in press. 2005; 69(3):429–434.
8. Nagao K, Matsuzaki O, Shigematsu H, et al. Histopatho- 28. Ramer N, Lumerman HS, Ramer Y. Sialolipoma: report of
logic studies of benign infantile hemangioendothelioma of two cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med
the parotid gland. Cancer 1980; 46(10):2250–2256. Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(6):809–813.
9. Odell E. Haemangioma. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart 29. Bansal B, Ramavat AS, Gupta S, et al. Congenital sialoli-
P, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of poma of parotid gland: a report of rare and recently
Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck described entity with review of literature. Pediatr Dev
Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press 2005; 276. Pathol 2007; 10(3):244–246.
10. Childers EL, Furlong MA, Fanburg-Smith JC. Hemangioma 30. Yau KC, Tsang WY, Chan JK. Lipoadenoma of the parotid
of the salivary gland. A study of ten cases of a rarely gland with probable striated duct differentiation. Mod
biopsied/excised lesion. Ann Diagn Pathol 2002; 6(6): Pathol 1997; 10(3):242–246.
339–344. 31. Hirokawa M, Shimizu M, Manabe T, et al. Oncocytic lip-
11. Ferreiro JA, Nascimento AG. Solitary fibrous tumour of the oadenoma of the submandibular gland. Hum Pathol 1998;
major salivary glands. Histopathology 1996; 28(3):261–264. 29(4):410–412.
12. Ogawa I, Sato S, Kudo Y, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor with 32. Seifert G, Donath K, Schafer R. Lipomatous pleomorphic
malignant potential arising in sublingual gland. Pathol Int adenoma of the parotid gland: classification of lipomatous
2003; 53(1):40–45. tissue in salivary glands. Pathol Res Pract 1999; 195(4):
13. Williams SB, Foss RD, Ellis GL. Inflammatory pseudotu- 247–252.
mors of the major salivary glands. Clinicopathologic and
immunohistochemical analysis of six cases. Am J Surg Malignant Lymphomas
Pathol 1992; 16(9):896–902.
14. Van Weert S, Manni JJ, Driessen A. Inflammatory myofibro- 1. Colby TV, Dorfman RF. Malignant lymphomas involving
blastic tumor of the parotid gland: case report and review of the salivary glands. Pathol Annu 1979; 14(pt 2):307–324.
the literature. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125(4):433–437. 2. Gleeson MJ, Bennett MH, Cawson RA. Lymphomas of
15. Kojima M, Nakamura S, Itoh H, et al. Inflammatory pseu- salivary glands. Cancer 1986; 58(3):699–704.
dotumor of the submandibular gland: report of a case 3. Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Malignant lymphomas of the major
presenting with autoimmune disease-like clinical manifes- salivary glands. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of
tations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125(8):1095–1097. the Salivary Glands. 3rd series, fascicle 17. Washington DC:
16. Walts AE, Perzik SL. Lipomatous lesions of the parotid Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1996:387–402.
area. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102(4):230–232. 4. Barnes L, Myers EN, Prokopakis EP. Primary malignant
17. Baker SE, Jensen JL, Correll RW. Lipomas of the parotid lymphoma of the parotid gland. Arch Otolaryngol Head
gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 52(2):167–171. Neck Surg 1998; 124(5):573–577.
648 Eveson and Nagao
5. Chan ACL, Chan JKC, Abbondanzo SL. Haematolymphoid 21. Casato M, Agnello V, Pucillo LP, et al. Predictors of long-
tumours. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. term response to high-dose interferon therapy in type II
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: cryoglobulinemia associated with hepatitis C virus infec-
Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. tion. Blood 1997; 90(10):3865–3873.
Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:277–280. 22. Dierlamm J, Wlodarska I, Michaux L, et al. Genetic abnor-
6. Chan JK, Tsang WY, Hui PK, et al. T-and T/natural killer- malities in marginal zone lymphomas. Hematol Oncol
cell lymphomas of the salivary gland: a clinicopathologic, 2000; 18(1):1–9.
immunohistochemical and molecular study of six cases. 23. Remstein ED, James CD, Kurtin PJ. Incidence and subtype
Hum Pathol 1997; 28(2):238–246. of Api2-MALT1 fusion translocations in extranodal, nodal
7. Harris NL. Lymphoid proliferations of the salivary glands. and splenic marginal zone lymphomas. Am J Pathol 2000;
Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111(suppl 1):S94–S103. 156(4):1183–1190.
8. Hyjek E, Smith WJ, Issacson PG. Primary B-cell lymphoma 24. Liu H, Ye H, Dogan A, et al. T(11;18)(q21;q21) is associated
of salivary glands and its relationship to myoepithelial with advanced mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lym-
sialoadenitis. Hum Pathol 1988; 19(7):766–776. phoma that expresses nuclear BCL-10. Blood 2001; 98(4):
9. Abbondanzo SL. Extranodal marginal-zone B-cell lympho- 1182–1187.
ma of the salivary gland. Ann Diagn Pathol 2001; 5(4): 25. Streubel B, Lamprecht A, Dierlamm J, et al. T(14;18)
246–254. (q32;q21) involving IGH and MALT1 is a frequent chromo-
10. Jaffe ES. Lymphoid lesions of the head and neck: a model somal aberration in MALT lymphoma. Blood 2003; 101(6):
of lymphocyte homing and lymphomagenesis. Mod Pathol 2335–2339.
2002; 15(3):255–263. 26. Streubel B, Simonitsch-Klupp I, Mullauer L, et al. Variable
11. Ambosetti A, Zanotti R, Pattaro C, et al. Most cases of frequencies of MALT lymphoma-associated genetic aber-
primary salivary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue rations in MALT lymphomas of different sites. Leukemia
lymphoma are associated either with Sjogren’s syndrome 2004; 18(10):1722–1726.
or hepatitis C virus infection. Br J Hematol 2004; 126(1): 27. Streubel B, Vinatzer U, Lamprecht A, et al. T(3;14)(p14.1;
43–49. q32) involving IGH and FOXP1 is a novel recurrent chro-
12. Park CK, Manning JT Jr., Battifora H, et al. Follicle center mosomal aberration in MALT lymphoma. Leukemia 2005;
lymphoma and Warthin tumor involving the same ana- 19(4):652–658.
tomic site. Report of two cases and review of the literature. 28. Bacon CM, Du MQ, Dogan A. Mucosa-associated lym-
Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 113(1):113–119. phoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma: a practical guide for
13. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, et al. World Health Organiza- pathologists. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60(4):361–372.
tion Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of
Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Press,
Secondary Tumors
2001.
14. Isaacson P, Wright DH. Malignant lymphoma of mucosa- 1. Löning T, Jäkel KT. Secondary tumours. In: Barnes L, Eveson
associated lymphoid tissue. A distinctive type of B-cell JW, Reichart P, et al., eds. World Health Organization
lymphoma. Cancer 1983; 52(8):1410–1416. Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head
15. Isaacson PG. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lympho- and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005:281.
ma. Semin Hematol 1999; 36(2):139–147. 2. Gnepp DR. Metastatic disease to the major salivary glands.
16. Du M, Diss TC, Xu C, et al. Ongoing mutation on MALT In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology
lymphoma immunoglobulin gene suggests that antigen of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
stimulation plays a role in clonal expansion. Leukemia 1991:560–569.
1996; 10(7):1190–1197. 3. Ying YL, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Squamous cell carcinoma
17. Bahler DW, Swerdlow SH. Clonal salivary gland infiltrates of the parotid gland. Head Neck 2006; 28(7):626–632.
associated with myoepithelial sialadenitis (Sjogren’s syn- 4. Seifert G, Hennings K, Caselitz J. Metastatic tumors to the
drome) begin as nonmalignant antigen-selected expan- parotid and submandibular glands—analysis and differen-
sions. Blood 1998; 91(6):1864–1872. tial diagnosis of 108 cases. Pathol Res Pract 1986; 181(6):
18. Diss TC, Wotherspoon AC, Speight P, et al. B-cell mono- 684–692.
clonality, Epstein-Barr virus and t(14;18) in myoepithelial 5. Auclair PL. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation in
sialadenitis and low grade B-cell MALT lymphoma of the the parotid gland. A potential diagnostic pitfall. Oral
parotid gland. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19(5):531–539. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77(1):19–26.
19. Quintana PG, Kapadia SB, Bahler DW, et al. Salivary gland 6. Conley J, Arena S. Parotid gland as a focus of metastasis.
lymphoid infiltrates associated with lymphoepithelial Arch Surg 1963; 87:757–764.
lesions. A clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and 7. Rees R, Maples M, Lynch JB, et al. Malignant secondary
genotypic study. Hum Pathol 1997; 28(7):850–861. parotid tumors. South Med J 1981; 74(9):1050–1052.
20. Harris NL, Isaacson PG. What are the criteria for distinguish- 8. Nuyens M, Schüpbach J, Stauffer E, et al. Metastatic disease
ing MALT from non-MALT lymphoma at extranodal sites? to the parotid gland. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;
Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111(suppl 1):S126–S132. 135(6):844–848.
Index
AAD. See Acroangiodermatitis (AAD) Acyclovir, 1673 ALCD. See Anterior lingual cortical defect
ABC. See Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) Addison’s disease, 1460 (ALCD)
ABCD. See Anterior buccal cortical defect Adenocarcinoma, 578–580 ALCL. See Anaplastic large cell lymphoma
(ABCD) of left supraclavicular lymph node, 1151 (ALCL)
AC. See Atypical carcinoid (AC) Adenocarcinomas Alcohol, oral cancer, 288
Acanthamoeba keratitis, 1571–1572 ceruminal gland, 462–463 ALHE. See Angiolymphoid hyperplasia
Acantholytic actinic keratosis (AK), 1491 intestinal-type, 383–387 with eosinophilia (ALHE)
Acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma middle ear, 466–467 ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma,
(ALSCC), 159–160 of nasal cavity/paranasal sinuses, 1065–1068
clinical features, 160 classification, 383 clinical features, 1066
diagnosis, 160 nonintestinal-type, 387–389 differential diagnosis, 1068
etiology, 159–160 Adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC), 23, immunohistochemistry, 1066–1067
overviews, 159 24–25, 76, 168–169, 178, 390, molecular genetic data, 1067–1068
pathology, 160 552–557 pathology, 1066
treatment, 160 Adenoid hyperplasia, 225–226 ALK- anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 1068
Acanthosis, 253 pathology, 226 ALK+ DLBCL, 1042
ACC. See Adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) treatment, 226 ALK gene, 1042
Accessory tragi, 425–426 Adenoid squamous carcinomas, 313–314 Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS),
Acinar cells, 20, 27 Adenomatoid nodules. See Hyperplastic 354–356
Acinic cell carcinomas, 29–30, 390, 542–546 nodules clinical features, 355
Acne keloidolis, 1342 Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) etiology, 355
Acoustic neuromas, 454–455, 691–692 AMBN mutation, 1240 pathology, 355–356
Acquired cholesteatomas, 436–437 differential diagnosis, 1240 treatment, 356
Acquired encephalocele, 440 electron microscopy of, 1239–1240 Allergic fungal sinusitis (eosinophilic mucin
Acquired melanosis, 1560–1561 imaging, 1236–1237 rhinosinusitis)
Acquired nonneoplastic lesions, 427–432 immunohistochemistry, 1238–1239 clinical presentation, 1633
cholesterol granulomas, 430 pathology and pathogenesis, 1238 etiology, 1633
inflammatory otic polyps, 431 patterns of, 1237 histopathology, 1633–1634
malakoplakia, 431–432 prevalence and incidence, 1235–1236 treatment, 1634
necrotizing malignant external otitis treatment and prognosis, 1240 Allergic granulo matosis and vasculitis
(NEO), 427–428 Adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette (AGV). See Churg-Strauss syndrome
otitis media, 428–429 transporter A1 (ABCAL1), 1730 Allergic mucus, 354–356
tympanosclerosis, 429–430 Adenosquamous carcinomas, 158–159, Allergic rhinosinusitis, 343–345
Acroangiodermatitis (AAD), 1522 312–313 Alopecia, 252
Actinic cheilitis, 279–280 clinical features, 158 ALSCC. See Acantholytic squamous cell
clinical features, 279 diagnosis, 159 carcinoma (ALSCC)
defined, 279 etiology, 158 Alternaria, 1640
diagnosis, 280 immunohistochemistry, 159 Alveolar cysts, 1343
pathology, 280 overviews, 158 Alveolar mucosa, squamous cell carcinomas
treatment, 280 pathology, 158–159 of, 298–300
Actinic keratosis (AK) treatment, 159 Alveolar RMS (ARMS), 869, 872–873
clinical features, 1489–1490 Adipose tissue, 20 Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), 901–904,
differential diagnosis, 1490–1491 Adult onset laryngeal papillomas, 1677 1363
histologic features, 1490 Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, 1072 in children, 1346
imaging studies, 1490 AFD. See Ameloblastic fibrodentinoma Amalgam tattoo, 204–205
immunohistochemical studies, 1490 (AFD) clinical features, 205
treatment and prognosis, 1491 AFIP. See Armed Forces Institute of pathology, 205
Actinomyces, 1621 Pathology (AFIP) treatment, 205
Actinomyces spp, 953, 1013 Afipia felis, 1011 AMCA. See Ameloblastic carcinoma (AMCA)
Actinomycoses AFOD. See Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma Ameloblastic carcinoma (AMCA), 1292
clinical background, 1620–1621 (AFOD) differential diagnosis, 1295
etiology, 1621 Aggressive osteoblastoma, 970 DNA microarray study, 1295
histopathology, 1621 AIDS, 50 etiology of, 1293–1294
treatment, 1621 AIDS-related lymphomas, 1667 frequency of, 1293
Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, 345 AIDS-related nasopharyngeal lesions, 1661 gender ratio, 1293
Acute bacterial sinusitis, 345 AIDS-related parotid cysts (ARPC), growth rate, 1293
Acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis 1660–1661 immunohistochemistry, 1294
(AECS), 1609 AIDS toxoplasmosis, 1688 locations of, 1293
Acute myeloid leukemia, 1355 AIF. See Apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) ultrastructure of, 1294
Acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis and apoptotic cell death Ameloblastic fibrodentinoma (AFD)
(ANUG), 259 AJCC. See American Joint Committee on clinical features, 1247
Acute suppurative osteomyelitis Cancer (AJCC) immunohistochemistry
pathologic features, 958–959 AJCC 2002 melanoma staging, 1508 neural tissue markers, 1248
radiologic features, 958 AK. See Actinic keratosis (AK) pathogenesis of, 1247–1248
Acute suppurative sialadenitis, 484–485 Albendazole, 1690 treatment and prognosis, 1248
Acute thyroiditis, 4, 1391–1392 Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy, 1460 ultrastructure of, 1248
I-2 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
Ameloblastic fibroma (AMF) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), Apocrine hidrocystomas, 1484
clinical features, 1241–1242 42–43 Apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) and
differential diagnosis, 1245–1246 ALK+, 1065–1068 apoptotic cell death, 1212
etiology of, 1242–1244 ALK-, 1068 Apoptotic protease activating factor-1
imaging of, 1242 ANCA. See Antineutrophil cytoplasmic (APAF-1) and apoptotic cell death,
immunohistochemistry, 1244 autoantibodies (ANCA) 1212
molecular-genetic data, 1245 ANCA titers. See Antineutrophil AR. See Androgen receptor (AR)
treatment and prognosis, 1246–1247 cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) titers Argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions
ultrastructure of, 1245 Ancillary studies, of lymph nodes, 39–40 (AgNORs), 1479
Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFOD) cell block, 39 Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP),
clinical features, 1248–1249 core needle biopsy, 39 976
differential diagnosis, 1252 FISH studies, 40 ARMS. See Alveolar RMS (ARMS)
etiology of, 1249–1250 flow cytometry, 39–40 Arteriovenous hemangioma (arteriovenous
immunohistochemistry PCR studies, 40 malformation)
CK in epithelial component of, 1250 Androgen receptor (AR), 31 clinical findings, 776–777
enamel proteins in, 1251 Aneuploidy, 713 differential diagnosis, 778–779
growth factors, 1251 Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC), 963, 986–987 imaging, 777
MIB-1 antibody, 1251 Angiofibroma immunohistochemistry, 778
nestin and vimentin, 1251 clinical features, 834 pathologic findings, 777–778
molecular-genetic data, 1252 differential diagnosis, 836 prognosis and treatment, 779
osteocalcin transcripts and, 1252 electron microscopy, 836 Arthralgia, 253
radiographs, 1249 imaging, 834–835 Aspergillosis
treatment and prognosis, 1252 immunohistochemistry, 836 acute fulminant invasive, 1630
ultrastructure of, 1251–1252 molecular-genetic data, 836 chronic invasive/chronic granulomatous,
Ameloblastomas, 69 pathology, 835–836 1631–1632
ameloblastin (AMBN) gene mutations in, treatment and prognosis, 836–837 histopathology, 1630–1631
1213 Angiofibromas, 64 historical background, 1629–1630
amelogenin and, 1213 Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 1064 serology, 1631
differential diagnosis, 1214 Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with treatment, 1631
molecules involved in progression of eosinophilia (ALHE) Aspergillus flavus, 1630
angiogenic factors, 1214 clinical features, 1528 Aspergillus fumigatus, 354
cell adhesion molecules, 1213 defined, 1528 Aspirin, 968
matrix-degrading proteinases, differential diagnosis, 1529 intolerance, 346–347
1213–1214 electron microscopy, 1529 ASPS. See Alveolar soft part sarcoma
osteolytic cytokines, 1214 imaging studies, 1528 (ASPS); Alveolar soft part sarcoma
treatment and prognosis, 1214–1215 immunohistochemistry, 1529 (ASPS)
tumorigenesis and/or cell differentiation, molecular genetics, 1529 Asteroid bodies, 1693
molecules involved in pathology, 1528 Ataxia-telangectasia (AT), 1667
apoptosis-related factors, 1212 treatment and prognosis, 1529 Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome, 1523
cell cycle-related factors, 1212 Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH). AT-mutated (ATM) gene, 1667
DNA-repair genes, 1211 See Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Atrophic rhinosinusitis (ARS), 346
gene modifications and, 1210–1211 Angiosarcoma, 867–869, 982–983, 1415–1416 Atypia, 130
growth factors, 1211–1212 Angle recession, 1584 Atypical carcinoid (AC), 164–166
hard tissue-related proteins, 1213 Annexin V activity and apoptotic cells clinical features, 164
oncogenes, 1210 detection, 1212 diagnosis, 165
oncoviruses, 1211 Anterior buccal cortical defect (ABCD), 963 electron microscopy, 165
telomerase activity, 1212 Anterior lingual cortical defect (ALCD), 963 immunohistochemistry, 165
tooth development, regulators of, 1213 Anthelmintics, 1690 pathology, 164
tumor suppressor genes, 1211 Anthracosis, 1444 treatment, 165–166
Amelogenin and calcifying odontogenic cyst Antibiotics, 260 Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX), 463–464,
(COC), 1265 Anticonvulsants drugs, 260 1494–1495
American College of Rheumatology, 253, Antifungal therapy, 257 clinical features, 1520
652 Antigen, 249 differential diagnosis, 1521
American Joint Committee on Cancer Antimalarial drugs, 254 electron microscopy, 1521
(AJCC), 863 Antimicrobial therapy, 37 immunohistochemistry, 1521
staging of nasopharyngeal carcinomas, Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies molecular genetics, 1521
396 (ANCA) titers, 441 pathology, 1520–1521
staging of vestibular carcinomas, 373 Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies/ treatment and prognosis, 1521
AMF. See Ameloblastic fibroma (AMF) autoantibodies (ANCA), 649, 650 Atypical keratinocytes, 1489
5-aminolevulinic acid, 1488 cytoplasmic (C-ANCA), 650 Atypical lymphoid hyperplasia, 1081
Amiodarone drugs, 1386 perinuclear (P-ANCA), 650 Atypical lymphoreticular cells, 652
Amphotericin B, 1631, 1637, 1652 Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies Atypical marginal zone hyperplasia, of
Ampicillin-sulbactam, 1611 (ANCA) tonsil, 1093
Amputation neuroma. See Traumatic in Wegener’s granulomatosis, 443–444 Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, 1363
neuroma Antinuclear antibodies (ANA), 252 Auditory canal
Amyloid, 14 Anti-PTH immunohistochemistry, 1434 external. See External auditory canal
Amyloid goiter, 1391 Antoni type A, 679 mlignant neoplasms of, 459–464
Amyloidosis, 484, 1027–1029 Antrochoanal polyps (ACP), 350–351 Auricular cartilage
classification, 1028 ANUG. See Acute necrotizing ulcerative of idiopathic cystic chondromalacia,
clinical features, 1028–1029 gingivitis (ANUG) 433–434
pathology, 1029 AOT. See Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor Autoimmune diseases, 952
ANA. See Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (AOT) Autoimmune hypoparathyroidism, 1460
Anaplastic carcinoma, 14–15 APAF-1. See Apoptotic protease activating Autoimmune lymphoproliferative
clinical features, 1407 factor-1 (APAF-1) and apoptotic cell syndrome, 1024–1025
molecular genetics, 1408–1409 death Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-
pathology, 1408 Aplasia, of salivary glands, 476–477 candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy
treatment and prognosis, 1409 Aplasia cutis congenital (ACC), 1537 (APECED), 1460
Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734 Index I-3
Autoimmune polyglandular Basosquamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) Biphasic synovial sarcoma. See Synovial
syndrome-1, 1460 clinical features, 1498–1499 sarcoma
Autotransplantation, of parathyroid glands, differential diagnosis, 1499 Bipolaris, 1639–1640
1462–1463 imaging studies, 1499 Birefringent oxalate crystals, 954
Azathioprine, 257, 1693 immunohistochemistry, 1499 Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell
Azithromycin, 1689 pathology, 1499 neoplasm, 1077–1078
treatment and prognosis, 1499 Blastomycosis, 1642, 1648–1651
B-cell lymphoma Blue rubber bleb syndrome, 1523
Bacillary Angiomatosis (BA) intravascular large, 1042 B- lymphocytes, 952, 953
clinical presentation, 1628 primary mediastinal (thymic) large, BMP. See Bone morphogenetic protein
culture, PCR, and serological 1041–1042 (BMP), in ameloblastomas
identification, 1628 T-cell/histiocyte-rich large, 1042 BMZ. See Basement membrane zone (BMZ)
differential diagnosis, 1628 B-cells, 39 Bohn’s nodules, 1343. See also Oral cavity
etiology, 1628 lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, 1060 Bone, hematolymphoid lesions of, 1108–
histopathology, 1628 Bcl-2 and inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family 1109
treatment, 1628 proteins, modulators of Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), in
Bacilli Calmette-Guerin (BCG), 1623 mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, ameloblastomas, 1213
Bacterial conjunctivitis, 72 1212 Bone sialoprotein (BSP), in ameloblastomas,
Bacterial meningitis, 654 BCL2 protein expression, follicular 1213
Bacterial sinusitis lymphoma, 1049 Borrelia burgdorferi, 953, 1692
acute, 1609 Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, 1523 Botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma, 871
chronic, 1609–1610 Behcet’s disease, 261 Botulinum toxin, 1485
Band keratopathy, 1580 Benign epithelial neoplasms Bowenoid papulosis, 1676
Bartonella henselae, 51, 1011 actinic keratoses (AKs), 1489–1491 Bowen’s disease. See Squamous cell
Basal cell adenocarcinoma, 25, 564–567 cutaneous lymphadenoma (CL), 1482–1484 carcinoma (SCC)
Basal cell adenoma, 23–24, 34 hidrocystomas, 1484–1485 BP-antigen, 249
clinical features, 522–523 pilar cysts (PCs), 1477–1478 BRAF mutations, 1488, 1510
differential diagnosis, 525 pilomatricoma, 1479–1481 Branchial cleft anomalies, 426–427
electron microscopy, 524 proliferating pilar cyst (PPC), 1478–1479 Branchial cleft cyst, 21, 1351–1352
immunohistochemistry, 524–525 sebaceous adenoma, 1488–1489 Branchial complexes, 1429
overview, 522 sebaceous hyperplasia, 1487–1488 Branchiogenic carcinoma, 1155–1156
pathology, 523–524 seborrheic keratoses (SKs), 1475–1477 BRD4-NUT fusion product, 1730
treatment, 525–526 syringoma, 1485–1487 BRD4 tumors, 1730
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 75–76, trichilemmomas (TLs), 1481–1482 BSP. See Bone sialoprotein (BSP), in
459, 1342 Benign FHH, 1438 ameloblastomas
clinical features, 1496 Benign lymphoepithelial lesion (BLEL), 1661 Buccal mucosa
differential diagnosis, 1498 Benign lymphoepithelial tumor, of the skin. squamous cell carcinomas, 294–295
eyelids, 1552–1553 See Cutaneous lymphadenoma (CL) Buccal nerve, 669
imaging studies, 1496 Benign mesenchymal tumors Buccinator muscle, 669
immunohistochemistry, 1497–1498 of external auditory canal, 448–449 Bullous keratopathy, 1564–1565
molecular genetics, 1498 Benign mesenchymomas, 895 Bullous pemphigoid, 248–249
pathology, 1496–1497 Benign migratory glossitis, 205–207 clinical presentation, 248
treatment and prognosis, 1498 clinical features, 206 immunology, 249
Basal cell nevus syndrome, 1342 diagnosis, 206 immunopathology, 249
Basal cell type ameloblastoma, 1206–1207 pathology, 206 pathology, 248–249
Basal encephaloceles, 652 treatment, 207 treatment, 249
Basaloid cells, 23 Benign neoplasms, 1481 Bulls eye, skin lesion, 258, 259
Basaloid keratinocytes, 1475 external auditory canal, 447–449 Burkitt’s lymphoma, 40–41, 1056–1057, 1355,
Basaloid squamous carcinomas, 309–312, middle ear and temporal bone, 449–456 1667–1668
398. See also Squamous cell Benign odontogenic tumors
carcinomas adenomatoid odontogenic tumor,
differential diagnosis, 311–312 1235–1240 Calcification, 1477, 1594
histologic features, 309–310 ameloblastoma Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor
immunohistochemistry, 311 desmoplastic ameloblastoma, (CCOT)
treatment and prognosis, 310–311 1218–1221 adenomatoid odontogenic tumor-
Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, keratoameloblastoma, 1225–1226 associated, 1268
62, 155–158 papilliferous keratoameloblastoma, ameloblastic fibroma-associated, 1268
clinical features, 155 1226–1228 ameloblastic fibro-odontoma-associated,
diagnosis, 157 solid/multicystic ameloblastoma– 1268
electron microscopy, 157 central, 1202–1215 clinical features, 1269–1270
etiology, 155 solid/multicystic ameloblastoma– immunohistochemically studies, 1271
immunohistochemistry, 157 peripheral, 1215–1218 odonto-ameloblastoma-associated, 1269
overviews, 155 unicystic ameloblastoma, 1221–1225 odontogenesis stages of, 1270–1271
pathology, 155–157 calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor, odontogenic fibromyxoma-associated,
treatment, 157–158 1230–1235 1269
Basaloid tumors, 25 squamous odontogenic tumor, 1228–1230 odontoma-associated, 1269
Basement membrane-associated molecules Benign thyroid inclusions, in lymph node, solid/multicystic ameloblastoma–
AOT and, 1238 230–231 associated, 1267
and CEOT, 1234 Benzoylmethylecgonine. See Cocaine treatment and prognosis, 1272
Basement membrane zone (BMZ), 246 Ber-EP4 expression, 1499 ultrastructure of, 1271
Basement-type heparan sulfate Bethanechol chloride, 1691 unicystic ameloblastoma–associated,
proteoglycan (HSPG) and solid/ Bilateral acoustic neuroma. See 1267–1268
multicystic ameloblastoma–central, Neurofibromatosis 2 Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor
1209 Biopsy (CEOT)
Base of tongue, squamous cell carcinomas, ABCD, 963 calcification and, 1233
303–305 osteoblastoma, 970 clear-cell variant of, 1231–1233
Basidiobolus, 1638 PLCD, 963 differential diagnosis, 1235
I-4 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
[Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor [Carcinomas] Central odontogenic fibroma (COF), 1276
(CEOT)] spindle cell. See Spindle cell carcinomas differential diagnosis, 1278–1279
etiology and source, 1232–1233 (SPCC) etiology of, 1277
extraosseous variant of, 1233 squamous cell. See Squamous cell histochemical studies, 1278
immunohistochemistry carcinomas treatment and prognosis, 1280
CK antibody reaction, 1234 staging in nasal vestibule, 373 ultrastructure of, 1278
epithelial membrane antigens (EMAs), verrucous. See Verrucous carcinomas CEOT. See Calcifying epithelial odontogenic
1234 Carcinosarcoma, 586–588. See also Spindle tumor (CEOT)
proliferation marker Ki-67, 1234 cell carcinomas (SPCC) Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 672
tenascin, 1234 Cardiac myxomas, 1727 leak, 675
molecular-genetic data, 1235 Cardiovascular complications, associated rhinorrhea, 675
prevalence and incidence, 1230 with hyperparathyroidism, 1442 Ceruminal gland adenocarcinomas, 462–463
radiograms of, 1231–1232 Carney complex (CNC), 1726–1727 Ceruminal gland adenomas, 447
radiolucent–radiopaque type, 1231 Carotid body paraganglia (CBPG), 718–721 Ceruminal gland neoplasms, 447–448
treatment and prognosis, 1235 Cartilaginous lesions, 974 Ceruminal gland pleomorphic adenomas, 447
ultrastructural studies, 1234–1235 Caseating granulomas, 1012 Ceruminal glands, 424
Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), Caspase-8 apoptosis initiator, role in Cervical adenopathy location, 1147–1148
1262–1263 ameloblastomas, 1212 Cervical lymphadenitis, 1623
etiology of, 1263 CaSR gene, 1458 Cervical lymph nodes, 144, 1147, 1148
immunohistochemical studies, 1264 Castleman disease deep, 1135
treatment and prognosis, 1267 hyaline-vascular, 1019–1021 levels, 1135
Calcimimetics, 1456 localized plasma cell, 1021–1022 metastasis to, 299–300
Calcitonin-producing C cells, 1385 multicentric, 1009, 1022–1023 superficial, 1135
Calcium channel blocking agents, 217–218 Cataract, 72 Cervical thymoma
Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition B-catenin stabilization, 1481 clinical features, 1724
disease (CPCDD) Cat scratch disease (CSD), 51 imaging studies, 1724
pathologic features, 954 clinical features, 1627 pathology, 1724
radiologic features, 954 etiology, 1627 treatment and prognosis, 1724–1725
Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD), histopathology, 1627–1628 CFP-10 (culture filtrate protein 10), 1623
gout, 443 of lymph node, 1011–1012 CFS. See Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)
Calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), 1435 serology and PCR, 1628 CFTR. See Cystic fibrosis transmembrane
Calcium supplements, 1456 treatment, 1628 conductance regulator (CFTR)
Calretinin and ameloblastic epithelium, Cavernous hemangiomas, 74, 1596–1597 CGH. See Comparative genomic
1223 CBPG. See Carotid body paraganglia hybridization (CGH)
Canalicular adenoma, 24 (CBPG) Chalazions, 73, 1553
clinical features, 531 CCC. See Clear cell carcinoma Charcot-Leyden crystals, 355
defined, 531 C cells tumors Cheilitis glandularis, 490–491
differential diagnosis, 532 hyperplasia, 1409–1410 Chemical carcinogens, oral cancer, 286–288
immunohistochemistry, 532 medullary thyroid carcinoma, 1410 metabolism, 288
pathology, 531–532 mixed medullary-follicular carcinoma, Chemodectoma, 717
treatment, 532 1411 Chemoreduction, 1594
Cancer, 1438 mixed medullary-papillary carcinoma, Chemotherapy, 983
sarcoma staging, AJCC on, 863 1411–1412 Chemotherapy-induced atypia, 1491
Candida albicans, 289 CCLE. See Chronic cutaneous lupus Cherubism, 966–967
Candida albicans pseudohyphae, 59 erythematosus (CCLE) Chlamydia, 72
Candidiasis, 1645–1646 CCOC. See Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma Chlamydial conjunctivitis, 72
Canker sores. See Recurrent aphthous (CCOC) Chlorhexidine, 263
stomatitis (RAS) CCOT. See Calcifying cystic odontogenic Cholesteatomas
Capillary hemangioma in soft tissues of tumor (CCOT) acquired, 436–437
neck, 1358 CD31, 866, 867 congenital, 437–438
Capillary malformations, 1522 CD34, 866, 867 Cholesterol granulomas, 30, 357–358
Carboxyterminal fragments, 1436 CD3 and CD4-like moieties, 1435 versus congenital cholesteatomas, 438
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), 14, 1483 CD99 immunoreactivity, in ES/PNET, 737 Chondroblastomas, 69, 978–979
Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, 583– CD3 immunostains, 39 Chondrocalcinosis. See Calcium
586 CD20 immunostains, 39 pyrophosphate crystal deposition
Carcinoma in situ (CIS), 130, 133–135, 269 CD44s, inverted papilloma, 368 disease (CPCDD)
clinical features, 133 CE. See Congenital epulis (CE) Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronicus
introduction, 133 CEA. See Carcinoembroyonic antigen (CEA) helicis (CNCH), 432–433
molecular-genetic data, 134 Cefixime, 1618 Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH)
pathology, 133 Cell block, 39 clinical features, 1534
treatment, 134–135 Cellular alterations, in dysplasia, 267 differential diagnosis, 1535
Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), Cellular hemangioma of infancy. See histologic features, 1534
1147 Infantile hemangioma (IH) immunohistochemistry, 1534
frequency, 1148 Cellular neurothekeomas, 694, 695 treatment and prognosis, 1535
metastase histology, 1150 Cellular PA, 34–35 Chondroid metaplasia, 975–976
Carcinomas. See also Granulomas Cellular schwannomas, 680 Chondroma, 976
adenoid squamous, 313–314 CEMBLA. See Cementoblastoma (CEMBLA) Chondromatosis, synovial
adenosquamous, 312–313 Cementoblastoma (CEMBLA) of temporomandibular joint, 435–436
exophytic papilloma and, 362–363 differential diagnosis, 1290 Chondromyxoid fibroma, 978
inverted papilloma and, 366–368 etiology of, 1289 Chondrosarcoma, 976–978
incidence, 367 growth rate, 1288 larynx, 977
molecular biology in HPV-related, 290 immunohistochemistry, 1290 law, 977
neuroendocrine, 322–323 prevalence and incidence, 1288 Chordoid meningioma, 706
and OSP, 370–371 radiographic examination, 1288–1289 Chordoma, 979–981
papillary squamous, 316–318 treatment and prognosis, 1290 Choroidal melanoma, 1589
showing thymus-like Cemento-osseous dysplasia, 965–966 Choroid plexus, 675
differentiation, 1413 Cemento-ossifying fibroma, 1279 Choroquine, 1693
Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734 Index I-5
EAF. See Eosinophilic angiocentric fibrosis Enamel proteins [Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)]
(EAF) in AFOD, 1251 disease associated with, 1664
Ear, 953 and AOT, 1238 EBV-lymphoproliferative disorders,
external, 423–424 CEOT, 1234 1667–1668
hematolymphoid lesions of, 1107–1108 Enamelysin and calcifying odontogenic cyst infectious mononucleosis, 1666–1667
inner, 424–425 (COC), 1265 inverted papilloma, 363
middle, 424 Encephalocele, acquired, 440 latent infections, 1664–1665
neoplastic lesions of, 446–467 Encephaloceles, 674 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 1668–1669
benign neoplasms, 447–456 nasal. See Nasal encephalocele nasopharyngeal carcinomas, 398
endolymphatic sac papillary tumor, Endemic goiters, 1391 oral hairy leukoplakia, 1669–1670
457–458 Endodermal sinus tumor, 1365–1366 overview and pathobiology, 1663–1664
malignant neoplasms, 459–467 Endodontic therapy, 959, 960 proteins, 1665–1666
nonneoplastic lesions, 425–432 Endolymphatic sac papillary tumor, 457–458 severe chronic active EBV infection,
acquired, 427–432 Endoneurial fibroblasts, 677 1667
congenital abnormalities, 425–427 Endophytic growth, of the tumor, 1593 sinonasal NK/T-Cell lymphoma,
squamous cell carcinomas, 459–460 Endoscopic sinus surgery, 1609 1670–1671
EBA. See Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita Endothelial cells, 981, 983 strains of, 1664
(EBA) Enneking staging system, for undifferentiated salivary
EBV. See Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) musculoskeletal sarcoma, 863 lymphoepithelial carcinoma, 1669
EBV nuclear antigens (EBNA), 1665 Entomophthorales Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA (EBER), 398
EBV-positive DLBCL, of elderly, clinical course, 1637 Epstein’s pearls, 1343. See also Oral cavity
1043–1044 epidemiology, 1637 ER. See Estrogen receptor (ER)
Eccrine hidrocystomas, 1484 histopathology, 1637 ERMS. See Embryonal RMS (ERMS)
Eccrine poroma, 1476, 1482 serology, 1637 Erosive lichen planus, 250
ECRS. See Eosinophilic chronic treatment, 1637 Eruptive vellus hair cyst, 1343, 1363
rhinosinusitis (ECRS) Enucleation Erythema, 250
ECS. See Extracapsular spread categorizations for, 1577 Erythema multiforme (EM), 258–261
Ectopic acinic cell carcinoma, 1152 indications, 1577 clinical presentation, 258–259
Ectopic benign thyroid tissue, in phthisis bulbi diagnosis, 260–261
nonlymphoid tissues, 231–232 clinical features, 1579 etiology, 260
clinical features, 231–232 pathology, 1579–1582 pathology, 260
pathology, 232 specimen handling, 1577–1579 treatment, 261
treatment, 232 sympathetic ophthalmia, 1583–1586 Erythromycin, 1628
Ectopic hamartomatous thymoma–branchial traumatic injury, 1582–1583 Erythroplakia, 131, 275–277
anlage mixed tumor Enzyme activity, 669 clinical features, 276
clinical features, 1725 Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay defined, 275
differential diagnosis, 1726 (ELISA), 246, 650 diagnosis, 277
imunohistochemistry, 1726 Eosinophilic angiocentric fibrosis (EAF), pathology, 276–277
pathology, 1725–1726 359–360 treatment, 277
treatment and prognosis, 1726 Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), ESAT-6 (early secretory antigenic target
Ectopic lacrimal glands, 74 354–355 protein 6), 1623
Ectopic protrusion, 676 Eosinophilic granulomas, 438–439, 989 ES/PNET. See Ewing’s sarcoma and
Ectopic thyroid, 229–232 Eosinophilic ulcer, of tongue, 1093 primitive neuroectodermal tumor
benign thyroid inclusions, in lymph node, Eosinophils, 660 (ES/PNET)
230–231 Eosin stains, 1445 Estrogen receptor (ER), 31
benign thyroid tissue, in nonlymphoid Ependyma, 675 Eustachian tube, 424
tissues, 231–232 Epibulbar conjunctival stroma, 1557 Evan’s tumor. See Low-grade fibromyxoid
lingual thyroid, 229–230 Epidermal nevus, congenital and acquired sarcoma (LGFMS)
Edema, 250 lesions, 1341 Ewing sarcoma–primitive neuroectodermal
EH. See Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), 243 tumor (EWS-PNET), 1347
(EH) Epistaxis, 1157 Ewing’s sarcoma, 55, 989
EKH-6, 1486 Epithelial atrophy, 253 Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive
Electron microscopy Epithelial cysts, 117 neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET)
of ITAC, 386 Epithelial dysplasia, nasal polyps, 350 clinical features, 735
of SCNEC, 381 Epithelial-lined cysts, 1342 diagnosis, 737–738
of SNUC, 379 Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), 42–43, histopathology, 736
ELISA. See Enzyme-linked immunosorbent 1483 imaging, 735–736
assays (ELISA) Epithelialmyoepithelial carcinoma (EMC), immunohistochemistry, 736–737
EM. See Erythema multiforme (EM) 31, 561–563 macroscopy, 736
EMA. See Epithelial membrane antigen Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMEC), overview, 735
(EMA) 1729 somatic genetics, 737
Embryology Epithelioid cell sarcomas. See Polygonal cell treatment, 738
of external ear, 423 sarcomas ultrastructure, 736
of inner ear, 424 Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EH), EWS-PNET. See Ewing sarcoma-primitive
of middle ear, 424 61, 863–867, 981–982 neuroectodermal tumor (EWS-PNET)
Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, Epithelioid hemangioma, 61, 1357 Excision, 677
1361–1362 in dermis and soft tissues of temporal Excisional biopsy, hematolymphoid
Embryonal RMS (ERMS), 869, 870–871 region, 1359 neoplasms, 1031
EMC. See Epithelialmyoepithelial carcinoma Epithelioid histiocytes, 1584 Exophytic growth, of tumor, 1593
(EMC) Epithelioid tumor cells, 864 Exophytic papilloma, 362–363
EMC-degrading serine proteinases role in E-2 promotor-bindingfactor-1(E2F-1) and and carcinomas, 362–363
ameloblastomas, 1214 phosphorylated RB role in HPV incidence in, 363
EMMPRIN. See Extracellular matrix ameloblastomas, 1211 Exostosis, 967
metalloproteinase inducer Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), 41, 155, 160, 660, external auditory canal, 434–435
(EMMPRIN) 1150, 1483, 1661. See also Human Explosive follicular hyperplasia, of lymph
Enamelin and calcifying odontogenic cyst papillomavirus (HPV) node, 1009
(COC), 1265 clonal infections, 1665 Exserohilum, 1639–1640
I-8 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
Hydrochloroquine, 1693 Immotile cilia syndrome. See Primary ciliary [Inflammatory diseases, of joints]
Hydroxylysylpyridinoline, urine dyskinesia (PCD) dystrophic calcification, 954–955
concentrations, 959 Immunoblastic lymphomas, 42 ganglion, 957
Hyoid bone, 16 Immunocytochemical stains, 14 gout, 953–954
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, 961 Immunocytochemical techniques, 1433 infectious arthritis, 953
Hypercalcemia, non-PTH causes of. See Immunocytochemistry. See Cytometry oxalosis, 954
Non-PTH-related hypercalcemia Immunodeficiency-associated pigmented villonodular synovitis, 956–957
Hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands lymphoproliferative disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, 952–953
multigland and multifocal disease, 1072–1073 synovial chondromatosis, 955–956
1453–1455 Immunoglobulin G (IgG), 245, 650 synovial cysts, 957
single-gland disease Immunohistochemistry (IHC), 14 tumoral calcinosis, 954–955
adenoma, 1446–1449 ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma, Inflammatory lesions
atypical adenoma, 1449–1450 1066–1067 chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis,
carcinoma, 1450 Burkitt lymphoma, 1056–1057 1534–1535
differential diagnosis and molecular classical Hodgkin lymphoma, 1034–1035 rhinophyma, 1532–1534
pathology, 1450–1453 of DLBCL, 1041 rosacea, 1532–1534
Hyperkeratosis, 1677 extramedullary plasmacytoma, 1057 weathering nodule of the ear,
Hyperorthokeratosis, 253 extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, 1061 1535–1536
Hyperparakeratosis, 253 follicular lymphoma, 1049 Inflammatory malignant fibrous
Hyperparathyroidism, 985–986. See also of hyaline-vascular Castleman disease, histiocytoma, 890
Primary hyperparathyroidism; 1021 Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor,
Secondary hyperparathyroidism intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC), 172–173
Hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPT-JT) 386 Inflammatory otic polyps, 431
syndrome, 1437–1438 of Kikuchi lymphadenitis, 1016 Inflammatory papillary hyperplasia,
Hyperplasia, 130 lymphoepithelial carcinomas (LEC), 382 220–221
adenoid, 225–226 malignant melanomas, 393 Inflammatory process, 661
atypical, 271 MALT lymphoma, 1055 Inflammatory pseudotumor, of lymph node,
basal, 271 mantle cell lymphoma, 1053 1025–1026
fibrous. See Fibrous hyperplasia, nasopharyngeal carcinomas, 398 Infliximab, 1693
denture-induced nodular lymphocyte–predominant INF-a therapy, 1677
gingival. See Gingival hyperplasia, Hodgkin lymphoma, 1037 Infundibular cyst, 1342
drug-induced nonintestinal-type adenocarcinomass Inner ear, 424–425
papillary. See Inflammatory papillary (non-ITAC), 388–389 Meniere disease, 445–446
hyperplasia nonkeratinizing carcinomas, 377 Insular carcinoma, 14
parabasal cell, 271 papillary adenocarcinomas of Insulinlike growths factors (IGFs)
squamous, 271 nasopharynx, 401 expression and stroma of
tonsillar, 222–225 of Rosai-Dorfman disease, 1024 ameloblastomas, 1212
Hyperplastic dental follicles, 1279 sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas Integrin
Hyperplastic nodules, 5, 7 (SNUC), 378–379 and AOT, 1238
diagnosis, challenges, 7–8 small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas solid/multicystic ameloblastoma–central,
Hyperuricemia, 953 (SCNEC), 381 1209
Hypervascular follicular hyperplasia, 1009 Immunostains, on synovial sarcoma, 898 Interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma,
Hypointense meningiomas, 702 Immunosuppressive drugs, 251 1076–1077
Hypopharynx, hematolymphoid lesions of, Immunosuppressive therapy, 249 Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study
1099–1100 Incidental pituitary adenoma, 709 Postsurgical Clinical Grouping
Hypophysis. See Pituitary gland Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), 650 System, on RMS staging, 876
Indolent T-lymphoblastic proliferation, of Interleukin-1, 958
oral cavity and oropharynx, 1093 International Classification Of
Iatrogenic KS, 1660 Infantile fibrosarcomas, 885, 886 Rhabdomyosarcoma (ICR), 54
ICR. See International classification of Infantile hemangioma- International Prognostic Index (IPI) Scoring
rhabdomyosarcoma (ICR) hemangioendothelioma, 1355 System, 1031
Idiopathic cervical fibrosis Infantile hemangioma (IH) International Prognostic Index score, 1032,
clinical features, 824 clinical features, 1525 1045, 1054, 1063
differential diagnosis, 825 defined, 1524 Intestinal-type adenocarcinomass (ITAC),
electron microscopy, 825 differential diagnosis, 1526 383–387
imaging, 824 imaging studies, 1525 classification and survival, 384
immunohistochemistry, 824 immunohistochemistry, 1526 clinical features, 383–384
pathology, 824 molecular genetics, 1526 differential diagnosis, 386–387
treatment and prognosis, 825 pathology, 1525–1526 electron microscopy, 386
Idiopathic cystic chondromalacia, auricular treatment and prognosis, 1526 etiology, 383
cartilage, 433–434 Infantile myofibroma, 1355 imaging, 384
Idiopathic midline destructive disease desmoid and diffuse type, 1360 immunohistochemistry, 386
(IMDD), 660 Infantile systemic hyalinosis, 1344 molecular-genetic data, 386
Idiopathic orbital inflammation, 73, 1598 Infectious arthritis, 953 Paneth cells in, 386
IgE antibodies in allergic rhinosinusitis, Infectious mononucleosis, 51, 1007, pathology, 384–386
344–345 1666–1667 treatment and prognosis, 387
IgG. See Immunoglobulin G (IgG) versus large cell lymphoma, 1088 variants of, 384–385
IgG4-related sclerosing disease, nasopharynx, 1087 Intracranial extension, 676
1014–1015 tonsil, 1091–1092 Intracytoplasmic lumen formation, 1486
of nasopharynx, 1087–1088 Infectious rhinosinusitis, 345 Intraepithelial alterations, classifications,
of ocular adnexa, 1105–1106 Infiltration, fatty, 20 267–272
of parotid gland, 1097–1098 Infiltrative BCC, 1496 dysplasia classification, by WHO, 269–270
IHC. See Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Infiltrative fibroblastic disorders, 1344 Ljubljana classification, 271–272
IIF. See Indirect immunofluorescence Inflammatory diseases, of joints, 952–957 squamous intraepithelial neoplasia
IMDD. See Idiopathic midline destructive calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition classification, 270
disease disease (CPCDD), 954 Intralesional mineralization, 1478
Immature teratoma, 1365 dermoid cysts, 957 Intralymphatic growth, in ASPS, 902
I-12 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
Intraneural perineurioma, 697 Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, 1357–1358 Keratosis obturans (KO), congenital
Intraocular conditions, 1576–1586 clinical features, 1527 cholesteatoma, 438
Intraocular lymphoma, 1104–1105 defined, 1526–1527 Keratosis with dysplasia (KWD), 131
Intraoperative cytologic evaluations, 1445 differential diagnosis, 1527 Keratosis without dysplasia (KWOD), 131
Intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing electron microscopy, 1527 Keratotic plugging, 253
(IOPTH), 1455 imaging studies, 1527 Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease. See Histiocytic
Intraosseous basal cell ameloblastoma, immunohistochemistry, 1527 necrotizing lymphadenitis; Kikuchi
1214 pathology, 1527 lymphadenitis
Intraosseous tumors, of salivary gland, treatment and prognosis, 1527–1528 Kikuchi histiocytic necrotizing
597–598 Kaposi-like infantile lymphadenitis, 1354
Intrathyroidal parathyroid glands, 1430 hemangioendothelioma. See Kikuchi lymphadenitis, 52, 1015–1016
Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma Ki-67 labeling in, 1452
cutaneous, 1111 Kaposi sarcoma (KS), 63, 277, 1659–1660 Killian polyps. See Antrochoanal polyps
Intraventricular meningioma, 703 clinical features, 1530 (ACP)
Intubation granuloma, 111–112 differential diagnosis, 1532 Kimura disease, 1016–1018
Inverted papilloma, 363–369 electron microscopy, 1532 clinical features, 1016–1017
carcinomas and, 366–368 imaging studies, 1530–1531 differential diagnosis, 1017–118
clinical features, 363–364 immunohistochemistry, 1531–1532 pathology, 1017
differential diagnosis, 368 molecular genetics, 1532 of salivary glands, 1098
etiology, 364 pathology, 1531 KIT mutations, 1510
imaging, 364 treatment and prognosis, 1532 Klebsiella ozaenae, 346
Krouse staging system for, 369 in vascular transformation of sinuses, Klebsiella pneumoniae, 64
pathology, 364–366 1005–1006 Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis, 1085
treatment and prognosis, 368–369 Karyotypes, 727 Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome, 1523
Inverting papilloma, 1678 Kassabach-Merrit syndrome, 1357, 1523 Koch’s bacillus, 1621
Involucrin and calcifying odontogenic cyst Kawasaki disease, 1018–1019 Koplick’s spots, 1685
(COC), 1265 KCOT. See Keratocystic odontogenic tumors Krouse staging system, inverted papilloma,
Involucrin expression, in TL, 1481 (KCOT) 369
Iodine therapy, 6 Keloids KS. See Kaposi sarcoma (KS)
Iridocyclectomy, 1587 clinical features, 1512 Kursteiner’s canals, 1431
Iris root, 1587 defined, 1511 Kuttner tumor. See Chronic sclerosing
Iron pigment in thyroid follicular cells, 1393 differential diagnosis, 1512–1513 sialadenitis
Irritation fibroma, 221–222 electron microscopy, 1512 Kviem test, 1693
Isoniazid, 252 immunohistochemistry, 1512 KWD. See Keratosis with dysplasia (KWD)
Isthmus-catagen cyst. See Pilar cysts (PCs) molecular genetics, 1512 KWOD. See Keratosis without dysplasia
ITAC. See Intestinal-type adenocarcinomass pathology, 1512 (KWOD)
(ITAC) treatment and prognosis, 1513
Itraconozole, 1637 Kenny–Caffey syndrome, 1460 Lacrimal gland
Keratin-filled clefts, 1678 clinical findings, 1599–1600
Jaw, 68–70 Keratinization, 715 extranodal marginal zone B-cell
metastases, 1156 in MCE, 28 lymphoma, 1600–1601
Jeryl Lynn vaccine substrain, 1687 Keratinized cells, 267 lymphoproliferative processes, 1599
JHF. See Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis (JHF) Keratinized papilloma, 123–124 Laminin and solid/multicystic
JNA. See Juvenile nasopharyngeal Keratinizing squamous carcinoma, 100 ameloblastoma–central, 1208
angiofibroma (JNA) Keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), 438–
JOC. See Juxtaoral organ of Chievitz (KSCC), 285, 290 439, 966, 1074–1075, 1351, 1415
(JOC) pathologic features, 290–292 of bone, 1109
JOC vs Carcinoma, microscopic features, variants of, 285 dermatopathic lymphadenopathy, 1005
671 Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), Kimura disease, 1018
JTPG. See Jugulotympanic paragangliomas congenital cholesteatomas, 438 of skin, 1112
(JTPG) Keratinocytes, in seborrheic keratoses (SK), Langerhan’s cells, 52, 438–439
Jugular paraganglioma, 721 1475 and CEOT, 1234
Jugulotympanic paragangliomas, 451–454 Keratinocytic intraepithelial neoplasia sarcoma, 1075
classification, 452 (KIN). See Actinic keratoses (AKs) Langerhan’s histiocytes, 52
Jugulotympanic paragangliomas (JTPG), Keratinous cysts of infundibular type, 1342 Large cell carcinoma, 591–593
721–722 Keratoacanthoma, 1493–1494 Large cell infiltrates, diffuse/nodular
Juvenile hemangioma. See Infantile Keratoameloblastoma, 1225–1226 diagnosis, of hematolymphoid lesions of
hemangioma (IH) Keratoconus, 1569–1570 skin, 1113–1114
Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis (JHF), 1344 Keratocystic odontogenic tumors (KCOT), Large cell lymphoma. See also Diffuse large
Juvenile melanoma, 1340 1209, 1240 B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma Keratocystoma, 540–542 anaplastic. See Anaplastic large cell
(JNA), 1360–1361 Keratohyaline granules, 1486 lymphoma
Juvenile onset laryngeal papillomatosis, Keratoma. See Cholesteatomas, acquired versus infectious mononucleosis, 1088
1677 Keratosis, 129–133 problems in diagnosis of, 1093–1094
Juvenile xanthogranuloma, nasal cavity, atypia, 130 Laryngeal candidiasis, 1645
1085 CIS, 130 Laryngeal carcinoma, 144–145
Juxtaoral organ of Chievitz (JOC) clinical features, 131 Laryngeal cartilages invasion, 144
clinical features, 669 dyskeratosis, 130 Laryngeal kaposi sarcoma (KS), 1660
diagnosis, 671 erythroplakia, 131 Laryngeal leiomyosarcoma, 876
embryology, 669 histology, 129–130 Laryngeal metastases, 1157–1158
histopathology, 670 hyperplasia, 130 Laryngeal papilloma, 1677
immunohistochemistry, 671 KWD, 131 Laryngeal paragangliomas (LPG), 723–724
macroscopy, 670 KWOD, 131 Laryngeal TB, 1622
overview, 669 leukoplakia, 131 Laryngoceles, 117–119
physiology, 669 overviews, 129 Larynx, 953
ultrastructure, 670–671 parakeratosis, 130 hematolymphoid lesions of, 1099
treatment, 132–133
Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734 Index I-13
Malignant epithelial neoplasms Malignant oral lesions, 61–63 Median rhomboid glossitis, 207–208
basal cell carcinoma, 1495–1498 basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, 62 clinical features, 207
basosquamous cell carcinoma, 1498–1499 metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, diagnosis, 208
merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), 1502–1504 62–63 pathology, 207–208
microcystic adnexal carcinoma, 1499–1501 nonepithelial tumors, 63 treatment, 208
squamous cell carcinoma, 1491–495 PLGA, 63 Medium-sized cell infiltrates
trichilemmal carcinoma (TLC), 1501–1502 salivary gland lesions, 63 diagnosis, of hematolymphoid lesions of
Malignant extrarenal rhabdoid tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, 61–62 skin, 1114
900–901 Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor Medullary carcinoma, 13–14
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), 57, (MPNST), 58, 688. See also Malignant Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), 1355,
885–892 triton tumor 1356, 1391, 1441, 1451
Malignant GCT, 700–701 clinical features, 726 Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), 685
Malignant lesions, in nasal cavity sinuses, diagnosis, 728 Meibomian gland, 73
64–68 histopathology, 727 Meige disease, 1523
Malignant lymphomas, 32–33, 38 imaging, 726–727 Melanin, 48
Malignant melanomas, 47–48, 80–81, immunohistochemistry, 727 Melanocytic lesions, in ocular adnexa, 79–81
170–171, 391–394, 1587 macroscopy, 727 malignant melanoma, 80–81
amelanotic, 392 overview, 725–726 melanocytoma, 79–80
in children, 1341 somatic genetics, 727–728 melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of
clinical features, 391–392 treatment, 728 infancy, 79
differential diagnosis, 393 ultrastructure, 727 Melanocytic neoplasms
etiology, 391 Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT), 1363 melanomas, 1507–1511
immunohistochemistry, 393 in floor of mouth, 1364 spitz nevus, 1504–1507
molecular-genetic data, 393 Malignant round cell neoplasms, 1363 Melanocytic neuroectodermal tumor of
oral, 323–326 Malignant syringoma. See Microcystic infancy (MNTI)
pathology, 392–393 adnexal carcinoma (MAC) clinical features, 733
treatment and prognosis, 393–394 Malignant triton tumor, 726, 892–894 diagnosis, 734
Malignant mesenchymal tumors Malignant tumors, in ocular adnexa, 75–79 histopathology, 733–734
ASPS, 901–904 ACC, 76 imaging, 733
fibrosarcoma, 885–892 basal cell carcinomas, 75–76 immunohistochemistry, 734
grading, 862–863 Merkel cell tumor, 77 macroscopy, 733
malignant extrarenal rhabdoid tumor, metastatic carcinoma, 78–79 overview, 733
900–901 orbital teratomas, 77 somatic genetics, 734
malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 885–892 retinoblastoma, 77–78 treatment, 734–735
malignant lipomatous, liposarcomas, sebaceous carcinoma, 76–77 ultrastructure, 734
881–885 squamous cell carcinoma, 76 Melanocytic nevi, cutaneous tumefactions
malignant mesenchymoma, 894–895 MALT. See Extranodal marginal zone B-cell from children
malignant skeletal muscle lymphoma (MALT) atypical pattern of lentiginous
leiomyosarcomas, 876–881 MALT lymphoma, 33 proliferation, 1341
RMS, 869–876 Manchester clinical diagnostic criteria, for congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN), 1339
malignant triton tumor, 892–894 NF2, 690 giant CMN, 1341
malignant vascular Mandible, cortical defects. See Cortical nested and lentiginous junctional
angiosarcoma, 867–869 defects of mandible component, 1340
epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, Mandibular margin, 99 neurocytic hamartoma, 1340–1341
863–867 Mantle cell lymphoma risk of a malignancy in, 1340
mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, 895–897 clinical features, 1051–1052 single cell pattern, 1340
staging, 863 differential diagnosis, 1053–1054 spitz-like features, 1340
synovial sarcoma, 897–899 immunohistochemistry, 1053 Melanocytoma, 79–80
Malignant mesenchymoma, 894–895 molecular genetic data, 1053 Melanomas
Malignant neoplasms, 9–15 pathology, 1052–1053 clinical features, 1507–1508
anaplastic carcinoma, 14–15 treatment and prognosis, 105 differential diagnosis, 1511
of external ear and auditory canal, 459–464 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 40, 44 electron microscopy, 1510
insular carcinoma, 14 Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), 43 imaging studies, 1508
lymphoma, 15 Massachusettes General Hospital, 982 immunohistochemistry, 1510
medullary carcinoma, 13–14 Masson trichrome histochemical stain, 878 molecular genetics, 1510
of middle ear, 465–467 Masson vegetant hemangioma. See Papillary pathology, 1508–1510
papillary thyroid carcinoma, 9–11 endothelial hyperplasia staging, 1507
Malignant odontogenic tumors Mastocytosis, cutaneous, 1112, 1113 treatment and prognosis, 1511
ameloblastic carcinoma (AMCA), 1292 Mastoid, heterotopias of, 427 Melanoses and melanocytic proliferations,
differential diagnosis, 1295 Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), 685 1559–1562
DNA microarray study, 1295 Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), and Melanosis, 170
etiology of, 1293–1294 ameloblastomas, 1213–1214 Melanotic ameloblastoma. See Melanocytic
frequency of, 1293 Matrix-rich microcirculation architecture, neuroectodermal tumor of infancy
gender ratio, 1293 1587 (MNTI)
growth rate, 1293 Maxillary sinuses, squamous cell Melanotic lesions, 170–171
immunohistochemistry, 1294 carcinomas of, 374–376 Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of
locations of, 1293 Mayo Clinic, 96 infancy, 1346
ultrastructure of, 1294 Mazabraud myxomas, 1728 Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of
metastasizing ameloblastoma Mazabraud syndrome, 964, 1727–1728 infancy, 79
(METAM), 1290 McCoy cell culture, 72 Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of
age range, 1291 McCune Albright syndrome, 964 infancy (MNTI), 1346
growth rate, 1291 MCL. See Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) vimentin and HMB45, 1347
histopathological features of, 1291 Measles (rubeola), 1685–1687 Melanotic progonoma. See Melanocytic
immunohistochemistry, 1291–1292 Mebendazole, 1690 neuroectodermal tumor of infancy
location of, 1291 MEC. See Mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MNTI)
treatment and prognosis, 1292 (MEC) Mel-CAM glycoprotein and calcifying
secondary (Dedifferentiated) AMCA, 1295 Medial pterygoid muscle, 669 odontogenic cyst (COC), 1265
Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734 Index I-15
Membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase Metastatic tumors, to oral regions Mohs surgery, 1495, 1504, 1510, 1511, 1519
(MT1-MMP), and ameloblastomas, jaw metastases, 1156 Molecular genetic data
1214 oral soft tissue metastases, 1156–1157 ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma,
Membranous labyrinth, 424–425 Metastatic tumors to middle ear and 1067–1068
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, temporal bone, 467 Burkitt lymphoma, 1056–1057
295, 305 Metastatic tumors to thyroid, 1416–1417 classical Hodgkin lymphoma, 1035
MEN. See Multiple endocrine neoplasia Metastatic undifferentiated nasopharyngeal DLBCL, 1041
(MEN); Multiple endocrine neoplasia type, of carcinoma, 1151 extramedullary plasmacytoma, 1057
(MEN) Methimazole antithyroid drugs, 1386 extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma,
Meniere disease, inner ear, 445–446 Methotrexate, 1693 1061–1062
Meningeal sarcoma, 706 Methylene diphosphonate bone of hyaline-vascular Castleman disease,
Meningioma scintigraphy, 961 1021
clinical features, 701–702 Metronidozole, 1611 MALT lymphoma, 1055–1056
diagnosis, 707 MFH. See Malignant fibrous histiocytoma mantle cell lymphoma, 1053
imaging, 702 (MFH) nodular lymphocyte–predominant
immunohistochemistry, 705 MIB-1 antibody in AFOD, 1251 Hodgkin lymphoma, 1037
malignant, 704–705 Microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC), Molecular-genetic data
overview, 701 1486–1487 ITAC, 386
pathology, 702–704 clinical features, 1499 malignant melanomas, 393
somatic genetics, 705–707 differential diagnosis, 1500 nasopharyngeal carcinomas, 398–399
treatment, 707–708 immunohistochemistry, 1500 Molecular genetic data, follicular
WHO classification, 701 molecular genetics, 1500 lymphoma, 1049
Meningioma of the ocular adnexa, 1602 pathology, 1499–1500 Moll’s gland cyst. See Hidrocystomas
Meningiomas, 75, 455–456 treatment and diagnosis, 1500–1501 Molluscum contagiosum, 1684–1685
Meningitis, bacterial, 676 Microinvasive carcinoma (MIC), 135–136 Monocytoid B cells, 999
Meningoceles, 674 clinical features, 136 Mononucleosis, 1355
Meningothelial cells, 704 overviews, 135–136 Monophasic synovial sarcoma. See Synovial
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treatment, 136 sarcoma
clinical features, 1502 Microlaryngoscopy with laser excision, 1677 Monosodium urate crystals, in gout, 953
differential diagnosis, 1503–1504 Micronodular BCC, 1496 Monospot test, 1666
electron microscopy, 1503 Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) Monostotic fibrous dysplasia, 964–965
immuhistochemistry, 1503 clinical features, 655 MPA. See Microscopic polyangiitis
molecular genetics, 1503 diagnosis, 655 MPNST. See Malignant peripheral nerve
pathology, 1503 pathology, 655 sheath tumor (MPNST)
treatment and prognosis, 1504 treatment and prospect, 655–656 MPO. See Myeloperoxidase
Merkel cell tumor, 77 Middle ear, 424 MRI. See also Magnet resonance imaging
Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, 895–897 adenocarcinomas, 466–467 (MRI)
Mesenchymal tumors adenomas. See Middle ear adenomas acute supprative osteomyelitis, 958
angiosarcoma, 1415–1416 benign neoplasms of, 449–456 chondrosarcoma, 977
aytpical fibroxanthoma, 1520–1521 cholesteatomas of, 436–438 chordoma, 980
dermatofibroma, 1515–1517 endolymphatic sac papillary tumor, chronic suppurative osteomyelitis, 959
dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, 457–458 gout, 953
1517–1520 heterotopias of, 427 osteoblastoma, 969
fibrous papules (FPs), 1513–1514 malignant neoplasms of, 465–467 parosteal osteosarcoma, 973
keloids, 1511–1513 metastatic tumors, 467 PVNS, 956
leiomyomas, 1416 squamous cell carcinomas, 465–466 MRT. See Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT)
nuchal-type fibroma, 1514–1515 Middle ear adenomas, 449–451 MTC. See Medullary thyroid carcinoma
Mesenchymal tumors, benign with neuroendocrine differentiation, (MTC); Medullary thyroid carcinoma
of external auditory canal, 448–449 450–451 (MTC)
Metastases, 179 Middle ear squamous cell carcinomas, MT1-MMP. See Membrane type 1-matrix
cervical lymph nodes, 299–300 465–466 metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) and
clinical features, 179 Midfacial destructive diseases, diagnosis of, ameloblastomas
nasal cavity/paransal sinuses, 402 664 Mucinous adenocarcinoma, 572
overviews, 179 Midline carcinoma with NUT rearrangement Mucinous carcinoma, 100
prognosis, 179 (MCNUTR), 1729–1730 Mucoceles, 74, 356–357
Metastases , of orbit, 1603 Mild dysplasia, 269 Mucoceles, of salivary gland, 480–481
Metastasizing ameloblastoma (METAM), Milial cysts, 1342 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 546–552
1290 Milk alkali syndrome, 1438 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), 1352,
Metastatic adenocarcinoma, 1150 Minimally invasive techniques, 1455 1412
Metastatic carcinoma, 25, 78–79, 1138 Minocycline, 1693 Mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC), 17, 23,
Metastatic cystic squamous carcinoma, 1151, Minocycline ingestion and pigment 102, 169, 391
1152 accumulation in thyroid, 1393 Mucorales
Metastatic malignancies, 17–18, 31 Minor aphthae, 261 clinical presentation, 1636
Metastatic melanoma, 1591 Minor aphthous ulcers, 261 etiology, 1635–1636
Metastatic neoplasms to cervical lymph Mitomycin-C, 1556 histopathology, 1636–1637
nodes, FNAB, 46–49 Mitoses, 1480, 1726 serology, 1637
malignant melanoma, 47–48 Mitotic activity, 1493 treatment, 1637
nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 47 Mixed mesoneuroectodermal hamartoma, Mucor hyphae, 1637
squamous cell carcinoma, 46–47 1348 Mucormycosis, 1637
supraclavicular lymph node metastases, MMP. See Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP); Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)
48–49 Mucous membrane pemphigoid lymphoma. See also Extranodal
thyroid carcinoma, 47 (MMP) marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
Metastatic neuroblastoma, to skull, 1363 MMPs. See Matrix metalloproteinases clinical features, 1054
Metastatic papillary carcinoma, of thyroid, (MMPs) and ameloblastomas of conjunctiva, 1105
1151 MNTI. See Melanotic neuroectodermal differential diagnosis, 1056
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, 62–63 tumor of infancy (MNTI) immunohistochemistry, 1055
Metastatic thymoma, 1725 Moderate dysplasia, 269 of lacrimal gland, 1106
I-16 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
Necrobiosis with palisading mantle of Neuroendocrine differentiation, middle ear Nodular lymphocyte–predominant
histiocytes, 1367 adenomas, 450–451 Hodgkin lymphomas, 1035–1039
Necrosis, 1591 Neuroendocrine tumors, 162–167 clinical features, 1036
Necrotizing external otitis, 427–428 AC, 164–166 differential diagnosis, 1038–1039
Necrotizing granulomatous combined small cell neuroendocrine immunohistochemistry, 1037
lymphadenitis, 1354 carcinoma, 167 molecular genetic data of, 1037
Necrotizing granulomatous nodules, 952 overviews, 162 pathology, 1036–1037
Necrotizing sialometaplasia, 491–493 paraganglioma, 167 versus PTGC, 1005
Neisseria gonorrhea, 953 SCNEC, 166–167 transformation to non-Hodgkin
Neonatal hyperparathyroidism, 1458 TC, 162–164 lymphoma, 1037
Neoplasm, in ocular adnexa, 74–75 Neurofibroma, 63, 127–128, 681–683 treatment and prognosis, 1039
cavernous hemangiomas, 74 Neurofibromatosis 1, 687–689 Nodular melanoma, 1509
hemangiopericytoma, 74 Neurofibromatosis 2, 689–691 Nodular sclerosis, classical Hodgkin
meningioma, 75 Neurofibromatosis (NF), 676, 1344 lymphoma, 1032–1033
mucoceles, 74 Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), 1601 Nodulosis—arthropathy—osteolysis
pilomatrixoma, 74 Neurofibrosarcoma. See Malignant syndrome, 1344
pleomorphic adenoma, 74–75 peripheral nerve sheath tumor Nonallergic rhinosinusitis with eosinophilia
schwannoma, 75 (MPNST) syndrome (NARES), 347
Neoplasms Neurogenic sarcoma. See Malignant Noncutaneous leiomyosarcoma, 876
of bone, hematolymphoid, 1108–1109 peripheral nerve sheath tumor Nonepithelial larynx tumors, benign,
of eye, hematolymphoid, 1103–1105 (MPNST) 126–129
of ocular adnexa, hematolymphoid, Neurothekeoma, 694–696 hemangioma, 126–127
1103–1105 Neutrophilic abscesses, 1493–1494 leiomyoma, 128–129
of skin, hematolymphoid, 1109–1112 Neutrophilic microabscess, 652, 653 lipoma, 128
of thyroid, hematolymphoid, 1100–1101 Nevoid BCC syndrome (NBCCS), 1344 neurilemoma, 127–128
Neoplastic cells, 13, 661 Nevus, 170 neurofibroma, 127–128
Neoplastic diseases, condroid. See Nevus sebaceous of Jadassohn (NSJ), overviews, 126
Neoplastic diseases, osseous 1341–1342 Nonepithelial tumors, 63
Neoplastic diseases, mesenchymal clinical features, 1536 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), 15, 39,
aneurysmal bone cyst, 986–987 differential diagnosis, 1537 1039–1073, 1354
angiosarcoma, 982–983 imaging, 1536 adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, 1072
desmoplastic fibroma, 987–988 molecular genetics, 1537 anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 1065–1068
eosinophilic granuloma, 989 pathology, 1536–1537 angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma,
epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, treatment and prognosis, 1537–1538 1064
981–982 NF. See Neurofibromatosis (NF) in B-cell, 43–45
Ewing’s sarcoma, 989 NF-2 follicular lymphoma, 44–45
fibrosarcoma, 988–989 in acoustic neuroma, 454 mantle cell lymphoma, 44
giant cell granuloma, 984–985 in meningiomas, 456 small lymphocytic lymphoma, 44
giant cell tumor, 984 NG. See Nasal glioma (NG) Burkitt lymphoma, 1056–1057
hemangioma, 981 NHL. See Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) CLL/SLL, 1059
hyperparathyroidism, 985–986 Nicotiana rustica, 287 DLBCL, 1039–1045
lymphangioma, 983–984 Nicotiana tabacum, 287 extramedullary plasmacytoma, 1057–1059
Neoplastic diseases, nonchondroid. See Nicotinic stomatitis extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma,
Neoplastic diseases, mesenchymal clinical features, 208–209, 277–278 1060–1064
Neoplastic diseases, nonosseous. See defined, 277 FNA, 39
Neoplastic diseases, mesenchymal diagnosis, 278 FNAB, 40–43
Neoplastic diseases, osseous pathology, 209, 278 anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 42–43
cartilaginous lesions, 974 treatment, 209, 278 Burkitt’s lymphoma, 40–41
chondroblastomas, 978–979 NIH diagnostic criteria, for NF1, 687 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 41–42
chondroid metaplasia, 975–976 Nikolsky sign, 250, 259 immunoblastic lymphomas, 42
chondroma, 976 NK. See Natural killer (NK) cells lymphoblastic lymphoma, 40
chondromyxoid fibroma, 978 NK/T-cell lymphomas follicular lymphoma, 1045–1051
chondrosarcoma, 976–978 clinical features, 660–661 hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma,
chordoma, 979–981 immunohistochemistry, 662 1072
exostosis, 967 pathology, 661 immunodeficiency-associated
extraosseous osteosarcoma, 974 treatment and prospect, 662 lymphoproliferative disorders,
nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, Nodal and extranodal lymphoma, 63 1072–1073
974–975 Nodal marginal zone lymphoma, 1060 lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, 1060
ossifying fibroma, 970–971 Nodular BCC, 1496 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma,
osteoblastoma, 969–970 Nodular/diffuse dermal infiltrate diagnosis, 1059–1060
osteochondroma, 968 of hematolymphoid lesions of skin, MALT lymphoma, 1054–1056
osteoid osteoma, 968–969 1113–1114, 1115 mantle cell lymphoma, 1051–1054
osteosarcoma, 971–974 Nodular fasciitis, 54 mycosis fungoides, 1069–1070
Nephrolithiasis, 1455 in children, 1359 nodal marginal zone lymphoma, 1060
Nephrotic syndrome, 252 Nodular fasciitis and related lesions peripheral T-cell lymphoma, 1064–1065
Nerve sheath myxomas, 694 including cranial fasciitis, 812 primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive
Nestin antibodies clinical findings, 813 epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell
AFOD, 1251 differential diagnosis, 813–815 lymphoma, 1071–1072
AMF, 1244 electron microscopy, 813 primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium
and AOT, 1238 imaging, 813 T-cell lymphoma, 1071
and ODOMYX, 1286 immunohistochemistry, 813 primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell
Neurilemoma, 127–128 molecular findings, 813 lymphoproliferative disorders,
Neuroblastoma (NB), 1347, 1355 pathologic findings, 813 1068–1069
Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), 322– prognosis and treatment, 815 Sézary syndrome, 1070–1071
323, 380. See also Primary small cell Nodular goiter, 4–5 subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell
carcinoma Nodular KS, 1660 lymphoma, 1071
I-18 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
Polycystic disease, of salivary glands, 478 [Primary intraosseous squamous cell Pseudophakia, 1565–1566
Polygonal cell sarcomas, 55–56 carcinoma (PIOSCC)] Pseudovasculitis, 660
Polyhydraminios, 1364–1365 molecular-genetic data, 1299 Psoralen and ultraviolet light A
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), 1576 radiograms, 1298 (PUVA), 257
Polymicrobial infections, 958 treatment and prognosis, 1299 Pterygium, 1573–1574
Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, Primary lymphomas and plasmacytomas, PTGC. See Progressive transformation of
557–561 1414–1415 germinal centers (PTGC)
Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma Primary malignant melanoma of the larynx PT stage grouping, 98
(PLGA), 26, 27, 63 (PMML). See Malignant melanomas Pulmonary cryptococcosis, 1652
Polyostotic fibrous dyspalsia, 965 Primary oral CD30+ T-cell Pulsion diverticula, 1720
Polypoid nasal mass, 672 lymphoproliferative disorders, 1069 PUVA. See Psoralen and ultraviolet light A
Pompe disease, 1392 Primary small cell carcinoma, 25–26 (PUVA)
Poorly differentiated carcinoma Primary systemic amyloidosis, 1391 PV. See Pemphigus vulgaris (PV)
clinical features, 1406 Priming, 649 PVL. See Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia
pathology, 1406 Primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), (PVL)
TP53 and BRAF mutations, 1407 1503 PVNS. See Pigmented villonodular synovitis
treatment and prognosis, 1407 Procainamide, 252 (PVNS)
Positron emission tomography (PET), 1 Progesterone receptor (PR), 31 Pyogenic bacterial infections, 1013
Postcricoid carcinoma, 176–177 Progressive transformation of germinal Pyogenic granuloma. See Lobular capillary
Posterior buccal cortical defect(PBCD), 963 centers (PTGC), 1004–1005 hemangioma; Lobular capillary
Posterior hypopharyngeal wall Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), hemangioma (LCH)
carcinoma, 176 697 Pyriform sinus carcinoma, 175–176
Posterior lingual cortical defect (PLCD), Proliferating follicular-cystic neoplasm. See Pyrimethamine, 1689
962–963 Proliferating pilar cyst (PPC)
Postpartum thyroiditis, 1389 Proliferating pilar cyst (PPC) QPTH. See Quick parathyroid hormone
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative clinical features, 1478 (QPTH)
disorders, 1073, 1667 differential diagnosis, 1479 QuantiFERON-TB Gold, 1623
Postvaccination fatal disseminated genetic association, 1479 Quick parathyroid hormone (QPTH), 104
infection, 1686 imaging studies, 1478 Quinidine, 252
Potassium iodide, 1638 immunohistochemical studies, 1479 Quinolones, 1691
Pouch–derived cysts, 1457 pathology, 1478–1479
P53 protein treatment and prognosis, 1479
and AOT, 1238 Proliferating tricholemmal cyst. See Radiation-associated osteosarcomas, 974
p53 mutations in ameloblastomas, 1211 Proliferating pilar cyst (PPC) Radiation therapy, 14, 31, 976
PR. See Progesterone receptor (PR) Proliferative myositis, 54 Radiography, FD, 964
PR3. See Proteinase 3 Proliferative myositis/fasciitis and atypical RANKL. See Receptor activator of nuclear
Prasad’s microstaging, mucosal malignant decubital fibroplasia (ischemic factor-kB ligand (RANKL) and
melanomas, 394 fasciitis) osteoclastogenesis
Precancerous keratosis. See Actinic keratoses differential diagnosis, 817–818 RAS. See Recurrent aphthous stomatitis
(AKs) electron microscopy, 817 (RAS)
Pregnancy, rhinosinusitis during, 347 immunohistochemistry, 816 RCC. See Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Primary acquired melanosis, 1561 molecular, 817 Reactive follicular hyperplasia, 997–999
Primary bone lymphoma, 1108–1109 pathologic findings, 816 versus follicular lymphoma, 1051
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), 351–352 prognosis and treatment, 818 monocytoid B cells in, 999
Primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive radiologic imaging, 815–816 of palatine tonsils, 1001–1003
epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell Proliferative periostitis, 960 Reactive/inflammatory hematolymphoid
lymphoma, 1071–1072 Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL), lesions
Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium 275 of eyes and ocular adnexa, 1105–1107
T-cell lymphoma, 1071 Proptosis, 1596 of skin, 1112–1113
Primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell Propylthiouracil antithyroid drugs, 1386 of thyroid, 1101–1102
lymphoproliferative disorders, Prosecretory granules, 1433 Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, 49–50
1068–1069 Prostate acid phosphatase (PAP), 31 of extranodal sites, 1001
Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg-type, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), 31 nonspecific, 997–1003
1110–1111 Proteinase 3 (PR3), 650 specific, 1003–1029
Primary cutaneous follicle center Proteus syndrome, 1523 of tonsil, 1002, 1003
lymphoma, 1050, 1109–1110 Pruritus, 248 Reactive paracortical hyperplasia,
Primary cutaneous MALT lymphoma, 1111 Prussak’s space, 436 999–1000
Primary effusion lymphoma, 1044 PSA. See Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Reactive periostitis, BPOP, and turret
Primary follicular lymphoma of thyroid, Psammoma bodies, 10 exostosis
1101 PSC. See Papanicolaou Society of clinical findings, 818
Primary herpetic stomatitis, 59 Cytopathology (PSC) differential diagnosis, 818
Primary hyperparathyroidism PSCC. See Papillary squamous cell immunohistochemistry, 818
clinical differential diagnosis, 1438 carcinoma (PSCC) pathologic findings, 818
clinical presentation, 1438–1439 Pseudoallescheriasis, 1637–1638 prognosis and treatment, 818
definition, 1437 Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, 1345 radiologic imaging, 818
epidemiology, 1437–1438 Pseudogout, 442–443. See also Calcium Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB
FNA cytology, 1440–1442 pyrophosphate crystal deposition ligand (RANKL) and
imaging studies, 1439–1440 disease (CPCDD) osteoclastogenesis, 1212
preoperative localization, 1439–1442 Pseudohyperparathyroidism Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS),
selective venous sampling (SVS) for PTH clinical features, 1460 261–263
levels, 1440 differential diagnosis, 1460 diagnosis, 262
treatment and prognosis, 1455–1456 gene alterations in, 1461 etiology, 261
Primary intraosseous squamous cell molecular biology, 1461 immunopathology, 262
carcinoma (PIOSCC), 1235, 1297 pathologic features, 1460 pathology, 262
frequency, 1298 treatment and prognosis, 1461 treatment, 263
histomorphology of, 1298 Pseudolymphoma, cutaneous, 1112 Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, 1721
immunohistochemistry, 1299 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1609 Recurrent parotitis, 494–495
I-22 Index Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734
[Solid/multicystic ameloblastoma–central] [Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)] Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), 258
[immunohistochemistry] [metastasis determinants] Stomal recurrence, 144–145
integrin, 1209 soft tissues, 1140 Storiform pleomorphic malignant fibrous
laminin, 1208 stromal reactions, 1141 histiocytoma, 886, 888
mitogen-activated protein kinases Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 46–47, Stratum fibrosum externum, 672
(MAPKs), roles of, 1209 61–62, 76, 1413–1414, 1476. See also Stratum fibrosum internum, 670
tenascin, 1208 Oral cancer Stratum nervosum, 670
prevalence and incidence clinical features, 1491 Streptococcus, 261
age range, 1203 differential diagnosis, 1494–1495 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 345, 429, 1392, 1609
frequency of, 1202–1203 of ear, 459–460 Stromal atypia, nasal polyps, 350
location of, 1203 eyelids, 1553 Stromal dystrophies, 1570–1571
plexiform growth pattern, 1204 of hypopharynx, 174–177 Stucco keratosis. See Seborrheic keratoses
radiological appearance and, 1204 clinical features, 175–177 (SKs)
Solid/multicystic ameloblastoma– etiology, 175 Sturge-Weber syndrome, 1523
peripheral (PERAM) overviews, 174 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus
CK-19 and Ber-EP4, 1217 treatment, 177 (SCLE), 252–253
differential diagnosis, 1217 keratinizing. See Keratinizing squamous Subacute granulomatous thyroiditis, 4
gender distribution of, 1215 cell carcinomas (KSCC) Subacute necrotizing sialadenitis, 493
immunohistochemical studies, 1216–1217 of larynx, 137–145 Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis
molecular-genetic data, 1217 glottic carcinoma, 139–142 (SSPE), 1685
pathology, 1216 laryngeal carcinoma, 144–145 Subacute thyroiditis, 1392
prevalence and incidence, 1215 molecular genetic data, 145 Subcutaneous lymphoid infiltrate
radiological changes, 1216 overviews, 137–139 diagnosis, of hematolymphoid lesions of
treatment and prognosis, 1217–1218 subglottic carcinoma, 142–143 skin, 1115
ultrastructure of, 1217 supraglottic carcinoma, 139 Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell
Solid parathyroid adenomas, 19 transglottic carcinoma, 143 lymphoma, 1071
Somatostatin analogue octreotide, 712 maxillary sinuses, 374–376 Subglottic carcinoma, 142–143
Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) gene underexpression T staging, 375 Subglottic stenosis, 114
in ameloblastomas, 1213 of middle ear, 465–466 Sulfodiazine, 1689
SOT. See Squamous odontogenic tumor (SOT) molecular genetics, 1494 Sulfonamides, 260
South Asia, oral cancer incidence in, 287 nasal cavity, 371–374 Superficial extending carcinoma (SEC),
SPCC. See Spindlecell carcinomas (SPCC) of nasopharynx, 397 136–137
Sphenoethmoidal, through sphenoethmoid nonkeratinizing. See Nonkeratinizing Superficial lymph nodes
junction, 674 squamous cell carcinomas lateral, 1135
Sphenomaxillary, through sphenoid, 675 oral cavity, 292–301 medial, 1135
Spheno-orbital though superior orbital buccal mucosa, 294–295 Supernumerary parathyroid glands, 1429,
fissure, 674 floor of mouth and oral tongue, 295–298 1430
Spindle cell carcinomas (SPCC), 146–151, gingiva and alveolar mucosa, 298–300 Suppurative granulomas, 1012
318–322, 1492 hard palate, 300–301 Suppurative lymphadenitis, 50
clinical features, 147, 319 lip, 292–294 Suprabasal bullae formation, 244
diagnosis, 150 oropharynx, 301–305 Supraclavicular lymph node metastases,
etiology, 147 oropharyngeal wall, 303 48–49
immunohistochemistry, 149–150 palatine tonsils and base of tongue, Supraglottic carcinoma, 139
molecular genetic data, 150 303–305 Surgical margins, 97–100
overviews, 146–147 retromolar trigone (RMT), 301–302 Surgical resection, of cancer, 98
pathology, 147–149, 319–321 soft palate and uvula, 302–303 Sympathetic ophthalmia, 1583–1586
treatment, 150–151 pathology, 1492–1494 Synaptophysin, 67
treatment and prognosis, 321–322 of trachea, 178 Syndecan-1 (SDC-1) for Wnt induced
Spindle cell lesions, 35 glottic carcinoma, 139–142 carcinogenesis, 1213
Spindle cell melanoma, 1509–1510 laryngeal carcinoma, 144–145 Syndrome-associated osteosarcoma, 974
Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma, 871–872 molecular genetic data, 145 Synovectomy, 956
Spindle cell sarcomas, 58 overviews, 137–139 Synovial chondromatosis
Spindle epithelial tumor with thymus-like subglottic carcinoma, 142–143 pathologic features, 955–956
differentiation (SETTLE), 1412–1413 supraglottic carcinoma, 139 radiologic features, 955
Spindle-pleomorphic lipoma (SPL), 1728 transglottic carcinoma, 143 Synovial chondromatosis of
Spitz nevus treatment and prognosis, 1495 temporomandibular joint, 435–436
clinical features, 1504 of upper aerodigestive tract, 1459 Synovial cysts, 957
differential diagnosis, 1506 variants, 1492–1494 Synovial sarcomas, 56–57, 897–899, 1360
electron microscopy, 1506 Squamous eddies, 1479 biphasic, 897
immunohistochemistry, 1506 Squamous intraepithelial neoplasia monophasic, 897
and melanocytic proliferation, 1340 classification, 270 Syphilis
molecular genetics, 1506 Squamous metaplasia, nasal polyps with, 368 congenital, 1615, 1616
pathology, 1504–1506 Squamous odontogenic hamartoid lesions differential diagnosis, 1617
treatment and prognosis, 1506–1507 (SOHL), 1229 epidemiology and historical perspective,
Spitzoid melanoma, 1340 Squamous odontogenic tumor (SOT) 1612–1613
Sporothrix, 1638 etiology and pathogenesis, 1228–1229 head and neck manifestations, 1613–1614
Sporotrichosis, 1641–1642 histochemical markers for, 1229 oral manifestations, 1613
S-100 protein, 1286, 1500, 1729 hyperplastic islands, 1229 otosyphilis, 1614
S-100 protein-positive cells, 683 molecular-genetic data, 1230 primary, 1615–1616
Squamous carcinoma, 21–22 prevalence and incidence, 1228 secondary, 1616
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 588–589, radiograms of, 1228 serologic identification, 1617
958, 1147 treatment and prognosis, 1230 and spirochetes, 1616–1617
metastasis determinants Stafne cyst, 962 tertiary, 1614–1615, 1616
extracapsular spread, 1138–1140 Stapedial footplate, otosclerosis of, 445 treatment, 1617
histologic prognostic factors, 1141–1142 Staphylococcus aureus, 50, 953, 1609 Syphilitic (luetic) lymphadenitis, 1012
micrometastases, 1140–1141 Sternomastoid tumor. See Fibromatosis colli Syringocystadenoma papilliferum,
positive lymph nodes, 1140 Steroid therapy, 254 ceruminal gland, 447–448
Volume 1: 1–648; Volume 2: 649–1200; Volume 3: 1201–1734 Index I-25
Vitamin D receptor (VDR), 1435 WDLS. See Well-differentiated liposarcoma Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS), 1667
Vitrectomy, 70 (WDLS) Wnt signaling pathway in ameloblastomas,
Vocal cord nodule and polyp (VCNP), 109– Weathering nodule of the ear (WNE) 1213
111 clinical features, 1535 World Health Organization (WHO), 37, 43,
clinical features, 109 differential diagnosis, 1536 269
diagnosis, 111 immunohistochemistry, 1536 classification
etiology, 109 pathology, 1535 ossifying fibroma, 970
overviews, 109 treatment and prognosis, 1536 osteosarcoma, 972
pathology, 109–110 Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG), 73, dysplasia classification by, 269–270
treatment, 111 443–444, 961, 1392, 1610 histological classification of odontogenic
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH), clinical features, 650–652 tumors, 1202
1584 criteria for diagnosis, 652
Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) syndrome, 457 ELK classification, 654 Xanthelasma, 1557
Vossius ring, 1586 etiology, 649–650 Xanthogranuloma, juvenile, 1085
VPG. See Vagal paragangliomas (VPG) limited form of(LWG), 653–654 X chromosome-linked IAP (XIAP), and
VVL. See Verruca vulgaris of larynx (VVL) nasal cavity, 1083 odontogenic epithelial cells, 1212
pathology, 652–654 Xeroderma pigmentosa, 1341
treatment and prospect, 654–655 Xeroderma pigmentosum, 76
Waldeyer’s ring, 1147 Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS), XIAP. See X chromosome-linked IAP (XIAP)
normal lymphoid tissues of, 1001 862 and odontogenic epithelial cells
Warthin-Starry stain, 64 ‘‘Western’’ sinonasal lymphomas, 1670 X-linked idiopathic hypoparathyroidism,
Warthin’s tumor, 505 Wet keratin, 715 1460
cigarette smoking and, 507 WG. See Wegener’s granulomatosis X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome,
clinical features, 526 Whipple’s disease, 73, 1691 1667
differential diagnosis, 529–530 White sponge nevus
electron microscopy, 529 clinical features, 201–202
etiology, 526–527 diagnosis, 203 Yolk sac carcinoma, 1365
imaging, 526 molecular and genetic data, 203
immunohistochemistry, 529 pathology, 202 ZEBRA, 1665
molecular-genetic data, 529 treatment, 203 Ziehl-Neelsen stain, 1623
overview, 526 WHO. See World Health Organization Zimmerman tumor. See Phakomatous
pathology, 527–529 (WHO) choristoma
treatment, 530 Wickham’s striae, 254 Zygomycetes, 1638
Warthin tumor, 22, 30–31 Winkler disease. See Chondrodermatitis
Water-clear cells, 1448, 1454 nodularis chronicus helicis (CNCH)
Pathology
H9163