Daimler Process Signoff Document

Process Sign-Off
Fifth Edition
DAIMLERCHRYSLER
COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

PROCESS SIGN-OFF
(PSO)
Fifth Edition
December 2004

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

PROCESS SIGN-OFF (PSO)
Foreword to the Fifth Edition
The purpose of this manual is to define the requirements for Process Sign-Off (PSO) and
detail the documentation required to verify conformance to DaimlerChrysler's Quality
System Standards. This document includes requirements identified in the Product
Assurance Planning (PAP4CDS 5.0) and the Quality System Requirements (ISO/TS-16949)
manuals. A Supplier’s certification to TS-16949 alone is not sufficient to pass PSO. All PSO
requirements shall be met for PSO approval. The PSO, TS-16949 and PAP manuals will
form the foundation for Supplier readiness to assure proactive Advanced Product Quality
Planning. Where the word “Supplier” is used in this manual, it is intended to indicate both
external and internal Suppliers. To assure conformance to dimensional, material,
functional, and (where required) appearance requirement of a part, it is important to
understand the relationship between PSO and the Production Part Approval Process. It
should be noted that every external Supplier of production parts to DaimlerChrysler shall
be ISO/TS-16949:2002 third party registered. All the requirements stated in this document
also apply to the sub-tier Suppliers, including Suppliers directed by DaimlerChrysler.
In order to achieve an appreciable improvement in part quality this manual has been
modified to reflect DaimlerChrysler Corporation’s current PSO philosophy and emphasize
the importance of adhering to our Product Creation Process, called Chrysler Development
System (CDS). This manual should be reviewed carefully and in its entirety to assure that
all the PSO requirements are known and understood. The twenty-two PSO Process
Elements identified in the PSO 4th Edition, were revaluated and in some cases expanded
into separate elements. In addition, the Continuing Conformance Section was added which
explains the Layer Process Layer (LPA) requirement for all organizations supplying
components to DaimlerChrysler.
The names “Chrysler” and “DaimlerChrysler” as used in this manual refer to

DaimlerChrysler Corporation (formerly known as Chrysler Corporation) and its
subsidiaries, which manufacture Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep® brand vehicles. This manual
does not apply to other DaimlerChrysler AG subsidiaries or operations, which manufacture
Mercedes-Benz, Freightliner or other brand vehicles or products.
For questions or comments concerning the Process Sign-Off manual, please contact your
DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality representative.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Fifth Edition
Process Sign-Off Team Members
Kimball Shellnut — Advanced Quality Planning

Jeanine Grimaudo — Advanced Quality Planning
Julie Stallard — Black Belt
Mike Holden — Body & White
Brenda Grulich — Chassis
Nicole Waters-Scheuer — Corporate Quality
Craig Stevens — Electrical
Donald Michie — Exterior
Francis Stetsko — Interior
Chris Cottham — Manufacturing Quality
Gopichand Yarlagadda — Powertrain
Kevin Pratt — Supply
Kenya Spratt — Warranty
Requests for revisions or changes to the manual

should be directed to P&S Supplier Quality at CIMS
484-01-07

Table of Contents
Page
Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1
Process Sign-Off Strategy ........................................................................................... 7
Process Sign-Off Flow Chart & Responsibilities .......................................................... 8
PSO Element Description ................................................................................... …...12
Forever Requirements .............................................................................................. 23
Process Sign-off Element Requirements.................................................................... 27
Process Sign-Off Forms ............................................................................................ 63
Commodity Specifics ............................................................................................... 73
Glossary ................................................................................................................ 113
Appendix A Guidance for New Specialist /Suppliers ................................................. 123
Appendix B Tables and Examples ........................................................................... 163
Appendix C Formulas & Calculations....................................................................... 171
Appendix D PSO Extended Run............................................................................... 183
Appendix E Warranty ............................................................................................ 187
Appendix F Most Frequently Asked Questions.......................................................... 197
Reference Manuals ................................................................................................ 203
Index ..................................................................................................................... 203


Process Sign-Off (PSO)
INTRODUCTION
SCOPE: Process Sign-Off shall be performed on all new or modified parts, parts which
have been out of production for 12 months or more, parts with historical high
warranty or quality problems, new/additional production lines (e.g. capacity
increases) , and production line moves for Directed AQP risked parts. All parts
that have a Directed AQP Activity Level (AAL) shall have a DaimlerChrysler led
PSO and Product Assurance Plan (PAP). Parts with a Collaborative AAL shall
have a DaimlerChrysler led PSO and a Supplier led APQP (Advanced Product
Quality Plan, refer to APQP manual). Parts with a Self Directed AAL shall have
a Supplier led PSO and Supplier led APQP to establish production readiness.
Any product or process change that occurs during the lifecycle of a part or
system shall be reviewed by the PSO Team to determine whether re-PSO is
required based on the Risk Drivers. For further information on Risk Drivers see
Appendix B Tables and Examples.
It should be noted that all supplier manufacturing locations that produce end-
items for DaimlerChrysler shall be registered with the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP
system (e.g. Powerway.com) and hold at least one seat on the system prior to
receiving a Purchase Order.
COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 1

PROCESS SIGN-OFF DEFINITION
WHAT IS A PSO?
Process Sign-Off is a systematic and sequential review of the Supplier's
planned and actual manufacturing process at the quoted peak daily line rate,
including manpower, facilities, equipment, material, methods, procedures,
software level, and tooling. The DaimlerChrysler PSO is composed of four
phases, which collectively ensure that the Supplier’s system is acceptable and
results in quality products.
1. Pre-PSO Documentation Review

Documentation ensures that the company methods of operation are recorded
and available for all employees to reference. While important for training new
employees, it also serves the experienced employee who encounters
infrequent situations or changes. The DaimlerChrysler team shall review
PSO documentation during PAP meetings and again during the Pre-PSO
Documentation Review for compliance to PSO requirements.
2. PSO On-site Visit

There is no substitute for observing an operation first hand. Therefore, it is a
requirement that PSO teams witness a build as part of the DaimlerChrysler
PSO process. The team shall witness at least one build using production
tools. The run shall produce product that meets the quality and production
rate requirements of DaimlerChrysler Corporation.
2a. Performance Results

Data analysis provides measures of quality for the production system.
Observing a build will reveal extreme bottlenecks and inefficiencies, but
data collection, analysis, and summarization are the real measures of
part quality and production efficiency. Production measurements will
provide the production rate, First Time Capability (FTC), and other
statistics that validate the Supplier’s ability to produce the product
quantities required by DaimlerChrysler Corporation.
3. Post PSO Visit

Testing of the production parts will validate the Supplier’s system and
provide evidence that the part meets the engineering, quality, durability,
and reliability requirements contained in the performance, process, and
material specifications.
4. Continuous Conformance
Adherence to on-going requirements and Supplier support for the life of the
program is the final phase of the PSO process. Warranty, Layered Process
Audits, Forever Requirements, Problem Solving and Annual Validation are
key activities which ensure on-going quality and drive continuous
improvement for both the Supplier and DaimlerChrysler.

In summary, the PSO process assures that the Supplier has exhibited
performance that justifies a Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) warrant
submission and promotes continuous conformance.
WHY IS A PSO NECESSARY?

Process Sign-Off is a method to verify that a Supplier’s quality planning
processes have been successfully executed and that its production processes
are capable of producing quality parts in sufficient quantity for production.
WHO CONDUCTS THE PSO?

The PSO Team consists of, as a minimum, the DaimlerChrysler Supplier
Quality Specialist and the DaimlerChrysler Product Engineer. Other PSO team
members may include the DaimlerChrysler Buyer, Center of Competence (COC)
Engineer, and Platform Quality Specialist.
The Supplier shall also identify a Supplier PSO team. These individuals shall
be trained (at a minimum) in the DaimlerChrysler PSO process, PPAP, PSO 5th
Edition, Interim Approval Authorization (IAA), CDS (Chrysler Development
System), and the DaimlerChrysler’s eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway). The
Supplier PSO team shall include those individuals from the Supplier
manufacturing facility responsible for PSO preparation as well as any corporate
quality and/or engineering support. The Supplier shall identify a team for
DaimlerChrysler led PSO’s as well as for Supplier led PSO’s.
WHEN IS THE PSO PERFORMED?

The Process Sign-Off On-Site Visit shall be scheduled by the PSO Team
following the Pre-PSO Documentation Review when the PSO Team agrees that:
• All required Supplier documentation has been reviewed and is acceptable.
• Production tooling is complete, finalized, on-site at the Supplier's plant,
has been setup and debugged, and the Supplier Readiness Evaluation
Run is complete with the results documented and acceptable to the
team.
• The production process is in place, preliminary performance has been
determined, and the Supplier is ready for the Production Demonstration
Run. This run is based upon a predetermined sample size and line speed.
• The production operators are trained and capable of running at the
contracted peak and sustained line speed.
The purpose of PSO is to demonstrate Supplier process capability.

The requirement is to complete all PSO’s prior to supplying parts for S2 build.
If PPAP is not complete prior to S2 build an Interim Approval Authorization
(IAA) is required. For specific requirements regarding IAA submission, refer to
P&S procedure PSSP0108 “Interim Approval Authorizations”, as well as any
special requirements of the specific DaimlerChrysler platform. See Figure 1
(following page) for DaimlerChrysler’s Product Creation Process (CDS).

Chrysler Development System
Validate
Confirm Optimize Verify Validate
Establish Identify Product &
Product & Product & Product & Facilities &
Potential Process &
Process Process Process Launch
Program Verify
Design Design Design Ramp-up
Facilities
I H G1 G2 EF D1 D2 C B A Z
Program Preliminary Theme Final Product & S0 S0 S1 S1 S2 Post

Start Program Selection Program Process Start En Start End End V1
Specifications Specifications Design & &
(Rahmenheft) (Lastenheft) Complete S2 V1
Start
All parts IAA Submission

PPAP’d (For PPAP’s not
approved approved prior to S2)
Figure 1
HOW IS THE PSO PERFORMED?

Refer to Figure 3 for the PSO strategy and Figures 4.1 and 4.2 for a step-by-
step flowchart and responsibility matrix for the PSO process.
• Pre-PSO Documentation Review:
The DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist will initiate the PSO
dialogue with DaimlerChrysler Engineering and the Supplier, schedule and
coordinate the Pre-PSO Documentation Review and the PSO On-Site Visit.
The Supplier Quality Specialist will also advise the Supplier of the
documentation the team will want to review and whether the part has been
selected for a PSO Extended Run. PSO Extended Runs are determined by the
Vehicle Product Team based on such factors as Supplier Quality part risk,
Engineering part risk and PSO timing. If the part was selected for a PSO
Extended Run, the PSO Team establishes the option and the timing with
which the Supplier shall comply.
The PSO Team shall review the PSO documentation including the Supplier
Readiness Evaluation prior to scheduling the PSO On-Site Visit. The
acceptable method for presenting documentation to the DaimlerChrysler PSO
Team is to upload all required documentation into the DaimlerChrysler
eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway). Documentation required for each element
shall be uploaded in the appropriate Gate from Gate G1 through Gate C.
English is the official corporate language of DaimlerChrysler.

All PSO documentation shall contain English text. Supplemental foreign
language translations are permitted to facilitate communications among
team members. However, the English version constitutes the official record.
• Process Sign-Off On-Site Visit:

The PSO Team shall complete the first 22 elements of the PSO SUMMARY
REPORT at the Supplier’s manufacturing facility. The team shall verify the
Supplier’s compliance to all 22 elements of the PSO 5th Edition. Any
deviations shall be recorded on the PSO COMMENTS SHEET. A successful
Production Demonstration Run shall yield parts for Production Validation
testing.
PSO verifies the dimensional, material, performance, and production capability of the
component. When appearance approval is required, a separate approval and warrant is
required. Refer to the AIAG PPAP manual for further guidance.
PSO “Z” Approval: The “Z” Approval is an internal code within the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP
System (e.g. Powerway). This code in conjunction with the submission of a dimensional
PSW indicates that the first 22 PSO elements have been completed and approved and
confirms the dimensional requirements are met; the Supplier is then eligible for partial
tooling payment. The Supplier Quality Specialist is responsible for entering the “Z” approval
into the eAPQP system.
PSO “A” Approval: The “A” Approval is an internal code within the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP
system (e.g. Powerway). This code in conjunction with the submission of a material/
functional PSW and an Appearance Approval Report (in the case of designated appearance
items) confirms that all PSO and PPAP requirements are met, and therefore the Supplier is
eligible for full tooling payment. The Supplier Quality Specialist is responsible for entering
the “A” approval for PSO’s with Directed and Collaborative AQP part risk. The Supplier is
responsible for “A” approving PSO’s for parts which have a Self Directive AQP risk.
The PSO date and an “A” disposition is required to be entered into the eAPQP system prior
to the Supplier submitting the Part Submission Warrant (PSW), and entering the PPAP date
and PPAP “A” disposition. This requirement is true for all parts, regardless of AQP part
risk.
Interim Approval Authorization

All parts require full PSO and PPAP approval. PSO “A” disposition is a prerequisite for PPAP
approval. PPAP approvals are submitted through the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g.
Powerway) by the Supplier. Failure to meet the S2-PPAP requirement will require an Interim
Approval Authorization (IAA) in accordance with DaimlerChrysler P&S procedure
PSSP0108. DaimlerChrysler Engineering or Supplier Quality is responsible for issuing the
IAA.
NOTE: Even with “Z” Approval, an IAA is required for any PSO deficiencies beginning with
material supplied for S2 Build.


PROCESS SIGN – OFF STRATEGY
REVIEW PSO
REQUIREMENTS WITH
PSO TEAM
& SUPPLIER
SUPPLIER PERFORMS
READINESS EVALUATION
RUN
CONDUCT PRE-PSO
MEETING (REVIEW
SUPPLIER’S
DOCUMENTATION & SRE)
PSO TEAM CONDUCTS

PSO ON-SITE VISIT
(WITNESS PRODUCTION
DEMONSTRATION RUN)
SUPPLIER CONDUCTS
PV TESTING &
PACKAGING SHIPPING
PSO TEAM
COMPLETES
PROCESS SIGN-OFF
SUPPLIER SUBMITS PPAP

PART SUBMISSION
WARRANT
SUPPLIER COMPLIES WITH

CONTINUOUS
CONFORMANCE
REQUIREMENTS
Figure 3

PROCESS SIGN-OFF FLOWCHART
1
PART ENTERS
eAPQP SYSTEM
(e.g. Powerway)
2
Self Directed AQP INITIAL RISK Collaborative/Directed AQP
EVALUATION
& AQP LEVEL
4
3 DAIMLERCHRYSLER
SUPPLIER LED PSO LED PSO
3A 5
SUPPLIER PSO REQUIREMENTS
UPLOADS DOCUMENTS REVIEW WITH
INTO THE eAPQP PSO TEAM AND
SYSTEM (e.g.. Powerway) SUPPLIER
6
SUPPLIER PREPARES
DOCUMENTATION AND
CONDUCTS READINESS
EVALUATION RUN
YES
7A 7
ANOTHER NO PRE-PSO MEETING:
PRE PSO MEETING DOCUMENTATION
NECESSARY? ACCEPTABLE?
NO YES
8 9
SUPPLIER MODIFIES SCHEDULE
AND SUBMITS PSO ON SITE VISIT
DOCUMENTATION
10
SUPPLIER FINALIZES
LINE AND APPROVES
EVIDENCE OF PRO-
DUCTION READINESS
a b c d
Figure 4.1

PROCESS SIGN-OFF
FLOWCHART RESPONSIBILITIES
SUPPLIER QUALITY
MANUFACTURING
PROCUREMENT
ENGINEERING
SUPPLIER
RESPONSIBILITY
LEGEND PROCESS NAME REMARK
Part enters
L = LEAD 1 eAPQP P P L
RESPONSIBILITY (e.g. Powerway)
S = SUPPORT TO 2 Initial Risk P S L S
P = PROVIDES 3&
Supplier led PSO P S P S L
INFORMATION 3(A)
P/S = DEPENDS ON DaimlerChrysler
4 P S P L S
COMPOSITION OF led PSO
PRODUCT TEAM PSO
5 Requirements P S P L S
Review
Supplier prepares
documentation
6 P S P S L
and readiness
evaluation
Pre-PSO
7& P/ P/
Documentation S L S
7(A) S S
Reviews
Supplier modifies
8 and submits P S P S L
documentation
Schedule PSO on-
9 P S P L S
site
Supplier finalizes
line and approves
10 P S P S L
evidence
production

A b c d
11
PSO ON-SITE VISIT
YES
12A NO 12
PSO ON-SITE REVISIT ELEMENTS 1-22
NECESSARY? ACCEPTABLE?
NO YES
14
“Z” DISPOSITION AND
COMPLETION DATE
ENTERED IN eAPQP
13 SYSTEM (e.g. Powerway)
SUPPLIER CONDUCTS
CORRECTIVE ACTION
AND SUBMITS 15
DOCUMENTATION SUPPLIER CONDUCTS
ELEMENTS 23 THRU 25
YES
18
REPETITION NO
OF ELEMENTS 23 THRU 26
SUFFICIENT?
19A 17
SUPPLIER CONDUCTS INVESTIGATE REASON
PSO IN ACCORDANCE FOR FAILURE AND ROOT
WITH PSO MANUAL CAUSE ELIMINATION
AND ENTERS PSO
DATE INTO eAPQP
SYSTEM (e.g. Powerway) 16 NO
ELEMENTS 23 THRU 25
ACCEPTABLE?
YES
19
PSO APPROVED,
“A” DISPOSITION AND
COMPLETION DATE
20 ENTERED IN eAPQP
SUPPLIER SUBMITS SYSTEM (e.g. Powerway)
PPAP WARRANT & ENTERS
PPAP DATE IN eAPQP SYSTEM
(e.g.Powerway)
Figure 4.2
PROCESS SIGN-OFF
FLOWCHART RESPONSIBILITIES
SUPPLIER QUALITY
MANUFACTURING
PROCUREMENT
ENGINEERING
SUPPLIER
RESPONSIBILITY LEGEND PROCESS NAME REMARK
P/ P/
11 PSO on-site visit S L S
S S
L = LEAD RESPONSIBILITY Acceptance of P/ P/
12(A) S L P
S = SUPPORT TO Elements 1-22 S S
P = PROVIDES
INFORMATION Supplier conducts
corrective action
P/S = DEPENDS ON 13 P S P L L
and submits
COMPOSITION OF documentation
PRODUCT TEAM
"Z" code entered
14 into eAPQP (e.g. S L
Powerway)
Supplier conducts
15 P S P L L
Element 23-25
Acceptance of P/ P/
16 S L P
Elements 23-25 S S
Investigate reason
17 for failure and root P S P L L
cause elimination
Repetition of P/ P/
18 S L P
elements 23-25 S S
PSO "A" disposition
& date entered into P/ P/
19 S L P
eAPQP S S
(e.g. Powerway)
Supplier conducts
PSO and enters “A”
P/ P/
19A disposition & date S S L
S S
into eAPQP
(e.g. Powerway)
Supplier submits Refer to
PPAP
PPAP warrant and
20 P S P L L Manual for
date into eAPQP further
(e.g. Powerway) details

Process Sign-Off (PSO)
Instructions
This section explains the PSO Element Requirements, the process expectations and the
PSO forms. The forms are the SUPPLIER READINESS EVALUATION form, PROCESS SIGN-
OFF SUMMARY form, COMMENTS SHEET, MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION
REPORT, and PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RESULTS.
PRE-PSO
The DaimlerChrysler PSO is a culmination of PAP activities; without such activities the PSO
will not be successful. All documents reviewed during the Pre- PSO Meeting should have
been previously verified during scheduled PAP meetings. The Pre-PSO Documentation
Review should not take the place of periodic PAP/APQP meetings with the Supplier.
To reduce the time spent at the Supplier's facility, the PSO Team shall review and approve
all applicable PSO element documentation with the Supplier prior to the PSO On-Site Visit.
It is important to remember that the PSO is a team effort to verify production readiness
and process capability.
NOTE: It is strongly recommended that for new suppliers and/or new processes, the
PSO team perform a Pre-PSO on-site visit to ensure a successful Process Sign-Off.
ELEMENT DESCRIPTION
Element 1 - Part Number, Description and Change Level

The PSO team shall review all PSO related documents to ensure all documents have the
correct part number, description and change level present or cross-referenced (reference
TS-16949 section 4.2.3 Control of Documents).
The Supplier shall have an acceptable change notice procedure capable of cascading
changes down through their Extended Enterprise. All customer change notices shall be
documented.
1.4 - Engineering Standards Identified

The PSO team shall review all applicable engineering standards to ensure the latest
change level is identified, listed and available.
The Supplier shall have a process for obtaining the latest specifications and
standards for all DaimlerChrysler, governmental, safety, and other product related
standards/specifications.

Element 2 & 4 - Design FMEA and Process FMEA
For all Design and Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA & PFMEA)
documentation, the following criteria shall be used to identify the need to take corrective
action:
Rolling Top 20 Rule: Using the RPN, Pareto the failure mechanisms and address the top
20% regardless of RPN value. (i.e. 80/20 rule).
Special Attention Shall Be Given To:

I. RPN’s that have a Severity ≥ 9 regardless of RPN value, Occurrence level, or
Detection level. (Per SAE J1739 (Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice)
criteria:
3.2.1.9 & 4.2.19 In general practice when the severity is a “9” or “10”, special
attention must be given to assure that the risk is addressed through existing
design controls or preventive/corrective action(s), regardless of the RPN. In all
cases where the effect of an identified potential failure mode could be a hazard to
the end-user, preventive/corrective actions should be considered to avoid the
failure mode by eliminating, mitigating, or controlling the cause(s).
II. RPN's that have a Severity ≥ 5 and an Occurrence ≥ 2 regardless of Detection

level and RPN value. (Per the SAE J1739 criteria: This equates to customer
dissatisfaction and C/100 > .01 [C/1000 > 1]).
III. Detection = 10. (The potential defect is allowed to leave the plant and reach the
field).

Element 2 & 4 - Design FMEA and Process FMEA (cont.)
Element 2 - Design FMEA
Design FMEA shall be completed for each unique product and shall be approved by the
PSO Team. Engineering leads this activity verifying all possible failure modes are
represented on the DFMEA with appropriate severity, occurrence, and detection numbers
assigned. Supplier Quality supports this activity by ensuring the completed document is
available for the Pre-PSO Documentation Review.
The PSO team shall verify the DFMEA contains any design changes incorporated due to DV
failures.
Element 4 - Process FMEA

Completed PFMEA shall include all unique process steps from receiving through shipping
(including addressing any BSR/NVH issues and special process characteristics that were
identified).
The PSO team shall ensure all failure modes observed during the Production
Demonstration Run are captured on the PFMEA.
The PSO team shall ensure the occurrence of failures and the detection ability of these
failures observed during Production Demonstration Run correlate with the occurrence and
detection numbers documented on the PFMEA.
Element 3 - Test Sample Size and Frequencies

Products covered under a Performance Standard that specifies test sample sizes and test
frequencies shall have these testing requirements included in a Design Verification Plan
and Report (DVP&R) test plan. Reference the DaimlerChrysler Product Assurance Testing
manual
Engineering leads this activity by approving both the DV and PV test plans prior to start of
each test phase. Engineering shall also approve the completed DVP&R test results for both
DV and PV testing. Both the test plans and the completed DVP&R’s shall be signed by the
responsible Product Engineer.
Supplier quality supports this activity by ensuring all failures are addressed with a
corresponding DaimlerChrysler 7-step Corrective Action form; all test deviations are
documented on the DVP&R; test plans are signed prior to start of test and completed
DVP&R’s are signed prior to PSO “A” approval.
Element 5 - Process Flow Diagram and Manufacturing Floor Plan

Process Flow Diagram(s) and Manufacturing Floor Plan(s) shall exist for the entire
production process including all in-house sub-assemblies that support the production line.
All production equipment appearing on the manufacturing floor plan shall be verified by the
PSO team. Stations measuring critical characteristics are clearly identified on the flow
diagram

Element 6 - Control Plan
The Control Plan shall describe each step of the manufacturing process including:
receiving, material handling and storage, in-process operations, testing, inspections,
rework/repair, and shipping. Refer to the Advanced Product Quality Planning manual.
The PSO team shall verify all process and product controls identified in the Control Plan are
present on the primary production line as well as any off-line process (e.g. repair/rework).
The team shall also verify that measurements and inspections are done at the appropriate
frequencies according to the Control Plan.
Element 7 - Quality Planning

The Supplier’s quality planning shall translate DaimlerChrysler’s Product Creation Process
into product and process design requirements. The first tier Supplier is responsible for
conducting quality planning that includes all sub-tiers, (see element 7.4.3 of TS-16949,
Quality Management Systems). Quality planning shall cascade through the “Extended
Enterprise™”.
The PSO team shall ensure that for Collaborative AQP risked programs, the Supplier has a
current APQP timeline.
Element 7.2 - Supply Base Management

The supplier shall risk all components listed on the build of material and shall show
evidence of PSO-like activities for high and medium risked components (i.e. Level 3
PPAP documentation, line speed demonstration, sub-supplier visits, APQP meeting
minutes, etc).
The PSO team shall ensure the Supplier has a process which monitors and
documents the quality of all sub-tiers.
Note 1: In the event of a DaimlerChrysler directed sub-tier with PPAP requirements

to DaimlerChrysler, the sub-tier DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist is
responsible for adding the DaimlerChrysler Tier 1 Supplier Quality Specialist to the
eAPQP (e.g. Powerway) project as a team member.
Note 2: For source packages that reflect proprietary document exclusions, those
documents sited for exclusion are not required to be uploaded into the eAPQP system
(e.g. Powerway). However, these documents shall be available for review at the
request of the DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist. A cover page with the
documents title block, revision level and date is required to be uploaded in place of
the actual document.
Note 3: In the event of DaimlerChrysler directed sub-tiers, joint meetings with all
directed tiers and responsible DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialists and
Engineers are required to discuss program status, issues, concerns and
requirements, etc. prior to sub-tier Pre-PSO Documentation Review.

Element 7.3 - Problem Solving Methods
The PSO team shall view evidence of problem solving techniques describing how
these techniques were used in developing the production process (Reference TS-
16949, section 8.5.2.1 Problem Solving).
A minimum of two SID’s (Supplier I.D.’s) shall be obtained for the DaimlerChrysler
problem solving eSystems (e.g. eCIMS, PRAS).
Element 8 - Incoming Material Qualification/Certification Plan

The PSO team shall review the Incoming Material Qualification/Certification Plan plus
associated documents and records.
The PSO team shall verify that all incoming product is verified per an internal Supplier
Qualification/Certification Plan. The plan shall prevent non-conforming incoming product
from entering the manufacturing floor.
Element 9 - Parts Handling Plan

The Supplier shall have a documented plan which details how parts are managed and
tracked throughout the entire manufacturing process. This plan shall address the
segregation and identification of scrap, rework/repair, and work in process (WIP).
The PSO team shall confirm that parts are properly segregated and identified
throughout the different stages of the manufacturing process.
Element 10 - Operating Instructions

The Supplier is responsible for creating and documenting operating instructions for all
individuals having responsibilities relating to the manufacturing process that impact
product quality. These instructions shall have input from all associated organizations
responsible for supporting the manufacturing process.
Operator, set-up, changeover, and inspection instructions shall be documented and

accessible for all associated work stations per TS-16949, section 7.5.1.2 Work Instructions.
Element 11 - Tooling, Equipment and Gages Identified

All tooling, gages, fixtures and capital equipment required to produce a product shall be
uniquely identified and appear on a tooling list. All DaimlerChrysler owned tooling, gages
and fixtures shall be permanently tagged, and uniquely identified on the tooling list (refer to
TS-16949 section 7.5.4 Customer Property).
A copy of the completed Supplier Tool Record (STR) shall be provided from the
DaimlerChrysler STR system. The PSO team shall verify that all tooling. Gages, and/or
fixtures listed on the STR are present at the Supplier’s manufacturing location during the
PSO on-site visit.

Element 12 - Special Product and Process Characteristics Identified
A list of special product and process characteristics such as key, safety, noise, etc., shall be
developed using DaimlerChrysler input as well as Supplier knowledge of the product. The
design and process FMEAs shall be used to help create the list (Reference TS-16949,
section 7.3.2.3 Special Characteristics). Review product characteristics and identify the
characteristics that will be measured during the PSO On-Site Visit.
Note: Special Product and Process Characteristics are those characteristics identified by the
Supplier and/or the PSO team, along with any governmental, safety, environmental, etc.
characteristics.
Each product where DaimlerChrysler leads the PSO shall have a First Production Shipment
Certification (FPSC) plan. The process/part characteristics to be measured for the FPSC
plan shall be reviewed in detail with the Supplier's plant personnel prior to the Pre-PSO
Documentation Review. The proposed FPSC plan shall be reviewed during the Pre-PSO
Documentation Review and the completed FPSC form shall be reviewed by the PSO team
once completed by the Supplier.
FPSC requires the Supplier to measure and record characteristic data on the first 2000
parts shipped to each DaimlerChrysler assembly plant (e.g. 3 DaimlerChrysler assembly
plants = 6000 parts measured). A high or medium risked directed sub-tier shall abide
by the same FPSC requirements as the DaimlerChrysler Tier 1. FPSC quantity shall
depend upon the number of DaimlerChrysler assembly plants Tier 1 product is
shipped to. DaimlerChrysler FPSC blank forms along with instructions for their completion
per procedure PSSP0106 may be found internally on the DaimlerChrysler Extended
Enterprise™ Network. Externally, the document may be found on the COVISINT website.
The PSO team shall verify that SPC is performed for both customer and Supplier identified
characteristics agreed to by the PSO team.
Element 13 - Process Monitoring

The Supplier is responsible for maintaining manufacturing process capability and/or
performance. The control plan shall be adhered to and reaction plans shall be implemented
for characteristics that are not statistically capable or unstable. The reaction plan shall
include containment of product and 100% inspection as appropriate.
SPC shall be used to monitor and measure the characteristics of the product and/or
process to verify that the product and/or process requirements have been met. This shall
be carried out at the appropriate stages of the process in accordance with the Control Plan.
Evidence of conformity with the acceptance criteria shall be maintained.
A system of process monitoring shall exist which shall demonstrate the ability of the
processes to achieve planned results. When planned results are not achieved, correction
and corrective action shall be taken, as appropriate, to ensure conformity of the product
per TS-16949, section 8.2.3 Monitoring and measurement of processes.

Element 13 - Process Monitoring (cont.)
First Piece Approval is required at the beginning of every production run and when a major
disruption of the process has occurred, to verify dimensional and process stability. The
First Piece Approval process shall be an integral part of the supplier’s production start-up
procedure. The process shall include at a minimum: the retention of the first piece until the
end of the production run; proper identification of the first piece to prevent shipment to the
customer; and analyzes of special product characteristics identified by the PSO Team and
the Supplier during the AQP process.
Element 14 - Error and Mistake Proofing

The Supplier is responsible for developing and implementing error proofing and mistake
proofing to ensure part presence, orientation, and color match of all assembled components
in an assembly. Each assembly requires in-process checks to ensure that functional
standards are met prior to release of product for shipment to the customer. Error proofing
eliminates by design the possibility of producing a specific defect. Mistake proofing
identifies errors and prevents them from becoming non-conformances. When Error proofing
through design cannot be achieved, process error proofing measure will begin with
“Prevention”, then onto mistake proofing for “Detections” and or “Inspection”. “Error
Proofing” and “Mistake Proofing” approaches used to improve the production process shall
be reviewed during APQP/PAP meetings.
Error Proofing” and “Mistake Proofing” approaches used to improve the production process
shall be verified during the PSO On-Site Visit.
Element 15 - Layered Process Audit Plan

Layered Process Audit (LPA) is a system of audits performed by multiple levels of
management per the Supplier’s organizational chart. Special process characteristics are
audited frequently to verify process conformance.
Management must physically perform the audit; this is not a desk audit.
The purpose of Layered Process Audits is to ensure continuous conformance thereby

improving process stability and first-time through capability.
The implementation of Layered Process Audits:
Reduces variation (both assignable and common cause)

Prevents process errors and operator mistakes
Improves and maintains discipline
Initiates Continuous Improvement actions
Reduces rework
Reduces scrap and eliminates waste
Improves communication
Instills and improves standardization
Improves overall Quality and reduces costs

Element 15 - Layered Process Audit Plan (cont.)
There are two Types of Layered Process Audits: (See Appendix B for LPA audit examples)
Process Control Audits

• Once per shift done by group leaders, supervisors, etc.
• Plant management performs audits weekly
• Divide manufacturing areas and rotate so all areas are audited.
Error and Mistake Proofing Verification Audits

• Error and Mistake Proofing Verification audits shall be conducted once per shift.
• Only qualified employees shall perform Error and Mistake Proofing Verification Audits.
• Set-up, maintenance or quality auditors are usually qualified to perform Error and
Mistake Proofing Verification Audits.
Supplier Quality Specialist shall review and approve LPA Plan with supplier (Required only
for Directed and Collaborative AQP risked parts). For Self Directed AQP risked parts
suppliers will approve their own LPA plan.
The PSO team shall witness a complete LPA by all management levels. For PSO visits for
multiple parts, the LPA review must include every process not necessarily every part. PSO
“Z” approval will be dependent upon successful LPA Plan approval and demonstration.
Element 16 - Evidence of Product Specification

PSO Team members are required to randomly select and witness the measurement of
specific product and/or process characteristics (other than those of the final product) using
the Measurement System Verification Report. This audit is typically completed before the
Line Speed Demonstration.
Element 17 - Line Speed Demonstration

The PSO Team shall review the plan for required production rates. The Team shall discuss
the Quoted Line Speed, Daily Capacity Planning Volume, and Quoted Net Operating Time
for DaimlerChrysler Parts with the Supplier during the Pre-PSO Documentation Reviews.
These numbers shall be verified with the production buyer. The PSO Team should know the
required line speed the Supplier shall demonstrate for the Supplier Readiness Evaluation
and during the PSO On-Site visit.
The Supplier shall demonstrate to the PSO Team that they are capable of producing quality
parts at the Daily Capacity Planning Volume based on the Net Operating Time for
DaimlerChrysler Parts.

Element 18 - Outgoing Material Inspection Plan
Review the Outgoing Material Inspection Plan plus associated documents and records. The
plan shall be verified during the PSO on-site visit.
It is the Supplier’s responsibility to ensure that sub-components and end-assemblies are in

conformance with identified dimensional, functional, and miscellaneous requirements.
Where discrepancies are found, the Supplier shall report those finding to the
DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist and Product Engineer and resolution mutually
agreed upon between DaimlerChrysler and the Supplier through the issuance of either a
CN or an IAA – BEFORE AUTHORIZED SHIPMENT CAN OCCUR.
Element 19 - Parts Packaging and Shipping Specifications

The parts packaging and shipping plan shall address the types of containers (expendable
and/or returnable) that will be used to ship product to DaimlerChrysler/customer plants;
container specifications; and test validation for shipping (simulation or trial shipping).
Note: Refer to the DaimlerChrysler Packaging and Shipping Instructions manual for
detailed information. Manual is available internally through eShop. Externally, see your
corporate Material Handling Engineer.
All Supplier designed packaging used for part shipment shall be approved by
DaimlerChrysler Corporate Material Handling Engineering using the Unit Load Data (ULD)
sheet (example in Appendix B). Expendable dunnage shall be monitored, maintained and
cleaned per an approved Container Management Plan.
Element 20 - Gage and Test Equipment Evaluation

The Supplier shall perform a gage study on all gages impacting the manufacturing process.
The Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) manual may be referenced for further
clarification on gage R&R. The PSO team shall review the Gage R&R results for approval.
All gages and test equipment shall be calibrated, reflect the last calibration date and
expiration date. Calibrations shall be traceable to a known source/standard.
Element 21 - Preventive Maintenance

A Preventive Maintenance (PM) plan shall exist for all equipment and tooling (see TS-16949
element 7.5.1.4 Preventive and predictive maintenance).
All tooling/equipment shall be monitored and scheduled for routine preventive

maintenance to ensure product integrity.
Element 22 - Initial Process Study

The PSO Team shall review the Initial Process Study plan for each characteristic and
tolerance designated as a "Special" characteristic, as well as those additional characteristics
and operations selected by the team for the Initial Process Study. The team shall review the
inspection methods, gage calibration and R&R results, the quantity to be inspected, and
the calculations to be performed.

Element 22 - Initial Process Study (cont.)
If the PSO team has agreed to deviate from the 100% measurement requirement for the
Initial Process Study, the Ppk Matrix (found in Appendix B) shall be used to decide the
sample size and corresponding Ppk requirement for the Production Run.
Process performance studies (Pp and Ppk) shall be performed for all special characteristics
and other dimensions selected by the PSO Team, using part data from the Production
Demonstration Run.
Element 23 - Packaging Shipping Testing

The Supplier shall provide completed packaging test results (simulation or shipping).
Shipping test results shall be submitted with the appropriate Assembly Plant Material
Handling Engineering signature on the DaimlerChrysler Unit Data Load Sheet (ULD).
Element 24 - Production Validation Testing Complete

Supplier responsible component level Production Validation (PV) test plan and
DaimlerChrysler Engineering signed test results (DVP&R) shall be reviewed and approved
by the PSO Team. This shall include any BSR/NVH testing (if applicable).
Element 24.2 – BSR/NVH

The Supplier is responsible for ensuring the part has no squeaks and/or rattles and
to maintain support resources for future system level BSR testing.
Element 25 - Continuous Conformance
Element 25.1 - Support

The Supplier shall provide trained resources to support each vehicle program from
development throughout the life of the program. The support team shall include but
not be limited to the following:
Designated Supplier Quality Representative(s):

The Supplier is responsible for providing a plant quality representative(s) available as
required for assisting the DaimlerChrysler assembly plant with quality issues. This
support is to start at the S0 build and continue though the life of the program.
DaimlerChrysler eSystems Representative(s):

The Supplier is responsible for providing a trained support team to monitor and
update all DaimlerChrysler quality eSystems (e.g. Powerway, WIS, PRAS, eCIMS,
NCT) throughout the life of the program.
Warranty Supplier Quality Representative(s):

The Supplier is responsible for providing a warranty quality representative(s)
available as required for attending and supporting warranty meetings at the
DaimlerChrysler Quality Engineering Center. This person(s) is also responsible for
periodic visits to the QEC to evaluate dealer returns and support the DaimlerChrysler

Element 25 - Continuous Conformance
Element 25.1 – Support (cont.)
Warranty Specialist with warranty issues. When the Supplier is a DaimlerChrysler
directed sub-tier, this individual will be responsible for supporting the Tier 1 in the
same manner as outlined above. (Additional Warranty requirements see Appendix E)
Element 25.2 - Layered Process Audits

Verify that LPA Plan includes provisions for eventual LPA coverage of all Chrysler
Group parts produced at supplier’s location.
Institutionalize LPA:
• Cascade audit to all processes and operations.
• Complete all LPA action plan items.
• Continue LPA team meetings less frequently.
• Link LPA to other activities: APQP, Continual Improvement…
• Develop action plans to address non-compliances.
• Modify LPA questions. LPA should be a living document.
• Validate effectiveness of follow-up actions.
Monitor:
• Feedback follow-up actions and results to LPA plan.
• Suppliers shall monitor/measure impact of LPA on business metrics.
• Suppliers shall upload in Powerway Quality Gate Z the deliverable “Layered
Process Audit Results” and provide supplier opinion(s). (Red, Yellow, Green)
Results shall be updated monthly.
• Supplier Quality Specialist shall review LPA as part of corrective action(s) for
quality spills.
• Chrysler Group’s specific TS-16949 LPA requirements reference multiple levels of
management. Please note that the following two slides only reflect two levels of
plant management.
Element 25.3 - Problem Solving Methods

The Supplier is required to root cause and furnish corrective action and resolution,
for issues pertaining to performance, quality, reliability and durability, which arise in
Warranty, PIECS, CAG reports, Fast Feed Back system, CSA audits, QTS, JD Power
surveys, Consumer Reports, etc., in an expeditious and timely manner. The Supplier
is responsible for containing the issues throughout the Extended Enterprise. Interim
7-steps are to be furnished within 24 hours (to include problem description and, if
possible, containment), and Final 7-steps due within 72 hours subsequent to
identification of issue. Deviations from this timing require mutual agreement by
DaimlerChrysler Product Team members. All eCIMS issues shall be closed within 30
days.
The Supplier is responsible for implementing 3PVA/3CPR/3PSD (Third Party

Validation Activity) at their expense as a preventive or corrective measure, as and
when requested by DaimlerChrysler.

Element 25.4 - Warranty
The Supplier is responsible to track warranty performance and report on issues
through QEC and Management reviews, make dealership calls, utilizing available
tools and eSystems (e.g. PRAS, QTS, WIS, etc.) Qualified personnel, trained on the
DaimlerChrysler Warranty systems shall be available for tracking warranty field
issues providing quick response time for corrective actions. The Supplier shall
provide monthly reports with prioritized issues, and corrective actions on Warranty to
the respective Commodity Quality Specialist/Manager in P&S.
Element 25.5 - Annual Validation

The Supplier is responsible for performing Annual Validation (when applicable) each
model year per the appropriate DaimlerChrysler product specification. Signed
approval from both DaimlerChrysler Engineering and Supplier Quality shall be
obtained each year annual validation is requested to be waived or modified.
Element 25.6 - Forever Requirements

Conformance to the DaimlerChrysler Forever Requirements is required. The Forever
Requirements state that the Supplier shall notify DaimlerChrysler, per the DCX
FOREVER REQUIREMENTS ACTIVITY FORM, of any non-CN change(s) reflected in
PPAP Manual Table I.3.1 and/or Table I.3.3. Further, it is the Supplier’s
responsibility to proactively communicate with DaimlerChrysler and notify us of any
potential supply/quality issues or sub-Supplier issues such as outsourcing, failure to
obtain PPAP approval or shipment of defective material. The Forever Requirement’s
Supplier Notification of Potential Nonconformance shall be used by Suppliers to alert
DaimlerChrysler assembly plants of shipped defective material. Information
concerning this process and the form are located on the Forever Requirements
website on the DaimlerChrysler Extended Enterprise Network.
PSO ON-SITE VISIT

Begin and end the PSO On-Site Visit by meeting with the appropriate plant management
personnel to discuss the purpose of the visit and the results of the on-floor assessment.
The majority of the time shall be spent on the plant floor observing the manufacturing
process and reviewing the plant's production readiness.
Reinforce to Supplier plant personnel that they cannot change the approved process
without prior notification and written approval by DaimlerChrysler Engineering, Purchasing
and Supplier Quality. This includes continuous improvement workshop floor exercises,
sub-source changes, and sub-source process changes. See the “Forever Requirements”.
PSO FORMS
SUPPLIER READINESS EVALUATION

The Supplier Readiness Evaluation Run shows that the process is set-up, debugged, and
ready for a Production Demonstration Run during the PSO On-Site Visit. The Supplier
Readiness Evaluation Run and analysis provides the Supplier with the opportunity to
optimize and refine the process.

SUPPLIER READINESS EVALUATION (cont.)
The Supplier is required to present the performance results obtained from a Supplier
Readiness Evaluation Run for each production line/tool. The DaimlerChrysler PSO team
with the concurrence of the Supplier will determine the exact quantity and line required
line speed.
Process performance calculations (Pp and Ppk) are required for each machine and
operation as well as the overall process. In the case of multiple production lines/tools,
process performance calculations are required for each line. These performance values will
be used as numeric requirements for FTC, yield, Pp or Ppk are imposed at this time.
Note: In the event of extenuating circumstances (e.g. late sourcing, late design freeze, etc.),
the Supplier shall utilize every opportunity to exercise the production line to prepare for the
Production Demonstration Run.
All information shall be recorded on the SUPPLIER READINESS EVALUATION form and
submitted into the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway).
After reviewing all documentation including the Supplier Readiness Evaluation, the PSO
team shall decide whether the Supplier is ready for the on-site PSO visit. If the PSO team is
satisfied with the documentation submitted, the team along with the Supplier shall
establish a date for the PSO on-site visit.
PROCESS SIGN-OFF SUMMARY REPORT

The PROCESS SIGN-OFF SUMMARY REPORT shall be used to document the Process Sign-
Off information. The Supplier Quality Specialist shall upload a copy of the PSO SUMMARY
REPORT, COMMENTS SHEET, and MEASUREMENT VERIFICATION REPORT into the
DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway).
COMMENTS SHEET
All PSO deviations, issues, and concerns shall be documented on the PSO COMMENTS
SHEET. Once the team has documented all issues and concerns, the Supplier is
responsible for identifying the responsible individual for each issue and the target due date
in which the issue/concern is expected to be resolved.
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION REPORT

Each Process Sign-Off shall have a MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION REPORT
included with the PSO SUMMARY REPORT as an upload into the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP
system (e.g. Powerway). This is a verification audit of the Supplier’s measurement process
and is one of the requirements for element 16 of the Process Sign-Off. The parts and
features checked will be determined by the PSO Team during the PSO On-Site Visit and
may include, but are not limited to, work in process, piece parts from workstation bins and
stock, or final products from the Production Demonstration Run.

PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RESULTS
Each Process Sign-Off shall have a PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RESULTS form which
is to be completed and uploaded into the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway).
For multiple production lines or multiple tools, a separate form shall be included for each
one. This form is used to document the quantity of units built during the Production
Demonstration Run, the demonstrated line speed, element 17, and the Initial Process Study
and First Time Capability results from element 22.


PSO ELEMENT REQUIREMENTS
copyright 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 27

PART NUMBER, DESCRIPTION AND CHANGE LEVEL
Element Requirements Documentation
1.1 A procedure shall be in place to assure correct part number
and revision level as changes occur. • CATIA files,
drawings,
1.1.1 An internal system of communication/notification for comments
changes shall exist between the Tier 1’s and designated page(s) (includes
DaimlerChrysler Tier 2’s/Tier 3’s. The Tier 1 is ultimately list of applicable
responsible to ensure product shipped to Engineering
DaimlerChrysler is the latest revision level. (See standards,
DaimlerChrysler Forever Requirements.) software level
and hardware
1.1.1.1 This system shall include the receipt of a level)
documented approved DaimlerChrysler change • Part number
authorization notification (e.g. ODD Box or CN). cross reference
sheet (if
Note: Voicemail, email, or verbal authorizations are applicable)
unacceptable forms of communication. The Supplier shall
make no changes without document approval from the
customer.
1.2 Where the product identity is not inherently obvious, the

Supplier and sub-Suppliers shall employ an internal
numbering system and provide a cross reference which
enables users to identify the DaimlerChrysler/customer part
number and revision which corresponds to the Supplier’s
numbering and revision system.
1.3 An internal procedure shall exist which ensures updates to

affected documents (e.g. Control Plan, PFMEA, etc) and
ensures testing is performed, when applicable, when a change
occurs.
1.3.1 The Supplier shall not PPAP until all affected documents
are updated.
1.4 Engineering Standards Identified
1.4.1 A system shall be in place to obtain revisions to the

standards and to notify all applicable departments of
specification changes as they occur (see TS16949,
section 4.2.3.1 Engineering Specifications).
1.4.2 The Supplier shall have a process for monitoring the

DaimlerChrysler standards (via Autoweb.net) and all
other applicable standards for revision level changes.
1.4.2.2 This process shall include the frequency and

responsibility for review of standards.
1.4.3 The CATIA comments page shall have as a minimum

those standards identified on the source package, plus
any directed DaimlerChrysler changes.
1.4.3.1 DaimlerChrysler approval for discrepancies shall

copyright 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER Cbe documented.
ORPORATION 28
PART NUMBER, DESCRIPTION AND CHANGE LEVEL (cont.)
1.4.3.2 To assist in enforcement of the Forever
Requirements, the Comments Pages attached to the
design model shall list (Section 6: Assembly
Information) the level 2 sub-components of the
end- item. This listing must include part number
(supplier part number), quantity and revision
level.
1.4.3.3 The Supplier, with the DaimlerChrysler Product

Engineer's approval, shall ensure all dimensional
requirements are adequately defined in the GD&T
sheets and attached to the design model(s).
Supplier shall implement mutually agreed upon
GD&T datum scheme CONSISTENTLY
throughout the design, manufacture and
verification of the product.
1.4.3.4 Any material, part identification, appearance,
process or other requirements shall be called out
in sections 1 & 7 of the design model Comments
Pages. If other sources of dimensioning and
tolerancing requirements are used (e.g.
CMDANA and/or Zima hole layers of CATIA) they
must be listed in the General Engineering Notes
section of the Comments Pages. Supplier must
adequately define all Performance Objectives in
support of defined Functional Objectives.
DESIGN FMEA
2.1 Supplier is responsible for strategies/designs for improving • DFMEA
reliability.
2.2 Supplier shall understand 1st, 2nd & 3rd failure mode
occurrences, and implement “Robust Designs” to exceed
specifications.
2.3 DFMEA shall be created using the latest AIAG guidelines.
2.4 There shall exist an internal “best practice” document

and communication process that is utilized in the DFMEA
development. The process shall include documentation and
data which explains how the DFMEA numbers were
developed.
2.4.1 This process shall but reviewed periodically for

effectiveness and continuous improvement.
2.4.2 This process shall include lessons learned with inputs

from past issues (e.g. pilot, NCT, warranty, CSA, etc.)
2.5 The Supplier shall use the DaimlerChrysler FMEA criteria

(see DFMEA Element Description) to determine when a
reaction plan is needed for DFMEA RPN’s.

DESIGN FMEA (cont.)
2.6 All DFMEA concerns shall have descriptions of current controls
and recommended actions.
2.7 Error proofing potential failure modes and controls shall be

identified in the DFMEA.
2.8 Buzz-Squeak-Rattle (BSR) and Noise-Vibration – Harshness

(NVH) issues shall be addressed in the DFMEA if applicable.
2.9 The DFMEA is a living document and shall be traceable to

processing changes. These documents shall contain the special
characteristics agreed to by the PSO Team from the PSO
element “Special Product/Process Characteristics Identified”.
2.10 The Design FMEA (DFMEA) shall include all sub-components

of the product.
2.10.1 The Supplier shall ensure all failures observed during

DV testing are captured on the DFMEA.
2.10.2 The Supplier shall ensure the occurrence of failures and

the detection ability of these failures, observed during
DV testing correlate with the occurrence and detection
numbers documented on the DFMEA.
TEST SAMPLE SIZES AND FREQUENCIES
3.1 The Supplier is responsible for implementing a “Test to Failure”
verification plan. • DVP&R
• Applicable
3.2 DV and PV test plans shall be signed by DaimlerChrysler Performance
Engineering prior to testing. Process and
Material
3.3 Completed DV and PV DVP&R test results shall be signed by Engineering
DaimlerChrysler Engineering. Standards
• DaimlerChrysl
3.4 All functional requirements shall be defined in the DVP&R and er Engineering
the Supplier shall verify the DVP&R against the Performance signed DV and
Standard for accuracy. PV test plans
DaimlerChrysl
3.4.1 Discrepancies shall be uniquely identified and clearly er Engineering
visible on the DVP&R (e.g. changes to Performance signed DV and
Standard’s test sample sizes, test waivers, etc) PV completed
DVP&R test
3.4.2 Continuous Conformance testing shall be documented on results
the DVP&R when applicable.
PROCESS FMEA
4.1 PFMEA shall be created using the AIAG guidelines.
4.2 There shall exist an internal best practice document and

communication process that is utilized in the PFMEA
development. The process shall include documentation and
data which explains how the PFMEA numbers were developed.

PROCESS FMEA (cont.)
4.2.1 This process shall be reviewed periodically for
effectiveness and shall include continuous improvement
and lessons learned.
4.3 The Supplier shall use the DaimlerChrysler criteria to

determine when a reaction plan is needed for PFMEA RPN’s.
4.4 All PFMEA concerns shall have descriptions of current controls

and recommended actions.
4.5 Buzz-Squeak-Rattle (BSR) and Noise-Vibration-Harshness

(NVH) issues shall be addressed in the PFMEA if applicable.
4.6 Mistake proofing potential failure modes and controls shall be

identified in the PFMEA.
4.7 The PFMEA is a living document and shall be traceable to

process changes. These documents shall contain the special
characteristics agreed to by the PSO Team from the PSO
element “Special Product/Process Characteristics Identified”.
4.8 The Process FMEA (PFMEA) shall reflect the entire

manufacturing process from receiving through shipping.
4.8.1 The Supplier shall ensure all failure modes observed

during pre-production runs (including the Supplier
Readiness Evaluation Run) are captured on the PFMEA.
4.8.2 The Supplier shall ensure failure occurrence and the

detection ability of these failures, observed during pre-
production runs (including the Supplier Readiness
Evaluation Run) correlate with the occurrence and
detection numbers documented on the FMEA.
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM AND MANUFACTURING FLOOR PLAN
5.1 The process flow diagram shall represent the entire • Process flow
manufacturing process from receiving through shipping diagram
operations and shall include the following:
5.1.1Processing sequence, method and equipment used at

each station including inspection and repair/rework
stations.
5.1.2 Number of operators, including float operators, needed

per station inspection and repair/rework stations.
5.1.3 Both main-line assembly processes as well as all off-line

processes that supply it.
5.1.4 Stations which measure special characteristics and/or

stations which may contribute to significant customer
issues (as identified on the PFMEA) shall be identified.
5.2 The Supplier shall perform DFMA (Design for Manufacturing

and Assembly) analysis, providing actions towards simplifying
copyright 2004assembly andCminimizing
DAIMLERCHRYSLER ORPORATION
production process risks. 33
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM AND MANUFACTURING FLOOR PLAN (cont.)
5.3 The manufacturing floor plan shall show the layout of the • Manufacturing
facility and illustrate station-by-station the overall flow of the floor plan
manufacturing process. • Work Station
Layout
5.3.1 The manufacturing floor plan shall highlight all
production equipment used.
5.3.2 The manufacturing floor plan shall show the date in

which the document was released.
5.3.3 The manufacturing floor plan shall show Work in

Process (WIP), raw material, and scrap material storage
locations.
5.3.4 A work station layout shall exist which identifies all work
stations and operators per station.
5.4 The flow diagram, manufacturing floor plan and/or the work
station layout shall include each unique machine number
CONTROL PLAN
6.1 The Control Plan shall describe each step of the manufacturing • Control Plan
process including: receiving, material handling and storage, in-
process operations, testing, inspections, rework/repair, and
shipping.
6.1.1 The Supplier shall reference all applicable documents

when developing the Control Plan (e.g. DFMEA, PFMEA,
flow diagram, DVP&R, etc).
6.1.2 Repair/rework stations shall have as a minimum,

controls equivalent to those of the primary production
line.
6.1.2.1 Deviation from this requirement is acceptable

with a written approval from the PSO team.
6.1.3 The Control Plan shall address verification of Mistake

Proofing (e.g. number of pieces, frequency, etc.).
6.1.4 There shall exist a mechanism which links the Supplier’s

DFMEA and PFMEA to the Control Plan.
6.1.4.1 The Supplier shall look at the FMEA “High

Severity Zone” and “Potential High Warranty
Zones” (see FMEA criteria in the front of the
manual) and ensure these are addressed in the
Control Plan.
6.1.4.2 Lessons learned from PFMEA’s shall be included

in the Control Plan when applicable.
CONTROL PLAN (cont.)
6.1.5 The Supplier shall reference known issues from similar
products (e.g. PRISM, warranty, NCTs) and include any
applicable preventive actions in the Control Plan.
6.1.6 All process and product control parameters shall be

documented.
6.1.6.1 Sample sizes, frequency of inspection, acceptance

criteria, and reaction plans shall be included.
6.1.7 All critical characteristics identified in the GD&T sheets

and the DVP&R and any special product and process
characteristics that describe materials, processes,
performance, reliability, quality, and/or design
requirements shall be included.
6.1.7.1 Sample sizes for checks shall be based on

industry-standard statistical sampling plan
tables or shall use Statistical Process Control.
6.1.8 Any temporary or interim off-standard operation (e.g.

back-up operation) shall be identified.
6.2 The Control Plan is a living document and shall be updated to

reflect any changes to the manufacturing process.
6.2.1 All changes that occur anywhere in the Extended

Enterprise that affect the process (reflected in the
PPAP Manual Table I.3.1 and/or Table I.3.3) shall be
approved through the Forever Requirements process per
the DCX FOREVER REQUIREMENTS ACTIVITY form by
DaimlerChrysler.
6.3 For designated appearance items the Supplier shall have an

Appearance Control Plan as required by the DaimlerChrysler
Appearance Standard AS-10119.
Note: Based on the classification of the part (General, Exterior,

Interior) there may be additional appearance requirements that
affect the dimensional PSW (refer to the appropriate
DaimlerChrysler standard, Table 2 of AS-10119). The Appearance
Control Plan and the additional appearance requirements shall be
verified by the PSO Team during the PSO On-site Visit.

QUALITY PLANNING
7.1 All Product Quality Plans shall coordinate with the
DaimlerChrysler PAP timing for each applicable program. • Product
Assurance Plan
7.1.1 The plan shall identify major MTS (Master Timing (PAP) or Advanced
Schedule) milestone events, required product or process Product Quality
tasks, responsible organizations, and scheduled and Plan (APQP).
actual timing dates. Refer to the Advanced Product • List with PPAP
Quality Planning and Control Plan (APQP) manual and status of the
DaimlerChrysler’s PAP4CDS. parts supplied.
• Indented list of
7.2 Supply Base Management sub-tier
manufacturers,
7.2.1 The plan shall include an indented list of all sub-tier including
manufacturers or “Easy Map” diagram. This list shall secondary
also include secondary processes/services (e.g. plating, processes/
heat treating, etc.) if applicable. services if
applicable. (Refer
to “Easy Map”
7.2.1.1 Each component listed on the Bill of Material diagram)
corresponding to the DaimlerChrysler part
• Listed risk of all
number shall be risked. The criteria for risking
sub-components
components shall take into consideration the
and processes.
DaimlerChrysler risk drivers.
• Level 3 PPAP
documentation,
7.2.1.2 Each component risked as medium or high shall including a line
be accompanied by an exercise equivalent to a speed
DaimlerChrysler PSO conducted by the Tier 1. demonstration,
for those sub-
7.2.1.2.1 Level 3 PPAP documentation components
including a line speed demonstration risked medium or
is required for medium and high high.
risked parts. Additional
documents may be required at the
request of the DaimlerChrysler
Supplier Quality Specialist.
7.2.1.3 Plan shall demonstrate how risk criteria/PSO

requirements are cascaded down through the
Extended Enterprise™.

QUALITY PLANNING (cont.)
7.3 Problem Solving
Examples of
7.3.1 The Supplier shall have a mechanism to carry lessons Problem Solving
learned and corrective actions back through their Methods:
facility on a system level. • DOE (Design of
Experiments
7.3.1.1 Corrective action shall be implemented across • 7-step Corrective
the entire manufacturing plant for every Action Plan Form
applicable DaimlerChrysler production line. • Root-Cause-
Analysis
7.3.2 The Supplier shall have a process which details how
lessons learned and corrective actions are
communicated to other facilities owned by that Supplier.
7.3.2.1 Corrective action shall be implemented at all

applicable Supplier plants shipping to
DaimlerChrysler.
7.3.3 The Supplier shall use the DaimlerChrysler corporate 7-

step Corrective Action Plan Form to document non-
conformances and test failures, and the actions taken
to permanently resolve the issue.
7.3.4 The Supplier shall have corporate guidelines for

conducting Design of Experiments.
7.3.4.1 The Supplier shall conduct DOE’s or similar

activities to identify and establish the optimal
process parameters for all new and modified
parts prior to the PSO on-site visit.
7.3.5 The Supplier shall support the DaimlerChrysler quality

systems (e.g. eCIMS, Non-Conformance Ticket (NCT)
and PRAS (warranty) systems).
7.3.5.1 The Supplier shall obtain a minimum of 2 SID’s

(Supplier ID”S) for each manufacturing location.
7.3.5.2 The Supplier shall ensure that all users SID’s

are accurate and active.
7.3.5.3 The Supplier shall ensure all resources

supporting the DaimlerChrysler systems have
been trained.

INCOMING MATERIAL QUALIFICATION/CERTIFICATION PLAN
8.1 The plan shall describe operations and procedures used by • Incoming
incoming inspection to qualify and certify incoming material inspection
prior to releasing into production. procedures
• Sampling plans
8.2 The plan shall have a product validation procedure which • Receiving Reports
determines the frequency of inspection based on component • Material
and sub-tier history. Standards
• Inspection/test
8.2.1 The plan shall include an escalation process which reports
increases the inspection frequency level when a defect is • Copies of sub-tier
found. Supplier
Certificates of
8.2.2 When a de-escalation process exists, the inspection Analysis for each
frequency level shall be reduced one level at a time, only specific PIA (Part
if defects have not be found after a predetermined in Assembly)
period of time documented in the process. component
• Copies of sub-tier
8.2.3 When the plan includes “dock to stock” (i.e. ships parts Supplier PSW’s
directly out of the receiving area without inspection) the (Part Submission
process, at a minimum, shall require three previous Warrant)
consecutive shipments to have been defect-free and no • Copies of sub-tier
subsequent internal or external non-conformances to Supplier ISO-
have been found. 9001
certifications
8.2.3.1 The plan shall include at a minimum 3 levels of
inspection frequencies prior to release to “dock
to stock”.
8.3 The plan shall include incoming acceptance sampling plans, for
both attribute and variable data. Two or more of the methods
described in element 7.4.3.2 of TS-16949 shall be used;
otherwise, the minimum requirements found in the Lot
Acceptance Sampling Table in Appendix B.
8.3.1 The risk for the purchased component and material

shall be taken into account when developing the
incoming acceptance sampling plan.
8.4 All parts require lot control and traceability, within the
organization’s manufacturing facility, which shall be
described in detail and verified (elements 7.5.3 & 7.5.3.1 of TS-
16949).
8.4.1 Parts required to meet the DaimlerChrysler Traceability

specification, PS-10125, shall adhere to all
requirements therein. Product identification and
traceability shall be maintained and recorded through
all stages of production, delivery and
installation. At a minimum, record keeping which
tracks the usage of lots or batches back to the
production date is mandatory.

INCOMING MATERIAL QUALIFICATION/CERTIFICATION PLAN (cont.)
Element Requirement Documentation
8.4.2 All parts shall be identified with Supplier Code, Part
Number and Manufacturing dates based on Engineering
Standards PS-4480, if specified. When part design
prevents compliance then an alternate method shall be
documented and approved by DaimlerChrysler
Engineering.
8.5 For lot traceability, the lot size shall be no more than one shift
or one production run, whichever is smaller.
8.6 Special controls are required for sorted, reworked or repaired

material to provide traceability to the sorted, rework or repair
process.
8.7 The plan shall address containment of non-conforming

material. This shall also include the use of the
DaimlerChrysler Supplier Notification of Potential
Nonconformance process outlined in the Forever
Requirements located on the COVISINT website.
8.8 The plan shall address part handling and part identification for
nonconforming product.
8.9 The plan shall identify processes performed by sub-Suppliers

or any outside processor and shall include records indicating
inspection/test results that relate to the appropriate lot
code.
8.10 The plan shall identify sub-component processes performed

in-house and shall include records indicating
inspection/test results that relate to the appropriate lot code.
8.11 The lot acceptance date (or date the lot was inspected) shall
be identified by the year, month, day and numeric sequence.
8.12 Components or production materials used in the assembly of

parts for DaimlerChrysler shall have full approval status. The
PSW from sub-tier Suppliers shall be on file or easily
accessible.
8.13 Certificates of Analysis shall comply with DaimlerChrysler

Engineering Standard Requirements identified on the CATIA
comments page.
8.14 The plan shall address returned assemblies or components

from the customer.
8.15 All incoming appearance sub-components shall meet the

requirement outlined in the DaimlerChrysler Appearance
Standard AS-10119<A>.

PARTS HANDLING PLAN
Element Requirement Documentation
9.1 The Parts Handling Plan shall include the following: • Parts handling
plan
9.1.1 Documented procedures that detail the internal material • Material
handling operations. handling
procedures
9.1.2 The types of containers used throughout the • Packaging
manufacturing process including any external instructions
processing. • Maintenance
plan for WIP
9.1.2.1 Each container type shall be clearly defined with containers
material dimensions, quantity per container,
part numbers, stack height limits (static &
mobile), etc.
9.1.2.2 Method to clearly identify and differentiate

rework/repair, scrap, WIP bins, etc.
Note: DaimlerChrysler does not procure returnable containers

for Supplier’s WIP (Work in Process) or sub-tier Suppliers.
Containers for these components are the responsibility of the
Supplier. Use the DaimlerChrysler containers for this
purpose is considered misappropriation of corporate assets. If
the PSO Team detects a container violation during the PSO
On-Site Visit, Parts Handling Plan on the PSO SUMMARY
REPORT shall be marked REJECT in the Process column and
an explanation added to the COMMENTS SHEET.
9.1.3 The method for in process raw material replenishment

(e.g. Kan- Ban)
9.1.4 The method of inventory control (e.g. FIFO).
9.1.4.1 Material storage locations shall be clearly

defined (e.g. by part number).
9.1.4.2 When FIFO is used as a method of inventory

control, the Supplier shall have an effective
method of ensuring FIFO stock rotation
throughout the manufacturing facility.
9.1.4.2.1 When the traceability process is FIFO

dependent, the Supplier’s shipping
process and all sub-tiers part
handling shall conform to FIFO.
9.1.5 The method by which material is tracked and

transferred from one process to another (e.g. travelers,
routing cards, etc.)
9.1.5.1 Information, at a minimum, shall include lot

code, date, number of pieces entering/exiting
the operation, number reworked/repaired,
number scrapped, operation number and
shift.
PARTS HANDLING PLAN (cont.)
9.1.6 Where production operators use special handling
methods, appropriate instructions shall be included in
the operating instructions. (e.g. hazardous material,
ESD, Color or appearance parts, etc.)
OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS
10.1 Operator set-up, changeover, 1st piece approval, mistake • Operator
proofing, rework/repair, part loading, inspection and instructions
packaging instructions shall be approved, signed, dated, • Set up sheets
traceable to the level of parts being produced, and shall • Inspection
include documented sample sizes and frequencies. instructions
• 1st piece approval
10.1.1 A procedure shall exist that obtains cross-functional instructions
signatures (e.g. Quality, Engineering, Manufacturing • Mistake proofing
and Production Operators) for release of operating instructions
instructions. • Rework/repair
instructions
10.1.2 A system shall exist which prevents non-standardized • Part loading
or out of date instructions from existing on the instructions
manufacturing floor (e.g. Document audit). • Operator
Qualification
10.1.3 “Part loading and sequencing of operation” process
instructions shall exist for Gage R&R and in-process • Visual
part loading into gages and/or fixtures. Management
Document control
10.2 Operator training shall be documented and a record of procedure
training for all operators shall be maintained.
10.2.1 The Supplier shall have a robust process for training

and qualifying operators prior to operators
performing production processes (e.g. classes,
mentorship, and/ or temporary supervision, etc.).
10.2.2 A list of training requirements is needed for each

unique workstation.
10.2.3 Visual inspection stations shall have methods

established to verify operator’s ability to find defects.
(e.g. periodic testing, recertification).
10.2.4 Operations requiring special certification shall be

identified and operators certified to perform that
operation shall be identified (e.g. rework/repair).

OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS (cont.)
10.3 All instructions, control charts, defect tracking sheets, log
sheets, and reactions plans to out of control measurements
(if applicable) shall be located adjacent to the process,
visible to the operator and legible. Visual management
techniques (displays & diagrams) shall be used whenever
possible.
10.3.1 Sample parts used as visual displays shall be

properly identified and maintained to the correct
revision level and located at the applicable work
station.
10.4 Key <D>, safety <S>, noise <N>, emissions <E>, theft <T>,
and homologation <H> characteristic parameters shall be
addressed in the instructions. The instructions shall enable
any adequately trained person to perform the described
operation.
TOOLING, EQUIPMENT, AND GAGES IDENTIFIED
11.1 The Supplier shall establish a tooling list which shall include • Tooling list
all production, interim, and/or temporary tooling and Supplier Tool
equipment used in the production process. Record (STR)
11.1.1 The list shall indicate ownership (e.g. Supplier

owned, other OEM, etc.) for each item listed.
11.2 All DaimlerChrysler owned tooling, fixtures, and gages shall

be clearly and permanently marked with the same tool
number as identified on the Supplier Tool Record” (STR) and
the Tool Purchase Order, and be identified “Property of
DaimlerChrysler”.
11.2.1 Gages shall be manufactured and approved per the

DaimlerChrysler gage standards identified on the
AME web site (http://ame.ctc.chrysler.com/gages).
11.2.2 DaimlerChrysler owned gages/fixtures shall have

GR/GR&R Tags (84-206-0021) per the AME Design
and Build Gage Standard (GEDOC001).
DaimlerChrysler Gage Process Engineering shall
provide the tags for DaimlerChrysler stamping
plants and assembly gages.
11.2.3 All tooling, equipment, gages and fixtures shall

possess unique identification numbers.
11.2.4 Verification of the STR against the Supplier’s

manufacturing facility shall be performed by the PSO
team during the PSO on-site visit.
Note: DaimlerChrysler owned tooling shall be used for the

production of DaimlerChrysler product(s) only.
11.3 All tooling, fixtures, equipment and gages used in the

manufacturing process from the laboratory, production, tool
room, maintenance, and quality areas shall be identified in
copyright 2004 the 43
Supplier’s maintenance, storage, and calibration
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION
SPECIAL PRODUCT & PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIFIED
12.1 Special product and process characteristics shall include • FPSC (First
those identified by DaimlerChrysler as well as those Production
characteristics identified by the Supplier. Shipment
Certification) Plan
12.1.1 The Supplier shall have documented definitions of • PPSR (Pre-
special product and process characteristics and the Production Sample
internal requirements for control and monitoring. Report)
12.2. Special product and process characteristics shall be included
in the MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION REPORT.
12.3 Special product and process characteristics and all Key <D>,
emissions <E>, noise <N>, theft <T>, safety <S>, and
homologation <H> characteristics shall be noted on all
applicable quality documents (e.g. Control Plan, DFMEA,
PFMEA, DVP&R, set-up sheets, and operator instruction
sheet).
12.4 Safety <S> characteristics require SPC reporting that shall be

made available to DaimlerChrysler representatives upon
request (refer to Engineering Process Standard PF-SAFETY).
12.5 For those special characteristics identified by the PSO team,

SPC is not required unless specified by the team.
12.6 Previous S0 Pre-Production Sample Report (PPSR) product

and process characteristics shall be reviewed to establish
possible special product and process characteristics for the
production.
12.7 If no special characteristics exist, the Supplier may identify

short-term special characteristics that were identified on the
PPSR form to select for the MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
VERIFICATION REPORT.
12.8 First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) Plan

First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) documents
the initial production shipments meet all DaimlerChrysler
drawing and Engineering Standards requirements. The
FPSC program requires the Supplier to provide statistical
evidence of conformance to special product and process
characteristics prior to the shipment of components to
DaimlerChrysler receiving plants. Certification is for a
minimum of 2000 parts. 100% of the FPSC parts are to be
inspected for conformance to special product and process
characteristics.
12.8.1 The Supplier shall provide the FPSC plan for PSO team
approval.
12.8.2 All parts/components regardless of risk shall be held

to FPSC requirements. It is the responsibility of the
PSO team to identify those requirements.
12.8.3 All completed FPSC’s shall be reviewed with the

DaimlerChrysler PSO team.

PROCESS MONITORING
13.1 The Supplier shall have a procedure that requires
• 1st piece approval
documented corrective actions for all out of control
process
measurements.
• Control Charts
• Process
13.1.1 Maintenance logs shall be updated to record any
Performance
maintenance related corrective actions.
Charts
13.2 A documented First Piece Approval Process shall exist which • Total production
verifies product at each station is being made according to maintenance
specification; verifies proper machine set-up; and verifies charts
correct parameter setting. This first piece shall be retained • Log Sheets
until the end of the production run. • Defect Tracking
Sheets
13.3 All inspection stations shall have a method of defect tracking. • Corrective Action
Forms
13.4 Visual displays of process performance (e.g. FTC, scrap and
rework) and total production maintenance (e.g. downtime,
etc) shall be present on the manufacturing floor.
13.4.1 These displays shall be frequently updated to reflect

current quality data.
13.4.2 Targets shall be identified for each measurable.
13.4.3 Plans to achieve each targeted measurable shall be

documented.
13.5 For requirement for special product and process

characteristics, see Special Product and Process
Characteristics Identified.
13.6 Where SPC methods are used, the Supplier is required to

maintain a history of component production sequence,
production line/tool and characteristics’ values to assist in
assembly plant, warranty and field return root cause
investigations.
13.7 The DaimlerChrysler PSO team shall approve all rework and
repair operations, procedures and work instructions.
13.7.1 All reworked/repaired products shall be clearly and

uniquely identified.
13.7.2 All reworked/repaired products (if applicable) shall be

production tested prior to packaging.
13.7.3 The rework/repair procedure shall state that when a

component is replaced which has safety
characteristics and a new component is installed, the
lot from which the replacement component came
must be identified and it must be linked one-to-one
with the final assembly or lot on which the
component was used (e.g. part sequence number).
PROCESS MONITORING (cont.)
13.7.4 The rework/repair procedure shall state that when a
component is removed from an assembly which has
been returned from a DaimlerChrysler assembly plant
which is to be re-used in another assembly, the lot
code of all components with safety characteristics
must be identified and linked one-to-one with the new
assembly or lot in which the component will be
used.
13.7.5 The procedure shall ensure traceability in the event

that any part returned from a DaimlerChrysler
assembly plant is to be re-sent with out replacing or
repairing components with safety characteristics.
ERROR AND MISTAKE PROOFING
14.1 The Error and Mistake Proofing Plan shall describe how the • Error and
Supplier addresses error proofing and mistake proofing from Mistake Proofing
an organizational level. Plan
• List of error and
14.1.1 The plan shall include the creation of boundary mistake proofing
samples Boundary samples may be defined as: implemented by
• Designated conforming and non-conforming product operation
(e.g. Go/No Go) number
• Master samples for appearance items • Error and
• Product built to the ends specification limits (i.e. just mistake proofing
inside the spec limit and just outside the spec limit) studies
• Mistake Proofing
14.1.2 The plan shall explain how failure modes for Contingency
“designated non-conforming product” are selected in Plan
the event of multiple possible failure modes.
14.1.3 The plan shall explain how the verification frequency

of boundary samples is determined.
14.1.4 The plan shall describe how boundary samples are

labeled.
14.2 Line or station lock out shall be implemented in the

manufacturing process at all steps to prevent failed
operations (detected by mistake proofing) from proceeding to
a subsequent station or into finished product. Audible and
visual indicators shall notify the operator of the failed
operation.
14.3 Boundary samples shall be verified on the production line as

frequently as needed to ensure mistake proofing is
operational. The frequency of verification shall take into
account such activities as start of shift, production
changeover, major disruptions, tooling maintenance, etc.
14.4 Error and/or mistake proofing is required for severity

numbers of 9 and higher in the PFMEA and DFMEA.

ERROR AND MISTAKE PROOFING (cont.)
14.5 Mistake proofing is required for all special process and
product characteristics.
14.5.1 Dimensional features that affect fit, form or function

as defined by the Engineering drawings or the PSO
team shall have mistake proofing to ensure that all
products meet the requirements.
14.6 Rework/Repair and secondary processes shall incorporate

all error and mistake proofing from the production line.
14.7 A contingency plan shall be developed and documented in

the event the production mistake proofing is not operable. A
visual and/or audible alert shall signify the mistake
proofing is inoperable.
14.7.1 In the event the mistake proofing becomes inoperable,

the DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist shall
be notified per “The Forever Requirements” for
product shipment. The “Potential Non-conformance
Process” shall be used when applicable.
14.8 Mistake proofing verification shall be addressed in the

Preventive Maintenance Plan.
14.8.1 Controls shall be in place to validate the on-going

effectiveness of all Error and Mistake proofing.
14.8.2 Error and Mistake Proofing software shall be tested

for all possible failures, and bypass scenarios.
14.9 Mistake proofing verification shall be addressed in the

Process Layered Audit Plan and checklist.
14.10 The process shall include part presence sensing and

location assurance of all parts, at the same station or
subsequent station.
Note: Mistake proofing shall verify that the final state assembly is
complete and correct. Verifying the component is in the machine
prior to assembly, and then assuming it is on the finished product
after the machine cycle is not acceptable.
14.11 Sequential sensing shall be used when the process utilizes

physically independent cells making up one process flow.
14.12 All assembly (secondary) equipment shall leave an

identifiable mark (physically or through software) on the
part that is indicative of a successful operation (e.g. pin
hole, barcode label).
14.13 Dimensional features that affect fit and function as defined
by the PSO team, which are not capable or consistent, are
to be linked to the process to ensure that all products meet
requirements.
14.14 When positive alignment features cannot be designed into

the product, process alignment assists shall be
implemented (e.g. laser lights, fixtures, equipment
modifications, etc.).
14.15 Appropriate mistake proofing shall be implemented for the

measurement of rivet head diameter and height.
14.16 In-process verification of product performance criteria (e.g.

Cup Holder Opening and Closing Efforts, Opening Time
etc) shall be applied to all functional features of the product
that have a high customer interface as determined by the
PSO team.
14.17 All components, which are sorted for specific application

(content or function), shall have 100% verification of proper
part selection through robust mistake proofing.
14.18 All cylinders applying components or performing staking

shall be verified for full stroke.
14.19 Primary manufacturing processes (e.g. Injection Molding,

Welding, Heat staking, Machining etc.) shall have
controllers (e.g. RJG, MACO etc.) with a closed loop
feedback system and process limits established, to
produce a defect free product.
14.20 All critical lubrication, adhesive points, liquids and gases

shall be automated and Error and Mistake proofed for
proper flow/amount/location.
14.21 Assembly machines that accommodate right and left parts

in the same process shall have mistake proofing to prevent
assembly and packing errors.
Note: The process flow shall accommodate separate paths of right

and left parts if deemed necessary by the PSO team.
14.22 Supplier and sub-suppliers must comply with DCX

Supplier Quality weld validation plan for any Fusion arc
weld and Resistance spot welding parts.

14.23 Mistake Proofing requirements for Module Assembly/
Sequenced Part Delivery (SPD)
14.23.1 Barcodes and/or pick lights shall be used to

ensure the correct part is picked and assembled
per the broadcast.
14.23.2 Electrical continuity testing of all the electrical

components of the module, which also ensures
correct content per broadcast.(See Commodity
Specific – Electrical, for further mistake proofing
requirements)
14.23.3 Vision systems shall ensure correct color match of

components, and correct components (where
applicable).
14.23.4 “Push click pull” method shall be utilized for all

electrical and other applicable connections.
14.23.5 SPD part sequence shall be maintained through

the rework/repair process.
14.24 Mistake Proofing requirements for Product Testing
14.24.1 All functions, efforts and travel shall be exercised

and measured 100% on line to full extent of
function and travel to ensure product
performance.
14.24.2 Leak testing for liquids and gas shall be automated

and measured 100% on line.
14.24.3 The Supplier shall ensure that the number of

testing and rework stations in the production
process shall ensure uninterrupted flow of
acceptable product to DaimlerChrysler at the
quoted volume.
14.24.4 The Supplier shall ensure systematically that all

reworked/repaired parts are re-verified through
production testing and inspection.

LAYERED PROCESS AUDIT PLAN
15.1 The Layered Process Audit plan shall be added to the
Supplier’s existing Internal Audit procedure. • LPA roll-out
timing plan
15.2 The Layered Process Audit (LPA) plan shall have a roll-out • LPA procedures
timing plan for coverage of all processes that produce • LPA work
Chrysler Group parts. instructions
• LPA Structure
15.3 The LPA plan shall address mandatory training of all and Frequency
individuals involved in the audit activity. Chart
15.4 The LPA plan shall identify all levels of management • LPA Process
structure per the Supplier manufacturing facility’s Control Audit
organizational chart. Checklist
• LPA Error
15.5 The LPA plan shall have procedures and work instructions Proofing
for each level of management which details the roles, Verification Audit
responsibilities and the frequencies of each audit. Checklist
15.5.1 The LPA plan shall include a non-conformance

corrective action procedure.
15.5.2 The LPA plan shall contain a schedule frequency and

structure chart (see example in Appendix B).
15.6 The LPA plan shall require top management reviews of LPA
results.
15.6.1 The plan shall state the frequency of management

reviews.
15.6.2 Meeting minutes and attendance shall be

documented.
15.6.3 Management reviews shall address LPA non-

conformances, and corrective actions shall be
identified and implemented.
15.7 The Supplier shall develop both a Process Control Audit

Checklist and an Error and Mistake Proofing Verification
Audit Checklist.
15.7.1 Each checklist shall have an area/section for entering

immediate reaction plans.
15.7.2 When process changes occur, the LPA checklist shall

be updated accordingly.
15.7.3 After PSO approval, no item shall be removed from the

LPA checklist without DaimlerChrysler Supplier
Quality approval regardless of initial part risk.
15.8 A LPA audit shall be demonstrated during the PSO on-site

visit.
15.8.1 Any LPA plan or demonstration issues during the PSO

on-site visit shall be documented on the PSO
Comments Sheet.

EVIDENCE OF PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
Prior to the Pre-PSO Documentation Review: • Supplier
16.1 The Supplier is required to present the performance results Readiness
obtained from a Supplier Readiness Evaluation Run for each Evaluation (SRE)
production line/tool. Run results
• Measurement
16.1.1 The Supplier shall conduct the Supplier Readiness System
Run at production (CPV – Capacity Planning Volume) Verification
speed with production tools/equipment. Report
16.1.2 The Supplier with the concurrence of the Examples of

DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist will Problem Solving
determine the exact quantity (usually 30 pieces). Methods:
• DOE (Design of
16.1.3 During the SRE run, the Supplier shall measure all Experiments)
characteristics on all parts per the Control Plan, • 7-Step Corrective
regardless of Control Plan frequency. Action Plan Form
• Root-Cause-
16.1.4 Process performance calculations (Pp and Ppk) are
Analysis Charting
required for each machine and operation as well as
the overall process.
16.1.4.1 Process and product characteristics

identified on DaimlerChrysler drawings
shall have a Ppk of 1.67 or greater. All
other characteristics identified shall
have a Ppk of 1.33 or greater.
16.1.4.2 In the case of multiple production lines/

tools, process performance calculations are
required for each line. These performance
values will be used as an indication of the
beginning performance. No numeric
requirements for FTC, yield, Pp or Ppk
are imposed at this time.
During the PSO On-Site Visit:

16.2 PSO Team members are required to randomly select and
witness the measurement of specific product and/or process
characteristics using the MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
VERIFICATION REPORT form. This audit is typically
completed before the Product Demonstration Run.
Examples:
• Stock thickness for a stamped part
• Moisture content, mold pressure or temperature for a molded
part
• Solderability, dimensional checks or reflow oven profile for an
electronic printed wiring assembly
16.2.1 A minimum of 3 characteristics shall be measured.
16.2.2 A minimum of 30 parts shall be selected.

EVIDENCE OF PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS (cont.)
During the PSO On-Site Visit:
16.2.3 The PSO team shall decide the quantity of parts to be

witnessed for measurement verification. The PSO
team should take into consideration the number of
characteristics identified, the complexity and the
time for completion of all measurements.
16.2.4 The PSO team shall determine if the measuring

process for each characteristic identified on the
report is acceptable. The results shall be recorded on
the MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION
REPORT form.
16.2.5 The PSO team shall take the results from the
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION REPORT
and compare the Ppk’s to those of the SRE.
LINE SPEED DEMONSTRATION
17.1 The Production Demonstration Run shall be on the all • Line speed
production lines of record, using production tools, calculation
production processes, and trained operators. • Process
constraints and
17.1.1 The Production Demonstration Run consists of 300 contingency
pieces or two hours of production whichever is more plans
stringent. For multiple production lines or tools this
requirement applies for each production line/tool.
NOTE 1: The PSO Team has the authority to adjust the

quantity of parts based on the parts complexity and cost.
Any deviations from the minimum quantity of 300 pieces or
two hours of production shall be approved in writing by the
PSO Team and documented on the PRODUCTION
DEMONSTRATION RESULTS form.
NOTE 2: Rework/repair/scrap shall not be included in the

Product Demonstration line speed calculation. The line
speed calculation shall only include those components
produced successfully. If the line is empty at the start of
the Production Demonstration Run, line fill time
shall not be counted in the two-hour requirement. Count
completed units only starting with the first completed unit
off the production line.

LINE SPEED DEMONSTRATION (cont.)
17.2 The PSO Team shall witness the PSO build and monitor the
PSO Line Speed during the Production Demonstration Run
and record the data on the PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION
RESULTS form. In the case of multiple production
lines/tools, the line speed for each line/tool will be recorded
and the production line identified.
17.2.1 The PSO Team will also indicate on the form whether
the production line is a "shared" line with additional
production requirements for other DaimlerChrysler
(or other customers') products and will enter the
DaimlerChrysler Tooling Capacity as well as the
Total Tooling Capacity. If it is a shared line they will
additionally enter Other Customer Capacity
and Excess Capacity.
17.3 Process studies shall be performed using part data from the
Production Demonstration build.
17.4 Process constraints (bottlenecks), which may impact quality

or production schedules shall be documented on the
COMMENTS SHEET, and contingency plans shall be
documented and submitted to the PSO team for approval.
17.4.1 When process constraints are attributed to high scrap

or rework/repair, the issue shall be documented on
the COMMENTS SHEET and the Supplier shall
identify root cause, implement permanent corrective
action and verify corrective action with a new
DaimlerChrysler PSO on-site Production
Demonstration Run prior to receiving “A” approval.
17.5 Test samples used in Production Validation (PV) testing shall

come from the Production Demonstration Run (PDR) that
meet the following requirements:
17.5.1 PDR meets the Process Performance (PP and PPK)

requirements or if not, has performance values and a
recovery plan judged acceptable by the PSO Team.
17.5.2 The Demonstration Run was conducted using the

Daily Capacity Planning Volume.
17.5.3 Approved piece parts and materials were used.
17.5.4 Production processes and production tooling were

used.
17.5.5 Acceptable Gage R&R study results were obtained for

production measuring tools.

OUTGOING MATERIAL INSPECTION
18.1 The plan shall describe the operations and procedures used • Final audit
by outgoing inspection to qualify outgoing product prior to sampling plan
releasing to the customer. • Final audit
procedure
18.2 The plan shall include outgoing acceptance sampling plans, • Shipping
for both attribute and variable data. reports
• Audit Records
Note: The FMEA risk of the production part shall be taken into • Containment
account when developing the outgoing inspection sampling plan. Records
• Final Audit
18.3 Parts required to meet the DaimlerChrysler Traceability Work
specification, PS-10125, shall adhere to all requirements Instructions
therein.
18.4 All parts shall be marked with Supplier Code, Part Number
and Manufacturing Dates based on Engineering Standard
PS- 4480, if applicable.
18.5 For lot traceability, the lot size shall be no more than one
shift or one production run, whichever is smaller.
18.6 The plan shall address containment of non-conforming

material. This shall also include the use of the
DaimlerChrysler Supplier Notification of Potential
Nonconformance process outlined in the Forever
Requirements located on the DaimlerChrysler COVISINT
website.
18.7 The plan shall address part handling and part identification
for nonconforming product.
18.8 The lot acceptance date (or date the lot was inspected) shall
be identified by the year, month, day and numeric sequence.
18.9 Shipping, Audit, and Containment Records shall be

documented and maintained.
PARTS PACKAGING AND SHIPPING SPECIFICATIONS

19.1 The parts packaging and shipping plan shall include the • Parts packaging
types of containers (expendable or returnable) that will be and shipping
used to ship product to DaimlerChrysler/customer plants. plan
The plan shall also include:
19.1.1 Specific container information which shall include the

following: (returnable and/or back up expendable,
container dimensions, container material, #of pieces
per container, weight of full/empty container, # of
containers per pallet, etc.).
19.1.2 Shipping and labeling instructions shall conform to

Shipping/Parts Identification Label Applications
Standards manual.
PARTS PACKAGING AND SHIPPING SPECIFICATIONS (cont.)
19.1.3 All Suppliers using expendable packaging as their • Packaging and
primary packaging OR for returnable backup are Shipping
responsible for designing, manufacturing, and testingProcedures
their packaging. The Supplier designed dunnage and • Packaging,
simulation test pack shall be approved by shipping and
DaimlerChrysler Corporate Material Handling labeling
Engineering and the receiving plant using the MHE instructions
Unit Load Data (ULD) sheet. • Returnable
Container
19.1.4 When DaimlerChrysler designed dunnage is used, the Management
Supplier is not responsible for obtaining packaging Plan
approval. • Bar coded
labeling
19.2 When returnable containers are to be used, a management procedure
plan shall be developed which includes: • Shipping label
example
19.2.1 Training and access to the DaimlerChrysler Container • MHE ULD
Management System (CMS). Provide a documented approval for
procedure for the mandatory data entry. Supplier
dunnage design
19.2.2 Inventory control to track the number of containers on (if applicable)
hand and in transit.
19.2.2.1 The management plan shall identify a

minimum number of containers to be on
hand before the Supplier contacts
DaimlerChrysler for assistance with
container return.
19.2.3 Documented procedure for the mandatory transmittal

of container/part number information during ASN
submissions from the Supplier’s facility.
19.2.4 Maintenance plan shall identify how damaged or

contaminated containers are removed from service
and how previsions for repair and cleaning are
performed.
19.2.5 Expendable backup plan shall ensure on-time

shipment in the event of a shortage of returnables.
Backup expendable packaging shall maintain the
same footprint (dimensions) as the returnable
container, and where possible, hold the same number
of pieces.
19.2.6 Both expendable and returnable packaging shall be

sized not to exceed the DaimlerChrysler assembly plant
requirement of “two-hour-of-assembly-plant-
production” per container. Deviation from this
requirement requires concurrence from
DaimlerChrysler’s Corporate Material Handling.

PARTS PACKAGING AND SHIPPING SPECIFICATIONS (cont.)
19.2.7 Bar coded shipping labels shall reflect the latest change
level.
19.2.7.1 The date and sequence code shall be displayed

in the manufacturing date space” of the
prescribed shipping container label.
GAGE AND TEST EQUIPMENT EVALUATION
20.1 The Supplier shall have a Gage plan that explains how the • Gage Plan
appropriate gage for the process is determined. • Gage R&R
results
20.1.1 This plan shall document how the Supplier verifies • Gage and test
the gage layout matches the DaimlerChrysler part equipment
drawing; capturing critical dimensions as well as those calibration
dimensions identified by the PSO team. records
• Validation of
20.2 All gages used in the process shall be identified on the gages for
Control Plan. production
release
• Calibration
20.3 FMEA RPN’s, which were reduced due to measuring/gaging,
schedule
shall have an acceptable gage evaluation and calibration
frequency.
20.4 The Supplier shall refer to the Design and/or Process FMEA
to determine what is the appropriate gage to be used
(attribute vs. variable).
20.5 The Supplier shall have a plan to validate gages/equipment

prior to release unto the manufacturing floor.
20.6 The Supplier shall have a plan which periodically verifies

the condition of designated conforming Boundary samples
to ensure the samples are still acceptable.
20.7 All gages shall have acceptable R&R studies performed in

conjunction with the Supplier Readiness Evaluation Run
(SRE) prior to the Pre-PSO Documentation Review. Gage R&R
studies shall meet the requirements below for both attribute
and variable gages.
20.7.1 Total R&R as a percent of part tolerance should be

used for new processes, while total R&R as a percent
of process variation should be used for process
improvement.
20.7.2 Acceptable gage R&R as a percentage of tolerance

shall be less than 10%. The gage R&R as a percent of
study variation shall also be less than 10%. A gage
R&R between 10% and 30% shall require approval
from the PSO team. A gage R&R equal to or greater
than 30% is unacceptable. 64
copyright 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION
GAGE AND TEST EQUIPMENT EVALUATION (cont.)
20.7.3 For attribute gages the organization shall complete a
study as per the Measurement System Analysis
manual or shall use a minimum of 50 samples, three
operators, and three sets of measurements from each
operator. The test samples shall include parts that
are close to each side of the specification(s). To be
acceptable all measurements taken on parts that
are out of specification shall indicate that the parts
are to be rejected.
Note: No attribute gaging is allowed on special characteristics.
20.8 For variable gages, tolerances used for 100% verification

shall be reduced by the extent of Gage R&R.
20.9 All gages and test equipment shall be calibrated and reflect
the last calibration date and expiration date. Calibrations
shall be traceable to a known source/standard.
20.10 A calibration schedule shall be established for all applicable

equipment.
20.10.1 The schedule shall identify if the calibration is done

by an internal or 3rd party source.
20.10.1.1 Equipment that is calibrated internally

shall have detailed procedures for
calibration for all applicable
equipment.
20.10.1.2 The 3rd Party source shall have a

calibration process equal to or better
than that of the Supplier.
20.10.2 The Supplier shall identify how the calibration of

equipment is established.
20.10.2.1 The Supplier shall have a system that

evaluates the frequency of calibration
and adjusts the calibration frequency as
necessary.
20.10.3 The Supplier shall have an effective system to

ensure that the calibration of equipment is done per
schedule. A reaction plan shall be established for
containment of equipment that is out of calibration.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANS
21.1 Associated quality documents shall be referenced when • PM Plan
establishing the Preventive Maintenance plan (e.g. FMEAs • PM schedule
Control Plan, tooling/equipment/gage list). • PM procedures
• PM work
21.2 The PM plan shall describe how the frequency of PM was instructions
established for each piece of tooling/ equipment. (e.g. past
history, tooling/equipment specifications).
21.3 The PM plan shall be a living document which shall be

reviewed periodically for efficiency.
21.3.1 The PM plans shall include schedules, frequencies,

and instructions for the periodic maintenance of
equipment or machinery, tools, dies, patterns,
fixtures, etc., for each item of process equipment
and tooling
21.3.2 The PM plan shall include set-up and approval

procedures for the installation, set-up, and
adjustment for all machines, tools, and other
equipment.
21.3.3 PM schedule conformity, machine performance

issues and any PM related quality issues shall be
reviewed for process optimization.
21.3.3.1 The PM plan, schedule, procedure and/or

work instructions shall be updated with
the corrective actions when applicable.
21.3.4 The PM plan shall include lessons learned from

similar tooling/equipment.
21.4 The Supplier shall develop a robust PM process that ensures

that preventive maintenance is performed per the
established PM schedule. (ex. Software controlled PM to alert
when PM is due).
21.5 Frequently replaced parts for tooling/equipment shall be

readily accessible within the time frame that finished goods
will allow.
21.6 All new tooling/equipment shall be added to the PM schedule

prior to production release.
21.7 The PM plan and schedule shall address 3rd party/

outsourced PM activities when applicable.
21.7.1 Tooling/equipment with 3rd Party/outsourced PM

activities shall be uniquely identified on the
schedule.
21.7.2 The 3rd Party source shall have a PM process equal

toCor
copyright 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER better than that of the Supplier.
ORPORATION 68
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANS (cont.)
21.8 The PM plan shall address proper storage of tooling/

equipment, when not in use, to ensure tooling/equipment is
clean and protected from damage.
21.9 The Supplier shall ensure that as tooling/equipment

approaches life, appropriate measures are taken to ensure
product conformity (e.g. increased inspections).
21.10 The PM procedure shall identify frequency and

responsibility for each PM activity for each piece of
tooling/equipment.
21.11 PM procedures for perishable tools and supplies, etc., shall

have life expectancy and utilization parameters identified.
21.11.1 All tooling/equipment shall be replaced/

refurbished prior to life.
INITIAL PROCESS STUDY
22.1 100% of the parts from the Production Demonstration Run • Initial Process
shall be used in the Initial Process Study. Study Results
22.1.1 When the PSO team chooses to deviate from this

requirement, the Capability Matrix (Appendix B)
shall be used to identify the sample size and the
corresponding Ppk capability requirement for the
Supplier to meet.
22.1.1.1 The sample size, probability, and Ppk

requirement shall be recorded on the PSO
SUMMARY form.
22.1.2 If the Production Demonstration Process Capability is

less than the established requirement, then 100%
verification of shipped parts is acceptable as an
interim process with PSO Team agreement. The
Initial Process Study shall be marked “unaccept” on
the PSO SUMMARY form.
22.1.2.1 Permanent corrective action is required for

all items in the Initial Process Study
section that do not meet the established
Ppk requirement.
22.1.2.2 When the Initial Process Study is marked

“unaccept”, an on-site revisit is required by
the PSO team. This shall be noted on the
PSO SUMMARY REPORT.

INITIAL PROCESS STUDY (cont.)
22.1.2.3 An Interim Approval Authorization (IAA,
refer to BOS procedure PSSP0108) shall be
issued for product shipment until the
Supplier proves capability.
22.2 All production run data shall be recorded on the

PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RESULTS form, Initial
Process Study section
22.2.3 For multiple lines/tools/cavities, the data from each

one shall be recorded separately and identified.
22.2.3.1 Pp and Ppk shall be calculated individually

for each line/tool/cavity (each process
stream).
NOTE 1: For attribute studies, the performance calculations Pp

and Ppk do not apply.
NOTE 2: First Time Capability is measured as the total number of

items correctly processed, divided by the total number attempted.
These calculations shall be completed for each production
line/tool. Correctly processed means no repairs are required or
allowed. Repaired parts are not to be used in the FTC calculation
(see Appendix C).
22.3 The Supplier shall demonstrate a FTC of 90% or greater.
22.3.1 When FTC percentage does not meet the requirement,

the PSO team shall mark “unaccept” for FTC on the
PSO SUMMARY REPORT.
NOTE: Deviation from this requirement shall have signed

authorization from the Commodity Supplier Quality Manager.
22.3.2 When Line Speed is met but the FTC percentage does
not meet the requirement, the PSO team shall mark
“unaccept” for FTC on the PSO SUMMARY REPORT.
22.3.3 When FTC percentage is not met, an on-site revisit is

required by the PSO team. This shall be noted on the
PSO SUMMARY REPORT.
22.3.3.1 The Supplier shall identify and document

root cause and implement permanent
corrective action prior to the PSO revisit
being scheduled. The PSO team shall verify
corrective action during the revisit
22.4 Parts made during the Production Demonstration Run may

be used for PPAP if and only if PPAP requirements including
the statistical requirements have been successfully
completed.
PACKAGING SHIPPING TEST APPROVAL
23.1 Simulation tests and/or shipping tests shall be conducted • Simulation or
prior to S2 and documented. Shipping Test
Results
23.1.1 Simulation (e.g. shaker) testing shall include
simulation of air suspension and spring suspension.
23.1.2 Back up expendable and returnable containers shall

be tested using simulated or actual shipping routes
23.1.3 Point to point shipping test requires DaimlerChrysler

assembly plant and Corporate Material Handling
Engineering sign off.
23.1.3.1 Approval from each applicable assembly

plant Material Handling Engineer is required.
23.1.4 Signed approval from Corporate Material Handling is

required when simulation testing is performed.
PRODUCTION VALIDATION TESTING COMPLETE
24.1 Test samples used in Production Validation (PV) testing must • Component level
come from the Production Demonstration Run. PV test results
• PV Test
24.1.1 The PV test part selection process depends upon the procedures
PSO strategy:
24.1.1.1 When a single production line/tool will be

qualified, the PV test components shall be
selected randomly from the Demonstration
Run.
24.1.1.2 When multiple production lines/tools will be

qualified in a single PV test, a portion of the
PV test components shall be randomly from
each production line/tool in proportion to
that line’s contribution to the total
production.
24.1.1.3 When multiple production tools will be

qualified on separate PV tests, the PV test
components may be randomly selected from
the first production tools’ Demonstration
Run.
24.1.1.3.1 The PSO Team must place

special emphasis on all
characteristics that could affect
the outcome of PV testing and
ensure that subsequent
production tools maintain
capability comparable to the
first tool qualified. Otherwise, a
separate PV test may be
required
copyright 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION for each production 71
tool.
PRODUCTION VALIDATION TESTING COMPLETE (cont.)
24.1.2 Test samples used for PV testing shall meet the • BSR team
production design release configuration. member list
• Training/certific
24.1.3 When rework/repair is agreed by the PSO team to be ation for BSR
an acceptable process, parts from the rework/repair operators
process shall be included in PV testing for process
validation. Additional
documents that
24.2 BSR/NVH shall indicate
Buzz, Squeak and Rattle (BSR) and Noise, Vibration and BSR/ NVH
Harshness (NVH) issues must be addressed, with root cause consideration:
determined and documented. • Applicable PF
standards
24.2.1 Analyses should include evaluations of Interactions • Vibration Test
with mating parts. To reduce/eliminate and/or Procedure
monitor any objectionable BSR/NVH characteristics,
potential causes must be addressed in the DFMEA,
PFMEA, DVP&R, and the Control Plan.
24.2.2 It is the Supplier’s responsibility to ensure that the

part has no squeaks and/or rattles.
24.2.3 The Supplier shall identify and maintain support

resources for future system level BSR testing (e.g.
tires, wiper motors, speakers, etc)
24.2.4 The Supplier shall have detailed procedures and/or

test methods to:
• Properly detect BSR’s without subjectivity.
• Recreate BSR’s as found through DaimlerChrysler
testing.
• Define boundary samples
24.2.5 The Supplier shall have training/certification for BSR

operators (e.g. hearing tests, etc.)
24.3 The DVP&R must be updated with the component level PV

test results.
24.4 Component level PV testing must have been successfully

completed on all test samples.
Note: For Annual Validation requirements please see the

Continuous Conformance Element.

CONTINUOUS CONFORMANCE
25.1 Support • Continuous
Conformance
25.1.1 The Supplier shall identify and maintain a list of team list
trained team members who shall be responsible for • Training record
the support of the product from both a component for CC team
and system level from development throughout the members
life of the program.
25.1.2 A list of roles and responsibilities along with contact

information shall be provided to DaimlerChrysler
upon equest.
25.1.3 The team members shall include but not be limited to:
Designated Supplier Quality Representative(s);
DaimlerChrysler System Representative(s); and
Warranty Supplier Quality Representative(s).
25.1.4 Each team member shall have a valid

DaimlerChrysler SID and password where applicable
for access to all Supplier responsible eSystems (e.g.
Powerway, Non-Conformance Ticket system, eCIMS,
PRAS, COVISINT, etc.)
25.2 Layered Process Audits
25.2.1 The Supplier shall identify and maintain a list of

trained LPA team members who shall be responsible
for developing, implementing and updating the LPA
plan and checklist.
25.2.2 The Supplier shall upload the LPA results quarterly

(by the last day of the end of the quarter) into the
DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway).
25.3 Problem Solving Methods

trained individuals to assist in problem solving
activities (e.g. Kepner Trego, Shainin training).
25.3.2 The Supplier shall use the DaimlerChrysler corporate

7-step Corrective Action Plan Form to document Non-
Conformances and test failures, and the actions
taken to permanently resolve the issue.
25.3.2.1 The Supplier shall adhere to the

DaimlerChrysler 7-step corporate
requirements which dictates an Interim 7-
step to be issued within 24 hours (to
include problem description and, if possible,
containment), and a Final 7-step
due within 72 hours subsequent to
identification of the issue.

CONTINUOUS CONFORMANCE (cont.)
25.3.3 The Supplier shall be responsible for implementing • Warranty
3PVA/3CPR/3PSD at their expense as a preventive or procedure
corrective measure, as and when requested by • Warranty Process
DaimlerChrysler. Flow Diagram
• Test Methodology
25.4 Warranty and/or test flow
diagram
25.4.1 The Supplier is responsible for providing service parts • Annual
that meet all DaimlerChrysler requirements. Validation
Schedule
25.4.2 Design responsible Suppliers are responsible for
Design for Serviceability, which ensures ease of
disassembly of product with minimal cost and time.

trained warranty team members to support in
DaimlerChrysler’s warranty activities.
25.4.4 The Supplier shall document a warranty procedure

including a process flow diagram of the Supplier’s
warranty process.
25.4.4.1 The flow diagram shall originate with the

receipt of the product from the customer
and end with the disposition of the
product after customer closure of the 7-
step process.
25.4.4.1.1 This procedure shall identify

roles and responsibilities for
each individual team member.
25.4.4.1.2 Test methodology and/or test

flow diagram shall exist for
failure duplication.
25.5 Annual Validation

Annual validation testing must be completed annually (each
model year) as specified in the Product Assurance Testing
Manual, unless waived in writing by the Product Team. A
waiver must be obtained each model year annual validation
will not be performed.
25.5.1 A schedule for Annual Validation shall exist for all

DaimlerChrysler products.
25.5.2 The Supplier shall have a robust process to ensure on-

time Annual Validation, prevent scheduling conflicts
and prevent fixture/testing shortages in the event of
multiple Annual Validations.

CONTINUOUS CONFORMANCE (cont.)
25.5.3 Product Family validation must be agreed to by the
DaimlerChrysler PSO team and documented on the
PSO SUMMARY REPORT prior to PSO approval.
NOTE: For addition information refer to DaimlerChrysler Product

Assurance Testing Manual, IRIS #84-231-1311, and TS-16949,
section 7.5.2, Validation of process for productions and service
provision.
25.6 Forever Requirements

Conformance to the DaimlerChrysler Forever Requirements
is required. The Forever Requirements state that the
Supplier shall notify DaimlerChrysler, per the Forever
Requirements process, of any non-CN process changes
(reflected in PPAP Manual Table I.3.1 and/or Table I.3.3).
Further, it is the supplier’s responsibility to proactively
communicate with DaimlerChrysler and notify Supplier
Quality, Purchasing, and Engineering of any potential
supply/quality issues or sub-supplier issues (e.g.
outsourcing, failure to obtain PPAP approval or shipment of
defective material.)
25.6.1 The Supplier is responsible for ensuring the Forever

Requirements are cascaded to all sub-tier suppliers.
There shall exist a documented process of how this
is accomplished for all new sub-tiers.

trained individuals who will be responsible for
submitting the Forever Requirements requests to
DaimlerChrysler for approval.
25.6.3 The risk of a line move shall be determined by the

DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist and
Product Engineer.
25.6.3.1 Products with a prior AQP risk of Directed

shall require a DaimlerChrysler led PSO for
all line moves.
25.6.3.2 Products which experienced Supplier launch

issues, field issues and/or warranty issues
shall require a DaimlerChrysler led PSO for
all line moves.
Note: For further guidelines on line moves refer to the

Electrical Commodity PSO Requirements.

PROCESS SIGN-OFF FORMS


COMMODITY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS


BODY & WHITE (STAMPING) REQUIREMENTS

PSO Summary Matrix
The PSO Summary Matrix located in the PSO forms section of this manual is one of the
required Process Sign-off documents for Body & White. Below is a brief description of the
process.
Purpose: Confirm that all processes are capable of manufacturing a quality part at the
required volume, and that the plant has the support plans, documentation & procedures in
place to function on a continuous basis
Scope: QG-D1 - SO Start through QG-A - V1
Lead Responsible: Stamping Mfg Plants
Metrics:
Φ Reference: Part Quality: Plant SPIR status per MP90-67 and MP90-57
Φ Process Performance: FTC, Throughput, Downtime, Scrap Rate, Pp/Ppk, etc..
Φ PSO Documentation Assessment
Basic Process Description:

Φ Stamping Plants prepare advance documentation and plans
Φ Stamping Plant develop PSO targets, timing and track program readiness for all
elements
Φ Stamping Plants identify process deficiencies (Health Assessments) – prepare projects
Φ Stamping Plants identify training requirements – prepare training plans
Φ Stamping Plants receive dies - perform production tryouts to validate capability
Φ Stamping Plants receive tooling, install and perform production tryouts to validate
capability
Φ Stamping Plant qualify parts (dim’l / surface) – work part quality and process
improvements
Φ Product team completes Process Sign Off to validate readiness
Quick Hit Item:

Φ Internal Stamping Plants use the DaimlerChrysler PSO process

ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS

I. IN-PROCESS TESTING AND FUNCTIONAL TESTING MISTAKE PROOFING
REQUIREMENTS
• All electrical connections shall have a positive detent that can be positively identified through audio,
tactile or visual feedback.
• All connections shall have continuity check with automated line stop/lockout if the continuity is not
achieved to verify integrity of the connection.
• All electrical components shall be verified for continuity and function. Specific care shall be taken to
ensure female electrical terminal contacts are not violated or damaged prior to mating of connectors at the
vehicle assembly plant. When making terminal contact for in process manufacturing (harness assembly,
engine testing, device testing, etc.) the following criteria shall be followed:
o It is preferred to provide spring loaded pogo pin access to the terminals through the front of the connector.
The pogo pins shall not violate the contact area of the terminal(s) being tested.
o Pogo pins shall be properly maintained, i.e. cleaned and inspected regularly. Care shall be taken to use a
solvent/lubricant that will not damage or reduce the functionality of the terminal or contact housing.
o The test fixture shall provide features to properly align the connector to the test fixture prior to
engagement of the pogo pins.
o When pogo pin access is not provided, and spring member contact is the only option, the following
requirements shall be followed:
It is absolutely critical that the terminal spring member is not overstressed under any circumstance.
The probe being used to contact the terminal spring member shall be smaller in thickness than the
minimum blade (including tolerances) applicable to the terminal being tested. If round pin terminals
are being tested, the male pin probe shall be smaller than the minimum diameter (including tolerances)
than the applicable male pin.
The depth of insertion of the probe shall be limited to the minimum depth required to make electrical
contact for testing. The contact interface of the spring member shall not be violated.
II. ELECTRO-STATIC DISCHARGE (ESD) GUIDELINES
At a minimum, the manufacturing facility should have:

• ESD mats and/or floors
• Heel and/or wrist straps. ESD certified shoes are also acceptable.
• Training program for ESD (this training should be reinforced periodically)
o ESD Operators should be clearly identified (e.g. button or badge)
• ESD testers for operators – verifies heel and wrist straps, and/or shoe functionality
o ESD testers are to be included in the calibration and preventive maintenance schedules. Calibration and
preventive maintenance procedures exist to ensure the correct functionality of testers.
o Operator instructions exist for the use of these testers that include, but are not limited to, operators
testing themselves every time they enter the floor (e.g. start of shift, after lunch, if they leave the
production floor for any reason).
o Log-in sheet for operators to verify all operators on the floor have been tested.
• ESD totes/bags/travelers/carts for ESD sensitive product/components to be transported to and from the
line, and in-process.
• ESD workbenches that are grounded with plugs for wrist straps (if applicable).
o All workstation which are denoted as ESD stations shall have work instructions which specify any special
tools/materials required for that operation (e.g. gloves, finger cots, and heel and/or wrist straps).
• ESD certification schedule
o A procedure for periodic recertification of all ESD equipment (should include how it certification is
performed, what measurements are taken, etc.).
Records of the certification and the recorded measurements shall be filed)
o All carts, workbenches, totes, travelers shall be recertified each year.
• All carts, workbenches, totes, travelers, shall be clearly identified to distinct this equipment from normal
production equipment.
• ESD gloves and/or finger cots for handling of PCB's (e.g. rejects)
• An ESD support team to conduct recertification of ESD equipment each year. Also conduct informal audits
to ensure operators are adhering to the established procedures. Process for Corrective Action in the event
operators are not adhering to procedures or recertification is not being performed according to schedule.

III. PRODUCTION LINE MOVE GUIDELINES
Pre-Move Activities:
1.Provide a timing schedule, by DaimlerChrysler part number, for each affected part/line. The schedule
shall contain the following:
a. Start and completion ‘planned’ and ‘actual’ dates for each part/line.
b. Finished part ‘banking’ plans to provide safety net during line transfer/start-up time. Bank quantities
require Buyer approval.
c. PV test timing. Test requirements are at the discretion of DaimlerChrysler Engineering and Supplier
Quality.
d. Production line capability measurement timing. Process and/or product parameters and quantities to
be measured will be determined by DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality, DaimlerChrysler Engineering and
the Supplier.
e. Production subassembly/subcomponent tooling capability measurement timing (if tooling is to be
moved). Process and/or product parameters and quantities to be measured will be determined by
DaimlerChrysler Engineering, DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality and the Supplier.
f. Operator training timing (required if new operators are to be used).
2.Provide information on where and how the part bank will be stored (e.g. temperature controlled
environment, bank location, etc.)
3.Provide a list of which PV tests will be conducted.
4.Provide a list of which production line process parameters and quantities will be measured.
5.Provide a list of which production subassembly/subcomponent tooling dimensions and quantities will be
measured.
6.Provide information of how the operators will be trained. Ideally, operators will be trained on the
production line prior to the line move.
7.Provide a detailed list of all tooling and equipment that is to be moved. Include tool numbers on the list.
8.Provide a list of the tool transportation method and the protective measures to prevent damage that will be
undertaken.
9.Provide updated documentation for the part being moved (process flowchart, control plan, PFMEA, etc.).
10.Provide a 2000 piece First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) form. These quantities shall be agreed
upon by DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality and DaimlerChrysler Engineering and the Supplier.
Post-Move Activities:
1.Report results of the production line/subassembly tooling/subcomponent tooling capability studies to
DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality and Engineering.
2.Complete PV testing and supply a copy of the completed DVP&R to DaimlerChrysler Engineering and
Supplier Quality.
3.Upon successful completion of step 2 and approval from DaimlerChrysler, PPAP part per the
DaimlerChrysler Forever Requirements process, then resume production.
4.Provide an updated timing schedule.
5.Complete the FPSC measurements and supply a copy of the form to DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality and
Engineering.


INTERIOR & EXTERIOR REQUIREMENTS

Craftsmanship & Fit and Finish Requirements
Craftsmanship:
The Supplier shall actively support the DaimlerChrysler Craftsmanship Studio Process and Program
requirements through participation and information sharing, follows the steps for appearance approval and
maintain the process through the life of the vehicle. If selected as the Key Supplier, Supplier shall also provide
a qualified, dedicated individual to work closely with DaimlerChrysler Craftsmanship Studio to help
administer, manage, and facilitate the program.
• Color and gloss of “designated appearance items” will be controlled throughout the life of the program with
visual and mechanical measurement technology (as per CS9022).
Fit and Finish:

Fit and finish of the product needs to be evaluated on a daily basis production to the DaimlerChrysler defined
objective and criteria. Any concerns and issues shall be managed as follows:
• Supplier shall report on all Fit and Finish “Craftsmanship” conditions on standardized DaimlerChrysler
improvement.
• All Suppliers shall create a detailed internal Craftsmanship Quality Initiative Procedure & accordingly
execute. Included within this procedure shall be: team, regular scheduled reviews and audits, condition
resolution tracking matrix, containment procedures/guidelines, the Plant Manager will Champion.
• All Suppliers shall furnish an Appearance Manual for applicable commodities prior to each major build, or
shortly after as mutually agreed upon by DaimlerChrysler team members. The appearance manual is to
include: documentation (sign-off sheet, table of contents, revision history, general appearance
characteristics acceptance specification), studio quality photos of product shown in appropriate views,
studio quality photos for any “conditions” deviating from design intent, and the above mentioned
Craftsmanship worksheets (photos of conditions, containment and permanent correction actions, along
with supporting verbiage).

Internal Quality Requirements

I. MQAS 90-6710 - Dimensional Buy-Off Procedure for Upgrading Stamped Parts
During Die/Tool Development
This Manufacturing Quality Assurance System procedure applies to all corporate produced in-house stamped
parts including closure panels (doors, hood, deck-lid), body-in-white, sub assemblies and chassis
components. The respective technical responsibilities of both DaimlerChrysler and Suppliers are included in
this procedure while contractual requirements are in the Purchase Order.
This procedure specifies dimension, sampling, and data submission requirements for upgrading stamped
parts in each stage of the die/tool development in a timely manner to meet tolerances specified in the CATIA
math data in a continual improvement manner leading to volume production.
For further information concerning this MQAS procedure and the requirements there in please see your
DaimlerChrysler Quality Representative.
II. Internal Mistake Proofing Requirements
• DC Guns and Controllers: Utilize at all threaded fastener processes and control the following:
• Torque Limits
• Angle of Rotation
• Count Per Station
• Each “Reverse” operation will subtract one torque count (on already counted torques)
• A “check fixture/pallet” containing all fastener torque scenarios is to be run through each line at the
beginning of each shift (“white rabbit” / “red herring”), ensuring the proper function of DC guns and
Controllers.
• Spatial control
• Critical and Safety related assembly operations which utilize screws and bolts must have DC Guns and
Controllers which maintain a record of characteristics ensuring clamp pressure and screw presence
(torque and turn profile and count) that cannot be turned off by the supplier's management
• CMM gages must be manufactured and approved per the DCX gage standards identified on the following
web site: http://ame.ctc.chrysler.com/gages/.

Internal Forms


GLOSSARY

ADVANCED QUALITY PLANNING: is a structured method of defining and establishing the
required steps necessary to assure that a product satisfies the customer. Advanced Quality
Planning embodies the concepts of defect prevention and continuous improvement as
contrasted with defect detection.
BSR: Buzz – Squeak – Rattle are objectionable vehicle attributes. All BSR issues are tracked
by Vehicle Development and subsequently assigned to the most responsible party for
resolution, be it Engineering, Manufacturing, or the Supplier. Although somewhat
subjective, BSR issues shall be eliminated in order to achieve customer satisfaction.
CAPABILITY STUDY: is a statistical analysis of the output from a machine or a process to

determine its capability. This analysis is especially important when a new product is
introduced so product quality and variation reduction can be assessed.
CATIA: is a computer aided three dimensional interactive applications design and

manufacturing system. This software was developed and is maintained by Dassault
Systemes of France and is marketed in the United States by IBM. It is known as a
CAD/CAM system.
CHARACTERISTIC: is a unique feature of a product or process, or its output, from which

variable or attribute data can be collected.
COMPLIANCE REPORT RANDOM AUDIT: is an audit performed during a PSO On-Site Visit
to determine whether arbitrarily selected characteristic(s) of a part or process meet their
specification requirements. The part or process samples shall be randomly selected.
CONTINUING CONFORMANCE TESTS (CC): are tests and evaluations performed during
production to monitor the effects of processing and to assure continued conformance to
engineering requirements.
CONTROL PLANS: Control Plans are written descriptions of the systems for controlling
parts and processes. They are written by Suppliers to address the important characteristics
and engineering requirements of the product. Each part shall have a Control Plan, but in
many cases, “family” Control Plans can cover a number of parts produced using a common
process. Customer approval of Control Plans may be required prior to production part
submission.
COVISINT: A web based system that grants qualified Supplier users access to selected
portions of the DaimlerChrysler Network
DESIGN FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (DFMEA): is a formalized method for
quantifying the risk associated with identified potential design failure modes. It is used to
identify corrective actions required to prevent failures from reaching the customer. The
DFMEA is a living document that will be updated as the design changes and progresses
through design verification and production. The first iteration shall be done before program
release.

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS (DOE): is a statistical approach to efficiently plan and
structure a series of controlled tests. In its broadest sense, it encompasses planning,
setting up, and running the tests, and analyzing the data. The goal is to identify the
sources of product variation that should be optimized or avoided for consistent product
performance with a minimum number of tests.
DESIGN VERIFICATION PLAN AND REPORT (DVP&R): is a formalized test planning and
reporting tool. It itemizes all testing necessary to assure that functional and reliability
criteria and target requirements are defined in specific measurable terms. It provides a
convenient reporting format for Engineering Development (ED), Design Verification (DV),
Production Validation (PV) and Continuing Conformance (CC) testing.
DESIGN VERIFICATION TESTS (DV): demonstrates that the final released component or
assembly meets design intent. The tests, sample sizes, and performance requirements are
detailed in Engineering Performance Standards.
ENGINEERING CHANGE LEVEL, DCL: the Drawing Change Level (DCL) is the latest design
level of the released drawing. It is a two digit alpha field that can be accessed on ODCICS2
through screen ENAA or ENJA.
ENGINEERING CHANGE LEVEL, PCL: the Part Change Level (PCL) is the latest design level
of the part (not necessarily the drawing). It is a two digit alpha field that can be found on
ODCICS2 through screens ECCE or ENCZ.
ENGINEERING STANDARDS: are written requirements that describe materials, processes,

performance, reliability, quality and/or design requirements for a material, process, or part
or a family of materials, parts, or systems.
ERROR AND MISTAKE PROOFING: are defined separately. Error proofing is a method used
to identify potential process errors and either design them out of the product or process, or
eliminate the possibility that the error could produce a defect. Mistake proofing is an
approach used to develop methods to clearly identify errors that may occur and prevent
them from becoming non-conformances.
EXTENDED ENTERPRISE™: is a DaimlerChrysler coordinated process that unifies and

extends the business relationships of Suppliers and Supplier tiers in order to maximize the
effectiveness of vehicle development, minimize total system costs, and improve quality and
customer acceptance.
FIRST TIER: is a term used for a Supplier who is responsible for providing components,
services, or raw material directly to DaimlerChrysler.

FPSC: the purpose of the First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) program is to
insure that the initial production shipments meet all DaimlerChrysler drawing and
Engineering Standards requirements. FPSC is intended to identify part problems and
contain the parts at the Supplier during first production shipments to ensure a successful
launch. The FPSC program requires the Supplier to provide statistical evidence of
conformance to special product and/or process characteristics prior to the shipment of
components to DaimlerChrysler receiving plants. Certification is for a minimum of 2000
parts.100% of the FPSC parts are to be inspected for conformance to special product
and/or process characteristics.
FTC: the purpose of the First Time Capability (FTC) is part of a process capability study
that identifies the capability of a process (how well it produces quality parts) by operation.
FTC can also be extended from just one (1) operation to the overall production process
(Plant FTC).
GAGE INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS: are documented instructions for a specifically

identified gage indicating step by step procedures for its use or layout of a part.
GAGE R&R (REPEATABILITY & REPRODUCIBILITY): is a method used to rate the

appropriateness of a measurement system as a percentage of the product tolerance or
process variation. Repeatability is a measure of the ability of the gage to repeat a given
measurement, and is evaluated by repeatedly measuring the same parts (equipment
variation). Reproducibility is a measure of the ability of people to reproduce a series of
measurements using the same gage, and is evaluated by two or more operators
independently repeating the inspection of a set of parts (appraiser variation).
HOME LINE: Supplier’s assembly line located in the manufacturing facility where volume
production of the part(s) takes place using production tooling and processes.
INTERIM APPROVAL AUTHORIZATION (IAA): documentation and approval to temporarily

use a part that does not meet PPAP approval requirements for Pilot builds or launch.
ISO/TS 16949: is a Technical Specification that describes, in conjunction with ISO

9001:1994, the Quality System Requirements for Automotive Suppliers. ISO/TS 16949 has
been prepared by the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) for all participating
worldwide OEM’s and may become the Quality Management Standard of the future.
KEY CHARACTERISTICS: are features applicable to a component, material,

manufacturing, or vehicle assembly operation which are designated by DaimlerChrysler
Engineering as being critical to part function, fit or appearance, and having particular
quality, reliability, durability or functional significance. These characteristics are identified
with <D>.
LAUNCH VEHICLES (V1): the start of volume production and assembly of vehicles. V1 shall
result in quality vehicles that meet all customer requirements and corporate objectives. All
regulatory requirements and approvals will have been obtained. Part Supplier and assembly
plant facilities will be complete and ready for full volume production.
LIFE EXPECTANCY: is a time established service or operating life objective of a system,

component, or material.
LINE SPEED: is the contracted maximum tool capacity rate determined by dividing the
Quoted DaimlerChrysler Tooling Capacity (Pieces per Hour) by the Supplier’s Quoted Net
Operating Time for DaimlerChrysler Parts (Hours/Day). The Line Speed shall be verified
during the Production Demonstration Run while process performance studies are
maintained at a level greater than or equal to 1.67 PPK.
LOT: is not to exceed eight hours or one day’s production, whichever is smaller.
MANUFACTURING FLOOR PLAN: is a pictorial layout of the entire manufacturing facility

drawn to scale. It is to include all machinery, office space, lab space, shipping-receiving
areas, quarantine areas, hold areas, etc. The layout shall also indicate any proposed areas
for expansion and development.
MAPPING: a method used to look at the complexity of the extended enterprise value chain.
Mapping details the manufacturing process, transportation and other factors that go into
component production.
NET OPERATING TIME FOR DAIMLERCHRYSLER PARTS: is number of hours (normal

work pattern), less scheduled “down-time” (breaks, start up, prev. maintenance, shared
production, tool changes, shut down) and unscheduled “down-time” (estimated, based on
historical or projected information). In case of multiple DaimlerChrysler part numbers the
changeover time has to be considered.
NVH: Noise – Vibration – Harshness are measurable perceptions of vehicle attributes. These
items are usually discovered and measured by DaimlerChrysler’s NVH laboratory facilities.
NVH attributes are typically tuned to a certain frequency and amplitude in order to achieve
an overall vehicle signature frequency. This signature is optimized by vehicle development
for the best customer responses.
OPERATOR INSTRUCTIONS: are lists of steps that may contain inspection requirements,
required tools and gages, SPC applications, sample size and frequency, and
acceptance/rejection criteria. They shall communicate all requirements involved in the
process. These shall be readily available to the operator.
PACKAGING: is material that is used to store and ship parts. It provides protection and
containment of parts. It affects ease of handling by manual or mechanical means.
Packaging may consist of returnable or non-returnable items including dunnage.
PART NUMBER: a ten digit alphanumeric number which represents a production part
number that is assigned to a commodity or part. These numbers are assembled to describe
the DaimlerChrysler Engineering Bill of Materials used in building a vehicle.
PERISHABLE TOOLS: are tools which are consumed in the process of producing a product,
and are usually a cost item, e.g., drill bits, cutters, sockets, driver tips, inserts, hobs,
broaches, welding tips, etc.

PRE-PSO DOCUMENTATION REVIEW: is a meeting conducted by the PSO Team, chaired
and coordinated by the Supplier Quality Specialist with the Supplier and their Advanced
Quality Planning Project Team. The meeting is conducted at a DaimlerChrysler selected
location prior to the planned Process Sign-Off (PSO). The purpose is to review all of the
Supplier’s advanced quality planning and system plan documents in a sequential way and
determine the Supplier’s readiness to demonstrate a first Production Demonstration Run
(300 pcs.) in the form of a PSO.
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE REPORT (PPSR): is a dimensional and performance

verification document, submitted with all part samples used prior to S1 build.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (PM): is a planned system of actions performed to prevent

breakdown of a machine or equipment as a result of normal use.
PROBLEM SOLVING TECHNIQUES (PST): are methods used to identify the “root cause” of
a problem. The most common forms of PST are corrective action teams, Quality Circles,
Multi-Vari Charts & Analysis, Design Of Experiments (DOE), Benchmarking, Root Cause
Analysis, Fishbone Diagramming, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) teams, Shainan
Consultants Inc.’s, trademarked PST techniques (Isoplot, Red”X”, Rank Order ANOVA, etc.),
Pareto charts, & many more. The most successful techniques have employee teams
contributing in some special way to perform “root cause analysis” and then permanently
solve the issue or problem.
PROCESS: is a combination of people, equipment, methods, materials and environment

that produces a product or service. Any aspect of a business may be involved.
PROCESS CAPABILITY: is the total range of inherent variation in a stable process. It is

determined using data from control charts. The control charts shall indicate stability before
capability calculations can be made. Histograms are to be used to examine the distribution
pattern of individual values and verify a normal distribution. When analysis indicates a
stable process and a normal distribution, the indices CP and CPK can be calculated. If
analysis indicates a non-normal distribution, advanced statistical tools such as PPM (Parts
Per Million) analysis will be required to determine capability. If control charts show the
process to be non-stable, the PPK index can be calculated (see Fundamental Statistical
Process Control reference manual).
PROCESS FAILURE MODE & EFFECTS ANALYSIS (PFMEA): is a structured method of

documenting historical or potential process failure modes, their effects, and the controls
taken to ensure their prevention. The PFMEA rating system allows quantification of the risk
presented by each failure mode. The risk rating shall be used to prioritize failure
prevention. The PFMEA shall be developed by a cross-functional team and shall be
uniquely developed for each process/product.
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM/CHART: illustrates the flow of materials through the process.
Usually starting at receiving, material in process, through shipping including any special
processing which may result from a nonconformance requiring disposition, rework or repair
operations.
PROCESS PERFORMANCE AND PROCESS CAPABILITY INDICES (PP, PPK, CP and CPK):
are defined in the Statistical Process Control manual.

PROCESS SIGN-OFF (PSO) ON-SITE VISIT: is a systematic and sequential review of the
Supplier’s manufacturing process conducted by a PSO Team at the Supplier’s production
facilities. Supplier Quality is responsible for team leadership.
PRODUCT ASSURANCE PLAN (PAP): is a structured method of defining and establishing

the required steps necessary to assure that a product satisfies the customer. It is a
checklist to track all Engineering, Supplier and quality planning events required for new
products. It lists all the important tasks to be completed, the persons responsible, the
estimated/actual completion dates and how the individual tasks contribute to the progress
of the phases of the Product Creation Process.
PRODUCT ASSURANCE PLANNING MANUAL: is a DaimlerChrysler published “blue dot”

manual which provides Requirements to assure that specific activities occur at the proper
time in the Product Creation Process. It also gives specific instructions on how to develop a
Product Assurance Plan. It involves assurance activities that focus on the areas of quality,
reliability, producibility, maintainability and serviceability.
PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RUN: is a production run consisting of 300 or more parts

(2 or more hours of production), from the production line of record, using trained operators,
production approved piece parts or materials from production sub-Suppliers, and run at a
rate equal to the quoted maximum tooling capacity. All special characteristics shall meet or
exceed a process performance of PP ≥ PPK ≥ 1.67. FTC shall be calculated for each station
and overall. A DaimlerChrysler PSO Team will be on the manufacturing floor during the
demonstration to observe and verify the documented production system. PV test parts are
taken from this run to demonstrate that the production process has not degraded the
design performance that was verified by DV testing.
PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL PROCESS (PPAP): process for ensuring that production
parts are manufactured at the production site using the production tooling, gaging,
process, materials, operators, environment, and process settings, (e.g., feed, speed, cycle
time, pressure, temperature). Parts for production part approval shall be taken from a
significant production run. DaimlerChrysler requires that this run is a minimum of two (2)
hours or 300 pieces, whichever is more stringent, unless otherwise stated in writing by the
customer. Parts from each position of a multiple cavity die, mold, tool or pattern are to be
measured and representative parts tested.
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS: are the sum total of engineering drawing requirements

including standards referenced on those drawings and within the contract. Some of these
requirements are determined by team consensus during Advanced Quality Planning
meetings and Design Reviews and can take the form of Safety Standards, Material
Standards, SRPC’s, Temporary Standards, Process Standards, Laboratory Standards,
Reliability Standards, or Performance Standards.
PRODUCTION VALIDATION TESTING (PV): are demonstration tests performed to validate

design conformance of initial production parts manufactured with production tools and
processes.
PROGRAM: is the identification of a specific car line and model year.
ROOT CAUSE: is the assignable source of variation that affects all the individual values of
the process output/phenomenon being studied. Root cause is the reason for the primary
nonconformance, which has induced other failures and for which effective permanent
corrective action can be implemented.
S0 VEHICLES: Prototype vehicles built to provide verification that the production design
and the intended production process for components, systems and vehicles meet objectives.
“Production” means that the product and process design release is complete for the Product
and Process Design Complete (PPDC) milestone. These components may be built using hard
or soft tools, as determined to be appropriate based on part or process knowledge required.
Design verification testing shall be successfully completed before parts are submitted for S0
Build. PPSR’s are required for all non-PPAP approved parts.
S1 VEHICLES: are vehicles built to confirm production design intent, validate parts, and
prove out vehicle and assembly processes (at the assembly plants when feasible). S1
vehicles provide early detection, identification and resolution of production process issues
prior to S2 vehicle build. Production Control Systems are used to order, track and supply
parts. Production intent containers/racks shall be tested using S1 level parts. Grained and
new color mastered materials are required and shall be accompanied by a part inspection
report for each Supplier shipment.
S2 VEHICLES: sellable vehicles built by manufacturing at the assembly plants to verify

Corporate and Supplier production tooling, equipment and processes, and to confirm
successful resolution of any CN’s written to correct problems found in the S0/S1 Build or
testing. All parts, including powertrains, supplied by the Production Suppliers shall be
manufactured using production tools (on their home lines) and processes. All parts used
are required to have full PSO and PPAP Approval.
SAFETY CHARACTERISTICS: are product features or functions that require special

manufacturing control to assure compliance with DaimlerChrysler or Government Vehicle
Safety requirements.
SAMPLING PLAN: defines the minimum number of parts that shall be inspected from a
given population (see DaimlerChrysler’s Lot Acceptance Sampling Table Plan in this
manual).
S/E/N: is a characteristic that will affect compliance with DaimlerChrysler Corporation

and/or Governmental Vehicle Safety/ Emissions/ Noise requirements.
SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS: product and process characteristics designated by

DaimlerChrysler and the Supplier, including governmental regulatory and safety
characteristics as well as characteristics selected through knowledge of the product or
process. These include characteristics identified key <D>, safety <S>, noise <N>, or theft
<T> or as determined by the PSO Team.
STATISTICAL CONTROL: is the condition describing a process from which special causes
of variation have been eliminated. Only common causes remain; e.g., observed variation
could be attributed to chance causes. On a control chart, statistical control is evident by
the absence of points beyond the control limits and by the absence of non-random patterns
or trends within the control limits.
STATISTICAL PROBLEM SOLVING (SPS): is the organized use of special problem solving
tools (e.g. Fishbone Diagrams, Pareto Charts, ANOVA, etc.), to better understand problems,
their causes and determine solutions.
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC): is the use of statistical techniques such as
control charts to analyze a process or its outputs to take appropriate actions to achieve and
maintain a state of statistical control and to improve the process capability.
SUB-TIER SUPPLIER: provider of production materials, or production or service parts,

directly to a tier 1 Supplier to DaimlerChrysler. Also included are providers of heat-treating,
painting, plating or other finishing services.
SUPPLIER READINESS EVALUATION RUN: the first documented build attempt by the
Supplier following installation, setup, and tryout of the production equipment and tools.
The Supplier, with the concurrence of the DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist, will
determine the quantity of parts that are completed during this run, but 30 pieces is a
typical build size. The purpose of this run is to provide pre-production data that confirms
the proper set-up, operation, and performance of the installed production line. Data
collected during this run typically include measurement data, machine cycle times,
operation times, quantity attempted, quantity accepted, etc. From this data, estimated
production rates, FTC, yields, and PP and PPK for special characteristics are calculated.
There are no minimum requirements for process performance, FTC, yields, or other
indicators at this time. The DaimlerChrysler PSO Team will evaluate the analysis of this
run when deciding whether to schedule the PSO On-Site Visit.
SUPPLIER TOOL RECORD (STR): A form generated by the creation of a new TPO (Tool
Purchase Order) requiring the identification of Supplier, or DaimlerChrysler owned tooling,
affected by the TPO.
SUPPLY CHAIN: includes all Suppliers used in producing a given part; from tier one to the
source of production materials.
TAKT TIME: The time in which one vehicle, assembly, or part (the item of interest) is to be
made.
Net Operating Time Per Shift

TAKT Time =
Customer Re quirements ( in Units of Pr oduction ) Per Shift
UNIT LOAD DATA (ULD) SHEET: Loading and unloading instructions for a specific
durable.
VDA 6.1: Quality System Requirements of VDA (“Verband der Deutschen

Automobilindustrie” = German OEM’s), the German equivalent to QS 9000. Effective since
September 1999, as part of our Global Procurement & Supply strategy at DaimlerChrysler,
registration to either QS 9000 or VDA 6.1, including company specific requirements, will be
accepted as quality registration from our Suppliers.
WARRANT: an industry-standard document required for all newly-tooled or revised

products in which the Supplier confirms that inspections and tests on production parts
show conformance to customer requirements.


APPENDIX A
GUIDELINES FOR NEW SPECIALISTS/SUPPLIERS

Recommended Training for New Specialists/Suppliers
NOTE: It is recommended that prior to performing a PSO, new Specialist accompany at a minimum 2
mentored PSO’s.
Recommended Training
DQIPSO100 PSO 5th Edition Training

DQIPSO150 Process Sign-Off Training
P&SSCA101 7-Step Corrective Action
P&SCDS260 CDS for Supplier Quality
DQICPD300 Control Plan Development
DQIMPT200 Error/Mistake Proofing
P&SIAA100 Interim Approval (PPAP) and Self Certification
DQIPAP115 PAP4CDS
MEERCA102 Problem Solving/Root Cause Analysis Workshop
P&SPWY400, 500 Powerway.com (400 is for new users, 500 is for
current users)
P&SLPA100 LPA Training
P&SSQS100 LPA Training for Supplier Quality Specialists
P&SLAS100 LPA Training for Suppliers
DQIMSA100 Gage Reliability & Repeatability
DQISPC109 Introduction to SPC
DQIFMA210 Advanced FMEA Overview
Interested Suppliers should contact the DaimlerChrysler Registration Center at

(248) 512-4350.
Suppliers may schedule PSO training at the DaimlerChrysler Technical Center or via the Consortium for
Supplier training by calling the DaimlerChrysler Registration Center at (248) 512-4350.

Complete PSO Document List
Compilation of all documents to be reviewed during a PSO (not all documents are required for upload)
ELEMENT 1 - Part Number, Description and Change Level

o CATIA comments sheet (list of Engineering standards on sheet)
o Supplier part number cross reference sheet (if applicable)
o Supplier’s procedure for documentation revision changes due to part number changes
o Customer approved change document (if applicable)
o Supplier’s change document for sub-tiers
o Sub-tier’s request for change document
o 1.1 - Engineering Standards Identified

Procedure for monitoring DaimlerChrysler standards for revision changes
Procedure for monitoring governmental, safety, etc. standards for revision changes.
Documented approval for specification waivers (if applicable)
ELEMENT 2 - Design FMEA

o DFMEA
o Internal best practice document for DFMEA development
ELEMENT 3 - Test Sample Sizes and Frequencies

o DVP&R
o DaimlerChrysler Engineering signed DV test plan
o DaimlerChrysler Engineering signed completed DVP&R for DV testing
o DaimlerChrysler Engineering signed PV test plan
o Documented waivers for any testing
ELEMENT 4 - Process FMEA

o PFMEA
o Internal best practice document for PFMEA development
ELEMENT 5 - Process Flow Diagram and Manufacturing Floor Plan
o Process Flow Diagram
o Manufacturing floor plan
o Work Station Layout
ELEMENT 6 - Control Plan

o Control Plan
o Documented waivers for Rework/repair controls (if applicable)
o Best Practice document for developing Control plans (input from FMEA & Control plans for
similar products)
ELEMENT 7 - Quality Planning

o Supplier’s APQP for medium risked Parts and DaimlerChrysler’s PAP for high risked parts
o 7.2 - Supply Base Management

Supply Base Management plan
List of indented sub-tier manufacturers or “Easy-Map”
PPAP status list
List of risked sub-components
Evidence of PSO-like activity including level 3 PPAP documentation with line speed
demonstration data for high and medium risked components

o 7.3 - Problem Solving Methods
Evidence of problem solving – DaimlerChrysler 7-step Corrective Action Form
Corporate guidelines for conducting DOE’s
Evidence of a DOE being performed to establish process parameters for the PSO line
Lessons learned procedure for internal manufacturing and for communicating lessons
learned to other supplier plants
Evidence of Supplier ID’s obtained for DaimlerChrysler quality system
ELEMENT 8 - Incoming Material Qualification/Certification Plan

o Incoming inspection plan
o Incoming inspection procedures
o Incoming sampling plans
o Receiving reports
o Material standards
o Inspection/test reports
o Copies of sub-tier Supplier Certificates of Analysis
o Copies of sub-tier PSW’s (Part Submission Warrants)
o Copies of sub-tier ISO-9001 certifications
o Supplier’s traceability procedure (shall include sorted, rework and repair when applicable)
ELEMENT 9 - Parts Handling Plan

o Parts Handling Plan
o Material Handling procedures
o Packaging Instructions
o Maintenance plan for WIP (work in process) containers
o Copy of Routing cards or travelers
ELEMENT 10 - Operating Instructions

o Operator, 1st piece approval, mistake proofing, set-up, changeover, rework/repair, inspection
and packaging instructions
o Record of operator training
o Operator qualification process
o Documentation control procedure
o Visual management (displays & diagrams)
ELEMENT 11 - Tooling, Fixtures and Gages Identified

o Tooling List
o Supplier Tool Record (download from DaimlerChrysler system)
ELEMENT 12 - Special Product & Process Parameters Identified

o First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) Plan
o Pre-Production Sample Report (PPSR)
o Supplier definition of and internal requirements for special product and process characteristics
ELEMENT 13 - Process Monitoring

o Control Charts
o Process Performance Charts
o Total Production Maintenance charts
o Log Sheets
o Defect Tracking Sheets
o Corrective Action Forms

o 1st Piece Approval Procedure
ELEMENT 14 - Error and Mistake Proofing

o Error and mistake proofing plan
o List of error and mistake proofing by operation number
o Error and mistake proofing studies
o Mistake Proofing Contingency Plan (in the event mistake proofing becomes inoperable)
ELEMENT 15 - Layered Process Audit Plan

o LPA roll-out plan
o LPA plan
o LPA procedure
o LPA work instructions
o LPA Structure and Frequency Chart
o LPA Process Control Audit Checklist
o LPA Error Proofing Verification Checklist
ELEMENT 16 - Evidence of Product Specification

o Completed Supplier Readiness Evaluation (SRE) form
o Measurement System Verification Report
ELEMENT 17 - Line Speed Demonstration

o Line Speed section on Production Demonstration Results form
o Documented deviation to the “300 part or 2 hour” requirement (if applicable)
o Process Constraints (bottlenecks) documented on PSO COMMENTS SHEET
ELEMENT 18 - Outgoing Qualification Plan

o Final Audit Plan
o Final Audit Procedure
o Final Audit Work Instructions
o Final Audit Sampling plan
o Shipping Record Example
o Audit Record Example
o Containment Record Example
ELEMENT 19 - Parts Packaging and Shipping Specification

o Parts Packaging and Shipping Plan
o Packaging and Shipping Procedures
o Packaging, shipping and labeling instructions
o Corporate and Assembly plant MHE Unit Load Data (ULD) sheet approval for supplier designed
dunnage (if applicable)
o Returnable Container Management Plan
o Barcode Labeling Procedure
o Shipping Label example
ELEMENT 20 - Gage and Test Equipment Evaluation

o Gage Plan
o Gage R&R results
o Gage and Test Equipment Calibration Records
o Gage Validation Plan
o Calibration Schedule
o Calibration reaction plan
ELEMENT 21 - Preventive Maintenance Plan
o PM plan
o PM schedule
o PM procedures
o PM work instructions
ELEMENT 22 - Initial Process Study

o Initial Process Study results (on Production Demonstration Results form)
o Deviations to Initial Process Study requirements documented on the PSO COMMENTS SHEET
(if applicable)
o Deviation from FTC requirement w/Commodity Supplier Quality Manager signature (if
applicable)
ELEMENT 23 - Packaging Shipping Test Approval

o Simulation or shipping test results
o MHE signed ULD sheet for approval of shipping or simulation lab test results
ELEMENT 24 - Production Validation Testing Complete

o DaimlerChrysler Engineering signed DVP&R for PV test results
o PV test procedures
o DaimlerChrysler Engineering approved BSR results (if applicable)
o 25.2 - BSR
BSR test procedures (if applicable)
BSR team member list
Training/Certification procedures for BSR operators
ELEMENT 25 - Continuing Conformance

o 25.1 - Support
Training records for CC team members
o 25.2 - Layered Process Audit

LPA team member list
o 25.3 - Problem Solving Methods

Problem Solving team member list
o 25.4 - Warranty
Warranty team member list
Warranty process flow diagram
Warranty procedures
Test Methodology and/or test flow for returned products
o 25.5 - Annual Validation

Annual Validation Schedule
o 25.6 - Forever Requirements

“Forever Requirements” team member list
Process for cascading “Forever Requirements” to new sub-suppliers

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PSO FORMS
This section explains the PSO forms. The four forms are the PROCESS SIGN-OFF SUMMARY form,
COMMENTS SHEET, MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION REPORT, AND PRODUCTION
DEMONSTRATION RESULTS form.

Supplier Readiness Evaluation Instructions
Note: When requesting approval for multiple manufacturing lines, a SRE form shall be completed for
each manufacturing line requesting approval.
1. Quantity Determined by Supplier and DaimlerChrysler PSO Team: Number of parts agreed by
DaimlerChrysler and the Supplier prior to the SRE run.
2. SRE Line Rate: The calculated line rate for the Supplier Readiness Evaluation run = SRE Part Quantity
Accepted ÷ Duration of SRE run.
3. Shift: The manufacturing shift the SRE was performed. Record shift # and hours. (e.g. 1st shift, 6am-3pm)
4. Process Feature/Part Characteristic: The process feature or part characteristic that is being measured.
5. Process/Part: Document if data is for a process measurement or a part measurement.
6. Meas. Freq.: Measurement Frequency. Record the number of part/process measurements taken per time
interval.
7. USL: Upper Specification Limit. The upper limit of the part or process specification per the part drawing or
process standard.
8. UCL: Upper Control Limit: The upper limit established by the Supplier for process/part control. NOTE: This
number should be less than the USL.
9. Part/Proc. Avg.: Part/Process Average. The average of all measured process features/part characteristics.
10. LCL: Lower Control Limit. The lower limit established by the Supplier for process/part control. NOTE: This
number should be less than the LSL.
11. LSL: Lower Specification Limit. The lower limit of the part or process specification per the part drawing or
process standard.
12. Pp: The calculated Pp for all measured process features/part characteristics.
13. Ppk: The calculated Ppk for all measured process features/part characteristics.
14. Quantity Attempted: The total number of part/process measurements taken.
15. Quantity Accepted: The total number of part/process measurements acceptable per the established
controls (within the LCL-UCL).
16. FTC percent (without repairs): Calculated First Time Capability. For further details, please see Appendix C
17. % GR&R: Calculated percentage of Gage R&R for gage used for part/process measurement.
18. Acc/Unacc: Has the PSO team determined the supplier’s data to be acceptable (acc) or unacceptable
(unacc)?
[i.e. LCL <Proc Avg < UCL;
Ppk ≥ Ppk matrix requirement (see Initial Process Study element); FTC ≥ 90%;
GR&R < 10% ; 10< GR&R < 30 – PSO team decision].
.

PSO Element
1 Part No. ,Description and Change Level

( E/C Verif. ) = CATIA Comment Page and Change Notices
100 % Identified if Corporate Model Is released External to SSP
2 Process Flow Dia. and Manufacturing Floor Plan

( Process Flow ) = AMPS, MEDDS, Book Of Knowledge, Tool and or Die Construction Book
100 % Predefined in advanced Quality and Plant Load Assignments
3 Design FMEA and Process FMEA

( FMEA ) = Process FMEA completed and stored in Public Drive at SSP
50 % is Platform defined in Public Drive
50% FMEA's updated to new Tooling and Dies
4 Error and Mistake Proofing

( Mistake Proofing ) = Performed and Documented by Engineering
50 % Carry Over Typical Items Identified
25 % Updated to SPIR and or Change Notice / IAA Approval
25 % Tool & Die Engineering Updating to unique and or new Tools and or Dies
5 Problem Solving Plan

( Problem Solving ) = Problem Solving Templates, 5 Whys activities documented
50 % Standard Problem Solving Templates Applied
25 % Updated to SPIR and or Change Notice / IAA Approval
25 % Unique 5 Why Activities Documented
6 Incoming & Outgoing Material Quail / Cert. Plan

( Receiving & Final Inspection ) = Supplier QS-9000 Certification, MQAS Level 2 SSSP025
100 % MQAS Procedures Audited and maintained
7 Test Sample Size and Frequencies

( All Inspection SWI's ) = SWI's and or Work Instructions under Doc & Data Control
25 % Carry Over Information
25 % Unique Product information inputted
25 % Submitted to MQAS for Doc and Data Control
25 % Released for Production Use
8 Parts Packaging & Shipping Spec.

( Unit Load Data ) = Unit Load Data sheets and or graphic complete
25 % Unit Load Data Sheet standard
25 % Unique Product Information Inputted onto Date Sheets
25 % Graphics Provided
25 % Unit Load Data Sheets Released For Production Use
9 Parts Handling Plan

( Material Handling SWI's ) = Material Handling SWI's under Doc & Data Control
10 Engineering Standards Identified

( Engineering Standards Identified ) = CATIA Comment Page
11 Preventive Maintenance Plan

( PM Plan ) = PM Schedule and check sheets completed in TMS
25 % Tool's and or Dies Identified
25 % Activities Identified
25 & Catalog Codes Identified
25 % TMS ( Total Maintenance System ) complete and scheduled
12 Product Quality Plan

( Quality Plan Timing ) = Launch Book, Assembly Launch Readiness Check List
25 % Platform defined in public Drive
25 % Data Inputted
25 % Data Inputted and Revised
25 % Tool and or Dies Launch Activities in-process
13 Gage and Test Equipment Evaluation
( Calibration & GR&R ) = Document Calibration, GR&R and R&R Records retained at SSP
25 % R1 fixture and Inspection Equipment Identified
25 % Certification and or R&R performed
25 % Documentation retained at SSP
25 % Verify Tagging and Documentation
14 Tooling, Equipment and Gages Identified

( Engage Updated ) = 13 entered into ENGAGE Database at SSP
50 % Product Identified In Engage
50 % Verified by documentation retained by SSP
15 Special Product and Process Characteristics Identifies

( Special Characteristics Identified ) = CATIA Comment Page (Safety, Diamonds, Shields, Pentagons)
16 Control Plan
( Control Plan ) = Quality Plan ( MQAS Procedures and Work Instructions )
50 % Carry Over Quality Plan
50 % Updated to Revised MQAS Procedures ( 90 Series, CPG's, SSP level 2, 3, 4 and
Quality Records ETC. )
17 Evidence of Product Specification

( PO SPIR Approval ) = External and or Internal PO SPIR written / Approval
25 % 5 panel Study
25 % 25 Panel Study
25 % SPIR's Dispositioned
25 % SPIR Approved and or Issues defined and assigned ( CN or IAA )
18 Process Monitoring and Operation Instructions

( Product SWI's & Set Up Sheets ) = Inspection & Non Inspection WI's & SWI's, Set-Up Sheets
Visual Aids
19 Line Speed Demonstration

( Line Speed ) = PDR ( Production Data Recording ) Update / Counts
The % is based on defined Line Speed and or Hourly Standard to recorded Data
25% T1 (or production test run Assy equivalent)
25% T2 (or production test run Assy equivalent)
25% T3 and must include cycle with all Automation (or production test run Assy equivalent)
25% Run at required rate and quantity; exceptions only with appropriate approval
20 Initial Process Study

( S1 and or S2 SPIR Approval ) = 5 & 25 SPIR's complete and Dispositioned / Resolved
25 % 5 panel Study
25 % 25 Panel Study
25 % SPIR's Dispositioned
25 % SPIR Approved and or Issues defined and assigned ( CN or IAA )

PROCESS SIGN-OFF (PSO) SUMMARY REPORT
Document Instructions
PRE-PSO DOCUMENTATION REVIEW DATE

The DaimlerChrysler Supplier Quality Specialist will contact the Supplier to set a meeting date for a review of
the Supplier’s documentation. At that meeting, the PSO Team will review the documentation and any required
corrections with the Supplier. Deficiencies may require additional Pre-PSO Documentation Reviews. The PSO
Team shall determine that all the submitted documentation is acceptable before scheduling the PSO On-Site
Visit.
NOTE: All documentation corrections should be reviewed and accepted prior to the PSO On-Site Visit.
PSO ON-SITE VISIT DATE / NUMBER

The PSO Team will enter the PSO On-Site Visit date and number in the “PSO ON-SITE VISIT DATE /
NUMBER” field. If this is the first PSO On-Site Visit, enter a “1”, if this is the second, enter a “2”, etc.
ALL PROCESS SIGN-OFF ELEMENTS APPROVED

Check the appropriate box after completing PSO elements 1 thru 25. All PSO elements shall be approved prior
to full PPAP submission. If shipments are required prior to full PPAP approval, refer to BOS procedure
PSSP0108 regarding Interim Approval Authorization.
YES: Means that all PSO elements are acceptable for both DOCUMENTATION and PROCESS. The PSO is
approved.
NO: Means that at least one PSO element is unacceptable. The PSO is NOT APPROVED.
DOCUMENTATION (APPROVAL COLUMN)

Each category of the PSO SUMMARY REPORT identified by an asterisk (*) shall be reviewed by the PSO Team
during APQP/PAP meetings and again at the PSO Documentation Review prior to visiting the Supplier’s
manufacturing plant. Before the PSO On-Site Visit the PSO Team shall “check-off” the appropriate boxes for
the DOCUMENTATION (element 1 through element 23) as defined below:
NOTE: If an element does not apply, e.g. BSR/NVH for a spark plug, the PSO Team will mark the
“Yes” and “No” box “N/A” and explain on the COMMENTS SHEET.
YES: When the Supplier has presented documentation to support the line element requirements,
check the appropriate YES box under Documentation.
NO: Supporting data and documentation shall be sufficient to meet the line element requirements.
If any supporting documentation is insufficient or inadequate, then check the appropriate NO
box under Documentation.
ACCEPT: When all documentation presented for the element is acceptable, signified by all “Yes” boxes
checked (or N/A), then the element is considered acceptable. The ACCEPT box shall be
checked for that element under Documentation.
UNACCEPT: When at least one piece of documentation is insufficient, signified by the “No” box checked,
and then the element is considered unacceptable. The UNACCEPT box shall be checked for
that element under Documentation.

PROCESS (APPROVAL COLUMN)
During the PSO On-Site Visit the PSO Team shall “check-off” the appropriate boxes for the PROCESS as
defined below:
NOTE: If an element does not apply, e.g. BSR/NVH for a spark plug, the PSO Team will mark the box
“N/A” and explain on the COMMENTS SHEET.
YES: When the PSO Team witnesses the production process and agrees that the line element
requirements have been met and are effectively implemented, check the appropriate YES box
under Process.
NO: When the PSO Team witnesses the production process and agrees that the element
requirements have not been met, or have not been effectively implemented, check the
appropriate NO box under Process.
ACCEPT: When all process requirements for that element have been satisfied, signified by all “Yes”
boxes checked (or N/A), then the element is considered acceptable. The ACCEPT box shall be
checked for that element under Process.
UNACCEPT: When at least one process requirement is insufficient, signified by a “No” box checked, then
the element is considered unacceptable. The UNACCEPT box shall be checked for that element
under Process.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED

Indicate whether any corrective action is required for this PSO and enter the completion date for the corrective
action. A detailed description of the discrepancy and corrective action should be found on the COMMENT /
FOLLOW-UP SHEET. If multiple corrective actions are required, record the completion date of the last
corrective action.
ON-SITE REVISIT REQUIRED

The PSO Team will determine if a re-visit is needed to achieve PSO approval. The PSO Team will mark the
appropriate box and enter the intended re-visit date. In some cases, the Supplier will need additional time to
assess the extent of the required corrections before a re-visit date can be proposed. In that case, indicate the
re-visit date is “TBD by…” and enter the date by which the Supplier will be able to propose a re-visit date.
NOTE: An UNACCEPT for Line Speed or First Time Capability (under Initial Process Study) shall require a
DaimlerChrysler PSO revisit.
Re-visits require a new PSO SUMMARY REPORT be initiated. Previously accepted elements need not be
repeated. Only those elements that were originally judged unacceptable need be reviewed and rated. A copy of
the prior PSO forms shall be uploaded into the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway) to document
the previously accepted elements.
SIGNATURE BLOCK
The DaimlerChrysler PSO Team members and the Supplier representatives shall print their names in the
appropriate fields, then sign and date the PSO SUMMARY REPORT. Doing so indicates the signers’ approval of
all documented PSO information.

COMMENTS
The COMMENTS SHEET shall be used to record all deficiencies or comments by PSO element number. These
may be favorable comments or discrepancies, but discrepancies requiring corrective action or a re-visit prior
to PSO approval shall be described in detail. In the case of multiple production lines or multiple tools,
comments or discrepancies regarding each one should be described separately. Use additional copies of the
form or attach additional pages as needed to accommodate more comments.
ISSUE / ACTION
For each discrepant PSO element, describe the present condition or discrepancy that was found during the
PSO On-Site Visit or Production Demonstration Run. Include actions required to improve or correct the
situation.
RESPONSIBILITY
Enter the name, department, and location of the person responsible to take action. Include the phone
number, email address, or other contact method. Action can be required of the Supplier, Sub-Supplier, or a
DaimlerChrysler team member.
TARGET DATE
Enter the target date for issue resolution or action completion. This date shall occur before a re-visit can be
scheduled. The date of the last corrective action will be repeated on the PSO SUMMARY REPORT in the
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED’ field.

Measurement System Verification Report Instructions
The MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION REPORT is used to document the results of the measurement
audit performed during the PSO On-Site Visit. Use additional copies of the form or attach additional pages as
needed to accommodate more characteristics.
1. Number of parts witnessed: The number of parts the PSO has personally witnessed the supplier measure
characteristics.
2. Witnessed by: The names of all the DaimlerChrysler PSO team members who witnessed the measurement
audit.
3. Characteristic: Measurement characteristics identified by the team to be measured.
4. Specification: The documented specification of the characteristics as identified on the part drawing.
5. Method of Measurement: The gage, fixture, or equipment used to measure the identified characteristics.
6. Quantity Attempted: The total number of parts chosen to be measured by the team (this may exceed the
number of parts witnessed by the PSO team members).
7. Quantity Accepted: The number of parts which whose characteristic was within the specification.
8. FTC percentage (without repair): Calculated First Time Capability. For further details, please see
Appendix C.
9. Pp/Ppk: The calculated Pp/Ppk for the quantity of parts attempted.
10. Process Acc/Unacc: Has the PSO team determined the supplier’s measurement process to be acceptable
(acc) or unacceptable (unacc)?
11. Comments: Any waivers/deviations should be recorded here for documentation purposes.

Production Demonstration Results Instructions
The PSO Team will record the quantity of parts built (and the production line or tool identification if multiple
production lines or tools were used) during the Production Demonstration Run. In the event the build
quantity is less than the required minimum (300 pieces or 2 hours of production per line/tool whichever is
more stringent) provide an explanation and the PSO Team justification.
A dimensional PSW (Part Submission Warrant, refer to PPAP manual) required for tool payment can not
be submitted until elements 1 through 23 are complete and all requirements of dimensional PPAP have
been met.
Appendix C has a detailed explanation of Line Speed calculation.

Appendix C has a detailed explanation of First Time Capability calculation.
Note: When requesting approval for multiple manufacturing lines, a PDR form shall be completed for
each manufacturing line requesting approval.
Line Speed
1. CPV Daily: The Capacity Planning Volume as found on the ODCICS2 on the 3270 mainframe. The Part
Volume System (PVSJ screen). See page 152 for screen shot example.
2. Quoted Net Operating Time: The supplier’s quoted net operating time for DaimlerChrysler parts for the
identified manufacturing line. (e.g. 7 hours/day)
3. Line Speed Required: The calculated line speed = Item 1 ÷ Item 2
4. Part Quantity Ran: The total number of parts attempted, including reworked/repaired and scrapped parts.
5. Part Quantity Accepted: The total number of parts completing and passing all operations which are
packaged as final assemblies. This may include rework/repair (for rework/repair
processes agreed to by the PSO team) but excludes scrap.
6. Duration of Run: The total time for the part quantity accepted to complete the entire manufacturing
process. (e.g. 2 hours)
7. Pieces per hour: The number of accepted parts produced per hour =
Part Quantity Accepted ÷ Duration of Run. NOTE: This quantity shall be greater than or
equal to Line Speed Required (3).
8. FTC: Calculated First Time Capability. For further details, please see Appendix C.
9. % of DaimlerChrysler Capacity: The percentage of capacity of the manufacturing line that this product
utilizes.
10. Line Shared (Y/N): Is this line shared with another DaimlerChrysler or non DaimlerChrysler owned
product? (Y=yes or N=no).
11. Number of shifts: How many shifts are scheduled to produce this part per 24 hour day?
12. Hours/Shift (HR): The number of hours scheduled per shift.
13. Days/Week (DY): The number of days scheduled for production of this part.
14. Other Customer Capacity: The percentage of capacity of the manufacturing line that other customers
utilize.
15. Excess Capacity Available: The percentage of remaining capacity of the manufacturing line minus
DaimlerChrysler and other customer usage.
16. Comments: Any waivers/deviations should be recorded here for documentation purposes.

NOTE: Waivers for FTC ≥ 90% require a Supplier Quality Manager’s signature.
Initial Process Study
17. Process Feature/Part Characteristic: The process feature or part characteristic that is being measured.
18. Process/Part: Document if data is for a process measurement or a part measurement.
19. Meas. Freq.: Measurement Frequency. Record the number of part/process measurements taken per time
interval.
20. USL: Upper Specification Limit. The upper limit of the part or process specification per the part drawing or
process standard.
21. UCL: Upper Control Limit: The upper limit established by the Supplier for process/part control. NOTE:
This number should be less than the USL.
22. Part/Proc. Avg.: Part/Process Average. The average of all measured process features/part characteristics.
23. LCL: Lower Control Limit. The lower limit established by the Supplier for process/part control. NOTE: This
number should be less than the LSL.
24. LSL: Lower Specification Limit. The lower limit of the part or process specification per the part drawing or
process standard.
25. Pp: The calculated Pp for all measured process features/part characteristics.
26. Ppk: The calculated Ppk for all measured process features/part characteristics.
27. Quantity Attempted: The total number of part/process measurements taken.
28. Quantity Accepted: The total number of part/process measurements acceptable per the established
controls (within the LCL-UCL).
29. FTC percent (without repairs): Calculated First Time Capability. For further details, please see Appendix
C.
30. % GR&R: Calculated percentage of Gage R&R for gage used for part/process measurement.
31. Acc/Unacc: Has the PSO team determined the supplier’s data to be acceptable (acc) or unacceptable
(unacc)?
[i.e. LCL <Proc Avg < UCL;
Ppk ≥ Ppk matrix requirement (see Initial Process Study element); FTC ≥ 90%;
GR&R < 10% ; 10< GR&R < 30 – PSO team decision].

3270 Mainframe – PVSJ Screen Shot
How to find the CPV Daily
Enter the Model Year (2 digit)

Enter the Part Number
F7 provides the information below
Daily Capacity Planning Volume


PSO WORKSHEET
This PSO worksheet was developed to assist specialist with conducting Process Sign-Off’s.
This worksheet is for guidance only. Only the PSO SUMMARY REPORT and PSO forms
shall be uploaded into the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway). This worksheet
may also be beneficial to Suppliers for PSO preparation.

APPENDIX B
Tables and Examples

RISK DRIVERS
Risk & AQP Category Guidelines

Step 1: Assess Part Risk
1 Source Package complete?
2 Purchase Order Issued?
Timing
3 Will Production Tooling be in Place to Support S1 Build?
4 PPAP Promise Dates
5 Design Responsibility (per Authority Definition Package ADP)?
6 Historical Design Stability?
7 Customer Impact?
Part
8 Process Technology?
9 Manufacturing Location
10 Historical Quality Problems with Similar Parts (Lesson's Learned)?
Step 2: Determine AQP Activity Level
11 Supplier ISO/TS16949 Certified?
12 Supplier PPAP Self Certified?
13 EBSC Measure for Quality?
14 Supplier Historically Required Multiple PSO visits to obtain PSO approval?
15 Supplier Ever Been Placed on 3PVA?
16 Supplier Ability to Conduct AQP activities?
AQP Activity
Part Risk Level
Determination Determination
Logic Logic
Low Risk (L) Self Directed (SD)
Medium Risk (M) Collaborative ( C)
High Risk (H) Directed (D)

LOT ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING TABLE
Sample Size Per Characteristic Classification

*Lot Size or Shipment Acceptance
Number = 0
Size
<S> / <E> / <N> <D> / <T>
0-15 100% Inspection
16-25
26-50
51-75 50
76-125 75 65
126-225 90 75
226-425 100 85
426-1300 110 90
1301 and up 115 90

TWO OR MORE OF THE METHODS DESCRIBED IN ELEMENT 7.4.3.2 OF TS-16949 SHALL BE
USED, OTHERWISE, THIS TABLE APPLIES.
Characteristics Definition
SAFETY <S>/EMISSION <E>/NOISE <N>/THEFT <T>/HOMOLOGATION <H>: A characteristic that will

affect compliance with DaimlerChrysler Corporation and/or Governmental Vehicle
Safety/Emission/Noise/Theft/Homologation requirements.
KEY <D>: A characteristic that is key to part function and has particular quality, reliability, and
durability significance (Refer to Engineering Process Standard PS-7300).
* Sample size shall be based upon the normal production lot size. If the lot size is temporarily reduced
due to material shortages or production problems, the sample size will not change. If the temporarily
reduced lot size is smaller than the required, production sample size, inspect 100%. A lot is not to
exceed one shift or one-day's production whichever is smaller.
PRODUCT QUALIFICATION
SAMPLE RESULTS ACTIONS ON PROCESS ACTIONS ON LOT
No Nonconforming units Continue to operate Accept
One or more Find Root Cause(s) and Sort 100% since last
Nonconforming units Correct Process conforming lot

CAPABILITY MATRIX
There are two risks inherent in every decision, either (1) we have accepted "bad" parts (consumer's risk), or
(2) we have rejected "good" parts (producer's risk). Tests plans seek to balance these risks by specifying sample
size and/or acceptance criteria so that neither the consumer nor the producer carries the higher proportion of risk.
Sometimes, for business or other reasons, it may be important to hold one risk constant and allow the other
risk to "float" based on sample size. Such is the case for Pp and Ppk. DaimlerChrysler wants to minimize its
risk of accepting a population below 1.33.
The following table presents the sample size and acceptance criteria that keeps the risk of accepting a "bad"
population (<=1.33) at 6.4% (96.4% that a population > 1.33 Ppk will be accepted). Depending upon sample size,
the risk of rejecting a "good" population (=>1.67) could be very high. The table allows for trade-offs between
sample size and producer's risk to be identified.
Acceptance Ppk Risk of Accepting a Risk of Rejecting a

Sample Size
Criteria Population <= 1.33Ppk Population >= 1.67Ppk
5 2.94 6.4 % 86.3%
10 2.10 6.4 % 77.3%
15 1.89 6.4 % 68.7%
20 1.78 6.4 % 60.7%
25 1.71 6.4 % 53.3%
30 1.67 6.4 % 46.5%
35 1.64 6.4 % 40.4%
40 1.61 6.4 % 34.9%
45 1.59 6.4 % 30.1%
50 1.58 6.4 % 25.8%
55 1.56 6.4 % 22.0%
60 1.55 6.4 % 18.7%
65 1.54 6.4 % 15.9%
70 1.53 6.4 % 13.4%
75 1.52 6.4 % 11.3%
80 1.52 6.4 % 9.5%
85 1.51 6.4 % 8.0%
90 1.50 6.4 % 6.7%
95 1.50 6.4 % 5.6%
100 1.49 6.4 % 4.7%
LAYERED PROCESS AUDIT EXAMPLES

EXAMPLE: LPA FREQUENCY AND STRUCTURE
Department A
Department B
Department C
Department D
Department E
Department F
Assigned Assigned
Management Management
Category Personnel Audit
(example) (example) Assignment
1st Layer of
Management 1 per 1 per
Supervisors Supervisor 1 Own Department shift shift
1 per 1 per
Supervisor 2 Own Department shift shift
1 per 1 per
Supervisor 3 Own Department shift shift
2nd Layer of
Management Area 2 per 2 per 2 per 2 per
Managers Area Manager 1 Own Area week week week week
2 per 2 per
Area Manager 2 Own Area week week
3rd Layer of Plant Staff
Management and Plant
Manager Engrng Mgr Rotate Depts. 1 per week
Quality Mgr Rotate Depts. 1 per week
Tooling Mgr Rotate Depts. 1 per week
H.R. Mgr Rotate Depts. 1 per week
Training Coord. Rotate Depts. 1 per week
Plant Manager Rotate Depts. 1 per week

DAIMLERCHRYSLER PROCESS CONTROL AUDIT SHEET
Back to 9000 (42RLE) ASSEMBLY: ZONE "A" PROCESS CONTROL AUDIT Next: Layered
Process Control Audit Example
(done once per shift by Supervisor)
All questions are to be answered with a checkmark "√" or no "N" in the

Date: ______________
corresponding day's box. Non-compliances are to have corrective action
SHIFT: ___________ **PLEASE WRITE ACTUAL DATES IN THE
recorded in the space provided & identified with either the letter of the day CORRESPONDING COLUMNS!!**
(M,T,W,R,F) or the date (MM/DD/YY)
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
ITEM# THESE ITEMS ARE TO BE CHECKED EVERY SHIFT ST.# Corrective Action Taken
What?
Lead Off - Inspection Log Book: Verify QAFM250092 is being filled out
How?
with date, shift, badge, and initials and checks are being made (Missing or
Why? 1 1
incorrect data could result in incorrect units being held in the event of a
containment)
Lead Off - Load Case to Pallet: Verfiy the operator is visually inspecting
2 the case for chips and damage defects (Chip in transmission or damage 1
across a machined face can result in field failure for the customer)
Lead Off - Install Hat Plug: Verify the hat plug is being installed flush with
3 the case as shown in SWI (failure to install hat plug flush may result in 1
rejects at final air decay or field failures)
L/R Ball and Stake: Verify presence of L/R circuit ball and proper stake.
4
Note: "proper stake" will show three point movement of aluminum in hole.
2
(If stake is not secure, the ball could come out causing a failure of the L/R
clutch.)
Bar Code Tags: Verify that the bar code tag and the pinstamp match each
5 other on two consectutive transmissions (Duplicate tags will create a reject 2
for our customer - the car plant.)
L/R Piston Retainer Installation: Is the operator using the grease

6 dispenser to apply grease to the L/R gasket? (Absence of grease could 6
result in a mislocated gasket and leak tester reject or warranty failure.)

DAIMLERCHRYSLER ERROR AND MISTAKE PROOFING VERIFICATION
AUDIT EXAMPLE
D-9100 (41TE) ASSEMBLY ERROR AND MISTAKE PROOFING VERIFICATION AUDIT

(done once per shift by Utility man / Quality
All questions are to be answered with a checkmark or no “N” in

Date:
corresponding day's box. Non compliances
- are to have corrective
SHIFT: ______________
**PLEASE WRITE ACTUAL DATES IN THE
recorded in the space provided & identified with either the letter of the
CORRESPONDING COLUMNS!!**
(M,T,W,R,F) or the date
Mo Tu We Th Fri Sa
Ite THESE ITEMS ARE TO BE CHECKED DAIL Sta Corrective Action
CASE LINE
LINE
At Station #10 allow 1 unit to -build without low/reverse piston

1 snap - follow
follow to Station # 12, verify that unit rejects for pistonmen 1
& follow to audit . (causes clutch/trans
2 Review log book at -Is gage crib calibration of air decay up to 1

date?
Visual RTV sealant bead for uniform size (width/height) & t isthat
3 1
applied to the extension face sealing area. (causes
Review log book at audit -Is gage crib calibration of air decay up
4 1
date
PRE LOAD LINE

LINE
5
Remove -Ring from transfer shaft bearing retainer cup. Does 8
system give "Red"
With Vision system showing "Red" - hit foot pedal. Does pallet
6 8
(stay) in - until proper parts are

APPENDIX C
Formulas & Calculations

Line Speed
EXAMPLE #1
NON-SHARED PRODUCTION LINE
PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RESULT FOR ELEMENT 18
DAILYCPV ( PIECES / DAY )

LINE SPEED REQUIRED =
QUOTED NET OPERATING TIME FOR DC PARTS ( HOURS / DAY )
OBTAINED FROM THE 3270 MAINFRAME PSVJ SCREEN OR BUYER:
"Daily CPV" = Daily Capacity Planning Volume
= 1,600 Pieces/Day
"SH/HR/DY" = Normal weekly Supplier work pattern (Shifts / Hours / Days)

=2/8/5
SH = shifts per day HR = hours per shift DY = days per week
OBTAINED FROM THE SUPPLIER:
"Net Operating Time for DaimlerChrysler Parts" = Normal Supplier work pattern
(16 Hours/Day) less time used for other
customers/excess capacity (0 Hours/Day) and less
non-productive time, e.g. down-time for maintenance
(1 Hour/Day)
= 15 Hours/Day
LINE SPEED CALCULATION:
Line Speed Required = (1,600 Pcs / Day) ÷ (15 Hours / Day) = 107 Pcs / Hour
CALCULATIONS
Select the appropriate Production Demonstration Run, a or b.
a) If Line Speed Required < 150 Pcs/Hr, Run 300 Pieces.
b) If Line Speed Required ≥ 150 Pcs/Hr, Run for 2 Hours.
The required Line Speed is 107 Pcs / Hr. Since this is less than 150 Pcs / Hour, the Supplier must
run at least 300 Pieces.
The Supplier ran the required 300 Pieces in 2 Hours, 43 Minutes.
300 Pcs 300 Pcs

Line Speed Demonstrated = = = 110 Pcs / Hr
2 Hours 43 Minutes 2.717 Hr

EXAMPLE #1
NON-SHARED PRODUCTION LINE
NOTES:
1) Rejects must be deducted from the Supplier's Line Speed.
For example: If 10% of the final product were non-conforming, the Supplier's effective
production rate would be
Pcs
110 ( 0.1× 110) Pcs = 99 Pcs
Hr Hr Hr
Since the Supplier is quoted 107 Pcs/Hr, this Production Demonstration Run
would fail the required Line Speed.
2) Down-time for maintenance or change-over affects the Supplier's Line Speed if it reduces the
number of hours available for producing DaimlerChrysler Parts during the Supplier's normal
work pattern. Therefore the Quoted Net Operating Time for DaimlerChrysler Parts is used for
the Line Speed calculation.
EXAMPLE #2
SHARED PRODUCTION LINE
PRODUCTION DEMONSTRATION RESULT FOR ELEMENT 18
DAILYCPV ( PCS / DAY )

LINE SPEED REQUIRED =
QUOTED NET OPERATING TIME FOR DC PARTS ( HOURS / DAY )
OBTAINED FROM THE 3270 MAINFRAME PSVJ SCREEN OR BUYER:
"Daily CPV" = Daily Capacity Planning Volume
= 1,600 Pieces/Day
"SH/HR/DY" = Normal weekly Supplier work pattern (Shifts / Hours / Days)

=2/8/5
SH = shifts per day HR = hours per shift DY = days per week
OBTAINED FROM THE SUPPLIER:
"Net Operating Time for DaimlerChrysler Parts" = Normal Supplier work pattern
(16 Hours/Day) less time used for other
customers/excess capacity (8 Hours/Day) and less
non-productive time, e.g. down-time for
maintenance (1 Hour/Day)
= 7 Hours/Day
LINE SPEED CALCULATION:
Line Speed Required = (1,600 Pcs / Day) ÷ (7 Hours / Day) = 229 Pcs / Hour

EXAMPLE #2
SHARED PRODUCTION LINE
CALCULATIONS
Select the appropriate Production Demonstration Run, a or b.
a) If Line Speed Required < 150 Pcs/Hr, Run 300 Pieces.
b) If Line Speed Required ≥ 150 Pcs/Hr, Run for 2 Hours.
The required Line Speed is 229 Pcs / Hr. Since this is greater than 150 Pcs / Hour, the Supplier
must run for at least 2 Hours.
The Supplier ran the required 472 Pieces in 2 Hours, 3 Minutes.
472 Pcs 472 Pcs

Line Speed Demonstrated = = = 230 Pcs / Hr
2 Hours 3 Minutes 2.05 Hr
NOTES:
1) Rejects must be deducted from the Supplier's Line Speed.
For example: If 3% of the final product were non-conforming, the Supplier's effective
production rate would be
Pcs
230 ( 0.03 × 230) Pcs = 230 Pcs 7
Pcs
= 223
Pcs
Hr Hr Hr Hr Hr
Since the Supplier is quoted 229 Pcs/Hr, this Production Demonstration Run
would fail the required Line Speed.
2) This is a shared line. Down-time for maintenance or change-over affects the Supplier's Line
Speed if it reduces the number of hours available for producing DaimlerChrysler Parts during
the Supplier's normal work pattern. Therefore the Quoted Net Operating Time for
DaimlerChrysler Parts is used for the Line Speed calculation.

First Time Capability
CALCULATING FIRST TIME CAPABILITY (FTC) AND PROCESS YIELD WITHOUT REPAIRS
PURPOSE
First Time Capability (FTC) is part of a process capability study that identifies how well it produces quality
parts. For multiple assembly lines or tools, FTC studies shall be conducted on each one. FTC can be an
important measure, because generally the lower the value, the greater the amount of rework required. As
defects and rework increase, there is a greater possibility that the Supplier will ship non-conforming parts.
DaimlerChrysler does not impose any numerical requirement for FTC. Generally, a Supplier manufacturing a
part similar to one already in production will demonstrate high FTC values, while a Supplier manufacturing a
totally new component or system (new technology or new process) will tend to have low FTC values. Following
the Production Demonstration Run, the Team shall review the FTC values for each operation and the overall
process. The Team shall take product and process technology, complexity, Supplier experience, and the
effectiveness of defect containment actions into account when deciding whether the demonstrated FTC values
are acceptable.
FTC can be used to prioritize product and process improvement. If a Supplier encounters a situation where,
despite their best efforts, they cannot find a solution to an inherently low FTC, DaimlerChrysler can assist in
the improvement effort by supplementing the Supplier's team with experienced engineering and
manufacturing specialists from a wide variety of disciplines.
DESCRIPTION
FTC is measured as the number of items processed correctly divided by the total number of items processed.
Correctly processed items means no repairs are required or allowed. Therefore, in a multi-operation process, a
higher FTC is expected for an operation or zone than for an entire process.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE

This three-step procedure is suggested for calculating a production line FTC.
1. Create a block diagram for the process showing each operation. The flow diagram or floor layout provided
by the plant can also be used.
2. Collect the following data from the demonstration run.

a. Quantity of assemblies attempted.
b. Quantity of rejected assemblies from each operation.
c. Quantity of acceptable assemblies from the end of the line. Do not include reworked parts.
3. Calculate the operation and process FTC using the examples as a guide.

CALCULATIONS & EXAMPLES
Example 1, Series Process Flow without Repair:

During a typical PSO Production Demonstration Run, the goal is to show that the production line is capable of
producing parts that meet DaimlerChrysler quality and volume requirements. The main objective is to
demonstrate process capability at production rate not to build 300 components (or some other agreed upon
quantity), therefore, component rework or repair shall not be performed during a production demonstration
build. FTC and Yield are equal for a process without repairs so only FTC calculations will be shown in Section
I. For established production lines and carryover component production demonstrations that may include
rework, refer to Section II of Appendix C.
Using the three-step, data collection procedure outlined above, the following processed and rejected quantity
data were collected during the Production Demonstration Run. The data are shown on the process block
diagram.
Operation 1 Operation 2 Operation 3 Operation 4

270 Pcs 243 Pcs 226 Pcs
217 Pcs
300 Pcs
30 Pcs 27 Pcs 17 Pcs 9 Pcs

Rejected Rejected Rejected Rejected
Figure 1
Example 1 - Series Process Flow Diagram With Demonstration Data
Begin by calculating the FTC for each operation. Operation 1 is shown here with its respective PSO Production
Demonstration Run data
Operation 1
270 Pcs Divide the quantity completed at Operation 1, 270 units, by the quantity
attempted at the operation, 300 units. The result is the operation FTC.
300 Pcs
Qty Completed 270
30 Pcs FTCOp 1 = = = 0.90 or 90%
Rejected Qty Attempted 300
Figure 1A
In a similar manner, calculate the FTC for each operation in the process using Equation 1. The general
operation model is shown in Figure 1B. Table 1 shows a summary of the quantities and FTC’s for the process
in Example 1.
Operation
Quantity Number Quantity
Attempted Completed Qty Completed
FTCOPERATION =
Qty Attempted
Equation 1
Quantity
Rejected
Figure 1B

Operation Quantity Attempted Quantity Completed FTC
1 300 270 0.90
2 270 243 0.90
3 243 226 0.93
4 226 217 0.96
TABLE 1
Quantities and FTC’s for Example 1
Enter the calculated operation FTC’s in their respective operation blocks of the process diagram. Calculate
the process FTC by dividing the quantity completed for the process, 217 units, by the quantity attempted 300
units.
Total Qty Completed 217

FTCPROCESS = = = 0.723 or 72.3%
Total Qty Attempted 300
Enter the FTCPROCESS value on the process diagram. The completed Example 1 process diagram is shown in
Figure 2. The diagram can be included with the final PSO documents as a record of the process capability.

FTC 270 Pcs FTC 243 Pcs FTC 226 Pcs FTC 217 Pcs
90% 90% 93% 96% FTC = 72.3%
300 Pcs
30 Pcs 27 Pcs 17 Pcs 9 Pcs

Rejected Rejected Rejected Rejected
Figure 2
Example 1 - Series Process With Operation and Process FTC's Shown

Example 2, Series/Parallel Process Flow without Repair:
Using the three-step data collection procedure outlined on page D.2, the following processed and rejected
quantity data were collected during the Production Demonstration Run. The data are shown on the process
diagram in Figure 3.
Operation 3
96 Pcs 94 Pcs
2 Pcs
Rejected
288 Pcs 265 Pcs 242 Pcs
218 Pcs
91 Pcs 81 Pcs
300 Pcs
10 Pcs
12 Pcs 23 Pcs Rejected 24 Pcs
Rejected Rejected Rejected
Operation 5
78 Pcs 67 Pcs
11 Pcs
Rejected
Figure 3
Example 2 - Series / Parallel Process Flow Diagram with Demonstration Data
Calculate the FTC for each operation in the process using Equation 1 and the operation model shown in
Figure 1B on page 2. Table 2 shows a summary of the quantities and FTC’s for the operations in Example 2.
Operation Quantity Attempted Quantity Completed FTC
1 300 288 0.96
2 288 265 0.92
3 96 94 0.98
4 91 81 0.89
5 78 67 0.86
6 242 218 0.91

TABLE 2
Quantities and FTC’s for Example 2

Enter the calculated operation FTC’s in their respective blocks on the process diagram. Calculate the process
FTC by dividing the total quantity completed, 218 Units, by the quantity attempted 300 units. The result is
the FTC for the process.
Qty Completed 218

FTCPROCESS = = = 0.726 or 73%
Qty Attempted 300
Add the process FTC to the process diagram. The completed diagram for Example 2 is shown in Figure 4. The
diagram can be included with the Production Demonstration Run report to document the initial process
performance.
Operation 3
96 Pcs 94 Pcs
FTC
98%
2 Pcs
Rejected
FTC 288 Pcs FTC 265 Pcs FTC 242 Pcs FTC 218 Pcs
96% 92% 89% 90% FTC = 72.6%
91 Pcs 81 Pcs
300 Pcs
10 Pcs
12 Pcs 23 Pcs Rejected 24 Pcs
Rejected Rejected Rejected
Operation 5
FTC
86%
78 Pcs 67 Pcs
11 Pcs
Rejected
Figure 4
Example 2 – Series / Parallel Process with Operation and Process FTC’s shown SECTION II

Ppk Calculations
Bilateral Tolerances:
For bilateral tolerances, the typical situation, use the formulas below.
USL - x
PPK = the smaller of... (2)
USL - LSL 3s
PP = (1)
6s x - LSL
or... (3)
3s
Where, USL = Upper Specification Limit
LSL = Lower Specification Limit
x = Average of the sample measurements
s = Sample Standard Deviation
NOTE: If a unilateral tolerance is specified, PP is undefined because when one specification limit is omitted, a
PP value cannot be calculated. For these situations PPK can be used. Choose the PPK formula that contains the
appropriate specification limit.
Example 1
A drilled hole has a diametrical specification and tolerance of 6.0 ± 0.2 mm. Data from a sample of 300 parts
yields x = 5.9 mm and s = 0.04 mm. What is the process performance?
This is a bilateral tolerance situation. PP is calculated using equation (1).
USL - LSL 6.2 - 5.8

PP = = = 1.67
6s 6(0.04)
PPK is the smaller result from either equation (2) or (3). In this example, the mean is closest to the lower limit
so we will use equation (3) to calculate PPK.
x - LSL 5.9 - 5.8

PPK = = = 0.833
3s 3(0.04)
The process performance for the drilled hole is PP = 1.67 and PPK = 0.833.
Example 2
A machined part has a 1 mm maximum radius specified at the intersection of two perpendicular surfaces. A
sample of several parts yields an average value of 0.63 mm and a sample standard deviation of 0.1 mm. What
is the process performance?
In this example, a maximum is specified so only PPK can be calculated. Again, with only a maximum specified,
the appropriate formula is (2).
USL - x 1.0 - 0.63

PPK = = = 1.23 .
3s 3(0.1)
The process performance for the machined radius is 1.23.

Example 3
A welded pressure vessel has a minimum burst pressure specification of 200 psi. Several samples are burst
and we obtain x = 264 psi and s = 32 psi. What is the process performance of the pressure vessel?
In this example, only a minimum value is specified so PP is undefined and only a PPK value can be calculated.
Equation (3) is the appropriate choice for a minimum specification.
x - LSL 264 - 200

PPK = = = 0.67
3s 3(32)
The process performance for the welded pressure vessel is 0.67.
Note: There are instances when you can assume a value for the second limit. Frequently these assumptions
are made simply to enable a PP calculation. An example is flatness. A flatness callout of 0.2 mm is a
maximum or upper specification limit. The implied minimum or lower specification limit is 0.0 mm. However,
this assumption may confuse the issue.
Assume for our 0.2 mm maximum flatness example that the measured flatness mean is 0.07 and standard
deviation is 0.01. Which are the correct set of indices to report: PP = 3.33, PPK = 4.33; PP = undefined, PPK =
4.33; or PP = 3.33, PPK = 2.33?
The first choice, PP = 3.33, PPK = 4.33, cannot be correct because PPK cannot exceed PP. The last choice, PP =
3.33, PPK = 2.33, cannot be correct because 0.0 was used to calculate PPK and 0.0 is an assumed limit not the
specified limit. That leaves only the middle choice, PP = undefined, PPK = 4.33, which is a correct statement for
a one-sided specification. In this example, the use of an assumed limit for the purpose of determining a value
of PP would confuse the process information conveyed by the indices rather than clarify it.
If the process distribution is severely skewed or non-normal, the data can be transformed to obtain a more
normal distribution enabling calculation of PP and PPK. There are various methods for determining an
appropriate transformation that are beyond the scope of this response. However, one generally assumes that
process performance indices are based on normal process distributions. When process performance indices
are reported following transformation of non-normal data, one can easily be misled to assume the data was
normally distributed and make invalid inferences regarding the process. Therefore, transformation methods
should be used sparingly, only where fully understood by the parties involved, and only if the capability
analysis clearly shows the transform that was used.


APPENDIX D
PSO Extended Run

PSO Extended Run
This activity is intended for new vehicle launches or major vehicle upgrades to reduce the risk of the vehicle
launch. It does not impact the PSO approval process described in this manual but is a supplemental activity
to further assure a Supplier’s readiness to support the full volume production with capable processes (see
Figure 1).
PSO Process as described in the PSO manual Increased

confidence of
Supplier
readiness on
PSO Extended Run selected parts
Figure 1
It is important for the PSO Team to decide the type of PSO Extended Run that will be accomplished and the
timing, so it can be integrated into the PSO planning process. In some cases there will be additional pieces
built or multiple shifts exercised during the Production Demonstration Run and in other cases there will be
additional visits made at later dates to ensure readiness as launch approaches. The timeline shown below
depicts the PSO Extended Run activities in relation to the CDS milestones and identifies responsibilities (see
Figure 2).
Planning
Platform Quality Specialist Product Team establishes PSO

recommends PSO Extended Run Extended Run option
part list (Reference Table 1)
Additions to List
1st Last 1st 1st

S0 CDS Timeline S0 S1 S2 V1
Quality Specialist or Product Team

member verifies Extended Run
Execution
Results reported to
Figure 2 Platform Quality
Specialist
Due to the variety of manufacturing processes utilized at Suppliers, the final details of a PSO Extended Run
for a particular part are decided by the PSO Team. The following reference options (1-5) have historically been
used but other, more applicable, options may be developed as indicated in option number 6.

Option Number Option Description Option Benefit
Expanded production of 1000 or

Higher confidence level that the Supplier can
more parts during the PSO
1 sustain line rate over a longer period of time.
Demonstration Run.
Perform 2 separate PSO
Confirms that the Supplier can start the process
Demonstration Runs with the
2 up on multiple occasions and meet capability and
last run occurring prior to S2
line rate.
MRD.
Perform 3 separate PSO
Demonstration Runs:
Verifies Supplier’s process consistency and
3 Prior to S1 MRD
validates readiness for V1 Launch.
Prior to S2 MRD
Prior to V1 MRD
Perform PSO Demonstration
4 Runs on multiple shifts at the Ensures operational readiness on all shifts.
Supplier.
In addition to the Pre-S1 PSO,
perform a post-launch PSO Validates the line rate after several weeks of
5 occurring 2-5 weeks after V1 operation.
Launch.
Any combination of the above 5
options or an appropriate Allows flexibility to accommodate unique
6 variation for the specific circumstances.
commodity.
Table 1


APPENDIX E
Warranty Requirements

WARRANTY SCORING GUIDELINES
A - Management and Personnel

1 Does the supplier have an organization chart indicating the warranty reporting relationship?
0 - No organizational chart exists
1 - Organization chart exists, but individuals named on the org chart do not understand the warranty process
(verify with sample interviews)
2 - Individuals named on the organizational chart understand the warranty process (verify with sample
interviews
3 - Individuals named on the organizational chart understand the warranty process, and the job function of all
individuals on the organizational chart (verify with sample interviews)
2 Does the supplier have a Warranty Champion (Single point of contact) and a Backup Warranty Champion
identified on the organizational chart?
0 - No Warranty Champion
1 - Have a Warranty Champion
2 - Have a Backup Warranty Champion
3 - Backup Warranty Champion is as capable as Warranty Champion
3 Is the Warranty Champion working to resolve warranty issues?
0 - Only Conducts parts reviews at QEC and/or Supplier plants
1 - Coordinates root cause analysis of defective parts
2 - Coordinates/monitors warranty reduction efforts at supplier location and at DaimlerChrysler, and
documents efforts
3 - Actively works with supplier engineering and manufacturing as well as DaimlerChrysler engineering and
assembly
4 Does the supplier have adequate personnel involved in warranty analysis?
0 - PRAS, PRISM, and associated testing is not being completed on time
1 - PRAS, PRISM, and associated testing is being completed on time
2 - Documentation of an active warranty reduction program that covers all vehicle lines, such as lessons
learned
3 - All significant EWT issues are in the process of root cause analysis
5 Has the supplier warranty personnel been trained in the DaimlerChrysler Warranty Systems? (WIS) (EWT)
(QNA) (Vehicle History) (Quality Tracking System) (PRAS) (PRISM)
0 - The Warranty Champion has not been trained in all of the Warranty systems
1 - The Warranty Champion has been trained in all of the Warranty systems
2 - The Backup Warranty Champion has been trained in all of the Warranty systems
3 - Additional warranty personnel have been trained in the most used systems
6 Does the supplier conduct "Warranty Awareness Training" throughout it's corporation?
0 - No warranty awareness training has been conducted for management or the work force
1 - Awareness training has been conducted for management
2 - Awareness training has been conducted for the work force, along with visual displays
3 - The status of the warranty reduction program is regularly relayed to the all employees with visual displays
7 Does the supplier incorporate warranty targets into employee goals or incentive plans?
0 - Warranty reduction targets are not part on any employees goals and/or incentive plans
1 - Warranty reduction targets are part of management goals and/or incentive plans
2 - Warranty reduction targets are part all profession's goals and/or incentive plans
3 - Warranty reduction targets are part of all employees goals and/or incentive plans
8 Does the supplier have an accurate LOP matrix assignment for parts supplied to DaimlerChrysler?
0 - Supplier has a LOP matrix that is less than 50% accurate
1 - Supplier has a LOP matrix that is less than 100% accurate
2 - Supplier has a LOP matrix that is 100% accurate
3 - Supplier tracks MY changes, new parts and dropped parts, and submits LOP changes per Assembly plant
use of the parts. Note: Supplier should produce a component list of current items shipped to
DaimlerChrysler including vehicle line and show documentation of LOP assignment. Demonstration of this
information in WIS/EWT is acceptable

B – Warranty Process
9 Does the supplier actively manage the resolution of warranty issues identified by the returned part
analysis?
0 - PRAS and eCIMS corrective actions are submitted and less than 50 % implemented
1 - PRAS and eCIMS corrective actions are submitted, and less than 100% implemented
2 - PRAS and eCIMS corrective actions are submitted and are 100% implemented
3 - Information is incorporated into a lessons learned data base for continuous improvement of all parts and
production lines. Information is shared with the entire organization
10 Does the supplier have a documented process for their parts return analysis, and provide evidence that
the process is followed?
0 – No Process exists
1 – A process exists, but is not fully implemented and/or does not meet the requirements in the note below
2 – Supplier can demonstrate compliance to the documented procedure for all part returns
3 – Supplier can demonstrate that the corrective actions developed are reviewed for all product lines and new
products
Note: The supplier process/procedure should include the receipt of warranty parts, analysis, and the
disposition in PRAS. (Including corrective action plans) A flowchart mapping this process is recommended.
11 Does the supplier have a documented procedure to analyze current and emerging warranty issues using
available DaimlerChrysler Warranty Systems such as: EWT, QNA, WIS, QTS, and vehicle history?
0 – No procedure exists
1 – Procedure exists, but is not fully implemented and/or does not include the systems noted in the question
above
2 – Procedure is followed for all parts
3 – Supplier makes Dealer calls and assembly plant visits as needed
12 Does the Supplier use trend charting to track parts or issues that are driving warranty, and new warranty
issues that need immediate attention?
0 – No trend charting.
1 – Trend charting is done, but only upon request
2 – Trend charting is done on all parts with significant warranty. Peaks and valleys on the trend charts of
significant parts are identified with the cause
3 – Trend charting is done on all parts. All peaks and valleys on the trend charts are identified with
causes/corrective actions
13 Does the Supplier conduct regular warranty review meetings internally to report performance to
DaimlerChrysler Warranty Reduction targets, and distribute warranty data throughout their corporation?
0 – No meetings or distribution of warranty data
1 – Meetings with distribution of warranty data to management
2 – Regular meetings and distribution of warranty data to the work force. The warranty data should include
their activities and how they are performing to the DaimlerChrysler targets
3 – A more detailed and proactive analysis of the warranty data is presented
14 Does the supplier regularly report to DaimlerChrysler personnel on their warranty performance and
activities to support DaimlerChrysler warranty reduction targets?
0 – No meetings or distribution of warranty data
1 – Occasional meetings with distribution of warranty data sent DaimlerChrysler personnel
2 – Regular meetings with DaimlerChrysler personnel on all significant warranty issues. This should
include their activities and how they are performing to the DaimlerChrysler targets
3 – A more detailed and proactive analysis of the warranty data is presented
15 Does the supplier actively work with the assigned DaimlerChrysler Warranty Specialist to coordinate
warranty reduction efforts for current and emerging issues for the Supplier and DaimlerChrysler?
0 – No contact
1 – Works occasionally with the Warranty Specialist
2 – Meets regularly with the Warranty Specialist and sends monthly reports (include actions and/or
activities) and updates as needed
3 – Updates Warranty Specialist on all emerging concerns

B – Warranty Process (cont.)
16 Does the supplier have regularly scheduled warranty part return reviews at the QEC or internally?
0 – Supplier never attends part review meetings at the QEC/supplier location
1 – Supplier attends part review meetings at the QEC/supplier location, if there is a significant warranty
issue
2 – Supplier has regularly scheduled parts review meetings at the QE/supplier location
3 – Supplier makes additional visits to QEC and other Chrysler facilities to work on warranty issues
17 Does the supplier conform to PRAS and eCIMS timing requirements where applicable?
0 – Supplier is late all of the time on their PRAS & eCIMS documentation
1 – Supplier is late more than 50% of the time on their PRAS & eCIMS documentation
2 – Supplier is 100% on time with their PRAS & eCIMS documentation
3 – Supplier uses advanced techniques such Black Belt/six sigma personnel to help develop corrective
actions for PRAS & eCIMS issues
18 Does the supplier regularly use the following tools to find the root cause of warranty issues? (claim
narrative analysis; dealer calls, as necessary, to gain additional information not contained in claim
narratives; vehicle history reviews)
0 – Supplier does not use these tools
1 – Supplier uses these tool occasionally
2 – The use of these tools is part of the supplier’s warranty analysis process, and can be documented
3 – These tools are used for EWT issues
19 Does the supplier actively pursue resolution of TNF (Trouble not found) issues beyond part meeting
specifications?
0 – No
1 – Additional testing will be done upon DaimlerChrysler request
2 – A procedure is in place to resolve TNF issues, and the procedure is followed for all TNFs
3 – Supplier has all needed test equipment and vehicles to test TNF issues and resolve them
20 Does the supplier use a multidisciplinary approach to support their warranty program?
0 – NO, Warranty champion does all of the work
1 – Warranty Champion gets occasional support from other Departments in their organization
2 – Warranty Champion gets full support and help from other Departments in their organization
3 – All Departments are actively involved in reducing warranty
21 Does the Supplier provide technical expertise for the review of service manuals, diagnostic manuals,
owners manuals, TSB’s (Technical Service Bulletins), and Service Repair Tips in GPOP, as required?
0 – No
1 – Supplier has assisted when told to help
2 – Supplier assists on all requests
3 – Supplier requests that these things be done and submits drafts for DaimlerChrysler information
22 Does the supplier’s AQP/Product Development Process incorporate lessons learned from warranty
analysis?
0 – No
1 – Lessons learned are sometimes incorporated into the APQP documents
2 – Lessons learned are incorporated into the APQP documents most of the time
3 – Lessons learned are always incorporated into the APQP documents, and a Lessons learned data base is
maintained

WARRANTY SCORING GUIDELINES
C - Test Equipment
23 Does the supplier have sufficient inspection and test equipment available to meet PRAS timing
requirements?
0 - Supplier is less than 60% on time with PRAS requirements
1 - Supplier is at least 60% on time with PRAS requirements
2 - Supplier is 100% on time with PRAS requirements
3 - Supplier is actively working to improve DVP&R tests
24 Does the supplier use a test facility in the U.S. or within one day shipping time of the QEC?
0 - No test facility in the US or within one day shipping
1 - Can ship parts to test facility within 5 days
2 - Can ship parts to test facility within 1 days
3 - Supplier is actively working to improve test equipment and test facility.
25 Does the supplier test warranty return parts in the vehicle environment, simulating customer
usage?
0 – No
1 - Done only on a limited basis
2 - Done on a routine basis
3 - Supplier is actively working to improve DVP&R tests
26 Does the supplier incorporate any new tests developed, changes to specifications, or any new
characteristics measured, as a result of a warranty issue into their Quality Documents (Work
Instructions, Control Plan, PFMEA, DFMEA, QFD)?
0 – No
1 - DaimlerChrysler initiates the new test, change to specification or the measurement of a new
characteristic to solve a warranty issue. The supplier does not always update their Quality Documents
with the new requirements.
2 – DaimlerChrysler initiates the new test, change to specification or the measurement of a new
characteristic to solve a warranty issue. The supplier updates their Quality Documents with the new
requirements.
3 - The supplier initiates the new test, change to specification or the measurement of a new characteristic
to solve a warranty issue. These updates are added to Lessons Learned database

APPENDIX F
Most Frequently Asked Questions

1. How far down do we go with the certification of the extended enterprise? 3rd tier? 4th tier?
Certification down to the production materials Suppliers would be sufficient.
2. What should our reaction plan be if Suppliers refuse to conduct PSO's on their sub-Suppliers?
PSO is part of DaimlerChrysler's Supplier evaluation and Production Part Approval Process.
According to TS-16949, Suppliers are responsible for evaluation and Production Part Approval
of their subcontractors. All DaimlerChrysler Suppliers were required to be TS-16949 certified.
Failure to conduct evaluations and Production Part Approval of subcontractors is a failure to
meet TS-16949 requirements and may result in the loss of DaimlerChrysler business. Notify
the Buyer and P&S Management of any occurrence of this situation.
3. Suppliers don't follow the Lot Acceptance Sampling Table. They always inspect about 5
parts/lot, lot size is 1,000 pcs. Should we force them to inspect as many as the table says?
For attribute sampling, two or more of the inspection criteria in TS-16949 shall be used,
otherwise the guidelines in the Lot Acceptance Sampling Table shall be followed. For variable
sampling, the Supplier shall be consistent with the Statistical Process Control manual
requirements.
4. "This Lot Acceptance Sampling Table is the minimum attribute sampling requirement. Methods
used that are superior to attribute sampling are acceptable." What does this mean? Is the table
for both attribute & variable? If subjective, all will do differently.
The table is for attribute sampling only. This is the minimum requirement. SPC is superior and
if used, the sampling quantities in the Lot Acceptance Sampling Table need not be followed.
5. Need a better explanation of the timing of PSO and PPAP relative to key program milestones
such as S0, S1, S2, V1, etc.
Timing for starting the PSO relative to CDS would be useful.
A generic timing diagram, Figure 1, is included in PSO manual. For actual dates contact the
PSO Team because program milestone timing varies from platform to platform.
6. Where is the program "road map" which defines AQP, APQP, PSO, PPAP, and other
requirements?
The "roadmap" is TS-16949. You will find reference to Statistical Process Control (SPC),
Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA), Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP), Production
Part Approval Process (PPAP), Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA), and so forth contained in
this document.
DaimlerChrysler's Product Assurance Planning (PAP) manual in accordance with the

DaimlerChrysler Product Creation System (CDS) is the "roadmap" that outlines
DaimlerChrysler's Product Creation Process. PAP is the DaimlerChrysler version of APQP and
meets the requirements of TS-16949 in conjunction with the other TS-16949 referenced
manuals. It identifies the cross-functional activities that shall be performed in each phase of
the Product Creation Process including PSO, PPAP, etc.

7. Collaborative AQP risked parts require a PSO if selected by the PSO Team. If the PSO Team
considers a product to be Self Directed, is PSO required?
Yes. All Self Directed products shall have a Supplier internally led PSO that documents and
establishes their production readiness. The Supplier's PSO documentation shall be uploaded
into the DaimlerChrysler eAPQP system (e.g. Powerway).
All Directed AQP risked products will have both a DaimlerChrysler led PAP and PSO. All
Collaborative risked products will have a DaimlerChrysler led PSO and a Supplier led PAP or
APQP. The PSO team shall determine the risk of the product.
8. Since AAR is a requirement for PPAP, shouldn’t AAR be required for PSO approval if the process
appreciably affects color?
AAR is not a requirement of PSO. Refer to the AIAG PPAP manual for an explanation of the
relationship between PSO and PPAP.
9. If a Supplier changes a process, where does the Supplier go to start the PSO process, the
Responsible Design Engineer or the Supplier Quality Specialist? We've been told both.
Before a Supplier makes any changes to their assembly process they shall notify the
responsible Product Releasing Engineer (PRE), Supplier Quality Specialist and Purchasing
Agent to obtain approval for the change.
10. Most Suppliers use CMM printout for inspection documentation. Do we need to transfer this
data to the appropriate form?
No, a copy can be attached or a statement provided on the COMMENTS SHEET that the PSO
Team verified the measurement.
11. Can Suppliers copy these forms or create their own electronic masters even though it says
"copyright"?
Yes, Suppliers can copy these forms or create electronic masters as long as the forms are not
modified.
12. In a multi-cavity tool, should parts come from all cavities to calculate PP and PPK?
Parts should come from all cavities, however each cavity (process stream) should be calculated
individually as stated in the Statistical Process Control (SPC) manual published by AIAG.
13. Our forms do not have a control number or issue date. This is a TS-16949 requirement. What
should be done?
The forms are part of the manual, and they are identified in DaimlerChrysler’s Master Record
List.

14. Why don't we take rework into account when calculating FTC?
Greater quantities of rejects increase the potential for greater quantities of non-conforming
parts shipped. DaimlerChrysler PSO Teams will review FTC at each Supplier to confirm that
defects have been minimized. If rework were included in the FTC calculation, it wouldn't be a
measure of First Time Capability. While we recognize that rework of in-process rejects is
common, we want to measure the true First Time Capability of the process in order to quantify
the quality potential.
Appendix C, provides a standard method and examples for calculating FTC for a new process
with no rework.
15. Can the PSO Team accept a Production Demonstration Run which is less than 300 pieces/2
hours?
Yes. The Electric Vehicle is an example of a low-volume vehicle with a Production

Demonstration Run less than 300 pieces/2 hours. The PSO Team shall authorize any deviation
from requirements (minimum of two hours or 300 pieces, whichever is more stringent) and
enter an explanation on the PSO COMMENTS SHEET.
16. Clarify IAA requirements.
Information regarding current interim approval requirements are located in procedure

PSSP0108. Contact your Supplier Quality Specialist or Buyer if you do not have access to
procedure PSSP0108.
17. You don't have to have PSO approval prior to V1 if you have an IAA. Explain the system of tool
payment after PSO elements 1-23 without an approved PSW.
IAA is not an alternative to PSO. An IAA indicates failure to meet program requirements. It
enables shipments on an interim basis to support vehicle development timing until corrective
action (PSO approval) can be completed.
After a Supplier successfully completes the first 23 elements for both documentation and
process, the Supplier Quality Specialist enters a “Z” disposition into the eAPQP system (e.g.
Powerway) which, following the submission of a dimensional warrant, allows tool payment at
the discretion of the Purchasing Agent.
Information regarding current interim approval requirements and procedures can be found in
the latest revision of PPSP0108. Contact your Supplier Quality Specialist or Buyer if you do not
have access to procedure PSSP0108.
18. Can parts used for PV testing be selected from a non-successful Production
Demonstration Run?
In general, parts for PV testing shall be selected from a successful Production Demonstration
Run, however, there are exceptions. The PSO Team will review any deficiencies. A non-
successful Demonstration Run can only be used for PV testing if the deficiencies are due to
documentation discrepancies or appearance (non-functional) issues not involving finish
durability.

19. Is the 2000 minimum quantity for FPSC a negotiable amount?
Yes, however, any deviation from the 2000 minimum shall be explained using the PSO
COMMENTS SHEET.
20. If the PSO is not approved does this imply that there is no FPSC?
No, FPSC is still required, but it will probably extend the time period and quantity of the FPSC.
21. Who gets the FPSC form in the plant? Is there an organization to handle this?
The Supplier shall review the completed form with the PSO team and shall retain the original
form for up to one year following the launch. DaimlerChrysler may request a copy of FPSC data
at any time during this retention period.
22. Regarding FPSC, what if we take a truck frame with 400 dimensions, for example. How many
frames do we need to measure? All 2000?
The PSO Team, working with the Supplier, will determine what shall be an adequate plan to
satisfy the FPSC requirements.
23. It's critical to know where parts are going - if there are 3 truck plants, it could mean 6000 parts
for FPSC.
FPSC requires that the first 2000 parts shipped to each customer facility be certified. If there
are 3 truck plants, then 6000 parts will require FPSC.
24. Expand the FPSC explanation. Add examples for attendees to follow. Include a slide that
explains a statistical analysis of the first 2,000 pieces is required which is different than the
300 piece PSO capability study.
The 300 piece Production Demonstration Run that is part of the PSO, satisfies the component
requirements for PV testing, other testing, S1 vehicles, and S2 vehicles. These components are
not intended to satisfy the FPSC requirements. However, under certain circumstances, the PSO
Team may allow the remainder of these PSO parts, if any, to be included with production parts
shipped to the Assembly Plant. Refer to the DaimlerChrysler FPSC procedure PSSP0106.
25. If an offshore DaimlerChrysler employee performs a PSO in his/her local country, this manual
requires them to use English for the master documentation. This should be a team decision.
DaimlerChrysler is a global company. As stated, English is the official language of

DaimlerChrysler and therefore an English translation has to be available. It does not preclude
other language versions.
26. What is an acceptable FTC rate?
A Supplier shall demonstrate an FTC of 90% or greater. Deviation from this requirement
requires Commodity Management approval.

27. At what level must packaging be signed off?
Supplier designed packaging shall be signed off by DaimlerChrysler Corporate and the
receiving Assembly Plant Material Handling Engineering prior to “Z” approval of the PSO using
the Unit Load Data (ULD) sheet. Actual packaging shipping test shall be signed off by
DaimlerChrysler Assembly Plant Material Handling Engineering prior to PSO “A” approval.
Packaging shipping simulation testing shall be signed off by Corporate Material Handling
Engineering prior to PSO “A” approval.
28. Who pays for additional manpower needed to support FPSC?
FPSC is a PSO requirement and any additional manpower or tooling needed to fulfill this
requirement is the sole responsibility of the Supplier.

REFERENCE MANUALS
DaimlerChrysler Manuals:
• Process Sign-Off (PSO) 5th Edition
• Packaging and Shipping Instructions
• Product Assurance Testing
• Product Assurance Planning manual (4th Edition for CDS)
• Test Data Analysis manual
• Design Verification and Report (DVP&R) manual
• P&S 7-Step Corrective Action Process manual
• CEP-001 CAD/CAM Data Exchange Policy & Procedure Outline
• CEP-002 CATIA Standards Reference Manual
• CEP-006 Design Data Security Policy
• CEP-010 Supplier Product Design Information Security requirements
• AME Standards-Gage Standards
Available From: Ricoh Business Systems (Lanier Professional Services)

Detroit Production Center
2119 Austin Ave.
Rochester Hills, MI 48309
Phone: 248.564.4748
Fax: 248.564.4679
Other Manuals:
• Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)

• Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) Manual
• Statistical Process Control (SPC) Manual
• Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
• Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan (APQP) Manual
• Quality Systems Requirements for Automotive Suppliers (ISO/TS 16949)

• Quality Systems Requirements of VDA (VDA 6.3)
• Quality Systems Requirements (TS-16949)
• Shipping/Parts Identification Label Application Standards
Available From: Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG)

Phone No: (248) 358-3003
NOTE: DaimlerChrysler personnel can obtain copies of the manuals through DaimlerChrysler's on-line
Internal Registration Information System (IRIS).

INDEX
Page
Comments Sheet .......................................... 5, 12, 24, 38, 47, 50, 127-129, 135-142, 199-201
Control Plan ................................................................... 15, 17, 32-33, 48, 55, 59, 114, 125,
Corrective Action Required .......................................................................................... 136-137
Design FMEA & Process FMEA .............................. 13-14, 28-32, 43, 51, 53, 59, 114, 118, 125
DVP&R ............................................................................ 14, 21, 30, 33, 59-60, 115, 125, 128,
Element Description.......................................................................................................... 12-23
Error and Mistake Proofing ..................................... 18-19, 31, 39, 43-47, 78, 84, 115, 127, 169
First Time Capability ..................................... 2, 25, 57, 116, 131, 136, 139, 141-142, 175, 200
Forever Requirements ........................................................................2, 23, 33, 37, 44, 63, 128
FPSC ................................................................................................ 17, 41, 116, 126, 201-202
Glossary …….................................................................................................................... .. 113
IAA …………………………………………………… ............................................... 3, 20, 57, 116, 200
Initial Process Study …………………………………….....................20-21, 25, 56-58, 128, 136, 142
Instructions ………………………………………………… ............................................... …….129-143
Line Speed …………………… .. …15, 19, 24-25, 34, 49-50, 58, 117, 125, 127, 136, 141, 172-174
Lot Acceptance Sampling Table ………………………… ...................... ……… 37, 51, 120, 165, 198
Measurement System Verification Report ........................................ 12, 19, 24, 41, 49, 127, 139
Most Frequently Asked Questions …………………… ........................................................ ….. 197
Pp, Ppk ......................................... 21, 24, 48-50, 56-57, 76, 117-119, 131, 142, 166, 180-181
PPAP ……………....………………23, 28, 33-34, 58, 63, 79, 116, 119-120, 125, 135, 141, 198-199
Pre-PSO Documentation Review …………………………… 2-4, 12, 14-15, 17, 19, 48, 53, 118, 135
Process Sign-Off Element Requirements …………… ....................................... …. . 27-63, 73-111
Process Sign-Off Flowchart …………………………………… .................................................... 8, 10
Process Sign-Off Responsibilities …………………………….................................................. …9, 11
Process Sign-Off Strategy …………………………………… ............................................................ 7
Product Creation Process ………………………………………..............................................…………4
Production Demonstration Run 14, 21, 23-25, 49-50, 58, 117-119, 136, 141,175-176, 184, 200
PSO Extended Run................................................................................................... 4, 183-184
Production Validation Testing ….……………………… ................................... 21, 59-60, 119, 128,
Reference Manuals ………………………………… .......................................................…………. 203
Risk Drivers …………………………………………………………… .....................................………. 166
Scope ……………………………………………………………………............................................………1
Supplier Readiness Evaluation Run ……………………… 3-4, 12, 19, 23-24, 48, 53, 121, 127, 131
Z approval ……………………………………………….................................................................. …..5

Daimler Process Signoff Document

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daimler Process Signoff Document

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daimler Process Signoff Document

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of this manual?

What is the purpose of this manual?

What are some of the changes made in the 5th edition of this manual?

What are some of the changes made in the 5th edition of this manual?

Process Sign-Off

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

Foreword to the Fifth Edition

The names “Chrysler” and “DaimlerChrysler” as used in this manual refer to

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

PROCESS SIGN-OFF (PSO)

Process Sign-Off Team Members

Kimball Shellnut — Advanced Quality Planning

Requests for revisions or changes to the manual

PROCESS SIGN-OFF (PSO)

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

Process Sign-Off Strategy ........................................................................................... 7

Process Sign-Off Flow Chart & Responsibilities .......................................................... 8

PSO Element Description ................................................................................... …...12

Forever Requirements .............................................................................................. 23

Process Sign-off Element Requirements.................................................................... 27

Process Sign-Off Forms ............................................................................................ 63

Commodity Specifics ............................................................................................... 73

Glossary ................................................................................................................ 113

Appendix A Guidance for New Specialist /Suppliers ................................................. 123

Appendix B Tables and Examples ........................................................................... 163

Appendix C Formulas & Calculations....................................................................... 171

Appendix D PSO Extended Run............................................................................... 183

Appendix E Warranty ............................................................................................ 187

Appendix F Most Frequently Asked Questions.......................................................... 197

Reference Manuals ................................................................................................ 203

Index ..................................................................................................................... 203

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 1

1. Pre-PSO Documentation Review

2. PSO On-site Visit

2a. Performance Results

3. Post PSO Visit

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 2

WHY IS A PSO NECESSARY?

WHO CONDUCTS THE PSO?

WHEN IS THE PSO PERFORMED?

The purpose of PSO is to demonstrate Supplier process capability.

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 3

Program Preliminary Theme Final Product & S0 S0 S1 S1 S2 Post

All parts IAA Submission

HOW IS THE PSO PERFORMED?

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 4

• Process Sign-Off On-Site Visit:

Interim Approval Authorization

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 6

PSO TEAM CONDUCTS

SUPPLIER SUBMITS PPAP

SUPPLIER COMPLIES WITH

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 7

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 8

COPYRIGHT 2004 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 9