Plasticizer Formulation Selector Guide: Technical Tip
Plasticizer Formulation Selector Guide: Technical Tip
Plasticizer Formulation Selector Guide: Technical Tip
Plasticizer formulation
selector guide
Manufacturers of coatings, caulks, and sealants are often hardness was measured with a Pendulum Hardness tester
in search of alternative plasticizers for better performance (ASTM D4366). The efficiencies of the plasticizers in
and availability or to move towards non-phthalate architectural, industrial, and maintenance (AIM) water-
alternatives. This technical tip is a general guide to aid based systems were measured by determining the amount
formulators in selecting Eastman plasticizers or of plasticizer required to form a film of several latexes at
coalescents for their systems. In general, additives act certain temperatures using a Minimum Film Formation
differently depending on the formulation, so these ratings Temperature (MFFT) gradient bar.
and suggestions may not hold true for every application.
Based on internal evaluations of these materials, we have Three of the plasticizers in Table 1 were more efficient
found general trends with the products listed in the at softening lacquers than the others. Eastman DOA,
following tables. Eastman Triacetin, and Eastman Optifilm™ enhancer 400
are the most efficient in these systems. Eastman DOA
was the best overall in the wood lacquer tested since no
Efficiency haze formed after mechanical polishing. Addition level
Table 1 compares several plasticizers and coalescents and
also had no effect on haze formation, making Eastman
denotes their compatibility with solventborne and/or
DOA the most formulator friendly. Initially, the others
waterborne coatings. It indicates there is little difference
made clear films as well but mechanical polishing caused
in plasticizer efficiency in solvent-based coatings. The
haze in the films that had high addition levels. In a water-
efficiencies of these plasticizers were evaluated by adding
based system, both Optifilm 400 and Eastman Velate™
the plasticizer at five different levels, then measuring the
coalescent 368 were highly efficient, but Optifilm 400
glass transition of the material by Differential Scanning
has the lower VOC content of the two.
Calorimetry (DSC). The effect of each plasticizer on
Table 1
Benzoflex 50 C C 2 M
Benzoflex 9-88 C C 2 M
Benzoflex 9-88SG
C C 2 M
(lower –OH content)
Benzoflex 1046 C C 2 M
Eastman 168™
C I 2 L
non-phthalate plasticizer
Eastman Effusion™ plasticizer C C 2 M
Eastman DOA C I 3 L
Eastman DOM C C 2 M
Eastman Optifilm ™
C C 3 H
enhancer 400
Eastman SAIB C I 1 n/a
Eastman TOTM C I 2 L
Eastman Triacetin C C 3 M
Eastman TXIB ™
C C 2 M
formulation additive
Velate 262 C C 2 L
Velate 368 C C 2 H
Velate 375 C C 2 M
Key: Key:
C = Compatible 1 = Good 2 = Better 3 = Best
P = Partially compatible H = High M = Medium L = Low
I = Incompatible
Table 2 lists the recommendations for Eastman plasticizers
in various types of caulks and sealants. Some plasticizers are
the primary recommendation for specific systems. Others
are only effective in certain formulas, and some have more
than one plasticizer that is suitable for a certain application.
Table 2
Plasticizer recommendations for adhesives and sealants applications
Benzoflex 9-88SG
Eastman Triacetin
Benzoflex LA-705
Benzoflex LC-531
Benzoflex PS-507
Benzoflex 2088
Benzoflex 9-88
Benzoflex 352
Eastman TXIB
Eastman 168
Benzoflex 50
End use
Cyanoacrylate adhesives ●
Polyurethane adhesives ● ● ❍
Hot melt adhesives ●
Latex construction adhesives ● ❍ ❍
Adhesives
PVC plastisols ❍ ❍ ● ❍
Polysulfide sealants ● ●
Two-part polysulfide sealants (B-side) ❍
Key: ● = Primary recommendation ❍ = Suitable in some formulations
PZ-056 9/15