Certification Article 03 2002
Certification Article 03 2002
Certification Article 03 2002
Introduction
ln January 2002 we reviewed the current status of the NDT Certification Programme
documents; I am pleased to report that to date there have been no further changes. All
reference to documents in this Article relate to the January 2002 article.
ln February I made the case for every employer of NDT operators to hold a Written Practice,
which would be part of the Company Quality System describing exactly how the Company
authorises its operators to carry out NDT.
We now consider the responsibility of the major players in the implementation of the Written
Practice - the Employer and the Level 3.
Generally, the definition of the Employer is along the lines of (SNT-TC-1A): 'The corporate,
private or public entity, which employs personnel for wages, salary, fees or other
consideration'. Alternatively (PCN Gen 2000) states: 'Employer - The Organisation for which
a candidate or holder of certificate works on a regular basis; an employer may be a candidate
at the same time'.
SNT-TC-1A states 'The Employer shall establish a Written Practice for the control and
administration of NDT personnel training, examination and certification.'and that'Certification
of all levels of NDT personnel is the responsibility of the Employer.'
SNT-TC-1A states: 'An NDT Level lll individual should be capable of developing, qualifying,
and approving procedures, establishing and approving techniques, interpreting codes,
standards, specifications and procedures; and designating the particular NDT methods,
techniques and procedures to be used. The NDT Level lll should be responsible for the NDT
operations for which qualified and assigned and should be capable of interpreting and
evaluating results in terms of existing codes, standards and specifications. The NDT Level lll
should have sufficient practical background in applicable materials, fabrication and product
technology to establish techniques and to assist in establishing acceptance criteria when
none are otherwise available. The NDT Level lll should have general familiarity with other
appropriate NDT methods, as demonstrated by an ASNT Level lll Basic examination or other
means. The NDT Level lll, in the methods in which certified, should be capable of training
and examining NDT Level I and ll personnel for certification in those methods'.
a. Level 3 personnel are qualified to direct any NDT operation for which they are
certificated and:
ls there a clear link between the Employer and the Level 3? I believe this is clarified in SNT-
TC-14 as follows:
'At the option of the Employer, an outside agency may be engaged to provide NDT Level lll
services. ln such instances, the responsibility of certification of the employees shall be
retained by the employer.'
What does all this mean - well my interpretation is as follows: for PCN - the Employer need
not have a Written Practice (or an NDT Level 3) and is not allowed to be directly involved in
the qualification exam but must accept the responsibility for the issue of the operating
authorisation to the NDT Technician (including the Level 3).
For SNT-TC-1A - the Employer must have a Written Practice which will be approved by an
NDT Level 3 and through this document ensure that the qualification requirements are met
appropriately to allow the Employer to certiff the NDT operators.
This is covered in SNT-TC-1A under two definitions as follows:
So within the Written Practice we specify that the Personnel Certification records, to be
retained on file, shall be the signed by the Employer's designated person, and this person
(the certifying authority)shall be named in the Written Practice.
The Employer (Certifying Agency) must be able to draw on the experience of a properly
designated person who may be the Company Level 3, who has demonstrated knowledge of
that Company's requirements. lt must be based on appropriate demonstrated experience,
because the 'Employer'will be putting his trust in this person.
So there it is - surprisingly, both Employer based and Central Certification programmes come
very close on the issues discussed in Article 3.
Conclusions
1. Both systems require that the 'Employe/ takes responsibility for the authority to
operate.
3. The SNT system requires that this person is properly designated within a Company
Written Practice - the PCN system does not cover this.
4. Neither system makes any demands on the eligibility requirement for a 'properly
designated person'.
5. All these points constitute further reasons why an employer of NDT personnel must
have a Written Practice which clearly defines the Company's position with respect to
Training, Work Experience, Exams and certificate to operate signed by an appropriately
designated person.