4x6x2.50 - 4.00m Wide - 0.0mfill - MNB - BOX
4x6x2.50 - 4.00m Wide - 0.0mfill - MNB - BOX
4x6x2.50 - 4.00m Wide - 0.0mfill - MNB - BOX
1) Structure Details
b) Design Chainage :-
2) Materials Used
3) Codes Used :
a) IRC 6 : 2014 Code for Practice for Road bridges, Sec-II, Loads & Stresses
b) IRC 112 : 2011 Code for Practice for Concrete Road bridges
c) IRC 78 : 2014 Code for Practice for Road bridges, Sec-VII, Foundations
For analysis, the box model is subjected to Dead loads, SIDL ,Earth pressures,Surcharge loads on
d) the side walls, and Live Loads.
5) Design philosophy :
Various combination of loads are adopted for checking structural strength & Serviceability Limit
State
Lay the bottom slab- then side wall- then cast the Top slab.
Filling shall be done behind both end wall or abutment walls simultaneously.
2. Design Constants :
The basic stress value is as per Table 6.5 of IRC: 112 -2011
Factor (η) η = 1
2
α*fck = 0.447fck = 13.400 N/mm
Design Compressive strength fcd =
γm
Limiting Neutral Axis Depth (for Balanced section )
εcus3 * d Xulim = 0.456 d
Xulim =
(εcus3+ εs)
Structure Dimensions
Vent Width = 6m
0.15
0.15 (TYP)
Inner Wall
2.50 3.60
0.4 6.00 0.3 0.4
Outer Wall
0 0
25.7
Staad Modelling
1 7 25
67 72
Top Slab
77
Inner Wall
Outer Wall
Bottom slab 79
71 76
26 36 66
1 6 24
67 7 72
Top Slab
77
Inner Wall
Outer Wall
Bottom slab 79
71 76
35 26 36 66
Material Properties
Grade of Concrete = M 30
Top Slab
Total UDL due to SIDL & Soil Fill on Top Slab (except self weight) = 1.125 t/m
Bottom Slab
Walls
Haunch
2) Earth Pressure
3
Saturated Density of Soil = 2.2 t/m
Surcharge Angle β = 0º
Wall Angle, α = 90 º
2
SBC = 25 t/m
0.550t/m
0.715t/m
1.925t/m
3.135t/m 0.00t/m
3.300t/m
3.630t/m 1.32t/m Loading Diagram Due to SIDL & Earth Pressure 1.320t/m 3.6t/m
2
Maximum Base Pressure = 14.910 < 25 t/m <SBC, Hence OK
4. Design of Box as per IRC 112 -2019
Unfactored Moments
Sagging Moment
2 Wearing Coat 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 Earth Pressure 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.1 3.0 0.2 0.0
6 Class 70R Wheel 8.3 9.0 7.3 5.0 4.8 2.0 3.9 3.0
7 Class 70R Track 5.7 9.0 5.1 7.0 3.4 2.0 3.1 2.0
8 Class 40T Boggie 8.9 8.0 5.7 6.0 3.6 2.0 2.6 2.0
Max sagging 16.4 17.0 19.4 17.0 7.4 7.0 5.5 3.0
2 Wearing Coat 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 Earth Pressure 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.0
6 Class 70R Wheel 7.5 9.0 5.5 5.0 5.6 2.0 4.1 3.0
7 Class 70R Track 6.0 9.0 5.9 7.0 3.9 2.0 3.7 2.0
8 Class 40T Boggie 6.6 8.0 4.5 6.0 4.8 2.0 3.3 2.0
Max Hogging 19.3 17.0 13.7 17.0 10.3 7.0 6.4 3.0
LL Surcharge = 1.2
LL = 1.5
Impact Factors (100%, as fill<600mm) (Ref: Pg no. 24, Cl.208 of IRC 6-2014)
Factored Moments
Sagging Moment
2 Wearing Coat 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 Earth Pressure 0.5 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.7 4.5 0.2 0.0
6 Class 70R Wheel 15.1 16.4 13.2 9.1 8.6 3.6 7.0 5.5
7 Class 70R Track 10.4 16.4 9.2 12.7 6.2 3.6 5.7 3.6
8 Class 40T Boggie 16.2 14.6 10.4 10.9 6.5 3.6 4.8 3.6
Max sagging 29.3 29.4 31.0 26.2 14.0 11.0 9.1 6.2
2 Wearing Coat 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 Earth Pressure 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.7 4.5 0.2 0.0
6 Class 70R Wheel 13.6 16.4 10.0 9.1 10.2 3.6 7.4 5.5
7 Class 70R Track 10.9 16.4 10.7 12.7 7.1 3.6 6.8 3.6
8 Class 40T Boggie 12.0 14.6 8.2 10.9 8.7 3.6 6.0 3.6
Max Hogging 32.1 29.4 21.2 26.2 16.5 11.0 12.0 6.2
As per IRC:112-2011, Annexure B-3, Slabs designed on effective width basis need
not be checked for shear. Hence the same will be checked only for Shear due to Dead
Data
xu,max 0.0035
=
0.87 . fy = 0.456
d 0.0055 +
ES
Accidental Condition,
xu,max 0.0035
=
1.0 . fy = 0.438
d 0.0055 +
ES
Therefore,
Mu,lim
dreqd. =
Qlim x b
fck b d 4.6 Mu
Ast,reqd. = 1- 1-
2 fy fck b d2
Hence OK
0.0035 d
xu,max=
0.87 . fy = 212.96 mm
0.0055 +
ES
fck b d 4.6 Mu
Ast,reqd. = 1- 1- = 1680.53 mm2/m
2
2 fy fck b d
Ast,min. Max { 0.26.fctm / fyk * (btd ) (or) 0.0013 btd } = 607.10 mm2/m
Reinf. OK
0.87 . fy . Ast
xu = = 80.98 mm
0.36 fck. b
Hence, SAFE
Hence, SAFE
Hence OK
0.0035 d
xu,max=
0.87 . fy = 201.56 mm
0.0055 +
ES
Ast,min. = Max { 0.26.fctm / fyk * (btd ) (or) 0.0013 btd } = 574.60 mm2/m
Reinf. OK
0.87 . fy . Ast
xu = = 80.98 mm
0.36 fck. b
Hence, SAFE
Hence, SAFE
The shear force has been computed at distance deff from face of support
Subject to a minimum of
VRd.c = ( Vmin + 0.15σcp ).bwd
200
K = 1 + < = 2.0
d
NEd
σcp = < = 0.2fcd
Ac
Asl
ρ1 = < = 0.02
bwd
Ac = 500*1000/1000000 = 0.5 m2
Design shear force VED = 14.68 < 19.93 T/m Safe in Shear
The shear resistance with vertical shear reinforcement is given by as per CL. 10.3.3.2
Asw
1 ) VRd.s = z . fywd .cotθ
Min of s
fcd
2 ) VRd.max = αcw bw z v1
cotθ + tanθ
cot θ = 1
fywd = fyk/ γm (As per amendment of CL.10.3.3.2 IRC:112-2011) = 434.8 Mpa
v1 = 0.6*(1-30/310) = 0.542
VRd.s = 36.94 T
Design Shear Resistance = Min
VRd.max = 147.11 T
0.0035
Frequent / Quasi- xu,max=
0.87 . fy = 0.456
Permanent combination 0.0055+
d ES
0.0035
xu,max=
Rare combination 0.8 x fy = 0.467
0.0055 +
d ES
Therefore, Mu,lim
dreqd. =
Qlim x b
Frequent/Quasi-Permanent
Rare combination
M xY = M x (D/2) = (((6.12+10.13)*10000000)*500*0.5)/(1000*500^3/12)
Cracked
=((-2010.62*200000)+SQRT((-2010.62*200000)^2+ = 94.64 mm
(2*1000*2010.62*200000*31,187*442)))/(1000*31,187)
=((-2010.62*200000)+SQRT((-2010.62*200000)^2+
(2*1000*2010.62*200000*31,187*442)))/(1000*31,187)
1 Eceff
Moment of inertia for cracked section Icr = As(d- dc)2+ b dc3
3 Es
OK
OK
(1+f)
OK
OK
Combined Tensile Stress at level of Steel = 198.94 MPa < 300 MPa
OK
OK
Combined Tensile Stress at level of Steel = 70.83 MPa < 300.0 MPa
OK
1) Top slab
σs
σs = 240 N/mm2
Kc = 0.4
OK
2) Side Wall
σs
σs = 240 N/mm2
Kc = 0.4
K = 0.79
OK
3) Bottom slab
σs
σs = 240 N/mm2
Kc = 0.4
K = 0.93
1) Top slab
Es Es
αe = Es/Eceff = 6.413
For the case of deformed bars associated with pure bending, as per Eq. 12.11 of IRC:112-2011
3.4 c + 0.17 φ
Sr.max =
ρp,eff
Φ eq = n1Φ12 + n2Φ22 = 16 mm
n1Φ1 + n2Φ2
Sr.max = 281.61 mm
Hence OK
Ultimate Limit State of Strength : Component Design
Effective Depth xu= Transverse Reinforcement (As per Cl. 16.6.1.1 of IRC 112-2011) :
Moment
Moment Overall of Moment
Clear Xumax= Ast min (0.87fy*Ast of Moment of
(with Partial Safety Depth Depth Mulim Ast Req Bar dia spacing Ast prov resistance
Section Cover 0.456d mm2 Ast Check pt % prov ) Section resistance resistance (i) 20% of main Reinf. Required Steel Provided Steel
factor) Provided Check offered by
/ offered by Diff.
steel
Required Provided (0.36*fck*b steel check
)
(t-m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (t-m) (mm2) (mm2) (mm) (mm) (mm2) (t-m) (mm2) Bar dia Spacing Ast Bar dia Spacing Ast (mm2)
(mm) (mm) 2
(mm ) (mm) (mm)
Sagging 16 200 Under
29.28 50 500 271 442 OK 201.6 79.32 1622.7 574.6 2010.6 OK 0.45 80.98 35.68 OK 6.41 402 10 195 402 10 150 524
(Bot reinf.) 16 200 Reinforced
Top Slab
Hogging 16 200 Under
32.08 75 500 284 467 OK 213.0 88.55 1680.5 607.1 2010.6 OK 0.43 80.98 37.87 OK 5.79 402 10 195 402 10 150 524
(Top reinf) 16 200 Reinforced
Shear Check (shear force has been considered for a combination of DL and LL) fck = 30 Fe = 500
Shear
Design Shear Reinforcement Provided Design
NED (axial Design Shear fywd = fyk/ Resis.
Shear Shear , Ast prov dprovided deff K Vmin = σcp ρ1 VRd.c Min. VRdc Shear Asw prov z = 0.9d VRd.s VRd.max Shear
force) Resist. γm Check
Section βVED Resistanc Bar dia spacing Legged cot θ v1 fcd αcw Resist.
with
e Check
Shear
(t/m) (t/m) (mm2) (mm) (mm) (mm) Mpa (t) Mpa (t) (t) (t/m) (mm) (mm) (No.) (mm2) (mm) (Mpa) (t/m) (t/m) (t/m) Reinf.
Sagging 10.80 10.80 2011 500 442 1.673 0.367 0.00 0.00 0.0040 19.11 16.55 19.11 OK - - - 0 397.8 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 147.02 0.00 OK
Top Slab
Hogging 10.80 10.80 2011 500 467 1.654 0.361 0.00 0.00 0.0040 19.97 17.20 19.97 OK - - - 0 420.3 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 155.33 0.00 OK
Sagging 13.50 13.50 2011 600 567 1.594 0.342 0.00 0.00 0.0034 22.00 19.75 22.00 OK - - - 0 510.3 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 188.60 0.00 OK
Bottom
Slab
Hogging 13.50 13.50 1571 600 542 1.607 0.346 0.00 0.00 0.0026 19.55 19.12 19.55 OK - - - 0 487.8 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.0 180.28 0.00 OK
Sagging 4.50 4.50 1131 400 344 1.762 0.397 0.00 0.00 0.0028 13.95 13.93 13.95 OK - - - 0 309.6 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 114.42 0.00 OK
Outer
Wall
Hogging 4.50 4.50 2011 400 367 1.738 0.389 0.00 0.00 0.0050 17.75 14.56 17.75 OK - - - 0 330.3 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 122.07 0.00 OK
Sagging 0.00 0.00 1131 300 244 1.905 0.447 0.00 0.00 0.0038 11.76 11.11 11.76 OK - - - 0 219.6 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 81.16 0.00 OK
Inner
Wall
Hogging 0.00 0.00 1131 300 294 1.825 0.419 0.00 0.00 0.0038 13.57 12.54 13.57 OK - - - 0 264.6 1 0.542 13.4 1 434.8 0.00 97.79 0.00 OK
Limit State of Serviceability : As per cl. 12.2.1 IRC 112-2011.
Tensile
Earth Effec. Depth Assumming uncracked Compr
Wearing Moment Depth of Moment Stress at
DL Pressure DL+WC+E Live load Bar dia spacing section top & bottom Stresses at
Clear Coat due to Overall concrete of inertia level of
Section Moment due to P+SUR Moment stress Section check top in Mpa Eceff
Cover Moments Surcharge Required Provided depth Ast compressi for cracked Steel in
(t.m) Back Fill Moment (t.m) M*Y/I={M*(D/2)}/{(b* (Live load
(t.m) (t.m) provided Ast req provided on dc section, Icr Mpa (Live
(t.m) 2
D^3)/12} only)
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm2) (mm) (mm) (mm ) load only)
16 200
Sagging 50 5.33 0.00 0.36 0.54 6.12 10.13 193 442 500 953.7 2010.6 3.900 Cracked 94.64 286659461 5.22 122.75 15594
16 200
Top Slab
16 200
Hogging 75 9.28 0.00 0.94 0.66 10.75 8.41 209 467 500 1066.4 2010.6 4.598 Cracked 97.60 322681911 3.97 96.28 15594
16 200
16 200
Sagging 75 9.49 0.00 1.22 1.41 11.84 7.27 209 567 600 864.6 2010.6 3.185 Cracked 108.71 489060680 2.52 68.13 15594
Bottom 16 200
Slab 12 200
Hogging 50 7.06 0.00 0.27 0.50 7.73 5.89 176 542 600 640.9 1570.8 2.270 Uncracked 58.00 1.327E+10 0.04 2.15 15594
16 200
12 200
Sagging 50 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.76 1.73 5.53 129 344 400 541.8 1131.0 2.722 Cracked 63.76 102292096 5.37 151.50 15594
Outer 12 200
Wall 16 200
Hogging 75 3.44 0.00 0.49 0.76 4.54 5.63 152 367 400 716.0 2010.6 3.813 Cracked 85.24 191809554 3.90 82.70 15594
16 200
Moment Tensile
Effec. Depth Depth of Compr QUASI PERMANENT
of inertia Stress at RARE COMBINATION : RARE COMBINATION : Combined QUASI PERMANENT COMBINATION :
concrete Stresses COMBINATION : Crack width
Section Ast for level of Combined Compression Tensile Stress at level of Steel in Combined Tensile Stress at level of
Required Provided compressi at top in Combined Compression Stresses (mm)
provided cracked Steel in Stresses at top in Mpa Mpa Steel in Mpa
on dc Mpa at top in Mpa
(mm) (mm) (mm2) section Icr Mpa
Sagging 193 442 2010.6 127.38 2.53E+08 2.41 76.2 7.62 <14.4 OK 199.0 <300 OK 2.24 <10.8 OK 70.83 <300 OK 0.072 OK
Top Slab
Hogging 209 467 2010.6 131.54 2.85E+08 3.86 126.3 7.83 <14.4 OK 222.6 <300 OK 3.67 <10.8 OK 120.12 <300 OK 0.132 OK
Sagging 209 567 2010.6 147.15 4.37E+08 3.11 113.7 5.63 <14.4 OK 181.8 <300 OK 2.81 <10.8 OK 102.84 <300 OK 0.113 OK
Bottom
Slab
Hogging 176 542 1570.8 58.00 1.33E+10 0.03 2.8 0.07 <14.4 OK 5.0 <300 OK 0.02 <10.8 OK 2.67 <300 OK 0.003 OK
Sagging 129 344 1131.0 86.44 91809442 1.27 48.5 6.64 <14.4 OK 200.0 <300 OK 0.82 <10.8 OK 31.42 <300 OK 0.034 OK
Outer
Wall
Hogging 152 367 2010.6 114.19 1.67E+08 2.42 68.6 6.32 <14.4 OK 151.3 <300 OK 2.09 <10.8 OK 59.42 <300 OK 0.065 OK
5. Calculation of Maximum Base Pressure
MAX BASE
REAC REACT REACT REACTI REACTI BASE
NODE NODE NODE NODE NODE REACTI WIDTH/
TION ION ION ON ON PRESS.
ON m
DL+EP Class A 70R Track 70R Wheeled 40T Bogie (T) (m2) (T/m2)