Titanium Dioxide Mediated Photocatalysed Degradation of Phenoxyacetic Acid and 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, in Aqueous Suspensions
Titanium Dioxide Mediated Photocatalysed Degradation of Phenoxyacetic Acid and 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, in Aqueous Suspensions
Titanium Dioxide Mediated Photocatalysed Degradation of Phenoxyacetic Acid and 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, in Aqueous Suspensions
Abstract
The photocatalysed degradation of phenoxyacetic acid (PAA, 1) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T, 2), has been investigated in
aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide under a variety of conditions. The degradation was studied by depletion in total organic carbon (TOC)
content as a function of irradiation time. The influence of various parameters such as, different types of TiO2 powders, pH, catalyst and substrate
concentrations, and in the presence of electron acceptors such as hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) and potassium bromate (KBrO3 ) besides molecular
oxygen have been investigated. The effects of these parameters on the degradation rates were found to be significant. TiO2 , Degussa P25 was
found to be more efficient for the degradation of both the compounds under investigation as compared with other TiO2 powders. The degradation
products were analyzed by GC–MS analysis technique and probable pathways for the formation of different products have been proposed.
© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1381-1169/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.08.088
H.K. Singh et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 264 (2007) 66–72 67
2.2. Procedure
Table 1
Degradation rate for the mineralization of PAA (1) and 2,4,5-T (3) in the presence
of different photocatalysts
Type of photocatalyst (1 g L−1 ) Degradation rate for the mineralization
(10−3 ×M min−1 )
PAA 2,4,5-T
Experimental conditions: PAA (1.0 mM), 2,4,5-T (0.5 mM) photocatalysts: TiO2
Degussa P25 (1 g L−1 ), Hombikat UV100 (1 g L−1 ), PC500 (1 g L−1 ), irradia-
tion time = 120 min.
Table 2 Table 4
Degradation rate for the mineralization of PAA (1) and 2,4,5-T (3) at different Degradation rate for the mineralization of PAA (1) and 2,4,5-T (3) at different
pH catalyst concentrations of three different TiO2 powders
pH Degradation rate for the mineralization (10−3 ×M min−1 ) Photocatalyst concentration Degradation rate for the
(g L−1 ) mineralization (10−3 ×M min−1 )
PAA 2,4,5-T
PAA 2,4,5-T
3 0.0152 0.0255
5 0.0136 0.0182 P25
7 0.0079 0.0145 0.25 0.0114
9 0.0047 0.0126 0.5 0.0120 0.0134
1.0 0.0152 0.0255
Experimental conditions: phenoxyacetic acid (1.0 mM), 2,4,5-T (0.5 mM) pho- 2.0 0.0140
tocatalysts: TiO2 Degussa P25 (1 g L−1 ), reaction pH (3, 5, 7 and 9), irradiation 3.0 0.0291
time = 120 min. 5.0 0.024
UV100
3.4. Effect of substrate concentration 0.25 0.0045
0.5 0.005 0.0052
1.0 0.0136 0.0057
It is important both from mechanistic and application point
2.0 0.0064
of view to study the dependence of substrate concentration on 3.0 0.0071
the photocatalytic reaction rate. As oxidation proceeds, less and 5.0 0.0063
less of the surface of the TiO2 particle is covered as the pol- PC500
lutant is decomposed. Effect of substrate concentrations on the 0.25 0.0032
degradation of compounds 1 and 2 was studied at different con- 0.5 0.0038 0.004
centrations. 1.0 0.0088 0.008
TOC depletion rate is shown in Table 3 as a function of 2.0 0.0036
3.0 0.011
substrate concentration employing TiO2 Degussa P25 (1 g L−1 ) 5.0 0.010
as a photocatalyst. As expected, the degradation rate for the
mineralization increases with the increase in substrate concen- Experimental conditions: PAA (1.0 mM), 2,4,5-T (0.5 mM), photocata-
lysts: TiO2 (Degussa P25, UV100 and PC500), catalyst concentrations
trations and the results are in agreement with a number of studies (0.25–5.0 g L−1 ), irradiation time = 120 min.
reported earlier.
Table 5 evident from the Table. However the addition of bromate ions
Degradation rate for the mineralization of PAA (1) and 2,4,5-T (3) at different markedly enhanced the degradation, indicating that this com-
electron acceptor concentrations
pound is more effective electron acceptor as compared with other
Additives Degradation rate for the oxidants employed in this study. The respective one electron
mineralization (10−3 ×M min−1 ) reduction potentials (measured against NHE) of different species
PAA 2,4,5-T are E (O2 /O2 •− ) = −155 mV, E (H2 O2 /• OH) = 800 mV and E
P25 0.0152 0.0255 (BrO3 − /BrO2 • ) = 1150 mV [23]. From thermodynamic point of
P25/KBrO3 (mM)
view both the additives should therefore be more efficient elec-
1.0 0.0242 0.0342 tron acceptors than molecular oxygen. Since the addition of
3.0 0.0260 0.0424 bromate ions markedly enhanced the degradation, which can be
5.0 0.0380 0.0490 attributed to the large number of electron involvement as shown
P25/H2 O2 (mM) in Eq. (10). Another possible explanation might be a change
1.0 0.0163 0.0417 in the reaction mechanism of the photocatalytic degradation,
3.0 0.0200 0.0432 since the reduction of bromate ions by electrons does not lead
5.0 0.0220 0.0437
directly to the formation of hydroxyl radicals, but rather to the
Experimental conditions: PAA (1.0 mM), 2,4,5-T (0.5 mM), photocatalysts: formation of other reactive radicals or oxidizing reagents eq.
TiO2 (Degussa P25, 1 g L−1 ), KBrO3 H2 O2 , concentrations (1,3,5 mM), irra- BrO2 − and HOBr. Furthermore, bromate ions by themselves
diation time = 120 min.
can act as oxidizing agents. Lindner has also proposed a mech-
anism for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol in
the presence of bromate ions considering direct oxidation of the
also shown that 1 g L−1 catalyst concentration was better as com- substrate by bromate ions [24]. A similar mechanism might also
pared to very high catalyst concentrations. be operative in the cases of the model compounds studied in
this work.
3.6. Effect of electron acceptors
3.7. Intermediate products
One practical problem in using TiO2 as a photocatalyst is the
undesired electron/hole recombination, which, in the absence An attempt was made to identify the intermediate products
of proper electron acceptor or donor, is extremely efficient and formed in the photocatalytic degradation of the compounds 1 and
thus represent the major energy—wasting step thus limiting the 2 in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide through GC/MS
achievable quantum yield. One strategy to inhibit electron–hole analysis.
pair recombination is to add other (irreversible) electron accep- An aqueous suspension of phenoxyacetic acid (1 mM,
tors to the reaction. They could have several different effects 250 mL) in the presence of Degussa P25 (1 g L−1 ) was irra-
such as, i.e., (1) to increase the number of trapped electrons and, diated for 15, 30 and 60 min in separate runs. The catalyst was
consequently, avoid recombination, (2) to generate more radicals removed by filtration and the solution was extracted with chlo-
and other oxidizing species, (3) to increase the oxidation rate of roform, which was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The
intermediate compounds and (4) to avoid problems caused by removal of the solvent under reduced pressure gave a residual
low oxygen concentration. In highly toxic waste water where mass, which was analyzed by GC–MS analysis. The GC/MS
the degradation of organic pollutants is the major concern, the analysis of the irradiated samples of phenoxyacetic acid (1)
addition of electron acceptors to enhance the degradation rate showed the formation of two intermediate product phenol and
may often be justified. The effect of electron acceptors such as 1,2-diphenoxyethane appearing at retention time (tR ) 2.92 and
potassium bromate and hydrogen peroxide on the photcatalytic 9.84 min, respectively. These two products were identified by
degradation of 1 and 2 in addition to the molecular oxygen was comparing their molecular ion and mass fragmentation peaks
investigated at varying concentrations. The degradation rate for with those reported in the library. A plausible mechanism for
the mineralization (TOC depletion) of the compounds 1–2 in the the formation of these two products, involving reactions with
presence of different electron acceptors is shown in Table 5. hydroxyl radicals formed in the photocatalytic process could
Hydrogen peroxide, bromate ions are known to generate be understood in terms of the pathways shown in Scheme 1.
hydroxyl radicals by the mechanisms shown in Eqs. (8)–(10); The model compound undergoes addition of a hydroxyl rad-
H2 O2 + eCB − → • OH + OH− (5) ical formed in the photocatalytic process leading to the for-
mation of a radical species 3, which may undergo loss of
BrO3 − + 2H+ + eCB − → BrO2 • + H2 O (6) (• OCH2 COOH) group to give the observed product phenol (4).
Alternatively, the model compound 1 on addition of hydroxyl
radical followed by loss of CO2 may lead to the formation of
BrO3 − + 6H+ + 6eCB − → [BrO2 , HOBr] → Br + 3H2 O the radical species 5. This species can either lose formalde-
hyde molecule followed by addition of hydroxyl radical led
(7)
to the formation of phenol or can combine with another radi-
As expected, both the additives showed beneficial effect on the cal species leading to the formation of the 1,2-diphenoxyethane
photocatalytic degradation of compounds under investigation as (6).
H.K. Singh et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 264 (2007) 66–72 71
Scheme 1.
An aqueous suspension of 2,4,5-T (0.5 mM, 250 mL) in three intermediate products namely, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (8),
the presence of Degussa P25 (1 g L−1 ) was irradiated for 15, 2,4-dichlorophenol (12) and 1,2,4-trichloro-5-methoxy benzene
30 and 60 min in separate runs. The GC/MS analysis of the (10) appearing at retention times 4.11, 6.30 and 12.86 min,
irradiated samples of 2,4,5-T (2) showed the formation of respectively, and were identified by comparing their molecu-
Scheme 2.
72 H.K. Singh et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 264 (2007) 66–72
lar ion and mass fragmentation peaks with those reported in the References
library.
A plausible mechanism for the formation of products 8, 10 [1] Z.Z. Cohen, C. Eiden, M.N. Lober, in: W.Y. Gerner (Ed.), Evalution of pes-
and 12, involving electron transfer reaction and reaction with ticide in Ground Water, ACS Symp. Ser. 315, American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, 1986, p. 170.
hydroxyl radicals formed in the photocatalytic process could be [2] L. Muszkat, D. Raucher, M. Mogaritz, D. Ronen, in: U. Zoller (Ed.),
understood in terms of the pathways shown in Scheme 2. The Groundwater Contamination and Control, Marcel Dekker, 1994, p. 257.
model compound 2 on addition of a hydroxyl radical can lead [3] M. Rosner, I.T. Yasur, A. Hadas, D. Russo, B. Yaron, Water Air Soil Pollut.
to the formation of a radical species 7, which may undergo loss 113 (1999) 319.
of (• OCH2 COOH) group to give the observed product 2,4,5- [4] R.M. Dowd, M.P. Anderson, M.L. S Johnson, Proceedings of the Second
National Outdoor Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration Groundwa-
trichlorophenol (8). Alternatively, the model compound 2 upon ter Monitoring Geophysical Methods, National Water Well Association,
the transfer of an electron followed by loss of CO2 may lead to Dublin, OH, 1998, p. 365.
the formation of the radical species 9. This species abstracts a [5] D.M. Blake, In Bibliography of work on the photocatalytic Removal of
hydrogen atom to form the observed product 1,2,4-trichloro-5- Hazardous Compounds from Water and Air, National Renewal Energy Lab-
methoxy benzene (10). The product, 8 on further transfer of an oratory, Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado, 1999.
[6] C.T. Chiou, P.J. Reucroft, Carbon 15 (1977) 49.
electron may undergo loss of chlorine atom followed hydrogen [7] STORET, Water Quality File, Office of water, U. S. Environmental Protec-
atom abstraction giving 2,4-dichlorophenol (12) as shown in tion Agency (data file search conducted in May 1988).
Scheme 2. [8] F. Schweinsberg, W. Abke, K. Reith, U. Rohmann, N.Z. Seibert, Toxicol.
Lett. 107 (1999) 201.
4. Conclusion [9] N. Somasundaram, C. Srinivasan, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. Chem. 99
(1996) 67.
[10] M. Trillas, J. Peral, X. Domenech, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 67 (1996)
The results of this study clearly indicate that TiO2 can effi- 237.
ciently catalyse the photomineralisation of the phenoxyacetic [11] R. Meister, Farm Chemical Handbook, Meister Publishing Company,
acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the presence of Willoughby, OH, 1988.
light and oxygen. The results also indicate that degradation rates [12] N. Serpone, E. Plizzetti, Chemosphere 16 (1987) 1165.
[13] R.I. Bickley, T.G. Carreno, J.S. Lees, L. Palmisano, R.J.D. Tilley, J. Solid
could be influenced not only by the different parameters such as State Chem. 92 (1991) 178.
type of photocatalyst, catalyst concentration, substrate concen- [14] M. Lindner, D.W. Bahnemann, B. Hirthe, W.D. Griebler, J. Solar Energy
tration, pH and additives and their concentration but also by the Eng. 119 (1997) 120.
model pollutants. The intermediate products formed during the [15] S. Rauer, Untersunchung von kommerziell erhaltlichen Titandioxiden hin-
process are also a useful source of information for the degrada- sichtlich ihrer photokatalytischen Aktivtat, Diplomarbeit, fachhochschule
Hannover, Fachbereich Maschinenbau Vertiefung Umwelt-und Verfahren-
tion pathways. stechnil, Hannover, Germany, 1998.
[16] M. Muneer, J. Theurich, D. Bahnemann, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:
Acknowledgements Chem. 143 (2001) 213.
[17] M. Muneer, D. Bahnemann, Water Sci. Technol. 144 (2001) 331.
Financial support by the Department of Science and Tech- [18] M. Muneer, J. Theurich, D. Bahnemann, Res. Chem. Intermed. 25 (1999)
667.
nology (DST), Govt. Of India, New Delhi, for the award [19] M. Lindner, D. Bahnemann, B. Hirthe, W.D. Griebler, in: W.B. Stine, T.
of Young Scientist to Dr. M. Saquib (Project No. SR/FTP/ Tanaka, D.E. Claridge (Eds.), Solar Water Detoxification; Solar Engineer-
CS-25/2005), Senior Research Fellowship to Hemant Kumar ing, ASME, New York, 1995, p. 339.
Singh from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research [20] M. Muneer, H.K. Singh, D. Bahnemann, Chemosphere 49 (2002) 193.
(CSIR) and Post Doctoral Fellowship to Dr. Malik M. [21] D.C. Hurum, A.G. Agrios, K.A. Gray, T. Rajh, M.C. Thurnauer, J. Phys.
Chem. B 107 (2003) 4545.
Haque from The Muslim Association for the Advancement [22] M.C. Lu, G.D. Roam, J.N. Chen, C.P. Huang, Chem. Eng. Commun. 139
of Science (MAAS), India is gratefully acknowledged. Total (1995) 1.
Organic Carbon (TOC) Analyzer used in this study was gift [23] P. Wardman, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 18 (1989) 1637.
equipment from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, [24] M. Lindner, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Han-
Bonn, Germany. nover, Hannover, Germany, 1997.