Rashid 2019 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 385 012022
Rashid 2019 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 385 012022
Rashid 2019 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 385 012022
mohds637@uitm.edu.my
1. Introduction
Decorative elements in Malay traditional architecture are a manifestation of the understanding of
integration between functionalism and aesthetics. It represents the uniqueness and beauty of Malay
symbols, arts, philosophy as well as great design work by local craftsmanship or carpenter. In fact,
according to Ezrin [1], despite of traditional architecture being treated as primitive or outdated, it has
always been the main source of references in the social and cultural studies by architects, historian and
anthropologists. Thus, the term of ‘architecture is the manifestations of the society and their cultural
practise’ will reflects the society’s way of life, their belief and philosophy; ‘all encompassing; forms
important components in the uniqueness of a culture’. The existence of decorative elements in
traditional Malay houses represents the integration between functionalism and aesthetics of
architecture. Its ornamentation, form and pattern particularly in woodcarving and bamboo weaving
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
reflect the uniqueness of local craftsmanship and the master carvers. According to Nursuriani and
Ismail [2], a decorative elements or architectural elements in Malay Traditional House were designed
intentionally to facilitate and express the respect for Malay culture through the design structure of
ornamentation.
The development and expansion of the traditional Malay villages and towns at Perak during the
colonial era outlined an interesting collection of architectural study. Architectural study along Sungai
Perak established two types of architecture which are:
b) Colonial architecture
Colonial architecture are mostly located in several towns along the river such as Kuala
Kangsar, Parit, Bota, Pasir Salak, Kampung Gajah and Teluk Intan where many houses,
schools, offices, rest houses, mosques and hospital still stands and in use to this day.
Majority of ‘Rumah Limas Johor’ were architecturally influence from the Riau-Lingga in Indonesia,
Dutch and English style Mastor Surat et-al [6]. The people of Bugis were migrated after the arrival of
the Dutch East India Company in 1669 with the goal of monopolising the spice trade. Apart from that,
more Bugis migrated to the other parts of Indonesia and other countries including Malaysia. Hence,
most of the architectural styles in Johor were affected based on their history.
Several of traditional and hybrid Malays house can be classified mainly by their basic roof shapes
Mastor Surat et-al [6]. They further explain that there are two (2) categories of Malays Traditional
House which are:
2
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
2. Literature Review
A few studies have been done on decorative elements of traditional Malay houses. With reference to
Diagram 1, they were listed sixteen (16) decorative elements and further explain in detail in Diagram 2
within a particular traditional Malay house which is:
Figure 1. Decorative
Elements of Traditional Malay House
Source: Mohd Sabrizaa and Sufian [7]
3
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
c) Sulur Bayung
Sulur bayung refer to a decoration on the corner of a roof edge. Other names are sulo bayung, sayap
layang-layang, sayap layangan, ekor Itik, anjong balla’, som. In the traditional architecture of Bugis
Makasar it is also called anjung balla, representing the creeping plants, Mohd Sabrizaa and Sufian [7].
1 2 3 4 5 Diagram2.
Decorative Elements
in Traditional Malay
Architecture
1. Pemeleh
2. Sisik Naga
3.Tunjuk Langit
13 4.Tunjuk Bumi
5. Lebah Bergantung
1 6. Gerbang Pintu
7. Kekisi
8. Ande-ande
9. Kepala Cicak
10 Kepala Pintu
11. Pagar Musang
12 12. Kepala Tingkap
13. Ekor Itik
11
1
10 9 8 7 6
1
d) Ande-Ande
Ande-ande is the term used in Kelantan and Terengganu for fascia board also known as papan
manis is the horizontal decorative timber roof eaves covering the timber rafters (kayu kasau).
Other names ande-ande are papan meleh, papan pator, papan cucuran atap, papan kaki atap,
kening, papan tumpu kasau, papan cantik. There are at least two types of ande-ande which are the
single piece type with carvings on a single long timber piece and multiple pieces) with carvings
on multiple timber pieces arranged side by side, Mohd Sabrizaa and Sufian [7].
e) Pemeleh
Other names for kayu pemeleh are peles, pemeles, papan layan. Kayu pemeleh is actually a pair
of timber pieces located on two fascia ends of a gable roof (tebar layar). The ones covering kasau
lintang or kasau jantan is called peles or pemeleh in Kelantan and Terengganu but called papan
layang elsewhere. Kayu pemeleh or peles is shaped slightly curving and sharpens towards the top
as a sign of strength in the design language of houses in Kelantan, Terengganu on the East coast
and also in Cambodia and Pattani in Thailand, Yusoff and Rashid [8].
4
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
j) Gerbang (Archway)
Decorative piece of timber as an arch at entrance of a house or used for dividing space usually
between Anjung and Rumah Ibu of the main house.
l) Sesiku Keluang
Decorative piece of timber normally in shape of triangle fix to the column and sometime function
to support the beam. Otherwise it is for decorative purpose.
m) Pagar Musang
Balustrade In the form of timber rod or timber plank often beautifully carved and arranged to
decorate the window opening. It is function as safety features apart from its aesthetical role. The
other names also known as Jeriji, Jerejak, Pagar Tinggalung.
5
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
3. Research Methodology
This study aims to investigate the existence of decorative elements at RLBP and RLJ. As discussed,
RLBP are located in the state of Perak whilst RLJ in the state of Johor at the southern of the Peninsula.
The selection of RLBP and RLJ were done based from previous study by the author and the research
team member. An exploratory research was carried out through site observation on traditional villages
at both states during the previous study by Mohd Sabrizaa et al. [13] and current study. Thirty (30)
RLBP and twenty seven (27) RLJ were observed and documented from that particular. For the purpose
of this study twenty-five (25) houses were selected from each state for RLBP and RLJ. The selection
was done based on their best level of authenticity, architectural type, current physical condition,
accessibility and geographical factor. All the houses than were coded accordingly. Many houses were
found have done major renovation by the owner and has lost its ingenuity in terms of traditional
architectural style. Few houses also found to be abandoned and left over by the owner and make it
difficult to access for the study. Many houses were found heavily damaged and ruined. These are some
of the factors that contribute to the limitation of the scope of the study. Documentations of visual data
were collected using EOS DSLR Canon 6D camera whilst semi-structured interview were done to
collect verbal data from the owner of the house or the occupancies. Both data were used to investigate
and identify the existence of the type of decorative elements at selected RLBP and RLJ. Results were
discussed based on the visual tabulation and inventory analysis produced from the study.
6
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
Jalan Besar Utara Selatan, Kampung Padang Ampang, 33000, Kuala Kuala
PLH8 (4.810440, 100.954338)
Kangsar, Perak Kangsar
Jalan Besar Utara Selatan, Kampung Padang Ampang, 33000, Kuala Kuala
PLH9 (4.810744, 100.954491)
Kangsar, Perak Kangsar
Kuala
PLH10 Kampung Sayong Lembah, Kuala Kangsar, Perak (4.771876, 100.948547)
Kangsar
PLH11 2010, A3, Kampung Suak Petai, 33800, Manong, Perak. Manong (4.595965, 100.881981)
PLH12 2010, A3, Kampung Suak Petai, 33800, Manong, Perak. Manong (4.601509, 100.880867)
PLH13 A3, Kampung Ulu Piul, 33800, Manong, Perak. Manong (4.572912, 100.874680)
PLH14 A17, 32800, Parit, Perak. (Jalan Parit) Parit (4.443276, 100.905777)
PLH16 A17, 32800, Parit, Perak Parit (4.454128, 100.907036)
PLH17 Jalan Parit, Kampung Senin, 32800, Parit, Perak. Parit (4.386045, 100.901413)
PLH18 Jalan33A, Siputeh, Parit, Tanjung Ara,32800, Perak Parit (4.474646,100.913315)
PLH19 Jalan Parit, 32600, Bota, Perak Bota (4.336138, 100.895859)
PLH20 Jalan Parit, 32600, Bota, Perak. Bota (4.363739, 100.892860)
PLH21 Jalan Parit, 32600, Bota, Perak. Bota (4.364304, 100.893463)
PLH22 Jalan Parit, 326600, Bota, Perak. Bota (4.363926, 100.893311)
PLH23 Jalan Teluk Intan, Kampung Padang Changkat Bota, 32600, Bota, Perak. Bota (4.324942, 100.907959)
PLH24 5A, Jalan Teluk Intan, Bota Kanan, 32600, Bota, Perak. Bota (4.346352,100.884758)
8089, Jalan Bota Kiri-Teluk Sena, Bota Kiri, 32900, Lambor Kanan, Lambor
PLH25 (4.348048, 100.874062)
Perak Kanan
7
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
8
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
5. Findings
This study established and highlighted the existence of decorative elements on both RLBP and RLJ.
The aim of this study is to look into the architectural characteristics by investigating the similarity and
differences of decorative elements of both types of houses (refer Table 3). Based on inventory analysis
and comparative analysis done on both type of houses it can be concluded that:
A) Most of the decorative elements studied were found on both types of houses. There were 9
decorative elements that found on RLBP and 7 decorative elements on RLJ. 2 decorative
elements which do not exist at RLJ are Kepala Cicak (KC) and Tunjuk Bumi (TB). This
indicates that KC and TB are two major decorative elements that shape the characteristic of
RLBP.
B) Kepala Tingkap (KT) was found at both RLBP and RLJ. As discussed earlier the existence
of KT was not only for aesthetic reasons but also function for air flow. This indicates that both
types of houses produce good cross ventilation by maximizing wall openings. This study found
that the designs of KT at RLBP are slightly different from RLJ. Both have the semi-circular or
fan like shape with different composition.
C) Both RLBP and RLJ were built on stilt which elevates the house from the ground. This is
common for a vernacular house in the tropical climatic zone. This study found that most of
RLBP are much higher from the ground (around 2 – 2.5m) compared to RLJ (around 1.5m). The
lower part of the house at the ground is called Kolong. For RLBP this space is used as a place to
relax during daytime. This study found that decorative fan was used to cover the bottom part of
the house called Pagar Musang (PM) or Kekisi (KK) for RLJ. It is also known as Banji. This
decorative element enhances the architectural characteristics of RLJ.
D) The window design for both RLBP and RLJ is called Tingkap Labuh (literally means long
window) simply because it is a full height opening from floor level to the above. Both RLBP
and RLJ used Pagar Musang (PM) as decorative elements and function as balustrade to protect
people from falling down. This study found that 4 inches to 5 inches width of carved timber
piece were used at RLJ compared to carving array used at RLBP.
E) Openable louvred timber window is popularly used as Daun Tingkap or the window piece
used at RLJ. This compared to RLBP that used solid timber plank as their window piece. These
elements contribute to the characteristics of RLJ.
F) The used of Gerbang only can be found at RLBP. This element become one of the major
characteristics of RLBP
As discussed earlier decorative elements were considered or defined as additional or extra elements of
the more functional structure elements. As a traditional architecture decorative element play important
role in shaping the characteristics and identity of a particular house. This study contributes to the
development of the aesthetical theory and concept of the Malay architecture especially the RLBP and
RLJ.
Acknowledgement
I would like to acknowledge and extend heartfelt gratitude to The Ministry of Higher Education and
Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) for funding this study under the Fundamental Research Grant
Scheme (FRGS). Research code FRGS/1/2017/SS/11/UITM/02/6. My sincere thanks to all KUTAI
members for their support and provided valuable comments of this article.
9
ICRMBEE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 385 (2019) 012022 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012022
References
[1] Ezrin A. Ke Arah Jatidiri Senibina Dalam Konteks Nusantara, Prosiding Simposium Nusantara .
UiTM Cawangan Perak, Kampus Seri Iskandar. 21 Jun 1997.
[2] Norsuriani S. and Ismail S. Types of Floral Motifs and Patterns of Malay Woodcarving in
Kelantan and Terengganu. Social and Behavioral Sciences Procedia, Elsevier, 2013
[3] Anuar T., The Perak Kutai Asli Malay House: Form, Function and Meaning, unpublished PhD
thesis, Institut Pengajian Siswazah, Universiti Teknologi MARA, October 2005.
[4] Norhasandi M. Ciri-Ciri Fizikal Ruang Dalaman Rumah Melayu: Kajian Kes Rumah Bumbung
Melayu Perak, unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Graduate Studies, USM, 2010.
[5] Mohd Sabrizaa A.R. Rumah Kutai : Documentation of Memories, Institut Darul Ridzuan : Ipoh,
2017
[6] Mastor S. and Nik H.S. Rumah Limas Johor, Yayasan Warisan Johor : Johor Baharu, 2006
[7] Mohd Sabrizaa A.R and Sufian C.A. The Traditional Malay Architecture: Between Aesthetics
and Symbolism in Mark Taylor (ed.), Interior Design and Architecture: Critical and Primary
Sources, Vol 1.Bloomsbury Publishing: London, 2013
[8] Yusoff, R and Rashid, M.S. The Analysis of the “Pemeleh”: Decorative Roof Element of Malay
Traditional Architecture, Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Heritage &
Sustainable Development, HERITAGE 2012 , Porto, Portugal, June 2012
[9] Hanafi Z. Pola-pola hiasan di dalam bangunan tradisional Melayu, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka :
Kuala Lumpur, 2000
[10] Halim N. Traditional Malay Wood Carving, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka : Kuala Lumpur, 1987
[11] Norhasandi Mat et al., The Architecture of Perak Traditional Malay Roof Houses (PTMRH) in
the Year of 1820-1940: A Chronological Analysis of the Arabesque Types on Wall of Rumah
Ibu, Prosiding Simposium Nusantara 9 (SIMPORA 9:2012), Dewan Al- Khawarizmi, UiTM
Perak. 11 & 12 Disember 2012.
[12] Jahn S. et. al. The Resilience of Tradition: Malay Allusions in Contemporary Architecture. (S. J.
Kashim, Ed.). Penang: Areca Books, 2017
[13] Sabrizaa R, Iryani AHC, Rohaslinda R, Mohd Nurfaisal B, Kartina A. Decorative Elements Of
Traditional Malay Houses: Case Study Of Rumah Limas Bumbung Perak (RLBP). JSSR. 2018;
special issue(6):105-115
10