s13731 017 0070 3 PDF
s13731 017 0070 3 PDF
s13731 017 0070 3 PDF
DOI 10.1186/s13731-017-0070-3
Journal of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship
* Correspondence:
Legashtiwilid@gmail.com Abstract
2
Haramaya University, Dire Dawa,
Ethiopia This research paper is on youth employment and entrepreneurship. It has
Full list of author information is investigated a total of 3591 youths in two different geographical areas of Ethiopia.
available at the end of the article Entirely, it has taken three specific villages: Melka Jebdu, Gedenser (eastern Ethiopia),
and Wereda 10 (Addis Ketema, central Ethiopia). The core objective of the study was
to assess issues related to youth unemployment and entrepreneurship in major cities
of Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa. Some of the specific objectives set were to
determine unemployment rate for male and female youth in the selected Kebele/
Sub city, determine the magnitude/proportion of the unemployed across population
subgroups (by specific age bracket, by sex, and by urbanity), and similarly identify
major bottlenecks for the female youth and male youth to start up own business in
the selected two areas.
As a springboard for conclusion, the following hypotheses were set: the level of
female youth unemployment exceeds male youth unemployment, financial
constraint is the most critical bottleneck to start up a new business in the selected
sites, the youth is suffering from unfair competition and corruptive employment
actions, and youth in the area lack training related to starting their own venture.
As a tool of descriptive data analysis and presentation, in this study, frequency tables
have been utilized in depth. Moreover, binary logistic regression predicting and
analysis tool has been used to check the prospect of youth self-employment in the
study sites.
The census finding shows that youth unemployment rate is at 11.39% aggregately
for the two project sites. Specifically, the study site at Addis Ababa prevails youth
unemployment rate of 10.06%. Contrastly, the two sites in Dire Dawa sites Melka
Jebdu and Gedenser have youth unemployment rate of 12.87 and 20.34%
consecutively. In addition, it has found that the major cause of youth not to engage
in self-employed job is related to capital financing.
The research has also tried to determine how unemployment is reflected gender
wise. Accordingly, the aggregate data shows hypothesizing that unemployment are
highly prevail on female than on male in the localities is totally false.
Generally, this paper has investigated issues like factors affecting youth prospect to
(Continued on next page)
© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
indicate if changes were made.
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 2 of 22
Background
Almost 90% of the world’s youth are living in countries where they can hardly access
sufficient education, capital, paid employments, and health services. As the sizes of
younger populations in Africa steadily swell to account the single largest category of
age group, the likelihood of majority of these youth being absorbed within the formal
economy is nearly nonexistent (DSW 2011).
Encouraging the integration of young people at work and improving their situation in
the labor market are two of the main priorities of the government of Ethiopian (Talent
Youth Association (TaYa) 2014).
This hard fact has strong implication on the demographic and socioeconomic reality
of Ethiopia. More than half of the population in Ethiopia is made up of young people
under the age of 25 (DSW 2011). It is also true that women constitute slightly more
than half the population of Ethiopia. Greater numbers of youth and women are
vulnerable to conditions which deprive them from securing material welfare. They are
mostly engaged in the informal sector to earn income for their day to day life (Central
Statistical Agency 2008).
Governmental organizations, NGOs and civic associations in Ethiopia, and other
countries adopt and use various age ranges for the concept of “Youth” from the stand-
point of the purpose which they stand for and the activities they undertake. For
example, the United Nations (UN) and WHO define the youth as persons between
15–24 years and 10–24, respectively. In Ethiopian context, the Ethiopian Social
Security and Development Policy define youth as someone between the age ranges
of 15–24 years old (Ministry of Youth, Sports and Culture of Ethiopia 2005).
In the context of Ethiopia, all persons aged 10 years and over who were productively
engaged or available to be engaged during the reference period were included as
economically active persons. In other words, the economically active population com-
prises all persons aged 10 years and over who were employed or unemployed in the
stated period. The complements, i.e., those who were neither engaged nor furnish their
labor constitute the economically inactive population (Central Statistical Agency 2005).
The employed population in the current status approach consists of those who were
engaged in productive activity for 4 h or more during the 7 days prior to the date of
the interview. Persons who had regular jobs, occupation, or holdings to return to but
were absent from work (i.e., not at work or worked less than 4 h) for various reasons
were also considered as employed (ibid).
The Central Statistical Agency definition of unemployment includes an individual
who satisfies the ILO standard definition, and it is also contextualized for Ethiopia by
incorporating partially relaxed and completely relaxed options of measurements (ibid).
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 3 of 22
it is our duty to utilize the opportunity unless it will be a time bomb blast at one time
in future which can completely distract the social, political, and economic stability of
the country. Even though it is primarily the government’s responsibility to address the
issue of unemployment, the society should play their parts in the efforts being taken by
the government as they will be the main victims of unemployment which ultimately
results in poverty. Meanwhile, the country higher officials need to intensively work on
entrepreneurship and job creation for the targeted portion of the society (youth).
Though it is not sufficient enough, the Ethiopian government is working hard to open
suitable ground for youth entrepreneurship through crafting and implementing a sound
policy to bind youth under Small and Micro Enterprises (SMEs).
Finally, it is better to inquire why prevalence of unemployment is high in the country
and in the selected Community Based Monitoring System (CBMS) project areas. Is that
due to the number of youth and job creation rate is mismatched or any other factors
are influencing? And how government is working with entrepreneurship and how
youth are benefited from the policy direction needs to be investigated.
The data has been collected from total of 3591 both from Dire Dawa and Addis
Ababa. Numerically, the number of youth in Wereda 10, Melka Jebdu, and Gedenser is
2048, 1484, and 59 consecutively.
Methods
Participants and procedures
Youth with the age range of 15–24 years old has been taken as a target study. The
instruments which have been developed were tested for field validity on 100 targets.
Then, the field pilot study has clearly indicated the contents of the instruments in
which the researcher has to review. Consequently, some questions have been added
and removed. Options or response lists have been updated. After doing this on all the
questionnaires, Household Profile Questionnaire (HPQ), Community Profile Question-
naire, and Youth Employment and Entrepreneurship Questionnaire (YEEQ), they have
been uploaded to digital format where it become available for tablet based data
collection purposes.
Then, the data has been collected using the latest gadget of Samsung tablet 4
equipped with GPRS reading. Every data collected has GPRS readings of latitude,
longitude, and altitudes with accuracy of less than 15.
to the independent or explanatory variables of age, sex, access to various media outlets,
social capital, education and etc. Those independent (explanatory variables have been
grouped as individual characteristics, household characteristics, and community charac-
teristics. For instance, age, sex, and education level best describe individual characteristics.
Household’s total asset, household’s access to various media outlets (TV, radio, and news-
paper) describe the household’s characteristics. Meanwhile, membership in cooperative
union and equib best explains the impact emanating from community characteristics to
affect youth intention to be self-employed.
Below is the logit model used in this study;
pi
log ¼ α þ βI þ θH þ δC þ e
1−pi
Where
α-vector of coefficient of independent variation
β-vector coefficient of variables, which indicates individual characteristics
θ-vector coefficient of variables, which indicates household characteristics
δ-vector coefficient of variables, which indicates community level characteristics
Y-whether the individual is self-employed or not, i.e., 1=self-employed and 0=not
self-employed
Pi=probability of Y = 1
I-vector variables, which indicates individual characteristics
H-vector variables, which indicates household characteristics
C-vector variables, which indicates community characteristics
e-error term
As a complimentary for this analysis, the multicollinearity test based on variance in-
flation factor (VIF), correction method for heteroskedasticity problem, and specification
tests has been done. According to Gujarati (2004), VIF shows how the variance of an
estimator is inflated by the presence of multicollinearity. It is defined as VIFj ¼ 1−R
1
2
j
where R2j is the coefficient of determination that is obtained when the continuous
explanatory variable is regressed against all the other explanatory variables. When VIF
increases with R2j , collinearity will increase. According to Gujarati, as a rule of thumb, if
the VIF of a variable surpasses 10, which will happen if R2j exceeds 0.90, those variables
are said to be highly collinear.
The post optimality tests of endogeneity and multicollinear have been made and the
mean VIF result is less than 10.
This study has avoided the traditional paper and pen-based data enumeration and
substituted by tablet-based data collection. This approach helped the researcher to
track the GPS location of each and every household and genuine process of the data
collection. Totally, the data collection was digital and the data editing was conducted
in the same format.
Those H1, H2, and H3 are hypotheses set between corresponding group of factor
variables (individual, household, and community) and prospect of youth to involve
on entrepreneurial activity. Those hypotheses have been set one by one in the later
section (Fig. 1).
Supporting the above literature, the figures set on the table above related to this study
indicate capital as the major factor which contributes adversely to youth not to involve
in self-employment in the overall study area. As an adverse effect, capital takes 35.70%
of the time as a cause to aggravate youth not to begin their own business. Numerically,
almost 1282 of the 3591 youths complain absence of capital as a major factor to
influence self-employment.
Similarly, the figures in the same table indicate capital as the major hindering factor
for the youth not to be self-employed in Wereda 10. Almost 22.56% of the youths
complained capital as prominent factor in this area.
Still in Melka Jebdu (Kebele 01), capital persists as the core problem for youth not to
involve on self-employed businesses. It takes 53.84% of the time as hindering and
challenging factor.
Note: None in the table above indicates the proportion of youth who do not try to be
self-employed at all or who tried but not mentioned factors which adversely affect
their effort to be self-employed.
Exceptionally, in Gedenser area, capital is not considered as the factor which
challenges those youth who tried to be self-employed. Capital gives way to problem of
access to market. With regard to capital, being in rural area, there is enough land and
irrigable land. But the major factor is impossibility of market access due to absence of
transportation infrastructure. The problem of market access is high at 42.37%.
However, it does not mean that the issue of capital problem is zero. Still, it affects
35.59% of the time.
Table 3 Youth participation on technical and vocational school and corresponding gender
distribution in overall project sites
Site Participating in TVS Sex
Male Female
Magnitude Proportion Magnitude Proportion Magnitude Proportion
Wereda 10 116 5.66 66 56.90 50 43.10
Gedenser 2 3.39 2 100.00 0 0.00
Kebele 01 29 1.95 23 79.31 6 20.69
Total 147 4.09 91 61.90 56 38.10
Source: CBMS-Ethiopia Survey, 2015
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 9 of 22
Financial constraints such as inadequate investment capital, insufficient loan, and ineffi-
cient financial market are the major obstacles in doing business, and most MSE’s are highly
risky ventures involving excessive administrative costs and lack of experience in dealing with
financial institutions (Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor (CLEP) 2006).
Access to finance is the most serious barrier for expansion of businesses and start-
ups which have been mentioned by existing SMEs and potential operators (Olomi and
Urassa 2008). Hence, one of the hypotheses was set as follows:
found that those firms that were growing fast used more planning tools than those
that were not, and declining firms used the fewest. Nonetheless, there is also a need to
provide training to improve the chances of business success. A lack of knowledge is
the obstacle in using planning tools rather than the value that small firm managers
place on a tool that they have not heard about (Woods and Joyce 2003).
Accordingly, one of the pull factors which stimulate youth to be self-employed is
participation in entrepreneurial training. Considering this fact, from the total 3591
youths of the study sites, only 11.11% have participated in entrepreneurial training.
However, 88.89% had no related training at all.
Hypothesis: youth in the area lack training related to starting own venture
According to the above table or finding, majority of the youth (88.89%) in the whole
project sites does not have entrepreneurship training. Additionally, 95.91% of the
youth does not pass through technical and vocational schools from where youth could
learn various technical skills. Hence, conditions are sufficient to conclude that youth in
the area lacks training related to starting their own venture.
As far as youth employment is concerned, almost 34.22% of youth in the overall
project site is employed. Employed means they are either self-employed or employed
somewhere for wage or salary.
When the issue of employment is decomposed at Kebele or Wereda level, in Wereda
10, still, a significant number of the youth population are not employed, i.e., at 45.46%
employed, figure shows only 54.54%.
In Kebele 01, Dire Dawa, the number of youth is 1484. Of which, only 6.87% are
employed (self-employed or employed for wage/salary or family gain, etc.). The
severity of the problem of being not employed is high in this study site. Whereas, in
Gedenser, 16.95% of the youth are employed.
Youth might involve in multiple jobs in a regular or part-time basis. The overall project
site observation shows, out of total employed youth of 1229, that only 5.13% have
multiple jobs or duties. However, 94.87% are with no extra job.
In Wereda 10, 1117 youth are employed and out of that, 7.77% are working with extra
duty. Still, 94.45% are limited in a single job.
In Melka Jebdu, out of the entire youth, only 102 are employed. Even out of those 102
employed youth, only 0.98% has engaged in multiple jobs.
In the other subproject site in Gedenser, Dire Dawa, there is no observation with
employment and extra duty engagement.
Hypothesis: many youth especially those with lower educational attainment venture
into entrepreneurial activity out of necessity
The above table confirms that majority of youth in the area joins self-business out of
necessity because 94.87% of employed youth does not have extra job. It has involved in
the self-business for necessity purpose.
In Ethiopia, 54.8% of the self-employed in both urban and rural areas were male, and
the survey results indicate that paid employment is dominated by males (NLFS 2005).
Age can be an important factor in entrepreneurial intention (prospect). Research
shows that people mostly decide to establish their own firm between the age of 25 and
45 years old (Storey 1994). This tendency specially increases between the ages of 25
and 34 (Delmar and Davidson 2000).
Though literatures indicate that being youth has high tendency to involve in
self-business, the finding in the above table or this study depicts only 1.73%
of the youth owns or involved in self-business. However, 98.27% are either
employed for wage/salary or jobless. Specifically, 2.88% of youth in Wereda 10
are self-employed, while 97.12% of them are either employed for wage or simply
jobless.
While in Melka Jebdu (Kebele 01), the problem of being not self-employed is extremely
high with the proportion or percentage of 99.80. It is daring to say almost no one is
self-employed.
The above table shows there is no self-employment in Gedenser rural Kebele of Dire
Dawa. Previous tables show that the youth of Gedenser are totally not self-employed
or employed for wage/salary.
Youth might raise various reasons for being self-employed. The table above shows why
youth prefer to be self-employed. As per the analysis result in the table above, the
major factor which influences the youth to be dared of self-employment is the absence
of employment opportunity. This also complies with youth engagement on self-
business out of necessity. Youth will prefer to start their own business if they are
jobless for a long period of time. In addition, so as to generate higher amount of
income, youth might join self-business.
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 14 of 22
Employment services in Ethiopia are too weak to provide even basic services such as
information to jobseekers and employers. They have not been able to comply with the
changing requirements of the labor market. In addition, many jobs in Ethiopia are in
the informal economy and, by definition, the vacancies are not documented or
registered with the Public Employment Services. Informal mechanisms such as
personal networks have been common ways of recruitment in Ethiopia (Kibru 2012).
Based on the literature above, the study initially set the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis: the youth is suffering from unfair competition and corruptive employment
actions
The table above indicates that 5.87% of the unemployed youth confirmed that the
employment environment is highly unfair. Hence, it is true that the youth is suffering
from unfair competition and corruptive employment actions.
Model specification
The dependent variable represents the engagement of the youth in entrepreneurial
activity. To identify the correlates of this engagement, binary variable that indicates
involvement in entrepreneurial activity is regress up against different covariates of this
engagement in logistic regression. Denoting all explanatory variables as Xi, the
following equation specifies the model used in this section.
Left-hand side term of Eq. (6) is a dichotomy variable which has a value of 1 if the youth
is engaged in own business and 0 otherwise. And the right-hand side values in the
equation or explanatory variables are (a) household characteristics and demographic
variables like sex, age, and years of education of the youth; (b) family background variables
like total asset of his/her family, television, and radio access, and family size; (c) social
capital variable like engagement in village-level saving and loan association, locally called
“equib,” and membership for village-level cooperatives; (d) access variables like telecom
service accessibility, television, radio, and newspapers’ accessibility of youths are considered,
and (e) training exposure variables like whether the youth took entrepreneurship short-
term training or short- or long-term training from technical and vocational school is
the variable involved in this regression analysis.
The partial correlation coefficient, β, tells us the association between entrepre-
neurship engagement indicator and the explanatory variables rather than their
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 15 of 22
causal relationship. The detail list of explanatory variable and their description is
presented as follows:
in their own business, consequently, a negative sign is expected from this vari-
able’s coefficient.
Access variables: television ownership of the youth’s family (x4), radio ownership of the
youth’s family (x5), telecommunication access of the youth (x6), and newspaper access of
the youth (x7)
Youth who have access to these information sources are empowered by the information
and share the experiences of successful entrepreneurs. This is expected to inspire the
youth to have their own business or to be engaged in entrepreneurial activities. These
variables are expected to contribute positively to entrepreneurial engagement. Hence,
positive coefficient is expected.
Equib membership of the youth (x8) and cooperative membership of the youth (x9)
These social capital indicator and microcredit service variables expected to contribute
positively for the youth to be self-employed or to create their own business. Since they
are substitute for the formal financial institutes, which marginalize the poor and youth
who cannot afford a strong collateral requirement, a positive sign is expected from
their coefficient estimates.
The following literature supports the above hypothesis: the access to resources is
possible because of the development of social networks (Aldrich and Zimmer 1986).
Social connections are the potentially most valuable relationships that an entrepreneur
or the entrepreneurial team holds: they help not only to identify business opportunities
and attract human and financial resources but also to gain legitimacy (Lechner and
Dowling 2003; Stam 2010).
Technical or vocational training received (x12) and Entrepreneurship training received (x13)
Learning important entrepreneurial skills and competencies will lead to perceiving new
feasible venture by students, thus affect perceived behavioral control (PBC) (Krueger et
al. 2000; Zhao et al. 2005). Second, research found positive relationship between social
desirability and entrepreneurship career intention (Tkachev and Kolvereid 1999).
The major objective of such training is to create individuals who can use the available
theory and practice in the science of entrepreneurship together with different technical
and vocational training skills to engage in their self-employed business. These trainings
expected to enhance a person’s probability to engage in entrepreneurship activities.
Therefore, a positive sign is expected from both variables’ coefficients.
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 17 of 22
Meanwhile, all aforesaid hypotheses are tested and the result is presented below
The regression model estimates are presented below in Table 10, and it indicates that
the overall model, chi2 calculated, is significant at less than 1% level of significance.
This indicates that the variables which are included in the logistic regression model
have coefficients which are jointly different from zero value. In addition, the regression
estimate has made with an option of robust standard error rather than the normal one,
heteroskedasticity is not a problem anymore. The related multicollinearity test also
performed using variance inflation factor (VIF).
In the empirical result with 4.03 average values of VIF, there is no severe multicolli-
nearity among the explanatory variables. All of them have the value less than three,
with the exception age of youth.
Most of the coefficients of the explanatory variables have similar signs as it has
been expected (hypothesized). With the exception of access to newspaper, cooperative
membership of the youth, and entrepreneurship trainings, other variables which are
included in the model, viz, age of youth, sex of youth educational status, television,
radio and telecommunication access, and equib membership, total asset comes up
with the expected sign despite some of them are non-significant as it is observed
from Table 10.
Age can be an important factor in entrepreneurial intention (prospect). Research
shows that people mostly decide to establish their own firm between the age of 25 and
45 years old (Storey 1994). This tendency specially increases between the ages of 25
and 34 (Delmar and Davidson 2000). From the table, as it was hypothesized, the
variable age level of the youth has positive and highly significant (with p value less than
1% level) contribution for the youth to engage in self-employment.
Demographic factors such as age and gender have been proposed to have an impact
on entrepreneurial intention (prospect) (Kristiansen and Nurul 2004). In literatures, it
is argued that females are less likely to establish their own business than men (Phan
et al. 2002; Verheul et al. 2005).
Similarly, the logit output in this study found that variable indicated as sex of the
youth shows the expected sign and it is also significant at less than 10%. This indicates
that there is significant partial correlation between being female and engagement in
self-employment.
The logit result specific to the study area confirms similar result. Being male/female
has positive relation with the prospect to be an entrepreneur. This will be reinforced by
the number of female entrepreneurs that is lower than that of male entrepreneurs in
almost every country in terms of Total Entrepreneurial Activity, except Ghana, Costa
Rica, and Australia (Kelley et al. 2010). Research provides convincing evidence that the
concept of entrepreneurial activity is gender biased: entrepreneurship is often depicted
as a form of masculinity, and the terms “entrepreneur” and “male” have tended to
become interchangeable (Ahl and Marlow 2012; Gupta et al. 2009).
In addition, empirical studies also focused on individual background characteristics
such as education, prior employment experience, and parental role models to explain
entrepreneurship intention (Kristiansen and Nurul 2004). There are contradictory find-
ings on education level and entrepreneurial activity. Some argue that education has a
positive impact on employment (Bates 1995) whereas others find negative relationship
and disagree with this preposition (Reynolds 1995). It can be argued that for people
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 18 of 22
with lower education achievement, the only option could be self-employment. In other
words, their chance of getting into an organization as paid employee is less. On the
other hand, people with higher education have better chances for success both as an
entrepreneur and waged employee (Davidson 1995). In this study, the other variable,
years of education, come up with the expected negative sign and highly significant
result, with p value less than 1%, as it was hypothesized. The coefficient sign of educa-
tion (negative) implied that the higher the education achievement of the youth the less
will be the tendency him/her to involve on self-employment activities. Most of youth
who achieves higher level of education are not willing to take risk of involving in entre-
preneurial activities. This also better supports youths who are involved if and only if
they do not have higher level of education and chance of employment.
The study of Potter (2008) highlighted the function of entrepreneurship education is
vital in enhancing the entrepreneurship attitudes of individuals at tertiary level of
education. Consequently, entrepreneurship education initiatives at university level are
considered vital for increasing potential entrepreneur supply by making more students
conscious and interested choosing entrepreneurship as a career option. First, entrepre-
neurship education helps the students to learn and identify new business opportunities.
Such knowledge leads to enhance the number and innovativeness of opportunities
which are linked with the technology (Shepherd and DeTienne 2005). Learning vital
entrepreneurial skills and competencies will lead to perceive new feasible venture by
students, thus affect PBC (Krueger et al. 2000; Zhao et al. 2005). Second, research
found positive association between social desirability and entrepreneurship career
intention (Tkachev and Kolvereid 1999). While the important role of education is
counted in socializing individuals into entrepreneurial careers (Krueger and Brazeal
1994) which can form attitude toward behavior and social norms.
Formal entrepreneurial education provides student experience of mastery, role
models, social persuasion, and support by involving them in hands-on learning activities,
business plan development, and running simulated or real small business (Fiet 2000; Segal,
Borgia & Schoenfeld 2005). In this study, technical or vocational training (tvs) received
and entrepreneurship training received (entrep_te) are the variables considered as areas of
entrepreneurial education. Entrepreneurial education mainly motivates and capacitates
youth to be self-employed. Though literatures signify the vitality and positive relationship
between entrepreneurship training and the entrepreneurial intention of the youth, the re-
sult of this study is quite the reverse.
In this study, some variables like access to information show consistent and the rest
show contrary result from previously hypothesized coefficient sign. Access to tele-
communication services has high, significant, and positive contribution, even less than
1% p value, for a youth to engage in entrepreneurship. However, television and radio
access have no significant contribution for the youth to engage in entrepreneurial
activity. On the contrary, those youth who have access for newspaper found that there
is a lower probability of youth to engage in his/her own businesses. Empirical review
shows that most of Ethiopian newspapers are overwhelmingly crowded with vacancy
announcements. Having an exposure to that newspaper will shape youths’ intention to
be employed than self-employed.
The access to resources is possible because of the development of social networks
(Aldrich and Zimmer 1986). Social networks are the potentially most valuable
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 19 of 22
relationships that an entrepreneur or the entrepreneurial team holds: they help not only
to identify business opportunities and attract human and financial resources but also to
gain legitimacy (Lechner and Dowling 2003; Stam 2010).
The value of social networks can be summarized under the concept of social capital
theory that is “used to describe the instrumental benefits of social relationships”
(Aldrich and Martinez 2001, p.47). Social capital is defined as “resources embedded in
a social structure which are or accessed and/or mobilized in purposive action” (Lin
1999, p.35). Social capital is created through investment in social relationships, leading
to the creation of socially embedded resources that can be mobilized by individuals
(Lin 1999). Social capital allows therefore to achieve objectives that were otherwise
difficult to obtain based on the assumption that the social resources of entrepreneurs
are more important than the possession of personal resources (Lin 1999).
Similarly and supporting the above literatures, this study confirms social capital
variable, equib membership, coefficient is significant and positive as it was hypothe-
sized. It is due to a dual purpose that equib plays in Ethiopia’s various villages in both
at rural and urban. In the one hand, it substitutes formal financial institutes by
providing of microcredit services without collateral requirement to finance members
businesses or to start up a new one. On the other hand, it creates a good platform to
share experiences of different business persons. Both reinforce the logic behind the
positive and significant variable’s coefficient. On the contrary, membership in local
cooperative has no impact on probability of being self-employed. It may emanate
from a very limited human and financial capacities of majority of cooperatives operate
in Ethiopia.
All other variables, viz, asset ownership of families of youths, family size, and short-
term entrepreneurship and technical and vocational training from technical and
vocational colleges, found to be non-significant.
Variable that indicates urban rural dwellership is automatically dropped by STATA
due to its functional multicollinear relationship with other explanatory variables. This
has been indicated by STATA output attached in the annex.
The table above indicates marginal effect of the variables (individual, households, and
community) on youths’ possibility to be self-employed. A percentage increase in educa-
tional status reduces the youth possibility to be self-employed by 0.05%. Similarly a per-
centage increase in youths’ access to telecom service increases youths’ possibility to be
self-employed by 0.7%.
The likelihood of the youth to involve in self-employment positively changes by
0.62% when the youth decided to participate in equib.
The basic limitation of this study are: first, the study cannot able us to make
generalization about the whole youth in Ethiopia. Since the study has collected data
from limited households.
Second, the researcher does not think that those are the only variables to affect
youth entrepreneurial prospect. Hence, future researchers are anticipated to investi-
gate for other factors which have an impact on the youth prospect to be an
entrepreneur.
Third, it will be good if the study were using structural equation model (SEM) than
logit model because SEM will show both the paths of effects and degree of impact. The
research has an intention to use this model.
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 20 of 22
Acknowledgements
It is our pleasure to express gratitude to De La Salle University (DLSU) for their support by providing necessary fund to
implement the CBMS project in Ethiopia. Next, we would like to thank Dr. Celia M. Reyes and the CBMS international
network research team for their relentless effort in visualization the Community-Based Training Program in Ethiopia.
They were part of it since the inception of the project proposal and were not tired of providing supportive comments
to improve our research project outputs till today.
Special gratitude goes to Novee Lor Leyso and Steffie Joy Calubyan for their long-lasting effort of editing the
questionnaires and guiding our team on the CBMS tablet scan process and the commencement of data collection.
Funding
This study has been sponsored by De La Salle University (DLSU). Also, staffs of the funding institution have provided
technical support or training on digital data collection and analysis.
Authors’ contribution
Authors contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 21 of 22
Author Details
Abel Tewolde is a lecturer and researcher at Arsi University, and Christian Feleke is a lecturer and researcher at
Haramaya University.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author details
1
Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia, P.O. Box:193, Asella, Ethiopia. 2Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
References
ACCA. (2009). Access to finance for small and medium enterprises sector: the evidence and the conclusion.
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to
escape a dead end? Organization Science, 19(5), 543–562.
Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study
of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.
Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In R. Smilor & D. Sexton (Eds.), The art and
science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). New York: Ballinger.
Andries, P., & Debackere, K. (2007). Adaptation and performance in new businesses: understanding the moderating
effects of independence and industry”. Small Business Economics, 29(1/2), 81–99.
Bates, T. (1995). Self-employment entry across industry groups. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 143–l 5 6.
Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small-medium enterprise sector: access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal
of Finance and Banking, 30(11), 2931–2943.
Bizuneh, G., Adino, T. Gesano, G. Guarneri, A. & Heins, F. (2001). Work status and unemployment in urban Ethiopia.
Central Statistical Authority (CSA), Addis Ababa: Ethiopia & Institute for Population Research – National Research
Council (Irp-Cnr), Roma: Italy.
Central Statistical Agency. (2008). Summary and statistical report of the 2007 population and housing census results:
Population size by age and sex. Addis Ababa.
Central Statstical Agency. (2005). Census report. http://www.csa.gov.et/images/documents/surveys/Employment_
Unemployment_Survey/Employment_Unemployment_Survey_2004/survey0/data/docs/Pdf/report/summaryreport.
pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2014.
Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor (CLEP). (2006). Legal empowerment of the Poor: Entrepreneurship.
Background issue paper.
Davidson, P. (1995). Entrepreneurship – and after? A study of growth willingness in small firms. Journal of Business
Venturing, 4, 211–226.
Delmar, F., & Davidson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs,
Entrepreneurship and regional development, 12, 1–23.
DSW Ethiopia Brief. (2011). Leavening destitution through decent works:Economic empowerment for poor and the
powerless (Vol. 7). http://www.dswethiopia.org. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.
Fiet, J. (2000). The Theoretical Side of Teaching Entrepreneur Ship. Journal of Business Venturinglin, 16, 1–24.
Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: The McGraw − Hill Companies.
Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of
entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397–417.
ILO. (2009). http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/ent/coop/africa/countries/eastafrica/ethiopia.htm
Kelley, D., Bosma, N., & Amoros, J. E. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2010 global report. Babson
College,Universidad del Desarrollo and London Business School.
Kibru, M. (2012). EMployement Challenges in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Kristiansen, S., & Nurul, I. (2004). Entrepreneurial Intentions among Indonesian and Norwegian Students. Journal of
Enterprising Culture, 12(1), 55–78.
Krueger, N. F., Jr., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory &
Practice, 18(3), 91–104.
Krueger, N. F., Jr., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of
Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.
Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness
of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
Ministry of Youth, Sports & Culture of Ethiopia. (2005). National youth policy. Retrieved on March 14, 2014 from http://
www.mysc.gov.et/youth.html.
NLFS. (2005).National Labour Force Survey.Central Statistical Authority of Ethiopia.
Olomi, D., & Urassa, G. (2008). The constraints to access the capital by SMEs of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: REPOA.
Osano, H., & Languitone, H. (2016). Factors influencing access to finance by SMEs in Mozambique: case of SMEs in
Maputo central business district. Journal of Innovation & Enterpreneurship, 5, 13.
Phan, H. P., Wong, P. K., & Wang, C. K. (2002). Antecedents to Entrepreneurship among University Students in
Singapore: Beliefs, Attitudes and Background. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 10(2), 151–174.
Stam, W. (2010). Industry event participation and network brokerage among entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of
Management Studies, 47(4), 625–653.
Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London; New York: Routledge.
Mehari and Belay Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2017) 6:11 Page 22 of 22
Talent Youth Association (TaYa). (2013). Young People and the Demographic Dividend.
Talent Youth Association (TaYa). (2014). Report.Ethiopia.
Tkachev, A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional
Development, 11(3), 269–280.
Verheul, L., Thruik, R., & Grilo, I. (2005). Determinants of self-employment preference and realization of women and men in
Europe and the United States, 2005, EM Scales paper N200513. Zoetermeer: EIM Business and Policy Research.
Woods, A., & Joyce, P. (2003). Owner-managers and the practice of strategic management”. International Small Business
Journal, 21(2), 181–195.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial
intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265.