What Is SD-WAN

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that SD-WAN simplifies WAN management by decoupling hardware and software and allowing the use of less expensive internet connections. It also discusses some of the main components and applications of SD-WAN.

According to MEF Forum, the main components of an SD-WAN architecture are the SD-WAN Edge, SD-WAN Controller, and SD-WAN Orchestrator.

The passage states that WANs face challenges like network congestion, packet delay variation, packet loss, and service outages. They also have difficulties supporting modern applications that require low latency and increasing bandwidth needs.

SD-WAN

SD-WAN is an acronym for software-defined networking in a wide area network (WAN). SD-WAN simplifies
the management and operation of a WAN by decoupling the networking hardware from its control mechanism.
This concept is similar to how software-defined networking implements virtualization technology to improve
data center management and operation.[1]

A key application of SD-WAN is to allow companies to build higher-performance WANs using lower-cost and
commercially available Internet access, enabling businesses to partially or wholly replace more expensive
private WAN connection technologies such as MPLS.[1]

American marketing research firm Gartner predicted in 2018 that by 2023 more than 90 percent of WAN edge
infrastructure refresh initiatives will be based on virtualized customer premises equipment (vCPE) platforms or
SD-WAN software/appliances.[2]

Contents
Overview
History
Required characteristics
Form factors
Features
Resilience
Quality of service
Security
Application optimization
Deployment options
Administration and troubleshooting
Online traffic engineering
Complementary technology
SD-WAN versus WAN Optimization
WAN edge routers
SD-WAN versus hybrid WAN
SD-WAN versus MPLS
SD-CORE
Testing & validation
Marketplace
Opensource
References

Overview
WANs allow companies to extend their computer networks over large distances, connecting remote branch
offices to data centers and each other, and delivering applications and services required to perform business
functions. Due to the physical constraints imposed by the propagation time over large distances, and the need to
integrate multiple service providers to cover global geographies (often crossing nation boundaries), WANs face
important operational challenges, including network congestion, packet delay variation,[3] packet loss,[4] and
even service outages. Modern applications such as VoIP calling, videoconferencing, streaming media, and
virtualized applications and desktops require low latency.[5] Bandwidth requirements are also increasing,
especially for applications featuring high-definition video.[6] It can be expensive and difficult to expand WAN
capability, with corresponding difficulties related to network management and troubleshooting.[1]

SD-WAN products are designed to address these network problems.[7] By enhancing or even replacing
traditional branch routers with virtualization appliances that can control application-level policies and offer a
network overlay, less expensive consumer-grade Internet links can act more like a dedicated circuit. This
simplifies the setup process for branch personnel.[8] MEF Forum has defined an SD-WAN architecture[9]
consisting of an SD-WAN Edge, SD-WAN Controller and SD-WAN Orchestrator. The SD-WAN Edge is a
physical or virtual network function that is placed at an organization's branch/regional/central office site, data
center, and in public or private clouds cloud platforms.[9] MEF Forum has published the first SD-WAN service
standard, MEF 70[10] which defines the fundamental characteristics of an SD-WAN service plus service
requirements and attributes.

The SD-WAN Orchestrator, which typically also includes the SD-WAN Controller functionality, is used to set
centralized policies which are used to make forwarding decisions for application Flows[10]. Application flows are
IP packets that have been classified to determine their user application or grouping of applications to which they
are associated. The grouping of application flows based on a common type, e.g., conferencing applications, is
referred to as an Application Flow Group in MEF 70. Per MEF 70, the SD-WAN Edge classifies incoming IP
packets at the SD-WAN UNI[10], determines, via OSI Layer 2 through Layer 7 classification, which application
flow the IP packets belong to, and then applies the policies to block the application flow or allow the application
flows to be forwarded based on the availability of a route to the destination SD-WAN UNI on a remote SD-WAN
Edge. This helps ensure that application performance meets service level agreements (SLAs).[11]

History
WANs were very important for the development of networking technologies in general and were for a long time
the most important application of networks both for military and enterprise applications. The ability to
communicate data over large distances was one of the main driving factors for the development of data
communications technologies, as it made it possible to overcome the distance limitations, as well as shortening
the time necessary to exchange messages with other parties.

Legacy WANs technologies allowed communication over circuits connecting two or more endpoints. Earlier
technologies supported point-to-point communication over a slow speed circuit, usually between two fixed
locations. As technology evolved, WAN circuits became faster and more flexible. Innovations like circuit and
packet switching (in the form of X.25, ATM and later Internet Protocol or Multiprotocol Label Switching
communications) allowed communication to become more dynamic, supporting ever-growing networks.[12]

The need for strict control, security and quality of service meant that multinational corporations were very
conservative in leasing and operating their WANs. National regulations restricted the companies that could
provide local service in each country, and complex arrangements were necessary to establish truly global
networks. All that changed with the growth of the Internet, which allowed entities around the world to connect
to each other. However, over the first years, the uncontrolled nature of the Internet was not considered adequate
or safe for private corporate use.

Independent of safety concerns, connectivity to the Internet became a mandatory necessity to the point where
every branch required Internet access. At first, due to the safety concerns, private communications were still
done via WAN, and communication with other entities (including customers and partners) moved to the
Internet.

As the Internet grew in reach and maturity, companies started to evaluate how to leverage it for private
corporate communications. During the early 2000s, application delivery over the WAN became an important
topic of research and commercial innovation [13]. Over the next decade, the increasing computing power made it
possible to create software-based appliances that were able to analyze traffic and make informed decisions in
real time, making it possible to create large-scale overlay networks over the public Internet that could replicate
all the functionality of legacy WANs, at a fraction of the cost.
SD-WAN combines several technologies to create full-fledged private networks, with the ability to dynamically
share network bandwidth across the connection points.[1]. Additional enhancements include central controllers,
zero-touch provisioning, integrated analytics and on-demand circuit provisioning, with some network
intelligence based in the cloud, allowing centralized policy management and security.[14]

Networking publications started using the term SD-WAN to describe this new networking trend as early as
2014.[7]

Required characteristics
Research firm Gartner has defined an SD-WAN as having four required characteristics:[1]

The ability to support multiple connection types, such as MPLS, Last Mile Fiber Optic Network or through
high speed cellular networks e.g. 4G LTE and 5G wireless technologies
The ability to do dynamic path selection, for load sharing and resiliency purposes
A simple interface that is easy to configure and manage
The ability to support VPNs, and third party services such as WAN optimization controllers, firewalls and
web gateways

Form factors
SD-WAN products can be physical appliances or software based only.[15]

Features
Features of SD-WANs include resilience, quality of service (QoS), security, and performance, with flexible
deployment options; simplified administration and troubleshooting; and online traffic engineering.

Resilience

A resilient SD-WAN reduces network downtime. To be resilient, the technology must feature real time detection
of outages and automatic switch over (fail over) to working links.[16]

Quality of service

SD-WAN technology supports quality of service by having application level awareness, giving bandwidth
priority to the most critical applications. This may include dynamic path selection, sending an application on a
faster link, or even splitting an application between two paths to improve performance by delivering it faster.[16]

Security

SD-WAN communication is usually secured using IPsec, a staple of WAN security.[17]

Application optimization

SD-WANs can improve application delivery using caching, storing recently accessed information in memory to
speed future access.[18]

Deployment options
Most SD-WAN products are available as pre-configured appliances, placed at the network edge in data centers,
branch offices and other remote locations. There are also virtual appliances that can work on existing network
hardware, or the appliance can be deployed as a virtual appliance on the cloud in environments such as Amazon
Web Services (AWS), Unified Communications as a service (UCaaS) or as Software as a Service (SaaS).[19] This
allows enterprises to benefit from SD-WAN services as they migrate application delivery from corporate servers
to cloud based services such as Salesforce.com and Google apps.[15]

Administration and troubleshooting

Management simplicity is a key requirement for SD-WANs, per Gartner. As with network equipment in general,
GUIs may be preferred to command line interface (CLI) methods of configuration and control.[20] Other
beneficial administrative features include automatic path selection, the ability to centrally configure each end
appliance by pushing configuration changes out, and even a true software defined networking approach that lets
all appliances and virtual appliances be configured centrally based on application needs rather than underlying
hardware.[1]

Online traffic engineering

With a global view of network status, a controller that manages SD-WAN can perform careful and adaptive
traffic engineering by assigning new transfer requests according to current usage of resources (links). For
example, this can be achieved by performing central calculation of transmission rates at the controller and rate-
limiting at the senders (end-points) according to such rates.[21][22][23][24][25]

Complementary technology

SD-WAN versus WAN Optimization

There are some similarities between SD-WAN and WAN optimization, the name given to the collection of
techniques used to increase data-transfer efficiencies across WANs. The goal of each is to accelerate application
delivery between branch offices and data centers, but SD-WAN technology focuses additionally on cost savings
and efficiency, specifically by allowing lower cost network links to perform the work of more expensive leased
lines, whereas WAN Optimization focuses squarely on improving packet delivery. An SD-WAN utilizing
virtualization techniques assisted with WAN Optimization traffic control allows network bandwidth to
dynamically grow or shrink as needed. SD-WAN technology and WAN optimization can be used separately or
together,[26] and some SD-WAN vendors are adding WAN optimization features to their products.[18][27]

WAN edge routers

A WAN edge router is a device that routes data packets between different WAN locations, giving an enterprise
access to a carrier network. Also called a boundary router, it is unlike a core router, which only sends packets
within a single network.[28] SD-WANs can work as an overlay to simplify the management of existing WAN edge
routers, by lowering dependence on routing protocols.[7] SD-WAN can also potentially be an alternative to WAN
Edge routers.[8]

SD-WAN versus hybrid WAN

SD-WANs are similar to hybrid WANs, and sometimes the terms are used interchangeably, but they are not
identical. A hybrid WAN consists of different connection types, and may have a software defined network (SDN)
component, but doesn't have to.[29]

SD-WAN versus MPLS


Cloud-based SD-WAN offers advanced features, such as enhanced security, seamless cloud and support for
mobile users, that result naturally from the use of cloud infrastructure. As a result, cloud-based SD-WAN can
replace MPLS, enabling organizations to release resources once tied to WAN investments and create new
capabilities.[30]

An overview discussing three typical reasons to compare MPLS with SD WAN. Specifically where IT teams need
to retain MPLS due to contract commitments and where the Enterprise migrates from MPLS to an Internet
based SD WAN.[31]

SD-CORE

SD-WAN appliances alone do not solve the middle-mile performance issues of the Internet core. SD-CORE
architectures (https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/enterprise-networks/sd-wan/sd-wan-performance-m
pls.html) are more consistent than the Internet, routing traffic optimally through the core. SD-CORE is available
as Independent MPLS backbones or Software-defined backbones. (https://www.sd-wan-experts.com/blog/sd-c
ore-qos-without-mpls/)

Testing & validation


As there is no standard algorithm for SD-WAN controllers, device manufacturers each use their own proprietary
algorithm in the transmission of data. These algorithms determine which traffic to direct over which link and
when to switch traffic from one link to another. Given the breadth of options available in relation to both
software and hardware SD-WAN control solutions, it's imperative they be tested and validated under real-world
conditions within a lab setting prior to deployment.

There are multiple solutions available for testing purposes, ranging from purpose-built network emulation
appliances which can apply specified network impairments to the network being tested in order to reliably
validate performance, to software-based solutions.

Marketplace
IT website Network World divides the SD-WAN vendor market into three groups: established networking
vendors who are adding SD-WAN products to their offerings, WAN specialists who are starting to integrate SD-
WAN functionality into their products, and startups focused specifically on the SD-WAN market.[1]

Alternatively, a market overview by Nemertes Research groups SD-WAN vendors into categories based on their
original technology space, and which are "Pure-play SD-WAN providers", "WAN optimization vendors", "Link-
aggregation vendors", and "General network vendors"[32] While Network World's second category (startups
focused specifically on the SD-WAN market), is generally equivalent to Nemertes' "Pure-play SD-WAN
providers" category, Nemertes offers a more detailed view of the preexisting WAN and overall networking
providers.

Additionally, Nemertes Research also describes the in-net side of the SD-WAN market, describing the go-to-
market strategy of connectivity providers entering the SD-WAN market. These providers include "Network-as-a-
service vendors", "Carriers or telcos", "Content delivery networks" and "Secure WAN providers".[32]

Several online resources, including the networking technology podcast "Packet Pushers", keep an updated list of
existing SD-WAN vendors.[18] In June 2018, Network World named 10 hot SD-WAN startups.[33]

A guide to 20 UK and US SD WAN vendors with a brief overview of capability helping the Enterprise to evaluate
the Software-WAN market.[34]

Opensource
MEF 70 standardizes SD-WAN service attributes and uses standard IPv4 and IPv6 routing protocols. SD-WAN
services also use standard IPsec encryption protocols. Additional standardization for other SD-WAN functions
and related security functionality not covered in MEF 70 are under development at the MEF Forum. There are
several opensource SD-WAN solutions and opensource SD-WAN implementations available. For example, the
Linux Foundation has three projects that intersect with and help the SD-WAN market: ONAP, OpenDaylight
Project, and the Tungsten Fabric (formerly Juniper Networks' OpenContrail).

References
1. "SD-WAN: What it is and why you'll use it one day" (http://www.networkworld.com/article/3031279/internet/s
d-wan-what-it-is-and-why-you-ll-use-it-one-day.html). networkworld.com. 2016-02-10. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
2. "Gartner Report Highlights Different Vendor SD-WAN Strategies" (https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/analys
is/gartner-report-highlights/2018/11/). gartner.com. 2018-11-15. Retrieved 2019-05-29.
3. "How to address WAN jitter issues for real-time applications" (http://www.networkworld.com/article/2223363/
cisco-subnet/how-to-address-wan-jitter-issues-for-real-time-applications.html). networkworld.com. 2012-10-
22. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
4. "What's slowing down your network and how to fix it" (http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/Whats-slowin
g-down-your-network-and-how-to-fix-it). computerweekly.com. 2015-04-01. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
5. "Low-latency networks aren't just for Wall Street anymore" (https://gigaom.com/2012/04/06/low-latency-netw
orks-arent-just-for-wall-street-anymore/). gigaom.com. 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
6. "How fast should my Internet connection be to watch streaming HD movies?" (http://entertainment.howstuffw
orks.com/fast-internet-connection-for-streaming-hd-movies1.htm). HowStuffWorks.com. 2011-10-31.
Retrieved 2016-06-27.
7. "Software-Defined WAN: A Primer" (http://www.networkcomputing.com/networking/software-defined-wan-pri
mer/2018665838). networkcomputing.com. 2014-09-09. Retrieved 2016-06-27.
8. "SD-What? Understanding SD-WAN" (http://searchsdn.techtarget.com/feature/SD-What-Understanding-SD-
WAN). techtarget.com. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
9. Santitoro, Ralph (July 2017). "Understanding SD-WAN Managed Services" (http://www.mef.net/resources/do
wnload?id=45&fileid=file1). MEF Forum.
10. "SD-WAN Service Attributes and Services" (https://www.mef.net/resources/technical-specifications/downloa
d?id=122&fileid=file1). MEF Forum. July 2019.
11. "SD-WAN Vendors Making A Splash" (http://www.networkcomputing.com/networking/sd-wan-vendors-makin
g-splash/1374423624). networkcomputing.com. 2015-08-27. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
12. "A Brief History of the Enterprise WAN" (http://www.networkworld.com/article/2222089/cisco-subnet/a-brief-h
istory-of-the-enterprise-wan.html). networkworld.com. 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
13. "Managing the WAN" (http://www.networkworld.com/article/2309455/lan-wan/managing-the-wan.html).
networkworld.com. 2006-03-13. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
14. "SD-WAN: The Killer App For Enterprise SDN?" (http://www.networkcomputing.com/networking/sd-wan-killer
-app-enterprise-sdn/1747434541). networkcomputing.com. 2015-07-22. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
15. "SD-WAN: Bringing WAN Sexy Back" (http://www.nojitter.com/post/240170850/sdwan-bringing-wan-sexy-ba
ck). nojitter.com. 2015-11-02. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
16. "Do wide area networks need to get software-defined?" (http://searchsdn.techtarget.com/tip/Do-wide-area-n
etworks-need-to-get-software-defined). techtarget.com. Retrieved 2015-05-13.
17. "How IPsec provides secure communications" (http://searchenterprisewan.techtarget.com/tip/How-IPsec-pro
vides-secure-communications/). techtarget.com. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
18. "List of SD-WAN Vendors" (https://packetpushers.net/virtual-toolbox/list-sd-wan-vendors/).
packetpushers.net. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
19. Hardesty, Linda (20 December 2018). "Oracle's Purchase of Talari Makes It the First Major Public Cloud
Provider to Offer SD-WAN" (https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/news/oracles-purchase-of-talari-makes-it-th
e-first-major-public-cloud-provider-to-offer-sd-wan/2018/12/). SDX Central. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
20. "Difference Between GUI and Command Line" (http://www.differencebtw.com/difference-between-gui-and-co
mmand-line/). differencebtw.com. 2015-05-29. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
21. C. Hong; et al. (2013). "Achieving High Utilization with Software-Driven WAN" (http://www.microsoft.com/en-
us/research/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Achieving-High-Utilization-with-Software-Driven-WAN.pdf) (PDF).
ACM SIGCOMM.
22. S. Kandula; et al. (2014). "Calendaring for Wide Area Networks" (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/w
p-content/uploads/2016/02/sigc334-kandula.pdf) (PDF). ACM SIGCOMM.
23. H. Zhang; et al. (2015). "Guaranteeing Deadlines for Inter-Datacenter Transfers" (https://cs.nju.edu.cn/tianch
en/lunwen/2015/eurosys2015.pdf) (PDF). ACM EUROSYS.
24. M. Noormohammadpour; et al. (2017). "DCCast: Efficient Point to Multipoint Transfers Across Datacenters"
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316921061_DCCast_Efficient_Point_to_Multipoint_Transfers_Acr
oss_Datacenters). USENIX HOTCLOUD.
25. M. Noormohammadpour; et al. (2018). "QuickCast: Fast and Efficient Inter-Datacenter Transfers using
Forwarding Tree Cohorts" (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322243498_QuickCast_Fast_and_Effici
ent_Inter-Datacenter_Transfers_using_Forwarding_Tree_Cohorts). IEEE INFOCOM. Retrieved January 23,
2018.
26. "Why SD-WAN is the next breed of WAN optimization" (http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/feature/Why-
the-next-breed-of-WAN-optimization-is-SD-WAN). techtarget.com. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
27. "Citrix Combines SD-WAN, WAN Optimization In Single Appliance" (https://packetpushers.net/citrix-combine
s-sd-wan-wan-optimization-single-appliance/). packetpushers.com. 2016-03-16. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
28. "Definition: edge router" (http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/edge-router). techtarget.com.
Retrieved 2016-06-29.
29. "Definition hybrid WAN" (http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/hybrid-WAN). techtarget.com.
Retrieved 2016-08-22.
30. "SD-WAN vs. MPLS vs. Public Internet" (https://www.catonetworks.com/blog/sd-wan-vs-mpls-vs-public-inter
net/). Retrieved 2018-02-28.
31. "How to compare SD WAN vs MPLS?" (https://www.netify.co.uk/learning/how-to-compare-sd-wan-vs-mpls).
Retrieved 2020-06-28.
32. "SD-WAN providers: Consider the small with the big" (http://searchsdn.techtarget.com/tip/SD-WAN-provider
s-Consider-the-small-with-the-big). SearchSDN. Retrieved 2017-11-01.
33. Vance, Jeff. "10 hot SD-WAN startups to watch" (https://www.networkworld.com/article/3284367/sd-wan/10-
hot-sd-wan-startups-to-watch.html). Network World. Retrieved 2018-10-30.
34. Sturt, Robert. "Who are the 20 top/best SD WAN providers & vendors?" (https://www.netify.co.uk/learning/to
p-best-sd-wan-providers-vendors). Netify. Retrieved 2020-06-28.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SD-WAN&oldid=964952954"

This page was last edited on 28 June 2020, at 15:43 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you
agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.

You might also like