RANK RANKL OPG During Orthodontic Tooth Movement: M Yamaguchi
RANK RANKL OPG During Orthodontic Tooth Movement: M Yamaguchi
RANK RANKL OPG During Orthodontic Tooth Movement: M Yamaguchi
Introduction
Mechanical stress evokes biochemical responses and source of the aqueous component of GCF; however, the
structural changes in a variety of cell types in vivo and gingival tissue through which the fluid passes, along
in vitro. The overall objective of many investigations with bacteria present in the tissue and gingival crevice,
has been to further understanding of the mechanisms can modify its composition (5). With constituents of
involved in converting molecular and ⁄ or mechanical GCF being derived from a variety of sources, including
stress to the cellular responses resulting in tooth microbial dental plaque, host inflammatory cells, host
movement. In sites at which inflammation and tissue tissue, and serum, GCF varies according to the condi-
destruction have occurred, cells may communicate tion of the periodontal tissues. In addition to the cells,
with one another through the interaction of cytokines immunoglobulins, microorganisms, toxins, and lyso-
and other related molecules. Thus, it is important to somal enzymes detected in GCF, the mechanism of
more completely elucidate the complex cytokine bone resorption may also be related to the release of
cascade flow associated with inflammation-mediated inflammatory mediators present in GCF. Recently, a
tissue destruction at the molecular level (2). number of GCF constituents have been shown to be
The role of the receptor activator of nuclear factor- diagnostic markers of active tissue destruction in peri-
kappa (RANK), receptor activator of nuclear factor- odontal diseases (6), although only a few studies have
kappa ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) focused on those involved in bone remodeling during
system in inducing bone remodeling was recently orthodontic tooth movement. Mogi et al. (7) found that
demonstrated. The tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related GCF concentrations of IL-1b and IL-6 were significantly
ligand, RANKL, and its two receptors RANK and OPG, higher in a group with severe periodontal disease
have been shown to be involved in this remodeling compared with controls, and Yavuzyilmaz et al. (8)
process (3). RANKL is a downstream regulator of demonstrated the GCF IL-1b and TNF-a levels had a
osteoclast formation and activation, through which positive correlation to mean pocket depths, suggesting
many hormones and cytokines produce their osteo- that the cytokines may be involved in the pathogenesis
resorptive effect. In the bone system, RANKL is of periodontal diseases. Further, Mogi et al. (9) reported
expressed on the osteoblast cell lineage and it exerts its that an increased concentration of RANKL and
effect by binding to the RANK receptor on osteoclast decreased concentration of OPG were detected in GCF
lineage cells. This binding leads to rapid differentiation from patients with periodontitis, while the ratio of
of hematopoietic osteoclast precursors to mature RANKL concentration to that of OPG in GCF samples
osteoclasts. OPG is a decoy receptor produced by was significantly higher for patients with periodontal
osteoblastic cells, and competes with RANK for RANKL disease than for healthy subjects. Taken together, these
binding. The biologic effects of OPG on bone cells data suggest that RANKL and OPG contribute to
include inhibition of terminal stages of osteoclast osteoclastic bone destruction in periodontal disease.
differentiation, suppression of activation of matrix Storey (10) proposed that the early phase of tooth
osteoclasts, and induction of apoptosis. Thus, bone movement involves an acute inflammatory response
remodeling is controlled by a balance between RANK– characterized by periodontal vasodilation and migration
RANKL binding and OPG production (4). This review of leukocytes out of the capillaries. Recent research has
covers current evidence regarding the role of the led to the hypothesis that inflammatory mediators are
RANK ⁄ RANKL ⁄ OPG system in periodontal tissue reac- released following mechanical stimulus, triggering the
tions, in response to orthodontic force application. biologic processes associated with alveolar bone
resorption and apposition (2). Among the local bio-
chemical mediators are cytokines secreted by mono-
Gingival crevicular fluid study during nuclear cells and leukocytes. Cytokines can provoke the
orthodontic tooth movement synthesis and secretion of numerous substances that
form the molecular basis for cell-to-cell communication,
Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) is an osmotically medi- including prostaglandins (PGs) and growth factors, thus
ated inflammatory exudate found in the gingival sulcus, interacting directly or indirectly with bone cells (2).
where it tends to increase in volume with inflammation Uematsu et al. (11) found that the levels of inflammatory
and greater capillary permeability. Serum is the primary mediators (IL-1b, IL-6, TNF-a, epidermal growth factor,
and b2 microglobulin) in GCF were elevated during periodontal tissues during experimental tooth move-
orthodontic treatment, and Grieve et al. (12) reported ment of rat molars. Therefore, it is suggested that in
similar results for PGE and IL-1b. Further, Lowney et al. response to mechanical stress, RANKL is regulated by
(13) described an increase in TNF-a in GCF from teeth inflammatory cytokines in the PDL.
undergoing orthodontic forces. As noted above, inflam- The number and distribution patterns of RANKL and
matory mediators have been detected in GCF samples RANK-expressing osteoclasts change when excessive
during orthodontic tooth movement in the early phase. orthodontic force is applied to periodontal tissues.
Nishijima et al. (14) found an increased concentration of Aihara et al. (21) and Kim et al. (22) showed the pres-
RANKL in GCF during orthodontic tooth movement, and ence of RANKL in periodontal tissues during experi-
the ratio of concentration of RANKL to that of OPG in the mental tooth movement of rat molars. Kanzaki et al.
GCF was significantly higher than in control sites in (23, 24) demonstrated that transfer of the RANKL gene
another study. Further, Kawasaki et al. (15) reported that to the periodontal tissue activated osteoclastogenesis
the age-related decrease in amount of tooth movement and accelerated the amount of experimental tooth
may be related to a decrease in RANKL ⁄ OPG ratio in GCF movement in rats. In contrast, OPG gene transfer
during the early stages of orthodontic tooth movement. inhibited RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis and
Consequently, analysis of GCF samples may provide a inhibited experimental tooth movement. Therefore, it
better understanding of the biochemical processes is suggested that PGE2, inflammatory cytokines, and
associated with tooth movement, potentially helping the RANKL–RANK system may be involved in regula-
clinicians make therapeutic choices based on qualitative tion of orthodontic tooth movement (Fig. 1).
and quantitative information.
compression force the production of RANKL increased Several investigations have been conducted on the
via FGF-2 expression. These results suggest that PDL effects of low-energy laser irradiation on bone tissues
cells under mechanical stress may induce osteoclasto- and these may relate to potential applications in
genesis through upregulation of RANKL expression orthodontic tooth movement. Saito and Shimizu (47)
during orthodontic tooth movement. reported the stimulatory effects of low-energy laser
irradiation on bone regeneration in the median pala-
tine suture area during rapid maxillary expansion in
Low-power laser irradiation stimulates the rats. Ozawa et al. (48) demonstrated that laser irradia-
velocity of tooth movement via the tion stimulates cellular proliferation and differentiation
RANK ⁄ RANKL ⁄ OPG system of osteoblast lineage nodule-forming cells, especially in
committed precursors, resulting in an increase in the
From the patientÕs point of view, accelerating tooth number of differentiated osteoblastic cells as well as in
movement would be desirable during orthodontic bone formation. Kawasaki and Shimizu (49) reported
treatment to reduce treatment duration. Literature that low-energy laser irradiation stimulated the amount
shows various methods to stimulate bone remodeling of tooth movement and formation of osteoclasts on the
such as drug injections (30), electric stimulation (31), pressure side during experimental tooth movement
and ultrasound application (32). Recently, various bio- in vivo. Further, Fujita et al. (50) and Yamaguchi et al.
stimulatory effects of low-energy laser irradiation have (51) demonstrated that low-energy laser irradiation
been reported in wound healing (33–35), fibroblast (36, enhanced the velocity of tooth movement via
37), and chondral (38) proliferation, collagen synthesis (RANK) ⁄ RANKL and the macrophage-colony stimulat-
(39–41), and nerve regeneration (42). Acceleration of ing factor and its receptor (c-Fms) expression.
bone regeneration by laser treatment has been the Together, these findings suggest that low-energy laser
focus of recent studies (43, 44). In the field of ortho- irradiation accelerates bone remodeling and thus could
dontics, low-energy laser irradiation has been utilized potentially shorten the orthodontic treatment period.
for several types of clinical orthodontic treatment, such
as reduction of post-adjustment pain (45), or treatment
of traumatic ulcers in the oral mucosa induced by an Root resorption and the
orthodontic appliance (46). However, scant informa- RANK ⁄ RANKL ⁄ OPG system
tion is available concerning the effects of low-energy
laser irradiation on bone remodeling during ortho- Many orthodontists consider external apical root
dontic tooth movement. resorption (EARR) to be an unavoidable pathologic
Acknowledgements: This research was supported in part by periodontal cells to mechanical stress in vivo and in vitro. Am J
a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:226–40.
for the Promotion of Science (C: 18592252, C: 19592367). 17. Chumbley AB, Tuncay OC. The effect of indomethacin (an aspi-
rin-like drug) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J
Orthod 1986;89:312–4.
18. Yamasaki K, Shibata Y, Imai S, Tani Y, Shibasaki Y, Fukuhara T.
References Clinical application of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) upon orthodontic
1. Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1984;85:508–18.
reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 19. Palmon A, Roos H, Edel J, Zax B, Savion N, Grosskop A et al.
2006;129:469, e1–32. Inverse dose- and time-dependent effect of basic fibroblast
2. Davidovitch Z, Nicolay OF, Ngan PW, Shanfeld JL. Neurotrans- growth factor on the gene expression of collagen type I and matrix
mitters, cytokines, and the control of alveolar bone remodeling in metalloproteinaseI by periodontal ligament cells in culture.
orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1988;32:411–35. J Periodontol 2000;71:974–80.
3. Alhashimi N, Frithiof L, Brudvik P, Bakhiet M. Orthodontic tooth 20. Shiotani A, Shibasaki Y, Sasaki T. Localization of receptor acti-
movement and de novo synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines. vator of NF-kappaB ligand, RANKL, in periodontal tissues during
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:307–12. experimental movement of rat molars. J Electron Microsc
4. Theoleyre S, Wittrant Y, Tat SK, Fortun Y, Redini F, Heymann D. 2001;50:365–9.
The molecular triad OPG ⁄ RANK ⁄ RANKL: involvement in the 21. Aihara N, Otsuka A, Yamaguchi M, Okada H, Utunomiya T,
orchestration of pathophysiological bone remodeling. Cytokine Yamamoto H et al. Localization of RANKL and cathepsin K, B, and
Growth Factor Rev 2004;15:457–75. L in rat periodontal tissues during experimental tooth movement.
5. Cimasoni G. Crevicular fluid updated. In: Myers HM, editor. Orthod Waves 2005;64:107–13.
Monographs in Oral Sciences. Basel: Karger; 1983. pp. 1–152. 22. Kim T, Handa A, Iida J, Yoshida S. RANKL expression in rat
6. Lamster IB, Novak MJ. Host mediators in gingival crevicular fluid: periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic
implications for the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Crit Rev force. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:244–50.
Oral Biol Med 1992;3:31–60. 23. Kanzaki H, Chiba M, Takahashi I, Haruyama N, Nishimura M,
7. Mogi M, Otogoto J, Ota N, Inagaki H, Minami M, Kojima K. Mitani H. Local OPG gene transfer to periodontal tissue inhibits
Interleukin 1 beta, interleukin 6, beta 2-microglobulin, and orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 2004;83:920–5.
transforming growth factor-alpha in gingival crevicular fluid from 24. Kanzaki H, Chiba M, Arai K, Takahashi I, Haruyama N, Nishimura
human periodontal disease. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:535–9. M et al. Local RANKL gene transfer to the periodontal tissue
8. Yavuzyilmaz E, Yamalik N, Bulut S, Ozen S, Ersoy F, Saatci U. The accelerates orthodontic tooth movement. Gene Ther 2006;13:
gingival crevicular fluid interleukin-1 beta and tumour necrosis 678–85.
factor-alpha levels in patients with rapidly progressive perio- 25. Yamaguchi M, Shimizu N, Goseki T, Shibata Y, Takiquchi H,
dontitis. Aust Dent J 1995;40:46–9. Iwasawa T et al. Effect of different magnitudes of tension force on
9. Mogi M, Otogoto J, Ota N, Togari A. Differential expression of prostaglandin E2 production by human periodontal ligament
RANKL and osteoprotegerin in gingival crevicular fluid of patients cells. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39:877–84.
with periodontitis. J Dent Res 2004;83:166–9. 26. Shimizu N, Ozawa Y, Yamaguchi M, Goseki T, Ohzeki K, Abiko
10. Storey E. The nature of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Y. Induction of COX-2 expression by mechanical tension force
1973;63:292–314. in human periodontal ligament cells. J Periodontol 1998;69:670–
11. Uematsu S, Mogi M, Deguchi T. Interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, tumor 7.
necrosis factor-alpha, epidermal growth factor, and beta 2-micro- 27. Nakao K, Goto T, Gunjigake KK, Konoo T, Kobayashi S, Yamag-
globulin levels are elevated in gingival crevicular fluid during uchi K. Intermittent force induces high RANKL expression in
human orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 1996;75:562–7. human periodontal ligament cells. J Dent Res 2007;86:623–8.
12. Grieve WG III, Johnson GK, Moore RN, Reinhardt RA, DuBois LM. 28. Yamaguchi M, Aihara N, Kojima T, Kasai K. RANKL increase in
Prostaglandin E (PGE) and interleukin-1b(IL-1b) levels in gingival compressed periodontal ligament cells from root resorption.
crevicular fluid during human orthodontic tooth movement. Am J J Dent Res 2006;85:751–6.
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:369–74. 29. Nakajima R, Yamaguchi M, Kojima T, Takano M, Kasai K. Effects
13. Lowney JJ, Norton LA, Shafer DM, Rossomando EF. Orthodontic of compression force on fibroblast growth factor-2 and receptor
forces increase tumor necrosis factor-a in the human gingival activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand production by peri-
sulcus. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:519–24. odontal ligament cells in vitro. J Periodontal Res 2008;43:168–73.
14. Nishijima Y, Yamaguchi M, Kojima T, Aihara N, Nakajima R, Kasai 30. Kobayashi Y, Takagi H, Sakai H, Hashimoto F, Mataki S, Kobay-
K. Levels of RANKL and OPG in gingival crevicular fluid during ashi K et al. Effects of local administration of osteocalcin on
orthodontic tooth movement and effect of compression force on experimental tooth movement. Angle Orthod 1998;68:259–66.
releases from periodontal ligament cells in vitro. Orthod Cranio- 31. Spadaro JA. Mechanical and electrical interactions in bone
fac Res 2006;9:63–70. remodeling. Bioelectromagnetics 1997;18:193–202.
15. Kawasaki K, Takahashi T, Yamaguchi M, Kasai K. Effects of aging 32. Hadjiargyrou M, McLeod K, Ryaby JP, Rubin C. Enhancement of
on RANKL and OPG levels in gingival crevicular fluid during fracture healing by low intensity ultrasound. Clin Orthop
orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006;9:137– 1998;355(Suppl.):S216–29.
42. 33. Kana JS, Hutschenreiter G, Haina D, Waidelich W. Effect of
16. Saito M, Saito S, Ngan PW, Shanfeld J, Davidovitch Z. Interleukin low-power density laser radiation on healing of open skin wounds
1 beta and prostaglandin E are involved in the response of in rats. Arch Surg 1981;116:293–6.
34. Mester E, Nagylucskay S, Tisza S, Mester A. Stimulation of wound 48. Ozawa Y, Shimizu N, Kariya G, Abiko Y. Low-energy laser
healing by means of laser rays. Part III – Investigation of the effect irradiation stimulates bone nodule formation at early stages of
on immune competent cells. Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung cell culture in rat calvarial cells. Bone 1998;22:347–54.
1978;19:163–70. 49. Kawasaki K, Shimizu N. Effects of low-energy laser irradiation on
35. Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A. The biomedical effects of laser bone remodeling during experimental tooth movement in rats.
application. Lasers Surg Med 1985;5:31–9. Lasers Surg Med 2000;26:282–91.
36. Oudry M, Franquin JC, Pourreau-Schreider N, Martin PM. 50. Fujita S, Yamaguchi M, Utsunomiya T, Yamamoto H, Kasai K.
Effect of a helium-neon laser on cellular growth: an in vitro Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates the tooth movement
study of human gingival fibroblasts. J Biologie Buccale 1988; velocity via expression of RANK and RANKL. Orthod Craniofac
16:129–35. Res 2008;11:143–55.
37. van Breugel HH, Bar PR. Power density and exposure time of 51. Yamaguchi M, Fujita S, Yoshida T, Oikawa K, Utsunomiya T,
He–Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy Yamamoto H et al. Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates the
dose in photo-biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro. Lasers tooth movement velocity via expression of M-CSF and c-fms.
Surg Med 1992;12:528–37. Orthod Waves 2007;66:139–48.
38. Schultz RJ, Krishnamurthy S, Thelmo W, Rodriguez JE, Harvey G. 52. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflamma-
Effects of varying intensities of laser energy on articular cartilage: tory root resorption. Part II: The clinical aspects. Angle Orthod
a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med 1985;5:577–88. 2002;72:180–4.
39. Abergel RP, Meeker CA, Lam TS, Dwyer RM, Lesavoy MA, Uitto J. 53. Killiany DM. Root resorption caused by orthodontic treatment: an
Control of connective tissue metabolism by lasers: recent evidence-based review of literature. Semin Orthod 1999;5:128–33.
developments and future prospects. J Am Acad Dermatol 54. Harris EF, Kineret SE, Tolley EA. A heritable component for
1984;11:1142–50. external apical root resorption in patients treated orthodontically.
40. Balboni GC, Brandi ML, Zonefrati R, Repice F. Effects of He–Ne ⁄ I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:301–9.
R. Laser irradiation on two lines of normal human fibroblasts 55. Harris EF, Boggan BW, Wheeler DA. Apical root resorption in
in vitro. Arch Ital Anat Embryol 1986;91:179–88. patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. J Tenn Dent
41. Bosatra M, Jucci A, Olliaro P, Quacci D, Sacchi S. In vitro fibro- Assoc 2001;81:30–3.
blast and dermis fibroblast activation by laser irradiation at low 56. Bosshardt DD, Masseredjian V, Nanci A. Root resorption and
energy. An electron microscopic study. Dermatologica tissue repair in orthodontically treated human premolars. In:
1984;168:157–62. Davidovitch Z, Mah J, editors. Biological Mechanisms of Tooth
42. Anders JJ, Borke RC, Woolery SK, Van de Merwe WP. Low power Eruption, Reabsorption and Replacement by Implants. Boston:
laser irradiation alters the rate of regeneration of the rat facial Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics; 1998.
nerve. Lasers Surg Med 1993;13:72–82. pp. 425–37.
43. Tang XM, Chai BP. Effect of CO2 laser irradiation on experimental 57. Pierce AM, Lindskog S, Hammarstrom L. Osteoclasts: structure
fracture healing: a transmission electron microscopic study. and function. Electron Microsc Rev 1991;4:1–45.
Lasers Surg Med 1986;6:346–52. 58. Boyde A, Ali NN, Jones SJ. Resorption of dentine by isolated
44. Trelles MA, Mayayo E. Bone fracture consolidates faster with osteoclasts in vitro. Br Dent J 1984;156:216–20.
low-power laser. Lasers Surg Med 1987;7:36–45. 59. Seifi M, Eslami B, Saffar AS. The effect of prostaglandin E2 and
45. Lim HM, Lew KK, Tay DK. A clinical investigation of the efficacy calcium gluconate on orthodontic tooth movement and root
of low level laser therapy in reducing orthodontic postadjustment resorption in rats. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:199–204.
pain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:614–22. 60. Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK Jr, Everett ET, Flury L, Liu L, Foroud
46. Rodrigues MTJ, Ribeiro MS, Groth EB, Zezell DM. Evaluation of TM et al. Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption
effects of laser therapy (k = 830nm) on oral ulceration induced by in orthodontic patients: linkage of chromosome-18 marker. J Dent
fixed orthodontic appliances. Laser Surg Med 2002;30(Suppl. Res 2003;82:356–60.
14):15. 61. Low E, Zoellner H, Kharbanda OP, Darendeliler MA. Expression of
47. Saito S, Shimizu N. Stimulatory effects of low-power laser irra- mRNA for osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor
diation on bone regeneration in midpalatal suture during kappa beta ligand (RANKL) during root resorption induced by
expansion in the rat. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop the application of heavy orthodontic forces on rat molars. Am J
1997;111:525–32. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:497–503.