409.10 - NOVA Gas-Lift Orifice APPENDIX PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

FEEDBACK ON
NOVA GAS LIFT VALVE
TM

ROB BROWN
CAMCO (UK) LTD : EOR GROUP
3rd February 1998

Rob Brown

ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

CONTENT

Ô BRIEF OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF A VENTURI TYPE


(NOVA ) GAS LIFT VALVE
TM

Ô BRIEF EVOLUTION OF THE NOVA DEVELOPMENT TM

Ô WELL INSTABILITY & BENEFIT OF NOVA VALVE


TM

Ô SOME FIELD SERVICE HISTORIES

Rob Brown
ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF THE VENTURI

The industry standard has been a


square edged orifice :
• reliable & proven pressure drop /
flow rate correlations
• simple design
• reliable performance
The orifice induces a high pressure
loss.
The orifice has a large sub-critical
flow operating envelope.

Rob Brown

ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF THE VENTURI


200
180

CHARACTERISTICS OF A
160

140
Flow Rate (MCF/d)

120

100
The Square-edged orifice SQUARE-EDGED ORIFICE
performance curve
80

60
• Large sub-critical flow
40 regime
20

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 • Gas passage dependent on
Tubing Pressure
downstream pressure until
40 - 50% pressure lost
• Poor pressure recovery =
large pressure drop & large
energy loss

Rob Brown
ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF THE VENTURI


The venturi/nozzle design gives the following benefit :
• Better Pressure & Energy recovery
• Lower discharge coefficient
• Drastically reduced sub-critical flow regime
• Critical velocity (velocity of pressure
transmission/sonic velocity) attained within 10%
pressure drop
• Reduces influence of downstream pressure on gas
passage = reduced risk to propagating instability
Nozzle-Venturi Gas Lift Valve Project
Pressure vs. Flow Rate Summary
4000
1400 psi Upstream
3500

3000
Flow Rate (Mcf/d)

Improved Orifice Valve


2500
Conventional Orifice Valve
2000 900 psi Upstream

1500

1000 400 psi Upstream

500

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Downstream Pressure (psi)
Rob Brown Data shown is from actual flow tests

ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

EVOLUTION OF THE VENTURI/NOZZLE VALVE (NOVA ) TM

C e

 Concept : Tulsa University


 Concept Testing : Tulsa University & D1 P1 D2 P2 D3
H.E.S. α
7 sizes, 21 Tests h
Both retrofit inserts & optimal
R
geometry valves were tested
Attained Flow Characteristic of 3500
.332 Nozzle-Venturi Orifice

Critical Flow at < 10% Differential 3000

Development of computational 2500


Flow Rate (MCF/d)

throat sizing 2000

 Initial Field Testing : H.E.S.


1500

1000

† Current Field Applications : Camco 500

Intl. 0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

 Industry Database : Being Tubing Pressure

established
Rob Brown
ASME International : GAS LIFT WORKSHOP Feb 98

WELL INSTABILITY & BENEFIT OF NOVA VALVE TM

BACKGROUND : Why develop a Venturi/Nozzle gas lift valve.


• Reduce Pressure & Energy losses
• Reduce influence of tubing pressure on gas passage
= minimising instability
INSTABILITY - The perpetuation of slugging (whilst sub-critical flow across the operating valve)
Slight decrease in CSG
Fluctuation in
pressure until drop in
Tubing pressure
gas inj. rate

g
sin Increased Decreased Ge
ea ate n
Pro eral
r gas inj. rate gas inj. rate Increase TBG
Decreased c
In n R du Dec pressure
fluid density al
n er ctio cti r
on easi
u
Ge rod Ra ng
P te
Slight increase in CSG
Decrease TBG pressure until sufficient
to increase gas inj. rate Increased fluid
pressure density

Rob Brown

You might also like