Organising: According To Theo Haimann, "Organising Is The Process of Defining and Grouping The
Organising: According To Theo Haimann, "Organising Is The Process of Defining and Grouping The
Organising: According To Theo Haimann, "Organising Is The Process of Defining and Grouping The
According to Louis Allen, “Organising is the process of identifying and grouping the
work to be performed, defining and delegating responsibility and authority and
establishing relationships for the purpose of enabling people to work most effectively
together in accomplishing objectives”
Nature of Organising :
The nature of organising are explained as follows :
ii) Organization is a process: The feature of organization can put to be as a process, because a
large number of events are done under organizing process towards the attainment of
predetermined goals, such as determination of various activities, grouping of activities,
allocation of work amongst the employees and delegation of authority as well. Hence,
organization is a process.
iv) Organization is related to its Objectives: Organization is directly concerned with the
objectives of enterprise. In the absence of objectives there is no life of organization. If there
is an organization then the objectives must be attached with it. Hence, Organization is
related with its goals.
Importance/ Significance of Organising :
A sound organizing facilitates administration, promotes specialization, encourages growth, and stimulates creativity. It can
contribute to the success of an organization. Hence, the significance of organizing may be discussed as below:
i) Efficient Administration: Organizing is an important and the only tool to achieve enterprise goals. A sound organizing helps the
management in many ways. It defines various activities and their authority relationships in the organizational structure. It can avoid
confusion and delays as well as duplication of work and overlapping of effort. It is the mechanism by which management directs,
controls, and coordinates the various activities in the enterprise.
ii) Optimum Use of Human Resources: Sound organizing ensures that every individual is placed on the job for which he is best
suited. Such matching of jobs and individuals helps in better use of human talent. It also provides the benefits or specialization, which
results in economy of operations and reduction in costs.
iii) Coordination and Communication: Organizing is an important means of creating coordination and communication among different
departments of the enterprise. Different jobs and positions are welded together by structural relationship. It also specifies the channels of
communication among different members of the enterprise.
Training and Development: A sound organizing provides a good scope for the development of managerial ability
iv) through
proper delegation of authority and decentralization. It provides responsibility, sufficient freedom to the supervision and creative
thinking in different levels. By this practice, managers are trained, developed and tested for assuming greater
responsibilities in the future.
v) Productivity and Job Satisfaction: A sound organizing is based on democratic and participative management.
Hence, the entire organizational environment is favourable for productivity and job satisfaction.
Process of Organising :
The process of organising consist of 4 steps which are explained as follows :
Meaning of Authority:
Authority is the right to direct the behaviour of others in the organisation and also the
right to expand the organisational resources towards the attainment of the organisational objectives.
Authority includes the right to make decisions and to discharge one’s responsibilities. Authority is the
formal and legitimate right of a manager to make decisions, issue orders, and allocate resources to
achieve organizationally desired outcomes.
Organizational authority has three important underlying principles:
• Authority is based on the organizational position, and anyone in the same position has the same
authority.
• Authority is accepted by subordinates. Subordinates comply because they believe that managers
have a legitimate right to issue orders.
• Authority flows down the vertical hierarchy. Positions at the top of the hierarchy are vested with
more formal authority than are positions at the bottom.
Meaning of Power:
Many people confuse power with authority. Power is the ability to command or apply force and
is not necessarily accompanied by authority. In the organisational processes, power means the ability
to enforce managerial authority. It is influence that causes subordinates to do what the manager
requests. The influence may take various forms including force and persuasion.
Meaning of Centralisation:
Centralisation is the systematic and consistent reservation of authority at central points in the
organisation. Centralisation involves systematic reservation of authority of central points within an
enterprise. In other words, a majority of decisions regarding the work are made not by those who are
actually doing the work but at a point higher up in the organisation.
Advantages of Centralisation:
• It may facilitate greater uniformity.
• It is easier to adopt uniform strategies throughout the organisation.
• Close supervision and control can be exercised.
• Effective utilisation of talents of the top management.
Disadvantages of Centralisation:
• Due to the fact that all decisions are made at the top it might result in delays in decision-making
and communication.
• Centralised organisation faces the problem of lower motivation levels among workforce.
Meaning of Decentralisation:
Decentralisation is the result of delegation of authority. In other words, decentralisation
refers to dispersion of decision making authority to the downward. Every organisation practices some
degree of decentralisation. It is opposite of centralisation. It is autonomy in decision making.
According to Koontz and Weinrich, “Decentralisation is the tendency to disperse decision making
authority in an organised structure”
Advantages of Decentralisation:
• Decentralisation reduces the workload of top executives.
• Decision making is quicker.
Disadvantages of Decentralisation:
• Decentralisation increases the administrative expenses and each division or department has to be
sufficient in terms of physical facilities and trained personnel.
• There might be lack of uniformity and inconsistent procedures as each department might have the
authority to formulate its own policies and procedures.
• There may be problems of coordination and control.
• Increase in cost.
i) Assignment of Duties - The delegator first tries to define the task and duties to the subordinate.
He also has to define the result expected from the subordinates. Clarity of duty as well as result
expected has to be the first step in delegation.
ii) Granting of authority - Subdivision of authority takes place when a superior divides and shares
his authority with the subordinate. It is for this reason, every subordinate should be given
enough independence to carry the task given to him by his superiors. The managers at all levels
delegate authority and power which is attached to their job positions. The subdivision of powers
is very important to get effective results.
iii) Creating Responsibility and Accountability - The delegation process does not end once
powers are granted to the subordinates. They at the same time have to be obligatory towards the
duties assigned to them. Responsibility is said to be the factor or obligation of an individual to
carry out his duties in best of his ability as per the directions of superior. Responsibility is very
important. Therefore, it is that which gives effectiveness to authority. At the same time,
responsibility is absolute and cannot be shifted. Accountability, on the others hand, is the
obligation of the individual to carry out his duties as per the standards of performance.
Therefore, it is said that authority is delegated, responsibility is created and accountability is
imposed. Accountability arises out of responsibility and responsibility arises out of authority.
Therefore, it becomes important that with every authority position an equal and opposite
responsibility should be attached.
Advantages of Delegation of Authority:
i) Builds Trust and Understanding:
Delegation involves trusting in someone's abilities and relying on them. This helps build a feeling
of mutual understanding and trust. It gives managers the opportunity to understand the employees'
approach towards work.
ii) Motivates Employees:
Entrusting employees with additional responsibilities works as a great motivator at the
workplace. An employee who feels trusted; i.e. when he knows that the higher management trusts
him and relies on his capabilities, he works with greater efficiency. Delegation of authority makes
him feel important and more responsible.
iii) Tests Employee Skills:
With authority comes added responsibility, shouldering which, is not easy. It requires one to work
with greater focus and efficiency, and to take initiatives, be alert, think creatively, analyze situations,
and take decisions. Assessing how well the delegates are functioning can help a manager rate their
performance and take decisions about their promotions.
iv) Gives Scope for Innovation:
To implement new ideas in the organization, one needs to have certain powers and the right
amount of freedom. A rigid framework and lack of authority may restrict an individual from
thinking differently. If deserving individuals are given the right authorities, they may be able to
bring innovation. Delegation of authority may invite out-of-the-box ideas and positive changes
in the organization.
Disadvantages of Delegation of Authority:
i) Misuse of Power:
In delegating authority, there is a risk of the delegate misusing his power for personal gains.
He may have access to confidential information, which he may leak to the competitors, or
involve himself in other fraudulent activities. This possibility raises a question mark on the
employee's integrity, in which case, choosing such an individual as the delegate would be a
wrong decision.
ii) Failure to Fulfil the Tasks:
The manager's instructions may not be well taken care of by the delegate, or he may not be
very particular about following them. This may breed from unwillingness or incapacity of
the delegate.
iii) Delay:
The delegate may take long to understand the new responsibility. As he has authority,
delayed actions on his part may hamper his team's performance. A delay in planning or
taking decisions may not be affordable for the organization. Hence, it is not advisable to
delegate authority when there is a time crunch.
iv) Impact on Quality of Work:
There are chances of quality being affected simply because the employee is new to the
work. The experience and knowledge that the manager has, may be lacking in the delegate.
He might make mistakes. His way of working may be different. This may impact the overall
quality of work. Thus, it is important for a manager to understand that his responsibility
does not end after delegation.