The Meaning of History: Historical Method
The Meaning of History: Historical Method
The Meaning of History: Historical Method
The English word history is derived from the Greek word “istoia” meaning learning
According to Aristotle, history is the systematic account of a set of natural
phenomena whether or not chronological ordering was a factor in an account, and this
is considered as natural history. As time passed, the equivalent Latin
word “scientia”, which is science in English later was used more to designate non-
chronological systematic accounts of phenomena.
Presently, the word “history” means the “past of mankind”. History is the study of
past events, particularly in human affairs.
History in German is “Geschichte”, meaning, “that which has happened”. This means
that the word implies that history teaches and we may learn from the lessons of
history.
With the definition of history, it brings man to a recognition that history cannot be
reconstructed, that the past of mankind, much of it, is beyond recall. And that even
the best of our memories cannot re-create our past.
The reconstruction of the total past of mankind is the total goal of historians which,
however, is unattainable. Historians will never really know everything that happened
in the past.
The problem that every historian confronts is that the evidence they rely on is likely
to be fragmented, incomplete and even contradictory. The result is, each historian’s
conclusions are influenced by the evidence they have selected from what is available
and from how they interpreted it.
And from whatever a historian only has will be the only thing that he can use to
connect him to the past.
HISTORICAL METHOD
The process of critically examining and analyzing the records and survivals of the
past.
To study objectively (intention of acquiring detached and truthful knowledge
independent of one’s personal reactions) a thing must first be an object and must
have an independent resistance outside the human mind). Most of history is based
on the human mind since most of history is based upon recollection (written or spoken
history).
In reconstruction, only a part of what was observed is remembered, only a part of
what was remembered is recorded, only a part of what was recorded survives, only
a part of what survived comes to the historian’s attention.
Only of a part of what is credible has been grasped, only a part of what has been
grasped can be expounded and narrated by the historian.
HISTORICAL SOURCES
- Objects from the past or testimony concerning the past which historians use
to create their own depiction of the past.
1. According to Form
*Written Sources
- Published materials (books, journals etc.) and manuscript (handwritten and
unprinted like archival materials and memoirs)
*Non written Sources
-Oral history, artifacts, fossils, etc.
2. According to Origin
*Primary Sources
- Testimony of an eyewitness
- It must have been produced by a contemporary of that is narrated. It is a
document or physical object written or created during the time under study. These
sources were present during an experience or time period and offer an inside view
of a particular event.
*Secondary Sources
- Interpret and analyze primary sources
- They are one or more steps removed from the event. Examples are printed
textbooks.
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
-Settles matters on the form and content of a source
• Determine the Corroboration, historical facts rest upon the testimony of two
or more reliable witnesses
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
*Internal Criticism