Effectiveness of Bacillus Thuringiensis Strains Against: Spodoptera Frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Effectiveness of Bacillus Thuringiensis Strains Against: Spodoptera Frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Effectiveness of Bacillus Thuringiensis Strains Against: Spodoptera Frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
frugiperda
ISSN 1517-8382
Ricardo Antonio Polanczyk1; Rogério Fernando Pires da Silva 1; Lidia Mariana Fiuza2*
1
Health Plant Department, School of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brasil; 2Centro de
Biotecnologia do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul e Departamento de Microbiologia,
UNISINOS, RS, Brasil
Submitted: August 13, 1999; Returned to authors for corrections: December 16, 1999; Approved: September 13, 2000
ABSTRACT
The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) is one of the most important pests of maize, causing up to
20% production losses when defoliation occurs near to flowering, or even complete destruction of plants.
Among the alternatives to control this pest, the use of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has gained attention due
to its efficiency and low impact on natural enemies. Strains Bt dendrolimus HD 37, Bt aizawai HD 68, Bt
kurstaki HD 73, Bt darmstadiensis HD 146, and Bt thuringiensis 4412 were tested against second instar
larvae in in vivo assays. Suspensions of Bt aizawai HD 68 and Bt thuringiensis 4412, containing 3 x 108
cells/ml, induced mortality of 100% and 80.4%, respectively. To test virulence, cell concentrations of 8 x
105 to 3 x 108 cells/ml of strains Bt aizawai HD 68 and Bt thuringiensis 4412 were applied on the second
instar larvae: LC50 were 6.7 x 106 and 8.6 x 106 cells/ml, respectively.
Key words: Bacillus thuringiensis, Spodoptera frugiperda, biological control, bioassays, fall armyworm
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratório de Microbiologia, Centro 2, UNISINOS, Caixa Postal 275, CEP: 93022-000, São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil. E-
mail: fiuza@cirrus.unisinos.br
165
R.A.Polanczyk et al.
a
MATERIALS AND METHODS 100
Mortality (%)
90 a
Insects: S. frugiperda larvae were obtained from maize 80
6868
412
D
12
7373
ai H
sis 4
were provided by Plant Genetic Systems, Gent. They were
37
44
37
H izaw
ki H
46
HD
ai
6
gien
Strains of Bt
D
is
D1
14
D
H
ns
ursta
Bt a
ki
mus
aw
urin
grown in Usual Glicosed Medium (8) at 28°C and 180 rpm for
is H
D
z e ta us
gi
roli
ai
Bt k
Bt th
H
iens
in rs is
end
Bt ku im
ur ol ns
stad
48h. The suspension was centrifuged at 5,000 rpm and washed
Bt d
th Bt dr ie
arm
n d
Bt de
Bt d
ta
3 times with sterilized water. The concentration of bacterial Bt m
s
d ar
spores was determined in a Neubaeur chamber using phase Bt
contrast microscopy at 400x. 100 ml of the both containing of Figure 1. Mortality in selective assays of Spodoptera frugiperda second
3 x 108 cells/ml were added to the surface of artificial diet instar larvae and Bacillus thuringiensis strains at 3 x 108 cells/ml
previously put in mini-plates (30 mm of diameter), where larvae concentration.
of 2nd instar of S. frugiperda were individualized (20 insects
per strain). In controls, the broth was replaced by 100 µl of The virulence assays showed that Bt aizawai HD 68 was
sterile water. The mortality was evaluated up to seven days the most active strain, with an LC50 of 6.7 x 106 cells/ml. Bt
after treatment. The data were corrected according to Abbot thuringiensis 4412 presented an LC50 of 8.6 x 106 cells/ml
(1) and submitted to Duncan’s t test (P = 0.05). (Table 1). These LC50 values showed that a concentration 42.0%
LC50 assays: The virulence of Bt aizawai HD 68 and Bt higher of Bt thuringiensis 4412 than the other strain was
thuringiensis 4412 was evaluated by LC50 assays, using 8 x necessary to kill 50.0% of a S. frugiperda population in a
105, 3 x 106, 8 x 106, 3 x 107, 8 x 107 and 3 x 108 cells/ml and certain period. Fig. 2 compares the virulence of the strains
control. Three replications were carried out, totalizing 1,050 and shows that Bt aizawai HD 68 requires a lower
insects per strain. To achieve the initial concentration of 3 x concentration to be letal to 100% of larvae population.
108 cells/ml, the above mentioned method for cell counting The differences in toxicity of these strains to S. frugiperda
was used. All other cell concentrations was obtained through may be related to the composition of cristals and their toxic
dilutions of this suspension. The exact number of spores was potential. Bt aizawai HD 68 has two genes (cryIA(a), cryID)
determined in a Neubaeur chamber. The amount of suspension related to toxicity, while Bt thuringiensis 4412 has only one
and the method for growth of microorganism were the same as
in selective assays. The data were analyzed by Polo-PC (LeOra (a )
5
Software 1987).
4.9 B t a iza w a i H D 6 8
Subletal effects: The possible effects of the strains on insects
were verified through visual comparison between growth of 4.8
4.6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
P R O BIT
4.5
observing mortality of 80%, 100% and 70%, respectively, to 3 Figure 2. Comparative virulence of Bt aizawai HD 68 and Bt
x 107 cells/ml. thuringiensis 4412 to Spodoptera frugiperda second instar larvae.
166
B. thuringiensis against S. frugiperda
Table 1. LC50 of Bacillus thuringiensis strains to Spodoptera frugiperda second instar larvae.
(cryIB) (3). LC50 values of 77 ng/cm2 for cryID and above REFERENCES
2,000 ng/cm2 for cryIA (a,b,c) were observed (3). Chak et al.
(7) described a new strain of Bt with cryI (a,b), cryIC and cryID 1. Abbot, W. S. A method of computing the effectiveness insecticide. J. Ec.
Ent., 18: 265-267, 1925.
genes, and emphasized that the high activity of Bt aizawai 2. Alves, S. B.; Moino Jr., A.; Almeida, J. E. M. Desenvolvimento, potencial de
strains to S. frugiperda may be related to interactions between uso e comercialização de produtos microbianos. In: Alves, S. B. (ed). Controle
cryIA and cryID genes. microbiano de insetos. FEALQ, São Paulo, 1998. p. 1143-1163.
3. Aranda, E.; Sanchez, J.; Peferoen, M.; Güereca, L; Bravo, A. Interactions of
It must be pointed out that although the mortality to the Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins with the midgut epithelial cells of
selected strains in concentration of 3 x 10 8 cells/ml was Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Invert. Pathol., 68: 203-
incomplete, the surviving larvae had their development delayed, 212, 1996.
4. Bohorova, N.; Maciel, A. M.; Brito, R. M.; Aguilart, L.; Ibarra, J.E.;
and didn’t reach the fourth instar. From a practical point of Hoisinggton, D. Selection and characterization of mexican strains of Bacillus
view, the control can be considered effective, because the thuringiensis active against four major lepidopteran maize pests.
damage potential of surviving larvae was affected. This Entomoph.,41:153-165, 1996.
5. Bowling, C. C. Rearing of two lepidopterous pests of rice on a common
enhanced the possibility to use moderated toxic proteins as a artificial diet. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America, 60: 1215-1216, 1967.
helpful tool to control S. frugiperda in integrated pest 6. Cruz, I. Manejo de pragas de milho no Brasil. Curso Sobre Manejo y Control
management systems in maize. The subletal effects of Bt on S. de Plagas en Maiz y Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, 1988, p.17-31.
7. Chak, K.F.; Chao, D.C.; Tseng, M.Y. et al. Determination and distribution of
frugiperda (13), S. littoralis (15) and S. exigua (14) were cry-type genes of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from Taiwan. Appl. Environ.
pointed out in other studies, where subletal doses caused Microbiol., 60:2415-2420, 1994.
reduction in consumption and delay in development. However, 8. De Barjac, H.; Lecadet, M.M. Dosage biochimique d’exotoxine thermostable
de. Bacillus thuringiensis d’après l’inhibition d’ARN-polymerases
these effects were temporary, and the intensity decreased with bacteriennes. C. R. Acad. Sci., 282:2119-2122, 1976.
the growth of larvae. 9. Fiuza, L.M.; Nielsen-Leroux, C.; Gozé E.; Frutos, R.; Charles, J. F. Binding
The high virulence presented by Bt aizawai HD 68 and Bt of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1 toxins to the midgut brush border membrane
vesicles of Chilo supressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Evidence of shared
thuringiensis 4412 to S. frugiperda indicates their application binding sites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62:1544-1549, 1996.
in integrated pest management systems. The great majority of 10. Hernandez, J.L.L. Évaluation de la toxicité de Bacillus thuringiensis sur
surviving larvae had their development delayed by the action Spodoptera frugiperda. Entomoph., 32:163-171, 1988.
11. Höfte, H.; Whiteley, H. R. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus
of these pathogenic microorganisms. This aspect is very thuringiensis. Microbiol. Rev., 53:242-255, 1978.
important, but rarely considered in the evaluation of 12. Knowles, B. H. Mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal
effectiveness of biological agents. d-endotoxins. Adv. Insect Physiol., 24:275-308, 1994.
13. Lambert, B.; Buysse, L.; Decock, C.; Jansens, S.; Piens, C.; Saey, B.; Seurinck,
J.; Van Audenhove, K.; Van Rie, J.; Van Vliet, A.; Peferoen, M. A Bacillus
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein with high activity against members
of the family Noctuidae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62:80-86, 1996.
14. Lopes Lastra, C. C.; Boucias, D. G.; Soares Jr., G. G. Bacillus thuringiensis
We are especially grateful to Marnix Peferoen (Plant Genetic endotoxin effects on Spodoptera exigua and Spodoptera frugiperda larva
Systems, Gent, Belgium) and Jean-François Charles (Institut infected with baculovirus. Env. Entomol., 24:239-242, 1995.
Pasteur, Paris, France) for providing the Bacillus thuringiensis 15. Regev, A.; Keller, M.; Strizhov, N.; Shen, B.; Prudovsky, E.; Chet, I.; Ginzberg,
I.; Koncz-Kalman, Z.; Koncz, C.; Schell, J.; Zilberstein, A. Synergistic activity
strains. We are also thank Andresa P. de Lucho and Ana Paula of a Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin and a bacterial endochitinase against
G. de Castro, students from School of Agronomy/UFRGS (Porto Spodoptera littoralis larvae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,62:3581-3386, 1996.
Alegre, Brazil), for their assistance in insect rearing. This 16. Valicente, F. H. Levantamento dos inimigos naturais de Spodoptera
frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) em diferentes regiões
research was supported by CNPq (Brazil). do Estado de Minas Gerais. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil, 18: 119-130, 1989.
17. Wiseman, B. R., Painter, R. H., Wassom, C. E. Detecting corn seedling
differences on the greenhouse by visual classification of damage by the fall
armyworm. J. Ec. Ent., 59:1211-1214, 1966.
167