Arecanut: Breeding of Horticultural Crops Vol. 1 - Part B: L'lantation Crops (2017) : 569-589
Arecanut: Breeding of Horticultural Crops Vol. 1 - Part B: L'lantation Crops (2017) : 569-589
Arecanut: Breeding of Horticultural Crops Vol. 1 - Part B: L'lantation Crops (2017) : 569-589
IS based
3nd the
nts a nd
risbane.
ARECANUT
K.S. Ananda, Anitha Karun and V. A. Parthasarathy
Jngress,
The abundant use of arecanut in chewing and religious functions was Java
compared to other accessions. Other varieties released for cultivation are Achrol1~
'Sumangala' and'S reemangala' that are introductions from Indonesia and (1945)/
Singapore respectively. High yield potential was observed in one of the (1956) :
indigenous collection from West Bengal and it was released as 'Mohitnagar' determir
variety. A comparative yield trial involving five high yielding varieties of 11=]6. S
arecanut viz., Mangala, Sumangala, Sreemangala, Mohitnagar and non-disj
Thirthahalli local was studied at Thirthahalli to identify suitable variety reported
for cultivation in the Malnad (hills) region of Karnataka (Ananda et of., four eco
2000). 'Mangala' registered significantly lower height with high percentage and met
of flowering palms. 'Mangala' performed better than other varieties with disj unct
highest yields in the initial years of bearing closely followed by 'Thirthahalli chromos
local' while 'Sreemangala' recorded comparatively lower yields. Five
arecanut cvs (VTL-3, VTL-ll, VTL-12, VTL-13 and VTL-17) were
quite nc
assessed for increasing production/unit area. The mean tree height, number
chromos
of leaves producedltree, girth at collar 45 months after planting, time taken also rep(
for first flowering, nut weight and processing out-turn were recorded.
cultivar'
Cultivars VTL-3, VTL-12 and VTL-13 were considered the most productive and Nair
(Thangaraj et of., 1980). Data on nut weight and nuts/tree were obtained
palms, 0
from two experiments, one involving 13 varieties of Areca catechu over even dec
eight years and the other 11 varieties over nine years. The three highest
of chrom
yielding varieties proved suitable when planted in favourable enviro1U11ents
species.
only. Two others, with fairly high yields, were considered stable in all
mother CI
environments (Natarajan et of., 1982).
extent of
Bavappa (1974) recorded morphological, anatomical and yield high degJ
characters for 13 cultivars of A. catechu and four ecotypes of A. triandra The poss
during the years 1963, 1966 and 1972. The analysis of variance of the being une
results obtained in 1963 showed that the differences between cultivars are (Bavappc
highly significant for all the six morphological characters. A combined diakinesi~
analysis ofthe data for two years for 24 common characters recorded during 1974). D
1967 and 1972 also revealed significant interaction between cultivars for pamng a
all characters. A significant interaction between years and cultivars was triandra
seen for height, girth, internodal distance, number of bunches and distributi
inflorescences on the palm, length and breadth of leaf sheath, length and ensuring
volume of nut and length, breadth, weight and volume of kernel. was hight
A. triandl
4. Genetics and Breeding
may be d
The chromosome number of Areca catechu L. was first determined as compa
and reported by Venkatasubban (1945) as 2n=32. The chromosome number of the par
ofthe species was later confirmed by Sharma and Sarkar (1956), Raghavan satelJited
and Baruah (1958), Abraham et of., (1961) and Bavappa and Raman (1965). catechu
573
in different varieties except for period of culturing. For rapid germination wounde
of somatic embryo, MS liquid medium supplemented with 5 iJM BA was structu!
used. Plantlet with 2-4 leaves and fairly good root system were weaned dicamb,
using sand: soil (5:1) potting mixture. These pl antlets were field planted callus ~
during 2006 at CPCRI (RS) Vittal for field evaluation. This protocol has subcultt
been applied for mass multiplication of field resistant Yellow Leaf Disease callus ti
(YLD) palms (Karun et af., 2005). Direct and indirect so matic after 10
embryogenesis from inflorescence explants of areca palms was reported After su
by Radha et af., (2006). However the numbers of direct somatic embryos to conta
formed were very less compared to indirect somatic embryos. The effect 24%.
of various cytokinins viz., TDZ, BA, Kinetin, 2i-P and Zeatin on growth 5.1.1. A
and maturation of direct somatic embryos were studied and it was found
that TDZ was essential for maturation and conversion of somatic embryos
into complete healthy plantlets (Radha et aI., 2008). Mass mUltiplication devastat
was also achi eved through indirect secondary somatic embryogenesis. in Keral:
susceptil
Mathew and Philip (2000) first reported the protocol for in vitro to be fie
propagation via direct adventitious shoot bud differentiation from embryo that heal
explants. Results obtained with excised embryos of A. catechu (cv. disease [
'Kasargodan' and 'Mangala') grown on Murashige & Skoog's medium, breeding
White's medium and Branton & Blake's (BB) medium with permutations used for
and combinations of auxins and cytokinins showed that activated charcoal, palms. T
2,4-D and high levels of phosphate in BB medium were critical for the villages v
differentiation of additional shoots from the cotyledon. Wang et af., (2003a) Kannada
developed a protocol for plantlet formation through shoot formation from plantlets
callus of arecanut. Greenish soft callus was formed from shoot tip explants compara1
within four weeks, when cultured on Gelrite-gelled MS basal medium
supplemented with BA in combination with TDZ. The highest percentage c
of callus formation (100%) was found on the medium supplemented with has also
0.2 mg 1. 1 BA and 0.2 mg 1. 1 TDZ. During subculture on the same medium 'Hi rehalli
for callus induction, most of calli proliferated and 50-60% formed shoots. in 1963
About 90% of shoots formed roots on BM containing 0.1 mg 1-1 NAA after Improven
four weeks in culture. Regeneration ofplantlets from shoot tips via primary of the int(
callus production and a two-step process of organogenesis, required about all the m:
20 weeks. hybrids v
way of in
Wang et af., (2003 b) obtained plant regeneration through somatic The breec
embryogenesis from zygotic embryo-derived callus of arecanut. An in Regional
vitro culture procedure was established for somatic embryogenesis and involving
plant regeneration from callus cultures. Segments of zygotic embryos were varieties
cultured on Murashige and Skoog basal medium supplemented with vitro plan
dicamba (9.05, 18.1,27.15, and 36.2 )lM). After 7-8 week in darkness, of these h
577
,.on wounded regions of explants formed callus with yellow, soft, glutinous
las structures. Proliferation and maintenance of callus was on the same
led dicamba-containing medium. With regular subculture every 8 weeks, the
ted callus showed pale yellow, compact and nodular structures. During
1as subculture, somatic embryos were formed spontaneously from nodular
lse callus tissues within 2-4 months. The embryos developed into plantlets
tic after 10 weeks of culture on basal medium free of plant growth regulators.
ted After subculturing every month for 3 months, the plantlets were transferred
(OS to containers for acclimatization in the greenhouse. The survival rate was
eet 24% .
vth 5.1.1. Applications
md
yos One of the major production constraints of arecanut is the
IOn devastating Yellow Leaf Disease (YLD). This serious malady is prevalent
in Kerala and Karnataka states. All the cultivars have been reported to be
susceptible for this disease but few South Kanara Local cultivars are found
'tro to be field resistant. Surveys conducted in the hot spot regions revealed
ryo that healthy palms with good yields are available in the midst of the severely
cv. disease affected trees. These healthy palms are being used for resistant
1m, breeding programme. The tissue culture protocol developed at CPCRI was
Dns used for mass multiplication of field resistant Yellow Leaf Disease (YLD)
)al, palms. The field evaluation of these plants have been taken up in three
the villages viz. Gunadka, Balambi, and Nadubettu at Suliya Taluk ofDakshina
3a) Kannada District ofKarnataka State. The performance of the tissue cultured
om plantlets in the YLD hot spot region was found to be satisfactory and
mts comparable with seeding raised palms (Karun et al., 2005) .
urn
age Currently the arecanut tissue culture protocol developed at CPCRI
vith has also been applied for mass mUltiplication of dwarf arecanut (variety
'Hirehalli') and its hybrids. 'Hirehalli Dwarf', a natural mutant identified
urn
ots. in 1963 for its short stature, is a good genetic source for arecanut
fter improvement. The main features of the dwarf are the complete suppression
of the internodal space and erect crown shape. This dwarf has been used in
ary
lout all the major hybridization programmes of CPCRI. The identification of
hybrids with dwarfness and high yielding potential will benefit areca by
way of increased returns and reduced cost of various cultural operations.
atic The breeding programme at the Central Plantation Crops Research Institute
1 in Regional Station at Vittal, Karnataka have carried out crossing programme
and involving various combinations of a local dwarf with five high yielding '
,ere varieties and have succeeded in developing three promising hybrids. In
vith vitro plantlet development could be achieved from inflorescence explants
ess, of these hybrids.
578
580
Mangala 1972 Introduction, evaluation VTL-3 (China) Semi Tall palm with partially drooping CPCRI,
and selection crown, earliness in bearing, more number Kasaragod
of female flowersllnl1orescence, higher
nutset, quicker stabilization, round and
medium sized ye llow coloured nuts.
Average chalildry kernel yield is 3.00kg!
palm/year
Sumangala 1985 Introduction , evaluation VTL-il (Indonesia) Tall palm with partially drooping crown, CPCRI,
and selection oval to round shaped deep yellow Kasaragod
coloured nuts. High recovery of chali
(26.50%) from fresh fruits. Average
chalildry kernel yield is 3.28 kg/palm/year
Sreemangala 1985 Introduction, evaluation VTL-17 (Singapore) Tall palm with sturdy stem, partially CPCRl,
and selection drooping crown. Round and bold with Kasaragod
deep yellow coloured nuts. Average chalil
dry kernel yield is 3.18 kg/palm/year
Mohitnagar 1991 Introduction , evaluation VTL-60 (\V. Bengal, Tall palm with medium thick stem, CPCRI,
and sele ction India) partially drooping crown, orange Kasaragod
yellow coloured oval to round shaped
nuts. Higher level of uniformity in
Cal-17 /Samrudhi 1995 Introduction, evaluation VTL-37(Andaman & Tall palm with longer internodes, CPCRI and
and selection Nicobar Islands, India) partially drooping crown. Elongated bold CARl
nuts with orange yellow in colour.
Average chali/dry kernel yie ld is 4.34
kg/palm/year and recommended for
Andaman & Nicobar group of Islands.
SAS-I 1995 Introduction, evaluation VTL-52 (Sirs i Local, Tall palm with compact canopy, deep UAS, Dharwad
and selection India) orange colour with round and even
sized nuts. It is suitable for both tender
nut and ripe nut processing. Average chali/
dry kern el yield is 4.60 kg/palm /year and
recommended for Sirsi hill zone of
Karnataka.
Swarnamangala 2006 Introd uction, evaluation VTL-12 (Saigon) Tall palm with medium thick stem and CPCRI,
an d selection comparatively shorter internodes, partially Kasaragod
drooping crown . Nuts are bold and heavier
with high recovery of chali (26.40 %).
Average chal iJdry kernel yield is 3.88 kg/
palm/year.
VTLAH-I 2006 H ybri dization and Hirehalli dwarf (VTL- D warf in nature. Sturdy stem with super CPCRI,
tJl
evaluation 56) and Sumangala imposed nodes, reduced canopy size, Kasaragod 00
W
fJl
(VTL-ll )
to round shaped nuts and early
stabilizat ion and me dium yielder.
Average chali/dry kernel yield is
2.54 kg/pa lm /y ear. Advantages-reduced
cost of cultivation in terms of harvesting
and spraying.
Hybridi zation and Hireh aUi dwarf (VTL Dwarf in nature. Sturdy stem with
VTLAH-2 2006
eva luati on 56) and Mohitnagar super imposed nodes, redu ced canopy
(VTL-60) size, well spread leaves, medium sized
oval to round shaped nuts and early
stabilization and med ium yie lder. Average
chali/dry kern el yield is 2.54 kg/palmi
year. Advantages-reduced cost of
cu ltivation in terms of harve sting and
sp raying.
Introduction, evaluat ion VTL-64 (Ass am, India) Tall in natu re with mediu m thick stem, CPCR I,
Kahikuchi 2009
longer intern odes, regular bearer, Kasaragod
and selection
consistent in yield, bunches are well
placed on the stem, oran ge colour, bold
and round shaped nuts, high recovery
(25. 16 %) ofch ali from fresh nuts,
comes to bearing by 5th year. Average
yield is 3.70 Kg dry kernel/palmi
year under normal conditions.
Madhuramangala 2013 Introduction , evaluation VTL62 (Maharastra, In dia) Sem i tall type, medium thick stem, CPCRI,
and selection regular bearer, medium maturity and Kasa r agod
'- • _ __ : __ _ 1 _. .A ,n __ _ _
year under normal conditions.
Madhuramangala 2013 Introduction , evaluation VTL-62 (Maharastra, India) Semi tall type, medium thick stem, CPCRI,
and select ion regular bearer, medium maturity and Kasaragod
bearing by 4th year, synchronized
maturity of nuts, orange to yellow
colour nuts, oval to round shaped
nuts, marble appearance in split kernel,
suitable for making both chali and
processed tender nut. The average yield
under normal conditions is 3.54 Kg
ChaliJpalrnlYear and 2.95 Kg Dry tender
processed nuts/palmlYear.
Nalbari 2013 Introduction, evaluation VTL-75(Assam, India) The yield performance of this variety CPCRI,
and selection is higher than the earlier released Kasaragod
varieties.TaU type with medium thick
stem, shorter internodes, hom ogenous
population, regular bearer, well placed
bunches, yellow coloured round shaped
nuts, and belong to medium maturity
group, suitable for making chaliJdry
kernel. The average yield under normal
condition is 4.15 Kg Chalil dry kernel
palm/year.
'Jl
00
'Jl
-
-- --~- -- -
586
Reference
Abraham, A.,
Ananda, K. ~
J 05-1
Ananda, K. S
Agrici
7.
Ananda, K.S
Klima
Plant2
Ananda, K.S.
Piant~
Anuradha, S.
Klima
Planta
Bagindo, M.
Bavappa, K.v
Bavappa, K.v
Ba vappa, K. v
Bavappa, K.V
Bavappa, K.v
Bavappa, K.V
Nair, ~
Kasan
Bavappa, K. V
Medic
Tomar
Bavappa, K.V
breecli
Bavappa, K.V
505 .
Bavappa, K.V
Beccari, O. I'
Bharalh, B.G.
Rajes~
Bhat, S. K, I
J 0: 2:
587
References:
Abraham, A, Mathew, P.M., and Ninan, C.A. 1961. Cytologia 26: 327-332.
Ananda, K . S., Sane, A, and Choudhary, B. S. 2000. Journal of Plantation Crops 28:
105-109.
Ananda, K. S., and Rajesh, B. 2002. Paper presented in National Conference on Coastal
Agricultural Research , ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Old Goa, India, April 6
7.
Ananda, K.S., and Thampan, C. 1999. Tndian Journal ofA recanut Spices and Medicinal
Plants 1: 24-28.
Bavappa, KVA . 1963. M.Sc. (Ag.) thesis, 63. University of Madras, India.
Bavappa, KVA. 1974. Ph.D thesis, 170. University of Myso re, India.
Rava[lpa, KVA, and Nair, M.K. 1982. Tn Th e Arecanut Palm, edited by Bavappa, K.VA.,
Nair, M.K. , and Premkumar, T., 51-96. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute,
Kasaragod, India.
Bavappa, K.VA, and Pillai, S.S. 1976. In Tmprovement o.lHorticulture, PIC/ntC/tion and
Medicinal Plants . Vol. 1, edited by Chadha, K.L. , 243-246. New Delhi: Today and
Tom o rrow Printers and Publishers.
13avappa, K.VA., and Ramachander, P.R. 1967. Indian Journal of Genetics C/nd plant
breeding 27: 93-100.
Bavappa, KVA, and Ram an, VS. 1965. Journal ofindian Botanical Society 44: 495
505.
Bavappa, K.VA. , Nair, M.K., and Ratnamb al, M.L 1975. Nucieus 18: 146-151.
Bharath, B.G, Ananda, K.S., Rijith , J., Nagaraja, N .R. , Chandran, K.P., Karun, A., an cl
Rajesh, M .K . 2015. Journal of Plantation Crops 43(2): 117-125.
Bhat, S. K., Krishna Murthi, S., and Madhava Rao, VN. 1962. South indian Horticulture
10: 22-34.
588
Blatter, E.S.J. 1926. The Palms of British India and Ceylon, 600. Bombay: Oxford
university Press.
Radha,
Blume. 1836. RUl11hiasive COl11mntations Botanicae de Plantis Indiae Orientalis, Leyden.
Raghav
Darlington, CD., and ]anaki Aml11al, E.K. 1945. Chromosome Atlas of Cultivated Plants
Ragh av
397. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Rajesh,
Furtado, CX. 1933. Fedde's Repertrium Specierul11 Novarum. Regn um Vegetabilis 33:
217-239. Rau, M
Furtado, CX. 1960. Principes 4: 26-31. Ren,]J
Ganapathi, T. R., Suprassanna, P., Bapat, V, and Rao, P. S. 1997. Friuts 52 : 313 - 316. Sharma,
Hu,CH., Huang, CC, Hung, K.H., Hsu, T.W, and Chiang, T. Y. 2009. Molecular Ecology Stebbin ~
Resources 9: 658-660.
Thangar
Karun, A., Manimekalai, R., Priya, S., and Radha, E. 2005. Poster paper presented at
In ternationa l Conference on Plant genomics and Biotechnology Challenges and
oPPOltul1ities at Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur. Venkata
Wang, ~
Karun, A, Radha, E., Sangeetha Vijayan, P., ] iji George, Raj esh, M.K ., and Ananda, K.S.
2008 . Journal of Plantation Crops 36(3) : 228-231.
Karun, A, Siril, E . A, Radha, E., and Palthasarathy, V A 2004. Current Science 86: Wang, f
G
1623-1628.
Karun, A., Siril, E. A, Radha, E., and Parthasarathy, V A 2002 . Pro ceedings ofPlacrosym Wang, H
XV, 209 - 2 14. Watt, G.
Mathew, M., and Philip, V J. 2000. Phytomorphology 50: 221-227. Zhan, Q.
Mohan Rao, M. 1982. In The A recanut Palm, edited by Bavappa, K. VA., Nair, M .K., 2
and Premkumar, T., 1-9. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod,
India.
MUlthy, K.N., and Bavappa, K. VA. 1960. Arecanut Journal 11: 51-55 .
MUlthy, K.N., and Bavappa, K. VA. 1962. Arecanllt Journal 13: 59-78.
Murthy, K.N ., and Piliai, R.S.N. 1982. In The Arecal1ut Palm, edited by Bavappa, K. VA,
Nair, M.K., and Premkumar, T., 11-49. Central Plantation Crops Research Institule,
Kasaragod, India.
Naidu, G.VB. 1963. Indian Farming, 12:16-17 .
Nair, M.K., and Ratnambal, M.J . 1978 . Current Sc ience 47: 172-173.
Nampoolhiri, K.U.K., Ananda, K.S., and Parthsarathy, VA 1999 . Botal1ica, 49: 127-135 .
Natarajan, U.S., Narayanan, S.S. , Nayar, N.M. , MU lihy, K.N. , and Nair, M.K. 1982. Indian
Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding , 42: 282-286 .
Radha, E., Karun, A., Rajesh, M. K., and Nancy, M. ].2008. Journal 0.( Plantation Crops
36 (3): 243-245.
Radha, E ., Karun , A., Ananda, K.S., and Kumaran, P.M. 2006 . Journal of plantation
589
Radha, E., Kuran, A., and Ananda, K.S. 2009 . Journal ofplantation crops, (com municated).
den.
Raghavan, Y. 1957 . D. Phil. thesis, 186. Gauha ti University, India .
ants Raghavan, Y., and Baruah , H.K. 1958 . Eco nomic Botany 12 : 3 15-345.
Rajesh, B. 2007 . PhD disse l1ation, 2 02. University of Mangalore, Kamatak a, Indi a.
33 :
Rau, M.K.T. 1915. Journal of the Bombay Natural HistOlY Soc iety 23: 793.
Ren, J.F., and Tang, L.X. 20 10. Hunan Agricultural Science and Technology 9 : 1-4
316. Shanna, AX., and Sarkar, S.K. 1956. Genetics 28: 361-4 88 .
logy Stebbins, G.L. 1958. Co ld Spring Harbor Symposia Quantitative Biology 23 : 365 -378.
Thangaraj , T., Subbiah, R ., Ponnu swa my, Y., Mu thuswam i, S., and Nanja n, K . 1980. Sou th
:d at Indian Horticultllre 28: 152-153.
and
Venkatasubban, K.R. J 945. Proceeding of/he Indian Academy of Science 22: 193-207.
K.S.
Wang, H. c., Chen, J.T. , Wu, S.P., Lin, M .e., and Chang, w. e. 2003a. Plant Cell Tissue
and Organ Cu llure 75 (1) : 95-98.
, 86: Wang, H.C., Chen , J.T., Wu , S. P., Lin, M. e., and Chang, w. e. 2003b. 111 vitro cellular
and Developmenta l Biology plant 39( 1): 34-36.
Wang, H .C., Chen, J.T., a nd Chang, W. C. 2006. Biologio plantaru m 50: 279-282.
Jsym
Watt, G. 1889. 559. Vol. Periodicals Experts, Delhi
Zhan, Q.Q ., Zhou , YK., Yang, Y, Gan, B .C., and Lu, L.L. 2012 . Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi
24: 60-62.
1.K.,
Igod,
VA,
itute,
·135.
·dian
:rops