Academic MBA Programs For The 21 Century Workforce Development
Academic MBA Programs For The 21 Century Workforce Development
Academic MBA Programs For The 21 Century Workforce Development
ABSTRACT: Business school enrolments in Master of Business Administration (MBA) programs are down.
Is this trend due to a strong job market, shifting economic conditions, changing immigration policies, or purely
a supply and demand situation? This research presents a strong reason for this decline. Some of the traditional
focus of the MBA programs are now obsolete, some contents are no longer relevant, and, most importantly,
some new areas and subjects need to be added to make the programs and the graduates more relevant and
attractive to the marketplace. The traditional focus areas are no longer in synch with the workforce
requirements of the 21st century marketplace. In the past, the focus of the industry were sales and marketing
areas, as the logic was that these functions made the biggest impact to the bottom-line of the business. But this
mindset needs to be updated. Today, the biggest impacts to the bottom-line of a business are the contributions
by technology and applications. All areas of a business are significantly enhanced and the bottom-line
contributions are improved with the use of technology. Globalization is another aspect that needs to be
recognized and incorporated in business curriculums as the trend is towards more and more distributed work
environments, collaboration, and working relations, leading to impacts on economics, finance, development,
and other business centers. This research analyzes and suggests changes and updates to the contents and the
delivery of the business MBA programs to make them more relevant and attractive to the business world.
KEYWORDS – Action research, artificial intelligence, block chain, data analytics, distributed project
management, globalization, quantum computing, soft skills, strategic planning.
I. INTRODUCTION
The continued relevance of the Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree has been widely
debated in academia and industry for many years [1]. This paper examines and analyses factors that make an
MBA program relevant and attractive in 2020 and beyond. It examines what aspects of the traditional
curriculums remain relevant, and, also, what considerations must be highlighted to make the programs and the
graduates better aligned with the workforce requirements of the 21st century marketplace.
Historically, the value of an MBA is based on many variables, including (a) compete in the current job
market, (b) develop critical thinking skills, (c) meet employer’s requirements, etc. [2]. Furthermore, graduates
from MBA programs are likely to be working professionals [3] who are seeking additional education to increase
their marketability. Their expectations of value are generally more focused that a recent graduate of a Bachelors
program with little or no actual work experience [4]. A critical success factor is the importance of globalization
and its impact on current and future managers. Tibbetts asserts that “Today’s education recognizes that business
as usual in the United States is not necessarily an applicable method of management in Europe” [5] (p.2).
Tibbetts further asserts that the traditional MBA program must evolve to an International Master of Business
Administration (IMBA) to remain relevant in today’s global economy [5].
that the Corporate Recruiters Survey Report indicated that specialized degrees and certificates are becoming
more sought after in the job market, than an MBA [8]. Given that business schools are tasked with preparing
graduates for the rigors of 21st century business, this disengagement is troubling.
From the graduate’s perspective, the value or relevance of an MBA program is generally one that
prepares them with the skills and managerial capabilities to be competitive in today’s turbulent markets. To be
relevant today, and into the future, the MBA curricula must prepare the graduate for their managerial role [6].
Kolina, in 2006, concurred stating “The role of the teacher is changing from being the source of information to
being an adviser and coach in the learning process” [9] (p.35). The primary challenge, from the graduate’s
perspective, is ascertaining what course content is in fact relevant. In recent years, there has been a tendency for
ranking programs, by the institutions, as an indicator of perceived quality [10].
The employer’s perception of value appears to be significantly different than the graduates [11]. A
disconnect exists in the perception of critical skills the graduates’ need as compared to the employer’s
requirements. Muff, in 2012, reflects this same observation [12]. Commenting on a study involving sixty-seven
companies across eight different industries, Muff further asserts that “business leaders across all industries
pointed out that teamwork, soft skills, leadership, honesty, communications skills, flexibility, creativity,
motivation, being a team-player and managerial skills are key factors enabling an individual to succeed in
business today” [12] (p.654). A study, conducted in 2018, revealed similar findings. The 2018 Financial Times
MBA Skills Gap Survey examined sector-specific results and graduate’s opinions. According to Nilsson in 2018
“Some employers are questioning the value of MBAs. Some leading employers are increasingly sceptical about
the MBA qualification as a means of delivering candidates with the skills they need — soft or hard” [13] (p.10).
Nilsson, quoting the assistant dean of MIT’s Sloan School of Management, asserts that the ability to build,
sustain and expand a network, may be a skill employers’ highly value, but "unless [MBA graduates] have
technical skill requirements, they are not even getting through the door" [13] (p.10). There is considerable
support in the literature [2,6,13] that reflects that the MBA programs need to be a combination of academic and
vocational skills to add value to the program. Tan and Ko suggest that “the MBA curricula is always a mix of
teaching managerial practice (i.e., similar to a vocational program imparting specific techniques) and the
reasoning for the practice (i.e., similar to an academic program imparting the research and reasoning skills)" [6]
(p.65).
In their 2017 research findings, Ahmad and Pesch, looking at the issue from a different perspective,
suggest “Periodic surveys of employers and business students make important contributions in aligning
employer needs in new-hires with student skill sets and expectations.” [14] (p.1). Richards-Wilson and
Galloway concur adding that business schools will benefit from surveying their graduates to ascertain what their
experiences have been in the employment market [15]. By analysing the data, the schools are more likely to
identify emerging niche markets. An important source of relevant information is the annual survey of National
Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), piloted at St. Cloud State University in 2016, conducted at the
state or region level [16]. Many are joint ventures of business schools and industry employers to identify the
most important skill sets for graduates.
(p.21). As Ahmad and Pesch observed in 2017, there is a combination of skill sets that are more or less universal
to employers [14]. As organizations become more information driven, additional skill sets, focused around
technology, are also in demand [2]. In their examination of survey data from the National Association of
Colleges and Employers (NACE), Ahmad and Pesch found that the employers identified; (1) honesty/integrity,
(2) strong work ethic, (3) interpersonal skills, (4) professionalism, (5) develop creative solutions, (6) think
analytically, as key skills [14]. Additional skills, such as interpersonal, flexibility, and teamwork were also
identified. In contrast, DuPre and Williams examined perceptions of employer expectations, stated “The 2010
Job Outlook, an annual NACE publication, listed these desired characteristics as, in order of importance,
communication skills, analytical skills, teamwork skills, technical skills (as related to major), and a strong work
ethic” [11] (p.8). Some segments of industry have a very interesting approach to the topic. Moules and Nilsson,
in discussing their research of 48 companies world-wide, “spanning 12 business sectors in e-commerce,
industry, and finance” [10] (p.3) suggest:
Employers in some sectors, such as oil and gas, civil engineering, transport and energy, see
little need for senior staff to hold an MBA degree. Part of the reason, they say, is that they
do not believe that business schools teach the right skills (p.1)
In 2019, R. Fisher, conducting a similar study of employers, concluded that:
Because the MBA degree no longer holds the prestige that it once did, other master’s level
qualifications may better serve some people in their search for an executive level job.
Simply put, MBAs are no longer rare and as such are no longer a guarantee for
employment. Employers no longer view an MBA as a differentiating factor, unless the MBA
was obtained at one of the world’s best business schools [7] (p.11)
One methodology for ensuring alignment of expectations is to constantly seek feedback from graduates
and employers. Demonstrating to employers that MBA graduates add value to their organization provides a
strong case for differentiating them from non-MBA graduates. Important sources of relevant information are
annual surveys (American Association of Colleges and Universities, National Association of Colleges and
Employers (NACE), Saint Cloud State University, etc.), conducted at the state or region levels. Many are joint
ventures between business schools and employers to identify the most important skill sets for MBA graduates.
sustain and expand a network of people globally in a decentralized space, and (5) ability to conceptualize
complex problems [10]. Soft-skills also rose to the top when Bloomberg surveyed 1,320 job recruiters at more
than 600 companies in a 2015 report [26], to find out which skills employers want but cannot find. The most
desired skills, according to the survey, were: (1) strategic thinking, (2) creative problem-solving, (3) leadership
skills, (4) communication skills, (5) analytical thinking, and (6) the ability to work collaboratively. But MBAs
are also expected to be more than problem solvers with great interpersonal skills. Employers rated skills
according to how difficult they are to find in MBA grads when hiring. Levy and Cannon observed that the top
five technology related skills as: (1) the ability to use social media, (2) ability to train/coach others, (3) financial
forecasting, (4) big data analysis, and (5) brand storytelling skills [27].
In addition to the above soft-skills, specific concentration and competencies are in the areas of the
traditional programs: (1) accounting, (2) finance, (3) economics, (4) human resources, (5) management, (6)
marketing, (7) entrepreneurship, etc. To answer these questions, our study examines the curriculums of MBA
programs. It asks if aspects of the traditional curriculums are no longer relevant or are obsolete; and, also, if
some new areas and subjects need to be added to curriculums to make the programs and the graduates better
aligned with the workforce requirements of the 21st century marketplace. Thus, this study’s problem statement
asks “What skills in 2020 should a newly graduated MBA have in order to be valuable to an employer
immediately upon graduation” and “What classes would better prepare the new MBA for employment.”
Following are the research questions that guide this study (as of 2020):
1. How could the MBA graduates be better prepared for employment post-MBA?
2. What skills are MBA graduates lacking in when they graduate with their degree?
3. What curriculums and classes could MBA programs implement to align skill sets of MBA graduates
with those that employers of MBAs value and require?
Significant shifts are happening in the global workplace environment. Meeting business objectives is,
of course, critical, but how employees work, where, when, and with whom they work to meet these objectives
are getting redefined. Even the expectations of the parties involved in the workplace are getting altered. Social
developments, digital business, consumer behaviours, emerging technologies, and more, will change how people
will work in 2028 [28]. This section analyses the main paradigm shifts, with respect to business curriculums in
academia, and concludes with recommendations for the MBA program content and delivery methods to meet
the workforce requirements going forward. A summary of this research and analysis is presented in the next
concluding section.
As globalization is extended, technology assisted digital business will be built on huge networks built
on digital platforms. This will increase the distribution of work across physical boundaries, geographical
locations, nations, languages, customs, and time zones. Use of real-time language translation software within the
team members and with outside entities will be the new normal mode of operation. In such a system, peer
collaboration and teamwork will be centred on trust, competence and ethical behaviour.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is creating machines that can think, follow orders, make decisions, and
make recommendations. These will be used increasingly for collaboration and will function as colleagues and
co-workers alongside human employees. These machines are getting smarter as we move forward with
technological progress and these new capabilities are increasingly and continuously being used to get a
competitive edge in the business world. These machines are taking over, and performing better, some repetitive
tasks currently performed by humans. In addition, as they become more capable, they are being used to perform
duties previously thought difficult, and sometimes impossible, even for human employees. Advances in the AI
space is making significant and positive impacts on how businesses operates, evaluates, and optimizes. Personal
toolkits for employees are becoming a reality for the near future that will help employees with their personal and
team-based activities. It has already started to an extent, and soon, employees will have the ability to carry their
personal workplaces with them using cloud infrastructures, open-source and specialized applications, and
personal virtual collaborators, advisors, and helpers. Visionary proactive leaders and executives must promote
the use of AI technology in forms of robots, smart applications, and uses, to significantly enhance work
efficiencies, business strategies, time-to-market, and to achieve the edge over competition. Employees must be
encouraged to always look for creative ways to use these new and powerful AI technologies to bring in the use
of smart digital possibilities and capabilities.
Traditionally, the focus of the industry is in the sales and marketing areas. These areas are considered
critical as the reasoning is that these functions make the biggest impact to the bottom-line of the business. But
this mind-set needs to be updated. Today, going forward, the biggest impacts to the bottom-line of an
organization are the contributions by technology and related applications. Most, if not all, areas of a business are
significantly enhanced and the bottom-line contributions are improved with the use of technology. Globalization
and distributed business operations have started playing important roles for the success of the organization, and
these functions are enhanced and made efficient by technology. Soft skills – the interpersonal qualities which
are difficult to measure and teach – are those most appreciated by employers. Examples include presentation
skills – both oral and written, the ability to work with a team and with people from different backgrounds and
cultures, and leadership qualities. Regardless of the industry and the job role, teamwork and project
management is always critical and central to the company’s success. The ability to solve complex problems is
another soft skill that is an important items to master during MBA studies. All these skills are enhanced with
technology, to the extent that today’s business necessitates the use of technology to meet these basic
requirements of soft-skills. This research recommends additional focus in the following technology areas for the
21st Century MBA program content: (1) mathematics, statistics and probability, (2) quantitative methods applied
to business, (3) globalization and sharing resources, (4) global project management, and (5) technology based
time management.
Based on the above findings and reasoning, this research recommends inclusion of the following
technology related topics and their business applications in the MBA program curriculums: (1) value-add with
leveraging technology in business, (2) use of social media for enhancing presence and improving efficiency, (3)
Big Data and the inclusion of Cloud infrastructure in the business models, (4) Blockchain technology for
security and efficiency, and (5) use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in appropriate aspects of business. Of course,
these areas are not all inclusive and new technologies (like data analytics and other variations) will continue to
be introduced. The program content will need to be continuously updated to use the latest and appropriate
technologies as required for the business bottom line and other objectives.
Faculty must promote learning and create the environment where learning happens for students, in the limited
time available. The new faculty is the facilitator and his/her role is to make sure that students learn and the
learning is permanent. He/she must encourage learner reflection and critical thinking at each learner’s own level
of understanding. Students today are tech savvy and are capable of getting information they need. The ability to
browse and learn on their own has become a growing expectation for many digital natives [31-35]. The
instructor should prepare questions and discussions that guide the learners in the right direction and make them
reflect and think. Create open-ended questions that learners can explore, reflect and think critically by applying
the concepts that they are learning. This makes the learning process more interesting and the learning more
permanent. The best practices for the instructor, described in this section, is used to promote reflective and
critical thinking in learners.
Faculty needs to incorporate time management for reflection in the curriculum content. One of the best
practices for creating content is that the content be organized efficiently to promote and encourage learners
manage time effectively and productively. Structured organization and systematic layout is the key to getting
this done. The course site and the syllabus should clearly set time limits on instructor availability, discussion
times, and feedback times. Availability of a teaching assistant is helpful and, whenever possible, should be
encouraged. Knowing the availability of the instructors and their individual schedules will encourage the
learners to reflect on their own and evaluate their learning process more deeply. Creating lesson plans for
individual modules is always recommended. Getting familiar with and using available technologies for content
distribution, student submissions, grades, and other normal manual operations are becoming standard
technology enabled practices. Once familiar with these technologies and tools, the instructor become more
organized, and this also enables the learners to manage their time effectively. In addition, educators and content
providers need to continually take the initiative and familiarize themselves with new and latest technologies as
a part of their normal teaching responsibilities [36].
It is suggested that the course content be designed and created to encourage reflection. Course
Learning Outcomes (CLOs) should be developed that are measurable and contain assessment criteria. These are
important because they inform the students the expectations and how these expectations are to be measured.
Also this enables the student reflect and think critically to achieve the required outcomes. Many educational
technologies and course management tools are available for online teaching, but not all of these technologies
are good matches. The content should use the technology that matches and encourages the understanding of the
course objectives. To accomplish this, course planning and overall content framework should be completed
before selecting the technology and course management system [37]. The content needs to contain resources,
applications, examples, and links to relevant and current events that are easily accessed from the student’s
locations. Given the existing online resources, there is no need to re-invent. Sources such as MERLOT
(http://merlot.org), Khan Academy (http://www.khanacademy.org), or YouTube (http://youtube.com), will
improve the content significantly to promote reflective and critical thinking.
Planning for reflection levels for diverse group of students, especially for online delivery, is a crucial
responsibility of the instructor. Online education, both synchronous and asynchronous, is becoming increasing
more global and used by learners from different groupings. As the online content is created, the instructor must
target students with a broad range in ability, background, preferred learning style, languages, age group, work
experience, time obligations, and other personal situations. Individual students must be accepted for their
unique needs or learning preferences. Different available technologies can be used in appropriate variety and
levels of engagement to target the greatest number of learners with maximum impact [38]. This will help all
students’ access, use, and reflect effectively, thus helping in the learning process and positive student
experience.
Taking time out for reflections helps and encourages critical thinking and this leads to permanent
learning. Learners may be engaged with the course material at many times and over several sessions, and this
needs to be addressed during the content design phase of the course design. Course creators should be aware of
and design accordingly so that students experience the ability to interact with smaller pieces or sequences of
material so they can continue to make effective use of the asynchronous learning experience [39-40]. By
packaging data in small sequential lessons or learning activities, course designers provide a vehicle for the
student to engage and reflect in small steps, thus proceeding to the next step only after the previous step is
given sufficient thought. Additionally, there is the opportunity for non-linear content where objectives are
demonstrated in non-sequential activities that can be utilized by students in no particular order [41]. This non-
linear approach increases engagement by allowing the learner the freedom to choose content in their own order
of interest. This also encourages the learner to reflect and take responsibility of their own customized learning
process.
Faculty must carefully create and design the closing activities to encourage reflection and critical
thinking. A good closing activity for the course is important for making the learning more permanent. This
could be in the form of a project or a final discussion that covers most of the topics the learners have been
introduced to in the course. This helps the student to think about and reflect upon the relationships between the
different concepts that the students have learnt and helps make learning relevant. By linking the theoretical and
the practical elements of a course through a well-formed closing activity the online students begin to think
critically of activities that may seem purely theoretical but are actually preparing the student for the real world
scenarios they should expect in the marketplace [42]. Research activities for online students also encourages
curiosity and promotes reflection about the practice and the practical demonstration of real world scenarios. As
online students are assigned to uncover converging and divergent discussions in the available literature, they
are driven to examining the gaps between their own workplace experiences and the theoretical possibilities for
improvement outlined by these publications [43]. Therefore, as closing activities, the instructor should include
a mix of real world or simulated real world practical application with effective use of scholarly research in
which to develop the practical illustrations.
graduate in the 21st century. With the emergence of the global economy, it has also become apparent that skill
sets identified as critical in the North American market, may not prepare the graduate to compete in the global
market [5]. The literature reflects a paradigm shift in the skill sets that many employers are looking for in new
MBA graduates. Nilsson, discussing the results of the 2018 FT MBA Skills Gap Survey, asserts “Some
employers are questioning the value of MBAs. Some leading employers are increasingly sceptical about the
MBA qualification as a means of delivering candidates with the skills they need - soft or hard” [13] (p.10). This
is made evident by reports that some employers are seeking candidates that have very specialized degrees with
relevant vocational certificates. Bell asserts "Many industries will hire prospective employees with certifications
over advanced degrees because they’re looking for a specialized employee for very technical jobs" [2] (p.22).
For the MBA to remain relevant going forward, it must have more perceived value-add to both the employers
and the graduates.
Fisher asserts that there is criticism of the practice by some schools to accept students with no real-
world work experience [7]. Without real-world experience, the MBA student is not able to leverage their own
real-work experiences or that of his or her classmates, thus limiting the depth and breadth of the experience.
Fisher argues that the goal of the MBA program is to; (1) provide additional skills to build on a candidate’s real-
world experience, (2) leveraging real world experience from the student’s peers and professors, and (3) provide
the students a more rounded business education; grounded in practice [7]. The lack or real-world experience
limits the realization of the relevance of the educational experience by the student. The desired features of the
MBA graduates have evolved considerably in the last 10 years. DuPre and Williams assert that “The 2010 Job
Outlook, an annual NACE publication, listed these desired characteristics as, in order of importance,
communication skills, analytical skills, teamwork skills, technical skills (as related to major), and a strong work
ethic” [11] (p.8). By 2018, the employer’s needs have developed, assigning emphasis on soft-skills and ability to
collaborate. Bell (2017) asserts that “Educators must produce graduates who are able to adapt to their jobs and
effectively use their critical thinking skills to make strategic decisions that further an organization” [2] (p.21).
Commenting on a study involving sixty-seven companies across eight different industries, Muff, in 2012, asserts
that “business leaders across all industries pointed out that teamwork, soft-skills, leadership, honesty,
communications skills, flexibility, creativity, motivation, being a team-player and managerial skills are key
factors enabling an individual to succeed in business today” [12] (p.654). The challenge for educators in
academia is to understand this trend and predicting the changes coming in the next few years.
Going forward into the 21st century, designing the MBA curriculum and content, that considers and
addresses these characteristics, will ensure the worth and importance of an MBA program. The literature on this
topic reveals a worrying trend in the educational requirements for some jobs. In the 2019 Corporate Recruiters
Survey Report, Fisher indicates that specialized degrees and certificates are becoming more sought after by
some employers in the job market, thus reducing the perceived value of an MBA [7]. Commenting on the
apparent lack of differentiation between specialized degrees and the regular MBA degree, Fisher asserts that “
Notably, the findings revealed a lack of empirical data demonstrating that competency skills employees gained
in an MBA program have an impact in the business world” [7] (p.1). This should be viewed as an opportunity
for the subject matter experts (SMEs) creating the contents and curriculum developers. By seeking continuous
feedback from graduates and employers, program developers can differentiate the MBA programs from the
apparent value of a specialized and narrow degree that includes vocational certificates; the latter having very
focused skills as opposed to the well-rounded MBA graduate. Fine-tuning for the 21st century market
requirements, necessitates a curriculum that is a mixture of academic rigor and practitioner driven skills
differentiating it from a specialized degree that includes vocational certificates [2].
This research and analysis also revealed a common theme that has emerged in several studies in the
literature. Faculty that have a purely academic background, as opposed to having a balance of academic and
real-world experience, were viewed by many as being unprepared to instruct MBA students in real-world
business challenges. Leveraging the experience of professors who are scholar-practitioners bridges the gap
between theoretical and real-world applications [7]. Fisher further suggests that “Faculty should regularly share
their proficiency by serving as members of professional organizations, submitting at scholarly conferences, and
consulting with local businesses and government agencies” [7] (p.10). For MBA programs to have value to the
employers and graduates, they must have a balanced approach that is continuously adapting to the needs of the
stakeholders [2].
traditionally valued MBA skills and competencies that may now require some integration and re-
evaluation.
2. A research study comparing and contrasting what a domestically focused MBA curricula should
include, versus a Global Business MBA. This is expected to determine if the feedback received from
the global business community, in terms of desired skill sets for the MBA in the 21st Century,
correspond to the skill sets identified for the North American market. This study may determine if there
is a need for a specialized MBA for the domestic business (who may not be competing in the global
market place) as opposed to the global business.
3. A study to determine the level of technical or IT knowledge that is considered a core competency for
an MBA graduate in the 21st Century. What specific new technical areas are important and ascertain if
data analytics should be taught in the core class structure of an MBA. Should a data analytics specialty
be considered as a requirement in the workforce? This may lead to the important discussion on whether
the domestic and global businesses place value in candidates that have a MBA, without a specialty or
concentration, as much as specific specialties such as data analytics?
4. A study is recommended to determine if the 21st Century MBA graduates are being replaced with
applicants with other Master’s degrees? If so, which ones, and why? This study may be instrumental to
further designing the new MBA curriculums.
5. A study to ascertain the relative values corporate America places on top-ranked MBA programs versus
the un-ranked ones. This study may also include analysing the perceived value corporate America
places on on-line synchronous and asynchronous MBA programs.
6. The role of an Instructor in 21st MBA programs is changing. This would be a continuation of the
limited study in this paper and would look at how the role of a MBA instructor has changed over the
years, and determine if teachers are obsolete in certain areas of the curricula. As well, the study will
delve into if teaching is migrating into facilitating. Furthermore, the study should examine how
students are learning today and thus how to make learning happen.
7. Do MBAs need nationally created exit exams to ensure standard competency? This research would be a
study on if exit exams would ensure levels of competency for graduating MBAs that are desired by
industry. A study of the current status of what criteria are required to accredit an MBA program is
suggested as a follow-on to this study.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and support received from the administration, staff, and
faculty members at their academic institutions, during the continuing research on this subject and the
preparation of this document.
REFERENCES
[1]. Luberecki, B. (2019). Is getting an MBA worth the leap? Washington Post. Retrieved from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/express/2019/09/08/is-getting-an-mba-worth-leap/
[2]. Bell, T. (2017). Integrating third party-certification with traditional MBA curriculum, defining value
and encouraging innovation. International Journal of Higher education Management. 4 (1) p. 19-25
[3]. Mariner, D. (2015). Factors that influence the outcomes in a master of business administration
program: A program evaluation of an MBA program. (Publication 3708237) [ Doctoral Dissertation,
The Robert Morris University] ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Global.
[4]. Atwater, B. (2007). A graduate career services program for regional business school: facilitating the
career growth and development of MBA students. (Publication No. 1443596) [Master’s Thesis,
University of New Hampshire] ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Global.
[5]. Tibbetts, D. (2009) Internationalization of MBA programs: A review of the international aspect of
masters of business -level programs in top domestic institutions. [Doctoral Dissertation, Capella
University] ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Central.
[6]. Tan, B. and Ko, S. (2019). How relevant is the MBA: A revisit, Journal of Education for Business,
94:1, 64-69, DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2018.1503587
[7]. Fisher, R. (2019). A triangulation assessment: the value of an MBA degree, an evidenced based
management (EBMGT) systematic review (SR). Journal of Education and Leadership Journal. 23(1)
Arden, Retrieved from ProQuest Central.
[8]. GMAC Report (2017). Graduate Management Admission Council. Application Trends Survey Report
2017. Retrieved from https://www.gmac.com/-/media/files/gmac/research/admissions-and-application-
trends/2017-gmac-application-trends-web-release.pdfX17.Yeaple, R. (2012). Is the MBA Obsolete?
Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ronaldyeaple/2012/05/30/is-the-mba-
obsolete/#59db6632f8a2
[9]. Kolina, D. (2006). Do You Have a Strategy? Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers. 81(6) p34-
36. Retrieved from ProQuest Central.
[10]. Moules, J., Nilsson, P. (2017). What employers want from MBA graduates – and what they don’t?
FT.COM, ProQuest
[11]. DuPre, C., Williams, K. (2011). Undergraduates Perceptions of Employer Expectations. Journal of
Career and Technical Education. 26 (1) p 8-19.
[12]. Muff, K. (2012). Are Business Schools Doing Their Job? Journal of Management Development. Vol
31, Issue 7, Pages 642-662. ISSN: 0262-1711.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02621711211243854/full/html
[13]. Nilsson, P. (2018). What employers want from MBAs: Business education The FT's Skills Gap survey
reveals what lies ahead for graduates, writes Patricia Nilsson [Usa Region]. Financial Times, London.
Retrieved from ProQuest Central.
[14]. Ahmad, S. Pesch, M. (2017). Essential work skills and readiness: perceptions of employers, MBA
students and undergraduates. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. 21(1) p.1-10.
[15]. Richards-Wilson, S., Galloway, F. (2010). What every business school needs to know about its Master
of Business Administration (MBA) graduates. Journal of Education for Business 82 (2) p. 95-100
[16]. NACE Staff (2017). National Association of Colleges and Employers. Piloted at St. Cloud State
University in 2016. Retrieved from https://www.naceweb.org/career-development/best-
practices/program-has-employers-review-student-linkedin-profiles/
[17]. Yeaple, R. (2012). Is the MBA Obsolete? Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ronaldyeaple/2012/05/30/is-the-mba-obsolete/#59db6632f8a2
[18]. Cutter, C. (2019). Elite M.B.A. Programs Report Steep Drop in Applications. Wall Street Journal.
Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/elite-m-b-a-programs-report-steep-drop-in-applications-
11571130001
[19]. Ethier, M. (2020). Acceptance Rates At The Top 50 Business Schools In The U.S. Retrieved from
https://poetsandquants.com/2020/01/30/acceptance-rates-at-the-top-50-business-schools-in-the-u-s/
[20]. Byrne, J. A. (2019). It’s Official: The M.B.A. Degree is in Crisis. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/poetsandquants/2019/08/20/its-official-the-mba-degree-is-in-
crisis/#49ab97752df7
[21]. Jaschik, S. (2019). Understanding the Decline in M.B.A. Applications. Retrieved from
https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2019/02/04/new-data-help-explain-decline-mba-
applications
[22]. Forsyth, B., Anastasia, C. (2016). The business simulation paradigm: tracking effectiveness in MBA
programs. Journal of Management Policy and Practice. 17 (2) p. 85-100.
[23]. Higher Education Opportunity Act – 2008. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from
https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html
[24]. Khurana, R. (2007). From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American
Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession (Princeton University
Press, 2007): A Harvard Business School professor’s review of the history and purpose of management
education and an outline for reform.
[25]. Gentile, M. C. (2008). The 21st-Century MBA. Strategy and Business, Columbia Business School,
Executive Education. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/08209?gko=63b46
[26]. Bloomberg Report (2015). The Bloomberg Recruiter Report: Job Skills Companies Want but Can’t
Get. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-job-skills-report/
[27]. Levy, F., Cannon, C. (2016). The Bloomberg Job Skills Report 2016: What Recruiters Want. Retrieved
from https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-job-skills-report/
[28]. Cheremond, R. J. (2019). 6 Ways the Workplace Will Change in the Next 10 Years. Smarter and
Gartner. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/6-ways-the-workplace-will-
change-in-the-next-10-years/
[29]. Griffin, D. (2019). Senior Director Analyst at Gartner. Retrieved from
https://www.gartner.com/analyst/75082
[30]. Gregg, J., Steward, D. W. (2013). Speculations on the Future of Graduate Management Education.
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. Vol. 13(2). http://na-
businesspress.homestead.com/JHETP/StewartDW_Web13_2_.pdf
[31]. Mitra, S., Minimally Invasive Education for mass computer literacy, Presented at the CRIDALA 2000
conference, Hong Kong, 21-25 June, 2000
[32]. Mitra, S., Rana, V., Children and the Internet: Experiments with minimally invasive education in
India, The British Journal of Educational Technology, volume 32, issue 2, pp 221-232. (2001)
[33]. Mitra, S., Self-organising systems for mass computer literacy: Findings from the 'Hole in the Wall'
experiments, International Journal of Development Issues, Vol. 4, No. 1 (2005) 71-81
[34]. Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., Chatterjee, S., Jha, S., Bisht, R.S. and Kapur, P., Acquisition of computing
literacy on shared public computers: Children and the “hole in the wall”, Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology 2005, 21(3), 407-426
[35]. Mitra, S., 2013. We Need Schools, Not Factories. Winner of TED Prize 2013.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/sugata-Mitra/2013-ted-prize_b_2767598.html
[36]. Koedel, C. (2011). Grading Standards in Education Departments at Universities. [Article]. Padrões de
Avaliação nos Departamentos de Educação nas Universidades., 19(23), 1-20.
[37]. Horton, W. (2006). E-learning by Design Retrieved from
http://books.google.com/books?id=pn1r35moircC
[38]. Flores, R., Coward, F., and Crooks, S. M. (2010). Examining the Influence of Gender on the Modality
Effect. [Article]. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 87-103. doi: 10.2190/ET.39.1.g
[39]. Liqiu, W. (2011). Formative Assessment in Classrooms: Operational Procedures. [Article]. Journal of
Language Teaching & Research, 2(1), 99-103. doi: 10.4304/jltr.2.1.99-103
[40]. Patron, H. and Lopez, S. (2011). Student Effort, Consistency, and Online Performance. [Article].
Journal of Educators Online, 8(2), 1-11.
[41]. Gregorius, R. (2011). Student Performances in Various Learning Protocols. [Article]. Journal of
College Science Teaching, 40(5), 85-95.
[42]. Lumsden, E., McBryde-Wilding, H., and Rose, H. (2010). Collaborative practice in practice in
enhancing the first year experience in Higher Education. Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher
Education, 2(1), 12
[43]. Condie, R. and livingston, K. (2007). Blending online learning with traditional approaches: changing
practices. [Feature Article]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 337-348.