Jusoh 2020 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 463 012129 PDF
Jusoh 2020 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 463 012129 PDF
Jusoh 2020 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 463 012129 PDF
Abstract. This paper presents accurate control parameters estimation of the hydraulic Power
Take-Off (PTO) model for the wave energy conversion system to maximise energy production.
In general, the performance of the hydraulic PTO system depends on the parameters setting of
hydraulic PTO system components such as hydraulic motor displacement setting, pre-charge of
the hydraulic accumulator, and et cetera. Conventionally, it requires to manually obtain the
optimal parameters of a hydraulic PTO system by repeating the simulation process. However,
this estimation method exposed to human error and would easily be resulting in a non-optimal
selection of hydraulic PTO parameters for the wave energy conversion system. Therefore, an
easy and accurate approach of using the GA optimisation method for determining hydraulic PTO
parameters was introduced in the present study. This approach is simple and more accurate
compared to the conventional optimisation method. The hydraulic PTO model was developed in
SIEMENS/Amesim environment using available components in the library. The specifications
of the actual hydraulic PTO system components from the manufacturer were used during the
simulation set-up. The complete hydraulic PTO system was optimised using a special genetic
algorithm (GA) optimisation tools in the SIEMENS/Amesim software. The simulation results
showed that GA was effective to determine the optimal configuration parameters of hydraulic
PTO system. From the results, the optimal configuration parameters of hydraulic PTO system
were successfully reduced about 38%. Consequently, the maximum force applied to the WEC
devices was reduced up to 34%. This force reduction is important since it will enable the WECS
to be operated during a smaller wave condition.
1. Introduction
Ocean waves is considered as one of the largest untapped and most promising renewable energy sources
due to its natural characteristics of high-power density, cleanest, predictable, inexhaustible, safe and et
cetera [1,2]. There are numerous wave energy conversion system (WECS) concepts that have been
proposed and patented, which are capable of converting the energy from the ocean waves become usable
electricity [3]. In general, these WECS concepts consist of three main subsystems, namely the wave
energy converter (WEC) device, power take-off (PTO) system, and the control system. Recently, there
are a variety of PTO concepts have been invented by researchers for the WECS application using
different working principles such as air or water turbine-based, mechanical hydraulic-based, direct-
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
2. Methodology
In general, the design of the WECS is dependent on location characteristics. In the present study, the
concept of multi-point WEC with hydraulic PTO system which suitable for shoreline and nearshore
location, as illustrated in Figure 1 is considered. This multi-point WEC concept is quite similar to the
one used in several previous studies [12,13]. However, the difference in WEC shape design and the
hydraulic configuration are proposed in this study. This concept has been specifically designed for
nearshore application in Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia. The advantage of this concept is
that only the WEC is placed in the water, whereas all the technical equipment operates on fixed-
structure, thereby improving reliability and providing easy access for maintenance and repair. In this
concept, the four parallel WEC devices, which includes uniquely shaped floaters, floaters arm, and
floater level regulators are attached to the fixed-structure, as depicted in Figure 1. These WEC devices
are connected to a single 10 kW hydraulic PTO system, which is located on the top of fixed-structure.
A hydraulic PTO system includes a hydraulic double-acting cylinder, control manifold (set of check
valves), accumulator, hydraulic motor, electrical generator, and et cetera, as presented in Figure 2.
According to Figure 1 and 2, the induced forces by the ocean wave against the floaters, namely an
excitation forces, (Fexc) forced the floaters to swing upward and downward. The double-acting cylinder
is attached to each floater’s arm to absorb the oscillating motion of WEC devices. The WEC devices
motion push the double-acting cylinder rods at specified velocity (ẋ) relatively subjected to the PTO
forces (Fpto,i). Then, the rod and piston exerted force the fluid in the hydraulic cylinder chamber through
a controlled hydraulic manifold to a hydraulic motor. The produced torque from hydraulic motor (τG) is
used to drive the electrical generator at the specified rotation speed (ωG). The control manifold is utilised
2
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
to ensure that the hydraulic motor only rotating in a single direction. The accumulator also added to the
PTO system, where the high-pressure accumulator (HPA) is placed on the inlet of the hydraulic motor.
This accumulator is included to smooth out the supply of high-pressure fluid in the system by either
providing or accumulating hydraulic energy when necessary.
PTO house
Floater level
regulator
Breakwater
Hydraulic
cylinder
Fixed-
structure
Floater
Figure 1: Future design of 10-kW Wave energy converter with hydraulic PTO system.
The performance and behaviour of the hydraulic PTO system are influenced by parameters setting
of hydraulic components. Based on the theoretical descriptions in [14], several influence parameters
setting of hydraulic PTO system have been obtained for optimisation purpose as summarised in Table
1.
Table 1: Important parameters setting of hydraulic PTO system.
No. Parameters setting Unit
1 Diameter of piston, Dp,i mm
2 Diameter of rod, Dr,i mm
3 Accumulator capacity, VHPA L
4 Accumulator pre-charge gas pressure, Gpre,HPA bar
5 Hydraulic motor displacement, DM cc/rev
3
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
4
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
5
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
Table 2: Optimal parameters setting and behaviour of hydraulic PTO system using two different
parameter estimation method
Parameter Estimation Method
Hydraulic PTO Parameters
Manually GA Optimization
Diameter of piston, Dp,i mm 65 58
Diameter of rod, Dr,i mm 50 31
Accumulator capacity, VHPA L 35 34
Accumulator pre-charge gas pressure, Gpre,HPA Bar 70 56
Hydraulic motor displacement, DM cc/rev 95 88.5
Hydraulic PTO System Behaviour
Average generator speed, ωG,ave rpm 250 250
Average generator Torque, τG,ave Nm 382 382
Maximum hydraulic Cylinder force, Fpto,max kN 221 146
Average electrical output power, Pe,ave kW 10 10
Furthermore, Figure 4 illustrates the complete hydraulic PTO system behaviour using optimal
configuration parameters that were obtained using the proposed optimisation method. Figure 4(a) shows
the obtained xp,i and ẋp,i of piston motion profiles in order to generate 10 kW electricity. The patterns are
similar for all hydraulic cylinders used since a similar ocean wave signal was applied to all hydraulic
cylinders. The xp,i and ẋp,i have a sinusoidal profile, where the highest xp,i and ẋp,i are equal to 0.097 m/s
and 0.109 m, respectively. Figure 4(b) illustrates the required forces profiles for pushing the hydraulic
piston at the rated condition. A maximum of 146 kN PTO forces was applied to the WEC devices to
push the hydraulic piston at the 0.097 m/s and resulted in 10 kW electricity was generated. This result
was proven that the optimisation method was capable of reducing the PTO force applied to the WEC
devices by 34% due to the reduction of configuration parameters, as mentioned previously. Apart from
that, Figure 4(c) and (d) illustrates the performances of the hydraulic motor in terms of speed and torque.
The hydraulic motor was required 150 s to operate at its rated condition (250 rpm and 382 Nm). Finally,
Figure 4(e) shows the generated electrical output power profiles by the hydraulic PTO system at the
optimal condition. As shown in the figure, the PMSG driven by the hydraulic motor was capable of
generating the electricity of up to 10 kW.
6
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
Figure 4: Performance of 10 kW hydraulic PTO system using optimal configuration parameters obtained by GA.
4. Conclusion
The optimal parameters setting of a nonlinear hydraulic-based PTO system is a critical issue since it can
influence the performance of the system and the amount of the output to be generated. Previously, only
few studies concerning this critical issue. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no report has
been found so far using the intelligent mathematical algorithm to estimate the optimal configuration
parameters for the wave energy conversion system. Therefore, this paper presents the development,
optimisation and performance investigation of a 10 kW hydraulic PTO system for wave energy
conversion system. The objective of this paper is to determine the optimal configuration parameters of
a hydraulic PTO system. Initially, the concepts and the mathematical models of the hydraulic PTO
system were described. Then, the important configuration parameters of hydraulic PTO system was
discussed. Finally, the simulation model set-up and the evaluation of the hydraulic PTO system model
in Siemen Amesim software were carried out.
The presented results in this study illustrate that GA was effective to determine the optimal
configuration parameters of hydraulic PTO system. From the results, the optimal piston and rod
7
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
diameters of the hydraulic cylinder were successfully reduced by 10% and 38%, respectively. Besides
that, the accumulator capacity, accumulator precharge gas pressure and hydraulic motor displacement
setting also have been reduced by 2.8%, 20% and 6.8%, respectively. The significant reduction of the
configuration parameters consequently reduces the overall operational cost of the hydraulic PTO system.
In addition, the most important finding to emerge from this study is that GA was able to reduce the PTO
force applied to the WEC devices by 34%, from 221k kN to 146 kN in order to generate 10 kW
electricity. This finding is important since it will enable the WECS to be operated during a smaller wave
condition.
5. Future Work
The study has gone some way towards enhancing the performance of the hydraulic PTO system using
mathematical optimisation method. It is recommended that further research be undertaken in the
following areas: Firstly, it would be interesting to obtain an optimal configuration parameters of
hydraulic PTO system using different types of a mathematical optimisation algorithm such as particle
swarm optimisation (PSO), gravitational search algorithm (GSA), genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony
optimisation algorithm (ACO), and et cetera. Thus, the best optimisation algorithm for hydraulic PTO
system case could be obtained. Secondly, further investigation and experimentation of optimal hydraulic
PTO system are strongly recommended. Therefore, the effectiveness of the proposed parameters
estimation method on the actual condition can be proved.
References
[1] Sang Y, Karayaka H B, Yan Y, Yilmaz N and Souders D 2018 Ocean (Marine) Energy
Comprehensive Energy Systems vol 1–5 (Elsevier) pp 733–69
[2] Mustapa M A, Yaakob O B, Ahmed Y M, Rheem C K, Koh K K and Adnan F A 2017 Wave
energy device and breakwater integration: A review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 77 43–58
[3] Rusu E and Onea F 2018 A review of the technologies for wave energy extraction Clean Energy
2 10–9
[4] Pecher A and Kofoed J P 2017 Handbook of Ocean Wave Energy vol 7 (London: Springer
International Publishing)
[5] Gaspar J F, Calvário M, Kamarlouei M and Guedes Soares C 2016 Power take-off concept for
wave energy converters based on oil-hydraulic transformer units Renew. Energy 86 1232–46
[6] Jusoh M A, Ibrahim M Z, Daud M Z, Albani A and Yusop Z M 2019 Hydraulic Power Take-Off
Concepts for Wave Energy Conversion System: A Review Energies 12 4510
[7] Galván-Pozos D E and Ocampo-Torres F J 2020 Dynamic analysis of a six-degree of freedom
wave energy converter based on the concept of the Stewart-Gough platform Renew. Energy
146 1051–61
[8] Penalba M, Davidson J, Windt C and Ringwood J V. 2018 A high-fidelity wave-to-wire
simulation platform for wave energy converters: Coupled numerical wave tank and power
take-off models Appl. Energy 226 655–69
[9] Liu C, Yang Q and Bao G 2018 Influence of hydraulic power take-off unit parameters on power
capture ability of a two-raft-type wave energy converter Ocean Eng. 150 69–80
[10] Sheng W and Lewis A 2016 Power Takeoff Optimization for Maximizing Energy Conversion of
Wave-Activated Bodies IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 41 529–40
[11] Cargo C J, Hillis A J and Plummer A R 2014 Optimisation and control of a hydraulic power take-
off unit for a wave energy converter in irregular waves Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power
Energy 228 462–79
[12] Hansen R H, Kramer M M, Vidal E, Hansen R H, Kramer M M and Vidal E 2013 Discrete
Displacement Hydraulic Power Take-Off System for the Wavestar Wave Energy Converter
Energies 6 4001–44
[13] Hansen A H, Asmussen M F and Bech M M 2018 Model predictive control of awave energy
converter with discrete fluid power power take-off system Energies 11 635
8
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 463 (2020) 012129 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012129
[14] Cargo C J, Plummer A R, Hillis A J and Schlotter M 2012 Determination of optimal parameters
for a hydraulic power take-off unit of a wave energy converter in regular waves Proc. Inst.
Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 226 98–111
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Ministry of Energy,
Science, Technology, Environment & Climate Change (MESTECC) and the Ministry of Higher
Education (MOHE) for financial support for this research. This research is supported by MESTECC
under the Malaysian Electricity Supply Industries Trust Account (MESITA) and by MOHE under
Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) Vot: 59601.