M1 Statics - Equilibrium Problems
M1 Statics - Equilibrium Problems
M1 Statics - Equilibrium Problems
com
1. A beam AB has length 6 m and weight 200 N. The beam rests in a horizontal position on two
supports at the points C and D, where AC = 1 m and DB = 1 m. Two children, Sophie and Tom,
each of weight 500 N, stand on the beam with Sophie standing twice as far from the end B as
Tom. The beam remains horizontal and in equilibrium and the magnitude of the reaction at D is
three times the magnitude of the reaction at C. By modelling the beam as a uniform rod and the
two children as particles, find how far Tom is standing from the end B.
(Total 7 marks)
2.
A particle of mass 0.4 kg is held at rest on a fixed rough plane by a horizontal force of
magnitude P newtons. The force acts in the vertical plane containing the line of greatest slope of
the inclined plane which passes through the particle. The plane is inclined to the horizontal at
3
an angle α, where tan α = , as shown in the diagram above.
4
1
The coefficient of friction between the particle and the plane is .
3
Given that the particle is on the point of sliding up the plane, find
(a) the magnitude of the normal reaction between the particle and the plane,
(5)
3.
A small box of mass 15 kg rests on a rough horizontal plane. The coefficient of friction between
the box and the plane is 0.2. A force of magnitude P newtons is applied to the box at 50° to the
horizontal, as shown in the diagram above. The box is on the point of sliding along the plane.
4.
A small package of mass 1.1 kg is held in equilibrium on a rough plane by a horizontal force.
3
The plane is inclined at an angle α to the horizontal, where tan α = . The force acts in a
4
vertical plane containing a line of greatest slope of the plane and has magnitude P newtons, as
shown in the diagram above.
The coefficient of friction between the package and the plane is 0.5 and the package is modelled
as a particle. The package is in equilibrium and on the point of slipping down the plane.
(a) Draw, on the diagram above, all the forces acting on the package, showing their
directions clearly.
(2)
(b) (i) Find the magnitude of the normal reaction between the package and the plane.
5. Two forces, (4i – 5j) N and (pi + qj) N, act on a particle P of mass m kg. The resultant of the
two forces is R. Given that R acts in a direction which is parallel to the vector (i – 2j),
Given also that q = 1 and that P moves with an acceleration of magnitude 8√5 m s–2,
6.
20°
P
12 N
A particle P is attached to one end of a light inextensible string. The other end of the string is
attached to a fixed point O. A horizontal force of magnitude 12 N is applied to P. The particle P
is in equilibrium with the string taut and OP making an angle of 20° with the downward
vertical, as shown in the diagram above.
Find
7.
1.2 N
40 °
A small ring of mass 0.25 kg is threaded on a fixed rough horizontal rod. The ring is pulled
upwards by a light string which makes an angle 40° with the horizontal, as shown in the
diagram above. The string and the rod are in the same vertical plane. The tension in the string is
1.2 N and the coefficient of friction between the ring and the rod is μ. Given that the ring is in
limiting equilibrium, find
(a) the normal reaction between the ring and the rod,
(4)
8.
PN
30 °
QN
A particle of weight 24 N is held in equilibrium by two light inextensible strings. One string is
horizontal. The other string is inclined at an angle of 30° to the horizontal, as shown in the
diagram above. The tension in the horizontal string is Q newtons and the tension in the other
string is P newtons. Find
9.
4N
α
10.
PN
30°
A parcel of weight 10N lies on a rough plane inclined at an angle of 30° to the horizontal. A
horizontal force of magnitude P newtons acts on the parcel, as shown in the figure above. The
parcel is in equilibrium and on the point of slipping up the plane. The normal reaction of the
plane on the parcel is 18N. The coefficient of friction between the parcel and the plane is µ.
Find
11.
A C
B
6N
A smooth bead B is threaded on a light inextensible string. The ends of the string are attached to
two fixed points A and C on the same horizontal level. The bead is held in equilibrium by a
horizontal force of magnitude 6 N acting parallel to AC. The bead B is vertically below C and
∠BAC = α, as shown in the diagram. Given that tan α = 34 , find
12.
P
XN
20º
A particle P of mass 2.5 kg rests in equilibrium on a rough plane under the action of a force of
magnitude X newtons acting up a line of greatest slope of the plane, as shown in the diagram
above. The plane is inclined at 20° to the horizontal. The coefficient of friction between P and
the plane is 0.4. The particle is in limiting equilibrium and is on the point of moving up the
plane. Calculate
13.
60°
A heavy package is held in equilibrium on a slope by a rope. The package is attached to one end
of the rope, the other end being held by a man standing at the top of the slope. The package is
modelled as a particle of mass 20 kg. The slope is modelled as a rough plane inclined at 60° to
the horizontal and the rope as a light inextensible string. The string is assumed to be parallel to a
line of greatest slope of the plane, as shown in the diagram above. At the contact between the
package and the slope, the coefficient of friction is 0.4.
(a) Find the minimum tension in the rope for the package to stay in equilibrium on the slope.
(8)
The man now pulls the package up the slope. Given that the package moves at constant speed,
(c) State how you have used, in your answer to part (b), the fact that the package moves
14.
A B
30 60
C
A particle of weight W newtons is attached at C to the ends of two light inextensible strings AC
and BC. The other ends of the strings are attached to two fixed points A and B on a horizontal
ceiling. The particle hangs in equilibrium with AC and BC inclined to the horizontal at 30° and
60° respectively, as shown in the diagram above. Given the tension in AC is 50 N, calculate
15.
50 m
15°
The diagram above shows a boat B of mass 400 kg held at rest on a slipway by a rope. The boat
is modelled as a particle and the slipway as a rough plane inclined at 15° to the horizontal. The
coefficient of friction between B and the slipway is 0.2. The rope is modelled as a light,
inextensible string, parallel to a line of greatest slope of the plane. The boat is in equilibrium
and on the point of sliding down the slipway.
The boat is 50 m from the bottom of the slipway. The rope is detached from the boat and the
boat slides down the slipway.
(b) Calculate the time taken for the boat to slide to the bottom of the slipway.
(6)
(Total 12 marks)
16.
A (2m) B (2m)
C (3m)
Two small rings, A and B, each of mass 2m, are threaded on a rough horizontal pole. The
coefficient of friction between each ring and the pole is µ. The rings are attached to the ends of
a light inextensible string. A smooth ring C, of mass 3m, is threaded on the string and hangs in
equilibrium below the pole. The rings A and B are in limiting equilibrium on the pole, with
∠BAC = ∠ABC = θ, where tan θ = 34 , as shown in the diagram above.
17.
PN
S
30°
A heavy suitcase S of mass 50 kg is moving along a horizontal floor under the action of a force
of magnitude P newtons. The force acts at 30° to the floor, as shown in the diagram above, and
S moves in a straight line at constant speed. The suitcase is modelled as a particle and the floor
as a rough horizontal plane. The coefficient of friction between S and the floor is 53 .
18.
20 N
A parcel of mass 5 kg lies on a rough plane inclined at an angle α to the horizontal, where
tan α = 34 . The parcel is held in equilibrium by the action of a horizontal force of magnitude
20 N, as shown in the diagram above. The force acts in a vertical plane through a line of greatest
slope of the plane. The parcel is on the point of sliding down the plane. Find the coefficient of
friction between the parcel and the plane.
(Total 8 marks)
19.
12 N
O C
XN
8N
In the diagram above, ∠AOC = 90° and ∠BOC = θ °. A particle at O is in equilibrium under the
action of three coplanar forces. The three forces have magnitudes 8 N, 12 N and X N and act
along OA, OB and OC respectively. Calculate
20.
TN
20
30
A box of mass 1.5 kg is placed on a plane which is inclined at an angle of 30° to the horizontal.
The coefficient of friction between the box and plane is 13 . The box is kept in equilibrium by a
light string which lies in a vertical plane containing a line of greatest slope of the plane. The
string makes an angle of 20° with the plane, as shown in the diagram above. The box is in
limiting equilibrium and is about to move up the plane. The tension in the string is T newtons.
The box is modelled as a particle.
21.
A C
30°
A particle has mass 2 kg. It is attached at B to the ends of two light inextensible strings AB
and BC. When the particle hangs in equilibrium, AB makes an angle of 30° with the vertical,
as shown above. The magnitude of the tension in BC is twice the magnitude of the tension
in AB.
(a) Find, in degrees to one decimal place, the size of the angle that BC makes with
the vertical.
(4)
(b) Hence find, to 3 significant figures, the magnitude of the tension in AB.
(4)
(Total 8 marks)
1.
M ( B),
500x + 500.2x + 200x3 = Rx5 + Sx1
(or any valid moments equation) M1 A1 A1
(↓) R + S = 500 + 500 + 200 = 1200 (or a moments equation) M1 A1
solving for x; x = 1.2 m M1 A1 cso
[7]
2. (a) F = 13 R B1
( ↑ ) R cos α − F sin α =
0.4 g M1 A1
=R 23=
g 6.53 or 6.5 M1 A1 5
3. F = Pcos50° M1 A1
F = 0.2R seen or implied. B1
Psin 50° + R = 15g M1 A1 A1
Eliminating R; Solving for P ; DM1;D M1;
P = 37 (2 SF) A1
[9]
4. (a)
B2
–1 e.e.o.o.
(labels not needed) 2
(b) F = 12 R
1.1g
R= = 9.8 N M1 A2
(cos α + 12 sin α )
M1 A1 6
(→), P + 12 R cos α = R sin α M1 A2
P = R (sin α – 12 cos α ) M1
= 1.96 A1 5
[13]
5. (a)
2
tan θ = ⇒ θ = 63.4º M1 A1
1
angle is 153.4° A1 3
(c) q = 1⇒ p = – 2 B1
⇒ R = 2i – 4j M1
⇒ R = 2 2 + (–4) 2 = 20 M1 A1 f.t.
20 = m8 5 M1 A1 f.t.
1
⇒ m= A1 cao 7
4
[14]
6.
T 20º
12
(b)
W
7. (a)
R
1.2
40º
F
0.25g
9. (a)
R
F
4
0.5g
R = 0.5g cos α = 0.4g M1 A1
4 = F + 0.5g sin α M1 A1
F = μR used M1
4 = 0.4g.μ + 0.3g
⇒ μ ≈ 0.27(0) M1 A1 7
1st two M1’s require correct number of the
correct terms,with valid attempt to resolve
the correct relevant term (valid ‘resolve’ = x sin / cos).
4th M1 (dept) for forming equn in μ, + numbers only
(b)
F
R
a
0.5g
0.5a = 0.3g − 0.27 × 0.4g M1 A2,1,0ft
⇒ a ≈ (+) 3.76 m s−2 (or 3.8) A1 4
In first equn, allow their R or F in the equation for full marks.
A marks: f.t. on their R, F etc. Deduct one A mark (up to 2) for
each wrong term.
[11]
10.
18
P
18µ
10
(b) R( // plane):
P cos 30 = 10 sin 30 + F M1 A1
F = 18µ used M1
Sub and solve: µ = 0.621 or 0.62 M1 A1 5
11.
T
T
6
W
(a) R(→) T cos α = 6 M1 A1
→ T = 7.5 N A1 3
12. R
X 2.5g
F
(a) R = 2.5g cos 20 M1
≈ 23.0 or 23 N A1 2
(c) R F
2.5g
In equlib. F = 2.5g sin 20 ≈ 8.38 or 8.4 N B1
μR = 0.4 × 2.5g cos 20 ≈ 9.21 or 9.2 N B1
8.4 < 9.2 (using ‘F < μR’ not F = μR) M1
Since F < μR remains in equilibrium (cso) A1 4
[10]
T
R
F
13. (a)
20g
R(perp. to slope): R = 20g cos 60 (= 10g = 98 N) M1 A1
F = 0.4R (used) B1
R(parallel to slope): T + F = 20g cos 30 M1 A2, 1, 0
↓
T = 10√3 g – 4g ≈ 131 or 130 N M1 A1 8
R
T
(b)
F
20g
R = 10g as before B1 ft
T – 0.4R = 20g cos 30 M1 A1
T = 10√3 g + 4g ≈ 209 or 210 N A1 4
(c) (i) Friction acts down slope (and has magnitude 0.4R) B1
(ii) Net force on package = 0 (or equivalent), or ‘no acceleration’ B1 2
[14]
T
14. 50
W
(a) R (→): T cos 60 = 50 cos 30 M1 A1
T = 86.6 N A1 3
R F
T
15. (a)
400g
R = 400g cos 15° (≈ 3786 N) B1
F = 0.2R used B1
T + 0.2R = 400g sin 15° M1 A1
↓
T ≈ 257 or 260 N M1 A1 6
R R
µR
16. (a) 2 mg 2 mg
T T
3 mg
R ↑ for C; 2T sin θ = 3 mg M1 A1
3 5
sin θ = ⇒ T = mg (*) A1 3
5 2
R
17. P
F
R ↑: R = 50g + Psin30° M1 A2,1,0
R →: F = Pcos30° M1 A1
3
F = R used B1
5
3
P cos 30° = (50g + P sin30°) Elim F, R M1
5
Solve P = 520 or 519 N M1 A1
3rd M1 dependent on both 1st two M1’s
4th M1 dependent on 3rd M1
[9]
R
18. F
20
α
5g
[⇒ R = 51.2 N; F = 13.4 N]
Using F = µR M1
Solving: µ = 0.262 (accept 0.26) M1 A1 8
[8]
19. (a)
12
X
8
R
T
20.
F
1.5g
R( ): T cos 20° = F + 1.5g sin 30° M1 A2, 1, 0
R( ): T sin 20° + R = 1.5g cos30° M1 A2, 1, 0
Using F = 13 R M1
Eliminating R, solve T M1, M1
T = 11 or 11.0 N A1
[10]
21. (a)
A C
T 2T
30°
1. This question was well answered, particularly by those who resolved vertically to produce one
of their equations. Those who took moments about two different points had a higher failure rate,
partly because of the need to represent more lengths in terms of x and partly because of the
heavier algebra required. Most had the R and 3R the right way round, and few were tempted to
swap over Tom and Sophie. There were seven significant points on the beam, and the
candidates between them took moments about all seven. The least successful seemed to be those
who took moments about Tom’s position, which generally led to errors in the distances. A few
took moments about a point but equated the sum of the moments to the reaction at the point
producing a dimensionally incorrect equation and losing all the marks for that equation. It was
rare to see g’s being used.
2. This question proved to be a good discriminator. The most popular approach was to resolve
parallel and perpendicular to the plane (rather than horizontally and vertically which was much
easier and avoided having to use simultaneous equations). The majority of candidates used
F = μR appropriately. Some, however, just equated the reaction to a weight component thereby
simplifying the equations considerably and losing a significant number of marks. Candidates
who did set up simultaneous equations correctly sometimes had difficulty in solving them to
find the correct values for R and P, with poor use of brackets and algebraic manipulation
contributing to this. A fairly common error was to give R in terms of P instead of calculating a
numerical value for it. The final answers were required to be rounded to 2 or 3 significant
figures for consistency with the use of g = 9.8 but this was not always observed and incurred a
one mark penalty for the question.
3. Most candidates scored three marks for F = Pcos50° and for F = 0.2R. However, errors were
often made in the vertical resolution, with some ignoring P completely, giving R = 15g, while
others included a component of P but made a sign error. A small minority of candidates was
unable to eliminate R legitimately between their equations, while a significant number lost the
final A1 for giving the answer as 36.9 (or 36.93).
4. Part (a) was usually correct with the majority of candidates producing a correct diagram. A
significant minority had the friction force acting down the plane. In the second part by far the
most popular approach was to resolve parallel and perpendicular to the plane, producing two
simultaneous equations in P and R. There were many who went on to solve these correctly, but
a common error was to find R in terms of P, use this to find a value for P, but then forget to go
back and use it to find the value for R. A few of the more able students appreciated the idea of
resolving perpendicular to an unknown force, and resolved vertically to find R, without the need
to solve simultaneous equations.
5. Many were able, in the first part, to use tan to find an acute angle, scoring two of the three
marks, but were then unable to identify and find the required angle. In part (b), the first mark
was for adding the two vectors together but many students then stated that this sum was equal to
(i – 2j) rather than a multiple of it and were unable to make any progress. In the final part, many
who failed in (b), obtained p = –2 from the printed equation and, even if their R was wrong,
were able to benefit from follow-through marks. It was amazing to see so many arrive correctly
at √20 = m8√5 then correctly write m = 2√5 / 8√5 but then give m = 5/4!
6. This was a straightforward starter question and a majority of candidates got off to a good start.
A few thought that 20 /80 were complementary angles whilst some did not check that their
calculator was in degree mode.
(a) Most were able to resolve correctly (with the occasional inevitable confusion between sin
and cos) although some attempted to resolve parallel to the string, giving
T = W cos 20 + 12 sin 70, but omitted one of the terms, thus scoring zero.
(b) Even if scoring zero in part (a), most candidates were able to gain 3 marks for this part. It
is disturbing to find that a significant number of candidates for a Mechanics paper do not
know the difference between mass and weight. A few candidates used the triangle of
forces but sometimes slipped up by failing to take the essential step of drawing a separate
triangle of forces diagram. Increasingly rarely seen, a few candidates successfully used
Lami’s theorem.
7. (a) In a number of cases the vertical component of the tension was missing; a few missed out
the weight, and a small minority “resolved” it. Some mixed up sine and cosine and a few
subtracted 40 from 90 to give 60. There was some very poor algebraic manipulation,
going from a correct first statement, to an incorrect value for R.
(b) Most candidates earned the B mark, for knowing that F = uR and the majority could get
F = 1.2 cos 40 (or 1.2 sin 40) and so, even getting part (a) completely incorrect, could
gain 5 out of 6 marks for (b). As usual, rounding and accuracy, when using g, caused
some problems
8. This proved to be a good starter for the majority of candidates, with most resolving horizontally
and vertically, although a few chose to resolve parallel and perpendicular to P. Common errors
included “24g” instead of “24”and the mixing up of sin and cos. P =24sin30 was also often
seen. A small number attempted to use a triangle of forces with mixed success.
9. This was generally well done and many fully correct solutions were seen to part (a). However, a
number of weaker candidates could not handle the angle in question (e.g using 0.75 degrees);
also some weaker candidates were evidently confused about what precisely ‘F’ was in the
equations F = µR and F = ma. In part (b) a number of candidates also lost marks by effectively
omitting one of the two terms in the equation of motion, forgetting about either the friction or
(more commonly) the component of the weight acting down the plane.
10. In parts (a) and (b) candidates managed to recover and most could make good attempts here.
Most could resolve perpendicular to the plane and parallel to the plane, with a correct use of the
frictional force. Some lost marks by omitting forces, but several gained at least all the method
marks here. Part (c) proved to be more discriminating, at least for gaining all 5 marks. Some
could make little progress since they did not realise that the normal reaction had now changed.
Others did realise this and could get to the stage of setting up the value of the component of the
weight down the plane and the value of µR. However it proved to be very difficult for
candidates to understand clearly that ‘µR’ was not necessarily the actual frictional force acting
(except in limiting equilibrium): hence there were many final answers to part (c) stating that the
box remained in equilibrium ‘because the frictional force was greater than the component of the
weight’.
11. This question proved to be more of a discriminator. In part (a), most appeared to realise that
they should be trying to resolve horizontally (though they did not always say so!), but even here
there were some errors in the trigonometry. There were also some confused attempts at ‘triangle
of forces’ approaches, though as often as not confusing a possible triangle of forces with the
triangle in the given diagram. In part (b) only the better candidates realised that the tension in
the same throughout the string and those who did not realise this could make little progress.
Some ignored one part of the string completely; others took the tension in the vertical part to the
vertical component of the tension in the sloping part.
12. Parts (a) and (b) were generally well answered, though several lost a mark by failing to give
their answers to an ‘appropriate’ degree of accuracy (which here, as in all questions using g as
9.8m, was to 2 or 3 significant figures). Part (c) was however very poorly answered. Several
simply assumed that the value of the frictional force was equal to its value in limiting
equilibrium, and then confidently stated that as the frictional force was greater than the
component of the weight, equilibrium resulted (failing apparently to realise that equilibrium
requires a zero net force). The condition that, for friction, F had to be less than (rather than
equal to) μR was clearly not understood by the vast majority of candidates.
13. This proved to be the most discriminating question on the paper and not so many fully correct
answers were seen. A common mistake in part (a) was to assume that the friction was acting
down, rather than up, the slope for the minimum force. Several then went on to repeat the same
working in part (b) (which was of course then correct). Several too failed to round their answers
to an appropriate degree of accuracy (having used g as 9.8, they should have given their answers
to no more than 3 significant figures). Explanations in part (c) were fair, with answers to (ii)
better than answers to (i). In the latter case, it was often not clear from the statement written
what exactly was being asserted: a succinct statement is all that is required – but it must be
clear!
14. The majority of candidates scored well on this question and made a good start to the paper.
Most realised that they had to resolve the forces. However, a surprising number took the
magnitudes of the tensions as the lengths of the (sloping) sides on the given triangle, effectively
assuming that the given triangle was a triangle of forces. Such candidates often went on
correctly into the second part of the question by resolving vertically. A number of candidates
also confused weight and mass in part (b).
15. Some very good answers were seen to this question with many fully correct (or all but correct)
answers. However, as with Q4, many again lost a mark by giving their answers (especially in
part (a)) to 4 or more significant figures. The most common other mistake in (a) was to have the
wrong sign with the friction in the equilibrium equation. It was however pleasing to note the
very high standard generally of accuracy in processing the resulting equation here with
awkward figures involved. In part (b), most realised that they had to find the acceleration, but
several omitted one or other of the relevant forces in doing so. Most however could use their
resulting acceleration to find a value of the time appropriately.
16. This proved to be one of the hardest questions on the paper. Very few clearly understood that
there were three separate objects in the system and hence forces on each needed to be
considered. Connected objects in equilibrium was evidently a topic that was found to be new for
many (although it is a common problem in a dynamics situation); hence many failed to realise
that the tensions at the ends of the strings were acting in opposite directions. Few drew clear
force diagrams with all the forces clearly marked: those who did benefited themselves and then
successfully completed the question.
17. Candidates began to recover a little in question 3, with a fair number of correct approaches and
only an odd mark or two dropped for algebraic or arithmetic errors. There were though still a
significant number of candidates who thought that the normal reaction was simply 50g. A
number of candidates also lost a mark by failing to give their answers to no more than 3 s.f. (in
a calculation which has used g as 9.8): several appeared to think that one decimal place was an
‘appropriate’ degree of accuracy.
18. It was pleasing to see rather fewer candidates than has sometimes been the case simply writing
down ‘R = mg cos a’. Most realised that they had to resolve in two directions. Some mistakes
did however arise from candidates failing to have the friction acting in the right direction. Work
was not always well presented with expressions such as ‘sin 53 ’ or ‘cos 54 ’ written down.
Sometimes candidates appeared to mean the correct thing by this, but often scripts provided a
considerable challenge of interpretation to examiners!
19. Of the early questions, this was perhaps the most demanding, with some weaker candidates
offering no attempt at all. Most realised that they had to resolve, but many failed to specify the
direction in which they were attempting to resolve. There was often too considerable confusion
about the angle which they were using, with little consistency between the q given in the
question and that used by the candidates. Only the stronger candidates gave a clear indication in
the diagram which acute angle they were finding in part (a) and then used that consistently to
find the obtuse angle q as required. In part (b) several spurious attempts were seen, attempting
to resolve using the obtuse angle directly.
20. As far as the mechanics of the question was concerned, this was generally well done. A
significant minority still oversimplified the problem considerably by assuming that the normal
reaction was 1.5g cos 30. However, many others succeeded in writing down two appropriate
equations and then seeking to solve to find the tension. There was an inevitable crop of errors in
solving the equations, but generally the approaches adopted were sound.