Production Sectors (Agriculture Production) : PC - I FORM (Revised 2005)

PC - I FORM (Revised 2005)
PRODUCTION SECTORS
(Agriculture Production)
OPTIMIZING WATERCOURSE CONVEYANCE

EFFICIENCY THROUGH ENHANCING LINING LENGTH
(ADP Funded)
Project Cost: Rs. 9,287.862 Million

Govt. Share: Rs. 6,829.695 Million
Farmer Contribution: Rs. 2,458.167 Million
(2015-16 to 2019-20)
DIRECTORATE GENERAL AGRICULTURE

(WATER MANAGEMENT) PUNJAB, LAHORE
August, 2015
1. NAME OF THE PROJECT
Optimizing Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency through Enhancing Lining

Length
2. LOCATION
The proposed project will be implemented in the entire canal commanded areas of
the Punjab.
3. AUTHORITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR

a) Sponsoring
Agriculture Department through Annual Development Program (ADP)
b) Execution
i) Punjab Agriculture Department through Directorate General Agriculture (Water

Management) Punjab, Lahore
ii) District Governments through District Officers (OFWM)
iii) Pre-cast Parabolic Segments (PCPS) Supplier Firms
iv) Water Users Associations (WUAs)
c) Monitoring
i) Directorate General Agriculture (Water Management) Punjab, Lahore

ii) Project Consultants
d) Operation and Maintenance
Water Users Associations (WUAs)
e) Concerned Federal Ministry
Not Applicable
4. PLAN PROVISION
a) If the project is included in the current Five-Year Plan, specify actual

allocation
The proposed project is in line with the agriculture sectoral plan and has strong
relationship with the Medium Term Development Framework (MTDF) of the Planning and
Development Department, Government of the Punjab, which envisages “Efficient Water
Conveyance and Application through Improved Watercourses” as one of objectives/policy
of the agriculture sector. Furthermore, this is also well aligned with the provisions of the
Pakistan Vision 2025 of the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms, Government
of Pakistan, which recognizes sufficient, reliable, clean and cost-effective availability of
energy, water for ensuring sustainable economic growth and development. It has been
envisaged therein that Pakistan needs a comprehensive water strategy that must combine the
building of a substantial amount of additional water storage, minimization of losses in the
2
conveyance system, and strengthening of the governance to implement effective policies to
maximize crop yields per unit of water. It has also been planned in Pakistan Vision 2025 to
"invest in proven methods and technologies to minimize wastage (e.g. in the agricultural
sector), promote conservation and gain efficiencies through rationalization of pricing".
The government's vision for agriculture sector, alongwith other initiatives,

encompasses enhancing water productivity through efficient water conveyance, application,
and optimal use. The proposed project aims at improving water availability and equity at the
farm level by enhancing conveyance efficiency of watercourses, which in turn will
contribute significantly towards improving water productivity. The project has, accordingly,
been included in the sectoral plan and an allocation of Rs. 1,300.000 million has been made
under Annual Development Program (ADP) 2015-16.
b) If not included in the current plan, how is it now proposed to be

accommodated (Inter/Intra-Sectoral adjustment in allocation of or other
resources may be indicated)
Not applicable.
c) If the project is proposed to be financed out of block provision for a program
or PSDP/ADP, indicate in Pak-Rupees?
Not applicable.
d) If the project is not in the plan, what warrants its inclusion in the plan?
Not applicable.
5. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH SECTOR
OBJECTIVES______________________________________________________
a) Project Objectives
The key objective of the proposed project is to enhance conveyance efficiency which
in turn would result in saving of water and improvement in water productivity at the farm
level. The intervention will have following key objectives.
i. Enhance efficiency of tertiary level irrigation conveyance
network (community watercourses) for increasing water
availability at the farm level.
ii. Harness maximum attainable benefits of watercourse
improvement through enhancing lining length.
iii. Strengthen irrigated agriculture at the grassroots level through
upgrading farm level water conveyance network.
iv. Support the rural communities in increasing their farm returns by
utilizing the available resources more efficiently to alleviate
poverty.
3
b) Sectoral Relationship
The proposed project has a strong relationship with the objectives and growth policy
of the agriculture sector i.e. making every average farmer progressive. Increasing
efficiency/productivity, especially at the farm level is one of key objectives of sectoral plan.
The proposed intervention aims at enhancing water conveyance efficiency at the farm level
through increasing lining percentage of watercourses so that maximum attainable benefits
of watercourse improvement can be harnessed. The proposed project would become part of
the on-going on farm water management (OFWM) program for development and
rehabilitation of conveyance system at the farm level for improving its conveyance
efficiency in the province. Implementation of envisaged activities would result in enhanced
water productivity through increased water availability in canal irrigated areas. The
underlying objectives of envisaged initiative are consistent with those of the agriculture
sector that aims at increasing water productivity at the farm, ensuring food security,
economic uplift of small farmers, and improving the economy of the country as a whole.
6. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
a) Irrigated Agriculture Significance
Water is essential for sustenance of all forms of life on earth and as such the most
critical and precious input for the agriculture. Irrigated agriculture is the lifeline of
Pakistan’s economy as about 80 percent of the cropped area is irrigated and 90 percent of
the agricultural output comes from irrigated lands.
Pakistan has the largest single contiguous gravity flow irrigation system in the world.
The Indus Basin Water System (IBWS) comprises three major reservoirs, 16 barrages, two
headworks, two syphons across major rivers, 12 inter river link canals, 44 canal commands,
and more than 140,000 watercourses. It is, however, pointed out that expansion of water
resources during last three decades for production of food and fiber food did not
commensurate with the population growth. The surface water supplies are almost stagnant
since Tarbela commissioning in 1976 as there is no major water resources development
taken place afterwards. The storage capacity is rather continuously declining due to silting
up of reservoirs. The lost capacity water is, however, somewhat recovered after Mangla
raising in 2013 (Figure-1).
4
Figure-1: Sedimentation and Storage Capacity
(Source: Pakistan Water Economy Running Dry, the World Bank Publication)
The total annual canal diversion for the Punjab has significantly declined to about
48 MAF in the last decade against 54 MAF of post Tarbela period. The historic canal water
withdrawals of Rabi and Kharif of the province are shown in Figure-2.
60
54 53
1976-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010
50 48
Canal Withdrawals (MAF)
40
34 34 33
30
20 19
20
15
10
0
Rabi Kharif Total
Figure-2: Average Canal Diversions in the Punjab

b) Punjab Water Budget
The main source of irrigation is from vast canal systems but available surface
supplies are inadequate to meet the crop water requirements under present cropping
intensity. The total surface water allocation for the Punjab as per Provincial Water Accord
of 1991 is 55.54 MAF. There are, however, huge water losses in the distribution network
5
comprising of main/branch canals, distributaries, minors, and tertiary conveyance systems
of about 59,000 watercourses. In addition, a substantial amount of irrigation water (21 MAF)
is also lost during its application due to uneven fields and poor farm designs. This deficiency
is, however, compensated to a great extent by groundwater abstractions of almost 33 MAF,
which is in fact over exploitation of this vital resource as recharge to fresh groundwater
areas is only 23 MAF. In nutshell, about 47 MAF water remains available for use against 65
MAF of actual crop water requirements. As such, there exists a gap of nearly 18 MAF to
meet irrigation requirements for present cropping intensity exceeding 130 percent. The
Punjab water trail is shown in Figure-3.
Figure-3: Punjab Water Budget
The Punjab Government has, however, embarked upon various irrigated agriculture
improvement initiatives to enhance its performance during last decade, which are
contributing significantly towards sustaining the agriculture sector. It includes water
conservation and efficiency enhancement measures such as irrigation infrastructure
rehabilitation and canal lining, improvement of watercourses, LASER land leveling, and
promotion of better irrigation technologies & practices.
c) Improving Water Productivity
It has been observed that the canal withdrawals are decreasing and subsurface water
availability has almost become stagnant over the last decade in the Punjab but there has been
6
about 36 percent increase in crop production during 1999-00 to 2012-13 as presented in
Figure-4. The same can be attributed to many factors e.g. improved irrigation management,
use of better crop production technologies, better seeds, increased fertilizer applications,
effective insect/ pest control etc. The efficacy of all of these measures, however, largely
depends upon improved water availability as there has been no incremental water resources
development taken place during this period in the province. The only source of increased
water availability at the farm level has been through adoption of conservation measures e.g.
barrages modernization, canal rehabilitation & lining, improvement of watercourses, high
efficiency irrigation systems (HEIS), LASER land leveling, bed and furrow irrigation etc.
100 85 90
90 87 80
87
80 70
Crop Production (Million Tons)

63
70
Water Availability (MAF)
60
60
55 50
50 52
40
40 32 33
30
30
20 20
10 10
0 0
Canal Withdrawals Total Water Availabilty

Crop Production Groundwater Abstractions
Figure-4: Water Availability and Crop Production
The mega OFWM initiatives implemented during last decade include National
Program for Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan (NPIW) wherein, improvement of
18,471 canal commanded watercourses and development/ rehabilitation of 3,734 irrigation
schemes outside the canal commands have been completed with an investment of Rs. 15.742
billion. It has been quantified in its impact assessment study carried out by independent
consultants that these improvements have increased farm level water availability to the tune
of 2.30 million acre feet (MAF) per annum. Moreover, the Punjab government has provided
2,500 LASER units to the farmers/service providers during 2005-06 to 2007-08 under
“Strengthening of LASER Land Leveling Services in the Punjab” project, which have
7
resulted in significant saving of water through improving application water efficacy at the
farm level.
Currently, the On Farm Water Management (OFWM) is promoting all above

mentioned interventions under the World Bank assisted mega initiative "Punjab
Irrigated-Agriculture Productivity Improvement Project (PIPIP)". It envisages execution of
complete package of on farm water management (OFWM) interventions including installation
of high efficiency irrigation systems (HEIS) on 120,000 acres, improvement of 5,500
watercourses in barrage commanded areas, completion of lining on 1,500 already improved
watercourses, rehabilitation of 2,000 irrigation schemes outside the canal commanded areas,
and provision of 3,000 LASER units to the farmers/service providers as well as to provide the
research backup support. The combined effect of these advancements would lead to maximize
productivity of available water by minimizing water losses at various levels in order to ensure
its adequacy, reliability, and effectiveness at the farm level.
d) Watercourse Improvement Status
Tertiary level irrigation system in the Punjab comprises of about 59,500

watercourses. Improvement of 25,257 canal watercourses had been completed before
launching of National Program for Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan (NPIW) upto
2003-04. Further 18,471 watercourses in canal irrigated areas were completed under Punjab
component of NPIW. Subsequently, improvement of 3,102 canal watercourses have so far
been improved under the PIPIP besides other OFWM interventions. In total, about 46,830
canal area watercourses have been improved so far and remaining un-improved canal
watercourses are being improved under the PIPIP. The detail of watercourse improved prior
to NPIW, under NPIW, PIPIP, and remaining balance is shown in Figure-5.
12,665
To be takenup under 25,257
PIPIP & future Before NPIW
projects (Upto 2003)
3,102
Total
Under PIPIP
59,495
18,471
Under NPIW
Figure-5: Watercourse Improvement Status in the Punjab

8
e) Watercourse Improvement Impact
The watercourse improvement is the most studied and researched intervention

amongst all OFWM activities. Its numerous evaluation and impact assessment studies have
been carried out by various national and international organizations/institutions. Their
findings have indicated huge benefits accruing from an improved watercourse including
saving of about 119 acre feet of water per annum valuing about Rs. 1.30 million. In addition,
a number of other significant benefits also result from watercourse improvements. The
glimpses of unimproved vis-à-vis improved watercourses are shown in Figure-6 & 7.
The impact evaluation study carried out by the Planning Commission of Pakistan
titled “Project Impact Evaluation Study (PIES) for National Program for Improvement of
Watercourses in Pakistan (NPIW)” is the most recent one, which reveals that the
intervention is highly cost effective option for improving farm gate water availability. The
salient impacts of watercourse improvement reported in the study are summarized hereunder
in Table-1.
Table-1: Impact of Watercourse Improvement

Sr.
Impact Extent
No.
1 Annual water saving (acre feet) 119
2 Improvement in crop yields (%) 2-15
3 Increase in cropping intensity (%) 4
4 Saving in irrigation time (%) 28
5 Expansion in irrigated area (%) 21
6 Reduction in labor for irrigation (%) 50
7 Enhancement in farm incomes (%) 15
8 Decrease in conveyance losses (%) 39
9 Curtailment in saline area (%) 87
10 ERR (%) 28.1
11 C:B ratio 1: 2.3
Considering huge benefits of watercourse improvement, it is considered that lining

of all watercourses should be completed upto optimal limits in the shortest possible
timeframe for mitigating the farm gate water shortages.
9
Figure-6: Unimproved Watercourses
Figure-7: Improved Watercourses
The undertaking would also be helpful in reducing the waterlogging, salinity, and
mining of the groundwater aquifer as well as land and water degradation.
6. PROJECT COMPONENTS
The major activities to be carried out under the proposed project would include,
interalia, the followings.
A. Re-activation of 2,900 Water Users Associations already registered

under On Farm Water Management and Water Users Association
Ordinance [Act], 1981(Amended 2001).
B. Extension in lining of critical reaches of community channels and
installation of water control structures on 2,900 already improved
watercourses.
C. Improvement of 100 watercourses of Agricultural Extension and
Research Farms.
A conceptual layout of the benefits obtained from undertakings under the proposed
project is shown in Figure-8.
10
Productivity Contribution in
Increase Agriculture GDP
Save Water
Reduce Conveyance Losses

 One million beneficiaries
Incresae Farm Level Water Availabity  Half MAF annual water saving
 Rs. 6 billion productivity gains
Enhance Cultivated/Irriagted Area
Increase in Cropping Intensity
Support Rural Communities to Increase

Farm Income
Watercourse Improvement
Figure-8: Conceptual Layout of the Project
A. Re-activation of Water Users Associations (WUAs)
Effective involvement and participation of the shareholders acts as a catalyst for

successful implementation of any development undertaking. The key to success of OFWM
program in Pakistan is farmers’ participation in execution of envisaged interventions
through a community driven implementation approach. The OFWM staff is successfully
carrying out this function for last 40 years. They have organized about 50,000 water users
associations (WUAs) under “On Farm Water Management & Water Users Association
Ordinance [Act]-1981 (Amended 2001)” having membership of over two million farm
families in the province for improvement of watercourses.
These WUAs have contributed in cash about Rs. 2.3 and Rs. 2.051 billion as skilled
and unskilled labour for civil works, respectively. In addition, they have also provided about
Rs. 5.5 billion as unskilled labour for earthen improvements and over Rs. 2.7 billion for
material costs. The proposed works will also be carried out through WUAs already
organized/registered for the purpose with following key responsibilities.
a) Provide right of way for constructing watercourse

b) Arrange skilled and unskilled labour required for reconstruction/
maintenance of earthen water channel, installation of water control
structures, and lining of critical reaches
c) Procure construction materials for carrying out civil works
11
d) Settle matters of disputes amongst the water users in respect of
channel alignment, fixation of nakkas, distribution of work etc.
e) Make alternate arrangements for conveyance of water during
execution of improvement works
f) Carry out civil works in accordance with standards and
specifications under the supervision of OFWM field staff
g) Regularly undertake O&M of improved watercourses
B. Extension of Lining on Partially Improved Watercourses
Keeping in view significant savings of water and enhancement in conveyance

efficiency as a result of watercourse improvement, numerous analysis were carried out for
finding out optimal lengths to be lined. It has been reported that lining of watercourses upto
about 60 percent length is technically feasible and economically viable. For example, it has
been concluded in 1975’s study on “Optimum length required to be lined in a watercourse”,
published in the Annual Journal, The Institution of Engineers, India and reported by the
International Water Management Institute (IWMI) in Research Report-46 titled “Using
Remote Sensing Technologies to Evaluate Lining Efficacy of Watercourses” that lining of
60 percent of watercourse length is the most economical/feasible.
Similarly, S.P. Malhotra (1982) has reported in “The Warabandi and its
Infrastructure” published by Central Board of Irrigation and Power, New Delhi, India
(Publication No. 157) that lining of 53 percent of watercourse length can contribute to save
91 percent of the seepage losses). It has further been reported by the Punjab Water
Management Consultants (PWMC), a joint venture of National Engineering Services of
Pakistan (NESPAK) and Associated Consulting Engineers (ACE), engaged as project
consultants for National Program for Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan (NPIW), on
the basis of a study during 2008 that the lining requirement for watercourses on the basis of
technical criteria comes to be upto 72 percent.
In order to assess the optimal length of lining to harness maximum benefits of

watercourse improvement under present scenario, Monitoring & Evaluation Consultants
engaged under the PIPIP (a joint venture of M/s MM Pakistan Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Associated
Consulting Engineers-ACE) were assigned to carry out a case study in association with
Project-Implementation Supervision Consultants (PSC). Based on the field data collected
for unimproved and improved watercourses, the consultants have developed a relationship
between the percentage length of lining and corresponding percentage loss reduction. It can
be concluded from Figure-9 that an average loss reduction of 80 percent can be obtained
with 50 percent lining of watercourse length. It indicates that the optimum length of lining
12
that can be taken up is 54 percent of total watercourse length as the incremental benefits
beyond 54 percent of its total length are not significant. The consultants, based on this study,
recommended that upper limit for lining a watercourse may be enhanced to 50 percent.
90
80 84
80
Cut Off
70 Point
60
Average Saving (%)
50
40
30
20
10
0 52 54
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Percent Lining
Figure-9: Relationship between Lining Length and Reduction of Losses in Watercourses
It is mentionable that permissible watercourse lining limit was upto 30 percent of

total watercourse length under various watercourse improvement projects/ programs so far
implemented in order to provide wider coverage with limited available financial resources.
About 80 percent of total watercourses in the province have since been improved under the
permissible limit of 30 percent with average lining percentage ranging from 20-30 percent.
Owing to the demand of farmers, technical feasibility, cost effectiveness, and current water
economics, lining length of watercourses is required to be extended upto optimal length to
harness maximum benefits of watercourse improvements. It has, accordingly, been planned
that lining of already improved such 2,900 watercourses will be extended upto 50 percent
under the proposed project.
B-1. Selection Criteria for Extension of Lining
In order to ensure execution of additional works on already improved watercourses,

following uniform and transparent selection criteria will be adopted.
a) The WUA has

i) repaired/ rehabilitated the already lined section.
ii) maintained earthen section of the watercourse for efficient flow of
irrigation water.
13
b) The WUA agrees
i) to extend lining upto permissible limits;
ii) to contribute farmers’ share; and
iii) to provide litigation free right of way.
c) Sections of watercourse eligible for extension of lining will be based on following
criteria.
i) Head reaches having maximum usage and flows.
ii) Elevated sections susceptible to leakage, over topping, and
spillage.
iii) Portion of watercourse crossing / passing through / along
villages/roads.
iv) Sections having sandy/porous soils.
B-2. Procedure for Extension of Lining
The procedure for watercourses to be taken up for extension of lining on already

improved watercourses will be as follows.
a) The yearly quota of each district will be fixed by the Project Steering
Committee at the start of each year. The tentative district-wise targets on
the basis of improved watercourses are enclosed (Annexure-A).
b) A comprehensive publicity campaign in print and electronic media at the
provincial level as well as in the districts will be launched to create
awareness amongst the farming community about benefits of
intervention, facilities available under the proposed project, and
procedure for availing government support. The farmers desirous of
extending lining of their watercourses will, inter alia, be informed to
carryout repair/rehabilitation of already lined portions to become eligible
for inclusion under the proposed project.
c) The applications will be invited from participating farmers in the districts
against quota fixed by PSC. A watercourse will be considered for
extension of lining only after repair/renovation of already lined sections.
DO (OFWM) and consultants will furnish a certificate for the purpose.
If there are more eligible applications than allocation, balloting will be
carried out in the public place under supervision of the District
Coordination Officer. Ballots of three times the yearly quota will be
drawn to keep enough watercourses as replacements of non-qualifying
or dropout cases afterwards.
d) The OFWM staff will mobilize WUA and stakeholders for active
participation in improvement works.
e) Afterwards, the OFWM field staff will conduct engineering surveys of
the command area and prepare a complete case including inventory of
previously executed works and those planned to be covered under the
proposed project that will be marked on the topo map. The design and
cost estimates of planned/required civil works will be prepared in
consultation with WUA.
f) The case will then be submitted to the consultants’ Field Engineer by DO
(OFWM) for its scrutiny, verification, and approval. The project
consultants will also review the design and performance of existing lined
14
sections of the watercourses to recommend modification in design and
up-gradation of the sections to be lined for improving its efficiency, if
needed.
g) The consultant will submit the complete case to Directorate General
Agriculture (WM) for checking/verification/updation of water
management database system. After verification, the record will be
returned to the DO (OFWM).
h) An output-based agreement will be signed with WUA wherein, roles and
responsibilities of both the parties will be defined.
i) An account will be opened in a Commercial Bank with the authorization
of DO (OFWM) to be operated jointly by Chairman and Treasure of
WUA.
j) The competent authority will accord the Technical Sanction for planned
works.
k) The WUA will collect the required farmers’ share as per approved cost
sharing mechanism and arrange execution of work under its supervision.
l) The OFWM staff will provide technical assistance to WUA for
watercourse improvement. The staff will make frequent visits at sites to
ensure that works are being carried out as per prescribed standards/
specifications.
m) The consultants will arrange spot checking as per their TORs during
watercourse improvement for quality assurance, recommending transfer
of funds to WUAs, and certification of completed works.
n) Prior to recommending the third installment of payment, the consultant
will submit certified FCRs alongwith Takmeli certificate to DGA (WM)
for updation of the database records.
The requisite funds for improvement of watercourses under the proposed project will
be transferred from provincial Account-I to Account-IV of District Government with the
authorization of the Finance Department. The funds from Account-IV will be released by
the District Officer (OFWM)/competent authority into the joint account of respective WUA
in three installment on recommendations of project consultants as per criteria given in
Figure-10. Further release of funds from the joint account of WUA will be regulated in
accordance with the already approved procedure by the Finance Department vide letter No.
1/933-Agri-I(FD)/03 dated 28-05-2004.
15
Figure-10: Payment Millstones for Extension of Lining Works
C. Improvement of Canal Watercourses of Government Farms
There are about 100 watercourses feeding the irrigated area of various government
farms under administrative control of Extension, Research and other wings of Agriculture
Department. These watercourses are providing irrigation water purely for crops grown on
government farms and could not be lined/partially lined in the past due to their ineligibility
against selection criteria under previous OFWM projects including on-going PIPIP project.
Considering demand of concerned farm management of improving these watercourse, it is
planned to improve 100 watercourses with lining upto 50 percent of watercourse length.
C-1. Selection Criteria

Following selection criteria will be adopted for improvement of watercourses at
government farms for improvement under the proposed project.
a) Watercourse has either not been previously improved or partially
improved
b) The Farm Management agrees
i) to improve the watercourse;
ii) to constitute a committee for execution and supervision of
improvement works;
iii) to maintain the earthen section of watercourse for smooth and
efficient flow of irrigation water;
iv) to facilitate the OFWM staff and consultants for supervision of
watercourse improvement; and
v) to execute the planned works as per relevant standards,
specifications, and procedures.
16
The sections of watercourse to be selected for lining will be based on the same
criteria as adopted under extension of lining component. The procedure for transfer and
release of funds to the designated committee, constituted by the concerned wing of
Agriculture Department/ Farm Management for watercourse improvement would be similar
as for extension of lining component whereby a joint account in the name of committee
members will be opened in the commercial bank to be operated with authorization of DDO
(OFWM) of concerned tehsil. The detailed estimates of earthen improvements and civil
works prepared by the OFWM staff will be separately approved by the supervisory
consultants. Furthermore, the payments will also be certified by the consultants both for the
earthen and lined sections.
In case of unimproved/ partially improved watercourses irrigating government

farms, the lining will be carried out upto permissible limit of 50 percent whereby, the entire
labour cost for earthen improvement and lining of watercourse sections falling in
government farm area will be provided by the project. It is indicated that if any
implementation issue arises during improvement/lining of watercourses on the government
farms, the same will be placed before the Project Steering Committee for its resolution. The
tentative list of watercourses of agricultural farms of Extension and Research to be taken up
for improvement is enclosed (Annexure -B).
D. Lining Options
The standard lining executed under previous and ongoing OFWM projects has been
a rectangular shaped channel constructed by using double brick masonry walls (23 cm) and
a brick masonry floor (07 cm) plastered inside and on top of the walls. This type of lining
has been adopted since inception of OFWM program mainly being easy to install. However,
under continuous rise in demand for bricks, little price control, and day by day dwindling
quality of bricks, there was dire need to adopt lining alternatives to overcome the
multifarious problems being faced in the field. The Pre-cast Parabolic Lining (PCPL) has,
accordingly, been approved under the PIPIP being more efficient, durable, quick in
installation, and relatively more economical.
It is planned that most of the watercourses to be undertaken under proposed project

will be improved/lined/re-constructed using Pre Cast Parabolic Segments (PCPS). The
supplier firms already prequalified under PIPIP for supply of PCPS would be eligible for
providing services under the proposed project. However, more firms will be prequalified to
fulfill the requirements of PCPS under both projects. PCPL is new technology and
factices/yard are mostly at development stage due to which it may be difficult for the firms
17
to supply the requisite PCPS as per demand. Accordingly, brick lining as alternate may also
be adopted considering farmers’ choice, field conditions, and cost effectiveness.
E. Lining Percentage
The lining of watercourses would be completed upto 50 percent of total length of

community channels. It has, however, been experienced under previous projects that actual
lining remained much lower than maximum ceiling, which seriously affects watercourse
improvement impacts. It is, therefore, considered to fix lower limit of 40 percent lining.
F. Cost Sharing Arrangements
The paying capacity of the farming community has been eroded due to continuous
increase in prices of essential inputs required for crop production and price crash of major
crops during last four years. They are, accordingly, finding it difficult to mobilize matching
resources for any new development even on farm infrastructure. A farmer-friendly cost
sharing mechanism already adopted under previous OFWM projects and ongoing PIPIP has,
therefore, been proposed for envisaged project interventions.
Presently government is providing entire cost of construction materials while the

farmers are required to contribute entire labour costs for improvement of the watercourses
under on-going PIPIP. These arrangements are well accepted and adopted by the farming
community. It is, therefore, planned that the same cost sharing mechanism will be followed
for undertaking envisaged works under the proposed project as per following provisions.
I. Farmers will contribute entire labour costs for

i) Maintenance of earthen section of watercourse
ii) Making alternate irrigation channel during execution of lining
iii) Excavation for the section to be lined
iv) Masons and unskilled labour of all civil works
v) Back earth filling of structures and lined section
vi) Any other cost required during improvement works
The farmers can contribute in cash and kind. The cash contribution requirement
would generally be for the payments to be made by the WUA to the masons and labour for
lining and installation of structures, while all remaining share will be contributed in kind
such as labour for maintenance of katcha sections. The entire cost for watercourse
improvement at government farms including labour charges will be borne by the project.
II. Government will bear the entire material costs for lining and structures (Pacca
Nakkas, Culverts, Drops, Syphons, and Super Passage etc.).
18
7. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
A. Existing OFWM Setup
On Farm Water Management (OFWM) program in the Punjab is part of the

Provincial Agriculture Department headed by Secretary, Government of the Punjab
Agriculture Department. The program is planned, coordinated, supervised, and operated by
Director General Agriculture (Water Management) at provincial level who is assisted by the
Director (Headquarters) and Director (Training). On promulgation of Devolution Plan 2001,
the OFWM functions were devolved to District Governments.
Under this set-up, offices of District Officers (OFWM) have been established in all
36 districts of the province to supervise OFWM activities. Tehsil is the lowest tier of OFWM
administrative system where office of Deputy District (OFWM) has been created for
physical execution of works through field staff comprising of one Deputy District Officer
(OFWM), one Water Management Officer, two Water Management Supervisors, and other
support staff. Out of 133 tehsils of the province, regular offices of Deputy District Officers
(OFWM) have so far been established in 101 tehsils. Furthermore, this basic tier has been
established on development side in 25 tehsils under the PIPIP.
In addition to field hierarchy, the Directorate Water Management Training Institute

(WMTI), Lahore has been established under non-development budget to provide training
support to various stakeholders of water management in the province.
B. Project Implementation and Coordination Arrangements
The proposed project will be implemented with existing infrastructure and human
resource base of OFWM wing of Agriculture Department. The government’s over all policy
of devolution of powers would be adopted and District Governments will be assigned to
implement the envisaged interventions. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), defining
roles and responsibilities of provincial and district governments, will be signed between
Government of the Punjab, Agriculture Department and District Governments for execution
of envisaged activities under the proposed project. The major project activities will be
implemented through well established and time tested farmers’ institution of water users
association (WUA).
B-1. Provincial Supervision, Management, and Monitoring
Director General Agriculture (Water Management), Punjab would act as Project

Director who will be responsible to supervise, manage, and monitor the proposed project
19
from provincial headquarters through its existing establishment.
B-2. Regional Project Coordination Support
Three Regional Project Coordination Units (RPCUs), one each at Lahore, Multan,
and Rawalpindi have been established under the PIPIP to provide necessary technical
support to the District Governments as well as coordinate activities between provincial
headquarters and field formations. The regional level PCUs are headed by a Regional Project
Director (RPD) in BS-19 who is supported by one Deputy Director (Technical) in BS-18+SP
and one Assistant Director (Technical) in BS-18 with some support staff. The existing three
offices of RPDs under the PIPIP will also provide requisite support to the proposed project
as well.
B-3. District and Tehsil Offices
District Office (OFWM) would be responsible for supervision, coordination and

internal monitoring at district level. The field activities under proposed project will be
executed by the WUAs and supervised by the Deputy District Officers (OFWM) for which
targets will be assigned to each tehsil. It is indicated that offices of Deputy District Officers
(OFWM) have been established in 25 uncovered tehsils under the PIPIP which are being
operated with development funds. In addition, the incremental staff comprising of Water
Management Supervisors and Rodmen have been provided in the offices of DDOs (OFWM)
under PIPIP as per work load/targets in various tehsils. It is planned that project works will
be carried out with existing OFWM personnel. The organogram of implementation
hierarchy is attached (Annexure-C).
C. Project Management
The coordination, administration, and monitoring for successful execution of

envisaged activities under the proposed project will be achieved through establishment of
following committees.
a) Project Steering Committee (PSC)
b) Project Implementation Committee (PIC)
c) District Implementation Committee (DIC)
d) District Rate Committee (DRC)
a) Project Steering Committee
The Project Steering Committee (PSC) would be chaired by Secretary Agriculture,

Government of the Punjab with Chief (Agriculture) P&DD; Additional Secretary
(Expenditure), Finance Department; and Additional Secretary (Tech.), Irrigation
20
Department as its members. Director General Agriculture (Water Management) would act
as Secretary of the PSC. The PSC would meet quarterly or whenever required to review the
physical and financial progress as well as to suggest measures to overcome the constraints/
bottlenecks faced in the field during execution of project activities. The major functions of
PSC would be as follows.
i) Approve annual work plan and streamline flow of funds

ii) Allocate/approve yearly district-wise quota for extension of lining
on watercourses and government farms watercourses
iii) Monitor physical and financial progress
iv) Identify the constraints in achieving targets and devise strategies for
their redressal
v) Review provincial/district monitoring reports and take appropriate
actions, if required
vi) Formulate committee (s) to resolve specific issues relating to civil
works, unspent funds, rates of construction materials and cost
sharing mechanism
vii) Review/devise implementation modalities of government farms, if
required.
viii) Devise mechanism for transparent monitoring of project activities
b) Project Implementation Committee
The Project Implementation Committee would be chaired by Director General

Agriculture (Water Management) with Deputy Project Director (Watercourses) PIPIP,
Regional Project Directors (PIPIP), Rawalpindi, Lahore and Multan, Deputy Director
(Hqs.), District Officers (OFWM), and Team Leader of Project Consultants as its members.
Director (Headquarters) would act as Secretary of the committee. The PIC would meet every
month or as and when required to review the physical and financial progress as well as to
suggest means/measures to overcome the constraints faced during execution of project
activities. The major functions of PIC would, inter alia, be as follows.
i) Prepare annual work plan

ii) Review physical and financial progress
iii) Coordinate and supervise the project activities
iv) Ensure implementation of decisions of Project Steering Committee
v) Formulate mechanism for transparent external monitoring of project
activities
vi) Review the monitoring reports and rectification of the shortfalls
c) District Implementation Committee
The District Implementation committee (DIC) comprising of the following officers

would be constituted in each district to implement the project at district level.
21
a) District Coordination Officer Chairman
b) Executive District Officer (Finance & Planning) Member
c) Executive District Officer (Agriculture) Member
d) Regional Project Director concerned Member
e) Representative of Revenue Department Member
f) District Officer (OFWM) Member/Secretary
The DIC is proposed to meet on monthly basis or as and when required. The major
functions of DIC would be as follows.
i)Review physical and financial progress

ii)Ensure effective project implementation
iii)Oversee proper flow of funds to WUAs
iv) Arrange transparent internal monitoring of project activities
v) Resolve any constraint/bottleneck/dispute faced in the field during
execution of project activities
vi) Make recommendations to PIC for improving pace of
implementation
d) District Rate Committee
The District Rate Committee (DRC) comprising the following officers have already
been constituted under DIC to decide the rates of construction materials for improvement of
watercourses under the PIPIP. The same committee would also provide rate fixation services
for construction materials including PCPS under the proposed project.
a) Executive District Officer (Agriculture) Chairman

b) District Officer (OFWM) concerned Member/Secretary
c) District Officer (Building) Member
d) Field Engineer (Consultant) Member
The DRC will have the following mandate.
i) Periodically review rates of various construction materials

ii) Fix price band for different materials for clusters on geographical
basis
D. Project Monitoring
Internal monitoring of project activities at provincial level would be carried out by

the Director General Agriculture (Water Management) Punjab through its staff and Regional
Project Directors (PIPIP) while internal monitoring at district level would be responsibility
of DO (OFWM). The external monitoring & evaluation of project activities would be
undertaken by the project consultants.
22
E. Project Consultants
The objectives of the consultancy services under the project would be to provide
project implementation and supervision support in carrying out the project activities. The
consultants would provide support through design review/approval, construction
supervision, quality assurance, technical assistance, and overall coordination of project
execution. Moreover, the consultants would assist in overall project management activities
such as preparation of project implementation plans, expenditure planning budgeting and
financing forecast and plans, monthly, quarterly and annual progress reports or work
programs as required by the project management.
It is planned to engage Project Implementation Supervision Consultants (PISCs)

under the proposed project for implementation assistance and supervision for execution of
project interventions. The consultants’ team shall primarily be responsible to the Director
General Agriculture (Water Management) but its major responsibilities would be in the
districts. All records and sites shall be open and available to the consultants to enable them
to perform intended functions. The selection of PISCs will largely depend on their technical
expertise and experience in providing consultancy services under similar projects. The
Consultant Selection Committee (CSC) to be notified under the convenorship of Secretary
Agriculture would recruit the consultants in accordance with PPRA Rules, 2014.
The PISCs’ scope of work would include but not limited to the followings tasks.
A. General
a) Provide project management support services to the Director General

Agriculture (Water Management)/Project Director.
b) Prepare standards and specifications of earthen
rehabilitation/improvement of watercourses, different alternatives of
lining, water control structures, other civil works etc.
c) Develop detailed mechanism for inspection of watercourse
construction material in accordance with the departmental standards
and specifications.
d) Extend technical support to maintain a database regarding beneficiary
farmers, location of the schemes, year of improvement, planned works
and those actually completed at site. Periodic updation of water
management database system would also be one of the responsibility
of the consultants through field checking and ground-truthing.
e) Ensure submission of monthly, quarterly, and annual reports for
proposed project activities besides other periodic reports as per
requirement of project management.
f) Liaise with provincial, regional, district, and tehsil level project
management offices for smooth execution of field activities.
23
g) Undertake any additional task whenever assigned by the Client.
B. Top Supervision
a) The consultants will be responsible for top supervision of the work by

qualified graduate engineers in the respective discipline with sufficient
experience in the field of on farm water management/watercourse
improvement in order to ensure and certify the quality of works
executed at site as per following stages.
i. Survey, design and quantification of watercourse construction
material
ii. Construction supervision
iii. Final certification of works as third party validation
b) The consultants shall certify that works are being executed as per
approved design, drawings, standard specifications, technical
sanctioned estimates and within the provisions of the contract
agreement.
c) The consultants shall carry out spot check minimum of one-third of
watercourses (by number), for quality assurance of works during
construction.
d) The consultants shall ensure that construction schedule agreed with the
Water Users Association (WUA) is being followed strictly.
e) The consultants shall be bound to ensure that the watercourse
construction materials being used at site are in accordance with relevant
standards and specifications and has been tested by them as per laid
down specifications.
f) The consultants shall advise the District Officer (OFWM)/ Deputy
District Officer (OFWM) on any problem arising during watercourse
improvement and suggest remedial measures.
g) The consultants shall submit inspection report to the concerned District
Officer (OFWM) with copies to the Director General Agriculture
(WM)/Project Director clearly pointing out the deficiencies, if any, in
the work and suggestions for its rectifications.
h) The consultants shall verify the payments to be released to the Water
Users Association (WUA) at different stages certifying that requisite
millstones have been completed and at rates approved by the District
Rate Committee (DRC).
i) The consultants shall certify the completed works as Third Party
Validation in terms of quantity and quality.
j) The consultants shall submit certified Final Completion Reports (FCRs)
to the client.
k) The consultants fee will be linked with the periodic submission of
requisite progress reports.
l) The client/department will be at liberty to decrease or increase the
quantum of work without assigning any reason.
The experts required for the project implementation and supervision consultancy
alongwith their estimated inputs are given below.
24
Sr. # Category Number Man Months
1. Project Manager/Team Leader 1 60
2. Field Engineer 16 960
3. Unallocated - 30
Total 17 1,050
The detailed Terms of Reference (TORs) of PISCs including their qualification and
indicative duties / job description as well as other modalities are given at Annexure-D.
8. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENT
It is envisaged to utilize the existing facilities and infrastructure for implementation

of the scheme.
9. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES
a) Indicate date of estimation of project cost estimates

The cost estimates of the project have been prepared during June 2015.
b) Basis of determining the capital cost (market survey, schedule rates, estimation
on the basis of previous work done etc.)
Capital cost of the project is based on the prevailing average market rates of various
items available in the open market during June 2015. The unit costs analysis for watercourse
improvement is attached (Annexure-E).
c) Year-wise/Component-wise Phasing of Physical Activities
The year-wise/component-wise phasing of physical targets/activities of the project
is appended (Annexure-F).
d) Year-wise/Component-wise Financial Requirements
The year-wise/component-wise phasing of financial requirements for project
activities is provided (Annexure-F). The yearly operational expenses at the provincial and
district level is also attached (Annexure-G).
10. ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COST AFTER

COMPLETION OF PROJECT ______
It is envisaged that the farmers/WUAs would be responsible for the operation and
maintenance of improved watercourses. As such, there would be no recurring expenditure
for activities completed under the proposed project.
11. DEMAND AND SUPPLY ANALYSIS
The low irrigation efficiencies at the farm level are major constraint in attaining
potential production from otherwise highly productive agricultural lands of the Punjab. As
25
such, more than 40 percent of canal water is lost between mogha outlet and farmers’ fields
due to poor condition of tertiary conveyance system (watercourses). The crop water
requirements are not met quantitatively and temporally because of supply based irrigation
water delivery, which negatively affects the overall agricultural production.
The proposed project envisages improvements in canal water supplies to the farms
through extension of lining upto 50 percent of total length on already improved watercourses
and re-building of watercourses completing structural life. These interventions will result in
saving of precious amount of water and will enhance conveyance efficiency, which in turn
improve the water availability at the farm level and enhance crop productivity.
12. FINANCIAL PLAN (FINANCING SOURCES)

a) Equity
NA
b) Debt
NA
c) Grants alongwith Sources

(Rs. in million)
Amount for Amount for Recurring
Sources
Capital Cost Cost
(a) Foreign Assistance
i- Loan - -
ii- Grant - -
iii- Technical Assistance - -
(b) Federal Government - -
i- Grant - -
ii- Loan - -
iii- Investment - -
iv- Direct Expenditure - -
(c) Provincial Government 6,829.695 -
i- Grant - -
ii- Loan - -
iii- Investment - -
iv- Direct Expenditure - -
(d) Sponsoring Agency's own fund - -
(e) Private Investment (SSCs) - -
(f) Local Body Resources, if any -
(g) Non-Government borrowing 2,458.167 -
(h) Beneficiaries Contribution - -
(i) Other sources (e.g. Recoveries) - -
d) Weighted Cost of Capital

NA
e) Flow of Funds
The annual physical targets for watercourse improvement will be approved by the
Project Steering Committee (PSC) at the start of each financial year. The estimated costs of
operational expenses as well as civil works at district level would be transferred from
Account No. 1 (non-food) of the Provincial Government to Account-IV of the District
26
Governments through Finance Department. The funds allocated for operational expenses
and civil works at district level will be released through the concerned District Accounts
Office. At provincial level an Assignment Account/Special Drawing Account (SDA) will
be opened in the name of DGA (WM) after authorization of the Finance Department and
fulfilling prescribed codal formalities. The DGA (WM) would be allowed to maintain and
operate said account for channelizing the payments to the project consultants. The PSC may
make necessary adjustments in financial and implementation modalities, if needed by
keeping the overall scope and cost of the project intact.
13. PROJECT BENEFIT AND ANALYSIS
a) Financial Benefits
The project will have both tangible and intangible benefits but there will be no direct
income from the scheme to the government. It is estimated that watercourse lining upto 50
percent of length would result in saving of about 220 acre feet of water per watercourse per
annum valuing about Rs. 2.00 million. Other benefits of envisaged interventions include
increase in crop yields, enhancement in cropping intensity, increase in cultivated & irrigated
areas etc. The same would result in substantial increase in farm returns and provide enhanced
employment opportunities to the rural communities.
b) Economic Returns
The interventions proposed under the project are technically feasible and
economically viable. It has been worked out that extension of lining upto 50 percent would
result in significant reduction in water losses and increased productivity of water. It is quite
challenging to fully capture and quantify the benefits of such intervention in sector like
agriculture where numerous factors are at play. A simplified but authenticated approach is,
therefore, used to estimate the benefits of the project and cost benefit analysis has been
carried out, which reveals following Economic Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Cost
Benefits Ratio (Annexure-H).
IRR = 23 percent
CBR = 1: 1.54
c) Social Benefits
Irrigation water saved through reduced conveyance losses in the
improved/rehabilitated watercourses would increase the cropped area, crop yields, cropping
intensity and farm incomes in the project area. Accordingly, increased income levels of the
farming community will improve livelihood in the rural areas. Lessening the drudgery of
irrigation operation to a great extent, shift to high delta crops like vegetables, reduction in
27
water theft and related litigation among farmers, increase in farm income etc. would result
in social uplift of rural people.
d) Environmental Benefits/Impact Assessment

Various project impact evaluation studies were carried out to assess the effects of
different OFWM interventions including watercourse improvement. These studies clearly
indicate that the improvements in water conveyance have positive affects in controlling
waterlogging and rising water-tables, improving water management, curtailing the drainable
surplus, and reducing soil salinity risks. The project builds on existing infrastructure and
improves system operations. It would, thus, not experience adverse environmental affects
normally associated with new developments, such as resettlement, depletion of land and
water resources, and loss of wildlife habitat. In addition to reducing the problems of
waterlogging and salinity, improved water management would reduce incidence of
mosquito-borne diseases by reducing the habitat of mosquitoes with reduction in stagnant
water leaking from deteriorated water channels. The social and environmental benefits of
watercourse improvement are given as under.
 Enabling farmers to execute small scale community irrigation

development works through their institutions
 Building farmers’ capacity for better managing water at farm level
 Alleviating poverty as a result of improving agricultural output as well as
increased employment opportunities in the rural sector
 Control of tampering of watercourse turn-outs (Naccas), particularly in
lined sections
 Reduction in conflicts/thefts/disputes among water users regarding
water distribution
 Lessening the drudgery of irrigation operation
e) Employment Generation
Implementation of the project would provide enhanced employment opportunities,
particularly to the rural population in project areas. It is indicated that watercourse
improvement will make available 20.150 million man-days of skilled and un-skilled labour
as employment opportunities during execution of project activities. Similarly, employment
opportunities will be generated through enhance activities in related sectors like brick kilns,
PCPS yards etc. Improvement in crop yields will also boost economic activity in rural areas
of the province that will create further employment options. The project activities will
benefit about 900,000 farm families including 112,500 and 787,500 farm families
benefitting directly and indirectly, respectively. It is, therefore, concluded that project
implementation will stimulate employment generation not only for skilled and unskilled
labor in the villages but will help in opening of new earning opportunities in the rural sector.
28
f) Impact of Delays on Project Cost/Viability
In view of no major incremental water resources development in near future, only
source of increased water availability at the farm level is water saving interventions such as
watercourse improvement. The escalating surface water shortages and depleting
groundwater aquifers due to over exploitation necessitate immediate adoption of water
conservation technologies for efficient utilization of limited water resources. Any delay in
implementation of proposed interventions may result in irreversible losses besides increase
in project costs due to price escalation of materials.
14. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE (INCLUDING STARTING AND

COMPLETION DATES)_____________________________________________
Indicate starting and completion date of the project:-
Starting Date Completion Date

July 2015 June 2020
29
30
Annexure-A
Optimizing Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency through
Enhancing Lining Length
District-wise Targets
Watercourses
Sr.
District Total Improved
No. Target (No.)
(No.) No. % of Total
1 Bahawalpur 3,625 3,336 93 104
2 R.Y.Khan 5,230 3,772 74 82
3 Bahawalnagar 4,080 3,608 89 100
4 D.G.Khan 2,826 1,739 63 71
5 Muzaffar Garh 4,808 3,759 80 89
6 Layyah 1,209 1,120 94 105
7 Rajanpur 2,357 1,469 64 72
8 Multan 2,503 1,523 64 71
9 Khanewal 2,188 1,661 78 87
10 Vehari 2,145 1,776 85 95
11 Lodhran 1,576 1,215 80 89
12 Faisalabad 2,729 2,641 98 109
13 Jhang 1,763 1,402 82 91
14 Chiniot 676 576 87 97
15 T. T. Singh 1,366 1,363 100 111
16 Sahiwal 1,639 1,398 87 97
17 Pakpattan 1,192 1,044 90 101
18 Okara 1,903 1,530 84 93
19 Lahore 479 424 91 101
20 Sheikhupura 1,528 1,369 92 103
21 Nankana Sahib 866 815 95 106
22 Kasur 1,628 1,178 77 86
23 Gujranwala 1,868 1,422 79 88
24 Hafizabad 905 756 86 96
25 Narowal 200 138 71 79
26 Sialkot 474 322 72 80
27 M.B. Din 1,240 999 83 92
28 Gujrat 259 209 83 93
29 Sargodha 2,641 1,974 77 86
30 Khushab 984 707 74 83
31 Bhakkar 1,702 971 59 66
32 Mianwali 906 612 69 77
Total 59,495 46,830 - 2,900
31
Annexure-B1
OPTIMIZING WATERCOURSE CONVEYANCE EFFICIENCY THROUGH ENHANCING LINING LENGTH
LIST OF WATERCOURSES IRRIGATING GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURE FARMS -DGA (RESEARCH)
Identification of Watercourse Basic Data of Watercourse Already work done if any Proposed Works
On the Community
In the Farm Area
Total Discharg Total Watercourse
Sr. Watercourse Farm Area Lining Nakkas Culverts
Name of Farm Disty/Minor Village/ Chak No CCA e (LPS)/ Length Other Structure
No. No. (Acres) Lining Nakkas Culverts Lining Nakkas Culverts (M) (No.) (No.)
(Acres) Cusic (M)
(M) (No.) (No.) (M) (No.) (No.)
1 Wheat Research Institute, Faisalabad. 1/17350-L Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 191 85 0.61 1,775 - - - 1,775 60 2 -
2 Cotton Research Institute, Faisalabad 1/17350-L Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 191 70 0.61 3,200 3,200 60 6 -
3 Plant Pathology Section, AARI, Faisalabad 1/17350-L Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 12.5 13 0.61 667 667 5 3 -
4 Horticulture Research Institute, Faisalabad. 6225-L Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 62.5 63 0.61 1,610 - - - - - - 1,610 15 1 -
5 Sugarcane Research Institute, Faisalabad 6225-L Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 99 111 0.61 7,500 550 8 5 6,950 100 50 -
6 Agronomic Research Institute, Faisalabad (Seed Farm) 10283-L Tulwala Minor Chak No.221/ RB 0 151 0.60 1,500 1,167 - 1 -
7 Agronomic Research Institute, Faisalabad (CP, VO, F crops) 2450R Distributary Chak 295R.B 0 80 500 225 3 2 5,338 39 15 -
8 Soil Chemistry Section, AARI, Faisalabad 2450R Distributary Chak 295R.B 10 10 200 - - - -
9 Plant Virology Section, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 10.88 11 1.11 367 300 4 2 367 10 3 -
10 Maize Research Station, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 10 10 1.11 535 4 1 736 6 3 -
11 Forage Production Unit, AARI, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 11 11 1.11 365 365 6 - -
12 Pulses Research Institute, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 15.5 18 1.11 3,600 3,600 6 3 -
13 Vegetable Research Institute, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB - 33 1.11 3,675 1,817 70 3 - - - 1,858 - -
14 Fodder Research Sub-Station, AARI, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 19 18 1.11 1,627 1,627 15 6 -
15 Crop Physiology Section, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 14 1.11 1,900 1,900 70 3 -
16 Soil Chemistry Section, AARI, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 10 9 1.11 361 3 -
17 Oilseeds Research Institute, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 36.8 33 1.11 2,457 2,457 25 2 -
18 Entomology Research Institute, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 5 5 1.10 3,675 70 3 1 -
19 Agri. Biotechnology Research Institute, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 23.6 20 1.11 655 198 10 Nil N.A N.A N.A 457 18 2 -
20 Cotton Research Institute, Faisalabad (Breeding Area) 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 4.25 4 1.11 665 665 12 5 -
21 Plant Pathology Research Institute, Faisalabad 13965-R Tulwala Minor Chak No.295/ RB 4 4 1.11 341 341 2 2 -
22 Mango Research Institute, Multan 18900/R Wali Mohammad RangeelPur 5 20 1 Cusec 300 443 20 1 1,669 64 - 965 20 3 -
23 Mango Research Station, Shujabad 24220/L DaudSher Wahi Rikki 212 79 1.02 2,973 900 30 - 2,073 36 1 -
24 Cotton Research Sub-Station, Sargodha 425/L (RD116) Chak No.38 NB 76.65 10 2,224 2,224 2 1 -
25 Citrus Research Institute, Sargodha 425/L (RD116) City minor Chak No.38 NB 64.65 77 1 Cusec 2,214 2,214 2 1 - - - 660 20 4 -
26 Fodder Research Institute, Sargodha 425/L (RD-110) City minor Chak No.38NB 59 27 1 Cusec 783 783 4 1 -
27 Fodder Research Institute, Sargodha 04-576-L City minor Chak No.38NB 30 1 Cusec 611 611 4 1 -
28 Arid Zone Research Institute, Bhakkar 27125/R Kamal Theme Chak No.32/ TDA 725 765 70.00 9,090 1,332 51 3 900 10 - 1,670 50 3 -
29 Gram Breeding Research Sub-Station, Kallurkot 28000-R Kallurkot Minor Kallurkot 42 52 3,024 3,024 5 5 -
30 Rice Research Institute, Kala Shah Kaku 1/ 91000-L Kala Shah KakuDisty Chak No.38 38 38 6" 410 94 316 30 2 -
31 Rice Research Institute, Kala Shah Kaku 1/ 95000-L Kala Shah KakuDisty Chak No.38 44 44 6" 1,200 282 918 40 4 -
32 Rice Research Institute, Kala Shah Kaku 1/ 92000-R Kala Shah KakuDisty Chak No.38 35 35 6" 632 244 388 30 2 -
33 Agronomic Res. Station, Faroqabad, Sheikhupura 118000/R Upper gogera canal Farooqabad 853 614 1.16 2,481 872 10 6 1,609 -
34 Agronomic Res. Station, Faroqabad, Sheikhupura 7879L Lagar disty. Farooqabad 530 401 0.20 1,140 510 7 2 630 -
35 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 16734/R 2-R/5-L 64/5-L 375.0 375 1.25 3,444 1,033 - - - - - 3,444 10 2 -
36 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 17640/R 2-R/5-L 64/5-L 368 368 1.23 4,362 1,309 50 2 1,309 50 2 - - - -
37 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 17800-L 1-R/5-L 64/5-L 301.02 301 1.00 2,621 787 - - - - - - - - -
38 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 25200-L 1-R/5-L 64/5-L 232.78 233 0.77 5,252 1,576 9 3 1,576 9 3 93 1 -
39 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 29530-L 1-R/5-L 64/5-L 228.2 228 0.76 2,119 636 6 1 - - - 270 7 - -
40 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 2750-L 9-L 86/9-L 180 180 1.20 3,688 1,106 7 2 - - - - - - -
41 Maize And Millet Research Institute, Yousafwala 744-L 9-L 86/9-L 353.64 354 1.15 3,990 1,197 15 2 - - - - - - -
42 Maize Seed Farm, Iqbal Nagar, Chichawatni 23000-R 14-L 11/14-L 495 495 1.50 6,016 1,805 20 3 1,805 20 3 - - - -
43 Maize Seed Farm, Iqbal Nagar, Chichawatni 24810-R 14-L 11/14-L 494 494 1.50 7,873 2,362 - - - - - - - - -
44 Potato Research Institute, Sahiwal 1/744/1L 9-L Chak No. 86/9-L 100 11 600 600 10 4 -
45 Cotton Research Station, Sahiwal 1/854-R/9-1 89/9-L 127 24 0.42 2,100 2,100 16 - -
46 Regional Agri. Research Institute, Bahawalpur 28880-R IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samma Satta 113 1.50 5,650 1,950 60 4 - - - 3,750 130 30 -
47 Jajoba Researcg Station, Bahawallpur 28880-R IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samma Satta 24 24 1.50 1,548 1,548 10 5 -
48 Agronomic Research Station, bahawalpur 28880-R IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samma Satta 25 22 1.50 1,050 1,050 17 7 -
49 Sugarcane Research Station, Bahawalpur 28880-R IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samma Satta 11.5 12 1.50 825 825 15 3 -
50 Guar Research Station, Bahawalpur 28880-R IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samma Satta 42 38 1.50 1,100 1,100 30 1 -
51 Cotton Research Station, Bahawalpur 28880-R IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samma Satta 45 40 1.50 2,609 2,609 22 6 -
52 Horticultural Research Sub-Station, Bahawalpur 1/17350-L IR/AP Minor Zakhira Samna Satta 50 50 1.5c 3,750 1,950 60 6 - - - 1,900 - - -
53 Sugarcane Research Institute, Rahim Yar Khan 20722-L Abehayat Chak No.4/P 39 46 0.95 2,406 137 3 1 2,209 35 6 -
54 Cotton Research Institute, Rahim Yar Khan 20722-L Abehayat Chak No.4/P 35 1,573 1,573 6 6 -
55 Oil Seed Research Station, Khanpur 20772-1 Abehayat Chak No. 4/P 225 30 140/70 2,820 846 15 2,261 45 4 -
56 Oil Seed Research Station, Khanpur 21050-R Abehayat Chak No. 4/P 273 127 55/110 3,294 987 19 3,542 60 6 -
57 Oil Seed Research Station, Khanpur 3884-L Colony Chak No. 4/P 202 18 1.30 2,615 503 14 5 -
58 Oil Seed Research Station, Khanpur 24268-R Shadab Faizabad 260 4 1.09 3,009 615 20 7 -
59 Oil Seed Research Station, Khanpur 23782-L Shadab Faizabad 216 18 1.21 2,917 312 10 3 -
60 Soil Salinity Research Institute, Pindi Bhattian 12630TR Rajbah Thatha Raika 500 163 49.00 5,311 1,311 20 5 578 9 2 4,000 60 15 -
61 Agronomic Res. Station, Khanewal 29115 10 R Chak 83-85 10 R 450 46 2,727 1,212 18 2,870 30 3 -
62 Barani Agri. Research Institute, Chakwal (Seed Farm) 21R 47 RakhGhulama Chak No. 8 ML 350 11 1.5 cft 818 - - 818 86 3 -
Chak
63 Oil Seed Research Sub-Station, Piplan 24464-R RakhGhulama Chak No. 8 ML 106 76.00 2 5,069 5,069 85 8 -
No. 8
64 Cotton Research Sub-Station, Raiwind - Raiwind 88 18 - 1,910 1,910 78 3 -
65 Cotton Research Sub-Station, Jhang - Ghumanana 35 1,372 1,372 20 5 -
66 Date Palm Research Sub-Station, Jhang. - - Ghumnana and civil station 52.2 47 - 2,286 - - - - - - 2,286 - - -
67 Agronomic Research Station, Karor
32 425 2,385 17 4 -
68 Govt. Seed farm, Dhakhar Mauza Dhakhar 599 599 3,030 3,030 50 10 6 drop structure
Annexure-B2
OPTIMIZING WATERCOURSE CONVEYANCE EFFICIENCY THROUGH ENHANCING LINING LENGTH
LIST OF WATERCOURSES IRRIGATING GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURE FARMS -DGA (Extension & AR)
Identification of Watercourse Basic Data of Watercourse Already work done if any Proposed Works
Total On the Community Nakka
Disty/ Village/ Total CCA Discharge In the Farm Area Culverts
S. Water Farm area Length Watercourse Lining s Other
Name of Farm
No. course No. (Acre) (LPS Lining Nakka Lining (M) structure
Minor Chak No. (Acre) (M) Culverts Nakkas Culverts (No.) (No.)
/Cusec (M) s (M)
1 ARF, DG Khan 260501/L Kotla Shikhni Rakh Chabri Zareen 147 11 20 1200 - - - - - - 80 3 0 -
4 ARF, Vehri 7224/R 3/R 43/R 385 40 28.317 1211 1211 39 6 - - - - - - -
5 ARF, Karor 64130 /R Rajan Shah Minor 84-A/TDA 750 70 1.70 Cusec 5500 202 7 - 739 9 2 2495 640 9 -
6 ARF, RY Khan 24130/L Pattan Minara Minor Chak 101/P 33 10 1.8 2100 620 6 8 1738 34 10 620 6 8 -
7 ARF, Sargodha 425/L City/ Minor 38/NB 338 46 74 5600 470 6 1 362 9 1 1000 20 4 -
8 ARF, Vanian W ala - - - - 28.15 - - 1606 40 7 - - - 939 27 5 -
9 ARF, Kot Nainan - - - - 32.25 - - - - 1 - - - 1500 30 1 -
10 ARF, Sheikhupura 2050/L Jewanpura Jewanpura 60 33.3 - 2600 - - - - - - 2600 80 10 -
11 ARF, Farooqabad RD/7879 Lagar Rajba Such Soda 117 29.3 - 2650 - - - - - - 2500 83 10 -
12 Students Farm Agicultural Training Institute Karor 68100/R Rajan Shah Minor Chak No. 84-A/TDA 780 Acre A-K 14-6 2.45 Cusec 6500 - - - - - - 1253 90 7 -
13 Trainees Farm Chak No.101/P, IATI, R.Y.Khan 24130/L Pattan Minara Minor 101/P 400 23 1.8 K 2100 0 0 0 683m 32 1 381 9 2 0
14 Trainees Farm Campus Area, IATI,R.Y.Khan. 9250/L Noushera Minor IATI,R.Y.K 30 19 6 inch 2314 200 10 2 1306m Nil Nil 808 17 2 Nil
City Minor, Aarha Sub 21 Acre, 1 21 Acre, 1 Kanal, Five Slabs of
15 Students Demonstration Farm, In-Service Agri. Training Institute 425/L 38/N.B (Risala No. 5) 10 LPS 1000 M - - - - - - 1000 M 16 2
Division Kanal, 7 Marla 7 Marla 5x5 Ft.
16 Govt. Agriculture Station, Multan 19800/R W ali Muhammad Rangeelpur 162 acre 162 acre - 5200 1669 60 - - 4 - 300 7 - -
1.5
17 Govt. Seed Farm Gojra 500/R Bubak 357/JB 450 273 5280 1320 20 8 0 20 4 1980 60 10 -
Cusec
Chak 350
18 Government Agiculture Seed Farm Chillianwala 2327 /L Murala Minor 250 0.90 Cusec 3650 1570 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 36 Acres
19 Govt Agriculture Farm Jhang - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
20 Government Seed Farm Vehart 7224/R 3R/8L 43/W B 491 Acre 383 Acre 1.8 Cusec 5588 (M) - - - - - - - - - -
21 Government Seed Farm Vehart 5200/R 3R/8L 43/W B 168 Acre 68 Acre 0.75 Cusec 875 (M) - - - - - - - - - -
22 Govt. Fruit Farm Chak # 127/15-L 2500/L 15/AL 127/15-L 348 A-K-M 121-1-10 44 LPS 5333 0 0 0 1600 34 1 6467 185 5 -
Chak # A-K-M 1.56
23 Govt.Fruit Farm Chak # 86-75/10-R 73707/R 10/R 468 2346.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 335.28 10 4 -
86-75/10-R 25-0-0 Cusec
34970 /L 1959 - - 4400 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
30675/L - - - 3250 570 25 3 - - - - - - -
33400/L - - - 3000 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
33660/L - - - 5860 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
33815/L - - - 3250 1062 20 4 - - - - - - -
Upper Hazara Minor Rakh Ehsanpur
34640/L - - - 4600 1375 30 2 - - - - - - -
Govt. Seed Farm
24 28830/L - - - 2700 1356 22 3 - - - - - - -
Ehsanpur
27815/R - - - 1500 1500 25 2 - - - - - - -
25220/R - - - 366 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
32600/R - - - 750 200 4 1 - - - - - - -
13900/R - - - 366 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
16500/L Bahar Minor 174/TDA - - - 660 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
19200/R - - - 366 0 0 0 - - - - - - -
25 Government Agriculture Farm, Sahiwal 14408/L 9-L 90/9-L 187 82-2-0 2.1 Cusec 3427 396 5 Nil Nil Nil Nil 2127 30 5 -
26 Govt. Seed Farm Karor 68100-R Rajan Shah Chak No. 84-A/TDA 780 325 2.45 Cusec 6500 1206 30 5 1206 147 8 2312 300 6 0
27 Govt. Seed Farm Karor 64130-R Rajan Shah Chak No. 84-A/TDA 750 185 1.6 Cusec 5800 890 8 1 890 81 9 1520 150 8 0
28 8/ML Farm Piplan 21427R Ghulama 8/ML 110 58 1.5 cusec 5298 - - - - - - 5298 20 6 -
29 19/ML Farm 54000 L Ghulama 19/ML 50 50 1.5 cusec 5000 324 2 3 - - - 1620 15 4 -
30 13/DB Farm 92000/R Dulla Branch 13/DB 1250 50 3 cusec 5000 - - - - - - 5000 60 3 -
31 1/ML 26500L MML 1/ML 256-7-11 58-7-11 3 cusec 2640 1320 5 - - - - 1320 13 3 -
32 2/DB 14600L Hernoli 2/DB 225 100 5 cusec 700 220 45 - - - - 1300 25 2 -
33 5/DB 22560/R Dulla Branch 5/DB 226-6-00 71-6-00 3 cusec 2093 660 7 - - - - 1433 20 4 -
34 District Demonstration Farm Mianwali 43600L 1-R Mianwali 50 13-5-00 1.5 cuses 5000 - - - - - - 5000 18 5 -
35 Agriculture Farm, BW P 2880-R IR-Disty Mouza Zakhira, Sama Satta 99 99 1 Cusec 5880 36300 5 5 - - - 2250 8 5
36 Govt. Garden BW P Vislan Disty Mouza Baqarput 28 28 1 Cusec 670 - - - - - - 670 20 5 -
37 Govt. Garden KPT 146-110R Bahawal Canal Mouza KPT 10 1 Cusec 3300 - - - - - - 1600 4 1
82500/R Tranda Minor Chak No.108/P 319-Acres 248-Acres 2750 2 8 1 2 6 2 1 8 1 -
2700-
47469/L,
38 Govt. Seed Farm 108/P Rahimyarkhan. 210-acres, 200- 64-Acres, 140- Meter,
50685/L, Pattan Minara Minor Chak No.108/P 1, 4 9, 12 - 1 9 - 1 9 2 -
acres, 240-acres acres, 224-acres 2900-
51743/L
Meter,
39 Government Progeny garden Chak No. 4/ P Khan Pur 18600/ L Aab E Hayat Miinor 4/ P 39 acre 11 acre 20 LPS 832 meter 0 20 3 0 0 249 20 3 -
101350/L 52/MB Nil 181 4 Inch 320 130 30 5 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Hadali Minor
40 Sultana Garden 97850/L 53/MB Nil 29 4inch 600 400 6 1 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
43200/1/R Khushab Minor 53/MB Nil 30 7 inch 700 600 15 0 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
41 25-MB Garden 50900/R Noorpur Mionr 25/MB Nil 49-4 7 inch 733 200 6 0 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
44500/L Adhi Kot 51/MB Nil 167 7 inch 1000 900 5 2 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
45500/R Adhi Kot 51/MB Nil 36 4 inch 700 570 8 2 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
42 Rakh Utra
49532/R Adhi Kot 51/MB Nil 120 6 inch 700 730 6 3 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
6000/R Shah W ala 51/MB Nil 90 6.5inch 500 200 8 1 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
62600/R Nil 2.25 90 2400 720 40 3 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
63960/L Nil 0.26 Nil 1006 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 1006 40 3 Nil
43 RakhRajar farm Dhak Minor 65/MB
56000/R Nil 0.36 Nil 1676 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 1676 40 3 Nil
63500/R
44 Mandi Garden Bhakkar 41825 Right Bhakkar Minor 34/TDA 32-3-11 32-3-11 1677 1677 90 6 1677 90 6
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
45
46
18/TDA Farm
65/DB Farm
40300 Right
70568 Right
Querishi Minor
Dullah Branch
18/TDA
65/DB
33124-7-13
96-6-14
124-7-13
122-6-14
3020
5150
3020
5150
150
150
20
15
3020
5150
150
150
20
15
153520 Right 56.620 in
47 Farida Garden Thall Canal 42-44 ML 5000 482.0-00 2 km 6160
-
156418 two mogas
Annexure-C

Institutional Arrangements
SECRETARY
AGRICULTURE
PROVINCIAL DISTRICT
LEVEL LEVEL
DIRECTOR GENERAL AGRICULTURE District Coordination
(WATER MANAGEMENT) PUNJAB Officer
Director (Training) Director (Hqs)

Support Staff Deputy Director (Hqs)
Deputy Director (A&A) Executive District Officer
Deputy Director (M&E) (Agriculture)
Deputy Director (Farms) Assistant Directors
(Training) Support Staff
Support Staff
Project Coordination Unit (PCU), PIPIP

Support Staff
Deputy Project Director (HEIS & LASER) District Officer (OFWM)
Deputy Project Director (W/Cs) ADT
Deputy Director (Accounts) Support Staff
Assistant Directors (Technical)
Support Staff
Regional PCUs, PIPIP DDO (OFWM)

Regional Project Directors (RPDs) WMO
Deputy Directors (Technical) WM Supervisor
Assistant Directors (Technical) Support Staff
Support Staff
Consultants PCPS Supplier Firms
34
ANNEXURE-D
TERMS OF REFERENCES (TORS)
OF
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SUPERVISION CONSULTANTS
(PISCS)
Project: Optimizing Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency through Enhancing
Lining Length
Sponsor: Agriculture Department
Location: Entire Canal Commanded Areas of the Punjab
Background
The main source of irrigation in the Punjab is from vast canal system but available
surface supplies are inadequate to meet the crop water requirements but present cropping
intensity. The total surface water allocation for the province as per Provincial Water Accord of
1991 is 55.54 MAF. There are, however, huge water losses in the distribution network
comprising of main/branch canals, distributaries, minors, and tertiary conveyance systems of
about 59,000 watercourses. In addition, a substantial amount of 21 MAF irrigation water is also
lost during its application due to uneven fields and poor farm designs. This deficiency is,
however, compensated to a great extent by groundwater abstractions of almost 33 MAF, which
is in fact over exploitation of this vital resource as recharge to fresh groundwater areas is only
23 MAF. In nutshell, about 47 MAF water remains available for use against 65 MAF of actual
crop water requirements. As such, there exists a gap of nearly 18 MAF to meet irrigation
requirements for present cropping intensity exceeding 130 percent.
The watercourse improvement is the most studied and researched intervention amongst
all OFWM activities. Its numerous evaluations and impact assessment studies have been
carried out by various national and international organizations/institutions. Their findings have
indicated huge benefits accruing from an improved watercourse including saving of about 119
acre feet of water per annum valuing about Rs. 1.30 million. In addition, a number of other
significant benefits also result from watercourse improvements. The impact evaluation study
carried out by the Planning Commission of Pakistan titled “Project Impact Evaluation Study
(PIES) for National Program for Improvement of Watercourses in Pakistan (NPIW)” is the
most recent one, which reveals that the intervention is highly cost effective option for
improving farm gate water availability. Considering huge benefits of watercourse
35
improvement, it is considered that lining of all watercourses should be completed upto optimal
limits in the shortest possible timeframe for mitigating the farm gate water shortages. It has,
accordingly, planned to extend lining upto optimal length i.e. 50 percent to harness maximum
benefits of watercourse improvements owing to the demand of the farmers, technical
feasibility, cost effectiveness, and current water economics.
Initially, it is envisaged to extend lining on 2,900 watercourses up to 50 percent of their

length under the proposed project. In addition, about 100 watercourses will be improved at
Extension and Research Farms of the Agriculture Department. The major activities to be
carried out therein would include, inter alia, the followings.
A. Re-activation of 2,900 Water Users Associations already registered

under On Farm Water Management and Water Users Association
Ordinance [Act], 1981(Amended 2001).
B. Extension in lining of critical reaches of community channels and
installation of water control structures on 2,900 already improved
watercourses.
C. Improvement of 100 watercourses of Agricultural Extension and
Research Farms.
Objectives of Consultancy Services
The objectives of the consultancy services under the project would be to provide project
implementation and supervision support in carrying out the project activities. The consultants
would provide support through design review/approval, construction supervision, quality
assurance, technical assistance, and overall coordination of project execution. Moreover, the
consultants would assist in overall project management activities such as preparation of project
implementation plans, expenditure planning budgeting and financing forecast and plans,
monthly, quarterly and annual progress reports or work programs as required by the project
management.
Scope of Consultancy Services
It is planned to engage Project Implementation Supervision Consultants (PISCs) under

the proposed project for implementation assistance and supervision for execution of project
interventions. The consultants’ team shall primarily be responsible to the Director General
Agriculture (Water Management) but its major responsibilities would be in the districts.
All records and sites shall be open and available to the consultants to enable them to
perform intended functions. The selection of PISCs will largely depend on their technical
expertise and experience in providing consultancy services under similar projects. The
36
Consultant Selection Committee (CSC) to be notified in the convenorship of Agriculture
Department would recruit the consultants in accordance with PPRA Rules, 2014.
The PISCs’ scope of work would include but not limited to the followings tasks.
A. General
1. Provide project management support services to the Director General

Agriculture (Water Management)/Project Director.
2. Prepare standards and specifications of earthen rehabilitation/improvement
of watercourses, different alternatives of lining, water control structures,
other civil works etc.
3. Develop detailed mechanism for inspection of watercourse construction
material in accordance with the departmental standards and specifications.
4. Extend technical support to maintain a database regarding beneficiary
farmers, location of the schemes, year of improvement, planned works and
those actually completed at site. Periodic updation of water management
database system would also be one of the responsibility of the consultants
through field checking and ground-truthing.
5. Ensure submission of monthly, quarterly, and annual reports for proposed
project activities besides other periodic reports as per requirement of project
management.
6. Liaise with provincial, regional, district, and tehsil level project management
offices for smooth execution of field activities.
7. Undertake any additional task whenever assigned by the Client.
B. Top Supervision
1. The consultants will be responsible for top supervision of the work by

qualified graduate engineers in the respective discipline with sufficient
experience in the field of on farm water management/watercourse
improvement in order to ensure and certify the quality of works executed at
site as per following stages.
iv. Survey, design and quantification of watercourse construction
material
v. Construction supervision
vi. Final certification of works as third party validation
2. The consultants shall certify that works are being executed as per approved
design, drawings, standard specifications, technical sanctioned estimates and
within the provisions of the contract agreement.
3. The consultants shall carry out spot check minimum of one-third of
watercourses (by number), for quality assurance of works during
construction.
4. The consultants shall ensure that construction schedule agreed with the
Water Users Association (WUA) is being followed strictly.
37
5. The consultants shall be bound to ensure that the watercourse construction
materials being used at site are in accordance with relevant standards and
specifications and has been tested by them as per laid down specifications.
6. The consultants shall advise the District Officer (OFWM)/ Deputy District
Officer (OFWM) on any problem arising during watercourse improvement
and suggest remedial measures.
7. The consultants shall submit inspection report to the concerned District
Officer (OFWM) with copies to the Director General Agriculture
(WM)/Project Director clearly pointing out the deficiencies, if any, in the
work and suggestions for its rectifications.
8. The consultants shall verify the payments to be released to the Water Users
Association (WUA) at different stages certifying that requisite millstones
have been completed and at rates approved by the District Rate Committee
(DRC).
9. The consultants shall certify the completed works as Third Party Validation
in terms of quantity and quality.
10. The consultants shall submit certified Final Completion Reports (FCRs) to
the client.
11. The consultants fee will be linked with the periodic submission of requisite
progress reports.
12. The client/department will be at liberty to decrease or increase the quantum
of work without assigning any reason.
The experts required for the project implementation and supervision consultancy
alongwith their estimated inputs are given below.
Sr. # Category Number Man Months

1. Project Manager/Team Leader 1 60
2. Field Engineer 16 960
3. Unallocated - 30
Total 17 1,050
Time Schedule/Assignment Duration
The Consultants will be engaged till project completion and estimated duration of the
consultancy services is about 60 months. The Consultants shall, however, maintain a proper
manpower to do the requisite tasks during specified period. Last but not least is the undertaking
of consultants for obligatory responses to any technical query arising from time to time during
entire project period. The period of consultancy services may be extendable to accommodate
any delay under unavoidable circumstances.
38
Core Team of Experts
Following is an indicative list of core skills required for carrying out the assignment.
General /
Job Specific Input
Sr. Overall
Position Qualification Experience (Man
No. Experience
(Years) Months)
(Years)
M.Sc. Degree in
Agricultural 10
Project Manager/
1. Engineering / Water 15 (On Farm Water 60
Team Leader
Resources Management)
Engineering
2
B.Sc. Agricultural
2. Field Engineer 4 (On Farm Water 960
Engineering
Management)
Job Description and Qualifications of Staff
1. Project Manager/Team Leader
Qualifications: The Project Manager/ Team Leader will possess a Master’s degree in
Agricultural Engineering / Water Resources Engineering / Irrigation Engineering after B.Sc.
Agri. Engineering with 15 years’ experience. A minimum of 10 years of experience will be
required in the management/administration of similar consultancy services with demonstrated
ability to work with government officials, technical field staff, and farmers. In addition, the
Team Leader would be required to have familiarity with the principles and practices of
participatory community development, irrigated agriculture, on farm water management
related issues, and knowledge of project management information systems besides, having
fluency in spoken and written English.
Responsibilities of the Project Manager/Team Leader will be but not limited to the
following:
i. Report to the Client.

ii. Assume overall responsibility for management of the supervisory team.
iii. Work as the “the Engineer” as per Client’s agreement with the Water Users
Associations (WUAs)/ participating farmers/service providers to supervise
construction/installation/equipment delivery with the best professional and
consulting standards to ensure that the scheme/task is completed satisfactorily.
iv. Keep the Client informed of technical issues and the progress of all works both by
direct contacts and through discussions or correspondence.
v. Attend, at Project level, all meetings as required and keep a record of all such
meetings.
vi. Assist the Client in any project issue that the Employer may require.
39
vii. Ensure preparation of a project completion report (PCR) and its submission to the
Client.
viii. Assist the Client in preparing the annotated replies to Audit observations.
ix. Assist the Client in preparing response to financiers or other authority’s quarries,
observations, requirements etc.
x. Coordinate with all Client’s related organizations for project issues.
2. Field Engineer
Qualifications: The Field Engineer should possess a Bachelor degree in Agricultural

Engineering with four (4) years’ work experience including at least two (2) years in on farm
water management/watercourse improvement. Work experience in computer related tools,
good communication skills, fluency in English having proven satisfactory record of similar
consultancies would be preferred.
Responsibilities of the Field Engineer will be but not limited to the following:
i) Check and approve field survey, design and cost estimates of watercourses.
ii) Coordinate and supervise the construction activities.
iii) Carry out ground-truthing of works already completed on watercourses to
be undertaken for extension in lining under proposed project
iv) Ensure quality as well as quantity of works by spot-checking.
v) Certify physical works and financial accounts for ongoing as well as
completed works.
vi) Support the DGA (WM)/PD in updation of water management database
system through checking and ground verification.
vii) Bring deficiencies, if any into the notice of the controlling officers of district
and DGA (WM)/PD.
viii) Develop close liaison with project stakeholders including project
management and farmers.
ix) Undertake any other relevant duties assigned by the Client/project
management.
x) Client will be at the liberty to increase or reduce the targets/quantum of
works
Deliverables & Schedule

The consultants will supply the deliverables as per schedule. The schedule for various
reports likely to be prepared by the consultants is given below. Additional reports may be
required as and when needed. It is indicated that the payments will be linked with deliverables.
40
Sr.
Document Copies Due
No.
30 days after the effectiveness of the Consulting
1. Draft Inception Report 5
Services Agreement
One week after the issuance of comments by the
2. Final Inception Report 10
Client on Draft Inception Report
Monthly Progress Report (Physical &
3. 10 10th of the following month
Financial)
Quarterly Summary Progress Report
4. 10 10th of the first month of following quarter
(Physical & Financial)
Annual Progress Report (Physical &
5. 10 During first month of the following year
Financial)
6. Quality Control / Assurance Report 10 Bi-annually
At completion of assignment or one month
7. Draft Assignment Completion Report 5
before expiry of project period
At completion of assignment period after
8. Final Project Completion Report 15
incorporation of comments of the Client
Planning Commission Proforma-IV
9. 10 At completion of project activities
(PC-IV)
Complete inventory of works/activities
10. 10 At completion of the project
completed
11. Special Reports 10 As and when required
Note: The payments may be linked with deliverables at contract finalization stage, if required.
Payment of Taxes
Income tax, sales tax and all other taxes applicable for the time being or enforced during the
services shall be deductible from the payments as per rules/procedures.
Retention Money/Security Deposit of Consultants
The Director General Agriculture (WM)/ Client’s representative will deduct/retain 10 percent
of each payment made to the consultants for their services as retention money/security deposit
to ensure efficient services by the consultants. The same would be released to the Consultants
after expiry of security or indemnity period. The retention money will, however, not be
deducted on direct costs, if any.
Professional Liability
The consultants would be responsible for professional liability as per provisions under
Section-54 of PPRA Rules, 2014 of the consultants as well as will also cover the followings.
i) The consultants selected and awarded the contract will be liable for the consequence
of errors and omissions on their part or on the part of their employees.
ii) The consultant shall be held liable for all losses or damages suffered by the procuring
agency on account of any misconduct by the consultant in performing the consulting
services
iii) The extent of liability of the consultant shall form part of the contract and such
liability shall be 1.5 times of remunerations.
iv) The liability of consultants stated in clause (i) will expire after one year from the
41
stipulated date of completion of assignment as provided in the agreement with the
Client.
v) The consultants would also be liable for the consequences as per provisions contained
in bye-laws of Pakistan Engineering Council for “Conduct and Practice of Consulting
Engineers”.
vi) The consultants will provide insurance for liabilities on part of the consultant @ 10
percent of contract cost and necessary costs shall be borne by the consultants in this
regard.
vii) Consultants will not engage any person, who is paid employee of another consulting
firm, works part-time in its offices or performs any piece of work or work on contract,
until they have not obtained permission in writing of the consultants who are the
employer of such person.
viii) Consultants shall not make any offer of employment to employees of their Client and
if they are approached by employees of their Client regarding employment with them,
they shall make certain that they have their Client’s consent before entering into any
negotiations with such employees.
ix) In case of any dispute between the consultants and Client, the matter shall be referred
to the competent authority for arbitration as per rules. The decision of the arbitrator
shall be final and non-appealable.
42
Annexure-E1
Optimizing Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency through Enhancing Lining Length
Completion of Partially Improved Watercourses through Extension of Lining
Estimated Break-up of Unit Cost (Brick Lined Watercourse)
1. Cross Section of a Typical Watercourse

Lined Section Dimensions
Depth = 60 cm (24 inches)
Bottom Width = 60 cm (24 inches)
Floor Thickness = 7 cm (2.75 inches)
Floor Width = 132 cm (52 inches)
Wall Thickness = 23 cm (9 inches)
2. Basic Data of a Typical Watercourse to be Lined

Unit Volume Total Volume
Items Unit Qty
(m3) (m3)
Length of Watercourse m 4,150
Design Discharge lps 80
Average Slope m/m 0.0004
Length of Lining (upto 50% of total length) Excluding 26%
m 996 0.3684 366.93
already Lined
Nakka Structures (0.51 m dia) No. 16 0.52 8.32
Culvert No. 2 5.00 10.00
Sign Board No. 1 0.50 0.50
Drop Structure No. 2 0.25 0.50
Animal Wallow No. 0.18 15.00 2.70
388.95
3. Estimated Materials & Cost
Total Cost
Items Unit Qty. Unit Cost (Rs.)
(Rs.)
Bricks (500 Bricks per cubic meter) No. 194,473 6,900 /1000 1,341,865
Cement (1.87 bags per cubic meter with Cement
bag 727 550 /bag 400,031
Sand Ratio 1:4)
3 3
Sand (0.26 cubic meter per cubic meter) m 101 730 /m 73,822
Nakkas No. 16 900 /Nakka 14,400
Total Material Cost 1,830,118
Material Cost per Running Meter (Rs.) 1,837
4. Cost of Labour & Masons
Items Labor (Rs.) Masons (Rs.) Total (Rs.)

Alternate irrigation channel for construction of 996 meters lined section (0.2 men-
89,640 89,640
days/meter @ Rs. 450/man-day)
Excavation /pad work/backfilling of section to be lined 996 meters (0.2 men-days/meter
89,640 89,640
@ Rs.450/man-day)
Construction of lined section 996 meters @ Rs. 350/meter 174,300 174,300 348,600
Installation of 16 nakkas @ Rs. 800/- each 6,400 6,400 12,800
Construction of 2 culverts @ Rs. 9000/- each 9,000 9,000 18,000
Construction of 0.18 animal wallows @ Rs. 20,000/- each 1,800 1,800 3,600
Construction of 02 drop structures @ Rs. 1,000/- each 1,000 1,000 2,000
Construction, painting and writing of sign board @ Rs. 3,500/- each 1,750 1,750 3,500
Earthen maintenance of 2,075 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @ Rs. 450/man-day) 186,750 186,750
Repair of 50% of old lined section @ 10% of material and labour expenses 118,014
Total Labor & Masons 560,280 194,250 872,544
5. Overall Unit Cost of Watercourse Improvement
Items % Amount (Rs.)

Cost of materials 68 1,830,118
Cost of labor for earthen maintenance and alternate watercourse 10 276,390
Cost of labor for civil works 11 283,890
Cost of masons 7 194,250
Cost of repair and maintenance 4 118,014
Total 100 2,702,662
6. Cost Sharing
Distribution Share
Government share 68% 1,830,118
Farmer share 32% 872,544
Total 100% 2,702,662
43
Annexure-E2
Esitimated Break-up of Unit Cost (PCPL Watercourse)
PCPS Size (Segment # 6)

Maximum Height, D 530 mm
Maximum Width, T 760 mm
Designed Flow Depth, d 412 mm
Free Board, FB 12 mm

Items Unit Quantity
(m3) (m3)
Length of Lining (upto 50% of total length) Excluding 26% already Lined m 996
Culvert No. 2 5.00 10.00
Animal Wallows No. 0.18 15.00 2.70
22.02
Total Cost
Items Unit Quantity Unit Cost (Rs.)
(Rs.)
PCPL Segments (# 6) No. 1,089 1,535 /Segment 1,671,908
Bricks No. 11,010 6,900 /1,000 75,969
Cement (including Joints) bag 48 550 /bag 26,485
Sand (including in bed) m3 53 730 /m
3
38,694
Nakkas No. 16 900 /nakka 14,400
Total Cost of Material 1,827,456
4. Cost of Labor & Masons (Farmers' Share)
Items Labor (Rs.) Masons (Rs.) Total

Alternate irrigation channel for construction of 996 meters lined section (0.2 men-days/meter
89,640 89,640
@ Rs. 450/man-day)
Excavation /pad work/backfilling of section to be lined 996 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @
89,640 89,640
Rs.450/man-day)
PCP Segments laying, jointing and back earth filling (996 meters) @ Rs.300/meter 149,400 149,400 298,800
Installation of 16 nakkas @ Rs. 800/- each 6,400 6,400 12,800
Earthen maintenance of 2,075 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @ Rs. 450/man-day) 186,750 186,750
Repair of 50% of old lined section @ 10% of material and labour expenses - 118,014
Total Labor & Masons 535,380 169,350 822,744

Cost of repair and maintenance 4 118,014
Total 100 2,650,200
6. Cost Sharing
Distribution Share Amount (Rs.)
Farmer share 31% 822,744
Total 100% 2,650,200
44
Annexure-E3
Improvement of Watercourses of Agricultural Farms (Ext. & Research)
Estimated Break-up of Unit Cost (Brick Lined Watercourse)
Lined Section Dimensions
Depth = 60 cm (24 inches)
Bottom Width = 60 cm (24 inches)
Floor Thickness = 7 cm (2.75 inches)
Floor Width = 132 cm (52 inches)
Wall Thickness = 23 cm (9 inches)

Items Unit Qty
(m3) (m3)
Length of Lining ( upto 50% of total length ) m 2,075 0.3684 764.43
Culvert No. 3 5.00 15.00
Animal Wallow No. 0.18 15 2.70
800.32
Items Unit Qty. Unit Cost (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

Bricks (500 Bricks per cubic meter) No. 400,161 6,900 /1,000 2,761,113
Cement (1.87 bags per cubic meter with Cement
bag 1,497 550 /bag 823,132
Sand Ratio 1:4)
3 3
Sand (0.26 cubic meter per cubic meter) m 208 730 /m 151,901
Nakkas No. 33 900 /Nakka 29,700
Total Material Cost 3,765,846
4. Cost of Labour & Masons
Items Labor (Rs.) Masons (Rs.) Total (Rs.)
Alternate irrigation channel for construction of 2,075 meters lined section (0.20 men-
186,750 186,750
Excavation /pad work of section to be lined 2,075 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @
186,750 186,750
Rs.450/man-day)
Construction of lined section 2,075 meters @ Rs. 350/meter 363,125 363,125 726,250
Installation of 33 nakkas @ Rs.800/- each 13,200 13,200 26,400
Earthen maintenance of 2,075 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @ Rs.450/man-day) 186,750 186,750
Total Labor & Masons 954,625 394,375 1,349,000

Total 100 5,114,846
6. Cost Sharing

Farmer share 26% 1,349,000
Total 100% 5,114,846
45
Annexure-E4
Unit Cost (PCPL Watercourse)
PCPS Size (Segment # 6)

Maximum Height, D 530 mm
Maximum Width, T 760 mm
Designed Flow Depth, d 412 mm
Free Board, FB 12 mm

Items Unit Quantity
(m3) (m3)
Length of Lining ( upto 50% of total length ) m 2,075
Culvert No. 3 5.00 15.00
Animal Wallows No. 0.18 15.00 2.70
35.86
Total Cost
Items Unit Quantity Unit Cost (Rs.)
(Rs.)
PCPL Segments (# 6) No. 2,269 1,535 /Segment 3,483,143
Bricks No. 17,930 6,900 /1,000 123,717
Cement (including Joints) bag 74 550 /bag 40,719
Sand (including in bed) m3 57 730 /m
3
41,321
Nakkas No. 33 900 /nakka 29,700
Total Cost of Material 3,718,599
4. Cost of Labor & Masons (Farmers' Share)
Items Labor (Rs.) Masons (Rs.) Total
Alternate irrigation channel for construction of 2,075 meters lined section (0.20 men-
186,750 186,750
Excavation /pad work of section to be lined 2,075 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @
186,750 186,750
Rs.450/man-day)
PCP Segments laying, jointing and back earth filling (2,075 meters) '@ Rs. 300/meter 311,250 311,250 622,500
Installation of 33 nakkas @ Rs.800/- each 13,200 13,200 26,400
Earthen maintenance of 2,075 meters (0.2 men-days/meter @ Rs.450/man-day) 186,750 186,750
Total Labor & Masons 902,750 342,500 1,245,250
Cost of Masons 7 342,500
Total 100 4,963,849
6. Cost Sharing
Government Share 75% 3,718,599
Farmers' Share 25% 1,245,250
Total 100% 4,963,849
46
Annexure-F
Phasing of Physical Targets and Financial Outlay
Sr.
Particulars Units 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total %age
No.
I. Physical Activities
A. Re-Activation of Water Users Associations Nos. 500 550 600 625 625 2,900
B. Completion of Partially Improved Watercourses Nos. 500 550 600 625 625 2,900
Improvement of Watercourses of Agricultural Farms
C. Nos. 50 50 - - - 100
(Ext. & Research)
Total Nos. 550 600 600 625 625 3,000
D. Consultancy Services Man Months 162 222 222 222 222 1,050
II. Financial Outlay (Rs. Million)
B. Completion of Partially Improved Watercourses

i) Government Share 1.83 914.394 1,005.832 1,097.273 1,142.992 1,142.992 5,303.483
ii) Farmers' Contribution 0.85 423.822 466.205 508.586 529.777 529.777 2,458.167
Sub-Total (B) 1,338.216 1,472.037 1,605.859 1,672.769 1,672.769 7,761.650 83.57
Improvement of Watercourses of Agricultural Farms

C. 5.04 251.918 251.918 - - - 503.836 5.42
(Ext. & Research)
D. Supervisory Consultants/Third Party Validation
i) Tentative Consultancy Cost 39.840 53.940 53.940 53.940 53.940 255.600 2.75
ii) PRA Sales Tax @ 16% 6.374 8.630 8.630 8.630 8.630 40.894
Sub-Total (D) 46.214 62.570 62.570 62.570 62.570 296.494 3.19
E. Operational Costs 107.904 119.562 135.791 174.300 188.325 725.882 7.82
(i) Government Share 1,320.430 1,439.882 1,295.634 1,379.862 1,393.887 6,829.695 73.53
423.822 466.205 508.586 529.777 529.777 2,458.167 26.47

(ii) Farmers Contribution
1,744.252 1,906.087 1,804.220 1,909.639 1,923.664 9,287.862 100.00

H. Total Project Cost
47
Annexure-G1
Optimizing Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency Through Enhancing Lining Length
Summary of Operational Cost
Sr. No. Particulars 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total
1 Provincial Level 14,260,000 16,430,000 19,741,000 24,541,500 28,777,575 103,750,075
2 District Level 93,644,000 103,132,000 116,050,000 149,758,000 159,547,000 622,131,000
TOTAL 107,904,000 119,562,000 135,791,000 174,299,500 188,324,575 725,881,075
48
Annexure-G2
Operational Cost
A. Provincial level
Code No. Unit of Appropriation 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total
A012 Allowances
A01201-70 Regular Allowances
A01227 Project Allowance Rate/Month
Director General Agriculture (WM) (BS-20) 40,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 2,400,000
Director (Headquarters) (BS-19) 30,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 1,800,000
Deputy Director (Headquarters) (BS-18+SP) 25,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
Deputy Director (A&A) (BS-18) 25,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
Assistant Director (Tech.) (BS-18) 25,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
Assistant Director (Tech.) (BS-18) 25,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000
Superintendent (BS-17) 20,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,200,000
Superintendent (BS-17) 20,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,200,000
Total 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 12,600,000
A03 Operating Expenses
A032 Communication
A03201 Postage & Telegraph 20,000 24,000 28,000 32,000 37,000 141,000
A03202 Telephone & T/Calls 280,000 336,000 386,000 444,000 510,000 1,956,000
A03204 Electronic Communication 150,000 202,000 263,000 316,000 364,000 1,295,000
A03205 Courior & Pilot Services 20,000 24,000 28,000 32,000 36,000 140,000
Total: 470,000 586,000 705,000 824,000 947,000 3,532,000
A033 Utilities
A03301 Gas 30,000 36,000 41,000 51,000 58,000 216,000
A03302 Water 20,000 24,000 28,000 35,000 41,000 148,000
A03303 Electricity 250,000 300,000 405,000 547,000 656,000 2,158,000
A03304 Hot & Cold Charges 10,000 12,000 13,000 16,000 20,000 71,000
Total:- 310,000 372,000 487,000 649,000 775,000 2,593,000
A034 Occupancy Costs
A03406 Rent for office buildings - - - - - -
A03407 Rate & Taxes - - - - - -
Total:- - - - - - -
A038 Travel & Transportation
A03805 Traveling Allowance 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,750,000 4,687,500 5,859,375 19,796,875
A03807 P.O.L. Charges 4,000,000 4,600,000 5,980,000 7,774,000 10,106,200 32,460,200
Total:- 6,500,000 7,600,000 9,730,000 12,461,500 15,965,575 52,257,075
A039 General
A03901 Office Stationery 500,000 600,000 690,000 862,000 864,000 3,516,000
A03902 Printing & Publication 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,380,000 1,725,000 1,725,000 7,030,000
A03905 News Papers & Periodical Books 10,000 12,000 14,000 18,000 20,000 74,000
A03906 Uniform & Liveries 10,000 12,000 14,000 18,000 20,000 74,000
A03907 Advertising & Publicity Charges 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,380,000 1,725,000 1,725,000 7,030,000
A03918 National Celebration 200,000 240,000 276,000 345,000 397,000 1,458,000
A03970 Other 500,000 600,000 690,000 862,000 992,000 3,644,000
Total General:- 3,220,000 3,864,000 4,444,000 5,555,000 5,743,000 22,826,000
Total Operating Expenses:- 10,500,000 12,422,000 15,366,000 19,489,500 23,430,575 81,208,075
A13 Repair & Maintenance of Durable Goods
A13001 Transport 800,000 960,000 1,248,000 1,685,000 1,854,000 6,547,000
A13101 Machinery & Equipment 250,000 300,000 345,000 466,000 536,000 1,897,000
A13201 Furniture & Fixture 30,000 36,000 41,000 50,000 57,000 214,000
A13370 Others 20,000 24,000 28,000 33,000 38,000 143,000
A137 Computer Equipment
A13701 Hardware 100,000 120,000 138,000 230,000 264,000 852,000
A13703 I.T Equipment 40,000 48,000 55,000 68,000 78,000 289,000
Total:- 1,240,000 1,488,000 1,855,000 2,532,000 2,827,000 9,942,000
G.Total:- 14,260,000 16,430,000 19,741,000 24,541,500 28,777,575 103,750,075
49
Annexure-G3
Operational Cost
B. District Level
Code No. Unit of Appropriation 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total
A03 Operating Expenses
A032 Communication
A03201 Postage & Telegraph 1,430,000 1,771,000 1,983,000 2,281,000 2,166,000 9,631,000
A03202 Telephone & T/Calls 2,860,000 2,656,000 2,975,000 3,940,000 4,334,000 16,765,000
A03204 Electronic Communication 1,030,000 1,254,000 1,404,000 1,544,000 1,966,000 7,198,000
A03205 Courior & Pilot Services 400,000 494,000 554,000 554,000 607,000 2,609,000
Total: 5,720,000 6,175,000 6,916,000 8,319,000 9,073,000 36,203,000
A033 Utilities
A03301 Gas 1,005,000 1,254,000 1,404,000 1,502,000 1,508,000 6,673,000
A03302 Water 290,000 368,000 423,000 452,000 424,000 1,957,000
A03303 Electricity 2,860,000 2,656,000 3,055,000 3,268,000 3,268,000 15,107,000
A03304 Hot & Cold Charges 1,430,000 885,000 930,000 996,000 1,074,000 5,315,000
Total:- 5,585,000 5,163,000 5,812,000 6,218,000 6,274,000 29,052,000
A034 Occupancy Costs
A03406 Rent for office buildings 13,680,000 14,030,000 16,555,000 19,006,000 20,906,000 84,177,000
A03407 Rate & Taxes 715,000 1,403,000 1,656,000 1,860,000 1,085,000 6,719,000
Total:- 14,395,000 15,433,000 18,211,000 20,866,000 21,991,000 90,896,000
A038 Travel & Transportation
A03805 Traveling Allowance 18,050,000 22,885,000 26,318,000 35,538,000 38,095,000 140,886,000
A03806 Transportation of Goods 570,000 288,000 330,000 386,000 871,000 2,445,000
A03807 P.O.L. Charges 14,125,000 17,940,000 21,528,000 25,688,000 28,257,000 107,538,000
Total:- 32,745,000 41,113,000 48,176,000 61,612,000 67,223,000 250,869,000
A039 General
A03901 Office Stationery 2,860,000 3,542,000 3,542,000 3,940,000 4,215,000 18,099,000
A03902 Printing & Publication 2,010,000 1,771,000 1,771,000 3,940,000 3,016,000 12,508,000
A03905 News Papers & Periodical Books 315,000 391,000 391,000 432,000 475,000 2,004,000
A03906 Uniform & Liveries 545,000 678,000 678,000 746,000 821,000 3,468,000
A03907 Advertising & Publicity Charges 2,860,000 1,771,000 1,771,000 3,940,000 4,137,000 14,479,000
A03918 National Celebration 1,160,000 1,254,000 1,254,000 1,544,000 1,698,000 6,910,000
A03942 Cost of Other Stores 290,000 885,000 886,000 386,000 425,000 2,872,000
A03970 Other 2,860,000 3,542,000 3,542,000 3,940,000 4,255,000 18,139,000
Total General:- 12,900,000 13,834,000 13,835,000 18,868,000 19,042,000 78,479,000
Total Operating Expenses:- 71,345,000 81,718,000 92,950,000 115,883,000 123,603,000 485,499,000
A13 Repair & Maintenance of Durable Goods
A13001 Transport 12,850,000 11,442,000 12,587,000 19,698,000 21,668,000 78,245,000
A13101 Machinery & Equipment 3,575,000 1,771,000 1,860,000 4,625,000 4,758,000 16,589,000
A13201 Furniture & Fixture 715,000 886,000 974,000 985,000 1,084,000 4,644,000
A13370 Others 715,000 885,000 974,000 985,000 1,084,000 4,643,000
A137 Computer Equipment
A13701 Hardware 2,000,000 5,544,000 5,820,000 3,256,000 2,592,000 19,212,000
A13703 I.T Equipment 2,444,000 886,000 885,000 4,326,000 4,758,000 13,299,000
Total:- 22,299,000 21,414,000 23,100,000 33,875,000 35,944,000 136,632,000
G.Total:- 93,644,000 103,132,000 116,050,000 149,758,000 159,547,000 622,131,000
50
Annexure-H
Economic Analysis (Additional Lining from 26% to 50%)

Sr. Yearly Incemental
Year Capital Cost Net Benefits
No Benefits Benefits
1 2015-16 1,744 - - -1,744
2 2016-17 1,906 493 493 -1,413
3 2017-18 1,804 530 1,023 -781
4 2018-19 1,910 542 1,565 -344
5 2019-20 1,924 542 2,108 184
6 929 542 2,650 1,721
7 929 - 2,650 1,721
8 929 - 2,650 1,721
9 929 - 2,650 1,721
10 929 - 2,650 1,721
11 929 - 2,650 1,721
12 929 - 2,650 1,721
13 929 - 2,650 1,721
14 929 - 2,650 1,721
15 929 - 2,650 1,721
16 929 - 2,650 1,721
17 929 - 2,650 1,721
18 929 - 2,650 1,721
19 929 - 2,650 1,721
20 929 - 2,650 1,721
21 929 - 2,650 1,721
22 929 - 2,650 1,721
23 929 - 2,650 1,721
24 929 - 2,650 1,721
25 929 - 2,650 1,721
26 929 - 2,650 1,721
10652 16446
NPV of Costs @ 12% 10,652
NPV of Net Benefits @ 12% 16,446
B/C Ratio 1.54
IRR (%) 23
51

Production Sectors (Agriculture Production) : PC - I FORM (Revised 2005)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Production Sectors (Agriculture Production) : PC - I FORM (Revised 2005)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Production Sectors (Agriculture Production) : PC - I FORM (Revised 2005)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PC - I FORM (Revised 2005)

OPTIMIZING WATERCOURSE CONVEYANCE

Project Cost: Rs. 9,287.862 Million

DIRECTORATE GENERAL AGRICULTURE

Optimizing Watercourse Conveyance Efficiency through Enhancing Lining

3. AUTHORITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR

i) Punjab Agriculture Department through Directorate General Agriculture (Water

i) Directorate General Agriculture (Water Management) Punjab, Lahore

a) If the project is included in the current Five-Year Plan, specify actual

The government's vision for agriculture sector, alongwith other initiatives,

b) If not included in the current plan, how is it now proposed to be

6. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

a) Irrigated Agriculture Significance

Figure-2: Average Canal Diversions in the Punjab

Figure-3: Punjab Water Budget

c) Improving Water Productivity

Crop Production (Million Tons)

Canal Withdrawals Total Water Availabilty

Figure-4: Water Availability and Crop Production

Currently, the On Farm Water Management (OFWM) is promoting all above

d) Watercourse Improvement Status

Tertiary level irrigation system in the Punjab comprises of about 59,500

Figure-5: Watercourse Improvement Status in the Punjab

The watercourse improvement is the most studied and researched intervention

Table-1: Impact of Watercourse Improvement

Considering huge benefits of watercourse improvement, it is considered that lining

Figure-7: Improved Watercourses

A. Re-activation of 2,900 Water Users Associations already registered

Reduce Conveyance Losses

Increase in Cropping Intensity

Support Rural Communities to Increase

Figure-8: Conceptual Layout of the Project

A. Re-activation of Water Users Associations (WUAs)

Effective involvement and participation of the shareholders acts as a catalyst for

a) Provide right of way for constructing watercourse

B. Extension of Lining on Partially Improved Watercourses

Keeping in view significant savings of water and enhancement in conveyance

In order to assess the optimal length of lining to harness maximum benefits of

Figure-9: Relationship between Lining Length and Reduction of Losses in Watercourses

It is mentionable that permissible watercourse lining limit was upto 30 percent of

B-1. Selection Criteria for Extension of Lining

In order to ensure execution of additional works on already improved watercourses,

a) The WUA has

B-2. Procedure for Extension of Lining

The procedure for watercourses to be taken up for extension of lining on already

C. Improvement of Canal Watercourses of Government Farms

C-1. Selection Criteria

In case of unimproved/ partially improved watercourses irrigating government

It is planned that most of the watercourses to be undertaken under proposed project

The lining of watercourses would be completed upto 50 percent of total length of

F. Cost Sharing Arrangements

Presently government is providing entire cost of construction materials while the

I. Farmers will contribute entire labour costs for

A. Existing OFWM Setup

On Farm Water Management (OFWM) program in the Punjab is part of the

In addition to field hierarchy, the Directorate Water Management Training Institute

B. Project Implementation and Coordination Arrangements

B-1. Provincial Supervision, Management, and Monitoring

Director General Agriculture (Water Management), Punjab would act as Project