The document discusses in-service teacher education under the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) in India. DPEP was launched in 1994 with the objectives of universalizing primary education access, improving retention, learning achievement, and reducing disparities. It adopts a district-level, participatory approach focusing on local conditions. Teacher training is emphasized through institutions like DIETs, CRCs, and BRCs to improve classroom transactions and quality of education. Funding is primarily from the central government. Self-evaluation questions are provided to analyze DPEP's contributions and drawbacks.
The document discusses in-service teacher education under the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) in India. DPEP was launched in 1994 with the objectives of universalizing primary education access, improving retention, learning achievement, and reducing disparities. It adopts a district-level, participatory approach focusing on local conditions. Teacher training is emphasized through institutions like DIETs, CRCs, and BRCs to improve classroom transactions and quality of education. Funding is primarily from the central government. Self-evaluation questions are provided to analyze DPEP's contributions and drawbacks.
The document discusses in-service teacher education under the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) in India. DPEP was launched in 1994 with the objectives of universalizing primary education access, improving retention, learning achievement, and reducing disparities. It adopts a district-level, participatory approach focusing on local conditions. Teacher training is emphasized through institutions like DIETs, CRCs, and BRCs to improve classroom transactions and quality of education. Funding is primarily from the central government. Self-evaluation questions are provided to analyze DPEP's contributions and drawbacks.
The document discusses in-service teacher education under the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) in India. DPEP was launched in 1994 with the objectives of universalizing primary education access, improving retention, learning achievement, and reducing disparities. It adopts a district-level, participatory approach focusing on local conditions. Teacher training is emphasized through institutions like DIETs, CRCs, and BRCs to improve classroom transactions and quality of education. Funding is primarily from the central government. Self-evaluation questions are provided to analyze DPEP's contributions and drawbacks.
DPEP Aroob Parween Research Scholar Department of Education P.U. Objectives
After going through this topic, students will be able to:
Understand the concept & functions of DPEP. Understand the objectives of DPEP. Analyze the significance of DPEP in teacher education. Content Concept of DPEP Objectives Significance Funding Planning process Quality improvement under DPEP a. Teacher training b. Academic support institutions Self evaluation questions District Primary Education Programme The centrally—sponsored scheme of District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) was launched in 1994 as a major initiative to revitalize the primary education system and to achieve the objective of universalisation of primary education. DPEP adopts a holistic approach to universalize access, retention and improve learning achievement and to reduce disparities among social groups. Adopting an “area specific approach” with district as the unit, of planning, the key strategies of the programme have been to retain the sensitivity to local conditions and ensuring full participation of the community. It also seeks to strengthen the capacity of national, state and district institutions and organisation, for planning, management and professional support in the field of primary education. DPEP is based on the principle of “additionally” and is structured to fill in the existing gaps by providing inputs over and above the provisions made under central and state sector schemes for primary education. Objectives To provide all children access to primary education through either the formal or non-formal stream. To reduce differences in enrolment, drop-out rates and learning achievement among gender and weaker section groups to less than five percent. To reduce overall primary dropout rates for all children to less than 10 percent. To rise the average achievement rate by 25 percent by measured baseline level and ensuring achievement of basic literacy and numeracy competencies and minimum of 40 percent achievement in other competencies by all primary education children. Significance The DPEP has made decisive impact on : increasing enrolment reducing stagnation improving class-room transaction. While the DPEP has been operational in backward districts with female literacy below the national average, total literacy campaign has started up the demand for elementary education. Funding
DPEP is an externally aided project. 85 percent of the project
cost is met by the Central Government and the remaining 15 percent is shared by the concerned state government. The central government share is resourced through external assistance. Planning process Planning process and project formulation under DPEP is of great significance. DPEP emphasizes location-specific planning in a participatory manner. In a sense there are some basic postulates which need to be born in mind for DPEP planning processes, namely the “nine pillars”. DPEP planning should include : (i) Mobilization for UEE by activating village education committees, teachers, parents/guardians and linking up with efforts under the Total Literacy Campaign. (ii) Planning for primary education and not merely primary schooling. Alternative methods have significance and a holistic view be taken. (iii) Cover all qualitative aspects such as school effectiveness, textbooks, teacher training and improvement in simple reading and learning skills. (iv) Convergence of services, such as primary education, primary health and ECCE to provide synergistic development (v) Provision for training's to improve teacher motivation and classroom transactions, as also in management of education. (vi) Openness to innovations which thrown up new solutions and once tested can be scaled up, or aborted if unsuccessful. (vii) A marked gender focus to provide for improvement in access, retention and achievement levels of girls education, as also to permeate gender sensitivity through all aspects of DPEP planning, including teacher training/recruitment, textbooks other educational facilities and incentives. (viii) The canvas of DPEP is systemic where the issue is one of management of change and improving of the system. (ix) Evaluation monitoring and research are interactive and supportive of DPEP. Studies and evaluations will play a major role in project planning and action research to facilitate decision-making. Quality improvement under DPEP
Quality improvement is one of the stated objectives of DPEP
and focus is on ensuring improvement in teaching learning processes. This is being attempted through : renewal of curriculum and teaching learning material (TLM) teacher training and empowerment provision of decentralised academic support capacity building of institutions. Teacher training (a) Strengthening the teachers in-service training and development of new designs for such training. (b) Selection and training of master trainers and resource persons within the district. (c) Training of educational administrators including district and block level functionaries and VEC members. (d) Augmenting the DIETs (e) Any other activity/facility required for continuous and updated training. Academic support institutions It may be stated that teacher development is a continuing process with regular academic support. The CRC's (Cluster Resource Centric) plans such inputs for a group of 8 to 10 villages, and BRC's (Block Resource Centre) for a group of 8 to 10 clusters. The block or mandal level resource centers are being set up to provide onsite support to teachers in terms of school visits, demonstrations and feedback, teacher training, material preparation discussion of specific problems at monthly meetings etc. DlETs which provide academic and resource support to elementary education have been identified as technical and professional resource institutions. DlETs have taken up number of activities. In service teacher training include sensitizing them about academic monitoring and supervision, planning for action research, Mapping out Total Literacy Mission (TLM). The state councils of Educational Research and Training also extended academic support. The faculties of SCERT are involved in a range of quality improvement interventions. Self evaluation questions: Q. Discuss the contributions of DPEP in India . Q. Discuss the drawbacks of DPEP scheme. Topic for next class: “In-Service teacher education under SSA” Contact : Email id - aroobparween@gmail.com Mobile -9955142371