Design/Analysis of Experiments STAT615 Section: 02 Fall 2020

Name: BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: Assignment 2 (13/11/2020)

202090119

Problem 1: A metal is used to make components for jet turbine aircraft engines. Cracking is a potentially serious problem
in the final part because it can lead to non-recoverable failure. A test is run at the parts producer to determine the effect of
four factors on cracks. The four factors are pouring temperature(A), titanium content (B), heat treatment method (C), and
amount of grain refiner used (D). Two replicates of a 24 design are run, and the length of crack (in mm ×10-2) induced in a
sample coupon subjected to a standard test is measured. The data are shown in Prob1_Ass2.mtw.
(a) [2 points]Estimate the factor effects.
Answer: Based on the Minitab results attached, all factors with P-Values > 0.0500 are not significant. These
include all higher terms interactions with the exception of ABC, AC, AD, & A, B, C, D single effect factors

Coded Coefficients
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0.284885 99.77% 99.56% 99.09%

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS

Model 15 570.948 38.063

  Linear 4 333.496 83.374

    Pour Temperature 1 72.909 72.909

    Titanium Content 1 126.461 126.461

    Heat Treat Method 1 103.464 103.464

    Grain Refiner 1 30.662 30.662

  2-Way Interactions 6 158.609 26.435

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 1 29.927 29.927

    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method 1 128.496 128.496

    Pour Temperature*Grain Refiner 1 0.047 0.047

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1 0.074 0.074

    Titanium Content*Grain Refiner 1 0.018 0.018

    Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 1 0.047 0.047

  3-Way Interactions 4 78.841 19.710

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1 78.751 78.751

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Grain Refiner 1 0.077 0.077

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 1

     Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 1 0.003 0.003

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 1 0.010 0.010

  4-Way Interactions 1 0.002 0.002

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 1 0.002 0.002

Error 16 1.299 0.081

Total 31 572.246  

Source F-Value P-Value

Model 468.99 0.000

  Linear 1027.28 0.000

    Pour Temperature 898.34 0.000

    Titanium Content 1558.17 0.000

    Heat Treat Method 1274.82 0.000

    Grain Refiner 377.80 0.000

  2-Way Interactions 325.71 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 368.74 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method 1583.26 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Grain Refiner 0.58 0.459

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 0.91 0.355

    Titanium Content*Grain Refiner 0.22 0.645

    Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 0.58 0.456

  3-Way Interactions 242.86 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 970.33 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Grain Refiner 0.95 0.345

    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 0.04 0.852

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 0.13 0.728

  4-Way Interactions 0.02 0.890

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner 0.02 0.890

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 2

 Error    

Total    

Regression Equation in Un-coded Units

Crack Length = 11.9881 + 1.5094 Pour Temperature + 1.9879 Titanium Content
- 1.7981 Heat Treat Method + 0.9789 Grain Refiner + 0.9671 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content
- 2.0039 Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method + 0.0383 Pour Temperature*Grain Refiner
+ 0.0480 Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method + 0.0236 Titanium Content*Grain Refiner
- 0.0384 Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner + 1.5688 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method
+ 0.0490 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Grain Refiner+ 0.0096 Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method*Grain 
Refiner
+ 0.0178 Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner
+ 0.0071 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method*Grain Refiner

Alias Structure
Factor Name

A Pour Temperature

B Titanium Content

C Heat Treat Method

D Grain Refiner

ALIASES: I, A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, CD, ABC, ABD, ACD, BCD, ABCD

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Seq SS Contribution Adj SS

Model 8 570.744 99.74% 570.744

  Linear 4 333.496 58.28% 333.496

    Pour Temperature 1 72.909 12.74% 72.909

    Titanium Content 1 126.461 22.10% 126.461

    Heat Treat Method 1 103.464 18.08% 103.464

    Grain Refiner 1 30.662 5.36% 30.662

  2-Way Interactions 3 158.497 27.70% 158.497

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 1 29.927 5.23% 29.927

    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method 1 128.496 22.45% 128.496

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1 0.074 0.01% 0.074

  3-Way Interactions 1 78.751 13.76% 78.751

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1 78.751 13.76% 78.751

Error 23 1.502 0.26% 1.502

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 3

   Lack-of-Fit 7 0.203 0.04% 0.203

    Pure Error 16 1.299 0.23% 1.299

Total 31 572.246 100.00%  

Source Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Model 71.343 1092.46 0.000

  Linear 83.374 1276.68 0.000

    Pour Temperature 72.909 1116.43 0.000

    Titanium Content 126.461 1936.46 0.000

    Heat Treat Method 103.464 1584.32 0.000

    Grain Refiner 30.662 469.52 0.000

  2-Way Interactions 52.832 809.01 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 29.927 458.26 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method 128.496 1967.63 0.000

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 0.074 1.13 0.299

  3-Way Interactions 78.751 1205.90 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 78.751 1205.90 0.000

Error 0.065    

  Lack-of-Fit 0.029 0.36 0.913

    Pure Error 0.081    

Total      

Regression Equation in Un-coded Units

Crack Length = 11.9881 + 1.5094 Pour Temperature + 1.9879 Titanium Content - 1.7981 Heat Treat Method
+ 0.9789 Grain Refiner + 0.9671 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content
- 2.0039 Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method
+ 0.0480 Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method+ 1.5687 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat 
Method

Alias Structure

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 4

 Factor Name

A Pour Temperature

B Titanium Content

C Heat Treat Method

D Grain Refiner

ALIASES: I , A, B, C, D, AB, AC, BC, ABC

[3 points]
(b) Write two regression models for predicting crack length, one for each level of the heat treatment method
variable. What differences, if any, do you notice in these two equations?

Regression Equations
Heat
Treat
Method
-1 Crack = 13.786 + 1.509 Pour Temperature + 1.988 Titanium Content + 0.979 Grain Refiner
Length
       
1 Crack = 10.190 + 1.509 Pour Temperature + 1.988 Titanium Content + 0.979 Grain Refiner
Length

Answer: The two equation differs in terms of their constant terms i.e. at lower level of heat treatment (-1),
Bo=13.785 while at higher level (+1), its value is 10.190
[2 points]
(c) Generate appropriate response surface contour plots for the two regression models in part (b). Describe.

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 5

 Answer: By holding Grain refiner constant (with contribution of 5%), the 2 plots are unequal and is safer to operate
at lower level of heat treatment method
[2 points]
(d) What set of conditions would you recommend for factors A, B and D if you use heat treatment method
C=+?
Answer: I will recommend low level of A(-),B(-) and D(+)
[3 points]
(e) Suppose that only 16 runs could be made on a single day, so each replicate was treated as block. Analyze
the experiment and draw conclusions.

Answer: Based on the Minitab output, all main effects are significant including all two factors interactions with
the exception of Titanium concentration-Heat treatment Method that has P-Value greater than 0.0500

Coded Coefficients
Term Effect Coef SE Coef 95% CI
Constant   12.0103 0.0684 (11.8486, 12.1720)
Pour Temperature 3.0436 1.5218 0.0684 (1.3601, 1.6835)
Titanium Content 4.0421 2.0211 0.0684 (1.8594, 2.1828)
Heat Treat Method -3.4244 -1.7122 0.0684 (-1.8739, -1.5505)
Grain Refiner 1.9649 0.9824 0.0684 (0.8207, 1.1441)
Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 1.9886 0.9943 0.0684 (0.8326, 1.1560)
Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method -3.8469 -1.9234 0.0684 (-2.0851, -1.7617)
Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 0.1831 0.0916 0.0684 (-0.0701, 0.2533)
Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 3.0861 1.5431 0.0684 (1.3814, 1.7048)

Term T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 175.63 0.000  

Pour Temperature 22.25 0.000 1.00

Titanium Content 29.55 0.000 1.00

Heat Treat Method -25.04 0.000 1.00

Grain Refiner 14.37 0.000 1.00

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 6

 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 14.54 0.000 1.00

Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method -28.13 0.000 1.00

Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1.34 0.222 1.00

Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 22.56 0.000 1.00

Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) PRESS R-sq(pred) AICc BIC
0.273542 99.81% 99.60% 2.73647 99.02% 54.70 18.42

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Seq SS Contribution Adj SS
Model 8 278.001 99.81% 278.001
  Linear 4 164.758 59.15% 164.758
    Pour Temperature 1 37.055 13.30% 37.055
    Titanium Content 1 65.355 23.46% 65.355
    Heat Treat Method 1 46.905 16.84% 46.905
    Grain Refiner 1 15.443 5.54% 15.443
  2-Way Interactions 3 75.146 26.98% 75.146
    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 1 15.819 5.68% 15.819
    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method 1 59.194 21.25% 59.194
    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1 0.134 0.05% 0.134
  3-Way Interactions 1 38.097 13.68% 38.097
    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 1 38.097 13.68% 38.097
Error 7 0.524 0.19% 0.524
Total 15 278.525 100.00%  

Source Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Model 34.7501 464.42 0.000

  Linear 41.1895 550.48 0.000

    Pour Temperature 37.0546 495.21 0.000

    Titanium Content 65.3551 873.44 0.000

    Heat Treat Method 46.9054 626.86 0.000

    Grain Refiner 15.4429 206.39 0.000

  2-Way Interactions 25.0488 334.76 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content 15.8185 211.41 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method 59.1938 791.09 0.000

    Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 0.1341 1.79 0.222

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 7

   3-Way Interactions 38.0967 509.14 0.000

    Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method 38.0967 509.14 0.000

Error 0.0748    

Total      

Regression Equation in Un-coded Units

Crack Length = 12.0103 + 1.5218 Pour Temperature + 2.0211 Titanium Content - 1.7122 Heat Treat Method
+ 0.9824 Grain Refiner + 0.9943 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content
- 1.9234 Pour Temperature*Heat Treat Method + 0.0916 Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method
+ 1.5431 Pour Temperature*Titanium Content*Heat Treat Method
Alias Structure
Factor Name
A Pour Temperature
B Titanium Content
C Heat Treat Method
D Grain Refiner

Aliases: I, A, B, C, D, AB, AC, BC, ABC,

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 8

Problem 2: An electrical engineer tests the efficiency of the heat radiator. Four factors were selected, and two replicates
of a completely randomized experiment were run. The results are shown in Prob2._Ass2.xls

a) Analyze the effects of the 4 factors on the efficiency of the heat radiator. Use α =0.05 .
[2 points]

From the attached Minitab, all treatments combinations or single effect treatments with P-value.0.0500 are not
significant The heat radiator is only affected with those treatment combinations with P-value <0.05.
The data satisfy normality assumption, homogeneity, and independent. This can be seen in the attached plots. A
further confirmation can be seen in the residual plots and the probability plots.
Coded Coefficients
Term Effect Coef SE Coef 95% CI T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant   82.469 0.445 (81.525, 83.413) 185.22 0.000  
A -8.562 -4.281 0.445 (-5.225, -3.337) -9.62 0.000 1.00
B -1.813 -0.906 0.445 (-1.850, 0.038) -2.04 0.059 1.00
C -3.312 -1.656 0.445 (-2.600, -0.712) -3.72 0.002 1.00
D 4.438 2.219 0.445 (1.275, 3.163) 4.98 0.000 1.00
A*B 4.687 2.344 0.445 (1.400, 3.288) 5.26 0.000 1.00
A*C 1.188 0.594 0.445 (-0.350, 1.538) 1.33 0.201 1.00
A*D -2.812 -1.406 0.445 (-2.350, -0.462) -3.16 0.006 1.00
B*C -1.062 -0.531 0.445 (-1.475, 0.413) -1.19 0.250 1.00
B*D 0.437 0.219 0.445 (-0.725, 1.163) 0.49 0.630 1.00
C*D 2.188 1.094 0.445 (0.150, 2.038) 2.46 0.026 1.00
A*B*C -4.563 -2.281 0.445 (-3.225, -1.337) -5.12 0.000 1.00
A*B*D 4.187 2.094 0.445 (1.150, 3.038) 4.70 0.000 1.00
A*C*D -1.563 -0.781 0.445 (-1.725, 0.163) -1.75 0.098 1.00
B*C*D -0.312 -0.156 0.445 (-1.100, 0.788) -0.35 0.730 1.00
A*B*C*D 1.937 0.969 0.445 (0.025, 1.913) 2.18 0.045 1.00

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Seq SS Contribution Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Model 15 1514.47 93.72% 1514.47 100.965 15.92 0.000
  Linear 4 858.12 53.10% 858.12 214.531 33.82 0.000
    A 1 586.53 36.30% 586.53 586.531 92.46 0.000
    B 1 26.28 1.63% 26.28 26.281 4.14 0.059

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 9

     C 1 87.78 5.43% 87.78 87.781 13.84 0.002
    D 1 157.53 9.75% 157.53 157.531 24.83 0.000
  2-Way Interactions 6 299.19 18.51% 299.19 49.865 7.86 0.000
    A*B 1 175.78 10.88% 175.78 175.781 27.71 0.000
    A*C 1 11.28 0.70% 11.28 11.281 1.78 0.201
    A*D 1 63.28 3.92% 63.28 63.281 9.98 0.006
    B*C 1 9.03 0.56% 9.03 9.031 1.42 0.250
    B*D 1 1.53 0.09% 1.53 1.531 0.24 0.630
    C*D 1 38.28 2.37% 38.28 38.281 6.03 0.026
  3-Way Interactions 4 327.12 20.24% 327.13 81.781 12.89 0.000
    A*B*C 1 166.53 10.31% 166.53 166.531 26.25 0.000
    A*B*D 1 140.28 8.68% 140.28 140.281 22.11 0.000
    A*C*D 1 19.53 1.21% 19.53 19.531 3.08 0.098
    B*C*D 1 0.78 0.05% 0.78 0.781 0.12 0.730
  4-Way Interactions 1 30.03 1.86% 30.03 30.031 4.73 0.045
    A*B*C*D 1 30.03 1.86% 30.03 30.031 4.73 0.045
Error 16 101.50 6.28% 101.50 6.344    
Total 31 1615.97 100.00%        
Regression Equation in Un-coded Units
Response = 82.469 - 4.281 A - 0.906 B - 1.656 C + 2.219 D + 2.344 A*B + 0.594 A*C 1.406 A*D - 0.531 B*C + 0.219 B*D + 1.094 C*D
- 2.281 A*B*C + 2.094 A*B*D - 0.781 A*C*D - 0.156 B*C*D + 0.969 A*B*C*D
Alias Structure
Factor Name
A A
B B
C C
D D

Aliases: I, A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, CD, ABC,ABD, ACD, BCD,ABCD

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Seq SS Contribution Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Model 12 1464.12 90.60% 1464.12 122.010 15.27 0.000
  Linear 4 858.12 53.10% 858.12 214.531 26.84 0.000
    A 1 586.53 36.30% 586.53 586.531 73.39 0.000
    B 1 26.28 1.63% 26.28 26.281 3.29 0.086
    C 1 87.78 5.43% 87.78 87.781 10.98 0.004

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 10

     D 1 157.53 9.75% 157.53 157.531 19.71 0.000
  2-Way Interactions 6 299.19 18.51% 299.19 49.865 6.24 0.001
    A*B 1 175.78 10.88% 175.78 175.781 22.00 0.000
    A*C 1 11.28 0.70% 11.28 11.281 1.41 0.249
    A*D 1 63.28 3.92% 63.28 63.281 7.92 0.011
    B*C 1 9.03 0.56% 9.03 9.031 1.13 0.301
    B*D 1 1.53 0.09% 1.53 1.531 0.19 0.667
    C*D 1 38.28 2.37% 38.28 38.281 4.79 0.041
  3-Way Interactions 2 306.81 18.99% 306.81 153.406 19.20 0.000
    A*B*C 1 166.53 10.31% 166.53 166.531 20.84 0.000
    A*B*D 1 140.28 8.68% 140.28 140.281 17.55 0.000
Error 19 151.84 9.40% 151.84 7.992    
  Lack-of-Fit 3 50.34 3.12% 50.34 16.781 2.65 0.085
    Pure Error 16 101.50 6.28% 101.50 6.344    
Total 31 1615.97 100.00%        

Regression Equation in Un-coded Units

Response = 82.469 - 4.281 A - 0.906 B - 1.656 C + 2.219 D + 2.344 A*B + 0.594 A*C - 1.406 A*D
- 0.531 B*C + 0.219 B*D + 1.094 C*D - 2.281 A*B*C + 2.094 A*B*D

[3 points]
b) Consider the data from the second replicate. Construct a design of two blocks of eight observations each
with ABCD confounded. Analyze the data. Compare your findings to a)
The effect of B, D, AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, CD are not significant since they all have p-value >0.0500 while that
of AB IS SLIGHTLY significant. All other effects are significant. This is not the same as the result obtained in

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 11

 (a) to a large extent Since only B, AC, BC, BD, and CD are not significant in (a) While D, AB and AD are
significant with other single factor effect too. Comparison of the residual and probability plots reveal this.
Aliases: I, Block 1 – ABCD, A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, ABC, ABD

Coded Coefficients
Term Effect Coef SE Coef 95% CI T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant   82.188 0.717 (79.905, 84.470) 114.60 0.000  
Blocks              
 1   -0.813 0.717 (-3.095, 1.470) -1.13 0.340 1.00
A -8.125 -4.063 0.717 (-6.345, -1.780) -5.66 0.011 1.00
B -1.875 -0.938 0.717 (-3.220, 1.345) -1.31 0.282 1.00
C -4.625 -2.313 0.717 (-4.595, -0.030) -3.22 0.048 1.00
D 2.875 1.438 0.717 (-0.845, 3.720) 2.00 0.139 1.00
A*B 3.625 1.813 0.717 (-0.470, 4.095) 2.53 0.086 1.00
A*C 0.875 0.438 0.717 (-1.845, 2.720) 0.61 0.585 1.00
A*D -0.625 -0.312 0.717 (-2.595, 1.970) -0.44 0.692 1.00
B*C 0.125 0.063 0.717 (-2.220, 2.345) 0.09 0.936 1.00
B*D 1.125 0.562 0.717 (-1.720, 2.845) 0.78 0.490 1.00
A*B*C -4.375 -2.188 0.717 (-4.470, 0.095) -3.05 0.055 1.00
A*B*D 4.625 2.313 0.717 (0.030, 4.595) 3.22 0.048 1.00
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) PRESS R-sq(pred) AICc BIC
2.86865 96.24% 81.20% 702.222 0.00% 500.35 91.16
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Seq SS Contribution Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Model 12 631.750 96.24% 631.750 52.646 6.40 0.076
  Blocks 1 10.563 1.61% 10.562 10.562 1.28 0.340
  Linear 4 396.750 60.44% 396.750 99.188 12.05 0.034
    A 1 264.063 40.23% 264.063 264.063 32.09 0.011
    B 1 14.063 2.14% 14.062 14.062 1.71 0.282
    C 1 85.563 13.03% 85.562 85.562 10.40 0.048
    D 1 33.063 5.04% 33.063 33.063 4.02 0.139
  2-Way Interactions 5 62.313 9.49% 62.313 12.463 1.51 0.389
    A*B 1 52.563 8.01% 52.563 52.563 6.39 0.086
    A*C 1 3.063 0.47% 3.063 3.063 0.37 0.585
    A*D 1 1.562 0.24% 1.563 1.563 0.19 0.692
    B*C 1 0.063 0.01% 0.063 0.063 0.01 0.936
    B*D 1 5.062 0.77% 5.062 5.062 0.62 0.490
  3-Way Interactions 2 162.125 24.70% 162.125 81.063 9.85 0.048
    A*B*C 1 76.563 11.66% 76.563 76.563 9.30 0.055
    A*B*D 1 85.563 13.03% 85.563 85.563 10.40 0.048
Error 3 24.687 3.76% 24.687 8.229    
Total 15 656.438 100.00%        
Regression Equation in Uncoded Units
Response = 82.188 - 4.063 A - 0.938 B - 2.313 C + 1.438 D + 1.813 A*B + 0.438 A*C - 0.312 A*D
+ 0.063 B*C + 0.562 B*D - 2.188 A*B*C + 2.313 A*B*D

Equation averaged over blocks.

Alias Structure
Factor Name
A A
B B

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 12

 C C
D D

Aliases : I, Block 1 – ABCD, A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, ABC, ABD

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 13

 c) Consider the data from the first replicate. Suppose we want to use the 24 −1 fractional factorial
[3 points]

design with I=ABCD instead. Set up the design and select the responses for the runs from the full
factorial data. Analyze the data and draw conclusions. Compare your findings with those from full
factorial in a) and the confounded in b).

Answer: Only A, C, ABD and BCD are not significant with other main effects and other
interactions significant with their confounding terms. See Aliases: I+ABCD, A+BCD, D + ABC,
AB + CD, AD +BC for this

Coded Coefficients
Term Effect Coef SE Coef 95% CI T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant   85.000 0.500 (82.849, 87.151) 170.00 0.000  
A -1.000 -0.500 0.500 (-2.651, 1.651) -1.00 0.423 1.00
B 4.000 2.000 0.500 (-0.151, 4.151) 4.00 0.057 1.00
D -12.000 -6.000 0.500 (-8.151, -3.849) -12.00 0.007 1.00
A*B -5.000 -2.500 0.500 (-4.651, -0.349) -5.00 0.038 1.00
A*D 6.000 3.000 0.500 (0.849, 5.151) 6.00 0.027 1.00
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Seq SS Contribution Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Model 5 444.000 99.11% 444.000 88.800 44.40 0.022
  Linear 3 322.000 71.87% 322.000 107.333 53.67 0.018
    A 1 2.000 0.45% 2.000 2.000 1.00 0.423
    B 1 32.000 7.14% 32.000 32.000 16.00 0.057
    D 1 288.000 64.29% 288.000 288.000 144.00 0.007
  2-Way Interactions 2 122.000 27.23% 122.000 61.000 30.50 0.032
    A*B 1 50.000 11.16% 50.000 50.000 25.00 0.038
    A*D 1 72.000 16.07% 72.000 72.000 36.00 0.027
Error 2 4.000 0.89% 4.000 2.000    
Total 7 448.000 100.00%        
Regression Equation in Uncoded Units
Response = 85.000 - 0.500 A + 2.000 B - 6.000 D - 2.500 A*B + 3.000 A*D

Alias Structure
Factor Name
A A
B B

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 14

 C C
D D

Aliases: I+ABCD, A+BCD, D + ABC, AB + CD, AD +BC

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 15

BUSURA Saheed Adekunle ID: 202090119 STAT 615 DOE Page 16