0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4K views6 pages

Homework #7, Sec 12.2

Similar linear transformations have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials. Two 2x2 matrices are similar if and only if they have the same characteristic polynomial. Two 3x3 matrices are similar if and only if they have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials. However, this is not true for 4x4 matrices which can have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials but not be similar. The minimal polynomial of a linear transformation has degree at most n^2 where n is the dimension of the vector space.

Uploaded by

Masaya Sato
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4K views6 pages

Homework #7, Sec 12.2

Similar linear transformations have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials. Two 2x2 matrices are similar if and only if they have the same characteristic polynomial. Two 3x3 matrices are similar if and only if they have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials. However, this is not true for 4x4 matrices which can have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials but not be similar. The minimal polynomial of a linear transformation has degree at most n^2 where n is the dimension of the vector space.

Uploaded by

Masaya Sato
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Section 12.2.

Homework #7 Masaya Sato

1. Prove that similar linear transformations of V (or n × n matrices) have the same charac-
teristic and the same minimal polynomials.
Proof. Let ϕ and ψ be similar transformations on V with representation matrices A and B,
resepectively. Then observe by assumption that there exists some invertible matrix T such
that
A = T −1 BT .
So for an indeterminate x
xI − A = xI − T −1 (B)T ⇒ xI − A = xT −1 T − T −1 (B)T
⇒ xI − A = T −1 (xI − B)T
and thus
det (xI − A) = det (T −1 (xI − B)T ) ⇒ det (xI − A) = det T (det T )−1 det (xI − B)
⇒ det (xI − A) = det (xI − B).
This shows that any similar linear transformations on V have the same characteristic polyno-
mial. Now let mϕ (x) be the minimal polynomial for the transformation ϕ, whose dimension
is m < n. By the division algorithm for polynomials there exist a unique pair of polynomials
q(x) adn r(x) such that
det (xI − B) = q(x)mϕ (x) + r(x),
where 0 ≤ deg r(x) ≤ m − 1. Since det (xI − A) = det (xI − B),
det (xI − A) = q(x)mϕ (x) + r(x).
By minimality of mϕ (x), r(x) is the zero polynomial. Moreover,
0 = det (BI − B) = q(B)mϕ (B)
and therefore mϕ (B) = 0 since F [x] is an integral domain. Hence mϕ (x) is also the minimal
polynomial for the transformation ψ.
3. Prove that two 2 × 2 matrices over F which are not scalar matrices are similar if and only
if they have the same characteristic polynomial.
Proof. (⇒) Suppose that 2 × 2 non-scalar matrices A and B are similar. Then by result
from Exercise 1, A and B share the common characteristic polynomial.
(⇐) Conversely suppose that A and B have the same characteristic polynomial p(x) of
degree 2, i.e. p(x) = x2 + ax + b, where a, b ∈ F . Observe that p(x) is not of the form
p(x) = (x − λ)2 , where λ ∈ F , since A and B are non-scalar matrices. Thus p(x) is also the
minimal polynomial. Therefore both A and B are similar to the companion matrix
 
0 −b
1 −a
and hence A and B are similar.

Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote 1


Section 12.2. Homework #7 Masaya Sato

4. Prove that two 3 × 3 matrices are similar if and only if they have the same characteristic
and same minimal polynomials. Give an explicit counterexample to this assertion for 4 × 4
matrices.
Proof. (⇒) Suppose that 3 × 3 matrices A and B are similar. So, similar to Exercise 3, A
and B have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials by result from Exercise 1.
(⇐) Conversely suppose that A and B have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials,
p(x) and m(x). Observe that deg p(x) = 3 and consider the following 3 cases.
Case 1. Suppose that deg m(x) = 1. Then m(x) = x − a and p(x) = (x − a)3 for some a ∈ F .
So invariant factors are ai (x) = x − a for i = 1, 2, 3.
Case 2. Suppose that deg m(x) = 2. Then there exists some linear factor a1 (x) = x − a,
where a ∈ F , such that (x − a)m(x) = p(x). Moreover a2 (x) = m(x).
Case 3. Suppose that deg m(x) = 3. Then a1 (x) = p(x) = m(x).
In any cases discussed above, the characteristic and minimal polynomial uniquely determine
invariant factors. Therefore A and B have the same rational canonical form and hence A
and B are similar.
In terms of a counterexample for 4 × 4 matrices, consider the following distinct lists of
invariant factors

(i) a1 (x) = x, a2 (x) = x, a3 (x) = x2 , and

(ii) a1 (x) = x2 and a2 (x) = x2 .

Observe that both (i) and (ii) have the same characteristic and minimal polynomials x4 and
x2 , respectively. For (i), the matrix is given by
 
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
 
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0

and, and on the other hand (ii) gives the matrix


 
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
 .
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0

However those matrices are not similar.


5. Prove directly from the fact that the collection of all linear transformations of an n
dimensional vector space V over F to itself form a vector space over F of dimension n2 that
the minimal polynomial of a linear transformation T has degree at most n2 .

Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote 2


Section 12.2. Homework #7 Masaya Sato

Proof. For an arbitrarily taken linear transformation ϕ on V , let A = (aij ) denote the
representation matrix for ϕ, where 1 ≤ i ≤ n and 1 ≤ j ≤ n. Moreover let Eij be an n × n
matrix defined by (
1 at the (i, j) entry
Eij =
0 elsewhere .
Then n
X
A= aij Eij
i,j=1

and thus A is generated by the set {Eij ∈ Mn×n (F )}ni,j=1 . Moreover for cij ∈ F the following
equation
Xn
cij Eij = 0,
i,j=1

where 0 is the zero matrix, has only the trivial solution since
n
X
cij Eij = 0 ⇒ C = 0 [∵ C = (cij )]
i,j=1

⇒ cij = 0

for all i = 1, . . . , n and j = 1, . . . , n. Therefore {Eij ∈ Mn×n (F )}ni,j=1 is linearly indepen-


dent and a basis for a vector space of dimension n2 . This indicates that the characteristic
polynomial is of degree n2 and therefore the degree of its minimal polynomial is at most
n2 .
6. Prove that the constant term in the characteristic polynomial of the n × n matrix A is
(−1)n det A and that the coefficient of xn−1 is the negative of the sum of the diagonal entries
of A (the sum of the diagonal entries of A is called the trace of A). Prove that det A is the
product of the eigenvalues of A and that the trace of A is the sum of the eigenvalues of A.
Proof. For an n × n matrix A its characteristic polynomial is given by det (xI − A). Then

det (xI − A) = xn + an−1 xn−1 + · · · + a1 x + a0 ,

which is the monic polynomial of degree n. Evaluating the above identity in terms of the
indeterminate x at x = 0 ∈ F ,

a0 = det (−A) = (−1)n det A.

On the other hand, the expansion of det (xI − A) gives


X
det (xI − A) = (σ)(xδσ(1)1 − aσ(1)1 ) · · · (xδσ(n)n − aσ(n)n ),
σ∈Sn

Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote 3


Section 12.2. Homework #7 Masaya Sato

dn−1
where δij denotes the Kronecker delta. Moreover, applying nth derivative dxn−1
to both sides
of the identity and comparing the constant terms,
−((n − 1)!)a11 − · · · − ((n − 1)!)ann = ((n − 1)!)an−1 ⇒ −((n − 1)!)(Tr(A)) = ((n − 1)!)an−1
⇒ an−1 = −Tr(A).
The argument above implies that for eigenvalues λ1 , . . . , λn of A
det (λI − A) = xn + (λ1 + · · · + λn )xn−1 + · · · + a1 x + (λ1 · · · λn ).
Therefore n
X
Tr(A) = λi
i=1
and n
Y
det A = λi .
i=1

8. Verify that the characteristic polynomial of the companion matrix


 
0 0 0 ··· 0 −a0
1 0 0 · · · 0 −a1 
 
0 1 0 · · · 0 −a2 
 
 .. .. .. .. .. 
. . . . . 
0 0 0 ··· 1 −an−1
is
xn + an−1 xn−1 + · · · a1 x + a0 .
Proof. For an indeterminate x observe first that xI − A is given by
 
x 0 0 ··· 0 a0
−1 x 0 ··· 0 a1 
 
 0 −1 x ··· 0 a2 
 ,
 .. .. .. .. .. 
 . . . . . 
0 0 0 · · · −1 x + an−1
where A denotes the companion matrix. By induction on the size n of the matrix, suppose
that n = 2. Then det (xI − A) = x2 + a1 x + a0 . So now suppose that the det (xI − A) has
the desired polynomial for n. Then for n + 1
 
x 0 0 ··· 0 a0
−1 x 0 · · · 0 a1 
 
 0 −1 x · · · 0 a2 
 
 .. .. .. .. .. 
 . . . . . 
 
0 0 0 ··· x an−1 
0 0 0 · · · −1 x + an

Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote 4


Section 12.2. Homework #7 Masaya Sato

and the expansion along the 1st column gives the determinant of minors, i.e.

det (xI − A) = (−1)1+1 x det Ã11 + (−1)2+1 (−1) det Ã21 ,

where Ã11 and Ã21 denote cofactors. Then

det Ã11 = x(xn + an xn−1 + · · · + a1 ) = xn+1 + an xn + · · · + a1 x.

To evaluate det Ã21 , keep expanding along the 1st column and then

det Ã21 = a0 .

Therefore det (xI − A) = xn+1 + an xn + · · · + a1 x + a0 as desired.


11. Find all similarity classes of 6 × 6 matrices over C with characteristic polynomial
(x4 − 1)(x2 − 1).
Solution: Observe that the characteristic polynomial (x4 −1)(x2 −1) factors into irreducibles
in C[x] as (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)2 (x + 1)2 . To find all similarity classes, consider their minimal
polynomials m(x). Since m(x) and (x4 − 1)(x2 − 1) have the same roots, the candidates for
m(x) are (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)(x + 1), (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)2 (x + 1), (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)(x + 1)2 ,
and (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)2 (x + 1)2 . So consider all 4 cases given above.
Case 1. Suppose that m(x) = (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)(x + 1). Then the invariant factors are
a1 (x) = (x − 1)(x + 1) and a2 (x) = m(x).
Case 2. Suppose that m(x) = (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)2 (x + 1). Then the invariant factors are
a1 (x) = x + 1 and a2 (x) = m(x).
Case 3. Suppose that m(x) = (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)(x + 1)2 . Then the invariant factors are
a1 (x) = x − 1 and a2 (x) = m(x).
Case 4. Suppose that m(x) = (x − i)(x + i)(x − 1)2 (x + 1)2 . Then a1 (x) = m(x) is the only
invariant factor.
Therefore, according the classification discussed above, there are 4 similarity classes.
17. Determine representatives for the conjugacy classes for GL3 (F2 ). [Compare your answer
with Theorem 15 and Proposition 14 of Chapter 6.]
Solution: For F2 [x], since the only nonzero element in F2 is 1,
(i) F2 [x]/(x − 1) ⊕ F2 [x]/((x − 1)2 ),

(ii) F2 [x]/(x − 1) ⊕ F2 [x]/(x − 1) ⊕ F2 [x]/(x − 1), and

(iii) F2 [x]/(Q(x)), where Q is a cubic polynomial.


For (i) and (ii), the corresponding matrices are given by
   
1 0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 and 0 1 0 , respectively.
0 1 1 0 0 1

Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote 5


Section 12.2. Homework #7 Masaya Sato

Then for (iii) let Q(x) = x3 + ax2 + bx + 1. The matrix is given by


 
0 0 1
1 0 −b  .
0 1 −a

Classifying Q(x) as the product of primes factors, Q(x) has the following forms.

(1) x3 + x + 1,

(2) x3 + x2 + 1,

(3) (x − 1)(x2 + x + 1), and

(4) (x − 1)3 .

Therefore from (1) to (4) the matrices are given by


       
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
1 0 1 , 1 0
  0 , 0 0 1 , and 1 1 0 .
0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1

18. Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over Q and suppose T is nonsingular linear
transformation of V such that T −1 = T 2 + T . Prove that the dimension of V is divisible by
3. If the dimension of V is precisely 3 prove that all such transformations T are similar.
Proof. Let V be an n dimensional vector space over Q. Observe that T −1 = T 2 + T implies
T 3 + T 2 − I = 0. So the minimal polynomial m(x) is given by

m(x) = x3 + x2 − 1,

which is irreducible. Therefore

V ∼
= Q[x]/(m(x)) ⊕ · · · ⊕ Q[x]/(m(x)),

where each quotient space is 3 dimensional. Hence the dimension of V is 3k for some k ∈ Z>0
as desired.
Now suppose that V is 3 dimensional. Then

V ∼
= Q[x]/(m(x)).

So all nonsingular linear transformations T satisfying T −1 = T 2 +T have the same companion


matrix because m(x) is also the characteristic polynomial for T . Thus all such T ’s are
similar.

Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote 6

You might also like