Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    6 12

    Uploaded by

    C

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    6 12

    Uploaded by

    C
    18 views2 pages

    Original Title

    6.12

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    18 views2 pages

    6 12

    Uploaded by

    C

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Financial statement effects of depreciation—straight-line versus accelerated methods  Assume that a company chooses an accelera

    expense for financial statement reporting purposes for an asset with a five-year life.

    Required:
    State the effect (higher, lower, no effect) of accelerated depreciation relative to straight-line depreciation on:
    (Higher, Lower, or No Effect?)
    A. Depreciation expense in the first year
    Depreciation expense in the first year would be higher using the accelerated method relative to the s

    B. The asset's net book value after two years


    The asset's net book value after two years would be lower using the accelerated method relative to th

    C. Cash flows from operations (excluding income taxes)


    Cash flows from operations would have no effect using the accelerated method relative to the straigh
    t a company chooses an accelerated method of calculating depreciation
    sset with a five-year life.

    r, Lower, or No Effect?)

    celerated method relative to the straight-line method.

    e accelerated method relative to the straight-line method.

    ated method relative to the straight-line method.

    You might also like