Samartlis Jurnali: Journal of Law
Samartlis Jurnali: Journal of Law
Samartlis Jurnali: Journal of Law
universiteti
iuridiuli fakulteti
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
Faculty of Law
samarTlis Jurnali
Journal of Law
#1, 2009
Tbilisi, Tbilisi
1
mTavari redaqtori Editor-in-Chief
besarion zoiZe (prof., Tsu) Besarion Zoidze (Prof., TSU)
ISSN 1987-76-68
2
sarCevi
Table of Contents
redaqtorisagan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
mecniereba
SCIENCE
giorgi daviTaSvili
Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Giorgi Davitashvili
Complicity in Georgian Habitual Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
guram naWyebia
danaSauli bralis ori formiT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Guram Nachkebia
Crime with Two Forms of Guilt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
lado Wanturia
evropis kerZo sazogadoeba — siaxle evropis sakorporacio samarTalSi . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Lado Chanturia
European Private Company – Novelty in the European Company Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
giorgi TumaniSvili
policiis saqmianobis ZiriTadi principebi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Giorgi Tumanishvili
The Basic Principles of Police Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
mzia dundua
deliqturi pasuxismgeblobisa da saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis
Tanafardoba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Mzia Dundua
Correlation Between Tort and Contractual Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
giorgi kaxiani
abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi saqarTvelos sakonstitucio
sasamarTlos saqmianobaSi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Giorgi Kakhiani
The Problems of Abstract Control of Norms within the Framework of the Activities
of the Constitutional Court of Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
qeTevan qoCaSvili
brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
(SedarebiTsamarTlebrivi kvleva) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78
Ketevan Kochashvili
Fault – as a Condition of Civil Liability
(Comparative Law Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3
gulnaz galdava
samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da saSualebebi saqarTvelos
samoqalaqo kodeqsis mixedviT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
Gulnaz Galdava
The Forms and Means of Protection of Civil Rights According to the Civil Code of Georgia . . . . . . . . . . 116
naTia CitaSvili
bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis
gansazRvrisTvis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Natia Chitashvili
Importance of Fault for the Determination of Contractual Liability (Comparative Analysis
of the Principles of European Contract Law and German and Georgian Legislation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
devi xvedeliani
anderZiT memkvidreoba da masTan dakavSirebuli problemebi saqarTvelos
saerTaSoriso kerZo samarTlis mixedviT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
Devi Khvedeliani
Testamentary Succession and Related Thereto Conflict of Law Problems
According to the International Private Law of Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
Targmani
TRANSLATION
klaus hopti
korporaciuli marTva evropaSi: regulirebis axali modeli da
`rbili samarTali~
Targmna irakli burdulma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
Klaus J. Hopt
Corporate Governance in Europe: New Model of Regulation and “Soft Law”
translated by Irakli Burduli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
4
redaqtorisagan
5
6
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
giorgi daviTaSvili
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis sruli profesori
Sesavali
1
Косвен М., Преступление и наказание в догосударственном обществе, М., 1925, 130. msgavs cnobas aWaraSi Ca-
weril masalebSic vxvdebiT. mag., erT-erTi aWareli informatoris cnobiT: `Tu uSualod mkvleli ver
moixelTes, mis Tanmxlebs moklavdnen. magram orives arcerT SemTxvevaSi ar moklavdnen.~ (kekelia m.,
masalebi aWarul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1989, 18).
7
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
2
kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #6, 1977, 27.
3
jalabaZe d., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 41-42.
4
merabiSvili j., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 47.
5
iqve, 75.
6
kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 42.
8
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
SuRli da carieli xeliT gaartyes erTimeores. mangianT mamisave kaci iyo wiqa
(metsaxelad brucas eZaxdnen). mas sami Svili hyavda: niko, Calxia da baTika. mgelias
erTi Zmac yavda, vaJkacad qebuli samuka. Cxubrem jer mgelias sca da memre mTel
mangianT dauwyo gineba..... mere ki samukamac dakra Cxubres, brucaT nikom xanjari
dakra Cxubres da Calxiam joxi imave naxanjralSi. Cxubre wavida Sin da TandaTan
tkivili dauwyo naxanjralma da najoxarma Tavma. daayenes soflisa eqimi,
dauCirqda Tavi da gardaicvala... Cxubre rom gardaicvala, saWiro gaxda rigis
yeneba, gaxda saardaraod. bruca ambobda: Cemma Svilebma mgeliais gulisad
iSuRles, mere magaTma naWrevma arc mokla, samukamac dakra joxi da iman moklao.
samuka eubneboda: marTalia, Cvenis gulisad iSuRles, magram drama da
sisxlisaTvis gaZRola xels misdevs, me arc damikravs rame CxubresTviso......~7
rogorc magaliTidan Cans, Cxubres winaaRmdeg moSuRlar naTesavebs Soris sadavo
gamxdara, Tu vis unda ekisra pasuxismgebloba momxdari mkvlelobisaTvis. es
garemoeba miuTiTebs imas, rom xevsureTSi gadamwyveti mniSvneloba hqonda
mkvlelobis uSualo Camdenis gamovlenas. SuRlis erT-erTi monawilis fraza:
`drama da sisxlisaTvis gaZRola xels misdevs~ (e.i., mkvlelobisaTvis sisxlis
fasis, qonebrivi sazRauris gadaxda da amasTan dakavSirebuli xevsuruli
`rjuliT~ gaTvaliswinebuli wesebis Sesruleba mxolod imis valdebulebaa, visi
xeliTac sasikvdilo Wrilobis miyeneba xdeba), niSnavs, rom jgufuri mkvlelobis
SemTxvevaSi, xevsuruli `rjuliT~, pasuxismgebloba mkvlelobisaTvis ekisreba
mxolod da mxolod sasikvdilo Wrilobis mimyenebels.8 sxva Tanaamsruleblebs,
rogorc zemoT moyvanil erT-erT cnobaSi gamoCnda, SeiZleboda pasuxi egoT maT
mier, sasikvdilo Wrilobis garda, miyenebuli sxva WrilobebisaTvis, Tu aseTi
aRmoCndeboda (rac damoukidebel danaSaulad unda CaiTvalos), maTi Sesatyvisi
qonebrivi sazRauris gadaxdiT da ara mkvlelobisaTvis.
zemoT moyvanili cnobebi da konkretuli magaliTi, romlebic xevsurul
sinamdviles asaxavs, Cveni azriT, kargad warmoaCens mkvlelobis, rogorc kerZo
deliqtis, bunebas xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalSi. swored amiT unda aixsnas,
jgufuri mkvlelobis SemTxvevaSi, mkvlelobisaTvis mxolod zianis (am SemTxvevaSi
sasikvdilo Wrilobis) mimyeneblis pasuxismgebloba.
7
oCiauri a., piradi arqivi, 7/10, mosisxleoba xevsureTSi, xelnaweri, 112-113; a. oCiauris piradi arqivi
inaxeba saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa akademiis iv. javaxiSvilis saxelobis istoriisa da eTnologiis
institutis arqivSi.
8
roca vsaubrobT xevsureTSi jgufuri mkvlelobisas mxolod sasikvdilo Wrilobis mimyeneblis
pasuxismgeblobaze, vgulisxmobT swored am pirovnebis axlonaTesauri jgufis pasuxismgeblobas,
radganac xevsureTSi, mkvlelobis SemTxvevaSi, danaSaulis subieqtad ara calkeuli pirovneba, aramed
swored es jgufi (mkvlelobis Camdenis gvaris Semadgeneli struqturuli erTeuli — mamiSviloba)
gvevlineba. amitom dazaralebuli mxaris mier SurisZiebis aqtis ganxorcielebisas ar unda
gamovricxoT uSualo mkvlelis axlo naTesavis SesaZlo sapasuxo mkvleloba, romelic SurisZiebis
obieqtTa wreSi Sedis, gansakuTrebiT im SemTxvevaSi, Tu uSualo mkvlels ver moklavdnen. es
mkvleloba ganxiluli unda iyos uSualo mkvlelis pasuxismgeblobis konteqstSi. igi CaiTvleboda
sapasuxo mkvlelobad, rac wina mkvlelobas `gabrida~. Tu uSualo mkvlelis Tanaamsrulebeli, amave
dros, SurisZiebis obieqtTa wreSi Semavali misi axlo naTesavi iyo, aseT SemTxvevaSi romel maTganze
iZiebdnen Surs moklulis naTesavebi, amas samarTlebrivi mniSvneloba ar hqonda da sapasuxo mkvle-
lobad CaiTvleboda. (Tumca, pirvel rigSi, cxadia, mkvlelis mokvlas cdilobdnen). Tu moklulis
naTesavebi uSualo mkvlelis aranaTesav Tanaamsrulebels moklavdnen, maSin, xevsuruli `rjulis~
principebidan gamomdinare, moklulis naTesavebi ar CaTvlidnen amas sapasuxo mkvlelobad da
SeuZleblad miiCnevdnen am mkvlelobaTa `urTierTgabras~. am SemTxvevaSi SesaZlebelia warmoq-
mniliyo axali mesisxleoba.
9
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
9
jalabaZe d., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 41-42.
10
merabiSvili j., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 75.
11
oCiauri a., piradi arqivi, 6/5, Wra-Wriloba xevsureTSi, 57.
12
`rigis yeneba~ mkvlelobis saqmeze mxareTa Serigebis sakmaod rTuli da xangrZlivi procesia,
romelic xevsurulma `rjulma~ Seqmna, rogorc sisxlis aRebis alternatiuli meqanizmi. rigis yeneba
aferxebs SurisZiebas da arcTu iSviaTad mkvlelis mxare, romelic rigs uyenebs moklulis mxares da
saTanadod Seasrulebs masTan dakavSirebul yvela moTxovnas (aseve Serigebis procesis sxva kom-
ponentebs), aRwevs sisxlis aRebis Tavidan acilebas da didi droisa da xangrZlivi Zalisxmevis Semdeg
xdeba mxareTa saboloo Serigeba. rigis yeneba gulisxmobs yovelwliurad daTqmul dRes (es unda iyos
romelime dReoba) moklulis ojaxisaTvis mkvlelis mier saklavis gagzavnas, sanam ar moxdeba mxareTa
saboloo Serigeba. aseve arsebobs sxvadasxva saxis rigi, romelTac mkvlelis naTesavebi erTjeradad
uxdian moklulis naTesavebs. esenia: sagvaro rigi, saZmo rigi, sadedo rigi, samamido rigi, sado rigi.
13
`pirSesamyrelo~ — moklulis salocavSi (`jvarSi~) mkvlelisa da moklulis biZaSvilebis, Semdeg
ojaxis wevrebis Serigebis ceremoniali. pirSesamyrelo mkvlelis Semosarigebladac tardeboda.
14
`pativi~ — mkvlelis axloblebis mier moklulis axloblebisadmi xaTris gaweva, rac gansazRvruli
wesebis Sesrulebas gulisxmobs.
15
`Tavis gaTaveba~ — mxareTa saboloo Serigeba, rac SesaZloa, mkvlelobidan mravali aTeuli wlis
Semdeg momxdariyo. Tavis gaTavebis ceremonialis Semdeg sabolood wydeboda yovelwliuri rigis
yeneba da mkvlelis naTesavebisaTvis moklulis naTesavebis mimarT pativis valdebuleba.
10
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
16
mxedvelobaSi araa arasasikvdilo Wrilobis mimyenebeli is Tanaamsrulebeli, romelic sasikvdilo
Wrilobis mimyeneblis axlo naTesavia da isedac Sevidoda sisxlis aRebis uSualo obieqtTa wreSi,
Tanaamsrulebelic rom ar yofiliyo.
17
sainteresoa, rom xevsuruli `rjuliT~, xelCasamrTaos ara mxolod jgufuri mkvlelobisas
arasasikvdilo Wrilobis mimyenebeli mkvlelobis Tanaamsrulebeli ixdida, aramed is pirovnebac,
romelmac arasasikvdilo Wriloba mokluls sasikvdilo Wrilobis mimyeneblisagan damoukideblad
miayena, sxva drosa da viTarebaSi, ara rogorc misma Tanaamsrulebelma. xevsureTSi xSiri iyo
SemTxveva, rodesac daWrili im Wrilobis miyenebidan, romelmac misi sikvdili gamoiwvia, garkveuli
drois Semdeg gardaicvleboda. Tu am Wrilobis miyenebis Semdeg, daWrilis gardacvalebamde, vinme
sxvac miayenebda mas Wrilobas, isic ixdida xelCasamrTaos. a. oCiauris masalebSi gvxvdeba kon-
kretuli SemTxveva, romelic adasturebs zemoT Tqmuls: erTma adamianma meores miayena Wriloba.
garkveuli drois Semdeg dazaralebuli gardaicvala, Tumca Wrilobis mimyenebelma uari ganacxada,
pasuxi ego misi mkvlelobisaTvis im motiviT, rom gardacvlils mis mier Wrilobis miyenebamde imave
adgilas adre hqonia sxva Wriloba miyenebuli, romelic daCirqda da gaxda daWrilis gardacvalebis
mizezi, mis mier miyenebuli Wriloba ki umniSvnelo iyo da mas ar SeeZlo, daWrilis gardacvaleba
gamoewvia. saqmis sasamarTlo ganxilvisas man es Tavisi pozicia ficiT daamtkica, aseve daWrilis
mkurnalma adgilobrivma eqimmac daadastura es da amitom sasamarTlom (`rjulma~) igi gaamarTla,
Tumca 5 Zroxa xelCasamrTaos gadaxda daakisra (a. oCiauri, piradi arqivi, 6/7, Wra-Wriloba
xevsureTSi, xelnaweri, 82-84). es magaliTic amtkicebs, rom xelCasamrTaos gadaxda mkvlelobisaTvis
gaTvaliswinebuli wesiT pasuxismgeblobas ar niSnavs. xelCasamrTaos gadamxdeli mkvlelobisaTvis
gaTvaliswinebuli wesiT pasuxismgeblobisagan sruliad gaTavisuflda, is arc gaxiznula, arc rigi
uyenebia da sxva. rogorc Cans, xelCasamrTaos xevsureTSi maSin ixdidnen, rodesac mokluls, sa-
11
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
sikvdilo Wrilobis garda, sxva arasasikvdilo Wrilobac eqneboda miyenebuli, rogorc imave SuRlSi,
rodesac mas sasikvdilo Wriloba miayenes, aseve Semdgomac (cxadia, es im SemTxvevaSi moxdeboda, Tu
sasikvdilo Sedegi sasikvdilo Wrilobis miyenebidan garkveuli drois Semdeg dadgeboda).
18
oCiauri a., piradi arqivi, 7/11, mosisxleoba xevsureTSi, xelnaweri, 128-129.
12
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
19
iqve, 6/5, Wra-Wriloba xevsureTSi, xelnaweri, 56.
20
kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 42.
13
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
21
iqve, #6, 1977, 42.
22
an mis uaxloes naTesavze, romelic SurisZiebis obieqtTa wreSi Sedis.
23
oCiauri a., piradi arqivi, samamo miwismflobelobis Sesaxeb xevsureTSi, xelnaweri, 1953, rveuli #3,
31-32.
14
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
24
svaneTSi wors uwodeben mkvlelobisaTvis gansazRvrul gadasaxads, sisxlis fass.
25
kekelia m., masalebi svanur CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #2, 1968, 43-44.
26
iqve, #6, 1969, 25; 5, 1968-1969, 42.
27
iqve, #2, 1968, 43.
15
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
28
iqve, #1, 1967, 7. masalebis mixedviT, mkvlelobis Casadenad Tu vinme wavidoda, damxmared, ZiriTadad,
Tavisi axlo naTesavi mihyavda.
29
iqve, 63.
30
iqve, #2, 1968, 44; 5, 1968-1969, 42; 6, 52.
31
iqve, #6, 1969, 52.
16
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
32
Ковалевский М., Современный обычай и древний закон, М., 1886, 93.
33
zoiZe o., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 75.
34
merabiSvili j., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 48.
35
jalabaZe d., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 36.
36
kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #5, 1977, 12.
37
jalabaZe d., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 18, 36;
merabiSvili j., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 20, 81;
kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #5, 1977, 12; makalaTia
s., xevsureTi, Tb., 1984, 95. Zroxa xevsureTSi qonebrivi sazRauris gadaxdis ZiriTadi ekvivalenti iyo.
38
xaraZe r., xevsuruli rjuli, `analebi~, t. I, 1947, 188; kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT
samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #6, 1977, 9.
39
vaJa-fSavela, Txz. sruli krebuli aT tomad, t. IX, 1964, 76.
17
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
40
kovalevski m., dasax. naSromi, 106-107.
41
iqve, 107.
42
merabiSvili j., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli, 1988, 20.
43
gaburi b., xevsuruli masalebi, qarTuli saenaTmecniero sazogadoebis weliwdeuli, I-II, 1923-1924,
142.
44
xaraZe r., xevsuruli rjuli, `analebi~, t. I, 1947, 188; a. oCiauri, xevsuruli rjuli, xelnaweri, 1945,
rveuli #3, 35-36; jalabaZe d., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli,
1988, 18, 36; kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #5, 1977, 12;
eTnografiuli rveuli #6, 42-43.
18
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
iaraRis mimcems an enis mimtans edeba arbiTi, magram, rogorc Cans, Tu aRmoCndeba,
rom enis mimtani tyuoda da ar gamarTlda, da rasac igi abralebda mokluls,
sinamdvileSi ar yofila, mkvlels SeuZlia, igi sisxlSi CarTos, e.i. mkvlelma
TviTon daados naxevari Tavi, e.i., Tu mkvlelma imarjva, Tavisas miaRwevs da
CarTavs sisxlSi. arbiTi am SemTxvevaSi aRar gadaxdeba, radgan igi sisxlSi iqneba
CarTuli.~45 am cnobiT dasturdeba, rom, `rogorc wesi~, enis mimtani arbiTs ga-
daixdida, Tumca, Tu aRmoCndeboda, rom enis mimtanma Segnebulad cru informacia
miutana mkvlels, SesaZloa, mkvlelis zemoqmedebiT, enis mimtani misi Tanamoziare
gamxdariyo Tavsisxlis gadaxdaSi. ramdenad xSiri iyo aseTi faqti, Zneli saT-
qmelia, saTanado cnobebis arqonis gamo. SeiZleba vivaraudoT, rom es calkeul,
gamonaklis SemTxvevebSi Tu moxdeboda, mkvlelis SesaZleblobebidan gamomdinare.
masalebiT dasturdeba arbiTis gadaxda SuRlis wamomwyebis mierac, ro-
desac erTi daiwyebda Cxubs, mere gamoecleboda moCxubrebs, am Cxubs ki Sedegad
mkvleloba, an daWra mohyveboda.46
zemoT motanili masalebi aSkarad miuTiTebs, rom xevsureTSi danaSauleb-
rivi Sedegis dadgomis SemTxvevaSi, danaSaulis maprovocirebeli, kerZod,
damnaSavisaTvis enis mimtani, iaraRis mimcemi, Cxubis damwyebi, ZiriTadad, arbiTis
gadaxdiT agebda pasuxs. xevsuruli `rjuli~ maT danaSaulis Tanamonawileebad
moiazrebs, radganac arbiTis gadaxda swored mkvlelobis Tu daWris CadenaSi maT
garkveul monawileobas ukavSirdeba. Tumca sakiTxavia, ramdenad SeiZleba, aq saqme
gvqondes TanamonawileobasTan, Tanamedrove gagebiT; SesaZlebelia Tu ara, enis
mimtani, Tofis mimcemi an, Tundac, Cxubis damwyebi CaiTvalos wamqezeblad?
Tanamedrove gagebiT, wamqezebeli aris piri, romelic sxvas daiyoliebs swored
ganzraxi danaSaulis Casadenad. enis mimtanis, iaraRis mimcemis wamqezeblad
ganxilva SeiZleba maSin, rodesac enis mitanis, iaraRis gadacemis mizani iqneba,
danaSaulis Cadenisaken ubiZgos adamians, anu enis mimtans, iaraRis mimcems aseTi
ganzraxva eqneba da amisaTvis agebs pasuxs. masalebis mixedviT, es garemoeba
gamokveTilad ar Cans. enis mitanis, iaraRis micemis Sedegad Tu danaSauli
iqneboda Cadenili, enis mimtani, iaraRis mimcemi ixdida arbiTs, savaraudod,
maSinac, roca ena miitana, iaraRi gadasca raime boroti ganzraxvis gareSe da,
SesaZloa, arc fiqrobda, rom mis mier enis mitanas, iaraRis gadacemas danaSauli
mohyveboda da maSinac, rodesac igi amas akeTebda swored im mizniT, rom visTanac
ena mihqonda, visac iaraRs aZlevda, mas danaSauli Caedina. aqedan gamomdinare,
Cveni azriT, enis mimtani, iaraRis mimcemi ar SeiZleba klasikuri saxiT CaiTvalos
wamqezeblad, radganac xevsuruli `rjuli~ mniSvnelobas ar aniWebs enis mimtanis
Tu iaraRis mimcemis ganzraxvas danaSaulis CadenasTan mimarTebiT da nebismier
SemTxvevaSi akisrebs mas arbiTis gadaxdas danaSaulebrivi Sedegis dadgomisas.
ganzraxvis gareSe, mis gauTvaliswineblad ki, Tanamedrove gagebiT, Tanamonawi-
leoba, aseve wamqezebloba ar xdeba.
rogorc davinaxeT, m. kovalevski sxvisi iaraRiT mkvlelobisas iaraRis
mkvlelisaTvis gadamcems avtomaturad ganixilavs wamqezeblad, radganac Tvlis,
rom iaraRis Txovebis mizani, ZiriTadad, danaSaulis Cadenis waqezeba iyo. aseTi
midgoma sakiTxisadmi arasworad migvaCnia. ratom ar SeiZleba danaSauli Cadenili
yofiliyo sxvisi iaraRiT, magram iaraRis patrons azradac ar hqonoda, rom misi
45
kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #6, 42-43.
46
xaraZe r., xevsuruli rjuli, `analebi~, t. I, 1947, 188; kekelia m., masalebi xevsurul CveulebiT
samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #5, 1977, 12.
19
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
47
oCiauri a., piradi arqivi, xevsuruli rjuli, xelnaweri, 1945, rveuli #3, 36.
20
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
48
iqve.
49
kekelia m., masalebi svanur CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #1, 1967, 24, 61; #5, 10.
50
iqve, #5, 1968-1969, 31.
21
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
51
iqve, #1, 1967, 64.
52
iqve, 12-13.
53
am magaliTSi saqme gvaqvs Tofis patronis daudevrobasTan da danaSaulis (mkvlelobis) araganzrax,
SemTxveviT CadenasTan. rogorc Cans, svanur CveulebiT samarTalSi araganzraxi danaSaulis
SemTxvevaSic SesaZlebeli iyo piris danaSaulSi Tanamonawiled ganxilva, misi daudevari moqmedebis
gamo, rasac mohyva danaSaulebrivi Sedegi da misTvis pasuxismgeblobis dakisreba.
54
kekelia m., masalebi svanur CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #1, 1967, 64.
22
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
daskvna
55
mxedvelobaSia sabWoTa maneTi e. w. Zveli kursiT —1961 wlis fulis reformamde.
56
kekelia m., masalebi svanur CveulebiT samarTalze, eTnografiuli rveuli #7, 1970, 53.
57
iqve, #1, 1967, 35, 70.
58
iqve, 35.
23
g. daviTaSvili, Tanamonawileobis sakiTxi qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi
24
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
GIORGI DAVITASHVILI
Full Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
The institution of complicity in Georgian habitual law is analyzed on the basis of ethnographic
findings collected in Khvesureti and Svaneti in the twentieth century.
According to the data on hand, Khevsuretian justice would hold liable not only a perpetrator, but
also the other persons, who were related to the commission of a crime: a co-perpetrator, a person
who lent the weapon the crime was committed with, a perpetrator, a slanderer – when the crime
was committed due to slandering, etc. The foregoing evidences the existence of the elements of the
institution of complicity in Khevsureti. This is a certain derogation from the principle of objective
imputation, under which principle only the direct inflictor of a damage, the one who caused the
consequences of a crime, is to be held liable. However, the principle of objective imputation has an
essential impact on the institution of complicity.
In Khevsureti, only the person who personally committed a crime (e.g. the one, who did the
wounding to death in the case of homicide) was held liable. A co-perpetrator in murder was
required to pay khelchasamrtao (payment for giving a hand in a crime), which was not included
into the composition provided for homicide, whilst an accomplice was not supposed to observe the
rules imposed on a person held liable for a homicide, i.e. he was not subject to sanctions which
were envisaged for the crime he was an accomplice in. The same can be said about a slanderer and
a lender of a weapon who pay arbit, irrespective of their subjective relation to the committed
crime. The aforementioned factors prove the influence being exerted by the principle of objective
imputation on the institution of complicity.
There is no institution of complicity in the habitual law of Khevsureti in the modern meaning of
this term. In our opinion, this is the early, germ-type form of the institution of complicity, the
peculiar characteristics of which are conditioned by the primacy of the principle of objective
computation as compared with the subjective one and the private tort nature of crimes.
The liability of an accomplice in a crime, lender of a weapon the crime was committed with, to a
perpetrator, initiator of fighting which resulted in a crime is also proved by the available data of the
habitual law of Khevsureti (the data on hand do not certify the existence of the liability of an
instigator).
Unlike Khevsureti, the amount of penalty payable by the aforementioned persons in Svaneti was
not predetermined – the morves (judges, mediators) would set the necessary amount on a case-by-
case basis – according to the level of their involvement in a crime, which evidences the
development of subjective factor in the habitual law of Svaneti. This amount was sizably lesser
than the amount payable by a direct perpetrator of a crime in the case of reconciliation of the
parties. If there was such a person, he would be held liable for the crime concerned through the
payment of the respective amount of compensation in rem (tsori).
25
g. naWyebia, danaSauli bralis ori formiT
guram naWyebia
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis sruli profesori
1
ugrexeliZe m., Sereuli anu ormagi brali sisxlis samarTalSi, J. `saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa akdemiis
macne~, filosofiis, fsiqologiis, ekonomikisa da samarTlis seria, 1, 1971, 160.
26
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
27
g. naWyebia, danaSauli bralis ori formiT
2
Курс уголовного права, Общая часть, т. 1, М., 1999, 303.
3
gamyreliZe o., saqarTvelos sisxlis samarTlis kodeqsis ganmarteba, Tb., 2005, 86-67.
4
gamyreliZe o., dasax. naSromi, 87.
28
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
5
SuSanaSvili g., Rirebuleba da sazogadoebrivi cnobierebis formebi, Tb., 1990, 100.
29
g. naWyebia, danaSauli bralis ori formiT
6
kutalia l.-g., brali sisxlis samarTalSi, Tb., 2000, 529.
7
turava m., sisxlis samarTali, zogadi nawilis mimoxilva, Tb., 2008, 77.
8
iqve, 77.
30
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
9
kutalia l.-g., bralis normativistuli modeli, Tb., 1999, 31.
31
g. naWyebia, danaSauli bralis ori formiT
10
naWyebia g., brali, rogorc soicialuri filosofiis kategoria, Tb., 2001, 180-182.
32
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
33
g. naWyebia, danaSauli bralis ori formiT
daskvna
34
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
GURAM NACHKEBIA
Full Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
Based on the new concept of fault commensurate with Article 11 of the Criminal Code of Georgia,
the author puts forward and offers his own solution to the problem of possibility not of the
existence of two or double guilt within a single composition of an act, but rather of two forms of
guilt (intention and negligence). In particular, the guilt is neither the psychic attitude of a person
toward an action and the consequences thereof or abstract condemn for an unlawful action (the
normative theory of fault), but rather the irresponsibility of a person before the state, that is –
irresponsible attitude of a person towards his obligation to act lawfully, which is manifested in the
commitment of an unlawful action, punishable under the criminal law. The intension is the willful
denial of positive responsibility of an individual before the state, whilst negligence is revealed in
disregarding this responsibility. Based on the foregoing, it is possible, for example, to willfully
inflict heavy injury on somebody’s health (Criminal Code of Georgia, Article 117, Paragraph 1)
which can be followed by the death of the victim through negligence (Paragraph 4 of the same
Article).
35
l. Wanturia, evropis kerZo sazogadoeba _ siaxle evropis sakorporacio samarTalSi
lado Wanturia
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis sruli profesori
I. Sesavali
1
Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, Brussels, 25.6.2008 Com (2008) 396 final (SEC(2008)
2098); Verordnung des Rates über das Statut der Europäischen Privatgesellschaft.
2
ixileT amis Taobaze: Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba
sakorporacio samarTalSi, Tb., 2006, 87-90; misive, evropis saaqcio sazogadoeba (Societas Europaea) _
universaluri modeli Tu sakanonmdeblo kompilacia, J. `adamiani da konstitucia~, 4, 2004, 90-100.
3
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee
of the Regions: „A single market for 21st century Europe“ – COM(2007) 724, 20.11.2007.
4
Hopt K. J., Die Europäische Privatgesellschaft, EuZW 17/2008, 513 ff.
5
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 1.
6
Der „Small Business Act“, EuZW 14/2008, 419.
7
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/entepreneurship/sba_de.htm.
36
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
8
Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on a „European Company Statute for SMEs“ (OJ C 125, 27.5.2002, 19.
9
European Parliament Report with recommendations to the Commission on the European private company Statute
(2006/2013(INI)), A6-0434/2006 final.
10
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/advisory/index_en.htm
11
Hopt K. J., Die Europäische Privatgesellschaft, 513.
12
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 2.
13
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 7.
14
Hommelhoff P.r, Der Wettbewerb der Rechtsordnungen im Europäischen Unternehmensrecht: www.uni-
heidelberg.de/presse/news/2110rektor.html 21.08.2008, Eidenmüller Horst, Die GmbH im Wettbewerb der Rechtsformen, ZGR
2/2007, S. 168-211, Schuhmann Ralph, Das deutsche Wirtschaftsrecht im Wettbewerb der Sprachen, ZRP, 5/2007, 160-162.
15
Kieninger E.-M., Wettbewerb der Privatrechtsordnungen im Europäischen Binnenmarkt – Studien zur Privatrechts-
koordinierung in der Europäischen Union auf den Gebieten des Gesellschafts- und Vertragsrechts, Verlag Mohr Siebeck,
Tübingen, 2002 = Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, Band 74 (Habilitationsschrift, 2001), Heine
Klaus, Regulierungswettbewerb im Gesellschaftsrecht: zur Funktionsfähigkeit eines Wettbewerbs der Rechtsordnungen im
europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht, Berlin: Duncker & Humlot, 2003; Ogus Anthony, Competition Between National Legal
Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis to Comparative Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 48,
April 1999, 405-418.
37
l. Wanturia, evropis kerZo sazogadoeba _ siaxle evropis sakorporacio samarTalSi
16
Article 3 (1) (e) of the Regulation.
17
Hopt K. J., Die Europäische Privatgesellschaft, 513.
18
Article 5 (1) of the Regulation.
19
Article 5 (3) of the Regulation.
20
Article 6 of the Regulation.
21
An SPE shall not be under any obligation to have its central administration or principal place of business in the Member State
in which it has its registered office: Article 7 of the Regulation.
22
aRsaniSnavia e.w. Centros-is saqmeze gamotanili gadawyvetileba: C-212/97.
23
First Council Directive 68/151/EEC of 9 March 1968 on co-ordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests
of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58
of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the Community, Official Journal L 065 ,
14/03/1968, 0008 – 0012.
24
Article 10 (1) of the Regulation.
25
maT ganekuTvneba: evropis kerZo sazogadoebis saxelwodeba da misi adgilsamyofeli, saxeli da
misamarTi im pirebisa, romlebic uflebamosilni arian, sazogadoeba warmoadginon mesame pirebTan
urTierTobaSi, an monawileoben sazogadoebis marTvaSi; sazogadoebis kapitali, wilebis kategoriebi
da wilTa raodenoba calkeuli klasebis mixedviT, wilTa saerTo raodenoba, wilebis nominaluri
Rirebuleba an wilTa ariTmetikuli jami, sazogadoebis wesdeba; Tu sazogadoeba reorganizaciis
Sedegad dafuZnda, maSin gadawyvetileba amis Sesaxeb: Article 10 (2) of the Regulation.
26
Article 9 (2) of the Regulation.
27
Article 10 (4) (a), (b).
38
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
28
„As the SPE is a private company, the shares of the SPE may not be offered to the public or be publicly traded”: Explanatory
Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 7 I.
29
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 7 I.
30
Article 15 of the Regulation.
31
Article 14 (1) of the Regulation.
32
Article 15 (3) of the Regulation.
33
Article 16 (1) of the Regulation.
34
Article 16 (2) (3) of the Regulation.
35
Article 16 (4) (a) (b) of the Regulation.
36
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 7 III.
39
l. Wanturia, evropis kerZo sazogadoeba _ siaxle evropis sakorporacio samarTalSi
37
Article 18 of the Regulation.
38
am modelis yvelaze TvalsaCino warmomadgeneli aris germania. am qveynis samarTliT saaqcio
sazogadoebebisaTvis dadgenilia minimaluri sawesdebo kapitali 50 000 evros odenobiT, xolo
SezRuduli pasuxismgeblobis sazogadoebebisaTvis — 25 000 evros odenobiT. evropis saaqcio
sazogadoebis minimaluri sawesdebo kapitali ki Seadgens 120 000 evros.
39
amerikis SeerTebuli Statebi da inglisi amis yvelaze TvalsaCino magaliTebia.
40
sawesdebo kapitalis mxardasaWeri Tu sawinaaRmdego argumentebis mimoxilva ix.: Drygala Tim,
Stammkapital heute – Zum veränderten Verständnis vom System des festen Kapitals und seinen Konsequenzen, ZGR 2006, 589
ff.
41
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 7 IV.
42
Article 19 (1) of the Regulation.
43
Explanatory Memorandum to Council Regulation on the Statute for a European private company, paragraph 7 IV.
40
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
IV. daskvna
44
dadgenileba ar Seicavs „qonebisa“ da „valebis“ definiciebs da maT mimarT gamoiyeneba evropis
meoTxe sakorporaciosamarTlebrivi direqtivis normebi an 2002 wlis 1606-e dadgenileba: Fourth Council
Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of
companies, Official Journal L 222 ,
14/08/1978 P. 0011 – 0031.
45
Article 26 (1) of the Regulation.
46
Article 30 (1) of the Regulation.
47
Article 31 of the Regulation.
48
Hopt K. J., Die Europäische Privatgesellschaft, 514.
41
l. Wanturia, evropis kerZo sazogadoeba _ siaxle evropis sakorporacio samarTalSi
LADO CHANTURIA
Full Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
On 25 June 2008 the European Commission produced the Proposal for a Council Regulation on the
Statute for a European Private Company (Societas Privata Europeae, SPE). After the introduction
of the European Co-Operative Society this is another great novelty, which aims at the promotion of
small and medium-sized businesses within the European Union. In this article the author discusses
the preconditions of origin of the European Private Company and highlights the opportunities
offered by this new form of corporations to the representatives of small and medium-sized
businesses.
An SPE company is a new European legal form. At the same time, according to its legal nature and
status, it is more like a limited liability company; it has a legal personality and has the authorised
capital. The Regulation does not provide for any restriction with respect to the manner in which an
SPE may be created. It can be set up by one or more natural persons and/or legal entities; however,
the registration is of constitutional importance for the origin of a legal entity. This approach aims at
the simplification and reduction of the price of creation of a company, for example, it is possible to
apply for the registration of an SPE by electronic means.
Unlike European Co-operative Societies, the shares of which are designed for public offers, the
shares in an SPE are devoid of this opportunity: they cannot be offered to the public and cannot be
publicly traded. The SPE departs from the recognition of a high minimum of legal capital as a
means of creditor protection. Although it does not refuse the minimum capital requirement, it
makes this requirement of a more symbolic nature and sets this minimum capital requirement for
the creation of a company at one Euro.
Through the introduction of the legal form of a European Private Company the European Union
does its best to pursue the policy of promotion of small and medium-sized businesses, the main
purpose of which is to give the opportunity to the enterprises of various countries to enter and
operate on the European Internal Market.
The study of the processes ongoing within the European company law is undoubtedly of major
importance for Georgia, as Georgian company law requires urgent reformation. The Law of
Georgia on Entrepreneurs was subjected to so many unmethodical and hardly explainable
amendments for the past years that the necessity of elaboration of a new law has been the topic of
agenda for a long period now. In this respect, it is beyond doubt that due consideration is to be
given to the European experience.
42
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
giorgi TumaniSvili
samarTlis doqtori
1. Sesavali
1
prevenciuli funqciisgan gansxvavebiT, policiis amocanebs ar miekuTvneba samarTlebriv sikeTeTa
movla da maTi arsebuli mdgomareobis gaumjobeseba; magaliTad, avtoavariis SemTxvevaSi policia
valdebulia, izrunos saavtomobilo gzis dazianebuli avtomobilebisgan gaTavisuflebaze da
daSavebuli pirebis winaswari samedicino daxmarebis dawesebulebaSi gadayvanaze, magram mas ar
evaleba avtoavariis Sedegad dazianebul satransporto saSualebaTa SekeTeba da daSavebul pirTa
mkurnaloba.
2
Schoch F., In: Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Schmidt-Aßmann, E., (Hrsg.), Berlin, 2003, 157.
43
g. TumaniSvili, policiis saqmianobis ZiriTadi principebi
2. oportunobis principi
3
Knemeyer F. L., Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, Lehrbuch, 9. Auflage, München, 2002, Rn. 92.
4
Schoch F., In: Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Schmidt-Aßmann, E., (Hrsg.), Berlin, 2003, 163.
5
oportunoba laTinuri sityvaa (opportunus) da niSnavs `mocemul situaciaSi mizanSewonils~; Waechter K.,
VerwArch, 88 (1997), 313; Rühle D. G., Polizeiß und Ordnungsrecht für Rheinland-Pfalz, 3. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2004, 89.
6
BVerwG, NJW, 1989, 2034.
44
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
7
sapolicio samarTalSi xelmyofs uwodeben pirs, romelmac sakuTari an sxvisi qmedebiT, risTvisac
Tavad aris pasuxismgebeli, gamoiwvia sapolicio dacvis sikeTis xelyofis safrTxe. xelmyofia ag-
reTve is piri, romlis sakuTrebaSi an faqtobriv mflobelobaSi arsebuli nivTebi sapolicio
samarTliT daculi sikeTisTvis zianis miyenebis an xelyofis safrTxes qmnian. ix. Rühle D. G., Polizeiß und
Ordnungsrecht für Rheinland-Pfalz, 3. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2004, 69-80.
8
Garbe A.A., DÖV 1998, 632.
9
Ossenbühl F., in Erichsen/Ehlers, Allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht, 13. Auflage, München 2006, § 10, Rn. 10.
10
Pieroth B., Schlink B., Kniesel M., Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 2. Auflage, München, 2004, 191.
11
Laub K., Die Ermessensreduzierung in der verwaltungsrechtlichen Rechsprechung, München, 2000, 50.
12
Drews B., Wacke G.,Vogel K., Martens W., Gefahrenabwehr. Allgemeines Polizeirecht des Bundes und der Länder, 9
Auflage, Köln, 1986, 369.
13
Rachor F., in Lisken/Denninger, Handbuch des Polizeirechts, 3. Auflage, München, 2001, F Rn. 131.
45
g. TumaniSvili, policiis saqmianobis ZiriTadi principebi
14
Pietzcker J., Jus 1982, 108; Götz V., Allgemeines Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 13. Auflage, München, 2001, Rn. 354;
Schenke W.R., Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, Heidelberg, 2002, Rn. 100.
15
Schoch F., In: Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Schmidt-Aßmann, E., (Hrsg.), Berlin, 2003, 170.
46
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
3. legalurobis principi
4. Tanazomierebis principi
16
Pieroth B., Schlink B., Kniesel M., Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 2. Auflage, München, 2004, 193.
17
sssk-is 22-e muxli; Schroeder R., JZ 85, 1033; Hamburg B., GA 84, 290; Hund H., ZRP 91, 464.
18
aRniSnuli valdebulebebis Taobaze ix.: `policiis Sesaxeb~ kanonis me-8 muxlis `d~ da `m~ qvepun-
qtebi; Beulke W., Strafprozessrecht, 9. Auflage, München, 2006 64; Roxin C., Strafverfahrensrecht, 25. Auflage, München,
1998, 85; Schlüchter E., Das Strafverfahren, Köln, 1981, 66.
19
Schulenburg J., JuS 2004, S. 765; Weigend T., ZStW 109, 103.
20
`policiis Sesaxeb~ kanonis me-8 muxlis `m~ qvepunqti; Roxin C., Strafverfahrensrecht, 25. Auflage, München
1998, 56.
21
Krebs W., Jura, 2001, 228; Arnauld A., JZ 2000, 276; Henne T., DVBl, 2002, 1094.
47
g. TumaniSvili, policiis saqmianobis ZiriTadi principebi
22
Ossenbühl F., Jura, 1997, 618; Kuhl W., JA 1999, 609; Michae L., JuS, 2001, 764.
48
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
23
Kluht R., JA 1999, 609.
24
Ossenbühl F., Jura, 1997, 619.
25
OVG RP, DVBl, 1991, 1378.
26
Ossenbühl F., Jura, 1997, 618.
27
Schwabe J., NJW 2002, 652.
28
Schoch F., In: Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Schmidt-Aßmann E. (Hrsg.), Berlin, 2003, 167.
49
g. TumaniSvili, policiis saqmianobis ZiriTadi principebi
5. daskvna
29
Rühle D. G., Polizeiß und Ordnungsrecht für Rheinland-Pfalz, 3. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2004, 97.
30
Gusy C., Polizeirecht, 5. Auflage, Köln, 2003, Rn. 399.
31
Pieroth B., Schlink B., Grundrechte. Staatsrecht II, 19. Auflage, Berlin, 2003, Rn. 293.
50
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
GIORGI TUMANISHVILI
Doctor of Laws
(Short Summary)
The recent police reforms have defined anew the duties and tasks of the police. Since the Soviet
period the police has rather been the repressive machine of the state than the body, which was
supposed to serve the society and safeguard it against any violation or abuse. The reformed police
was deprived of its mandate to punish. The main task of the police is prevention of crime and
protection of the society. The article reviews the main principles modern police activities are to be
based on. The author is of the opinion that the Law on Police does not contain the exhaustive list of
guidelines for police activities. Based on the foregoing, the author discusses both - the principles
enshrined in the Law on Police and also the principles of reasonability, adequacy and legality,
which play a particular role in police practice.
51
m. dundua, deliqturi pasuxismgeblobisa da saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis Tanafardoba
mzia dundua
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis asistent-profesori
Sesavali
1
Иоффе О.С., Обязательственное право, М., 1975, 95.
52
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
2
axvlediani z., valdebulebiTi samarTali, Tb., 1999, 64.
3
Wanturia l., Sesavali saqarTvelos samoqalaqo samarTlis zogad nawilSi, Tb., 1997, 60.
4
Todua m., valdebulebiTi samarTali, Tb., 2006, 37.
5
Иоффе О.С., Обязательственное право, М., 1975, 97.
53
m. dundua, deliqturi pasuxismgeblobisa da saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis Tanafardoba
6
ix. axvlediani z., valdebulebiTi samarTali, Tb., 1999, 65.
54
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
7
ix. Морандьер Л.Ж., Гражданское право Франции, М., 1960, 464.
55
m. dundua, deliqturi pasuxismgeblobisa da saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis Tanafardoba
8
am terminTan dakavSirebiT e.a. fleiSici SeniSnavs, rom arsebobs ufro zusti gamoTqma da es aris
„saxelSekrulebo“ da deliqturi pasuxismgeblobis konkurencia. am SemTxvevaSi saqme exeba ara
ubralod SeerTebas am ori saxis pasuxismgeblobisas, aramed mosarCelis arCevans — waradginos
sarCeli saxelSekrulebo valdebulebis darRvevasTan dakavSirebiT. (iqve, 464).
*didi frangi civilisti, romelic moRvaweobda XIX saukunis bolosa da XX saukunis dasawyisSi.
9
zoiZe b., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, wigni me-3, Tb., 2001, 391.
56
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
10
Sead. Мораньдер Л.Ж., dasax. naSromi, 465-466.
11
zoiZe b., qonebrivi pasuxismgebloba valdebulebaTa darRvevisaTvis, Tb., 1989, 21.
57
m. dundua, deliqturi pasuxismgeblobisa da saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis Tanafardoba
58
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
daskvna
59
m. dundua, deliqturi pasuxismgeblobisa da saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis Tanafardoba
MZIA DUNDUA
Assistant Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
The legal liability arises in the case of breach of a law. The civil liability is one of the types of legal
liability. The difference is made between contractual and non-contractual liabilities. The
contractual liability arises when a party to an agreement fails to fulfil the obligation assumed under
a contract, whilst non-contractual liability originates when a perpetrator, through performing some
action, causes damage to a person with whom he had no contractual relationships.
Practically, it is very important to delimit between tort and contractual liabilities, insofar as one and
the same action can be regarded as both a tort and breach of a contractual obligation.
It is impossible to explicitly assert that in the case of cumulation (competition) of the provisions on
contractual and tort liabilities, the latter should apply. Presumably, it would have been more
reasonable to say that the situation is to be resolved on a case-by-case basis, with due consideration
of specific circumstances and, mainly, in favour of a creditor.
60
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
giorgi kaxiani
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis asistent-profesori
Sesavali
1
Droit constitutionnel, Eric Oliva, 5e edition, 2006, 39; Шульженко Ю.Л., О понятии «правовая охрана конституции»,
Государство и право, №7, 2002, 11; Овсепян Ж.И., Судебный конституционный контроль в зарубежных странах:
правовая защита конституции, Ростов-на-дону, 1992, 42.
2
Marcou J., Justice constitutionnelle et systèmes politiques. Presse Universitaires de Grenoble, 1997, 5; Rousseau D., La justice
constitutionnelle en Europe, 3-e éd., 1998, 9.
3
Kelzen H., La garantie juridictionnelle de la Constitution // Revue du droit public et politique en France et à l’ étranger, P.,
1928, nr. 2, 198.
4
zoiZe b., sakonstitucio kontroli da RirebulebaTa wesrigi saqarTveloSi, Tb., 2007; demetraSvili a.,
sakonstitucio sasamarTlo konstituciur uflebaTa dacvis garantia, J. `adamiani da konstitucia~, 4,
2000, 202-207; beniZe o., konstituciis dacvis ganuxreli garanti, J. `adamiani da konstitucia~, 4, 2001, 9-13.
5
saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlo 11 gansxvavebuli saxis uflebamosilebiT aris aRWurvili.
saqarTvelos konstitucia adgens sakonstitucio sasamarTlos kompetencias mikuTvnebul uflebamo-
silebaTa nusxas da imavdroulad gansazRvravs, rom sakonstitucio sasamarTlo `axorcielebs saqarT-
velos konstituciiT da organuli kanoniT gansazRvrul sxva uflebamosilebebs” (89-e muxlis 1-li na-
wilis `z” qvepunqti). aqedan gamomdinare, saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos kompetencia gans-
61
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
sagania, kerZod ki, saqarTvelos konstituciis 89-e muxlis 1-li punqtis `a~ qve-
punqtiT gansazRvrul uflebamosilebas, romlis farglebSic sakonstitucio
sasamarTlo abstraqtul6 normaTkontrols axorcielebs.
unda aRiniSnos, rom miTiTebuli uflebamosilebis realizaciiT sakonsti-
tucio sasamarTlos SeuZlia, mniSvnelovani wvlili Seitanos rogorc konsti-
tuciis uzenaesobis, aseve xelisuflebis danawilebis konstituciuri principebis
uzrunvelyofis saqmeSi. saqarTvelos konstituciis 89-e muxlis 1-li nawilis `a~
qvepunqtiT gaTvaliswinebuli uflebamosilebis farglebSi sakonstitucio
sasamarTlosadmi mimarTvis uflebamosilebiT aRmasrulebeli da sakanonmdeblo
xelisuflebis warmomadgeneli Sesabamisi subieqtebi sargebloben. abstraqtuli
kontroli xelisuflebis erTi Stos warmomadgenels yovelTvis aZlevs sa-
Sualebas, moiTxovos xelisuflebis meore Stos warmomadgeneli organos mier
miRebuli normatiuli aqtis arakonstituciurad cnoba. yovelive es ki, cxadia,
xelisuflebis danawilebis meqanizmSi urTierTSekavebisa da gawonasworebis
mniSvnelovan rols asrulebs. yovelive es, Cveni azriT, gansaxilveli sakiTxis
aqtualobasa da mniSvnelobaze miuTiTebs.
62
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
7
materialuria sakonstitucio kontroli, rodesac, konstituciasTan Sesabamisobis dadgenis mizniT,
mowmdeba ama Tu im aqtis an calkeuli misi debulebis Sinaarsi.
8
formaluria sakonstitucio kontroli, rodesac mowmdeba konstituciuri normebiT dadgenili
normatiuli aqtis ganxilvisa da miRebisaTvis dadgenili proceduruli wesebis dacva.
9
Сравнительное конституционное право, Отв. ред. Чиркин В.Е., М., 2002, 108.
10
saqarTvelos sakanonmdeblo macne, 108, 2002, 954-e muxli..
63
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
11
dasax. wyaro: Сравнительное конституционное право, 110.
12
Конституционное (государственное) право зарубежных стран, отв. ред. Страшун Б.А., Т. 2, М., 1995, 326.
13
sazRvargareTis qveynebis konstituciebi, nawili II, pasuxismgebeli redaqtori gonaSvili v., Tb.,
2005, 558.
14
iqve, 605.
15
Бриксов В.В., Конституционный Суд России и законы о конституционных поправках, Академический юридический
журнал, №4 (6), (Октябрь-Декабрь), 2001.
64
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
16
Конституционное правосудие в странах СНГ и Балтии, Отв. ред. Митюков М.А., М., 1998, 59-60.
17
Кряжков В.А., Лазарев Л.В., Конституционная юстиция в Российской Федерации, М., 1998, 79-80.
18
sazRvargareTis qveynebis konstituciebi, nawili III, 593-594.
19
iqve, nawili IV, 644, 646.
20
xecuriani j., saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos uflebamosileba, J. `adamiani da
konstitucia~, 3, 2006, 18.
65
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
teqstSi. miuxedavad imisa, rom konstituciuri kanonis miRebis wesi saerToa yvela
SemTxvevisTvis, Cveni azriT, konstituciuri kanoni, romliTac cvlilebebi da
damatebebi Seitaneba konstituciis teqstSi da `aWaris avtonomiuri respublikis
statusis Sesaxeb~ konstituciuri kanoni, samarTlebrivi bunebidan gamomdinare,
gansxvavdebian erTmaneTisagan. kerZod, konstituciuri kanoni, romliTac moqmedi
konstituciis teqstSi Sedis cvlilebebi an damatebebi, ZalaSi Sesvlis momentidan
wyvets damoukidebeli normatiuli aqtis saxiT arsebobas da konstituciis
Semadgeneli nawili xdeba.21 `aWaris avtonomiuri respublikis statusis Sesaxeb~
konstituciuri kanoni ki, romelic aseve saqarTvelos konstituciis Semadgeneli
nawilia, SeiZleba iTqvas, rom ZalaSi Sesvlis momentidanac ganagrZobs damou-
kidebeli normatiuli aqtis saxiT arsebobas. aRniSnulidan gamomdinare, cxadia,
pirvel SemTxvevaSi SeuZlebelia konstituciuri kanonis konstituciurobis
Semowmeba, radgan, rogorc aRvniSneT, ZalaSi Sesvlis momentidan igi wyvets
damoukidebeli normatiuli aqtis saxiT arsebobas. xolo, rac Seexeba `aWaris
avtonomiuri respublikis statusis Sesaxeb~ konstituciur kanons, Cveni azriT,
Teoriulad misi konstituciurobis Semowmeba SesaZlebelia, Tumca, rogorc
zemoT mivuTiTeT, migvaCnia, rom masze sakonstitucio kontrolis iurisdiqcia
ver gavrceldeba saqarTvelos kanonmdeblobaSi arsebuli im mniSvnelovani daT-
qmis gamo, romlis Tanaxmadac, konstituciuri kanoni saqarTvelos konstituciis
ganuyofeli nawilia.
amdenad, moqmedi kanonmdeblobis Tanaxmad, saqarTveloSi konstituciuri
kanoni sakonstitucio kontrols ver daeqvemdebareba, Tumca, Cveni azriT,
kanonmdeblobaSi Sesabamisi cvlilebebis Setanis SemTxvevaSi SesaZlebelia maTze
winaswari (prevenciuli) kontrolis ganxorcieleba. kerZod, kanonmdebels SeuZ-
lia daadginos, rom parlamentis mier miRebuli konstituciuri kanonis proeqti,
mis promulgirebamde, konstituciurobis Taobaze Sesabamisi daskvnisaTvis saval-
debulo wesiT unda gadaecemodes sakonstitucio sasamarTlos da mxolod
dadebiTi daskvnis SemTxvevaSi iyos SesaZlebeli, igi promulgirebisaTvis ga-
daeces prezidents.
Cveni azriT, saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos konstituciuri ka-
nonebis proeqtebze winaswari (prevenciuli) kontrolis ganxorcielebis uf-
lebamosilebiT aRWurva mizanSewonilia sxvadasxva faqtoris gaTvaliswinebiT.
kerZod, amJamad saqarTvelo aris saxelmwifo, romelSic saprezidento bloki
sakanonmdeblo organoSi `konstituciuri umravlesobiT~ aris warmodgenili, anu
deputatTa im raodenobiT, romelsac konstituciaSi cvlilebebisa da damatebebis
Setana Tavad SeuZlia.22 es TavisTavad moicavs riskis faqtors da qmnis saSiS-
roebas, rom aseTi gabatonebuli mdgomareoba, xelisuflebaSi myofi partiis mxri-
dan ar gaxdes TviTnebobisa da ukontrolo moqmedebis safuZveli. gasaTvalis-
winebelia isic, rom, rogorc praqtikam gviCvena, konstituciaSi cvlilebebis
Setanis process, rogorc wesi, Tan axlavs konstituciuri kanonis proeqtis
mimarT gansxvavebuli poziciebis arseboba parlamentSi xelisuflebisadmi
opoziciurad ganwyobili politikuri partiebis warmomadgenlebSi. amasTan, es
xSirad xdeba sazogadoebis msjelobis sagani. Cndeba Sefasebebi, rom konsti-
21
cnobilaZe p., saqarTvelos konstituciuri samarTali, t. I, Tb., 2004, 40.
22
niSandoblivia, rom saqarTvelos parlamentSi politikur ZalTa amgvari Tanafardobaa 1995 wlis
konstituciis amoqmedebidan dRemde.
66
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
23
saqarTvelos saxelmwifo samarTali (sakanonmdeblo aqtebis krebuli), Tb., 2004, 141.
24
dawvrilebiT ix. xecuriani j., saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos uflebamosileba, J. `ada-
miani da konstitucia~, 3, 2006, 19-20.
25
gamonaklisia brZanebulebebi saqarTvelos mTavrobis wevris Tanamdebobaze daniSvnisa da Tanamde-
bobidan gaTavisuflebis, saqarTvelos moqalaqeobis miniWebis, mopovebis, Sewyvetisa da aRdgenis
Taobaze, agreTve sakonstitucio sasamarTlos wevris daniSvnis Sesaxeb.
67
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
26
afxazeTis avtonomiuri respublikis konstituciis teqsti ix.: giorgaZe g., Tordia v., xmalaZe v.,
saqarTvelos konstituciuri samarTali, Tb., 2001, 279-307.
27
konstituciuri kanonis teqsti, ssm, 16, 2004, 53-e muxli.
28
xecuriani j., saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos uflebamosileba, 23.
68
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
29
formaluri kontrolis uflebamosileba saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlom 2004 wlis 25
noembers `saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos Sesaxeb” organul kanonSi ganxorcielebuli
cvlilebebis Sedegad SeiZina.
30
xecuriani j., saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos uflebamosileba, 25.
31
konstituciuri samarTali, pasuxismgebeli redaqtori demetraSvili a., Tb., 2005, 93.
32
ix. iqve, 93.
69
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
`normatiuli aqtebis Sesaxeb~ kanonis me-9 muxls asaxelebs, romlis me-2 punqtSi
aRniSnulia, rom konstituciis gadasinjvisas miiReba konstituciuri kanoni,
xolo pirvel punqtSi mocemulia im normatiuli aqtebis sruli CamonaTvali,
romelTa miReba SeuZlia saqarTvelos parlaments. am CamonaTvalSi ki saqarTve-
los konstitucia ar aris moxseniebuli.33
konstituciis erTi debulebis gansxvavebuli interpretacia, Cveni azriT,
upirveles yovlisa, miTiTebuli normis bundovanebaze miuTiTebs. cxadia, gasaT-
valiswinebelia j. xecurianis mosazreba, romelic Tvlis, rom `zogadi gadasinjva~
axali konstituciis miRebas ar niSnavs, Tumca aseT SemTxvevaSi ibadeba kiTxva:
rogor unda gavigoT es termini? Tu igi axali konstituciis miRebas ar niSnavs,
maSin samarTlebrivad ra gansxvavebaa konstituciis `zogad gadasinjvasa~ da
`nawilobriv gadasinjvas~ Soris? `normatiuli aqtebis Sesaxeb~ kanonSi terminebi:
`zogadi~ an `nawilobrivi~ saerTod ar aris moxseniebuli. masSi mxolod is aris
aRniSnuli, rom konstituciis gadasinjvisas miiReba konstituciuri kanoni da ar
aris dazustebuli, `zogad~ Tu `nawilobriv~ gadasinjvazea saubari. Tu gamovalT
im poziciidan, rom `zogadi gadasinjva~ axali konstituciis miRebas niSnavs, maSin
is garemoeba, rom `normatiuli aqtebis Sesaxeb~ kanonSi araferia naTqvami
konstituciis miRebaze, am kanonis xarvezze Tu kanonmdeblobaSi arsebul
koliziaze miuTiTebs. amdenad, migvaCnia ra, rom konstitucia axali konstituciis
miRebis proceduras unda iTvaliswinebdes, vTvliT, rom saqarTvelos kon-
stituciis 102-e muxli dazustebas saWiroebs. amasTan cxadia, Sesabamisi cvli-
lebebi kanonmdeblobaSic unda aisaxos.
33
xecuriani j., saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos uflebamosileba, 25-26.
70
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
1. saqarTvelos prezidenti
2. saqarTvelos mTavroba
71
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
34
dawvrilebiT saqarTvelos mTavrobis statusis Sesaxeb ix. demetraSvili a., kobaxiZe i., konstitu-
ciuri samarTali, Tb., 2008, 315-330.
35
ix. sakonstitucio-politikuri reformis procesi saqarTveloSi: politikuri elita da xalxis
xmebi, Tb., 2005, 21.
72
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
36
2008 wlis 12 martis konstituciuri cvlilebiT saqarTvelos parlamentis wevrTa raodenoba
ganisazRvra 150 deputatiT. manamde saqarTvelos parlamenti Sedgeboda 235 wevrisagan, Sesabamisad,
parlamentis wevrTa aranakleb erTi mexuTedi Seadgenda 47 deputats an mets.
37
saqarTvelos konstituciuri kanoni `saqarTvelos konstituciaSi cvlilebis Setanis Sesaxeb”, 2008
wlis 10 oqtomberi.
73
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
daskvna
74
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
75
g. kaxiani, abstraqtuli normaTkontrolis problemebi...
76
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
GIORGI KAKHIANI
Assistant Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
Georgian legal literature has paid due tribute to the importance of constitutional justice within the
process of building a rule-of-law state. However, irrespective of the foregoing, it should be
mentioned that many problems related to constitutional control are inadequately studied, or even
not investigated in Georgia. In his article the author reviews the power of the Constitutional Court
of Georgia guaranteed by Paragraph 1(a) of Article 89 of the Constitution of Georgia. Within the
framework of this power, the Constitutional Court discharges the abstract control of norms.
The article consists of: the introduction, which investigates the importance and topicality of the
issue under review; the main part, which, in its turn, is subdivided into two chapters: the objects of
abstract control of norms and the persons/entities enjoying the right to apply to the Constitutional
Court; and the conclusion. When discussing the objects of constitutional control, the author pays a
particular attention to the possibility of exerting constitutional control with respect to a
constitutional law. Also, a special importance is accorded to the possibility of subjecting the
Constitution of Georgia to formal control. In the second chapter the author deals with the problems
which, in his opinion, are related to the exercise of the discussed power. The offered conclusions
and recommendations also add the due value to the article.
77
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
qeTevan qoCaSvili
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis asistent-profesori
(SedarebiTsamarTlebrivi kvleva)
1. Sesavali
1
Регицци Д.Г.К., Гармонизация права и международные организации: Унидруа. В книге: Пути к новому праву.
(материалы международных конференции в Санкт – Петербурге и Бремене. под общей ред. Богуславского М.-М. и
Книпера Р., Эшборн, 1998, 290.
2
Lando O., Principles of European Contract law. part III. The Hague: Kluwer Law International – 2003. miTiTebulia:
Синяевская М. Европейская интеграция и вопросы частного права. ж. Вестник высшего арбитражного суда Российской
федерации, №9, 2003, 136.
3
Базедов Ю., Кодификация частного права в рамках Европейского Союза: создание гибрида. Реферативный журнал ,
Государство и право, №1, 2004, 35.
4
zoiZe b., evropuli kerZo samarTlis recefcia saqarTveloSi, Tb., 2005, 5.
78
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
5
jorbenaZe s., Cemi cxovrebis gza, krebuli `s. jorbenaZe — 75~, Tb., 2003, 20.
6
kniperi r.., kodifikaciis meTodebi da koncefciebi gardamavali periodis sazogadoebaSi, krebuli
`samarTlis reforma saqarTveloSi~, Tb., 1994, 188.
7
jorbenaZe s., saqarTvelos respublikis momavali samoqalaqo kodeqsis ZiriTadi problemebi,
krebuli `samarTlis reforma saqarTveloSi~, Tb., 1994, 142.
8
zoiZe b., qarTuli valdebulebiTi samarTlis sistema da principebi, J. `qarTuli samarTlis
mimoxilva~, III — IV kvartali, 2000, 114.
9
romis samarTlis Zeglebi. iustinianes instituciebi. w.III, t.XIII (laTinuridan Targmna, winasityvaoba,
SeniSvnebi da saZieblebi daurTo n. surgulaZem, red. v. metreveli), Tb., 2002, 168.
10
Покровский, И.А., Основные проблемы гражданского права , М., 1998, 236.
11
magaliTad: saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis 316-e muxlis I nawili; germaniis samoqalaqo
sjuldebis 241-e paragrafi; ruseTis federaciis samoqalaqo kodeqsis 307-e muxli.
79
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
12
ZlieriSvili z., valdebulebis Sesruleba, Tb., 2006, 12.
13
maCalaZe s., zianis anazRaureba valdebulebis darRvevisas (saqarTvelosa da germaniis kanon-
mdeblobaTa SedarebiTi analizi), J. `qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva~, specialuri gamocema, 2004, 74.
14
xecuriani j., samoqalaqo samarTlis funqciebi, Tb., 1995, 108.
15
Собчак А.А., О некоторых спорных вопросах общей теории прававой ответственности, ж. `Правоведение~, №1, 1968,
48. miTiTebulia wignidan: zoiZe b., qonebrivi pasuxismgebloba valdebulebaTa darRvevisTvis, Tb.,
1989, 11.
16
Гражданское право (т.1) 2-е изд. под ред. Суханова Е.А., М., 2003, 431.
17
Леист О.Э., Санкции и ответственность по советскому праву, М., 1984. miTiTebulia wignidan: zoiZe b.,
qonebrivi pasuxismgebloba valdebulebaTa darRvevisTvis, 7.
18
Попондопуло В. Ф., Динамика обязательственного правоотношения и гражданско-правовая ответственность,
Владивосток, 1985, 43; sxva mosazrebiT, darRveuli valdebulebis iZulebiT Sesruleba samoqalaqo pasu-
xismgeblobis saxea. Братусь С.Н., Юридическая ответственность и законность, М., 1976, 69; germaneli
mkvlevris, r. kandelhardis, mosazrebiT, zianis anazRaureba da realuri Sesruleba valdebulebis
Seusruleblobis SemTxvevaSi ori SesaZlo da, funqciuri TvalsazrisiT, erTi da imave samarTlebrivi
dacvis formaa. r. kandelhardi, realuri Sesruleba Tu zianis anazRaureba: saerTaSoriso konsensusi,
krebuli `s. jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996. sakiTxi imis Sesaxeb, valdebulebis darRvevisas kvlav ZalaSi
rCeba nakisri moqmedebis Sesruleba Tu SesaZloa is sxva gziT (fuladi kompensacia) ganxorcieldes,
80
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
81
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
2.2.1. ziani
2.2.2. marTlwinaaRmdegoba
26
Жалинский А., Рерихт А., Введение в немецкое право, М., 2001, 369.
27
CikvaSvili S., moraluri ziani samoqalaqo samarTalSi, Tb., 1991, 15-16.
28
Hans-Heinrich Jesheck, Thomas Weogend, Lehrbuch des strafrechts; Allg. Teil. Berlin, 1996, 233. miTiTebulia
wignidan: e. futkaraZe, marTlwinaaRmdegobis sakiTxisaTvis, krebuli: `sisxlis samarTlis Tanamed-
rove problemebi~, red. gamyreliZe o., Tb., 2006, 125. sapirispirod marTlzomieri qmedebisa, romelic
Seesabameba samarTlis normis moTxovnas da qmnis marTlwesrigs, marTlsawinaaRmdegoa qmedeba,
romelic arRvevs marTlzomieri qmedebis valdebulebas da xelyofs marTlwesrigs. ix. naWyebia g.,
qmedebis marTlwinaaRmdegobis dadgenis sakiTxisaTvis, J. `marTlmsajuleba da kanoni~, 1, 2006, 72.
29
Иоффе О.С., Обязательственное право, М., 1975, 59.
30
Зоидзе Б., Договорная и внедоговорная ответственность в механизме гражданского правового регулирования, 165.
31
Lowisch Manfred in Staudinger (2004), $276, Rn 13ff. miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da
xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, Tb., 2006, 376.
32
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w.III, (zoiZe b.), Tb., 2001, 364.
82
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
2.2.4. brali
33
Советское гражданское право под ред. Грибанова В.П. и Корнеева С.М., т.1, М., 1979, 41.
34
Dertmann P., Recht der Schuldverhaltnisse, I, 1928, 50. miTiTebulia wignidan: saqarTvelos samoqalaqo
kodeqsis komentari, w.III, (b.zoiZe), 369.
35
CikvaSvili S., deliqturi valdebulebebi samoqalaqo samarTalSi, krebuli `saxelmwifosa da samar-
Tlis aqtualuri problemebi~, Tb., 2003, 186.
36
Варкалло В., Об ответственности по гражданскому праву, М., 1978, 100.
37
Цваигерт К., Кётц Х., Введение в сравнительное правоведение в сфере частного права, т.2, М., 1998, 388.
38
zoiZe b., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis sistema, J. `qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva, 1998, I kvar-
tali, 28.
39
Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakoporacio samarTalSi,
Tb.., 2006, 375.
83
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
40
Гражданское право под ред. Суханова Е.А., 447.
41
Новицкий И.Б., Лунц Л.А., Общее учение об обязательстве, М., 1950, 323.
42
Cornil G., Droit Romain Bruxelles, 1921, 251. miTiTebulia wignidan: kutalia l.-g., brali sisxlis samar-
TalSi, Tb., 2000, 52.
43
vaCeiSvili a., narkvevebi qarTuli samarTlis istoriidan, w.I, Tb.., 1946, 36.
44
vaCeiSvili a., danaSaulis subieqturi mxare sabWoTa sisxlis samarTalSi, Tb., 1957, 43.
45
Варкалло В., Об ответственности по гражданскому праву, 35.
84
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
46
Матвеев Ю.Г., Англо-Американское деликтное право, М., 1973, 80.
47
Анненков К., Система русского гражданского права, т.3, СПБ, 1898, 136.
48
Флейшиц Е.А., Обязательство из причинения вреда и из неосновательного обогощения, М., 1951.
49
gamyreliZe o., brZola samarTlebrivi saxelmwifosTvis, Tb., 1998, 250. sabWoTa samoqalaqo samar-
TalSi braleulobis principis gandevnis winaaRmdeg gamovida sergo jorbenaZe, romelic braleu-
lobas ucilobel elementad miiCnevda socialisturi ekonomikis pirobebSic ki. ix. pelegrino mario,
subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? (saxelSekrulebo samarTalSi bralis
rolis SedarebiTi samarTlebrivi ganxilva), saiubileo krebuli `s. jorbenaZe _ 70~, Tb., 1996, 151).
50
Хохлова Г.В., Понятие гражданско-правовой ответственности. В книге: Актуальные проблемы гражданского права,
Выпуск 5, под ред. Витрянского В.В., М., 2002, 70.
51
vaCeiSvili a., narkvevebi qarTuli samarTlis istoriidan, w.I, 136.
52
CitaSvili n., bralis problemis axleburi gaazreba Zvel qarTul samarTalSi, J. `samarTali~, 11-12,
2002, 133.
53
kekeliZe k., Zveli qarTuli literaturis istoria, t. I, Tb., 1980, 211-213. miTiTebulia wignidan:
zoiZe b., evropuli kerZo samarTlis recefcia saqarTveloSi, 87.
85
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
54
iqve, 42.
55
vaCeiSvili a., dasax. naSromi, 137.
56
nadareiSvili g., romis samoqalaqo samarTali, Tb., 2003, 125.
57
daviTaSvili g., samediatoro sasamarTlo, anu “rjuli” xevsureTSi, Tb., 2001, 8. kerZo interesebis
winaaRmdeg mimarTul danaSaulTa (kerZo deliqtebi) gverdiT arsebobda sazogadoebis winaaRmdeg
mimarTuli danaSaulebic, romelnic xelyofda mTeli sazogadoebis interess da iwvevda sazogadoebis
reagirebas (magaliTad: sazogadoebis mtrebis daxmareba, eklesiis gaZarcva da a.S.). ix. daviTaSvili g.,
danaSaulis bunebisaTvis qarTul CveulebiT samarTalSi, saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa akademiis macne,
1, 2005, 76.
58
nadareiSvili g., kerZo da sajaro sasjelebi feodalur saqarTveloSi, J. `almanaxi~, 14, 2000, 113.
59
arseniZe r., ganxilva mefe vaxtang VI-is kanonmdeblobisa, parizi, 1963, 43. miTiTebulia wignidan: zoi-
Ze b., evropuli kerZo samarTlis recefcia saqarTveloSi, 31.
60
Хохлова Г.В., dasax. naSromi, 75-76.
61
samarTlis istorikosebi miuTiTeben kompoziciis kerZo da sajaro xasiaTze. marTalia, misi umetesi
nawili dazaralebuls eZleoda, magram gansazRvruli nawili xelisuflebis, rogorc sazogadoebrivi
uSiSroebis damcvelis, sasargeblod gadaexdevineboda. ix. vaCeiSvili a., narkvevebi qarTuli samar-
Tlis istoriidan, w.I, 41.
86
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
62
Nass G., Wandlungen des Schuldbegriffs im Laufe des Rechtsdenkens, Berlin, 1963, 97. miTiTebulia: kutalia l.-g.,
bralis Sesaxeb fsiqologiuri moZRvrebis frankiseuli kritikisaTvis, J. `samarTali~, 7-8, 1998, 41-42.
63
am gansazRvrebidan gamomdinare, brali fsiqologiuri cnebaa, radgan qmedebisa da misi Sedegisadmi
fsiqikuri damokidebuleba fsiqologiuri kvlevis obieqtia. ix. naWyebia g., bralis cnebis sakanon-
mdeblo gansazRvrebis sakiTxisaTvis, J. `samarTali~, 5-6, 2002, 7.
64
tyeSeliaZe g., brali SefasebiTi cnebaa, krebuli `saxelmwifosa da samarTlis aqtualuri proble-
mebi~, 322.
65
aRniSnuli Sexeduleba moyvanilia wignidan: surgulaZe l., sisxlis samarTali. danaSauli (leqcie-
bi), Tb., 182.
66
Wolf E.A., Strafrechtliche Schuldlehre Teil. I, Mannheim Berlin Leipzig. 1928, 126. miTiTebulia: kutalia l-.g.,
brali sisxlis samarTalSi, 9.
67
gamyreliZe o., dasax. naSromi, 254.
68
brali — es iseTi fsiqikuri damokidebulebaa qmedebasa da SedegTan, romelic imsaxurebs zneobriv
gakicxvas sazogadoebis mxriv. ix. wereTeli T., tyeSeliaZe g., moZRvreba danaSaulze, Tb., 1969, 60.
87
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
69
turava m., sisxlis samarTali, zogadi nawilis mimoxilva, meore Sevsebuli da gadamuSavebuli
gamocema, Tb., 2002.
70
gamyreliZe o., saqarTvelos sisxlis samarTlis kodeqsis ganmarteba (2004 wlis 1 noembris mdgo-
mareobiT), zogadi nawili, I wigni, Tb., 2005, 85. arsebobs bralis sxvagvari ganmartebac, kerZod, brali
pasuxismgeblobis pozitiuri aspeqtis uaryofaa, anu movaleobisadmi subieqtis pasuxismgebluri ki
ara, upasuxismgeblo damokidebulebiT vlindeba. ix. naWyebia g., brali, rogorc socialuri filo-
sofiis kategoria, Tb., 2001. brali aris normatiulad dadgenili valdebulebisadmi subieqtis upa-
suxismgeblo damokidebuleba, Sesabamisad — gakicxvis safuZveli. naWyebia g., sisxlissamarTlebrivi
pasuxismgeblobis safuZvlis problema krebulSi: `sisxlis samarTlis Tanamedrove problemebi~, Tb.,
2006, 147.
71
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 370.
72
Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных государства, т. 1, под ред. Васильева Е.А. и Комарова А. С., М., 2004, 467.
73
Медикус Д., Отдельные виды обязательств в Германском гражданском уложении. В книге: Проблемы гражданского и
предпринимательского права Германии, 136.
74
Жалинский А., Рёрихт А., dasax. naSromi, 367.
75
Морандьер Ж., Дела. Гражданское право франции, М., 1960, 407.
76
Гражданское право, I, 2-е изд. (под ред. Суханова Е.А.), 449.
77
Комментарий к гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации, части первой, постатейный. под.ред. Садикова О.Н.,
М., 1999, 900.
88
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
4. bralis formebi
78
Кофман В.И., Соотношение вины и противоправности в гражданском праве, ж. `Правоведение“, №1, 1957
(http://law.edu.ru/magatzine/article 7.05.2007).
79
Semler in MunchkommAKtG (2004), 116, Rn. 507. miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da
xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, 386.
80
romauli samarTali ganzraxvad (Dolus) miiCnevda piris mier Segnebulad moqmedebis Cadenas misi
marTlwinaaRmdegobis gaTvaliswinebiT, xolo gaufrTxileblobad (Culpa) — saWiro windaxedulebisa
da yuradRebianobis argamoCenas, arasakmaris swrafvas aramarTlzomieri Sedegis Tavidan asacileb-
lad, oRond borotebis Cadenis pirdapiri survilis, ganzraxvis gareSe. ix. Гримм Д.Д., Лекции по догме
римского права (под ред. Томсинова В.А.), М., 2003, 178. amasTan, ganirCeoda ganzraxvisa da gaufrTxi-
leblobis cnebebi deliqtur da saxelSekrulebo samarTalSi. ganzraxva, ufro sworad boroti gan-
zraxva, rogorc mas romaeli iuristebi moixseniebdnen, raTa ganesxvavebinaT arsebuli terminisagan
`keTili ganzraxva~, deliqtur samarTalSi gulisxmobda piris mier gamovlenil sicrues, cbierebas
meore piris sazianod (labeoni). pirvelad peregrinebis pretoris akvilius galusis ediqtiT (Cv. w. aR-
mde 66w.) iqna aRiarebuli boroti ganzraxviT Cadenili moqmedeba deliqtad da dazaralebuls mieca
SesaZlebloba, moeTxova miyenebuli zianis anazRaureba. termini `keTili ganzraxva~ gulisxmobda pi-
ris mier mtris, yaCaRis motyuebas. ix. Гаридо Г., Римское частное право. Казусы, иски, институты М., 2005, 467.
termini `saxelSekrulebo brali~ niSnavda xelSekrulebaTa Sesrulebisas mzrunvelobis ararsebobas.
boroti ganzraxvis cneba am sferoSi gulisxmobda piris ganzraxvasa da survils, emoqmeda ise, rom
xelSekrulebis Sesruleba SeuZlebeli yofiliyo, xolo gaufrTxilebeli brali saxeze iyo, roca piri
ar moqmedebda keTilsindisierad an ar avlenda mzrunvelobis im zomebs, rac damaxasiaTebeli iyo
ojaxis keTilsindisieri ufrosisaTvis. ix. Гаридо Г., dasax. naSromi, 557. romis samarTali ganasxva-
vebda uxeS da msubuq gaufrTxileblobas. miiCneoda, rom pirveli formiT moqmedebda is, vinc ar
iRebda iseT zomas, romelsac miiRebda nebismieri normaluri adamiani, xolo meore formad
iTvleboda iseTi zomis miuRebloba, romelsac miiRebda windaxeduli mesakuTre. ix. Новицкий И.Б.,
Римское Право, М., 2001, 152-153.
81
gariSvili m., daviT giorgis Ze bagrationis (batoniSvilis) politikuri da iuridiuli Sexedulebani,
Tb., 2004, 145.
89
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
82
Fikentscher W., Schuldrecht, 8, Auflage, Berlin - New-York, 1992, 312. miTiTebulia wignidan: saqarTvelos
samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 382.
83
Dieter Medicus, Schuldrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, 149. miTiTebulia wignidan: saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 384.
84
cvaigerti k., kotci h., SedarebiTi samarTalmcodneobis Sesavali kerZo samarTlis sferoSi, t. II,
Targmani rusuli gamocemidan e. sumbaTaSvilisa, qarTuli gamocemis redaqtori da boloTqmis
avtori T. niniZe, Tb., 2001, 290.
85
kutalia l.-g., dasax. naSromi, 103.
86
Fikentscher W., dasax. naSromi, 314.
87
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 386.
88
Эннекцерус Л., Курс германского гражданского права, т. I, М., 1950, 356.
90
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
89
Lowisch Manfred in Staudinger (2004), $ 276, Rn. 28. miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da
xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, 377-378.
90
Саватье Р., Теория обязательств, М., 1972, 308.
91
Матвеев Ю.Г., Англо-Американское деликтное правo, 148.
92
Гражданское право, под ред. Сергеева А.П. и Толстого Ю.К., 500.
93
Гражданское право, под ред. Суханова Е.А., 447.
91
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
94
kandelhardi r., dasax. naSromi, 103.
95
evropuli saxelSekrulebo samarTlis ZiriTadi debulebebi, qarTuli kerZo samarTlis krebuli, w. I,
Tb., 2004, 230.
96
Ефремов Л.В., Важный шаг в правовом обеспечении экономической интеграции, ж. `Вестник высшего арбитражного
суда Российской федерации“, №3, 2005, 174.
97
Гражданское право, под ред. Суханова Е. А., 600.
98
Жaлинский А., Рёрихт А., dasax. naSromi, 355.
99
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III (l. Wanturia), 51.
100
ZlieriSvili z., nasyidobis xelSekrulebis samarTlebrivi buneba, 140.
92
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
101
CaCava s., myidvelis meoradi uflebebis SedarebiTsamarTlebrivi analizi, J. `qarTuli samarTlis
mimoxilva~, specialuri gamocema, 2004, 42.
102
Дождёв Д.В., Римское частное право, М., 2002, 501.
103
ZlieriSvili z., valdebulebis Sesruleba, 64.
104
zarandia T., saxelSekrulebo valdebulebis Sesrulebis adgili da vadebi, Tb., 2005, 103.
105
z. ZlieriSvili, valdebulebis Sesruleba, 126.
93
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
106
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 354.
107
Гражданское и торговое правo зарубежных государств, т. II, 85.
108
Sengelia r., Txovebis da sesxis samarTlebrivi buneba, Tb., 1999, 13.
109
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. IV, t. I, (Sengelia r.), Tb., 2001, 73.
110
Барон Ю., Система римского гражданского права, 3-е изд., кн. 1, Общая часть СПБ, 1909, 98.
94
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
111
Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных государств, т. II, 227.
112
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. IV, t. II (suxitaSvili d.), Tb., 2001, 56. saerTo
samarTalSi miCneulia, rom pasuxismgeblobisgan ganTavisuflebis Sesaxeb xelSekrulebis pirobebi
baTilia, Tu isini aragonivrulia saerTod an konkretul samarTaldarRvevasTan mimarTebiT, radgan
dauSvebelia xelSekrulebis Tavisuflebis principis borotad gamoyeneba. ix. Романов А.К., Правовая
система Англии, М., 2002, 138.
113
Новицкий И.Б., Римское право, 153.
114
Дзюба И., Условия договоров об ограничении и исклучении ответственности, ж. `Хозяйствo и право~, №1, 2003, 19.
zoiZe b., evropuli kerZo samarTlis recefcia saqarTveloSi, 126.
116
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 391.
117
Ефремов Л.В., dasax. naSromi, 168.
95
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
118
Гражданское и тoрговое право зарубежных государств, 49.
119
Ансон В., Договорное право, М., 1984, 118.
120
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 371.
121
Тархов В.А., Ответственность по советскому гражданскому праву, Саратов, 1973, 98.
122
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, 364.
123
Антимонов Н.С., Значение вины потерпевшего при гражданском правонарушении, М., 1950, 503.
124
Иоффе О.С., Ответственность по советскому гражданскому праву, Л., 1955, 161.
96
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
125
A. Colin et H., Capitant Cours elementaire de droit civil II 1915, 355. miTiTebulia wignidan: Антимонов Н.С., dasax.
naSromi, 64.
126
Романов А.К., dasax. naSromi, 259.
127
evropuli saxelSekrulebo samarTlis ZiriTadi debulebebi qarTuli kerZo samarTlis krebuli,
259.
128
Комментарии к гражданскому кодексу Российской федерации (постатейный части первой, второй, третьей), 2-е изд.,
под ред. Борисова А.Г., М., 2002, 397.
129
Иоффе О.С., dasax. naSromi, 163.
130
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, (zoiZe b.), 481.
131
Май С.К., Очерк общей части буржуазного обязательственного права, М., 1953, 150.
132
Морандьер Л. Ж.., dasax. naSromi, 423.
97
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
133
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. III, 483.
134
Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных стран, под ред. Безбаха В.В. и Пучинского В.К., М., 2004, 94.
135
Эннекцерус Л., dasax. naSromi, 283.
136
Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных государств, т. I, 122.
137
Шумилов В.М,. Введение в правовую систему, ФР,. Москва - Бреме,. 2001, 69.
138
Wanturia l., Sesavali saqarTvelos samoqalaqo samarTlis zogad nawilSi, Tb., 1997, 154.
139
cvaigerti k., kotci h., dasax. naSromi, t. II, 33.
98
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
140
Кавелин К., Права и обязанности по имуществам и обязательствам, СПБ, М., 1879, 186.
141
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. IV, t. II (CikvaSvili S.), 394.
142
CorgolaSvili l., deliqturi valdebulebebis axleburad gadawyvetis Sesaxeb, krebuli `samar-
Tlis reforma saqarTveloSi~, 248.
143
Пилияева В.В., Гражданское право. части общая и особенная, М., 2006, 377.
144
Кузнецова Л.Г., Шевченко Я.Н., Гражданско-правовое положение несовершеннолетних, М., 1968, 101.
99
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
145
Иоффе О.С., Ответственность по советскому гражданскому праву, 488.
146
Иванова Г.Н., Шевченко А.С., Субсидиарная ответственность, ж. `Правоведение~, №2, 1998, 150.
100
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
147
ZlieriSvili z., valdebulebis Sesruleba, 15.
148
iqve, 29.
149
Kётц Х., Лорман Ф., Введение в обязательственное право. В книге: Проблемы гражданского и предприниматель-
ского права Германии, М., 53.
101
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
150
Комментарий к гражданскому кодексу Россиийской федерации, части первой, второй, третьей, под.ред. Борисова
А.Г., 396.
151
Новицкий И.Б., Римское право, 154.
152
cvaigerti k., kotci h., dasax. naSromi, t. II, 320.
153
Дернбург Г., Обязательственное право, 3-е изд., М., 1911, 148. warmomadgenloba garigebis dadebaze
uflebamosilebis delegirebaa, warmodgenili piris mier warmomadgenlisTvis sakuTari nebis gada-
cemaa. ix. Кётц Х., Лорман Ф., dasax. naSromi, 65.
154
kaxaZe m., warmomadgenlobisa da mindobilobis institutis Taviseburebani, krebuli: `samarTlis
reforma saqarTveloSi~, 256.
155
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w. I, (zoiZe b.), Tb., 1993, 280.
102
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
156
Wanturia l., Sesavali saqarTvelos samoqalaqo samarTlis zogad nawilSi, 212.
157
kerZo samarTlis iuridiuli pirebis mimarT zogad uflebaunarianobas aRiarebs kontinenturi
evropis samarTlis sistema. kerZod: qarTuli, germanuli, avstriuli, Sveicariuli samarTali, xolo
iuridiul pirTa specialur uflebaunarianobas ganamtkicebs angloamerikuli samarTlis sistema,
aseve romanul-germanuli samarTlis sistemidan — franguli samarTali. ix. Чантурия Л., Свобода и от-
ветственность, Тб., 2004, 57.
158
zoiZe b., evropuli kerZo samarTlis recefcia saqarTveloSi, 209.
159
Братусь С.Н., Субъекты гражданского права, М., 1950, 201.
160
Wanturia l., samewarmeo sazogadoebis xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgeblobis Taviseburebebi aSS-isa da
germaniis sakorporacio samarTalSi, J `saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa akademiis macne~, 1, 2005, 89.
161
Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, 90.
162
Oltmanns Geshäftsleiterhaftung und unternehmerisches Erme ssen, 201. miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., dasax. naSromi, 92.
103
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
163
mewarmeTa Sesaxeb kanonis komentari, III gamocema (Wanturia l., niniZe T.) Tb., 2002, 119-122.
164
SesaZloa Tu ara iuridiuli piris samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis gverdiT sisxlis-
samarTlebriv pasuxismgeblobaze saubari? samarTlis istoria mowmobs, rom Sua saukuneebis kanon-
mdeblobaSi iuridiul pirTa winamorbedebis, magaliTad: qalaqTa, TemTa, sisxlis samarTlis wesiT
pasuxismgebloba aRiarebuli debuleba iyo. ix. vaCeiSvili a., narkvevebi qarTuli samarTlis isto-
riidan, w. I, 209. safrangeTSi 1670 wlis ordonansi iTvaliswinebda Temebisa da korporaciebis (magali-
Tad: gildiebi, universitetebi) sisxlissamarTlebriv pasuxismgeblobas jarimisa Tu garkveuli
uflebebis, privilegiebis CamorTmevis formiT, ix. gabisonia i., iuridiuli piris sisxlissamarTleb-
rivi pasuxismgeblobis materialursamarTlebrivi da saproceso Taviseburebani. J. `profesia advo-
kati~, 2, 2007, 68. dRes iuridiuli piris sisxlissamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis koncefcia damkvid-
rebulia rogorc saerTo samarTlis, ise kontinenturi evropis samarTlis sistemis qveynebSi. maga-
liTad, inglisuri precedentuli samarTali adgens kompaniis pasuxismgeblobas xelmZRvanel su-
bieqtTa, anu im pirTa mier Cadenili danaSaulisaTvis, vinc warmoadgens kompaniis gons, nebas, mis alter
ego-s, ix. Полковников Г.В., Английское право о компаниях: закон и практика, М., 2000, 28-29. aRsaniSnavia, rom
saqarTvelos sisxlis samarTlis kodeqsic adgens iuridiuli piris, kerZod, kerZo samarTlis iu-
ridiuli piris pasuxismgeblobas misi saxeliT an mis sasargeblod pasuxismgebeli piris mier danaSau-
lis CadenisaTvis. pasuxismgebel pirad miiCneva iuridiuli piris xelmZRvanelobaze, warmomadgen-
lobaze, misi saxeliT gadawyvetilebis miRebaze uflebamosili piri. iuridiuli piris pasuxismgeb-
loba ar gamoiricxeba danaSaulis Camdeni fizikuri piris daudgenlobis an misi pasuxismgeblobisagan
ganTavisuflebis SemTxvevaSi. dasaSvebia erTdroulad fizikuri da iuridiuli piris pasuxismgeb-
lobac, aseve iuridiuli piris sisxlissamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis gverdiT samoqalaqosamar-
Tlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis arseboba. iuridiuli piris pasuxismgebloba gulixmobs sasjelis Semdegi
saxeebis gamoyenebas: likvidacia, jarima, qonebis CamorTmeva da saqmianobis uflebis CamorTmeva.
saqarTvelos sisxlis samarTlis kodeqsis 107’ muxli.
165
jorbenaZe s., iuridiuli piris bralis Sinaarsis gansazRvrisaTvis, J. `sabWoTa samarTali~, 34, 1985, 17.
166
Якушев, Юридическая личность государственного предприятия, Свердловск, 1973, 233. miTiTebulia: jorbenaZe
s., dasax. naSromi, 17.
104
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
167
Zitelmann, Ernst, Bergiff und Wesen der sogenannten juristischen person, Leipzig, 1873, 23. miTiTebulia: Wanturia
l., Sesavali saqarTvelos samoqalaqo samarTlis zogad nawilSi, 213.
168
Покровский И.А., Основные проблемы гражданского права, 157.
169
Иоффе О.С., Толстой Ю.К., Новый гражданский кодекс РСФСР, Л., 1965, 231.
170
saxelmwifo organizaciebSi nebis Camomqneli organo aris direqtori, is aris nebis gamomvlenic
(Черепахин Б.Б., Волеобразование и волеизьявление юридического лица, ж. `Правоведение~, №2, 195,
http:/law.edu.ru/magazine/article...17.05.2007, 7.)
171
Рабинович Ф. Л., Вина как основание договорной ответственности предприятия, М.., 1975, 55; Гражданское право, т.
I. (под ред. Грибанова В.П.), М., 1969, 536.
172
Покровский И.А., dasax. naSromi, 157.
173
Semler in MünchKommAKTG (2004), § 116, Rn. 502. miTiTebulia wignidan: Wanturia l., korporaciul
marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, 386.
174
Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, 386.
175
Братусь С.Н., Субьекты гражданского права, 208.
105
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
176
sxva mosazrebiT, am SemTxvevaSi iuridiuli piris brali swored rigiTi muSakis, da ara xelmZRva-
neli subieqtis, braleuli moqmedebiT gamoixateba. ix. Гражданское право, под ред. Сергеева А.П. и Толстого
Ю.К., 4-е изд., т.3., М., 2005, 15.
177
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w IV, t. II (CikvaSvili S.), 400.
178
cvaigerti k., kotci h., dasax. naSromi, 330.
106
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
179
Комментарий к гражданскому кодексу Российской федерации (части второй) постатеийный, под ред. Садикова О.Н.,
М., 1999, 672.
180
Покровский И.А., Основные проблемы гражданского права, 286.
181
cvaigerti k., kotci h., dasax. naSromi, 339.
182
Виндшеид Б., Об обязательствах по римскому праву, СПБ, 1875, 42.
183
Гражданское право, под ред. Сергеева А.И. и Толстого Ю. К., ч. I., М., 1996, 505.
107
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
184
ZlieriSvili z., nasyidobis xelSekrulebis samarTlebrivi buneba, 144.
185
evropuli saxelSekrulebo samarTlis ZiriTadi debulebebi, qarTuli kerZo samarTlis krebuli, 255.
186
cvaigerti k., kotci h., dasax. naSromi, 190.
187
Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, 373.
188
Бушев А.Ю., Макарова О.А., Попондопуло В.Ф., Коммерческое право зарубежных стран, М., СПБ, 2003, 125.
189
Суханов Е.А., dasax. naSromi, 450.
108
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
190
zarandia T., dasax. naSromi,127.
191
maCalaZe s., dasax. naSromi, 76.
192
Кётц Х., Лорман Ф., dasax. naSromi, 53.
193
Palandt (Heinrichs, 2003, BGB, $286, Rn, 44. miTiTebulia: maCalaZe s., dasax. naSromi, 95.
109
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
194
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, w.3, (zoiZe b.), 425-426.
195
Комменнтарий к гражданскому кодексу Россйской Федерации, ч. 1, под ред. Садикова О.Н., М., 1997, 397.
196
Флейшиц Е.А., dasax. naSromi, 132. saerTo samarTlis sistemaSi sasamarTlo gansazRvravs amgvar
saqmianobas Semdegi garemoebebidan gamomdinare: 1) riskis xarisxi anu arsebobs Tu ara zianis miyenebis
mometebuli riski; 2) adamianis SesaZlebloba, SeaCeros aRniSnuli saqmianobidan gamomdinare safrTxe;
3) mocemuli saqmianobis uCveulo xasiaTi; 4) saqmianobis ganxorcielebis adgilis mizanSewoniloba; 5)
mocemuli saqmianobidan gamomdinare sazogadoebrivi sargeblisa da sazogadoebrivi saSiSroebis
urTierTmimarTeba. ix. Осакве К., Сравнительное правоведение в схемах. Общая и особенная часть, М., 2002, 268.
197
Майданик Л.А., Сергеева Н.Ю., Материальная ответственность за повреждение здоровья, М., 1953, 30.
198
sabWoTa sasamarTlo praqtika miuTiTebda mometebuli safrTxis wyaros mflobelisa da droebiTi
mosargeblis solidarul pasuxismgeblobaze. ix. Советское гражданское право, под.ред. Брятуся C.H., 320.
110
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
199
Гражданское право, Под.ред. Сергеева А.П. и Толсотого Ю.К., 4-е изд., т.3, 55.
200
cvaigerti k., kotci h., dasax. naSromi, 355.
201
niniZe T., ukiduresi aucileblobis viTarebaSi miyenebuli zianis anazRaurebis valdebulebis
iuridiuli buneba, krebulSi: `sabWoTa samoqalaqo samarTlisa da procesis aqtualuri sakiTxebi~,
Tb., 1977, 72-73.
202
Собчак А., О некоторых спорных вопросах общей теории правовой ответственности, ж. `Правовeдение~, №1, 1968, 55.
203
Ойхгензихт В. А., Категория риска в советском гражданском праве, ж. `Правоведение~, №5, 1971, 65.
204
Суханов Е.А., dasax. naSromi, 453.
205
erTi mosazrebiT, samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis safuZveli marTlsawinaaRmdego
arabraleuli moqmedebis ganxorcielebisas aris riski. ix. Ойхгензихт В., dasax. naSromi, 67; xolo sxva
mosazrebiT, zianis anazRaureba pasuxismgeblobis formad miiCneva mxolod maSin, roca is emyareba
braleul moqmedebas. ix. Красавчиков О.А., Возмещение вреда, причиненного источником повышенной опасности,
М., 1966, 142.
111
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
206
Coxeli n., kereseliZe d., garemosaTvis saSiSi saqmianobiT gamowveuli zianisTvis samoqalaqo pa-
suxismgeblobis sakiTxi qarTul kanonmdeblobaSi, J. `qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva~, pirveli-meore
kvartali, 2000, 84.
207
Хохловá Г. В., dasax. naSromi, 72.
208
wiqariSvili k., bralis gareSe pasuxismgebloba inglisur-amerikul sisxlis samarTalSi. samarTleb-
rivi anomalia Tu regulirebis efeqtiani meqanizmi, J. `samarTali~, 1, 2000, 70.
209
Покровский И. А., dasax. naSromi, 290.
210
zoiZe b., avtomobilis mflobelTa qonebrivi pasuxismgeblobis dazRvevis sakiTxisaTvis, J. `sabWo-
Ta samarTali~, 4, 1984, 24-25.
211
Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных стран, под ред. Безбаха В.В. и Пучинского В.К., 413.
212
zoiZe b., sakonstitucio kontroli da RirebulebaTa wesrigi saqarTveloSi, Tb., 2007,19-20.
112
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
7. daskvna
213
Медикус Д., dasax. naSromi, 150-151.
214
zoiZe b., dasax. naSromi, 20.
215
Коммерческое право России, под ред. Пугинского Б.И. М., 1999, 119.
113
q. qoCaSvili, brali, rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba
114
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
KETEVAN KOCHASHVILI
Assistant Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
The civil law is the set of legal rules regulating the relationships between a personal initiative and
the persons with self-responsibility. The principle of due performance of an obligation arising on a
certain basis is also recognised within the civil law; however, the non-performance of an obligation
is a risk, which is quite common for civil relationships and this risk is followed by the origin of
civil liability. The study offered to the readers serves the purpose of clarification of the essence of
one of the conditions of civil liability – the fault.
The concept of fault has undergone certain changes within the legal doctrine. In particular, the
purely evaluative or normative theory of fault was introduced instead of the psychological theory
of fault. The former is no more based on the psychic attitude of a perpetrator to his/her actions and
the consequences thereof.
This approach was accepted both by criminal and civil laws. Currently, the key point in the concept
of fault within civil law is the observance of the requirements of due diligence characteristic of
civil relationships. Against the background of these dramatic changes the author tried to develop
her own vision of civil law concept of fault. The study investigates various aspects of the category
of fault. Along with the discussion of historical development of the concept of fault, which covers
the general overview of the path taken by the mankind from objective imputation to subjective
liability, the paper deals with the essence of the types of fault (intention, negligence) from the era
of Roman Law until the present; the cases of manifestation of these types of fault within
contractual and tort law; the circle of perpetrators which, in its turn, covers the following aspects:
mixed fault, liability for the actions of incapable persons and actual executors. Furthermore, the
problem of comprehension of the fault of a legal person is also raised. A separate chapter of the
paper is dedicated to the problem of liability without fault, the discussion of the commonly
acknowledged preconditions thereof (delay on the part of a debtor and creditor and causing damage
via a source of increased danger) as well as the reasonability and lawfulness of liability without
fault. The author summarises the outcomes of the research in the final part of the paper.
115
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
gulnaz galdava
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis doqtoranti
Sesavali
116
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
117
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
1
xazgasasmelia, rom saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis mesame karis — `uflebaTa ganxorcieleba~ (115-
e-120-e muxlebi) — adekvaturi normebi gvxvdeba germaniis samoqalaqo kodeqsSi (gsk-is § 226-231).
SeiZleba iTqvas, rom, mcire sxvaobis garda, saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis aRniSnuli muxlebi,
normebisa da ideebis TvalsazrisiT, germaniis samoqalaqo samarTlis kodeqsis muxlebis analogia.
2
zoiZe b., qarTuli sanivTo samarTali, Tb., 2003, 110.
118
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
119
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
120
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
3
amerikis iuristTa asociacia, saqarTvelos iuridiuli profesiis reformis indeqsi, gamocemulia
aSS-Si amerikis iuristTa asociaciisa da centraluri evropisa da evraziis samarTlebrivi inicia-
tivis mier, vaSingtoni, 2005, NW.15, b 740, www.abaceeli.org.
121
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
4
kobaxiZe a., samoqalaqo samarTali, I, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 338.
122
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
vaSi SeiZleba gamoyenebul iqnes kanoniT gaTvaliswinebuli maTi dacvis sxva xerxe-
bic.5
samoqalaqo uflebebis dacvis saSualebaTa samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi re-
gulirebis meore doneze warmodgenilia kanoniT dadgenili dacvis saSualebebi,
romlebic gamoiyeneba mxolod garkveul saxeobaTa samoqalaqo uflebebis dasaca-
vad an garkveuli darRvevebisgan dasacavad. am TvalsazrisiT, SegviZlia vilapara-
koT iuridiul pirTa damfuZneblebis (monawileebis), qonebis mesakuTris, valde-
bulebiT kreditoris da sxvaTa uflebebis dacvis damoukidebel saSualebebze.
samoqalaqo uflebebis dacvis saSualebebi eqvemdebareba klasifikacias Semdegi
kategoriebiT: gamoyenebis sferos mixedviT (universaluri da specialuri); gan-
xorcielebis meTodebis mixedviT (sasamarTloSi sarCelis wardgena, saxelmwifo
organoebisaTvis mimarTva, damoukidebeli gamoyeneba da a.S.).
Tumca, vfiqrobT, rom samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis saSualebebis klasifi-
kaciisaTvis praqtikulad yvelaze mniSvnelovani kriteriumi aris Sedegi, romlis-
Tvisac gamiznulia maTi gamoyeneba, darRveuli uflebisaTvis maTi gamoyenebis
Sedegebis xasiaTi.
aRniSnuli kriteriumi imavdroulad SeiZleba erT-erTi ZiriTadi kriteri-
umi iyos darRveuli uflebis subieqtis mier misi dacvis optimaluri saSualebis
SerCevisaTvis. swored esaa misi praqtikuli mniSvneloba.
amrigad, Tu samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis saSualebebis klasifikacias sa-
fuZvlad davudebT Sedegs, romlisTvisac misi gamoyenebaa gaTvaliswinebuli, uni-
versaluri saSualebebi Semdeg jgufebad SeiZleba ganawildes:
pirveli jgufi Seicavs dacvis saSualebebs, romelTa gamoyeneba saSualebas
iZleva, dadasturdes dasacavi ufleba, an Sewydes (Seicvalos) valdebuleba. aseT
Sedegs iZleva dacvis Semdegi saSualebebis gamoyeneba: uflebis aRiareba; naturiT
valdebulebis SesrulebisTvis misja; saxelmwifo organos an adgilobrivi TviTm-
marTvelobis organos kanonsawinaaRmdego aqtis sasamarTlos mier gamou-
yenebloba; samarTlebrivi urTierTobebis Sewyveta an Secvla.
yvela, erTi SexedviT sruliad gansxvavebul, dacvis saSualebas aerTianebs da-
sacavi uflebisaTvis maTi gamoyenebis Sedegebi. ras SeiZleba niSnavdes sasamarTlos
gadawyvetileba naturiT valdebulebis aRsrulebisaTvis iZulebis Sesaxeb? uwinares
yovlisa, es aris imis dadastureba, rom pirs, romelmac sasamarTlos Sesabamisi sarCe-
liT mimarTa, aqvs ufleba, mopasuxisagan moiTxovos am valdebulebis aRsruleba. sa-
xelmwifo organos an adgilobrivi TviTmmarTvelobis organos kanonsawinaaRmdego
aqtis gamouyeneblobis Sesaxeb sasamarTlos SuamdgomlobiT rom mimarTavs, samoqa-
laqo uflebis subieqti agreTve iTxovs am uflebis dadasturebas, imis damowmebas,
rom am uflebas ar SeiZleba Seexos kanonsawinaaRmdego aqti.
praqtikis analizi mowmobs, rom dacvis yvela dasaxelebul saSualebas su-
bieqtebi iyeneben, ZiriTadad, pirvel winaswar etapze dacvis sxva xerxebis gamoye-
nebisaTvis xelSemwyobi pirobebis Seqmnis mizniT. amgvari moqmedebis aucilebloba
warmoiqmneba, rogorc wesi, situaciebSi, roca arsebobs sxva piri, romelic pre-
tenzias acxadebs dasacav uflebaze an sacilos xdis mas. magaliTad, sakuTrebis
uflebis aRiarebis Sesaxeb moTxovna xSirad win uZRvis sarCels sxvisi ukanono
5
uflebaTa dacvis saSualebebis klasificirebasTan dakavSirebiT, garkveuli azrTa sxvadasxvaobaa
mecnier iuristTa Soris, Tumca saSualebaTa ZiriTadi nawili Tanmxvedria. Толстой Ю.К., Сергеев А.П.,
Гражданское право, 1, Санкт-Петербург, 1996, 247-248.
123
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
6
Суханов Е.А, Гражданское право, Том 1, М., 2005.
124
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
125
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
7
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis analogi normebi gvxvdeba germaniis samoqalaqo kodeqsSi:
ssk-is 408-e muxli — gsk-is § 249, ssk-is 409-e — gsk-is § 251, ssk-is 411-e — gsk-is § 252, ssk-is 413-e —
gsk-is § 253, ssk-is 415-e — gsk-is § 254.
8
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, (zoiZe b.), wigni III, Tb., 2001, 469.
9
iqve, 452.
126
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
127
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
10
saqarTvelos uzenaesi sasamarTlos internetgverdi: http://www.supremecourt.ge.
128
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
11
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari (niniZe T.), wigni I, 1999, 74.
129
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
12
Актуальные проблемы гражданского права, Сборник статей под редакцией профессора Брагинского М.И., Статья
Кораблевой М.С., «Защита гражданских прав: новые аспекты», М., 1998, 85.
130
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
13
Грибанов В.П., Пределы осуществления и защиты гражданских прав, М., 1972.
14
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis 120-e muxlis analogiur mowesrigebas gvTavazobs germaniis
samoqalaqo kodeqsis § 231.
131
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
132
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
15
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari (jorbenaZe s.), wigni I, Tb., 2002, 302.
16
kobaxiZe a., samoqalaqo samarTali, I, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 331.
17
SavguliZe T., aucilebeli mogerieba, saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa akademiis `macne~ 1, 1993, 41.
133
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
18
SavguliZe T., moqalaqis uflebebi moZaladis mogeriebis dros, Tb., 1975, 13.
19
iqve, 5.
20
niniZe T., ukiduresi aucileblobis viTarebaSi miyenebuli zianis anazRaurebis valdebulebis
iuridiuli buneba, `sabWoTa samoqalaqo samarTlisa da procesis aqtualuri sakiTxebi~, 1977, 58.
21
kobaxiZe a., samoqalaqo samarTali, I, zogadi nawili, 331.
22
iqve, 332.
134
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
135
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
136
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
137
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
138
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
daskvna
139
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
140
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
GULNAZ GALDAVA
Doctoral Student, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
Like any other right, the right to defence implies the possibility of undertaking of an own positive
action by an authorised person, on the one hand, and on the other – the possibility of demanding
certain behaviour from a responsible person. The right to own action in the case concerned
encompasses such treatment of a perpetrator as: the necessary defence, the application of the so-
called operational sanctions, etc. The right to demand a certain behaviour from a responsible
person mainly implies the measures applied by competent authorities against a perpetrator,
provided an aggrieved party applies thereto for the protection of his violated rights.
Delegating the parties with the right to define the relationship between them and the content
thereof is manifested in the dominance of the optional rules of civil law, which, as a rule, imply the
possibility for the participants to choose the most suitable for them option. Furthermore, they are
able to apply or not to apply the means of protection of their interests, granted thereto by civil law,
at their own discretion. At the same time, this provides for unsolicited nature of their interrelation
in most cases. The attainment of consequences by the parties, which is necessary for the
satisfaction of their needs, first of all depends on their initiative and ability to settle their
relationships, which does not exclude a certain property (commercial) risk, but rather implies it.
Another most important aspect of the duty to defend is also the preventive task, which means the
stimulation and organisation of such behaviour of the participants of a regulated relationship,
which excludes unjustified encroachment upon or violation of the others’ interests. This duty
becomes particularly apparent within tort or other legal obligations, also through the regulation of
personal non-property relationships.
Insofar as the majority of the relationships regulated by civil law account for property (or related
thereto non-property) relationships, the civil law responsibility, like the majority of the other civil
law measures, is of property nature. It is revealed in the compensation of damages to the aggrieved
party or enforced payment of the other amounts or assets in their favour, which, as a rule, do not
exceed the amount of damages. To put it in other words, it is of compensative nature, which is
compatible with the principle of equivalence applied in the field of value-based (commodity-
pecuniary) relationship.
141
g. galdava, samoqalaqo uflebaTa dacvis formebi da safuZvlebi...
The main duty of the civil law is, first of all, to regulate normal economic relationships within the
society. To put it in other words, this concerns not the offences, but rather the organisation of
ordinary property relationships. Due to this reason, it contains the minimum set of necessary bans
and the maximum set of possible permissions. With the help of civil law instruments, the
participants of property relationships regulate their activity for the purpose of attaining the
necessary for them consequences. Even the moral damage within the civil law is compensated in
monetary terms. Property loss may be compensated in the case of violation of personal non-
property rights as well.
142
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
naTia CitaSvili
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis doqtoranti
I. Sesavali
143
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
1
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema, `uwyebani~,
sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997.
2
Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I and II - Revised 1998, Part III – 2003, www.lexmercatoria.org, (08.12.07.).
3
CaCava s., myidvelis meoradi uflebebis SedarebiTsamarTlebrivi analizi, qarTuli samarTlis
mimoxilva, specialuri gamocema, 2004, 35.
4
germaniis samoqalaqo kodeqsi — German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris
GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005.
144
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
145
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
5
Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 387.
6
garda vadis gadacilebisa, romlis samarTlebriv konstruqciaSi brali gansakuTrebul mniSvnelobas
iZens.
146
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
7
Lessius L., De iustitia et iure, lib. 2, cap. 7, dub. 6 (omission alicuius Diligentia, unde sequitur aliquod incommodum),
miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2006, 338.
8
Molina L., De iustitia et iure, disp. 293, no.12 (deviationem ab eo, quod bonum est, quodque per hominis potuit diligentiam
provideri), miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006, 338.
9
Dig. 44.7.1.4, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006, 337.
10
Gratian, Decretum, D.50, cc.49-50; Decretales Gregorii ix.5.10.7-13 on Corpus iuris canonici 2 (Friedberg E., ed., Leipzig,
1876); Papiensis B., Summa Decretalium (laspeyres, ed., Graz, 1976), lb.5, tit.10, §§5-6; Pennaforte R., Summa de Paenitentia
(Ochoa and Diez, eds., Rome.1976), lib.2, tit. 1, § 3. ix. Kuttner S., Kanonistische Schuldlehre von Gratian bis auf die
Dekretalen Gregors IX (Vatican City, 1935), 213-27, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort,
Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 337.
11
Glossa ordinaria to Decretales Gregorii ix,Venice, 1595, 5.36.5, Casus to non custovit; to reddet; to 5.36.6 to voluntarie;
to5.36.9, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006, 338.
12
Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 338.
13
iqve, 341.
14
Puchta G.F., Pandekten, 2nd ed., Leipzig, 1844, §266, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property,
Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 341.
15
ix. Windscheid B., Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts 1, 7th ed., Frankfurt–am-Main, 1891, §101, miTiTebulia: Gordley J.,
Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 341.
16
ix. Lessius L., De iustitia et iure, lib. 2, cap.7, dub.6, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property,
Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 338.
147
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
17
ix. Molina L., De iustitia et iure, disp.293, no.10, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort,
Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 338.
18
ix. Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 338.
19
Lessius L., De iustitia et iure, lib.2, cap.7, dub.6, no.23; Molina L., De iustitia et iure, disp. 293, no. 18, miTiTebulia:
Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 338-9.
20
Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 339.
21
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 370-1.
22
Powell J.L., Stewert R., Jackson R.M., Jackson and Powell on Professional Negligence, 5th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, 2001, 2-
120, miTiTebulia: Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd
ed., Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 445.
23
Supply of Goods and Services Act, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1982/cukpga_19820029_en_1,
(15.08.2008).
24
ix. Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 446.
25
damatebiT ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 126.
148
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
2. bralis formebi
2.1 ganzraxva
26
Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 447.
27
ix. iqve, 447.
28
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 382.
29
Fikentscher W., Schuldrecht, 8, Auflage, Berlin – New-York, 1992, 312; Müch-Komm-Hanau, §276, 49-50. Schellhammer
K., Zivilrecht nach Anspruchsgrundlagen, 627, miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecu-
riani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi
nawili, Tb., 2001, 382.
149
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
30
ix. essp-is (Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I and II - Revised 1998, Part III – 2003, www.lexmercatoria.org,
(08.12.07)) 1:301 (5), 2:104, 3:102 (2), 3:204 (2), 3:205(1)(3), 3:208, 3:209 (1), 3:301(1), 4:109(1), 4:103 (1), 4:111(2), 4:113
(1), 4:114, 4:117(1), 6:101(2)(3), 6:110(3), 6:111(2), 7:101(2), 8:103 (b), 8:108(3), 9:102(3), 9:303(2)(3), 9:503 muxlebi.
31
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 382.
32
ix. iqve, 384.
33
Medicus D., Schuldrecht, Allgemeiner, 8 Auflage, 149, miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia
r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali,
zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 384.
34
ix. cvaigerti k., kotci h., SedarebiTi samarTalmcodneobis Sesavali kerZo samarTlis sferoSi, tomi
II, Tb., 2001, 290.
150
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
35
ix. Manfred L., in Staudinger, $276, 2004, Rn. 28, miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da
xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samarTalSi, Tb., 2006, 377.
36
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 386.
37
Fikentscher W., Schuldrecht, 8, Auflage, Berlin – New-York, 1992, 314, miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe
T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi
samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 386.
38
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 383-4.
39
ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 125.
151
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
40
iqve, 122-3.
41
ix. ZlieriSvili z., valdebulebis Sesruleba, Tb., 2006, 126.
42
French Civil Code, Translated by Rouhette G. with the assistance of Rouhette-Berton A., 2006.
43
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni IV, t. II, Tb., 2001, 56.
44
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§599.
152
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
45
ix. iqve, §1359.
46
ix. iqve, §1664.
47
ix. iqve, §277.
48
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Lon-
don/Boston, 2000, 385.
49
ix. iqve, 385.
153
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
50
ix. Treitel G.H., The Law of Contract, 9th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1995, 755.
51
analogiurad inglisur samarTalSi baTilad iTvleba SeTanxmeba ganzraxi darRvevisaTvis
pasuxismgeblobisagan ganTavisuflebis Sesaxeb. ix. Unfair Contract Terms Act, 1977, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/
RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1977/cukpga_19770050_en_1, (22.09.2008).
52
The EC Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts 93/13/EEC: L 95/29, http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/articles3/kaye3.rtf,
(15.05.08).
53
pasuxismgeblobisagan ganTavisuflebis an SezRudvis Sesaxeb saxelSekrulebo daTqmebis baTiloba
gaTvaliswinebulia ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri
gamocema, `uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) araerTi muxliT, magaliTad, 497-e, 539-e, 697-e
da sxva.
154
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
54
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 460.
55
ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Lon-
don/Boston, 2000, 386.
155
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
56
Варкалло В., Об ответственности по гражданскому праву, М., Прогресс, 1978, 100, miTiTebulia: qoCaSvili q.,
brali rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxismgeblobis piroba, Tsu-is iuridiuli fakul-
tetis doqtorantis saseminaro naSromi, Tb., 2007, 10.
156
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
57
ix. Basedow J., Towards a Universal Doctrine of Breach of Contract: The Impact of the CISG, International Review of Law
and Economics, September 2005, http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/basedow.html#i, (09.11.2006).
58
ix. Цваигерт K., Кётц X., Введение в сравнительное правоведение в сфере частного права, т. 2, М., Международные
oтношения, 1998, 388, miTiTebulia: qoCaSvili q., brali rogorc samoqalaqosamarTlebrivi pasuxis-
mgeblobis piroba, Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis doqtorantis saseminaro naSromi, Tb., 2007, 12.
59
Verschuldensprinzip - Fault principle.
60
gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§276.
61
analogiurad niderlandebis samoqalaqo kodeqsis (New Netherlands Civil Code, Translated by Haanappel P.C.,
Mackaay E., Under the Auspices of the Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands, Quebec Centre of Private and Comparative Law,
Boston) 6.74 da 6.75 muxlebi movales akisrebs SeusruleblobiT miyenebuli zianis anazRaurebis val-
debulebas, Tu mas Seusrulebloba miewereba. amgvari miweris [Seracxvis] winapiroba aris braleuloba,
Tu kanonidan, garigebidan an zogadad aRiarebuli Sexedulebidan sxva ram ar gamomdinareobs, ix. Fok-
kema D.C., Hartkamp A.S., Law of Obligations, in: Introduction to Dutch Law, Chorus u.a. (Hrsg.), 99, miTiTebulia: pe-
legrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo
jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 153.
157
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
62
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 395-e muxli.
63
ix. iqve, 992-e muxli.
64
ix. Zweigert K., Kötz H., Introduction to Comparative Law, Volume II-The Institutions of Private Law, 2nd Revised ed.,
Translated from German by Weir T., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987,187.
65
ix. Reimann M., Zimmermann R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Farnsworth A., Comparative Contract
Law, Part III, Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2006, 922.
66
ix. iqve, 922.
67
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 450.
158
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
68
ix. iqve, 445.
69
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis ko-
mentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 374.
70
Sead. Frossard, La distinction des obligations de moyens et des obligations de résultat, Paris, 1965, S.3 ff. miTiTebulia:
pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `ser-
go jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 151.
71
Larenz K., Schuldrecht, Bd. 1, Allgemeiner Yeil, 14. Aufl., München, 1987, §20 I, miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., su-
bieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe —
70~, Tb., 1996, 152.
72
Constantinesco E., Inexécution et faute contractuelle en droit comparé, Bruxelles 1960, Nr. 203, miTiTebulia: pe-
legrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo
jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 152.
73
Constantinesco E., (Fr.6); Hübner H., Subjektivismus in der Entwicklung des Privatrechts, in FS Kaser, München, 1976,der
auf Ausnahmen bei den Rechtsverhältnissen in der Familie und unter den Mitgliedern einer bürgerlich-rechtlichten Gesellschaft
verweist, S. 715.732; siehe zur Entwicklung des Schuldbegriffs, Meder, Schuld, Zufall, Risiko, Frankfurt am Main 1993, miTi-
Tebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo kre-
buli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 152.
159
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
74
Traité des obligations, Bd. 5, Paris 1925, Nr. 1237, miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi
saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 153.
75
ix. Schmidt-Kessel M., Osnabrück, Remedies for Breach of Contract in European Private Law- Principles of European
Contract Law, Acquis Communautaire and Common and Frame of Reference, Schulze R., ed., New Features in Contract Law,
Sellier, European Law Publishers, 2007, 185.
76
ix. Reimann M., Zimmermann R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Farnsworth A., Comparative Contract
Law, Part III, Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2006, 923.
77
Schmidt-Kessel M., Osnabrück, Remedies for Breach of Contract in European Private Law - Principles of European Contract
Law, Acquis Communautaire and Common and Frame of Reference, Schulze R., ed., New Features in Contract Law, Sellier,
European Law Publishers, 2007, 185.
160
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
daucvelobiT. `cause etrangere-s cneba aerTianebs rogorc force majeure-s, ise mesame
piris an mevalis qmedebebs, romlebic zianis warmoqmnas uwyoben xels~.78
im SemTxvevaSi, Tu xelSekruleba mxolod aucilebeli da gonivruli
windaxedulebis gamoCenas avaldebulebs mxares, maSin pasuxismgebloba swored
aRniSnuli valdebulebis darRvevisTvis dadgeba da ara Sedegis miuRwevlo-
bisTvis.79
obligation de résultat-is safuZvelze movale iZleva xelSekrulebiT dasaxuli
miznis Sesrulebis sagarantio pirobas. aseTi saxis valdebulebis xelSek-
rulebiT ganmtkiceba gamarTlebulia im SemTxvevaSi, Tu, mosalodneli riskis
gaTvaliswinebiT, movales valdebulebis Sesrulebis uzrunvelyofisaTvis
meti garantiebi aqvs. obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba umTavresad
Sedegis valdebulebebs aerTianebs, vinaidan igi gamoricxavs subieqturi
mosazrebebis gaTvaliswinebas Sedegis miuRwevlobis SemTxvevaSi.80 qcevisa da
dacvis valdebulebebi ki, ZiriTadad, braleulobis princips emyareba.
`essp-is 8:108 muxli Seicavs daTqmas klasikuri forsmaJoruli garemoebis
Sesaxeb. aRniSnuli muxlis ZaliT izRudeba pasuxismgebloba xelSekrulebiT
gaTvaliswinebuli Sedegis miRwevis valdebulebis (obligations de résultat) darRve-
visaTvis~81, vinaidan saxelSekrulebo urTierTobaSi warmoSobili dauZleveli ga-
remoeba SeuZlebels xdis Sesrulebas da pasuxismgeblobisagan ganTavisuflebis
safuZvels qmnis.82 `Tu xelSekruleba iTvaliswinebs gansazRvruli Sedegis miR-
wevis valdebulebas, maSin pasuxismgeblobisagan ganTavisuflebis winapirobaa mxa-
ris kontrols miRma arsebuli damabrkolebeli garemoeba, romelic SeuZlebels
xdis Sesrulebas.~83 Tu xelSekrulebiT ganmtkicebulia obligations de moyens, maSin
movalis pasuxismgeblobas gamoricxavs ara forsmaJoruli garemoeba, aramed
mis mier valdebulebis SesrulebisaTvis aucilebeli windaxedulebisa da go-
nierebis standartis dacva.84
Sedegis valdebulebebs ganekuTvneba pasuxismgebloba fuladi da gva-
rovnuli nivTebisaTvis, aseve sagarantio pasuxismgebloba nivTis naklis gamo.
78
Weill A., Terré F., Fn. 8, Nr. 411 ff.; Malaurie P., Aynés L., Fn.15, Nr. 827 ff., miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., su-
bieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe —
70~, Tb., 1996, 154.
79
ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Lon-
don/Boston, 2000, 434.
80
Sead. Mazeaud, Essai de classificatiob des obligations, RTDC 1936, 1; Tunc A., La Distinction des obligations de résultat et
des obligations de diligence, JCP, 1945, 1,449; Unter welchen Umständen eine Erfolgspflicht angemessen ist, ist insbesondere
im französischen Recht diskutiert worden, dad ort eine Abgrenzung zwischen obligations de moyens und obligations de résultat
notwending ist, siehe dazu auch Crépeau (Fn.8), Nr. 63 ff.; vgl. zudem im deutschen Recht etwa Esser J., Schmidt E.,
Schuldrecht, Bd.1 1, Allgemeiner Teil, Teilbd. 1,7. Aufl., Heidelberg 1992, §6 I, miTiTebulia: pelegrino m.,
subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe —
70~, Tb., 1996, 154.
81
Schmidt-Kessel M., Osnabrück, Remedies for Breach of Contract in European Private Law - Principles of European Contract
Law, Acquis Communautaire and Common and Frame of Reference, Schulze R., ed., New Features in Contract Law, Sellier,
European Law Publishers, 2007, 185.
82
fsk-is (French Civil Code, Translated by Rouhette G. with the assistance of Rouhette-Berton A., 2006) 1147-e muxlis
Tanaxmad, Sesrulebis valdebulebisagan Tavisufldeba movale, Tu Seusrulebloba gamowveulia ga-
regani mizeziT, rac keTilsindisier movales bralad ar Seeracxeba.
83
Schmidt-Kessel M., Osnabrück, Remedies for Breach of Contract in European Private Law - Principles of European Contract
Law, Acquis Communautaire and Common and Frame of Reference, Schulze R., ed., New Features in Contract Law, Sellier,
European Law Publishers, 2007, 192.
84
ix. iqve, 185.
161
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
85
Treitel G.H., Remedies for Breach of Contract, Oxford, 1988, Nr. 17. damatebiT ix. Fault in the Common Law of Contract,
in: Liber Amicorum for Lord Wilberforce, M. Bos/I. Brownlie (Hrsg.), 185, miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi
Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb.,
1996, 158.
86
Wieacker F., Leistungshandlung und Leistungserfolg im Bürgerlichen Schuldrecht, in: FS Nipperdey, München, 1965, S. 783
ff., miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubi-
leo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 163.
87
pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli
`sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 163.
88
iqve, 158.
89
ix. iqve, 163.
90
italiis samoqalaqo kodeqsis 1176-e muxlis Tanaxmad, movalem Tavisi valdebulebebis Sesrulebisas
,,mzrunveli meojaxis~ (Buon padre di famiglia) gulmodgineba unda gamoiCinos, iqve, 156.
162
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
91
ix. pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli
`sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 169.
92
Ob eine Beseitigung der sogenannten ,,Schwächen” des Deliktsrechts geegnet ist, daran etwas zu ändern, muß angesichts des
Bestehens von Schutzpflichten in anderen Rechtsordnungen bei insoweit günstigerer normativer Ausgangslage im Deliktrecht
often bleiben. Siehe einerseits die folgenden ausführungen zum französischen und italienischen Recht und andererseits Gotthard,
Landesbericht Frankreich sowie Busnelli, Landesbericht Italien, in: Deliktsrecht n Europa, v. Bar (Hrsg.), München, 1993;
ablehnend auch Larenz K., (Fn.5), §9 I c, miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSek-
rulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 167.
93
ix. Schmidt-Kessel M., Osnabrück, Remedies for Breach of Contract in European Private Law - Principles of European
Contract Law, Acquis Communautaire and Common and Frame of Reference, Schulze R., ed., New Features in Contract Law,
Sellier, European Law Publishers, 2007, 184.
94
iqve, 386.
95
Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 387.
163
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
96
pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli
`sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 168.
97
ix. Stoll H., Abschied von Lehre von der positive Vetragsverletzung, AcP 136, (1932), 257,298 ff. Esser J., Schmidt E., (Fn.
38), §29 und ders. (Fn.56), §§ 5 II, 6 II-IV.; Larenz K., (Fn.5), § 9 II, Canaris, Ansprüche wegen ,,positiver Vertragsvertzung”
und ,,schutzwirking für Dritte” bei nichtigen VerTrägen, JZ, 1965, 475 ff.; Castrobovo (Fn.75), Nr.3.2; Nr.3.2;Visintini (Fn.28),
S. 239 ff, miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba?
saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 167.
98
ix. essp-is (Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I and II - Revised 1998, Part III – 2003, www.lexmercatoria.org,
(08.12.07.)) 7:110 muxli.
99
ix. Wanturia l., korporaciuli marTva da xelmZRvanelTa pasuxismgebloba sakorporacio samar-
TalSi, Tb., 2006, 373.
164
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
100
Zimmermann R., Breach of Contract and Remedies Under the New German Law of Obligations, Saggi, Conferenze e
Seminari 48, Roma, 2002, 1.
101
Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Sculdrechts, Vom 26.11.2001, verkündet in Jahrgang 2001 Nr. 61 vom 29.11.2001,
http://www.rechtliches.de/info_Gesetz_zur_Modernisierung_des_Schuldrechts.html, (24.07.08.).
102
Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 383.
103
iqve, 438.
104
iqve, 438.
105
Zimmermann R., Breach of Contract and Remedies Under the New German Law of Obligations, Saggi, Conferenze e
Seminari 48, Roma, 2002, 7-8.
106
Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 438.
107
iqve, 438.
108
ix. iqve, 379.
165
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
109
iqve, 387.
110
Pflichtverletzung.
111
Schutzpflichten.
112
ix. essp-is (Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I and II - Revised 1998, Part III – 2003, www.lexmercatoria.org,
(08.12.07.)) 1:103 IV muxli.
166
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
113
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§ 286 IV.
114
Palandt O., Heinrichs H., 2003, BGB $286, Rn.5, miTiTebulia: maCalaZe s., zianis anazRaureba valdebulebis
darRvevisas (saqarTvelosa da germaniis kanonmdeblobaTa analizi), qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva,
specialuri gamocema, 2004, 77.
167
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
115
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 420.
116
gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
286-e II paragrafi gansazRvravs SemTxvevebs, rodesac vada gadacilebulad iTvleba saTanado
gafrTxilebis gareSe.
117
Zimmermann R., The Law of Obligations - Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Breach of Contract, Chapter 25,
Clarendon, Oxford University Press, 1996, 792.
118
iqve, 792.
119
ix. iqve ,793.
120
iqve , 793.
121
ix. iqve, 792.
122
ix. iqve, 792.
123
ix. iqve, 794.
168
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
169
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
131
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§ 286 IV.
132
fsk-is (French Civil Code, Translated by Rouhette G. with the assistance of Rouhette-Berton A., 2006) 1138-e muxlis
Tanaxmad, myidvels sakuTrebis ufleba nivTze warmoeSoba xelSekrulebis dadebis momentidan, magram
movalis mier vadis gadacilebisas kreditors ar daekisreba nivTis SemTxveviTi daRupvisa da ganad-
gurebis riski.
133
ix. maCalaZe s., zianis anazRaureba valdebulebis darRvevisas (saqarTvelosa da germaniis kanon-
mdeblobaTa analizi), qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva, specialuri gamocema, 2004, 77.
170
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
134
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 120.
135
iqve, 120.
136
iqve, 121.
137
ix. iqve, 121.
138
ix. kandelhardi r., realuri Sesruleba Tu zianis anazRaureba: saerTaSoriso konsensusi?
saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 108.
139
ix. Zimmermann R., Roman Law and European Culture, New Zealand Law Review 341, 2007,4.
171
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
140
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 651-e muxli.
141
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 631.
172
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
142
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§300.
143
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 355.
144
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 391-e muxli.
173
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
145
ix. kandelhardi r., realuri Sesruleba Tu zianis anazRaureba: saerTaSoriso konsensusi?
saiubileo krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 108.
146
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§ 326 V.
174
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
147
ix. Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 386.
148
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 404-e muxli.
149
ix. iqve, 407-e muxli.
150
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 399.
151
Zimmermann R., Breach of Contract and Remedies Under the New German Law of Obligations, Saggi, Conferenze e
Seminari 48, Roma, 2002, 10.
152
Dig.50.17.185, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment,
Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 336.
153
Zimmermann R., The Law of Obligations - Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, CapeTown, 1990, 192-7,
miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2006, 337.
175
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
154
Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 337.
155
Aquinas T., Summamtheologiae II –II. Q. 88, a.2 (How to do impossible not binding); 89,a.7 (Oath to do the impossible not
binding), miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006, 338.
156
ix. Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New
York, 2006, 341.
157
Brinz A., Lotmar P., Lehrbuch der Pandekten 3, 2nd edn., Erlangen, 1892, §245; Dernburg H., Pandekten 2, 4th edn., Berlin,
1894, §16; Puchta G.F., Pandekten, 2nd edn., Leipzig, 1844, §302; Windscheid B., Book review of Mommsen T., I Kritishe
Zeitschrift für die gesammte Rechtswissenschaft 2,1855, 106-45, 118, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law:
Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 341.
158
rac Seexeba amerikul samarTals, aq damkvidrebulia arabraleuli Sesrulebis SeuZleblobis
gamomxatveli ori termini: Sesrulebis arapraqtikuloba da xelSekrulebis miznis xelyofa. ix.
"Impracticability" and "Frustration of Contract" in Burton S.J., Contract Law: Selected Source Materials, Restatement of Law,
West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minn., Chapter 11, 1995, 233-236.
159
ix. Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New
York, 2006, 337.
160
Dig 15.1.137, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006, 337.
161
Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 413.
162
ix. Medicus D., Grudnwissen zum Bürgerlichen Recht, 2002, Rn.150, miTiTebulia: maCalaZe s., zianis
anazRaureba valdebulebis darRvevisas (saqarTvelosa da germaniis kanonmdeblobaTa analizi),
qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva, specialuri gamocema, 2004, 86.
176
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
163
ix. Mattheus D., Schuldrechtsmodernisierung 2001/2002, Die Neuordnung des allgemeinen Leistungsstörungs – rechts, JuS,
2002, 212, miTiTebulia: maCalaZe s., zianis anazRaureba valdebulebis darRvevisas (saqarTvelosa da
germaniis kanonmdeblobaTa analizi), qarTuli samarTlis mimoxilva, specialuri gamocema, 2004, 86.
164
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 453.
165
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§275 I, III.
166
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Lon-
don/Boston, 2000, 362.
177
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
167
Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 390.
168
iqve, 415.
169
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 383.
170
ix. iqve, 383.
178
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
171
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 412-e muxli.
179
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
172
Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 413.
173
Zweigert K., Kötz H., Introduction to Comparative Law, Volume II-The Institutions of Private Law, 2nd Revised ed.,
Translated from German by Weir T., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987, 521, miTiTebulia: Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe
T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi
samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 408.
174
Tu xelSekrulebis sagani individualuri niSniT gansazRvruli nivTia, maSin valdebulebiTsamar-
Tlebriv urTierTobaSi warmoSobili dabrkolebis daZlevisaTvis movales ar akisria finansuri
saxsrebis gaRebis movaleoba im odenobiT, rac aRemateba saxelSekrulebo fass. ix. Markesinis S.B.,
Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing, Oxford and
Portland, Oregon, 415.
175
Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart Publishing,
Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 413.
180
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
176
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§275 I.
177
ix. iqve, §275 III.
178
ix. iqve, §275 II.
181
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
179
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 396.
182
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
180
iqve, 379.
181
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract - A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 447.
182
Schlechtriem P., Uniform Sales Law-The UN-Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods,
www.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/treaty, (20.07.08.).
183
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 445.
183
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
184
ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Lon-
don/Boston, 2000, 380.
185
iqve, 381.
186
iqve, 381.
187
iqve,379.
188
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 372-3.
184
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
189
saqarTvelos uzenaesi sasamarTlos samoqalaqo, samewarmeo da gakotrebis saqmeTa palatis
ganCineba (02.03.06.) as-853-1122-05, http://www.supremecourt.ge/default.aspx?sec_id=133&lang=1, (15.07.08.).
190
mniSvnelovania, rom angloamerikul samarTlebriv sistemaSi valdebulebis arabraleuli Seus-
rulebloba darRvevad ar ganixileba. Tumca ssk-is 401-e muxlSi es wesi ar igulisxmeba, vinaidan qar-
Tuli samarTali valdebulebis darRvevis sakiTxis regulirebisas ZiriTad principebSi germanuli
samarTlis moziarea.
185
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
191
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 399-e I muxli.
186
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
187
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
192
Sale of Goods Act, 1979 – This act is Reproduced with amendments as at 1st October 2003. Crown Copyright Material is
reproduced with the Permission of the Contoller of HMSO and the Queen‘s Printer for Scotland. http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/en-
gland.sale.of.goods.act.1979/doc#3 , (20.09.2008).
193
ix. snSk-is me-13 muxli.
194
iqve, me-15 muxli.
195
iqve, me-14 muxli.
196
Treitel G.H., The Law of Contract, 9th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1995, 752.
188
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
197
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§438.
198
ix. Beale H., Kötz H., Hartkamp A., Tallon D., eds., Casebooks on the Common Law of Europe, Hart Publishing, Oxford
and Portland, Oregon, 2002, 756.
199
ix. fsk-is (French Civil Code, Translated by Rouhette G. with the assistance of Rouhette-Berton A., 2006) 1643-e muxli.
200
ix. iqve, 1645-e muxli.
189
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
201
ix. iqve, 1642-e muxli.
202
mniSvnelovania, rom saqonlis nasyidobis Sesaxeb kanoni (35.2 muxli) gonivrul vadas uwesebs myid-
vels xiluli defeqtis aRmosaCenad, sanam Sesruleba miRebulad CaiTvlebodes samarTlebrivi mniS-
vnelobiT.
203
ix. ZlieriSvili z., valdebulebis Sesruleba, Tb., 2006, 15.
190
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
204
ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 134.
205
ix. iqve, 135.
206
ix. essp-is (Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I and II - Revised 1998, Part III – 2003, www.lexmercatoria.org,
(08.12.07.)) 8:108 I muxli.
207
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 78.
191
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
208
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§179.
209
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§831.
210
Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 364.
211
iqve, 363.
192
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
212
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§662.
213
ix. iqve, §664.
214
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 363.
215
es samarTlebrivi tradicia jer kidev romis samarTlisgan momdinareobs. ix. Zweigert K., Kötz H.,
Introduction to Comparative Law, Volume II-The Institutions of Private Law, 2nd Revised ed., Translated from German by Weir
T., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987, 299.
193
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
216
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 766-e II muxli.
217
ix. iqve, 997-e muxli.
194
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
218
pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo krebuli
`sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 160.
219
Sead. Stoll H., in: Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht, 2, Aufl., München 1995, v. Caemmerer E., Schlechtriem P.
(Hrsg.) Art.79 Rdnr.7; Keil A., Die Haftungsbefreiung des Schulners im UN-Krankfurt am Main 1993, S.105 ff.,
miTiTebulia: pelegrino m., subieqturi Tu obieqturi saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgebloba? saiubileo
krebuli `sergo jorbenaZe — 70~, Tb., 1996, 162.
220
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§362.
221
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 410.
222
Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 406.
223
ix. iqve, 345.
224
ix. iqve, 345.
195
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
225
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 357.
226
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 405-e II (a) muxli.
227
ix. iqve, 352-e I muxli.
196
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
228
Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 409.
229
ix. Zimmermann R., The Law of Obligations - Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Breach of Contract, Chapter 25,
Clarendon, Oxford University Press, 1996, 803.
230
Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komen-
tari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 448.
231
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 406-e II muxli.
197
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
232
analogiuri midgomaa gaziarebuli amerikul samarTalSi, sadac valdebulebis Seusrulebloba
sinalagmatikur xelSekrulebebSi aqarwylebs meore mxaris Semxvedri valdebulebis Sesrulebis
vadamosulobas, ix. Burton S.J., Contract Law: Selected Source Materials, Restatement of Law, West Publishing Co., St.
Paul, Minn., 1995, 228.
233
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§326 II.
198
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
234
Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague/London/Boston, 2000, 115.
235
iqve, 360.
236
iqve, 361.
237
Larenz K., Canaris C.W., Lehrbuch, §31 I e, Grunsky W. in Münchener Kommentar to §254, no. 7. OLG, Munich, 23 Feb.
1990, NJW-RR 1990, 828 at 829 (all the damages on the injured party when the injurer was grossly negligent); Heinrichs H. in
Palandt O. to §254, no.51, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust
Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 411.
238
ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis
komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 482-3.
199
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
239
arsebiTi Seusruleblobis samarTlebrivi kategoria gansakuTrebiT aRiarebulia angloamerikuli
samarTlis sistemaSi — Substantial Failure in Treitel G.H., The Law of Contract, 9th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, London,
1995, 686-693.
240
ix. gsk-is (German Civil Code - Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Juris GmbH, Saarbrücken, 2005)
§323 V.
200
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
241
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 405-e III (a) muxli.
242
ix. Lando O., Beale H., Principles of European Contract Law, part I and II, Kluwer Law International, The Ha-
gue/London/Boston, 2000, 364.
243
ix. iqve, 365.
201
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
244
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 388.
245
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 405-e III (b) muxli.
246
ix. Treitel G.H., The Law of Contract, 9th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1995, 674-666.
202
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
247
amave Sinaarsis normas ganamtkicebs essp-is (Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I and II - Revised 1998,
Part III – 2003, www.lexmercatoria.org, (08.12.07.)) 9:301 I, 9:102 II muxlebi.
203
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
248
Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 432.
204
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
gsk-is 346-e III (3) paragrafi awesrigebs kidev erT SemTxvevas, rodesac
movales ar warmoeSoba fuladi anazRaurebis valdebuleba, kerZod, Tu qoneba
gafuWda an ganadgurda uflebamosil pirTan, miuxedavad imisa, rom igi iseve
eqceoda qonebas, rogorc sakuTars. am dros qonebis SemTxveviTi daRupvisa da
ganadgurebis riski valdebulebis damrRvev mxarezea da ara kreditorze, romlis
gankargulebaSic qoneba imyofeba. valdebulebis darRvevis ZaliT aRniSnuli
riski kreditoridan movaleze gadainacvlebs. magaliTad, qonebis nasyidobis
SemTxvevaSi, Tu gamyidvelis darRvevis gamo myidvelma moiTxova xelSekrulebidan
gasvla, es ukanaskneli uflebamosili iqneba, miiRos miRebuli qonebis saxel-
Sekrulebo fasi gamyidvelisagan im SemTxvevaSic ki, Tu qoneba mis xelSi daiRupeba.
magram amisTvis aucilebelia, kreditori iseTive gulisxmierebiT eqceodes
qonebas, rogorc sakuTars.249 gsk-is 277-e paragrafis Tanaxmad, Tu mxares
pasuxismgebloba unda daekisros im windaxedulebisa da sifrTxilis mixedviT,
romelsac, Cveulebriv, sakuTari saqmeebis mimarT avlens, maSin igi ar SeiZleba
ganTavisufldes uxeSi gaufrTxileblobisaTvis pasuxismgeblobisagan. zemo-
aRniSnul SemTxvevaSi kreditori martivi gaufrTxileblobisaTvis ganTavisuf-
ldeba kompensaciis valdebulebisagan, Tu daamtkicebs, rom sakuTari saqmeebis
mimarTac iseTive gulgrilobiT moqmedebs, rogorc mocemul konkretul
urTierTobaSi. `qonebiT saTanado sargebloba, rogorc aseTi, ar gulisxmobs
uxeSi gaufrTxileblobis arsebobas. Tu xelSekrulebis sagnis saTanado gamo-
yenebis Sedegad qoneba ganadgurda an dazianda, maSin gsk-is 346-e III (3) paragrafiT
ganmtkicebuli privilegia kreditoris mimarT [fuladi kompensaciisagan gan-
Tavisufleba] sruli ZaliT moqmedebs.~250 miuxedavad imisa, rom ganxilul Sem-
TxvevaSi qoneba kreditoris gavlenisa da kontrolis sferoSia moqceuli, riski
mainc valdebulebis damrRvev mxareze gadainacvlebs, vinaidan xelSekrulebidan
gasvlis safuZvels movalis mier valdebulebis Seusrulebloba qmnis.251
kreditoris ganTavisufleba qonebis kompensaciis valdebulebisagan
keTilsindisierebis dacviTaa ganpirobebuli. Tu kreditori xelSekrulebidan
gasvlis Sesaxeb gancxadebis Semdgom daazianebs misTvis nasyidobis safuZvelze
gadacemul qonebas, maSin mas yovelgvari bralisaTvis daekisreba pasuxismgebloba.
martivi gaufrTxileblobis SemTxvevaSic myidveli valdebulia, daubrunos
gamyidvels qoneba sawyis mdgomareobaSi (amasTan, normaluri sargeblobiT
gamowveuli cveTa mxedvelobaSi ar miiReba), an gadasces ekvivalenturi fuladi
kompensacia. kreditors pasuxismgebloba aRar daekisreba iseTi windaxedu-
lebisaTvis, rogorsac sakuTari saqmeebis mimarT avlens, aramed ganzraxvisa da
nebismieri formis gaufrTxileblobisaTvis. rac Seexeba sagnis SemTxveviTi
daRupvisa da ganadgurebis risks, igi kvlav valdebulebis damrRvev (am Sem-
TxvevaSi — gamyidvelis) mxarezea. 252
movalis mier valdebulebis braleuli darRvevis SemTxvevaSi ssk-is 407-e
muxli iTvaliswinebs zianis anazRaurebis moTxovnis uflebas kreditoris mier
249
ix. Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 434.
250
iqve, 435.
251
ix. Zimmermann R., The Law of Obligations - Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, CapeTown, 1990, 330,
miTiTebulia: Markesinis S.B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed.,
Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 435.
252
ix. Markesinis S. B., Unberath H., Johnston A., The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Hart
Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon,435.
205
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
253
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 412-e muxli.
254
aRniSnuli principis safuZvelze anazRaurebas ar eqvemdebareba arapirdapiri ziani, romelic,
gonivruli varaudis cnebidan gamomdinare, ver iqneboda movalisaTvis mosalodneli da winaswar
gansazRvradi. ix. Wanturia l., zoiZe b., niniZe T., Sengelia r., xecuriani j., saqarTvelos samoqalaqo
kodeqsis komentari, wigni III, valdebulebiTi samarTali, zogadi nawili, Tb., 2001, 466.
255
ix. Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New
York, 2006, 408.
256
ix. Puchta G.F., Vorlesungen, 2, §224; Windscheid B., Lehrbuch, 2, §257; ix. Vangerow K., Lehrbuch der Pandekten 3, 7th
ed., Marburg, 1863, §571, Anm.3. ix. Zimmermann R., Obligations, 833-4, miTiTebulia: Gordley J., Foundations of Private
Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 411.
257
Grunsky W. in Münchener Kommentar to §254, no.59. ix. Heinrichs H. in Palandt O. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch 62nd ed.,
Munich, 2003, to §254, no.51, OLG, Bremen, 20 Nov. 1975, Versicherungs Recht, 1976, 558-560 miTiTebulia: Gordley J.,
Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006, 411.
206
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
VIII. daskvna
258
Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York,
2006, 411.
259
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 412-e muxli.
207
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
260
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 402-e muxli.
208
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
261
ix. iqve, 391-e muxli.
262
ix. iqve, 394-e I muxli.
263
ix. iqve, 434-e II muxli.
209
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
210
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
211
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
212
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
264
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) me-8 III muxli.
213
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
214
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
265
ix. ssk-is (saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsi, saqarTvelos parlamentis oficialuri gamocema,
`uwyebani~, sakanonmdeblo damateba, 31, 1997) 412-e muxli.
215
n. CitaSvili, bralis mniSvneloba saxelSekrulebo pasuxismgeblobis gansazRvrisTvis
NATIA CHITASHVILI
Doctoral Student, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
The article offers the scientific analysis of the provisions regulating fault on the example of the
Principles of European Contract Law and German and Georgian legislation. The study aims at
revealing the positive and negative aspects of different regulation of the problem by the analysed
legal acts and also at offering specific proposals for the improvement of the domestic legislation.
The analysis of the problem of fault discloses more than one important shortcomings and gaps of
the national legal framework:
There is no single concept of breach of a contractual obligation within the Georgian legal system.
Furthermore, the Civil Code of Georgia (CCG) does not regulate the different categories of breach
in separate articles. For example: the stipulations regulating defective performance are scattered
amongst the provisions regulating sales contract. Only the delay in the performance on the part of
a debtor is being regulated separately, and only one article of the respective chapter deals with the
impossibility of performance within specified timelines as one of the main types of breach of an
obligation, and again in relation with the delayed performance – just to illustrate cases when
timelines will not be regarded as overdue. Furthermore, Article 401 of the CCG regulates only one
type of the impossibility of performance – non-faulty impossibility, which is not the only classic
example of this legal structure. Actually the impossibility of performance may be conditioned by
the fault of both a debtor and a creditor. The Code identifies any type of non-performance that is
not caused by the fault of a debtor with non-faulty impossibility of performance, which is not
correct. For example, in the case of creditor’s delay with the due date, the obligation is not fulfilled
independently from the fault of the debtor; however, this does not unconditionally provide for the
impossibility of performance. Hence, the CCG includes only the concept of impossibility of
performance without the fault of a debtor and, what is more, the wording of the provisions is
deficient and imperfect. In addition, unregulated is the availability of derivative rights, liabilities of
the parties, impossibility of objective or subjective, absolute or relative performance caused by the
fault of the creditor or debtor, which generated essential difficulties both at the level of doctrine
and application of law.
Based on the foregoing, it is important for the CCG to provide for the impossibility of performance
as a separate category of breach in order to ensure the accessibility to the right to withdraw from
the contract and claim damages. For the purposes of legal certainty, it is necessary to regulate the
types of impossibility of performance in a detailed manner and to provide for the scope of liability
of the parties to a contract with due consideration of the fault of the parties in the impossibility of
performance.
216
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
Insofar as the legal category of fault is of particular importance for each type of legal structures of
the breach of an obligation, it is necessary for the Code to regulate the categories of non-
performance in a detailed manner and to specify the importance of fault within each legal regime of
breach of an obligation. The study aims at filling up this very legislative gap.
The survey offers the following succession of the analysed issues: initially the fault and its place
within the framework of preconditions of civil liability is investigated; the next chapter discloses
the legal essence of fault and the importance of its separate forms for the administration of justice;
a separate chapter is dedicated to the interrelationship between the principles of faulty and strict
liability and their operation within the legal regime of specific types of breaches of obligation,
where the importance of fault in the case of breach of an obligation to act jointly and the liability
for faulty actions of third persons, who are performing the obligation, are discussed separately; the
problems related to the risk of non-performance of an obligation are analysed again in a separate
chapter as they are of particular importance for the administration of justice; and, finally, the
impact of fault on the origin of the right to withdraw from the contract, on the determination of the
amount of compensation for potential damage and the exemption from counter-performance is
demonstrated. The final chapter of the paper outlines the findings of the study, where the main
benchmarks of the research are analysed in aggregate.
217
d. axvlediani, anderZiT memkvidreoba da masTan dakavSirebuli problemebi...
devi xvedeliani
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis doqtoranti
I. Sesavali
1
saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis komentari, wigni me-5, Tb., 2201, 401.
2
Марышева Н.И., Международное частное право, М., 2000, 425.
218
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
3
Schönfelder H., Deutsche Gesetze, Sammlung des Zivil-, Straf und Verfahrensrechts, München, 2002, 10.
4
Hoffman B., Internationales Privatrecht einschlisslich der Grundzüge des Internationalen Zivilverfahrensrecht, München, 1999,
337; hinwais Soergel-schuring, Art.25,Rz.3, Müko-Birk, Art.25,Rz.21, mit Beispilen in Fussn, 27.
5
www.notiss.ru «Единое общеевропейское регулирование имущественных отношений супругов и наследование»,
06.08.2008.
219
d. axvlediani, anderZiT memkvidreoba da masTan dakavSirebuli problemebi...
1. anderZis forma
6
Wanturia l., Sesavali saqarTvelos samoqalaqo samarTlis zogad nawilSi, Tb., 1997, 346; agreTve,
Flume, Rechtsgeschäft, 244.
7
Ануфриева Л.П., Международное частное право, т.1-2, M., 2002, 527.
220
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
anderZis an aseTi aqtis Sedgenis momentSi. magram anderZi an misi gauqmebis aqti ar
SeiZleba baTilad iqnes cnobili formis daucvelobis gamo, Tu is Seesabameba
anderZis Sedgenis an misi gauqmebis aqtis Sedgenis adgilis samarTals an ruseTis
kanonmdeblobas.~ (rfsk, 1224);
germaniis samoqalaqo kodeqsis Sesavali kanonis 26-e I-IV muxlebSi mocemulma
alternatiulma koliziurma sabmelebma unda gamoricxon anderZis baTiloba
formis daucvelobis gamo. amasTan dakavSirebiT l. raape aRniSnavs: „Tu germaniis
arasrulwlovani moqalaqe inglisSi Seadgens anderZs inglisis samarTlis gaT-
valiswinebuli formiT, e.i. ori mowmis TandaswrebiT, maSin germaniis samarTalma
unda gadawyvitos, sakmarisia Tu ara am adgilobrivi formis dacva anderZis
namdvilobisaTvis. es sakiTxi dadebiTad unda gadawydes. Tu aseT anderZs adgens
safrangeTis moqalaqe, safrangeTma, e.i. samkvidros statutma, unda gadawyvitos,
pasuxobs Tu ara inglisSi Sedgenili anderZi ss (Code civil) 999-e muxlis moTxovnebs.
safrangeTi am kiTxvaze dadebiT pasuxs iZleva.“8
anderZis formis sakiTxi regulirdeba saerTaSoriso aqtebSic. am Tva-
lsazrisiT, aRsaniSnavia haagis 1961 wlis konvencia saanderZo gankargulebaTa
formis mimarT gamosayenebel kanonTa koliziis Sesaxeb. konvencia adgens, rom
anderZi formis mixedviT namdvilia, Tu igi alternatiulad akmayofilebs: an-
derZis Sedgenis qveynis samarTals, moanderZis moqalaqeobis qveynis samarTals
anderZis Sedgenis momentSi an gardacvalebisas, moanderZis domicilis qveynis
samarTals anderZis Sedgenis momentSi an gardacvalebisas, moanderZis Cveu-
lebrivi adgilsamyofeli qveynis samarTals anderZis Sedgenis momentSi an gar-
dacvalebisas. uZravi qonebis anderZiT gadacemisaTvis gaTvaliswinebulia dama-
tebiTi alternativa — uZravi qonebis adgilsamyofeli qveynis samarTali. am
konvenciis monawileni arian: avstria, belgia, germania, didi britaneTi, irlandia,
iaponia, Sveicaria, samxreT afrikis respublika da sxva.
rac Seexeba saqarTvelos koliziur samarTals, igi erTmaneTisagan ar ganas-
xvavebs samkvidros saerTo statuts da anderZis formis statuts. rogorc sam-
kvidros saerTo statuti, ise anderZis formis statuti ganisazRvreba mam-
kvidreblis gardacvalebis momentSi arsebuli moqalaqeobis qveynis samarTliT.
anderZis formis namdvilobis sakiTxi SeiZleba gaCndes moanderZis mier mo-
qalaqeobis Secvlis SemTxvevaSi. sainteresoa, Tu rogor unda gadawydes sa-
qarTvelos moqalaqis mier Sedgenili anderZis namdvilobis sakiTxi, Tu Seicvala
samarTlebrivi statuti, magaliTad, saqarTvelos moqalaqe gaxda sxva qveynis
moqalaqe. SeinarCunebs Tu ara Zalas wina statutis Sesabamisad Sedgenili an-
derZi? am kiTxvaze uaryofiTi pasuxi unda gaeces, vinaidan saqarTvelos kanoni
sks-is Sesaxeb anderZis formis sakiTxs ukavSirebs im qveynis samarTals, romlis
moqalaqec piri iyo gardacvalebis momentSi da ara manamde, e.i. anderZis Sedgenis
momentSi. gamonaklisi SeiZleba iyos mxolod SemTxveva, rodesac axali statutiT
anderZisaTvis gaTvaliswinebuli forma daemTxveva pirisaTvis manamde moqmedi
statutiT gaTvaliswinebul formas, rac ar uzrunvelyofs moanderZis mier
erTxel gamoxatuli nebis dacvas, miT umetes, imis gaTvaliswinebiT, rom anderZi
moqmedebas iwyebs moanderZis gardacvalebis Semdeg.
8
Раапе Л., Международное частное право, M., 1960, 894.
221
d. axvlediani, anderZiT memkvidreoba da masTan dakavSirebuli problemebi...
2. saanderZo qmedunarianoba
9
Hoffman B., dasax. naSromi, 32.
10
Вольф М., Международное частное право, M., 1949, 619.
222
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
11
Маковский А.Л., Жильцов А.Н., Муранов А.Н., Международное частное право, Иностранное законодательство, М.,
2001, 647.
12
Вольф М., dasax. naSromi, 620.
13
Залесский В.В., Основные институты гражданского права зарубежных стран, сравнительно-правовой анализ, M.,
2000, 549-553.
223
d. axvlediani, anderZiT memkvidreoba da masTan dakavSirebuli problemebi...
14
Васильев Е.А., Гражданское и торговое право капиталистических стран, M., 1993, 540.
15
Summary of American Law by Martin Weinstein, of the New-York Bar, 1988, 563-566.
224
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
16
Чешир Дж., Норт П., Международное частное право, М., 1982, 323-324.
17
Ануфриева Л.П., dasax. naSromi, 122.
225
d. axvlediani, anderZiT memkvidreoba da masTan dakavSirebuli problemebi...
III. daskvna
226
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
DEVI KHVEDELIANI
Doctoral Student, TSU, the Faculty of Law
(Short Summary)
The author discusses the problems of testamentary succession burdened with a foreign element in
the International private law. Along with highlighting the conflict of law issues, the paper offers
the analysis of Georgian and foreign substantive provisions of the law of succession.
The author reviews the aspects of testamentary succession in the international private law and
refers to the shortcoming of Article 56 of the Law of Georgia on International Private Law. In
particular, this article says nothing about such important for the validity of a testament aspects as:
the age and capability of a testator, his/her other features, witnesses to the testament. The Georgian
provision does not specify which part of the real estate is supposed to be in the country for the
testament related to real estate to be regarded as made in accordance with the standards, provided
for by the law of the country concerned. Furthermore, insofar as the law applicable to the
relationships burdened with a foreign element is identified upon the death of the testator, being the
citizen of the country concerned, the foregoing cannot ensure the protection of will once expressed
by the latter. The disclosure of all these shortcomings and gaps aims at theoretical substantiation of
the necessity to introduce an addition into the Law of Georgia on International Private Law.
The author offers not only the theoretical statements, but also the new wording of Article 56 of the
Law of Georgia on International Private Law, which adds the value of legal importance to the
paper.
The article consists of the introduction, the main part and the conclusion. The author offers his
findings in the final part of the paper, which allows for better comprehension thereof from the
technical point of view.
227
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
klaus hopti
1
Picot, Hrsg., Corporate Governance, Unternehmensüberwachung auf dem Prüfstand, Stuttgart, 1995.
228
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
2
Feddersen/Hommelhoff/Schneider, Hrsg., Corporate Governance, Optimierung der Unternehmensführung und der
Unternehmenskontrolle im deutschen und amerikanischen Aktienrecht, Köln, 1996.
3
Hopt/Teubner, eds., Corporate Governance and Directors’ Liabilities – Legal, Economic and Sociological Analyses on
Corporate Social Responsibility, Berlin/New York, 1985.
4
Hopt/Wymeersch, eds., Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, Berlin/New York, 1997.
5
Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Cadbury Report, London, 1992.
6
Comparative Study of Corporate Governance Codes Relevant to the European Union and Its Member States (On Behalf of the
European Commission, Internal Market Directorate General), Final Report & Annexes I-III, Brussels, 2002.
7
Mülbert, ZGR 1997, 129 Semdgomi miTiTebebiT. zogadad, es instituti imas niSnavs, rom sazogadoeba,
romelsac, dividendebis gacemis nacvlad, aqvs Tavisufali (qonebrivi, fuladi) saSualebebi aqciaTa
SesaZenad, uadvilebs aqcioners, Tavisi aqciis Rirebulebis zrdaSi miiRos monawileoba (i.b.).
229
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
8
konkurirebadi kavSirisa da sawarmoo samarTlebriv principTa nimuSisa da interesTa pluralizmis
sakiTxTan dakavSirebiT: Hopt, ZGR 1993, 534 (535 ff) da Mülbert, ZGR 1997, 129 (140 ff, 156 ff).
230
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
9
Hopt/Kanda/Roe/Wymeersch/Prigge, eds., Comparative Corporate Governance – The State of the Art and Emerging Research,
Oxford, 1998. amasTan dakavSirebiT aseve: Cioffi, State of the Art: A Review Essay on Comparative Corporate
Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research, American Journal of Comparative Law 48 (2000), 501.
10
Hopt, Ideelle und wirtschaftliche Grundlagen der Aktien-, Bank- und Börsenrechtsentwicklung im 19. Jahrhundert, in:
Coing/Wilhelm, Hrsg., Wissenschaft und Kodifikation im 19. Jahrhundert, Bd. V, Geld und Banken, Frankfurt, 1980, 128 (152 ff).
231
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
2001 wlis JurnalSi `ZGR— 2001~, rveuli 2 (imedia, es moridebuli iribi reklama
kanonsawinaaRmdegod ar iqneba aRqmuli).11
11
miniSnebani: Hopt, in: The German Two-Tier Board (Aufsichtsrat), A German View on Corporate Governance, in:
Hopt/Wymeersch, eds., Comparative Corporate Governance – Essays and Materials, New York, 1997, 3; masSi: The German
Two-Tier Board: Experience, Theories, Reforms, in: Hopt/Kanda/Roe/Wymeersch/Prigge, loc. cit., 277; sabolood: Lutter,
Corporate Governance rechtsvergleichend – die deutsche Sicht, und Davies, Comparative Corporate Governance – an English
and Market Perspective, in: Symposium „Corporate Governance – European Perspectives“, 60. Geburtstag Klaus J. Hopt, ZGR
2001, 224, 268.
12
germaniasTan dakavSirebiT: Oetker, Mitbestimmungsgesetz, in Hopt/Wiedemann, Hrsg., Großkommentar Aktiengesetz,
4. Aufl., 12. Lieferung, Berlin/New York 1999; holandiasTan dakavSirebiT: Dorresteijn, Corporate Governance Issues
in the Netherlands: The Legal Structure for Large Companies, in: Wymeersch, ed., Further Perspectives in Financial Integration
in Europe, Berlin/New York, 1994, 209 (214); zur Entwicklung in Europa Hopt, Arbeitnehmervertretung im Aufsichtsrat –
Auswirkungen der Mitbestimmung auf corporate governance und wirtschaftliche Integration in Europa, in: Festschrift für
Everling, Bd. I, Baden-Baden, 1995, 475.
13
sadiskusiod Sead.: erTi mxriv, Gerum/Wagner, Economics of Labour Co-determination in View of Corporate Governance,
meore mxriv, Roe, German Co-Determination and German Securities Markets, in: Hopt/Kanda/Roe/Wymeersch/Prigge, loc, cit., 341,
361; gadawyvetilebis miRebaSi Tanamonawileobis sakiTxTan dakavSirebiT: Hopt, ZGR 2000, 779 (798 ff).
14
ekonomikuri argumentebis safuZvlian mimoxilvas warmogvidgens Sadowski/Junkes/Lindenthal, ZGR 2001, 110.
232
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
bankebi
15
Monopolkommission, Dreizehntes Hauptgutachten 1998/1999, Bundestags-Drucksache 14/4002 vom 16.8.2000, Nr. 123:
yvela sakredito institutTan mimarTebiT biujetis wili Seadgens 50%-s (sazogadoebrivi seqtori _
36%, sajaro samarTlis sakredito institutebi TavianTi gansakuTrebuli amocanebiT _ 14%), kerZo
sakredito institutebisa _ daaxl. 26%-s da kerZo sakredito koop. _ daaxl. 15%-s.
16
miniSnebani: Mülbert, Empfehlen sich gesetzliche Regelungen zur Einschränkung des Einflusses der Kreditinstitute auf
Aktiengesellschaften?, rekomendaciebi germaniis iuristTa 61-e krebisTvis, Karlsruhe 1996; Hopt, Corporate Governance
und deutsche Universalbanken, in: Feddersen/Hommelhoff/Schneider, Hrsg., Corporate Governance, Köln, 1996, 243.
17
Hopt/Baum, Börsenrechtsreform in Deutschland, in: Hopt/Rudolph/Baum, Hrsg., Börsenreform, Stuttgart, 1997, 287; es
aseve: WM Sonderbeil. 4/1997, 1. uaxlesi cifrebi germaniis saaqcio institutebidan, DAI-Factbook 2001 und
DAI-Kurzstudie 3/2001: aqcionerTa da saaqcio fondTa wilebi zrdas agrZelebs.
233
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
sajarooba da revizia
18
amasTan da germanuli da evropuli sawarmoTa dauflebis (SeZenis) samarTlis urTierTmimarTebis
Taobaze: Hopt, ZHR 161 (1997) 368.
19
Börsensachverständigenkommission, Standpunkte zur künftigen Regelung von Unternehmensübernahmen, Frankfurt, Februar
1999; Hopt, Auf dem Weg zum deutschen Übernahmegesetz, Überlegungen zum Richtlinienentwuf 1997, zum
Übernahmekodex (1997) und zum SPD-Entwurf 1997, in: Festschrift für Zöllner, Köln u.a. 1998, 253 (263 ff, 266 f).
20
Merkt, Die Publizität von Unternehmen, Tübingen 2001; Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW), Kapitalmarktorientierte
Unternehmensüberwachung, Düsseldorf, 2001.
21
Sead.: Hopt, Ein Debakel à la Enron ist auch in Deutschland denkbar, Handelsblatt Nr. 37, 21.2.2002, 8.
234
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
22
Baums, Hrsg., Bericht der Regierungskommission Corporate Governance, Unternehmensführung, Unternehmenskontrolle,
Modernisierung des Aktienrechts, Köln, 2001, 360, SemdgomSi: Kommissionbericht. Näher zum Auftrag Kommissionsbericht S. 1.
23
komisiis wevrebi warmodgenilni arian komisiis moxsenebis me-3 gverdze.
24
Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex, 26.2.2002. amasTan dakavSirebiT: Ulmer, ZHR 166 (2002) 150 da demnächst
Seibt, AG 2002, Heft 5.
25
Hopt, Unternehmensführung, Unternehmenskontrolle, Modernisierung des Aktienrechts – Zum Bericht der
Regierungskommission Corporate Governance, in Hommelhoff/Ulmer, Hrsg., Aktienrecht für globale Kapitalmärkte,
Heidelberg, 2002, 27 (33 ff).
235
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
26
evropuli sakoncerno samarTlis forumi, Konzernrecht für Europa, ZGR 1998, 672.
236
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
27
Hopt, Corporate Governance: Aufsichtsrat oder Markt? – Überlegungen zu einem internationalen und interdisziplinären
Thema, in Hommelhoff/Rowedder/Ulmer, Hrsg., Max Hachenburg, Dritte Gedächtnisvorlesung 1998, Heidelberg, 2000, 20 ff.
28
miniSnebani: Hopt, ebenda, S. 21; londonis fasiani qaRaldebis bazris erToblivi kodeqsi (Combined
Code) saxelwodebiT: „Principles of Good Governance and Code of Best Practice“ 1998 wels dasaxelebul wi-
namdebare moxsenebebs, specialur principebs Tavi mouyara erTaderT kodeqsSi. 2000 wlidan lon-
donis birJaze notirebuli sawarmoebi angariSs uweven da aRiareben mas. amasTan dakavSirebiT ix. aseve:
Kommissionsbericht Rz 5.
29
OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris, 1999, agreTve in AG 1999, 340; dazu ausführlich Hommelhoff, ZGR
2001, 238.
30
AG 2000, 109 SesavaliT Schneider/Strenger, AG 200, 106.
31
Von Werder, Hrsg., German Code of Corporate Governance (CGCG), Stuttgart 2000.
32
Sida (insaideruli) vaWrobis direqtivebi (saxelmZRvanelo principebi) 1988 wlis ivnisis bolo
gamocemiTa da mokle komentarebiT: Baumbach/Hopt, HGB, 29. Auf., München 1995, (16) Insiderhandels-Ri.
33
nebayoflobiTi sajaro nasyidobiTi an gacvliTi SesaTavazebeli winadadebebis, anu msgavsi
SeTavazebis miwodebisadmi moTxovnebis administraciulad notirebuli an Tavisufali vaWrobisaTvis
daSvebuli aqciis, ufro sworad, SeZenis uflebis zogadi debulebani, 1978 wlis ianvari,
gamoqveynebuli da mokled komentirebuli: Baumbach/Hopt, aaO, 29. Aufl., (18) LSÜbernahmeangebote.
34
finansTa federaluri saministros birJaTa zedamxedvelobis federaluri komisiis mier miRebuli
sawarmoTa SeZenis kodeqsi (Übernahmekodex), 1997 wlis ianvari, gamoqveynebuli da mokled
komentirebuli: Baumbach/Hopt, aaO, 30. Aufl., (18) Übernahmekodex.
35
ix. zemoT, me-5 struqturul elementTan dakavSirebiT.
36
Hopt, Self-Regulation in Banking and Finance – Practice and Theory in Germany, in: AEDBF/EVBFR-Belgium, La
Déontologie bancaire & financière/The Ethical Standards in Banking & Finance, Bruxelles, 1998, 53.
237
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
37
AEDBF/EVBFR-Belgium, La Déontologie bancaire & financière/The Ethical Standards in Banking & Finance, Bruxelles,
1998.
38
The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers and The Rules Governing Substantial
Acquisitions of Shares, London (loose-leaf).
39
amasTan: Fleischer, RIW 2002 (miRebulia dasabeWdad).
238
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
40
Rosengarten, Bericht der Regierungskommission „Corporate Governance“, Gesellschaftsrechtliche Vereinigung (VGR),
Hrsg., Gesellschaftsrecht in der Diskussion 2001, VGR Bd. 4, Köln, 2002 (im Druck). Auch die Regierungskommission selbst
sieht das Problem, Kommissionsbericht Rz 7 a.E.
41
regulirebisa da deregulirebis debatebTan dakavSirebiT: Kübler, Hrsg., Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft,
Arbeit und sozialer Solidarität, Vergleichende Analysen, Baden-Baden, 1984 und Frankfurt, 1985.
239
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
42
Davies, ZGR 2001, 268 (274): es gamosayenebelia TiTqmis 400 sawarmosaTvis, romelTa wilebiTac vaWroba
xorcieldeba kapitalis sxva bazrebze, rogorc birJebze, TiTqmis 40 sazogadoebisa ki ucxour
birJebzea gatanili, ebenda Fn 22. Sdr. separaciis problemebi, rogorc maT samTavrobo komisia ganxilavs,
Rz 14, da romelic, Tavis mxriv, gadaWras eqvemdebareba.
43
German Code of Corporate Governance VII. korporaciuli marTva daxuruli tipis sazogadoebebSi.
44
Sdr.: evrosamarTlis normaTa mixedviT, sawarmoTa diferencireba sididis TvalsazrisiT, romelic
savaWro kodeqsis 267-e paragrafSia mocemuli. savaWro kodeqsis 267-e paragrafis mesame abzacis me-2
winadadebis mixedviT, kapitaluri sazogadoeba amgvar klasad iTvleba maSin, roca igi, fasiani
qaRaldebiT vaWrobis Sesaxeb federaluri kanonis me-2 paragrafis me-5 abzacis Tanaxmad,
organizebul bazarze, amave kanonis me-2 paragrafis pirveli abzacis pirveli winadadebiT
gaTvaliswinebul fasian qaRalds iZens an organizebul bazarze vaWrobisaTvis akeTebs gancxadebas
daSvebis Taobaze. samTavrobo komisiis moxsenebas (Rz 14) ar surs, uari Tqvas sawarmoTa am
klasifikatorze, imdenad, ramdenadac es diferencireba sxva miznebs emsaxureboda.
45
Deutsche Bank, Corporate Governance Grundsätze, Frankfurt, März, 2001.
240
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
241
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
46
Sdr. dava `fasiani qaRaldebiT vaWrobis Sesaxeb~ federaluri kanonis 31-e da momdevno parag. dam-
cavi xasiaTis kanonis xarisxTan dakavSirebiT, ufro dawvrilebiT: Hopt, ZHR 159 (1995) 135 (158 ff);
Bliesener, Aufsichtsrechtliche Verhaltenspflichten beim Wertpapierhandel, Berlin/New York, 1998, 148 ff.
242
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
levis niSnis mixedviT.47 1999—2000 wlebSi makinsis mier Catarebuli investorTa az-
ris ubralo meToduri kvlevis mixedviT, dadasturebulia, rom germaniaSi Tanabar
pirobebSi myofi investorebi mzad arian, kargad marTuli da kontrolirebadi
sazogadoebis fasian qaRaldebSi 20%-iT meti gadaixadon, aSS-sa da iaponiaSi —
18%-iT meti, xolo e.w. mesame msoflios qveynebSi es maCvenebeli kidev ufro ma-
tulobs.
2) normaTa qmediTad gatarebis sakiTxi SeiZleba, aseve, birJebis an pro-
fesiul-wodebrivi saxis sxva kavSirebisa da instituciebis xelSi moeqces. maga-
liTad, germanulma birJam 1998 wlis ianvridan DAX-Si (germanuli aqciebis in-
deqsi) da M-DAX-Si (germanul birJaze notirebuli samocdaaTi saSualo kompaniis
aqciebis indeqsi) sazogadoebaTa miReba imaze gaxada damokidebuli, aRiarebdnen
Tu ara es ukanasknelni Übernahmekodex-s (aqti `sawarmos dauflebisa da kontrolis
qveS moqcevis Sesaxeb — sawarmoTa SeZenis~ kodeqsi).48 did britaneTSi dafuZne-
bulma da notirebulma sawarmoebma TavianT wliur angariSSi unda asaxon, Seasru-
les Tu ara erToblivi kodeqsis (Combined Code) pirveli TaviT gaTvaliswinebuli
moTxovnebi ukanaskneli 12 Tvis ganmavlobaSi da Tu ar Seasrules an mxolod
nawilobriv Seasrules, miuTiTon Seusruleblobis safuZvlebis Sesaxeb. swored
es gaxlavT sazogadoebis birJaze daSvebis (dasaSvebobis) erT-erTi winapiroba.49
3) Tumca korporaciuli marTvis germanulma samTavrobo komisiam uaryo
birJaze notirebis inglisuri modeli. britanuli midgoma aisaxa sxva qveynebSi,
magaliTad: italiaSi,50 SveicariaSi.51 amis sapirispirod komisia `daemorCile an
ganmartes~ (comply or explain) principis gamtarebeli gaxda.52 es miuTiTebs imaze, rom
nebarTvis gamcemi (daSvebis, dasaSvebobis nebarTvazea saubari) moxele rogorc
pirovnulad, ise sagnobrivad mzad ar aris am valdebulebis dacvis kontrolisa da
SemowmebisaTvis (Tumca es SesaZloa Secvliliyo). amasTan, amgvari nebarTvis
(daSvebis) gamoxmoba, rogorc sanqcia sajaro valdebulebis darRvevisaTvis,
Zalze problemuria. es ukanaskneli gansakuTrebiT sayuradReboa. nebarTvis ga-
moxmoba, rogorc investorTa dacviTi meqanizmi, mxolod gansakuTrebul Sem-
TxvevaSia mizanSewonili, radganac gamoxmoba investorebis wilebs (savaWro) brun-
vaunarianobas arTmevs da, aqedan gamomdinare, maTTvis marTlac savalalo Sedegis
momtani SeiZleba gaxdes. amitom amis ganxorcieleba uaryofiTad aisaxeba bazarze.
britanuli `daemorCile an ganmartes~ principi germanul sinamdvileSi sxvagvari
formiT aris gadmoRebuli, kerZod, birJaze notirebuli saaqcio sazogadoebis
gamgeoba da sameTvalyureo sabWo yovelwliurad specialur moxsenebaSi, romelic
wliur angariSTan erTad iqneba wardgenili samewarmeo registrSi (germaniis
47
Vgl. Hopt/Rudolph/Baum, Hrsg., Börsenreform, Eine ökonomische, rechtsvergleichende und rechtspolitische Untersuchung,
Stuttgart, 1997, 399.
48
Hopt, Auf dem Weg zum deutschen Übernahmegesetz, Festschrift für Zöllner, Köln u.a., 1998, 253 (264).
49
Financial Services Authority (FSA9, The Listing Rules 2000, para. 12.43A(a),(b), www.fsa.gov.uk; Davies, ZGR 2001, 268
(277).
50
Istruzioni al Regolamento dei Mercati Organizzati e Gestiti dalla Borsa Italiana, Sezione IA.2.11 comma 1. italiasTan
dakavSirebiT, aseve: Kronke, Konditionierung der Unternehmensverfassung von Publikumsgesellschaften durch „Soft Law“
– Deutschland und Italien im Vergleich, Festschrift für Lutter, Köln, 2000, 1449 (1453 ff).
51
SWX Swiss Exchange, Richtlinie betreffend Informationen zur Corporate Governance, Entwurf 26.9.2001; amasTan:
Expertengruppe Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance, Swiss Code of Best Practice, 21.9.2001 und Hofstetter, Bericht
„Corporate Governance in der Schweiz“, Vernehmlassungsunterlage 24.9.2001. Allgemeiner NZZ Fokus, Corporate
Governance, Nr. 10, Oktober, 2001.
52
Kommissionsbericht Rz 8 ff.
243
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
5. pasuxismgeblobis sakiTxisaTvis
53
aRniSnuliT, federalur uwyebebSi gakeTebuli Setyobinebani, sadac miewodeba samewarmeo (savaWro)
reestrisa da dokumentaciis nomeri (savaWro kodeqsis 325-e paragrafis pirveli abzaci), ganacxadze
iqneba orientirebuli.
54
Kommissionbericht Rz 10. ganmarteba unda gasces sameTvalyureo sabWom, amasTan, korporaciuli
marTvis kodeqsis normaTa gadaxvevebisaTvis savaldebulo ar aris misi Tanxmoba, Kommissionsbericht Rz
11.
55
SWX Swiss Exchange, Richtlinie betreffen Informationen zur Corporate Governance, Entwurf 26.9.2001.
56
Kommissionsbericht Rz 12.
244
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
57
amasTan dakavSirebiT: Baumbach/Hopt, HGB, 30. Aufl., München 2000, (14) BörsG §§ 45 ff. Zur Reform der
Prospekthaftung im Dritten Finanzmarktförderungsgesetz Hopt, Das Dritte Finanzmarktförderungsgesetz – Börsen- und
kapitalmarktrechtliche Überlegungen, Festschrift für Drobnig, Tübingen 1998, 525 (526 ff); Kort, AG 1999, 9; Groß, AG 1999,
199. Monographisch Ellenberger, Prospekthaftung im Wertpapierhandel, Berlin/New York, 2001; Gerber, Die Prospekthaftung
bei Wertpapieremissionen nach dem Dritten Finanzmarktförderungsgsetz, Baden-Baden 2001.
58
Hopt, Kapitalmarktrecht (mit Prospekthaftung) in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofes, in: Heldrich/Hopt, Hrsg., 50
Jahre Bundesgerichtshof, Festgabe aus der Wissenschaft, Bd. II, München Beck, 2000, 497.
245
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
Targmna
irakli burdulma
Tsu-is iuridiuli fakultetis asocirebuli profesori
translated by
IRAKLI BURDULI
Associated Professor, TSU, the Faculty of Law
59
Baumbach/Hopt, aaO, 30. Aufl., Anh § 177 a Rn 63 Semdgomi miTiTebebiT.
60
Baumbach/Hopt, aaO, 30. Aufl., § 347 Rn. 24 ff. sasamarTlo praqtikis miTiTebebiT.
246
samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2009
247
k. hopti, korporaciuli marTva evropaSi...
248