CFVGBH NJ
CFVGBH NJ
CFVGBH NJ
-2017
http://iraj.in
DEVELOPMENT OF ALUMINIZED AND NONALUMINIZED
COMPOSITE SOLID PROPELLANTS WITH LOW PRESSURE INDEX
1
MANUPRASAD.E.S, 2S.R.CHAKRAVARTHY
1,2
Department of Aerospace Engineering, IIT Madras
E-mail: 1manuprasades@gmail.com, 2src@ae.iitm.ac.in
Abstract- Minimizing the pressure index of a composite solid propellant is of prime importance as far as the
stability of solid rocket motor is concerned. Aluminized and non-aluminized propellants of different
formulations are tested in window bomb and the burning rates are analyzed. A constant burning rate is obtained
in the pressure range 60-80 bars for the propellants with low fine AP/binder ratio, ultrafine AP and cured by
IPDI. This is termed as plateau burning and the pressure index is found to be minimal in the corresponding
pressure range.
23
International Journal of Mechanical And Production Engineering, ISSN: 2320-2092, Volume- 5, Issue-1, Jan.-2017
http://iraj.in
Table 1. Propellant formulations. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1Matrices
The matrices of fine AP/Binder ratio from 55/45 to
75/25 are burned in window bomb and the result is
shown in figure 2. These matrices are prepared with
fine AP of size 5-10 micrometer and cured by IPDI.
The matrices 75/25 and 70/30 is burned
completely in all pressures from 20 bars to 70 bars.
The matrix 65/35 is quenched beyond 30 bars. The
matrices 60/40 and 55/45 is started quenching at 30
bar itself. This self-quenching is called the mid-
pressure extinction and it happens primarily due to
the fine AP-Binder melt layer interactions. As we
move from 75/25 to 55/45, the fine AP content
decreases and correspondingly the binder content
increases which make the fine AP movement in
binder melt layer easier and thus the mid-pressure
extinction range is shifting towards left as the plot
proceed to bottom.
Development of Aluminized and Nonaluminized Composite Solid Propellants With Low Pressure Index
24
International Journal of Mechanical And Production Engineering, ISSN: 2320-2092, Volume- 5, Issue-1, Jan.-2017
http://iraj.in
The pressure index obtained for each sections of the REFERENCES
curve is given in table 2.
[1]. G. P. Sutton, Rocket Propulsion Elements, John Wiley, New
Table 2. Pressure range and pressure index York (1992)
[2]. R. L. Foster and R. R. Miller, “The influence of the fine
AP/binder matrix on composite propellant ballistic
properties,” in: Proc. of the 17th JANNAF Combustion
Meeting, Publ. No. 329(3), Chem. Propuls. Inform. Agency,
Laure (1980), pp. 91–104.
[3]. J. P. Renie, J. A. Condon, and J. R. Osborn, “Oxidizer size
distribution effects on propellant combustion,” AIAA J., 17,
No. 8, 877–883 (1979).
[4]. C. W. Fong and R. F. Smith, “The relationship between
plateau burning behavior and ammonium perchlorate particle
size in HTPB–AP composite propellant,” Combust.Flame,
67, 235–247 (1987).
[5]. S. R. Chakravarthy, E. W. Price, and R. K. Sigman, “Binder
melt flow effects in the combustion of AP–HC composite
solid propellants,” in: 31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint
Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper No. 95-
2710, San Diego (1995).
[6]. S. R. Chakravarthy, J. M. Seitzman, E. W. Price, and R. K.
Sigman, “Intermittent burning of ammonium perchlorate–
hydrocarbon binder monomodal matrixes, sandwiches, and
propellants,” J. Propuls. Power, 20, No. 1, 101–109 (2004).
[7]. S. R. Chakravarthy, E. W. Price, R. K. Sigman, andJ. M.
Seitzman, “Plateau burning behavior of ammonium
perchlorate sandwiches and propellants at elevated
CONCLUSIONS pressures,” J. Propuls. Power, 19, No. 1, 56–65 (2003).
[8]. E. K. Bastress, “Modification of the burning rates of
The plateau burning behavior of different propellants ammonium perchlorate solid propellants by particle size,” Ph.
D. Thesis, Princeton Univ., Princeton (1961).
is analyzed and the major conclusions are as follows. [9]. J. A. Steinz, P. L. Stang, and M. Summerfield, “Effects of
1. The mid-pressure extinction is observed even in oxidizer particle size on composite solid propellant burning:
low pressure regions while the fine AP/binder ratio Normal burning, plateau burning, and intermediate pressure
decreases extinction,” Aerospace and Mech. Sci. Report No. 810,
Guggenheim Laboratories for Aerospace Propulsion
2. A combination of low fine AP/binder ratio, very Sciences, Princeton Univ., Princeton (1967).
low micron fine AP and IPDI will yield constant burn [10]. S. Banerjee and S. R. Chakravarthy, “Ammonium
rate in higher pressure range. The plateau burning Perchlorate-Based Composite Solid Propellant Formulations
pressure range is obtained as 60-80 bar. with Plateau Burning Rate Trends”, Combustion, Explosion,
and Shock Waves, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 435–441, 2007.
Development of Aluminized and Nonaluminized Composite Solid Propellants With Low Pressure Index
25