Primary vs. Secondary Sources On Tejeros Convention (1897
Primary vs. Secondary Sources On Tejeros Convention (1897
Primary vs. Secondary Sources On Tejeros Convention (1897
Secondary
Sources on Tejeros
Convention (1897)
PRIMARY SOURCES : SECONDARY SOURCE:
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ’ TEODORO
“MEMOIRS OF A AGONCILLO’S
GENERAL” “REVOLT OF THE
MASS”
AUTHOR’S
BACKGROUN
D
PRIMARY SOURCES : SECONDARY SOURCE:
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ’ “MEMOIRS OF A TEODORO AGONCILLO’S “REVOLT OF THE
GENERAL” MASS”
- The Katipunan and the - The Revolt of the Masses: The Story
Toledo Revolution: Memoirs of of Bonifacio and the Katipunan (mainly a
a General. biography of Andres Bonifacio, 1956)
- Recalling the Toledo - Malolos: The Crisis of the Republic
Revolution: Memoirs of a Filipino (sequel to Revolt of the Masses which
General. discusses the events from Biak-na-Bato
to the end of the Philippine–American
War, 1960)
- The Fateful Years: Japan's Adventure
in the Philippines (Philippine history
during World War II, two volumes, 1965)
- History of the Filipino People (eight
editions: 1960, 1967, 1970, 1973, 1977,
1984, 1986, 1990)
WHEN WAS THE ACCOUNT WRITTEN?
SECONDARY SOURCE:
PRIMARY SOURCES : TEODORO AGONCILLO’S “REVOLT OF THE
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ’ “MEMOIRS OF A MASS”
GENERAL”
Published: Published:
1920 1956
In Sampaguita, a tagalog weekly College of Liberal Arts of the
and translated in english by Paula
Carolina Malay.
University of the Philippines
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/3613857-the-katipuna
n-and-the-revolution https://kyoto-seas.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/490306.pdf
MENTION OF DATE(S)
PRIMARY SOURCES : SECONDARY SOURCE:
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ’ “MEMOIRS OF A TEODORO AGONCILLO’S “REVOLT OF THE
GENERAL” MASS”
Cavite
Noveleta
San Francisco de Malabon
Naik
Cavite Kawit
Santa Cruz de Malabon Maragondon
Mountains of montalban
Mariquina
Zapote
Imus
Morong
San Juan del Monte
Salitran
Tanza
KEY PERSONALITIES
PRIMARY SOURCES : SECONDARY SOURCE:
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ’ “MEMOIRS OF A TEODORO AGONCILLO’S “REVOLT OF THE
GENERAL” MASS”
• The text from this source is short than • It was more complex than the primary
the secondary source. source because it tell what are the things
happen before, during and after the
• The author is one of the member in assembly.
tejeros convention and I think is bias
because he only give his own perspection • Also, the author made a lot of
about his experience and the group accomplishment where he never been bias
where he belonged. Yet, the author is upon writing because he doesn’t belong in
the eyewitness. any group in in the context.