Original Article
Original Article
Original Article
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy of a line-probe assay ∆ (LiPA) as rapid diagnostic test for early detection of
drug-resistant tuberculosis compared to conventional susceptibility methods in Pakistan.
Methods: Resistance to rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) in 108 smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
samples was detected using a line-probe assay [GenoType® MTBDRplus (Hain Lifescience, GmbH, Nehren,
Germany)] at the clinical microbiology laboratory of Aga Khan University Hospital in May, 2009. Results were
compared with susceptibilities performed while using agar proportion.
Results: In comparison to the agar proportion method, the detection rate and specificity of resistance using
MTBDR plus was 92.5% and 98.2% for rifampicin, and 76.3% and 100% for isoniazid.
Mutations in codons 531 and 533 of rpoB gene (62%S531L) were responsible for 67.9% of rifampicin resistance.
S315T mutation of katG gene was detected in 55.9% and inhA promoter mutation at positions -15 (C15T) in
11.9% of isoniazid resistant isolates. Four phenotypically rifampicin-resistant and 14 isoniazid-resistant strains
were not detected by MTBDRplus. Sequencing these strains revealed mutations in 4 strains; 2 in rpoB gene
S531W, del518 and 2 in katG genesW300L, S315N. Hence, two phenotypic rifampicin-resistant and 13
phenotypic isoniazid-resistant strains were not detected by the commercial line probe assay.
Conclusion: The study showed that MTBDRplus had a high detection rate for rifampicin resistance. However,
additional probes need to be included in the assay to improve the detection of isoniazid-resistant mycobacterium
tuberculosis strains in Pakistan.
Keywords: Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Tuberculosis, MTBDRplus, Pakistan. (JPMA 62: 767; 2012)
Table-1: Comparison of LiPA and phenotypic susceptibility for INH and RIF resistance.
Table-2: Frequencies of rpoB, katG and inhA mutations detected through LiPA.
rpoB
WT 8 531, 533 36 (67.9)
MUT 3 S531L 33 (62.3)
WT 3, 4 513-6, 516-8 6 (11.3)
MUT 1 D516V 3 (5.7)
WT 2, 3 510-3, 513-6 4 (7.5)
WT 7 526 3 (5.6)
MUT 2A H526Y 2 (3.8)
WT 1, 2, 8 505-9,510-3, 531,533 1 (1.9)
katG
WT 315 39 (66.1)
MUT1 S315T (ACGACC) 33 (55.9)
MUT 2 S315T (ACGAAC) 1 (1.7)
inhA regulatory sequence
WT 1 -15,-16 7 (11.9)
MUT 1 -15 (CT) 6 (10.2)
Note: 12 out of 53 RIF-resistant strains showed loss of wild type but no known mutations.