Classics in Magnetics Summary of Losses in Magnetic Materials
Classics in Magnetics Summary of Losses in Magnetic Materials
Classics in Magnetics Summary of Losses in Magnetic Materials
5, SEPTEMBER 2002
Classics in Magnetics
I. INTRODUCTION
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GOODENOUGH: SUMMARY OF LOSSES IN MAGNETIC MATERIALS 3399
versible changes each within a small region of the lattice, the they order parallel to one another. In Néel ferrimagnetic
so-called Barkhausen jumps. These rapid, irreversible changes materials there are two sublattices. The atomic moments order
are produced by relatively strong local fields within the ma- parallel to the other moments of their sublattice, antiparallel to
terial. These small, rapid changes have associated with them the moments of the other sublattice. The material has ferromag-
the same losses that are associated with macroscopic dynamic netic properties because the net moment on one sublattice is
changes. However, it is convenient to isolate the quasistatic from greater than that on the other. As a magnetic material is cooled
the macroscopically dynamic processes as the total effect of the through the Curie temperature, ordered regions of different
varying internal magnetic fields can be known from a measure- orientation are created. These regions are called magnetic
ment of the quasistatic loop. domains. The transition regions between neighboring domains
The energy per unit volume of a magnetic material of magne- are called domain walls. In contrast to the transition regions
tization in an external field is given by . Therefore, between crystallographic domains (grains)—the grain bound-
the sum of the energy stored and the heat dissipated in a mag- aries—domain walls can move through the lattice at lower
netic material whose magnetization changes from to temperatures. There are, therefore, two mechanisms by which
when placed in a magnetic field is flux may change inside a magnetic material: domain rotation
and domain-wall motion. Both processes may be reversible or
irreversible.
In the first of these mechanisms, the magnetic moments
within a domain rotate in unison. In the second, the moments
Reference to Fig. 1 shows that if the loop had been plotted with
within a domain wall rotate as the wall moves to a new position.
instead of for the ordinate scale, the total energy put into
This flux change is characterized by a sequential rotation of
the system on going from to would be the area be-
spins. It is intuitively obvious, therefore, that a domain-rotation
tween the ordinate and the corresponding magnetization curve.
mechanism is intrinsically faster than a domain-wall-motion
Similarly the energy restored to the specimen when the field is
mechanism. Since the basic physical process for flux reversal
removed is the area between the ordinate and the magnetization
is rotation of the atomic moments, the damping process which
curve from to . Therefore, in going around the hys-
limits the speed of rotation is the same for either process. This
teresis loop, energy equivalent to the area of the loop is dissi-
fact is important for the design of magnetic components with
pated as heat in the specimen. This energy dissipation is known
fast flux-reversal characteristics.
as hysteresis loss. This loss is present even if the loop is tra-
2) Energy Considerations: The factor that determines the
versed in a quasistatic manner. Because , this en-
relative importance of domain-wall motion and domain rotation
ergy loss per cycle may be written in cgs units as
in any particular flux change is the free energy of the system.
There are four principal magnetic contributions to the free en-
erg/cm
ergy of a magnetic specimen. The first of these is the magneto-
static energy
Since the area of the hysteresis loop increases with increasing
maximum induction , this energy loss can be plotted as a
function of . From such a relationship, Steinmetz [1] ex-
pressed the energy loss by the empirical equation
which results from the interaction of the atomic magnetic mo-
erg/(cm s). ments with the local internal magnetic field . This local field
varies from point to point within the specimen and is a function
This expression holds fairly well for values of lower than of the externally applied field strength, the saturation moment
the knee of the initial magnetization curve. Values of the Stein- , the shape of the specimen, the crystalline imperfections,
metz coefficient and the constant are often given for sheet and the degree of magnetization.
materials to be used in transformers and in parts of rotating elec- The second and third contributions to the magnetic free
trical machinery. energy result from the interaction between the atomic magnetic
moments and the crystalline lattice. For purposes of conve-
B. Factors Influencing Shape and Area of – Loop
nience, the results of this interaction are expressed in terms
1) Flux-Change Mechanisms: The magnetic flux per unit of two empirically determinable energies, the magnetocrys-
cross-sectional area is defined as the magnetic induction . In talline-anisotropy energy
cgs units . As is indicated in Fig. 1, ap-
proaches a saturation value as is increased to very large
values. The magnitude of is determined by the density and
magnitude of individual atomic moments that contribute to it.
Flux changes resulting from externally applied magnetic fields and the magnetostrictive energy
are normally not the result of variations in the magnitude of the
individual atomic moments; rather they are due to changes in
their individual orientations.
Below a critical temperature, the Curie temperature , the Since the total interaction energy is most stable when the mo-
atomic moments become ordered. In ferromagnetic material ments are oriented along certain crystallographic axes—the axes
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3400 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 38, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2002
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GOODENOUGH: SUMMARY OF LOSSES IN MAGNETIC MATERIALS 3401
Fig. 4. Typical B –H loops for materials with (a) H < 0, (b) H > 0.
Although square, low-frequency hysteresis loops have been ob-
served, these can usually be shown to be due to domain walls.
These loops have a coercivity .
In films with sufficiently low anisotropy that
is of the order of 1 Oe, domain rotation processes can be initiated
by a fast-rise-time ( 1 ns) driving-field pulse that is uniform
over the film. Flux-reversal speeds at least compatible with a
rotation process are observed [2]. Attempts are currently being
made to exploit these potentialities for switching devices and
storage elements in high-speed digital computers.
4) Domain-Wall Processes: Except in the special instances Fig. 5. Hysteresis loops of 68 permalloy under tension. Maximum field
strength 5 Oe.
cited above, the principal irreversible mechanism responsible
for the magnetic hysteresis loop is domain-wall motion. There-
fore, in order to understand the usual mechanisms contributing zation despite the varied grain orientations. A typical effect is
to the hysteresis losses, i.e., to the area of the hysteresis loop, it illustrated in Fig. 5. The development of oriented materials has
is necessary to understand the mechanisms that determine do- been extremely important for transformer design, magnetic am-
main-wall creation and motion. plifiers, and magnetic switches.
In order to reverse saturated magnetization, domains of re- In materials with such extremely square loops that the ex-
verse magnetization must be created. These domains will be ternal field for wall creation is greater than that for wall mo-
created in the neighborhood of crystalline imperfections or at tion, the reverse-domain nucleation field may determine the co-
a crystal surface where domain creation can reduce the energy ercivity ; but in most materials this quantity is determined by
associated with large local fields . If the local fields are suffi- domain-wall surface tension and internal fields resulting from
ciently strong to create many domains of reverse magnetization specimen shape or lattice imperfections, the walls stabilizing in
when the external field is still in the direction of the initial sat- positions that minimize the energy associated with them. Pre-
uration field, the remanence value will be low (see Fig. 4). In cipitates, inclusions, cold work, grain size, grain orientation,
some materials the remanence value is practically zero, and the and specimen shape are all important in determining . The
loop has a butterfly shape. In other materials there is little or important intrinsic parameters that enter into the various terms
no reverse-domain creation until the external field is opposed to contributing to the coercivity are and . The
the direction of the initial saturation field. These materials have control of by suitable chemistry and processing techniques
a high remanence. It is often possible to control the shape of the is extremely important in magnetic-material design.
loop by either controlling the shape and lattice imperfections of
the specimen, or controlling the effects of these imperfections. III. EDDY-CURRENT AND DIELECTRIC LOSS
A striking illustration of this is control of the effects of the grain
boundary. Because the crystallographic directions change on A. Flux Changes Throughout a Conductor
passing through a grain boundary, the normal components of the In 1831 Faraday found that whenever the number of tubes of
magnetization vectors in the two grains adjacent to a boundary magnetic flux linking a closed circuit are changed, an induced
are not usually equal at remanence, and grain-boundary mag- current results. The current so induced flows in such a direc-
netic poles exist. Commonly the local fields associated with tion that its magnetic field opposes the change in magnetic flux
these poles are sufficiently great to cause reverse-domain cre- that produces it. Consequently whenever the flux is changed in-
ation at the grain boundary [3]. Three methods have been used to side a ferromagnet, local currents that flow in planes perpendic-
reduce these grain-boundary poles: a) grain orientation by cold ular to the magnetic lines of force are induced within the mate-
rolling to reduce the misalignment of easy-magnetization direc- rial. These local currents are called eddy currents. The associ-
tions from grain to grain; b) a magnetic anneal; or c) application ated fields oppose the domain-wall motion producing the flux
of a tensile stress to produce a common axis of easy magneti- change. In a magnetic field varying with angular frequency
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3402 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 38, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2002
, the resulting power loss may be expressed in terms of the lag The average power dissipation occurs at . Also
between impressed field and induction change. If both and
vary with time as , such a lag is expressed mathe-
matically by introducing a complex permeability where and are the maximum and minimum values of .
with being the phase angle between Here, , , and
and . Since is a measure of the lag, which in turn is . Therefore
directly related to the power loss, is called the magnetic
loss tangent.
If one assumes a homogeneous permeability throughout the
The discrepancy between these cases is seen to be the factor
material in the calculation of eddy-current losses, the calcu-
. This means that calculations of eddy-cur-
lated losses are always somewhat smaller than the measured
rent losses based on any model between these two extremes will
losses. The discrepancy gets worse the larger the spacing be-
have the same functional dependence on specimen dimensions,
tween domain walls compared with the small dimension of the
frequency, , and resistivity. They will differ in absolute mag-
specimen perpendicular to the lines of magnetic flux. This is to
nitude by less than a factor of 2.
be expected since the permeability is not at all homogeneous
If the power dissipated by eddy currents about the expanding
throughout the material, but is localized to the vicinity of the
cylindrical wall is set equal to 2 , the power
moving domain walls. This discrepancy is known as the eddy-
released by magnetization change in the effective driving field
current anomaly.
, the reciprocal radial velocity of the domain
As an illustration of the order of magnitude of this effect, the
wall is calculated as
special case of eddy currents in a cylindrical rod of length ,
radius , will be considered. In the extreme of flux change due
to domain rotation, the assumption of homogenous permeability
where
is correct. In this approximation, the eddy currents are assumed
to flow tangentially about the rod so that the voltage induced at
any radius is given by
The fields and refer, respectively, to the externally ap-
plied field and a threshold field for domain-wall motion. Since
if the varying enclosed flux is given by . In 2 is the effective driving force per unit area on the wall,
Gaussian units, the power dissipated due to a current is it is apparent that gives the damping per unit area of wall due
therefore to eddy currents. The complete equation of motion for an ex-
panding 180 cylindrical wall would be
B. Skin Effect
The above discussion of eddy currents assumes that the ex-
where is the saturation induction. Again, the ternal field penetrates the entire ferromagnet so that flux change
power dissipated is is occurring in the interior as well as the exterior portions of the
specimen. This assumption is valid for the thin sheets or wires
that are customarily used in transformers or metallic-tape cores
that are designed to reduce eddy-current effects. In bulk metals,
however, the assumption of a homogeneous permeability is
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GOODENOUGH: SUMMARY OF LOSSES IN MAGNETIC MATERIALS 3403
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3404 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 38, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2002
immediate response of the atomic magnetic moments to an im- The factor 2 on the right-hand side of the equation is valid only
pressed force can only be interactions of these atomic moments for 180 walls. Any average value must be between 2 and 1, the
with themselves or with the lattice. Since the atomic moment is factor for 90 walls.
associated with the electron “spin” of the atom, these processes Whatever the equation used, both and can be expressed
may be described as either “spin–spin” relaxations or “spin–lat- in terms of measurable physical constants through the phe-
tice” relaxations, respectively. nomenological Landau–Lifshitz equation. To do this, use is
The precise interaction mechanisms that are responsible made of a concept introduced by Becker [10] in 1951. Becker
for the magnetic-relaxation processes are not completely showed that domain-wall velocity can be translated directly
understood. A brief summary of present theory is given in into the precessional velocity of the atomic moments inside
Section V. Although a quantitative explanation of the relaxation the moving wall. The precessional velocity can be imagined
effects that are observed must await a better understanding of due to a field which is perpendicular to the wall. The total
the detailed interaction mechanisms, the qualitative features of field responsible for wall motion is, therefore, ,
these effects may be described by a phenomenological equation where is the component of the applied field parallel to the
of motion of the magnetization subject to a torque imposed wall. The precessional velocity of the spins can then be shown
by an external field : from (1) to be
(1) (3)
where is the magnetomechanical ratio . This where
equation follows directly from equating the rate of change of an-
gular momentum to the torque reduced by a frictional
term that is directed to oppose the direction of motion. The ar- and the proportionality constant follows from the
bitrary parameter must have dimensions s and is therefore Landau–Lifshitz equation with the displacement variable
called the relaxation frequency. This equation, first proposed by or . The kinetic energy of the wall is the difference in the
Landau and Lifshitz [7] in 1935, does not attempt to differen- energy of a domain wall in motion and at rest
tiate between spin–spin and spin–lattice processes. Since sev-
eral physical processes may simultaneously contribute to the
relaxation frequency , it is extremely dangerous to assign a
measured value of to any actual physical process. The integral can be shown proportional to
Other phenomenological equations have been suggested. through use of (3) and a calculation of the domain-wall energy
One such formalism, adopted by Bloembergen [8] from Bloch’s per unit area . It follows that the mass per unit area of wall
[9] original description of nuclear magnetic resonance, attempts is , where is the exchange parameter
to separate the spin–spin and spin–lattice interactions by the defined in Section II. In typical materials, where
introduction of two relaxation frequencies, and . g/cm , the inertial term in the equation of wall motion is much
However it, with all other phenomenological equations, is smaller than the damping term and may be neglected. Only in
subject to the same major limitation: it cannot give any details high-resistivity ferrites driven at frequencies above 10 MHz
of the physics of the relaxation processes themselves. Since the does the inertial term have a measurable effect.
Landau–Lifshitz formalism can be easily adapted to describe From the Landau–Lifshitz equation it also follows that the
both domain-wall and domain-rotation processes, it is used in power dissipated by the motion of the wall is
this descriptive summary.
B. Domain-Wall Damping
1) Flux-Reversal: As was pointed out in Section III, the
equation of motion of a cylindrical 180 domain wall may be
where is the wall area.
expressed as
If inertia is neglected and the elastic terms are lumped into an
effective threshold field for irreversible wall motion, this power
(2) dissipation can be equated to 2 , the power sup-
plied by the effective applied field if is the
where the damping coefficient is composed of a volume of the growing domain bounded by the moving wall. It
relaxation contribution as well as the eddy-current contribu- follows that for walls experiencing large, irreversible motions
tion . If large, irreversible flux reversals take place, an equa-
tion for cylindrical walls is probably most appropriate as it de- (4)
scribes nucleation and/or growth of many ellipsoidal domains of where
reverse magnetization with large eccentricity. If initial-perme-
ability measurements are made, the domain-wall configuration
is more complicated and a plane-wall equation is a sufficiently
This relaxation damping is extremely important for pulse-cir-
satisfactory representation:
cuit applications. It not only limits the speed of flux reversal,
(2 ) it also contributes a residual energy dissipation per unit volume
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GOODENOUGH: SUMMARY OF LOSSES IN MAGNETIC MATERIALS 3405
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3406 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 38, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2002
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GOODENOUGH: SUMMARY OF LOSSES IN MAGNETIC MATERIALS 3407
with the lattice. The direct interaction between the spin system, Yager, Galt, and Merritt [21], working with single crystals of
in a mode of uniform precession, and the lattice is found to ferrous-nickel ferrite, have measured the resonance linewidth
be very small, leading to a relaxation time 10 s. The and determined as a function of temperature. They also
observed relaxation times are 10 s. This discrepancy may determined an activation energy in good agreement with that for
be accounted for by spin–orbit, orbit–lattice interactions. electrons found from dc resistivity measurements.
2) Spin–Lattice Interactions via Conduction Electrons in Although these experiments indicate that there can be a con-
Semiconductors: Wijn and van der Heide [20], working with siderable contribution to the relaxation frequency due to an
iron-rich ferrites, have measured the initial permeability and interaction between the atomic moments and the conduction
determined the magnetic-loss factor as a electrons in ferrites containing both ferric and ferrous ions, it
function of temperature for various frequencies. They observed is not yet clear just what it is that relaxes when the electrons re-
a maximum that shifted to higher temperatures with higher distribute themselves. This effect is reduced, of course, by the
frequencies. Such a relationship is characteristic of a relaxation elimination of the ferrous ions.
phenomenon with relaxation time 3) Spin–Lattice Interactions via Conduction Electrons in
Metals: If an electromagnetic field penetrates a ferromagnetic
metal, the phase angle between the electromagnetic field and
where the heat of activation is approximated by an activation the induced RF component of the magnetization vector varies
energy and is the Boltzmann gas constant. Except in the with depth of penetration. This variation is due to the eddy
immediate vicinity of the Curie temperature, the entropy will not currents that tend to concentrate at the surface of the material
contribute significantly to the heat of activation. The relaxation within a skin depth . If the skin depth is
phenomenon may be expressed by the basic equation small (experimentally obtained by choosing a material with
large ), the variation of the orientation of with penetration
can be made relatively large so that there exists a measurable ex-
where is the relaxation time for with constant , is the change torque tending to orient neighboring spins parallel. This
relaxation time for with constant , and is the relaxed exchange torque is capable of modifying the motion of and,
permeability. These definitions follow at once if, respectively, therefore, the nature of the ferromagnetic resonance. Ament and
and are substituted into the above Rado [22] have calculated the linewidth to be expected from
equation. If a periodic field is impressed on a magnetic material this interaction by adding to in the usual Landau–Lifshitz
such that , , the above equation an exchange field , where
equation gives is the usual exchange parameter discussed in Section II. In the
special case where this effect is large compared to the damping
introduced through the relaxation frequency , the agreement
between experiment and theory is satisfactory.
For small , and
B. Spin–Spin Interactions
In nonmetallic materials of high resistivity (ferrites with low
ferrous content, for example), there are no conduction electrons
(6) to dissipate energy. Since the spin-phonon interactions are too
weak to give the observed linewidths of 50 Oe (relaxation
where times 10 s), there must be at least one other source of line
broadening. A possible source is semicovalent exchange, which
involves transfer of two electrons from an oxygen, one each, to
and the d-state manifolds of the interacting spins.
1) Dipole–Dipole Interactions: The ordinary exchange in-
teraction that aligns neighboring spins parallel (or antiparallel)
It follows that is a maximum if . Therefore, at to one another cannot cause any broadening of the resonance
a given temperature , there will be a frequency for which line since the Weiss molecular field is always par-
is a maximum and allel to the magnetization so that the torque must
vanish. However, there are dipole–dipole interactions between
similar spins situated at the sites of a regular lattice that can
The activation energy can therefore be determined from the give rise to an intrinsic resonance linewidth. These calculations
slope of the line versus , where is the temperature [23] predict a strongly temperature-dependent linewidth that
at which is a maximum for a given . goes to zero at the absolute zero of temperature. Well below the
Wijn and van der Heide measured activation energies Curie point the experimental linewidths tend to increase slightly
varying from 0.41 eV for a nickel–zinc ferrite with resistivity as the temperature is lowered, suggesting strongly that a finite
10 cm. These activation energies were found to linewidth remains even at absolute zero. Attempts to amend the
correspond to the activation energy determined from dc original calculations [24] to give a finite linewidth at absolute
resistivity measurements on the same zero have been challenged [25]. A possible answer [23] to this
materials. dilemma lies in the effect of magnetic inhomogeneities that gen-
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3408 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 38, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2002
erally occur in the experimental materials. A microscopically in- [14] J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev., vol. 78, p. 266, 1950.
homogeneous distribution of two kinds of magnetic ions on the [15] C. Kittel, Phys. Rev., vol. 76, p. 743, 1949.
[16] C. Kittel, Phys. Rev., vol. 73, p. 155, 1948.
octahedral sites of a ferrospinel, for example, leads to a variation [17] D. Polder and J. Smit, Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 25, p. 89, 1953.
of the dipolar forces between neighboring ions. This variation [18] W. A. Yager, J. K. Galt, F. R. Merritt, and E. A. Wood, Phys. Rev., vol.
predicts a finite linewidth at the absolute zero of temperature. 80, p. 744, 1950.
[19] C. Kittel and E. Abrahams, Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 25, p. 233, 1953.
2) Interactions of Spin Waves With Spin Waves: Recent [20] H. P. J. Wijn and H. van der Heide, Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 25, p. 98, 1953.
studies of ferromagnetic resonance at high levels of signal [21] W. A. Yager, J. K. Galt, and F. R. Merritt, Phys. Rev., vol. 99, p. 1203,
power by Anderson and Suhl [25] caused these workers to 1955.
[22] W. S. Ament and G. T. Rado, Phys. Rev., vol. 97, p. 1558, 1955.
suspect that the spin-wave spectrum should be modified when [23] F. Keffer, Phys. Rev., vol. 88, p. 686, 1952.
considering a finite magnetic body. Clogston et al. [26] have [24] N. Bloembergen and S. Wang, Phys. Rev., vol. 93, p. 72, 1954.
recently shown that in a finite medium, there exists a degen- [25] P. W. Anderson and H. Suhl, Phys. Rev., vol. 100, p. 1789, 1955.
[26] A. M. Clogston, H. Suhl, L. R. Walker, and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev.,
eracy of the spin wave with many spin waves of large vol. 101, p. 903, 1956.
value. The spin–spin interactions due to the interactions of [27] C. Kittel, “Physical theory of ferromagnetic domains,” Rev. Mod. Phys.,
the degenerate spin waves can give rise to a linewidth of the vol. 21, pp. 541–583, 1949.
[28] J. Smit and H. P. J. Wijn, “Physical properties of ferrites,” Adv. Electron.
observed order of magnitude since the spin waves of higher Electron Phys., vol. 6, pp. 69–136, 1954.
value can transfer considerable energy to the lattice. [29] E. Abrahams, “Relaxation processes in ferromagnetism,” Adv. Electron.
Physically this degeneracy arises from the fact that the effec- Electron Phys., vol. 6, pp. 47–68, 1954.
tive field contains demagnetizing-field contributions of the
form , where and are demagnetizing fac-
tors corresponding, respectively, to the static-field direction and John B. Goodenough was born in Jena, Germany,
on July 25, 1922. He received the A.B. degree in
to all directions perpendicular to the static field. These contri- mathematics from Yale University, New Haven, CT,
butions depress the spin-wave spectrum from that for the infi- in 1943, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in physics
nite medium in which corresponding to lies at the from the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, in
1951 and 1952, respectively. Prior to graduate study,
very bottom. In an infinite medium, . In a fi- during World War II, he served in the U.S. Air Force
nite medium, remains roughly the same for all spin waves as a meteorologist.
whereas is rapidly reduced for spin waves of large except at He came to the Massachusetts Institute of Tech-
nology’s Lincoln Laboratory in 1952. His initial as-
the surface of the sample, neighboring regions of opposite po- signment was with a small group charged with the
larity being induced on the perpendicular surfaces by the spin development of the square-loop ferrite cores to be used in the coincident-cur-
waves with . Consequently the short-wavelength spec- rent magnetic memory of the early digital computer. Following the successful
completion of that project, he turned to studies of cooperative orbital ordering
trum (large ) is depressed from the infinite-medium case by a on transition-metal atoms in solids, the interatomic spin–spin exchange interac-
greater amount than the spin wave for , and the degen- tions, and the complex long-range magnetic ordering resulting from competitive
eracy follows. interatomic exchange interactions. These studies were summarized in his book,
Magnetism and the Chemical Bond, published in 1963. In the 1960s, he con-
In brief, line broadening occurs because of inhomogeneous centrated on the transition from localized to itinerant electronic behavior. That
internal fields. work was the subject of his book, Les Oxydes des Métaux de Transition, pub-
For important reviews not specifically referred to in the text, lished in 1973 as a translation of his review article, “Metallic Oxides.” He is the
author or coauthor of more than 500 papers and over 70 book chapters. In 1976,
see [27]–[29] he became Professor and Head of the Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Univer-
sity of Oxford, Oxford, U.K. While he was at Oxford, he developed the layered
Li CoO and spinel Li Mn O cathodes for secondary Li-ion batteries
REFERENCES used in cell telephones and laptop computers. In 1986, he took up the Virginia H.
[1] C. P. Steinmetz, Trans. Amer. Inst. Electr. Eng., vol. 9, p. 3, 1892. Cockrell Centennial Chair of Engineering at The University of Texas, Austin.
[2] N. Menyuk and J. B. Goodenough, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 26, p. 8, 1955. The discovery of high-critical-temperature superconductivity by Bednorz and
[3] J. B. Goodenough, Phys. Rev., vol. 95, p. 917, 1954. Müller brought him back to his study of the transition from localized to itin-
[4] H. J. Williams, W. Shockley, and C. Kittel, Phys. Rev., vol. 80, p. 1090, erant electronic behavior in transition-metal oxides. He has since demonstrated,
1950. with Jianshi Zhou, that the first-order character of this transition leads to phase
[5] F. G. Brockman, P. H. Dowling, and W. G. Steneck, Phys. Rev., vol. 77, and bond-length fluctuations that give rise to a variety of unusual physical prop-
p. 85, 1950. erties. He also continued with the development of energy materials. These in-
[6] C. G. Koops, Phys. Rev., vol. 83, p. 121, 1951. clude the olivine Li FePO cathode material under commercial development
[7] L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Physik Z. Sowjetunion, vol. 8, p. 153, 1935. for Li-ion batteries as well as solid oxide fuel cells based on Sr- and Mg-doped
[8] N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev., vol. 78, p. 572, 1950. LaGaO as the electrolyte. The arrival of his 80th birthday has not diminished
[9] F. Bloch, Phys. Rev., vol. 70, p. 460, 1946. his enthusiasm over the design and discovery of new properties and uses of the
[10] R. Becker, J. Phys. Radium, vol. 12, p. 332, 1951. transition-metal oxides.
[11] G. T. Rado, R. W. Wright, W. H. Emerson, and A. Terris, Phys. Rev., vol. Prof. Goodenough is a member of the National Academy of Engineering and
88, p. 909, 1952. a Fellow of the American Physical Society. He is a member of the American
[12] D. M. Grimes, “Reversible susceptibility in ferromagnets,” Electronic Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Chemical Society,
Defense Group, Dept. Electrical Engineering, Univ. Michigan, Tech. L’Academie des Sciences de L’Institut de France, the U.K. Royal Society of
Rep. 64, Apr. 1956. See also D. M. Grimes and D. W. Martin, Phys. Chemistry, and the Physical Society of Japan. He is a foreign associate of the In-
Rev., vol. 96, p. 889, 1954. dian Academy of Science. He was awarded the 2001 Japan Prize by the Science
[13] J. J. Went and H. P. J. Wijn, Phys. Rev., vol. 82, p. 269, 1951; Physica, and Technology Foundation of Japan for the discovery of environmentally be-
vol. 17, p. 976, 1951. nign electrode materials for high-energy-density rechargeable lithium batteries.
Authorized licensed use limited to: J.R.D. Tata Memorial Library Indian Institute of Science Bengaluru. Downloaded on September 15,2021 at 19:35:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.