Research Proposal REPORT
Research Proposal REPORT
Research Proposal REPORT
___Signed______________ _________________
Learner signature Tutor signature
Date: 15th July 2021 Date:
Assessment Marking Sheet
OTHM Level 7 Diploma in Strategic Management and Leadership (RQF)
Advanced Business Research Methods (J/616/2726)
(Please tick the appropriate Box)
Learner OTHM
Registration Number
Pass
Final Result
Refer
Student
Susan Vilogini Sellathurai
1. INTRODUCTION 6
1.1 Research Background 6
1.2 Research Problem 7
1.3 Research Objectives 7
1.4 Research Questions 8
1.5 Significance of Research 8
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Product Promotion 8
2.1.1 Psychological Promotion 9
2.1.2 Clearance Sale 9
2.1.3 Extended Warranty 10
2.1.4 Bundled Offer 11
2.2 Store Environment 12
2.2.1 Visual Merchandising & Window Display 12
2.2.2 Packaging 13
2.2.3 Brand Awareness 14
2.3 Quality of Service 15
2.3.1 Customer Service 15
2.3.2 Easy Payment Methods 16
2.3.3 Product Demonstration 16
2.4 Price Promotion 17
2.4.1 Psychological Pricing 17
2.4.2 Credit Card Offers 18
2.4.3 Instalment Plans 19
2.4.4 Discount on Products 20
2.5 Impulsive Buying Behaviour 21
2.6 Conceptual Framework 22
2.7 Hypothesis 22
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 22
3.1 Research Philosophy, Approach, Strategy, Choice and Time Horizon 22
3.2 Data Source and Collection 24
3.3 Data Sampling 24
3.4 Data Collection Instrument 24
3.5 Data Analysis 25
3.6 Operationalisation 25
3.7 Reliability and Validity 25
3.8 Ethical Consideration 26
3.9 Delimitation 26
4. REFERENCES 27
1. INTRODUCTION
Researchers have been fascinated in the field of impulse buying for the past sixty
years. Numerous researches on impulse purchasing has been conducted in developed
countries like Canada, Norway, England, America, etc and developing countries like
China, Korea, India, Lithuania, Thailand, Philippines, Poland, Indonesia, Pakistan,
etc. In that research, researchers have mostly focused on identifying the general
factors that increase impulse buying.
The research objective will be “Identify the impulsive buying behaviour among
consumers of Carrefour Supermarket in Belgium”.
The findings resulting from this research are of academic advantage and contribute to
the existing knowledge of the researched area, also benefiting other student and non-
student researchers. It is also helpful particularly to marketers/owners of
supermarkets and retail stores to better understand their consumers and occasion
where the consumers display irrational purchases in Belgium. Accordingly, they can
take advantage of this and present stimuli in supermarket settings that trigger such
behaviour among consumers of Belgium. In addition, this research helps consumers
gain an insight into the true reasons behind their impulsive buying behaviour in a
supermarket setting. Many times, consumers themselves are unclear about why they
purchase more than what they had initially thought before entering a
supermarket/retail stores.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1Product Promotion
In general, consumers believe that they will be able to choose freely in the
clearance sales offer and that is perceived as behaviourally directed
advantages, which is much more likely to lead to high levels of experienced
reactance. Hammock and Brehm (1966), argue that clearance sales attract the
secondary buyers like parents as children were allowed to freely choose toys
and confectionary more than the expected volume to take home. Ndubisi and
Moi (2005) discuss that the clearance sale announcement has a much greater
personal direction than a loyalty buying. In addition, the moderation role of
fear of losing face (or embarrassment) also acts a driving factor in rushing
towards the clearance sale. The fear of losing face significantly moderates the
relationship between in-store display and clearance sale.
The results of the study conducted by Oakley (1996) reveals that greater
success in sales of fashion goods sales is significantly associated with a more
ambitious and speedier launch clearance of older inventory to allow the inflow
of new fashion goods effectively.
According to Banks & Moorthy (1999), Bundled Offer led to sudden increase
of sales experienced by retailers due to impulsive buying behaviours and price-
consciousness of consumers. Sinha & Smith (2000), says that consumer would
be easily swayed to buy products as there is no extra cost by consumers and it
attracts them instantly. Blackwell et al (2001) identified that bundled offer play
a significant role in influencing consumer impulsive buying which indirectly
attracts new consumer. According to Shilpa Aggrawal & Amit Aggrawal
(2012), pricing of product has an impact in deriving consumer perception and
the extent to which perception is influenced, is derived from the nature of
consumer buying behaviour. Rebate & Discount offer Blackwell et al (2001)
reported that price discounts influence the impulsiveness of the consumers to
go for product trial by which retailers indirectly attract and gain new consumer.
Janet Hoek & Leon Roelants (1991) concluded that, this small scale study
raises the possibility that a product's susceptibility to stockpiling may affect the
extent to which price discounting increases its sales, at least in the medium
term. Priti Salvi (2013) said that the bundled offer scheme induced the
customers to visit store and influenced their purchase decision. And also buy
one get one free has been found effective in their purchase decision. Soni Neha
et al (2013) found that the most popular sales promotion technique bundled
offer plays significant role in consumer’s impulsive purchase behaviour.
2.2Store Environment
Visual merchandising is, therefore, concerned with both how the product/brand
is visually communicated to the customer and also whether this message is
aptly decoded. According to pleasure Fiore A. M., Yah X. and Yoh E.,
(2000) ,Visual merchandising includes various aspects of consumer such as
sensory pleasure, affective pleasure and cognitive. Customers account both
monetary and non-monetary costs of the merchandise (Zeithaml, V. 1988).
Recreational i.e. non-monetary are vital for shopping Treblanche, N. S. (1999).
The longer a shopper remains in store more he or she will buy. And the amount
of time the shopper will spend in the store depends on how comfortable or
enjoyable the experience is. So the visual stimulus and ambience must be
soothing and effective so customer remains in store for longer time. Along with
the merchandise, it triggered affective reaction among shoppers Baker, J. and
Grewal, D. (1992) which creates store patronage intentions pointed by Baker,
J., Grewal, D., Levy, Parasuraman, A. and Glenn, B. (2002). It is evident from
the above research studies, that Visual Merchandising and Window Display are
critical component of store choice and sales behaviour.
2.2.2 Packaging
According to Mel Byars and Alexander Gelman (2000) “The best and worst
human characteristics that foster excellence may arguably be obsession and
ego”. Alexander believes that “obsession with the graphics components
combines with designer individual egos to create the best possible solutions”.
There are many notions and ramifications of the packaging design concept and
its elements, For example, surface graphics, illustration, color, typography,
material, symbols and icons, brand, and size (Underwood et al., 2001). To
conduct packaging design elements, there are a various different points of
views which will be shown off. According to Ampuero and Vila (2006)
classified that distinctive packaging design into two components: Graphics
components: For example, surface graphics, illustration, branding, color,
typography, information layout and so on. Structural components: For
example, materials, size, shape, and innovative formats. On the other hand
Silayoi and Speece (2004) have a different opinion from Ampuero and Vilas
(2006) through divide packaging components into two categories. According to
Silayoi and Speece (2004) assume that there are four main packaging elements
possibly influence consumer impulsive purchase decisions and they could be
divided into two categories: Visual components: The visual components
include surface graphics, packaging size and shape, and in short all effective
components which play a significant role in impulsive buying decision making.
Informational components: All packaging displays information to a greater or
lesser degree. Typically, this information can be divided into different types,
such as branding, naming, and features and benefits (Silayoi & Speece, 2007).
Aaker (1996) stated that brand awareness was the strength of a brand’s
existence in the minds of consumers to push to do impulsive buying, and it was
one of the four brand components to create and maintain brand equity.
Similarly, Keller (2003) said that brand awareness was one of the components
of brand equity and stated that it was a priority to create brand awareness to be
able to form the Customer-based Brand Value model that he developed. As it is
the first stage of consumers’ brand preference behaviour, brand awareness
plays a major role in impulsive buying behaviour. With obvious brand
awareness, the other processes will follow it (Heding et al., 2009). According
to Keller (2003), consumers only buy products that are clearly understood and
that they are familiar with. In the set of preferences, if there are any brands that
meet the criteria determined by the consumers, they will prefer the brand they
are aware of, without any need to gain information about the other brands
which ends up in impulsiveness. If there are multiple brands in the set of
preferences, the strength of brand awareness will be the determinant
(Macdonald and Sharp, 2000). In the literature, there are no studies which
examine the moderator role of brand awareness in the relationship between
impulse buying behaviour online or conventional shopping channels and the
determinants of this behaviour. Consumers are inclined to buy products with
which they are familiar and know well and brand awareness has a great
influence on consumers’ impulsive buying decisions (Keller, 1993). Biswas
(1992) showed that brand awareness had a strong influence on consumers’
price perception. On the other hand, browsing is a very rapid behaviour which
is displayed without thinking. If consumers see a brand they know when
browsing in PSCs, they start to focus on the products of that brand. Since
brand awareness has a major effect on the intention to buy (Keller, 2003), it has
a positive effect on consumers’ impulse purchases from PSCs. When
consumers are in PSCs, this facilitates impulse purchase decisions without
thinking about them.
2.3Quality of Service
In a study carried out on the subject, it has been established that easy payments
methods like Debit Card, Credit card and Redeem points have a higher
tendency to make impulsive buying (Bauemeister, 2002). Even though the
consumer does not have the financial power to purchase a product he/she likes,
he/she makes more impulsive buying with the comfort of these paying
methods. If the consumer thinks that there will be no financial problems in the
aftermath of the purchase and does not have to establish a specific time and
budget for shopping, he/she decides on purchases more easily. These payment
methods cause impulsive buying due to the product which will be possessed
now and the payment which will occur in the future (Beatty et. al, 1998:108).
The individual can make impulsive buying by possessing the financial force
he/she does not currently have in line with the opportunities credit cards
present. Beatty et. al (1998:175) stated that the budget individual reserves
and availability of payment option at the supermarket when going for
shopping has an influence on impulsive buying. The consumer’s having
enough paying option or more money during shopping is a factor which
triggers impulsive buying for him/her. Even the fact that the consumer has a
usable credit card but no money can increase the impulsive buying of the
consumer.
2.4Price Promotion
The most frequently used psychological pricing method applies price endings,
that is, odd and even prices. These prices represent a straightforward
managerial implementation of potential threshold effects and are frequently
used by retailers to trigger consumers impulsive buying behaviour (Gendall,
Fox.Wilton 1998, p. 421). Odd prices usually are a little less than a round
number (e.g. 0.65€, 0.98€, 5.99€), and the round number is assumed to be the
threshold. However, a round number in psychological terms clearly depends on
the price level, such that 95€ or even 890€ might be regarded as odd prices. In
the class of odd prices, 9-ending prices are of particular importance. Bizer,;
G .Y Schindler (2005), emphasize that odd prices increase the probability that
purchase transactions involve receiving change from the cashier, which might
induce (positive) perceptions of getting something extra in return for a
purchase Guéguen N , Legoherel P , (2004)
In contrast, even prices equal a round number (e.g. 0.70€, 1.00€, 6.00€) Pechtl
H (2005). Schindler, R.M.; Wiman, A.R. (1989) show that people recall 0-
ending prices more precisely than odd prices. Even prices also facilitate
communication and increase price perceptions and recognition Schindler, R.M.;
Kirby, P.N. (1997). In addition, even prices ending in 00 (e.g. 10.0€, 100€,
1000€) might induce even more impulsive buying by the customers.
According to Gendall, P.; Fox, M.F.; Wilton, P. (1998): Many authors reveal
heavy usage of odd pricing by retailers, especially for frequently bought goods.
Levy et al. (2007), Wagner, U.; Grohs, R.; Stadler, E. (2001) says t he popularity
of odd prices is also evident in higher-priced merchandise sectors, especially if
consumers are highly involved (Kleinsasser, S.;Wagner,U (2011), However,
empirical evidence about the effects of odd pricing on profits for a single
product (i.e., ignoring potential increases in store patronage, cross-selling, or
the like) is mixed Harris, C.; Bray, J. (2007).
Literature thus reports common application of odd pricing, both for frequently
bought as well as higher-priced products through impulsive buying behaviour.
Research from Khare Gultekin, Beiza (2012) concluded that credit cards allow
consumers to show their status to others and communicate one's position in
society. Ease of making transactions makes one need not worry when shopping
if you do not carry or do not have cash, because he can still make purchases
with a credit card.
Infrastructure, volume of business, pricing and availability to use cards are the
different factors identified by Humphrey et al. (1996) which influence the
payment mechanisms and simultaneously have an impact on consumers’
impulsive purchase decision. Availability of credit cards, debit cards and
automatic teller machines (ATMs) as well as banking services create an ease of
operation in terms of payment mechanism which triggers the impulsive buying
behaviour (Scholnick et al., 2008). An equated monthly instalment (EMI) is a
fixed payment amount made by a borrower to a lender at a specified date each
calendar month. EMIs are used to pay off both interest and principal each
month so that over a specified number of years, the amount borrowed is paid
off in full. In case of buying and selling, a number of companies offer EMI
facility to their customers. The customers do not need to (Southeast University
Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, Issue 1, June 2020 42) make the
full payment at the time of purchase. Rather the price of the purchased product
can be paid off at later date.
Impulse buying defines any purchase which a shopper makes; however it was not
planned in advance. Impulsive buying behaviour is an important phenomenon in
the context of retail business and marketing (Verplanken & Sato, 2011).
According to (Duarte & Raposo, 2013) this type of buying behaviour comes to be
responsible for 62% of supermarket sales and as much as 80% of purchases in
some product categories. (James, et al., 2014) described impulsive buying
behaviour as the consumers share corresponding disposition to indulge in
impulsive buying behaviour since surroundings like atmosphere, layouts, and
promotions, friendly and persuasive salespersons can positively affect consumers’
emotion and persuade them to visit more aisles and zones in supermarkets,
therefore triggering consumers’ impulse to buy things. Unplanned buying refers to
all purchases made without such progressive planning including impulse buying,
which is famed by the relatively speedy decision-making encouraged by stimuli.
(JIYEON, 2000). Impulse buying is considered as relevant in today’s business
situation with the ground-breaking sales promotions, creative messages and
appropriate use of technologies in the retail stores (Schiffman, 2010 cited by
(Muruganantham & Bhakat, 2013).
2.6Conceptual Framework
Product Promotion
Store Environment
Quality of service Impulsive Buying Behaviour
Price promotion
2.7Hypothesis
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study is a deductive approach because there are numbers of publishes theories
and literature on the area concerned. According to Sekaran, (2013), deductive
approach defined as is undertaken to ascertain and be able to describe the
characteristics of the variables of interest in a situation. The deductive approach
develops the hypothesis upon a previous theory and afterwards frames the research
approach to test it (Silverman, 2013). The deductive approach is to be considered
particularly matched to the positivist approach, which allows the formulation of
hypotheses and the statistical testing of predictable results to an accepted level of
probability (Snieder & Larner, 2009). This will be done as a field study and cross
sectional in nature. The study will be based on both primary and secondary data.
Different web sites, journal articles, books and reports related to research will be
used for collecting secondary data in this study. Primary data will be collected
through questionnaire just once and accordingly the study is cross sectional instead
of longitudinal. Researcher will gather information on 4 independent variables:
Product Promotion, Store Environment, Quality of Service, and Price Promotion and
finally Impulsive Purchase as the dependent variable.
The third layer of research onion is a research strategy that will help in distinguishing
the various methods which can be used in order to answer the research questions.
These methods are surveys, case study, experiment, grounded theory, guided
approach, and ethnography and action research (Saunders 2009). The survey strategy
is typically related to the deductive approach. It is a popular and common strategy in
business and management research and is most often used to answer who, what,
where how much and how many questions. It, therefore, it tends to be used for
exploratory and descriptive research. Surveys are standard as they permit the
collection of a large amount of data from a sizeable population in an extremely
economical manner.
To test the hypothesis and solve the research problem, data is required to be collected
from all applicable sources. Since the data will be available to conclude the research,
primary data collection methods will be used. It is the method in which data is
collected for a precise research problem using the methods that fit the study goals.
The data for this research question needs to be formulated and the data will be
collected in a quantitative manner to align with the nature of the research. The main
source for data collection will be Self-administered survey method. Self-
administered survey method is chosen because it is one the faster way of gathering
data and it is possible to reach many respondents in very little time. Also, it is a very
economical method and can help to visualize the results. Self-administered surveys
are a quantitative research method that is, a research method that produces
information from which can generate percentages.
According to Thijs. (2021), there are 1212 people visit Carrefour Warregem. This
includes the buyer, buyers family, freinds and others who accompany the buyer. And
only 837 transation happends averagly per day. Which is 311,364 annual transations
happens at the Carrefour- Warregem, which is 25,947 transsation per month. It is
further narrowed to show that per day atleast 837 transation happens daily.
According to the above data the researcher’s total sample is 311,364 to do the
research, but according to Krejcie, R, and Morgan, D. (1970), based on the
calculator, the sample applicable for this study will 384 numbers.
In this study, stratified random sampling method will be used among the visitors at
Carrefour Warregem A structured questionnaire with the topic “Factors affecting
impulsive buying behaviour among consumers at Carrefour will be prepared and
distributed among desired sample.
3.4 Data Collection Instrument
To strengthen study, primary data will be collected from ten consumers per day up
till the thirty eight days which equalled the total sample of 384. This is to make sure
that consumers’ data is not collected in a particular time horizon but throughout
thirty eight days who had various behaviour change, mentally and physically which
had affected their impulsive buying behaviour. Those ten buyers will be selected on
morning hours and evening hours. The researcher will be giving the printed
questionnaire to the Store manager, Carrefour Supermarket, Gentseweg 524, 8793
Waregem, Belgium to keep it at the Cashier to fill out the questionnaire ensuring that
those respondents belonged to various backgrounds with different demographic
variables.
Data collected will be summarized in the data sheet and average for each variable
will be formulated through SPSS software and hypothesis will be tested using
correlation analysis. To test the hypothesis chi-square test or ANOVA test will be
used. Secondary data will be analysed using bar charts, pie charts, line charts etc.
3.6 Operationalisation
In order to understand the power of the impulsive buying scale to measure the
intended, the construct validity will be conducted on all the data. An appropriate tool
must be used to determine whether data and sample size are appropriate and
sufficient for the selected analysis. Construction of the questionnaire in a simple and
easy to understand, using Likert Scale. To check the consistency of the
questionnaires across time and items, questionnaire will be given to 4 people 2 times
with an interval of 4 days to see the reliability of the questionnaire and further if
needed, questionnaire could be edited accordingly. Validity of the questionnaire will
be checked to see the extent to which the scores genuinely represent the variable that
the researcher is intend to.
To understand how accurate the impulsive buying scale measures what it should
measure, a reliability study is conducted. In this respect a reliable reliability test,
item-test correlation analysis and the comparison will be conducted regarding the
reliability and similarity of the scale.
Researcher will avoid risk of psychological harm or hurt to the respondents. Also the
researcher will avoid collecting data from differently abled people, elderly people &
children to validate the results derive from the questionnaire. Researcher will avoid
asking inappropriate and unnecessary questions that might offend or upset people
and also evade addressing sensitive issues that could cause such offence or emotional
upset for the participants.
3.9 Delimitation
There are some limitation of this research which will not able to rectify during the
study that has to be addressed before generalizing the results and suggesting
recommendations. The first limitation will be, the sample of 384 respondents is
relatively smaller & not adequate to represent the whole population of Belgium.
Hence, the study will not make concrete testimonials on the entire Belgian
population.
Furthermore, the study will only be done on one province, where the area was
selected as Carrefour Warregem. However, a comparison among cities will be better
prospect for this study.
In addition to above factors, in this study has only four variables were considered as
the independent variables which will have an impact on impulsive buyer behaviour.
However, there are many other aspects such as demographic factors including age,
income, occupation, education qualification and psychographic factors including
personality attributes, motives and lifestyle.
4. REFERENCES
Aaker, D. (1996) Building Strong Brands. Free Press, New York, NY.
Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of
Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 102-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760610655032
Baker, J. and Grewal, D. (1992), “An experimental approach to making retail store
environmental decisions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 68, 445-60.
Baker, J., Grewal, D., Levy, Parasuraman, A. and Glenn, B. (2002), “The influence of multi-
store environmental clues on perceived merchandise valve and patronage intentions”, Journal
of Marketing, Vol. 66,120-41.
Banks, J., & Moorthy, S. (1999). A Model of Price Promotion. International Journal of
Industrial Organization, 17, 371-398.
Biswas, A. (1992). The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Reference Price Perceptions.
Journal of Business Research. 15. 251-262.
Bitner, M.J. (1992), “Services capes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and
employees”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, 57-71.
Bizer, G.Y.; Schindler, R.M. (2005): Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price
information processing, in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 771-783.
Blackwell, R. D., et al. (2001). Consumer Behavior (9th ed). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt
College Publishers.
Blattberg, R.C., & Neslin, S. (1990). Sales promotion concepts, methods, and strategies. New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1995). Factors influencing customers’ assessments of service
quality and their invocation of a service warranty. Advances in Services Marketing and
Management, 4(C), 195–210.
Buchanan, C, Simmons, CJ and Bickart, B A (1999), “Brand Equity Dilution: retailer display
and context brand effects”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.36 No. 3, p. 345.
Carman, J.M. (1990) Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the
SERVQUAL Dimensions. Journal of Retailing, Vol 66, spring, pp 33-55.
Chen, K. Y., Kaya, M., & Özer, Ö. (2008). Dual sales channel management with service
competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 654–675.
Chen, T., Kalra, A., & Sun, B. (2009). Why do consumers buy extended service contracts?
Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 611–623.
Cotton, B.C., & Babb, E.M. (1978). Consumer response to promotion deals. Journal of
Marketing, 42(3), 109-113. doi:10.2307/1250544
Cronin, Jr., J. Joseph; Brady, Michael K.; Hult, G. Tomas. (2000). Assessing the Effects of
Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service
Environments. Journal of Retailing, Summer, Vol. 76 Issue 2, p193.
Darden, W.R., Erdem,O. & Darden, D.K. (1983), “A comparison and test of three casual
models of patronage intentions”, Patronage Behavior and Retail Management, New York,
NY: North Holland.
Fiore A. M., Yah X. and Yoh E., (2000), “Effects of the Product Display and environmental
fragrancing on approach responses and pleasurable experiences”, Psychology & Marketing,
Vol. 17 (1), pp. 27-42.
Firas, J. A. (2016). The role of installment buying plans in increasing the impulse buying
behavior among Jordanian households. Journal of Management Research, 8 (1), 110-124.
Gendall, P.; Fox, M.F.; Wilton, P. (1998): Estimating the effect of odd pricing, in: Journal of
Product & Brand Management, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 421-432.
Gilly, M. C., & Wolfinbarger, M. (2000). A comparison of consumer experiences with online
and offline shopping. Consumption Markets & Culture, 4(2), 187–205.
Guéguen, N.; Legoherel, P. (2004): Numerical encoding and odd-ending prices: the effect of a
contrast in discount perception, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, No. 1/2, pp. 194-
208.
Gultekin, Beiza. & Ozer, Leyla. Store Image’s Influence on Perceived Quality of Store
Brands and Store Brand Purchasing Behavior. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.
2012. Vol 3 (March)
Hammock, Thomas and Jack W. Brehm (1966), “The Attractiveness of Choice Alternatives
When Freedom to Choose Is Eliminated by a Social Agent,” Journal of Personality, 34 (4),
546- 553
Hancock, D., & Humphrey, D. B. (1998). Payment transactions, instruments, and systems: A
Survey. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(11), 1573–1624.
Harris, C.; Bray, J. (2007): Price endings and consumer segmentation, in: Journal of Product
& Brand Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 200-205.
Heding, T. Knudtzen, C., F. Bjerre, M. (2009) Brand Management: Research, Theory and
Practice. The
Heese, H. S. (2012). Retail strategies for extended warranty sales and impact on manufacturer
base warranties. Decision Sciences, 43(2), 341–367.
Hirschman, E.C. (1979). Differences in consumer purchase behavior by credit card payment
system. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(1), 58-66. DOI: 10.1086/208748
Hoyer, W. & MacInnis, D.J. Consumer Behavior. 2nd Ed. 2010. Boston: Houghton Miffin
Company
Humphrey, D.B., Pulley, L.B. & Vesala, J.M. (1996). Cash, paper, and electronic payments: a
crosscounty analysis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28 (4), 914–
939.https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:28:y:1996:i:4:p:914-39
Janet, H., & Leon, R. (1991). Some Effects of Price Discounting on Discounted and
Competing Brands' Sales. Majrketing Bulletin, 2, 55-59.
Jiyeon Kim, (2003), “College Students’ Apparel Impulse Buying Behaviors in Relation to
Visual Merchandising”, pp 45-49.
Keller, K.L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing environment. Journal of
Marketing Communication 15(2), 139-155.
Kleinsasser, S.; Wagner, U. (2011): Price endings and the tourism consumers’ price
perceptions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 58-63.
Lattin, J. M., & Bucklin, R. E. (1989). Reference effects of price and promotion on brand
choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(12), 299-310. doi:10.2307/3172902
Lehman, D. R., & Winer, R. S. (2002). Product Management, (3rd ed.). New York: Mc-
GrawHill.
Levy, D.; Lee, D.; Chen, H.A.; Kauffman, R.J.; Bergen, M. (2007): Price points and price
rigidity, in: Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-34, Bar-Ilan University Pub
Law Working Paper No. 09-01.
Martins, A.L. & Senra, V. (2017). The impact of monetary and non-monetary promotions on
the brand equity of new and mature products. Master Dissertation; Universidade Catolica
Portuguesa.
Mills, K. H., Paul, J.E. & Moorman, K.B., (1995), Applied visual merchandising (3rd ed.),
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ndubisi Nelson Oly and Moi Chiew Tung (2005), “Customer Behavioral Responses to Sales
Promotion: The Role of Fear of Losing”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 17
(1), January, 32-49
Neha, S., & Manoj, V. (2013). Impact of Sales Promotion Tools on Consumer’s Purchase
Decision towards White Good (Refrigerator) at Durg and Bhilai Region of CG India.
Research Journal of Management Science, 2(7) 10-14.
Oakley Paul (1996), “High Tech NPD Success through Faster Overseas Launch”, European
Journal of Marketing, 30 (8), 75-91
Pakdil, F., Isı̧n, F. B., & Genç, H. (2012). A quality function deployment application using
qualitative and quantitative analysis in after sales services. Total Quality Management &
Business Excellence, 23(11–12), 1397–1411.
Parasuraman, A., Valerie A. Zeithaml and Leonard L. Berry. (1985). A Conceptual Model of
Service Quality and Its Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing 49(4), 41-50
Parasuraman, A., Valerie A. Zeithaml and Leonard L. Berry. (1991). Understanding Customer
Expectation of Service. Sloan Management Review (Spring), pp39-48
Prendergast, G., Shi, Y. & Cheung, K. (2005). Behavioral response to sales promotional tools.
International Journal of Advertising, 24(4), 467-486.
Quartier K, Vanrie J & Van Cleempoel K, (2009), “The interaction between interpreted space,
mood and behavior in retail environments: a conceptual research model”, IASDR09 ‘Design:
Rigor and relevance, pp 2-4.
Ramezani, M.R. & Heidarzadeh, K. (2014). The impact of monetary and non-monetary
promotions on brand equity in industrial market: case study: Iranpotk company. International
Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 3(5), 1-13.
Rook, D.W. (1987). The buying Impulse. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 189-199.
doi:10.1086/209105
Rook, D.W., & Fisher, R. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior.
Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305-313. doi:10.1086/209452
Roux, A.T. (2014). South African consumers’ views and responses to sales promotions.
Journal of Social Sciences, 41(2), 243-251.
Rozdobudko, A. (2005). In-store marketing sales driving factors: the case of hair care
products in modern trade retailers. Master Thesis; National University of Kyiv-Mohyla
Academy Ukraine.
Rundh, B. (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of packaging. British Food Journal, 107(9),
670-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700510615053
Salvi, P. (2013). Effectiveness Of Sales Promotional Tools: A Study On Discount, Price Off
And Buy One Get One Free Offers In Branded Apparel Retail Industry In Gujarat. ELK Asia
Pacific Journal of Marketing and Retail Management, 4(4).
Schindler, R.M.; Kirby, P.N. (1997): Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices:
implications for nine-ending effects, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24, pp. 192-201.
Schindler, R.M.; Wiman, A.R. (1989): Effects of odd pricing on price recall, in: Journal of
Business Research, Vol. 19, pp. 165-177
Scholnick, B., Massoud, N., Saunders, A., Carbo-Valverde, S., & Rodriguez-Fernandez, F.
(2008). The Economics of credit cards, debit cards and Atms: A survey and some new
evidence. Journal of Banking& Finance, 32 (8), 1468-1483.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.899452
Shilpa Agargwal & Amit Aggrawal (2012). A Critical Analysis of Impact of Pricing on
Consumer buying behaviour in Apparel Retail Sector: A Study of Mumbai City. International
Journal Of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 1(1), 34-44.
Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on
the impact of involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal, 106(8), 607-628.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700410553602
Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2007). The importance of packaging attributes: A conjoint analysis
approach. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1495-1517.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560710821279
Sinha, I., & Smith, M. F. (2000). Consumers’ perceptions of promotional framing of price.
Psychology & Marketing, 17(3), 257-75.
Taylor, S.A. (1992) Measuring Service Quality: A Re-examination and Extension. Journal of
Marketing, Vol 56, July, pp 55-68.
Teunter, L.H. (2002). Analysis of sales promotion effects on household purchasing behavior.
ERIM PhD Research Series in Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, p. 262-272.
Tong, P., Liu, Z., Men, F., & Cao, L. (2014). Designing and pricing of two-dimensional
extended warranty contracts based on usage rate. International Journal of Production
Research, 52 (21), 6362–6380.
Totten, J.C., & Block, M.P. (1994). Analyzing Sales Promotion: Text & Cases: How to Profit
from the New Power of Promotion Marketing, (2nd ed.). Dartnell Corp., Chicago, IL.
Tsao, Y. C., & Su, P. Y. (2012). A dual-channel supply chain model under price and warranty
competition. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 8(3),
2125– 2135.
Wagner, U.; Grohs, R.; Stadler, E. (2001): Einige Überlegungen zur Preisbildung im
Österreichischen Lebensmitteleinzelhandel im Zuge der Umstellung auf den Euro, in: Der
Markt, Vol. 40, No. 2+3, pp. 110-120.
Weinberg, P., & Gottwald, W. (1982). Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions.
Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 43-57. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(82)90016-9
Weng, J. & De Run. E.C. (2013). Consumer personal values and sales promotion preferences
effects on behavioral intention and purchase satisfaction for consumer products. Asia Pacific
Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(1), 70-101.
Wierenga, B., & Soethoudt, H. (2010). Sales promotions and channel coordination. Original
Empirical Research, 38(3), 383-397.
Yeh, C. W., & Fang, C. C. (2015). Optimal decision for warranty with consideration of
marketing and production capacity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18),
5456–5471.
Youn, S., & Faber, R. (2000). Impulsive buying: Its relation to personality traits and cues. In
S. J. Hoch & R. J. Meyer (Eds.), NA – Advances in Consumer Research. (v.27, pp. 179-185).
Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Alvarez, B., & Casielles, R.V. (2005). Consumer evaluations of sales promotion: The effect
on brand choice. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 54-70.
doi:10.1108/03090560510572016
Zhang, P., Xiong, Y., & Xiong, Z. (2015). Coordination of a dual-channel supply chain after
demand or production cost disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 53 (10),
3141–3160.