Scientists Junior Apar
Scientists Junior Apar
Scientists Junior Apar
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: Designing of a
Standardized Format for R&D Organization
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT (APAR) FOR SCIENTISTS (Junior Level)
Name of the Scientist ________________ Discipline _______________
Grade ________________ Sub Discipline____________
Lab/Estt ________________ Year ___________________
Guidelines to fill up the form
1. For the organisation to realize its mission and objectives, every member of the organisation needs to
perform to his/her potential. R&D organization values appraisal to have tremendous motivational
impact on people through goal setting, meaningful feedback, and recognition. The present appraisal
system has been designed to integrate individual goals with organization’s mission and objectives.
2. Initial discussions are required to be done between the Initiating Officer (IO) and the scientists to set
the targets for next year and discuss the previous year’s performance, followed by impediments and
facilities, facts at work place.
3. In part IV, IO shall be grading the scientist on all the sub‐attributes. Reviewing Officer (RO) can
modulate the final score given by IO on each category i.e. Work output, Personal attributes,
Functional Competency. Finally the Head of the establishment can modulate the final grading in the
end if there is any significant variance in the IO and RO score.
4. APAR has got the provision for representation within 15 days. If the concerned APAR Section does
not receive any information from the assessee on or before 15 days from the date of disclosure, the
APAR will be treated as final.
5. The competent authority for considering unfavorable or adverse remarks shall consult the Accepting
authority and decide the matter objectively within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of
the representation. The competent authority after due consideration may reject/accept the
representation and modify the APAR accordingly. The decision of the competent authority and the
final grading shall be communicated to the assessee reported upon within 15 days of receipt of the
decision of the competent authority by the concerned APAR Section.
6. Next year’s targets shall be broadly finalized during at the beginning of the Annual term and copy of
it to be retained by Initiating officer, the candidate and the office.
7. Targets can be changed on new project assignments, or transfer from one lab to other lab, in
consultation with IO/or can be reviewed half yearly.
• Spacing can be increased/decreased as per the Individual/ organizational requirements
1
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART-I
(To be filled by Office)
1. Name and grade of the Scientist : __________________________________
8. Reasons for taking leave other than CL, EL, Medical :_________________________
9. Academic Qualifications :
11. Details of appointments held including the current one:(in chronological order)
2
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART-- II
I am reporting to............................................
Guidelines
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Candidate’s viewpoint
• Working environment
3
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART-- III
(This part is associated with motivational component and anything discussed in this section, either positive or
negative shall not have any adverse consequences on the overall assessment)
(To be filled in by the Initiating Officer)
(Duration: A minimum of 30 minutes)
a) WORK OUTPUT
FIELD
c) PERSONALITY ATTRIBUTES
4
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
Part III (Contd)
Copy to:
- Initiating Officer
- Candidate
- Current APAR
- Next APAR
5
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART‐ IV
6
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART- IV (contd.)
REMARKS BY IO:
III. Attitude towards Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, Weaker Sections of the society:
(Comment on understanding of the problems of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, Weaker Sections of the society only if
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART- V
Remarks of RO: Reference to strengths/weakness. Please record your observations other than the points already covered by IO.
7
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART VI
The head of the Estt will give the final rating and normalize as per the table given below:
Outstanding 90-100
Average 70-80
Poor < 40
• APARs graded between 90 to 100 will be rated as ‘Outstanding’ and will be rounded off accordingly 90 or 95 for the purpose of calculating average
• APARs graded between 80 and 90 will be rated as ‘Very good’ and will be given a score of 85.
• APARs graded between 70 and 80 will be rated as ‘Average’ and will be given a score of 75.
• APARs graded between 40 and short of 70 will be rated as ‘Below average’ and will be given a score of 60.
• APARs graded below 40 will be rated as ‘Poor’ and will be given a score of 40.
8
ANNUAL APPRAISAL Assessee’s Signature
PART VII
DECLARATION
I Dr. Ms/Mr. ______________have carefully read the Annual Performance Appraisal Report for the year __________.
Signature of the Scientist: _________________ NAME (IN BLOCK LETTERS): ……………………………………
PART VIII
Name and grade of the Scientist : ___________________________________
Laboratory/ Establishment : ___________________________________
Period of Report : ___________________________________
Grievances:
Signature of the Assessee ………………………………………………… Date ……………………………………….
Remarks of the representing authority if applicable
Signature of the Representing Authority………………………………………….. Date ……………………………
9