I. O. Macari, Lecture 10: 5.3. The Noun 5.3.1. Definition and Characteristics
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10: 5.3. The Noun 5.3.1. Definition and Characteristics
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10: 5.3. The Noun 5.3.1. Definition and Characteristics
I, 2020
Contents
5.3. The noun ......................................................................................................................................................... 1
5.3.1. Definition and characteristics .........................................................................................................................1
5.3.2. Noun classes ...................................................................................................................................................2
Exercises .............................................................................................................................................................. 16
1
As identified by Biber, Conrad and Leech in The Longman student grammar of spoken and written English.
London: Longman, 2002.
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
Nouns commonly refer to concrete, physical entities (people, objects, substances, etc.):
e.g. book, friend, iron.
They can also denote abstract entities, such as qualities and states: e.g. freedom, wish,
friendship.
5.3.2. Noun classes2
Most common nouns have both a singular and a plural form, with either regular or irregular
forms. Nouns are subdivided into the following major categories: common nouns contrast with
proper nouns; count nouns contrast with non-count nouns (including mass nouns); concrete
nouns contrast with abstract nouns; collective nouns contrast with noncollective nouns.
Many abstract nouns are derived from verbs (explanation, actor, receiver, etc.) or from
adjectives (wisdom, length, happiness, etc.).
Many words can be recognized as nouns by their suffixes, for example -ion (in action), -er (in
reader), -or (in actor), -ness (in business), -ity (in authority), -ment (in department) and -ship (in
friendship).
Nouns are common (cat, nature, wood, etc.) or proper (Britain, London, Mary, etc.). Proper
nouns are normally uncountable, but if they are turned into common nouns they borrow some
of the features of the latter. Thus, in The Nadia I know would not say that, the proper noun
Nadia is preceded by the determinative the, and in The Browns are on vacation, the proper
noun takes both the determiner and the plural –s.
According to the type of referent, common nouns can be concrete (nouns refer to people, places,
or things) or abstract (nouns refer to qualities, states, or actions).
In reference to their grammatical form, common nouns can be count/countable or non-
count/uncountable.
Count nouns have both a singular and a plural form and they can be accompanied by determiners that
refer to distinctions in number, such as a, one, every, etc. for singular nouns and ten, many, those for
plural nouns.
Non-count nouns refer to an indivisible mass and are treated as singular. They accept only
determiners that do not mark distinctions in number, such as some, much, your, that, etc. Most
abstract nouns are non-count. The definite article the can accompany both count and non-count
nouns, while the indefinite article a/ an can only precede singular count nouns. Some nouns may
be either count or non-count, depending on their meaning; compare He is good at statistics [non-
count] and He produced several good statistics [count].
In order to illustrate the conversion of non-count into count nouns, Greenbaum and Quirk (1990)
propose the following cases:
1. When the count noun refers to different kinds:
The shop has a large selection of cheeses.
2. When the count noun refers to units that are obvious in the situation.
2
This section mainly draws on Greenbaum & Quirk’s A Student’s Grammar of the English Language, 1990, and
Bejan & Bejan’s Morphology of contemporary English, 2005.
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
As the unitary constituent of the verb phrase, the lexical/main verb is the central element that
determines the functional and meaning relations in a clause. Its valency selects the rest of the elements
in the clause.
Main verbs must occur in any normal clause or sentence (with the exception of verbless clauses
and ellipsis). Lexical verbs have the following characteristics:
A Morphological
Lexical verbs have different forms signalling tense (present and past), aspect (perfect,
progressive), and voice (active and passive). (see 5.2.)
Like nouns, several verbs have no suffixes: call, walk, etc.
Many of the verbs that do have suffixes are of Latin, Greek or French origin; some of
verbs were already suffixed when they were borrowed: magnify, agonize, realize.
By the addition of certain suffixes, nouns or adjectives can be turned into main verbs:
prefix noun base derived verb with suffix
-ate assassin, different assassinate, differentiate
-(i)fy beauty, class beautify, classify
-ize/-ise alphabet, apology alphabetize, apologise
-en Height Heighten
prefix adjective base derived verb with suffix
-ate active activate
-(i)fy simple simplify
-ize/-ise Actual actualize
-en black, deep blacken, deepen
Verb prefixes do not normally change the word class, yet they do change the meaning
prefix meaning of prefix Examples
re- again reabsorb, rebuild, redefine, refinance
dis- opposite, apart disarm, disconnect, discontinue, dislike
over- too much, across, beyond overbook, overcome, overeat, overhear
un- opposite, in reverse unbend, uncouple, unfold, unload, unpack
mis- wrong, poorly misbehave, mishandle, misinform,
out- beyond, further outdo, outgrow, outperform, outweigh
Regular verbs have only 4 morphological forms. These forms involve 3 suffixes added to a base:
form Example Use
base walk infinitive, present tense except 3rd person sg, and subjunctive
base +suffix -(e)s walks 3rd person sg present tense
5
catenative verb = a verb--such as keep, promise, want, seem, and many others--that can link with other verbs to
form a chain or series. A catenative verb (also called a chain verb) takes a nonfinite clause as its complement.
(Nordquist)
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
verbs of aspect characterize the stage of progress of an event or activity. Ex.: She started
telling him her story. The most common aspect verbs are begin, continue, keep, start and stop.
Multi-word verbs6
Inside the class of lexical verbs we should distinguish the group of multi-word verbs. According to
Hasselgård, Lysvåg, & Johansson (n.d.), a multi-word verb consists of two or more words which
function together like a single verb in making up meaning. A multi-word verb is usually a
combination of a verb and an adverb or a preposition, but other word classes may also be included.
Such combinations are also called verb idioms, as their meanings cannot normally be predicted
from the meaning of each individual component. For example, the meaning of the prepositional
verb to look after is different from the meanings of both to look and of after.
However, as with idioms in general, many multi-word verbs have a single-word verb with a
similar meaning.
multi-word verb one-word verb
call off cancel
catch up with reach the same stage as someone else
live through experience something and survive
look down on consider as inferior
look into examine or investigate
Not all the verbs followed by particles are multi-word verbs; often they are free combinations
consisting of a single-word lexical verb followed by an adverb or preposition with a separate
meaning (such as come down, go back). In fact, the same combination can be idiomatic in one
context and non-idiomatic in another.
He looked up the wall. (look and up form a free combination in which the two elements preserve
their own meanings)
He looked up the word. (look and up form a phrasal verb meaning ‘to seek information about
someone or something in a book or listing’)
However, as Biber et all mark that “(i)n practice, it is hard to make an absolute distinction
between free combinations and multi-word verbs. It is better to think of a continuum where some
uses of verbs are relatively free and others relatively idiomatic” (2002, p. 124).
There are 4 classes of multi-word verbs:
1) phrasal verbs are verb idioms consisting of a verb followed by an adverbial
particle/prepositional adverb (such as cross out = remove by drawing a line through. pop in =
make a brief visit, show up = appear/arrive).
2) prepositional verbs7 are verb idioms consisting of a verb followed by a preposition, such as
look after = take care of, name after = give the same name as another person, take after =
resemble in appearance or character.
6
As identified by Biber, Conrad and Leech in The Longman student grammar of spoken and written English.
London: Longman, 2002.
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
7
Prepositional verbs are also known as ‘verbs with obligatory prepositions’, and this name shows, in a simplified
way, that they are fixed expressions.
8
A prepositional adverb is an adverb which is identical (or similar) in form to a preposition to which it is also
related in meaning, for example on, by, off, over, about, past. (Words like out and away can be considered
prepositional adverbs because of their close relations to the complex prepositions out of and away from.)
Prepositional adverbs, unlike their matching prepositions, do not have a prepositional complement. For example, in
He jumped over the fence, over is a preposition, but in He jumped over it is a prepositional adverb. Similar examples
are: She fell down the stairs and She fell down. (Leech, 2006, pp. 89-90)
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
9
This is true about the majority of the transitive phrasal verbs, with the exception of two classes of such verbs:
inseparable phrasal verbs and separated phrasal verbs. With inseparable phrasal verbs the object NP occurs after
the adverbial particle (come across [a rare book] = find by chance, go over [something] = review, run into
[someone] = meet unexpectedly). With separated phrasal verbs, the NP functioning as object always occurs
between the verb and the adverbial particle. Examples: fit [somebody/something] in = to provide a place or time for,
get [a plumber] in = to arrange for someone to do a job in your home, get [a message] through = convey; transmit,
see [this nightmare] through = survive, overcome.
10
When the object of a transitive phrasal verb (underlined in the example) is a pronoun, the adverbial particle is
always placed after the object: He felt too hot in the winter coat, so he took it off.
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
From the observation above it is easy to infer that main verbs can be contrasted with auxiliary
verbs, and the following characteristics of the auxiliary verbs can be identified:
Unlike main verbs, auxiliaries do not have lexical meaning (think of the auxiliaries in
Romanian: if one says am mers, he/ she does not express any kind of possession, though
the verb a avea is used!)
Auxiliary verbs always come before the main verb. Examples (the main verb is in bold):
has read, has been reading, are reading, may have been reading. The same is true about
Romanian (a citit, va citi, va fi citind)
The primary verbs be, have and do can function as either auxiliary or main verbs.
Compare I don't like such things and I don't do such things. In the first example do is
used as an auxiliary (operator), and comes before the main verb like, while in the second
it is used as both an auxiliary preceding the main verb do, and as a main verb.
Auxiliaries are irregular in form. Be, for example, has 8 forms: am, is, are, was, were, be,
being, been. Have has 4 forms: has, have, had, having and do has five forms: does, do,
did, done, doing. Note that done and doing cannot be used as auxiliary forms.
In Romanian, all the auxiliary verbs (a fi, a avea, a voi, a vrea) are primary verbs,
although, when used as auxiliaries, they have reduced flexion, as in the forms of a fi in
conjuctiv perfect (fi for all persons – să fi mers), of a avea in perfect compus (a instead of
are for 3rd person sg, as in el a mers vs el are o carte, etc.), and so on.
The primary auxiliaries are different from each other and from the other auxiliaries. They
are used for the following forms:
be for a. the progressive: was walking
b. the passive: was walked
have for the perfect: has walked
do as the dummy operator: did walk
Auxiliaries can only occur together with a main verb (except in cases of ellipsis). When
used as auxiliaries, the primary verbs be, have and do are exclusively followed by non-
finite forms of the verb, as in:
is working be + present participle progressive
is worked be + past participle passive
has worked have + past participle perfect
does not work do + not + bare infinitive dummy operator
An interesting definition (Hudson, n.d.) contrasts auxiliaries, catenatives and operators: “An
auxiliary verb is a catenative which is also an operator.”
The author identifies the auxiliary verbs defined by this criterion as follows:
be when followed by a non-finite verb (is working, was chosen, is to go)
have when followed by a past participle (have finished)
do when followed by an infinitive (did know)
will, shall, can, may, must, ought
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
In English there are 9 central modal verbs: can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, would and must.
Modal verbs add meanings relating to modality to the lexical verb. Ability (can, could),
possibility or permission (can, may), obligation, necessity or likelihood (must, should),
prediction, intention or hypothesis (will, would), etc. are examples of modal meanings.
One grammatical approach groups all the modal auxiliaries except for must in pairs: will – would, can -
could, may -might, shall -should. Two types of relations can be identified between the members of a
modal pair:
1. Since the 2nd member is, historically, the past tense form of the former, it can express a
past time reference. Compare I can swim now. [present time reference] and I could swim
when I was a child. [past time reference].
2. In instances such as Can you help me? [present time reference] and Could you help me?
[present time reference], there is no difference in what regards the time reference. The
variation resides in the degree of politeness of the requests expressed in the two
examples. By generalizing this observation, we may say that there is a variation in the
degree of politeness, possibility, likelihood etc. as expressed by one or the other of the
members of a modal pair.
Modal auxiliaries have the following major characteristics:
They always function as operators, as in Can you help me? or in I can’t, I’m sorry. As we
can see in the two examples, they are placed before the subject to form questions and
before not in negation. (see 2.4.2.)
Except for may, modals occur in negative contractions: won’t, can’t, shan’t, mustn’t,
wouldn’t, couldn’t, mightn’t, shouldn’t.
Like any other auxiliary, modals always come before the main verb: may be working,
could have gone.
They are always followed by the bare infinitive (in one of its forms) of another verb, for
example can be, can have done, can be done, etc.
They are defective verbs, that is, they have no other forms, such as -s forms, -ing forms or -ed forms.
They can only appear in finite clauses, as in
I pray [that you may succeed].
11
They are each followed by a non-finite verb (raining, been, overcharged) which they 'support' in various ways.
The term 'auxiliary verb' refers to this support role. (Hudson, n.d.)
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
5.4.2.4. Semi-modals12
Semi-modals (also called semi-auxiliaries/ lexical auxiliary/ periphrastic modals/ marginal modals/quasi-
modals) are multiword constructions based on auxiliary verbs that function like modal verbs.
The subcategory of semi-modals includes the following structures: be about to, be able to, be
going to, be likely to, (had) better, have to, (have) got to, ought to, be supposed to, used to. Some
are followed by an infinitive, others by a bare infinitive.
Semi-modals can be regarded as equivalents of the modal auxiliaries, because they express
meanings that can usually be paraphrased with a modal verb.
semi- modal example comment
modal
be able to can/ He is able to swim to the other bank of the river. ~
could He can swim to the other bank of the river.
be to will/ shall He is to return next year. ~ He will return next Be to indicates plans and arrangements,
year. like simple future, like will/shall, but
with a slight degree of uncertainty. He is
to return next year means that ‘he is
likely to return’, but it is not quite
certain whether the action will actually
happen or not.
must You are to take the floor, whether you like it or Be to may also express orders that
not. ~ You must take the floor, whether you like it convey the idea of obligation or
or not necessity, almost like must, but it is not
as strong or direct.
had better should/ You had better call her at once. ~ You should/ No idea of comparison is conveyed by
ought to ought to call her at once. the comparative better. Its meaning is ‘it
would be good/advisable to’. Had better
expresses strong advice, we use it to tell
other people what to do.
She had better mind her own business. ~ She Had better may also express a threat;
should/ ought to mind her own business. the idea of ‘or else’ is implied.
If we are to finish before noon, we had better Had better in the main clause can combine
hurry. ~ If we must finish before noon, we should/ with be to in an if-clause, when the main
ought to hurry. clause expresses a pre-condition
have to and must I have to report for duty within a week. (= I must Have got to means the same as have to
have got report for duty within a week.) in most situations. It is more common in
I have got to talk to her. (= I have to/must talk to her.) an informal style.
Did you have to do that? (was that necessary?)
12
As identified by Biber, Conrad and Leech in The Longman student grammar of spoken and written English.
London: Longman, 2002.
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
Most semi-modals are fixed expressions, which cannot be inflected for tense or person.
However, some of them, like have to and be going to, are exceptions to this rule (past tense: She
had to get him out of there; third-person agreement: I don't think he is going to come.).
Some semi-modals can co-occur with a modal verb or another semi-modal (co-occurrence with a
modal: They may have to leave soon; co-occurrence with another semi-modal: I'm going to have
to charge you extra for that. Sorry!13
Together with dare and need, used to and ought to are on the boundary between the category of
the modal auxiliaries and that of lexical verbs, as they have characteristics from both. Thus, they
have negative contractions (usedn't and oughtn't) besides the do/did negative and interrogative,
but negation in general is quite uncommon with these verbs. Notice that used to and ought to are
followed by the to-infinitive:
A catenative verb is a verb that can be followed directly by another verb in the to-infinitive, bare
infinitive or present participle/gerund. A catenative verb governs a non-finite form of another
verb which, along with any clause it might introduce, serves as the direct object of the first verb.
In He deserves to win the cup, deserve is a catenative verb followed directly by the to-infinitive of win.
The verbs in this class are called catenative because of their ability to form chains, as in the
(quite extreme) example below.
He decided to agree to try practicing playing the guitar every day.
Most catenatives accept one form only; a few can take both infinitive and gerund forms, in which
case sometimes there is a difference in the meaning of the two structures. Compare
She stopped to look at the brochure. (= stopped with the purpose of looking at the brochure)
and
She stopped looking at the brochure. (= ceased the activity of looking at the brochure)
Catenatives form a class with fuzzy edges between auxiliary and lexical verbs. They resemble
auxiliaries in having little meaning and main verbs in requiring the do operator in questions and
negative statements (Compare Were they working? and Did they keep working?).
13
According to www.phrasemix.com, this structure is used to talk about something that you need to do, but which
might annoy your listener. It is similar to going to need to, but friendlier-sounding. Going to have to is also used
to talk about things that you have to do in the future. Just a heads up - we're going to have to meet soon.
14
As described by Hasselgård, in Glossary of grammatical terms used in English Grammar: Theory and Use (2nd
edition) and Verbs and verb phrases.
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
AUXILIARIES
As you can see in the tables below, catenative verbs may have aspectual meanings, denoting the
start, unfolding, or end of an action (e.g., stop running, get to like, continue to read), or modal
meanings such as ‘certainty’ and ‘usuality’ (seem to like, appear to be, tend to occur).
Aspectual catenatives (marking an activity as being in its initial, middle or final stage):
catenative aspectual meaning example
keep continuous activity They kept walking.
start initiated activity They started walking.
stop ended activity They stopped walking.
get initiated activity We should get moving.
tend habitual activity We tend to stay too long.
Modalizing catenatives (making reservations as to truth value; hedging expressions):
catenative modal meaning example
seem probability (judging These young women are not the angels they seem to be.
from appearances) The arguments seem to support a different conclusion.
appear probability They appear to have changed their minds.
suppose likelihood (according He was supposed to be in court that morning.
to expectation) Nothing on four legs was supposed to be faster than a lion
over a short distance.
suppose obligation They're not supposed to look at women.
assume possibility They're assumed to be dangerous.
The catenative get may be an alternative marker of the passive voice (get married, get paid), thus
serving the same function as the grammatical auxiliary be.
Danny and Sheila got married.
The car got wrecked in the crash.
Unlike auxiliaries, catenatives require do-insertion (or the support of another finite operator) in
the negative and interrogative.
Did Danny and Sheila get married? not Got Danny and Sheila married?
Be careful – don't get mugged! not Be careful – get not mugged!
A comprehensive list of catenative verbs and example sentences can be found in the Appendix:
English catenative verbs (http://en. wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix%3AEnglish_catenative_verbs)
Hasselgård (n.d.) contrasts verbs and verb phrases in the following sets of examples, and
consequently the relation between the two classes of constituents becomes obvious:
Exercises
de terminat The Noun din Limba Engleză, Exerciţii pentru admiterea în învăţământul
superior;
8. For each of the following sentences, decide if the word or phrase in bold is a participle, a
gerund, or an infinitive.
1. The wine urges me on, the bewitching wine, which sets even a wise man to singing and
to laughing gently and rouses him up to dance and brings forth words which were better
unspoken. (Homer)
2. The wine urges me on, the bewitching wine, which sets even a wise man to singing and
to laughing gently and rouses him up to dance and brings forth words which were better
unspoken. (Homer)
3. There are many ways of breaking a heart. Stories were full of hearts broken by love, but
what really broke a heart was taking away its dream--whatever that dream might be.
(Pearl Buck)
4. There are many ways of breaking a heart. Stories were full of hearts broken by love, but
what really broke a heart was taking away its dream--whatever that dream might be.
(Pearl Buck)
5. Happiness is having a large, loving, caring, close-knit family in another city. (George
Burns)
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10 sem. I, 2020
Further practice
http://www.englishpage.com/gerunds/index.htm
http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/verbtenseintro.html