Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 49 views

    1 Dme International Moot Court Competition, 2022: in The Hon'Ble High Court of Bombica

    Uploaded by

    Siddhartha Jaswal
    This document appears to be a memorandum submitted on behalf of the respondent in a court case between Ms. Seo-Jun (the appellant) and R.I.A.L Corporation (the respondent). It outlines 4 issues before the court regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, the legality of an non-disclosure agreement, the admissibility of sexual harassment instances, and whether the appropriate recourse was taken. It includes a table of contents, list of abbreviations, statement of jurisdiction, synopsis of facts, and arguments to be presented on each issue with supporting references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    1 Dme International Moot Court Competition, 2022: in The Hon'Ble High Court of Bombica

    Uploaded by

    Siddhartha Jaswal
    49 views17 pages
    This document appears to be a memorandum submitted on behalf of the respondent in a court case between Ms. Seo-Jun (the appellant) and R.I.A.L Corporation (the respondent). It outlines 4 issues before the court regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, the legality of an non-disclosure agreement, the admissibility of sexual harassment instances, and whether the appropriate recourse was taken. It includes a table of contents, list of abbreviations, statement of jurisdiction, synopsis of facts, and arguments to be presented on each issue with supporting references.

    Original Title

    TC-02 R

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document appears to be a memorandum submitted on behalf of the respondent in a court case between Ms. Seo-Jun (the appellant) and R.I.A.L Corporation (the respondent). It outlines 4 issues before the court regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, the legality of an non-disclosure agreement, the admissibility of sexual harassment instances, and whether the appropriate recourse was taken. It includes a table of contents, list of abbreviations, statement of jurisdiction, synopsis of facts, and arguments to be presented on each issue with supporting references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    49 views17 pages

    1 Dme International Moot Court Competition, 2022: in The Hon'Ble High Court of Bombica

    Uploaded by

    Siddhartha Jaswal
    This document appears to be a memorandum submitted on behalf of the respondent in a court case between Ms. Seo-Jun (the appellant) and R.I.A.L Corporation (the respondent). It outlines 4 issues before the court regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, the legality of an non-disclosure agreement, the admissibility of sexual harassment instances, and whether the appropriate recourse was taken. It includes a table of contents, list of abbreviations, statement of jurisdiction, synopsis of facts, and arguments to be presented on each issue with supporting references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 17

    TC- 02

    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF BOMBICA

    In the Matter Of

    …….………………………………………………………….APPELLANT
    Ms Seo- Jun

    V.

    R.I.A.L Corporation………..………………………….…………………RESPONDENT

    -MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT-


    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    INDEX OF AUTHORITIES...............................................................................................- 3 -

    STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION.................................................................................- 5 -

    SYNOPSIS OF FACTS.......................................................................................................- 6 -

    ISSUES RAISED.................................................................................................................- 7 -

    ISSUE 1.............................................................................................................................- 7 -

    ISSUE 2.............................................................................................................................- 7 -

    ISSUE 3.............................................................................................................................- 7 -

    ISSUE 4.............................................................................................................................- 7 -

    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS........................................................................................- 8 -

    ARGUMENTS ADVANCED...........................................................................................- 10 -

    PRAYER.................................................................................................................................21

    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -


    1|Page
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

    Abbreviations Expansions
    & And

    Art. Article

    BIT Bilateral Investment Treaty

    Buss. Business

    Co-op Cooperation

    DS Dispute Settlement

    DSU Dispute Settlement Understanding

    Dvlp. Development

    ECR European Court Reports

    ECHR European Court of Human Rights

    Econ. Economics

    Ford. Fordham

    GATT General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs

    GATS General Agreement on Trade in Services

    ICJ International Court of Justice

    IHRC Interantional Human Rights Council

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    2|Page
    IACHR Inter-Amercian Commission on Human
    Rights
    ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and
    Political Rights
    ICSID International Centre for Settlement of
    Investment Disputes

    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -


    3|Page
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

    STATUES

    1. Constitution of India, 1950.


    2. Indian Penal Code, 1860.
    3. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

    INTERNATIONAL CASES

    1. U.S. v. Lanier, 520 US 266 (1997) (US)……………………………...…….……………12


    2. U.S. v. Morison, 529 US 598 (2000) (US)
    ………………………………………………..12
    3. The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom. (1979) 2 E.H.R.R 245 (UK)……………………
    17
    4. Snyder v. Phelp, (2011) S.C.C. Online US SC 21 (US)
    …………………………………..17

    INDIAN CASES

    1. Charan Lal Singh v. Gaini Zail Singh, (1984) 1 S.C.C 390 (India)………………………
    10
    2. S.P.Gupta v. Union of India (1981) Supp S.C.C 220 (India)…………………………….10
    3. Janata Dal vs. H.S Chowdhary (1992) 4 S.C.C 305 (India)………………………………
    10
    4. Kazi Lhendup Dorji v. CBP (1992) 4 S.C.C 305 (India)…………………………………
    10
    5. S.P.Gupta v. Union of India, (1981) Supp S.C.C 214 (India)……………………………10
    6. Daryao & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. A.I.R (1961) S.C 1457 (India)………..….
    …….11
    7. Union of India v. Paul Manickam, (2003) 8 S.C.C 342 (India)………………………….11

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    4|Page
    8. Mark Netto v. Government of Kerala and ors., A.I.R 1979 S.C 83 (India)…………...…12
    9. Mylapore Club v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2005) 12 S.C.C. 752 (India)……………………
    13
    10. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar, A.I.R (1962) S.C 955 (India)……………….
    ……….13
    11. Santosh Singh v. Delhi Administration, A.I.R. (1973) S.C 1091 (India)…….
    …………..14
    12. State of Madras v. V.G. Row, A.I.R. (1952) 196 (India)…………………………………
    14
    13. AP Coop All Seeds Growers Federation Ltd. v. D. AchyutaRao, (2007) 13 S.C.C. 320
    (India)…………………………………………………………………………………….15
    14. Indian Rly. Construction Co. Ltd. V. Ajay Kumar,(2003) 4 S.C.C 579 (India)
    ………….15
    15. Khoday Distilleries Ltd. V. State of Karnataka (1996) 10 S.C.C 304 (India)……………
    15
    16. E.P.Royappa V. State of Tamil Nadu, A.I.R 1974 S.C 555 (India)………………………
    15
    17. Nazir khan v. state of Delhi, A.I.R. (2003) S.C. 4427 (India)……….…………….…..…
    15
    18. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla v. Union of India, A.I.R. (1957) S.C. 628 (India)……….…..16
    19. Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras, A.I.R. 1950 S.C 124 (India)………………….
    …….17
    20. Chintaman Rao v. State of Madhya Pradesh, A.I.R. (1951) S.C. 118 (India)
    …………….17
    21. Nazir Khan v. State of Delhi,(2003) 8 S.C.C. 461 (India)……………………..…………
    17
    22. R.K Karanjia v. Emperor, A.I.R. (1946) Bom 322 (India)
    ……………………………….17
    23. KedarNath v. State of Bihar, A.I.R. (1962) S.C. 955 (India)……….……………………18
    24. Ramjilal Modi v. state of U.P., (1957) S.C.R 860 (India)
    ………………………………..18
    25. Virendra v. State of Punjab, A.I.R. (1954) S.C. 447 (India)………………………………
    18
    26. Babu Rao Patel v. State (Delhi Administration), (1980) 2 S.C.R. 1082 (India)……..…..18
    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -
    5|Page
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    27. Joseph B D’souza v. State of Maharashtra (1995) Cr LJ 1316 (Bom)……..………….…


    19
    28. Sri Baragur Ramachandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Ors A.I.R. 2007 (India)…
    19
    29. Dr.Das Rao Deshmukh vs Kamal Kishore Nanasahebkadam, (1995) 5 S.C.C. 123 (India)
    …………………...…………………………………………………………..……19
    30. The Superintendent, Central vs Ram Manohar Lohia, (1960) 2 S.C.R. 821 (India)……..19
    31. Sri Baragur Ramachandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Ors A.I.R. 2007 (India)
    ….20
    32. Dr.Das Rao Deshmukh vs Kamal Kishore Nanasahebkadam, (1995) 5 S.C.C. 123 (India)
    …………………………………………………………………………………….19
    33. The Superintendent, Central vs Ram Manohar Lohia, (1960) 2 S.C.R. 821 (India)……..19
    34. Balwant Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab A.I.R. 1995 (India)……………………..…20

    BOOKS

    1. M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law (5th ed. 2003).


    2. H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India 4th Ed.

    WEBSITES

    1. www.lexisnexis.co.in
    2. www.manupatra.com

    STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    6|Page
    STATEMENT OF FACTS

    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -


    7|Page
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    8|Page
    ISSUES RAISED

    ISSUE 1

    Whether the Instant Writ Petition is maintainable in the High Court of Bombica?

    ISSUE 2

    Whether the relevant clauses pertaining to disclosure and confidentiality under the Non-
    Disclosure Agreement made to be signed by the Corporation are justifiable in the eyes of
    law?

    ISSUE 3

    Whether the instances put forth by Ms. Seo-Jun of Sexual Harassment against Mr. Sameer
    Waliya admissible in the court of law?

    ISSUE 4

    Whether Ms. Seo-Jun’s decision not to approach the Internal Complaints Committee of the
    Corporation was the right recourse taken by her?

    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -


    9|Page
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    ISSUE 5

    Whether the questions raised by Ms. Seo-Jun against the existing regime of Sexual
    Harassment Laws lead to any amendments or changes required?

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    10 | P a g e
    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -


    11 | P a g e
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    12 | P a g e
    ARGUMENTS ADVANCED

    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -


    13 | P a g e
    1st DME INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2022

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT -


    14 | P a g e
    - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITONERS -
    15 | P a g e
    SVKM’S NMIMS 3rd INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2021

    PRAYER

    WHEREFORE IN LIGHT OF THE ISSUES RAISED, ARGUMENTS ADVANCED,

    AUTHORITIES CITED, SUBMISSIONS MADE HERE TO ABOVE AND THOSE TO BE

    URGED AT THE TIME OF HEARING,

    IT IS HUMBLY PRAYED THAT THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT MAY BE PLEASED,

    AND PASS ANY OTHER ORDER, DIRECTION, OR RELIEF THAT THIS HON’BLE
    COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND APPROPORIATE IN THE INTERESTS OF justice, equity
    and good conscience.

    All of which is humbly prayed,

    (TC-02 R)

    Counsels for the RESPONDENT

    - MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT


    |Page

    You might also like