Monitoring Coherence Between The Macro and Microcirculation in Septic Shock
Monitoring Coherence Between The Macro and Microcirculation in Septic Shock
Monitoring Coherence Between The Macro and Microcirculation in Septic Shock
CURRENT
OPINION Monitoring coherence between the macro and
microcirculation in septic shock
Jan Bakker a,b,c,d and Can Ince a
Purpose of review
Currently, the treatment of patients with shock is focused on the clinical symptoms of shock. In the early
phase, this is usually limited to heart rate, blood pressure, lactate levels and urine output. However, as the
ultimate goal of resuscitation is the improvement in microcirculatory perfusion the question is whether these
Downloaded from https://journals.lww.com/co-criticalcare by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3mRgP8KMOyN+AkRkv3XRGvHVH/xHMH4VXRsnl5rweOqM= on 07/17/2020
currently used signs of shock and the improvement in these signs actually correspond to the changes in the
microcirculation.
Recent findings
Recent studies have shown that during the development of shock the deterioration in the macrocirculatory
parameters are followed by the deterioration of microcirculatory perfusion. However, in many cases the
restoration of adequate macrocirculatory parameters is frequently not associated with improvement in
microcirculatory perfusion. This relates not only to the cause of shock, where there are some differences
between different forms of shock, but also to the type of treatment.
Summary
The improvement in macrohemodynamics during the resuscitation is not consistently followed by subsequent
changes in the microcirculation. This may result in both over-resuscitation and under-resuscitation leading to
increased morbidity and mortality. In this article the principles of coherence and the monitoring of the
microcirculation are reviewed.
Keywords
endpoints, hemodynamics, lactate, perfusion, peripheral perfusion, resuscitation, shock
1070-5295 Copyright ß 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-criticalcare.com
FIGURE 1. Microcirculatory changes in lost hemodynamic coherence. Different microcirculatory changes characterize the
mechanisms associated with the loss of hemodynamic coherence resulting in a decreased delivery of oxygen to the cells. Type
1: Heterogenous perfusion of the microcirculation as seen in sepsis. Some capillaries have no flow where others have normal
or increased flow resulting in scanted oxygen delivery to some cells. Type 2: Loss of hematocrit in the microcirculation as seen
in hemodilution. The result in not only reduced delivery of oxygen but also increased diffusion distance between the red blood
cells and the tissue cells. Type 3: Stasis in the microcirculation induced by altered systemic variables. Increased arterial
resistance (R), increased venous pressure (P) resulting in a tamponade of the microcirculation. Type 4: Development of tissue
edema (e.g. due to capillary leak) resulting in increased diffusion distance between the normally perfusion capillaries and the
tissue cells. Red: well oxygenated red blood cells and tissue cells. Dark red/black: red blood cells with decreased oxygen
saturation. Blue: tissue cells with reduced oxygenation. From [10].
healthy volunteers, hemodynamic coherence is also volunteers resulted in a decrease in mean arterial
present during the progression of circulatory abnor- pressure and an increase in heart rate (HR) charac-
malities. In a model of simulated hypovolemia Bar- teristic of clinical sepsis. The bolus of endotoxin was
tels et al. [35] showed that lower body negative also associated with a decrease in vascular reactivity
pressure resulted in decreased CO (while BP was and a decrease in microcirculatory perfusion, both
maintained) coinciding with abnormal sublingual being restored 4 h after the bolus [38].
microcirculatory perfusion. In human models of With the exception of the brain microcircula-
sepsis, the (macrohemodynamic) characteristics tion, we can thus assume that in the early phase
mimic the ones seen in patients presenting with of severe macrocirculatory dysfunction the micro-
sepsis [36–39]. In a volunteer study, Draisma et al. circulation is compromised. It is conceivable that
[38] showed that a bolus of endotoxin in healthy microcirculatory perfusion abnormalities may
1070-5295 Copyright ß 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-criticalcare.com 269
develop before macrocirculatory hemodynamic there were no control animals in their study, the
changes are prominent. This could especially be the effect of time could not be ruled out [20]. Although
case during a tamponade of the microcirculation by some (experimental) treatments have shown to be
increased central venous pressure (CVP). A clue to this more effective in restoring microcirculatory perfu-
was the finding by Vellinga et al. [40] that patients with sion and oxygen exchange than the use of fluids only
increased CVP showed an impaired sublingual micro- [46,49,50] the type of fluids may not be an unimpor-
circulation. In patients with sepsis [41] and cardiac tant aspect of restoring microcirculatory perfusion as
failure [42], CVP has been shown to be an independent well [51,52]. However, a detailed discussion about
risk factor for acute kidney injury despite adequate this is beyond the scope of this publication.
macrocirculatory parameters. However, all of these
findings were postresuscitation and thus, other than
keeping CVP as low as possible during resuscitation of CLINICAL DATA
shock, general recommendations cannot be made Several studies in patients with sepsis and septic
from this [43]. It is clinically not feasible to monitor shock have shown a lack of coherence between the
sublingual microcirculatory perfusion in all patients at macrocirculation and microcirculation when treat-
risk while having normal macrocirculatory parameters ing the patient or following optimization of macro-
although monitoring by ICU nurses of the sublingual hemodynamics [53–59]. Similar findings have been
microcirculation using a simplified scoring system has shown in patients with cardiac failure, cardiogenic
been shown to be feasible [44]. In addition, the benefit shock and hemorrhagic shock [56,60–62]. When
of intervening to restore microcirculatory abnormali- there is a lack of coherence following initial resusci-
ties in patients with adequate macrocirculatory tation, some of these studies have shown that recov-
parameters has not been shown, this clearly has a ery of the microcirculation may take a much longer
sound rationale and represents a research challenge. time. In many of these studies, the lack of coherence
Overall, the assumption that the microcirculation is and prolonged recovery time of the microcirculation
compromised in patients with developing abnormal has been associated with mortality. Persistent macro-
macrocirculatory parameters in a relevant context hemodynamic abnormalities in combination with
seems valid. microcirculatory abnormalities may impose an even
more increased risk of mortality [63].
The relevance of different microcirculations,
COHERENCE IN THE TREATMENT PHASE: limited by the scarce availability of these in patients,
EXPERIMENTAL DATA is unknown. In a study in patient with sepsis two
The main clinically relevant phase of the presence or studies reported on the coherence of the intestinal
absence of hemodynamic coherence is the resusci- microcirculation [64,65]. Both studies showed the
tation phase. As argued earlier, the absence of coher- absence of coherence between intestinal microcir-
ence in this phase may have significant effects on culation the sublingual microcirculation and the
the adequacy of resuscitation as it may result in both macrohemodynamics. In the study by Boerma
over-resuscitation and under-resuscitation. It is et al. [64], it was shown that recovery of coherence
clear from experimental models in many different between the sublingual and intestinal sites was
pathophysiologic conditions, including sepsis, that restored after several days.
resuscitation on global hemodynamic parameters The use of vasoactive agents to resuscitate the
frequently fails to restore microcirculatory perfusion microcirculation has been reviewed earlier [66] and is
and oxygenation [25,28,45–47]. The effects in dif- outside of the scope of this article. The use of beta
ferent microcirculatory systems or even within one blocker therapy has gained new interest as both
microcirculatory system may however not be similar experimental and clinical studies have shown posi-
[30,48]. There may be few exceptions possibly tive effects on microcirculatory perfusion [50,67,68].
related to the specific hemodynamic compromise As in these studies beta blockers were titrated to HR,
or that may reflect differences in individual the recent finding of the additional effect on mortality
responses. In a model of tamponade, van Genderen of increased HR in patients with abnormal microcir-
et al. [20] showed that removing the pericardial fluid culatory perfusion [63] should encourage additional
resulted in a rapid restoration of both macrocircu- research in this context.
latory and microcirculatory perfusion parameters.
This was very different in the model of septic shock
these researchers studied, where restoration of base- CONCLUSION
line macrohemodynamics did not restore the micro- From the previous the following clinical consequences
circulation, only resuscitation to a hyperdynamic could be drawn. In patients with abnormal macro-
state restored the microcirculation. However, as hemodynamics it is very likely that microcirculatory
1070-5295 Copyright ß 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-criticalcare.com 271
24. Yin L, Yang Z, Yu H, et al. Changes in sublingual microcirculation is closely 48. Siegemund M, Van Bommel J, Sinaasappel M, et al. The NO donor SIN-1
related with that of bulbar conjunctival microcirculation in a rat model of improves intestinal-arterial P(CO(2)) gap in experimental endotoxemia: an
cardiac arrest. Shock 2016; 45:428–433. animal study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:693–700.
25. Krupickova P, Mlcek M, Huptych M, et al. Microcirculatory blood flow during 49. Zafrani L, Ergin B, Kapucu A, et al. Blood transfusion improves renal oxygena-
cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not correlate with tion and renal function in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in rats. Crit Care
global hemodynamics: an experimental study. J Transl Med 2016; 14:163. 2016; 20:406.
26. Fries M, Weil MH, Chang YT, et al. Microcirculation during cardiac arrest and 50. Jacquet-Lagreze M, Allaouchiche B, Restagno D, et al. Gut and sublingual
resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(12 Suppl):S454–S457. microvascular effect of esmolol during septic shock in a porcine model. Crit
27. Langeland H, Lyng O, Aadahl P, et al. The coherence of macrocirculation, Care 2015; 19:241.
microcirculation, and tissue metabolic response during nontraumatic hemor- 51. Wu CY, Chan KC, Cheng YJ, et al. Effects of different types of fluid
rhagic shock in swine. Physiol Rep 2017; 5:e13216. resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock on splanchnic organ microcirculation
28. Legrand M, Bezemer R, Kandil A, et al. The role of renal hypoperfusion in and renal reactive oxygen species formation. Crit Care 2015; 19:434.
development of renal microcirculatory dysfunction in endotoxemic rats. In- 52. van Bommel J, de Korte D, Lind A, et al. The effect of the transfusion of stored
tensive Care Med 2011; 37:1534–1542. RBCs on intestinal microvascular oxygenation in the rat. Transfusion (Paris)
29. Fang X, Tang W, Sun S, et al. Comparison of buccal microcirculation between 2001; 41:1515–1523.
septic and hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(12 Suppl):S447–S453. 53. De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in
30. Dubin A, Edul VS, Pozo MO, et al. Persistent villi hypoperfusion explains patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship
intramucosal acidosis in sheep endotoxemia. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: with outcome. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:791–799.
535–542. 54. Edul VS, Enrico C, Laviolle B, et al. Quantitative assessment of the micro-
31. Lam C, Tyml K, Martin C, et al. Microvascular perfusion is impaired in a rat circulation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock. Crit Care
model of normotensive sepsis. J Clin Invest 1994; 94:2077–2083. Med 2012; 40:1443–1448.
32. Farquhar I, Martin CM, Lam C, et al. Decreased capillary density in vivo in bowel 55. Trzeciak S, McCoy JV, Phillip Dellinger R, et al. Early increases in micro-
mucosa of rats with normotensive sepsis. J Surg Res 1996; 61:190–196. circulatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated
33. Wan Z, Sun S, Ristagno G, et al. The cerebral microcirculation is protected with reduced multiorgan failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis. Intensive Care
during experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:928–932. Med 2008; 34:2210–2217.
34. Rosengarten B, Hecht M, Auch D, et al. Microcirculatory dysfunction in the 56. Tachon G, Harrois A, Tanaka S, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in traumatic
brain precedes changes in evoked potentials in endotoxin-induced sepsis hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2014; 42:1433–1441.
syndrome in rats. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23:140–147. 57. LeDoux D, Astiz ME, Carpati CM, et al. Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue
35. Bartels SA, Bezemer R, Milstein DM, et al. The microcirculatory response to perfusion in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:2729–2732.
compensated hypovolemia in a lower body negative pressure model. Micro- 58. Hernandez G, Boerma EC, Dubin A, et al. Severe abnormalities in micro-
vasc Res 2011; 82:374–380. vascular perfused vessel density are associated to organ dysfunctions
36. Suffredini AF, Fromm RE, Parker MM, et al. The cardiovascular response of and mortality and can be predicted by hyperlactatemia and norepinephrine
normal humans to the administration of endotoxin. N Engl J Med 1989; requirements in septic shock patients. J Crit Care 2013; 28:
321:280–287. 538.e9–538.e14.
37. Kiers D, Koch RM, Hamers L, et al. Characterization of a model of systemic 59. Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, et al. Persistent microcirculatory alterations
inflammation in humans in vivo elicited by continuous infusion of endotoxin. are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit
Sci Rep 2017; 7:40149. Care Med 2004; 32:1825–1831.
38. Draisma A, Bemelmans R, van der Hoeven JG, et al. Microcirculation and 60. De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois MJ, et al. Microvascular alterations in patients
vascular reactivity during endotoxemia and endotoxin tolerance in humans. with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 2004;
Shock 2009; 31:581–585. 147:91–99.
39. van Loon LM, Stolk RF, van der Hoeven JG, et al. Effect of vasopressors on the 61. den Uil CA, Lagrand WK, van der Ent M, et al. Conventional hemodynamic
macro- and microcirculation during systemic inflammation in humans in vivo. resuscitation may fail to optimize tissue perfusion: an observational study on
Shock 2020; 53:171–174. the effects of dobutamine, enoximone, and norepinephrine in patients with
40. Vellinga NA, Ince C, Boerma EC. Elevated central venous pressure is acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. PLoS One
associated with impairment of microcirculatory blood flow in sepsis: a 2014; 9:e103978.
hypothesis generating post hoc analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2013; 13:17. 62. Chommeloux J, Montero S, Franchineau G, et al. Microcirculation evolution in
41. Legrand M, Dupuis C, Simon C, et al. Association between systemic hemo- patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory
dynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:e9–e17.
observational study. Crit Care 2013; 17:R278. 63. Vellinga NA, Boerma EC, Koopmans M, et al. International study on micro-
42. van den Akker JPC, Bakker J, Groeneveld ABJ, et al. Risk indicators for acute circulatory shock occurrence in acutely ill patients. Crit Care Med 2015;
kidney injury in cardiogenic shock. J Crit Care 2019; 50:11–16. 43:48–56.
43. Chen X, Wang X, Honore PM, et al. Renal failure in critically ill patients, 64. Boerma EC, van der Voort PH, Spronk PE, et al. Relationship between
beware of applying (central venous) pressure on the kidney. Ann Intensive sublingual and intestinal microcirculatory perfusion in patients with abdominal
Care 2018; 8:91. sepsis. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1055–1060.
44. Tanaka S, Harrois A, Nicolai C, et al. Qualitative real-time analysis by nurses of 65. Edul VS, Ince C, Navarro N, et al. Dissociation between sublingual and gut
sublingual microcirculation in intensive care unit: the MICRONURSE study. microcirculation in the response to a fluid challenge in postoperative patients
Crit Care 2015; 19:388. with abdominal sepsis. Ann Intensive Care 2014; 4:39.
45. Ergin B, Zafrani L, Kandil A, et al. Fully balanced fluids do not improve 66. Boerma EC, Ince C. The role of vasoactive agents in the resuscitation of
microvascular oxygenation, acidosis and renal function in a rat model of microvascular perfusion and tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients. In-
endotoxemia. Shock 2016; 46:83–91. tensive Care Med 2010; 36:2004–2018.
46. Guerci P, Ergin B, Kapucu A, et al. Effect of polyethylene-glycolated carbox- 67. Morelli A, Donati A, Ertmer C, et al. Microvascular effects of heart rate control
yhemoglobin on renal microcirculation in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock. with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study. Crit Care Med 2013;
Anesthesiology 2019; 131:1110–1124. 41:2162–2168.
47. Siegemund M, van Bommel J, Stegenga ME, et al. Aortic cross-clamping and 68. Hernandez G, Tapia P, Alegria L, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine and
reperfusion in pigs reduces microvascular oxygenation by altered systemic esmolol on systemic hemodynamics and exogenous lactate clearance in early
and regional blood flow distribution. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:345–353. experimental septic shock. Crit Care 2016; 20:234.