676 Tigrai Agricultural Research Institute
676 Tigrai Agricultural Research Institute
676 Tigrai Agricultural Research Institute
(TARI)
RESEARCH STRATEGY
FIRST DRAFT
2
3
Development Unit
TARI Tigray Agricultural Research Institute
UNDP United Nations Development Program
WADU Wolaita Agricultural Development Unit
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
4
5
1. Background 6
Regional Agricultural Development Policy
2. 6
Establishment of Rural Technology Development program
3. 7
Missions , strategy and objectives
4. 7
Establishment of Mekelle Rural Technology Promotion Center
5. 9
Major activities carried out by the Center
6. 10
12. The need for the establishment of Appropriate Technology Research and 17
Development Center
22. Regional Appropriate Technology Research and Development goals (out puts) 21
31. References 27
6
7
3. Background
Tigray region, with a population of more than 3.5 million, is one of the drought and
war affected regions of Ethiopia. The region is characterized by subsistence dry-land
agriculture. Crop production is highly dependent on seasonal and unreliable rainfall.
The topography is dominantly rugged (with few exceptions of Humera, Adiabo, &
Raya plains) & the cultivated land is fragmented into small land holdings making it
difficult for mechanized farming. Besides, the farmers have been using relatively
backward technologies. These and other related factors have resulted in low
productivity and food shortage.
Livestock and crop husbandry plays a considerable role in subsistence farming of
Tigray. The majority of the population, above 83% of the total, is dependent on this
ancient form of plough-based cultivation. Subsistence farming has been practiced in
the region without showing improvements. Semi -mechanized farming is being
practiced in the western lowlands. Climate, terrain and population are the three major
factors that appeared to have influenced both the uses of the land and the natural
vegetation cover type.
The agricultural potential and natural resource bases of the region have been
continuously exploited for a long period of time, without appropriate conservation
practices.
These inappropriate use and lack of attention by the previous regimes have led to:
Cyclic and recurrent drought
Overall environmental degradation
Declination of agricultural productivity
Poverty
One of the measures the regional government of Tigray took to improve the rural
population livelihood is, establishment of Mekele Rural Technology Promotion under the
Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources Development.
Rural technology promotion activities started initially by the name ‘‘rural industry
promotion’’ being part of the development activities of different development projects, in
different parts of the Country; namely CADU /later ARDU/, WADU, SEDU &
TAHADU, in which the latter was not functional due to security reasons. The other
projects had progressed effectively and resulted in the establishment of Assella, Bako, &
Sodo Rural Technology Promotion Centers respectively; each being equipped with full
manpower & machinery. These centers were totally managed by the respective projects
until the rise of the Derg Regime to power in 1967 E.C.
The main aim of the promotion activity was to bring about rapid change on the lively-
hood of the rural community, through introduction of small-scale rural industries,
small-scale agricultural implements and establishment of skill centers. At that time,
the centers’ activity was only limited to their vicinities and were promoting different
agricultural implements and small-scale food processing technologies namely; mould
board plow, animal drawn carts, oil extractors and Jaggery technology /making sugar
out of sugar cane juice/ etc.
In the Derg era, a rural technology promotion department was initiated under the Ministry
of Agriculture responsible for the promotion activities of appropriate technologies for
farmers, in agricultural implements, rural energy, and rural industry sectors. Besides
promotion activities, the department had established other four rural technology
promotion centers (RTPCs) namely; Harar, Jima, Bahir Dar, and Kombolocha, to fulfil
the objectives of RTPC in their respective surroundings.
i. Mission
ii. Strategy
Technology selection
The development program does not carry out research activities. It rather facilitates
the technology transfer process by:
8
9
Work shops
The other way to acquaint appropriate technology is by arranging workshops for experts
and farmers.
Promotion
Select, demonstrate and promote improved technologies that cope up with the
level of Ethiopian agricultural development
.
iv. Specific objectives
increase productivity of small-scale farmers & reduce drudgery by
introducing improved agricultural implements;
introduce small-scale food technologies and hand crafts industries for
processing of agricultural products and natural resources to the need of
farmers and consumers;
promote the establishment of technical service stations for co-operative
farms;
assess and introduce small-scale alternative sources of energy for the rural
society;
Introduce safe and fuel saving technologies.
The current agricultural & rural development policy of the country aims towards
achievement of food self sufficiency, by increasing the productivity. This is realized
through wise utilization of resources and introducing modern agricultural inputs. One of
the initiatives taken by the regional government of Tigrai is the establishment of Mekele
Rural Technology Promotion Center /MRTPC/.
Before the establishment of Mekelle Rural Technology Promotion Center (MRTPC), a
rural technology promotion team was organized in 1984 E.C, under the Bureau of
Agriculture to support the agricultural development program. The main task of the team
was promotion of technologies that are appropriate to the region in agricultural
implements, rural energy, & rural industry sectors; all at small-scale level.
a. Agricultural implements
Some improved agricultural implements and post harvest equipment had been
brought from other centers, and was demonstrated in some selected weredas of the
region. These technologies include EEC- mould board plow, animal drawn spike
tooth harrow, selam ridger, single row planter, engine driven maize sheller, votex
thresher, etc. These technologies had been demonstrated for consecutive years to
create awareness among farmers. EEC-mould board plow and spike tooth harrow
was found too heavy to be drawn by a pair of local breed oxen, although some
modifications had been carried out. Votex thresher was rejected by farmers
because it does not press and chop the straw effectively, hence not palatable for
animals
b. Rural energy
Improved charcoal stoves, brought from other centers, had been demonstrated
to farmers, but this activity was limited to the vicinity of towns, as most
farmers do not use charcoal. In attempt to promote biogas technology three
plants had been constructed at Wukro /eastern zone/, Laelay Maichew and
Tahitay Koraro; one in each wereda. A solar pump was also installed near
Hawzen town to be used for household consumption, domestic animals, and
irrigation. Installation and maintenance activities of engine driven irrigation
pumps were also among the major activities.
c. Rural Industry
10
11
It had been attempted to strengthen local blacksmith and artisans through training
and supplying production tools.
All of these activities were carried out when the team had only few staff
members.
Replacing the above team Mekele rural Technology Promotion center was
established in 1988 E.C to support the agricultural development program of the
region.
To fulfill its objectives the Center is provided with a production unit having three
work shops (i.e. metal, machine, & wood shops), and promotion sections; farm
implements, rural energy, & rural industry.
Since its establishment, the Center has been producing and disseminating various types of
animal powered and human powered agricultural implements and energy saving
technologies to be used by the farmer. These include tie-ridger, ridger, broad bed maker
(BBM), maize sheller, carts, treadle pump, weaving machine, wood stoves, solar cookers
and so on. The dissemination activity is carried out in collaboration with the Extension
Department of the aforementioned Bureau. The sources of the technology are mainly the
farmer himself, national research institutions and universities engaged in the innovation of
appropriate technologies, and experience of other countries shared through excursion.
After the establishment of the Center, a study was carried out to identify the major
problems of farmers related to agricultural implements, energy and rural industry. The
results and recommendations of the study had been strengthened in a workshop held at
MRTPC in 1989 E.C. As a result the center changed its strategy of promotion, i.e.
carrying out verification tests prior to demonstration while introducing any new
technology. Moreover production of technologies to be promoted has been consider as
part of the strategy to inherence the technology transfer process.
In 1994 E.C., following the organizational restructuring of the Bureau, the Center had also
made changes on its organizational structure. As a result the rural industry team has been
eliminated and parts of its activities have been shifted to Agricultural Implements team.
The above mentioned problems were known to all levels of management bodies of the
Center and the BoANR and concerned officials of the regional government. Hence,
some efforts were made to upgrade the Mekelle Rural Technology Promotion Center
since its inception. Among these efforts very limited ones were accomplished and
most of them remained suspended.
1. In the year 1991 EC a link was established with RELMA/RSCU and it was
proposed to hire a short-term expatriate staff to support the production unit of the
Center for a certain period of time. Accordingly discussion was made between the
Center and two representatives from Nazareth Technical College, delegated by the
aforementioned organization. Nevertheless it could not proceed due to some reasons
unknown to the Center.
2. Later on the same organization tried to study the problems of the Center by
assigning one consultant from Selam Technical and Vocational Center (STVC)-Addis
Ababa. The consultant tried to investigate the organizational structure of the Center
and internal capacity of the production unit, including the workflow, quality control
mechanism and the like. The recommendations drawn from this study were however
not appreciated by the center as well as the BoANR management. It set a vast
organizational structure but did not touch the way of governance of the center.
3. Similarly UNIDO carried out a study a Countrywide study for all RTPCs in the
country in1993 EC to gear them towards the development of agricultural machinery.
One short-term national consultant was assigned to assess the situation of the Center
and the findings were presented in a workshop organized at federal level. The output
of this study is not yet implemented and is still suspended.
4. In 1994 EC another link was established with STVC and a task force was formed to
pursue the issue. A term of reference was prepared by MRTPC with the objective of
restructuring the Center and adoption of immediately needed equipment in the region.
Accordingly certain implements particularly water lifting devices were rendered by
STVC so that a demonstration field can be established in the Center. The restructuring
of the Center was expected to be carried out simultaneously but was not put into
practice. The main reason for the delay is probably financial limitation and slow
response of the policy makers.
Generally speaking efforts made so far were not effective and did not bring the issue
to an end. Rather the Center was forced to carry out its current activities and the
problems remained unsolved. Hence, the huge and expensive machinery remains to be
fully unutilized.
Finally the regional government of Tigray has decided to change MRTPC to Rural
Technology Research Center and to be administered under TARI.
During April to July 1976 (G.C.) an FAO engineer and his counter part staff have
established an agricultural implements research section in Mekele town. During the
indicated period the following activities have been attempted:-
Work shop equipment such as heavy duty electric welder, mechanical hacksaw,
bench drilling machine, bench grinder, bench vices, forge equipment and wide
section of hand tools were purchased at Addis-Ababa and had been brought to
Mekele town. Due to lack of government promises, the equipment was
temporarily installed in Hunting (foreign development organization) work shop.
This was very unsatisfactory as three phase electricity was not available. After
a week operation, it becomes possible to move it to a small SIM (foreign
religion organization) workshop, which was equipped with three-phase
electrical power and office space. A stock of raw materials, which was large
enough for 12-month operation, was purchased at the cost of 15,000 Birr (1976
G.C. price).
14
15
During the indicated short period the work shop was in operation, various small
items were made for agronomist, soil and water conservation expert at Mekele
research station. The items includes:
1- A Stephen screen stand;
2- An anemometer stand;
3- An infiltrometer;
4- A light weight water cart;
5- A self-siphoning tank;
6- Maximum water level recorder.
The only engineering development to take place was on the maximum water
level recorder while the other initiated activities were abandoned for good
during the same year. As a result it has become impossible to make critical
review regarding implement research activities at the regional level. It has also
become difficult to locate the work shop facilities and make some statement
about it.
4.1.3. Conclusion
The above brief review reveals that some twenty two years ago a concerted and
coordinate effort of implement, agronomy, soil and water conservation research
program was existing at Mekele research station which depicts the right
direction for the regions agricultural development endeavors. However the
implement component of the research program was discontinued because the
FAO engineer was unwilling to settle in Mekele town; due to lack of
government premises and unavailability of three-phase electrical power. As a
result, in April 1976 (G.C.) the Institute of Agricultural Research (IAR)
decided to transfer the program to Nazareth Research Station (NRS) due to the
above lam reasons in general and security reasons in particular. Since then, the
gap still exists till this day.
The federal agricultural Implements research program was established in July 1977
(G.C.) by one FAO engineer transferred from Mekele and one newly recruited
national Agricultural-engineer staff in the compound of NRC. Since then the program
has changed many times its objectives and target group. To begin with, it was named
Appropriate technology for Farmers (ATF), then it was named Agricultural
implements research and improvement center (AIRIC) and currently it is called
National Agricultural Mechanization Research Center (NAMRC) and it is operating
at a division level. so far there is no a single document which explains why such
periodical changes of names were introduced.
C:\My Document Regional Ag.Implements Research Strategy Plan 15
16
The overall objective of the division is “to raise farmers productivity and improve
their livelihood by introducing new technologies through utilization of farm power
(human, draft animal, mechanical) and new farm implements that are suited to
Ethiopian condition.”
Since its inception the division has under take many activities the major ones being
the following:
Basic studies were undertaken on oxen, selected from central Ethiopia, and
recommendations have been made on the proper use of draft-oxen power in
general. In future, such recommendations may need to be re-tested and re
approved in order to ascertain its applicability to the region‘s oxen-draft power.
16
17
During the era of IAR the division had developed a research strategy and it has
been applying it up to June 1998 (G.C.). Currently IAR has been completely
and officially dissolved and replaced by the Ethiopian Agricultural Research
organization (EARO). Consequently, the division has reviewed its old strategy
document and has published a new strategy document entitled “Agricultural
Power, Implements and Mechanization Research strategy’’ in December,
1999.
4.2.10. Conclusion
Agricultural development activities of our region have been highly victimized due to
lack of appropriate technologies in each agricultural activity. More ever past
experiences on the promotion of improved agricultural implements have proven the
need for evaluation research on different agro-ecological conditions, to come up with
proper application recommendations.
During the past effort of the Center and concerned governmental organizations, great
result has been achieved in linking the private manufactures and end users. As a result
the mass production activity is being well accomplished by private workshops with no
need of governmental organizations involvement.
Hence, to bridge up the gap and speed up the research of appropriate technologies at
regional level, it has become essential to transfer the Mekelle Rural Technology
Promotion Center to Mekelle Appropriate Technology Research and Development
Center which will serve the hole region.
It is obvious that appropriate technologies are designed to meet wide range of agro-
ecological needs through provision of adjustments. But there are cases in which agro-
ecology has a direct influence on the type of technology to be developed. Taking the
18
19
case of humera area for example, it is characterized by light soil, which doesn’t fit to
the conventional tillage system, and hence minimum tillage is being practiced. Agro-
ecology can also affect means of applying the technology. The time of application of
tie ridging in Raya azebo and Alamata areas has been highly influenced by their
weathering conditions, and is being applied during cultivation operation. Hence
evaluation research of developed technologies need to be carried out on different
agro-ecological situations to come up with proper application procedures.
To properly address agro-ecological impacts, problem appraisals and technology selections of
all technological researches need to critically consider the agro-ecological variations of the
region.
7.1.Capacity building
The major focus of the Center as a whole during short term will be on
demonstration of already developed and evaluated technology visa-vis
fulfillment of laboratory and field equipment. Manpower development through
short training will also be the other focus area to upgrade the skill of research
staffs. The major capacity building activities of the staff as a whole will be
treated in the long term of the strategy through long training.
Animal traction (dominantly ox plough) has been a major source of farm power
since ancient time for most farm activities and will still remain to be a
dominant source of farm power for the following reasons:
Currently there is no other alternative source of farm power that can cope up
with the economic and technical capability of the farmers; High skill of farmers
on animal traction system, developed in the past, will serve as input for the
future in creating effective and efficient traction system. High potential
resource of animal traction power is available in the region.A survey carried out
by MRTPC indicated that; in Tigray 585,720 oxen, 366,451 equines, and
30,710 camels are available, MRTPC survey, (1997).
Past experience of the Center indicates that most of the huge machines available in
the machine shop of the MRTPC have never been used. This is mainly due to the fact
that technologies so far produced by the Center didn’t invite utilization of such
machines. Those machines, which were engaged in the manufacturing process, had
also been under utilized due to restricted management system and limited production.
Hence it has remained to be a major problem of the Center till this days and even for
the future it seems to be more worsen with the transformation of the Center to
research activities as the manufacturing activities of the Center will be limited to
prototypes.
9.1. Objective
This strategy plan aims at two different but complementary objectives, i.e.
general and specific objectives:
20
21
a. General Objectives
b. Specific objective
10.1. Focus:
The main target groups of this future desire are the rural peasants of the region
and the BoARD, commercial farmers are also beneficiaries of the research out
puts.
22
23
11.1. Considerations
Gap analysis is an important analytical tool, which is useful for comparing and
contrasting current situation viz-à-viz future desires of a particular research
program‘s objectives, outputs, capabilities and strategies. If it is correctly applied
it will be helpful for identifying the needed challenges so that the gap created
would be effectively closed or bridged. It mainly deals with resources that the
region could realistically mobilize and can allocate to the particular program under
consideration.
The short and medium term (2005-2011) research goals (outputs) are being
considered here while the long term ones (beyond 2011) are deferred for later times,
as it will be unrealistic to consider them at the present.
24
25
Center Manager
Secretary
Internal Audit
Agricultural
Rural Energy and Socio-economics research
Implements Irrigation equipment and Research extension Support
Research and Department
Research and Department
development development
Department Department
Socio-economics
research Team
Pre-harvest Household Administrative
& Harvest Energy Research Technical support Team
Research and and Development Research extension Support
Development Team Team Section
Team Administration and Finance
Section
Laboratory
Design, prototype
Post harvest & fabrication and Finance &
Agro- maintenance Sub section Property
Irrigation Planing Team
Processing Equipment Administration
Equipment Research and Metal workshop
Research and Audiovisual, information technology,
Development Team
Development library and documentation Team
Team Wood Work
Shop Personnel &
Budget General Service
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Center Manager Ag.r. eng. Msc. 1 X
Internal Auditor Accounting Dip. 1 X
Secretary Secretarial science & 1 X
office Management
Agricultural Department Head Agr. .eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
Implements Pre-harvest Research officer III Agr. .eng. Msc/Bsc.
Research and & harvest Research Officer II Ag.r. eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
Development Team Research Officer I Ag.r. eng. Bsc. 1 X
Department Technical Assistant Agr. Dip.
Field Assitant - 10th
Post harvest Research officer III Agr. .eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
& Agro- Research Officer II Ag.r. eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X X
processing Research Officer I Ag.r. eng. Bsc. 1 X X
Team Technical Assistant Agr. Dip. 1 X
Field Assitant - 10th 1 X
House hold Department Head Agr. .eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
Energy & Household Research officer III Agr. .eng. Msc/Bsc.
Irrigation Energy Team Research Officer II Ag.r. eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
Equipment Research Officer I Ag.r. eng. Bsc. 1 X
Research and Technical Assistant Agr. Dip. 1 X
Development Field Assitant - 10th 1 X
Department Research Officer III Agr. .eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
Irrigation Research Officer II Ag.r. eng. Msc/Bsc. 1 X
Equipment Research Officer I Ag.r. eng. Bsc. 1 X
Team Technical Assistant Agr. Dip. 1 X
Field Assitant - 10th 1 X
Socio – economics And Research Officer II Agr. Economics Bsc 1 X
Research Extension Research Research Officer I Agr. Economics Bsc 1 X
Department Technical Assistant Economics Dip 1 X
26
27
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Support department head Acc/Mng/Economics BA/B.Sc. 1 X
Secretary Computer/Typing Certificate 1 X
Administrative support section head Acc/Mng/Economics Dip 1 X
Sub section head Acc/Mng/Economics Dip 1 X
Accountant Accounting Dip 1 X
Finance and property Purchaser Acc/Mng Dip 1 X
administration sub Cashier Acc Dip 1 X
Administrative support Section
Melkassa research center and all other technological research centers located in other
regions of Ethiopia will be considered as sources of technologies applicable to the
region. Experience sharing and information exchange is also the major area to be
dealt with the other research centers. Melkassa is also considered as a major place for
capacity building of the staffs of the Center.
Any strategy plan that does not include accommodation programs for permanent
research staff and guest researchers can not be considered as a complete plan. In this
strategy document this has not been considered due to logistic problems. In future
necessary efforts should be made to include this important component in the next
strategy plan review.
This strategy plan should be reviewed initially at the end of the short-term period and
subsequently at the completion of each phase during the medium term period.
28
29
18. REFERENCES
1. M.s. Reddg & Araya kebede: Trip Report on visit to Mekele; IAR; 16-22 Feb.
1993;
6 pages
2. M.S.Reddy & Kidane George: Dryland Farming in Ethiopia Review of the Past
and
thrust in the nineties; IAR, 1993.
30