Sandip Bambhaniya
Sandip Bambhaniya
Sandip Bambhaniya
As a part of
Sandip Bambhaniya
Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre
Faculty of Science
The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda
Vadodara- 390002
Gujarat, India.
1
Contents
Summary 4
Introduction 5
Literature survey 6
Rationale 8
Objectives 9
Workplan and Methodology 11
Schedule 12
Budget 13
References 14
2
SUMMARY:
3
Introduction
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) comprise a large class of non- coding RNAs that are
produced by a non- canonical splicing event called backsplicing; during
backsplicing, a downstream splice- donor site is covalently linked to an upstream
splice- acceptor site. circRNAs were mainly considered to be ‘junk’ generated by
aberrant splicing events and only the testis- specific circRNA from the sex-
determining region Y (Sry) gene was thought to have a possible function (in
mouse testis) (Xia, S. et al., 2017). In recent years, high- throughput RNA
sequencing (RNA- seq) and circRNA- specific bioinformatics algorithms have
identified thousands of circRNAs in eukaryotes, including in fungi, protists,
plants, worms, fish, insects and mammals, and found them to have tissue- specific
expression patterns (Rybak-Wolf, A. et al., 2015). Despite a lack of
polyadenylation (poly(A)) and capping, circRNAs generally localize to the
cytoplasm. Although backsplicing is generally less efficient than linear splicing,
circRNAs can accumulate in specific cell types in a temporally regulated manner,
owing to their high stability. This high stability is presumably the result of their
covalently closed ring structure protecting these molecules from exonuclease-
mediated degradation. Interestingly, a high number of circRNAs are upregulated
during neurogenesis, and some circRNAs are enriched in synapses. To date,
circRNAs have been implicated in several human diseases, including diabetes
mellitus, neurological disorders, cardiovascular diseases, chronic inflammatory
diseases and cancer, and they accumulate during ageing (Kristensen et al., 2020).
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and lethal cancer of the
brain, with approximately 10,000 newly diagnosed cases each year in the United
States. Despite recent advances in understanding of its pathogenesis, GBM
remains incurable with standard treatment options contributing little to survival
time. Currently, GBM has a 5‐year survival rate of only 10% and a median
survival time of 15 months following treatment. Contributing to its poor
prognosis are numerous therapeutic challenges including aggressive growth rates,
tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and obstacles to drug delivery such as the
blood–brain barrier(Shea et al., 2016).
In an effort to find novel approaches to GBM treatment, recent studies have
focused on molecular phenotyping of GBM subtypes to identify new targets for
biomarkers and therapeutics.
4
Literature survey:
circRNAs are derived from canonical splice sites, and mutational analyses in
circRNA expression vectors as well as treatment of HeLa cells with the splicing
inhibitor isoginkgetin, which blocks spliceosome assembly, showed that
circRNA biogenesis is dependent on the canonical splicing machinery (Starke, S.
et al. 2015). Base pairing between inverted repeat elements (such as Alu elem
ents), which are located in the upstream and downstream introns is important for
circularization of RNA. Additionally, lariat formation during exon skipping, an
event during which alternative exons are spliced out of the final mRNA product
and end up contained within the excised lariat, can lead to the formation of
circRNA when the lariat undergoes internal backsplicing (Kelly, S. et al., 2015).
Since the recent discovery that endogenous circular RNAs (circRNAs) are widely
expressed in all human tissues, there has been an increasing focus on
characterizing their relevance and function in disease. the majority of studies have
focused on the role of circRNAs in solid tumours, in which individual circRNAs
have been described as either oncogenes (for example, circPvt1 in head and neck
squamous cell carcinoma and cirs-7 (CDr1as) in colorectal cancer, oesophageal
squamous cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma) or tumour suppressors
(for example, circsMarCa5 and circ-sHPrH in glioblastoma). the function of other
circRNAs in solid tumours may be cell type- specific; for example, circHiPK3
has been described as an oncogene in colorectal cancer and a tumour suppressor
in bladder cancer. Moreover, as the expression level of circRNAs often correlates
with clinical and pathological characteristics, these RNAs have the potential to
be diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Furthermore, the high
stability of circRNAs may allow them to be detected non- invasively in bodily
fluids, as exemplified by the detection of circCNOt2 in plasma from patients with
breast cancer and the detection of circ-KLDHC10 in serum exosomes from
patients with colorectal cancer(Kristensen et al., 2020.).
5
FIG. miRNA sponging activity of circRNA
6
Rationale
• Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and lethal cancer of
the adult brain, remaining incurable with a median survival time of only
15 months.
• Thus, it has the potential to regulate the expression of miR-7 target genes.
7
• Objectives
1. Genome wide profiling of circRNA in glioblastoma cells.
2. Effect of deletion and overexpression of circRNA on cell proliferation.
3. Analysis of interaction between circRNA and miRNA and identification of
miRNA which repress tumor suppressor gene.
4. Synthesis of tumor suppressor gene specific miRNA binding site
containing circRNA
5. Transformation of modified circRNA producing gene containing plasmid
into cell and analysis of proliferation.
6. In vivo transfer of pCDNA3 into mouse model.
Outcome
• Based on profiling of circRNA in glioblastoma cells, circRNAs are
identified which are dysregulated in tumor cells.
8
Workplan and Methodology
9
Objective 3: Analysis of interaction between circRNA and miRNA and
identification of miRNA which repress tumor suppressor gene.
• miRNA which are repressing tumor suppressor genes are identified based
on effect of knockout of miRNA producing gene on cell proliferation.
10
Schedule
11
Budget
Non-Recurring Expenditures
Product Cost
Cell lines ₹ 90000
Media and reagents ₹ 80,00,00.00
Maintenance of cell lines ₹ 100000.00
Glasswares and Plasticwares ₹ 30,000.00
contingency ₹ 10,00,000.00
Incubator (Thermo fisher) ₹ 1,00,939.00
Primers ₹ 50,000.00
RT-PCR ₹ 15,00,000.00
Monoclonal antibody ₹ 10,0000.00
Gene transfer technology ₹ 50,480.00
Mouse model ₹ 7000.00
Total ₹ 3,828,419.00
Recurring Expenditures
Product Quantity Cost
Other requirements and consumables ₹ 5,00,000.00
Junior Research Fellow 1 ₹ 6,20,000.00
Overheads ₹ 2,00,000.00
Total ₹ 2,613,627.00
12
References
13