ASSIGNEMNT2
ASSIGNEMNT2
ASSIGNEMNT2
Department of Education
Schools Division Office of Isabela
Jones West District
300555 - JONES RURAL SCHOOL
Jones, Isabela
Rationale We need to keep moving now, more than ever! Being confined in an
enclosed space for a prolonged period presents a lot of health challenges which
that can make us susceptible to infectious diseases. Stay active and survive this
understanding of why HRF is important so that the learner can translate HRF
this curriculum recognizes the view that fitness and healthy physical activity (PA)
behaviors must take the family and other environmental settings (e.g. school,
Move to learn is the context of physical activity as the means for learning,
while Learn to move embodies the learning of skills, and techniques and the
physical activities that include exercise, games, sports, dance and recreation.
says “The state shall promote physical education and encourage sports
Strong et. al., (2005) mentioned that the relationship of physical activity
and physical fitness to cognitive and brain health and to academic performance.
faster and with greater accuracy to a variety of cognitive task after participating
week-long physical activity. They also wanted to know the effect of this program
on the physical activity performance of the students from results of the PPFT
1. What is the fitness level of the two groups of respondents in the physical
2. What is the fitness level of the two groups of respondents in the physical
Intervention Project SIPA (Short Incidental Physical Activity) is the new exercise that’s made
for everybody, no matter how old or capable you are in doing physical ability.
sitting.
2. Less daunting that an exercise or less cumbersome that any activity that
3. Can and should be done with regularity throughout the day, especially
during ECQ.
Research This action research utilized the experimental design since its main
Methodology
purpose was to determine the effectiveness of Project SIPA and its possible
Two groups were taught the same lessons of physical activity for one
week. The control group was taught using the single teaching with similar
activities approach while the experimental group was taught using Project SIPA
with three sets of activities and three sets of evaluation and facilitation for the
three groupings of students for the one-week duration. Two regular sections were
included in the study out of the seven Grade Eight sections that the school have.
Both groups were given the PPFT pre-test to identify the classification of
students whether they belong to the above average group, average group, and
below average group. The achievement test was administered the following week
using parallel teacher-made physical fitness tests. The number of students was
again identified to know whether there was change in their classification. The
results of the pretest and the posttest were compared to determine whether using
The scores of both the pretest and the posttest of PPFT and Project SIPA
(Short Incidental Physical Activity) were taken and these data were coded,
tallied, and were statistically treated using the mean, standard deviation, and t-
The mean and the standard deviation were used to determine the level of
while the t-test was employed to determine the significant difference of the mean
Data Analysis
The data collected was from multiple PPFT results and teacher
observations of students. The initial survey of the PPFT pre-test was given to
students to gather baseline data for the action research process. The results
indicated that students had a variety of physical fitness level toward their physical
The action research will employ the following statistical tools: mean score to
describe the pre-test and post-test of both control and experimental group before
The researcher will use independent sample t-test to compare the mean
scores of the control and experimental groups in order to determine whether there
is statistical evidence that the experimental group mean scores are significantly
different.