Group 7 - Laboratory Report
Group 7 - Laboratory Report
Group 7 - Laboratory Report
College of Engineering
Laboratory Report
Spectrophotometry
Experiment 1
Submitted by:
Group 7
Submitted to:
51010
ABSTRACT
I. INTRODUCTION
The concept behind the absorbance and reflection of light can easily be
determined and observed by the unaided eye. In a lit up surrounding, the colors
that the human eyes receive are constantly the wavelengths of light that are
reflected. In turn, colors from an object that are invisible to the eye are
3
wavelengths of light that are absorbed. Each color has its corresponding
wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum. Longer wavelengths lean
toward the warmer colors of the spectrum like red and orange, while shorter
wavelengths lean toward the cooler colors of the spectrum like violet and blue.
Black absorbs all wavelengths while white reflects all wavelengths.
Abs = εlc
Where:
Abs = Absorbance
ε = Molar Absorptivity coefficient
l = Path length
c = Concentration
𝐼 𝑻 𝐼𝑜
T = 100 (𝐼𝑜 ) ; A = -log10 (
100
) = log10 ( 𝐼 )
Where:
T = Transmittance
A = Absorbance
I = Intensity of incident light
Io = Intensity of transmitted light
III. PROCEDURE
d. Data Analysis. For this part, the researcher will use the initial
experimental results from part C for the determination of concentration
using absorbance values will be plotted into a linear regression curve
to obtain an empirical equation. This equation will be true for all the
values in the particular graph based on data points gathered from the
experiment. From this method, we can determine any data with a given
assumed value. Furthermore, to ensure the accuracy of the simulation
used for this experiment, we will test the comparison of the theoretical
and experimental values to determine for lapses or errors in the results
of the experiment.
8
WAVELENGTH ABSORBANCE
(nm) (AU)
400 0
410 0.001
420 0.004
430 0.01
440 0.028
450 0.064
460 0.119
470 0.178
480 0.242
490 0.346
500 0.541
520 0.996
530 0.927 Mean 0.17692
540 0.547 Median 0.029
550 0.208 Mode 0.001
560 0.076
570 0.043
580 0.029
590 0.014
600 0.008
620 0.001
640 0.001
650 0.004
670 0.013
680 0.023
Table 1. Analysis of the Visible Spectrum of Red Dye
9
wavelengths of light. It shows more absorbance in the range 450 nm to 560 nm and
displays a maximum 0.996 AU at 520 nm. It also shows a minimum absorbance of
0 AU at 400 nm. This means that the red dye is able to absorb colors ranging from
blue to green on the electromagnetic spectrum end of shorter wavelengths.
11
WAVELENGTH ABSORBANCE
(nm) (AU)
Not within the
375
range
400 0.126
410 0.112
420 0.077
430 0.044
440 0.019
450 0.007
460 0.002
470 0.007
480 0
490 0.001 Mean 0.18464
500 0.002 Median 0.065
520 0.014 Mode 0.007, 0.002
530 0.025
540 0.039
550 0.065
560 0.12
570 0.211
580 0.311
590 0.397
600 0.504
620 0.886
640 0.858
650 0.6
670 0.141
680 0.048
The same procedure was performed for the second sample of blue dye and
recorded similarly as shown in Table 2. This set of data has an average absorbance
(mean) of 0.18464 A, a median of 0.065 AU at 550 nm, and a repetitive occurrence
(mode) of absorbance 0.002 AU at wavelengths 460 nm and 500 nm and absorbance
0.007 AU at wavelengths 450 nm and 470 nm.
Following this table is Figure 2, a graphical representation of the blue dye’s
absorbance based on the Table 2. The plotting of independent and dependent
variables are the same as Figure 1 which is the wavelength (x-axis) versus its
absorbance (y-axis). The graph also shows a positive kurtosis and leptokurtic
distribution with most of the data along its tails. Based on the plot’s trend, it can be
inferred that the blue dye becomes more absorbent in the ranges 550 nm to 680 nm,
and more transmittant in other wavelengths. According to the data, it reaches a peak
or maximum absorbance of 0.886 AU at 620 nm, but it can also be deduced from
the graph that the actual peak lies in between 620 nm to 640 nm. The minimum or
least absorbance is found at 480 nm where there is 0 AU or no absorbance at all.
13
This means that the blue dye is able to absorb colors ranging from green to red on
the electromagnetic spectrum end of longer wavelengths.
WAVELENGTH, 520 nm
RED DYE
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ABSORBANCE
0 0
10 1.073
50 1.074
80 1.073
100 1.074
Mean 0.8588
Median 1.073
Mode 1.073, 1.074
Margin of Error ± 0.001
In this part of the experiment, the wavelength of light is kept as the constant
variable. The wavelength is set to 520 nm where the red dye had its maximum
absorbance. This time the absorbance is measured against various concentrations
namely, 0 ppm,10 ppm, 50 ppm, 80 ppm and 100 ppm. Also, the margin of error is
added to the table of mean, median and mode. This helps in perceiving the slight
variances of absorbance values between the concentrations, also in contrast to the
known absorbance of red dye at 20 ppm. It can be seen that the average absorbance
is 0.8588 AU with a median of 1.073 AU and mode of 1.073 AU and 1.074 AU. It
also contains a margin of error of ± 0.001. Based on the Beer’s Law, absorbance
must increase as the concentration increases. This, however, is not visible in the
information that Table 3.1 provides; it does not align with the Beer’s Law.
14
Table 3.2. Analysis of Theoretical Values for the Absorbance of Red Dye
Empirical equation: Abs = 0.0136(Conc)
Absorbance Absorbance Percentage Error
Concentration
(Theoretical) (Experimental) (% error)
0 0 0 undefined
10 0.136 1.073 7.3
50 0.68 1.074 7.4
80 1.088 1.073 7.3
100 1.36 1.074 7.4
WAVELENGTH, 620 nm
BLUE DYE
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ABSORBANCE
0 0
10 0.886
50 0.889
80 0.886
100 0.888
Mean 0.7098
Median 0.886
Mode 0.886
Margin of Error ± 0.003
Similar to the tabulated data for the red dye, the wavelength for the blue
dye is set as a constant variable at 620 nm where it had its maximum absorbance.
The same procedure is performed yielding an average absorbance of 0.7098 AU
with a median and mode of 0.886 AU. Its margin of error is ± 0.003 which is
slightly larger than the red dye’s in Table 3.1. Here, it is also visible that the
absorbance values remain consistent and do not adhere to Beer’s law as the
concentration increases.
16
Table 4.2. Analysis of Theoretical Values for the Absorbance of Blue Dye
Figure 4 is the Beer’s Law Plot for the blue dye where the tabularized
data is plotted and linear regression is applied to get the empirical equation,
Abs = 0.0112(Concentration). Only one point aligns with the linear function
like Figure 3 and the theoretical absorbance values are calculated. The
theoretical data exhibits the directly proportional relationship of absorbance
17
and concentration and follows the Beer’s Law more accurately than the
experimental data. The information is arranged in Table 4.2 and it can be
seen that the percentage errors are 3% more than the percentage in the red
dye namely, 11.1%, 11.2% and 11.4%.
These large percentage errors can potentially be due to the
spectrophotometer simulation used for the experiment. Errors in the
simulation may have caused significant changes in the results. The
discrepancies present in the experiment proves a slight inaccuracy on the
reliability of the instrument or simulation used for this experiment.
18
AAT Bioquest. (2020, October 30). What factors will affect absorbance?
Retrieved from https://www.aatbio.com/resources/faq-frequently-
asked-questions/What-factors-will-affect-
absorbance#:%7E:text=The%20two%20main%20factors%20that,con
centration%2C%20the%20higher%20its%20absorbance.&text=This
%20increases%20the%20absorbance
VII. NOMENCLATURE
In this experiment, the researchers have determined the relationship
between several factors that affect the absorbance and concentration of a sample.
Analyzing this experiment, we have utilized the Beer-Lambert equation which
was used to determine the given unknown. This following equation consists of
the following variables and terminology that are presented and defined in this
table below:
APPENDICES
22
APPENDIX A.1
RAW DATA
23
APPENDIX A.1. I.
600 Yellow
24
Not within
375 520 0.996 670 0.013
range
Not within
410 0.001 540 0.547 690
range
Not within
420 0.004 550 0.208 700
range
Not within
430 0.010 560 0.076 710
range
Not within
440 0.028 570 0.043 720
range
Not within
450 0.064 580 0.029 730
range
Not within
460 0.119 590 0.014 740
range
Not within
470 0.178 600 0.008 750
range
Not within
480 0.242 620 0.001 760
range
Not within
490 0.346 640 0.001 770
range
Not within
500 0.541 650 0.004 780
range
25
APPENDIX A.1.III.
Not within
375 520 0.014 670 0.141
range
Not within
410 0.112 540 0.039 690
range
Not within
420 0.077 550 0.065 700
range
Not within
430 0.044 560 0.120 710
range
Not within
440 0.019 570 0.211 720
range
Not within
450 0.007 580 0.311 730
range
Not within
460 0.002 590 0.397 740
range
Not within
470 0.007 600 0.504 750
range
Not within
480 0.000 620 0.886 760
range
Not within
490 0.001 640 0.858 770
range
Not within
500 0.002 650 0.600 780
range
26
WAVELENGTH, 520 nm
RED DYE
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ABSORBANCE
0 0.000
10 1.073
50 1.074
80 1.073
100 1.074
WAVELENGTH, 620 nm
BLUE DYE
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ABSORBANCE
0 0.000
10 0.886
50 0.889
80 0.886
100 0.888
27
APPENDIX A.2
APPENDIX A.2.V.
WAVELENGTH, 520 nm
RED DYE
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ABSORBANCE
0 0
10 1.073
50 1.074
80 1.073
100 1.074
Mean 0.8588
Median 1.073
Mode 1.073
Confidence Interval ± 0.001
Empirical equation:
Abs = 0.0136(Conc)
Percentage
Absorbance Absorbance Error
Concentration (Theoretical) (Experimental) (% error)
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10 0.136 1.073 7.3
50 0.68 1.074 7.4
80 1.088 1.073 7.3
100 1.36 1.074 7.4
29
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Concentration = 100
1.36 − 1.074
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | 𝑥 100
1.074
=7.4%
30
WAVELENGTH, 620 nm
BLUE DYE
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ABSORBANCE
0 0
10 0.886
50 0.889
80 0.886
100 0.888
Mean 0.7098
Median 0.886
Mode 0.886
Confidence Interval ± 0.003
Empirical equation
Abs = 0.0112(Conc)
Percentage
Absorbance Absorbance
Concentration Error (%
(Theoretical) (Experimental)
error)
0 0 0 undefined
10 0.112 0.886 11.4
50 0.56 0.889 11.1
80 0.896 0.886 11.4
100 1.12 0.888 11.2
31
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Concentration = 10 Concentration = 0
Abs = 0.0112(Conc)
Abs = 0.0112(10) 0−0
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | 𝑥 100
Abstheo = 0.112 0
Concentration = 50 = undefined
Abs = 0.0112(Conc) Concentration = 10
Abs = 0.0112(50) 0.112 − 0.886
Abstheo = 0.56 % 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | 𝑥 100
0.886
Concentration = 80 =11.4%
Abs = 0.0112(Conc)
Abs = 0.0112(80) Concentration = 50
Abstheo = 0.896 0.56 − 0.889
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | 𝑥 100
Concentration = 100 0.889
Abs = 0.0112(Conc) =11.1%
Abs = 0.0112(100)
Abstheo = 1.12 Concentration = 80
0.896 − 0.886
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | 𝑥 100
0.886
=11.4%
Concentration = 100
1.12 − 0.888
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | 𝑥 100
0.888
=11.2%
32
APPENDIX A.3
SIMILARITY REPORT
33