Paris MoU On Port State Control 586d33490d194

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Port State Control

in the Paris MoU Region

Secretariat of the
Paris MoU on Port State Control
Amoco Cadiz - 1982

The AMOCO CADIZ ran


aground off the coast of
Brittany, France on 16 March
1978, spilling 68.7 million
gallons of oil. It currently is
nr.8 on the list of the largest
Paris MOU on Port State Control oil spills of all time. 2
Responsibility

 Owner, operator
 Flag state
 Recognized Organization
 Port State Control
 Others:
– Charterers
– Cargo owners
– Insurance Companies
– Bankers

Paris MOU on Port State Control 3


What is Port State Control?

Port State Control:


 Is a spot-check on visiting foreign merchant ships, not a full
survey
 Is a harmonized system,
 Is enforcing compliance where the owner and flag State have
failed in their responsibilities
 Requires deficiencies to be rectified
 Can detain the ship if unseaworthy
 Can refuse access to the region

Paris MOU on Port State Control 4


The growing importance of PSC

AIM:
Elimination of “sub-standard” ships
in the region.

Paris MOU on Port State Control 5


Conventions and agreements
 Port State Control is laid down in International Maritime
Conventions of the ILO and IMO.
 Regional agreement is laid down in Paris MoU on Port
State Control
 Legally binding for EU Members through EC Directive
on Port State Control 2009/16/EC.
– Any other EC Directive requirements exceeding the
requirements of the IMO/ILO Conventions can be
inspected/enforced by EU-member States PSCOs, but shall not
be recorded on the Paris MoU on PSC inspection forms, nor
entered into THETIS. Any EC Directive related deficiencies
found, should be recorded on a separate national inspection
form.
Paris MOU on Port State Control 6
‘Relevant instruments’
 LOAD LINES 66 plus Protocol.
 SOLAS 74 plus Protocols.
 MARPOL 73/78 plus Protocol.
 STCW 78
 COLREG 72
 TONNAGE 69
 ILO Convention No. 147 and Protocol
 Protocol to Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992
 AFS Convention
 Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001
 Control and Management of Ships’Ballast Water and Sediment
 MLC,2006 (effective from entry into force date in 2013)
Paris MOU on Port State Control 7
MoU’s worldwide

 Paris MoU
 Tokyo MoU
 Aquerdo de Viña del
Mar
 Caribbean MoU
 Mediterranean MoU
 Black SeaMoU
 Indian Ocean MoU
 Abuja MoU
 Riyadh MoU  US Coast Guard

Paris MOU on Port State Control 8


Regional scope: (from 01-01-2011 incl. anchorages)

MONTENEGRO Co-operative member

Paris MOU on Port State Control 9


Organizational structure :

Maritime Port State Control


THETIS
SIRENAC
Authorities Committee
Information
Ship System
European
Inspection Commission
Services of Secretariat
Paris MoU (The Hague, NL.)
port States Co-operating
Maritime
Authorities
MoU Advisory Board
Owners/operators Observers:
flag States and ILO, IMO, Technical Evaluation
Recognized other MoU’s Group
Organizations

Taskforces
Paris MOU on Port State Control 10
Poll 1:

 How often do you visit the Paris MoU website to


obtain PSC inspection data?

» Daily
» Weekly
» Monthly
» Few times a year
» Never
PSC Inspection system features:

 Risk based targeting

 Ship Risk Profile, PI and PII, Overriding Factors, Unexpected Factors


Inspection intervals, Complaints

 Fair Share commitment, Postponement and Missed inspections

 Refusal of access provisions (Banning)


All ship types, Grey and Black-list flags

 Benchmarking of Flags, RO’s and Companies


BGW-list, Company and RO Performance

 Full coverage of ships visiting Paris MoU region incl. anchorages

Paris MOU on Port State Control 12


Inspection Priority

Inspection Window If not inspected within


Window, ship becomes

Priority II Priority I

Ship may be Ship must be


inspected inspected

Overriding Factors Priority I


But…
Unexpected Factors Priority II

Paris MOU on Port State Control 13


Ship Risk Profile

• Generic Factors • Historical Factors


– Type of Ship – Deficiencies
– Age of Ship – Detentions
– Flag
– RO
– Company

HRS – High Risk Ship


SRS – Standard Risk Ship
LRS – Low Risk Ships
(SRP is recalculated on a daily basis)

Paris MOU on Port State Control 14


High Risk Ship (HRS) Low Risk Ship (LRS)

Weighting
Criteria Criteria
points

Oil, Chemical, Gas Bulk,


Type 2 All types
Passenger

Age > 12 yrs 1 All ages


Black - VHR, HR, M to HR 2
BGW-list White
Flag Black – MR 1
IMO-Audit - - Yes
H - - High
M - - -
Recognized Performance
L Low -
Organisation 1
VL Very Low -
EU recognised - - Yes
H - - High
M - - -
Company Performance
L Low -
2
VL Very Low -

≤ 5 (and at least 1 insp.


Nr of def. recorded in each insp.
Deficiencies Not eligible - carried out in pr. 36
within pr. 36 months
months)

No
Nr of detentions within pr. 36 months Detentions ≥ 2 detentions 1
Detention

HRS = 5 points * LRS = all criteria * SRS = not HRS or LRS


Types of inspection
Inspection Type
Ship Risk
Category Profile
Initial More detailed Expanded

HRS NO NO YES

Periodic SRS If the ship is of a risk ship


If clear grounds
YES type and more than 12
are found
years old
LRS

According to the
Additional: professional judgement
overriding or All NO YES of the PSCO if HRS or
unexpected SRS/LRS of a risky ship
factor type and more than 12
years old

Paris MOU on Port State Control 16


Additional Inspections

Other factors can trigger an additional inspection


 Overriding factors are Priority I – for example:
• reports by other MoU member (no UF)
• collision, grounding
• illegal discharge
• unsafe manoeuvring
• class suspended or withdrawn
• ship not in database

Paris MOU on Port State Control 17


Additional Inspections

 Unexpected factors are Priority II – for example:


• Ships reported by pilots, VTS, master, crew member or
others with a legitimate interest in the safe operation of the
ship, shipboard living and working conditions or the
prevention of pollution.
• not complying with reporting obligations
• outstanding deficiencies
• previously detained ships (after 3 months)
• cargo problems
• RO recognition withdrawn

Paris MOU on Port State Control 18


Information system:
Poll 2:

 Did you get a better understanding of PSC


inspections in relation to the PSC data used in your
insurance work?

» Yes
» No
» Don’t know
Paris MoU Website Public

Paris MOU on Port State Control 21


QUESTIONS?

 Secretariat of Paris MoU on


Port State Control,
P.O.Box 16191
2500 BD The Hague
The Netherlands

 secretariat@parismou.org
 www.parismou.org
 Thank you for joining!

 Survey

 Recording available upon request

 Next session: 22 November 2016 on “Project Cargo


on Container Vessels”

 Questions? Hendrike.Kuehl@iumi.com

You might also like