Billions in Climate Deal Funding Could Help Protect U.S. Coastal Cities
Billions in Climate Deal Funding Could Help Protect U.S. Coastal Cities
Billions in Climate Deal Funding Could Help Protect U.S. Coastal Cities.
September 20, 2022. New York Times. Retrieved September 18, 2022, from
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/20/us/politics/climate-law-coastal-projects.html
This article from the New York Times discusses a new law allocating categorical
grants to the states for conservation purposes, reaffirming the federal government’s
considerable authority in shaping how the policies are enacted on the ground.
Block grants, in contrast, give state policymakers a greater say in how these
monies are allocated and, therefore, what the policies actually look like when
difference between New Cooperative Federalism and New Federalism. This article
helped me to understand the practical use of categorical versus block grants and to
consider the development of modern federalism. I wonder if it would be better for this
money to be distributed as a block grant so each state is able to focus on the aspects
that are most important to them. For example, Maine may require more money for
wetland restoration, but North Carolina may prefer to pour all available resources into
weatherproofing. Then again, how specific should these grants be? Is “use this money
for ecological conservation” clear enough? I found it interesting, too, that federalism
has almost developed backwards in this area, returning somewhat to New Cooperative
alignment while the use of block grants—thus giving more power to the states—follows
Democrat side of the political spectrum, should more categorical grants be expected?
Or is a political contraction likely in the near future, and will it be signaled by the
methods on federalism’s development as the Biden Administration continues its work for
sustainability initiatives.