Unit 6 Activity 6
Unit 6 Activity 6
Unit 6 Activity 6
415
Educational Technology
First Semester, 2022-2023
Activity/Assessment No. 6
INSTRUCTIONS:
Topic/s:
Module Module 6: Innovative Technologies for Assessment Tasks in Teaching and Learning
Lesson 1-ICT and Assessment of Learning
Lesson 2-Criteria in Choosing Appropriate Assessment Tools
1. PPT Presentations:
2. Textbooks: 1. Technology for Teaching and Learning, Bilbao, Purita EdD et al.
2. Field Study 3: Technology in the Learning Environment,Lucas, Maria
Rita, Ph D, Lorimar Publishing House.
Activity/ies:
1. Look at the figure in the inset, list down the key terms that are related to
assessment. Compare your answers with at least 2 of classmates. Use table
below. 15 pts.
2. List down the common answers and the uncommon answers. Construct a table
for your answers. 10 pts.
The ability to capture, save, and easily access student data and test outcomes
makes using ICT in assessment quite advantageous for teachers. Using ICT, teachers
can give students immediate feedback on assessment results. When applying the same
test material again, student performance is improved thanks to computer feedback. In
order to improve instruction and performance, educational evaluation must make use of
technology as an innovation and support for teaching and learning. An efficient
classroom assessment system in place can provide a valid evidence of student learning
and development in relation to classroom instruction and experience.
6. Rate the output in each group by using the Rubric for video presentation. 20
points
Assessment/s:
With your original groupings, answer the following questions and select a rapporteur to
present your output in the class.
1. Enumerate and discuss the different assessment methods and tools utilized by
your teachers in elementary and high school.
Assessment methods and tools used Assessment methods and tools used
by your elementary teachers by your high school teachers
Paper and Pencil Summative
Quiz Formative
Projects Observations
Portfolios Portfolio
Summative Rubrics
Formative Subjective Assessment
Diagnostic Projects
Performance Assessment Oral Assessments
Group Based Assessment Performance Assessments
Grades Selected Response
Constructed Response
Grades
Objective Assessment
2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of these assessment methods
and tools? Give concrete examples.
Assessment Advantages Disadvantages Examples
methods and
tools used by
your teachers
Summative • Not always the
• Accelerate
perfect gauge of
individuals who
student understanding
already mastered the • Preliminary
(students don’t always
material. exams
test well.)
• Help assess how • Quarterly
• Students could
well you teach (how exams
underperform due to a
you present, type of
poorly made
instruction, etc.)
assessment.
Formative • Allow teachers to
• Are not graded,
check for
which takes the
understanding during • Short quiz
anxiety away from
the lesson instead of
students. It also • oral
waiting until the
detaches the thinking recitations
completion of the
that they must get
lesson to assess
everything right.
student learning.
Portfolio • Encourages student • Faculty time required
reflection on their to prepare the
learning. Students portfolio assignment
may come to and assist students as
understand what they they prepare them. • Learning
have and have not Logistics are Portfolios
learned. challenging. • Showcase
• Provides students • Students must retain Portfolio,
with documentation and compile their own •Personal
for job applications or work, usually outside Portfolio
applications to of class. Motivating
graduate school. students to take the
portfolio seriously may
be difficult.
Rubrics • Help students • Rubrics may not fully • Holistic rubric
understand your convey all information
expectations. instructor wants • Analytic rubric
students to know.
• Help students self-
improve. • Rubrics may lead to
anxiety if they include
• Make scoring easier too many criteria.
and faster.
• They take time to
• Make scoring more
accurate, unbiased, develop, test,
and consistent. evaluate, and update.
Standardized • Test scores serve as • Test scores cannot • National
Assessments helpful indicators for reliably serve as Achievement
colleges and indicators of a Test
employers when student’s future
determining admission success.
and hiring decisions.
• Standardized test
• Educators can view questions fail to
reports with assess a student’s
information on a higher-level thinking
student’s progress skills.
and identify a trend of
growth or decline.
Projects • Students learn to • Difficult to assess
value the work and individual
contributions of contributions when the
others, share product is a group
responsibilities, and product. • Investigatory
compromise. Projects
• Judging what has
• Project-based been learned is not • Group Project
learning is an always evident from
opportunity for • PIT
looking at products.
students to critique
and revise their
approach when they
encounter obstacles.
Oral • Oral exams provide • Oral tests are less
Assessments evidence and support work to administer
for higher order and mark than essay ,• Oral
thinking and problem exams but take more questioning
solving skills. time than self-grading during lecture
multiple-choice • Research
• Oral exams help exams.
students develop defense
authentic • Debate
communication skills
in their discipline.
Performance • Can be used to • Usually the mostly
Assessments assess from multiple costly approach
perspectives • Role-playing
• Time consuming and
• Using a student- labor intensive to • Reporting
centered design can design and execute • Individual or
promote student for faculty and group activities
motivation students
• Can be used to • Must be carefully
assess transfer of designed if used to
skills and integration document obtainment
of content of student learning
outcomes
• Engages student in
active learning
Selected • Can measure • Cannot assess • Multiple
Response abilities to make higher-order thinking choice
judgments about next skills (e.g., synthesis,
steps, draw organization, original • True-false
inferences, interpret thinking) • Matching type
data, and apply
information • Cannot provide
direct evidence of
• Can reliably assess real-world skills,
lower-order thinking particularly productive
skills or creative skills
• Can be efficient and
objective to score
Constructed • Short item questions • Best suited to testing • Fill in the
Response are truly easy to only factual black
construct knowledge
• Short answer
• Require student to • Must be carefully questions
create a correct worded to avoid
response ambiguity
• Can be scored • Difficult to score
relatively quickly accurately (spelling,
handwriting, grammar,
• Reduce the alternatives, etc)
possibility of simply
“guessing”
Grades • With the help of the • We can only get to • Percentage
grades the know about the grade grading
weaknesses and achieved by students
strength of the instead of the actual • Letter grading
students will be ability of the student.
identified.
• Students just focus
• By knowing the on attaining the
grades of the child, passing marks instead
parents also get of putting their main
aware about the focus on getting
capability of their child highest marks,
Objective • Quick and easy to • Take time and skill to
Assessments score, by hand or construct (especially • Instructor
electronically good questions) made quiz/tests
• Can cover lots of • Provide unprepared
content areas on a students the
single exam and still opportunity to guess,
be answered in a and with guesses that
class period are right, they get
credit for things they
don’t know
Subjective • Measure the test • Demands expertise
Assessments taker’s writing and in measurement to
language skills, assure
especially if the validity/reliability/utility.
purpose is to test
language proficiency.
• Faculty and
• Measures the ability department
of the test taker to made exams
apply his knowledge,
rather than just
retention of
information and being
able to correctly recall
it verbatim.
Below are several guidelines in designing fair, yet challenging, exams or test items
that accurately gauge student learning:
Maintain consistency
Between goals for the course, methods of teaching, and the tests used to
measure achievement of goals. If, for example, class time emphasizes review
and recall of information, then so can the test; if class time emphasizes
analysis and synthesis, then the test can also be designed to demonstrate
how well students have learned these things.
ROSALITO A. QUIRINO-Ph.D.
Prof.V1