Chapter 1 3 Jills PDF
Chapter 1 3 Jills PDF
Chapter 1 3 Jills PDF
A Research
Presented to the
by:
Badillo, MJ B.
Bilaro, Jillian C.
January 2023
CHAPTER I
Selected LGBTQIA+
Discrimination
Senior High School
Encountered Students in CSTC.
The researchers believe that this study entitled; “A Phenomenological Study on the
Discriminations Encountered by Selected LGBTQIA+ Senior High School Students in
CSTC” would be significant to a wide variety of people in the community, specifically to
the following:
To the Respondents, this study would help them to express their hidden feelings
to all the people of how hard it is to feel liked being discriminated.
To the Parents, this study would help them to realize the fact that their child chose
to be a part of LGBTIQA+ was the only way that can make their child happy.
To the Student, this study would make them think about the difference of
discrimination and jokes.
To the Researchers, this study would help them to understand more the concept of
research, the value of teamwork, cooperation, and not giving up. Aside from that, they will
also become more knowledgeable on the topic that they chose to study.
To the Future Researchers, this research paper could serve as their guide or basis
if they will also study the same topic.
This study is focused on the selected 10 Senior High School Students from the
College of Sciences Technology and Communications INC. located in the town of Sariaya,
in the province of Quezon. The researchers chose their respondents using Convenience
Sampling Technique. Convenience sampling is a non-probability sampling method where
units are selected for inclusion in the sample because they are the easiest for the researcher
to access. This study was conducted from August 2022 until January 2023.
CHAPTER II
This section comprises the various related articles and readings as well as related
studies and researchers consider to support and strengthen the concepts of the study.
Related Literature
Foreign
Since the student’s involvement was evident, according to Stephen T. Russell and
Jessica N. Fish (2016), concluded that LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender,
queer/questioning, intersex and asexual) youth come out at younger ages, and public
support for LGBTQIA+ issues has skyrocketed, why are LGBTQIA+ youth still at high
risk for poor mental health? We begin with an overview of the current environment for
LGBTQIA+ youth, followed by a review of current research on LGBTQIA+ youth mental
health. Over the last decade, research has identified risk and protective factors for mental
health, pointing to promising avenues for prevention, intervention, and treatment. Legal
and policy victories have paved the way for advancements in LGBTQIA+ youth mental
health programs and practices. The implications for clinical care are discussed, as are key
areas for new research and practice.
According to Alex E. Ronsenthal (2021), The United States Supreme Court will
hear Whitman-Walker Clinic v. HHS on September 2, 2020. The District of Columbia
District Court enjoined HHS from implementing key provisions of the Trump
Administration's 2020 rule, which rolled back Obama-era regulations implementing
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Section 1557, often known as the
antidiscrimination rule, forbids discrimination based on race, color, national origin, gender,
age, or disability in any federally funded health program or activity. Whitman-Walker was
the most recent in a long line of legal challenges to the Obama Administration's 2016 rule
and the Trump Administration's 2020 rule in interpreting the ACA's antidiscrimination
mandate.
Moreover, according to Sara Hajian and Josep Domingo-Ferrer (2012), data mining
is an increasingly important technology for extracting useful knowledge hidden in large
collections of data. There are, however, negative social perceptions about data mining,
among which potential privacy invasion and potential discrimination. The latter consists of
unfairly treating people on the basis of their belonging to a specific group. If the training
data sets are biased in what regards discriminatory (sensitive) attributes like gender, race,
religion, etc., discriminatory decisions may ensue. For this reason, anti-discrimination
techniques including discrimination discovery and prevention have been introduced in data
mining. Discrimination can be either direct or indirect
Synthesis
Local
On the other hand, according to Shiela Antonette Bacud and Diosa Joyce (2021),
One of the most difficult aspects of the journey for LGBTQIA+ youth is coming out in the
open. When one's gender preference is revealed to family, friends, and the community, it
may either be accepted or rejected.
Furthermore, according to Arianne Marie M. Castillo et al. (2019), Gay identity has
been studied in a variety of social science subjects. This was corroborated by Cass (1979),
who said that a person's surroundings and early developmental processes can help to
explain a person's homosexuality.
Synthesis
The above collection of local literature provides information claiming that physical
appearance is the most typical basis for prejudice. Additionally, it describes the continuous
struggles of LGBTQIA+ persons, particularly with regard to their rights and equality, as
well as the possibility of acceptance or rejection by their family, friends, and society if they
reveal their gender preference. Furthermore, it is stated that in order to comprehend the
health difficulties of lgbt persons, people should be aware of their unfair treatment. The
researchers greatly benefit from knowing the challenges of their potential respondents.
Related Studies
Foreign
According to Erin C. Wilson et al. (2016), in their research study titled “The Impact
of Discrimination on the Mental Health of Trans*Female Youth and the Protective Effect
of Parental Support”. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios for
mental health outcomes, comparing levels of discrimination and resiliency promoting
protective factors among the sample's (N = 216) sexually active youth. High transgender
discrimination was associated with an increased risk of PTSD (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI 1.4-5.0),
depression (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI 1.2-5.9), and stress related to suicidal ideation (AOR 7.7,
95% CI 2.3-35.2). High levels of racial discrimination were found to be substantially
related with higher levels of chances of psychological stress (AOR 3.6; 95 % CI 1.2–10.8),
PTSD (AOR 2.1; 95 % CI 1.1–4.2) and stress associated to suicide ideation (AOR 4.3, 95
% CI 1.5–13.3).
Synthesis
The above collection of foreign studies provides information to the proponents that
researchers proposed study has similarities to the researcher’s present study. It is related to
the study because it explained how society treats LGBTQIA+ people across the country
and the pervasive discrimination that negatively impacts all aspects of their lives. In this
study, researchers say that discrimination is an important topic because there are many
disadvantages contained in it, such as unfair treatment of people. It also addresses why
LGBTQIA+ youth are at high risk for poor mental health and legal policy successes that
have led to advances in LGBTQIA+ youth mental health programs and practices. The
researcher’s purpose was to characterize the discrimination experienced or encountered by
the LGBTQIA+ and to apply proper treatment to gender-based activities.
Local
According to the analysis of Layton et al. (2013), their report summarizes the
findings and makes recommendations for the Philippines based on an examination of
gender gaps, strategies, and promising initiatives to combat gender prejudice and advance
equality between men and women in Cambodia, Kazakhstan, and the Philippines, as well
as an inventory of the world's best legal, economic, and social practices. It demonstrates
how to enhance sexual identity job prospects, pay, and treatment of women and men at the
workplace to promote the growth of decent work and gender equality good practices in the
nation.
On the other hand, according to the study conducted by Masilungan and Golfo-
Barcelona (2020), they look into the possibility of establishing a community archive that
might provide a forum for the LGBTQIA+ community in the Philippines to express their
identity and demand full acceptance. A community archive is distinct from other archives
because it prioritizes identification and empowerment over the need to preserve a certain
legacy. The envisioned archive would document and compile life narratives, events, and
activities to show the diversity and commonality of the LGBTQIA+ community.
Synthesis
Research Methodology
This chapter presents the research design of the study, the research locale, the
respondents, sampling technique used, data gathering instrument and the data gathering
procedures, validation of the questionnaires and statistical treatment of data.
Research Design
The descriptive method of investigation was used in this study. According to Wil
Kenton (2018) to descriptive statistics are brief descriptive, coefficients that summarize a
given data set, which can be either a representation of the entire or a sample of a population.
Descriptive statistics are broken down into measures of central tendency and measures of
variability (spread). Measures of central tendency include the mean, median, and mode,
while measures of variability include the standard deviation, variances, and the minimum
and maximum variables
Research Locale
The research study was conducted at the College of Sciences Technology and
Communications, Inc. located in Gen. Luna St. Maharlika Highway, Poblacion 3. Arellano
Subdivision Sariaya, Quezon. College of Sciences Technology and Communications, Inc.
is one of the private schools in Sariaya that has a state-of-the-art facility, Wi-fi campus,
highly qualified faculty, and competent technical skills trainors, well-equipped laboratories
and work stations, and limited number of students per class (www.cstc.edu.ph,2015).
Research Instrument
In order to collect data, first, the researchers identified who are their respondents
and had their permission to be the respondents of the study. Next, the researchers explained
to the respondents the study itself and their significance in conducting it. The researchers
also explained and informed them their rights as respondents of the study. After that, the
researchers started the interview and had the respondents share their thoughts or insights
that will be needed in the study. Finally, the researchers analyzed, evaluated, and
interpreted the data and information from the respondents using different statistical tools
and operationalize reality by summarizing it into a narrative so it will be easy to analyze.